Monthly Archives: July 2016

THE OUTLANDISH HYPOCRISY AND LIES OF KHIZR KHAN’S ATTACK ON DONALD TRUMP

 

Does being a Gold Star parent give one the licence to slander a presidential candidate? 

 

KHIZR KHAN'S POLITICIZED REDEFINITION OF THE WORD "SACRIFICE" 

When has Hillary Clinton ever heroically risked her life to save the lives of other human beings? When has Barack Obama ever done that? Better still when has Khizr Khan or his wife committed any heroic act in their lives comparable to their son's on the deadly battlefield of iraq? How can the Khans fault Donald Trump for never heroically placing his life at risk to save others when neither they nor the Clintons nor most human beings have ever done that? Self-sacrificng heroes like Captain Khan are rare.

The Khans are typical partisan Democrat hypocrites redefining and distorting the universally accepted meaning of the word "sacrifice" to suit their jihad to politically destroy Donald Trump for his views on national security. This is intellectually dishonest, morally shameful, and will fail with anyone who owns a dictionary.

(See DEBATES below for more on this subject.) 

 

Khizri Khan, Democratic National Convention

THE KHANS IMMORALLY DISHONOR SON'S MEMORY

Moreover, weren't the Khans grossly and immorally dishonoring the memory of their son's heroic death by politicizing it during a Democrat convention, dragging his brave, life saving deed through the muck and mud of election year politics? It is completely reprehensible that the Democrats put the Khans up to this; and that they let themselves be used as political attack dogs against Trump as if it were he who killed their good, noble, patriotic son and not radical, murdering, Islamofascist terrorists-which they never once mentioned.

 

 

KHIZR KHAN NEEDS LESSONS IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Furthermore, what is unconstitutional about the President of the United States banning certain groups of people for national security reasons from migrating to this country when Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton did just that in 2011? Apparently they didn't know and weren't told that Obama and Hillary placed a temporary ban on Iraqi Moslem  refugees from entering this country because Islamic terrorists infiltrated their ranks-which ISIS says it's doing with Syrian refugees. Apparently it's Khizr Khan not Donald Trump who desperately needs lessons in constitutional law.

http://thefederalist.com/2015/...

 

  

HILLARY CLINTON IS PARTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CAPTAIN HUMAYUN KHAN'S DEATH

And lastly, if the Iraq War was a wrong war that should never have been fought (as Hillary now says) doesn't she then bear some blame for Captain Khan's death because of her vote authorizing the war and 21 subsequent votes to reauthorize its funding? Why do the Khans feel moral outrage at Donald Trump and none for Hillary and her war vote which helped send their son to his untimely death?

While Trump's done nothing to hurt the Khans Hillary has done so indirectly with her hawkish, gung ho support of the Iraq war from her vote on the Iraq War Resolution in 2002 to November 2005 when she said the war was a mistake-but hypocritically voted to continue funding it until May 2007. Hillary can't escape the fact that she has drops of Captain Khan's blood on her hands (and that of 3000 other dead US soldiers killed in Iraq). The Khans outrage at Donlad Trump with none for Hillary is unjustified, trumped up political bullsh*t with no moral basis.

 
 

DISQUS DEBATES 

 

 

 

Trump has spent a lifetime enriching himself through the use of his daddy's money and his daddy's political connections and his daddy's business connections.

He has earned the scorn of employees, contractors, lenders, and customers. He has bullied them, threatened them with legal action, and left them holding the bag on multiple occasions.

Great people don't need to constantly tell you how great they are.

 

 

What does your ignorant critique of Trump have to do with the Khan's immoral politicization of his son's death? His lying about Trump violating the US Constitution? And his faulting Trump for never having risked his life to save others when Hillary has never acted heroically herself?

Also, was JFK's political career invalid because he relied on his criminal, bootlegger, mob tied father and his wealth to run for Congress, the Senate and the Presidency?

https://www.amazon.com/Joseph-...

And if Trump is such a horrible boss and unfairly stiffs  his employees, and if he screws contractors and lenders, then how do you explain the tens and thousands of happy employees who work for him? And how do you explain the contractors the world over working on his projects? Moreover, why does Trump have no problem obtaining loans for his projects if he screws lenders? How come his credit so good?

And lastly, there's no such thing as businessmen who aren't in business to enrich themselves. Or could it be that you're an anti-business nut who thinks that "profits" are immoral?

 

----------------------------------------------------------

 

Jay Thompson

  

"Khans like Trump sacrificed nothing. They lost a son who heroically sacrificed himself. It wasn't their sacrifice, it was his"..
.
Are you friggin kidding us?
It's not a parents sacrifice when they lose a child in service of their country!?
That's about the worst thing i have ever heard in defence of a political position.
You need to really think about that statement you made and if you do and you feel no shame for saying it, I really feel sorry for anyone in your condition.
And if youre an American and a human you might want to apologize.

 

ApolloSpeaks    

 

No need to apologize.The Khans lost a son who heroically sacrificed himself. If they made the decision for the son to risk his life sending him to his death to save others then it would be their sacrifice-they would own it and participate in the glory of his heroism. If you chose to risk your life to save another and die doing so it is your sacrifice and yours alone-not your parents', not your wife's. not your childrens', not your friends'. No one but you are the self-sacrificing hero.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 I'm glad for ANY AND ALL attacks on this Gold Star couple coming from the right, and especially from Donald. It makes you look hateful and small. And scared and petty and mean spirited. I LOVE it!

 

 

Now only if these misogynistic Moslem terrorists can restrain themselves till after election day from launching more mass murder attacks here and in Europe they might get their wish of having a "weak" woman in the White House over a strong, aggressive alpha male who wants to "bomb the hell out of them."

 

 

DEBATE ON THE MEANING OF THE TERM "SACRIFICE"

 

John777  

ApolloSpeaks says, "Khans like Trump sacrificed nothing."

Message: "Losing a child to the defense of this nation is NOT a sacrifice. Ditto losing a spouse, or any loved one. No sacrifice there. Cop's wives wailing about their husbands shot dead in the line of duty? No sacrifice. Suck it up, you babies. You didn't lose anything, you didn't risk anything."

ApolloSpeaks

It would have been helpful to you to have looked up the meaning of u the term "sacrifice" before going off on an emotional tangent and misusing it to mean the loss or death of a loved one: parents, children, spouse, relatives, friends.

http://www.merriam-webster.com...

In using the term "sacrifice" in the ridiculous, unheard of, mistaken way that you do Donald Trump would then know more about making personal sacrifices in his life than do the Khans. The Khans we know lost a son; however, Trump we know lost his dad, his grandmother Liz, his uncle John and brother Fred. That's four Trump sacrifices to Khan's one. Next time remember to be less emotional and more careful in your use of terms so you don't embarrass yourself again.

--------------------------------------------------

Natedogg265 

"Politicizing" is when you don't like it. 

 

ApolloSpeaks   

 

So the reason for Captain Khan's heroic death wasn't to save the lives of fellow soldiers from anti-American al Qaida suicide terrorists, but to smear, trash and lie about a Republican presidential candidate, and benefit his Democrat opponent? That was the ultimate, overarching reason for Captain Khan's sacrificial life saving death? To replace the al-Qaida terrorists that killed him with Donald Trump as the real enemy as if Trump was the one who blew him up?

 

RELATED 

 

 

DONALD TRUMP says it’s obvious Hillary Clinton’s speechwriters wrote that BS convention speech for the Paki Muslim - BareNakedIslam

 

 

BILL CLINTON FALLS ASLEEP ON HILLARY’S HISTORIC SPEECH AS KAINE TRIES TO BLOCK SHOT (POSTSCRIPT: HILLARY SAYS JOB AT STATE WAS TOO EXHAUSTING

When David Axelrod on CNN said last night that Hillary's speech on the historic occasion of her nomination "wasn't a great speech" he was grossly understating just how bad, low energy, unelectric, ineffective, platitudinous and mendacious it was. It was so bland, so boring, so lacking in fire, passion, conviction and strength that it couldn't keep tired, old, feeble husband Bill awake. No doubt about it! Bill Clinton shut his eyes and dozed off into dreamland last night-with Tim Kaine leaning forward to block the cameras from picking up the embarrassing shot. You can't make this stuff up.
 

This is the man Hillary wants to put in charge to revive Obama's weak, pathetic, high debt, trickle growth, bad job's economy-that grew last quarter a mere 1.4%. Just as Bill dozed off during Hillary's speech he could just as easily do that at the wheel of the economy and drive it over the cliff-just like he nearly did with his reckless subprime housing program to quickly turn millions of low-income borrowers into middle class folks (SEE).
 
 
 
POSTSCRIPT
 
 
 
Trump is a force of nature. Hillary is a spent liberal force. 
   
 
HILLARY SAYS JOB AT STATE WAS WEARING HER OUT
 
 
Towards the end of President Obama's speech - Hilary could not keep her eyes open and began to look like she had fallen asleep
Worn out from her travels as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton falls asleep at historic event.
 
It runs in the family. If Hillary fell asleep at such an important event when Secretary of State what will she do as President? By her own words this low energy, tired,   oldeasily fatigued woman limited her term at State to four years because the job (which is far less grueling, stressful and demanding than the presidency) was wearing her out- weakening her immune system and very possibly making her sick. It is possible that another term at State would have completely shattered Hillary's health. Just think then what the presidency (the hardest job in the world)      could do to her?
 
 
Again I say with Donald Trump that Hillary lacks the energy, stamina and strength for the presidency-her lack of endurance when Secretary of State (a job she hated and couldn't wait to end) proves it.  
 
 
WE NEED A PHYSICALLY STRONG, INDEFATIGABLE LEADER IN THE WHITE HOUSE WITH THE ENERGY, STAMINA, INDEPENDENCE AND WILL POWER TO TAKE ON WASHINGTON, WALL STREET AND OUR ISLAMIC FOES. NOT AN EASILY TIRED WEAKLING WITH A FRAIL HUSBAND IN FAILING HEALTH WHO FELL ASLEEP AT THE DNC.
 
 
Hillary told Jimmy Kimmel at her great pickle jar opening feat      that "Donald Trump is as healthy as a horse." And so he is-and so she ain't.
 
READ THIS CONFESSION BY LOW ENERGY HILLARY ABOUT HER STAMINA PROBLEMS AT STATE AND VOTE FOR A FORCE OF NATURE TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT.
 
VOTE DONALD TRUMP!
 
 
 
 RELATED
 

WILL HILLARY’S HISTORIC ACCEPTANCE SPEECH BE AN INSIPID, LOW ENERGY, UNMOVING FAILURE?

 
 
Hillary Clinton could have an enormous problem tonight and it's not just the indefatigable, larger than life, Napoleonic 
Donald Trump who spending peanuts on his campaign is pulling ahead of her in the polls nationally and in key battle ground states. The problem is the unrealistic expectations foolishly and stupidly raised by her husband, the Obamas, Joe Biden, Tim Kaine, Cory Booker and others who said of her in idealistic terms that she's a women of true, exceptional greatness and worth more qualified to be president than her husband and Obama (laughter) and Donald J. Trump. The bar that's been set for her tonight is way too high and beyond her reach. Hillary lacks the charisma and communication skills of Obama and her husband which they seem to have forgotten when they praised her so effusively as more qualified for the office then them. 
 
 
I swear to God Hillary is more qualified to be president than I ever was.
 
Indeed, it is unrealistic to assume or hope that Hillary will do on the biggest, most important night of her life what Trump accomplished with his blockbuster speech at the Republican convention last week: outshine every other speaker. Giuliani, Christi, Cruz, Gingrich, Pence, all of them were overshadowed by Trump's impassioned speech. With the exception of Cruz (because of his betrayal) I barely remember their speeches as good as they were. No speech made so great an impression and was seared so deeply into me than Donald Trump's forceful speech.  Last Thursday when Trump accepted his party's nomination he made the night and the convention his own stamping his name all over it and winning the enthusiastic applause of an astonishing 75% of 35 million viewers.
 
 
What difference does it make that I'm a tired old woman who could take no more than four years as secretary of state?
 
But Hillary lacks the stuff for doing that. After tonight's speech the country most likely will better remember Obama, his wife and Hillary's feeble husband with his charming stories and embellished tales. Tonight we will see at best a mediocre performance by a mediocre woman straining and struggling to rise to a standard of greatness transcending her powers. Indeed, Hillary is under enormous pressure to deliver what's impossible for her: an inspiring historic world-class memorable speech like Trump gave in Cleveland last week. Because she's been idealized into a greatest of great souls on the world stage the reality of her speech tonight will likely disappoint many and dampen the enthusiasm that Obama brought to fever pitch yesterday.
 
 
 
But how badly she'll do depends on her energy level-which over the last few months of battling both Bernie and Trump has often been low to the point of exhaustion (as CNN's Chris Cuomo noted on one occasion HERE). Indeed, as Hillary's stamina is very poor (made that way from aging and globe trotting when secretary of state*) the worry and stressfulness of the unrealistic performance that's expected of her tonight could very well be wearing her down as I write.
 
 
Hillary's wanted so badly to be the first woman president and to that end plotted, schemed, lied and cheated for years to get to this moment of moments; and now with the nation and world watching if Hillary is anything less than her mediocre best it will be seen as a mini or major disaster like the first Obama-Romney debate-where Obama bombed out for lack of strength. And when her speech ends (if it's as bad as it could get) Trump will be gleefully tweeting to the world, 'You see folks, like I've been saying from the start Hillary doesn't have the energy, stamina and strength for the president's job.'
 
POSTSCRIPT
 
In an interview with Esquire in 2010 Hillary complained that her job as secretary of state was wearing her out; and that she could not take a second term of it.  If she found that job so taxing how could she handle the presidency with its greater responsibilities and demands? When Trump says that Hillary lacks the stamina and strength for the presidency he's not smearing her or being sexist.
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

DONALD TRUMP, HILLARY CLINTON AND THE HISTORY OF SAME STATE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES (POSTSCRIPT: THE 19TH CENTURY CLINTON WHO LOST A PRESIDENTIAL RACE)

 

Two articles ago I noted that the 2016 race for the 45th presidency of the United States is extraordinary not only because of political novice Donald Trump's gravity defying triumph in winning big the GOP nomination, and Hillary Clinton being the first female nominee of any major political party, but because these two historic figures are from the same state. This has rarely occurred in US presidential politics. In fact, of the 57 prior presidential contests same state candidates only happened three times in 1860, 1920 and 1944.

Indeed, in 1860 former Republican Congressman Abe Lincoln of Illinois battled Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas for the 16th presidency. In 1920 Ohio Republican Senator Warren Harding fought Ohio Democratic Governor James Cox (FDR was his running mate) for the 29th presidency. And in 1944 New York Republican Governor Thomas Dewey challenged the 32nd president, New York's Franklin Roosevelt for the White House.

 Now though Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump like Roosevelt and Dewey are New Yorkers this year's same state candidate race is more like the 1860 and 1920 races.  For Clinton and Trump, like Lincoln, Douglas, Harding and Cox weren't incumbent presidents running for reelection. Whereas in 1944 FDR was the incumbent running to stay in office for an unprecedented fourth term. In fact, like Republican Donald Trump Lincoln and Harding were agents of change promising a new direction for the nation from the policies and unpopular presidencies of Democrats James Buchanan and Woodrow Wilson. 

Indeed, Lincoln ran and won on the Republican platform of stopping the expansion of slavery (which he achieved as president and much, much more); and Harding ran and won on the platform of ending the depression that engulfed the nation after World War I and restoring a robustly growing jobs creating productive economy-which he achieved as President by slashing taxes, federal spending and crushing regulations. However, though Governor Dewey ran as the change candidate against FDR's New Deal, wanting (like Harding after World War I) to cut taxes, regulations and shrink the size of government, America was at war in Europe and the Pacific; and because a sick and ailing FDR was leading the nation to victory voters wanting to stay the course reelected him for the third time.

Indeed, this year's same state candidate race is more like 1920 than 1860 or 1944. Though in 1860 we were a terribly divided nation about to plunge into a Civil War over the issue of slavery, and there are growing racial divisions and tensions today with cops shooting blacks and visa versa;  and though in 1944 we were in a world war like we are today but on a far smaller scale with Islamonazi enemies, the nation now as in 1920 is similar in that the central issue is jobs, economic growth and an overextended government. Though the economy isn't depressed as in 1920 it's clearly in a state of decline headed toward a crisis due to massive debt, runaway spending, high taxes and crushing anti-business regulations (the main reasons for the 1920 depression).  

The Forgotten Depression
 

Moreover, 1920 is similar to 2016, and distinct from 1860 and 1944, in that like this election year the incumbent president Barack Obama (a former college professor) is in his second and last term; this too was the case with two term president Woodrow Wilson who, by the way, like Obama was a college professor. And one last similarity to the present race is that Donald Trump's running mate (Mike Pence) like Warren Harding's (Calvin Coolidge*) was the governor of a state.

*Cool Cal was governor of Massachusetts.

The big question then is this: will history repeat itself? Of the three past same state candidate races Republicans won the first two and lost the third. It's two to one in favor of Republicans; and of the three races the Republican year of 1920 is closer to 2016 than the other two. However, one thing is clear: the 45th President of the United States will be the 7th from the State of New York after FDR. And by an astonishing and perhaps meaningful or prophetic coincidence if number 7 is Donald Trump, when he's sworn into office on January 20, 2017 he will be exactly, precisely, amazingly 70 years, 7 months and 7 days old (see).

POSTSCRIPT

THE NEW YORK SENATOR CLINTON WHO LOST A PRESIDENTIAL RACE
 
 
When asked about the amount of 
 Dewitt Clinton on a $1000 bill.
 
I've written about this before (see) and it's worth repeating that Hillary isn't the first US senator from New York with the name Clinton to run for the presidency. In 1812 Governor and former US  Senator Dewitt Clinton from New York ran for the presidency against James Madison on the Federalist Party ticket. He lost in a close race.

 

RELATED

 
 
 
 

MICHELLE OBAMA’S UPLIFTING DNC AMERICA IS GREAT SPEECH FOLLOWED BY A SOCIALIST INDICTMENT OF HER HUSBAND’S AMERICA

 

Last night Michelle Obama gave the best, most effective and inspiring speech of the evening and perhaps of her life Saying that "America is [still] the greatest nation on earth," and that those who work hard with the will to succeed could make a good life for themselves she then called on the nation to elect as the next president someone who'd "make America even better for our kids." But unluckily Michelle Obama is the wife of a failed two term president whose destructive left wing domestic agenda and incoherent, blundering, incompetent foreign policy has made America and the world a worst place for her kids and ours, and perhaps for generations to come. Indeed, the economic and national security impact of her husband's bad judgment and terrible leadership has raised up tens and millions of angry, fearful, unhappy Americans as shown by the rise of Bernie Sanders on the Left and Donald Trump on the Right. Never before in our history has there been two strong politically opposite populist movements emerge in the same election year crying "ENOUGH!" and calling for a radical change of direction. The closest analogy to this election year is 1968 when the political Left turned violent over the Vietnam War, racial injustice issues and assassinations; and a frightened nation wanting law, order, stability and peace turned to Richard Nixon.
 
 
 
Ironically, Obama whose presiding over a weakening economy, growing racial strife, terrorist violence and a rudderless foreign policy in utter dangerous disarray was the first US president born in the tumultuous 1960s. And Donald Trump (born 1946) was born in the year Richard Nixon began his political career running for Congress.
 
But returning to Michelle Obama's uplifting "America is great" speech no sooner did it end than the rest of the evening went downhill going from bad to worse. For Michelle was followed by a dark, negative, blistering indictment of her husband's America by Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. Indeed, these two social justice warriors painted a bleak, depressing picture of a country in extreme peril and decline badly suffering from a multitude of economic, social, racial and environmental ills."
 
 
 
Warren and Sanders angrily complained about a dying, eroding, disappearing middle class; 47 million people living in poverty with more joining them daily; millions of unemployed or underemployed workers lacking healthcare benefits with low paying "starvation" jobs; millions of immigrants without legal status facing deportation; job killing free trade agreements destroying America's manufacturing base by shipping US plants overseas; a rigged Wall Street economy (and manipulated stock market) where 85% of newly created wealth goes to the top 1% at everyone else's expense; excessive burning of fossil fuels causing droughts, flooding and hurricanes driving catastrophic world destroying climate change; a broken criminal justice system with too many in jail; an America with too many young people unable to afford college; an America with too many guns on the street (though violent crime is down); too many cops killing blacks(most of whom are violent criminals); too many homeless, too many this too many that-and the litany of ills and grievances went on and on ad nauseam. 
 
 
 
Though he was effusively praised by Warren and Sanders Obama obviously has miserably failed his own agenda to transform America into an economy that works for all-meaning a cradle to grave free stuff utopia paid for by the rich whose wealth is imagined to be unlimited with enough to provide for the needs of all (socialism in a nutshell).
 
 
With a government $19 trillion in debt and growing, and over $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities that's crushing innovation, growth and opportunities in the worst recovery since the Great Depression-the message of Warren, Sanders and the Dems is insanely clear: the government isn't big enough, doesn't tax enough, doesn't borrow, spend and print (money) enough, doesn't regulate and control our lives enough. Until government is more "compassionate," loving and caring, until its mighty arms are holding all of us in one great big hug (the message of Cory Booker), until it's more activist, centralized and planning our lives, it is unjust, unfair and barely civilized; it falls short of the ideal of a truly good, great and just society of redistributed wealth.
 
 
Indeed, though Obama's been in office eight years getting an  $800 billion stimulus to fix a trickle growth economy (which hasn't worked), healthcare reform to insure the uninsured (millions are still uninsured) and Dodd-Frank to protect consumers from predatory lenders (its making big banks bigger and killing small ones); though Obama's pulled our troops from Iraq (they're still fighting there), killed bin Laden (after seven months of dithering) and is closing Gitmo as promised (releasing terrorists to kill again); though he got same-sex marriage and repeal of "Don't Ask Don't Tell" (demoralizing the military), after listening to Warren and Sanders last night you'd think that zero has been accomplished; that nothing's been done; that Obama's America differs little from the Bush years; that the status quo still reigns. Despite all the praise and accolades that Warren and Sanders showed on Obama they weren't being sincere-they couldn't have been. For they lead millions of mostly middle class voters who are angrily up in arms with what's happening in their lives. And who are Warren and Sanders turning to for the "Hope and Change" salvation that's eluded the country for eight years? Crooked, corrupt, low energy Hillary, the "Queen of the Status Quo," the "ultimate insider," the darling of greedy, cut throat, too big to fail, 1% run Wall Street. The establishment has defeated the socialist revolution, and Bernie and Liz have lost their souls throwing themselves under the Clinton bus.
 
 

FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE: DO TRUMP AND PUTIN HAVE A BROMANCE LIKE TED KENNEDY AND THE SOVIETS HAD TO STOP REAGAN?

 

Could it be? Is it possible that Vladimir Putin is covertly intervening in US politics and aiding Donald Trump (most likely without his knowledge) in his quest for the presidency by doing what he can to undercut and stop Hillary Clinton? Only a fool would deny the possibility. After all, something similar happened in 1983 when Ted Kennedy on behalf of the Dems colluded with the Soviets in trying to defeat Ronald Reagan and elect Walter Mondale-who promised to restore detante and unilaterally freeze the production of nuclear weapons. This was a clear act of treason which Kennedy should have been held accountable for (see).

However, it is certain that Putin prefers Trump in the White House (who he flattered by calling him a "genius") over Hillary who he loathes like Obama. If Hillary is elected it's practically certain she'd be more difficult than Trump to deal with on the lifting of EU and US sanctions which were imposed after Russia annexed Crimea in March 2014. These sanctions, which are hurting Russia in the billions, include restrictions on major Russian state banks and corporations; and the blacklisting of dozens of Russian officials and firms accused of undermining Ukrainian sovereignty. It is practically certain that a Clinton presidency would make the lifting of sanctions contingent on Russia withdrawing its remaining troops from Ukraine, stop supplying anti-Ukrainian rebel separatists with money, training and arms; and lastly returning Crimea to Ukraine. And that would happen in stages. 

 

But with Trump as president there's no telling what he'd be willing to do as he is unpredictable at this point. He did say confidently that he'd get on better with the Russian leader than Obama is doing; but that's about it. From Putin's viewpoint it's preferable for Russia to have a known unknown like Trump as president than a known known like Clinton (as Rumsfeld would say). 

But last Friday on the 21st during his impassioned acceptance speech in Cleveland, Trump, as he was listing Hillary's foreign policy failures made one glaring and perhaps telling omission: Russia.  Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, ISIS, and Clinton's overall disaster in the Middle East, were scathingly mentioned. But not a peep about her failure at Russian Reset, or blaming her for Russia's conflict with Ukraine and annexing of Crimea. Russian analysts could not have failed to notice this omission and probably took it as a sign, despite Ukraine and Crimea, of Trump's good will toward their country and its leader. Putin is certainly hoping that a Trump presidency would recognize Russia's ownership of the Crimean Peninsula and lift all sanctions in exchange for withdrawing its remaining troops from Ukraine, and cutting all aid to pro-Russian Ukrainian separatists.

Indeed, it was after Trump's speech on the following day (the 22nd) that Wikileaks posted the 20,000 DNC hacked emails that have thrown the Dems into pre-convention chaos, and forced Debby W. to resign as DNC chairperson, over evidence of their rigged pro-Clinton primary process.  Coincidence? I'll let you be the judge of that. But one thing is clear: Putin does not want a third term of Barack Obama, and he'll do whatever he can to prevent it.  

 

 

 

ANGRY, DARK, DIVISIVE DONALD AND HIS ANGRY, DARK, DIVISIVE UNIFIED PARTY

 
 
(Robinson: "It Was An Angry Speech For Angry People")
 

Clinton to call on Black Lives Matter at Dem convention | TheHill

 

ACCORDING TO THE CLINTON NEWS NETWORK

of the 35 million Americans tuned into Donald Trump's historic 75 minute, double barn burner acceptance speech Thursday a whopping 75% were supportive of him. So much for GOP disunity. In other words, at least 26 million Americans are dark, divisive, mad-as-hell, "crude, racist, xenophobic, fascist" anti-establishment Donald Trumps wanting to take back America from the spinelss pc appeasers, America last globalists and self-serving special interests. Apparently, 75% share Trump's fear and pessimism that Obama's America sucks big time; that it's losing its greatness and is working against them; that Obama's nation with its rigged, booming, middle class hurting stock market and financial system overwhelmingly favoring the rich is in economic, military and geopolitical decline; and that it's losing the War on Islamic Terror in a world that is spinning out of control and is falling apart due to the absence of strong US leadership.  There is much to be angry about-righteously angry.

 

 

Obviously these 26 million reject as delusional the sunny, bright, optimistic, rainbows and unicorn Obamunism that things are much better than they seem; that though growing fossil fuel use is dooming the planet (a complete pseudo-scientific lie), and there's an epidemic of murderous gun violence (this is only true in our lawless, anarchical black inner cities) that the nation and world, nevertheless, are more peaceful, less violent and prosperous today than at any time in history; that America is greater, stronger and more respected now than ever  (does any of this make sense?); that the public is being deceived by MSM, Fox, Hannity,  Limbaugh and Trump; that all the wonderful, uplifting, good news of Obama's stellar historic achievements-from ending two wars (when we're still fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan), to the millions getting health insurance (at a huge cost to jobs and a dying middle class), to saving the economy from depression (which was done by George Bush with TARP)-are being drowned out and obfuscated by all the bad sensationalist news of a few random cop killings, some isolated, unconnected, lone wolf "religion of peace"  terror attacks, and a weakening economy of under 2% growth ("the fault of a global slowdown," not of trillions in debt, high taxes, massive anti-business regulations and poor demoralizing economic leadership). 

Under George Bush polls showing that the US was on the wrong track reached a high of 67% in 2008. Under Obama it's exceeded that reaching 73% in September 2011. Today it's at 70% up from 65% a few short months ago (see) .
 

Now if these 26 million angry Americans-part of the 224 million (or 70%) that see Obama and Washington leading us in the wrong direction-don't want to trash all the great, good, transformational change that Obama has made these last eight years (in building "A More Perfect [Dependency] Union" of increasing poverty and hardship for millions) they must stay the course with progressive, hopeful, "stronger together," low energy, weak, establishment Hillary-who made such a mess of US foreign policy. 

Indeed, Hillary promises to continue Obama's good work and add to his glowing legacy (of ashes and dust) a new, glorious chapter of national greatness for posterity. And to help her write this new chapter she's calling on the race obsessed, anti-cop, capitalist hating Marxist leaders of Black Lives Matter-with their positive, inspiring, unifying vision of a white supremacist America that's oppressing millions of blacks and keeping them in poverty and degradation-trapped in dysfunctional, strife-torn inner city hell holes that worsen by the day as its victims cry out for police and white blood.

Needless to say Obama, Hillary and the Dems are misreading the American people; they've learned nothing from the rise of anti-establishment outsiders Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump; and if present economic, racial, foreign policy and national security trends continue on their downward course they're going to pay a bitter price on Election Day. From now to then the anger and fear over America's decline can only grow, along with the national Trump movement.

And BTW if Eugene Robinson wants to hear a red hot, divisive, angry white man then he should listen to any one of Bernie Sander's scorching, America sucks socialist speeches. Bernie garnered 13 million primary votes; and millions of these are mad-as-hell with Hillary, Kaine and the DNC that plotted to defeat their dear, beloved, crackpot hero for being unelectably too extreme.

RELATED
 
 

BERNIE SANDERS, SOCIALIST SWEDEN AND RECKLESS CASINO CAPITALISM ON WALL STREET 

DONALD TRUMP, NEW YORK, THE BUSHES, HILLARY’S DILEMMA AND THE 19TH CENTURY NEW YORK CLINTON WHO LOST A PRESIDENTIAL RACE

 

That 2016 is perhaps the most unusual presidential election year in American history goes without saying made that way officially Tuesday night with the nomination of billionaire businessman and political novice Donald Trump. But what also makes it unusual is that the two candidates of the major parties are from the state of New York. That has never happened before in American history. And now a New Yorker will be living in the White House which hasn't happened in 71 years when Franklin Roosevelt died in office 71 years ago.
 
Oddly, on the Democratic side the race for that party's nomination boiled down to Bernie Sanders who was born in Brooklyn, New York and moved to Vermont in his late 20s. And Chicago born Hillary Clinton, who, as First Lady, moved to New York in January 2000 so she could run for US senator of that state. But unlike Bernie and Hillary Donald Trump was born in New York and remains a New Yorker having been one for 70 years.
 
Now when Hillary as First Lady won the US senate seat from New York it was on November 7, 2000. That was the day that Republican Texas governor George W. Bush defeated vice president Al Gore for the presidency in the closest race in US history. Indeed, the Democrats after two successful terms of Bill Clinton (he left office with a 66% approval rating) amazingly lost the White House when they should have kicked butt. Now Hillary Clinton in 2008 after failing to succeed two terms of Republican Bush is hoping to break the pattern started by Bush and win the White House while a two term president of the same party is in power.
 
Indeed, Hillary is hoping to become the first presidential candidate since George HW Bush in 1988 to win an election for the incumbent party and continue in the White House. When that happened it fell on a November 8th election date which is the date for this year's contest. However, George HW had the advantage of following the larger than life, very popular Ronald Reagan, a super successful transformational two term Republican President who left office with a 63% Gallop approval rating. The American people loved Reagan and wanted him for a third term in the person of his very loyal VP.
 
Indeed, unlike today with a weak economy showing signs of deterioration, a world in increasing turmoil and suffering, and domestic Islamic and anti-cop violence and terror on the rise, George H.W. Bush inherited a very unified, prospering and happy nation, and a stable post-Cold War world. Indeed, though two term president Barack Obama (the great anti-Reagan and divider) has been a dismal failure Hillary is lyingly claiming the contrary: that Obama's been a great president with a record of worthy achievements and is vowing to continue his sorry legacy of ashes and dust.
 
To be sure, the only way Hillary can win in November is by convincing voters that she'd be the lesser of two evils. And that though Trump is offering change which millions desperately want he'd be far worse than Obama-and worse then herself. Or that somehow Trump would return the nation to "disastrous" Republican or Bush era policies that caused the housing crisis and nearly collapsed the economy. However,  that would be an awfully hard case to make since Trump has established himself as radically anti-establishment (GOPe), as well as viciously anti-Bush. With the Bushes having ditched the Convention it will prove nearly impossible for Hillary and the Dems to make a credible case (as was done to McCain and Romney) that Trump will be George W's third term.
 
 
THE NEW YORK SENATOR CLINTON WHO LOST A PRESIDENTIAL RACE
 
 
When asked about the amount of 
 Dewitt Clinton on a $1000 bill.
 
I've written about this before (see) and it's worth repeating that Hillary isn't the first US senator from New York with the name Clinton to run for the presidency. In 1812 governor and former US senator Dewitt Clinton from New York ran for the presidency against James Madison on the Federalist Party ticket. He lost in a close race.
 

DONALD TRUMP, MIKE PENCE, THE NUMBER 16 AND THE AUSPICIOUS STATE OF INDIANA

 

TP = TRUE [TEA PARTY] PATRIOTS 

Trump+and+Pence1

As I've previously written, on the 16th day of June 2015 (16 days from the publication of Ann Coulter's book "Adios, America" on illegal immigration, and 16 days before an illegal alien killed Kate Steinle in San Francisco) Donald Trump (16 months from Election Day 2016) announced his run for 1600 Pennsylvania Ave-making illegal immigration and border security the focus of his campaign (see and see).

*Today, July 18th, the start of the RNC when Donald Trump will be nominated the Republican presidential nominee, is 114 days to Election Day or 16 weeks (see).

I also wrote (see) that the important date of April 26th*, when Trump won five northeastern primary states virtually making him the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, fell on the 316th day of his campaign-which oddly was the 116th day or 16th week of the year (see). Moreover, as I  noted, not only was April 26th the 316th day of Trump's historic campaign it was also auspiciously its 45th week-the number of the next President.
 
* April 26th was  Melania Trump's 46th birthday (see)  .
 
 \
 
 The GOP has joined the Hair Club For Real Men.
 
But it wasn't until the following week with Trump's victory in Indiana (when Cruz and Kasich called it quits) that Trump effectively secured the nomination as announced by Reince Priebus (see). Oddly, Indiana (which ranks 16th in population) was the 19th state to join the Union doing so in 1816, the 16th year of the 19th century. By the way, the next Republican to live in the White House will be the 19th in American history (see).
 
 
Is Trump to Clinton what Obama was too McCain eight years ago? The "Hope & Change" candidate? The hope he can stop and reverse Obama's change?
 
Needless to say the prospering state of Indiana (a conservative economic model for the nation) was politically propitious for Trump; and now auspiciously he's picked its very successful governor Mike Pence as his running mate. Amazingly, on Friday when Trump announced his selection of Pence it was 116 days or 16 weeks to Election Day (see). And when on Saturday at the Hilton Trump and Pence* appeared together publicly for the first time it was the 16th day of July.
 
*It's also interesting to note that Governor Pence was born on a Sunday and Donald Trump on a Friday. Sunday and Friday are the 1st and 6th days of the week giving us the numbers 1 & 6 (see).
 
No one but God knows who the next President and VP will be. But could the above numeric patterns of 16s in this 16th year of the 21st century be a providential sign that conservative Republican Mike Pence will prove a big factor in Trump winning the presidency? We can only hope so. But there appear to be other signs suggesting that Pence will  prove to be a valuable asset for Trump in November. These are as follows:
 
 
What Trump and FDR have in common (besides being born and raised in New York) is their patriotic nationalism, indomitable strength and the immense drive to win.
 
Donald Trump is a native of New York a state that has produced 6 of our 44 presidents (see). This means that if elected in November Trump at age 70 would be the 7th New Yorker to be President following Franklin Roosevelt who was the 6th*. Now by chance or providence Mike Pence was born June 7, 1959 or the 6th month and 7th day of 1959 giving us the numbers 6 &7. Moreover, when Pence was born Donald Trump was in his 667th week on this earth (see)**.
 
*Oddly if Trump wins the presidency he will be sworn into office on the 70th year, 7th month and 7th day of his amazing life (see).
 
**When Trump began his candidacy on June 16, 2015 it was the 167th day of the year-the 67th number of the 100 series (see).
 
Furthermore, as I mentioned elsewhere, FDR was elected the 6th New York resident to be President on November 8, 1932. In other words, this November 8th* will be the 84th** anniversary of FDR's landslide victory over Herbert Hoover. And lastly, as the number 16 seems to be politically auspicious for Trump, he's now within striking distance of following FDR into the White House as the 7th President from New York, it just so happens that FDR was the 32nd President of the United States-32 is 16 doubled.
 
*On Election Day November 8th Donald Trump will be exactly 25,716 days old-a five digit number ending in 16. BTW, 8 is half 16 (see).
 
*84 years translates into 1008 months of calendar time (84x12=1008). 1008 is a multiple of 16 63 times.
 
And lastly, underscoring the significance of Indiana for Donald Trump as a possible sign of triumph in November was Hillary Clinton's loss of that state to Bernie Sanders (the populist Donald Trump of the Left) in an upset victory- which I wrote about HERE. Did underdog Bernie's defeat of Hillary in Indiana foreshadow underdog Donald being helped by Indiana's Mike Pence to defeat Hillary in November? As of today with the Baton Rouge and Dallas cop killings, the jihadist massacres in France and Orlando and the weakening of the economy (three straight quarters of GDP decline) things are looking brilliant for "the law and order," give-ISIS-hell, "make America great and safe again" presidential candidate and his terrific running mate.
 
 
 
 
POSTSCRIPT
 
IN DEFENSE OF MIKE PENCE
 
 

Pence the Con is a gift for the Dems and will sink Trump and the Republican Party!  Here's why:

Pense's stand on some key issues

Abortion: As governor, Pence signed into law a sweeping bill banning abortion if a fetus has a "genetic abnormality" such as Down syndrome and holding doctors legally liable if they had knowingly performed such procedures. The law also required that aborted fetal tissue be buried or cremated. A federal judge blocked the law from going into effect.

The environment: Pence has frequently expressed skepticism about the reality of climate change and fought back against key environmental acts designed to curb carbon emissions. In 2014, he told NBC's Chuck Todd that he doesn't know if climate change "is a resolved issue in science today." He wrote a letter to President Obama in 2015 saying he wouldn't comply with new Environmental Protection Agency regulations for coal plants.

Guns: Pence has an "A" rating from the NRA, and while in Congress he regularly voted with the gun lobby. That included voting against an assault weapons ban — something Trump has mentioned supporting during this election.

Immigration: In a December tweet, Pence called Trump's ban on Muslims entering the United States "offensive and unconstitutional." He has, though, supported strict immigration measures and opposed the resettlement of Syrian refugees in Indiana.

LGBT rights: Pence helped pass one of the nation's first "religious freedom" laws that protected people and businesses who wanted to refuse service to LGBT people if they cited religious objections. After businesses pulled out of expansion plans into the state, Pence faced immense pressure to roll back the law, which he did. Trump has actually been fairly open when it comes to rights for gay and transgender people.

Trade: Pence has offered support for the Trans Pacific Partnership, which Trump has routinely attacked, going so far as to call it a "rape" of the country. Pence in 2014 said, "Trade means jobs, but trade also means security. The time has come for all of us to urge the swift adoption of the Trans Pacific Partnership."

 

MY REPLY

 

Pence will sink Trump like GHW Bush sank Reagan: Bush opposed Reaganomics (ridiculing it as "voodoo economics"), was pro-Detente (thought Reagan's anti-communism extreme), voted for the Civil Rights Amendment which Reagan opposed. The American people chose Reagan over Carter and cared nothing about Bush's anti-Reagan positions, and Reagan's alleged racism, because he projected an image of strength promising to restore America's greatness at a time when we were in economic, military and geopolitical decline.

BTW, according to Pew Research of the top 14 national issues gun control ranks 5th, immigration 6th, race relations 10th, global trade 11th, environment (climate change) 12th, abortion 13th, and LBGT issues dead last in 14th place. The top four issues: the economy, terrorism, foreign policy and healthcare (Obamacare is hugely unpopular) favor Trump-Pence over Hillary and the Dems.

 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

OBAMA’S IRAN NUKE DEAL CELEBRATION RUINED BY NICE TERROR ATTACK, THE WORST BY A SINGLE MASS MURDERER IN HISTORY

 

 
article-3691019-3649377400000578-832_964x464
 
On the day that Barack Obama and John Kerry were festively congratulating themselves on the first anniversary of their completely worthless $150 billion nuke deal with Islamo-nazi "Death to America" terrorist Iran terrorism struck Nice, France ruining their day of appeasement, stupidity and infamy. A Moslem suicide terrorist armed with an 18 ton refrigerator truck bearing guns and grenades plowed into a large crowd of pedestrians at full speed walking on a promenade celebrating Bastille Day killing 84 and injuring more.
 
 
 
As yesterday July 14th was France's July 4th (Independence Day) the innocent victims of the Islamist attack were celebrating "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," the values of the French Revolution and Democracy. But for the mass murdering terrorist, Tunisian born Mohamed Bouhlel, Bastille Day was a godless day that comes from hell hated by God with murderous rage which he became a channel for. 
 
 
 
For "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity" are unIslamic values that conflict with the Koran (Islam's constitution of tyranny)-a declaration of endless war against democracy and infidel humanity until the later are conquered and the former is no more.
 
unnamed
 
 
 
This jihadist who went on the rampage was a soldier of Allah in a 1400 year old war unleashed by the Prophet Mohammed to advance the political and religious supremacy of Islam. Not "Liberty" but despotism and slavery. Not "Equality" but the oppression of minorities (women, gays, Christians, Jews, pagans). Not "Fraternity" but US versus THEM division, conflict and hate. That is what Mohammed Bouhlel  was fighting for when he martyred himself after killing liberty loving Frenchmen in droves. And that too is what Iran is fighting for in their jihad against America, Israel and the Democratic West.
 
  
 
Yesterday was the second worst July 14th in human history. The first just one year before was worse as it saw a weak, self-serving, appeasing US president looking to his legacy expanding Iran's capabilities to spread its evil influence and power across the region and world. It also didn't stop them getting the bomb. Go a head 
 
CLICK
 
 
 and prove me
wrong.
 
IN SOLIDARITY WITH THE PEOPLE OF FRANCE WE SING LA MARSEILLAISE  FROM CASABLANCA 
 
 
WE WILL CRUSH THESE ISLAMO-NAZIS LIKE WE DID HITLER AND THE THIRD REICH!  
 
POSTSCRIPT
 
 
 
NEED FOR GUN CONTROL AND TRUCK LICENSE RESTRICTIONS
 
Oh look! A Jihadist armed with a large speeding 18 ton truck just killed at least 84 people causing the same number of deaths (and injuring more) than the Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, San Bernardino and Aurora shooters combined. He now holds the world's record  for one single man mass murdering others exceeding the record held by Anders Breivik in Norway by seven deaths. It's horrific what one bloodthirsty Islamic terrorist with a truck can do. I guess those like our befuddled president who reduce mass shootings to a gun control problem need now to restrict who gets truck drivers licenses because truck jihad copy cats are coming.

 

“TRUE” ISLAM, TRANSGENDERISM AND THE UTTER INCOHERENCE OF OBAMA AND THE LEFT, SADDAM HUSSEIN TRUMP AND ANTI-AMERICAN JUSTICE GINSBERG

Obama: "Islam Is A Religion That Preaches Peace" | Video | RealClearPolitics

Obama Administration Imposes Transgenderism Nationwide - Breitbart

Above is a Moslem man cross dressed as a Moslema (Moslem woman). If he's a violent, radical, bloodthirsty jihadist who thinks he's transgender Obama, Clinton and the PC Left would deny that his self-identity as Moslem was valid; but they would validate his self-identity as a female.
 

If an extremely violent, bloodthirsty, sadistic man who enjoys making people suffer or killing them thinks he's transgender (believes he's a woman trapped in a male body who experiences the world like a female) Obama, Hillary and the PC Left (rejecting the truth that he has a treatable mental obsession, fantasy or disorder    see) would urge us to accept him (violence and all, and despite the gap between his mentality and genetic reality) as really, truly, authentically female.

But if an equally violent man strongly self-identifies as Moslem, and kills in the name of his God and faith, Obama, Hillary and the Left would deny that he's truly, really, authentically Islamic. In other words, no matter how strongly a violent Moslem (jihadist) feels like a Moslem, sees the world and experiences life as a Moslem-no matter if he's a frequent mosque goer and practices all the rituals of the faith-to Obama, Hillary and the Left his religious identity isn't valid, and he's a fake.

Indeed, leftists would have us believe  that a jihadist's self-identity as Moslem was a mental obsession and fantasy out of whack with true Islamic reality; and that he shouldn't be respected as truly Moslem, but stigmatized as a perverter of the faith-no matter how badly we might offend him.

 

 

What does transgenderism and liberalism have in common? Both are treatable mental disorders. I should know. I was once a liberal.

In truth, for Obama, Hillary and the Left a Moslem man isn't truly Moslem unless he's a harmless, peace-loving, progressive liberal like themselves. This of course would exclude Mohammed, the warlord founder of the faith, who was a mass murdering terrorist thug; and who (among his many atrocities and crimes) completed the ethnic cleansing of Medina of Jews by ordering the beheading of hundreds of Jewish men in front of their women and children. BTW, the Jewish women and children were sold into slavery; the only Jewish man who survived that "religion of peace" massacre was a convert to Islam (see).

 

THE ISLAMIC STATE AND ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

 

But it gets worse. Adding to the leftist confusion and incoherence of who is truly Moslem Obama rejects as Islamic the violent terrorist Islamic State (ISIS) but accepts as genuinely Islamic violent radical terrorist Iran, which he deferentially refers to as the ISLAMIC REPUBLIC.

 

In other words, for Obama, Hillary and the Left violent terrorist "Death to America and Israel" Iran practices true "religion of peace" Islam, as if it's an exemplary model of what an Islamic state should be. Is it any wonder why US foreign policy is in such incoherent disarray and is leading America and the world deeper and deeper into peril and tragedy? And who is it that wants to stay the course and continue Obama's legacy in foreign policy?  Hillary Clinton, one of its brilliant authors and architects. And she says Donald Trump is a dangerous man? 

 

 

 
 

 

 
 
 
As Commander-in-Chief Donald Trump wants to equal or surpass in brutality and inspiring fear Saddam Hussein when fighting our Islamic terrorist enemies. But Hillary, on the contrary, wants to continue in the way of another Hussein with the first name Barack, a reluctant warrior weak in the use of force when fighting merciless, menacing Islamic jihad. Which of the two candidates is more suitable to lead us in the war against a fanatical enemy hell-bent on our destruction? An enemy every bit as evil, power mad and bloodthirsty as the Nazis and Japanese who we fire bombed and nuked into surrender, submission and defeat?  
 
DONALD TRUMP 2016!
 
MAKE AMERICA RESPECTED, STRONG
AND FEARED
AGAIN!
 
 
 
 
FORGET ABOUT HER ANTI-TRUMP REMARKS
SENILE ANTI-AMERICAN LEFTIST NUTJOB RUTH BADER GINSBURG
TOLD EGYPTIANS:
 
 
 
 
Would she have preferred they used the Koran as a guide? 
 
 
When Ginsberg was sworn in as a supreme she swore to God  to uphold the Constitution. How could she do that when she doesn't believe in it? And (like Obama) would like to tear it up and replace it with something radically different?
 
 
 
 
 

WHY MARTIN LUTHER KING WOULD HAVE SHUNNED BLM DESPITE HIS CHILDREN’S (WEAK) ENDORSEMENT

 

 

 
If America the great, good and beautiful is in reality an ugly, evil "White Supremacist Nation" politically, socially and economically rigged to keep blacks in poverty, oppression, degradation and sin then how did   black American Barack Obama become the most powerful black man in all of human history? Isn't Obama's astonishing success in becoming a two term US President proof that "White Supremacist America" is a complete lie? That it only exists in the mind's of racially obsessed America-hating Leftists, grievance spewing race pimps and the low info   ignorant? And that the millions of blacks living in poverty and despair in our depressed, lawless, strife-torn inner cities is largely self-caused-having zero to do with racist cops, racist courts and a so-called "white racist controlled"  political, social and economic system?
 
Surely if Barack Obama could rise so high in prominence, power and wealth any black person with the will to succeed and surmount what racial difficulties exist (every society has them) can achieve the American Dream and live a good a rewarding life-as many blacks do. 
 
And as Black Lives Matter is based on the outrageous lie of a White Supremacist America that criminally discriminates against blacks using cops, courts and economic discrimination to kill and massively jail them and keep them down why would Martin Luther King, a man of God with enormous integrity and character who loved the truth and hated lies, favor BLM and march with them? King's Civil Rights Movement was from heaven, BLM is from hell; King (who opposed the Black Panthers in his day, seewouldn't  have legitimized them like Obama has done.
 
 
DEBATE ON DR. KING'S CHILDREN
AND BLM 
 
 
 
Alveda King niece of MLK.
 
 
If Martin Luther King were President instead of Barack Obama he would never have invited "No Justice, No Peace" "Fry Cops Like Bacon"  BLM leaders to the White House like Obama did . It's more than likely he'd have denounced BLM (like he did Huey Newton and the Black Panthers) as a [GODLESS] movement of divisive, mindless, insane race haters just like his niece Minister Alveda King ( speaking authoritatively in her uncle's name) is doing.
 
 
"Godless," now? Goodness you are full of yourself. Won't that come as a surprise to the pastors and priests marching in peaceful protest with BLM?
 
 
As Alveda King says her great uncle put God (the Divine Author of our Individual Rights and Liberties) at the center of the 1960s Civil Rights Movement and used Him (the Creator and Father of the human race) as a unifying principle to join blacks, whites and everyone else together.
 
What is BLM's unifying principle? If not God then what? Without such a powerful compelling principle how could BLM hope to succeed? With most Americans hostile to BLM, seeing it as a radical movement of divisive, violent, toxic, anti-white race haters (its public image) how does it expect to succeed like King's inclusive, peaceful, nonviolent, "God is Love" mainstream movement?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MLK's children: MLK III and Minister Bernice King. They talk the talk about BLM, but won't walk the walk and march with them.
 
How presumptuous of you and O'Reilly. It just so happens that
MLK's son and daughter both say he would have supported BLM. In fact His son said his dad would be "PROUD' of BLM. But, then, surely they don't know their own father as well as you and Bill O'Reilly..
 
 
 
Well, that was embarrassing for you and Billy. 😉
 
Actions always speak louder than words, friend. Where is the actual, active, passionate support of Bernice King and MLK III for BLM? Since it started three years ago how many BLM meetings, rallies and marches have they attended? How much money have they raised for the cause? Obama invited BLM's leaders to the White House. But when have the King children invited them to their homes? To date the Kings' support for BLM seems more lip (perhaps to appease friends and relatives who support it) than anything real and concrete.
 
And, BTW, like Alveda King Bernice is a Christian minister and pro-life, pro-family, anti-gay social conservative; and like Alveda she has nothing philosophically in common with the secular progressive, Marxist leaning BLM leadership-and its simplistic reduction of all       black socio-economic problems to the lie of White Racism. Hence, in her interview with Amy Goodman (which you linked) King commends BLM for "bringing attention to the suffering of blacks," and that's it; her praise goes know further; as King understands that underlying the problems and pathologies plaguing black inner cities (poverty, gang violence, drug abuse, illiteracy, broken families and schools)
is a profound crisis of values; and because the solution is spiritual not political or racial what she doesn't say is that BLM has the right answers-which it absolutely doesn't.
 
  
So now you see into the minds and hearts of MLK's children, not just MLK?
*snicker*
 
Goodness, you've tangled yourself up here. I will pray for you.
 
 
 
People should be judged by what they do or fail to do, not by what they say. What's striking is the gulf between the Kings' very few words of support for BLM and their actions in supporting it which to date are non-existent. Compare them to their father and the anti-war movement. MLK not only passionately spoke out against the Vietnam War and in support of the anti-war movement he participated in its marches and rallies (despite the frequent violence) demanding an end to the war.
 
 
After three years and dozens and dozens of BLM rallies across the country demanding an end to anti-black police violence the Kings have kept aloof from the cause not going to a single rally. What sensible person based on a few words of support for BLM followed by such glaring inaction would interpret it, as you do, as a sign of resounding support? It would seem that you're grasping at straws and reading too much into their words. Instead of a passionate commitment to BLM their support seems quite less than lukewarm.
 
In sum, Bill O'Reilly is correct: just as Bernice King and MLK III haven't marched with BLM neither would their father. And if he were President the White House would be off-limits to them-as well as Al Sharpton and every other deranged "racism-is-everywhere" Leftist ideologue.

 

RELATED 

 

US COPS, COURTS AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM BEST IN THE WORLD

 

 

  

 
 AMERICA LOVES ITS LOCAL COPS
  
 
 
 
LOVES ITS LOCAL COURTS
 
 
 
 
LOVES  ITS LOCAL JAILS
 
 
 
 
LOVES ITS CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
FROM BORDER TO BORDER AND COAST TO COAST
 
 
 
 
THERE'S NONE BETTER, FAIRER, JUSTER IN THE WORLD
 
 
 
 
 
 
DON'T LIKE IT?
 
 
 
 
DISAGREE?
 
 
 
 
HATE IT RIGHT OR WRONG?
 
 
 
 
THINK IT'S RACIST, ANTI-BLACK, UNFAIR,   DISCRIMINATORY?
 
 
 
 
THINK THERE'S RAMPANT COP BRUTALITY EVERYWHERE?
 
 
 
 
THINK IT ILL-SERVED TRAYVON?
 
MURDERED GRAY AND BROWN?
 
STRANGLED ERIC GARNER TO DEATH
AS HE WAS GASPING FOR AIR?
 
 
 
 
WELL THEN, I GOT THE PERFECT ANSWER IF YOU'RE LIVING IN FEAR:
 
 
 
 
FIND A COUNTRY WITH A BETTER SYSTEM AND GO LIVE THERE.
 
 

 

 RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 

CONSERVATISM: THE LAST BEST HOPE FOR BLACK AMERICA (POSTSCRIPT: DEBATE ON RACISM, WELFARE, GENERATIONAL POVERTY AND MARTIN LUTHER KING)

Newt Gingrich: 'It is more dangerous to be black in America'-USA Today' 

 

NEWT IS RIGHT: IT'S MORE DANGEROUS TO BE BLACK IN AMERICA THAN WHITE

But as statistics overwhelmingly and tragically show blacks have  far more to fear from each other than from whites, or from anyone else in America. Why? Because of the unique nationwide collapse of entire black communities into lawlessness, anarchy and anything goes immorality with black on black murder, rape, theft and violent crime worsening by the year the nightmare of deadly, strife-torn inner city life. Why? It's not anti-black bigotry or cops killing blacks (both of which have greatly declined over the last 50 years) that's causing blacks to violently turn on each other with such vicious animosity. The cause is a cancer inside the black America called welfare liberalism.

Indeed,  this crisis is caused by desperate, bankrupt, scapegoating liberals who demonize white Americans as differing little in their mentalities from old Jim Crow Democrats; and exploit the largely self-caused ills and miseries that plague blacks to keep alive the myth that we're a racist nation of privileged white supremacists that's rigged against blacks and oppress them. This utterly false, groundless, divisive lie (disproved by America making Obama the most powerful black man in human history) is advanced to avoid responsibility for the colossal failure of the liberal welfare state-a corrupt and dehumanizing system that traps millions in generational poverty and a web of social pathologies, hopelessness and racist lies.  

And the solutions proposed by race obsessed liberals and our clueless, divisive, pro-BLM president are what? Not the moral regeneration of black America starting with the individual and personal responsiblity; not teaching young people to become good productive law-abiding citizens with respect for authority; not ending the spiritually corrosive poison of government dependency that destroys character, the work ethic and the incentive to marry and raise kids normally; what they propose are  useless measures that keep the welfare status quo alive such as gun control, reining in police, reforming the criminal justice system and more money for war on poverty programs when trillions have been spent to no avail.

Apart from too few black conservatives in politics, the media, academia and church ministries blacks have no one to lead them out of poverty, illiteracy, drug abuse, crime and the plague of out of wedlock births. As thousands of angry, deluded blacks march across the country protesting the lie of institutional racism and anti-black police violence cops are killed and hurt and the streets of Chicago, Baltimore and South Central LA run red with blood as blacks kill blacks in droves.

The Age of Liberalism is over, bankrupt, finished, done. After 50 years of the War on Poverty moving all the ways to the radical LEFT with catastrophic results blacks have nowhere left to go but RIGHT. Black America is ready for a revolution. In the years ahead you will see an increasing number blacks waking up to the truth about welfare liberalism and joining our ranks realizing that their last best hope for social, economic and spiritual renewal is American Conservatism.

 

RELATED

 

CAN BERNIE SANDERS WIN OVER BLACK AMERICA AND BEAT THE CLINTONS FOR THE DEMOCRAT NOMINATION? YES HE CAN!

(This piece is about the Clinton/Gingrich Welfare Reform Bill)

 

 

POSTSCRIPT

(Reposted from November 6, 2015) 

 

 
 
jonah_goldberg.jpgMorgan Freeman, Don Lemon, 
 
 In his October 30 National Review column Jonah Goldberg invoked the two politicians' family backgrounds to justify his observation that Ben Carson may be "more authentically African-American" than Obama, pointing to the fact that "Obama's mother was white and he was raised in part by his white grandparents," while Carson "grew up in Detroit, the son of a very poor, very hard-working single mother"
 
Image
 
When I posted the comment below on Media Matters it sparked a number of  lively debates on racism, welfare, inner city life,  Martin Luther King and much more.
 
 
MY COMMENT
 
GOLDBERG AND MORGAN FREEDMAN
 
In an interview with NPR to promote his latest film, The 
Magic of Belle Isle, the popular Oscar-winning actor [Morgan Freedman] said that people “conveniently 
forget that Barack had a mama, and she was white — very white American, Kansas, middle of America There was no argument about who he is or what he is. America's first black president hasn't arisen yet. He’s not America’s first black president — he’s America’s first mixed-race president.”
 
 
THE MEDIA MATTERS' DEBATES
 
 
 
  
 

And if someone with Obama's coloration and features were to walk into a room right now, what percentage of Americans, Black or White, would immediately assume that he was a White man? Racism is situational. Glenn Beck said that Obama had "a deep-seated hatred for white people." In our culture, President Obama is defined as Black by those who would not see him as White. That and the fact that he was born in Kenya, according to morons like Donald Trump.

 

ApolloSpeaks  blessed56 

 

Even more idiotic than Trump's harmless birtherism is 

our utterly ignorant moron of a president telling comedian Marc Maron the dangerous divisive racist lies that racism is genetic in White America; that Whites are innately anti-black, that it's passed on from generation to generation "through their DNA." If that were true then how does this imbecile account for the fact that our predominantly White "genetically racist" society made him the most powerful black man in human history? With good reason Beck said what he did. Only an anti-White racist could make such a hateful, false statement.

 

http://www.npr.org/sections/th...

 

classicalmusiclover  ApolloSpeaks

 

You do realize that Obama's reference to "in our DNA" was a metaphor, not an assertion that racism is literally genetic, don't you?

It's actually a very common metaphor for "part of our culture and upbringing."

As the old song goes, "you've got to be carefully taught." That's how it is passed on.

 

 

So it's only metaphorical that Obama is supporting an overtly black racist movement organized on the proven leftist lie that America is a white supremacist society with cops across the country leading a murderous race war against poor, suffering, innocent, victimized blacks? In other words, we shouldn't take his support literally?

 

classicalmusiclover  ApolloSpeaks 

 

There is a lot of potted right-wing ideology and distortion in your comment. And you turn the "Black Lives Matter" movement into such a caricature that it can only be a strawman.

 

White supremacism runs deep in American history. It is real. That doesn't mean that America is necessarily a white supremacist society, but it does mean that there are unacknowledged anti-black biases that often go unacknowledged and have had a corrosive structural effect. Nowhere is this clearer than in policing and in the disproportionate incarceration rates.

 

Your literalism will be your undoing; it certainly is your unmasking as an idiot.

 

calls Obama a “Halfrican-

 

 

And it was only metaphorical that Obama sat in the pews of a racist church for 20 years listening to the ravings of his black supremacist mentor (so hateful Oprah couldn't stand him) that God hates the white race? And blacks (God's chosen people) are destined to rule? Oh, that's right, the compulsive liar wasn't there when Wright gave his hateful incendiary sermons.

 

obama-trayvon

 

 

And it was only metaphorical that Obama supported a violent homophobic black racist gangsta wannabe [Trayvon Martin] who murderously tried to ground and pound an innocent community watchman into unconsciousness and death thinking (as Rachel Jeantel told Piers Morgan) that he was "a gay predator out to rape him"? How despicable, shameful and hypocritical of Obama to say "If I had a son he'd look like Trayvon." Truth is he wouldn't have let his eldest daughter date such a sick, twisted, dangerous kid (see).

 

And let's not forget that Eric Holder was metaphorically speaking when he said in 2009 that Americans are a "nation of cowards" on racial issues-despite a devastating Civil War claiming 500,000 lives, nationwide support for the 1960s Civil Rights Movement, and a $19 trillion War On (mostly black) Poverty.

 

BTW, the moral collapse of our inner city ghettos (largely caused by the corrosive social welfare state as FDR warned) disproportionally into the most violent and lawless places in America is what underlie the "disproportionate black incarceration rate." "White Racism" is a scapegoat to hide the catastrophic failure of liberal social welfare policies (with trillions in transferred funds) to end poverty and improve black lives. Instead of the promised conquest of poverty we have more of it and worse than ever as inner city life (once decent, law-abiding communities with strong families and work values) are now progressive created war zones, hell holes and wastelands. The road to hell (and a third world America) is paved with liberal compassion.

 

NYC, Brooklyn and Queens

  

 

FactCheck   

 

Obama said racism is endemic (that is what is meant by the metaphor "in our DNA") to the US, not specifically white people. That is only "patently false" if we ignore...

- slavery

- the Indian Wars

- Native American reservations

- segregation

- Japanese internment camps

- Jim Crow laws

- socioeconomic inequality

- voter suppression efforts

- unequal mandatory sentencing laws

- disparate treatment from law enforcement

- chronic poverty

- housing discrimination

- declaring blacks to be only a fraction of a human being in our Constitution

- the 1790 Naturalization Act barring non-whites from becoming citizens

- discrimination against darker Southern European immigrants in the first part of the 20th century

- the intense concern of Trump supporters with immigrants from Latin America, but not the many undocumented coming from Eastern Europe

- the proliferation of violent white supremacist groups

- lynching

- the KKK

- poll taxes

- prohibitions against interracial marriage

- disparate loan practices from banks

- the fact that many citizens continue to hold discriminatory views toward other ethnic groups

- "Yellow Peril" racism against Chinese immigrants- the Chinese Exclusion Act

- the Alien Land Law restricting what property Asians buy

- the formation of the Native American Party (aka the Know Nothing party) on purely racist grounds

- the National Origins Formula in immigration law, designed to limit immigration from non-Nordic countries

- the Mexican Repatriation program, which forcefully removed US citizens and sent them to Mexico

- racist Tea Party depictions of Obama

- birtherism

 

So yeah, except for all of that and numerous other incidents I must leave off for the sake of brevity, it is "patently false." If we reduce all of US history to a single day in November, 2008, there is absolutely no racism in this country

 

 

 

Bull! Obama was literally referring to the contemporary genetic racism of white Americans against blacks, and no other group. But do tell me, why did you exclude from your list of white racism the white man created liberal welfare state that traps millions of blacks in poverty, degradation, oppression and sin? That's destroyed inner city communities, families, schools, churches and work values; that's turned black ghetto's into war zones and morally dehumanizing lawless wastelands of crime, violence, drug abuse, illiteracy, one parent homes, disease and death? How could you treat something so provably destructive to millions of black Americans as not being racist?

 

And where is black racism on your list?

 

Where's the violent Black (supremicist) Panthers with their insane call for a suicidal race war? Where's Farrakhan and the white hating, anti-semitic Nation of Islam? Where's the Afro-centric racist churches like the sh*t hole Obama sat in for 20 years? Where's your mention of James Cone and his poisonous Black Liberation Theology with its black Christ and white hating God? Where's Black Lives Matter with its bullsh*t race war of cops against blacks that is worsening the nightmare of inner city life as cops are inhibited from doing their jobs in enforcing the law?

 

And where are race hustlers and grievance pimps like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson on your list? Evil men who thrive on black misery while infecting black minds with the big lie that America is racially rigged against them? Why aren't they on your list?

 

Consider this post an addition to your one-sided, hate driven, pathetic racist list making it more balanced, rounded, complete and fair.

 

 

"Why did you exclude from your list of white racism the white created liberal welfare state that traps millions of blacks in poverty, degradation, oppression and sin?"

 

Yes...blacks had full equality...full rights...full access...equal opportunity...until the The Great Society created a problem that did not exist...

 

 

The remedy for poverty isn't government dependency which FDR warned was "an opiate that corrupts moral character"-creating moral and spiritual poverty and all the social pathologies that spring from it

 

 

 

Okay...

 

And?

 

 

 

 

Learning to distinguish between good and evil, right and wrong, what we ought and out not do. In other words, choosing to be good citizens. It's not anymore complicated than that.

 

ApolloSpeaks 

 

Okay...

 

And?

 

 

It would mean the moral regeneration of inner city community and family life which has disintegrated into anarchy, lawlessness and violence on a horrific scale never before seen in this country.

 

 RobRBarron  ApolloSpeaks

 

...so let's cut federal aid to the inner cities even more...including health care and education...

It's worked so well to date...

lawlessness and violence on a horrific scale never before seen in this country.

You weren't alive in the 60's, eh?

 

 

 

The Wire (2002) Poster

 

 

I was very much alive then. And as any old-timer living in our inner city ghettos will tell you community spirit, religious values, the tight-knit two parent family structure and respect for authority (parents, schools, churches, gov't, police, courts) has catastrophically eroded. I strongly recommend that you see the HBO award winning crime drama series "The Wire" for an education into the nightmare of contemporary inner city life. This outstanding series about inner city Baltimore is considered so authentic and authoritative that some major colleges and universities like Harvard use it in sociology courses. It will tear your heart out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

 

Moreover, welfare should be a temporary measure: a trampoline to a self-reliant and productive life, not a trap and a way of generational life.

 

 

There it is! Another one so poorly informed that he repeats the lie about "generational welfare" and "lifelong welfare." What's next a story about the people you have seen pulling into Social Services in their brand new BMW and going home to watch The Price is Right on their 72 inch surround sound TV?

There is a LIFETIME limit of 24 months and in somestates 20 months on the length of time one can receive welfare.

It is possible to receive SNAP and Medicaid benefits for extended periods but most of those are children, the elderly and people who work full time for such generous and benevolent employers as Walmart but aren't paid enough to live on.

Ignorance can be excused if one makes the effort to educate oneself. If the problem is stupidity, well, that just can't be fixed.

 

 

Intergenerational Transmission of Welfare Dependency

http://www.nber.org/digest/nov... 

 

 

There is no comparison between disability insurance and welfare, they are completely different things. Nowhere in this country is there more than a 24 month LIFETIME cap on welfare benefits and most who avail themselves of it, AS A LAST RESORT, never use that entire 24 months.

That wasn't even worthy of a "nice try," it was just a pathetic attempt to find something that justifies your desire to feel superior to others. I have never encountered anyone with a need to feel superior who was superior to anyone.

 

 

 

LOL!!! This study (one of many many many) proves beyond doubt that if parents become welfare dependents, the likelihood of their children eventually becoming welfare recipients (creating a destructive, degrading, work ethic eroding, welfare-entitlement mentality) also increases. This study uses DI as emblematic of the greater problem caused by the totality of such programs. Fact is (as the study shows) when parents are awarded just DI, the likelihood that one of their adult children will participate in DI rises by "5 percentage points over the next five years, and 11 percentage points over the next decade." DI combined with other anti-poverty welfare programs has a multiplying effect on these percentages.

FYI the reason for Bill Clinton's "Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996" was to the break the cycle of welfare dependency which creates the intergenerational welfare mentality and culture and its attendant social pathologies that have decimated our inner cities and lost the War on Poverty despite $19 trillion in redistributed wealth over the last 50 years. The liberal welfare state is not just a failure it's going broke and going the way of its European counterparts unsustainably supporting a great and growing mass of unemployed/unproductive recipients many of whom are poorly skilled, uneducated immigrants. 

I just love ropeadoping libs. Here's a few more (racist) studies that you can howl about.

http://web.crc.losrios.edu/~la...

http://www.jobs.utah.gov/edo/i...

http://familyfacts.org/briefs/...

Now who's the poorly informed, stuck on stupid ignoramus?

 

 

Why do you hate black people so much? Did one cut you off in the parking lot last week?

 

 

Along with my black conservative friends I hate radical

 

leftists.

 

 

 

Your mother must be so proud her darling son is so full of hatred.

And tell me more about how your best friend is black

 

 

My best black friend doesn't consider himself black. He treats his skin color as the lowest, basest, and least important part of his being, as do all rational blacks and human beings.

 

 

So he is a self-hating African-American. Interesting.

Are you a self-hating Jew?

 

 

 

Like Martin Luther King he puts his spiritual humanity above his skin color and race. But maybe you're too much of a leftwing materialist to understand this. 

 

 

 AronLump  ApolloSpeaks 

 

You said he considered his skin color the basest part of his person.

 

You didn't say it was the factor of least concern.

 

Words have meaning, you know.

 

(And FYI, had this been 1968, you would have been one of the people cheering at Dr King's assassination.)

 

 

Which is more important to your life and well-being, your skin color or your brain, lungs, heart, kidneys and other vital organs?

In the early 60s I was a teenage admirer of JFK living in New York. In the late 60s I was a radical counterculture lefty destroying myself and trashing New York.

 

 

 

Your question is completely irrelevant.

Your statement is very likely false.

 

 

And you're the typical left-wing moral coward. I'll answer the question for you. You're vital organs are more important than your skin color. And going further the soul (spirit) that gives your body life is more important than your vital organs. And by "soul (mental and moral faculties)" is what Dr. King meant by the famous words " the content of our characters." "Character" (which transcends race, ethnicity and gender) for King (and every black conservative) is the very essence of our beings-the most important and highest part of our humanity; what distinguishes us from the animals and beasts. When you die you can't take your skin color, body and vital organs with you to heaven; but you do take your soul, mind, spirit, character.

 

"Character is destiny" it determines your path in life. Those blacks, whites and others who give supreme value to skin color are lost to their spiritual humanity (the essence of their beings) and are among the worst members of their race. In other words, what you consider "irrelevant" was of the utmost importance to Martin Luther King as it is for all black conservatives. There is a crisis today of character in black America. Way too many blacks are making bad moral choices, becoming bad citizens and ending up dead or in jail. Those who think this is "irrelevant" are useless, worthless, ignorant fools, and are part of the problem.

 

MLK was no conservative.

But nice try.

Beyond that, tl;dr.

 

 

 

  

Martin Luther King, the God-loving, Christ worshiping, faith over race Baptist minister, was no traditional morality hating, anything goes, secular progressive. If he were alive today, like his daughter Bernice, he'd be against abortion, gay marriage, pornography, legalization of pot, the Black Panthers, Black Liberation Theology, the Nation of Islam, Afro-centric ministers like Rev. ("God damn America") Wright and the violent, sick,"kill the cops" BLM movement. Moreover, he wouldn't be too keen about America's first black (racially divisive demagogic) president

In other words, for the man who said:

“Bound by the chains of his own sin and finiteness, man needs a Savior…. Man cannot save himself, for man is not the measure of all things and humanityis not God.”

they'd be no place in the secularized (God is government) Democrat Party today.

 

 

You are the poster child for the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

Remind me, why was MLK in Nashville when he was shot?

And what's the 'Democrat Party?'

 

 

 

In his last

sermon before he died Martin Luther King said

 "I just want to do God's will."

From a theological and moral perspective what did MLK mean by the term "God"? As King's understanding of God

was the directing principle of

his civil rights activities and life the answer

to  this question is key to understanding

his character (who he truly was). Answer

my question and then I'll answer yours.

 
 

AronLump  ApolloSpeaks

 

Here's a hint: he was in Nashville marching with striking union sanitation workers.

 

Unlike conservatism, progressives are happy to welcome all comers, from anti-theists to evangelicals.

 

Do you honestly expect me to answer the question 'what is God?'

 

 

 

Progressives are happy to welcome anyone who embraces the progressive agenda, just as conservatives welcome anyone (gays, atheists, Moslems) who embrace conservatism.

 

 

I notice you addressed neither of the other points you mentioned.

And the Republican is explicitly opposed to both atheism and Islam.

What's the matter, coward: afraid to admit why Dr King was in Memphis?

 

 

 

As King himself indicated in his last sermon before his death he was in Memphis because he believed he was doing "God's will." And for no other higher reason.

 

Atheist Free Market Republicans

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/f...

 

Conservative Atheist S.E. Cupp

 

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/...

 

The pro-Republican Islamic Free Market Institute

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

 

Conservative Moslem Republican Dr. Zuhdi Jasser

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

 

Every properly informed, clear thinking American, and human beings everywhere (Moslem and non-Moslem) oppose Political Islam/Islamic Supremacism with its oppressive, totalitarian union of mosque and state and endless war against all infidels

 

"Democrat Party" should read Demo-Rat Party.

Sorry for the confusion.

 

RELATED

 

Sultan Knish: The Death of the American Welfare State

 

ABSOLUTE INDISPENSABLE HILLARY FOR RESETTING AMERICA AND THE AMERICAN DREAM

 
 
 
 
What difference would it make if innocent, cleared of all crimes Hillary weren't President? A great, great deal. Based on her exemplary record as secretary of state judge for yourselves what we the people would be missing.
 
 
HILLARY CLINTON 2016 
 
FOR
 
RESETTING AMERICA
 
AND THE AMERICAN DREAM 
 
 
hillary reset button
 
 
After resetting US foreign policy from the disaster of the Bush years this indispensable woman and national treasure is hell-bent on doing for you, me and this great country what she did for US/Russian relations, and the peoples of Georgia, Ukraine and Crimea.
 
 
 
 
What she did for Ambassador Stevens, his staff and the consulate in lawless, anarchical, unsafe Benghazi.
 
 
 
 
 What she did for US allies Hosni Mubarak
 
 
 
 
and 
Colonel Muammar Kaddafy.
 
 
 
 
What she did for the people of Iran in reining in the radical, expansionist, "Death to America," nuclear, genocidal oppressive mullahs.
 
 
 
 
What she did in transforming the extremist Moslem Brethren into moderate, freedom loving, pro-Western liberals by hugging and kissing the jihad out of them.
 
 
 
 
 
And lastly,
what she did for post-Saddam sectarian-torn Iraq,
 
 
 
 
pro-US sectarian-torn Yemen,
 
 
 
 
post-Kaddafy tribal-torn Libya,
 
 
 
 
and Bashir Assad's "reformed" Alawite Syria (that still hasn't surrendered its chemical weapons).
 
 
Violence In The Middle East Stock Photo
 
And let's not forget what she did for the peace and
stability of the Greater Middle East-
 
 
 
 
once the cradle (but no more thanks to her) of murderous, unIslamic Moslem terror.
 
 
 
 
With a record of achievements
so stunning as this how could we as voters in good conscience deny Hillary the White House-so her ever faithful, loving, virtuous husband can turn it into an
 
 
 
 
OPEN FLY ZONE
AGAIN
 
 
 
 The theme of Hillary's historic campaign shouldn't be 
 
 
  
 
but 
 
  
 
 
 
SO HAPPY TOGETHER
 
 
 
In conclusion, come November keep in mind that it will take 16 years to reset America from the catastrophe of the Bush years, and finish building Barack Obama's More Perfect Big Government Dependency Union of Moochers and Losers. And that after eight years of shredding the Constitution we're only half way there. 
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 

[REPOST OF JULY 4TH GEM] JULY 4TH AND THE EXTRAORDINARY PROVIDENTIAL DEATHS OF JOHN ADAMS, THOMAS JEFFERSON AND JAMES MONROE

 

 

http://sonomachristianhome.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/jefferson-adams-jpg-10001.jpg
 
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Aa8vdemlqGs/Tz0GkXloISI/AAAAAAAA4fU/kT4wMiEa3ac/s1600/James+Monroe%2C+painted+by+Rembrandt+Peale+about+1824-1825.jpg

 Presidents Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and James Monroe

 That our nation’s leaders and destiny are under the watchful eye of God Almighty and His special Providence was Divinely and infallibly revealed to us, as Daniel Webster said (see), when John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, the second and third Presidents (the two Founding Fathers most responsible for the writing and ratification of the Declaration of Independence) died just hours apart in 1826 on the 50th anniversary of Independence Day-the historic, world-changing day that they founded. What has gone unnoticed in this amazing event is the uncanny numerical signs given to us that day especially in the correspondence between the date July 4, 1776, when Congress adopted the Declaration, and the two principle Founder’s (Jefferson and Adams) near simultaneous deaths. What I mean is this:

When the single digits of the date 7-4-1776 are added together it gives us (as you shall see) the profoundly significant number 32, which is the number that signifies America, hence:

7+4+1+7+7+6=32

AMERICA

1459931=32 (see notes)

 Mere chaotic coincidence? If that was all, perhaps. But there is more, much more. Read on and judge for yourself:

John Adams our 2nd President and Jefferson our 3rd died in reverse order that July 4th day giving us the number 32. In other words, as 3 precedes 2 in the number 32 Jefferson, the greater and more important of the two Founders, was the first to leave this world.

As if foreshadowing the order of their deaths the friendship of Jefferson and Adams began when they first met at the Second Continental Congress in May 1775. Amazingly at the time Jefferson (born April 13, 1743) was 32 years old.

Now as 32 is a number symbolic of the day this great country was founded and is the numerical value of the name America, and as it signifies the order of Jefferson’s and Adams’ death on a July 4th date, remarkably and amazingly the exact number of words comprising the Declaration of Independence (which the 3rd and 2nd Presidents wrote and defended) is 1322, with the number 32 at its center.

Moreover, as the number 32 by addition is reducible to the number 5 (3+2=5) incredibly Jefferson and Adams died approximately 5 hours apart, the one dying around 1 pm and the other at 6:20 pm. Also incredible is that 1 pm to 6:20 pm equals 320 minutes (32 10x). And just as uncanny is the fact Jefferson and Adams died on the 50th celebration of July 4th-50 being a multiple of 5 10x.

Now in keeping with this remarkable pattern of fives (and fives multiples and variations) the date July 4, 1776 fell on a Thursday, the 5th day of the week. Moreover, July 4, 1826, the day Jefferson and Adams died, was the 185th day of the year. Not does 185 end in 5and is divisible by 5 but it’s a variant of the number 5 because it is reducible to 5, hence: 1+8+5=14, 1+4=5.

Furthermore, as mentioned above, Jefferson and Adams first met and became friends at the Second Continental Congress held in May 1775 when Jefferson was 32 years old. May is the 5th month of the year.

Also fascinating is that the only two future Presidents to sign the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams (they were two of the 5 key Founders*), were members of the Committee of FIVE that was appointed to draft the document. The other three members were Ben Franklin, Roger Sherman and Robert Livingston.

*The other three were Washington, Franklin and Madison.

Moreover, the Declaration that Jefferson and Adams composed (the later playing a minor role) is made up of 5 distinct parts: the introduction, the preamble, the body, which can be divided into two sections, and the conclusion.

Other signs of what I believe is God’s supernatural presence and signature effect in the founding of our country, and in the astonishing deaths of Jefferson and Adams, are as follows:

Shortly before he expired a sick and ailing John Adams strangely uttered the mysterious words “Thomas Jefferson survives.” Could it be that Adams’ had a vision of Jefferson’s disembodied spirit and that it seemed so life like and real to him that he spoke these words believing he had seen him in the flesh? Whatever, these words are part of the mystery of Adams’ and Jefferson’s “coincidental” deaths in more ways than one. For in keeping with the significant numbers 3 and 2 Adams’ statement is composed of 23 letters (32 reversed) which exactly corresponds with the numeric value of Jefferson’s birth date, hence:

4+1+3+1+7+4+3=23

As Jefferson and Adam’s were the great pen and voice of the Revolution, the one writing the Declaration of Independence and the other defending it with his eloquence, concealed in the date July 4, 1776 is the all important year 1787 when the Constitution was completed and adopted by the 13 states and America became a Constitutional Republic, hence

1776 + 4 + 7 = 1787*

Remarkably, the numbers in the historic year 1787 collapse into the number 23, which is further reducible to 5 hence:

1+7+8+7=23 ,2+3=5

*There were exactly 74 delegates to the Constitutional Convention a number signifying  the month (7) and day (4) of our founding.

It is also important to note that Jefferson and Adams were the 18th and 48th signers of the Declaration respectively. The multiplication of these two numbers gives us a total that’s a multiple of 32, hence:

18x48=864 or 32x27

THE JULY 4TH DEATH OF JAMES MONROE

James Monroe was the third and last President to die on July 4th . What is remarkable about this, and a sign that his death was Providentially arranged and designed like Jefferson’s and Adams’, is that while Adams and Jefferson were the 2nd and 3rd Presidents, numbers that total 5, Monroe himself was the 5th President-2 removed from Jefferson and 3 from Adams. Incredibly, the 5th President died in 1831, exactly 5 years to the date of Jefferson’s and Adams’ deaths on the 55th anniversary of Independence Day-55 is a multiple of 5 11x.

It is fascinating to note that Monroe the Jeffersonian (the student and lifelong friend of Jefferson) was succeeded to the presidency by John Quincy Adams, John Adams’ son. In other words, just as Thomas Jefferson succeeded John Adams to the presidency an Adams succeeded a Jeffersonian President*.

*Just as the addition of 2 (signifying John Adams’ presidency) and 3 (signifying Jefferson’s presidency) equals 5 (signifying Monroe’s presidency), so the multiplying of 2 and 3 equals 6 the presidency number of John Quincy Adams.

St. Augustine, following the ancient Greeks who believed that numbers (the basis of mathematics) rule the world, wrote that “Numbers are a universal language given to us by God for the confirmation of truth”-and, I might add, to justify His ways to us in this mathematically constructed, ordered and harmoniously designed universe. What was Divinely confirmed on July 4, 1826 with the near simultaneous deaths of Jefferson and Adams, and again on July 4, 1831 with the death of James Monroe, is that random, unplanned, chaotic chance had nothing to do with their deaths-nor was it the work of some impossible ingenious human conspiracy. Indeed, the July 4th deaths of these three Presidents confirm the existence of God giving evidence of His necessary being and mysterious and inscrutable governing of the universe and this nation. In other words, it is proof that Jefferson, Adams and Monroe died naturally under supernatural direction with an intelligent unifying principle coordinating their deaths as a sign that our country’s founding moment and Constitutional Republic were DIVINELY ORDAINED, as is our exceptionalism and glorious destiny as the greatest liberating force from tyranny in human history.

In celebration of God, Country and Liberty I wish you all a Happy 4th of July.

POSTSCRIPT I

The 3rd President Thomas Jefferson was the first to die on July 4th. The 2nd President John Adams was the 2nd President to die on July 4th. The 5th President James Monroe was the 3rd and last President to die on July 4th. This produces the number 325. 325 is a multiple of 13 5x. 13 is the number of colonies turned independent states on July 4, 1776. Moreover, 325 is a factor in the number 17875 a 5 digit number encoded with the year 1787 when America became a Constitutional Republic-325 x 55 = 17875. Isn't it odd that it was on the 55th anniversary of July 4th that James Monroe died.

POSTSCRIPT II

Thomas Jefferson, the first US President to die on July 4th, was President in 1808 when our nation celebrated its 32nd Independence Day. Amazingly, 7-4-1808 was the 7th year and 4th month (corresponding to July 4th) of Jefferson's two term presidency.

POSTSCRIPT III

Regal Eagle writes:

Mabye there’s something to this number 5. We’re a nation of 50 states, and our flag has 50 5 pointed stars. Just sayin.

X-MAN replies:

 And Hawaii, the last and 50th state to enter the Union, did so in the late 1950s.

My reply:

Not only did Hawaii (the 50th state) join the Union in the late 1950s but it did so exactly 6555 weeks from July 4, 1776,  hence:

July-4-1776 to August 21, 1959 (Hawaii joins the Union) is 183 years, 1 month and 17 days, that equates to 2197 months, or 66,886 days, or 9555 weeks (see).

 NOTES

The numerological table used in this article is as follows:

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9

A B C D E F G H I

J K L M N O P Q R

S T U V W X Y Z 

RELATED

 
  
 
 

ISIS FOR HILLARY, JAPAN BIG BROTHER’S MOSLEMS, CLINTON READS LYNCH RIOT ACT, AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF TRIUMPHANT LIBERALISM

 

 
“I will go so far as to say Donald Trump is the ISIS candidate. He inflames the passions of people in the West to perform Islamophobia, to draw recruits to them, to make them say ‘This is what America is.'”
 
Malcolm Nance

 

 

THE LIBYAN WAR + WITHDRAWAL FROM IRAQ = THE CREATION OF ISIS.

ISIS owes its existence to the catastrophically failed foreign policy of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton as expressed in the above irrefutable equation as I absolutely proved HERE. Why then would ISIS favor the aggressive, tough talking, I'm-going-to-bomb-the-hell-out-of-'em, Patton admiring Trump over Hillary who is pledging to be weak-on-terror, see-no-evil-in-Islam, lead from behind, butt kissing Obama's third term? ISIS no more favors Hillary than the Ayatollah Khomeini and Soviets favored Reagan over Carter in 1980. Just as Obama and Hillary midwifed ISIS and the greatest expansion of jihad influence and terror since 9/11 so did Carter mid wife Iran's Khomeinists regime and the greatest expansion of Soviet influence and power since the start of the Cold War.

In other words (as Donald Rumsfeld would say), why would ISIS favor the known known Hillary (who has put them on the map) over the known unknown Trump (who could be their worst nightmare)? Indeed, on the basis of their Moslem immigration policies alone (Trump wanting a temporary ban to prevent jihadist infiltrators from entering this country, and Hillary recklessly wanting to increase Moslem immigration) ISIS sympathizers in November will be casting their votes for Hillary.

Come to think of it, since jihadists following their manly, macho warrior prophet Mohammed are woman hating chauvinists why would ISIS want an alpha male member of the stronger sex to lead America over a woman? Does that make any sense? Malcolm Nance is a fool.

 

RELATED

HOW JOHN MCCAIN, BARACK OBAMA AND HILLARY CLINTON ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ISIS INSPIRED ORLANDO GAY MASSACRE 

HILLARY CLINTON WHO HELPED CREATE ISIS LIES ABOUT ISIS RECRUITMENT VIDEOS FEATURING DONALD TRUMP

 

 
 
 
 
 

JAPANESE MOSLEMS, BEWARE!

BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU!

It is 1984 for Moslems in Japan as it should be for the subversive 1400 year old political religion with unlimited global aspirations that's been at war with unbelievers from the moment Mohammed received his deadly revelations on Islamic supremacism from the pit of hell.

PAM GELLER WRITES,

"HERE IS A COUNTRY THAT'S DEALING WITH REALITY."

Indeed, indeed, indeed. In the world war with TOTALITARIAN ISLAM

Japan (once the Islamo-fascist-like enemy of the United States) is

leading the way 

becoming

 

 

THE LAND OF THE RISING SUN 

 

 
Cartoonists DESTROY the Clinton-Lynch Meeting (You'll LOVE It)...
  
BILL CLINTON READS LYNCH RIOT ACT 
(sarcasm)
 

Bill to Loretta:

 "If it weren't for me appointing you to a Federal judgeship you'd be carrying my bags and bringing me coffee. And before you dare indict my wife think very carefully what happened to Vince Foster. Don't try me, Loretta. I'm not golfing around...And by the way, how's the grand kids?"

 

 

 

ARE LIBERAL IDEAS "WINNING OUT"

the reason for America's economic, military, geopolitical and moral decline? With a nation in such turmoil that millions of angry, frightened middle class Americans slipping into poverty and losing the American Dream have turned to Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump for answers? Liberal ideas are triumphing and our nation is going to pot; and that's why millions of us are

 

AND DON'T WANT TO TAKE IT

ANYMORE!

< p style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 15px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; margin: 0px 0px 15px; line-height: 21px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: center;"> 

DONALD TRUMP “TORTURER IN CHIEF?” OKAY WITH MOST AMERICANS (POSTSCRIPT: TORTURE PROGRAM BEGAN WITH CLINTON)

 

 
 
 
 
 
During the GOP debates Donald Trump let it be known that he was no fan of George W. Bush. Sounding like a Bush derangement leftist he blamed President Bush for the 9/11 attack when neither Bush nor Bill Clinton had any actionable intel about the plot (see); and then he accused the former President of lying about Saddam Hussein's WMDs when Bush, like Clinton before him (and every other country) was deceived by Saddam into believing he was hiding his still missing stockpile (see).
 
 
But apparently one aspect of the Bush administration that Trump esteems and would like to revive is the use of waterboarding, sleep deprivation and other methods used in Bush's successful counter-terrorism program to extract critical life saving information from top, high value terrorist detainees.
 
 
At a recent rally in Ohio when talking about the horrific ISIS suicide bombings in Istanbul that left 40 dead and five times as many injured Trump shouted out to a cheering crowd "What do you think about waterboarding?" And followed up saying, "I like it a lot, but don't think it's tough enough."
 
 
In the past Trump has said that as Commander-in-Chief to save American lives he'd use "torture" on captured terrorists. And if that failed he'd then take it to a higher level and threaten the detainee's "families" with either injury or death to force them to cooperate. It is interesting to note that in the 1990s former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, as a last resort, ended a murderous nationwide terrorist campaign that killed 1200 people (he escaped assassination) by radical al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya by going after the terrorists' families (see). "If you continue killing Egyptians your wives, sons and daughters are going to die," warned Mubarak. And after carrying out his threat they stopped their killing spree frightened for the lives of their loved ones.
 
 Polls show that by a staggering 2:1 margin Americans favor torture as a tactic in the war on terror to keep them, their families and country safe, and had no problem with the Bush program (see).
 
 
But strictly speaking Bush's use of water boarding, sleep deprivation, lengthy exposure to ear-splitting music, etc. doesn't qualify as "torture." They were medically supervised Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EITs) falling short of what torture truly is. Consequently, Barack Obama's DOJ (headed by Eric Holder) after an extensive three year investigation of Bush's program couldn't find a single prosecutable crime. And how could they when their were none? 
 
What follows is a debate on this issue on Media Matters where my "Bush was a torturing war criminal" opponent didn't fare to well.
 
 
IT TOOK 183 LEGAL, MEDICALLY SUPERVISED, WATERBOARDINGS (6X PER DAY FOR A MONTH), AND SLEEP DEPRIVATION, TO BREAK 9/11 MASTER MIND KHALID SHEIKH MUHAMMED'S
 
iron jihadist will; after which he sang like a canary giving interrogators a treasure trove of info on planned terror attacks in the US and al-Qaida's international operations.
 
After two intensive investigations Barack Obama's DOJ (headed by Eric Holder) couldn't find the crime of "torture" committed by anyone in the Bush administration.
 
 
And all of KSMs "intelligence" turned out to be false. http://content.time.com/time/w...

 

ApolloSpeaks   B747 

KSM's chief interrogator said otherwise:

http://nypost.com/2012/05/06/h...

If KSM gave interrogators "false info" the waterboarding and sleep deprivation would have continued until he had enough and became cooperative.

B747  ApolloSpeaks 

False confessions: 

The al-Qaeda leader who suffered the harshest interrogations tried to stop his ordeal by giving false information about plots to attack Heathrow Airport and Canary Wharf, according to the Senate report.

Ten days after his capture, he was waterboarded for the first of what became 183 times. Under this relentless pressure, KSM “provided information on the Heathrow Airport and Canary Wharf plotting”. There was no suggestion of even trying to use other methods first, says the report. KSM, the acknowledged mastermind of the September 11 attacks, was then subjected to “facial and abdominal slaps, the facial grab, stress positions, standing sleep deprivation” and “rectal rehydration”. On the same day as KSM’s arrest in Pakistan on 1 March 2003, CIA headquarters authorised the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques”. Within two hours of the capture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed – known as “KSM” – the head of interrogations at CIA “Detention Site Cobalt” sent an email saying “let’s roll with the new guy”.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...

The cherry picked, politicized Democrat minority senate report on Bush's EITs was thoroughly rebutted and discredited by several former CIA chiefs who put up the web site "CIA SAVED LIVES." The Dem report ignored every piece of info (from 6 million docs) that contradicted its false conclusion that Bush's program was useless in facilitating detainee cooperation and gathering actionable intel to thwart terror attacks and save lives. 

The skewed report was also rebutted by the Republican majority report; and then by Obama's own CIA Chief John Brennen. Why do you think Brennen wasn't fired from his job after issuing his critique, or at least rebuked by Obama? Because he told the truth-as did out going DefenseSec Leon Panetta when he said that info extracted from terror detainees using EITs played a role in tracking down Osama bin Laden.

http://www.ciasavedlives.com/

https://www.cia.gov/news-infor...

Panetta: ‘Enhanced interrogation’ had role in bin Laden raid - NY Daily News   

Days after the raid in Abbottabad, former Attorney General Michael Mukasey wrote an op-ed titled “The Waterboarding Trail to Bin Laden.” The intelligence that led to the raid, Mukasey asserted, began with a disclosure from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), who broke like a dam under the pressure of harsh interrogation techniques that included waterboarding. He loosed a torrent of information — including eventually the nickname of a trusted courier of bin Laden.

It later became apparent that this account was wrong. KSM hadn’t revealed the courier’s alias. According to an American official familiar with KSM’s interrogation, KSM wasn’t asked about al-Kuwaiti until the fall of 2003, months after his waterboarding had concluded. KSM reportedly acknowledged having known al-Kuwaiti but told his interrogators al-Kuwaiti was “retired” and of little significance.

http://detaineetaskforce.org/p...

 

That was just a small piece of what KSM is said to have divulged. And as OBL was relatively isolated and impotent and no longer much of a threat killing him was a matter of simple justice for what he'd done with no benefits for fighting the war on terror. Unfortunately, in retrospect, OBL's death did nothing to demoralize and stop al Qaida as they subsequently metastasized, grew stronger than ever and spawned ISIS. What a terrible legacy lying, "al Qaida is decimated,"       weak-on-terror Obama is leaving behind. 

 

POSTSCRIPT

 

 

 

 

CIA'S TORTURE BY PROXY/RENDITION PROGRAM STARTED  WITH CLINTON/GORE

(H/T FOB Tycz)

SEE FOR YOURSELF

Fact Sheet: Extraordinary Rendition | American Civil Liberties Union 

 

RELATED

< p style="text-align: center;">“CRAZY” TRUMP ATTACKS GEORGE BUSH OVER 9/11 AND IRAQ. BUT IS HE CRAZY LIKE A FOX?