The 2016 World Series is being fought between the Chicago Cubs and Cleveland Indians. The Cubs haven't been in a Fall Classic in 71 years since 1945. The Indians haven't won a World Series since 1948. In American political history 1945 and 1948 are historically significant years that could, maybe, possibly in a symbolic or oracular sense be relevant to the outcome of this election. This is what I mean.
1945 (the year we defeated the Nazis and Japanese) marked the end of a transformational political era: FDR-the last New Yorker to be President-died of a stroke while serving a fourth unprecedented term. And three years later in 1948 underdog President Harry Truman (FDR's accidental successor) defeated favored to win New York Governor Tom Dewey to keep the Presidency.
Now if underdog candidate Donald Trump defies the odds (as he's been doing from the start of his historic campaign) and does a HarryTruman on November 8th he will be the first NATIVE New Yorker since FDR to be President. And if Trump wins not only will he be our 45th President but the 19th Republican to hold that office. These two numbers "19" and "45" gives us the year of FDR's death, and the last time the Cubs were in the World Series.
Now if Donald Trump is fated to be the next Harry Truman then that would make Hillary the next Tom Dewey. And it so happens that Hillary and Dewey share two things in common:both held high elected office in New York State; and both were born outside the state: Dewey was born in Owosso, Michigan (see) and Hillary in Chicago, home of the Cubs (who now are down two games to one in the World Series and looking like losers). Moreover, by accident or design, Hillary launched her presidential campaign on April 12, 2015 (see): the 70th anniversary of FDR's death (the year the Cubs lost the World Series). Could this be an ominous sign for Chicago born Hillary that she's about to lose the chance of succeeding FDR as the next New Yorker to be President to an authentic, life long New Yorker like FDR? Like 1948 will 2016 be the year of the political underdog?
Yesterday when FBI Director Comey (born in New York) announced he'd be resuming the criminal probe into Hillary's email server, that night at Wrigley Field (first time the World Series was played there since 1945) the Cleveland Indians (the 1948 World Champs) defeated the Cubs 1 to 0 in a pitching duel squeaker. Could this in some strange, crazy way prefigure that underdog Donald Trump, due to Comey's reopened investigation, is fated to defeat Hillary in a squeaker or close race? Right now as I write the presidential race is tightening both nationally and in swing states; and a close race as in 1960 or 2000 when the incumbent party lost could very well happen ten days from now.
Who's going to win the World Series? I don't have a clue. I'm a life long Dodger fan and was crushed when they lost to the Cubs last week. However, as it now stands, the Cubs look like the losers and underdogs. That could change tonight if they even up the series. But If they should lose and fall behind the Indians 3-1 they will very definitely be the underdogs likely to lose. Only six teams in history have come back from a 3-1 deficit to take the championship. If that should happen and they win that would make 2016 the Year of the Underdog.
"Under budget and ahead of schedule. o important. We don't hear those words so often, but you will," Trump said at the hotel's ribbon cutting ceremony. "Today is a metaphor for what we can accomplish for this country."
Yesterday Donald Trump on Hillary Clinton's 69th birthday officially opened the Trump International Hotel at Washington DC. Was this by accident or design? Did Trump do this to rub Hillary's face in his success and make her look foolish for ridiculing his incredible business career? It would seem so. Crooked, corrupt, incompetent Hillary campaigning in Tampa took a cheap shot at Trump and his latest achievement saying (without proof) that he hired illegal Mexican aliens to build this project and furnished it with furniture mostly imported from Asia. And to strike back at Trump for the audacity of opening the hotel on her birthday Hillary trotted out Chef Jose Andres, a Spanish-American celeb businessman who backed out of opening a restaurant at the new hotel because of the "racist" comments Trump made about Mexicans. If you want a good laugh listened to his slanderous Trump derangement speechHERE.
Hillary and Trump hater Chef Jose Andreas.
I wonder what Chef Jose thinks of all those Latino Americans who agree with Trump on immigration and border security and will be voting for him in two weeks (see)? That they're not right in the head? Or that they're more American than Latino? Too assimilated and therefore not truly representative of the American Latino community? Striping Blacks and Latinos of racial and ethnic authenticity is how leftists treat them if they're right thinking conservatives.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY HILLARY,YOU'RE BEHIND IN THE POLLS
A mere 1000 Floridians in Tampa turn out to celebrate Hillary's 69th birthday yesterday. A local resident jokingly said "there are more people in the park when Hillary isn't there."
Meanwhile, ironically, as a tired, worn out, sick Hillary was campaigning on her birthday in Florida she got word that the latest Bloomberg poll (as in Michael Bloomberg who backs her) had Trump topping her by two points in Florida (see). No surprise to me as I've predicted Trump taking the Sunshine State for very good empirical reasons: the sickest, most lifeless, least inspiring and corrupt Democrat presidential candidate in history isn't energizing or exciting enough voters-especially minorities as Politico warned (see).
"Trump is a fraud out to scam America!"
Now truly, if Trump were the awful, fraudulent, financially unsound businessman that Hillary and her media allies say he is then why did the General Services Administration pick him to renovate the Old Post Office and transform it into a luxury hotel with a 60 year lease? Why did Obama's GSA, after an exhaustive evaluation and vetting process, choose Trump for the project over some of the largest real estate companies and developers in the world (including Hilton Worldwide)? Surely the GSA knew of Trump's failures and bankruptcies, and his $916 million loss in the 90s. So why him? I don't know. But what is inarguable is that with the project completed on time and under budget-Hillary can denigrate it all she wants-the GSA picked the right man and organization for the job.
TRUMP, REAGAN AND THE OLD POST OFFICE
Now throughout the course of his campaign all of you have heard Trump boasting about winning the Old Post Office project from the government. But what you probably don't know is that Trump was awarded the deal on February 6, 2012, the 101st anniversary of Ronald Reagan's birth (see); and that the building's address 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue is just 500 numbers down the street from the White House at 1600, and 200 numbers from the Ronald Reagan Building at 1300 in between (see). Indeed, as the Old Post Office is the second tallest building in DC you can clearly see the White House from its higher floors. Now is winning this prime piece of historic real estate situated within earshot of the White House (and the Reagan Building) on the anniversary of Reagan's birth an auspicious sign for Trump? That he's walking in Reagan's footsteps and is on his way to the presidency? That now in the 16th month of his historic campaign (which started on 16th day of June) he's going to win 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue like he won the Old Post Office project down the street? With Trump defying the laws of political gravity and rising in the polls again I wouldn't bet against it.
1300 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE AND 13 DAYS TO ELECTION DAY
The Ronald Reagan Building
As the Ronald Reagan Building at 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue is just up the street from the new Trump International Hotel yesterday's official opening on October 26th was 13 days from Election Day (see). Strangely, the number of days separating Reagan's election on November 4, 1980 from this Election Day is 13,154 (see). Moreover, from Reagan's inaugural on January 20, 1981 to the inaugural this January is 13,150 days (see). And lastly, on the day when Donald Trump was born Ronald Reagan was in his 12,913th day on this earth (see). By the way, it was in the 13th month of Trump's campaign at the Republican National Convention that he officially became the GOP nominee (see and see).
MEET THE MAN WHO DID THE CLINTONS' DIRTY WORK FOR DECAD
In 2007 Michelle Obama campaigning for her husband took a veiled shot at the moral fitness of his rival for the presidency: crooked, lying, corrupt, sexually perverse Hillary Clinton. She said:
“One of the things — the important aspects of this race — is role modeling what good families should look like. And my view is that if you can't run your own house, you certainly can't run the White House. Can't do it.”
I bring this up because the public is now again learning just how sickening, sordid, foul and corrupt Hillary and her husband are and unfit for the White House. I'm referring of course to the bombshell revelations of the National Enquirer from the Clintons' "fixer" and "bagman"-the man whose job it was to hide their sins and ugly scandals and pay off people to shut up. Last night on Hannity this mysterious Clinton insider, "Mr. Fix It" as he's called, courageously revealed his true identity. And I was amazed to learn it was someone I knew of: Jeff Daniel Rovin.
“The New York Times has become the National Enquirer, and the National Enquirer has become The New York Times,” Rovin said. “We’ve got to set the world right again.”
Rovin is a magazine editor, free-lance writer, columnist and prolific best-selling author. Among his 47 novels is "The Game" (made into a film starring Michael Douglas), and 12 Tom Clancy Op Center books-this includes the New York Times best seller "War of Eagles" which I read.
Indeed, this highly credible man tells about the Clintons' open polyamorous marriage, Bill's hookers, Hillary's lover and suicide victim Vince Forster, her bisexual affairs, the plots to destroy Monica Lewinsky and Bill's other "bimbos" and much, much more. Rovin claims he worked ten years doing dirty work for the sick, decaying, degenerate Clintons who want to pollute and desecrate the White House again. Not only was the Clinton White House an open fly zone, according to Rovin, but an open legs zone as well as Hillary was just as lecherous as her husband having a ball swinging both ways. Is it any wonder that after years of sexual excess both Clintons are so burnt out? Old beyond their years shadows of their former selves?
Will this story gain traction and impact the campaign and help Donald Trump defeat the Clintons? Hopefully. There are over 36,000 grocery stores in this country most of which openly display the Enquirer and its front page for their shoppers to see. Between now and Election Day millions will see this story about the filthy, abhorrent, disgusting, perverse, sexually deviant Clintons. Drip, drip, drip. Every little ugly drip helps.
Hillary Clinton ridiculing Donald Trump at the Al Smith dinner said that he was "the strong horse that Vladimir Putin rides." Why did she say that? Principally because Trump is opposed to confronting Putin over Syria by creating a no-fly zone. But wouldn't that make Barack Obama another horse that Putin's riding? For like Trump he too opposes a no-fly zone.
If you want to know why reckless, extremist, war mongering neo-cons like Bill Kristol prefer Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump to be the next Commander-in-Chief then read this exchange between Chris Wallace and Hillary at last week's debate on the issue of imposing an aerial blockade or no-fly zone over Syrian airspace. It's mind-boggling:
Secretary Clinton, you have talked about in the last debate and again today that you would impose a no-fly zone to try to protect the people of Aleppo and to stop the killing there. President Obama has refused to do that because he fears it’s gonna draw us closer and deeper into the conflict. And General Joseph Dunford, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, says you want to impose a no-fly zone, chances are you are going to get into a war, his words, with Syria and Russia. So the question I have is first, how do you respond to their concerns? Secondly, if you impose a no-fly zone and a Russian plane violates that, does President Clinton shoot that plane down?
Well Chris, first of all, I think a no-fly zone could save lives and hasten the end of the conflict. I am well aware of the really legitimate concerns you have expressed from both the president and the general. This would not be done just on the first day.This would take a lot of negotiation and it would also take making it clear to the Russians and the Syrians that our purpose is to provide safe zones on the ground. We've had millions of people leave Syria, and those millions of people inside Syria who’ve been dislocated. So I think we could strike a deal and make it very clear to the Russians and Syrians that this was something that we believe the best interests of the people on the ground in Syria. It would help us in the fight against ISIS.
For those of you who may not know, a no-fly zone (NFZ)is defined as a territory over which aircraft are not permitted to fly. It is a demilitarized zone or red line in the sky that prohibits military aircraft of a billigerent power from operating in that area. Aircraft that break the NFZ are shot down.That's it.
Russian bomber in Turkish air space being blown out of the sky. Will President Hillary do this to Russian planes violating her Syrian NFZ?
In March 2011 Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and NATO (backed by neo-cons Kristol, John McCain and Lindsey Graham) imposed a NFZ over war torn Libya where there was an Arab Spring uprising against dictator Muammar Kaddafy. What was the reason for the NFZ? To provide "safe zones" on the ground for anti-Kaddafy rebels and civilians-to protect them from being targeted by Kaddafy's air force. So for whom does Hillary want to create "safe zones" in Syria with a nationwide NFZ? Like in Libya anti-regime rebels and innocent civilians. And to keep them safe from whose air force? Not ISIS' or al-Qaida's (they have no military planes); but from Putin's and Assad's deadly bombers.
Turkish Prime Minister Erdogen in Moscow apologizing to Putin for shooting down Russian plane.
As General Dunford warns, Hillary's plan would likely lead to war with Russia (Iran and Hezbollah). Once the NFZ is established it is nearly certain that Putin would test it like he did Turkish airspace last November (see) daring Hillary (as he did Erdogen) to shoot down his planes. If Hillary (like Marco Rubeo, see) is betting against Putin breaching her red line in the sky fearing a war with the US then she is insanely mistaken. When Turkey downed the Russian jet Putin, retaliating with punishing economic sanctions, practically brought Erdogen to his knees; and because Turkey is a NATO member this diplomatic victory increased Putin's growing international prestige. But if Putin were to intrude into Hillary's NFZ and loses one or more planes he'd have no choice but to respond militarily; for Russia has no economic leverage over the US like it does with Turkey. That Putin would likely risk a full-blown war and nuclear confrontation with the US is the position of General Dunford and others including, apparently, Barack Obama; for he fought with Hillary for years over her idea for a Syrian NFZ and rejected it as too risky.
Not only does Hillary differ with Obama on imposing a NFZ over Syria, but unlike Obama she is threatening war with Iran to enforce the nuclear arms deal.
Indeed, after Obama's and Hillary's humiliating failure of resetting relations with Russia (predicted by me HEREand HERE) through idiotic, butt kissing appeasement which emboldened Putin anti-Russian hawk Hillary is on the warpath against him. It appears that as President, Hillary will be intent on doing what Obama attempted and failed to do with sanctions: put neo-imperialist Putin in his place and hopefully bring him down. This has been her steadfast position for years and has nothing to do with alleged Russian hacking of the DNC or Putin preferring Trump to her in this election (who can blame him?); these have served to aggravate Hillary's animus toward Putin who repeatedly betrayed her and Obama with Edward Snowden, the Ukraine, annexation of Crimea, nuclear cheating, and now with Syria-and short lived designed to fail cease fires. In short, hawkish, neo-con Hillary Clinton is on a personal mission to topple Putin and bring down Assad; and that makes her, as I've said, extremely, recklessly dangerous.
The reality is this: Bashar Assad is here to stay. Both Putin and Iran are hell-bent on keeping Assad, their strategic ally and partner, in power and obliterating the rebels aligned against him-that's non-negotiable. And if that means turning Aleppo or other Syrian cities into rubble (and killing thousands more civilians on top of the 500,000 already savagely killed) then so be it. Donald Trump accepts this reality, Hillary clearly does not. Trump wants to de-escalate tensions with Russia, make peace with Syria, bring order and stability back to the country and stop the refugee crisis. Hillary, on the other hand, is betting that she can beat Putin in a showdown over an aerial blockade of Syrian airspace like JFK bested Khrushchev with a naval blockade of Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis; and that she could bring down both Putin and Assad-as Kennedy brought down Khrushchev.
Hillary Clinton must not be President. Like neo-con war hawks George Bush, Bill Kristol, John McCain and Lindsey Graham she is clearly too interventionist, dangerous and insane. The new cold war she started with Russia as Secretary of State would likely, if she were President, turn into a devastating hot war. As Green Party candidate Jill Stein warns: 'Hillary's militant hostility toward Putin, fixation on a Syrian NFZ and willingness to chance nuclear war makes her unfit for the Presidency.'
This past Sunday October 16th was the beginning of the 16th and final month of Donald Trump's 2016 volcanic campaign to achieve the impossible and win 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. As I've written before the most gravity defying, politically incorrect, unconventional presidential campaign in US history which started on June 16, 2015 (with illegal immigration and border security as key issues) began 16 days after Ann Coulter's terrific book "Adios America" was published, and 16 days before the shooting of Kate Steinlie in San Fransisco by a criminal Mexican alien. Amazingly. this brazen, in your face non-politician who first showed a real interest in running for president 16 years ago* went on (against staggering odds) to defeat 16 mostly professional political rivals for the GOP nomination. And victory virtually came on April 26th (the 16th week and 116th day of the year, see) when Donald Trump swept five northeastern primary states. Amazingly, April 26th was also the 316th day of Trump's campaign (see).
* In 2000 Trump started and quickly ended a campaign for the presidential nomination of the Reform Party (see).
As I wrote HERE, HERE and HERE the number 16 throughout Trump's campaign has uncannily and almost consistently been auspicious for him. And on Sunday October 16th the Trump campaign, perhaps auspiciously, entered its 16th and final month (see). And today the day of the third and final presidential debate, the signs are looking outstanding for The Donald.
Indeed, in addition to being in the 16th month of Trump's campaign, today Wednesday October 19th is the 4th day of the week, and the 4th day of the 16th month of the Trump campaign (see); 16, a square number, has 4 for its root (4x4=16); and 19, the number of this politically important October day, is the number of the next Republican President (from Lincoln to Bush there's been 18 to date).
It is also fascinating to note that on June 14, 2016 Donald Trump celebrated his 70th birthday; and today October 19th Trump is in the 128th day of his 70th year (see). This too seems significant in that 128 is a multiple of 16 8x. Also seeming significant is that 70 year old Trump is in the 70th week of his campaign (see) and in the 3670th week of his earthly life (see).
This certainly looks like a radically lucky day for Donald Trump; more so than September 26th and October 9th the dates of the last two debates; and if it's as good as this amazing pattern of numbers suggests then 21 days from now (a multiple of 7 3x or 7+7+7, see) Donald Trump will be elected president; and 73 days later (see) on the 70th year, 7th month and 7th day of Trump's incredible life, he will be sworn in as the 45th President of the United States (see).
THE THOMAS & MACK CENTER
According to Wikipedia the Thomas & Mack Center of the University of Nevada, which will hold tonight's debate, was opened on the 16th day of December 1983. And as the debate is for the 45 Presidency of the United States oddly the address of the university is 4505 S. Maryland Parkway (see).
Moreover Wikipedia also says that the city of Las Vegas was founded on May 15, 1905, and incorporated the 16th day of March 1911 (see); and that the state of Nevada entered the union in the 64th year of the 19th century. That's "64" as in 16x4 = 64.
And lastly, it is fascinating to note that when the Thomas & Mack Center was first opened Donald Trump was in the 450th month of his life, which is exactly 13,700 days (see). You can't make this stuff up.
CNN AND LUNTZ FOCUS GROUPS DECLARE TRUMP WINNER OF DEBATE. AOL FLASH POLL HAS TRUMP CRUSHING CLINTON BY 15 POINTS. SUPER ACCURATE IBD POLL HAS TRUMP UP BY 1. PROFESSOR NORPOTH DOUBLES DOWN ON TRUMP WIN.
I have a presentment: that despite movie star turned Republican governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's refusal to endorse Republican Donald Trump for President that his election 13 years ago prefigures Trump's election next month. It's crazy I know, but think about it. This Celebrity Apprentice host to be (replacing Trump in the now defunct TV reality show) in early October 2003, just days before the special California recall election, became, like Trump in recent days, the target of multiple sexual allegations by women who claimed he gropped them.
On October 2, 2003 the LA Times, after a seven week probe into Arnold's behavior toward women going back decades, published an article relating the experiences of six women who allegedly were his victims. His accusers (four of whom were anonymous) said that Arnold groped them in gyms, movie sets, office studios, elevators and other places. And in the next few days these six accusers turned into 16 as more came out of the woodwork raising one hell of a media storm.
Also mentioned in the article were stories of Arnold attending orgies, taking drugs and being a naughty LA boy in other ways. But the LA Time's October Surprise couldn't stop the popular political novice; he won the election crushing his main opponent (a Hispanic like Ted Cruz oddly named Cruz Bustamante) by a whopping 17 points.
But here is where it gets incredibly eerie and could very well be an auspicious sign for the embattled Donald Trump-himself the target of a dozen or so women claiming he gropped them. Arnold (who is 13 months younger than Trump) won the California election (and this is incredible) on October 7, 2003 - 13 years to the very day that NBC would release Trump's lewd Hollywood Access tape where he boasts about gropping women. Could it be that this tape surfacing on October 7th on the 13th anniversary of Arnold's gubernatorial victory is a sign that like the new host of Celebrity Apprentice to be, the old host Donald Trump will pass through the current storm of sexual accusations and defeat Hillary (and her sexual predator husband)? And could it be a sign that if Trump wins he will be a two term president like Schwarzenegger was a two term governor? It's just amazing what is happening. But we shall see.
As you can see I was right: Arnold's pre-election sex scandal failing to stop his election foreshadowed Trump's victory, sex scandal and all. Now Arnold is about to revive the TV show that made Trump a household name. Indeed, political novice Arnold's film career was to his achieving governor of the greatest state in the Union what the two Apprentice shows were to political novice Donald Trump's defying the odds and becoming leader of the greatest nation on earth. And now Arnold is about to host Celebrity Apprentice. It's truly, truly unbelievable.
Sunday October 16th was the beginning of the 16th month of Donald Trump's 2016 gravity defying, politically incorrect presidential campaign to do the seemingly impossible and win 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. As I've said before the campaign which started on June 16, 2015 (having illegal immigration and border security as key issues) began 16 days after the publication of Ann Coulter's book "Adios America," and 16 days before the shooting of Kate Steinlie in San Fransisco by an illegal, criminal, Mexican alien. Amazingly this non-politician, who first showed interest in the presidency in 2000 (16 years ago), went on against astounding odds to defeat 16 mostly professional politicians for the GOP nomination. As I wrote here, here and here throughout his campaign 16 has been an auspicious number for Trump. And Sunday, October 16th, the beginning of the Trump campaign's 16th month was no exception. For something quite remarkable happened to me that day which suggested that Trump is destined to win the presidency: I spotted a car owned by a Trump supporter displaying a "Trump For President" sign.
Why did something so trivial as a campaign sign so impress me? Because as incredible as it seems, and since the campaign began 16 months ago, I never once saw a car or motor vehicle in the city and surrounding area where I live bearing a Trump sticker or campaign sign. NOT ONCE! In fact, to date I've not seen one vehicle with a Hillary campaign sign either. Trump and Hillary signs on front lawns and along streets and highways I've seen. But bumper stickers or whatever on cars, SUVs and trucks I've seen naught. This was not the case in 2008 and 2012. Obama, McCain and Romney stickers were in evidence; if not abundantly it was nevertheless rare to go out driving and not see at least one car with a campaign sticker or sign. But not this election year. In Tampa where I live, and in Clearwater where I visit relatives, or in Largo where I dine and go to the movies I've not seen one Trump or Hillary car sign or sticker until Sunday the 16th.What happened to me that day was this:
SIMILAR TO THE TRUMP SIGN I SAW.
I had just left the Regal 8 Cinema in Largo with my dad. We saw the rip-roaring action western "The Magnificent 7." As we were walking to his car discussing the film I spotted a colorful, eye grabbing laminated, red, white and blue "Trump For President" sign on the dashboardof a black 2016 Ford Fusion. Curious to see if it also had a bumper sticker I walked to the rear of the car. But no sticker was there. What was there however was astonishing: a Florida licence plate with the number BZWD 45. Was it just a mere coincidence that this Florida car with a very rare Trump sign had a tag bearing the number 45? The number of the next President? Or was it a providential sign of what's to come? That come election day embattled, demonized, underdog Donald Trump (who vowed to stop Ford from opening plants in Mexico see) will take both Florida and the White House and become our 45th President? This doesn't seem likely if you listen to the deranged Trump hating media that's practically declared Hillary the winner because of the sex tape scandal and multiple groping allegations. But my experience Sunday reinforced my faith (based on how far Trump has come, the weakness of Hillary's candidacy, and a multitude of positive oracular signs) that The Donald will win Florida and the White House in November.
But perhaps only after a fierce battle over voter fraud or a close race (as in 2000) needing recounts in Florida or some other key battle ground states. For I can't help thinking that they'll be some terrible, possibly violent uproar over the election results as suggested to me by The Magnificent 7-the film I saw just prior to spotting the Trump sign and the number 45.
Let me explain.
The film Sunday started 4:35 pm, the 16th hour of the day (Trump's auspicious campaign number); and it starred Denzel Washington who like Trump was born in New York State (see). But this is where it gets profound and seems to point to election fraud or perhaps much chaos due to a surprising and much feared Trump victory: the film was a remake of the 1960 classic starring Yul Brenner. Like this year of 2016 1960 was an election year where the charismatic womanizer John Kennedy ran against the less likable and attractive Richard Nixon (often compared with Hillary see). The date of that election (like this year's) was November 8th. It was the closest race of the 20th century where the Kennedys it is believed stole the election from Nixon using a combination of dirty tricks (see) and fixing the outcome with mobsters and politicians in two critical states: Illinois and in Texas. Though Nixon knew the election was rigged and had evidence of massive fraud, for the good of the country he chose to bite the bullet and refused to contest it lest he cause a constitutional crisis.
But that won't happen today. Not with Donald Trump as a candidate. If Trump loses the election in a tight race where there's the slightest hint of voter fraud and fixing in key states he'll raise hell and won't rest until he wins what was stolen from him. And if that means causing a constitutional crisis (avoided by Nixon) then so be it. No way Trump will lose gracefully if he feels cheated. It's not in his nature.
The Magnificent 7 fighting the evil of land theft and murderous tyrannical oppression.
The question now is this: is The Magnificent 7, the violent, shoot em up, guns blazing western prophetic of this election year? Will the country be torn apart by the result with Trump emerging as the winner after battling Democrat corruption and voter fraud like the Mag 7 the evil robber baron Bart Bogue and his gang of killers in the film? Or will a clean win for Trump just simply drive the political Left and GOP "Never Trumpers" insane, with some turning to violence and uncontrollable rage? Will Trump, in effect, remain standing tall like hero Denzel Washington in the film after all the bloodletting, savagery and chaos ends? Is that what's in store for us?
Well, Trump defeated Hillary Clinton fair and square; but the anti-Trump "HE'S NOT MY PRESIDENT" lunatics rejecting his victory are out in force protesting with rowdy demonstrations across the nation where there's been bouts of violence with police. Will the violence worsen? Will we see the resurrection of the Weather Underground and terror attacks hitting Trump hotels, buildings and properties before or after he takes office?
Green Party candidate Jill Stein hoping to reverse the outcome of the election is raising money for a recount in the three battleground states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan that narrowly won the election for Trump. The comprehensive New York Times led media recount of the 2000 Florida vote found that Bush won the state but with 44 fewer votes-giving him a winning total of 493 instead of 537 (see). What Stein hopes to achieve when the three states she's targeted for recount had Trump winning by 44,000, 22,000 and 10,000 respectively is beyond me.
Trump supporter with similar amazing experience related to a license plate bearing the number 45.
"I have an amazing coincidence occurring on the Election day last Tuesday I would like to share with all of you. On the morning of November 8, 2016, I drove my 2006 Acura MDX to my local poll station which was set up inside the clubhouse of my community to vote. My MDX's license plate No. is 5WAS045 and the chrome license plate frame has a flying eagle spreading its wings over the top side of the frame. After I checked in and the poll people verified my identity and current address, they issued me a passcode for the voting machine and the passcode was 0545 [the numbers on her plate in a slightly different order]. I finished the voting, went to work, and didn't realize I voted for the 45th President of the U.S.A. until the news networks announced on TV later that night that Trump would be the 45th President!!! I had to Google President Obama to verify that he is the 44th President (see)."
Several weeks ago I noted the irony of the corrupt, lawless Democratic Party holding their national convention to nominate the profoundly corrupt, crooked, establishment insider Hillary Clinton at a facility owned by Wells Fargo-which has since been rocked by a phony credit card accounts scandal. But could it be that the Democrat convention held at the Wells Fargo Center (WFC) is ominous of a major scandal about to rock the party and their scandal plagued nominee? Will Fate intervene in the closing weeks of the campaign with a severely damaging surprise (from Wikileaks, Hillary's email server, the Clinton Foundation or elsewhere) that will greatly damage or deal a death blow to the Clinton campaign? There are rumors flying about of a sexual bombshell about to drop on the Clintons more devastating than Trump's sex tape or groping allegations (see and see). Will this materialize just before or after Wednesday's final debate? Or will the bombshell (if it comes) be something quite unexpected?
Or could it be that on November 8th the lawless, corrupt Democrats will win a close election by voter fraud in one or several key battle ground states? As in 2000 will the outcome hinge on a single state that the Democrats will narrowly win by stuffing ballot boxes, using dead voters or some other criminal dirty tricks? If that should happen no way Donald Trump will bite the bullet and concede defeat like Nixon did in 1960 when the Kennedys, using the mob and crooked politicians, stole the election from him by winning Illinois and Texas (see). Trump has already warned that he'll fight like hell to the bitter end if the Democrats dare screw him; and we will have 2000 post-election chaos all over again. Is this what lies ahead?
THE 2000 GOP CONVENTION
What we do know, however, is this: 16 years ago when Florida decided the outcome of the 2000 race in favor of Bush over Gore the Republicans held their convention in Philadelphia as did the Democrats this year. In fact, they held it at the First Union Center owned by now defunct First Union Bank. Now here is where it gets truly fascinating. In 2001 First Union consummated a merger with Wachovia Bank; and in 2003 the First Union Center was renamed the Wachovia Center. Then in December 2008 guess who acquired Wachovia? WELLS FARGO (see). And in 2010 the Wachovia Center was renamed WELLS FARGO CENTER.
In other words, in 2000 the year Republicans won the presidency in the closest race in US history (that went all the way to the Supreme Court) they held their convention in the exact same building and location the Democats held their's in July. The only difference is that First Union Bank, unlike Wells Fargo today, wasn't involved in a post-convention scandal. In fact, there was nothing illegal or scandalous about George Bush beating Gore; for this was done fair and square as even the pro-Gore Washington Post grudgingly admits (see).
What's at stake on November 8th is the 45th Presidency of the United States. On September 8th Wells Fargo went public with its fake accounts scandal (see) causing its CEO to quit five weeks later. Now take a look at this: the Democrats started their convention at WFC on July 25th (see). From July 25th to September 8th is exactly 45 days (see). Could this be a sign that a scandal is in the works that will wreck Hillary Clinton's run for the 45th presidency? Amazingly, from the launch of Trump's incredible, gravity defying campaign on June 16, 2015 to the breaking of the Wells Fargo scandal on September 8th is exactly 450 days, a multiple of 45 10x (see). Is this an auspicious sign for the scandal damaged Trump that a greater scandal will rescue him and help him to the presidency?
Moreover, this is the 2016 race. From the launch of Hillary's presidential campaign on April 12, 2015 (the 70th anniversary of FDR's death) to September 8th is 1 year, 4 months and 28 days. That equals 16 months or 516 days (see). Again is this a sign that the Wells Fargo scandal prophetically anticipates a campaign destroying scandal ahead for crooked, lying Hillary and the Corruptocratic Dems?
Or could it be that the damage has already been done? That Bill Clinton's past sexual scandals, Benghazi, the email server scandal, revelations from Wikileaks and elsewhere about the Clinton Foundation, Democratic dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders and the Trump campaign, and lie after lie after nauseating lie has taken its toll on Hillary and doomed her to defeat? We can only hope so.
Clinton blames James Comey for her loss; meaning that it was ultimately the self-caused email server scandal (stemming from the Benghazi investigation) and lie after lie after lie that brought her down.
Now, dear reader, do you see how amazingly ominous it was for the Dems to hold their convention in the Wells Fargo Center? BTW, the CEO of Wells Fargo who resigned due to the credit card accounts scandal was John Stumpf, a name that strangely sounds like D. John Trump (see). Ain't that a kick in the head.
raiding our wealth, stealing our jobs and grabbing Lady Liberty by the crotch we need a patriotic leader with the will power, stamina and strength to take our country back and make it great again; to take on the criminally corrupt Washington-Wall Street-Media-Global Establishment and 1% special interests: those who rig economies and world markets to enrich themselves at everyone else's expense; the self-serving politicians, banksters, CEOs and international financial gangsters who have plunged us into massive, crushing, bankrupting debt; who are imperiling our future to build a new world order of crony capitalist-progressive-socialist dread.
You're for her? Which her?
But the leader we desperately need is not weak, corrupt, crooked, two-faced, pro-TPP Hillary-the elite status quo establishment insider who wrecked US foreign policy making the world a more dangerous place for freedom and democracy; who dreams of recklessly replacing America's sovereignty with a borderless, free trade, North America Accord-NAFTA on coke and steroids. The multitude of closed factories (70,000 since NAFTA was signed) and millions of lost, good paying jobs are not bad enough for Hillary; fancying herself a great world citizen (like Obama) she's hell-bent on building a new international power structure where America is just one of many mediocre states $trillions poorer than it is today with a lower standard of living for everyone but her and her elitist friends.
Indeed, the collapse of US foreign policy is prelude to Hillary's catastrophic presidency. Just look at her record as secretary of state and shutter: after failing to reset US/Russian relations and moderate radical terrorist Iran, after failing to build a democratic post-Kaddafy Libya and a stable and peaceful Iraq, after midwifing ISIS and turning Benghazi into a 9/11 deathtrap how can we trust Hillary with our national security and economic future? How is she qualified for the presidency when her instincts and judgment have proved so destructively bad? With $19 trillion in debt, $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities, a $900 billion trade deficit this nation is being plundered, raped and pillaged by foreign powers and global elites at every turn-and Hillary's their creature (as Bernie Sanders said) as conclusively proved by Wikileaks.
America must be renewed and rebuilt from within by a strong patriotic country first American defying the elites. The government and taxes must be slashed so that innovation and business can thrive; illegal immigration must cease and our porous borders closed so that our people have more and better paying jobs; the mad, dollar killing, money printing by the Fed must end, and interest rates must rise to revitalize the bank accounts of millions of depositors; and our enemies must know that if they dare and f*ck with us and cross the line they'll be severely punished or die. America needs an epically strong, larger than life, risk taking leader in these critically troubling times; in no other way can we save the middle class and reverse our precipitous national decline.
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
DONALD TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT
OUR FREEDOM, JOBS, SECURITY AND FUTURE DEPEND ON IT
What has Donald Trump actually, provably done more sexist, vulgar, lewd, disgusting and obscene than this shocking, indecent, shameless, offensive, adolescent locker room act by hypocritical Michelle's bawdy husband?
OBAMA CAUGHT IN THE LEWD
It wasn't until I saw this video that I understood why some were calling Obama "O'Boner."
Listen to the women laughing, giggling at energized Obama and telling the female reporter who is standing in the way to "sit down!" so they can see it better. I wonder, are these same women giggling over Trump's tape of 11 years ago? Or have they suddenly turned prude and are shocked?
AND THEN THERE'S OUR MORALLY UPRIGHT HYPOCRITE-IN-CHIEF SHOWING HIS RESPECT FOR WOMEN WITH THE "P" WORD:
AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST THERE'S THIS BIT OF RANK HYPOCRISY BY THE OBAMAS
Contestants in a Miss Teen USA beauty pageant told BuzzFeed News that Trump walked into their dressing room while they were undressed. Trump walked into the changing area when several of them were completely naked. Some of the girls were as young as 15 years old and said they were distressed at his presence, calling it shocking and creepy. www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2...
LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!
You lose. Walking into a women's dressing room (assuming Trump did it) is rude, not lewd. But flouting an erection to female reporters is both rude and lewd.
BTW, if Obama were to suddenly do a Bruce Jenner and believes that he's female are you okay with him using women's restrooms?
What Trump said was in jest. Or didn't you hear the laughter? He also said on Howard Stern (a bawdy comedy show) that he was a "sexual predator." I bet you stupidly treated that as a serious admission about his behavior.
ON OBAMA USING "P" WORD
Thanks for telling me what I knew. Wonder if there were any children in the audience? If he objected to using the term he would have said "blank," or politely said " the P word."
Clinton and Gore fraudulently blaming Hurricane Matthew, the drought in California, flooding in Norfolk, Virginia and other things on anthropogenic (man made) global warming. Gore also warned that if they didn't help Hillary carry Florida 2016 could turn out like 2000.
Finally after years of estrangement Al Gore and the Clintons buried their differences (Gore blamed the Monica Lewinsky scandal for his loss in 2000) and the guru and leader of the climate change derangement movement for saving planet earth from harmless CO2 emissions hit the campaign trail and went to bat for Hillary. The great reunion took place at the Kendall Campus of Miami Dade College (in the wake of Hurricane Matthew) in the very state that cost Gore the election. The purpose of the rally was to garner support from millennials (who mostly dislike Hillary and are increasingly turning to Trump, see) by focusing on non-existent, catastrophic, doomsday global warming.
A 2014 poll commissioned by the Clinton Global Initiative and Microsoft found that by a 76% to 24% margin millennials care more about environmental issues than their parents (see); and that 66% believe the earth is getting warmer (which it is) and that human activity is responsible for it (how much if any is disputable). Now with most millennials believing with Gore and Clinton in man made global warming, and enrollment at MDC totaling 165,000 students (see), the turnout for their climate change rally was expected to be awesome. But it was a dud. Reports vary that an embarrassing, disappointing 1600 people or less showed up (see); that's less than 1% of MDC's student population. Given all the pre-rally media publicity for the event the terrible turnout is astonishing.
Millennials may believe in man caused global warming, but apparently few, very few share the Gore-Obama-Clinton doomsday alarmist hysteria: that the massive ongoing use of fossil fuels (the cheapest, best, most efficient form of energy) overshadows the national debt and global terrorism as the greatest threat to our national security-and it's imperiling mankind's existence. In other words, millennials aren't buying into the sci-fi lie fantasy and hoax that every extreme weather event (like hurricane Matthew) propagated by Gore, Obama, Clinton and other psyched out fanatics is caused or influenced by driving your car, smoking a cigar or farting.
Meanwhile, that same Tuesday at the other end of the state, battling, odds defying Donald Trump-who regards (and rightly so) catastrophic man-caused climate change as a leftist lie and hoax-held a massive rally of 20,000 plus cheering Floridians in Panama City ripping into sick, low energy (she could use some petro) Hillary. It was the largest political rally in that city's history, and included thousands of millennials who Trump (as I said) is increasingly winning over (see). Undoubtedly, if denialist Trump had held the rally where Clinton and Gore appeared he would have drawn the huge crowd that they were expecting. Perhaps Trump should go there to show just how weak and unlikable Hillary is in the area.
Indeed, before the flop of her rally in Kendall Team Clinton was in a panic over Florida. Despite millions spent on anti-Trump commercials their internal polling is apparently showing that voter enthusiasm for Hillary isn't there (especially with minorities, see); and that unless that changes they could lose the state. After Tuesday's debacle with millennials their panic must now be manic.
PANAMA CITY AND BAY COUNTY VS. KENDALL AND MIAMI DADE COUNTY
This population data is amazing. At his rally in Panama City Trump drew in excess of 20,000 supporters. Panama City, located in Bay County, has a population 36,000 (see), while Bay totals 168,000 (see). In other words, the 20,000 plus at Trump's rally was 6/10ths of Panama City's population, and a little less than 1/8th of Bay's population.
At their failed rally in Kendall Clinton and Gore drew at most 1600 supporters. Kendall, located in Miami Dade County, has a population of 75,000 (see), while Dade Miami totals 2.7 million (see). Not since Michael Dukakis have Democrats had a weaker candidate.
It makes a lot of sense. Many, many, many times worse than what Trump jokingly said doing to a woman in a private locker room chat is being governed by a weak, physically sick pussy of a woman who as the feckless US Secretary of State made the world a deadlier and more dangerous place. Who together with her lead-from-behind, ass kissing, pussy hearted boss were the greatest enablers of post-Soviet Russian power and the terrorist state of Iran since the fall of the Soviet Union and the shah's reign. What is the sordid thought of a liberal Democrat 11 years ago to a world in chaos and turmoil worsening by the day as America declines economically (with low growth and ballooning debt), militarily (with a shrinking army, air force and navy) and geo-politically (with diminishing influence on world events). America the Great is falling; and a fourth term of much worse than Jimmy Carter (after Barack Obama) would be a national disaster and disgrace.
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN LIKE REAGAN DID IN THE 80S
DEPUSSIFY THE WHITE HOUSE
DONALD TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT
STOP CHINA, RUSSIA, MEXICO AND IRAN
FROM KICKING LADY LIBERTY'S ASS
MAJOR BLOW TO THE SEX TAPE PLOT!
THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF REPUBLICAN WOMEN ENDORSE DONALD TRUMP
It looks like what happened decades ago to Donald Trump is possibly happening again: the "Comeback King" of the 1990s who reversed his business fortunes from near complete collapse started at last night's debate the reversing his political fortunes after the worst two weeks of his gravity defying campaign. And irony of ironies just as the great reversal of Trump's crashing business took place during the Clinton years the reversal of his campaign against the Clintons is occurring a week after the New York Times (who dubbed him the "Comeback King") illegally published his tax returns from his failing business in the Clinton 90s. You can't make this stuff up.
Moreover, Trump's political rebound after two ugly weeks occurred at George Washington University in St. Louis. Incredibly, the very first presidential debate held there was in 1992 when Bill Clinton, called the "Come Back Kid," ran for and won the presidency-achieving this despite damaging allegations of infidelity and sexual impropriety. Indeed, it seems that in an odd crazy way Donald Trump (who defeated George H. W. Bush's son Jeb in the primaries), is following in Bill Clinton's footsteps-as he defeated the elder Bush for the presidency.
Clearly the acrimonius second Trump-Clinton debate was the greatest, most memorable comeback of any candidate since Ronald Reagan's second debate with Walter Mondale 32 years ago. Afterwards, Reagan went on to defeat Mondale and his running mate New York Congresswoman Geraldine Ferraro-first female vice presidential candidate of a major party.
And then there were the stage optics and aftermath which were terrible for Hillary; for it revealed (no surprise to many of us) just how unwell she is and physically unfit for the presidency.
TRUMP'S STAMINA VS HILLARY'S
Donald Trump stood firm last night like a strong, tall, unshakable oak for the duration of the debate-a tower of strength amidst a crumbling world-overshadowing sick, weak, low energy Hillary who spoke and sat, spoke and sat, spoke and sat through out the night to rest and recuperate from the thrashing she took. Good thing for her that the room temperature was under 77 as she might have fainted from the extreme heat like she did on 9/11.
You will notice in the clip that a badly weakened Hillary got in on the other side of the car away from the cameras, so we couldn't see what? The SS agents loading her in?
But her failure to compete on stage with Trump in the stamina contest wasn't the worst of it. Afterwards, as she was leaving the building, a depleted, shaken, beaten Hillary reeling from Trump's assault was unable to walk unaided on her own. Fearing she might fall Hillary was supported by her sick, frail husband as they walked down the hall and stairs leading to thier vehicle. Lucky for Hillary that she could sit during the debate. For the medical event that I wrongly predicted would happen in the first debate would certainly have happened last night.
Liberal Democrat wild man Alec Baldwin violently lashing out at his 12 year old daughter on a phone message that she's a "rude little brainless pig" who needed to have her "ass straightened out"?
Or then liberal Democrat Donald Trump jokingly telling Howard Stern that his beautiful daughter Ivanka was "a piece of ass"?
AND THEN THERE'S OBAMA'S STAGGERING, HYPOCRITICAL, ASS-KISSING OF MISOGYNISTS
His shamelessly bowing to the sexist king of Saudi Arabia who rules over one of the most misogynistic and oppressive regimes on earth.
His releasing to oppressive, radical, misogynistic Iran $150 billion as part of a worthless nuke deal.
And his bromance with vile, violent, disgusting, America hating, misogynist (women are "bitches," "pussies" and "whores") rapper Jay-Z. His music which serially degrades and objectifies women is a roadmap to racism, sexism and mayhem that has corrupted and ruined tens and thousands (a conservative estimate) of young lives.
But 11 years ago when liberal Democrat Donald Trump jokingly spoke demeaningly of a woman in private it's now the unforgivable sin of the century, and makes him unfit for the presidency.
In 2006 Donald Trump appearing with daughter Ivanka on The View said jokingly that if he weren't Ivanka's dad he would date her. Neither the show's hosts nor its audience of millions objected to Trump's remark. It was said in jest and was taken as such as everyone laughed and had a good time .
But just three months after Trump launched his historic campaign his joke of nine years before was pounced on by the media as being lewd, sexist and incestuous. "He wanted to bang his daughter!" bellowed Alex Griswold of Mediaite. If Ivanka and her dad went on The View today and he had joked like that Woopi and Joy would fake outrage and all hell would break loose on the show and across the media. The hypocrisy, as I said, is staggering.
Keep in mind that in 2005 when Trump made those lewd remarks he was a liberal Democrat ("a liberal's liberal")-and friends of Bill and Hillary who, that same year, attended his wedding and showered him with gifts.
WHEN BILL CLINTON GOT BJS IN THE WHITE HOUSE FROM MONICA
he did it with charm, elegance and presidential class. But this crass, locker room, guy talk from Trump is beneath contempt.
Trump excoriates Hillary for being an all talk no action Washington/Wall Street political insider. But Bill has actually groped women, Trump hasn't. And until that changes he's an all talk no action hypocrite.
I live in the great, beautiful Sunshine State of Florida the most hurricane prone state in the Union. And back in 2005 in the wake of hurricane Wilma (a Category 5 that blew the roof off my vacated house in Ft. Lauderdale) screwball, doomsday, alarmists like Al Gore warned that it was a sign of much, much worse to come. They warned that if we failed to quickly and drastically cut the use of fossil fuels and CO2 emissions and aggressively move toward a green energy (low-carbon) future that by 2012 much of Florida would suffer terrible, unprecedented devastation; that hurricane after deadly hurricane (3s 4s and 5s) would slam us year after year until Florida became the Shambles State. Indeed, these alarmists urged Floridians like me to leave the state or risk the worst from catastrophic, man caused, climate change (AGW).
But together with other failed hysterical predictions like snowless northern winters, iceless Arctic summers and rising sea levels badly flooding coastal cities like New York, a hurricane ravaged Florida never materialized-leaving Gore and his ilk looking like a bunch of wolf crying fools. In fact, in the 165 years since scientists first started measuring and categorizing these storms (see chart below) 11 years without a deadly hurricane set a record both for Florida and the continental US; and as this record was completely out of line with climate computer models, and the theory of a catastrophically man-caused warming planet it was with great amusement that I read the following bit of pseudo-scientific left-wing propaganda about Matthew and the media in Media Matters:
"When record-breaking rainfall and flooding struck Louisiana in August, major newspapers like The New York TimesandThe Washington Postaddressed how the devastation was in line with the predicted impacts of a warming planet, but the major TV networks’ nightly newscasts did not. As CNN senior media correspondent Brian Stelter notedat the time, it’s essentialfor media to explain that extreme weather events “are happening more often due to climate change and are more extreme due to climate change,” particularly in the “early stages” of covering a weather disaster.
Time will tell if the major television networks cover the relationship between climate change and Hurricane Matthew, but the scientific evidence is clear."
Scientific evidence that Matthew is caused by climate change is what? "Clear"? Really? For whom and on what planet? Truth is there's no scientific proof or certainty that Matthew's existence or intensity, or the existence or strength of any extreme weather event, is influenced by human CO2 emissions. It's mere speculation and impossible to prove. Indeed, if it were 1816 there's no reason to doubt that Matthew would be every bit the Category 3 hurricane it is today. "Clarity" here doesn't mean scientific certainty; it means ideological certainty: the utterly stupid notion that every hurricane from Category 1-5 would be 0-4 if we lived in a low-carbon or zero carbon world.
Moreover, going back 106 years to 1910 (when scientists say that human behavior not nature became the dominant factor in warming the earth, see) despite the fact that global temperatures have steadily but minisculally increased from then to now, the number of strong Matthew-like storms making landfall (contrary to what alarmists say) has actually decreased. Indeed, from 1910 to the present I count (including Matthew) 61 deadly Category 3 to 5 hurricanes that made land fall wrecking havoc on us. But of these monster storms 37 or 60% hit us before 1963 when global temps were cooler; while the remaining 24 or 40% hit us since when global temps were warmer. As the last 58 years have been warmer than the preceding 58 how could there be a 20% reduction in high category hurricane events if warmer temps should multiply them? From the alarmist viewpoint it doesn't make sense; and because of that they ignore the fact of increased warmth and fewer hurricanes thinking that more carbon emissions will eventually change that and give them the destruction they foresee
Be that as it may, as you will see from the chronological hurricane chart below Media Matters has it all wrong. Their correlation between AGW and the frequency of bad hurricane events hitting the US mainland is completely and demonstrably false. A made up political lie or "HOAX" as Donald Trump would say.
But Gore and the alarmists are undeterred. After making fools of themselves over Wilma they're repeating their folly with Matthew saying that we've been lucky these last 11 years; and that Matthew is an unmistakable sign that Category 3s, 4s and 5s will be coming thick and fast to punish Florida and the U.S.
If Obamacare as Bill Clinton said (and Chuck Schumer and Chelsea Clinton inferred, see) is the "craziest thing in the world" because it unfairly "doubles premiums while cutting coverage in half" then what does that say about Barack Obama who proudly and adamantly insists that it's a "win win for all Americans;" and his "greatest achievement [and gift to this country] as president"?
Hillary defends failed Obamacare against Bernie Sander's failed single payer.
And what does that say about Hillary Clinton and the Democrats who still support this "train wreck" despite the terrible financial costs to millions of struggling middle class folks? Is this how status quo, Washington insider Hillary cares about working class families? By wanting to stay the course and continue what's hurting them and their kids? Where's the "I feel your pain" compassion in this?
After Democrats were decimated in the 2014 election Senator Chuck Schumer (anticipating Bill Clinton) craps on Obamacare as being a huge political and economic mistake.
And if Obamacare is "crazy" then what about SINGLE-PAYER (Medicare-for-All) healthcare and it's sad fate in socialist Bernie Sander's blue state of Vermont? If Obamacare is "crazy" because it "doubles premiums" (when Obama promised $2500 in savings) then even crazier is single-payer government-run, socalized healthcare which was killed in Vermont because of its insane, economy ruining costs: A DOUBLING OF STATE TAXES.
The full range of Obama's flat-out lies about his greatest gift to the American people.
If it's crazy to support Obamacare because of its crushing costs to the disappearing middle class then it's just as crazy to nationalize Vermont's failure and want financially unsustainable single-payer for 300 million Americans. Imagine the devastating impact to our economy from doubling national taxes to pay for this monstrosity? But don't take my word for it; just read what the Democrat governor of Vermont says about his failure; and then tell me with a straight face that you're sane, or rationally humane for wanting socialized medicine for America.
Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin announcing the death of single payer.
Thus giving the "Big October Trump Surprise" a very short, sweet lifespan.
Clinton told supporters at one rally last week, "He [Trump] actually bragged about gaming the system to get out of paying his fair share of taxes. In fact, I think there's a strong probability he hasn't paid federal taxes in a lot of years. If not paying taxes makes him smart, what does that make all the rest of us?"
Just when shameless, crooked, hypocritical Hillary Clinton thought she'd finally found the damning issue (paying no taxes) that would finally bury Donald Trump and win the presidency along comes a bombshell revelation from her own tax returns: like The Donald she didn't pay her full "FAIR SHARE" of taxes for last year. Turns out that in 2015 "SMART" Hillary Rodham Trump SMARTLY used a loss of $700,000 to SMARTLY avoid paying certaintaxes (that only dummies pay). It was "SMART" Donald Trump on a much smaller scale smartly "GAMING THE SYSTEM" and using Trump's "scandalous, immoral, un-American" TAX AVOIDANCE "SCHEME" to get out of paying her "FAIR SHARE." And even worse, the pro-Clinton New York Times (doing a Donald on the IRS) paid zero taxes in 2014. The Left just can't catch a break.
In other words, if Hillary were as rich as Trump, and her losseslast year were as great as his in 1995 ($916 million) she would have aggressively used the same deductions and provisions in the tax code to avoid paying federal taxes for 18 years (if that's what Trump did). In short, crooked, lying, hypocritical Hillary would have had no compunction about sending zero tax dollars "to troops, schools, vets and healthcare." But what she did do last year was short them all thousands of dollars-along with millions by her partner in hypocrisythe New York Times.
So much for shameless, lying, hypocritical Hillary being holier, more ethical and American than Trump (and better suited for the presidency) because she released her tax returns. Like Trump Hillary hired the best bean counters money could buy to legally lighten and minimize her tax load as much as possible. If it's not wrong for Hillary on a smaller scale how could it be wrong for anyone on any scale no matter the size? Trump and Hillary (and the New York Times) are joined to the hip on "gaming the system" and paying as little in taxes as the law allows. But the good news for Hillary is this: she has a bit more money to pay her doctors to stop her fainting spells and coughing fits.
BILL CLINTON'S PARDON OF CRIMINAL TAX CHEAT AND OIL PROFITEER MARK RICH, AND HILLARY'S LAUGHABLE HYPOCRISY IN DEMONIZING DONALD TRUMP'S LEGAL TAX AVOIDANCE PRACTICES.
One of Bill Clinton's most scandalous acts as President was granting a presidential pardon to indicted billionaire, tax cheat and wanted fugitive Marc Rich just before he left office. As Jimmy Carter said this was payback to Rich for his generous donations to Bill Clinton's presidential campaigns, Hillary's senatorial run, the Clinton Library Foundation and Democrat Party.
New York senatorial candidate Hillary Clinton shamelessly posing with Marc Rich's ex-wife and campaign donor Denise Rich.
Though Bill Clinton apologized for the Rich pardon he and Hillary continue to hugely benefit from it with millions in donations from Rich's friends (above) and associates to the Clinton Foundation and Hillary's presidential runs.
WHICH IS WORSE?
Donald Trump legally taking advantage of deductions and loop holes in the tax code to avoid paying unnecessary taxes (practiced by millions of Americans)? Or Bill Clinton's corrupt payback pardoning (with Hillary's approval) of a notorious, criminal tax cheat; and backing laws allowing millionaires and billionaires like Trump from paying their "fair share" of taxes?
Above: a frail, hoarse, painful to watch Bill Clinton at Peres funeral-9/30
Below: a tired, old, miserable looking, hoarse Hillary coughing again in Florida-9/30
It was at the Wells Fargo Center in Philadelphia (owned by a bank that was seven weeks away from being hit by a massive fraud scandal*) that scandalous Bill Clinton at the DNC delivered the keynote address of the evening praising his lying, crooked, mendacious wife Hillary. Called "weird and shocking" by MSNBC's Rachel Madow the former president tried to humanize in the speech his inauthentic, robotic, globalist wife and ensure us she was honest and trustworthy and the real agent of reform and change in the race; but instead of reinventing his low energy wife Bill gave one of the dullest and deadest speeches of his life.
*Isn't it odd that the party of political corruption
(Corruptocratic Party) who nominated for president one of the most corrupt and crooked (Wall Street owned) politicians in US history should hold its convention in of all places a facility owned by Wells Fargo?
Afterwards pundits remarked how Clinton's hands and voice were shaking; that he was unusually frail looking lacking energy, passion and strength; that he wasn't the Bill Clinton of old but a shadow and shell of his former self old beyond his 69 years. Gone was the warm, upbeat, optimistic, amiable charmer with the gleam in his eye who could talk you into anything. Indeed, of all the major speeches delivered at the DNC Bill Clinton's (next to his wife's which put him to sleep) was the weakest, lest inspiring and worst.
But the Bill Clinton I saw then was a dynamo compared to what I saw yesterday at Mount Herzl cemetery in Israel at Shimon Peres's funeral. Sickly, worn out, hoarse, and bleak (and clearing his throat occasionally) Bill Clinton feebly struggling through his speech (sounding as if half dead with one foot in the grave) praised the dead Israeli leader. As you can see in the video above it is very painful and pitiful to watch.
But while a sick, old, tired, burnt out Bill was listlessly giving his ineffective speech an exhausted miserable looking Hillary thousands of miles away in Ft. Pierce, Florida was (wouldn't you know it) back in form having an allergy or flu or pneumonia caused (take your pick) coughing attack-which she quickly suppressed with a lozenge before it got out of hand.
Obviously both Clintons are wearing themselves down battling against Donald "The Wall" Trump who has them tied in key swing states while taking a small dip in national post-debate polls. Politico reports that the Clinton campaign is in panic mode in Florida because internal polling shows a lack of enthusiasm for Hillary with black and minority voters (see). Team Clinton fears they won't get out the minority vote and lose Florida and the election to Trump. Before embarking to Israel in fact Bill was campaigning himself sick in Northern Florida. You could see from the video that it's taking its toll. Trump is unwearied, having more energy and stamina than both.