Monthly Archives: March 2015

KERRY TURNS TO ALLAH TO SAVE NUKE DEAL WITH IRAN

 
 
 John Kerry silently praying to Allah at Lausanne.
 

IF TOMORROW COMES AND GOES

and nothing happens in Lausanne in nuke talks with Iran-no framework, no deal, no nothing-don't blame it on Bibi Netanyahu and his "anti-Obama" speech to Congress-or on his unexpected "racist" reelection two weeks ago; nor blame it on the 47 senators and their "treasonous" letter to Iran-making them worse than a platoon of  Bo Berghdahls; nor will France be to blame-retaliating for Obama's no-show at the Hebdo march; nor blame it on the Iranophobic Saudis whose king Obama bowed to six years ago-where's their gratitude?. No, not even Iran will be to blame despite the bait and switch it pulled today on sending its enriched uranium to Russia-testing the limits of Obama's butt-kissing desperation. 

(thanx popeye)

You heard it from the horse's mouth: the blame will be ALLAH'S AND ALLAH'S ALONE, "for everything that happens is His Will," says the High Holy Koran, God's ultimate revelation of truth. And if you're fool enough to disbelieve in a God then blame it on catastrophic CLIMATE CHANGE deranging people and driving them mad. For If it can turn virtuous women into filthy whores then it can lead peaceful nations into war.

 

OBAMA TO IRAN: Okay, I get it. If you like your enriched uranium you can keep your enriched uranium. Just promise not to make a bomb on my watch. .

WAS FRANCE’S THWARTING OF IRAN NUKE DEAL THE REAL REASON OBAMA SKIPPED THE PRO-HEBDO RALLY?

 Report: President Obama Threatens France For Not Supporting Iranian Nuclear Deal… | The Last Refuge

 

French President Francois Hollande feted by the Obamas last year at White House. The date was February 11th- the 35th anniversary of the Iranian Revolution which has caused so much death and destruction in the world,  and will cause more if Iran gets the bomb.

When Barack Obama leaves office in 2017 he desperately wants to do so with at least one significant achievement in foreign policy under his belt to compliment his historic achievement in domestic policy: Obamacare, his signature legislation. Before he was sworn in as president Obama imagined that his presidency would be diplomatically and gloriously rich in accomplishments rivaling the globally transforming presidency of Ronald Reagan who brought down the Soviet Union and won the Cold War-which seemed impossible at the start of his presidency. Using soft power, smart power, multilaterialism, appeasement and avoiding stupid (what a joke) the Great Blundering Appeaser believed he'd finish his presidency with the following major accomplishments:
 

1) End the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan-we're still fighting in both countries with no end in sight.

2) Reset relations with Russia that were ruined by the war with pro-western democratic Georgia and the liberation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia-Russia went to war against pro-western democratic Ukraine and liberated then annexed Crimea.

3) Make peace between Israelis and Palestinians with a two state solution -since Obama's been president Israel has twice gone to war with Hamas in Gaza; and Prime Minister Netanyahu has sworn they'd be no Palestinian State while he's in power.

4) End Iran's nuclear weapons program-this is being negotiated as I write.

Indeed, of the four great diplomatic achievements Obama envisioned in his future only one remains a possibility: stopping Iran from getting the bomb-and that is going very badly. To date, despite all the spin about the "successful" Interim Agreement signed with Iran in 2012 (and Iran cheated on, see), Obama has gotten practically nowhere in his negotiations with the mullahs; and he's destroyed what little credibility he had as a deal maker when he prematurely lifted billions of dollars in sanctions on Iran (getting nothing in return). Frighteningly, Iran's vast and growing $100 billion plus nuclear weapons infrastructure-which includes hardened underground bomb making facilities, and perhaps one or more secret sites-is still in tact with spinning centrifuges enriching uranium as it builds ICBMs to deliver its nukes across oceans and seas to Europe and America.
 
 
Indeed, as Iranian power lethally grows across the Middle East (and around the world) turning the Shiite Crescent into a Full Blazing Shia Sun of terror and blood, and as it draws ever closer to becoming the menacing nuclear North Korea of the Middle East, a miserable, mad Barack Obama faced with a foreign policy legacy worse than Jimmy Carter's is seemingly more desperate for a deal than is Iran (see).
 
Indeed, as the March 31st deadline approaches Obama is panicking and striking out at allies who disapprove of his bad and dangerous peace-in-our-time Munich-like deal that isn't linked to Iran's criminal behavior (its sponsorship of terror abroad and human rights abuses at home) and simply freezes and doesn't dismantle (without enforcement and verification) its nuclear program. And the worst of these friendly offenders isn't Israel (which has no seat at the negotiating table) but leftist socialist economically  struggling France that is part of the P5 +1 group and which I wrote about HERE and HERE.
 
French President Francois Hollande, left, shakes hands with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi during a meeting in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. (AP Photo/Yoan Valat, Pool) 
 
But since I last wrote on this subject I've learned that prospects for a deal have gotten worse for the Obama regime. For Egypt (which Obama has stupidly alienated) has joined Saudi Arabia and the other Sunni Arab states hostile to Tehran and closed a multi-billion dollar arms deal with France-thus strengthening the leverage that the anti-Iran axis has over France (see). Reports of the US bullying France to get on board its dangerous bad deal train wreck are probably true. But the consequences to France of doing so could cost them billions in arms sales it can ill afford due to a weak economy.
 
 
 
Judging from the way Washington is treating France it is likely that the real reason Obama skipped the pro-Hebdo rally in Paris last winter was because of the Hollande government's thwarting of the Iran nuke deal. Obama couldn't care less about France's economic woes or that France's conservatives are gaining strength in the polls;  of utmost importance to him  is his legacy and getting just about any kind of deal by March 31st that he can celebrate as a victory for peace with Iran's radical Islamic regime-that defines peace as IMPERIAL RESTORATION OF THE PERSIAN EMPIRE and  WORLD DOMINATION OF ISLAM. 
 
 
  

 

OBAMA MUST APOLOGIZE TO AMERICA FOR THE BERGDAHL SCANDAL

Obama deeply bowing to Japanese Emperor Akihito possibly as a symbolic gesture for the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki which shortened the war and saved a million lives. And now he must apologize to the nation for Bowe Berghdahl and the release of the Taliban Five.

 

MR. PRESIDENT, YOU TRAVELED AROUND THE WORLD APOLOGIZING FOR AMERICA

bowing and scraping before emperors and kings, believing you were doing the right and noble thing and fixing the damaged image of this country caused by your predecessor. And now you need to humble yourself before the American people and apologize for trading five bloodthirsty Taliban murderers for a worthless America-hating deserter responsible for the death of up to 14 brave soldiers. And then you need apologize to the dead soldiers' families for the White House photo op with the deserter's parents where you ignorantly took credit for his release as if it were a good and  praiseworthy deed. And lastly you must apologize to the deserter's platoon mates who you wrongly smeared as "swiftboating liars" for honestly telling the truth about his crimes. APOLOGIZE OR RESIGN, Mr. President. With only 15 percent of the military respecting you save what little remains of your honor.

 

 

RELATED

JUNE 30, 2009: THE OMINOUS DAY BO BERGDAHL DESERTED

BOWE BERGDAHL: HERO OF THE RADICAL LEFT

WHY BO BERGDAHL SHOULD HATE PRESIDENT OBAMA

 

 
Not only does this worst of all US presidents think that he's the 4th greatest ever, but laughably he now likens himself to Spiderman-the only thing this spider spins is a
 
 
The truth is this:
 
OBAMA IS TO AMERICA
WHAT A VILLAIN WITH KRYPTONITE IS TO SUPERMAN
 
 
 
 
 
 

 RELATED

THE GREATNESS OF BARACK OBAMA (SATIRE)

 THE GREAT DEPRESSOR AND HIS SUB-ZERO PRESIDENCY

BARACK OBAMA AND THE WORLD’S MOST BEAUTIFUL SOUND

LEADING U.S. UNIVERSITY RANKS OBAMA 5TH BEST PRESIDENT

THE ANNIVERSARY OF CLINTON’S APPEASEMENT BOMBING OF SERBIA FOR ISLAM AND OTHER MISTAKES AND MISERABLE THINGS

 
 
 
nato bombing Serbia
  On March 24, 1999, Bill Clinton unleashed a disastrous NATO air campaign against Yugoslavia, against the Christian Serbs, against a sovereign nation that posed no threat to members of the alliance.
 
WHILE BILL CLINTON WAS ATTEMPTING TO APPEASE
 
the Islamic world (and radical terrorists like Osama bin Laden) by showing how much he cared for Moslems and compassionately felt their pain in Bosnia and Kosovo-by attacking and killing Christian Serbs (our WW1 & 2 allies)-bin Laden and al Qaida unimpressed went ahead with their monstrous plans for 9/11. And now Clinton and his lying, lawless, incompetent wife (who turned the Benghazi consulate into a 9/11 death trap) want to return to the White House? The 9/11 Benghazi attack was a sign and reminder to the nation of Bill Clinton's responsibility for 9/11; and how he insanely preferred killing innocent Christian Serbs (defending themselves from Moslem jihadists allied to bin Laden) to protecting the homeland by going after al-Qaida. The Clintons can't be trusted with our national security. Returning them to the White House would be to worsen the catastrophe caused by Obama.
 
RELATED
 
 

 

SO DEMOCRATIC IDEALS ARE UPHELD BY WHO MR. PRESIDENT?

The theocratic Khomenists of Iran? The pan-Arab Nationalists of the West Bank? The Islamic supremacists of Gaza? The Moslem Brotherhood of Egypt? The neo-Ottomans of Turkey? Are these models of democratic principles, values and ideals that Netanyahu and Israel could learn from, Mr. President? Could they learn about these things from you? Not in a 1000 years. It's you who needs to learn from them.

 
 
Screen Shot 2015-03-19 at 11.30.24 PM
 
AFTER THE SIGNING OF THE MUNICH PACT

 Hitler mocked Chamberlain in private for being such an easily deceived fool. But Iran's Islamonazi leadership knows no such restraint. Their contempt for our weak, gutless, ineffective president (shared by most world leaders) is such that they openly mock him by telling the world how desperate he is for a deal, destroying a fake US aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf, chanting death to America; and now we learn of their plans for a nuclear EMP attack over the US to shut down and paralyze this country. And in his self-degrading, butt kissing attempt to get a bad deal for his legacy our hopeless putz of a pres goes back for more and more and more humiliation. Obama is like a long-suffering abused wife whose capacity for hurt is endless. Pathetic!
 
 
 
This isn't an incomplete picture of Denis McDonough.
                       
HEY, DENIS
 

I predict that 50 years from now the Jewish population of the Jewish West Bank in Jewish Judea and Samaria will be a robust 700,000 plus Jews. And no one will remember you and the stupid things you said today to a group of stupid leftwing Jewicidal Jews.

 
 
 
View image on Twitter
 

SURE JEH, ANYTHING YOU SAY

And Mohammed was the George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison of Islam rolled into one great democratic prophet of progress, justice and freedom.

 

 
 
WHAT’S NEXT?
 
Replacing the Declaration of Independence with a Declaration of Surrender to Allah, Islam and the prophet of darkness, bondage and chains?
 
 
 

 

REDUCING TO UTTER IDIOCY THE RADICAL LEFT’S ANTI-ISRAEL BIGOTRY

   

The man on the left tells his people,"If you like your doctor and healthcare plan you can keep them." The man on the right tells his people, "If you like East Jerusalem and your West Bank settlements you can keep them." The one is a cowardly leader that lies and lies and lies; the other is a man of  enormous courage and integrity who means what he says and says what he means. So much for Peter Beinard a stupid liberal American  Jew who wants to punish Israel for daring to deny fascist racist intolerant Palestinians a terrorist state next door.

THE ULTIMATE ARGUMENT AGAINST THE RADICAL LEFT ON THE MORAL SUPERIORITY OF ISRAEL IN THE MIDDLE EAST

Radical Leftists (like our idiot ill-starred president) are morally blind, mentally deranged,  well-meaning fools who search the wide world over looking for victims of oppression and injustice (real or imagined) to cry over and bleed for to feel morally  superior and alive. And high on their list of so-called victims are savage, racist, intolerant, liberal-hating Palestinians. Arguably the world's most despicable people in  the Palestinians were created by Israel's Arab enemies after the catastrophe of the Six Days War for use as a weapon and propaganda tool  to delegitimize the Jewish State and eventually destroy her. That the Palestinians (who didn't exist before 1967) were invented for this evil end is proved by the words of PLO executive Zahir Muhsein, who frankly told a Dutch newspaper in 1977:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a
Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle
against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality
today there is no difference between Jordanians,
Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and
tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of
a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand
that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian
people' to oppose Zionism. 

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state
with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa.
While as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa,
Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we
reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even
a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan." 

(PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein, in a 1977
interview with the Dutch newspaper Trouw.) 
 
 Now while uniting  a liberated Palestine (meaning Israel) to Jordan is no longer the PLO's overarching aim  (Jordan has a peace treaty with Israel and wants no part of this scheme)  the annihilation of Israel remains the PLO's goal under the genocidal  dictatorship of Mahmoud  Abbas-like Yasser Arafat a vicious, vile, Jew-hating Arab-Nazi supremacist with a deceptively friendlier face. Now to delegitimize Israel the radical idiot Left has bought into the big insane PLO lie that it is a "racist, warmonger, oppressive, apartheid, theocratic state carrying out genocide on an indigenous people." Indeed, the radical Left's vision  of Israel as a tyrannical monster of social, racial and economic injustice (a kind of nuclear armed apartheid South Africa of the Middle East) is bigoted, perverse and easily refuted by the following simple argument that I use in debate:
 
THE ARGUMENT
 
 
Let's suppose that you (Mr. Leftist) were a practicing Hindu yogi married to an atheist with a son who was gay and a beautiful, sexy teenage daughter with gorgeous legs who loved wearing mini skirts. And let's suppose (for whatever reason) you had to live in the Middle East with your choice of countries to live in (including the Palestinian Territories), what country would you choose? The country that would be the most respectful, tolerant and accepting of your Hindu (polytheistic pagan) faith, your wife's atheism, your son's homosexuality and your daughter's dressing style. Right? In other words, the country that would be safest for you and your family to live in; where each of you could be yourselves (be what you want to be pursuing your happiness and dreams) without fear of violence, persecution or death. Right? In short, you'd choose the country that was the most enlightened, progressive, modern, tolerant of minorities and CIVILIZED. Right? And of all the countries in the Middle East which would that be? Saudi Arabia? Egypt? Lebanon? Kuwait? Jordan? The Palestinian West Bank? Gaza? Or Israel?
 
I posted this argument in the comment section of the Beinart article and it started this thread which I'm certain will interest you
 
This is another trite tactic used by Israeli propagandists. They tout Israel as the only western style democracy in the region, but when critics of Israel hold it up to western democratic standards they say "look at Syria" "look at Iran" "look at Saudi Arabia" Which is it? Are you the best repressive middle Eastern regime, or the worst western style democracy? You can't have it both ways.
 
Nobody in the West, other than antisemites, would have any problem with Israel if it weren't for the settlements and the (now transparent) policy of apartheid designed to displace the people who stand in the way of your ethnic majority.
 
An "enlightened" democracy doesn't need to oppress or silence people in order to protect a specific religious or ethnic majority. This is the very opposite of "enlightenment."
 
 
 
It's typical of useful leftist idiots duped by lying Palestinian propaganda to blame the Palestinian-Israeli conflict on "Israeli settlements" on the West Bank when the Palestinian Liberation Organization was formed in May 1964, three years before the 1967 War when there were NO SETTLEMENTS. "Settlements" are the excuse for the ongoing conflict not the underlying ideological Arab-Islamo cause as the historical record shows.
 
BTW, that Israeli Jews have no RIGHT to settlements on the West Bank or to own East Jerusalem ignores the fact that prior to the 1948 War the West Bank and East Jerusalem were populated by Jews and Arabs. After the war, with Jordan having seized the West Bank and East Jerusalem, only Arabs were living there. WHY? What happened to the West Bank and East Jerusalem Jews? They were expelled by the Jordanians with their homes, businesses and farm lands seized by greedy, thieving, filthy Arabs-in the tradition of the thieving Prophet Mohammed whose evil example provided the moral justification for this theft.
 
 
Why does any of that matter? The boundaries of Israel were established in 1948. What they have "settled" since then they took by force. Going forward, they need a negotiated adjustment to that boundary, recognized by international law.
 
 
LOL!!! If the boundaries of Israel were settled in 1948 to the satisfaction of its Arab enemies why then did they continue their JIHAD (Koran inspired Holy War) against Israel? Why then did Syria, Jordan and Egypt repeatedly send murdering armed terrorist thugs into Israel (acts of war) to kill its citizens? Why then did these countries support the PLO (sworn to the annihilation of Israel) when it was founded three years before the 67 War and seizure of the West Bank, Golan Heights and Sinai in a defensive war against aggressor enemies? Because Israel's Arab enemies continued their unjustified jihad against Israel after 1948...giving Israel an absolute moral right and justification to expand its borders by force for the protection and security of its citizens. No other nation would have done less.
 
 
Why does any of that matter? The boundaries of Israel were established in 1948. What they have "settled" since then they took by force. Going forward, they need a negotiated adjustment to that boundary, recognized by international law.
 
 
LOL!!! If the boundaries of Israel were settled in 1949 to the satisfaction of its Arab enemies why then did they continue their JIHAD (Koran inspired Holy War) against Israel? Why then did Syria, Jordan and Egypt repeatedly send murdering armed terrorist thugs into Israel (acts of war) to kill its citizens? Why then did these countries support the PLO (sworn to the annihilation of Israel) when it was founded three years before the 67 War and seizure of the West Bank, Golan Heights and Sinai in a defensive war against aggressor enemies? Because Israel's Arab enemies continued their unjustified jihad against Israel after 1949...giving Israel an absolute moral right to expand its borders by force for the protection and security of its citizens. No other nation would have done less.
 
 
Absolute moral right?
 
I guess by that standard the US is morally justified in annexing Japan and kicking out all the Japanese people
 
 
 
But the Japanese unconditionally surrendered and allowed us to transform them from savage medieval imperialist barbarians into a peaceloving liberal free market democratic people-a danger to no one.
 
 
 
 19 HOURS, NO ANSWER
 
Thumbnail
(thanx Nanna)

IS FRANCE DRIVING OBAMA TO DESPAIR OVER IRAN NUKE DEAL?

 
 
John Kerry in France with singer James Taylor ironically singing "If You Got A Friend." Ironically because France is proving very unfriendly to him and Obama in nuke negotiations with Iran.
 
Nine days from now on March 31st (the sixth anniversary of Bibi Netanyahu becoming Israel's 9th Prime Minister) a political framework for stopping theofascist Iran from developing the ultimate weapon of terror and death to advance their growing regional and global power  is supposed to be reached. But things are looking grim. Unsurprisingly it's being reported that the French (whose President was opposed to Netanyahu coming to his country when Islamic gunmen killed the Charlie Hebdo 12 and Jews in a Kosher Deli) is opposed to the deal in its current form (like Netanyahu they too think it's bad) and is taking a very tough line that must be driving Obama to despair. We don't know what the French are objecting to or demanding in terms of further restrictions. But the reason for the tough line (as I said HERE) is the economic leverage that Saudi Arabia and other Sunni Gulf states have over the French on arms sales. For the French (whose economy is in recession) more important than Obama's bad deal with Iran (which they might have gone along with under normal circumstances) is keeping its multi billion dollar arms business with the Saudis.  It will be fascinating to see if nothing is achieved by the 31st giving Netanyahu a kind of victory 14 days from his landslide reelection, on the anniversary of his becoming PM.
 
BIDEN ON CAMPAIGN TRAIL OUTDOES NETANYAHU'S "RACISM"
 
 
During his campaign Bibi Netanyahu warned his political base to get out in force because "Arab voters are streaming in quantity to the polling stations," with left-wing groups "bringing them in buses." And this created an international uproar accusing him  of anti-Arab racisism and wanting to turn Israel's Arabs into  the enemy-which too many of them are.  But when Biden while campaigning in  2012  made this awful racist remark about Republicans to a black audience it practically went unnoticed by the mainstream press.
  
 
 Republicans want to put you all [blacks] back in chains?
 
RELATED
 
 
 

OBAMA FEELING BETRAYED BY ISRAEL THREATENS A DOOMED-TO-FAIL TWO STATE SOLUTION AT UN

 

Barack Obama: a desperate man with time running out on his achievement poor presidency threatening Israel with a UN resolution on a two state solution it doesn't give him a deal.

NetanjahuHandy

Following Britain's David Cameron, Canada's Stephen Harper, Australia's Tony Abbot and the leaders of Germany, Italy,  Spain and other EU states it seems that our feckless, blundering, lead-from-behind president was dragged kicking and screaming Thursday to congratulate Bibi Netanyahu on his historic, landslide election victory-when the Israeli people said no to 1999 and the catastrophic mistake they made by removing him from office in favor of Ehud Barak: the so-called peace candidate from Israel's delusional Left who tried and predictably failed to negotiate a two state solution with Yasser Arafat that ended in the disaster of the Second Intifada.

 
On Tuesday Israelis said no to giving up East Jerusalem for "peace;" no to a return to indefensible pre-1967 borders for "peace;" no to a right of return of millions of Palestinian refugees for "peace;" and no to bad deal Barack's Munich appeasement talks with Iran that's turned him into an international joke as it's not stopping their nuclear weapons program and terrorist expansion in the region.
 
 
The Israeli people have spoken and want Bibi Netanyahu to stay the course in defying US pressure and world opinion to compromise with unappeasable, implacable, hate driven enemies-medieval death cult Moslem savages, and Arab supremacist racists who can't tolerate the existence of the Jewish State and religiously live for its Nazi destruction.
 
Against the Palestinians and their useful leftist Western idiots the people of Israel rose up Tuesday and said
 
NO!
NEVER AGAIN!
BIBI IS RIGHT!
THE WORLD IS WRONG!
WE WILL DEFY YOU TO THE END! 
 
But unsurprisingly and contemptuously Obama is ignoring them. In his stupid little petty vindictive narcissistic Chicagoland brain he feels personally betrayed by the Israeli people as if they stabbed him in the back for being their good and loyal friend. After everything he's done for them they repay him by reinstating as PM the man he hates most in this world: his nemesis Bibi Netanyahu who slapped him down in public and humiliates him time and time again.
 
Look at what Obama's done for Israel and feel the poor man's pain: At Cairo before the Moslem world he declared his commitment to a safe and secure Israel, and keeping its unbreakable bond with America. And showing that he meant what he said Obama has sent billions in military aid to Israel making it more secure from its Moslem enemies than ever. Indeed, this aid included funds for the development of the Iron Dome anti-missile system which protected innocent Israelis from deadly Hamas missile attacks; and for its Arrow Weapon System to counter long-range ballistic missiles that could rain down death on Israeli cities from Iran, ISIS or other more distant enemy states. In fact, Obama claims that America's military assistance to Israel during his presidency has exceeded any other president's in history; and that this proves his friendship to the Israeli people and that he's "got their back (see)." And Bibi Netanyahu showing his gratitude for what Obama has done said this:
 
 “Thank you for unequivocally affirming Israel’s sovereign right to defend itself by itself against any threat. Thank you for enhancing Israel’s ability to exercise that right through generous military assistance, revolutionary missile defense programs, and unprecedented security and intelligence cooperation.

Thank you, Mr. President, for upholding the Jewish people’s right to a Jewish state in our historic homeland, and for boldly defending that right at the United Nations. And thank you for strengthening the unbreakable alliance between our two nations during your Presidency.” [March 20, 2013]

 

On the following day Israeli President Shimon Peres awarding Obama the Presidential Medal of Distinction (in Israel) said this at the ceremony:

This [Presidential Medal of Distinction] speaks to your tireless work to make Israel strong. And peace possible. Your presidency has given the close ties between Israel and the United States a new height. A sense of intimacy. A vision for the future. The people of Israel are particularly moved by your unforgettable contribution to their security. To defending our skies. To the collaboration in the domain of intelligence, which is the right way to preempt bloodshed. The diplomatic and military bonds between us have reached an unprecedented level.”

All this praise from the two highest Israeli leaders would have been enough for any US president for benefiting a true, trusted friend and ally. But Barack Hussein Obama isn't just any US president. From the day he entered office he was obsessed with the notion that he'd succeed where his predecessors had failed. And that he'd be the one who'd make history and broker a two state solution between Palestinians and Israel. 

 

 

But 70 days into office an anvil fell on Obama's unrealistic head:  Bibi Netanyahu became Israel's prime minister making reasonable demands on the extremist Palestinians that made negotiations for a two state solution unfeasible: "recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish State," said Bibi, "and give up demands for East Jerusalem and a right of return for millions of Palestinian refugees." And what did Obama do in response to this? What he's done with many of our enemies: he went into appeasement mode thinking he could change Bibi's mind in moderating his demands, and pulled out all the stops in giving aid to Israel.

But it failed. Bibi, though thankful to Obama for all the aid, was not about to repeat the mistakes of Ehud Barak with a Palestinian leadership that differed little in character from Yasser Arafat. Obama was mortified. He had bent over backwards to accommodate Israel and been its good friend not because it was the right thing to do, but with an ulterior motive that Netanyahu rightly refused to respect. Stupidly thinking in his confused leftist mind that Netanyahu not the Palestinians was the obstacle to peace, and that Israel had a real peace partner in Mahmoud Abbas (as if he were another Anwar Sadat) Obama would then work behind the scenes with American political operatives in Israel to bring Netanyahu down. And that failed too making Obama look weak, ineffective and foolish.

 

Besides himself with rage over feeling betrayed Obama is now threatening as a last resort to go to the UN Security Council for a resolution on a two state solution. But that didn't work in 1947 when the partition of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states (accepted by the Jews) was rejected by the Arab League who chose war instead and lost. And it isn't going to work now as Israel will absolutely not return to the pre-1967 borders giving sworn Moslem-Arab Jew hating enemies more land; and there is no one who can force Israel to do so-especially with the unbreakable courageous defiant Bibi Netanyahu at the helm of a nuclear armed state that could devastate the Middle East in minutes and sink the world economy.

In short, the worse case scenario for Israel is using the Samson Option (rattling the nuclear sabre in private) to end any proposed damaging UN sanctions for noncompliance with a two state resolution. And realistically, who would risk the lives of millions and a world-wide depression for the despicable, hate driven, medieval Palestinians becoming a state with East Jerusalem for its capital? Obama? Russia? China? France? This is why a UN resolution on a two state solution (if it ever happens) will fail; and Obama again will be defeated by Netanyahu adding to his  legacy of folly and failure.

 

 

 

IS BIBI NETANYAHU A LIAR FOR REJECTING THE TWO STATE SOLUTION WHICH HE AFFIRMED SIX YEARS AGO AND RECENTLY TO CONGRESS? AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS

 
 
 
 Netanyahu 2009
 
There are two free peoples living side by side in this small land, with good neighborly relations and mutual respect, each with its flag, anthem and government, with neither one threatening its neighbor's security and existence.``
 
Netanyahu May 2011
 
“In any peace agreement that ends the conflict, some settlements [on the West bank] will end up beyond Israel’s borders.......We will be very generous on the size of a future Palestinian state … I am willing to make painful compromises to achieve this historic peace."
 
Netanyahu US Congress March 2015
 
Text of PM Bibi Netanyahu's recent speech to the US Congress
"We must also find a way to forge a lasting peace with the Palestinians. Two years ago, I publicly committed to a solution of two states for two peoples: A Palestinian state alongside the Jewish state.
I am willing to make painful compromises to achieve this historic peace. As the leader of Israel, it is my responsibility to lead my people to peace.
This is not easy for me. I recognize that in a genuine peace, we will be required to give up parts of the Jewish homeland. " 
 
Netanyahu Campaign 2015
 
Declares definitively that if he was returned to office he would never establish a Palestinian state

 

IS BIBI NETANYAHU A LIAR

as the Daily Kos and many on the Left are saying because he reversed his position on a two state solution and now rejects the establishment of a Palestinian state? No way! Six years ago Netanyahu offered the Palestinians the following two state solution, which they rejected: First, Palestinians recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish State; and second, they drop their demands for East Jerusalem as their capital, and the right of return for millions of Palestinian refugees (which would effectively destroy the Jewish nature and character of Israel). In his offer only the West Bank settlements were negotibale (the "painful concessions"). As Bibi's solution was rejected by the Palestinian leadership (Abbas and Hamas)-and he patiently gave them six years to reconsider-how does withdrawing the offer (the only one acceptable to him and Likud) make him a liar? How can you make peace with a people who want a right of return for millions of refugees as this would destroy the possibility of a two state solution and eventually turn Israel into a Palestinian state with a Jewish minority subject to an Arab majority?

Anyway, it would be absolutely hypocritical of Obama to punish Israel at the UN or anywhere for reversing HIS two state solution when he has known Netanyahu's stringent position all along, and its continued rejection by the intransigent Palestinians.

 

Sarcasm
 
 

AT LAST, AXIS OF EVIL OBAMA

has found the true, authentic "religion of peace" Islamic State that ISIS (at its best) could never be. Now that Iran is no longer a terror state it's the "More Perfect Union" of the Middle East. The new shinning Medina upon a hill that would make Mohammed proud. Ayatollah Khamenei is the new prophetic voice of God-the vessel of Allah's redemption, goodness and grace on Earth heading a social justice republic of equality, virtue and love. Will Obama's kowtowing to Iran earn him the honor of following Putin and meeting Khamenei face-to-face-who, as a rule, doesn't allow infidel leaders within a mile of him unless their pro-Iran? Obama (like Putin) is now a friend of the Islamic Revolution; and perhaps Khamenei's in the mood to make another exception and grant him an audience.

Peace at last!

Peace at last!

Thank God Almighty we have peace at last!

By the way, it did wonders for the security of South Korea when Bush removed the nuclear Norks from the terror list.

Putin receives the honor of being the first infidel leader to meet with a Supreme Leader of Iran. Will Khamenei grant the same to Obama? Or is he too contemptibe for Khamenei?

RELATED

WILL OBAMA MEET WITH KHAMENEI IN TEHRAN FOR HIS SUPREME MUNICH MOMENT?

 

 
 
 

THE MENTAL AND MORAL MIDGET

in the White House is fighting a losing battle against a larger than life Jewish leader who is favored by Heaven to continue as Israel's PM. As the wounded  narcissistic nut case doubles down on his personal vendetta against Netanyahu, his victory Tuesday will prove to be a tragic foreshadowing of worse humiliations and setbacks to come. If Obama doesn't accept the reality of Netanyahu's wisdom and moral clarity on Iran and the Palestinians he will finish his days a broken man in deep regret with a foreign policy legacy of ashes and dust.

 

 
Is this a new cold war? Just leave it to  dumb ass Obama  to get into a cold war with an ally. But wasn't this the same Obama who repeatedly said that the bond between the US and Israel is indissoluble?
 
 
 
Is a rightwing military dictatorship coming to America as it did with August Pinochet in Chile?
 

THE LEFT'S WAR ON POLICE

is part of a radical left George Soros (seescheme to destroy what's left of our Judeo-Christian constitutional capitalist order by reducing it to chaos, and replacing it with a leftwing socialist dictatorship. What's wrong with this scheme is that the breakdown of law and order would most likely push the public farther to the law and order right with a right-wing military dictatorship taking power that would utterly crush the left and put men like Soros in jail. A good example would be the Pinochet government in Chile and its harsh crackdown on the pro-Cuban communist supporters of Salvador Allende-a Marxist senator turned president like Barack Obama. Allende's socialist agenda made a predictable shambles of Chile's economy and divided the country into warring camps.

Chilian Marxist President Allende with Cuba's Fidel Castro.

RELATED

 THE MAN WITH THE MIDDLE NAME “HUSSEIN,” OR BARACK HUSSEIN ALLENDE

 
  Iran’s Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei, said: “The Zionist regime is a regime whose pillars are extremely shaky and is doomed to collapse.” 
 
 
THE SAMSON OPTION AGAIN
 
 The quote from Khamenei (a sick frail man with cancer) sounds like Samson in the bible bringing down the temple of the Philistines upon himself. If Israel should be faced with collapse from its enemies it will exercise the Samson Option and destroy Iran and the entire Moslem Middle East in a nuclear holocaust....where (to paraphrase Jonathan Schell) the Arab living will envy the Arab dead (see).
 
 
 
 
 

IN RETALIATION REPUBLICANS

should move the Keystone pipeline project to Israel. Or ban all electric cars, solar panels and windpower farms to incease CO2 output in anticipation of an Al Gore run for the presidency. /sarc

 

 
Screen Shot 2015-03-17 at 10.56.14 AM
 
 

GIVE THIS KID JEWISH JUSTICE!

Find the kid then put him in a sealed, air tight room with ten fat Jews with flatulence problems wearing gas masks and fart until he begs for mercy.

 

 

 It is said that a picture is worth a 1000 words. But this one is worth a 1000 woes as Obama's presidency in the end will come crashing down on his head with the realization that he'd been wrong all along; and that the foibles of his predecessor won't help him with his legacy.

NETANYAHU’S SPEECH TO CONGRESS, MUNICH 1938 , ISAAC HERZOG AND 1999 REDUX

On Saturday February 7, 2009 (the 38th day of the year*) just four days after radical terrorist Shiite Iran entered the Space Age by launching its first orbiting satellite (see), and three days before two Russian and US satellites were totally obliterated in an unprecedented collision over Siberia (see) Vice President Joe Biden (born 49 weeks into World War II**) was in Munich, Germany (symbol of war causing duplicity, naïvety and appeasement) foolishly offering Iran and Russia olive branches of peace. Rightly called by Heritage Foundation's Nile Gardiner "one of the weakest projections of U.S. leadership on foreign soil in recent memory (see)" Biden's speech foreshadowed the misjudgments, strategic blunders and foreign policy disasters to come, and are now being compounded. 
*38 is 1938 abbreviated.

 **Biden was born November 20, 1942. 

Then on March 31-7 weeks from Biden's February 7th Munich speech-on the 70th day of the Obama presidency Bibi Netanyahu (for the second time in 9 years) became Israel's 9th Prime Minister. Ominously the dates February 7 and March 31, 2009 were 70 years, 4 months and 70 years 6 months from September 29, 1938. That was the day of historic infamy and folly when Neville Chamberlain, mistaking Hitler for a statesman and Nazi Germany for a normal European power with legitimate political grievances, agreed to the Munich Pact ceding the Sudetenland to Germany.
Now fast forward six years later to Netanyahu's recent address to Congress-his 3rd address on the 3rd day of the 3rd month of March during his 3rd term as prime minister*. Sounding like Winston Churchill warning that the Munich Pact was a bad deal for Great Britain and the peace of Europe Netanyahu warned about the catastrophe that awaits the Middle East and world peace if radical jihadist Islamic Iran's nuclear weapons program isn't completely shut down along with their global terrorist activities. 

*Since his 1st term in the 90s Netanyahu has had two consecutive term. He's now running for a 3rd consecutive term .

 Now here is where it gets profound. The speech which started at precisely 11:11 am with the first "thank you" ran for approximately 40 minutes to the last "thank you" and (when the 7 Hebrew words from Deuteronomy 31:6 are added) amazingly totalled up to 3876* words. What is amazing and seems ominous and could be prophetic about the speech's word count (apart from its prescient message) is that 3876, whch is headed by the number 38, is a multiple of 1938 twice (1938 + 1938 = 3876) giving us the year of the disastrous Munich Pact.

*Strangely, Netanyahu's speech was 76 years from the 1938 signing of the Munich Pact  (see).

BIDEN , KERRY AND ISAAC HERZOG MEET IN MUNICH 
On  February 7, 2015, exactly six years to the date of Biden's portentous Munich speech (and on a Saturday as in 2009) Joe Biden and John Kerry met with Israeli opposition leader, so-called peace candidate, Isaac Herzog in Munich-obviously to discuss policy issues and the administrations support for his election run against Netanyhau for the prime-ministership (see). 
Herzog's party (Zionist Union) who recently pulled ahead of Netanyahu's Likud Party  in the polls and could possibly win would likely be as disastrous for Israel as was Ehud Barak who defeated Netanyahu in 1999 in a landslide-and whose naïve Chamberlain-like weakness in negotiating an impossible peace (blindly brokered by Bill Clinton) with Jew hating, Arab Nazi Yasser Arafat (thinking he turned moderate) led to the catastrophe of the Second Intifada where hundreds were killed and injured.
It is perhaps a providential warning to the Israeli people that from the Munich meeting between Biden, Kerry and Herzog on Februray 7 (the 38th day of the year) to tomorrow's election on March 17 is amazingly  and ominously exactly 38 DAYS.
Reinforcing, I believe, the above tragic sign of coming Munich-like disasters for Israel if Herzog replaces Netanyahu there is the unsettling fact that tomorrow's election is just one day short of the 146th anniversary of Neville Chamberlain's birth*.
 *Born March 18, 1869. 
 To summarize the above: from the 38th day of 2009 when Biden gave his appeasement speech in Munich, to Bibi Netanyahu's third speech to Congress totaling 3876* words (twice 1938), to Biden and Kerry's meeting with the weak, dovish, Barak clone  Isaac Herzog at Munich on the 38th day of the year-38 days before tomorrow's election-the defeat of Netanyahu has the Munich disaster written all over it. Which should surprise no one as our unrealistic, self-deceived, foreign policy failed president is hell-bent on repeating Bill Clinton's blunder of trying to force Israel into a two state solution with an enemy who wants a single Arab/Moslem state and victory over Jews.
* As the Munich Pact was agreed to in the 38th year of the 20th century (on the 29th day of September) it was 76 years from Netanyahu's speech-which is oddly reflected in the number 3876 (see). By the way, March 17 is the 76th day of the year.
OBAMA, HERZOG AND SEPTEMBER 29, 1938
 
The Munich Pact was agreed to by Hitler, Chamberlain, Mussolini and French premier Daladier late in the evening of September 29, 1938, and was signed in the early morning hours of the following day (see).  Now when Obama won the presidency on November 4, 2008 it was on the 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis-anticipating his intractable problems with Iran and perhaps a humiliation as severe as the hostage crisis (see).
This crisis which painfully humiliated the US for 444 days (and was the opening shot of radical Islamic jihad against our country and the West in modern times) resulted from Jimmy Carter abandoning the US friendly Shah and letting Islamic supremacists come to power thinking they were moderate liberal democrats. Now as this same Chamberlain-like naivety guides Barack Obama's negotiations with Iran (he now calls the mullahs "US allies" and its leadership "moderate" and no longer sponsoring terror) and his backing of Isaac Herzog's party in Israel, it is fascinating to note that the number 29 (another symbol of Munich appeasement giving us the day not the year) dominates these relationships. This can be seen in the birth dates of Obama and Herzog, and elsewhere as you will see below, hence: 
 Obama was born 8-4-1961 and Herzog ten months earlier on 9-22-1960 (see).

8+4+1+9+6+1 = 29

9+2+2+1+9+6+0 = 29

The birth dates of both Obama and Herzog total 29 corresponding to the 29th day of September 1938 when the Munich Pact was agreed to; and to the 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis* when Obama was elected president-as he's repeating with Iran the same Munich-like appeasement that characterized Chamberlain's relationship with Hitler.

*It is also fascinating to note that when the Ayatollah Khomeini returned to Tehran from exile in France to start the Iranian Revolution the date February 1, 1979 also totals to 29.

2+1+1+9+7+9 = 29

ELECTION DAY MARCH 17, 2015, AND MUNICH 29
The question now is this: with Isaac Herzog overtaking Netanyahu in the polls (due mostly to a weak Israeli economy) could tomorrow's election be 1999 all over again with Netanyahu being defeated by a weak Chamberlain-like dovish candidate like Ehud Barak? Only God knows what the outcome will be; but I may have discovered numeric signs that warn Israel of a catastrophe if Herzog becomes Israel's tenth prime minister (sharing it with Tzipi Livini). What follows is truly amazing and possibly ominous.

 From  Thursday, September 22, 1960 (Isaac Herzog's birth)

To Tuesday, March 17, 2015 (The Israeli election)

Result: 19,899 days (see).

You will notice that number of days separating Isaac Herzog's birth from election day has the year 1999 encoded in it-the year Ehud Barak defeated Netanyahu.  Moreover, in calculating the number of days separating Ehud Barak's birth from Herzog's we get what looks like another inauspicious sign:   

From Thursday, February 12, 1942 (Ehud Barak's birth) (see) 

To Thursday, September 22, 1960 (Isaac Herzog's birth)

Result: 6797 days (see). 

Why is this number inauspicious? Add up the digits,

6+7+9+7 = 29

But there is more. In counting the number of days from Netanyahu's birth to tomorrow's election this is what results:

FromFriday, October 21, 1949 (Netanyahus's birth)

To Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Result: 23,888 days (see)

Now add up the digits

2+3+8+8+8 = the unlucky inauspicious Munich 29.

If Netanyahu doesn't continue as Israel's prime minister until Obama leaves office (and he's replaced by a pro-Israel president) these next 22 months could be an Obama-Herzog created hell for Israel-like it was under Clinton when peace negotiations broke down between Ehud Barak and the evil Yasser Arafat.
POSTSCIPT
For those interested in checking my word count of Netanyahu's speech to Congress below is the Washington Post transcript. However, to get the proper count you need to eliminate the advertisements together with the words (APPLAUSE) (LAUGHTER) and (SPEAKING IN HEBREW).
The complete transcript of Netanyahu’s address to Congress - The Washington Post 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

WHY BARACK OBAMA IS WORSE THAN NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN AND ALL GREAT APPEASERS IN HISTORY COMBINED

 
Hitler's Nazi troops victoriously marching through the streets of Prague.
 
 On this day of March 15th 76 years ago when Hitler's Nazi army shredded the Munich Pact signed just 23 weeks before and nonviolently invaded the frightened Czechoslovakian provinces of Bohemia and Moravia taking over the country, it opened Neville Chamberlain's eyes to what a fool he'd been in treating Hitler as a normal European statesman with legitimate post-war grievances that could be appeased-and he began the rearming of Great Britain preparing for war.
 
But after appeasement and appeasement, embarrassment after embarrassment, and failure after failure in trying to get Iran to moderate its behavior and give up its ambition of becoming the nuclear armed terrorist hegemon of the Middle East: after brutally crushing the anti-mullah pro-US  democratic revolution in Tehran, after swallowing up Baghdad upon US troops deserting Iraq, after supporting Bashar Assad with Hezbollah jihadists and arms as he was mass murdering and gassing the Syrian people in the tens and thousands; after supplying Taliban insurgents with weapons to kill US  troops and after watching the fall of the US friendly regime in Yemen to Iranian backed rebels what does Barack Obama do? Does it open his eyes to what a fool he's been in treating radical terrorist theonazi Iran with a sensitivity and respect unbecoming a great power? NO!  Instead, after six long years of DEATH TO AMERICA and countless verbal attacks and ridicule Barack Obama has his idiot wife celebrate the Iranian New Year of Nowruz in the White House. It's mind boggling.
 
 
 As Obama's extreme radical weakness in dealing with enemies goes beyond Iran to include Russia, China, Cuba and the Moslem Brotherhood, as he has made the world a more dangerous place for freedom, human rights and peace he stands as a uniquely towering figure among history's foolish appeasers...so much so that he can only be compared to himself.
 
On this day, the 76th anniversary of the Nazi invasion of Prague, I declare  to the world that the Obama/Chamberlain analogy is dead, as Obama has taken ass-kissing appeasement to a whole new level of insanity.
 
 
 
 POSTSCRIPT I
 
 
 
REPUBLICANS, TREMBLE!
 
 
The weakest, most clueless, most ineffective president in US history (the leader who just 15% of the military respects and no one fears) is daring you to cross the red line and interfere with his failing appeasement negotiations with radical fanatical terrorist Iran. Cross that line and he will strike you with all the girlie man blows his gutless soul can muster. CROSS AT YOUR PERIL GOP! Don't say you haven't been warned.
 
POSTSCRIPT II
 
COLUTZUS
 
 
Hank Frost comments:
 
"Excellent post and true: Obama towers above all past appeasers. He’s the Appeasement Colossus."
 
My reply:
 

Actually Obama is a COLUTZUS: a colossal klutz. Or, in the immortal words of William Shakespeare:

Cassius:
Why, man, he [Obama] doth bestride the narrow world
Like a COLUTZUS , and all past appeasers
Walk under his huge legs, and peep about…..

 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

IS FRANCE AND SAUDI ARABIA DOOMING OBAMA’S IRAN NUKE DEAL AT THE UN?

 
 
 
 
French President Hollande and the Saudis.
 
 
I owe my readers an apology for what I previously wrote on this page and deleted. What I said about the UN Security Council was only partially true. It is true that the Obama administration will fail to bypass Congress and get the UNSC to sanction and turn into international law any bad Chamberlain- like "peace in our time" Munich deal it makes with radical terrorist Islamonazi Iran. But this won't be done as I wrongly supposed by Jordan, Nigeria and Malaysia (three of the fifteen council members) voting against the treaty. For what  is required to pass it are nine votes, which Obama absolutely has. But what Obama doesn't have and desperately needs are all five permanent members of the UNSC, each one of which has veto power over  any resolution, measure or treaty.
 
Indeed, Obama can ridicule Netanyahu and the 47 Republican senators all he wants; and the left can rage that there's a vast right-wing conspiracy afoot to deprive Obama of a framework or treaty with Iran because he's black or we hate his guts. But at the UNSC his real problem is with one of its five permanent members who will almost certainly resist any bad appeasement deal Obama wants with Iran; and that country is France with its socialist president Francois Hollande.
 
France which has given Obama so much trouble in the P5+1 talks with Iran, and was utterly shocked to the point of contempt when Obama eased sanctions on Iran with getting nothing in return (an obviously stupid desperate Munich appeasement move), will only settle for a treaty where Iran agrees to completely end its enrichment of uranium and dismantle its nuclear weapons making capabilities. Why would France be so stringent in its demands? Because the economically distressed French (they're suffering a recession) are in the pocket of Iran's powerful Sunni enemies, namely Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Kuwait, the Emirates and other Sunni gulf states.
 
Indeed, unfortunately for the Obama administration Saudi Arabia and some of these other countries have multibillion dollar contracts with France to purchase weapons and military equipment; and they won't tolerate France voting in favor of  a deal that guarantees (as Netanyahu warned Congress) "Iran getting the bomb any time in the future." NO IRAN BOMB EVER! That is their policy. Indeed, there's no way that the economically distressed French would risk their lucrative arms contracts with this Saudi led coalition to support a bad US-Iran nuke deal. And this is why the French as I write are not on board with the Obama administration with Kerry saying that "more work needs to be done to get to where France and the US want to be." Where they ideally want to be is where the Saudis, the Israelis, Jordan, Egypt and the other Sunni states want Iran to be: giving up its nuclear ambitions completely and absolutely. But that isn't going to happen as Iran is hell-bent on getting the bomb and continuing its expansion across the Middle East and global sponsoring of terror. It's either all or nothing with the Saudi led coalition.  Either the mullahs give up their quest of becoming a nuclear armed state with ICBM capabilities, or they'll be no deal at the P5+1 talks and at the UNSC with France walking out like Reagan on Gorbachev at Reykjavik.
 
In short, if Obama wants to take his Iran deal to the UN it will give the Saudi led Sunni coalition tremendous leverage over it practically guaranteeing its failure. In other words, without a deal approved by Saudi Arabia Obama doesn't have France or stand a chance in getting his "peace in our time" moment. 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
 
Meanwhile, our super-butt kissing, peace-through-weakness, get-a-deal-at-any-price-with-Iran-president observed the Iranian New Year of Nowruz in the White House hoping it would move the heart of Iran's cancer eaten supreme leader.
 
 
 
Works like a charm every time.
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

MY “TREASONOUS” LETTER TO IRAN’S SUPREME LEADER AYATOLLAH ALI KHAMENEI (POSTSCRIPT: JOHN KERRY: 48TH TRAITOR)

 

 

To Ayatollah Khamenei Supreme leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran:

 As a concerned citizen of the United States of America this is to warn you in no uncertain terms of the possible consequences to Iran and your regime if you continue your nuclear weapons program, global terrorist activities and building of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) which can threaten my country with nuclear attacks. Indeed, unless you agree to the complete dismantling and destruction of your uranium enrichment facilities (nuclear weapons making infrastructure), and stop the funding, training and arming of Islamic terrorist groups in the Middle East and beyond, any agreement that you conclude unilaterally (not radified by Congress) with the Obama Administration will be meaningless, invalid, non-binding, and will be revoked by a future Republican President. Moreover, the new President with the backing of Congress will likely move to reimpose the full range of economic sanctions prematurely lifted by this Administration with possible painful and costly additions. 
 
But it gets worse, sir. Be warned that the new Republican President may request from Congress and be granted a WAR RESOLUTION ACT against your country making regime change the official policy of the United States, and granting him the authority to 1) launch military strikes against your nuclear facilities and other military targets, and 2) to invade your country to topple your regime and end your oppressive autocratic rule.
 
I pray, sir, that this letter will bring you to your senses about the likely devastating consequences to you and your regime if a bad deal is reached with this Administration. BEND OR BE BROKEN!  What happened to Saddam could happen to you. The American people are losing patience. You have been warned.
 
Sincerely,
 
At great risk to my life and liberty,
 
ApolloSpeaks
 
 
 
  POSTSCRIPT I
 
The letter sent by the 47 Republican Senators to the Iranians  is protected as free speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution and could have been legally and lawfully sent by any American speaking as a citizen just as I do in my letter above. If the Senators' letter is "treasonous" then so is mine. However, those accusing the Senators of "treason"  are either ignorant of the Constitution or are leftist liars smearing good men who want to shut down debate on Obama's bad butt kissing deal .
 
 POSTSCRIPT II
 
JOHN KERRY: 48TH TRAITOR
 
 
 
If the 47 Republican Senators are irresponsibly and traitorously undermining US foreign policy for saying that an agreement with Iran would not be legally binding then what does that make John Kerry for saying the same thing? Now there are 48 traitors. Is this utterly laughably incoherent of Kerry or what?
 
POSTSCRIPT III
 
One man is the supreme leader of Iran, the other is the supreme joke of America. 

REPUBLICANS’ LETTER TO IRAN, MSNBC AND AIR AMERICA AND OBAMA’S BOYCOTT OF BIBI’S SPEECH

 

 

 

Republican Letter to Iran to Sabotage Nuclear Talks Could Backfire | The New Republic

 

Does anyone recall Ted Kennedy's outrageous collusion (making common cause) with the Soviets in trying to defeat Ronald Reagan in the 1984 election (see)? And wasn't Teddy Obama's mentor and kingmaker thinking he was the "new JFK"? Moreover, isn't it Obama who's "sabotaging" US foreign policy by being the greatest and mots dangerous enabler of Iranian power since  worthless Jimmy Carter deserted the pro-West Shah for America-hating Ayatollah Khomenie....thinking he was a Jeffersonian democrat?  If it weren't  for Jimmy Carter would there be a radical genocidal terrorist Iran threatening America, Israel and the Sunni Middle East with nuclear armed jihadist martydom and Armageddon? "LET IRAN BURN SO LONG AS ISLAM PREVAILS," said the Jeffersonian Khomenie who triggered an eight year war with Saddam Hussein where one million were killed and an equal number injured. Who then was the ultimate saboteur of US foreign policy in the region? And who is continuing his disgraceful legacy of weakness, appeasement and utter rank stupidity?

Come to think of it if Obama can't negotiate with Republicans why should we expect anything but failure in negotiating with unappeasable jihadist enemies who want to destroy us for Allah, Islam and a Moslem world government-an idiotic but dangerous utopian dream like a socialist one world borderless state? Anything less than Iran stopping enrichment and the dismantling of its nuclear weapons infrastructure and ICBM capabilities is failure requiring a military solution. If the people of Iran don't rise up and overthrow their Islamonazi masters war is coming.

 

 

DEMOCRATS COLLUDE WITH SOVIETS TO UNDERMINE REAGAN

What harm is a letter by 47 Republican Senators explaining to Iranians how our constitutional system works compared to the Democrats in the 1980s colluded with the Soviets in stiring up massive worldwide nuclear war hysteria to undermine Reagan's tough anti-Soviet policies (that won the Cold War)?

 

DEBATES ON THE NEW REPUBLIC

magboy47
 
 

@ApolloSpeaks2. 'DOES ANYONE RECALL TED KENNEDY'S COLLUSION WITH THE SOVIETS?'

Does anyone recall the collusion of the whole Republican Party with the government of Iran?  Eh? 

 
ApolloSpeaks2
 
 

@magboy47 @ApolloSpeaks2 Teddy represented the entire Democrat Party which, by the way, colluded with the Soviets in whipping up mass nuclear war hysteria over Reagan's tough anti-Soviet policies (which won the Cold War).

magboy47
 
 

@ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47 Reagan caved to his own hysteria.  After WWIII almost started over an incident in 1983, Reagan, in a panic, initiated nuclear disarmament with the Soviets.  Do your homework.

 
 
ApolloSpeaks2
 
 

@magboy47 @ApolloSpeaks2 lol!!!

It was Reagan's momentous, courageous epoch-making walkout on Gorbachev at Reykjavík in 1986 (after 45 minutes) that was the beginning of the end of the Cold War. As Gorby said: "I realized then that a new world was possible." Then several years later Gorby admitted that "Ronald Reagan spent the Soviet Union into bankruptcy."

 
 
 
 

@ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47 Teddy Kennedy's free-lance nuclear diplomacy in 1984 represented "the entire Democrat Party"?  Didn't the Democrats have a Presidential nominee in 1984 (Walter something or other), who was not in favor of a nuclear freeze or other pro-Soviet gestures the way Kennedy was?  And what about Al Gore, Sam Nunn and approximately half to 2/3 of the Democratic Congressional delegation, who were also not exactly on board with détente with the Soviets in 1984?

You are entitled to your opinions about how Reagan spent the Soviets into oblivion or stared them down in nuclear negotiations.  You are not entitled to your own facts about Democratic foreign policy in 1984.

 
ApolloSpeaks2
 
 

@Widldboy @ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47Walter Mondale absolutely campaigned for a nuclear freeze in 1984-the Democrat Party was overwhelmingly for it by at least 90% with Gore and Nunn among the few  exceptions.The Dems,  liberal media and Soviets had millions marching across the country and world for a unilateral nuclear freeze and against deployment of missile defense systems in Europe. Reagan laughed them off as weak, frightened, well-meaning fools and went on to peacefully defeat the Soviets and transform the world.

Republican opposition to and obstruction of Obama and his policies is kid stuff compared to the titanic forces allied against Reagan. What a man! Compared to Reagan Obama is a moral and mental pipsqueak.

 

FranzLiebkind
 
 

@ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47@CeceliaHolland 

The beginning of the end of the Cold War came at the beginning--with Kennan's "Long Telegram" of 1946. It captured the 45-year strategy, adopted even by presidents who had rejected it publicly on the campaign trail, that fatally weakened the USSR.

 

 

@FranzLiebkind @ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47 @CeceliaHolland Reagan opposed containment, coexistence and détente. His policy was "roll back." He wanted victory over the Soviets and an end to the Cold War, and achieved it by relentlessly hitting them from every conceivable angle (economic, political, strategic) short of war. George Kennan was so freaked out by Reagan's radical change of strategy that he fought him tooth and nail believing with the nuclear freeze loons that he was the most dangerous man on earth. I give Reagan 70% of the credit for finally collapsing the Soviet Empire. Ted Kennedy overwhelmed by the magnitude of Reagan's success said it best, "Ronald Reagan won the Cold War." And so he did.


http://redirect.disqus.com/url?impression=b0d3e166-c7e9-11e4-96a6-002590853080&forum=1422873&thread=3583993461&url=https://disqus.com/by/Lordwhiteman/?utm_source=reply&utm_medium=email&utm_content=avatar:QAR-etkLQMBqRbBQAookDziKok8&variant=active&experiment=digests&behavior=click&post=1901046534&type=notification.post.registered&event=email

Lordwhiteman

You do know the Pythia where high on hallucinogenic gases when they spoke for Apollo.

 

 
Avatar

And what were the liberal left and media high on when they went hysterical over Ronald Reagan's sober, sane victorious anti-Soviet policies? Perhaps they were all sniffing glue?

 

 Why Fox News Is Winning | Comments | RealClearPolitics

 

MSNBC the LEAST trusted cable network. Great work guys. I'm sure you're proud of yourselves. Below is your fate if you stay your lying leftist course.
 
 
FOX ROCKS!  
 
IT'S THE GOLD STANDARD
 

for cable news. Fair, balanced and unafraid to challenge the liberal media, the Democrat Party and the big leftist lies about America, government and the world. And unless MSNBC emulates Fox reporting more of the real news and not propagandizing for Democrats and Progressives it could go the way of Air America (remember them) into the crapper of leftist history.

 

RELATED 

 THE ASTONISHING AIR AMERICA/KEITH OLBERMANN “COINCIDENCE”

 

 
 

WHY DO I BELIEVE OBAMA

when he said that he boycotted Bibi Netanyahu’s address to Congress but read the transcript? Because you can’t hear the thunderous pro-Bibi ovations from the transcript-which would have greatly upset our thinned skinned, Netanyahu-hating president.

 

JOHN BOEHNER MUST INVITE EGYPT’S PRESIDENT AL-SISI TO ADDRESS CONGRESS

 Watch VIDEO: Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi speaks to Fox News’ Bret Baier in Cairo on the failure of American leadership - Atlas Shrugs

ATTN: JOHN BOEHNER
  

It is critically, urgently, absolutely important that you invite President al-Sisi to address Congress (like you did Bibi Netanyahu) on the subject of Obama's virtual desertion of Egypt and its allies in their struggle with ISIS, al-Qaida, the Moslem Brotherhood and all radical Islamic supremacist groups. The American public needs to hear this great man to understand the terrible danger Obama's weak leadership is putting us in and what needs to be done. You did a great patriotic thing by inviting  Netanyahu to speak on the perils of Iran's nuclear weapons capabilities and growing regional power. Now follow-up with al-Sisi!

 

Tweet John Boehner and tell him you want him to invite President al-Sisi to address Congress like Netanyahu, 
 

 

OBAMA REVEALS HIS ANNIHILATING HATRED OF ISRAEL WITH MALLEY APPOINTMENT

 Obama Appoints Man He Fired for Hamas Contacts as Middle East Coordinator | FrontPage Magazine

 

 

Obama's annihilating hatred of Israel most likely began when he joined Reverend Wright's Israel-hating, pro-Hamas racist church and continues today as is evident with the recent appointment of anti-Israel peace activist Robert Malley to head the Mideast desk for the National Security Council. Malley who was part of Bill Clinton's negotiating team for the failed Israeli-Palestinian peace talks in the late 1990s (sabotaged by Arafat who feared for his life) afterwards wrote a series of vicious anti-Israel articles blaming Israel for the failure. In other words, Malley was given this position because like Obama he insanely believes that the Palestinians are ready to make peace with Israel, and have been since Yasser Arafat headed the Palestinian Authority. In other words,  Obama and Malley insanely believe that Israel (since the 1990s) is the obstacle to peace, not the Palestinians who refuse to recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish State and want it to perish.

Malley like Obama and Abbas backs Hamas.

However, the good news is that Malley is a sign that if Netanyahu should lose on March 17th it will be the late 1990s all over again with Abbas (like Arafat) rejecting every generous Israeli offer for peace short of Israel committing national suicide by agreeing to the so-called right of return for millions of Palestinian refugees. And when peace talks breakdown and fail again Malley will write article after lying article blaming Israel for the failure because it refused to destroy itself-which is what Obama, Malley and the radical anti-Israel left pray for and want but will never see.
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 

OBAMA AT SELMA: AMERICA’S FAILED BIRACIAL PRESIDENT (POSTSCRIPT ADDED)

NewsAol

Obama at Selam: 'Our union is not yet perfect'

OBAMA IS AMERICA'S FIRST BIRACIAL PRESIDENT

He is mulatto: half black American, half white American. That is the truth as I said HERE.  And when Obama describes himself as "Afro-American" as if that's the whole of him and there's nothing more he insults white Americans as if there's something wrong with his white half, that it was a mistake, something to be ashamed of, something diseased that's unworthy of him. In short, for Obama white + black = black. and that is a lie. Obama wrote a book called "Dreams From My [black] Father." But Obama had a white mother with dreams. What was wrong with her dreams? Why didn't he write about them too? Were they too white for him? Apparently.

A biracial president should be a force for unity, good and racial peace. But not Barack Obama-who won an unearned Nobel Peace Prize and whose policies have undermined world stability and peace. Though Obama promised to be a post-racial uniter he has miserably failed at this because he prefers his Black half over his White half taking up Black causes no matter how false, unjust and divisive. He chose the violent crazed drug abusing thief Trayvon Martin over George Zimmerman who Martin nearly killed trying to pound and ground him into unconsciousness. He chose the violent crazed drug abusing thief Michael Brown over Darren Wilson who Brown wanted to kill grabbing for his gun and charging at him like a mad wounded bull.

In his speech yesterday at Selma Obama said "This Union is not yet perfect." Truth is this Union under his presidency is less perfect and worse off than before. Emblematic of his presidency is broken, busted Democrat  Detroit which Obama said would not go bankrupt (beacuse he saved the auto industry) and did. He said the same thing of this country assuring us that our growing mountain of unsustainable debt was not a looming crisis that would bankrupt us (see)

 Obama doesn't know how to make this country better. That is a difficult thing to achieve, and way beyond his ken as he completely lacks the wisdom for it. Moving in the opposite direction Obama divides black from white, Moslem from Christian, rich from poor, illegal alien from citizen. The March in Selma fifty years ago was led by Martin Luther King a great black civil rights leader who considered his blackness the least important part of his being. Who said it was "character" that mattered, the moral quality of a man's soul and inner being, not race, not skin color, not mortal flesh and blood-the mere shadow of man's immortal nature.

In 2008 then candidate Obama gave his Democrat acceptance speech on the 45th anniversary of Dr. King's "I Have A Dream Speech" signaling that as president he'd live up to King's example and ideals. But since his inaugural it's sickening to see how distant Obama is from King. That he's a moral midget in comparison with nothing of King's spiritual greatness, gravitas and strength. Six years in office and Barack Obama still doesn't know how (or care) to be the president of all the people. Still doesn't know who or what he really is. Still hasn't  discovered his true humanity and inner worth as he tends to put skin color above everything-which petty, ignorant, small-minded people do.  

In this way Obama resembles the radical, race obsessed Jeremiah Wright his spiritual mentor for twenty years-a man driven by hatred of whites the polar opposite of Dr. King. Was it Wright who made Obama ashamed to be biracial? Ashamed to be half white preferring the dreams of his black father to his white mother? Truth is we have a president who's more like the sick, ugly, white hating Wright than Martin Luther King, and it's a king size catastrophe.

POSTSCRIPT

 

IF BLACK AMERICA

was as good, decent, law abiding and productive as White America and Asian America there wouldn't be this "fear of police" problem that Ms. Jones complains about in her letter. As every Conservative (Black, White, Hispanic, Asian) knows the moral renewal of Black America (traditional Judeo-Christian values and the work ethic) is the ONLY ANSWER.

RELATED

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND HIS ANTI-WHITE, ANTI-MULATTO RACISM

< p style="text-align: center;">MIA LOVE: TRAILBLAZING REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVE LAWMAKER

THE TRIUMPH OF GLOBAL WARMING IDEOLOGY OVER THE REALITY OF GLOBAL TERROR & IRAN PLAYING THE CLIMATE CHANGE GAME TO LOOK LIKE A NORMAL STATE

   

What is the overarching reason for Barack Obama covering up evidence back in 2011 that al-Qaida was anything but being decimated? His reelection was one reason. But it goes much further than that. Before Obama took office he was ideologically hell-bent on doing two things: 1) diminishing the very real threat of global Islamic terrorism believing (or wanting to believe) this was dangerously exaggerated by the Bush Administration; and 2) augmenting the phony, creeping, destructive threat of so-called catastrophic man-made global warming-which a terrified Obama deeply believes is imperiling the world. And after six years of doomsday climate change alarmism what does Obama have to show for it? Due to his disastrous lack of leadership and blunder after blunder in foreign policy Islamic terrorism is surging world-wide with an alarmed public giving it the topmost place over all other issues; while concern for global warming (according to PEWhas dropped from 13th to 22nd place-a huge defeat for the ineffective Obama and world saving climate change fanatics.

Public’s Policy Priorities for 2015

Public’s Policy Priorities for 2015

Yet despite this Obama is stubbornly staying the course on global warming hoping against hope that enemies like Iran will see the light and join him in the fight (become a partner) to save the Earth and give up their terrorism and nuclear ambitions. And playing Obama for a fool Tehran is deceptively pretending to oblige him while they build the ultimate weapon of terror and death and expand their influence across the world-caring nothing for cutting carbon emissions as they produce more and more fossil fuels to burn.

 

Here are two examples of Iranian climate change propaganda to decieve Obama, the World Bank (for funds) and world community that Iran is normalizing:

 
 "The Islamic Republic, one of the developing world’s 15 biggest emitters of green house gases, may launch carbon bourse to improve efficiency and cut emissions."
 
This was announced in early 2014 and never happened.

 

Top Iran official warns of climate change - Al-Monitor: the Pulse of the Middle East

Not only is death cult Iran enriching uranium for "peaceful energy projects" (like the annihilation of Israel)  but they claim that Allah has been punishing them with drought and rising temperatures which they need to reverse lest Iran turn into an "uninhabitable ghost town." Of course the lying cheating genocidal mullahs haven't produced a single study to support their doomsday claim as it's 100% bull-like Osama bin Laden's late conversion to climate change science (see).

 (thanks SilverMoonTx)

RELATED

WHY THE GLOBAL WARMING MOVEMENT NEEDS GOD TO STOP CLIMATE ARMAGEDDON 

 

A SICK, CANCER EATEN AYATOLLAH KHAMENEI IRONICALLY SPENDS PURIM CRITICALLY ILL IN HOSPITAL

 IRANIAN DICTATOR Ayatollah Khamenei hospitalized in critical condition from cancer | BARE NAKED ISLAM
 
khamenei hospital
Sick in soul, sick in body perhaps this evil man is on his death bed about to experience the horror of 72 foul ragged decaying toothless shrieking skeletal hags in hell wanting him for a lover.
 
As reported in the Jerusalem Post (and I learned on Bare Naked Islam this morning) Iran's Supreme Leader (Allah's ultimate vessel of Islamic redemption on Earth), who is constantly raging at Israel as being an evil "cancer" on the Middle East "that must be cut out " and eradicated (see),  is slowly and painfully dying of prostate cancer that can't be cured or cut out. Unofficial reports say that Khamenie (75) has less than two years to live as the disease is spreading throughout his enfeebled, hate-filled body. Too bad on him. And ironically Khamenei was being hospitalized while Netanyahu was giving his historic Churchillian speech on his genocidal regime-and while Jews were observing Purim which celebrates the victory of Persian Jews over an evil state minister (Haram*) who wanted to exterminate them. Looks like Khamenie like his ugly predecessor (and Nasser, Assad, Arafat, Saddam and other Moslem enemies of israel) is going to die without seeing his vision of Israel's destruction realized. 
 
*Glen Judo Chop on Disqus, and Zalman in the comment section, pointed out that I misspelled Haman as "Harman". But isn't it true that Haman wanted to Harman Jews?
 

 

The Jerusalem Post reported:

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is currently hospitalized in serious condition at a hospital in Tehran, according to unofficial reports.

Khamenei is suffering from prostate cancer that has reportedly spread to the rest of his body.

Earlier this week, the French newspaper Le Figaro quoted Western intelligence officials as saying that the cancer was discovered about ten years ago. “The cancer is in stage four, in other words has spread.” Doctors estimate “he has two years left to live.”

On September 8, Khamenei underwent surgery and it was then that doctors discovered the fatal situation.

In Iran, however, his condition is not public, and only those close to him know how bad the situation is. One such person is one of his six children, his 45-year-old son Mugtaba Khamenei, who has major political clout in the country. 

72  Annie Robbins are waiting for Ayatollah Khamenei in Allah's Garden of Delights.
 

BILL DE BLASIO AND THE COMING OF NATIONAL ALL FAITHS DAY AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS

Mayor De Blasio to Close NYC Schools for Muslim Holidays | Atlas Shrugs

 

https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/

 

ALL FAITHS DAY 

 

Behind Christians, Jews and Moslems New York City  has a large Hindu (Indian) and Buddhist (Chinese-Korean) population. Why shouldn't De Blasio consider their religious sensitivies and close public schools in observance for Hindu and Buddhist holidays? And why stop there? Why not holidays for Mormons, Wiccans, Satanists, atheists (Christopher Hitchens' death day when he became nothing comes to mind) and Jehovah Witnesses? Taken to its logical conclusion secular leftists like De Blasio (whose real religion is Progressivism worshipping the State as their God) are paving the way for all religious groups in the city wanting an official holiday for themselves-with this eventually spreading to Philadelphia, Chicago, San Fransisco, Dallas and Los Angeles, etc. And the cacophony and chaos this will cause locally and nationally will be so great (with children missing too many school days) that the solution will have to be the end of all religious holidays and their collapse into a single day of celebrating all religions called:

 

ALL FAITHS DAY 

 

 

WE ARE ALL ONE

 

WE ARE ALL ONE

 

WE ARE ALL ONE

 

ONE ONE ONE 

 

 

JacktheRipper  writes on Atlas Shrugs

 

That's a brilliant suggestion. Of course the muslims would object to that equality and want to kill us, but who cares? they'll always want to kill us anyway.

  

 

THE TRUTH

Islamic jihad and terror aren't a perversion of islam. It is Islam that's a perversion of Judeo-Christian monotheism replacing true God with a projection of a mad man's ruthless will to power and violent conquest.

 

 

 

 

WHY SHOULD OBAMA WAIT FOR THE IRANIANS

or ISIS or anyone else to trimphantly raise the flag of Islam over the White House when he can beat them to the punch? Since Obama believes that “Islam has been woven into the fabric of our country since its founding” why not show the Moslem world that he means what he says? Why not weave the symbol of Islam into the fabric of our flag? Why not replace the 50 stars with Islam’s Star and Crescent? What a splendid outreach gesture to Islam that would make. It would blow the Moslem world away.

 

 
 
Alisa Doctoroff, radical leftist President of the United Jewish Appeal  complains
 
"…the inequalities between Arabs and Jews in Israel are staggering, with Arab Israelis experiencing significantly higher rates of poverty and unemployment than their Jewish neighbors.”
 
I SAY
 
the Arab world is one vast backward dysfunctional shit hole of ignorance, poverty, filth, barbarism and death. And the Israeli Arab community is the shit hole of Israel. As Islam's medieval denigration of life in this world in favor of the afterlife (heaven is everything  earth is nothing) causes social and economic stagnation why should the social and economic inferiority of Israel's Arabs to its Jews surprise anyone? And why should Israel be blamed for it (for the rank medievalness of Arab culture)?
 
  
 
 

AL SISI IS A REVOLUTION!

My esteem for him just grew another mile.

 
 
 
 

IF MORSI AND THE BROTHERHOOD WERE STILL IN POWER

the great Sphinx and pyramids might have suffered the same fate; and the song "You Belong To Me" by the Duprees would have been robbed of meaning. 

 

A beautiful old romantic tune, no? Does any of the crap you hear today stir your feelings  like  this?

 

 
 
 

WHENEVER FRANKLIN GRAHAM SPEAKS OUT

on political and religious issues he proves himself a worthy successor of his great, great dad .

 

 
 
 

BARACK OBAMA WAS A POTHEAD

The brain damage he sustained from smoking weed is evident in his immature, incoherent, chaos causing presidency.

 

 

 
obama nobel
 

THE ONLY PEACE PRIZE OBAMA DESERVED

was the "Religion of Peace" prize.

 

 

HE WHO LIVES BY OBAMA

 

shall die by Obama (politically speaking).

 

Queers Against Israeli Apartheid QuAIA is Dead | Atlas Shrugs

 

AS ALL ISRAELI QUEERS KNOW

 Israeli Apartheid is a queer idea.
 
 

 

A SCHMUCK

who concentrates the full force of his mental powers in his middle finger and wants to be taken seriously. Glad to see him go.

 

 

NICOLAS SARKOZY ON BARACK OBAMA’S REALITY PROBLEM

Bibi Netanyahu wasn't the first world leader to call into question Barack Obama's competence in handling foreign affairs. Long before yesterday's reality based speech on "axis of evil" nuclear Iran French President Nicolas Sarkozy shocked and embarrassed Obama when he publicly criticized him as suffering from a reality problem when it came to decision making-which Obama has failed at again and again from the premature withdrawal of US troops from Iraq to the premature lifting of sanctions on Iran to all the failed appeasement moves he's made with Vladimir Putin.

Two years later when Assad was mass murdering his people (with Iranian and Russian support) and Obama-deluding himself with the prediction that the tyrant would soon fall-did nothing, Sarkozy mocking him said  to the press "he's not a leader but a follower." And so he is. Ironically, Sarkozy would lead our hapless, ill-starred president into the misadventure in Libya which cost us Chris Stevens and three other Americans, and a stable and unified Libya-now being overrun by al Qaida, ISIS and other prospering terrorist groups.  

Below is a short article I posted on Townhall about Sarkozy speaking out on Obama's reality problem which reminded me of a famous wake up scene from a popular hollywood film-that now seems more appropriately applicable to Bibi's powerful "bad deal" speech. 

FROM APOLLOSPEAKS' TOWNHALL ARCHIVES

2009-10-07 15:58:47 -- NICOLAS SARKOZY ON BARACK OBAMA'S REALITY PROBLEM

 
 
When a frustrated Nicolas Sarkozy spoke truth to an embarrassed Obama in France this week and said: “We live in the real world, not a virtual one. And the real world expects us to make decisions,” it reminded me of this famous scene from one of America's most beloved movies (click).
 
Obama's Unicorn
 
RELATED
 

COURAGEOUS NETANYAHU EXPOSES OBAMA’S DANGEROUS STUPIDITY AND WEAKNESS WITH IRAN

BIBI NETANYAHU HAS COURAGEOUSLY EXPOSED TO ALL THE WORLD 

Barack Hussein Obama for the weak, dangerous, blundering, reckless, rank amateur that he is. And standing shoulder to shoulder with Netanyahu are the vast majority of US lawmakers, 55% of the US military*, and 65% of Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans** all of whom give Obama a well deserved Grade D as Commander-in- Chief. Add to this the disillusionment of most Americans with Obama's handling of foreign policy (seeand you have a president with no credibility in world affairs blindly midwifing the deadliest and most dangerous Islamic regime on earth in becoming a nuclear armed terrorist state. Even if it means destroying Iran with nuclear weapons it must not get the bomb. 

*According to The Military Times 55% disapprove of Obama and only 15% approve-an all time low (see).

**According to the Kaiser Foundation 65% of Iraq and Afghan war vets approve of George W. Bush as Commander in Chief. Only 42% approve of Obama (see).

RELATED

THE RISE OF NUCLEAR IRAN 

FORWARD EMAILS TO

reninvest2013@aol.com

< p style="text-align: center;">-

DEBATES ON MONDOWEISS WITH ANNIE ROBBINS ON NETANYAHU’S SPEECH TO CONGRESS AND ISRAEL’S REGIONAL POLITICAL AND MORAL SUPERIORITY

 

 

Annie Robbins is a loathsome, self-hating San Francisco liberal Jew and Editor-at Large for Mondoweiss: a despicable ultra-left, anti-Israel  hate site. Robbins, like savage medieval anti-semitic Moslem supremacists, believes that modern, democratic Jewish Israel (the greatest force for freedom, progress and peace in the Middle East) is an evil oppressive colonial power with no moral right to exist because of its refusal to make peace with the  hate-driven, genocidal Palestinians (who define peace with Israel as its destruction). And Israel's destruction is what  Annie Robbins (like most radical leftists) want insanely preferring in its place  an illiberal, sick, dysfunctional, corrupt Palestinian terror  state oppressing a Jewish minority or killing it off. In other words, when it comes to  the Arab/Palestinian-Israeli conflict you can't get anymore deranged than Annie Robbins. 

 Below are two  brief debates between me and Robbins before she had me banned from Mondoweiss for being a troublesome, pro-Israel gadfly who couldn't be bested  in argument. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ApolloSpeaks

            January 24, 2015,

WHERE WAS THE OUTRAGE ON THE DEMOCRATIC  LEFT WHEN IN 2007
 
then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (without approval of the Bush administration [and knowledge of Israel's PM]) grossly violated protocol and led a congressional delegation to Damascus to negotiate a  peace deal between Syria and Israel, as if she were the Secretary of State? As I recall Harry Reid , Hillary Clinton, MSM (and probably Barack Obama) praised Pelosi for her efforts to promote peace between the two countries because Bush [for no fault of his] had miserably failed .
 

Annie Robbins

she was the speaker of the house. this is the equivalent of John Boehner or Eric Cantor leading a delegation to israel without asking the president’s permission. happens all the time. in fact aipac arranges these trips regularly. romney went there without asking Obama’s permission too. it doesn’t violate protocol for members of congress to visit other countries without asking permission of the israel lobby.

nice try, no cigar.

ApolloSpeaks

Apples and oranges. Pelosi went to Damascus not just on a mere visit but in a kind of unofficial [self-appointed] diplomatic capacity* (without authorization from the White House) to specifically rekindle peace talks between Israel and Syria as if she were Condi Rice. That was the  last time she tried this stunt  as she failed and made a complete fool of herself. That was a far more serious breach of protocol** than Netanyahu’s upcoming visit. You need to work on your reading comprehension skills so you don’t embarrass yourself like this again.

*At the time Bush withdrew his Ambassador to Syria.

*It was later learned that Netanyahu did inform the Obama Administration of Boehner's invitation to  speak to Congress. 

Annie Robbins

an unofficial diplomatic capacity (without authorization from the White House)

so that’s your standard of unofficial diplomatic capacity? LOL. good to know. You need to work on your comprehension skills so you don’t embarrass yourself like this again..

Apollospeaks

Please define the word “diplomacy.” Then tell us how it doesn’t apply to what Pelosi was trying to accomplish in Damascus with Assad. This is Polisci 101 stuff.

 Annie Robbins 

now you’re playing partisan politics considering Reps. Frank Wolf, Joe Pitts and Robert Aderholt met with Assad in Damascus the day before she arrived and like them, there was nothing she said there that was against stated american policy goals.

unlike this latest deplorable and unprecedented “invitation*” there’s nothing unprecedented (or highly unusual) about high ranking officials (and sometimes not so high ranking) including congresspeople making trips to visit foreign leaders outside the purview of the white house. (as i mentioned they go to israel all the time, often sans seeking “authorization” from the WH). example link to huffingtonpost.com
link to huffingtonpost.com 

* Unprecedented? In 1996 Bill Clinton invited Shimon Peres to the White House one month before the election to bolster his sagging campaign against Netanyahu - Apollo

your pelosi argument here is a diversion anyway, because the analogy you’re making doesn’t pertain to netanyahu’s action (which happens to be the topic -and it’s highly likely this “idea” came from team netanyahu, either dermer or the PM himself), but house speaker boehner. your analogy involves what is or isn’t considered normal protocol for congressional diplomacy.  whereas netanyahu is a foreign leader w/a policy pitted against w/a policy pitted against the prez.pelosi didn't invite assad to address congress against the will of bush. so there's your apples and oranges. the criticism all over the talk shows today are not about boehner.he did what's now expected of lobby pushovers, it's netanyahu's chutzpa that being criticized.

ApolloSpeaks

The policy goals of the Bush administration were to restart peace talks between Syria and Israel [over the Golan Heights]. Because the administration wasn’t making progress Pelosi decided unilaterally-without so much as consulting the administration or Israeli PM Olmert-to step in to reanimate the process.

As the Obama administration has made zero progress in stopping Iran from building the bomb and containing its drive for regional hegemony it’s time for a new and tougher approach. Hence, Netanyahu’s address to Congress making the case to reimpose punishing sanctions at an opportune time when  declining oil prices are severly hurting Iran's economy. Both Republicans and Democrats who want to reimpose sanctions got it right [and Netanyahu is aligned with them]. Apples and apples. The analogy is as clear as day. 

 Robbins never replied.

 

In this piece Mondoweiss blogger Anthony Loewenstein asserts that Israel, the most tolerant and pluralistic nation in the Middle East, "is not a good model" for  tolerance and pluralism. And that European Jews thinking of migrating to Israel because of rising Islamic anti-semitism are better off staying there as if Israel were unworthy of them and more unsafe.
 Commenting on Lowenstein's article someone called Mooser wrote that because Israel isn't a perfect model of tolerance and pluralism it was "a historical error to give the Jews their own country," as if Israel were completely void of value-like its worthless  Palestinian neighbors.
 
To this I replied 
 January 25, 2015, 12:17 am

How could the most admirable nation in the Middle East, a model of freedom, progress, justice and peace to the region, be "a historical error?" Given Israel's moral, intellectual and spiritual superiority over its primitive, ignorant, dysfunctional, strife torn, savage neighbors its existence would seem to be a historical necessity and blessing. No?

Annie Robbins

the most admirable nation in the Middle East

link to haaretz.com

BBC poll: Israel among world’s least popular nations

The annual BBC World Service poll finds …only countries less popular than Israel are North Korea, Pakistan and Iran.

its existence would seem to be a historical necessity. No

ApolloSpeaks

Annie Robbins notes above that Israel just bearly beats out North Korea in a BBC world popularity poll. I wasn’t aware of that. Then should Hollywood do a sequel to “The Interview” where Rogen and Franco assassinate Netanyahu? Maybe not. As Israel technologically is light years ahead of the Norks a cyber terror attack on Sony would be ten times as devastating. /sarc

Annie Robbins

 "I wasn’t aware of that. Then should Hollywood do a sequel to “The Interview” where Rogen and Franco assassinate Netanyahu?"

your comeback is outdated — so last year. everybody already thought of that immediately – and not just the blogs either.

link to washingtonpost.com

MY ANSWER 

CENSORED AND SUPPRESSED

UPDATED, not "outdated" Annie. But seriously, instead of the world's opinion about Israel give us your opinion. Tell us what you think not what others think. Is Israel or isn't Israel  the most admirable nation in the region? Or to put it differently, if you were an atheist married to a practicing Buddhist with a gay kid which country in the Middle East would you and your familiy  be safest in? Israel? One of its Arab neighbors? If you ignore the question (which you'll probably do like before) I'll take it to be an admission that we're in agreement that the world's opinion of Israel is radically stupid and wrong;  and that Israel would be your  choice because it's the best nation in the region (the closest politically, culturally, progressively and economically to the US) for you and your family to live in safety and  peace.

 

POSTSCRIPT

(6-10-2016)

Josh from San Francisco posted the following comment this morning citing Annie Robbin's amusing rant about my "vile" " disgusting " pro-Israel site. If I were an angel from heaven I'd be no better than a sickening hateful vomit eating dog to these gutless detestable Pali useful fools.

Josh writes: 

Looks like this comment section has some effect on this scum Robbins.Look what she wrote there yesterday.

Annie Robbins June 9, 2016, 6:08 pm
Not a word to say about the zionists who post nothing but hate here? The ones who deny a people exist?? Who justify oppression and human rights abuses particularly against children on a regular basis?

the worst of the vile ad hominem stuff doesn’t get posted here. there’s no barrier too low for zionist discourse, for sure it’s way worse than anything i’ve encountered on the other side, just vile and personal. really filthy stuff — is so common on many pro israel sites.

it goes way beyond bs like “Annie Robbins, you should be ashamed of yourself. Disgusting. And typical.” (i guess hops assumed, with no evidence whatsoever, i cleared the original comment — btw i didn’t) it’s the routine-ness of the specific targeting. ie check out the comments in this so called “debates on mondoweiss”: link to apollospeaks.com this is an uncensored comment section (like for sure this would be going on here if we didn’t moderate). not one thing in the comments addresses the political topic. it’s all accusation i am ugly, i have aids, i’m a witch, i’m on drugs, i smell, i drink whiskey all day, i’m sexually perverted, my house is nasty, i have no friends, it goes on and on and on! not one or five but commenter after commenter after commenter. this is an example of the unfettered kind of vile stuff that goes hand in hand with slandering a dead person as a pancake and is tolerated without an ounce of concern or holding back from anyone on the thread. it’s totally routine for the zionist activist community to tolerate this kind of discourse, and anyone who can read hebrew can witness this kind of commenting on uncensored comment sections throughout the web. personal, filthy and vile. i just don’t encounter this kind of ad hominem stuff when reading anti zionist posters as they are more topic oriented (they can be mean tho for sure). generally, they don’t go for personal jugular. whereas there’s no limit whatsoever on team israel — routinely. arafat screwed animals and their adversaries are pedophiles or whatever. no limit. so i find this sort of ‘grab the smelling salts’ gatekeeping wrt ‘fraud’ another demonstration of hysterics actually.

– See more at: http://mondoweiss.net/recent-comments/#sthash.zdewJ0GS.dpuf

 MY REPLY

Thank you Josh. Just for the record I wasn’t banned from Mondoweiss because of ad hominem attacks on Annie Robbins-which I never indulged in there. I was banned because of my relentless criticisms of Mondoweiss for being an anti-Israel hate site and propaganda arm of Islamo-nazi/Arab-fascist Palestinians hell-bent on Israel’s destruction. As I am well read on the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict and in command of the facts it is impossible for irrational obsessive leftist Israel haters like Robbins to engage me in rational debate. Losing repeatedly is just too humiliating and painful for them. Challenging them to show me which nation in the Middle East tops Israel as a force for peace, justice, progress and modernization drives them crazy. Instead of rising to the occasion and admitting that it's Israel they angrily shut me down not wanting me and my challenge on their site. What pathetic cowards.

NETANYAHU, IRAN AND THE END OF NUCLEAR SADDAM: OR DESTROY THE MULLAHS LIKE WE DID SADDAM AND IRAN WON’T GET THE BOMB

 
 
 
TOMORROW MARCH 3, 2015
 
is the 44th president's 2233rd day in office (see). This four digit number of two doublet numbers preceding 44 (22 and 33) is a multiple of 7 giving us the highly significant number 319 (the number of weeks in Obama's presidency). 319 like 9/11 is a significant number in the history of the Global War on Terror in that it gives us the month (3) and day (19) when in 2003 the US (Washington time) launched its preëmptive war (Shock and Awe) against Saddam Hussein for his noncompliance for 12 years with 17 UN resolutions on WMDs and other violations. The purpose of Bibi Netanyahu's speech tomorrow is to prevent the nightmare of a nuclear armed Iran (a regional and world necessity) just as we stopped Iraq from becoming a nuclear power (which I'll prove below). As the hapless, blundering, inept Obama administration is failing badly in moderating stopping Iran the only option left is to devastate its nuclear facilities with a massive sustained military attack-more than 1500 targets have been identified for such a mission.
 
 Saddam's yellowcake uranium.
 
Now  those who disagree with my assertion that "the Iraq War stopped Saddam from acquiring the bomb" are greatly, greatly confused and mistaken. Why do I say this? Because knowing what we know today if Saddam had stayed in power chances are (with 90% certainty) that he would by now have gone nuclear. How do I know this? Because Saddam retained the services of his nuclear scientists and technicians keeping them on the government payroll with every intention of using them to build the bomb. Because Saddam owned 550 metric tons of yellow cake uranium (sold to Canada in 2008) with every intention of using it to build the bomb (see). Moreover, and most importantly, on October 9, 2006 Saddam's "evil axis" Stalinist ally communist North Korea detonated its first nuclear device becoming the 9th nation to do so. And ominously the following year the nuclear Norks were hard at work in murdering fascist Iran-backed Syria building a secret plutonium nuclear weapons plant, which Israel, thank God, destroyed.
 
  
Now on 3-19-2003 at the start of the Iraq War the price of oil was $20 per barrel. Two years later that doubled to $40 per barrel. By 2008 oil shot up to $100 per barrel. If there was no Iraq War and  Saddam had stayed in power he would have amassed hundreds and billions in petro-dollars which he would have certainly used to turn Iraq into a nuclear armed state. No way Saddam would have stood idly by and watched his enemies in Iran build the bomb knowing that once they had it, it could mean the end of his regime and his dream of becoming the unifying Joseph Stalin of the Middle East.
 
 
Indeed, If what I'm saying here seems far-fetched because neither Israel nor the US would have allowed Saddam to rebuild his nuclear weapons plants, or build  new ones in secret (Israel destroyed the Osiraq plant in 1981) what everyone seems to have overlooked is that Saddam had another option nuclearizing Iraq: BUILD THE BOMB IN NORTH KOREA. The poor cash strapped Norks would have enthusiastically welcomed Saddam's offer to build the Bomb in their country for billions, then smuggle it into Iraq. And by now the Norks would have produced at least several for him.
 
 
The great feckless appeaser in the White House  has bent over backwards accommodating Iran in trying to stop it from weaponizing uranium and building ICBMs, but to no avail. I imagine that he and Kerry even tried to uselessly persuade the mullahs about the common threat humanity faces from global warming and the need to join forces to survive. Indeed, hell-bent on becoming the hegemon of Middle East and a great world power-believing that God and history are on their side-Islamic Iran needs the bomb to fulfill its purpose and destiny. And from their unwillingness to halt the enriching of uranium the Iranians  have made it perfectly clear to the world that nothing short of military force will stop them.
 
POSTSCRIPT I
 
 
Samson pushing the pillars of the temple

 

IF THIS REPORT IS TRUE,

and Obama threatened to join forces with Islamonazi terrorist Iran and shoot down Israeli jets en route to destroy its nuclear facilities, all that Bibi Netanyahu had to do to put the fear of God into Obama was give him this warning:   "Shooting down our jets, Mr. President, would leave us no choice but to exercise the dreaded SAMSON OPTION and nuke Iran as a last resort (see)."

 POSTSCRIPT II
 
SAUDI ARABIA AND NUCLEAR PAKISTAN
 
BTW, for those who doubt my theory that if  there was no Iraq War Iraq by now would have been a nuclear military power just keep one thing in mind:  if the Saudis want the bomb all they need do is purchase it from nuclear Pakistan-just as  Saddam would have  done from nuclear North Korea.
 

IS ERIC HOLDER AN IGNORANT, DIVISIVE RACIALLY OBSESSED MORAN? OR AM I A FOUL, TWISTED, WHITE SUPREMACIST NUT POISONED BY FOX NEWS?

 

 
 
Screen Shot 2015-02-28 at 3.17.35 PM
 Wish they would drown in their white-hating racist tears.
 
Is outgoing Attorney General Eric "Americans are racial cowards" Holder an ignorant, divisive, unenlightened, racially obsessed moron? The answer to the question is an unqualified "YES." And here is incontrovertible proof not based so much on what Holder has said and done, but on a philosophical understanding of human nature.
 
 
 
The physical body is the vehicle of man's deathless, immortal, intellectual soul which is its life-giving principle and form. This makes the body the smallest and least important part of man's nature and being as it depends on the soul for its existence in this world. And the smallest and least important part of man's physical being (having immeasurably less value than the brain, heart, lungs, liver, kidneys and other vital oragns) is skin color.
 
Now racially obsessed men like Barack Obama and Eric Holder (be they White, Black, Hispanic, Arab, Asian, etc) are ignorant, divisive,  immature, unenlightened,  small-minded human beings (regressives not progressives) who reduce the true dignity and worth of man (his intellectual and spiritual nature) not just to mortal, perishable, ephemeral flesh (the body is the passing image and shadow of the soul) but to its smallest, basest, least important part: stupid, senseless skin color which we can't take with us to heaven.
 
Now in calling Obama and Holder "ignorant, unenlightened, morans..." because of their obsession with skin color and race (they're the John Birchers of racism seeing anti-black racism everywhere) am I being a foul twisted racist nut poisoned by Fox News and driven by hate like I've been accused of on occasion? Or am I being wise, realistic and philosophically sane seeing with unprejudiced, color blind, wide open eyes these two infantile leftists for the regressives they really, truly and stupidly are? in judging them am I using the immoral measure and yardstick of white supremacism and hate (I'm a Jewish conservative white man)? Or am I simply, justly and rigorously applying a right understanding of human nature which every rational man and woman does? Go ahead. Make my day. Try and prove that I'm racist.
 
 
 

 

HOLDER ON LOWERING LEGAL CIVIL RIGHTS STANDARDS TO JAIL INNOCENT NON-BLACK KILLERS OF VIOLENT BLACKS  LIKE ZIMMERMAN AND WILSON. PATHETIC!

 
 
 
HOLDER SAYS READ "MALCOLM X ."
APOLLO SAYS READ 
 
 
 
No Conservative's library is complete without this
magnificent Renaissance classic-and cure for all types of racism.
 

RELATED

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND HIS ANTI-WHITE, ANTI-MULATTO RACISM

 

MESSAGE TO AL SHARPTON: WHITE GUILT IS DEAD. BLACKS ARE ON THEIR OWN.

BARACK OBAMA AND THE END OF WHITE LIBERAL GUILT

FORWARD EMAILS TO

< p style="text-align: center;">reninvest2013@aol.com