Monthly Archives: February 2015

WHAT A HISTORIC DEAL ON IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAM WILL LOOK LIKE (SARCASM)

 
 
 AFTER A DEAL IS SIGNED BETWEEN THE US AND IRAN A TRIUMPHANT, ECSTATIC BARACK OBAMA WILL LIKELY SAY THIS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE:
 
 Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, a Moslem of enormous  integrity and peace, assured us in this historic agreement that was signed today that nuclear weapons are against God's Will; and that no Islamic state can be truly Islamic if it has the bomb and joins the Nuclear Age. But let me be perfectly clear:  under Islamic Law uranium enrichment is perfectly legal and permitted so long as it falls short of building a bomb. The two should not be confused. Keep in mind that If America, during World War II, had limited its nuclear program to enriching uranium we would never have destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing thousands of Japanese. The same holds true for Iran today. Indeed, this agreement with Khamenei guarantees that the Islamic Republic will remain truly Islamic and nuke free; and following God's Will  go no further than lawfully enriching uranium in peace. That means no nuking of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. That means no ICBMS hitting New York and Washington DC. That means Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan relieved. If not, if Khamenei dares to break this deal, flout Islamic Law and illegally build the bomb be certain that the consequences to him and his regime will be swift and severe. For Allah will be angered beyond measure, show him no mercy and preëmptively bring him down before he can strike anyone. Till then we have peace in our time. Till then I have earned my Nobel Prize. Now it's on to Moscow for talks with Putin about Ukraine and restoring US/Russian peace. Ayatollah Khamenei said he'd help us here.
  
 

 

 

 

RELATED

 

 

CLINTON AND BUSH, THE TWO WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMBINGS AND THE DEATH OF OSAMA BIN LADEN

 

 
Yesterday was the 22nd anniversary of the first bombing of the World Trade Center by death loving Islamic terrorists-a good account of which you can find HERE at Atlas Shrugs. But as I was thinking about that bombing and its relation to the 9/11 event (which it foreshadowed) I made a number of  extraordinary discoveries that my readers will find fascinating. Here is what I found:
 
 The full date of the 9/11 event in numbers is 9/11/2001. The number 2001 is a variant of 3 (2+0+0+1=3). Now if we combine 3 with 911 to form the four digit number 9113 then reverse it to 3119 incredibly (by chance or providence) we get the EXACT number of days separating the first World Trade Center bombing from the devastating second attack, hence:
 
From: Friday, February 26, 1993
To Tuesday, September 11, 2001

Result: 3119 days

Or 8 years, 6 months, 16 days, or 445 weeks and 4 days (see).

 
 
 Fascinating, no? Also fascinating are the exact number of days separating the births of the very two presidents whose weak-on-terror policies helped midwife the 9/11 event. For George W. Bush born July 6, 1946 and Bill Clinton born August 19, 1946 are separated by exactly 44 days. Oddly, when al Qaida struck America on 9/11 Osama ben Laden (born March 10, 1957) was 44 years old.
 
From: Sunday, March 10, 1957

To, Tuesday, September 11, 2001

Result: 16,256 days

Or 44 years, 6 months, 1 day, or 2322 weeks (see)

 

 
Also fascinating is that when 44 is multiplied by 80 it yields the number 3520. This is extraordinary in that 3520 is the EXACT number of days separating the 9/11 event from Osama bin Laden's death on May 2, 2011.
 

From: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
To, Monday, May 2, 2011

Result: 3520 days

 Or 9 years, 7 months, 21 days, or 502 weeks and 6 days (see).

 
Oddly, bin Laden was killed by Navy Seal commandos as they acted on an order given by America's 44th President.
 

RELATED

GEORGE BUSH, THE HUDSON RIVER MIRACLE AND HIS 9/11 PRESIDENCY

 

OBAMA AND THE TUCSON MASSACRE: THE 9/10 MAN IN A 9/11 WORLD

DICK CHENEY, WINSTON CHURCHILL AND FDR: WARNINGS FROM AN OLD CONSERVATIVE WARRIOR

 
FORWARD EMAILS TO

JOHN KERRY IS WRONG: BIBI NETANYAHU WAS PUBLICLY FOR IRAQ WAR BUT PRIVATELY AGAINST IT

 

 
Just one day before the 22nd anniversary of the first World Trade Center bombing as nuclear-to-be Islamonazi Iran was showing its respect for Obama and America by destroying a fake US aircraft carrier in a war game John F. Kerry bashed Bibi Netanyahu's opposition to a BAD US/Iran nuke deal as being as wrongheaded as his backing of the Iraq War-which Kerry voted for and supported as a presidential candidate.
 
But this is not exactly the truth. Truth is (and what no one is talking about) Bibi Netanyahu in 2003 (and the entire Israeli government) privately opposed the Iraq War as completely wrongheaded while publicly supporting it out of deference to the super pro-Israel Bush administration. Indeed, just before the Iraq War Netanyahu was the foreign minister of the anti-Iran Israeli government of Ariel Sharon that warned George Bush that attacking Iraq would destabilize the balance of power in the region in favor of Iran, and urged him instead to attack Iran as being the greater threat to US interests and regional peace.  This story was reported seven years ago by Garath Porter in  Asia Times, and is as follows:
  •  
    Israeli PM Ariel Sharon and President George W. Bush
Israel urged US to attack Iran - not Iraq
By Gareth Porter 
WASHINGTON –Israeli officials warned the George W Bush administration that an invasion of Iraq would be destabilizing to the region and urged the United States instead to target Iran as the primary enemy, according to former Bush administration official Lawrence Wilkerson.
Wilkerson, then a member of the US State Department's policy planning staff and later chief of staff for secretary of state Colin Powell, recalled in an interview that the Israelis reacted immediately to indications that the Bush administration was thinking of war against Iraq. After the Israeli government picked up the first signs of that intention, said Wilkerson, "The Israelis were telling us Iraq is not the enemy - Iran is the enemy."
Wilkerson describes the Israeli message to the Bush administration in early 2002 as being, "If you are going to destabilize the balance of power, do it against the main enemy."
The warning against an invasion of Iraq was "pervasive" in Israeli communications with the US administration, Wilkerson recalled. It was conveyed to the administration by a wide range of Israeli sources, including political figures, intelligence, and private citizens.
Wilkerson noted that the main point of their communications was not that the US should immediately attack Iran, but that "it should not be distracted by Iraq and Saddam Hussein" from a focus on the threat from Iran.
The Israeli advice against using military force against Iraq was apparently triggered by reports reaching Israeli officials in December 2001 that the Bush administration was beginning serious planning for an attack on Iraq. Journalist Bob Woodward revealed inPlan of Attack that on December 1, 2001, secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld had ordered the Central Command chief, General Tommy Franks, to come up with the first formal briefing on a new war plan for Iraq on December 4. That started a period of intense discussions of war planning between Rumsfeld and Franks.
Soon after Israeli officials got wind of that planning, Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon asked for a meeting with Bush primarily to discuss US intentions to invade Iraq. In the weeks preceding Sharon's meeting with Bush on February 7, 2002, a procession of Israeli officials conveyed the message to the US administration that Iran represented a greater threat, according to a Washington Post report on the eve of the meeting.
Israeli defense minister Fouad Ben-Eliezer, who was visiting Washington with Sharon, revealed the essence of the strategic differences between Jerusalem and Washington over military force. He was quoted by the Post as saying, "Today, everybody is busy with Iraq. Iraq is a problem ... But you should understand, if you ask me, today Iran is more dangerous than Iraq."
Sharon, who was incapacitated by a stroke last year, never revealed publicly what he said to Bush in the February 7 meeting. But Yossi Alpher, a former adviser to prime minister Ehud Barak, wrote in an article in The Forward last January that Sharon advised Bush not to occupy Iraq, according to a knowledgeable source. Alpher wrote that Sharon also assured Bush that Israel would not "push one way or another" regarding his plan to take down Saddam.
Alpher noted that Washington did not want public support by Israel and in fact requested that Israel refrain from openly supporting the invasion in order to avoid an automatic negative reaction from Iraq's Arab neighbors.
After that meeting, the Sharon government generally remained silent on the issue of an invasion of Iraq. A notable exception, however, was a statement on August 16, 2002, by Ranaan Gissin, an aide to Sharon. Ranaan declared, "Any postponement of an attack on Iraq at this stage will serve no purpose. It will only give [Saddam] more of an opportunity to accelerate his program of weapons of mass destruction."
As late as October 2002, however, there were still signs of continuing Israeli grumbling about the Bush administration's obsession with taking over Iraq. Both the Israel Defense Forces' chief of staff and its chief of military intelligence made public statements that month implicitly dismissing the Bush administration's position that Saddam's alleged quest for nuclear weapons made him the main threat. Both officials suggested that Israel's military advantage over Iraq had continued to increase over the decade since the Gulf War as Iraq had grown weaker.
The Israeli chief of military intelligence, Major-General Aharon Farkash, said Iraq had not deployed any missiles that could strike Israel directly and challenged the Bush administration's argument that Iraq could obtain nuclear weapons within a relatively short time. He gave an interview to Israeli television in which he said army intelligence had concluded that Iraq could not have nuclear weapons in less than four years. He insisted that Iran was as much of a nuclear threat as Iraq.
Israeli strategists generally believed that taking down the Saddam Hussein regime could further upset an Iran-Iraq power balance that had already tilted in favor of Iran after the US defeat of Saddam's army in the 1991 Gulf War. By 1996, however, neo-conservatives with ties to the Likud Party in Israel were beginning to argue for a more aggressive joint US-Israeli strategy aimed at a "rollback" of all of Israel's enemies in the region, including Iran, but beginning by taking down Saddam and putting a pro-Israeli regime in power there.
That was the thrust of the 1996 report of a task force led by Richard Perle for the right-wing Israeli think-tank the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, and aimed at the Likud prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
But most strategists in the Israeli government and the Likud Party - including Sharon himself - did not share that viewpoint. Despite agreement between neo-conservatives and Israeli officials on many issues, the dominant Israeli strategic judgment on the issue of invading Iraq diverged from that of US neo-conservatives because of differing political-military interests.
Israel was more concerned with the relative military threat posed by Iran and Iraq, whereas neo-conservatives in the Bush administration were focused on regime change in Iraq as a low-cost way of leveraging more ambitious changes in the region. From the neo-conservative perspective, the very military weakness of Saddam's Iraq made it the logical target for the use of US military power.
Gareth Porter is a historian and national-security policy analyst. His latest book, Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam, was published in June 2005.
(Inter Press Service)
 

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND HIS ANTI-WHITE, ANTI-MULATTO RACISM

 

 

It is a lie that Barack Obama is a Black man. He's a biracial Mulatto sprung from the womb of a racially pure White woman and fathered by a racially pure Black man. That is the reality. That is the truth. That is who and what Barack Obama racially is. He belongs to the Mulatto Race-the half white/black race. That Obama identifies himself as a Black man is a lie meant to deceive people and fool history. That he should prefer his Black half over his White half is both anti-White and anti-Mulatto racism. If Obama were truly liberal and racially honest, just and fair he'd define himself racially as Mulatto: as much White as Black, equally proud to be both, equally loving both races and all Black/White Mulattoes. But that's not what he does. Instead Obama plays the race card on himself; instead he discriminates against Whites and Mulattoes in his own person unfairly, unjustly denigrating both as if they were racially inferior to Blacks. That makes him a Black Supremacist like the New Black Panthers, Louis Farrakhan and his America-damning racist mentor Reverend Wright-who thinks Jesus was Black and that all Whites are devils hated and cursed by God.

 

 

 

 

Like it or not Obama isn't America's first Black president. Like it or not he's the closest we've come to having such a president. History should not, must not credit him with being the first. That is a lie. This should come as a relief to Black people. For the worst president ever is not really one of them, and is no reflection on their race. 

 

BLACK AMERICA

 

(at the risk of seeming anti-Mulatto)  

 

 

DISOWN OBAMA NOW!

 

 

BECAUSE HE'S GOING DOWN

 

 

 

 

POSTSCRIPT

 

 

 
 

 

BARACK OBAMA:

"If I had a son he wouldn't be CJ Pearson. This young man wasn't me 35 years ago."

 

AOSean

Poor kid is probably already getting death threats...

 

Worse still the IRS is targeting him for an audit.

 

 

47871_CJ-Pearson-001-1

 

Phuture writes

 

CJ Pearson for President. That little kid blew me away.

 

My reply

 

CJ PEARSON 2016

FOR AMERICA’S FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT

  •  
  •  

     

     RELATED

     

     

    IN DEFENSE OF MSNBC’S BIRACIAL CHEERIOS TWEET (SARCASM)

     

     

    DEBATING THE FATE OF CHRIS HITCHENS IN THE AFTERLIFE ON JIHAD WATCH

    As I've been writing on the subject of Atheism lately this I'm sure will interest my readers. Originally published on Townhall it was a debate  I had on Jihad Watch and Pajamas Media at the end of 2011 where I speculated on the fate of Christopher Hitchens (who recently died) in the afterlife.

    FROM APOLLOSPEAKS' TOWNHALL ARCHIVES

    2011-12-18 11:24--(ORIGINALLY) MY DEBATE ON JIHAD WATCH ABOUT CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS' FATE IN THE AFTERLIFE

    One of the great gods of atheism is dead uneasily dwelling in the spiritual world and shaking his atheist faith. It is a baptism of fire that will purge him of error and make a better and wiser soul of him. No matter how much he ate, drank,  screwed, smoked, learned, and raged at God and religion Hitchens could never fill the emptiness inside him. An emptiness that only God could ultimately fill (as religious people know) as  He is our greatest happiness and highest good.

    NOTE

    I hadn't realized till now that there are quite a few atheists posting comments on Jihad Watch. As on Frontpage and elsewhere I posted "Christopher Hitchens In The Afterlife" here and got this mostly hostile response:

     

    ApolloSpeaks says

    December 16, 2011 at 8:48 am

    CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS IN THE AFTERLIFE

    How I wish I was there in the spiritual realm to see Chris Hitchens’ astonishment that his mind had survived his untimely death; that he is very much alive in the spiritual state that he’d mocked all his life as a primitive fiction of “evil religion;” that there’s more to existence than flesh. Is he disappointed to know that he was wrong for so long, that his crude, inexorable materialism was a hoax? Does he unhappily feel cheated that he wasn’t obliterated, dissolved into nothingness like he rigidly thought? Is he saddened to know that religion was right, that he’s an undying, immortal, imperishable soul? Is he cursing his state craving nihilism instead which he believed was his fate in the end? How’s he handling the truth that God exists, and that he owes his great mind and existence to Him? Hitchens’ soul must be in intellectual turmoil as his life of unbelief ill-prepared him for death. And so must it be for all atheistic materialists who’ll have the truth thrust upon them in the end.

    gravenimage replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    Apollo Speaks wrote:

    Is he disappointed to know that he was wrong for so long, that his crude, inexorable materialism was a hoax? Does he unhappily feel cheated that he wasn't obliterated...

    I very much doubt it, Apollo. If the afterlife of Christopher Hitchens is as you imagine, I'm sure he would be fascinated at a new adventure...

    Christopher Hitchens was a hero. I salute him.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from gravenimage

    After a difficult period of adjustment where he accepts the new reality of a disembodied state (which he formally thought impossible) the experience will [as you say] become a wonderful new adventure for him.

    lilredbird writes

    ApolloSpeaks, this Comments section has resonated with expressions of regret at the passing of Christopher Hitchens, a staunch defender of freedom of thought and a opponent of the imposition of all forms of supernaturalist metaphysics on those who do not share such beliefs. It was such a consolation to read so many respectful and sincere tributes.

    Then you came along with your childish rant, imagining him waking up in an "afterlife" with your god presumably chanting Nyah-nyah-nah-nah-nyah. Do you have any idea how smug and vindictive you sound?

    We atheists hear this all the time and there is no way to express how tired we are of the silly taunts, to say nothing of the backhanded compliments about how amazing it is that we fight for freedom even though we have no souls and "don't believe in anything" (as a religious "friend" of mine puts it).

    May I refer you to Ole Hartling's comment, though I doubt you are willing to hear it. Thank you, Ole, for that quote of Hitch's, which says what I feel so much better than I ever can. If only more of the "religious" were willing to listen and secure enough to take his request to heart.


    Religion friendly atheist author S.E. Cupp

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from lilredbird

    Hitchens atheism was positively vindictive, unhinged, and hateful. He didn't just want to throw out the baby with the bath, he wanted to boil the baby in oil and eat it for dinner. Compare him to the lovely S.E. Cupp, a sensible, balanced, non-militant atheist who understands, and wrote about, the essential connection between the Judeo-Christian Tradition and our great nation and civilization. I'm not nearly as hard on Hitch as he was about reasonable, universal, ancient truths about God, immortality, and a moral law of right and wrong that he's now painfully and sorrowfully discovering to be true in the purgatory of his afterlife experience.

    Kinana of Khaybar replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    ApolloSpeaks,

    You disgrace only yourself, by gloating over Hitchens' death. Your irrational and unwarranted threat against atheists, at the end of your comment, is noted.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from Kinana of Khaybar

    Am I disgracefully gloating over Hitchens' death? I think not. I believe that Hitch is passing through the Purgatory of the after life he so militantly denied on his way to the loving peace and grace that passeth understanding.

    StephenA55 replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    ApolloSpeaks writes:

    "He also saw the Christian threat, the Jewish threat, the Hindu threat, and the Buddhist threat. All religion was toxic and a threat to this man, who now sees what a fool he has been."

     You are welcome to your view. He was actually much more nuanced than your gross over-simplification suggests.

    "Hitchens' soul must be in intellectual turmoil as his life of unbelief ill-prepared him for death. And so must it be for all atheistic materialists who'll have the truth thrust upon them in the end."

    His life of unbelief was the perfect preparation for death. Better than living in perpetual fear of an eternal agony in Hades. What could be better than living life to the full; free of nagging guilt from inherited sin; in accordance to moral tenets evolved by a rational mind that can easily surpass in goodness those biblical commands in the OT.

    The NT is better, but when you select from the bible then you are using your own judgement, and are ready to put that musty volume to one side.

    Merry Christmas, and a happy, well-lived life to you.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from StephenA55

    You say that "Hitchens life of unbelief was the perfect preparation for death." Are you using your head on this one my friend? Think about it. The death Hitchens prepared himself for intellectually and morally was eternal death and oblivion, the complete, everlasting extinction of consciousness-an absolute materialist's fiction. As the death Hitchens underwent wasn't what he imagined or foresaw how then was he prepared for it? How are you preapred for it?

    Tim Reynolds replied to comment from lilredbird

    Well said, LRB....

    I wondered at first that ApolloSpeaks was having a larf but obviously not. He/she's a sad indicator of the lengths that people will go to qualify their fantasies. Self-delusion is a wonderful thing and with it, anything is possible, including this type of crap. It shows an under-lying insecurity quite common in religionists of all faiths. They hate to see any kind of challenge to their belief-system and will react in the most bizarre fashion. You only have to look at islam and the almost-as-dreadful christian far-right, with their smug interpretation of scripture and the assumption of righteousness.

    In the end it's all 'borrowed-plummage'.

    "Religion poisons Everything".


    ApolloSpeaks
     relied to Tim Reynolds 

    Tim Reynolds writes

    "They [religious believers] hate to see any kind of challenge to their belief-system and will react in the most bizarre fashion."

    How is my reaction to the death of the boldest, most outspoken, and offensive militant atheist of our time bizarre? I think most any believer in an afterlife would be fascinated to learn how Hitchens is taking to his unexpected experience; to a spiritual state which he believed with unshakable faith was a childish, evil, degrading fiction that mankind must outgrow. How is that bizarre?

    Jan replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    '' ....a moral law of right and wrong that he's now painfully and sorrowfully discovering to be true in the purgatory of his afterlife experience.''

    Do you really think you speak for *God* ??

    If we're going to talk about right and wrong, then I would submit that Hitch spoke about what *he* believed to be right and wrong, and he was blazingly honest in what he said. And his beliefs about 'a moral law' are just as much valid as yours, if not more so.

    I would bet, if there is a God, He would like and appreciate Hitch more than the self-righteous attitudes of people like you. When you have achieved as much as Hitch, and risked as much, then you may have the right to judge his *earthly* achievements - as for the afterlife, if there is one, that is for *God* to judge, not you. Pharisee.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from Jan

    Jan writes

    "Do you really think you speak for *God* ??"

    My reply

    No. I speak from my soul about another human soul who foolishly believed he came from nothing and would return to nothing and shortened his life by his destructive excesses. If you honor the genius of Christopher Hitchens and believe that he was an asset to this country and the world then you must fault him for his nihilistic philosophy-the bad ideas that drove him to drink, chain smoking, and God knows what else, and deprived the world prematurely of his genius.

    Edna Pierce | Thanks, Robert Spence, for honoring Hitchens.

    He'll be greatly missed.

    And, ApolloSpeaks, you are indeed disgracefully gloating. All you seem to be preoccupied with is what you suppose Hitchens is enduring in imaginary supernatural realms. It's fairly disgusting, and even worse, silly.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from Edna Pierce

    What kind of "disgraceful gloating" is it that sees Hitchens' afterlife experience as a kind of necessary shock treatment (some would call it tough love) to purge his mind of error and fill it with truth and great happiness? I'm hoping for the best for him, am I not?

    StephenA55 writes

    Apollo Speaks says,

    "You say that "Hitchens life of unbelief was the perfect preparation for death." Are you using your head on this one my friend? Think about it. The death Hitchens prepared himself for intellectually and morally was eternal death and oblivion, the complete, everlasting extinction of consciousness-an absolute materialist's fiction. Since the death Hitchens has isn't what he foresaw how then was he prepared for it?"

    Well, how do you prepare for an afterlife!?

    I won't bother because it would be a waste of my limited time here in this life. If it does happen I'll be ready. Unless it requires a lifetime of humble prayer, worship and other grovelling. If God wants that then I will argue that he should have given better evidence for his existence. And why should an omnipotent being be so needy?

    Of course there is no afterlife. Nothing to worry about. Take it easy AS, you have all you need. Just enjoy your one life, it's all anyone ever gets, but it's all you need.

    He'll be greatly missed.

    Aristotle believed that man could not live a truly good life without God.

    ApolloSpeaks 

    StephenA asks

    "Well, how do you prepare for an afterlife!?"

    Everything in moderation; and the contemplation of God (man's highest good and happiness) as Aristotle said in his Nicomachean Ethics.

    David Dowse | December 18, 2011 10:34 AM | Reply

    Apollo- you are in error.

    "Jan asks

    Do you really think you speak for *God* ??

    No. I speak from my soul about another human soul who foolishly believed he came from nothing and would return to nothing and shortened his life by his destructive excesses. If you honor the genius of Christopher Hitchens and believe that he was an asset to this country and the world then you must fault him for his nihilistic philosophy-the bad ideas that drove him to drink, chain-smoking, and God knows what else, and deprived the world prematurely of his genius.

    Read your post again, with all its questionable presumptions, then let me know, and we'll argue.

    Never mind, for the moment, the man's supposed excesses, in your view, or his "religious" bent - it is not for us to judge - we may, however, judge his work, which was prolific and astounding.

    Let him rest in peace.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from David Dowse 

    THE MOHAMMED OF ATHEISM

    Yes, his output was astounding. Even more astounding for a thoughtful man of the mind was his pathological hatred of God and all things spiritual. It was as though the God Idea had broken half of his astounding brain. His wanting to destroy religion (a throwback to the ghastly French Revolution) betrayed his insecurity and weakness of faith in atheism. He needed to have everyone believe as he believed so he could believe more strongly. This former communist could never fully free himself from totalitarianism. In a certain sense he was the mad Mohammad of atheism waging jihad with his pen and tongue for a sword.

    StephenA55 replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks 

    Hitch did not hate God.

    How could he hate God when he did not believe that God exists?

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from StephenA55 

    Hitchens hated the GOD IDEA. For him it was the most toxic, poisonous, and destructive thing in existence. The man who once believed that communism was the one solution to all the world's problems became an anti-God maniac believing that mankind's salvation greatly depended on eradicating God and religion from the earth. A world free of God and religion was Hitchens' life mission and utopian dream.

    StephenA55 replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    I would say that you exaggerate a great deal.

    His writings on religion were well thought out, clear and reasoned. To call him a maniac on the grounds of his speaking for rationalism as opposed to supernaturalism is absurd.

    He was also well aware that he would never see a world without religion in his lifetime. His views were expressed with passion, certainly, but he was touched by the warmth of his reception in the bible belt when on his speaking tours; that was not the response of a fanatic.

    He was a humane man who understood the need of many people to believe in God.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from StephenA55 

    The God Idea was Hitchen's Great Satan, Ultimate Evil, mankind's worse and most destructive invention from which sprung most of our problems and ills. He was so blinded with hate for God, and the concept of a human soul and afterlife, that he couldn't see the slightest good in any religion or spiritual philosophy. That Hitchens displayed warmth toward friendly believers on occasion did nothing to deter him from his insane mission or soften his fanatical atheism. Till the end he remained hell-bent on his cause. To see Hitchens in perspective, and just how irrational and unhinged he was, study up on S.E. Cupp a sensitive, humane and understanding atheist who wrote a book against the Hitchens of the world and their mindless attack on the Judeo-Christian (Classical) tradition the bedrock of our civilization.

    Debate on Pajamas Media

    From Sam to Apollo:

    And how will you feel Apollo when you get there [to heaven] and truly understand that despite all of Hitchens’ atheism and dismissal of the eternal while he was alive, the Creator still loves him just as much as he loves you despite your lifetime of devotion?
    (Luke 15)

    Apollo to Sam:

    Like you I understand this in the here and now: that God is love (wisdom and justice) and loves his creatures and creations. I understand that despite his insane war against God (Divine Reason), and his nihilistic belief in the ultimate nothingness of existence, Hitchens still has life and being and the use of his mind and faculties by God's grace and the reality of the material and spiritual universe that He created. Having unexpectedly survived the death of his flesh Hitchens must be in a state of profound anguish and regret that he used his great intellect to no good end, in the service of big lies and very bad ideas: that God is nonexistent; that the physical world is ultimate reality; that everything comes from and returns to nothing. Now that Hitch’s disembodied state is painfully refuting his most cherished beliefs I am sure that he repents having lived his life in error spreading lies about the universe and its Creator. If he sincerely regrets his past mistakes and sins God I'm sure in his Mercy will forgive him.

    Posted on Huffington Post: 

    Christopher Hitchens' life was all sound and fury. And since he was an atheistic nihilist who believed that existence was an accident (that everything came from and returned to nothing with the Big Bang being a random unplanned event) by his own materialist philosophy he was an idiot telling a tale signifying nothing.

    No replies

    Posted on Atlas Shrugs

    CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS

    Loved the man and hated him. Loved his defense of freedom against the enemies of America and Western Man. Hated his militant atheism and his intemperate, brutal and savage attacks on all things religious and spiritual-from a God of incalculable creative power who can be known by direct experience, down to the indestructible human soul made in God's intellectual image. Right now Hitchens is most likely in torment (what Catholics and the Book of Maccabees call Purgatory) as the survival of his great mind after death is painfully refuting and shattering his atheistic materialism.

    No replies

     

    RUDY GIULIANI AND WHAT OBAMA MEANS BY “PATRIOTISM,” AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS

     
     
     
     Screen Shot 2015-02-21 at 9.44.24 AM
      
     

    DOES OBAMA LOVE AMERICA?

    He loves a romantic idea of America in his detached, professorial, abstract, theoretic, absurd leftist mind-America transformed into an egalitarian, cradle to grave, utopian welfare state-and childishly hates the reality with its inequalities, inequities and imperfections. Obama's patriotism (love of country) was aptly summed up by black American Communist singer Paul Robeson: "Patriotism means never being satisfied with your country [until it's perfect]." That is Obama's patriotism. That is his creed. That's how he loves this country. And it's unrealistic, unpatriotic, un-American and immature.

     Anti-American Utopian Communist Idealist Paul Robeson.

     

    RELATED

    FLAGLESS IN BERLIN

     

     

     
     

     

    GEORGE BUSH'S PATRIOTISM: I love my country (as it is) right or wrong.

    BARACK OBAMA'S PATRIOTISM; I'll love my country when it's PERFECT: only right and never wrong. Only Left not Right. Until then it sucks.

     

     
     

    BEWARE AMERICA! TEA PARTY TERROR ON THE RISE CALLING FOR VIOLENT FISCAL RESTRAINT AND BALANCED BUDGET JIHAD

    The extreme right-wing Tea Party is threatening terrorist austerity measures to save this country (so they say) from becoming a broken, bankrupt, socialist Greece with blood in the streets. Obama’s moderate, mainstream, transformational dream of a "MORE PERFECT ENTITLEMENT UNION" is in jeopardy. To realize this TRUE AMERICAN DREAM we must SPEND BABY SPEND, going deeper and deeper and deeper into debt, until we reach the promised land of cradle to grave welfare heaven. How can we save Obama's DREAM from the vast right-wing Tea Party terrorist austerity conspiracy?

    HILLARY CLINTON 2016 TO RESET AMERICA /sarc

     
     
     
     

    AMERICA ISN'T ABOVE CRITICISM

    But a true American loves his country right or wrong-as he loves his father, mother, sisters, brothers, uncles, aunts, cousins and friends right or wrong. That's what being a patriot means. But for truly devout Moslem Americans (who define themselves as citizens of Islam) this country will never be right (with God), and hatefully always be unGodly, perverse and wrong, until it's Islamized from border to border and coast to coast.

    Stop the Islamization of America NOW!

     

     
    OBAMA MOSUL MYSTERY SOLVED
     
    Obama by revealing the plan to retake Mosul is foolishly hoping that ISIS will see how serious he is and leave the city so our soldiers won't have to fight. But ISIS isn't leaving. They will stay there and go down fighting if necessary suffering the glorious death of  holy martyrs in a righteous cause, and pleasing Allah by killing as many Americans as possible.
     
     
     

    WHAT IS STUPID MR. BROOKS,

    and very dangerous, is Obama embracing as friends those Islamic supremacists who (like the Moslem Brethren) have a nonviolent approach to destroying us-at least for now.

     

    MAYBE THESE MOSLEM MEN

    should do what the 4th century Church Father Origen did to bring his sexual nature under control: castrate themselves.

    WE SHALL HAVE PEACE WITH ISLAM LIKE WE DO WITH GERMANY AND JAPAN

     
     
    The closest thing we have to a Moslem president is emboldening Jihad-Islam like never before in modern times and intensifying this new world war.  
     
    Truth is the Islam of the Prophet Mohammed has been at war with infidel humanity ever since that fateful day Mohammed (to save his faith from poverty and extinction) picked up his sword and looted his first Meccan caravan in Allah's name. From that first success at banditry and grand theft the terrible warlord Mohammed was born along with his empire of blood and death that spread across Arabia and beyond like an all consuming pestilence.
     
     The true Mohammed isn't the solution to the problem. He is the problem.
     
    And against all reality and history our idiot, appeasing, outreach nut of a  president believes that Mohammed was a prophet of peace (a 7th century Christ or Gandhi or Martin Luther King) when he was a menace to all infidels....and is still so today as millions of supremaicist Moslems-poisoned by his violent deeds and words of hate-see that first looted caravan as emblematic of humanity and a licence for conquest.
     
     The most beautiful smell in the world.
     
    Whether Obama likes it or not, admits it or not, is revolted by it or not the violent subversive imperialist Islam of Mohammed is the enemy. And we'll be at war with this enemy until we crush its will to victory and defeat it like Fascist Japan and Nazi Germany. Even if victory means killing millions of Moslems like we did Germans and Japanese Mohammed's Islam will be defeated and we shall have peace.
     
     
    POSTSCRIPT
     
    IS OBAMA MOSLEM?
     
     
    I can't blame anyone for suspecting that Obama might be a cypto-Moslem. It is clear that he wants Moslems to believe he's one of them. But his Secular Progressivism and left-wing relativist values make him unconvincing, and in part underlie his unpopularity in the Moslem world. For what traditional, mainstream, normative Moslem is pro-gay rights, pro-gay marriage, pro-partial birth abortion, pro-pot and champions women's rights? If Obama is Moslem he has reformed himself into being a mere caricature of one. In fact, with his radical left-wing politics and hedonistic (1960s) counterculture values Obama wouldn't last a day if he lived in the Moslem world. Most "religion-of-peace" Moslems would consider him a phony, Westernized, hypocritical believer profoundly and irredeemably corrupted by ungodly anti-Islamic values-the menacing enemy within-and would want him dead, jailed or banished from their society.
     
    In sum, Obama is a Secular Progressive Liberal disguised as a Christian sending signals to Moslems that he's really one of them. That is his act. And it's  failing.
     
     
    RELATED
     
     
     

    ATHEIST MORALITY AND THE COLD BLOODED MURDER OF THE CHAPEL HILL THREE (POSTSCRIPT ADDED ON DEBATE WITH ATHEISTS)

     
     
    This insightful article by Daniel Greenfield inspired me to write the following piece which I posted in the comment section and to which he kindly responded with a very interesting reply (posted below) about Dostoevsky and Christopher Hitchens.
     

     

    ANGRY MILITANT ATHEIST CRAIG HICKS' COLD BLOODED MURDER

    of three Chapel Hill students had everything to do with his atheism and disbelief in God and nothing to do with his victims being Moslem. It's all very simple to understand. If God (the Supreme Being) doesn't exist-as He doesn't for Hicks or any materialistic atheist-then there is no absolute, objective, extramental moral law of right and wrong for Hicks to follow, abide by, guide and constrain him. In other words, there is no being higher than Hicks, no God to ultimately judge his actions and hold him accountable for his crimes and sins; no after life of rewards or punishments determined by his choices in this life. Right and wrong are a matter of opinion and subjective belief for Hicks making him a law unto himself-with no authority (family, school, church or state) outside or over him. Whatever Hicks decides, believes, feels is good and evil, right and wrong, just and unjust is the only valid moral code for him. Hicks is his own god and lawgiver obeying nothing but his free, autonomous, liberated will-and if that means murder or any kind of  crime then so be it.

    In other words, as Dostoevsky said in his masterpiece The Brothers Karamazov "If there is no God, then all things are permitted." There are no rules to live by, no moral laws to follow, no higher authority to answer to and obey. Murder may be illegal and wrong according to conventional man-made rules and laws-which is someone's morality imposed on society-and killing someone could land you in jail and end your life in the electric chair if you're unlucky to get caught. But murdering another human being-erasing his existence which will end forever when he dies -is never in itself evil, immoral, unjust or wrong. We're all fated for extinction and it matters little when it comes. For in a world of random meaningless unguided chance, where life springs from nothing and returns to nothing, where there's no Intelligent Uncaused First Cause or Designer, no underlying purposeful teleological order-no ultimate measurer and architect of all things-nothing that lives (no animal and human being) has a right to life. For such a right would be innate in man, essential to his being, implying a giver of rights or Creator-a figment of man's imagination and need to believe according to atheists like Hicks.

    Now as morality for atheists like Hicks is a matter of personal opinion, feeling and belief-making him a law unto himself-killing someone who pisses him off, or angers him in a simmering dispute over a parking space that reaches a boiling point, is good, right and just if Hicks believes it so.

    In sum, Hicks' atheism (or anti-theism) was morally essential to his triple murder; while the religious belief of his victims (abhorrent as that was to Hicks) was incidental to their deaths-a mere chance accident. In fact, if we replace the three Moslem students with atheists like Hicks-hating God and despising all religions like him-they'd be just as dead today for angering him. 

     

    "GREAT post!.........and you really went to the Oracle on these type of issues with your Dostoevsky quote. In his book the Possessed(or Demons in some translations)...Dostoevsky's nihilist character Kirilov makes the declaration......"If there is no God.........then I am God." And speaking of these New Atheists...........when Christopher Hitchens wrote his book...."god is not great"...........and he wanted to make his most powerful case against God.......who did he steal from? You got it............DOSTOEVSKY!  He basically hijacks the chapter "Rebellion" from? The Brothers Karamazov. But Hitchens didn't understand that Dostoevsky refutes his own argument later in the novel."

     
     
     
    POSTSCRIPT
     
    Debate on Jihad Watch
     
    (SEE)
     
     
    Don McKeller writes:
     
     
    "What a bizarre world you live in, ApolloSpeaks. So just because somebody is too intelligent to believe in imaginary dieties (sic), somehow that means that they feel free to murder innocent people and have no morality or ethics? Does it not occur to you that atheists have moms and dads and brothers and sisters and can fall in love? And because they have those things, does it not occur to you that they can appreciate and care about other human beings and what happens to them? And that they can be empathetic to other people? And therefore have very strong and good ethics and personal morality and understandings of justice and decency? Of course you haven’t thought any of this out at all, have you? No, because the atheist is the person who tells you there is no Santa Clause and no god and no heaven and that makes you scared. Really scared — because you can’t make any logical argument or prove them wrong in any way. So therefore, in your little mind, that person must be evil by nature. What a sad little world you live in."
     
    My reply:
     
    The only atheists I respect philosophically are those who logically, consistently and relentlessly apply the principle of moral relativism and believe that there are as many valid moralities and moral codes as there are individuals who invent them; and refuse to be judgmental of anyone’s morality, behavior or beliefs like theists are. In being judgmental the theist at least is logical as he consistently applies the principle of moral absolutism measuring everyone by a single standard of right and wrong. But for an atheist who denies the existence of a supreme being with an extramental absolute moral law to do this-not respecting the moral autonomy of others and sits in judgment over them as if his standards alone are valid and morally sound-completely contradicts the principle of moral relativism as he stupidly and unconsciously looks like a theist. In short, the atheist who says that I or Hicks or anyone is morally wrong is a fool.
     
    BTW, it's not I who am afraid. It's you who are afraid. Afraid to be a thoroughgoing atheist taking the principle of moral relativism to its logical conclusion of radical individual moral autonomy, or moral anarchy and chaos.
     
    DEBATE ON THE TELEGRAPH
     
     
     
     
    "We are indeed fortunate--and equally so your argument--that no Christian ever commits murder."
     
    My reply:
     
    If we take the atheist's principle of moral relativism to its absolute logical conclusion then THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS MURDER IN REALITY. If I kill you for whatever reason I've simply taken your life with no moral qualification of right or wrong. Atheists who judge my killing you as evil or wrong are thinking in absolute moral terms like the theists they despise and ridicule. Such people are torn between moral relativism and moral absolutism and can't seem to make up their minds which way to go.
     
     

    HARF CALLS FOR JOBS IN MIDEAST ON ANNIVERSARY OF FAILED STIMULUS, ERIC HOLDER’S CONFUSION, AND ISIS’ CHIEF CHANNELING MOHAMMED, ETC.

    State Dept. Spokeswoman: ISIS Needs Jobs | Atlas Shrugs

    YESTERDAY WAS THE SIXTH ANNIVERSARY

    of Obama's failed, historic $860 billion stimulus bill (the largest of its kind) that was to trigger a robust Reagan-like jobs creating recovery like nothing ever seen in American and world history. What a sorry way to celebrate that day than with this clueless State Dept clown saying a jobs program for the people in the Middle East is needed to defeat ISIS.

    However, if Harf wants to be taken seriously she should propose something like reinstituting the military draft. That's the jobs program that could give hundreds and thousands of Americans work weaponizing them into deadly soldiers killing and destroying their way to victory over genocidal ISIS putting their death cult caliphate out of its misery.

     

     
     

    HOLDER'S MENTAL CONFUSION

    It's like Ralph Peters said on Fox yesterday "If in naming the enemy terminology doesn't matter [as Holder says] then why not call them Islamic extremists"? By stubbornly refusing to name the enemy Obama creates a divisive issue that distracts us from the war we're in-when we should be focused like a lasar beam on winning. No American wartime president has been this stupid and inept. Even Bush who said that "Islam was a religion of peace" identified the enemy as Islamic extremists-and on one occasion called them "Islamofascists (which he got hell for)." Again I say, with good reason 85% of our military contemptuously believe Obama is an awful Commander-in-Chief and have no confidence in his weak,  rudderless, demoralizing leadership which makes them sick.

     

     
    PAM WRITES:
     

    "No matter how much accommodation, self-censorship, and appeasement to Muslim sensitivities it is never enough." That is very true.  As absolute world power is the end and aim of fundamentalist Islam, for Islamic supremacists (like the Moslems at CAIR) who seek that end a glass that isn't full to overflowing is as good as empty. In short, not having it all is as good as nothing. For nothing short of the ultimate world triumph of Islam can vindicate their supremacist faith.

     

     

    THE TERRIBLE TRUTH ABOUT ISIS

    Deadly, murdering, genocidal Caliph Al-Baghdadi channels the infernal prophet Mohammed from his place in hell like no one else in Islam today. That’s why thousands are flocking to his banner of death dreaming of self-sacrifice and martyrdom in a war to make Islam a great power again.

     

     
     
    After reading this article by radical leftist Israel hater Philip Weiss  one is left with the impression that it's Netanyahu, not vicious Jew hating Islamonazis, who is making the Jews of Western Europe feel unsafe and causing them to leave. Anti-Zionist Jews like Weiss want a diminishing Jewish population in Israel-not a growing one-which in time, they hope, will be outnumbered by Israeli Arabs and end the Jewish State-hence his concern over Netanyahu's message to Europe's Jews. Weiss reminds me of Yassir Arafat begging Russia to stop the emigration of Russian Jews to Israel. The Jewish population of Israel is edging upwards while over in the Palestinian territories the fertility rate is in decline due to their  shrinking economy making large families too costly (see). Perhaps the PA and Hamas will soon start drawing on Palestinian refugees to cope with their growing demographic problem. Over time this could solve the refugee problem. Weiss and the anti-Israel left just can't win.
     
    BTW, Weiss has banned me from his site.
     
     
    What do 700 UK artists hope to achieve what 7 Arab armies failed to do 67 years ago?
     
     
     
     
     
    Obama bowed to the Japanese emperor. Truman A-bombed him into submission and humbled him. Would Obama have done that if he was the 33rd President?
     
     
     
     
     
    WHICH IS MORE DISGUSTING AND OFFENSIVE TO NORMAL PEOPLE?
     
    A Gay Pride Parade of perverts, queers and sickos celebrating their disgusting, filthy, dehumanizing vices? Or a public display of wild frenzied  Moslem freaks insanely flagellating themselves believing that they're pleasing God when only filthy demons delight in such things, as St Augustine said in the City of God.
     
     
     
     
     
    The Religion of Islamic Peace has had serious ongoing PR problems for 1400 years-with infidel humanity fearing and hating it more than any other faith. Why? Because every year of its existence Islam has been hijacked by radicals like ISIS posing as Moslems, I guess. /sarc
     
     

    JUST AS THE MURDERED CHRISTIAN COPTS

    in Libya were just ordinary Egyptian citizens to Obama. So this desecrated Christian Church would be just an ordinary Florida house of worship to him -unless, of course, it was a black church; then for Obama it would be a horrendous racist crime unrelated to Christianity. As Bill Clinton said in his post-9/11 speech in yesterday's piece "Christianity is still paying for the sins of the Crusades"-white Christianity that is.

     

     
     
     
    IT WAS A HARD DAYS NIGHT
     
    for this Moslem NOWHERE MAN.
     
    JamesonRocks adds,
     
    "Well, you know those moozies – they’re crazy EIGHT DAYS A WEEK…"

     

    BILL CLINTON IS BARACK OBAMA IN WHITE FACE WITH MORE SMARTS, CUNNING AND CHARM

       

    Critique of Bill Clinton's errors on the Crusades.

    WHO IS BILL CLINTON?

    Barack Hussein Obama in white face with more intelligence, charm and political cunning. Look at the comparison: 

    Anticipating Obama Bill Clinton said in response to the USS Cole bombing that killed 17 Americans that true Islam "had nothing to do with this atrocity or any act of terrorism." And sounding as if Islam was as American as apple pie (when it's our totalitarian opposite and enemy) Clinton said "there is nothing in Islam that would be destructive to our way of life, and that it's in harmony with the best of Western ideals." If so where is one Moslem country with a liberal, American-like democracy with division of powers, a free market system and equal rights for minorities? After 1400 years there should be at least one-but there's none. And what we see instead in Western Europe is a rising tide of anti-Western Islamic hatred hell-bent on turning the continent back to the Middle Ages of political oppression, injustice and moral darkness.

    BILL CLINTON ON THE CRUSADES

    57 days after the 9/11 disaster (57 is the number of Moslem countries) Bill Clinton anticipating by 13 years Obama's equating of the Christian Crusades with ISIS' genocidal killing rampage blamed the Crusades (and atrocities committed by Christians against Moslems who'd been slaughtering and enslaving Christians for centuries) as an important underlying factor for 9/11 and Moslem hatred of the West; and (as if he were the pope) Clinton apologized to Islam for it.

    Truth is if there hadn't been the Crusades the Soviets would still have invaded Afghanistan giving birth to al Qaida and the 9/11 event. For radical Islam's fanatical aim isn't to settle a score over the Crusades or any other grievance; its aim is IMPERIAL RESTORATION: reversing Islam's 500 year decline and restoring it as a great world power (caliphate) as a means to the greater end of world domination-the prophetic promise of the power mad, Hitler-like warlord Mohammed.

    CLINTON AND 9/11

    Indeed, this is the same soft-on-terror Bill Clinton who like Obama learning nothing from the explosive growth of Islamic extremism during his presidency (treating it as a common crime problem not an ideological/military conflict like Nazism and Communism) learned nothing from the first World Trade Center bombing, and the massive terror attacks in Saudi Arabia, East Africa and Yemen that followed-and handed George Bush the badly weakened national security system that al Qaida defeated on 9/11 killing 3000 innocent Americans.

    CLINTON AND NETANYAHU

    Moreover, Obama's hostility to Israeli PM Bibi Netanyahu was matched by Bill Clinton in the 1990s when he intervened in Israeli politics to effect Netanyahu's defeat against his weaker leftist Labor opponent Ehud Barak. That led to the failure of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks and the catastrophe of the Second Palestinian Intifada where thousands died.

    CLINTON AND THE HOUSING CRASH

     And lastly, this same Bill Clinton (an economic dumb ox slightly brighter than Obama) started the gigantic housing bubble (biggest in US history) that unstoppably grew exponentially during the Bush years and crashed the US economy as I wrote about HERE and HERE.  If Bill Clinton hadn't been president there would have been no 08 crash, and no disastrous Obama presidency.

     

    Bill Clinton: U.S. to Blame for Mexican Drug Violence | CNS News

     

    Now Bill Clinton is apologizing to Mexico for its escalating drug violence but hasn't yet offered one word of apology to the American people for 9/11 and the housing/finacial crash of which he was the fountainhead. And now this terrible, awful, reckless, lying man wants to return to the White House with his tired old worn out failed ex-Secretary of State wife to continue his legacy of liberal weakness, folly, confusion and destruction.

    RELATED

     

     

    IS SISTER OF SLAIN MOSLEM CHAPEL HILL STUDENT A JIHADIST? (UPDATE: BARAKAT’S BROTHER WAS ISLAMIST)

     
     
     
    Craig Stephen Hicks a religion hating radically left militant atheist who saw only evil in the God Idea but didn't hate all religions equally-prefering Islam and Moslems to Christians and their faith-shot and killed three students who  were incidentally Moslem over (what appears to be) a long simmering parking space dispute having nothing to do with their faith.
     
    But Dr. Mohamad Abu-Salha, father of two of the slain students and father-in-law of the third, disputes this. Believing that the murder of his kin was a "hate crime" he blames it on a deadly atmosphere of Moslem hate created by an anti-Moslem news media "bombarding every American every day with news about what they call Islamic terrorism, none of which is Islamic at all." In other words, if the media following our see-no-evil-in-Islam president had only censored itself not referring to Islamic terrorists as being Moslem Hicks might have thought differently of  Moslems, not  committed his "hate" crime and the three Moslem students would be alive today.
     

    What this says about Dr. Salha is that he takes his religion very seriously and (like Obama) thinks it a religion of justice and peace unfairly under attack by ignorant bigots. In other words, like Obama Dr. Salha is completely blind to 14 centuries of Islamic jihad rooted in the prophet or war whose name he bears and is the source of the deadly acts of Moslem jihadists.

     But contradicting Dr. Salha Dr. Suzanne Barakat, sister of one of the three slain students, blames Hick's crime on the controversial film American Sniper and its depiction of killing al Qaida terrorists by hero sniper Chris Kyle claiming that it diminishes the humanity of Moslems or dehumanizes them-making them look like vile despicable creatures worthy of death.

     Which is it then? Are radicals who kill in Allah's name real Moslems or not? And if they are  Moslem practicing true Islam in their crimes, as Ms. Barakat seems to believe, then what does that say about her? That prior to al Qaida terrorists being killed by Chris Kyle in Iraq they did nothing that diminished their humanity and dehumanized them? That their atrocities and crimes against US soldiers and fellow Moslems were Islamically justified? That in her eyes they were good Moslem men  who no more deserved death than did her brother? And that Chris Kyle should have left them alone free to kill American  soldiers at will? It sounds to me that the grieving Ms. Barakat, unlike the moderate Dr. Solha, is an Islamic supremacist who sided with al Qaida in Iraq during the war, and may now side with ISIS and the cause of radical Islam across the world.

    In short, this Moslem woman needs to be watched. If she embraces the ideology of Islamic supremacist jihad as I suspect, and blames the death of her brother on the film American Sniper and its depiction of justified and necessary killing of inhuman Moslem scum, she may be looking to avenge herself for her brother's death and strike out at this country in the name of Allah and Islam.

    UPDATE

    ChaimBenLevin just posted the following in the comment section about Barakat's brother:

    "Apollo. Your suspicions are confirmed. Barakat’s slain brother was a fucking Jew hating  pro-Islamist  9/11 truther."

    http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/02/12/well-well-looks-like-one-of-the-so-called-innocent-muslim-students-who-was-gunned-down-had-some-very-pro-islamic-terrorism-leanings-himself/

     

     

    CHRIS CUOMO POUNDS JUDGE MOORE AND SOUNDS ATHEIST, IN DEFENSE OF BRIAN WILLIAMS, THE CHAPEL HILL HATE CRIME? AND OTHER NONSENSICAL THINGS

     

    Un-American, anti-Constitutional Chris Cuomo arguing like a Marxist atheist with Judge Moore that our rights are from man not God.
     
    The late Mario Cuomo, a Liberal Roman Catholic Democat, believed in the biblical teaching as taught by his Church of an unwritten moral law of right and wrong that comes from God and is implanted in our souls before birth. And he admitted as much when he publicly stated his confused position on abortion: that he personally believed in the Church teaching that abortion was murder and morally wrong violating God's laws and the unborn's right to life. But that he also believed it was just as wrong to impose his religious beliefs on those who thought differently on the issue; and that the decision to murder the unborn should reside with individual women as allowed by Row v. Wade. Consequently, Cuomo was tolerant of the anti-abortion movement and never accused its members (as Obama and radical leftists do) of waging a war against women and wanting to oppress them.
     
    But Cuomo's tolerance is completely missing from his son Chris on the issue of same sex marriage. As we learned from his lengthy debate on CNN with Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy "Ten Commandments" Moore (a hero  to social and religious conservatives) only regressive bigots oppose gay marriage; and that "God's law against gays" is an imaginary projection of their bigotry and hate. Gone is Chris Coumo's Catholic upbringing and education from elementary school to Jesuit run Fordam University. Gone are Church teachings of a moral law innate in man requiring sexual sobriety for happiness and health. Gone is the Declaration of Independence which correctly states that our rights (and those of the unborn) originate from God. In fighting with Judge Moore over his decision to stop the issuing of marriage licences to gays in his state, no matter how much proof Moore offered (going back more than  a century) that his actions had judicial precedent and were perfectly legal under federal and state law, the ideological, politically correct, obsessive Cuomo (putting on a show for his few CNN fans) just couldn't accept it. Though gay marriage isn't the law of the land and it's against the Constitution of Alabama those like Judge Moore who stand  in its way (rejecting every form of marriage other than the traditional) are no better, to Chris Cuomo, than racial bigots practicing immoral, unjustified, irrational discrimination-homophobics driven by fear and hate, not principles based on Nature and Nature's God.
      
    What a far cry from his dad. If this were Mario Cuomo he'd have been more  civil and conciliatory on about gay marriage and said 'Though I personally agree with Church teaching that marriage should be between one man and one woman, and that same sex marriage is immoral, unnatural and wrong (as is homosexuality) I nevertheless think it's also wrong to impose this view on society and stop gays who want to marry from doing so.'  Unlike the son Marion Cuomo would have respected Judge Moore's court decisions and faith and not insinuated that he was a bigot driven by obsolete views and hate.
     
     But still, the Cuomos are CINOS (Catholics In Name Only) with the son (both of them) worse than the dad possibly being an atheist in disguise as he seems to believe that right and wrong are invented by man and not by Almighty God-the absolute measure of all things.

     

     
     
     

    IN DEFENSE OF BRAIN WILLIAMS

    If MSM gives Barack Obama a free pass on his compulsive lying about everything: healthcare, NSA snooping, deporting illegal aliens, the unemployment rate,  corruption at the IRS,  al Qaida's decimation and the War on Terror being won why should Brian Williams be punished for his lies? Which is worse? A President lying about healthcare, the IRS and al Qaida and thinking himself some kind of messiah? Or a newsman inventing stories about coming under rocket fire, or suffering dysentery during Katrina to make himself look bigger than he is? If a non-stop, serial lying Barack Obama can continue as President despite his severe truth and reality problems and lead the country and world into chaos, and he's revered by NBC who helped elect and reelect him, then why should Williams be suspended from his job, or possibly lose it because of his intermittent lies? What's fair about that?

     

     

    Embedded image permalink

    YOU WILL NOTICE

    that Obama is being hung in effigy with Jimmy Carter. Stands to reason. Obama is the greatest enabler of Iranian power since Carter mistook the evil Ayatollah Khomeini for a Jeffersonian democrat and Moslem saint. Carter midwifed the Iranian Revolution. Obama is midwifing a nuclear Iran and its expansion into a regional empire. But the Iranians are so barbaric, cruel and wicked that instead of showing gratitude to Carter and Obama they want to hang them dead. And Obama calls them "The Islamic Republic of Iran." I guess wanting him dead is true Islam.

     
    OUTRAGEOUS! Obama’s State Department Orders Marines To Destroy Their Weapons And Evacuate Yemen UNARMED! | The Gateway Pundit

     

    A RADICAL LEFTIST MILITANT ATHEIST NUT,

    who hates the God Idea and all religions equally, shot three people because they were Moslem? I don't buy it. If so  why didn't he go on a shooting spree killing every Moslem in sight until he weas stopped? Or walk into a mosque and gun down dozens of believers while at prayer?  Why would he limit himself to three victims if he lusted for Moslem blood? It doesn't make sense. I'm going with the parking dispute driving this guy mad with the victims accidentally being Moslem and not essential to the crime.

    BTW. leftist websites like pro-Islamist Mondoweiss and Loonwatch so badly want this murder to be an Islamophobic hate crime that they omit to mention Hick's militant atheism and espousal of leftwing causes like gay marriage. And when metrosexual Chris Hayes of MSNBC said that Chapel Hill was the "Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown moment for Moslems" he may have absolutely nailed it. For neither Martin nor Brown were victims of hate crimes.

    Lovelife writes on Media Matters

    "The killing of those kids was nothing short of a fox/media induced hate crime. That bastard is a terrorist just like Eric "the fiend" Frein .... Remember him? The liberal media sure doesn't."

    My unanswered reply:

    You're right, Lovelife. Where else but Fox would someone so disturbed as Hicks get his militant atheism, and hatred of homophobic rightwing Christians?/sarc. 

     

     
    ”I'M SHOCKED! SHOCKED! SHOCKED I TELL YOU!
     
    A radical leftist loon preferring Moslems to Christians?

     

     

    WHAT MR. PRESIDENT

    no post-mortem adoption? Moron!

     

    Obama’s Sad, Sick Selfie Stick | Atlas Shrugs

     

    Obama using selfie stick

     

    THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

    is both the longest running Amateur Hour show since Ted Mack, and the longest running clown show since Howdy Doody. In fact, as a clown Obama is an unfunny pathetic amateur sadder than depression hobo Emmett Kelly.

     

     

     
    RICHIUTTO IS RIGHT! CONSUMER SPENDING OVER THE HOLIDAYS
     
    was a disaster (worse than 2013) and continues to be poor into the new year. This despite consumer sentiment at a ten year high-due mainly to the dramatic drop in gas prices creating the illusion that the economy is returning to normal. It is not. Practically everything else is happy talk and lies  as Steve Richiutto notes.
     

    ELIJAH CUMMINGS AND THE RELIGION OF GOVERNMENT-OR GOVERNMENT AS SOUL FOOD

     
     
     

    Government is Congressman Cumming's holy religion as it is for all secular progressive liberals. Government is their Supreme Being, their God of Love, their moral absolute, their saving messiah and redeemer from the evils of this world (especially conservatism). For liberals like Cummings government is the source of all truth, wisdom and moral goodness which alone feed, nourish and sustain the human soul (or brain if they're materialists) curing it of ignorance, error and the misery of sin (like opposition to gay rights, abortion and open borders).

    Forget your Bibles Old and New; forget your Plato, Plutarch and Cicero. Forget Moses, Jeremiah, Jesus and the saints. Forget anything that brings you closer in mind and spirit to the one true living God (including prayer). Cummings hath spoken: there's no salvation outside of the state-no soul food to be gotten anywhere except what's given us mortals by the federal government-the center of the universe and lord of creation. Your true spiritual teachers and guides on earth aren't rabbis, priests, gurus and sages, but Congressmen like Cummings, Judges like Ginsburg and Presidents like Obama (once hailed the messiah). These alone will enlighten your mind with truth, elevate your moral nature with compassion (the left's master  virtue) and make you happy, whole and good-giving you a purpose in life to boot: ending poverty and racism with social injustice egalitarianism; and ending the horror of world destroying global warming (the terror of the ages). The great God government can do it all if it's given enough money and power.

    This is not a new idea. The Religion of Government is as old as the French Revolution which attempted to abolish Christianity from society closing down and destroying churches, ending the Catholic mass, killing priests and nuns in droves by beheading and hacking them to death (like ISIS does today).

    Sisters from the Order of St. Joseph being led to the guillotine by anti-clerical French Revolutionaries.
     

    While our Founding Fathers and Framers were separating Church and State French Revolutionaries were replacing the Church with the State-with an atheistic "Religion of Reason" administered by men like Cummings-a preposterous idea that catastrophically failed then and is failing today right under Cumming's Judeo-Christian hating liberal snoot.

    In our 238 glorious years never have the once great industrious, productive American people been more dependent on government for services and material things-for realizing the Good Life called the American Dream through the State; and never have they been more ignorant, senseless, sinful and miserable given up to sexual excess, drugs, drink and eating disorders. After decades of experimentation in government dependency with trillions redistributed in unearned wealth the STATE has proved itself once more (as it did in France, Russia North Korea, Cuba, etc.) to be a false God with a false faith and messianic pretensions failing at perfecting society which is liberalism's impossible goal. Instead of nourishing and sustaining our souls (which no government can do as we can't "live by bread alone") it corrupts and degrades us weakening our mental and moral powers, undermining good character (as FDR warned) and turning us into dopes-look at this lost generation of poorly educated dumbed down kids-it's a joke.

     Slums of Detroit.

    As a microcosm of what the Religion of Government is doing to us nationally look at broken, busted, bankrupt Detroit-an impoverished, depraved Third World-like sh*t hole liberal city of rising crime, violence, drug abuse, illiteracy, sexual lunacy, disease and death. Then look at Chicago the murder capital of the US. With $18 trillion in federal debt and growing, and $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities, the Detroiting of America is tragically underway as more and more Americans come under government's destructive sway-growing the state at the cost of freedom and shrinking the private sector where wealth is made.

    The Religion of Government (like liberalism in general) doesn't work; it's a false God that's exhausted, broken and dying dragging with it into bankruptcy and oblivion leftist politicians like Congressman Cummings-ironically named "Elijah" after the fierce biblical enemy of false prophets, idols and gods.

    Prophet Elijah smashing the idols of the false god Baal.
     

     The Age of Liberalism is over, It's finished with, done. And a new and glorious chapter in our country's heroic history is about to begin.

     

     

     

    OBAMA INSANELY BELIEVES IRAN MIGHT NOT BE BUILDING THE ISLAMIC BOMB BECAUSE OF ISLAM

    Obama: Iran Won’t Pursue Nuclear Weapons Because It’s ‘Contrary to Their Faith’ | Atlas Shrugs

    PRESIDENT OBAMA:
     
    The issues now are sufficiently narrowed and sufficiently clarified where we're at a point where they need to make a decision. We are presenting to them in a unified fashion, the P5+1 supported by a coalition of countries around the world are presenting to them a deal that allows them to have peaceful nuclear power but gives us the absolute assurance that is verifiable that they are not pursuing a nuclear weapon. 

    And if in fact what they claim is true, which is they have no aspiration to get a nuclear weapon, that in fact, according to their Supreme Leader, it would be contrary to their faith to obtain a nuclear weapon, if that is true, there should be the possibility of getting a deal. They should be able to get to yes. But we don't know if that's going to happen.
     
    JIMMY CARTER ABANDONED THE SHAH
     

    on the belief that the Ayatollah Khomeini was a humane and saintly man and a Jeffersonian democrat who’d replace monarchy with democracy in Iran. And in so doing he unleashed the rise of Islamic Jihad in the Middle East and millions of deaths. If Obama believes in the possibility that Khomeini’s successor isn’t pursuing the bomb because it’s a sin against Allah and Islam then why continue negotiations? If Iran has nuclear aspirations nothing will stop them short of destroying the regime. If Khameine believes that Allah frowns upon nuclear weapons and thinks them a sin then Iran isn't pursuing the bomb, and in enriching uranium and building ICBMs is playing a game of strategic ambiguity-like Saddam played with WMDs. Either way negotiations are an exercise in futility...an idiot's game as the mullahs remain a rising imperialistic terror regime that must be destroyed.

    But let's be realistic. Iran has spent over $100 billion on its nuclear program and is hell bent on getting the bomb and delivering it to us . That is the reality no matter how much Tehran tries to disguise it and confuse us. And Obama in allowing for the possibility that the disguise might be reality, and Iran on religious grounds (despite the enrichment and ICBMs) isn't pursuing the bomb shows that he's hopelessly hoping against hope and grasping at straws. Obama is the greatest enabler of Iranian power since Jimmy Carter's stupidity and naivety midwifed radical jihadist Iran. Now Obama is aiding the mullahs in midwifing a nuclear Iran and becoming the North Korea of the Middle East-a nuclear menace to the world; and they must be stopped!

     

    OBAMA’S HISTORICAL IGNORANCE, 9/10 MENTALITY, FAILURE TO SAVE AMERICA AND OTHER GRIM THOUGHTS

     
     
     
     HISTORY LESSON WASTED
     
    Does anyone think that the President who, not once but TWICE, made the shrouding of Christian symbols at Georgetown University a condition for speaking there is going to care about the historical truth of the Crusades? HELL NO! The Moslem perception of the Crusades (adopted by the Left) as Christianity's ORIGINAL SIN against Islam-history's first great infamous act of unjustified ISLAMOPHOBIA by the Christian West-is one of the reasons for Obama's actions at Georgetown, declaration of America as no longer Christian and anti-Crusade remarks at the Prayer Breakfast. Moreover, it could very well be that Obama considers the oppression of Christians across the Moslem world as karmic retribution for the Crusades.  As Christians are the most targeted minority for persecution in the Middle East Obama has voiced little support for them. And though at the Prayer Breakfast he mentioned Christians persecuted in Nigeria when it came to ISIS only Yazidis not Christians were mentioned.
     
     
     
     
     AFTER HEARING THIS
     

    only a fool would say that fear of Obama is overblown. Obama is a 9/10 president in a post-9/11 world (George Bush and Bill Clinton before 9/11) and very dangerous in his ignorance, arrogance, weakness and self-lies.

     

     
     
     

    OBAMA'S AMERICA IS NO BETTER THAN ISIS?

    What does that mean? America is so irredeemably evil-so lost to justice and hardened in sin-that a two term radically left Alinskyite president can't save it.

     

     

    MORE ANTI-WEST HATE TALK FROM OBAMA'S "MOST TRUSTED" FOREIGN "ALLY"

    Anti-West Statements By Turkish President Erdogan And PM Davutoglu: Muslim Countries Must ‘Unite And Defeat The Successors Of Lawrence Of Arabia'; ‘No One Will Be Able To Stop’ The Rise Of Islam In Europe

    muslim confabAt the PUIC, Istanbul. Yeni Akit, January 21, 2015.
    Lawrence of Arabia was a Zionist of Arabia believing that the restoration of Israel in Palestine was a regional necessity for its progress towards modernity. And that is absolutely what Israel is despite its demonization by enemies and global unpopularity. Neo-Ottoman Islamist Turks like Erdogan will never forgive Lawrence for driving the Turks from Arabia and making the necessary rise of Israel possible. And he dreams that in revenge Islamic supremacists will conquer Europe. What a fool!  Islamists and Jihadists can't even reconquer Palestine. 

     

     
    combo coexist
    French street artist Combo was physically assaulted over his latest art work. Photo: Combo Culture Kidnapper/Facebook
     

    MOSLEMS TO FRENCH COEXIST ARTIST:

    Desist! Or cease to exist!

     

     

    VIDEO Obama: Murdered Paris Jews Were Just Random Victims | Atlas Shrugs

     

     

    FRENCHMEN

    who were randomly born Jews and were randomly at a Parisian deli that randomly served and sold kosher food to Jews, were randomly shot by Jew haters randomly belonging to a Jew hating religion randomly founded by a Jew hating prophet who also randomly killed Jews who ate kosher food randomly far from Paris.

    Now it's all beginning ti make sense.

     

     
     

    ISRAELS EXISTENCE TERRIFIES THE MOSLEM WORLD

    causing doubts about Islamic revelation, purpose and truth-which makes that woman a terrorist like all Israeli Jews./sarc

     

     

    SEND JIHAD JOHN'S DADDY TO JORDAN

    where he'll get swift, immediate, well deserved justice. In fact, send all Gitmo innmates there for speedy executions.

     

    Litigation Jihad: Muslim Workers Sue Hertz Again, This Time for “Islamofauxbia” | Atlas Shrugs

     

    THEY WON'T STOP SUING HERTZ

     

    until they're in the driver's seat owning it, or driving it into oblivion.

     

     

     

     

    WHITE HATING RACISTS WAKE UP!

    As I predicted the Black Lives Matter Movement would have a short life like Occupy Wall Street. As of today BLM is practically DEAD!

     

    OBAMA’S CRAZY ARGUMENT FOR THE MORAL EQUIVALENCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND ISIS (POSTSCRIPT: ATHEIST PRAISES CHRISTIANITY)

     

     
    The political Left (founded on the messianic notion that government can perfect human society)  is one vast insane asylum of moral and intellectual confusion; and Barack Obama (the Left's worst nightmare) is its most prominent (narcissistic) mental case. Take for example his argument for the moral equivalence of Christianity and ISIS:
     
     
    Because of the atrocities committed by Christians in the name of Christ during the antI-Islam Medieval Crusades (which America had nothing to do with), and during the periods of American slavery and Jim Crow (which Christians were at the forefront of fighting), Christian America is no better than murderous, sadistic Christian-hating ISIS. Therefore, no American should get on his "high [righteous] horse" and feel moral outrage and anger over ISIS' horrific crimes. For we too as  Christians have just as much evil to answer for in history.
     
     
     Wait a minute. Didn't Obama say in 2009 that "America is no longer a Christian nation"?
     
     
     Can someone make sense of this for me before I go stark raving mad.
     
     

    POSTSCRIPT:

    ATHEIST BRAINIAC PRAISES CHRISTIANITY

     

    Brainiac writing in the comment section said: "Let’s not forget that although Christians have committed atrocities in the past, and may commit some in the future they have done much to stop atrocities, racism, inequalities, perhaps more than any other religion

    Slavery, and atrocities committed on people is not new. Slavery has been around for quite a while, and many other races besides blacks have been slaves, and have had atrocities committed upon them. Blacks in Africa practiced a brutal slavery. And not just slavery, look at the atrocities around the world from that pilot being burned to sexual slavery of young people to one faction or group brutally wiping out some other faction. On balance no religion has done more good for the human race than Christianity. And I, brainiac, am an atheist."

     Brainaic isn't the first or only atheist to find value in Christianity: the Left's most hated religion. Conservative political commentator and ATHEIST S.E. Cupp wrote a controversial book excoriating the liberal media's jihad against Christianity.

     

     
     

    CRUSADERS AND ISLAMONAZIS, OBAMA’S CRYPTO ISLAMISM? IRAN RISING AND PALI POND SCUM

     
    Michael Ramirez Cartoon(Ripped off from Gateway Pundit.)

     

    WITH MOSLEM OUTREACH IN SHAMBLES,

    (like the rest of his foreign policy) and his popularity in the Middle East no better than George Bush's, Obama needed another Neville Chamberlain moment (he's had dozens of them) to pathetically remind Moslems how much he loves and respects Islam. But no one is listening. Moslems can no more respect Obama than our military and for the same reason: he's a coward and weakling with no warrior-no Mohammed-in him.

    THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHRISTIAN CRUSADERS AND ARMY OF ISIS

    The Christian Crusaders waged a defensive war against Islamic aggression. ISIS are Islamic aggressors at war with all infidels and Moslems in their way. It's that simple.

     

    Obama: “We are summoned to push back against those who would distort our religion for their nihilistic ends”

     EITHER OBAMA IS A CRYPTO MOSLEM

    or he’s trying to deceive Moslems into thinking he’s crypto to boost his popularity in the Middle East-his ratings there are about equal to Bush’s. Either way it won’t help. If he couldn’t become the darling of the region with his Cairo speech what could a butt-kissing Chamberlain moment do?

     

    Official Palestinian Authority TV quotes Qur’an: Jews are “apes and pigs" - Jihad Watch”

     

    IF ISRAEL, A LIGHT UNTO THE SICK, DYSFUNCTIONAL, DESPOTIC MIDDLE EAST,

    the freest, most progressive and productive nation in the region, is a country of Jewish “apes and pigs” than what does that make Palestinian annihilationists? Is pond scum too generous a term?

     

     

    JORDAN LEARNED ITS LESSON

    about releasing terrorists when they freed monster jihadist (forerunner of al-Baghdadi ) Abu al-Zarqawi in 1999. But we've learned nothing from that and continue to release Gitmo inmates equal to Zarqawi in evil.

      

     
     
     
     
     
     

    WHEN OBAMA WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT ON 11-04-2008

    it was the 29th anniversary of the Iranian Hostage Crisis-a prophetic sign anticipating he'd be the greatest enabler of radical Iranian power since hapless Jimmy Carter. And what did Carter's abandoning of the pro-US Shah for Ayatollah Khomeine lead to in the region? A horrific eight year war between Iran and Iraq where one million died and millions were injured. With over 200,000 dead in Syria and ISIS killing thousands for Islam one million dead could be reached in half the time. And now Iran is getting the bomb. It's frightening.

     

     

     

    EARLY IN HIS PRESIDENCY

     
    I predicted that Barack Obama-because of his shameless mendacity and unfitness to command-would end up in the "Presidents' Hall of Shame." Does anyone doubt that he's already there?

     

     

    FAR MORE PERVERSE THAN HOMOSEXUALS

    are those who want to kill them for their sins.

     

     

     

    AMERICAN SNIPER VS. AMERICAN DESERTER, RIGHT EYELESS HARRY REID’S BAD KARMA AND GREECE’S NEW RADICAL LEFT GOV’T


    Michael Moore: ‘Passion of Christ’ Crowd Behind Box-Office Success of ‘American Sniper’ | The Gateway Pundit

    Deserter Bowe Bergdahl's hatred of America  was so great that he wanted to end his US citizenship and become a citizen of Afghanistan or Pakistan believing that either country was morally superior to America and more worthy of his lofty spiritual soul.

    WHY DOESN'T OBESE ANTI-AMERICAN BIGOT MICHAEL MOORE

    zip it about Chris Kyle's alleged anti-Arab racism and psychopathic right-wing savagery and try to outdo the box office success of American Sniper with a film about leftist hero Bo Bergdahl called American Deserter. Let's see how well that does at the box office; or if it wins any Oscar nominations like his last laughable flops ridiculing capitalism and extolling Castro's Communist healthcare system .

     

    FIRST PHOTO: Battered Harry Reid on Senate Floor | The Gateway Pundit

    After losing his position of Senate Majority Leader on November 4th ( the 28th anniversary of winning his senate seat)  Harry Reid (58 days later) injured and possibly lost his right eye in a freak excercise accident. 

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ELzxsAuMnuI/Sk5RE7RJxpI/AAAAAAAABAc/p4sdD-E8XTM/s400/three_blind_mice.gif

     

    BACK IN 2009 WHEN DEMOCRATS

    ruled the Executive Branch and Congress I referred to the Unholy Leftist Power Trinity of Obama, Pelosi and Reid as the "Three Blind Mice" because of their staggering stupidity and blindness in domestic and foreign policy. Little did I imagine that one of the three might be physically half blind in six years. You will notice that the injury Reid sustained was to his RIGHT eye. Could this be Karmic Justice for viciously poking the Right in the eye all these years? For preventing the Senate from voting on 350 bills passed by Congress and lyingly calling them "obstructionists"? For his defamation of fellow Mormon Mitt Romney as a "tax cheat"?  For demonizing the Tea Party as "racists" and  his insane tirades against  the "unAmerican radical" Koch Brothers ? I'm surprised nobody blamed the Kochs for Harry's injury accusing them of booby trapping  the resistance bands on his treadmill

    RELATED

    Hating on Harry Reid - Kenneth P. Vogel - POLITICO.com 

     

    Obama Expresses Sympathy for New Radical Left Greek Govt. “You Cannot Keep Squeezing Countries” | The Gateway Pundit

    THE ECONOMIC IGNORAMOUS-IN-CHIEF

    is urging broken, busted Socialist Greece-which taxed, spent,  borrowed and lied its way into national bankruptcy and blood in the streets (as we're doing)-to double down on spending when it didn't work for us in the 1930s, isn't working now and hasn't worked for Japan in 22 years. What will save Greece is what saved Socialist Sweden from Grecification in the 1990s: AUSTERITY ECONOMICS. Sweden faced with fiscal, financial and economic collapse drastically slashed taxes, spending, regulations, pensions and privatized national industries, and within five years restored prosperity. Austerity Economics works. Sweden is proof. Obama is a worthless, tax and spend, government-is-the-answer leftist jerk.

    RELATED

     

    OBAMA’S IS-LIE-MO STATISTICS, BEHEADING OBAMA, REAL DEFLATE-GATE, CHRIS KYLE RACISM AND JAPAN’S REVENEGE……

     
     
     
     

    ISN’T THIS THE PRESIDENT WHO RESORTS TO STATISTICAL TRICKERY

    on the GDP, job growth, inflation, climate change and deported illegal aliens? And didn't he tell  a French reporter that according to statistics “America is one of the largest Moslem countries in the world?” There are lies, damned lies, and Barack Obama’s statistics

     

     Islamic State Threatens to Behead Obama in White House - Atlas Shrugs

    Obama-head-up-ass-96567955871.jpeg

    BEHEADING OBAMA WON'T BE EASY

    as his head is way way way up his tight skinny butt from which he leads this country.

     

     
     

    THOSE WHO FORGET THE LESSONS OF HISTORY

    are doomed to repeat its mistakes. The last time a US President (Bill Clinton) intervened in Israeli politics to oust Netanyahu his success ended in the disaster of the Second Intifada.

     

     

     

    DEFLATE-GATE

     

    THE REAL DEFLATE GATE

    Obama's deflating of American credibility, power, military might and wealth-as the air goes out of his administration and crashes like the Hindenburg.

     

     

     

     

    ANTI-AL QAIDA = RACIST?

    KILLING AL-QAIDA = KILLING SPREE?

    If the above is true then I'm a Chris Kyle racist who'd love to practice Chris Kyle racism and go on Chris Kyle killing sprees.

     

    RELATED

    THE ULTIMATE DEFENSE FROM INTERNATIONAL LAW AGAINST ALLEGATIONS THAT CHRIS KYLE WAS A MURDERING, PSYCHOPATHIC WAR CRIMINAL

     

     

     

    A RELIGION OF PEACE MOSLEM

    blown to peaces by the enemies of Islamic peace. May this kind of peace soon be upon Nasrhalla and the entire Hezbollah leadership.

     

    ISIS BEHEADS JAPANESE HOSTAGE KENJI GOTO (Video— Photos) | The Gateway Pundit

     
     
    TIME FOR JAPAN

     

    to unsheathe its sword and unleash its Samurai!

     

     

     
     
     

    OBL AFTER 9/11 ASPIRED TO BIGGER TERRORIST PLOTS

    But they never got past the dream stage. For after 9/11 OBL-the world's most hunted man-was relatively impotent, isolated and broke. However, ISIS is richly funded and attracting jihadis like flies to shit who'll die a thousand deaths for Islam. And that is frightening.

     

     

     

     
     
    SOUNDS LIKE 2ND AMENDMENT TEA PARTY WHACKOISM

    is speading to Pakistan. If so welcome to the club sisters.
     

     

     
     

     

    THE DALAI LAMA MAY BE AN ENLIGHTENED MAN

    on the subject of Buddhism. But when it comes to Islam too much of his consciousness dwells on his Root Chakra-the lowest of the seven psychic centers located between the anus and genitals.

     

     

     

     

    THE SOLUTION?

    Attach pages of the Koran to all non-Islamic books. Or would that desecrate the Koran and get people killed?

     

    OBAMA’S PEACEFUL, PEACE-LOVING TALIBAN MOSLEMS (POSTSCRIPT ADDED)

     

    Who needs Osama when we have Obama.

    Eric Schultz's controversial characterization of the Taliban as a local non-terrorist insurgency group wasn't nearly as ignorant, troubling and sad as this half forgotten remark made by gaffemaster Joe Biden three years ago to Newsweek's Leslie Gelb:

     "Look," said Biden seriously," THE TALIBAN PER SE IS NOT OUR ENEMY. That’s critical. There is not a single statement that the president has ever made in any of our policy assertions that the Taliban is our enemy because it threatens U.S. interests (see)."

    That is true. In his six years in office Obama has not once called the Taliban either "terrorists" or "enemies" or "radical extremists" like he's calls al-Qaida, ISIS and others. But what then are they in Obama's murky mind?  If the Taliban who in the name of Allah and Islam have been fighting us for 13 years killing our soldiers and trying to drive us from Afghanistan aren't "terrorist enemies" like al-Qaida and ISIS (with a radical ideology foreign to Islam) then what are they ?

    There is only one possible answer: for Obama, Biden, Kerry and the administration Mullah Omar and the Taliban (like the mullahs of Iran and their Islamic Republic) are MOSLEMS. Not radical extremists like al-Qaida and ISIS twisting, distorting and perverting the faith; but real, genuine, authentic, normative, moderate, traditional Moslems practicing and applying the true RELIGION OF PEACE. There is no other logical explanation. But how are the Taliban practicing and applying the "religion of (Islamic) peace" when they are fighting and killing our troops on the battlefield and trying to drive us from Afghanistan? What's authentically Islamic and peaceful about that? 

    Nothing on the surface. It's what's underneath that distinguishes the Taliban from al-Qaida and puts them on the side of true, peaceful, justice-loving Islam. And what's underneath that everyone's missing except the administration is that US and NATO forces are (unintentionally) the bad guys in the conflict.

    What that means from Obama's perspective is  that unfortunately when our troops invaded Afghanistan we toppled an innocent regime of peaceful, peace-loving Moslems who were minding their own business practicing their peaceful nonviolent faith (true Islam) in ruling over their peaceful country. And our aggression against them pushed them into justified jihad and armed (non-terrorist) insurgency against us. In fighting us the Taliban are acting Islamically applying the just war doctrine of their peaceful faith wanting to restore the status quo ante of their peaceful Islamic regime as would any moderate peace-loving Moslem country that was  invaded by a foreign power.

    In other words, the Taliban for Obama are victims of the Bush administration's overreacting to the 9/11 attack secretly launched by al-Qaida from Afghanistan unbeknownst to the peaceful nonviolent Taliban regime. If Obama had been the 43rd president instead of 44th history would have been different. There would have been no US invasion of Afghanistan and long 13 year war. Obama with the magic of his splendid personality, Moslem family roots and Middle Eastern middle name name would have greatly impressed and dazzled Mullah Omar succeeding where Bush had failed in making him a partner of the US in its war against al Qaida and global terror.  

    Of course the Taliban are very much the "terrorist enemies" of our country; and denying this is a crazy Obama leftist appeasement fantasy. Mullah Omar willingly partnered with his buddy bin Laden in his global jihad against the US; and approved his every death-dealing  terrorist strike not once publicly dissociating himself and his regime from any one of them. And when given the choice of doing the right thing and cooperating with us in bringing bin Laden to justice or going down in flames Omar chose loyalty to bin Laden over the survival of his regime. And down he went thinking perhaps that Allah would miraculously save him good pius Moslem that he is. Mullah Omar is our unappeasable terrorist enemy hating us more now than before 9/11 because of all the Taliban we killed. And if he returns to power he'll seek vengeance for our  crimes against Allah and Islam; and that means partnering with al Qaida all over again as Afghanistan returns to pre-9/11 mode.

    POSTSCRIPT

     

    SUMMERIZING APOLLO'S ARGUMENT

    By

    Franz Bolling

    True blue religion of peace Muslims are neither terrorists nor enemies of the United States. The Taliban, according to the Obama Administration, are neither terrorists nor enemies of the US. Therefore, the Taliban are true blue religion of peace Muslims.

     

    RELATED

    BARACK OBAMA’S IDEA OF A TRUE ISLAMIC STATE