Monthly Archives: March 2017

DONALD TRUMP, CALIFORNIA’S DYING DROUGHT AND THE END OF CATASTROPHIC MAN CAUSED GLOBAL WARMING

 

 
 
  
 

Rainstorms Wash Away Drought in More than 90 Percent of California | NBC Bay Area

 

A map by the US Drought Monitor showing California drought conditions from Oct. 26, 2016 to Jan. 25, 2017.
 
A recent huge, major blow to the eroding credibility of ideology driven doomsday warmunists (the "settled science global warming  consensus") was the unforeseen end (defying their Nostra-doom-us computer climate models) of what was forecast to be California's "endless, permanent, ever worsening, disastrous drought." From Barack Obama on down what has now turned out to be a short-lived five-year drought (one of many such events over California's 166 years as a state) was ominously pointed to as conclusive, indisputable, settled scientific proof of catastrophic, world dooming anthropogenic global warming (CAGW)-with worse, much worse to come for the great Southwest and the United States.
 
 
In 2014 former NASA scientist and climate activist James Hansen (who'd been laughably warning for decades of worsening global heat waves and droughts amidst vast global greening due to rising, beneficial CO2 levels) said, “Increasingly intense droughts in California, all of the Southwest, and even into the Midwest have everything to do with human-made climate change.” Other climate alarmists hysterically warned, "California is now in the DEATH-GRIP of a brutal,  record breaking drought....." "The [entire] U.S. may NEVER AGAIN return to the relatively wet conditions experienced from 1977 to 1999.” “In the Southwest the [computer climate] models project a PERMANENT DRYING by the mid-21st century that will reach the levels of aridity not seen before in historical droughts...." And on and on went the fake science trickery, bad predictions and lies.
 
 
We were authoritatively told that the burning of fossil fuels, heat trapping CO2 emissions and increased warming of the atmosphere was either the primary cause or an aggravating factor of rainlessness, aridity, drought and (referring to the US droughts of the 1930s) dust-bowlification in California. For warminists like Hansen, Obama and Gore the so-called "record breaking" California drought was emblematic of what stupid, blind, ignorant, self-destructive, fossil fuel burning mankind was doing to planet earth, and ultimately to itself. That if man stayed the "perilous course" of oil, coal and gas-powered industrial capitalism (that's lifting millions out of extreme poverty in third world states) he would dangerously Californiaize the planet; that eventually arid, rainless, dry conditions would engulf the world causing global crop failure, famine, malnutrition, starvation, disease and massive death; Hansen and others predicted this holocaust was historically inevitable and was our horrific future if mankind didn't dramatically reign in and reverse his use of carbon emitting fuels. "Deindustrialize or Die" is their message of salvation to mankind-while proposing economic schemes of taxing carbon and hiking fossil fuel prices that are hyper inflationary, ruinous and politically impossible.
 
 
And then came the rains (as they did after the last two less severe five year droughts ending in the 30s and 90s) to dampen down the dumb hysteria and flush the climate lies down the drain. But even before the rains fell the big lie was that the drought was the worst in California's history; that its soil had never been so parched, dry and desert like; while this may have been true for California in its 166 years as a state (some dispute this see), it wasn't true, as the lying, deceptive, mendacious warmunists knew, for the last 1166 years.
 
 
MEDIEVAL CALIFORNIA MEGA DROUGHTS 
 
Scientists tell us that beginning in the year 850 and ending in 1320 California and the Southwest US experienced two pre-industrial era MEGA-DROUGHTS separated by 50 years: a 240 year drought from 850-1190; and a 180 year drought from 1140 to 1320 (see). 
 
 
These two mega-droughts occurred during what scientists call
the Medieval Warm Period (WPM); this was one of three world-wide interglacial warming epochs including our own (the first being the Roman Warm Period 250 BC-450 AD) which occurred over the last 2300 years when global temperatures have been proven to be warmer than they are today; this has been shown in hundreds of peer-reviewed studies ignored by the "CAGW concensus" as it makes nonsense of their unscientific war on fossil fuels, CO2 and "dirty" industrialization (see).
 
HOTTER TEMPS IN MEDIEVAL CALIFORNIA
 
Indeed, one such study (and this didn't surprise me) shows that coincident with its two long, devastating medieval droughts California's temperature was 3.0 C higher than it is today - and with significantly less atmospheric CO2 ( 270 ppm vs. 400ppm today       see). You can't have clearer proof showing the lack of any correlation between CO2 and intense global warming which is at the crux of CAGW theory. You can't have clearer proof on how badly warmunists exaggerate and distort the heat trapping and warming capabilities of CO2 - and falsely claim we are living in the hottest, most perilous period in human history. If their theories were correct temperatures would be catastrophically soaring, seas destructively acidifying, and millions dying from extreme heat, crop destruction and famine. But none of this is happening.
 
 
It is ironic that several days after climate realist Donald Trump's historic inauguration, and his promise of turning America into a fossil fuel superpower to make our economy great again, the terrible drought in California (defying unrealistic warmunist predictions) was declared at an end. As human activities had nothing to do with the drought there was nothing man could do to end it; and as global warming is the work of nature no policy of Trump's can effect it for better or worse. The media is now demonizing Trump as the greatest single contemporary threat (worse than Islamic terrorism)     to this planet and civilization. But this is the desperate cries of a dying order. It's the fanatical warmunist elite Trump is threatening and their pseudo-scientific messianic movement to save a world that's thriving, and not in peril or dying; and will thrive even more from the powerful, indefatigable, America first  presidency of Donald J. Trump.
 
 
 
UPDATE
 
 
 
RELATED
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

JFK’S FIRST 100 DAYS VS. DONALD TRUMP’S, TRUMP/JFK PARALLELS AND TRUMP’S WEALTHY PREDECESSORS

 

After talking with Trump, Bill Gates likens president-elect to JFK - CNBC.com

 
 

WHICH IS WORSE?

I REPEAT FROM FRIDAY

President Kennedy's Bay of Pigs fiasco (in his first 100 days), with its 118 dead anti-Castro commandos, 360 wounded, and 1200 captured prisoners? Or President Trump's temporary setback in repealing and replacing "CRAZY (Bill Clinton)," "MISTAKEN (Chuck Schumer)," "TRAINWRECK (Max Baucus)" imploding Obamacare?

Indeed, if nothing worse happens to our 45th President in the next 45 days he will have a more successful first 100 days than did JFK. Moreover, if in the next 45 days Trump and the GOP implement JFK type, across the board, supply-side tax cuts on individuals and corporations (that sent the 60's economy soaring) GDP growth will easily more than double in the years ahead adding $10 trillion to our flat to failing economy; and that will win Trump a second term, just as JFK would have won had he lived.

TRUMP/JFK PARALLELS AND COINCIDENCES

 Bill Gates, Chris Matthews (in a sober moment) and others have likened Donald Trump to JFK; and they were right in doing so as you shall see from the following  parallels, analogies and coincidences:  

1.Trump like JFK was born into great wealth and privilege.

2. Both are Geminis.

3. Both came from the northeastern United States.

4. Both have glamorous, classy, intelligent wives.

5. In 1946, the year Trump was born, JFK started his political career running for and winning a seat in the House of Representatives.

6. On November 5, 1946 when JFK won his House seat Donald Trump, the future 45th President, was 145 days old (see)*.

7. 45 is a multiple of 15 3x. On the day Donald Trump was born JFK was 1515 weeks old. 1515 is a factor of the number 4545 3x (see)*.

8. Trump was elected president in a tight race on the 56th anniversary of JFK's close victory over Richard Nixon (11-08-1960)*.

9. 20455 days separate both elections-a five digit number encoded with the number 45 (see)*.

10. JFK's and Trump's president numbers (35 and 45) end in the number 5. 

11. Both men succeeded popular two term presidents of the  opposing party.

12. Both became president when their respective parties controlled both houses of congress.

13. Both believe in the efficacy of creative tax cuts to stimulate robust economic growth.

14. Both are pro-military, peace through strength, patriotic nationalists.

15. Both came into office having trouble with an aggressive, imperialist, hostile Russia.  

*NOTE

For those of my readers who believe in God, and that America is a special nation under His Providential guidance, I ask you this: is it possible that JFK's close victory over Richard Nixon on a November 8th election date prophetically anticipated that the 45 president would also win in a close race on that same date, and like JFK not be of the incumbent party?

There are many signs that I discovered showing that the President is a Providential Man. Could this also be one of them?

DONALD TRUMP AND HIS WEALTHY, PRIVILEGED PREDECESSORS

 

 

As Trump haters mock and ridicule the President for his good fortune of being born into privilege and wealth it is fascinating to note that he is the fifth consecutive president elected on November 8 that was born this way. These other fortunate presidents were as follows: GHW Bush (Nov. 8, 1989), John F. Kennedy (Nov. 8, 1960), Franklin Roosevelt (Nov. 8, 1932), and Teddy Roosevelt (Nov. 8, 1904). Three of the five, Trump and the two Roosevelts, were born in New York; and the remaining two, Bush and Kennedy, were born in Massachusetts. All five hail from the great northeast; and the first four (anticipating Trump I believe) were successful presidents*.  

*George H. W. Bush was one of the most successful one term presidents in US history.

BTW, in 1892, before Teddy Roosevelt's election, Grover Cleveland was elected on Nov. 8. Though not born into wealth Cleveland was a New Jersey born resident of New York at the time of his election.  

RELATED

EXTRAORDINARY NEW DISCOVERIES ON THE PROVIDENTIAL DEATH OF JOHN F. KENNEDY  

THE TRUMPSLIDE AND OBAMA’S FAILED HILLARY/ BUSH 41 PREDICTION VS. MY TRUMP-JFK PREDICTION 

DONALD TRUMP, THE MAGNIFICENT 7 AND THE AMAZING SIGN I SAW WHICH MIGHT SIGNAL A TRUMP VICTORY 

1946 AND 1947: THE REMARKABLE YEARS DONALD TRUMP AND HILLARY CLINTON WERE BORN AND WHAT IT COULD MEAN FOR THEIR PRESIDENTIAL RUNS

CASTRO DIED ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF JFK KILLER LEE HARVEY OSWALD’S BURIAL AND DEATH -WHAT COULD IT MEAN?

 
 
 

VICTORY FOR ANTI-OBAMACARE LITE FOES! AND THE SIGN OF THE STAMP ACT (PREFIGURING BY 7 YEARS OBAMACARE’S INEVITABLE DEMISE)

 
 
 
VICTORY FOR ANTI-OBAMACARE LITE FOES!
 
As for President Trump (who was led astray by Paul Ryan) it's just a temporary setback on the way to repeal and replace "CRAZY (Bill Clinton)," MISTAKEN (Chuck Schumer)" "TRAINWRECK (Max Baucus)" Obamacare.
 
The celebration of Democrats over the Trump/Ryan failure is laughable. House and Senate Republicans one and all (and most rank and file party members) are united on ends and divided on means. They are hell-bent and unified on wanting to repeal and replace collapsing, imploding, impoverishing, class warfare  Obamacare, but differ on how to do it. When they resolve their differences, which I'm confident they will do soon, Obamacare will join Romneycare, Hillarycare and Single Payer (Bernie Sanders)
    Vermontcare on the ash heap of history.
 
 
 
See my prediction of Obamacare's inevitable repeal and demise based on the 18th century repeal of the Stamp Act. This ancient sign of liberty from unfair taxation and oppression shows that Obamacare was doomed from the start and doesn't have a future.
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 

DESPERATE DESTROY TRUMP MEDIA LAUGHABLY HANG HOPES ON COMEY TO BRING DOWN TRUMP

 
 
 
 
 
 
The desperate, vicious, failing, destroy-Trump-at-any-cost alt-left media as of yesterday have a strange new champion and political hero: FBI Director James Comey. Strange because less than five short months ago in the 11th hour of a tightening presidential race (11 days before the election) Comey delt an unexpected blow (a late "October surprise") to their sure to win darling candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton: Comey (without conferring with Obama's pro-Clinton "tarmac" Justice Department) sent a letter informing Congress that the FBI is reopening its investigation into Hillary's email server. That Comey should now be lauded as a hero by anti-Trumpers after being viciously demonized over the Hillary probe (that definitely cost her many late undecided voters and maybe the election) is strange in itself; but stranger still is this sudden love affair after learning yesterday that the TeamTrump-Russia probe started in July, five months before the election and not afterwards-which have some Clinton people badly and understandably upset (see).
 
 
Indeed, my question to Trump-haters is this: why does James Comey have any credibility with you as an impartial investigator when there's hard evidence that he's anything but? That he's partisan, corrupt and opportunistic? Why do you trust that he's heading a fair, honest, unbiased probe of the Trump campaign team's alleged ties to Russia when he kept it under wraps for eight months? When on the very day he reopened the Hillary case he went public with it knowing it would dominate the news cycle until Election Day and hurt Hillary politically (not that I care)? Why aren't you furious after learning that Comey zipped his lips until yesterday about the existence of a Trump campaign probe? Why the silence in July about Trump but not in October about Hillary? Why did Comey keep the Trump probe hidden for the four months prior to the election, and then publicly reveal it 18 weeks later when Trump was securely in power? Why did Comey wait so long? Didn't you, I and the public have a right to know?
 
 
The real question is this: was Republican Comey in collusion with the Trump campaign? Like Vladimir Putin, did Comey favor Trump (the border security, law and order, anti-jihad candidate) over Hillary (perceived to be weak on crime, border security and terrorism)? Did Comey at the last moment deliberately interfere in the election (doing it by design) to enable Hillary's defeat and endear himself to irate Republicans so he could keep his job if Trump should win? Was that Comey's self-serving plan? 
 
 
Schiff: We know less than a fraction of what the FBI knows. 
 
Really, Trump haters, how can you be certain that Comey wasn't a weaponized arm of the Trump campaign, and now of the Trump White House, and is putting on a show of impartiality? How can you be sure that when Trump (rejecting calls from Democrats to fire Comey) allowed him to continue as FBI chief he wasn't being rewarded for his October surprise that may have won Trump the White House (as both Hillary and Nate Silver believe see)? Indeed, if Comey finds a smoking gun that could hurt one or more of Trump's associates, or the big man himself, how can you be sure that he won't suppress it-as Adam Schiff recently accused him of doing with a sh*t load of information (see)?
 
 
 
Face the facts Trump haters: with James Clapper two weeks ago telling Chuck Todd that he saw no evidence from the FBI and other intel agencies of criminal collusion between Team Trump and Russia, and with Comey seemingly Trump's man and unreliable to disclose any crimes that have or may come to light since, things are looking mighty grim for you. Comey is not your last best hope for bringing down Trump. In hoping he is you're setting yourselves up for another disappointment (remember Gropergate?). Trump's MAGA revolution disruptively rolls on while you squirm and burn unable to stop him.  
 
O
 
RELATED  
 
MY ANALYSIS OF THE "COMEY EFFECT"
 
 
 
 
 
 

FUNNY AS HELL: DESPER8 DEFEATED TRUMP H8ERS PROGNOSTIC8 SHORT 8 MONTH PRESIDENCY FOR TRUMP-AND OTHER CRAZY LEFTIST THINGS

 

 
 
 

I posted this on Disqus:

WE'RE IN THE FIRST 100 DAYS OF 8 EPOCH MAKING MAGA TRUMP YEARS

THE TRUMP H8ERS REPLY

With Trump constantly throwing temper tantrums and running to his safe space at Mar A Lago, only a retard would assume he's going to be president for 8 months let alone 8 years.

At this rate of unbridled serial lying, I doubt he'll last 8 months before the Republicans impeach him.

You adore a goddamn liar.

You own it.

 

RobbieFreeman Apollospeaks 

 

Perhaps you mean 8 months?

 

 

He's not physically able to do eight months. We've had two presidents in a row who were in great physical shape, and they were visibly aged by the job. By month 8 Trump will be so worn out and sick that he'll be unable to continue. And If I'm wrong then by then he'll be impeached and removed from office. Only koolaid drinking Trumpbots think he'll last longer

MY REPLY

Wasn't it loony vicious Trump h8ers like you three fools who laughed hysterically when Trump announced his run for the presidency, anticip8ing an embarrassing clown show that would damage the Republican Party? Indeed, didn't masterminds like you predict with cocksure certainty that Trump's campaign would be short-lived and collapse after 8 weeks with no one taking him seriously? That he wouldn't make it past the first GOP deb8? That Cuze, Bush, Christe and the rest would totally eviser8 and humili8 him in front of a national audience?

And then after the 8th deb8 with Trump standing strong and winning primaries what did you geniuses predict? That if he became his party's candid8 Hillary would decim8 him in a 48 st8 sweep? Remember the Hillaryslide? And when you said that Trump was so badly toxic his defeat would be worse than Barry Goldwater's?

Then just weeks before the election in early October (the 8th month of the old Roman calendar) you convinced yourself the campaign was virtually over. That Trump was a dead candid8 walking because of the scandalous lewd Groperg8 tape, and the 8 fems who charged him with sexual harassment (see). Do you recall how el8ed you were as the media turned Trump into sexual predator? And how woman voters would reject him big time?

But 8 hours into election night what was your f8? You 8 your hearts out as Hillary went str8 down in flames losing Pennsylvania in a tight race - with Trump getting 48% of the vote. Remember your shock and disbelief as if the laws of God and N8ure were suddenly termin8ed and an altern8 reality where nothing made sense set in? Then came your post-election h8fest with baseless alleg8ions that Trump was Putin's criminal soul m8 and they conspired together to steal the election. How has that worked out for you after a lengthy FBI investig8ion turned up squat?

  And here you are just 8 short weeks into Trump's disruptive presidency frustr8ed beyond measure making the same mistake of underr8ing him; predicting he'll have the shortest time in office since John Kennedy, and be impeached for a worse crime than Waterg8? Do you really think that 8 months from now you'll be celebra8ing Trump vac8ing the White House and living in a jail cell? If you do then tell me: what drugs are you taking that's causing such hullucin8ing?

A word of advice to you rascally reprob8s: Before making more embarrassing predictions about our unpredictable, gravity defying Pres get yourselves a new one of these:

For a crystal gazer with a broken ball and brain cannot a good prognostic8or make.  

 

 

THRICE CIRCUMCISED BERNIE

 

Bernie Sanders and Ted Cruz Debate Health Care - The New York Times

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE
 
between this Jewish boy from Brooklyn and single payer socialist Bernie who was born in that great New York borough? 
 
 ANSWER
 
I was circumcised once at birth. But Bernie was circumcised thrice: at birth, by Hillary, and in his debate with Ted Cruz on healthcare reform. That was the unkindest cut of all. For it left Bernie with too little d*ck to please his wife anymore.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Don't let Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea fool you.
 

SOCIALISM IS HEAVEN ON EARTH

Though it can't to be found in this world just yet I assure you it's coming. How do I know? Bernie Sanders told us so. Like an Old Testament prophet that old socialist Jew is never wrong. Just look what happened to single payer socialized medicine in Bernie's  Vermont. The states are the laboratories of democracy. And what's been tested in one state tells us what's good and will work for all. Read this piece on BernieCare and tell me that I'm wrong: 

BERNIE SANDERS’ DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM AND THE STAGGERING COST OF SINGLE PAYER BERNIE-CARE 
 
 
 
QUESTION ABOUT CO2
 
.

If CO2 is a pollutant like catastrophe warmunists claim is it then dangerous to drink carbonated water? Am I polluting myself and hurting my health from drinking so much of it? I love the stuff and hope it's safe; I don't want to be poisoning myself and dying at an early age./sarc
 
For the only real, science based, climate change catastrophe humanity needs to worry about, click
 
 

 WHAT DID THE DONALD LEARN FROM OBAMA?

Don't be Obama.

Obama is anti-MAGA.

 

 
 
Though Donald Trump was mostly underwater for the duration of his 16 month campaign (sinking and surfacing, sinking and surfacing) he still managed to sail past Hillary to victory, despite Morning Joe and Mika predicting he'd fail. And he will do so again in 2020.
 
 

 

RELATED

 
 

WHAT WILL EIGHT YEARS OF DONALD TRUMP AND A BOOMING ECONOMY DO TO THE UNHINGED, BRAIN BROKEN RADICAL LEFT?

 

 
 
 
keithobrein_opener.jpg

The Great Rust Belt Revolt. Former steel workers, coal miners and party line Democrats put Trump in the White House, and will keep him there because of a coming booming high growth economy.

If this past historic election has so pathetically unhinged and collectively broken the brains of the Trump derangement political and media Left then what will they and their senseless "resistance" be like after eight successful Trump years? How far will they plunge into political and moral madness when a rejuvenated and richly prospering middle class (declining for decades) votes in 2020 to continue the Trump presidency? Then votes again in 2024 to continue his legacy?   

The Liberal Brain four months after Trump's election. What will it be like after eight years of his presidency?

Many Trump haters across the net unable to bear the thought of just four Trump years (imagining there could be no worse or crueler fate) childishly fantasize that he'll be gone in ten months or less impeached for this or that offense; or assassinated by a Moslem, climate change nut, or illegal immigrant. But as we learned from eight years of the impeached sexual predator and perjurer Bill Clinton the economy is destiny for presidents however flawed their characters. And all that big, bad "deplorable" Trump needs do to remain the Left's archenemy-in-chief for two terms (and ensure Republican congressional rule) is to double the national GDP, and reverse the worse recovery since the 1930s.

Indeed, and this is instructive, during the 1930s progressive, liberal (Teddy Roosevelt Republican) Herbert Hoover tried to tax, spend and regulate his way out of the Great Depression he helped create; and then FDR doubling down on Hoover's failed policies (he didn't go far enough FDR thought) prolonged the Depression until the great war. In short, the New Deal (which collapsed in 1937 from taxation, unionization and excessive regulation) was simply Hooverism on steroids (the one being the other in embryo).

 

Barack Obama (an economic ignoramus like Hoover and FDR), who stupidly thought the New Deal was a national success, fancied himself the new FDR with a new and greater New Deal for America -to end the Great Recession (which was ending when he took office). He, Barack Obama, would outspend FDR and Hoover combined, and every other US president in peacetime who tried to tax, spend and regulate their way out of economic distress. The size not the substance of the program was the answer. The more billions spent the better.

 And the result, believed Obama, would be historic: the greatest, grandest, most gigantic recovery ever recorded-far outdoing Ronald Reagan's high growth recovery in the 1980s. Indeed, the Obama years with its staggering $800 billion stimulus would go down in history as a new era of US economic growth and prosperity - that would be emulated the world over and ignite a global boom. Not only was Obama going to lower the rising seas, he was going to raise mankind's standard of living in every clime and country. But that was not to be. Obama taxed and taxed and taxed, spent and spent and spent, kept interest rates low, printed trillions (he backed Bernanke and the Fed) and enacted thousands of new rules and regulations to control economic activity, and what did we get? The rich got fantastically richer from a rigged, soaring, overpriced stock market (see), and government boomed at the expense of Mainstreet as the economy of the middle class lagging far behind continued to decline with millions going broke (see).

Indeed, while the federal government from 2009 to 2016 grew by 16% (see) the annual average growth rate of GDP was a trickle in comparison: a weak, pathetic, mediocre 1.48%-the lowest of the last 11 presidents. The Obama stimulus was another big government/Keynesian failure (hopefully the last of its kind) that grew the national debt, not the economy and the middle class. Obama who lyingly claimed that his policies saved us from a depression (Bush's TARP did that) told voters that they should be glad things weren't worse - as Hillary campaigned to stay the course which proved a fatal political mistake. As economic anxiety and discontent ran high (causing the rise of Trump and Bernie Sanders) it's no wonder Hillary lost with working men and women in the rust belt states: these forgotten Americans were in revolt against the Washington/Wall Street/Globalist status quo  that Hillary coddled. They wanted change, voted Trump and won't be sorry - already they're seeing results.

 

Indeed, the robust economy promised by Obama that never materialized (due to his growth killing policies) is there simmering beneath the surface waiting to volcanically erupt; waiting for the pro-growth, pro-business, America first policies of Donald Trump. Maganomics is Obamanomics in reverse: it puts economic growth above growing government, and the creation of new wealth over the spending and spreading of it. For Obama (as for FDR) government was the business of America, the primary engine of growth; for Trump, as for Coolidge (a great economic success story), it's BUSINESS with a capital "C"-Free Market Capitalism should and must be America's primary business for restoring the economy.

Because of clueless Obama's ignorant policies there's a tremendous amount of pent up growth inherent our economy that Trump is hell-bent on unleashing. Throughout the campaign Trump promised to deliver 4% GDP growth and create 25 million new jobs over a ten year period. And he wasn't bullshitting. Indeed, if Trump can simply double Obama's weak, pathetic 1.48% GDP to 3% or slightly less (easy to do) that would ensure his feared (by the Left) political success; it would add a massive $10 trillion to our $20 trillion economy increasing its size by a whopping 33%, and create 20 million new jobs. That means at least 12 years of Republicans ruling the White House and continued control of Congress.  And as long as Trump's successor keeps to his MAGA agenda (unlike Bush 41's eschewing of Reagan) he will be a two term president.

A LORETTA ANTI-TRUMP LYNCH MOB
 
MARCH! BLEED! DIE! 

 

Trump's victory over Hillary has transformed the political Left into one vast insane asylum of hysteria, hate and murderous rage. What will they be like when they lose to Trump (and the GOP) again and again and again with eight in your face defiant years haranguing, ridiculing and tormenting them? They'll be lots of riots and blood in the streets until like sick, low energy Hillary (in the last days of her failing campaign) they're completely worn down and exhausted by this man.

 

RELATED

BARACK OBAMA: THE PRESIDENT WHO SAVED THE U.S. AND WORLD ECONOMY FROM A SECOND GREAT DEPRESSION?

OBAMA’S FAILED STIMULUS AND BUSH’S UNDERREPORTED RECOVERY

DEMOCRAT POLLSTER’S POST-ELECTION POLL FINDS “COMEY EFFECT” AND “RUSSIAN-WIKI EFFECT” DIDN’T EFFECT OUTCOME OF ELECTION

2016 WHITE MIDDLE CLASS BACKLASH BASED ON ECONOMIC DECLINE NOT REACTIONARY RACIST POLITICS

 
 
 

HILLARY CLINTON AND THE FASCINATING HISTORY OF POPULAR VOTE WINNERS WHO LOST THE PRESIDENCY

TOM PEREZ AND KEITH ELLISON: STAYING THE COURSE TO DEMOCRAT DISASTER

  
 
 
 
Among US Presidents Barack Obama has two distinctions that set him apart from the rest: 1. He's our first black President; and 2. He's perhaps the most popular and likable FAILED President in U.S. history leaving his successor a mess while his approval rating was above 50%. And because he's failed so badly on the economy, fiscal policy, healthcare and financial reform, border and cyber security, law and order, national unity  Russian reset, Iran, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Yemen, Afghanistan and the War on Terror Obama's been a political disaster for his party on a scale unseen since Herbert Hoover devastated the GOP in 1932.
 
 
Perez doesn't rule out Hillary running again in 2020
 
 
RESET AMERICA
HILLARY CLINTON
2020
 
But the incompetent, feckless catastrophically failed Obama is so hugely popular with rank and file Democrats, and his successor Donald Trump so hated and reviled by them, that the party has chosen to keep the status quo and stay the course unmindful that worse is yet to come. Indeed, having learned nothing from Hillary's defeat in 2016 and the two mid-term debacles of 2010 and 2014, and believing that Trump will be such a disgrace and disaster that the Obama years will look like a golden age in comparison, the Democats have chosen the Far Left establishment again; and they have elected for their party chief and deputy two loyal, true blue radical Obamunists: Tom Perez and Keith Ellison. 
 
 
Tom Perez, Obama's former labor secretary, and Keith Ellison, America's first Moslem congressman, are ominous signs for the Dems of worse to come in the Era of Donald Trump who they continue to contemptuously underestimate and ridicule at their peril. Indeed, some of these signs as you will see are strongly and strangely linked to Obama by way of his birthday (a day of infamy) as well as his failed politics.
 
 
For example, on the day Tom Perez was born (10-7-1961) Barack Obama was exactly 64 days old (see). The proximity of Perez's and Obama's births (just 9 weeks apart), and the fact that Perez served in Obama's cabinet,  suggests that this is a significant coincidence that likely prefigures what lies ahead for the Dems in 2018: the third straight loss for Obamunists of a mid-term election. Indeed, as the number 64 is the square of 8, or 8x8, it just so happens that 88 weeks separates Perez's election as DNC chief last month from election day 2018 (see). On that day, November 6, I predict that the political collapse of the Democrats will continue; that they will lose more seats in the House, Senate and state legislatures principally because of a booming US economy triggered by Trump's anti-Obama pro-growth policies; and pundits will write that the party must strike out in a new direction or suffer the blow of losing the 2020 election.
 
 
Indeed, in 2018 the still very popular Obama will be out on the campaign trail supporting Democrat candidates, and personalizing the election (like he did in 2016 with Hillary) working desperately to save what little is left of his failed legacy after 20 MAGA months of Donald Trump. Astonishingly, that very November 6, 2018 will be continuing the wave of the 2014 mid-terms is indicated symbolically by the number 20914-this five digit number encoded with the year 2014 is the number of days separating Obama's birth from election day (see).
 
 
Also seemingly ominous of coming defeat was the convergence of Perez's last birthday on October 7th of last year (see). This was the eventful day that WikiLeaks launched its release of John Podesta's   6500 stolen emails which proved so embarrassing and hurtful to Hillary and her party. Could this possibly signify that Tom Perez as DNC chief will prove just as embarrassing and damaging to THE Dems as Wikileaks? And that he'll be gone as party chief after 2018?
 
 
Who then could replace Perez as party head to lead it into the 2020 election? Will it be Perez's deputy Keith Ellison who is backed by the Bernie Sanders wing of the party? Will Dems believe that the answer to their woes is moving further to the Left (as the country moves Right)? Under Ellison the Obama caused collapse of the party would continue unabated. Indeed, just as Perez was born just 64 days from Obama's birth in 1961, Ellison amazingly (as I wrote HERE) was born two years later in 1963 on Obama's second birthday. Incredibly, just as Obama is exactly 24 months older than Ellison, when he (the closest thing we had to a Moslem president) was sworn into office on January 20, 2009 it was 24 months and 17 days after Ellison's swearing in on the Koran by Pelosi as America's first Moslem congressman.
 
 
January 3, 2007 Ellison is sworn in as congressman
 
To say the least, the Perez-Ellison team is bad news for the Democrats. Both men are race obsessed, class warfare, business hating radicals. La Raza, pro-illegals Perez once characterized all bankers as "blood sucking Klu Klux Klansmen (that's how crazy this man is);" and Ellison is a pro-Palestinian, jihad friendly, anti-Semite. It will fascinate you to learn that on the day Keith Ellison was born Tom Perez was 666 days old (see). There are those who believe that this infamous triplet Biblical number, found in the Book of Revelation, is a symbol of extreme evil. In going further to the radical extreme greater evil than Obama will befall the Democrat Party. 
 
   
RELATED

IS KEITH ELLISON CHOSEN BY ALLAH AND BARACK OBAMA TO HEAD THE DNC AND STOP THE “RACIST” TRUMP PRESIDENCY? (SARCASM)

DONALD TRUMP, TOWERGATE AND OBAMA’S REPORTED DESPERATE 11TH HOUR TAPPING OF TRUMP’S SERVER

 

EXCLUSIVE: FBI 'Granted FISA Warrant' Covering Trump Camp's Ties To Russia-HEATSTREET

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On March 4th, the 44th day of his presidency, Donald Trump in 4 shocking tweets accused the 44th president (who was 44 days out of office) of spying on him to destroy his presidential campaign (see).
 

The vicious out of control anti-Trump derangement media has been reporting for months that the FBI and other intel agencies have been digging for evidence using wiretaps and secret surveillance that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia in interfering with the 2016 election; and that this may have tipped the outcome in Donald Trump's favor (which I disprove HERE ). Indeed, a scared sh*tless, panicking Barack Obama frightened at the thought that the hated, "deplorable" Donald Trump would succeed him in office and decimate his legacy pulled out all the stops to find the smoking gun that would criminally link him to Russia (or other crimes) and destroy his candidacy. And if that meant abusing his power and ordering legal or illegal wiretaps on Trump (which he has the authority to do see), then so be it. The terrible end of Trump being president justified and excused the immoral, politically driven (if not exactly criminal) means of bringing him down.

 

Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism! 

Indeed, "Desperate men do desperate things." And as the race drew closer to election day with a gravity defying Trump running strong, lying, lawless (see) Obama's desperation to stop him grew into an insane obsession; and as a last desperate resort he abused his powers and spied on Trump. Indeed, when sifting through and carefully analyzing the news reports from the credible sources cited above you will see that Donald Trump's shocking March 4th tweets accusing Obama of a McCarthyite political witch hunt to destroy him was JUSTIFIED.  

When Donald Trump on the 44th day of his presidency accused the 44th President of a Watergate type crime it was exactly 44 years, 8 months and 16 days  from the Watergate break in (see). Moreover, the Watergate break in on June 17, 1972 fell on the 1244th day of the Nixon presidency (see).
 

How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy! 7:02 AM - 4 Mar 2017

 
 
 
 

Indeed, in an explosive, eventful October after the failure of the strategically released Access Hollywood tape, and coordinated multiple groping allegations, a psyched out Obama (at his wits end) made one last pre-election day move to bring down Trump and irreparably damage his campaign. The story as reported by the Guardian, HeatStreet and the New York Times is as follows:

Back in June of last year (before the Republican Convention) Obama's Justice Department and the FBI believed that a private computer server in Trump Tower (Trump's campaign headquarters) was linked to several Russian banks, and was being used in the commission of possible financial/banking crimes that somehow posed a threat to our national security. The DOJ and FBI seeking a warrant from the FISA Court against Trump drew up an affidavit ( apparently citing him as a potential Russian agent or spy)  requesting permission to tap his server and phones. But the ridiculous request was denied because it failed to establish probable cause.

Now here is where the story gets extremely fishy and loses credibility. According to HeatStreet in October just weeks before the election the DOJ and FBI submitted a second request to FISA for a tap warrant for Trump's server. Because this new request was drawn differently ("more narrowly" says the report) it met the court's criteria for a warrant, and it was granted. This is what HeatStreet said:

"The first [FISA] request, which, sources say, named Trump, was denied back in June, but the second was drawn more narrowly and was granted in October after evidence was presented of a server, possibly related to the Trump campaign, and its alleged links to two banks: SVB Bank and Russia’s Alfa Bank. While the New York Times story speaks of metadata, sources suggest that a FISA warrant was granted to look at the full content of emails and other related documents......(see)"

Obama had the motive and means to tap Trump, and probably did given his desperation to stop him and save his legacy.
 

Now really, does this make any logical or even political sense? Why did Loretta Lynch and the FBI wait so long (five months) to rewrite the request to FISA when they could have immediately done so in June hours or days after the first request was denied? This way, not needlessly wasting precious time, Obama's DOJ (race obsessed Loretta Lynch), out for blood and wanting to stop ("white supremacist Islamophobic racist") Donald Trump and torpedo his campaign, would have started taping his alleged Russian linked server weeks before the GOP Convention; and if any crime, dirt or whatever was discovered it could have been used to wreck havoc on Trump, throw the Convention into chaos and possibly deny him the nomination.

Indeed, surely it could not have taken AG Lynch and FBI five months to figure out what to do after the initial application for the surveillance warrant was denied. With the server at Trump Tower possibly and potentially being the solution and key to stopping and defeating Trump (after everything else failed) it makes no sense for  Lynch to procrastinate so long - to wait so close to the election in October before taking the appropriate measures (rewriting the affidavit) in getting the FISA warrant.

"There's no question that something happened," White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Monday. "The question is it, is it surveillance, is it a wiretap, or whatever? There has been enough reporting strongly suggesting something occurred."
 

Indeed, as I said, it makes no logical or political sense for Lynch and the FBI to do in October what they could have easily done five months before in June - unless, of course, the story in whole or in part is untrue and a cover up. What I mean is this: After the first FISA request in June was denied Obama and Lynch were stuck. Contrary to what we're being told Lynch could not have improved the original affidavit that FISA rejected in June; they were unable to rewrite it (or "narrow it," as HeatStreet said) to show probable cause that Trump was some kind of Russian agent or spy and  national security threat. In other words, what they did in June was the best they could do. They couldn't go back to the court a second time as they had nothing more convincing to show it.

Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway told Fox News that "credible news sources" suggested there might have been politically motivated activity during the campaign that has yet to be divulged. "Trump is POTUS," said Conway "and has  information that the rest of us do not."

What am I inferring then? That there was no tap placed on Trump's server and phones? That it's fake news? No! President Trump in his tweets acknowledged that the tap did occur just as is stated and suggested in the above articles - but without a Trump related FISA warrant and court approval. The Washington Post after months of trying to confirm the October warrant couldn't do so (see)." WAPO failed because the October warrant is fake, phony news and doesn't exist.

 

The publisher of the Newsmax Media website, Christopher Ruddy, a friend of Trump's, wrote Sunday the president told him, "This [Towergate] will be investigated. It will all come out. I will be proven right."

But the Trump server, so it seems, was nevertheless tapped - tapped immorally if not illegally by a deeply distressed Barack Obama who saw the unthinkable unfolding before his eyes: the "nightmare" of a Trump presidency moving closer and closer to becoming a reality. Indeed, an alarmed Obama rightly understood that if Trump against all odds could politically emerge unscathed from Gropergate (which should have destroyed him) then he could go all the way to the White House. And thus was born the desperate idea (FISA Court be damned) of Obama deeming Trump a potential foreign spy (a danger to national security); and going to Loretta Lynch for approval in placing a covert tap on Trump's server and phones to find a criminal 11th hour link tying him to Russia. It was late in the race and there was nowhere left for Obama (Clinton and the Democrats) to go. "Nothing ventured nothing gained." Obama abusing his power turned Trump into the victim of a politically motivated unjustified surveillance investigation under the pretext that he was a possible Russian spy and national security threat. But that miserably failed like everything else that was tried. And now Trump is President rubbing Obama's face in the feces of his lies and subversive crimes and promising to prove them in time. As it says in the Zero Hedge piece, "Trump may have the last laugh."

 
Perhaps before he left office Obama
should have pardoned
himself.
 
 
UPDATE
 
10:08 AM: Nunes says 
there is no evidence of a “physical wiretap” of Trump Tower but remains open to the possibility of other types of surveillance against the Trump campaign and its associates. 
 
There you have it people. The FBI's denial of Obama directly ordering the wiretapping of Trump Tower doesn't mean that other types of surveillance weren't used.
 
UPDATE
 
 
 President Trump's Towergate allegation is coming closer and closer to being vindicated.
 

POSTSCRIPT

Flashback: Obama and Deep State Bugged House of Rep's Cloak Room - Why Wouldn't Obama Wiretap Trump? Gateway Pundit

Obama was accused of wire tapping the House of Representatives cloak room in 2013

Congressman Devin Nunes (speaking to Hugh Hewitt) : No, I absolutely do not, especially after this wiretapping incident, essentially, of the House of Representative. I don’t think people are focusing on the right thing when they talk about going after the AP reporters. The big problem that I see is that they actually tapped right where I’m sitting right now, the Cloak Room (see) .

OBAMA'S GLOBAL TAPPING

* a private climate change strategy meeting between UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin;


* Chief of Staff of UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) for long term interception targetting his Swiss phone;


* The Director of the Rules Division of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Johann Human, and targetted his Swiss phone for long term interception;


* Sensitive Italian diplomatic cables relating to Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu;


* Top EU and Japanese trade ministers discussing their secret strategy and red lines to stop the US “extort[ing]” them at the WTO Doha arounds (the talks subsequently collapsed);


* Five other top EU economic officials for long term interception, including their French, Austrian and Belgium phone numbers;


* The phones of Italy’s ambassador to NATO and other top Italian officials for long term interception; and


* Details of a critical private meeting between then French president Nicolas Sarkozy, Merkel and Berluscon, where the latter was told the Italian banking system was ready to “pop like a cork”.

OBAMA'S MEDIA TAPPING

In addition to the above list we also reported that Obama wire tapped various individuals in the US media that were reporting information not flattering to the Obama Administration. It is widely known that Obama’s Justice Department targeted journalists with wiretaps in 2013:

* Fox News’ James Rosen and his family, were part of an investigation into government officials anonymously leaking information to journalists. Rosen was not charged but his movements and actions were tracked.


* Members of the Associated Press were also a target of the surveillance in a phone-records scandal.


* Reporter Sharyl Attkisson said in 2014 that her personal computer and CBS laptop were hacked after she began filing stories about Benghazi that were unflattering to theObama administration. A source who checked her laptop said the hacker used spyware “proprietary to a government agency,” according to an article in the New York Post.


* WikiLeaks also tweeted that the Obama Administration spied on their journalists as well.

 

 RELATED

THE LAW

ALLOWING THE PRESIDENT TO ORDER WIRE TAPS

 

DEMOCRAT POLLSTER’S POST-ELECTION POLL FINDS “COMEY EFFECT” AND “RUSSIAN-WIKI EFFECT” DIDN’T EFFECT OUTCOME OF ELECTION

BARACK OBAMA THE GREAT ENABLER OF POST-SOVIET RUSSIAN POWER-OR THE STAGGERING STUPIDITY OF OBAMA, HILLARY CLINTON AND JOE BIDEN 

< p style="text-align: center;"> 

THREE U.S. PRESIDENTS HAVE BEEN STOOGES OF RUSSIA. WILL DONALD TRUMP BE THE FOURTH ?

 
 
 
 
 

 Trump is "Putin's puppet," "his useful fool," "his idiot and stooge" read the above pre-election headlines by Trump haters and concerned critics. But if what was negatively said of candidate Trump (based on his pro-Russian rhetoric and lack of criticism about neo-imperialist Vladimir Putin's sins) turns out to be true of President Trump what then? History tells us that he will join a club of useful idiot president stooges who were naïve about and dangerously soft on Russia, and paid a steep price for their blind trust and folly. These presidents are as follows:

 

 MO

 
 

First there was the gullible, butt kissing liberal Democrat appeaser Franklin Roosevelt who called implacable, mass murdering Russian strongman Joseph Stalin (allied to Hitler for several years) "Uncle Joe" to humanize him. FDR's weakness and naivety with good old "Uncle Joe" at Yalter (where Stalin had him bugged) emboldened the autocrat to dominate the war ravaged nations of eastern Europe and half of Germany after the war causing decades of misery and oppression to millions. This started the very dangerous 45 year-long Cold War that led to costly wars for us in Korea and Vietnam (which killed 100,000 US troops combined) and nearly went nuclear in 1962 over the Cuban Missile Crisis.

LARRY

 

Then 66 years later came the weak, butt kissing, ultra appeasing liberal Democrat Jimmy Carter. Ridiculously declaring that we had "overcome our inordinate fear of Communism" (as the Soviet Union was expanding its power and influence across the world) Carter made concession after concession to implacable Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev and paid the price when the Red Army brutally invaded Afghanistan - this gave birth to al-Qaida, 9/11 and the war on terror that we are still fighting today.

CURLY

 

Then 32 years later came another clueless, butt kissing, liberal Democrat Barack Obama. Obama having learned nothing from the Russian invasion of Georgia declared ominously in Munich (city of war causing weakness) an appeasement policy for "resetting U.S./Russian relations." Obama, stupidly believing that "Reset" was a historic success, and he'd won over the heart, mind, friendship and trust of Vladimir Putin with his bowing, scraping and concessions, assured us during a debate with Mitt Romney that "Russia was not our enemy or a geostrategic threat." Obama (the third and fourth terms of Jimmy Carter) was made to look like history's biggest fool since Neville Chamberlain when Russia invaded Ukraine, annexed Crimea then assisted Syria's Bashir "the Butcher" Assad in horrific genocide.

SHEMP?

 

The big question now is this: three American presidents have been the useful gullible idiot stooges of Russian imperialism. But will there now be a fourth? Will Donald Trump who was a liberal Democrat (and the seventh president from New York after FDR) be the Republican Shemp of American politics and repeat the mistakes of FDR, Carter and Obama? Will we see this?

 

Unless Putin does a 180 and becomes a real friend and ally of the U.S. (which is unlikely) I hope not.

BUT PERHAPS THE FOLLOWING ARE SIGNS THAT THIS ABASEMENT OF AMERICA UNDER TRUMP (HARD TO IMAGINE) WON'T HAPPEN

 Trump Wants to Expand Nuclear Weapons Capability, Make it 'Top of the Pack | Reuters

 

I THOUGHT TRUMP WAS PUTIN'S BITCH AND PUPPET?

Instead he's acting more like a Ronald Reagan nuclear adversary of Russia, something Obama dared not do. Peace Through Nuclear Strength. Will Trump like Reagan be seen as a  "nuclear cowboy?" Will we see the return of the failed nuclear freeze movement trying to frighten us to death? That instead of a global warming apocalypse caused by burning hydrocarbon fuels we'll freeze to death in a nuclear winter caused by hydrogen bombs decimating the world  (see)?

AND THEN THERE'S THIS:

 
Image result for un ambassador nikki haley
 
During her Senate confirmation for UN Ambassador Nikki Haley sounding very unTrumpian accused Russia of "war crimes" in Syria and supported keeping Russian sanctions in place. And then at the UN early last month Ambassador Haley condemned Russia for its recent aggressive actions in eastern Ukraine, and reiterated that sanctions imposed on Russia wouldn't be lifted as long as this aggression continued. Where's the Putin puppetry in this?

 

RELATED

VLADIMIR PUTIN: AMERICA’S GEO-STRATEGIC ENEMY NUMBER ONE

PUTIN, HITLER, THE ANNIVERSARY OF MUNICH AND THE GREAT PAN-NATIONALIST LIE

THE COMING COLLISION OF AMERICA AND RUSSIA? 

THE TERRIBLE SIGN OVER NORWAY OF US/RUSSIAN CONFLICT BEFORE OBAMA RECEIVED PEACE PRIZE

ARE US AND RUSSIA HEADED FOR A 1962-TYPE NUCLEAR SHOWDOWN?

US/RUSSIA REACH DEAL ON UKRAINE ON BAY OF PIGS’ ANNIVERSARY 

 

THE FOREIGN POLICY “GENIUS” OF BARACK OBAMA AND JOE BIDEN ON RUSSIA, PUTIN, ASSAD AND SYRIA

OBAMA CAVES AND ABANDONS REBEL CAUSE-RUSSIA/IRAN/SYRIA TRIUMPH 

RECKLESS WAR HAWK NEO-CON HILLARY WANTS NO-FLY ZONE FOR SYRIA AND WAR WITH RUSSIA

FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE: DO TRUMP AND PUTIN HAVE A BROMANCE LIKE TED KENNEDY AND THE SOVIETS HAD TO STOP REAGAN?

PUTIN MORTIFIES OBAMA LIKE KHRUSHCHEV KENNEDY AT VIENNA  

IS THE RISE IN ANTI-SEMITIC CRIMES DUE TO TRUMP’S JUDEOPHILIA AND PRO-ISRAEL POLICIES?

 

 
 
 
 
The hypocrisy of Hillary Clinton, Bill DeBlasio, Tom Perez and the pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel radical Democrat Left on their sudden discovery of anti-Semeticism and concern over rising anti-Jewish hate crimes (underreported by MSM during the Obama years see) is truly, truly stunning. While we don't yet know who is behind the rash of targeted bomb threats to Jewish Community Centers and schools (over 70 since the start of the year), and the recent vandalizing of Jewish cemeteries near St. Louis and in Philly, what we do know is this: the American Jewish community has no greater, stronger and more trustworthy friend than Donald J. Trump; and, on the contrary, it has no real friend in the cowardly, collapsing Democrat Party who came close last week to making the anti-Semite Keith Ellision its DNC chief.
 
 
It is not just that President Trump is a Judeophile who deeply loves the Jewishness of his daughter, his son in law, his lovely grand kids and jewish friends that proves he's a real true friend to American Jews; nor is it his Christian Zionism and belief that Israel is the legitimate national homeland of the Jewish people; apart from this is Trump's attempt to stem the flow of Jew hating, anti-American, Islamonazi Moslems into this country (from deadly Islamic terrorist states) whose actual number worldwide, as polls show (see), is in the hundreds of millions. It is certain that Donald Trump doesn't want to see happen in this country under his watch what's occurring in Europe with Jews fleeing to Israel in the thousands to escape growing anti-Jewish violence by vicious Moslem scum (see). There's no place in America for such evil; and Trump wants to keep it out as much as possible not just for Jews, but for all Americans as no good could come from continually increasing their numbers.
 
  
But is it neo-Nazis who are behind the bomb threats and vandalism as many on the Left want to believe caused by an atmosphere of racist hate created by President Trump? If so then why against Jews and not Moslems and Mexicans? Hasn't Trump been accused of racist hate against these two groups more than any others? When Hitler targeted German Jews for hate he unleashed a deadly wave of anti-Jewish persecution and violence. Where then is the surge of hate crimes against Hispanics and American Moslems allegedly incited by Trump's rhetoric? Why Jews? Did Trump say their were Jewish criminals, rapists and murders stealing across our southern border? Did he single out the Jewishness of a Jewish judge for possible bias in a lawsuit? Did he take issue with and was insensitive to Jewish goldstar parentswho were critical of him? Did he say that Israeli Jews danced on Jersey City rooftops celebrating the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11? No? Then how could Trump's rhetoric incite threats of deadly violence and vandalism against Jews? It makes no logical sense.
 
 
Or is it, as I suspect, an alliance of Israel hating pro-Palestinian Moslems and infidel idiot anti-Israel Leftists desperately reacting to Trump's Judeophilia and pro-Israel policies? Are Moslems and Leftists behind these attacks (as they are in universities) joined together in a common cause to stop Trump? Indeed, are the threats and vandalism an ominous warning of worse to come for American Jews if Trump dares to cut off funds to the Palestinian Authority, move the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, or fights BDS (the boycotting, disinvestment and sanctioning of Israel)? Indeed, if Trump stays the course in strongly backing Israel over Palestinians (he knows who the bad guys are in the conflict) and moves the embassy as US law requires are these anti-Semites planning to take the next extreme step and blow up Jewish centers and synagogues and kill Jews in protest? God forbid!
 
 
 But what is absolutely certain and clear is that Hillary Clinton, cying Chuckie, DeBlasio, Perez, Ellison and the pro-Pali Left in wanting to recklessly open the floodgates of Moslem refugees and immigrants into this country (from any land no matter how dangerous) are no real friends to America and American Jews whose peril would increase proportionally, as it's doing in more regressed Islamized Europe. 
 
 
  
 
 UPDATE
 
 
 
 
Juan thompson, jewish community center suspect
 
 
As you can see I more or less got this right. A white hating black pro-Palestinian leftist and convert to Islam to boot.
  
 
 
juantrump6
 
juanwhite3
 
juantrump3
 
juanviolence2
 
 
RELATED