Monthly Archives: January 2015

WHITE HOUSE SAYS TALIBAN NOT TERRORISTS THOUGH TALIBAN LEADER IS WANTED FOR TERRORISM

 Taliban an armed insurgency not a terrorist group says White House |Atlas Shrugs

 
 
Deputy Press Secretary Eric Schultz telling ABC's Jonathan Karl that the Taliban are armed insurgents, not terrorists; and that it was okay for the administration to negotiate with them for the release of deserter Bo Bergdahl in exchange for five detained Taliban commanders.
 
Wanted

Information that brings to justice…

Photo of Mullah Omar

Mullah Omar

Up to $10 Million Reward

Mullah Omar's Taliban regime in Afghanistan sheltered Osama bin-Laden and his al-Qa'ida network in the years prior to the September 11 attacks.

 

 
When given a choice by the US of keeping his power by rounding up and handing over Bin Laden and his group of monsters Mullah Omar remained streadfastly loyal to bin Laden chosing his downfall instead. And to this day he hasn't regretted his decision especially now that he sees victory over the US ahead.

 

SO THE FIVE TOP LEVEL TALIBAN COMMANDERS

who were jailed in Gitmo for terrorist jihad and exchanged for deserter Bo (pro-terrorist) Bergdahl were in reality non-terrorist insurgents-as is the entire Taliban army from its leader Mullah Omar down to the lowest ranking jihadi? Really? Well then if that's so why is the State Department offering up to $10 million for information leading to the capture of Mullah Omar as part of a program designed to fight against international terrorism? Afterall, wasn't it Taliban Omar's radical Islamic jihadist regime that provided shelter for and material support to radical Moslem Osama bin Laden when he publicly declared his Islamic jihad of terror and death on the United States, and then plotted and carried out his deadly Islamic terror attacks? Doesn't that make radical Islamic Mullah Omar an accessory to bin Laden's terror atrocities and  crimes: the terrorist mass murder and injury of thousands of innocent Americans in Africa, Yemen and here in the States? How then can the head of the Taliban be a top wanted Islamic terrorist  by the US State Dept. without the Taliban being an army of Islamic terrorists like ISIS, Hamas, Hezbollah and al Qaida? Does this make any sense? How does the White House explain this contradiction?

SEE

 

 

In the events leading up to the 2006 Lebanon War Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrhallah (above) relentlessly ridiculed Israeli PM Olmert's character and courage saying that he was less than half the leader with far less guts than his predecessor Ariel Sharon. Believing Olmert was a wimp who'd do nothing Nazrhallah ordered the kidnapping of Israeli soldiers for a prisoner swap and regretted the death and destruction it caused Lebanon ever since. Is it possible Nazrhalla will miscalculate like this again? With Obama insanely teamed up with Iran in fighting ISIS Nasrhallah and Tehran might believe that Hezbollah can attack Israel (and kidnap IDF soldiers again) with relative impunity; and that Obama will restrain Netanyahu from launching another devastating war. But then again could Tehran afford such a war and the cost of rebuilding post war Lebanon like it did in the past? With dropping oil prices hurting Iran's weak economy the answer is no. A second Israeli Hezbollah war at this time would be way too costly and serve to drastically slow down Iran's drive to build the Islamic terrorist bomb.
 
 
 
THIS WOULD BE LIKE NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN AFTER THE NAZI TAKEOVER OF PRAGUE 
 
meeting in Munich with Hitler for a new round of peace-in-our-time appeasement talks. After the political disaster of Morsi and the Brotherhood's brief radical Islamic rulership of Egypt this meeting shows that Obama has given a whole new meaning to the words naïvety, appeasement and insanity.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY
 
has its Winston Churchill in Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. But there's always room for another, and Newt Gingrich is he-as well as Dick Cheney.
 
 
 

FROM THE LONE STAR STATE

to the Lone Cresent/Star State-Sam Houston is rolling in his grave. How many years will it be before Texas (a gulf oil producing state) becomes a honored  member of OPEC?

But don't despair Texans. Hope springs eternal!

 

IGNORING RADICAL ISLAM INTO OBLIVION, UNISLAMIC BIN LADEN’S ISLAMIC FUNERAL AND THE MINOS OF GITMO

                                                                                                                                                                                 Former Defense Intel Chief Michael Flynn Blows the Whistle on Obama in Suppressing Bin Laden Terror Documents | Atlas Shrugs

                                                   5444538598_obama_crazy_faced_ ...

Listen up people. If we learn to see no evil in Islam what evil is there will be ignored into oblivion and disappear.

HOW CAN WE CONQUER OUR INORDINATE FEAR

 of non-Islamic "Moslem" extremism and terror, and learn to love the true religion of Islamic peace (as a force for good, justice and compassion in the world) if the treasure trove of Osama Bin Laden's captured terror documents (revealing the ubiquity of non-Islamic jihadist thinking and influence in the Moslem world) had been fully exploited by Flynn and the DIA or made public? It would only serve to confuse everyone with the truth; and feed divisive, bigoted, hate driven Islamophobia making Obama's noble work of passively ignoring "Islamic radicalism" into oblivion (wishing it away) far more difficult.  Obama sees the world as it should be and hates it as it is. And if enough of us see the world as he does he believes it will magically materialize. Jihad will go away, and  happiness and peace will reign . Damn those realists! If only he could shut them up. Free speech is anti-peace.

THE MINOS OF GITMO

And while I'm on the subject of false Islam and phony Moslems I need mention that what  still perplexes the hell out of me (as it should you) is why Obama gave Bin Laden the honor of a traditional Moslem funeral spoken in Arabic (with verses taken from the Koran?) if he was a monstrous, death loving, non-Moslem perverter of true, peaceful, nonviolent Islam (see)? Why was he accorded such respect when he's damaged Islam's name by killing so many  innocents? It makes no sense.

And if that's not confusing enough why do the al Qaida terrorists jailed at Gitmo get Korans, prayer rugs and halal food if like their idol bin Laden they are sick, phony, perverse, unIslamic Moslems-Moslems In Name Only (MINOS)? How can we win the hearts and minds of true, real, peace-loving Moslems if we treat false, deadly, sinful, monstrous Moslems (a discredit to the faith) as if they were good, pure, virtuous believers like them? Then release them from prison as if they were harmless gents? What kind of outreach to Moslems is that?  It's insulting and makes no sense.

RELATED

< p style="text-align: center;">WHAT IS BARACK OBAMA’S IDEA OF A TRUE ISLAMIC STATE

APOLLO TO ENTER PENTAGON ESSAY CONTEST HONORING DEAD SAUDI KING & DOES OBAMA HATE JEWS?

 
 

In what is most likely an appeasement move by the fawning Obama administration for recently criticizing and angering the oppressive Saudi government of its now deceased King for its human rights crimes (seethe Pentagon has announced an essay contest to butt-kiss the Saudis and honor the supremacist King's memory.

Dempsey Sponsors Essay Competition to Honor Saudi King

By Jim Garamone
DoD News, Defense Media Activity

WASHINGTON, Jan. 26, 2015 – The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has established a research and essay competition in honor of Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah Bin Abdul-Aziz hosted by the National Defense University.

The king, who died Jan. 23 at age 90, oversaw the modernization of his country’s military during the time he spent as commander of the Saudi Arabian National Guard, a position he held from 1963 until he became king in 2005.

Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey said the essay competition is a fitting tribute to the life and leadership of the Saudi Arabian monarch.

 

Needing the prize money (the Obama recovery has done nothing for me) I have

 decided to try my luck and enter the contest. My submission will be as follows:

 

 

 

In March 2009 at the G-20 meeting in London Moslem Defender in Chief Barack Obama was videotaped above shaking the hand of Islamofacist Saudi King Abdullah while bending deeply from the waist in what was obviously a bow. Conservatives like me went bonkers over this heaping ridicule on Obama for stupidly demeaning his great office by bowing to an oppressive, freedom hating, medieval Moslem ruler (a phony Moslem by Obama's standards*) who is secretly spreading his poisonous, evil, hate-driven Wahabi faith inside our country and across the world (see).  But Obama's defenders in the media quickly struck back with this photo taken in 2005 of George Bush taking a lovely hand holding stroll with then Crown Prince Abdullah on his Crawford ranch.

*Real Moslems of the religion of Islamic peace don't cut off heads and hands, torture or kill people  for apostasy, blasphemy and other similar "crimes" like the Saudis do. Right Mr. Obama?

 

 Now holding hands with the sad Saudi Prince is not the same as bowing to him; and  showing him a deference and respect he doesn't deserve being the enemy of all we believe in. What wasn't reported by MSM  is that the sad Saudi Prince who'd been sick for years (he was 81 at the time) was feeling gravely ill and feeble that day; and that Bush fearing the worse was lending him support so he wouldn't fall down on his sad Saudi face into a hot steaming pile of this
 
 
 Bush ranch horse sh*t.  
 
This was one of those rare occasions when Bush's kindness got the best of him. If only it were Dick Cheney with the Prince this might have had a more appropriate outcome.
 
 
 
 
Is Obama a Jew hater like Mark Levin says?  I don't know. But this much is certain: Obama hates Bibi Netanyahu and the Israeli electorate that backs him mainly for the following reason:
 

OBAMA TO NETANYAHU:

A thousand curses on you for depriving me of a Pali-Israeli peace agreement. Thanks to you I'll have nothing of great value or importance to show posterity on foreign policy but a legacy of ashes and dust.

NETANYAHU TO OBAMA:

Moron! Idiot! Schm*ck! Thanks to you radical jihadist genocidal Iran is getting the bomb and establishing an empire of blood and death across the Middle East. And what you want most is a Pali-Israeli peace deal when Israel has no peace partner? Schm*ck!

THE JEW NETANYAHU IS KICKING OBAMA'S SKINNY LEFTIST BUTT
 
And this Jew is enjoying every Zionist minute of it.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 
DISQUS COMMENTS AND REPLIES
 
 
 Antisemitism is every citizens duty.
 

 

Hitler's thousand-year Jew-free Reich fell 69 years ago after only 12 short years. And from the ashes of the Holocaust sprung the Jewish State with Hitler's Arab admirers unable to destroy her. Every day that Israel exists is a triumph over Hitler and Arab-Nazi scum.

 
 
Genocidal Iran? It was Jews that invented genocide and are intent on perpetrating on Iran...and using gentile blood and money to do it. Israel is a parasite and it should be bombed out of existence for the crimes it has committed against America, like the Lavon bombings and the failed USS Liberty attack.
 
 
 
Good heavens man,  get a grip!! If no one dares bomb North Korea out of existence for fear of its nukes who'd be crazy enough to do it to Israel with its stockpile of 200 plus land and sea based nuclear bombs?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE ULTIMATE DEFENSE FROM INTERNATIONAL LAW AGAINST ALLEGATIONS THAT CHRIS KYLE WAS A MURDERING, PSYCHOPATHIC WAR CRIMINAL

 

What Navy Seals did to Osama Bin Laden (under orders from Barack Obama) Navy Seal Chris Kyle did to 160 of his murdering jihadi followers.
 

 The ultimate, air tight, irrefutable, inarguable defense of Chris Kyle from outrageous leftwing PC allegations of being a psychopathic murdering war criminal whose 160 or so sniper killings were in violation of international law rests on UN Resolution 1483 (see). What is Res. 1483? It was a May 22, 2003 Security Council Resolution passed by a 14-0 vote making the US/UK military coalition in Iraq (the occupying forces) the "LEGAL AND LEGITIMATE GOVERNING AND PEACEMAKING AUTHORITY" of that country.  In other words, and contrary what anti-Iraq War leftists and their lying propaganda and media tools have been saying for years, the military occupation of post-Saddam Iraq (backed by 48 nations) was perfectly legal, moral and just  under international law (UNSC Resolution 1483).

In other words, those Iraqi and foreign insurgents (al-Qaida Sunnis, Sadrist Shiites, Baathist bitter enders, etc. called "resistance forces," "freedom fighters" and laughably "Minutemen" by Michael Moore and pro-terrorist, anti-war Leftist nuts) who took up arms against coalition forces (the legitimate governing and peacemaking authority of Iraq) were in violation of international law (Res. 1483) and were themselves murdering,  bloodthirsty, psychopathic WAR CRIMINALS.

So where does that leave controversial Navy Seal Chris Kyle? As an expert marksman and sniper "guardian angel" Kyle was protecting the peacekeeping forces of the  legal, legitimate governing power of post-Saddam Iraq from criminal insurgents violently attacking them with guns and bombs to drive them from the country they had every legal right to be in and occupy. In other words, Chris Kyle was empowered under international law (Res. 1483) to do what he did and kill the bad guys he killed who being illegally at war with coalition forces were enemy combatants and war criminals. How then is Chris Kyle a "psychopathic war criminal" from killing sadistic, savage, bloodthirsty, jihadist, Islamofacist criminals who killed US/UK led troops and the good citizens who cooperated with them? Do you see how absurd, sick and insane these allegations are?  How twisted, perverse and detached  from reality? Leftist can argue the wisdom of the war which is a matter of ongoing debate. But they cannot credibly argue the legality of the military occupation or the morality of Chris Kyle killing criminal insurgents who were violating international law in their so-called freedom fighting post-Saddam resistance.

 
RELATED
 

THE MOST OMINOUS SENTENCE IN OBAMA’S STATE OF THE UNION SPEECH-OR WHEN THE CLOCK STRUCK 9:11

 

 

ON THE 6TH ANNIVERSARY OF BARACK OBAMA'S ELECTION AS PRESIDENT

he lost the US Senate and nearly 70 House seats  to Republicans in a devastating, electoral defeat as most of the electorate fearing that the country is on the wrong track rejected his transformational agenda (see). But Tuesday  night  on the 6th anniversary of his swearing-in as president-when he botched his Constitutional Oath (foreshadowing the bungling and lawlessness of his errant  presidency)-it's clear that Obama has lost his mind as he doubles down hell-bent on staying his disastrous course on domestic and foreign policy blind to the harm he's doing to his legacy, the country and the world.

Aside from the delusions and smoke and mirror lies about the US economy that continues to struggle with weak GDP growth, flat wages, poor consumer demand and spending, dropping auto sales, sky rocketing fiscal debt, massive dollar destroying money printing by the Fed and terrible unemployment numbers (concealed by statistical trickery) Obama detached from reality and the rising tide of chaos and war in the world claimed that our nation is the safest it's been since the horrifying attack on 9/11. But the truth is otherwise. As Obama systematically dismantles the Pax Americana along with our military (thinking it will improve our national image by making us seem less threatening to our Moslem and non-Moslem foes) ISIS, Iran, Russia and China emboldened by our retreat rush in to fill the power void hoping to be number one. Indeed, as ISIS inspires a new generation of death-loving jihadis world-wide (seeing in its leader al-Baghdadi the warlord-prophet Mohammed resurrected), and Iran builds a radical Islamic nuclear armed empire across the Middle East (terrifying Sunni states and starting a nuclear arms race)  America with its broken borders faces the worst terrorist threat since 9/11-and the public fears it as national security once again has priority with them.

Indeed, from 9/11 to Charlie Hebdo, from the ISIS' conquests and horrifying beheadings to the Iranian backed Shiite coup in Yemen  Obama has learned nothing from these things about the true nature and causes of  ancient Islamic jihad and terror. Mistaking it as a reaction to US policies, and past Western imperialism in the Middle East, Obama continues to treat Islamic terror as something alien, foreign and abnormal to Islam when it was essential to its survival from its early beginnings as every fundamentalist knows. For it was terror and war that saved Islam from extinction as a desperate Prophet Mohammed turned to aggression against infidels when their peaceful conversion had failed. Indeed, after ten years of peacefully missionizing Mecca and having only 100 followers to show for it Mohammed turned to the sword as his only alternative to grow Islam into the world conquering faith he had imagined. And it's this militant Mohammed that was the inspiration behind the awesome killing machine that spread Islam beyond the Arabian peninsula across the world, and inspires jihadists across the ages today who dream of imperial restoration and making Islam powerful again. In short, as jihad saved Islam in Mohammed’s day so many fundamentalists and supremacists see it saving Islam today from impotency , injustice and decline  in a world they see as morally sick and depraved led by the West and the United States.

 Consequently, Barack Obama remains a dangerous delusional 9/10 man in a post-9/11 strife-torn world regarding Moslems as the poor suffering victims of past Western imperialism, injustice and crimes in need of coddling and appeasement and butt kissing lies about the greatness and peacefulness of their regressive, militant, murderous faith that's in its 500th year of self-caused decline-that millions want to reverse. If we can just hug Moslems hard enough (believes Obama and the empathetic pathetically weak Left) we can squeeze all the jihad out of them like juice from an orange and all will be well. This is the insanity we face.

 OBAMA SPOKE "TERROR"  WHEN THE CLOCK STRUCK 9:11 

\

 Obama is a 9/10  man in an increasingly dangerous post-9/11 jihadist resurgent world that in part is of his own making; a world that he doesn't understand (or want to understand) and lacks the mentality, character and backbone to deal with as our own demoralized and disgusted military perceive. And this reality problem that deranges Obama seemed strangely reflected  in Tuesday's loony, feel good speech. Indeed, as Obama's intransigent, tragic  9/10 mindset (treating Moslem terrorists as non-Islamic criminals and felons), combined with his dangerously weak border security policies, is likely leading us into the worst mass terror attack since 9/11 his SOTU speech oddly, precisely and perhaps meaningfully began at 9:10:40 PM EST. Then as if supernaturally directed by a HIGHER POWER something astonishing occurred that was missed by everyone: just as the weak-on-terror 9/10 mentality of the Clinton and early Bush administrations set the stage for the 9/11 event so it seems is Obama's. For 20 seconds and 25 words into his speech, JUST AS THE CLOCK STRUCK 9:11, Obama ominously uttered the portentous word “TERROR.” This is what he said:

 (9:10:40 PM) "Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, my fellow Americans: We are 15 years into this new century.  Fifteen years that dawned with TERROR (9:11 PM) touching our shores; that unfolded with a new generation fighting two long and costly wars......" (See 2015 State Union Address | Video | C-SPAN.org )

 Amazingly, at the precise moment when 9:10 was turning into 9:11 PM Obama begins that part of his speech that deals with the 9/11 event-the dawn of domestic Islamic terror and the two wars that followed. Either this was accidental or providential-the work of blind, chaotic chance or of a Higher (organizing) Power directing Obama as if to warn him and us of a new horrific dawn of domestic mass murder driven by resurgent anti-American triumphant jihad.

 THE TWO JETLINER CRASHES AND A NEAR SOUTHERN BORDER MASSACRE

And if (God forbid) another large scale Islamic attack should occur Obama will leave office in ignominy with a legacy of ashes and dust-regretting to his dying day his refusal to fully adopt the successful counterterrorism policies of his wiser predecessor and heed the three events that warned him like an oracle what was coming: the crashing of two jetliners and a horrible massacre related to 9/11 near our porous southern border.

The first two events were the plane crashes of US Airways Flight 1561 and Colgen Flight 3407 occurring within 28 days of each other in Lower and Upper New York State. In the first crash called "The Hudson River Miracle (where no one died)” the brother of a dead 9/11 first responder (a fire fighter) was one of the survivors while the abandoned plane floated down stream coming to rest at Ground Zero. As this miracle happened just hours before George Bush gave his farewell address (focusing on national security) it was I believe a providential testament to his counterterrorism policies that kept us surprisingly  safe for seven years in the post-9/11  era when new mass attacks were expected (see).

 And in the second crash (where there was no life saving miracle) famed 9/11 activist and widow Beverly Eckert died with 49 others just six days after meeting with Obama at the White House-a terrible sign for the president if there ever was one that new horrors will come to America from bloodthirsty, death loving jihadists if he's foolish (see ).

In the third event, The Tucson Massacre, a ten year old child Christina Green born 9/11/2001 was murdered by crazed gunmen Jared Laughner who was born 13 years earlier on a 9/10 date in the late 1980s. As the 9/10 mentality of two presidents gave us 9/11 the killing of a 9/11 child by a 9/10-born gunman just 60 miles north of our porous southern borders  looks like a frightful warning to our reality ignoring 9/10 president that he better wizen up (see).

Indeed, under our see-no-evil-in-Islam president we’ve had the worst post-9/11 jihadist attacks on US soil with the FT. Hood Massacre killing 14 (including an unborn child); and the Boston Marathon Bombing killing three and injuring hundreds by young al Qaida inspired terrorists. Both these strikes are prelude it seems to worse attacks as our intransigent, stuck on stupid president defying reason, history and (it seems) DIVINELY GIVEN SIGNS (?) stays his  course to death and  disaster. 

POSTSCRIPT:SIGNS OF 2016?

 From: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 (Obama’s inaugural)

To Tuesday, January 20, 2015 (Obama’s 6th State of the Union)

Result: 2191 days

 Or 6 years or 72 months (see)

 When Barack Obama gave his State of the Union speech last week it was the 2191st day of his presidency. What is remarkable and a bit scary about this number is that it’s encoded with the number 911 when the digits are rearranged. A remarkable coincidence for a man who spoke the word "TERROR" 20 seconds into his speech at exactly 9:11 PM

Moreover, as last Tuesday was the 6th anniversary of Obama’s ominous 2009 inaugural (when Ted Kennedy collapsed from his LEFT-sided brain tumor shortly after Obama botched his Constitutional Oath) 6 years is exactly 72 months. What is interesting and maybe significant about this is that 72 is a factor of the number 2016 28x the year of the next presidential election. Now as the number 911 is encoded in the number 2191, and 2191 days = 72 months which in turn is a factor of 2016 could this be a sign that a 911 type terrorist event could decide the outcome of the 2016 election? I hope not. One 9/11 was one too many.

 RELATED

GEORGE BUSH, THE HUDSON RIVER MIRACLE AND HIS 9/11 PRESIDENCY

 

 BARACK OBAMA AND THE TUCSON MASSACRE: THE 9/10 MAN IN A 9/11 WORLD 

OBAMA’S GIFT TO BIBI IN REFUSING TO MEET HIM AND KING OF SAUDI HATE IS DEAD (POSTSCRIPT ADDED)

 

 Midgetman with Bibi.

 

WHY BLAST OBAMA FOR NOT WANTING TO MEET WITH BIBI?

In refusing to do so Barack Obama is possibly doing Bibi a political favor as he probably doesn't want to meet with him anyway. Why? I'll answer the question with a question: Why would Netanyahu just prior to an election want to meet with a US pres who's perceived by most Israelis as the most anti-Israel, pro-Arab, Islamophilic in history, and is utterly loathed by them? Most Israelis probably cringe when they see their great PM together with our despicable pres-a moral and mental dwarf by comparison. In fact, Obama understanding his unpopularity in Israel will not even attempt to do what the very popular George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton did in the 1990s: help the Labor candidates defeat the incumbent Likud PM-which proved in both cases to be a disaster for Israelis and Palestinians as it caused the Second Intifada. If the highly radioactive Obama tried this today he'd probably hand Bibi a resounding landslide victory. Beside why on just moral grounds would the Lion of Judah and Freedom (the Jewish Reagan and Churchill) want to meet with our Mickey Mouse prez-a fool lacking in courage and strength who no world leader fears, trusts or respects? Obama doesn't deserve to share the same stage with Bibi. In snubbing him Obama is doing him an unintended favor. 

 

 

POSTSCRIPT

 
 
 
A SPITTING 900LB GORILLA?

What's so unusual about that?

BTW, in 2007 when Nancy Pelosi and a congressional delegation (over the objections of the White House) met with Syrian dictator Bashar Assad to reignite the dead peace process between Israel and Syria she was applauded by Obama and Congressional Democrats for trying to succeed where Bush had failed.

 

[Pelosi+meets+Assad.gif] 

 

RELATED

 

THE UNDERLYING CAUSES OF THE PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI CONFLICT

IT’S THE JEWISHNESS OF ISRAEL STUPID, NOT HER “COLONIALISM”

BARACK OBAMA AND THE SIGN OF THE 2008 HAWAII BLACKOUT DURING THE GAZA WAR

ISLAM: THE RELIGION OF WORLD PEACE-THE ISLAMIST VIEW

ISLAM’S JUST WAR DOCTRINE AND THE PROBLEM OF ISRAEL’S ENDURING EXISTENCE 

 
 

 

 

 

SINK INTO THE DESERT SANDS O HOUSE OF SAUD!

Your kingdom of evil and hate has reigned too long.

 

 
  
Hey you should be happy, the Saudis are pumping oil fast and driving down the price of gas and Obama is taken credit.
 
 
The big question is will Obama take credit for the increase in CO2 output as a result of cheaper gas?
 
 

 RELATED

 

AT LAST, OBAMA HAD HIS REAGAN MOMENT. OR DID HE?

Obama's 2015 State of the Union Was Reagan Moment He Imagined | The New Republic

 

        Obama vs Reagan Report card.

 Barack Obama has "turned the page" from Reagan's "Morning In America" to "Mourning For America"as four years of sunset has turned into an era of darkening night.

 

 

OUR ANTI-REAGAN PRESIDENT WITH HIS ANTI-REAGAN DESTINY

 

had a Ronald Reagan moment last night? Really? Where? With a disastrous foreign policy of peace through weakness and appeasement that dares not call an evil enemy by his proper name?  With a pathetic, weak, trickle growth recovery of 2%  though trillions of stimulus dollars have been borrowed, spent and printed? With a real unemployment rate of 9.9% when millions of discouraged workers are included? With $18 trillion in unsustainable debt, and $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities on top of that crushing us to death? With consumer sentiment high because of dropping gas prices, but consumer spending in the toilet (holiday sales were a disaster)? With auto sales declining though driven by risky subprime loans (a bubble in the making like the housing market)? With massive Fed money printing weakening the value of the dollar? With a phony FED manipulated 17,000 Dow (another bubble) that benefits the top 10% but not the rest of us (a failed trickle down wealth theory)? And then there's the blessings Obamacare which even Chuck Schumer can't tolerate and admits was a mistake as it punishes the middle class with higher insurance costs to benefit the poor-it's class warfare by healthcare means a community organizer’s dream.

Obama putting up a mighty struggle to save his legacy from ashes and dust.
 
What does any of the above have to do with Ronald Reagan, Reaganomics and patriotic Reaganism? How could Obama have a "Ronald Reagan Moment" when he's the dark, divisise  polar opposite of Reagan weakening the American Spirit, demoralizing the military and emboldening our enemies to strike? Compared to the Gipper Obama's a mental and moral pipsqueak who will enter the Hall of Presidential Shame on the glorious day he leaves office.
 
 
HAHAHA! This former Nuclear Freeze activist says government is the answer after I proved that wrong. 
 
 
 
 
RONALD REAGAN IN "BED TIME FOR OBAMZO" 
 
 

 POSTSCRIPT

Tax hikes won't improve the state of our union - The Detroit News

TDN nails it. And Obama knows it. In 2010 Obama signed into law a two year extension of all the Bush tax rates. Why?  Because letting them expire would have  had a contractionary effect on the struggling economy thus causing a double dip recession  and possibly killing his chances of winning reelection.

MICHAEL MOORE: AMERICA HATING PRO-AL QAIDA IGNORANT SICKO PUTZ

 
 
Pro-al-Qaida Michael Moore thinks killer of al-Qaida terrorists Chris Kyle a coward.
 
 In reaction to the great critical and box office success of American Sniper pro-al Qaida, sicko leftist film maker Michael Moore said this about legendary, life saving, heroic Chris Kyle
 
"My uncle killed by sniper in WW2. We were taught snipers were cowards. Will shoot u in the back. Snipers aren't heroes. And invaders [US forces] r worse"
 
And referring to the deadly al Qaida sniper that Kyle miraculously killed from a mile away, Moore sickeningly said : 
 
"But if you're on the roof of your home defending it from invaders [the Syrian, rooftop, al Qaida sniper in the film] who've come 7K miles, you are not a sniper, u are brave, u are a neighbor."
 
 
 The truth is this: the evil Jordanian jihadist Abu al-Zarqawi invaded Iraq with thousands of al-Qaida terrorists shortly after the US led invasion to set up a radical Islamic totalitarian Caliphate-not to defend the country from US forces. Consequently, as American Sniper shows, Zarqawi and al-Qaida killed and tortured Sunnis, Shiites, Americans and anyone who dared to get in the way of their Mohammed-inspired Koranic goals.
 
 
 

 In 2004 Michael Moore openly and shamelessly supported the sadistic mass murdering Zarqawi with his army of terror and death calling them "freedom fighters" and "Minutemen"- predicting that their forces would grow victoriously strong; and overwhelming US troops defeat them and ignominiously drive them from Iraq. And joining this sick, twisted, ignorant putz was then anti-war senator Barack Obama who opposed the necessary troop surge in Iraq to defeat al-Qaida and turn the war around, and predicted it would fail in the long term-a self-fulfilled prophecy.

 

Does Michael Moore consider Obama a cowardly sniper for ordering drone attacks on terrorists?
 

Moore must be thrilled that Obama has made a shambles of Iraq; and that Zarqawi and AQ in Iraq (his heroic, failed "Minutemen") have been replaced by the utterly brutal and more successful al-Baghdadi and ISIS. Indeed, having supported Zarqawi how could Moore reasonably oppose al-Baghdadi who is trying to liberate Iraq from the Shiites that the US put in power, and reestablish the status quo ante of Sunni rule which Moore wanted?

CLIMATE ALARMISTS VINDICATED! 2014 HOTTEST YEAR ON RECORD. OR WAS IT?

 
 
 
 
 
 
 From one end of the Warmunist Left to the other, from Obama on down to the fiercest eco-warrior, climate change alarmists have been suddenly, joyfully, ecstatically revived claiming vindication for their terrifying vision that humanity is headed toward collective, man-caused horrific extinction because of the heat trapping gases we're putting into the air. For word came down from NASA's Goddard Institute last week making it official: 2014 made the Guinness Book of Records as the hottest year since measurements were taken  smashing the record set in 2010 when we humans nearly roasted to death, as we did again last year .
 
 
 Warmunists hoping to silence cruel, uncaring, science-hating sceptics, and bring an indifferent public to its life and death senses, feel they now have all the proof they need  to scare us into mass hysteria; that there's a terrible looming climate change catastrophe ahead; and that this is the penultimate crisis of human history: the survival of our species. It's as John Kerry and his boss say: "Climate science is screaming at us."  Man-made Global Warming is a "WMD" and "a greater threat to world security than  (unIslamic) Global Jihad" and the thousands it kills every year in the name of a faith they misunderstand. For what is the murder of the Charlie Habdo Ten, or the thousands dying in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria and Nigeria compared to the extinction of up to 7 billion human beings, and billions more sentient creatures  (pet cats and dogs), either drowned to death in a biblical like flood, or asphyxiated by lethal amounts of green house gasses like holocaust victims in death camps? Who are the real terrorists we should fear? Al Qaida? ISIS? Iran? the Taliban? Or the greedy capitalist liars and big oil polluters slowly destroying the Earth and everyone on it (Moslem and infidel) for big profits? 2014 unmasked the real terrorists exposing their conspiracy of deception and lies that the heating of the Earth stopped 18 years ago; that global temperatures have leveled off despite a 25% increase of carbon emissions caused mostly by the dirty industrializing of developing Third World states.
 
 
We were wrong. They were right. The facts are clear: THE WORLD IS WARMING AND DOOMSDAY IS NEAR! Unless the UN finds the $44 trillion that it needs to reverse this apocalyptic climate trend (and stop rising Third World pollution and burning of fossil fuels with clean technologies) it will be the end (see). Or will it?
Yearly-global-LT-UAH-RSS-thru-Sept-2014

The chart above tells a different tale. A tale that global temperatures in 2014 were lower than in 2010 when the record was set. What's going on here? How do we explain the discrepancy? The chart is based on global temperature data gathered by satellites from our lower atmosphere (where catastrophic warming is supposed  to occur). This is the most reliable,  precise and soundly scientific way of measuring global temperatures-the only way that really counts and should be used. But the Warmunists at NASA (with the same radical agenda as Obama and his EPA) ignore the satellite data preferring instead far less accurate, flawed ground thermometer readings gathered from 3000 stations around the globe measuring surface (not atmospheric) temperature.

 Aside from the fact that the surface temperature of the Earth is warmer than in the atmosphere (the higher up the colder it is) these surface stations are located in populated urban centers that are warmer than in other areas with small or nonexistent human populations. 

For example if we were to move the city of Chicago to the center of Antarctica because of all the heat emitted by millions of human bodies driving millions of motor vehicles and living and working in hundreds and thousands of heated homes and buildings the city's temperature will always be warmer than in the surrounding barren frigid areas. But satellites measure both.

  Indeed, of planet Earth's surface of 196,939,900 square miles 139,440,000 (70%) is water: oceans, seas, rivers, lakes, etc. where there are no thermometer stations. But satellites cover and measure every square inch above this vast area, which can't be done by thermometers. Nor do these stations cover millions of square miles of desert lands, forests, mountain ranges and open prairies. But satellites inclusively measure it all  leaving out naught-not one bloody square inch.

How then with extremely limited range can ground thermometers measure global, worldwide, planetary temperatures? They can't. It's impossible. But this is what the Warmunists and their PC corrupted scientists pretend to do and want us to believe. It's just more global warming trickery to get control of you and changethe way you live and consume energy. And fortunately it's not working. As the article in the New Yorker says Americans are coldly indifferent to history's hottest year. And that's not going to change. The public isn't deceived that Shell, Exxon and corporate greed are the real terrorists we should fear; and that a radical transition to a clean, green energy economy costing trillions and causing a global depression is our salvation. And, by the way, no sooner did NASA issue its ominous report about record-breaking 2014 then they said they were only 38% certain that it was true-when they should have said they lied. You won't be hearing that on MSNBC.

RELATED

 

ISRAEL, ISLAM AND ISLAMIC PEACE AND THE DEMORALIZATION AND DEFEAT OF JIHAD

 
 
 Or slamming Islamic peace upon you.
 
What is Islam? The politically correct answer given by President Obama and his predecessor, and many on the Left and in academia, is summed up in six platitudinous words that we hear over and over ad nauseam: ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE. Why? Because, we are told, most of the world's 1.3 billion Moslems are harmless, good, peace-loving people who wouldn't hurt a hair on an unbeliever's head. And that may be true. But what of the rest of humanity? What of the Jews? What of Christians? What of Hindus and Buddhists? Aren't most of them peace-loving people too? Of course they are. So if peace-loving Moslems make Islam a religion of peace it stands to reason that peace-loving Jews, Christians, Hindus and Buddhists make Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism and Buddhism religions of peace.
  
 
So with so many billions of human beings belonging to one or the other religion of peace why is there so much religious conflict in the world with Islam today, and going back ages into the past? Why  have so many millions of Christians, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists been killed in the name of Allah and Islam? And why has the Jewish state of Israel fought more than a dozen wars of survival with Moslems since its founding in 1948 when seven Arab nations tried and failed to strangle her  in the cradle? And just as bad why are Moslems killing Moslems so massively and ferociously? Why did a million Moslems die in the Iraq-Iran War in the 1980s? And why have more than 200,000 Moslems died in Syria in the last few years in what is the worst human holocaust of this century?  If all the major religions are religions of peace because most of its members are peace-loving people why is there so much conflict between Islam and much of the world, and within Islam itself?
 
Thumbnail
(thanks Nanna)
 
The answer is simple: Islam is not religion of peace like other religions are peaceful and peace-loving. As I said HERE "ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF ISLAMIC PEACE." Not my peace or your peace. Not Jewish, Christian, Hindu or Buddhist peace. Not Democratic, Socialist, Secular Progressive, Capitalist or Communist peace. Islam is a religion of Islamic peace and only Islamic peace, unique among all faiths in its understanding of peace-which underlies all the trouble with Islam today, and why there's so much Islamic aggression against innocent, peace-loving unbelievers. For Islam is intolerant of other views of peace whether they be Jewish, Christian, Buddhist or secular and wants to impose by force its idea of peace on you and me and all mankind believing wrongly that it's God's Will, and the ultimate answer to our conflicts and problems. 
 
 
Egypt's extraordinary, sensible Moslem president Abdel El-Sisi (a true reformed modernized Moslem) said it all when he warned last week that the hostile, antagonistic Moslem world of 1.3 billion souls cannot conquer or kill the remaining 6 billion people on this Earth to achieve its vision and version of peace.  He warned in effect that it's a dangerous utopian dream that could only end in a nightmare for Islam with perhaps millions dying as happened to Nazi Germany and Fascist Japan in World War 2. That's why El-Sisi boldly called for a "revolution" within Islam; an overthrow of the Jihadist thinking that permeates and infects the Moslem world like a plague-that's shouted from the house tops with the war cry "Allahu Akbar!;" that's preached in countless mosques and taught in Moslem schools poisoning millions of minds with a false dream of triumph and glory restored; a dream inspired by the military victories of the Prophet Mohammed who desperately took a failed, nonviolent religious movement in Mecca and transformed it into a merciless militant faith and killing machine hell-bent on conquering unbelievers worldwide-and achieving great success with an empire of blood and death stretching from the Pyrenees in Spain to the Himalayas 100 years after his death. As El-Sisi tacitly warns the imams and leaders of his faith those days are gone never to return, and attempting to restore them is madness on steroids. Take Israel for example:
 
 
If after 66 years of war and conflict Islam can't conquer the tiny nation of Jewish Israel (once called Palestine) whose lands it had owned for centuries-taken by force from Byzantine Christians in the 7th century and lost to the British in the 20th when the Islamic Ottman Empire fell-how if Islam can't reconquer Palestine losing war after war could it possibly restore its lost empire of yore? And surpassing even that achieve totalitarian world domination in a one world universal caliphate (the promise of the prophet Mohammed in the Koran)? It's ludicrous and deranged as El Sisi affirms; and he warns that unless there's a revolution or reformation within Islam discrediting and marginalizing the one world Jihadist fanatics (who wrongly see Islam as God's end and purpose of history) the body count of Moslems will exponentially rise perhaps with millions dying as the Japanese did in conventional and nuclear bombings to crush their will to victory.
 
 
It happened before and could do so again. Israel (God forbid) if pushed to the edge (by its Jihadist foes and useful idiots in the West) as a last resort will use its nuclear weapons to survive. It's called the "Samson Option (see)" and is summed up in the post-Holocaust cry 'NEVER AGAIN!'  Indeed, such a terrible thing could mean millions of deaths turning the Middle East into a radioactive wasteland where the Arab living will envy the Arab dead. A horrible prospect.
 
 
 Israel providentially exists as the homeland of the Jewish people, as a beacon of freedom, progress and hope for the dysfunctional, sick, medieval Middle East and to demoralize and defeat Islamic Jihad. In fact, Israel is a weapon that anti-Jihadists must learn to use more effectively to strike at the heart of militant Islam and discredit it for the mindless, savage, senseless, regressive, 7th century utopian barbarism it is. Israel in part exists to show how unrealistic and delusional Islamic Jihad is; that it's obsolete having no future in this world-its resurgence being its last hurrah before it dies.  After 66 years of Jihad and relentless Moslem hatred Israel stands taller and stronger today than ever its jihadist enemies unable to destroy her, powerless to drive its Jews into the sea and reconquer its lands for Allah, Mohammed and Moslem community. I am certain that Israel is a prophetic sign Islamic Jihad is in its end time.
 
 
 

 RELATED

http://www.cyberistan.org/islamic/crusad... 
http://factreal.wordpress.com/2010/01/30... 
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/... 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution... 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution... 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution... 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Thail... 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_1...

ISLAM: THE RELIGION OF WORLD PEACE-THE ISLAMIST VIEW

AMAZING! EGYPT’S EL-SISI CALLS FOR ENDING JIHADIST THINKING AND REFORMATION OF ISLAM 

FRANCE HAS LEARNED NOTHING FROM THE 1/7 MASSACRE, QUESTION FOR OBAMA ON RADICAL ISLAM AND BARACK OBAMA THE GREAT ENABLER OF RADICAL IRAN

 If I were an Islamic supremacist I'd be hopping mad that the French have learned nothing from the terrible 1/7 event; that the Charlie Hebdo massacre (a revelation of God's wrath) didn't stop the publication of their blasphemous mag; and that its circulation is now in the millions turning the mockery of Mohammed into a national anti-Islam fade. If I were a supremacist I'd be praying to Allah for worst to come and that he use me to increase France's carnage, horror, death and blood. But while cursing France I'd also praise the two martyred jihadis who terrorized Paris  killing 12 in avenging the Prophet's name. And I'd also hail Barack Obama for bravely boycotting the evil rally telling the world that he wasn't the slanderer Charlie.  I'd also be pleased that the number of Jews fleeing France and Europe is on the rise. It would please me because if driving them out of Palestine isn't possible at this time scaring them out of Europe will do. We're on our way to fulfilling Hitler's dream of making Europe Jew free. If I were an Islamic supremacist that would greatly, greatly please me.

 

 

WH Explains Why It Won't Use Term 'Radical Islam' | Truth Revolt 

 
QUESTION FOR BARACK OBAMA ON USING THE TERM "RADICAL ISLAM"
 
Dear Mr. President,
 
If Islam, as you believe, in its essence, nature and historical mission is "a religion of justice and peace" and isn't inherently violent or evil like its detractors have said for centuries; and that, as you believe, there is no such thing as "radical Islam,"  "Islamic extremism,"  "militant Islamic jihadism," or "Islamo-fascism." If, in fact, true, authentic, genuine (misunderstood) Islam isn't "radical," "extreme," "militant," "jihadist" or "fascist" then why do you call the radical, extreme, militant, jihadist, fascistic, oppressive, violent state of revolutionary Iran (designated by your State Department  "a state sponsor of [global] terror (see)" the "ISLAMIC REPUBLIC?" How can you sanely apply the term "ISLAMIC" to the terror masters of Iran whose theocratic government plotted jihad attacks on US soil (see)  and not apply it to al Qaida, ISIS and the terrorists who in Islam's name killed 12 at Ft. Hood, three in Boston and the Charlie Hebdo Ten in Paris? Either you publicly denounce Iran as a fake Islamic state  like you do Baghdadi's Islamic State (ISIS), or continue to look like an inchoherent, inconsistent, self-contradictory fool earning the contempt of the world. Which is it going to be Mr. President? Is terrorist Iran an "Islamic Republic?" Or is it a "perversion of Islam" like the Islamic State? 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

It was reported Tuesday,

In the eyes of most Iraqis, their country’s best ally in the war against the Islamic State group is not the United States and the coalition air campaign against the militants. It’s Iran, which is credited with stopping the extremists’ march on Baghdad.”

 

FROM CARTER TO OBAMA:

THE EVOLUTION OF IRANIAN POWER

Since Jimmy Carter helped midwife radical, theocratic, genocidal Iran in 1979 Obama has become the greatest enabler of Iranian power doing more for Iran's hegemonic ambitions in the Middle East than all previous presidents combined. Ironically, on November 4, 2008 (as I've stated before) when Obama won the presidency it was on the 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis-the first jihadist blow against America since the Barbary Wars foreshadowing the catastrophe of 9/11 and 3000 dead.

In fact, in a very real way, what North Vietnam was to the South (upon the removal of our forces from South East Asia) Iran is to Iraq as Iraq is now Iran's dependent vassal state made possible by Obama's removal of our troops plunging that country into turmoil. And the horrors that over took South East Asia in the wake of the Vietnam War (Pol Pot and the killing fields, etc) have their parallel in ISIS and its bloodthirsty destabilizing jihad. Don't ever say that you haven't been warned (as McCain did in 2008) that Obama was unfit to command and would be Jimmy Carter on steroids.

RELATED

 
 

WHAT IF A MOSLEM MURDERED OBAMA? JIMMY CARTER AND THE GREATNESS OF ISLAM AND HITLER AND MOHAMMED: WHERE THEY DIFFER

 

 
 
 

JIMMY CARTER IS CORRECT

Every crisis is an opportunity to learn and grow in compassion, wisdom and grace. And what better time than now in the aftermath of the Charley Hebdo/Jewish Deli massacre in France to learn about the greatness and majesty of the Islam. And Carter, who speaks from experience, knows. Until the Islamic Revolution in Iran, and the 444 day hostage crisis, he was a dumb, ignorant, redneck, Southern Baptist hick completely in the dark about Islam treating it with contempt as the religion of Satan and the damned. Lucky him. If he hadn't forced the shah to let Khomeini return home from exile in France Carter would be a poorer soul, half the man, a credit to no one today. Just look at his record since he's been president, and the wonderful things he's achieved for peace in the Middle East and beyond. It takes my breath away thinking how he ended apartheid in Israel, persuaded Castro to hold elections in Cuba and stopped the Norks from getting nukes. The peace prize he won was well earned-and he deserves a second and third. But the question remains: having discovered the greatness of Islam why is Carter still a Christian? Or has he secretly converted to the faith?

 

 CBS News: “Hitler Appearing In Ads On SF Muni Buses” |  Atlas Shrugs

 
 
 

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MOHAMMED AND HITLER?

The basic difference between the savage, militant,  totalitarian, Jew-hating conqueror Adolf Hitler (a hero to millions of sick, twisted, regressive,  bloodthirsty Moslems) and the savage, militant,  totalitarian, Jew-hating conqueror Mohammed (who like Hitler hated Jews above all other peoples) is this:  Hitler's 1000 year Reich (empire) of terror, blood, booty and death lasted a mere 12 years. Mohammed's Reich of terror, blood, booty and death has lasted more than 1200 years. One monster was an enduring success (though his empire has been decaying for centuries); and the other (by comparison) was a flash in the pan failure. Oh, by the way, one other difference that comes to mind is that Hitler loved dogs, Mohammed hated them believing they were gross, impure creatures.

 

 

 

 

WHY OBAMA BOYCOTTED THE HISTORIC RALLY FOR CHARLIE HEBDO (NEW POSTSCRIPT ON OBAMA’S POST-PRESIDENCY AMBITIONS)

 

Thumbnail

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No one can know for certain why Barack Obama, the leader of the Free World and  the global war on terror, was AWOL from yesterday's massive four million man unity rally in Paris, France. No one but Obama can know why he shunned those millions braving death (including 50 world leaders) defiantly showing support for Charlie Hebdo against deadly, murderous, radical Islam-which wants to quash free speech by brutally punishing all mockery, blasphemy and criticism of Mohammed and their faith. These fanatics believe that Islam is God's greatest gift to mankind; it's His ultimate and final revelation of truth, justice and peace, the answer to the world's manifold problems and ills, surpassing and abrogating all other revelations; and Mohammed, God's anointed, blessed, chosen prophet and messenger of this gift-history's most perfect, exemplary and God-like man-stands above all criticism like a mighty colossus  overshadowing earlier prophets from Moses to Jesus in the evolution of the monotheistic faith. And those blind to this saving truth will suffer the certainty of God's wrath, if not in this life at the hands of jihadists (like killed 17 in France) then in the next endlessly tormented by devils in hell.

Now only  the president knows why he wasn't at the rally and wouldn't let America be represented by no one higher than his former fundraiser Jane Hartley our ambassador to France. We can only speculate as to his reason. But after analyzing this from multiple angles I find only two credible explanations for Obama's inaction, which are as follows:

 Now if you were Barack Obama a man scorned and despised by most world leaders as a blundering, incompetent, feckless, irredeemable amateur on the world stage-like he's disrespected and despised by most US servicemen as unfit to be commander in chief (see)-would you have gone out of your way to join with these leaders in Paris yesterday? Would you have gone through the trouble of traveling thousands of miles only to feel painfully uncomfortable with people who (like millions of Americans) think you're the worst US president ever? And that America and the world would be better off without you? If you were as weak, thinned skinned, immature and cowardly as Obama (a man of great moral and mental deficiencies) would you have gone through the humiliation of attending that event with leaders not wanting you there unwillingly smiling, hugging you and shaking your hand just for appearances, while ridiculing you in private?  Probably not. Obama meeting with world leaders at G-20 summits and the like is compulsory and necessary and cannot be avoided. But a spontaneous mass rally in a foreign land caused by Islamic terrorism (with no Americans dead) is optional and unnecessary. So why go when your heart isn't in it? When you know it will be unpleasant? When you could be home in the White House watching the NFL?

Outside of winning elections Barack Obama is a political rank amateur who has "oops" his way for six blundering years from a disastrous first tern into a catastrophic second term. 

But perhaps I'm being too harsh on Obama, too unfair. Perhaps my own unwavering contempt for him-which I admit having had before his election seeing intuitively what a disaster he'd be (see)-is getting the better of my judgment and causing me to project my disdain for him on Merkel, Cameron, Netanyahu and the other heads of state-who might at least grudgingly have some regard for him. If that's the case then there is only one other possible reason for Obama not going to the event-or allowing Biden or Kerry or Holder to represent his administration and the nation; and that reason (the more credible of the two) is avoiding any chance of offending Islam and the Moslem world community. 

Indeed, if the centerpiece of your foreign policy is outreaching, appeasing and making nice to Moslems (and defending Islam and its prophet against all forms of intolerance, bigotry and hate) would you have attended a massive, unprecedented rally in support of a satirical magazine that serially and relentlessly mocked the prophet and Islam?  A magazine that you personally criticised for this ugly, offensive practice? A magazine and its intolerant, hateful, bigoted cartoons that you (quoting Gandhi) likened to acts of physical violence and the destruction of Christian statues and churches (what a stretch)?

 Obama wrote in his autobiography that for him the sweetest smell in the world was the above./sarc
 

Indeed, if you were Barack Obama, Defender of Islam in Chief (who sees no evil in Islam and its prophet), and said that the future mustn't belong to those who do what Charlie Hebdo did in the face of death (and will continue to do in the time ahead) what kind of message would you be sending if you'd been at that rally, or sent Biden, Kerry or  Holder in your place? After condemning and apologizing for a stupid, artless anti-Mohammed video that you said outraged Moslems and underlied rioting in Cairo, protests in Pakistan, and the deaths of an ambassador and three others in Benghazi, how can you in good conscience go to a rally in support of the very same sin and chance stirring up more trouble for your embassies and diplomats? It's bad enough you praise Islam to the skies and look insincere for not being Moslem. After the anti-Mohammed video and criticizing Hebdo, being at that rally would make you look like the world's biggest hypocrite undermining what little effectiveness you have in making  peace between America and the faith.

 No! For the sake of your master plan for healing US/Islamic relations it's better that you let your unknown, virtually invisible ambassador to France attend the unity rally. For this would cause no offence to those whose butt you've been kissing for six years with nothing to show for it but intensified personal hatred and contempt (Obama's more unpopular than Bush in the Moslem world, see) and worsening anti-US rage.  What a sad, sad man.

In sum, Obama's reason for missing yesterday's rally was that he wanted the Moslem world to know that

 HE IS NOT CHARLIE

Because he doesn't want more of this

 

Or because he wants this

POSTSCRIPT

BARACK OBAMA SEC. GEN. OF THE UN?

Was Obama AWOL from the rally yesterday  because he was looking to his post-presidency years as a possible successor to Moon as  Sec. Gen. of the UN? Saskin thinks so. And he could be right.

American Thinker

saksin  ApolloSpeaks 

Yes, his being AWOL from this singular media event, with nothing except the NFL playoffs competing, must be a deliberate signal. What could move this narcissist to forego such a photo-op??? My guess is that he is not thinking of today, but of his future... say as Secretary General of the UN... To have even a prayer of getting there, he needs the votes of Muslim nations. From his Cairo speech to this, there is a consistent trajectory. He really sees himself as a world-historical personage, and all the evidence to the contrary seems to elude him...

RELATED

WILL WE HEAR THE PEOPLE SING?

AVENGING THE DEATHS OF THE CHARLIE HEBDO TEN

 

WILL WE HEAR THE PEOPLE SING?

 
 

 

Will the millions expected to protest the jihadist murder of the Charlie Hebdo Ten in Paris and across France be the start of a sustained movement throughout the Free World? Will history mark this day as the turning point in the renewal and saving of our civilization from inner spiritual decay and its totalitarian enemies? There is a song for all great occasions. Below is our battle song for today. Will we hear the people sing?!
 
 
 
PEOPLE OF FRANCE AMERICA STANDS WITH YOU!
 
WE WERE BORN FREE
 
BUT RADICAL ISLAM WANTS US IN CHAINS!
 
VIVE LA FRANCE!
 
VIVE LA AMERICA!
 
VIVE LA LIBERTE!
 
 
 
 
 RELATED
 
 

THE NON-MOSLEM ISLAMIC KILLERS OF THE CHARLIE HEBDO TEN, ISLAM’S PERFECT MAN OF WAR, INTOLERANCE AND DEATH AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND BLASPHEMOUS COMMENTS

 
Thumbnail(thanks Nanna)

The truth about Islam is this: "the Holy Koran," as Winston Churchill said "is the Mein Kampf of war." And the Prophet Mohammed was the conquering Adolf Hitler of his age whose lust for power, wealth and glory before he died turned a failed religious movement in Mecca into a killing machine for God bringing the entire blood soaked Middle East under its sway then expanding outwardly from the Himalayas to the Pyrenees in Spain. Islam is the religion of endless war against Christians, Jews and the human race driven by a prophetic vision of world domination that must be discredited and crushed like Nazism's quest for a Thousand Year Reich. It's the same totalitarian evil in a monotheistic form. Islamonazism is the enemy. And crush it we will!

RELATED

ISLAM: THE RELIGION OF WORLD PEACE-THE ISLAMIST VIEW

  
We have it on the good authority of non-Moslem Howard Dean, non-Moslem Barack Obama, and non-Moslem French President Hollande that it was three non-Moslem gunmen who murdered the Charlie Hebdo Ten. But why? If it's true that they were non-Moslem like Dean, Obama and Hollande then Islam had nothing to do with the crime. In murdering the Charlie Hebdo Ten the three non-Moslem killers weren't avenging the honor of  Mohammed against anti-Moslem cartoon mockery. Then what was their motive and reason for their crime if the Prophet's honor and  Islam wasn't the cause? Did they murder for the hell of it? For the sport of it? For the joy of it?  Because they were natural-born killers who loved spilling blood and used Islam as a cover for their crimes? Is that it? Or could it be that they hated Moslems and wanted to ignite  a "racist" war against them hoping that thousands would die as they watched in glee? If the killers were as Moslem as Dean, Obama and Hollande , and if Islam had nothing to do with their deed, someone please tell me what other reason can there be? 
 
 
 
 Aristotle: the enemy and corrupter of Islam.
 
WHEN ISLAMIC SCIENCE AND CULTURE WAS AT ITS INTELLECTUAL HEIGHT
 

Aristotle was the most revered philosopher studied by all learned Moslems many of whom found more wisdom and truth in his philosophy than in Mohammed's Koran. But then came Al Ghazali (the Sufi defender of Islam) and his criticism of and jihad against Aristotle and his intellectual Moslem  followers as dangerous unIslamic thinkers subversive of Islamic society, culture and faith. Al-Ghazali (considered "the greatest Moslem since Mohammed") unfortunately won that battle with theocratic thinking, Sufi mysticism and blind faith in the Prophet triumphing over reason and science. Aristotle was branded an enemy of Allah and the Prophet, and Islam was saved from the "corrupting influence" of his philosophy as the Moslem world was frozen in the Middle Ages where most believers are mentally and emotionally stuck today.

Al-Ghazali: the anti-Aristotelian destroyer of Moslem progress and thought . He locked the Islamic world in a Koranic box while the Christian West assimilated Arsitotle and the Greeks.

Islamic studies in a school named after this great Greek philosopher demonized by Islam is a desecration of the institution and crime against truth and wisdom. "Aristotle," as Pam says, "is spinning in his grave" along with Ibn Sina, Averroes, Al Farabi and other Moslem Aristotelians whose reputation for wisdom, truth and virtue Al Ghazali singlehandedly destroyed. Largely because of Al Ghazali the Moslem world is the most dysfunctional, despotic, regressive, depressive and destitute part of the Earth. And Al Ghazali's reputation today among Moslem intellectuals and scholars is as high and shinning as it was in the 11th century when he launched his victorious jihad on human reason.

 
 
MOSLEMS MUST STOP EMBARRASSING THEMSELVES
 
by saying that Mohammed is the most perfect and greatest of men-an exemplary human being whose virtues and nearness to God no believer can match or attain. For if this were true, if Mohammed was a paragon of Islamic virtue and truth (the ideal Moslem man) then what does that say of them? For no Moslem can truly follow in the prophet's way (doing as he did as best they can) and be anything less than a beast. To understand what Mohammed would be like today if he were resurrected from the dead  study closely ISIS deadly caliph Al-Baghdadi.
 

Kristof: "We Really, Really Have To Be Careful Not To Respond To Extraordinary Intolerance of These Jihadis With Our Own Intolerance"

OBAMA IN DEFENSE OF ISLAM QUOTING GANDHI AT THE UN SAID:

" Intolerance [against Islam] is itself a form of violence...." And more recently he said "the future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam." Well if intolerance of evil is a form of violence than I am a hopelessly and irredeemably violent man. And if being intolerant of the intolerant words and intolerant deeds of the intolerant Prophet of Islam makes me a slanderous bigot and Islamophobe then I'm a hopeless, fear driven slanderer and incurably bigoted fool. And if you are wise you'd be too.

 

 
 
 
SARCASM 
 

WITH ALL THE ISLAMOPHOBIC PROPAGANDA

pouring from this and other right-wing hate sites these young, impressionable Denver girls need to see what Islam really is before the haters get to them. They need to meet the nice, friendly, peaceful imam and the nice, friendly, peaceful believers, in the nice, clean, antiseptic mosque to see how nice, friendly, clean and peaceful Islam is. And maybe, just maybe, seeds of faith will be planted in their minds that could sprout in time giving them the urge to become nice, friendly, peaceful, clean Moslem women. A nice peaceful trip to a nice peaceful mosque by children without faith (educated by secularists) could do wonders for a soul needing meaning, purpose and peace in life-Islamic peace that is.

 

 
THE TERRORISM OF DOUBT AND UNBELIEF
 
In reality the "TERRORISM" that Isalm and the Prophet came to "finish off" is the TERROR OF UNBELIEF- the worst evil on Earth and greatest offense to Allah. For UNBELIEF terrifies and torments the believer with DOUBT. The DOUBT that Islam is not the  ULTIMATE TRUTH. The DOUBT that it's not God's FINAL REVELATION  of himself to man. The DOUBT that history isn't GOD'S PLAN to conquer all infidels and abolish unbelief  so that believers can believe more strongly,  believe without doubt, believe without fear, believe in peace. It's the TERRORISM OF SCEPTICISM AND DOUBT in a world ruled by Moslems that Islam and the Prophet came to wipe out.
 
 
  

WHY DOESN’T ITALY RECOGNIZE ISLAM

as a legitimate religion like it does Catholicism, Prostestantism, Judaism and Buddhism? Because it spawns too many unassimilable anti-social jihadist nuts who want to do to the country what this violent, Christian hating, Koran driven lunatic did to these beautiful statues.

RELATED

 ITALY GIVES ISLAM THE BOOT: WILL NOT RECOGNIZE IT AS LEGIT RELIGION

 
 

Muslims sprayed bullets on Prof. Muhari, a renowned Hindu educationalist. (Source: Mukto-Mona)

 
THIS IS ABSURD!
 

We have it on the good authority of Karan Armstrong, renowned scholar of world religions and mysticism  (she has the inside dope on all the major faiths), that Mohammed was a man of peace-the Mahatma Gandhi of his age-a real loving Sufi saint who saw jihad as the conquest of his soul and loved all peoples compassionately. So why in the land of Gandhi (he was shot by a peace-loving Moslem fanatic) are believers celebrating Mohammed's birthday by beating up poor pagan, polytheistic Hindus? What kind of partying is that? Don't they know that Mohammed loved polytheistic, idol worshipping pagans and never lifted a finger of terror against them? Clearly they misunderstand the prophet of nonviolence and peace (who taught Gandhi all that he knew about turning his cheek) and need to read Armstrong's brilliant books to make true, peace-loving, pagan friendly Moslems of them./sarc 

 

 

AVENGING THE DEATHS OF THE CHARLIE HEBDO TEN

 
future-must-not-belong-to-those-who-slander-prophet-islam-mohammad-barack-hussein-obama-muslim
 
 
 
 I hope that our ignorant Defender-of-Islam in Chief -who seems to have  more respect for a tyrannical faith than he does for the United States- is happy today. For today there are ten French citizens who relentlessly mocked and ridiculed the prophet he wrongly esteems (a monster of war, intolerance, torture  and death) who no longer have a future in this world because of what he did and said. They 've joined the millions who've been killed in his name and won't be the last to meet this fate. I hope Obama is happy today. And I'm hoping that these Ten brave souls spark an anti-Mohammed mockery craze: a defiant world wide backlash against the crimes and atrocities of the prophet of hate who killed those who opposed and mocked him.  Isn't this what The Ten are crying from the grave? There could be no better way to honor their memory and avenge their Islamic inspired deaths than to continue the mockery  of Mohammed on a universal scale.
 
MOCK MOHAMMED FOR THE CHARLIE HABDO TEN
 
OR TELL THE TRUTH
 
ABOUT HIM
 
STRIKE A BLOW FOR LIBERTY 
 
AND DESTROY
 
ISLAMIC SUPREMACY
 
 &
 
VIVE LA FRANCE!
 
 
3D waving flag of France3D waving flag of France

 

CLICK

 
for patriotic inspiration French style.
 
 
People gather in Toulouse last night to show their solidarity for the victims of the attack by gunmen on the offices of the satirical publication
 
 
 
 

AMAZING! EGYPT’S EL-SISI CALLS FOR ENDING JIHADIST THINKING AND REFORMATION OF ISLAM

 
 
President El-Sisi at Al-Azhar University warning that jihad dominates the thinking of too much of the Moslem world and is antagonizing the rest of the world . 
 
 
 
 

TO HAVE A TRULY WISE AND ENLIGHTENED MAN OF CHARACTER LIKE EGYPT'S PRESIDENT ABDEL EL-SISI

 warning about the dangers and hopelessness of jihad to conquer the infidel world, and calling for an end to jihad and reformation of Islam, made the downfall of Mubarak and brief disastrous reign of Morsi and the Brotherhood seem worthwhile. I don't recall Mubarak ever publicly criticizing Islam saying that there's something fundamentally wrong with the faith (or its thinking today) that must change.

Instead of praising the greatness of Isalm as if it were a misunderstood faith hijacked by extremists this is the speech that Obama should have given at Al Azhar six years ago. Islam needs criticism not flattery. It needs El-Sisis not Obamas.

The modernization of the Middle East began with the Napoleonic invasion of Egypt. And now Egypt under El Sisi is once again leading the way.

Obama at Al-Azhar.

One thousand of his rah rah Moslem ("New Beginning") outreach speeches couldn't equal in substance and imporatnce El-Sisi's one speech on Islamic reformation. 

 

POSTSCRIPT

IS EL-SISI FOR REAL?

El-Sisi has his sceptics who question his sincerity and believe that he's a deceitful crypto-jihadist. One such sceptic posted this very interesting and informative comment on Raymond Ibraham's site:

Fulano de Tal

Middle East Online, Egypt’s Third Way: A Blend of Islamism and Militarism (Aug. 2, 2013)

This article describes then-General Al Sisi as a religious conservative with close ties to Saudi Arabia. It also quotes key portions of his thesis, written in2006 while attending the U.S. Army War College, including his focus on religion in politics and belief that democracy would only successfully take hold in the Middle East if it sustained the religious base. Furthermore, it indicates that he pushed the notion of the ‘concept of El Kalafa’, which involves obedience to a ruler who consults its subjects. I think that he is pushing this need for obedience by this proclamation. He is under attack by the jihadists in Sinai especially, upper Egypt and throughout the country. He is attempting to make a strong political move to undercut their support among the people.

Foreign Affairs, Sisi’s Secret Islamism: The Rhetoric and Reality of Egypt’s New President (May 26, 2014) This article digs further into Sisi’s ideals, beyond the heavily edited and prerecorded television interviews published. It mentions Sisi’spotential ties to the Salafist Al Nour party, his devout upbringing, and that he has never disagreed with the Muslim Brotherhood on doctrine – only in who should rule. It further confirms that Sisi intends to draw heavily upon Islam to legitimate his new regime, quoting a leaked interview where Sisi indicates that he was inspired to run for the presidency by a “religious vision in which he was wielding a sword inscribed in blood with the words “No God but God and Muhammad is the prophet of God”

I think that his demands for obedience from the ikhwan is related to his attachments to the Salafis who want to give their support to a strong leader. Therefore, this is not a real call for an Islamic reformation. Instead, it is a call for a movement away from the ikhwan and to the Salafis. Not anything to be hopeful for or anything promising. Sorry guys, but the Salafis are worse than the brotherhood !

My reply

Interesting post. But perhaps (hopefully) it pertains to the old El Sisi. Anwar Sadat  a devout Moslem and pan-Arab Nationalist underwent a dramatic personal moral transformation when he lost the Yom Kippur War (and his dear brother) into a pro-Western secularist who made a historic peace with Israel that endures today. Perhaps after the disastrous year of Morsi and Brotherhood rule something similar happened to El-Sisi. Amazingly, Morsi replaced Tantawi with Sisi based on his Islamism making the biggest mistake of his political life; but it seems a fortunate mistake for his country and the anti-jihad movement whose members can now point to Sisi as vindicating "Islamophobia."

BTW, back in the 70s I was adamantly opposed to the Egyptian-Israeli peace process believing that Anwar Sadat hadn't changed; and I was wrong. After Sadat's death I then feared that Mubarak (judging from his background) would revive Nasserism and tear up the Camp David Accords; and I was wrong again. Call me stupid but I trust El Sisi.

 Fulano de Tal

Yours is also an interesting and thought provoking post, but I think that

it conflates two separate ideas. The first idea is whether or not he will be willing to work with the west and seek to ally with us seek our aid through his oppression of those who appear to be our enemies, like the brotherhood. Can he be a new Sadat, for example. (As an aside, I would say to those who remark that it is not so easy to kill Sisi, look what happened to Sadat !)

The second idea has to do with the reality, nature, and extent of his calls for reformation. The fact that we may have optimism for the first idea, does not necessarily mean that we should be optimistic of the second. Prior to the elections, the Al-Nour Party, and the elders of Salafi Da’awa released statements, saying that “a “majority” of its members supported Al-Sisi. They did not protest the ouster of Morsi, and they are philosophically opposed to the brotherhood (the MB follows the teaching of their religious leaders, the Salafis make their own understanding through personal readings fo the Koran, but they want to have a strong political leader that they will follow as long as he is sufficiently right-guided).

According to a recently released article including an interview from an Egyptian security source, Al-Nour is no less radical than ISIS. "They are just pragmati c; they are pretending to be otherwise for now but once empowered they would act exactly like ISIS does," said the source. This source, who asked for his identity to be withheld, argued that "the one thing one should not forget from the experience of [assassinated president Anwar] Sadat is never to get 
into an alliance with Islamists; he did and they turned around and 
killed him." http://www.copts-united.com/En...I=1287&A=17154.

The Salafis are extreme in different ways than the brotherhood, but
this does not mean that they are less extreme. The Muslim Brotherhood has been crushed, but the Salafis are stronger than ever. Tthe Alexandria Dawa's Nour Party, which won the overwhelming proportion of Salafi votes in the 2012 parliamentary election, offers unquestioning support to the regime of Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, Egypt’s new strongman president. It is a strange - political Islam supporting what claims to be secular authoritarianism. I think that is because it is not secular, but another brand of religious authoritarianism.

I look at the idea of peace that the Salafis have. The believe they want peace, but they want the peace of Islam. I think that Morsi wants this too, and everyone in Egypt who is not wanting that peace of Islam is not going to find it in this world. I am afraid of Sisi and those who support him.

Perhaps I am wrong. Perhaps there are real factions vying for power in Sisi's govt, fighting over nature of the relationship between the government and the Salafis , which will of course determine the nature of the very important outcome of the reformation discussed. If it is reformed to the liking of the Salafis we will have a worse situation altogether, as the peace of islam is no peace at all. if it is reformed in ways against the Salafis, we may truly have another Sadat (assassinated reformer)

 

My Reply

 

The Salafis are no more popular with the largely secularized people of Egypt than is the Brotherhood. If the Salafis came to power and tried to theocratize (Shariaize) the country they'd probably meet with the same massive resistence and share the fate of Morsi and the Brethern with Egyptians protesting their rule by the millions. No? Nevertheless, with regard to El Sisi let's hope for the best while expecting the worst. Afterall, this is the Middle East where things aren't always what they seem.

 

RELATED  

POST-MOSLEM BROTHERHOOD EGYPT AND THE MODERNIZATION OF THE MIDDLE EAST

The Jewish Press » » Egyptian President El-Sisi Appears at Coptic Mass

 

 

 

 

MIA LOVE: TRAILBLAZING REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVE LAWMAKER

 

 

 Mia Love was born December 6, 1975 in Brooklyn, New York on the 149th anniversary of the ratification of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution banning slavery. Will she be a force for breaking the chains of victimhood, anti-white racism and government dependency enslaving and crippling musch of the black community? I pray she will be.

 

MIA LOVE IS A MARTIN LUTHER KING-TYPE BLACK  REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVE

Like King she is free from the stupid, regressive, divisive, racial-identity politics of the stupid, divisive, ignorant, race obsessed, America sucks, Democrat left. Because Mia is an enlightened black woman putting her spiritual humanity above skin color (like King and all conservatives do) she doesn't see herself as representing the "black community" in this country, but all individual citizens in her district regardless of race, ethnicity, religious or political affiliation. 

 

  

Mia Love is what Barack Obama pretended to be when running for the presidency: a post-racial, color blind, unifying, paecemaking black politician who has transcended the mortal limitations of his flesh (skin color) and lives in the consciousness of his superior, immortal, rational God-like soul. But Obama is no such man-no such soul man. Though he gave his DNC acceptance speech on the anniversary of Dr. King's "I Have a Dream" speech, and took his second inaugural oath on King's Bible, there is no Dr. King in him-just as there's no Nelson Mandela (see). Radical left dissembler that he is Obama  turned out to be a smoother, friendlier, more passive and discreet version of his aggressive, insane, white-hating, racist mentor Reverend Wright-a far cry from his exalted, phony, messiah-like campaign image that caused fainting and tears (which I warned about HERE).

 

But Mia Love (love that name) is the real transracial deal. As Mia is this country's first Afro-American Republican congresswoman she is an inspirational trailblazer; the first of many black conservative female lawmakers to come. And they are coming.

 

 

POSTSCRIPT

 

A REMARKABLE COINCIDENCE

 

Democrat loser Steve Horsford

 

On the 44th week of November, on the 4th day of the month, our 44th President was politically crushed on the 6th anniversary of his historic election victory. And on that remarkable day  for the GOP there were two congressional races where Nevada's first black congressman, Steve Horsford (Hors4ord), of the state's 4th congressional district, was defeated by Mormon businessman Cresent Hardy. And in neighboring Utah simultaneous to Horsford's defeat was Mormon Mayor Mia Love making history becoming Utah's and America's first black GOP congresswoman. And to top off this pattern of 4s Mia's triumph was in Utah's 4th congressional district. Hopefully this 4tunate November 4th day for the GOP 4shadows the conquest of the presidency; and the spiritual renewal and reversal of  black America.

RELATED 

 
 

< p style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 15px; font-family: inherit; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; margin: 0px; line-height: 21px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: center;"> 

BARACK OBAMA’S MOSLEM OUTREACH HYPOCRISY, AND HIS ALLEGED ADMISSION TO BEING MOSLEM

Why did Barack Obama's "historic" Moslem outreach speech from Cairo six years ago fail so badly in achieving his aim of mesmerizing the Islamic world into worshipful adulation? I believe this Townhall essay from 2010 provides the answer.

FROM APOLLOSPEAKS' TOWNHALL ARCHIVES

2010-07-13 09:04--BARACK OBAMA'S MOSLEM OUTREACH HYPOCRISY,  AND HIS ALLEGED ADMISSION OF BEING MOSLEM

Egypt's Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul Gheit greeting Barack Obama at Cairo International Airport
 
It was doomed to fail from the start. A year ago last June Obama delivered his historic much lauded Moslem outreach speech to a worldwide audience from Al Azhar University in Cairo. It's well-meaning purpose was to repair US/Moslem relations which were damaged by the Bush years and the Global War on Islamic Terror perceived by many believers as a War on Islam. Predictably the initiative is failing. In spite of Obama's policies of apologizing, accommodation, appeasement and kowtowing to Islam US/Moslem relations today are not much better than when Bush left office; and though Obama's speech was praised by Moslem heads of state-with mixed reaction on the Arab street-his popularity of late in the Moslem world (never very high to begin with) has been plumeting. Why? Apart from Obama's unsatisfactory handling of Israel, Iraq and Afghanistan most Moslems are Islamic supremacists*: they see their religion as God's ultimate revelation of justice, salvation and truth  supreme over all other faiths and destined to rule the world. Consequently, Moslems would regard as hypocritical and insincere any non-Moslem who praises Islam's spiritual greatness and achievements (real or not) but remains an unbeliever ensnared by Satan in evil, ignorance and error.
 
Indeed, if Obama, who has Moslem family roots and attended Moslem schools in his youth in Indonesia, truly believes all the glowing things he said about the faith in his flattering and fawning historic speech then why does he identify himself as Christian? Why would he settle for an inferior religion-an incomplete and obsolete revelation (disfavored by God)-over its moral, spiritual and perfected superior? Why would he condemn his soul to hell when he dies when he could enjoy the great bliss and blessings of Allah's supernal paradise? In remaining a Christian Obama is signalling to Moslems that the revelation of Christ is greater and more perfect in God's eyes than Mohammed's revelation-an insult to Moslems everywhere.
 
*"Islamic supremacism is mainstream in the Muslim world," writes Andy McCarthy in The Grand Jihad.
 
As I wrote early last year: "Obama's attempt to.... plant his cult of personality in the midst of the Moslem world hoping to mesmerize its masses into venerating him like his awestruck followers here at home......is doomed to fail*." And fail it has as the whole thing was unrealistic  from the start and shows how little Obama understands the Moslem mind (see).
 
 

Seeing that his popularity with Moslems is waning and realizing that his good intentions and pro-Islamic policies were coming to naught Obama-because of his perceived hypocrisy with Moslems-may have tried a new approach (a last ditch effort?) to win over their hearts and minds by declaring himself a crypto-Moslem to a high official in the Egyptian government. This allegedly happened sometime last year [2009] at a private meeting with 
Egypt's Foreign Minister Ahmad Abul Gheit. As reported by Israel Today*, and journalist Dennis Avi Lipkin (alias Victor Mordecai), "Gheit [supposedly] appeared on Nile TV’s “Round Table Show” in January, on which he said that “he had had a one-on-one meeting with Obama who swore to him that he was a Moslem, the son of a Moslem father and step-son of a Moslem step-father, that his half-brothers in Kenya were Moslems, and that he was loyal to the Moslem agenda.” 

* See  Report: Obama said 'I Am a Muslim'

I do not know if our prevaricator-in-chief, the greatest and most shameless dissembler ever to sit in the White House, is a crypto-Moslem as implied by this report (true or false) and as some believe (I'm not one of them); only he knows for sure what and who he is. But that Obama would lie about being Moslem to Egypt's foreign minister (or other important people in the Arab world) and allow him to broadcast it on Egyptian TV is completely believable to me as a PR stunt to reverse Moslem public opinion about his disappointing presidency. Desperate men do desperate things.
 
 And now from desperation, to show Moslems how much he cares about their sad collective psychological state (their broken self-esteem) Obama is condescendingly using NASA (America's space agency) to  rescue them from cultural inferiority feelings self-caused by centuries of Islam's decline from a great world military power into relative powerlessness and impotency (see).
From the sublime of looking godlike at Cairo (at least to Newsweek's Even Thomas, see) Obama has collapsed into utter ridiculousness as his outreach program becomes the laughing-stock of the world*.


*The NASA story with Bolden was so embarrassing that Even Thomas and MSM wouldn't carry it in order to minimize the damage.

History, I believe, will show the the overarching, providential reason for the Obama presidency was to lead this nation into great and terrible suffering and peril and wake us up. To wake us to the gravity of the challenge before us of an evil, implacable, imperialist foe hell-bent on our subjugation and destruction who must be thoroughly demoralized and crushed like the Nazis and Japanese. "Man must suffer to be wise, " wrote a Greek tragic poet. And our incompetent, confused and ill-fated president is unconsciously playing his part in alarming this nation by emboldening our enemies to acts of aggression-intensifying our deadly conflict with them-much like Jimmy Carter did in the late 1970s when we went into a brief period of economic, military and geostrategic decline-and our enemies (Iran and Russia) were running amok. Obama is putting this nation through a trial by fire, a painful but necessary learning experience for national renewal that will be his undoing and that of the Left with freedom, truth and justice triumphing in the end.

RELATED

Arab world’s views of U.S., President Obama increasingly negative, new poll finds - Checkpoint Washington - The Washington Post

BARACK OBAMA’S MOSLEM OUTREACH INITIATIVE: WHY IT WILL FAIL

IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN AND RONALD REAGAN 2016

 

 
 "The demoralized American-built forces will constantly be dealt defeats just like their masters. Tens of thousands of soldiers were killed and wounded, billions of dollars wasted, their nations were exhausted, their countries faced economic turmoil and even recession, their generals failed one after the other and they lost their stature and prestige internationally. Our courageous nation shall continue its Jihad and struggle so long as a single foreigner remains in Afghanistan in a military uniform." - Zabihullah Mujahid Taliban spokesman.
  
On Sunday, December 18, 2011-the first anniversary of the Arab Spring revolt which started in Tunisia (see)-Barack Obama, the great appeaser, blindly reaching out to the Moslem world, and to war-weary voters and weak-on- terror leftists here at home, recklessly ignored the warnings of his generals and secretary of defense and irresponsibly brought the Iraq War to a premature and precipitous end losing our hard-won victory costing 4000 dead and thousands more injured. And now we're back fighting in "stable, self-reliant" Iraq as that country fell victim to one of the horrific consequences of the Arab Spring in blood drenched Syria: the rise of deadly jihadist Islamic ISIS. 
 
Now three years later on another Sunday in the same month of December Obama announced from Hawaii (where World War II began) the formal end to the 13 year Afghan War (the "good war") with a resurgent, energized, confident Taliban running amuck over a political, social and militarily dysfunctional country. The great American retreat continues leaving in its wake an increasingly chaotic and dangerous world with our enemies emboldened everywhere advancing their interests, ambitions and evil plans. But that day December 28th does not appear to be anymore auspicious for our country, Obama's legacy, or the Democrat party in 2016 than was the ominous day the Iraq War ended three years ago. This is what I mean.
 
From the ill-starred end of the Iraq War to Obama's ill-advised announcement Sunday was exactly 36 months and 10 days totalling 1106 days

From: Sunday, December 18, 2011
To Sunday, December 28, 2014

Result: 1106 days

Or 3 years (36 months), 10 days (see)

 

 

 

 

 

Oddly this four digit number 1106 gives us the date of Obama's reelection on 11-06-2012 which is turning into a predictable catastrophe for domestic and foreign affairs with worsening racial strife and soaring debt at home and America's enemies pressing ahead to fill the power vacuüm left by our crumbling world leadership. Is this number 1106 by happenstance? Or is it a providential sign that Obama was reelected on 11-06 to tragically retreat from Afghanistan (as he did in Iraq) to further discredit the Democrat left which happened in the aftermath of the Vietnam War? Will Afghanistan follow Iraq into turmoil with the Taliban (and al Qaida) returning to power thus aggravating the sense of US weakness and rudderless drift and engendering in the voting public the need for strong decisive leadership?

 

During the 2008 campaign John McCain, myself and many others warned that Obama would be Jimmy Carter redux, and, as Hillary Clinton predicted (see), America would regress under his leadership; and we were right. We're in the late 1970s all over again with a worse than Carter president blundering across the world stage making one bad call after the next and awakening in the public the need for a Ronald Reagan to stop the madness and reverse our decline. And the numeric signs seem to indicate that a strong Republican candidate is coming to take back the presidency from the party of retreat and defeat.

 

Just as 36 months separate the end of the Iraq War from Obama's announcement Sunday, 2016 will be 36 years from the epoch-making 1980 presidential election which turned America around and won the Cold War with a Soviet Union that was advancing across the globe. Now as the next President will be number 45 it so happens by accident or design that 36 and 45 are both multiples of 9; and that the number 4500 (45x100) is a multiple of 36 125x. And as 36 is double the number 18, the next Republican president will be the 18th in US history.

 

The 18th day of December 2011 greatly hurt Obama's credibility and was a factor in his crushing defeat in November (the 6th anniversary of his November 4, 2008 victory*). If ISIS isn't defeated and pushed out of Iraq by 2016 and the Taliban rides roughshod over Afghanistan with Russia starting trouble in the Baltics and China growing more aggressive in the South China Sea 2014 will be prelude to 2016 as America will want a strong Reagan-like Republican leader.

*Keep in mind that November 4, 2008 was the 29th anniversary of the the Iranian Hostage Crisis. And that Obama's loss last November was on the 35th anniversary of that crisis. Is there a sign here about nuclear negotiations with Iran? That Obama will suffer a great loss?

 

 

 

 

HOW MANY THOUSANDS OF TALIBAN

have US and NATO forces killed in this far from victorious war? Each Moslem life was precious to Allah and cries out for vengeance from the grave. And if the Taliban return to power bringing al Qaida with them we'll be thrown back into the pre-9/11 era with both joining ISIS against us.

 

 RELATED

OBAMA’S WORST DAY IN AFGHANISTAN AND WHAT IT COULD MEAN FOR US FOREIGN POLICY AND HILLARY CLINTON

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE DEATH OF WHITE GUILT, REV. WRIGHT’S RACISM, AN ATLAS WITHOUT ISRAEL, NAPOLEONIC ZIONISM, AND OTHER THOUGHTS TO START THE NEW YEAR

   

 
 

 

 

Black progression and retrogression-Walter Williams | WashingtonExaminer.com 

The slums of Detriot (Obamaville) looks like a wretched Third World shanty town despite trillions in redistributed wealth.

WITH THE PRESIDENCY OF BARACK OBAMA

white America has nothing left to give black America. 50 years of four civil rights acts, three voting rights acts, affirmative action (reversed discrimination against white males), trillions in federal hand outs, welfare benefits and War on Poverty programs; and lastly  the final gift of white guilt to the poor, oppressed, victimized blacks: the election of the first black president. America is broke. White guilt is dead. Blacks are on their own. The status quo is unsustainable. Now they must do for themselves or continue their self-destruction into a dysfunctional, welfare, third world subculture of violece, crime, poverty, illiteracy and death.

Not Interested in GOP Whip Scalise’s Meeting with White Supremacist Group | Mediaite

 

WE HAVE A RACE DIVISIVE OBSESSED PRESIDENT WHO RELIGIOUSLY SAT IN A BLACK SUPREMACIST CHURCH

for 20 years listening to a toxic, hate driven, racist loon (his "mentor") rage against Jews, white devils and this evil, cursed, God damn country and a big deal is made of a nonracist, pro-American, Israel supporting GOP congressmen speaking to a group of white supremacists he wasn't part of and would never join? Which is worse?

 
 

Got a quote from Wright concerning Jews or white devils?

 

  

More than just a quote. I have Wright's ideology and bizarre leftwing racist belief system. For the paranoid, conspiratorial nut case Wright (Obama's "mentor") believes that what the genocidal Nazis were to Jews the evil, diabolical, genocidal white race is to blacks;and its means of exterminating blacks is "HIV."

Underlying Wright's deranged hatred of Israeli Jews as "racist apartheid oppressors of Palestinians" is his Black Liberation Theology: the belief that white Israeli Zionist Jews are false Jews and Hebrews. That the true Jews and Hebrews are blacks-God's true chosen people and race; and that God incarnated on Earth as Jesus Christ not in a white Jewish body but in an authentic black Hebrew body. Heck, when Wright complained about Obama throwing him under the bus he blamed it on the "Jews" in his administration-false white Zionist Jews like Rahm Emanuel, David Axlerod, Bernanke, Summers, etc.

 

whichname emanism

 

So if a white guy goes to one meeting, that's worse than Obama attending Wright's church for twenty years. And if you think Wright agreeing with Farrakhan has nothing to do with anything, you're either very naïve or very stupid.

 

 El Kabong  whichname

 

To what extent can you say Wright agrees with Farrakhan? Farrakhan is Muslim and Wright is Christian. Obviously any association they had didn't sway Wright in terms of religion, so how can you assume Wright adopted anything taught by Farrakhan.

 

 ApolloSpeaks  

 

Wright and Farrakhan are black supremacists believing in the racial (mental and moral) superiority of the black race. Wright uses a twisted form of Christianity (Black LIberation Theology) to justify his racism; and Farrakhan a twisted heretical form of Islam.

 

  

HarperCollins bows to Muslims, omits Israel from school atlas | Atlas Shrugs

 

A MAP OF THE MIDDLE EAST

omitting its most admirable country is like a map of the after world without the Kingdom of God. For Israel is to the rest of the region what Heaven is to Hell.

UN Rejects Resolution on Terror State of “Palestine” | Atlas Shrugs

THE UN STANDS DIMINISHED
 
Hurrah!
 
Onwards to the International Criminal Court.
 
What would be the consequences to Israel if Abbas and the Palis win their case against her at the ICC  for "war crimes" and "illegal occupation of Palestinian lands?"
 
One expert of little importance and worth (Juan Cole) says "An ICC judgment would result in sanctions on Israel of some importance."Is that all? “Sanctions of some importance”? How many wars has Israel fought and survived over the last 66 years? How many PR disasters? How much relentless, annihilating, genocidal hatred? “Sanctions of some importance”? A spit in the pail. BRING IT ON!
 
BTW, aren’t Israel’s "war crimes" its successful self-defense against the religion of peace?

  

Sharia in the UK: 19-year-old arrested for video showing him burning Qur’an | Atlas Shrugs

 

WILL BURNING A KORAN SEND IT UP TO PARADISE?

If so, isn't it better off there than here like Moslem souls? If so, why then treat it as a hate crime as you're doing the book a favor and giving Moslems in the after life their holy book to read?

Muslim cleric: Even black men who smell bad get into Paradise | Atlas Shrugs

IF I'M FOLLOWING THIS CORRECTLY

 some devout Moslems believe that all blacks are foul smelling creatures. And that the only way to cure their bad body oder is to surrender to Allah and die fighting in his cause. Allah will then bath their bodies in the perfumed waters of paradise before allowing them in his presence-or to touch a pure virgin. But until blacks die they are doomed to stink. Excuse my French but what a crazy, f*cked up religion this is. BTW, what do black Moslems say about the Prophet Mohammed having had black slaves and Moslsm thinkers throughout the ages holding blacks in low esteem? 

see

 

Paris suburb honors convicted “Palestinian” jihad terrorist Marwan Barghouti |Atlas Shrugs

 

WHERE ARE THE NAPOLEANIC FRENCH ZIONISTS?

Do any still exist as they once did in the late 18th century when Napoleon wanted to restore the nation of Israel understanding what a progressive benefit  it would be to the backward Moslem Middle East?

Jobless claims rise to 298,000 | WashingtonExaminer.com

HERE I WAS GETTING READY TO CELEBRATE

Recovery Winter along with the New Year; and now we sadly learn that the economy's still mired in a weak, pathetic, trickle growth WRECKOVERY. Oh well, maybe next year.

Pamela Geller, Breitbart: ‘Proud Savage’ Mona Eltahawy Has to Pay Restitution In AFDI Ad Vandalism Case | Atlas Shrugs

Mona El'awy, Mona El'awy we abhor you.

You're so unlady like with your vicious Moslem bile

Is it only 'cause you're phony, that we hate you

Or are you so deranged you can't help being vile?

Do you sieg Heil to Adolf Hitler. Mona El'awy?

Are you a secret nazi in your savage heart?

Are you warm, are you real, Mona El'awy?

 Or just a cold and lethal, ugly jihadist?

17,500 Patriots Gather to Sing Christmas Carols Against Islamisation in Germany | Atlas Shrugs

GERMANY'S RIGHTEOUS REMNANT

May they grow into a mighty majority.

< p style="text-align: center;">