Monthly Archives: December 2016

2016 WHITE MIDDLE CLASS BACKLASH BASED ON ECONOMIC DECLINE NOT REACTIONARY RACIST POLITICS

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
I am sick to death of hearing race obsessed, "Hope is Dead," New Deal/Great Society losers like Van Jones and John Harwood analyzing the gravity defying triumph of Donald Trump on Election Day as a regressive racial backlash by angry white voters against Barack Obama, America's first black president. I'm sick of hearing that white voters after making Obama the most powerful black man in world history (electing and reelecting him by large margins) suddenly sloughed off their "white guilt," regrew racist horns and went charging after him in the person of Hillary Clinton (Obama in white face and drag). I'm sick of hearing that white Americans fearing the rise of minorities and blacks and the loss of political and economic power did a 180 in November and elected Donald Trump-a "white racist supremacist billionaire" to "take back America" for them.  
 
THE RACIST ELECTIONS THAT WEREN'T
 
But we've heard variations on this racism meme before. Indeed, in 2008 before the market crash decided the election for Obama and John McCain was topping him in the polls the Van Jones and Harwoods despaired that white America was still too racist (had made too little progress since Jim Crow) to elect a perfectly good and qualified black man president. But they were wrong. Obama won and won big collecting the most popular votes (69 million) of any presidential candidate in our history. 
 
 
 
But come 2012 the Harwoods and Van Jones worried anew that the white electorate (who massively voted for Obama and change in 2008 wanting anyone but George Bush II) would backslide and turn against him because of race. For arising since the last election was the angry white tea party movement and birtherism "stirring racial passions" to reverse 2008 and end Obama's ruinous reign; this despite his "stella achievements" in the economy, ending a war, getting bin Laden and financial and healthcare reform. They said that though Obama saved our economy from a second Great Depression (which was bull), and it was better than what he inherited from Bush (which was true), they warned that the weak recovery was being exploited by a vast right-wing racist conspiracy to make Obama a one term president. But they were wrong again as Obama won a second though less impressive election that year.  
 
THE RACIST ELECTION THAT WAS?
 
But now he lost, and in the most humiliating way. Campaigning hard for Hillary Obama pleaded with his base that "it would be a personal insult to my legacy [meaning him personally] if voters didn't back Hillary and elect her president." And the Harwoods and Van Jones are back with their anti-American analyses of an evil racial backlash to explain this undeserved insult to poor wounded defeated    Obama. There reasoning goes something like this: 
 
With the economy booming, unemployment under 5%, millions of new jobs created, low inflation and gas prices, and a record Dow at 19,000 reflecting great business success, only an upsurge of white bigotry, hatred and fear can explain the unlikely rise and victory of "white nationalist bigot" Donald Trump.
 
 
 
Indeed, across the internet I hear it said by grieving heartbroken Leftists that they were stupid, blind and too dismissive of Trump; that they made the mistake of treating him as a laughable joke who they couldn't respect and take seriously-even when he won the GOP nomination. Indeed, his nomination, they believed, meant an easy win for Hillary despite all her baggage, unlikability and sins. In short, Trump was an unelectable God send for them to elect Hillary.
 
 
Moreover, they blame themselves for being too complacent of all the underlying subtle racism still in the country. They were deceived or misled, they say, by Obama's eight years into forgetting our dark racist past, and how black and progressive success has always produced white male backlash and rage. They blame themselves for thinking that two terms of Obama meant that bigotry was practically dead; that citizens wearing suits, capable of holding a job and walking upright could also still be racists, religiously intolerant, misogynistic and homophobic. In short, they underestimated Trump and over estimated the progress that was made in ridding the country of racism. Indeed, they bemoan not giving enough heed to Black Lives Matter and its warning that racism was very much alive in this country institutionally and personally; and for ignoring the signs that were springing up everywhere (Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Eric Garner, etc.) they paid a heavy price on Election Day. Tears, tears.
 
THE RISE OF BERNIE SANDERS AND DONALD TRUMP
 
 
 

There's been a massive transfer of wealth from the 99% to the top 1%. We've got to bring that money back to working families.


But missing from this analysis is any explanation of Bernie Sanders whose millions of backers were mostly middle class whites (see). Was Bernie, the radical economic and social justice progressive, a racist for leading a mostly white populist movement of angry white voters wanting change? Wanting what eight long years of Obama and $trillions borrowed, spent and printed didn't do for them? They voted for Obama twice and in 2008 gave him margins of 10-20 points in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania (the states that made Trump President); but his didn't work for them as promised. They felt forgotten, left out, betrayed; many of them had been Occupy Wall Streeters raging against the millionaires and billionaires that were prospering under Obama while their fortunes either stagnated or dwindled. And they rallied to Bernie because he too like Trump offered hope and change from Obama's massive failures.  
 
IT'S ECONOMIC NATIONALISM AND ANTI-GLOBALISM, NOT RACISM STUPID
 
 
 
Indeed, underlying the rise of Sanders on the Left and Trump on the Right was essentially the same message of economic nationalism and anti-globalism, not racism. Put Americans first and the rest of the world last. Globalism was hurting all Americans; but these white Americans felt it more keenly due to the epic loss of factory and manufacturing jobs; and they had had enough. They were mad as hell and Sanders and Trump pledged to put a stop to it and make them economically secure and strong again. In other words, if the mostly white middle class Trump movement was racist then so was  Bernie Sanders' counterpart. No. Obama's happy talk and phony statistics (denied by both Trump and Sanders) about his low growth, bad jobs, pro-Wall Street economy couldn't fool the millions of white Americans suffering from decline, uncertainty and loss of faith in the future. And the real economic stats bear this out.
 
THE CRISIS OF THE DISAPPEARING MIDDLE CLASS
 
Indeed, under Obama the "Crisis of the Disappearing Middle Class" which has been progressing for decades has accelerated and worsened:
 
 
 
 
.
 
 
Share of adults living in middle-income households is falling
 
 
GDP during the Obama years has been the worst of the last 11 Presidents (see): 
 
Revised Obama GDP per quarter growth rate 2009 to  
End of 2016:
1.48%
(see)
 

 
 
30 years of decline in productivity and Obama’s non-recovery: 
 
 
20161202_GrowthSlowdown_chart
 
THIS IS WHAT DRIVES THE MOSTLY WHITE MIDDLE CLASS POPULISM BEHIND SANDERS AND TRUMP
 
 
 
THE VICTORY OF DONALD TRUMP IS A REMINDER OF THE INCREDIBLE UNBEATABLE POWER OF ECONOMIC POPULISM IN AN ERA OF DECLINE
 
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

DONALD TRUMP: THE AMAZING “COINCIDENCE” OF HIS ELECTION AND THE 1995 JERUSALEM EMBASSY ACT, AND THE END OF THE TWO STATE SOLUTION

 

TO EAST JERUSALEM
 
DEAR PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP,
 
To demonstrate America's solidarity with the democratic Jewish state of Israel in its existential struggle with Islamo-Arab racist supremacy, and murderous anti-Jewish jihad, please sir do the following in your first historic 100 days: relocate the US embassy in Tel Aviv to East Jerusalem not West Jerusalem; and move it as close as possible to the Holy Temple Mount.
 
 
Make it abundantly clear to the world Sir that the United States is radically reversing the pro-Palestinian policies of the Obama administration, and 68 years of US policy on the status of Jerusalem (see); and that it now recognizes only one, united, undivided Jerusalem as the political, cultural, religious and eternal capital of the Israeli state and Jewish people everywhere. One united capital for one united people in one united homeland till the end of time.
 
 
As for the reaction of implacable, deranged, Jew hating Palestinians? It will be violent with possible terror attacks and Jews being killed and injured; and with massive Gaza and West Bank demonstrations burning US and Israeli flags, and you, Sir, in effigy. But how would that differ much from the present turmoil?
 
 
 
 
As for the world's reaction? The embassy move will be universally and fervently condemned as violating International Law as decided by the United Nations; and some countries undoubtedly will recall their ambassadors from Washington in protest. But the furor will quickly die down. For the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is overshadowed in the region by the worsening deadly Sunni-Shiite divide (aggravated by Obama's Libya, Iraq and Iran policies), and no longer has the importance and urgency it once had-as Bibi Netanyahu has repeatedly stated. 
 
 
 
And as jihadist, terrorist, Shiite Iran grows in power and influence destabilizing the region it will inevitablely draw America, Israel and the Sunni states closer together in an anti-Iran alliance-as the Palestinian cause to destroy Israel practically drops off the map.
 
 
 And Sir, in case you haven't made up your mind to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, then hopefully the following signs will convince you that this is your DESTINY; that the time is right for this to happen; and that 21 years of inaction on the Jerusalem Embassy Act, and 68 years on the status of Jerusalem, must now come to an end.
Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995
Great Seal of the United States
Long title
An act to provide for the relocation of the United States Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, and for other purposes.
Acronyms(colloquial)
JEA
Enacted by
Effective
November 8, 1995.
Citations
Public law
Statutes at Large
109 Stat. 398
Codification
Acts amended
None
Titles amended
None
U.S.C.sections created
None
Legislative history
 

You will notice Sir that the Jerusalem Embassy Act passed by the 104th Congress in 1995 is PUBLIC LAW 104-45, ending in your president's number. And it appears that by an Act of Providence 104-45 became law on the auspicious date of NOVEMBER 8TH-21 years to the very day of you becoming 45th President of the United States. This can't be accidental.

Moreover, and just as fascinating, on the very day that 104-45 became law you Sir were exactly 18,045 days old-that's the 45th number of the 18,000 series. This too can't be accidental.

From and including: Friday, June 14, 1946
To and including: Wednesday, November 8, 1995

Result: 18,045 days

It is 18,045 days from the start date to the end date, end date included

Or 49 years, 4 months, 26 days including the end date (see).  

 

This should put to rest any doubts that you may have Sir. Be confident that moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem is the right thing to do for our country, Israel and, in the long run, peace. Strike out in a new direction Sir and history will praise you.

 

   POSTSCRIPT

 

    DAVID FRIEDMAN   

 

 

Donald Trump's Hanukkah gift to the people of Israel was nominating David Melech Friedman as the U.S. Ambassador to their country.

 

On December 15th President-elect Trump nominated attorney and campaign advisor David Friedman as America's next Ambassador to Israel. Friedman, an Orthodox Jew, supports moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and expanding settlements on the West Bank; and he also strongly believes in a "one state solution" to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. This is where Israel would annex all or some parts of the West Bank; and where there's no possibility of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.

 

David Friedman: Trump would support Israeli annexation of parts of West Bank - Israel News - Haaretz.com

 

Now according to Mr. Friedman, and this is exciting, Donald Trump would thumb his nose at the Palestinian leadership, and practically the entire world, and support annexation of parts of the West Bank. Now if true what that means is that Trump rejects the notion of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital; and that if and when he moves the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem he could defiantly (poking the Palis in the eye) place it in the eastern part of the city. That will be a day of celebration for me and millions.

 

 

 

 

RELATED

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

BARACK OBAMA, JEWISH SETTLEMENTS AND THE IGNORANCE OF THE LEFT ON THE CAUSES OF THE MOSLEM-ISRAELI CONFLICT

 
 
 

Obama's got Israel's back.

What an ignorant, despicable, backstabbing, devious, coward Obama is! And who does he think he's fooling? Less than 24 hours before Hanukkah (adding insult to in jury) he refused to block an immoral, unjustified, worthless pro-Palestinian UN resolution condemning as illegal growing Jewish settlements on Israeli owned lands; and he did this after hypocritically vetoing a similar measure in 2011. Why the sudden change in policy? It wasn't in response to any major shift in Israel's settlement program. Indeed, the pace of settlement building on the West Bank and in East Jerusalem today differs little from what it was six years ago when Obama vetoed its condemnation. So why now and not then? Only politics, meanspiritness, and ignorance explain it.
 
 
He forgot to add that the suffering is largely self-caused.
 
Though Obama in a pro-Palestinian UN speech in September 2009 condemned Israeli settlements as illegal he vetoed the Security Council resolution in 2011 to avoid giving Republicans an issue that could hurt his reelection the following year. In short, he didn't want to risk alienating millions of Jewish and pro-Israel voters and the influential Israeli Lobby (God bless them). Indeed,  it is certain that  Obama would have vetoed this second resolution had it come up for a vote before November 8th. There is no way he would have risked giving Donald Trump an issue that could have hurt Hillary with pro-Israel voters. In fact, Hillary herself took measures not the alienate the large pro-Israel public by making sure that the words "settlements" and "occupation" weren't mentioned in the Democratic Party platform (see).
    
 
The murdering genocidal racist folks Obama gave $150 billion to wipe out Israel for a worthless nuke deal that even John Podesta said was a 21st century Munich mistake. 
 
But with the election now past and the Dems having little or nothing to lose Obama-wanting to show his disdain for Netanyahu and his defiant ongoing expansion of settlements (which he ignorantly believes are an obstacle to peace)-abstained from Friday's vote allowing it to pass 14 to zip. Netanyahu is right to suspect that Obama colluded with the UN Security Council on this. It was probably orchestrated and preplanned weeks or months in advance. With no political price to pay Obama must have secretly pledged to Egypt and the other Security Council states that he wouldn't veto the anti-settlement measure so long as it was introduced after the election. And shamefully and ignorantly he kept his pledge. It's the only thing that makes sense.
 
 
 
Palestinians are opposed to all Jewish settlements. That includes Tel Aviv, Haifa, the Negev and all of Jewish Israel which, according to Islamic law, is in violation of God's will.
 
 But Friday's abstention not only stabbed Netanyahu and the Israeli people in the back, it revealed (emblematic of the pro-Palestinian, soft on terror, insane Left) Obama's cluelessness and ignorance of the true causes underlying the decades old Palestinian-Israeli conflict and Israels older conflict with Islam. Indeed, the causes are ancient and deep with settlements barely scratching the surface.
 
 
The sign should read:
"For my religious peace of mind Israel must be destroyed because its existence causes me to doubt the fundamentals of my faith."
 
The principle, primary, underlying cause going back to the anti-Zionist riots and killing of Jews in 1930s Palestine is summed up in one word: ISLAM. But if like Obama you're a politically correct ideologue stupidly fixed on the falsehood that "there is no evil in Islam," and that it's a "religion of justice and peace" then what drives this deadly conflict will elude you; and you'll foolishly blame it on peripheral things like  settlements, checkpoints, security walls, boycotts and the like.
 
 
 
Mohammed was the murdering, conquering, Jew hating Hitler of the 7th century. Hitler was the murdering, conquering, Jew hating Mohammed of the 20th century.
 
Truth is the Palestinians are a Moslem people, and they take their religion very, very seriously. And they are taught by their religion and prophet that Jewish Israel's very existence is in violation of GOD'S WILL or Islamic (sharia) law; they're taught that the land that the "filthy, impure, intruding infidel Jews" claim for their national homeland (Tel Aviv, Haifa and all of Jerusalem
 belong exclusively and absolutely to Islam. In fact, Palestinians and all Moslems generally are indoctrinated (instilled) with the belief that they own the deed to the land of Israel, a deed signed and given to them by God himself: the Holy Koran. And from their primitive, reactionary, medieval viewpoint they are correct. Interpreted literally the Koran is a deed to the land of Israel.
 
 
For the Koran teaches that any land any where that was conquered and colonized by Moslems (even if they've been expelled) eternally (by divine right) belongs to them. And that goes for other lands Islam once ruled: Spain, Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia, Romania, Moldova, parts of India, etc.; whether their infidel inhabitants know it or not all these lands once ruled by Moslems still in truth, and by God's will, belong to to them; and Islam will not rest until these lands are Islamized again. But Israel tops the list of lands (temporarily) lost to Islam. For it was in Jerusalem on the Temple Mount that Mohammed, according to the Koran, was miraculously transported and mounted a winged horse and flew to heaven. And Israel is close to the Arabian Peninsula,the birth place of Islam.
 
 
"Israel must die for Islam to live in peace." That's how these savage,    medieval monsters think.
 
But there's a deeper theological reason for Islam's violent hostility to Israel's existence, which ignorant delusional ideologues like Obama are oblivious to. For not only does Jewish Israel's existence breach Islamic law, it's very existence is a refutation of Islamic truths. And this is what really drives Moslems insane. The core premise of Islam (what makes it unique and distinctive among monotheistic faiths) is that it's the true, pure, authentic, unvarnished monotheism of Abraham (the ultimate and final revelation of God's truth to man)-and that Judaism (and Christianity) is its distortion or perversion. Indeed, Mohammed didn't regard himself as the founder of a new faith, but as the restorer of an ancient faith lost to the world because of the rebelliousness and disobedience of the Jews-God's most hated people.
 
 
 
 
But it gets worse. The Koran and Hadiths teach that the Jews loss of their homeland and exile were divine punishment for distorting Abraham's faith and disobeying God. And within a century of Mohammed's death Islam's conquest of Israel was seen by believers as a providential sign of Islam's supremacy over Judaism and all other faiths; and that Mohammed's claim to prophethood was valid and sane.
 
 
 
So imagine the intellectual and emotional blow devout Moslems experienced when contary to Koranic law and teaching Israel was restored after 2000 years. Called "the catastrophe" by Palestinians it was a direct challenge to Mohammed's claim to prophethood; that he was the last and final messenger of God (superior to all the Hebrew prophets and Moses himself) with the absolute and final revelation of saving truth to man. The very notion that Islam is the answer to all of humanity's manifold problems and ills, and that the purpose of history was its conquest of the world for a just and lasting peace,  were put in doubt by Israel's return to history. In other words, Israel's existence drives true believing Moslems insane because it raises painful doubts about the fundamentals of their faith: about Mohammed's place in history, Islam's relation to other faiths, and the inerrancy of the Koran believed to be the most perfect and complete of God's revelations. In short, either Islam is the ANSWER or it's not. And Israel's existence after 68 years (against staggering odds) says it is not.
 
Hopefully, now you understand why since 1948 Islam has been at war with Israel and seeks it's total  destruction; why in 1947 the Islamic world rejected the UN's proposed two state solution of dividing Palestine into Jewish and Arab/Moslem states; and why to this day most Palestinians and Moslems reject a two state solution and will settle for nothing short of Israel's destruction, which they pray for every day. 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 

FROM “HOPE AND CHANGE” TO “HOPE IS DEAD”-THE RISE AND FALL OF BARACK OBAMA

 
 
 
Obama is so lost in the ridiculously exalted opinion he has of himself that it blinds him to all the harm and wreckage he's done. So he blames it on those who for very sound reasons opposed his politics and policies.
 
It doesn't get anymore pathetic than this. If President Obama who rose to power on a messianic wave of "Hope and Change" was the resounding success story that he claims then why for God's sake is he behaving like a failure? What happy, successful, consequential President proud of his achievements and confident of his place in history leaves office after eight glorious years sounding like a miserable, bitter, petulant loser? Like a badly beaten man, wounded and betrayed? It's unheard of!
 
 
After eight years of vilification by the liberal media and Dems neither Ronald Reagan nor George Bush ever once publicly complained about their treatment and pains. They had the fortitude and moral strength to gracefully take every blow and rise above it showing the world they were stronger and better than the slings and arrows shot at them by their foes.
 
 
Obama once boasted that he was the Democrat Ronald Reagan-the Gipper of the Left. Where? On what world? Though millions worldwide marched against Reagan and his hardline anti-Soviet policies-demonizing him as a reckless nuclear cowboy leading mankind into Armageddon (and despite Democrats colluding with Russia to stop him see)-Reagan, always the happy, cheerful, optimistic warrior never let it sour him or get him down. And in the end he triumphed big time. How then is Obama Reagan?
 
 
The angry, deranged, delusional Left wrote books about hating Bush to death; and they produced a full length fictional film "The Death of a President" about his assassination in Chicago by a gunman; but not once did he bellyache or complain. Say what you like about Bush's presidency, there was much dignity and grace in the man deserving much respect. But there's little or none in Barack Obama. Soured, whining and mad he's turned the waning days of his presidency into one, big, sickening bellyache. His two terms as America's first black Pres didn't turn out as planned; and his critics and adversaries are to blame. They refused to obey and coöperate with policies they deemed  bad. Shame on them for their bigotry and racism. "The party of Lincoln is dead," says the Left; its treatment of Obama is proof of it-as if he were perfect.
 
 
 
Indeed, imagining himself the 21st century Reagan who'd infallibly be followed in office by a member of his party (like Bush 41 did Reagan) Obama can't come to grips with reality and his self-inflicted fate: that he's not the exalted, enlightened singular soul he thought he was with a character and destiny like Lincoln, FDR, Reagan and the greats. He feels cheated and lost as if all hope were gone and his presidency a waste with a legacy of ashes, dust and despair; that the imperiled world God chose him to save from fossil fuels, rising seas and climate change is now inevitably doomed to the grave. The forces of darkness conspired against him and prevailed proving themselves stronger than the God who anointed him at birth savior of men; he had a mandate from heaven, so he believed, to build a more perfect dependency union-a cradle to grave transformational nanny state-the true American dream. But that was not to be. He got no further than Obamacare which the public hates. No wonder why Bernie Sanders was incensed and millions supported him. The great progressive made too little progress for their tastes.
 
 
 
 
From "Hope and Change" to "Hope is Dead" it's the rise and fall of Barack Hussein Obama-as the world draws near to its end. But don't worry folks. Before it's curtains for America and the human race history will record that Fox, Republicans, Limbaugh and Putin are to blame as the nightmare reign of Donald Trump (the anti-Obama) begins.
 
HURRAY!
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
SHORT DISQUS DEBATE
 
 
BARACK OBAMA:
 
THE MOST POPULAR FAILED PRESIDENT IN US HISTORY
 .
 
Reagan is the only President in history to leave office wiith an approval rating as high as Obama. Telling the trutyh about you filthy vulgar bigots is needed to keep you from lying. Whining is what the coward you elected does every day. He is not man enough to accept he lost by 3 million votes and spends all day crying. Obama showed more dignity then that bigot Trump ever did. He was gracious and told other to cooperate. The way trump whines you would think he lost.
 
Obama has more dignity in the head of his Trouser Snake than you bigot nasty liars have in your whole family. If only linocln could bring Sherman back to burn all you bigots again.
 

 

Obama is arguably the most popular failed president in US history. If not why then did his wife say that "all hope is dead"? Those are the words of failure and loss, not success.

 

BTW, one of our very greatest Presidents Harry Truman left office with a 36% approval rating. Would you rank Obama

above the President who brought WW II to an end, and stopped the Soviet Union from swallowing up Western Europe because he left office with a low approval rating? What achievements of Obama's tops Truman's? Understanding his high place in history Truman left office with his head held high and without complaint. But not Obama who unlike Truman had a second term as President.'

 

Obama's poor domestic and foreign policy legacy is in peril because he supported a candidate to replace him who opposed change and wanted to stay the course. The voters wanting change said "no" to Obama/Clinton and handed Trump a large electoral and geographical upset victory.

Trump's so-called "whining" is a defense of the Electoral College system that elected him 45th President against those who want to change it. Understandably he wants to keep the EC because what elected him president against staggering odds will likely reelect him.

 

BTW, it's leftists like you, not Donald Trump who are crying and whining over the 2.8 million votes insisting insanely that Hillary is the real winner when she lost fair and square.

 

 

RELATED

 

BARACK OBAMA: TRANSFORMATIONAL PRESIDENT OR FORTUNE’S TRAGIC FOOL? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OBAMA TO REAGAN AND FDR

 

THE RISE AND FALL OF BARACK OBAMA: THE END OF NEW DEAL/GREAT SOCIETY LIBERALISM AND COUNTERCULTURE SIXTIES RADICALISM

 

THE 2014 ELECTION: WINNING FOR THE GIPPER, THE GREAT REVERSAL, MITCH MCCONNELL RISES

 

NO HUDSON RIVER MIRACLE FOR OBAMA: WWII PLANE CRASHES IN HUDSON KILLING PILOT WHEN OBAMA DISHONORS GREATEST GENERATION AT HIROSHIMA 

 

WHAT IF BARACK OBAMA WAS PRESIDENT DURING WORLD WAR TWO? 

 

PAM GELLER, GONE WITH THE WIND AND THE 1936 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

 

THE TRUMPSLIDE AND OBAMA’S FAILED HILLARY/ BUSH 41 PREDICTION VS. MY TRUMP-JFK PREDICTION

 

Now that the anti-Trump derangement nuts failed to reverse the  outcome of the 2016 election (with the Jillary Recount and great Electoral College revolt backfiring and making Trump's victory slightly stronger) let's take a comprehensive look at Trump's  triumph which on balance was a landslide.

 
For anti-Electoral College Trump haters the Constitution is living, breathing toilet paper.
 

Indeed, the most feared and hated President-elect ever by the political Left won 62.9 million votes; this set a record for a Republican candidate by just under 1 million votes*. No mean feat considering the extent, scope and power of the maligning bipartisan forces aligned against him.  Indeed, Trump's gravity defying miraculous win against staggering odds (which looks like the work of Providence) was the greatest upset political victory since certain to lose, underdog Harry Truman beat Thomas Dewey 68 years ago.

*Trump beat Bush's record of just over 62 million votes set in 2004 by approximately 900,000 votes (see).

 
trump-electors

But Trump's victory was more historic and greater than Truman's. For Truman had the advantage of being President, victoriously ending the worst war in human history and continuing the legacy of the immensely popular and revered FDR. But Trump never held elected office or ran in a political campaign; what he did have however was a flamboyant and super successful business and reality TV show career, great political instincts, untiring energy, an unbreakable iron will, effective communication skills, and the gift of a weak, unlikable, corrupt, low energy opponent who couldn't keep pace with him. And that combination of gifts and circumstances were enough to make Trump the third President-elect born during the Truman era; and the 7th to come from New York State after FDR.

In the end Trump pulled off a decisive electoral victory and staggering geographical sweep; and that created a

TRUMPSLIDE!      

geographic-landslide    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

@CNN is so embarrassed by their total (100%) support of Hillary Clinton, and yet her loss in a landslide, that they don't know what to do.

 
Donald Trump won the popular vote in 30 of 50 states, or 60% of the states vs. Hillary's 40%. That is a landslide. And out of 3141 counties across the land Trump won a whopping 2600 (flipping 200 that went for Obama in 2012), or 83% vs. Hillary's 17% (an all time low). That too was a landslide.
 
 
 
 
Now in the popular vote Hillary bested Trump by 2.8 million votes giving her a 2% lead. But this 2% came mostly if not exclusively from one lone state: deep blue leftist sanctuary California (overrun by over 3 million illegal, pro-Democrat aliens) where Hillary won a colossal, historic 8.7 million votes, 4.3 million more than Trump. This exceeded Hillary's overall popular vote lead by 1.5 million votes. How many of those votes were cast by illegals we don't know just yet (see).  But what we do know is that without California Hillary would have lost the popular vote by 1.4 million (see).
 
Outside California, Hillary Clinton lost the popular vote by 1.4 million to Donald Trump. (ZUMAPRESS.com/Newscom)

In CA they give drivers licenses to illegals; and they have motor voter registration. It's not particularly controversial to say they voted en masse.

Also in the popular vote Trump did 50% or better in 23 of the 50 states, while Hillary achieved that in only 11 states. That too was a landslide.  Also a landslide was Trump's 304 electoral votes vs. Hillary's 227. Indeed, this 77 point difference gave Trump about 57% of the electoral vote vs. Hillary's 43%, a double-digit 14% margin. How is that not a landslide?
 
 
Moreover, Trump's 304 electoral votes was the most of any GOP presidential candidate since 1988 when Vice President George H.W. Bush, with 426 votes, crushed Democrat Michael Dukakis. On the other hand, Hillary's 227 electoral votes was the least of any Democrat candidate since 1988 when Dukakis won a mere 111 votes.
 
Now though Bush's 1988 landslide was hugely greater than Trump's, it wasn't a win he had to work his butt off like Trump had to do. For Bush was the VP of one of the greatest presidents in American history: Ronald Reagan-who ended the perilous Cold War and left office with a booming, high growth, good jobs economy that greatly benefited the middle class. As Bush vowed to stay Reagan's course it was virtually impossible for him not to win, and win big. 
 
 
 
 
BARACK OBAMA: THE NEW RONALD REAGAN?
 
And this brings me to the subject of Obama's failed prediction for 2016 that he made last year. For some time now Obama (the great anti-Reagan) has laughably fancied himself the Democratic version of Ronald Reagan. Indeed, like Reagan Obama believes he's a great historical world figure; that like Reagan he's been a transformational president making a huge positive impact on American and world history. This claim rests on the following seven claims: getting bin Laden (after 7 months of dithering indecisiveness, and wasn't the beginning of the end of al-Qaida as claimed); ending two wars (a flat-out lie); stopping Iran from getting the bomb (he just kicked the can down the road, and who knows what Iran and nuclear North Korea are secretly doing); the passing of Obamacare (was unpopular then and is so today); the Paris Climate Accord (based on hysterical catastrophic pseudo-science); saving the US auto industry from collapse (he co-saved with Bush only GM and Chrysler); and lastly his claim that the $800 billion stimulus prevented a second Great Depression (in reality Bush did that with TARP). 
 
 
In Obama's delusional mind he's the 21st century Ronald Reagan and loved as much as Reagan was. And based on this belief he imagined that the American people wanted a continuation of his presidency (like they did Reagan's). Indeed, cock sure that 2016 would be 1988 for him and Hillary Obama predicted that on November 8, 2016 (the 28th anniversary of Bush's defeat of Dukakis) Hillary would defeat the GOP nominee.
     
 
MY PREDICTION THAT 2016 WOULD BE MORE LIKE 1960 THAN 1988
 
But compared to Ronald Reagan Obama is a mental and moral pipsqueak; in contrast to 1988 the US economy and foreign policy of 2016 are a mess; and, consequently, most Americans wanted change. Moreover, candidate Clinton was no physically healthy, honest, ethical, scandal free George H.W. Bush. Differing from Obama I wrote that a better model for predicting the outcome of this year's election was 1960 not 1988 (see). This was the year when the charismatic northeastern Democrat JFK defeated the less likable, charmless Richard Nixon, who'd been the Republican Vice President of the very popular Dwight Eisenhower. Oddly, the 1960 election like this year's fell on a November 8th election date. And when the votes were counted JFK in a narrow victory won 303 electoral votes (one less than Trump's), or 58% to Nixon's 42% (nearly identical with Hillary's). Amazing, isn't it? Oh, by the way, 1946, the year of Trump's birth, is when both JFK and Nixon began their careers in politics (see).
 
 RELATED
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

OBAMA’S FAKE “BOOMING” ECONOMY AND THE PRO-GROWTH, BUSINESS FRIENDLY TRUMP PRESIDENCY

 

 

This is beyond belief insane. The desperate narrative being spun by the brain broken Ben Whites of the anti-Trump Left before Inauguration Day is that our lucky President-elect is inheriting a "booming" economy from Barack Obama-who fixed what was broken by Bush and the Republicans; that compared to eight years ago the economy is so healthy, sound, robust and strong that it's the "envy of the world;" that it's anything but the "worst recovery since the Great Depression," that Rush and Hannity endless complain of; that it's not the anemic, pathetic, trickle growth, bad jobs, declining wage and productivity disaster Trump (and Bernie Sanders) campaigned on backed by millions of  hurting, struggling, forgotten middle class Americans craving change as their fortunes shrank.
 
 
White glowingly writes:  "today's economy is in a radically different position from the one President-elect Barack Obama found himself in 2008 with markets crashing, the financial crisis spinning out of control and joblessness headed toward 10 percent."
 
 
What White says was true for most of post-crash September 2008. But truth be told when Obama took office the very worst was past as the economy he inherited from Bush was on the mend (see). According to the BEA the V-shaped GDP recovery (the beginning of the end of every recession) started in December 2008; then (according to BLS) this was followed in April by the V-shaped jobs recovery when the economy started to gain instead of losing jobs. By June 2009 (still Bushes economy) the Great Recession was over having zero to do with Obama's massive, historic $800 billion stimulus (which took a year to impact the economy). And the stimulus proved to be a hugely expensive and wasteful dud.
 
 
Indeed, the billions in stimulus funds given to states and taxpayers to stimulate spending on infrastructure projects (the shovel ready jobs that weren't ready), and buying goods and services was mostly used to pay down debt-not create jobs and grow the economy. By the end of 2010 (when most of the stimulus was spent) the recovery was so painfully weak that Obama (shocking the Left) extended the much vilified Bush tax rates another two years; he did this because he feared (under advisement from Christina Romer and Larry Summers) that a tax hike with the recovery so weak would reverse it, cause a double dip recession and cost him reelection. In short, the Obama stimulus (falsely claimed by him to have prevented a second Great Depression) was a monumental waste of money, stimulating only our ballooning debt.
 
 
Obama's monetary policy-low interest rates, massive money printing, quantitative easing and stock buybacks (which underlie the rigged 19,000 Dow and booming Wall Street economy)-has increased the wealth of the top 1% by billions; and robbed millions of poor and middle class folks out of billions in interest earnings on their bank accounts. And he complains about wealth inequality? HYPOCRITE!
 
But the Ben Whites on CNN and MSN assure us the economy is doing just great. They cite the 4.6% unemployment rate (lowest since 2007), inflation at 1.6%, and a soaring, record breaking historic 19,000 Dow as evidence of robust, kick ass growth and Obama's economic success. "Without Obama where would we now be?" these imbeciles ask.
 
 
 
But the 4.6% jobless rate (rejected by both Trump and Sanders as bogus that leaves out millions of long-term unemployed (see), the low inflation rate (that leaves out energy, food and clothing), and the sky-high Dow (artificially created by low interest rates, massive money printing and record buybacks) are out of sync with harsh economic and fiscal realities that fill most sane people with dread.
 
 
 
The worrisome truth is this: if the economy was so strong (miles from the Great Recession) then interest rates wouldn't be so abysmally low at under 1% (it's been that way for ten years now). If all the happy talk about the economy were reality based rates would be at 5%, where they were before the start of the 18 month recession. .75% interest rates after ten years in which time $trillions have been borrowed, spent and printed is an infallible indicator on just how weak the economy is; how out of sync with reality the jobless and inflation rates and Dow are; and how fearful Fed Chief Janet Yellen is that raising rates too high could crash the economy all over again. And just what are the underlying weaknesses of the economy that so worries Yellen, myself and others?
 
 
To begin with (as we learn from a recent Gallup report see)  American productivity has been declining for 30 years (it's now at 1% growth per annum and falling); and neither Republicans nor Democrats have stopped and reversed it. And while America's been growing less productive and poorer the entitlement state (the largest part of the Federal budget) has been vastly expanding (9.5% per year) along with growth crushing regulations (costing $250 billion annually, and hundreds of billions more on waste, fraud and illegal immigrants. Moreover, we have declining incomes with a staggering $66 trillion in bankrupting debt ($24 trillion in federal and state and $42 trillion in private/consumer debt). We are the greatest debtor nation in world history on an unsustainable course; and this is what the Obama koolaid drinkers call a healthy, robust victorious economy? And what Obama congratulates himself on week after week along with saying that he's "ended two wars"? The man is worse than stupid, he's delusional.
 
 
As Obama has spent the last seven years playing the community organizer and focusing on redistributing (not creating) wealth, and spreading the poison of government dependency (expanding the welfare state that traps millions in poverty) soon like Greece before it crashed we're reaching the tipping point of no return where takers will outnumber makers (moochers overshadowing tax payers) in a crisis culture of collapsing dependency and strife.Yet everything is sweetness and light.
 
 
 
You get the picture. Despite appearances to the contrary Trump is inheriting a colossal, unsustainable mess. A progressively weakening economy bordering on a disaster (like Trump says) masked by happy talk, lies, statistical trickery and market manipulation to create a false wealth effect. But millions of forgotten Americans on the Right and Left aren't fooled. The more they hear the economy praised the more they puke. For they know that it's really the Wall Street economy being praised, which has vastly enriched the 1%, not Main Street's which has gained average working folks dreck.
  
Blest are we to have an incoming pro-growth, fiscally conservative ("under budget ahead of schedule") president who sees through the bull and understands the danger that we're in. The right man at the right time in history to reverse our economic, military and geopolitical decline that's imperiling our prosperity, security and national strength, and make America strong, secure, feared, respected and great again.  
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
                                     

HYPOCRITE OBAMA’S INTERFERENCE WITH FOREIGN ELECTIONS AND HIS LAX CYBER SECURITY ADMINISTRATION INVITING RUSSIAN ATTACKS

 
 
 
Atheist Paul Krugman praying for a miracle to keep Deporable Donald (the "Siberian Candidate") from the White House.
 
An angry and outraged Paul Krugman (who still bitterly thinks that Bush lost the 2000 election) believes that the 2016 presidential race was very badly "tainted"-which is his polite way of saying "covered in mud." Why? Because his ideologically pure candidate Hillary lost to someone he fears and loathes like no President-elect in his lifetime. Unwilling to see the truth on how weak and awful a candidate Hillary was; and that Trump's underdog, Trumanesque victory was part of a GOP wave that continued the 2014 landslide, Krugman resorts to conspiracy theories about Russian hackers from the Kremlin influencing the outcome of the election. It's as if it were 1960 and Krugman was a John Bircher crediting the subversive Kremlin with JFK's victory. 
 
 
 
 Vice-president Joe Biden told NBC on October 16 that retaliation for Russia’s hacking attacks “will be at the time of our choosing, and under the circumstances that will have the greatest impact”.
 
But assuming that Krugman and the anti-Trump left are correct, that the Russians made Trump the 45th President-elect, then how can they avoid not pinning the blame ultimately on Obama? Isn't national security the president's constitutional duty and chief domain? Isn't it his responsibility to combat and counterattack cyber warfare from hostile foreign governments and entities? Indeed, how can Krugman et al not fault Obama for 2016 when he miserably failed to launch a punishing, devastating counterattack two years ago when Russian hackers breached White House security? Because Obama failed to strike back, teaching the Kremlin a lesson they'd never forget, emboldened they did it again and cost Hillary the election. Indeed, Joe Biden's threat in October to massively retaliate against Russia for Wikileaks was too little too late (see). 
 
 
Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee said: "I think it was a mistake earlier frankly [for Obama] not to react more forcefully to Russian hacking. I think those kind of -- that lack of deterrence invited the Russians to meddle some more and consider they could do this with impunity."
 
  

Indeed, where was Biden's and Obama's outrage and alarm two years ago over this act of war and espionage targeting the White House? Where was Klugman, the Times and the rest of the watchdog media? If it was Bush's White House that was hacked the media would have rightly raised hell over it turning it into a major cyber security scandal to embarrass him. But because Obama's White House was the victim the story went underreported to avoid making him look weak and incompetent. And what were the consequences? As Adam Schiff said: "It invited the Russians to meddle some more believing they could do so with impunity."  

In other words, if what Klugman and other Trump haters are alleging is the truth, that Russia hacked DNC emails to hurt Hillary and help Trump, the blame falls mostly on  Obama. PERIOD!

 
 
 
 
 
 
Click the above link and read about Barack Obama's shocking underreported intervention in Iraq's 2010 parliamentary election.
 
 
 

And how can Obama with a straight face fault Russia for allegedly interfering with our election when he's done that himself on occasion? And to allies no less? In 2014 Obama tried to sway the Israeli election against Bibi Netanyahu with well-funded (by US tax dollars) anti-Bibi operatives in Israel working to advance Isaac Herzog's Zionist Union Party to victory (see). 

And more recently the meddling mendacious moron publicly threatened the British people with economic consequences if they dared vote to leave the European Union. It doesn't get anymore hypocritical than this.

 
 
 

And then there's the issue of US cyber attacks and spying on allies and friends (like the European Union and Germany) that went on under Obama's nose, and would have continued (or may still be going on) had Eric Snowden not blown the whistle. What goes around comes around.

Can anyone produce a single voter who was swayed by Wikileaks (and/or James Comey) to vote for Donald Trump? Just one?

Indeed, if in the unlikely event the massive DNC/Podesta Wikileaks dump swayed the election in Trump's favor (making Julian Assange the culprit not Russia) the blame nonetheless falls squarely on Obama's incompetence in protecting our country. Perhaps if more of his focus had been on strengthening cyber security, not on the imaginary, doomsday "national and global security threat" of [so-called] man-made global warming, Hillary might be President-elect.

 
10 ways the Democratic primary has been rigged from the start
 

But in truth, the only election this year that was certainly, absolutely badly "tainted" was the DNC rigging the democrat primaries for Hillary against Bernie. Before the primary voting began 400 superdelegates were already pledged to Hillary. And the head of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz (a Clinton surrogate) pressured another 300 superdels to back Hillary. Hillary didn't win her party's nomination by democratic means and stole the election from Bernie (as hers was stolen by Obama in 2008). What is Hillary's actual theft compared to Wikileaks or James Comey allegedly and unprovably winning the election for Trump? 

We'll never know for sure what the outcome of a Trump-Sanders race would have been. But every major poll showed Sanders topping Trump by higher points than Hillary. And surely anti-globalist, populist Bernie with his message of economic nationalism for the forgotten working man would have done better than Hillary in the Rust Belt states where she lost the race.

However, in reality, what gave Donald Trump his landslide electoral victory (he won the popular vote in 60% of the states) was his blazing, defiant, outlandish, indefatigable WILL TO POWER-which weak, feckless, low energy Hillary couldn't match. I predicted last year that Hillary wouldn't keep pace with Trump if both were the nominees; and that's what happened. From August 1st to November 7th Trump held approximately 100 large rallies (up to four per day) to Hillary's less than 50 (see); that was her limit beyond which could have proved perilous to her health (she complained to NBC she found campaigning terribly exhausting).

Assange, Russia and Comey be damned! In the end it was force of nature, Herculean Trump's great energy, stamina and strength that moved mountains; that impressed the Republican and Independent electorate, swept them into an anti-establishment frenzy and propelled him to victory-sending millions of Dems into despair.

And here we are five weeks after election day with snowflake leftist Bill DeBlasio (emblematic of the mental breakdown of the left) offering therapy to city workers suffering from distress. Proving conclusively that liberalism is a mental disorder, and that he has no future as mayor; as four successful Trump years will send him to a psych ward stark raving mad.

RELATED

 
 

TURNING #NOT MY PRESIDENT ON ITS HEAD. FOLLOWING THEIR LOGIC BARACK OBAMA IS AN ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT 

11/9 ANTI-TRUMP HYSTERIA ENGULFS THE LEFT WHEN 11/9 IS 9/11 REVERSE

THE DEATH OF JANET RENO AND TOMORROW’S HISTORIC PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

DONALD TRUMP, THE CHAMPION CHICAGO CUBS AND THE YEAR OF THE UNDERDOG

THE JILL STEIN (OR JILLARY) RECOUNT: AN EXERCISE IN DESPERATE, LAUGHABLE, ANTI-TRUMP FUTILITY

 

 

HOW TO SAVE CLEAN, GREEN, MESSIANIC WARMUNISM FROM THE WORLD DAMNING, DIRTY ENERGY TRUMP-PRUITT-TILLERSON REGIME

 

 
 
 
The Greenhouse Gas Gang of Three
 
 

QUESTION?  

 

How can we save clean, green, messianic   Warmunism (humanity's last best hope for climate    justice and peace) from the fascist, dirty, aggressive, big oil energy regime of Trump, Pruitt and Tillerson? What needs to be done to ensure its survival so it can continue its fight for the fate of the Earth, and a clean energy future?  

ANSWER

 Put it on the

Endangered Species List

together with

winter, snow and skiing
 

icebergs, polar caps and glaciers

penguins, polar bears and seals

 

above sea level coastal cities

AND

the Al Gores and DiCaprios of the world

 

Was the survival of their movement the topic of discussion at Trump's surprise meetings with these two great dedicated greenies?    

OR

(hat tip Sue2) 

did Trump convince them he was friendly to their cause? But for political reasons is hiding it? And that his $trillion plans for massively repairing America's crumbling infrastructure, and building a border security wall, are    scientifically valid DECARBONIZATION PROJECTS      using millions of tons of concrete to suck billions of tons of CO2 from the atmosphere?

 
 
 
WHAT BUILD BABY BUILD DONALD TRUMP HAS DONE TO FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE 
 
 
NOW WHAT HE PLANS TO DO
 
 
 

 

DISQUS DEBATE 

WHY DID DONALD TRUMP MEET WITH AL GORE AND DICAPRIO?

Was it to calm their fears that in reality he's not a climate denier? That he supports their cause but hides it for political reasons? And that his plans to fix America's crumbling infrastructure is a massive, Earth saving, scientifically valid DECARBONIZATION PROJECT?

SCWofTX ✔Trump Train  ApolloSpeaks   

To make it plain that they no longer have a chair at the WH table.

 

 

If that were so Gore wouldn't have said afterwards that he found his meeting with Trump "productive" and "extremely interesting."

SCWofTX ✔Trump Train  ApolloSpeaks 

Then said to be continued which means he made no headway

ApolloSpeaks   SCWofTX ✔Trump Train

Gore said the purpose of the meeting (set up by Trump not requested by Gore) was a "sincere search for common ground." If Trump had no intention of making peace with Wamunists why would he meet with two of their best known leaders?

SCWofTX ✔Trump Train  ApolloSpeaks   

Trump did not call him in to speak to him his daughter did and Gore made it a point to stop by Trumps office...Just tried to make it seem like Trump called him in

ApolloSpeaks   SCWofTX ✔Trump Train

Do you think Ivanka set up the meeting in defiance of her dad? Or that she's a whacko greenie?

 
 

RELATED

DONALD TRUMP’S PEARL HARBOR DAY COUNTER-OFFENSIVE AGAINST OBAMA’S WAR ON CO2 

 

THE DIRTY, IRREVERSIBLE, CATACLYSMIC INDUSTRIALIZING OF THE THIRD WORLD, OR YES WE HAVE NO $44 TRILLION TO STOP IT 

HOPELESSHAGEN, HOLLYWOOD AND SIGNS OF DEMISE FOR GLOBAL WARMING POLITICS

 

FROM BAN THE HYDROGEN BOMB TO BANNING HYDROCARBON FUELS: THE LEFT’S FAILED GLOBAL SALVATION MOVEMENTS

THE WORSENING CRISIS OF THE GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS

 

THE MAZE RUNNER, SOLAR SCORCHING AND THE END OF CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM 

< p style="box-sizing: border-box; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; text-transform: none; color: #141412; text-align: center; font: 16px/24px 'Source Sans Pro', Helvetica, sans-serif; margin: 0px 0px 24px; widows: 1; letter-spacing: normal; background-color: #ffffff; text-indent: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"> 

DONALD TRUMP’S PEARL HARBOR DAY COUNTER-OFFENSIVE AGAINST OBAMA’S WAR ON CO2

DECEMBER 7, 2016

PEARL HARBOR

DAY

 
 
 
Obama's former EPA chief Lisa Jackson announcing on December 7, 2009 that Carbon Dioxide is a dangerous pollutant.
 
It was a terrible Day of Infamy for the people of this great country that cost us dearly. No, I'm not alluding to December 7, 1941 when the imperial air force of fanatical, fascist Japan attacked us at Pearl Harbor destroying warships and planes and killing and injuring thousands. I'm alluding to another December 7th attack against our country that started 68 years later and without a bullet being fired. An attack not launched by a foreign enemy or government against our military, but by a powerful, prominent American politician...an enemy within; a man of staggering stupidity and ideological blindness whose policies have made a mess of this country costing our economy trillions in growth and private investment, and millions of good paying jobs; and that enemy, that man, that blind, stupid, reckless fool is Barack Hussein Obama.
 
 
It was December 7, 2009 in Washington DC (day one of the UN Climate Change Conference at Copenhagen see) when Obama began a major leftist assault on our economy, productivity and use of energy. It was a shot heard across the country fired by then EPA head Lisa Jackson (see), and aimed at American commerce and business and, more specifically, the fossil fuel industry-provider of the cheapest, most efficient and wealth creating form of energy known to man that over the centuries have lifted billions out of poverty.
 
 
Jackson speaking for the Enemy-in-Chief insanely and without basis in scientific reality declared (in science's name and the public good) that Carbon Dioxide (a harmless, natural, beneficial gas vital to plant growth and life) was a noxious, evil, deadly "POLLUTANT;" "it was," she said, "a poisonous health and life threatening substance that is driving global warming and endangering the welfare of Americans and peoples everywhere." And she warned that "human CO2 emissions must be drastically regulated and curtailed if America (and humanity) is to survive and have a future."
 
 
Then following Jackson's call for draconian cuts in carbon emissions an administration official went even further. Warning Congress that if it failed to pass "cap and trade legislation" (to control in a market based way carbon emissions from businesses and organizations) that the president would act directly; that he would apply top down "command and control emergency measures" to cap and cut carbon emissions nationally. Meaning that he would ruthlessly enact by executive decree (using the Clean Air Act) massively complex and costly regulations to drastically reduce CO2 pollution.
 
 
And since that infamous December 7th day our blackmailing, climate extremist president has made good on his threats. When Democrat led Congress failed to pass Cap and Trade he went to war big time against fossil fuels and CO2 using his phone and pen.
 
  
 
Indeed, from 2009-2015 the EPA created 35 new major regulations to reduce emissions at a cost of $54 billion (a conservative estimate) to our economy (see). And emissions were reduced as America fell behind China as the greatest CO2 polluter on Earth (see).
 
 
 
But unhappy with the progress that he made Obama in 2014 rolled out with a new massive unconstitutional emissions cutting program. Called the "Clean Power Plan (CPP)" it was hailed by Obama "as the biggest and most important step we've ever taken to control climate change."  Which is beyond the powers of man.
 
 
The CPP has dozens of job killing, growth crushing regulations to limit carbon emissions at power plants by replacing cheaper and more efficient fossil fuels (to generate electricity) with more expensive and less reliable clean, renewable energy technologies (solar, wind, etc). The estimated economic cost of CPP in higher energy prices to consumers, working families and businesses is a whopping $479 billion over ten years (see).
 
 
 
It is estimated that  each one of the  6,000,000,000 human beings on this planet    exhales on average 1000 lbs per year of the "deadly pollutant" CO2 (see). That means that  collective humanity exhales about 6,000,000,000,000 lbs per year of the  gas, or 3,000,000,000 tons. In other words fossil fuels aren’t the only major source of carbon poisoning the air. And then there are billions of breathing animals.
 
And what would be accomplished for this price? Practically nothing: a slight, meaningless, miniscule reduction in CO2 levels compared to the immense greenhouse gas output worldwide-especially from dirty industrializing, populous third world states like China, India and Indonesia with their growing, massive use of fossil fuels (see).
 
 
Knowing that CPP would do little to lower overall world carbon output Obama nevertheless presses on believing that the great expense to Americans will pay off in the long run. How? By setting an example to other nations. Our cutting emissions at great cost to ourselves would inspire other nations to follow suit and make similar sacrifices to their wealth and standard of living. In short, America (and messiah Obama) would lead the way in saving the planet from (nonexistent) Catastrophic Anthropogenic (made caused) Global Warming (CAGW). And such is the imbecile we have in the White House who, thank God, will soon be gone.  
 
DECEMBER 7, 2016
 
  
 
But Wednesday December 7th (the 7th anniversary of Obama launching his massive EPA Pearl Harbor attack) something quite extraordinary happened: Donald Trump announced his choice for EPA chief: Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt. Pruitt, a conservationist (clean air and water guy), and AGW denier, who has battled for years the EPA's anti-fossil fuels and CO2 regime, is the perfect man for the job of dismantling and reversing Obama's destructive clean energy policies.
 
 
Pruitt is Donald Trump's counter-offensive against the aggressive, doomsday, warmunist enemy within:-Obama and the powerful environmental lobby. And the signs of Trump surmounting every obstacle and killing Obamunism are remarkably auspicious. For Trump is the 7th President from New York after FDR, our greatest wartime leader next to Lincoln who led our country to unconditional victory over Japan. And when the electorate made Trump its 45th President it fell right smack on the 84th anniversary of Roosevelt's defeat of Herbert Hoover*.
 
*November 8, 1932
 
 
Trump has a "Rendezvous with Destiny" to be the Republican FDR minus the New Deal.
 
This I believe is an unmistakable sign that the Left's worst fears about Trump and Pruitt are about to be realized; and that they're about to do to Obama's economically destructive, anti-business clean energy agenda what FDR and the US military did to the Japanese because of Pearl Harbor. Think of the Paris Climate Accord and the lawless Clean Power Plan as Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and you have a good idea of the horror that lies ahead for the insane, doomsday, messianic Left. 
  
 
The Apocalypse of the Left is near. If they can't save themselves how can they save the world?
  

RELATED

DECEMBER 7, THE EPA AND THE COMING ECONOMIC PEARL HARBOR ?

THE DIRTY, IRREVERSIBLE, CATACLYSMIC INDUSTRIALIZING OF THE THIRD WORLD, OR YES WE HAVE NO $44 TRILLION TO STOP IT 

HOPELESSHAGEN, HOLLYWOOD AND SIGNS OF DEMISE FOR GLOBAL WARMING POLITICS

 

FROM BAN THE HYDROGEN BOMB TO BANNING HYDROCARBON FUELS: THE LEFT’S FAILED GLOBAL SALVATION MOVEMENTS

THE WORSENING CRISIS OF THE GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS

 

THE MAZE RUNNER, SOLAR SCORCHING AND THE END OF CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM 

MUSCULAR AMERICA FIRST DONALD TAKES ON RED CHINA

 

 
 
 
Donald Trump's call with Taiwan's leader T'sia  Lng -wen.
 
IT APPEARS THAT MUSCULAR, ART OF THE DEAL, ANTI-COMMUNIST DONALD
 
has made his first, bold AMERICA FIRST move to eliminate our massive $300 billion, jobs killing trade deficit with Red China; and to defend FREE ASIA and the China Seas from their aggression.
 
 
 
No longer will the free capitalist economy of the world's mightiest nation bow to the "socialist market economies" of any freedom hating, one party, oppressive state.
 
 
 
 
ASS KISSING, GIRLIE MAN OBAMUNISM IS DEAD!
 
 
 
 The totalitarian Chicoms must be crapping  in their murdering Maoist pants. EVIL RESPECTS STRENGTH!  Donald Trump is the 21st century Ronald Reagan with the power to bring down Red China like Reagan the     evil Soviet Empire. If Trump should visit China it's tyrants won't dare give him the humiliating treatment it gave Obama.
 
BEFORE
 
 
 

 AFTER

POSTSCRIPT

 WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OBAMA AND THE RED CHINESE?

ANSWER

They're better at being communists.

 

POSTSCRIPT II 

The Dalai Lama Weighs in on Trump’s Presidency: ‘I Have No Worries’ | Mediaite

 

Why should he worry? The Dalai knows he has an ally in Donald Trump, and won’t have to come into the White House by the kitchen entrance anymore.

RELATED 

 
 

ONE CHEER FOR MAD DOG MATTIS AS DEFSEC

 

Mattis Pick Would Risk Confirmation Fight with Pro-Israel Groups-Breitbart.com

 
 
If George "Blood and Guts" Patton were alive today Trump would make him Secretary of Defense to demonstrate his seriousness about putting the fear of hell and destruction in our enemies, and making America strong, great and respected again. But absent Patton Trump believes he has his reincarnation in James "Mad Dog" Mattis. And perhaps he is right. But as a strong pro-Israel American Jew I cannot enthusiastically support Mattis' nomination like many Trump supporters are doing. Why?
 
 
Because he's a borderline anti-Zionist who backed Obama's harsh policies toward Israel and mistreatment of Bibi Netanyahu. Because like Obama and Kerry (and Clinton before him) Mattis blames the Jewish state for its ongoing decade's long conflict with the Palestinians. What this means is that like Obama, Clinton and Kerry Mattis believes in the lie that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas (a warmed over Arafat in disguise) is a real peace partner for Israel (as if he were an Anwar Sadat see) willing to end the conflict (which he's not). And Mattis wants to alter the perception of America's bias toward Israel (which "damages us with moderate Arabs," he says) by forcing Netanyahu to negotiate a two state solution with Abbas (which is not in his cards). Moreover, sounding like Jimmy Carter Mattis claims that Israel's settlements on the West Bank are turning it into an "Apartheid " state (which isn't true) and wants their complete dismantlement.
jamesmattismeme2
Truth is, it's Israel's existence as a Western, non-Moslem, infidel state on land once ruled by imperialist Islam, that underlies the 68 year old Arab/Moslem-Israeli conflict. Currently, from the Arab veiw point, there's only two possible solutions to this conflict: 1) Israel's conversion to Islam, or 2) it's annihilation; this latter solution is subdivided into the violent, radical, Hamas/Hezbollah/Iranian way of war; or the  slow, non-violent, long-term Abbas way of political, cultural and social subversion through mass Palestinian refugee immigration; this is Abbas's gradual, incremental one state solution where Israeli Jews will live as an oppressed minority in a larger Arab state (if they're lucky).
 
Hopefully Trump's pick for Secretary of State will reverse Obama's anti-Israel policies instead of continuing them like Mattis madly wants to do. One cheer for Mad Dog Mattis. Because of his bias toward Arabs he doesn't deserve anymore.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

BERSERKO PROGRESSIVE LEFT PREDICTS TRUMP WILL WORSEN OBAMA’S WEALTH GAP, KILL THE MIDDLE CLASS AND CAUSE A GREAT DEPRESSION

 

Obama admits 95% of income gains gone to top 1% - CNN Money 

 

Under Obama (the failed community, redistribution, social justice organizer) the Wall Street economy has mightily boomed breaking all sorts of records; while the Main Street economy has deplorably sagged financially breaking millions of working class families. Obama waged class warfare against the rich, but ironically his policies helped them to win. Yet despite his self-caused defeat Obama's still a hero to the progressive, anti-capitalist Left. Why? Because he's a likable, charismatic left-wing black man whose "heart is in the right place;" and whose failures are blamed on an obstructionist Congress, FOX News, and hostile right-wing talk shows that he couldn't overcome-showing a failure of leadership, governing skills and know how. Despite his fairly high approval rating Obama is perhaps the most popular failed president in American history-his biggest political failure of which was using his popularity to win the presidency for Hillary.

 

 

During Obama's reign of error (with a trickle growth economy so fragile and weak that the Fed, fearing a recession, won't dare raise interest rates) the rich have gotten vastly, hugely, enormously richer in a transfer of wealth to the top 1% unseen since the days of the "Robber Barons." And like the criminal, oppressive Castros (one of the richest robber baron families on Earth) Obama's lauded as a champion of the little guy by an insane, out of touch liberal media, academia, and the Democrat establishment. It's mind-boggling!

 

 

After the crash of 2008 wiped out trillions the rich, under Obama, have recovered magnificently seeing their fortunes rise galactically. This is due mainly to the greatest, fraudulent government manipulation of the stock market in US and world history-growing the millionaire's and billionaire's club while impoverishing the middle class and swelling the ranks of the poor.  And none of this is the Republicans' fault.

 

 

Obama_income_inequality_Fox News
 

Benefiting from the Obama/Bernanke/Yellin policies of near zero interest rates (robbing billions from savings accounts), multi-trillion dollar money printing (devaluing the dollar and hurting purchasing power), and quantitative easing (artificially boosting stock values to historic highs) the top 1% since 2009 increased its wealth by 11.2%+; while the rest of us poor suckers saw a mere increase of 0.2%. Indeed, under Obama's policies the top 1% took an astonishing, unprecedented 93 cents out of every new dollar earned; under Bush they took 65 cents; under Clinton 45 cents. That equates to a staggering 112% increase over the Clinton years (see) due mostly to a rigged, over bought stock market-a bubble that sooner or latter is going to burst and come down to earth. 

 

 

 

 

Indeed, and quite unexpectedly, Obama's economic, fiscal and monetary policies hugely aggravated the wealth gap paving the way for the revolt of the forgotten, collapsing, disappearing middle class-that underlie the rise of Bernie Sanders on the Left and Trump on the Right; and led to the defeat of Wall Street's big money darling:  corrupt, two-faced lying, pay to play Hillary.

 

 

But now because of billionaire Donald's super rich 1% cabinet picks the Obama kool-aid drinking, business hating Left are predicting the absolute, catastrophic worst for this country. Seven weeks before Trump takes office they think they see the future with perfect prophetic clarity when they've been dead wrong about this man all along: wrong about him not surviving the first GOP debate ("he'll be laughed off the stage," they said); wrong about him never being the GOP nominee ("it will be Cruz, Rubio or Kaisich ," they said); wrong that the sex tape and groping lies had ruined his electability ("it made Hillary more likable and electable," they said); wrong he had no path to 270, and would lose in a Goldwater-like landslide    dragging down the Republican Party with him. 

 

 
 

But despite their failed record of pre-election predictions the Left is doubling down. Now with infallible certainty they see the next great depression ahead impoverishing and gutting our country and world; they believe with Michael Moore and Dana Milbank that "11/9 Trump" is the new Herbert Hoover (a 9/11 disaster in the making, see); that during his presidency Trump will crash Obama's over inflated stock market and weak, low growth economy throwing millions out of work; that his protectionist policies will start an international trade war killing US exports; and that after four or eight years of Trump the declining, dying, vanishing middle class will completely disappear and be a thing of the past. For the Left Trump has replaced fossil fuels and climate change as the greatest menace to humanity-more terrifying than ISIS, al-Qaida and all Islamic terrorists combined.

 

 
 

And when America is reduced to rubble and dust Trump (backed by the army and cops) will repeal and replace our democracy with a one party, totalitarian, white supremacist oligarchy; and he'll sign an executive decree making himself president for eternity. And the only hope of stopping him is the desperate Jillary three state recount (see); or the Electoral College waking up and making Hillary president.

 

 

This is the thinking that's breaking the brains of the berserko, unhinged, anti-Trump Left. And because of this I stopped watching Hannity,  O'Reilly, Tucker and FOX. It's way more fun seeing Trump drive Blitzer, Matthews, Cuomo  and Joe completely batshit loco. 

 

RELATED

 

11/9 ANTI-TRUMP HYSTERIA ENGULFS THE LEFT WHEN 11/9 IS 9/11 REVERSE 

 

BARACK OBAMA: THE PRESIDENT WHO SAVED THE U.S. AND WORLD ECONOMY FROM A SECOND GREAT DEPRESSION?

 

MR. PRESIDENT: THE ECONOMY SUCKS BECAUSE YOU’RE A LEFTIST IGNORAMUS