Monthly Archives: June 2017

DONALD TRUMP PREDICTS HIS REELECTION ON THE AMAZING 160TH DAY OF HIS PRESIDENCY

 

House Passes 'Kate's Law,' Sanctuary City, Immigration Reforms - Breitbart

 
 
 
 
 
Yesterday, June 29, 2017, at the Department of Energy Donald Trump on the 160th and perhaps best day of the second 100 days* of his presidency (see), gave a speech on energy independence where, I believe, he prophetically stated, and I quote, that he'd be "President for 8 years." And indeed it looks like he will be. For yesterday was a super-auspicious day for a President destined for greatness and reelection. Look what happened:
 
*Trump's best day arguably so far was on April 7th, the 77th day of his presidency. when he ordered the bombing of Syria, and the Senate confirmed Neil Gorsuch's nomination to the Supreme Court.
 
Kate's Law passed in Congress along with a bill for the defunding of sanctuary cities; the controversial so-called "Moslem Travel Ban" went into effect after being upheld by the Supreme Court against the unconstitutional rulings of left-wing hate Trump lower courts; the Secretary General of NATO (who credited the Trump Effect for increased NATO spending) announced that the alliance would be sending 2000 troops to Afghanistan to fight the radical Islamic Taliban; and US backed Iraqi forces took the Great Mosque at Mosul where three years ago murdering ISIS leader al-Baghdadi declared the ISIS caliphate. It takes your breath away.
 
 
Moreover, yesterday President Trump reconfirmed his  commitment and pledge to the American people and declining, disappearing middle class to restore American greatness and create American jobs by turning our country into a fossil fuel HYPERPOWER - another blow to crazy, crackpot global warming nuts after he shredded the worthless, US economy hurting Paris Climate Accord signed by his worthless warmunist predecessor.
 
 
With the US economy poised to take off from the slashing of taxes, spending and regulations Trump's recommittment to energy independence means, as White House officials tell us: benefiting every local US economy that produces "dirty" energy; boosting tax revenues that will help pay for infrastructure rebuilding and the security border wall; and it increases US leverage in diplomatic matters in dealing with such enemies as neo-imperialist Russia and radical "Death to America" Iran (both large oil-producing nations). Every president since Jimmy Carter promised energy independence, and now it looks like it will finally become a reality.
 
 
Indeed, yesterday was a stellar day for President Trump mixed with a little amusing side-show where he dumped all over ugly, boring, low ratings Mika and Morning "Trump sucks" Joe Scarborough. Did the President demean himself and the dignity of his office by crapping all over these two fools? HELL NO! They had it coming, as their fake news show is a daily, dreary, destroy Trump hate fest that makes you want to puke. But if Trump's crude counterpunching against his brain broken enemies upsets you then keep in mind that the economy is the destiny of presidents; and ultimately what counts for his success and the country's are his economic policies; and as long as he's making the right decisions in removing the right regulations and signing the right bill's into law,
his tweeting will mean nothing on election day 2020 when  a prospering middle class will reward him with a second term to continue the good work he began.
 
 
 
POSTSCRIPT
 
NUMERIC SIGNS
 
On June 16, 2015, 16 months before Donald Trump won 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue he announced his candidacy for the presidency; this "coincidently" happened 16 days after the publication of Ann Coulter's book "Adios Amigos" on illegal aliens; and 16 days before Kate Steinle's death by a criminal Mexican illegal (see). And then on the 160th day of his presidency (and 745 days after starting his campaign see) the House finally passed Kate's Law. Astonishingly, the vote on Kate was 257 to 157. Why is this astonishing? Because 257 = 16 x 16 +1, just one number exceeding 16 squared, strangely and almost consistently Trump's auspicious number (in its factors and multiples) during the 2016 campaign. And here it is popping up again on the day Trump predicted he'd win a second term.
 
 
Moreover, just as 16 months separated the start of Trump's campaign from his historic 2016 election, so is the 2018 mid terms 16 months away (see) - perhaps a sign that yesterday's events prefigured that 2018 will be a triumphant extension of Election Day with Republicans adding seats across the country to many legislative bodies including the House and Senate.  
 
And on a minor note, a full two terms for a US President covers exactly 2923 days (see); 2923 is a variant of the number 16, hence: 2+9+2+3 = 16
 
trumpamerica
 
POSTSCRIPT
 
ANOTHER SIGN OF TWO TERMS FOR 45?
 
It just came to my attention that on June 29th when the 45th President predicted he'd serve two complete terms it was exactly 7 years and 6 months to January 20, 2025, the day of his predicted retirement (see).
 
Could this be another auspicious sign that President 45 made an accurate prediction about the destiny of his time in office?  It could very well be. For 7 years and 6 months totals 90 months, 90 is a multiple of 45 2x - possibly indicating two terms for Donald Trump. It is fascinating to note that the number 2025, the year that the 45th President predicted his retirement, is the square of 45: 45x45 = 2025.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

OBAMA’S FAILED ALINSKY STEALTH SOCIALISM AND THE RETURN OF LEFT-WING VIOLENCE AND TERROR

[Untitled-1.jpg]
 
 

IS BARACK OBAMA THE MESSIAH?

"... A LIGHT WILL SHINE THROUGH THAT WINDOW, A BEAM OF LIGHT WILL COME DOWN UPON YOU, YOU WILL EXPERIENCE AN EPIPHANY ... AND YOU WILL SUDDENLY REALIZE THAT YOU MUST GO TO THE POLLS AND VOTE FOR OBAMA" - BARACK OBAMA LEBANON, NEW HAMPSHIRE.
JANUARY 7, 2008.

 
 
It was all so predictable. And I, a former radical counterculture hippy from the late revolutionary 1960s  (fan of Ho Che Mien and the Vietcong and the terrorist Weather Underground) predicted one year into Obama's presidency (see): the return of leftist terrorism and violence in the post-Obama era. The socialist chaos and rage following Obama's failed presidency wasn't too difficult to foresee. Based on the absurdity (believed by millions) that Obama was a spiritually exalted being and God-sent progressive messiah who'd work miracles (see)    - that his presidency would be "a great defining moment" in American and world history, that he'd save the earth from climate catastrophe and "fundamentally transform" our country into a more perfect dependency union - I predicted a dangerous descent into political violence and madness when this vision failed to materialize.
 
 
Though Obama, during his presidency, tolerated some left-wing violence (Occupy Wall Street and BLM rioting) he was essentially a nonviolent Alinskyite or Democratic  stealth socialist striving to build the transformative socialist state by democratic electoral and quietly subversive means; or, in contrast to Marxist-Leninism, to peacefully work through the system to gradually undermine it; instead of violently overthrowing it - as Marx and Lenin believed was the only possible way for revolutionary change.
 
 
Michelle "hope is dead" Obama herself a disillusioned Alinskyite.
 
But after one year into Obama's presidency seeing how inept, incompetent and feckless he was (how his $800 billion stimulus was failing to supercharge the economy, his EPA and other regulations were damaging to business, investment and growth, and how he was pushing with lie after lie for a total unpopular government takeover of healthcare) the writing was on the wall: Obamunism was the last hurrah for nonviolent, democratic, Alinsky stealth socialism.
 
 
 
Indeed, I foresaw that Obama would leave office with Alinskyism largely discredited; and the freaked out, disillusioned, angry Left would revert to Marxist-Leninism; they'd return to the violence and terror of the late 1960s as the only way left to revolutionary change. And now it's here spreading like cancer in all its savagery, blood lust, madness and rage.
 
 
 
RESIST! RESIST! RESIST!
 
SHOUT THESE LOSING LIBERAL FASCISTS, AS THEY CALL FOR TRUMP'S DEATH FEARING HIS SUCCESS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

IF DONALD TRUMP IS THE NEW AMERICAN CAESAR KILLING HIM WON’T STOP TRUMPISM

 
 
 
 
Back in my college days at Queens College in Flushing, Queens (I'm a Queens boy like the President) I majored in Classical Philosophy (I'm a Platonist) and was a veracious reader of the Greek and Roman classics in translation where I learned a great deal from writers like Plutarch, Suetonius, Appian and others about Julius Caesar: the great Roman dictator who destroyed the terribly corrupt and declining Roman Republic - and is getting much attention these days because of the tragic Shakespeare play in New York using a Donald Trump look-alike playing the assassinated leader (see postscript).
 
 
 
Now this awful business by deranged, violent, leftist Trump haters of turning the murdered Caesar in the play into President Trump (as if he had a tyrannical authoritarian personality wanting unlimited power and was plotting to destroy our constitutional republic to get it) is just plain nuts. True the two men are charismatic leaders who by sheer will power, audacity and cunning triumphed over all their enemies to achieve great power. But that's where their likeness ends. For Caesar politically was anti-Repubican and believed in unchecked, unlimited autocratic rule; while Trump is the opposite wanting to defend, protect and strengthen our republican form of government and constitutional norms; and to that end he nominated constitutional originalist Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court; and will possibly nominate two more like him if Justice Kennedy retires and Ruth Bader Ginsberg dies. Would Ceasar have done that?
 
However, just as the killing of Caesar by Brutus and the conspirators didn't kill or stop Caesarism*, making the restoration of the Republic impossible, nor would the killing of Trump stop Trumpism** which, unlike Caesarism, is trying to save our Republic from the radical statist left and its impoverishing, socialist, anti-free market, freedom killing agenda.
 
*Wikipedia defines Caesarism as "a form of political rule that emulates the rule of Roman dictator Julius Caesar over the Roman Republic, in that it is led by a charismatic strongman whose rule is based upon a cult of personality."
 
**Trumpism, in essence is radical America first economic nationalism for the restoration of middle class prosperity and family and work ethic values; and a "Peace Through Strength" foreign policy to restore America as the most powerful nation on earth after the military and geopolitical decline of the Obama years. For a fuller treatment of Trumpism see Trumpism: What Is It? Tradition, Populism, American Greatness, for Starters | National Review
 
   
Indeed, after Rome plunged into a series of bloody civil wars in wake of Caesar's death the ultimate victor Octavian (Caesar's nephew and heir) transformed himself into another all-powerful Caesar becoming the absolute master and ruler of the Roman world, and started a dynasty of Caesars that lasted centuries until Rome crashed and burned.
 
 Similarly, if President Trump's political enemies get their sick, evil, demented wish and he was, God forbid, murdered it wouldn't stop Trumpism anymore than Caesar's death stopped Caesarism. Indeed, Trump's MAGA Agenda for draining the Washington swamp, reviving the economy and reversing America's decline making it greater than ever would live on in his successor President Pence (who is to the right of his boss) - with perhaps another Trumpian President to follow who'll continue the necessary work of national renewal.
 
In other words, following the analogy with Julius Caesar and post- mortem Caesarism Trumpism and Republican rule of Congress would surely survive and live on for sometime to come (a generation, not ages) if President Trump met Caesar's fate. The genie of radical pro-American domestic and foreign policy change is out of the bottle; and because of an angry, American, disappearing middle class that's hell-bent on prospering again (and will do so under Trumpism) there's no putting it back, regardless if Trump lives or dies.
 
In sum, If Donald Trump is the new American Caesar, and Caesarism powerfully survived Julius Caesar's death, then killing Trump would be useless for stopping Trumpism as a powerful force shaping American politics, and would live on long after he was gone.
 
 
 
 POSTSCRIPT
 
ABC'S SCANDAL
 
 
 
Donald Trump and Scandal's Trump-like Hollis Doyle
 
This is amusing. One of the speakers at the Democratic National Convention last year was actor Tony Goldwyn. Goldwyn plays President Fitz Grant III in ABC's hit TV series Scandal. President Grant is a Republican version of Bill Clinton: he is liberal in his politics and cheats on his wife Mellie, with Olivia Pope (and other women) the show's central character who heads a DC law firm that fixes scandals for Washington politicians.
 
 
During Grant's second term wife Mellie (like Hillary when husband  Bill was President) runs for and wins a seat in the US Senate. Mellie then wanting to succeed her husband as President runs in the Republican primaries. One of her opponents is Hollis Doyle a coarse, flamboyant, insulting, sexist, anti-immigrant Texas oil billionaire  who was intentionally made to resemble Donald Trump. But what many don't know is that actor Gregg Henry who played the Trump like Doyle in Scandal is the actor playing the murdered Julius Caesar in the New York play.  Ain't that a kick in the head.
 
 
Shakespeare in the Park’s Gregg Henry on Playing a Very Trumpian Julius Caesar
 
 RELATED
 

THE FEDERAL RESERVE, THE TRUMP EFFECT AND THE COMING “TRICKLE DOWN” ECONOMIC BOOM

 

 
          

Since the start of Donald Trump's historic campaign for the presidency and rise to power his political adversaries from Left, Right and Center have been consistently wrong in their predictions about his fate right up to Election Day. And they haven't stopped being wrong since, as we saw on Tuesday with Karen Handel's upset victory in Georgia.

 

First treating Trump as a clown they roared with laughter when he announced his candidacy saying that his inexperience, ignorance of policy and mediocre debating skills would make him the laughing-stock of the race and  failure a certainty. Indeed, they predicted that Trump wouldn't survive the first GOP debate; that his rivals on the dabate stage - savvy, experienced, gifted politicians like Christe, Cruz, Bush, Kasich and Rubio - would cut Trump to ribbons and quickly end his run. But the exact opposite happened: he won that first debate and went on to do well in the others growing in popularity with Republicans and Independents.

 

Then they predicted that he could never surmount the opposition of the GOP establishment, the viciously, negative, hostile press and false image as a racist, sexist, xenophobic bully to win the GOP primaries; and again they were wrong as he tapped into the anger of a forgotten and collapsing middle class who wanted a President who'd reverse their fortunes and make them great and prosperous again.

 Then it was predicted that the GOPe fearing Trump would take down the party and cost it the House and Senate would deny him the nomination at the Convention and choose Ted Cruz or someone else. But again they were wrong as his support with Republican voters was just too damn strong.

 

Then in late September with Trump unexpectedly surging in the polls and tying Hillary (see) it was predicted that the "world's greatest woman" (and most qualified candidate ever to seek the presidency) would crush Trump in debate, show voters how unfit he was for office, and runaway with the election. And though HIllary bested Trump in their first debate and pulled ahead in the polls by several points (see) it wasn't enough to make the Clinton machine  comfortable that she'd win.

 
 

 So they came up with an 'October surprise' that they thought would do Trump in: the leaking of the Billy Bush "Access Hollywood" tape where Trump said denigrating things about women (he was, btw, a liberal Democrat at the time). Because of the tape and subsequent multiple groping allegations (whatever happened to them?) Trump's poll numbers took a nose dive (see) as his enemies were uncorking the champagne in expectation of a Hillaryslide.

 

But again they were wrong; as the race tightened going into the campaign's final week (Trump helped somewhat with late undecided voters by the "Comey Effect") a dire warning rang out from billionaire Mark Cuban, Nobel Prize economist Paul Krugman and other economic masterminds on the Left:
 
 
 
 
  

Trump beating Hillary would crash the Dow and world economy causing a domestic and global recession or worse.

But again from their broken, clouded, hate filled crystal balls the anti-Trumpers made yet another bad call. Predictably (immediately after the election) the very opposite occurred: the market began climbing after a slight fall, then soared into the stratosphere to record highs risng and rising as investors saw economic nirvava  ahead.

What was the reason for the sudden upsurge of investor  confidence and optimism?

IT WAS THE TRUMP EFFECT, STUPID!

The promise of MAGANOMICS: tax and regulatory relief (shrinking the size of our massively intrusive government) plus other business friendly polices (repeal of Obamacare, infrastructure rebuilding, trade renegotiation, etc.) designed to unleash the pent up GDP growth that Obamunism was suppressing.  

Indeed, Trump haters who are hell-bent on wanting to remove the President from office, or politically weaken him to the extent of paralyzing his presidency so he can't roll out with his leftist smashing MAGA Agenda, must be horrified by the actions taken by Janet Yellen (a liberal Democrat) and the Fed since the election.
 
 
Trump and Yellen
 

It's no coincidence that before the election (going back to January 2009) the Fed hiked interest rates only once (showing little faith in Obama's abysmally bad recovery and redistributionist-social justice-fake climate science policies); while since, Janet Yellen raised rates not once, not twice, but a whopping THREE times. Why? In anticipation of a "TRICKLE DOWN" economic boom like Coolidge had in the 1920s, John Kennedy in the 1960s, and Reagan in the 1980s when there was "Morning in America."

Look at this Fed timeline:

March 2016
 
 
In March 2016 Fed Chief Yellen announced that there were no definite plans to hike interest rates any time soon, after the slight increase of 0.25% made the previous December.
 
THEN CAME THE EARTHSHAKING ELECTION OF DONALD TRUMP
 
 
 
December 14, 2016
 
 
Make no mistake about it, if Hillary Clinton (who pledged to continue Obama's failed low growth bad jobs policies) was elected president the Fed rate hike of early December (one month after the election) would not have happened.  
 
Business Insider reported:
 
"2017 may be the year that fiscal policy starts to support the economy in a significant way [which it hadn't under Obama] as President-elect Donald Trump enters office. Trump has pledged to cut taxes for corporations and individuals and to invest about $550 billion [now $1 trillion] in infrastructure. Wall Street already thinks these steps will spur economic growth and inflation while supporting company earnings; stocks surged to new highs after the election, while bonds sold off."
 

THEN AT ITS JANUARY MEETING THE FED  ACKNOWLEDGES THE "TRUMP EFFECT"

 
 
"The [Fed] meeting was the first since Trump took office, following his stunning November election upset. The president's name was never mentioned in the minutes, but the broad brushes of his agenda show up often.
 
Members reported hearing higher levels of confidence in the business community. And they predicted that the expected increase in economic growth related to Trump's policy proposals could push the Fed into action [in raising interest rates]." 
 
AND SINCE DECEMBER'S RATE HIKE THE FED HAS DONE IT TWO MORE TIMES
 
Mar. 15, 2017
 
 
"The simple message is the economy is doing well," Yellen said in a press conference. "We have confidence in the robustness of the economy and its resilience to shocks..."
 
"While experts caution that President Trump's policies won't take effect until 2018, the Fed must pay attention to how financial markets perform in response to news about the policies.Trump's potential reforms have already caused U.S. stock markets to rise to all-time highs. Expectations for his policies have triggered a significant increase in business and consumer confidence."
 
June 14, 2017
 
Three Fed rate hikes in five months since the election vs. one before in the seven years since the end of the recession is an auspicious sign of what's ahead for the economy as Donald Trump battles on against titanic media adversity and keeps on winning - as his proxy Karen Handel did in Georgia on Tuesday. And as for those who fear or hope for Trump's impeachment based on some weak obstruction charge by Robert Mueller (very unlikely but not impossible in my view) keep this in mind: with the economy robustly growing and Donald Trump's popularity soaring there's no way in hell that he'll be impeached. With a prospering economy like Clinton had in the 90s (most voters believed he was guilty of perjury and justice obstruction) the chances of a Republican House impeaching a popular, successful President Trump are as remote as the Democrat Senate convicting Bill Clinton of crimes. No country wants a change in leadership when it's on the right course.
 
Get used to it Left!
 
WE'RE IN THE SECOND HUNDRED DAYS OF EIGHT MAGA TRUMP YEARS
 
 
 
 
 POSTSCRIPT
 
IMF ACKNOWLEDGES THE TRUMP EFFECT
 
 
 
WASHINGTON — The International Monetary Fund on Monday raised its forecast for the U.S. economy over the next two years, saying President-elect Donald Trump’s policies would boost economic growth.
 
 
UPDATE
 
 
 

Economic growth accelerated to an annual rate of 2.6% from April through June, the government said Friday.

 

Second-quarter growth more than doubled the sluggish pace from the first three months of the year. First-quarter economic growth was revised down to 1.2%

The economy gained steam in part because of stronger consumer spending, according to the Commerce Department. Helped by the strong job market, personal spending grew at a 2.8% pace, faster than in the first quarter.

 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

HANDEL WINS! HALLELUJAH! HALLELUJAH!

 
                           
 
Last night Republican Karen Handel (a Trump political proxy) defeated Democrat Jon Ossoff to represent Georgia's Sixth Congressional District in the U.S. Congress. Now Georgia (one of the original 13 American Colonies) was named after King George II of Great Britain who reigned from 1727-1760.
 
 
In 1742, the 15th year of George's reign, the classical composer George Frederick Handel (above)     debuted his greatest and most inspired work: Messiah. And in celebration of Karen Handel's victory I bring you the very moving and exhilarating "Hallelujah Chorus" from Handel's masterpiece - beautifully conducted by Georgia's very own Robert Shaw of the Atlanta Philharmonic Orchestra.
 
HEAR IT. ENJOY IT. FEEL THE LOVE.
 
 
 
 
  Let's top off this Republican-Trumpian triumph with Handel's glorious Royal Fireworks Music.
 
 
 
RESISTANCE IS FUTILE!
SUBMIT!
 
 
 
 RELATED
 
 

IN DEFENSE OF JAY SEKULOW: NO INVESTIGATION OF PRESIDENT TRUMP FOR FIRING COMEY

 

 
 
   HERE'S THE STORY
 
President Trump tweeted on Friday:
“I am being investigated for firing the FBI director by the man who told me to fire the FBI director."
 
Now taken literally the President is saying that he's being investigated for firing James Comey not by Special Counsel Robert Mueller but by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein - the one who told Trump to fire Comey then hired Mueller, which is totally absurd.
 
Jay Sekulow clarifying the President's statement said: "It should not be taken as a confirmation that Trump's under investigation by Mueller for the Comey firing.....The tweet from the President was in response to the five anonymous sources purportedly leaking info to the Washington Post that Mueller is investigating  him."
 
So what we have is 1. the President's tweet which makes no logical sense when taken literally; and 2. it's interpretation by Jay Sekulow which absolutely nails the President's true meaning.
 
But let me clarify this further: in his tweet the President isn't being mistakenly illogical as many believe, he's being satirical; he was simply, humorously pointing out the utter, total absurdity of news reports saying that he's being investigated by Mueller for firing Comey on the recommendation of Rosenstein - the correct, legal, DOJ procedure for firing the FBI director.
 
In other words, just as it would be absurd for Rosenstein to investigate Trump for the perfectly legal firing of Comey (done on his advice) so would it be absurd for Mueller (hired by Rosenstein after firing Comey) to investigate possible crimes related to the firing. If the Deputy AG, for whatever reason, determines that the FBI Director is unfit to carry out his duties  he writes a memo to the President telling him to fire him. No special council would investigate this perfectly legal procedure for a crime. It could be the reason for firing the FBI Director was inappropriate; but (with one theoretical exception) it wouldn't be a crime; and especially the crime of "justice obstruction (stifling a federal investigation)" which fake news reports say is what Mueller is looking for.
 
Indeed, that Comey's firing couldn't possibly be justice obstruction is proved by its total ineffectiveness in impeding, halting or obstructing in any way the Russiagate investigation; as acting FBI director Andrew McCabe told the Senate Intelligence Committee, the firing of an FBI director under no circumstances can affect or impact in the least any FBI investigation or project (see).
 
However, there is one theoretical exception (and this is important to understand) that McCabe doesn't mention in his testimony (because it's never happened and probably never will). Indeed, the only possible way that the canning of an FBI director can criminally stop, impede or obstruct an investigation is if it's his own personal project where he's the entire probe doing all the work with no one assisting him; then and then only would firing him criminally impede, halt and obstruct that probe; but this wasn't the case with Russiagate which has a life of its own apart from the FBI chief with possibly hundreds of agents working it*.
 
*The Clinton email investigation had 147 agents working it.
 
In conclusion, then, Mueller can't be investigating the President  for firing Comey as it was perfectly legal following protocol and didn't criminally obstruct the Russiagate investigation. 
 
And as for what Trump allegedly said to Comey in private about "letting Flynn go" it's a "he said he said" situation with no corroborating witnesses; and falls way below the high bar of proving justice obstruction and criminal intent as in for example Watergate. In Watergate there was hard objective evidence of crimes: a burglary by the president's men followed by a White House cover up where Nixon told his deputies to lie to FBI agents, then used hush money to bribe witnesses into silence. Those who compare the legal, non-obstructive Comey firing to Watergate crimes are either Trump hating liars or Trump hating fools; and if they think, because of the firing, that Trump is on his way to impeachment by a Republican led Congress then they're headed for disappointment. 
 
RELATED
 
 

BASEBALL GUNMAN AND WASHINGTON POST AGREE: IT’S TIME TO DESTROY TRUMP & COMPANY

 

IT'S TIME TO DESTROY TRUMP

&

COMPANY!

 

 

The only real difference between the radical, psycho, leftist loser on the left and the unhinged, brain broken billionaire on the right is that the one wanted to kill President Trump physically (and took out his rage on Republican Congressmen during a practice baseball game), and the other wants to kill him politically and takes aim and fires with lies, leaks, innuendo and character assassination. Otherwise they're of one mind and spirit, comrades in arms joined to the hip fighting in the same failing cause to unseat a U.S. President they hysterically fear more than hacking Russians, Moslem terrorists and fake science climate change.  

 
The question now is this: will vicious, frustrated, wingnut moguls like Jeff Bezos turn increasingly to violent dissent as the economy booms, Trump's popularity soars and the destroy Trump media falls flat on its face, worn out and exhausted unable to compete? Hope not.
 
 
 But whether the Jeff Bs of the country fight civilly or violently against the "orange menace" one thing is clear: Donald Trump is bigger, much bigger than them; they are midgets with pee shooters firing spit balls at a battleship - hoping against hope that Robert Mueller will be the torpedo to sink him when all else has failed. But the closest they'll come to killing Trump's presidency is the idiotic corruption of Shakespeare's great play; and ISIS inspired wingnut comedians cutting off his head.  
 
The Left is at it's wits end. And their mounting berserko rage at Trump are 
 
THE DESPERATE CRIES OF
A DYING ORDER.
 
 photo 19060168_10213290324397762_2632493764485375362_n_zpsh3cvcrve.jpg  
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 

HAPPY BIRTHDAY PRESIDENT TRUMP! YOU’RE ON YOUR WAY TO REELECTION

 

November 1, 2016

 

December 7, 2016

 
 January 11, 2017
 
 
March 11, 2017
 
 
May 5, 2017
 
 
 June 14, 2017
 

You can't deny Trump's tremendous effect on the economy | TheHill

 

 

by

Andy Puzder

"The results through the first four months of the Trump presidency are clearly impressive. More Americans are working at better jobs, new claims for unemployment benefits are at a 44-year low, and median household income, household net worth, and job openings all set record highs. Some might call that “tremendous.”

Now, it’s time to pass tax and healthcare reform......."

THINK ABOUT IT PEOPLE:

If Donald Trump's disgusting Hollywood Access tape (recorded when he was a progressive liberal) and multiple subsequent groping allegations (whatever happened to them?) couldn't stop his impossible, unthinkable election just think how impossible it will be to stop his reelection with a booming, high powered economy hugely benefiting the forgotten, declining, angry middle class that put him in office?
 
 
Take sleazy, perverted, alleged rapist Bill Clinton and Monicagate for example: though he befouled and desecrated the White House with Lewinsky, and a majority of Americans (who he lied to) believed he was guilty of perjury and justice obstruction, they were against his impeachment and removal from office. Why? Because of a robustly growing, kick ass economy that was lifting all boats and prospering the country.
 
 
 
 
"The survey found that although most people did not dispute the accusations in the articles of impeachment approved by the Judiciary Committee [perjury and justice obstruction], only 24 percent wanted the House to actually vote to impeach. Thirty-seven percent of Americans want Congress and Mr. Clinton to forge a compromise; another 37 percent want the matter dropped entirely."
 
 In other words, with a supercharged economy growing in jobs and rising wages the public will reelect Donald Trump to a second term even in the unlikely event that Robert Mueller charges him with a crime, like Ken Starr charged Clinton.
 
The economy is the destiny of presidents. It is conceivable that if Richard Nixon had Clinton's or Reagan's high growth economy (not double digit inflation) he would have finished out his presidency Watergate and all; his economic policies and great popularity would have chilled any attempt to impeach him as happened to guilty as sin Bill Clinton in the Senate. When times are good voters want to stay the course and fear a change of leadership.
 
HAPPY BIRTHDAY MR. PRESIDENT!
 
YOU'RE ON YOUR WAY TO REELECTION CARRIED ON THE
 
WAVE OF A HUGE ECONOMIC BOOM SUCH LIKE WE
 
HAVEN'T SEEN IN
 
DECADES.
 
 
 
POSTSCRIPT
 
 
 
 
AT THIS POINT IN BILL CLINTON'S PRESIDENCY
 
 he had an approval rating as low as Donald Trump at 37%. Then the economy took off (as it will for Trump) and he was reelected, as Trump will in 2020 (see). 
 
 
Two years into his presidency and the economy in recession Ronald Reagan's approval rating fell below 40% (see). Then came the great Supply-Side driven economic boom just in time for the 1984 election; and Reagan won a second term in a 49 state landslide.  
 
The question for 2020 is not will the Reaganite Donald Trump win? The question is by how much?
 
 
RELATED
 
< p dir="ltr" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 18px; font-family: 'Graphik Web', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-weight: 400; color: #2b2c30; margin: 0px 0px 20px; line-height: 1.4; text-align: center;"> 

DONALD TRUMP JR., JIM COMEY’S PHONY MEMO AND THE REAL BRUTAL, BANE-LIKE DONALD TRUMP

 

 Donald Trump Jr. appears to corroborate Comey's version of the Oval Office meeting with Trump - AOL News

Donald Trump Jr. Helps To Impeach His Own Father By Proving Comey Right-politicusa.com

 

Don Trump Jr. to Judge Pirro:

"You and I both know my father a long time. When he tells you to do something, guess what? There's no ambiguity in it."

 After 24 months on the American political and world stage everyone knows who Donlad Trump is; they know that he's a brutally blunt, direct, straightforward man who hits back harder when he's hit; and pulls no punches holding nothing back when he fights to achieve his aims. Indeed, he was that way before his election; and defying expectations he'd be different once in office (softening his rhetoric and crude, harsh, aggressive style) he's hardly changed a bit.

\

Now in searching for a real life or fictional analogy to President Trump one writer has likened him to the comic book super villain Bane wonderfully played by Tom Hardy in the blockbuster film The Dark Knight Rises - who Trump seemed to quote in his inaugural speech (see). Trump is not a schoolyard bully who loves pushing around weaker souls, as Hillary Clinton and others have said; instead, he greatly delights in taking on the strong and powerful (Obama, Clinton campaign machine, Democrat Party, GOPe, liberal media for example) and in defeating and breaking them if he can; and when they're down he pounces on them like Bane broke Batman in the film, then continued to beat him into unconsciousness. Just look at his continued post-election attacks on Hillary and Obama. Rightly or wrongly he just loves to keep on bashing them.

Bane breaks Batman

Indeed, the radically extreme politically incorrect Trump (PC's worst nightmare) loves tormenting his opponents and eating them alive then spitting them out. Recall how this 900 pound gorilla treated his political rivals and enemies heaping a torrent of abuse and insults on them during the campaign: there was Carley Fiorina's looks, John Kasich's dining manners, Jeb's low energy, Rick Perry's IQ; there was "sad, lyin Ted" whose dad "killed JFK;" "crooked, weak Hillary" with her pathetic lack of "stamina, energy and strength;" look how he eviscerated "little" Marco Rubio, called Obama "sick," and recently started in on Comey calling him a "nutjob." Earlier this year The New York Times compiled a list of 332 people, places and things that Trump has insulted on Twitter. For a good laugh you can read them here

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/01/28/upshot/donald-trump-twitter-insults.html?_r=0

 

              
 
 In a word, Donald Trump is Mr. Meanie, and it's hilarious. Only humorless lefties don't appreciate the entertainment value in all this. But I digress from my reason for writing this piece; that being that the Donald Trump of James Comey's leaked memo (and testimony to the Senate) is not the audacious, defiant, counter punching, anti-PC Donald that we've come to know and love. No way that the real President Trump would have said to Comey about his friend Mike Flynn:
 
'I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.' 
 
How can anyone but an obsessive, hyperpartisan, anti-Trump freak see in these 28 words the candidate who bludgeoned and bulldozed his way into office, and continues to be so outrageous, defiant and unchained? This is not the Donald Trump that we know or, for that matter, the duplicitous Comey knows and conversed with that day.
 
 
 
 
 
 
It's as Don Jr. (an authority on his dad) indicated to Judge Pirro Saturday night: the Donald Trump of Comey's memo is radically uncharacteristic of him; he's too vague, subtle, nuanced, indirect and ambiguous for the real, gruff, hard-hitting Donald; those 28 words and Trump's habitual style simply don't mesh - they're way too unTrumpian. If Trump was hell-bent on Comey dropping the Flynn investigation he wouldn't have testified: "I FELT that Trump was pressuring me to drop the probe." Comey would have had no doubts or misunderstanding about the president's intent. He wouldn't have "FELT" that Trump was pressuring him (leaving open the possibility he could be wrong); on the contrary, he would have KNOWN with 100% certainty what Trump meant. 
 

Trump: James Comey, You're Fired!

 

 

 Indeed, as Comey's meeting with Trump was private there was nothing stopping him from being the brutally blunt Donald Bane (Batman breaking) Trump he normally is; there was nothing stopping him from applying the utmost excruciating pressure on Comey (short of violence) threatening him unequivocally to do or die, saying:

 

'This is the deal, Comey: drop the Flynn probe or lose your job starting today! Now what are you going to do?'

 

That's Trump's way; he doesn't mince words. Don Jr. is perfectly correct: the subtle, nuanced Donald Trump of Comey's February 14th memo isn't his father. It's crystal clear those 28 words are wordsmith Comey's skillful invention. In other words, it's more James Comey than Donald Trump and should be dismissed as a lie designed to appear like justice obstruction in retaliation for being fired - and wanting a lengthy, troublesome special council investigation to follow him. That was very clever of Comey. But it's not going to stop the roll out of Trump's ambitious agenda to

 

MAKE AMERICA

 

A LAW AND ORDER NATION AGAIN

 

without James Comey

 

                      

                    

 RELATED

 

 
 

 DEMOCRAT POLLSTER’S POST-ELECTION POLL FINDS “COMEY EFFECT” AND “RUSSIAN-WIKI EFFECT” DIDN’T EFFECT OUTCOME OF ELECTION 

 

JAMES COMEY, PLAMEGATE, SCOOTER LIBBY AND THE COMING INDICTMENT OF HILLARY CLINTON? 

 

IF COMEY FOUND THE TRUMP-PUTIN COLLUSION LINK HE’D BE A DEAD MAN, STUPID! |  



GOD, PENNSYLVANIA, THE FOUNDING OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC AND THE 11/9 VICTORY OF DONALD TRUMP

 

                        

 

I have written on the topic of President Trump winning the 2016 election in the wee hours of the morning on November 9th or 11/9 when the great Rust Belt state of Pennsylvania put him over the 270 electoral votes he needed to win. But what I wrote was a defense against those shell-shocked Trump haters on the Left who seized on the date "11/9" and spun it into an ominous sign that Trump would be a 9/11 disaster (11/9 reverse) as president:

 
 
"11/9 is the new 9/11,"  tweeted one. "Worst day in
America 9/11....2nd worst day in America 11/9" tweeted another. Then came Michael Moore, who predicted Trump's victory, with the tweet, "Fahrenheit 11/9."
 
  
 
In defense of the newly elected president I wrote that "11/9" was 9/11 reverse. That it was a sign of Donald Trump completely reversing the fortunes of our radical Islamic terrorist enemies; and I predicted that Trump (with Mad Dog Mattis* at Defense) will do to them what they did to us on 9/11-and worse, much worse. In short, I predicted that Donald Trump will be their worst nightmare and 9/11 CATASTROPHE. And so far, unless you hate his guts, President Trump hasn't disappointed us.
 
*Oddly, on 9-11-2007 (sixth anniversary of 9/11) President George Bush elevated Lieutenant Mattis to the rank of general to command U.S. Joint Forces Command in Norfolk, Virginia. Then on 11-9-2007 Mattis was promoted to four-star general and took control of
 NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (see).
 
 
But what you're about to read has nothing to do with defeating ISIS and al Qaida and winning the war against Islamic jihad and terror. What you're about to read is a new, astonishing, inspirational discovery about Donald Trump's historic 11/9 victory date; a discovery like many others that I wrote about since the start of his gravity defying against the odds presidential campaign two years ago, signifying that his presidency is the Work of Divine Providence, as Reverend Graham said, and not a freak historical accident. For what I've discovered below can only be explained supernaturally as a signature effect of a 
Higher Power, or sign, that Donald Trump is a Providential Man: a blessing to this nation and its people in a time of peril for reversing our economic, military and geopolitical decline. This is what I found:
 
DONALD TRUMP'S 11/9 ELECTION VICTORY AND THE FOUNDING AND FRAMING OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC
 
 
When on 11-09-2016 around 2:30 p.m. a stunned anti-Trump media led by the New York Times called the election for Donald Trump it was the 44th week of the year, one day shy of the 45th (see). Indeed, on 11/9 Trump was elected by the country to succeed the 44th president, Barack Obama, to be its 45th president; and it was the blue state of Pennsylvania, one of the 13 original revolutionary colonies (which a GOP presidential candidate hadn't won in 28 years*) that led the way to Trump's astounding, odds defying, underdog victory - and put him in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
 
*Oddly, on November 8, 1988 (the last time before 2016 a presidential election was held on that date) George H. W. Bush won Pennsylvania and the presidency.
 
Now here is where it gets profound and shows signs of a Higher Power connecting Donald Trump's 11/9 election victory to the Founding and Framing of our Constitutional Republic:
 
First off when we combine the numbers 119 (signifying the month and day of Donald Trump's victory) with 44 (signifying the week of the year) it gives us the five digit number 11944. Now if we turn 11944 into WEEKS then subtract it from the complete date 11-09-2016 something
 seemingly or actually (however you want to see it) miraculous happens: it brings us the the date December 12, 1787. What is significant, astonishing and mind boggling about this date, and indicates that Trump's victory was no chance accident or mistake (or work of Russian hackers, or a James "Comey Effect" as Hillary Clinton believes) is that it was precisely when the great state of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia was our capital at the time) ratified the U.S. Constitution and entered the Union...the second state to do so (seesee and see).
 
 
 Just write 11944 in the Weeks box (only three digits of the number will appear) hit Subtract, then hit Calculate New Date, and this is the result you will get:
 

From Wednesday, November 9, 2016
Subtracted 11,944 weeks
Normalized to 83,608 days


Result: Wednesday, December 12, 1787

But there's more:

 

 
 
 President Trump in celebration of the last day of his very productive first 100 days (more productive that Ronald Reagan's) decided to skip the White House correspondents' dinner in Washington and be with his supporters in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; he did this to thank them once again for electing him president on 11-09-2016, and to celebrate his achievements.
 
 
 
Now Donald Trump's presidency which auspiciously began on the 70th year, 7th month and 7th day of his life (see), and whose 77th day in office, April 7th*, was the best of his first 100 days, ended that very productive period on Saturday, April 29th, the 7th day of the week. Amazingly, astonishingly and I believe providentially April 29th, when Trump was with his Pennsylvania supporters, was the 119th day of the year (see and see).
 
*On April 7th Syrian time President Trump ordered the bombing of Bashir Assad's air base as punishment for his chemical attack on innocent Syrian civilians. Moreover, April 7th was the day Neil Gorsuch was confirmed to the Supreme Court (see). BTW, 119 is a multiple of 7 17x.   
 
OUT OF MANY ONE
 
 
In the above I established what I believe is a providential connection linking Donald Trump's election victory on 11-09-2016 to the historic day Pennsylvania ratified the Constitution and entered the Union. This was part of the process that turned 13 separate states into a unified nation. "OUT OF MANY ONE." Does this foreshadow Donald Trump unifying our terribly divided and turbulent country? The odds seem against it. But will Providence intervene sometime in the near future confronting us with an existential threat that will unite the country behind Donald Trump like it did with Franklin Roosevelt in the 1940s? 
 
THE CONNECTION OF PRESIDENT TRUMP'S 11/9 VICTORY TO JULY 4, 1776
 
 
However, going further I will show you something equally astounding: the linking of President Trump's election to July 4, 1776, our nation's Founding Moment. This is how it's done:
 
Above I mentioned that when Donald Trump was sworn into office it auspiciously fell on the 70th year, 7th month and 7th day of his incredible life. That gives us the numbers 70 (7 X 10), 7 and 7. Now look at this: when I used timeanddate.com to calculate the exact number of days separating 7-04-1776 (a date encoded with three 7s) and 11-09-2016 it totals exactly (are you ready for this) 87,787 days - a number like the date of our Founding, and Donald Trump's age at his inaugural, encoded with three 7s (see).
 
From and including: Thursday, July 4, 1776
To and including: Wednesday, November 9, 2016
 
Result: 87,787 days
 
 Anyone who thinks that all the above is the work of random, meaningless, chaotic, undirected chance, or mathematical trickery on my part, is greatly mistaken. Donald Trump, just like FDR his predecessor from New York is a Providential Man with a great national mission, purpose and destiny; part of which is to reverse 9/11 and reign utter, total, devastating havoc on our radical Moslem terrorist enemies. This, I believe, is supernatually indicated by the following:  
 
PRESIDENT TRUMP'S 11/9 TRIP TO THE MIDDLE EAST 
 
 
 I began this article with an interpretation of Donald Trump's 11/9 victory as a sign of his destiny to completely reverse the 9/11 event which first struck New York City (where Trump was born) and then Washington DC (where Trump currently resides as president); and then there was  the third terrible event of that day: the crash of United Airlines Flight 93*near Shanksville, Pennsylvania - the state that gave Donald Trump his victory on 11/9.
 
*As Trump won Pennsylvania on 11/9, the 44th week of the year, oddly there were 44 people aboard Flight 93 (including the terrorists) when it crashed (see).
 
Now here is where it gets profound. On Friday May 19th Donald Trump went on his first overseas trip as President of the United States. As you will see according to the signs it was the right trip, to the right place at the right time in history. Why?  Because it was an 11/9 trip. Why do I say this? Because amazingly, incredibly, astonishingly it fell on the 119th day of Donald Trump's presidency (see and see).
 
Think about this: as 11/9 symbolically is the reverse of the terrible destructive terrorist attack on 9/11 (and signifies,  I believe, Donald Trump completely reversing the fortunes of (turning the table on) our radical Islamic terrorist enemies, he began his trip on the 119th day of his presidency in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Osama bin Ladin's birthplace) where 15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers originated.
 
And what did President Trump accomplish by that first and most important leg of his trip? He reasserted US power in the region after a period of intentional and deliberate retreat and decline by his predecessor where the terrorist states of ISIS and Iran filled the void wrecking havoc on the region; and Syria descended into a fratricidal civil war where 500,000 have died. Donald Trump on that trip united 54 Sunni Moslem nations* behind his leadership to end the financing, support and murderous existence of Islamic terrorism; an amazing historic achievement unprecedented for a nonMoslem head of state. Clearly the consequences of what he accomplished that day will long be remembered, as will his epoch making presidency for our nation.
 
POSTSCRIPT
 
GENERAL JAMES MADDIS
 
 
 
 
As I wrote above General James "Mad Dog" Maddis who is President Trump's right hand man for completely reversing 9/11 and defeating our Islamic terrorist enemies became a general,  and was given control of the US Joint Forces Command, on 9-11-2007; and 60 days later on 11-9-2007 he was upgraded to a 4-star general and took control of NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation.
 
 
 
In what follows you will see God's hand at work in bringing together General Mattis and his commander-in-chief, President Trump. Above I wrote that Donald Trump on the day he became President was in the 70th year, 7th month and 7th day of his amazing life. Well, quite incredibly, when Trump kicked off his presidential campaign on June 16, 2015 General Mattis had been a four star general and NATO's Supreme Allied Commander for exactly 7 years, 7 months and 7 days. I'm not making this up:
 

From and including: Friday, November 9, 2007
To, but not including Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Result: 2776 days

It is 2776 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date

Or 7 years, 7 months, 7 days excluding the end date (see). 

 

Now if we include the end date in our calculations the number of days is increased by one giving us a total of 2777 days (see).

 

Now the question is what does the number 7 mean if it has meaning at all? Pythagoreans, Kabbalists and those who assign meanings to numbers tell us that 7 is symbolic of

 

VICTORY

 

THE TRIUMPH OF THE WILL

 

 

 

By the sheer force of his indomitable will and personality Donald Trump against titanic opposition and seemingly impossible odds became President of the United States; and is staying in power confident that nothing and no one can or will undo his election and bring him down.

 

MAGA

 

And with the superb Mad Dog Mattis as Defense Secretary Donald Trump will accomplish legendary things as America is made great again rising phoenix like from the  ashes of the Obama years to new heights of glory and achievement.

 

 

 

GOD'S WILL BE DONE

 

                                 

 

 

RELATED

 

 

DONALD TRUMP, HILLARY CLINTON AND THE HISTORY OF SAME STATE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES 

THE DEATH OF JANET RENO AND TOMORROW’S HISTORIC PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

IS HILLARY CLINTON UNDER A GEORGE MCGOVERN “CURSE?” WILL 2016 BE 1972 FOR HILLARY? 

DONALD TRUMP: THE “COMEBACK KING” OF THE CLINTON ERA REVERSES HIS FORTUNES AGAINST THE CLINTON MACHINE?

COULD THE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION AT THE WELLS FARGO CENTER PREFIGURE HILLARY’S DEFEAT DUE TO SCANDALS?

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

DONALD TRUMP’S HISTORIC ALLIANCE WITH SUNNI ISLAM AND LONDON’S IDIOT MOSLEM MAYOR WHO CALLED HIM AN “IGNORANT, DIVISIVE, ANTI-MOSLEM BIGOT”

 

President Trump blasts London’s Muslim Mayor after latest Muslim terrorist attack – BARE NAKED ISLAM

London Is About To Elect A Muslim Mayor Who Has Defended Islamists, 9/11 Terrorists, And Who Is Endorsed By Anti-Semites - Breitbart

Anti-Trump London Mayor Sadiq Khan Hosts Party With Countries That Ban Israelis- inquisitor.com

On May 6, 2016 the citizens of London wanting to show the Moslem world and its anti-Western extremists how tolerant they were of their faith made history: they elected in a landslide Labor Party candidate Sadiq Khan, a British born Moslem of Pakistani parents, mayor of their great city. Not only did this historic election make Khan London's first ethnic minority mayor, but he also became the first Moslem to head a major Western capital.
 
  Now when Khan won I like many on the Right who'd been following Khan's career were alarmed and dismayed. For this was the man who was the legal consultant to 9/11 bomber Zacarius Moussaoui, shared platforms with and showed deference to anti-Western and Jew hating Islamist extremists like Azzam Tamini and Suliman Gani; and derogatorily referred to moderate Moslems as "Uncle Toms"- meaning that they were false Moslems and betrayers of the faith; and that only Islamists or Islamic supremacists (those who believe in Islamic world rule) were true Moslems worthy of the name.
 
 
 
 
Yet despite Khan's association with Islamists, and the fear and condemnation of him by the American and British Right when he became mayor Donald Trump going against the grain congratulated him saying during a New York Times interview:
 
“I was happy to see him elected mayor. I think it’s a very good thing, and I hope he does a very good job setting an example because frankly that would be very, very good (see) .”
 
And that should have been the end of it. But an ungrateful Mayor Khan rejecting Trump's congrats and well wishing chose instead to pick a fight with him over his proposed Moslem immigration ban and issued this tweet:
 

 Responding, the presumptive Republican nominee said:

“He doesn’t know me, never met me, doesn’t know what I am all about. I think they are very rude statements. Frankly tell him I will remember those statements. They are very nasty. It is ignorant for him to say that.

“When he won I wished him well. Now, I don’t care about him. I mean it doesn’t make any difference to me. Let’s see how he does, let’s see if he is a good mayor.”  

A spokesman for Khan then hit back, saying:

 “Donald Trump’s views are ignorant, divisive and dangerous - it’s the politics of fear at its worst and will be rejected at the ballot box just as it was in London.”  

 

 

But it wasn't rejected. Trump having the last laugh over Sadiq Kahn (and that other idiot Pakistani Khirz Khan who slandered him at the DNC) was elected POTUS by a nation hurting economically and rightly fearful of radical Islamic terror. And to worsen the humiliation and anger of both Khans the president of Pakistan together with 53 other Sunni leaders (representing 1 billion Moslems and caring nothing about his ban) embraced the "ignorant," "bigoted," "divisive" Trump in Saudi Arabia as a good, wise and courageous man - the leader uniting them in the war against ISIS, al Qaida and Islamonazi terrorist Iran.

Perhaps never in the history of the world have so many Moslem heads of state joined forces behind a leader of a powerful infidel country. It's unprecedented and awesome and will go far in crushing and demoralizing the scourge of violent Islamic jihad .

 

 "Tell Khan I will remember his rude statements about me."

Trump has kept his word.

              

 

RELATED

PUTIN’S “PUPPET” DONALD TRUMP DEALS HIM A SERIES OF DAMAGING BLOWS AS RUSSIA IS MADE SMALLER AGAIN 

 

THE TRUMP EFFECT AND THE NATO ALLIANCE: HOW NATO IS STRONGER TODAY BECAUSE OF DONALD TRUMP – A DEBATE

 

 

NATO AND THE TRUMP EFFECT: DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF THE TREMENDOUS POSITIVE IMPACT OF DONALD TRUMP ON NATO SINCE ELECTION

 

NATO chief: Allied spending up $10 billion because of Trump - WashEx

 

 
At a joint press conference at the White House on April 12th  Jen Stoltenberg (NATO's Secretary General) praised President Trump for the measurable impact of his hardline stance on increasing NATO spending since his election. Stoltenberg said:
 
"Mr. President, I thank you for your attention to the issue of NATO's defense spending; we are already seeing the EFFECT of your strong focus on burden sharing in the alliance; and we agree that the alliance needs to redouble the effort they pledged in 2014..."
 
 
 
 
Indeed, as you will see from the evidence below SecGen Stoltenberg wasn't merely flattering the president with words, but genuinely praising him for lighting a fire under the NATO members who, despite a 2014 agreement to boost spending, were greatly underspending when he took office . But since, NATO has been spending substantially more - now well over the $10 billion Stultenberg cites at the press conference. What I posted below from news stories documents this achievement from shortly after the election to just days before the president's trip to Brussels. As you will see, the Trump Effect is very real and growing; and as a result NATO is stronger today in meeting threats from Vladimir Putin and Moslem terrorism than it was on November 8th when Donald Trump's election sent shock waves through the alliance.
 
 
   
 

Defense budgets climb as NATO countries step up spending - CNBC

20 Dec 2016
(42 days after Trump's election)
 
SINCE THE U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, European members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization have announced plans to buy everything from surveillance aircraft and drones, to new air defense systems and warships. The announcements come amid U.S. criticism that European countries are not doing enough to uphold their part of the alliance.
 
 
 Jan 18, 2017
(2 days before inaugural)
 
Germany, UNDER FIRE FROM U.S. PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP for not meeting NATO's defense spending goal, is boosting military budgets, but also wants Trump to map out a consistent foreign policy agenda, Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen said.
 
 
22 FEBRUARY 2017
 
Germany is to increase the size of its armed forces amid growing concerns over the security of Europe by 200,000. 
 

The move comes days after MIKE PENCE, THE US VICE PRESIDENT, CALLED ON NATO'S EUROPEAN MEMBERS TO INCREASE MILITARY SPENDING.    

The move also comes amid growing concern in European capitals over MR. TRUMP'S COMMITTMENT TO NATO, after he described the alliance as “obsolete”.
 
 
 Posted on7
 

Germany’s Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen announced today that Germany will be deploying a substantial force of tanks and armored vehicles to Lithuania, along the Russian border, where they will be joining the NATO anti-Russia force in the region, which already has upwards of 1,000 German troops involved.

While the timing would aim to directly link Germany’s military growth with its anti-Russia deployments, the reality is that the effort is also meant as a way to increase spending in an effort to PLACATE THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION...

 
16 November 2016
(8 days after Trump's election)
 

The French Parliament has approved an EUR600 million increase to the country's defence budget above current-year levels.

In total the 2017 budget will sit at EUR32.44 billion, a 1.8% increase over 2016. This is the latest in upward revisions of the French defence budget, with the new 2017 figures about EUR1.1 billion higher than was envisaged by the 2014-2019 Military Programming Law (LPM) and EUR775 million higher than the revised LPM of July 2015. Approximately EUR250 million of 'exceptional income' is included in the new budget figures, set to be sourced by land and property sales.

Brussels to Outline Plans to ‘Turbo Boost’ Defence Spending-defense-aerospace. com

Nov 29, 2016

(21 days after Trump's election)

Brussels is to unveil plans to “turbo boost” spending on cyber security, war ships and drone technology as part of a multi-billion euro European Defence Fund, which comes as US PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP presses Nato allies to significantly increase military spending. 
 
May 17, 2017
 

BRATISLAVA (Reuters) - Slovakia approved on Wednesday plans to spend 1.2 billion euros ($1.33 billion) by 2029 to replace the army's outdated armored personnel carriers, in the biggest defense modernization project in the country's history.

 

Slovakia is stepping up defense spending and its military presence in NATO missions after calls by U.S. PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP on allies to recommit themselves to the alliance.

 

Croatia has to increase defense budget by 2,8 billion HRK | Defense Issues 

 

Feb 17, 2017

 

A day after new US DEFENSE MINISTER JAMES MATTIS requested allied countries to increase defense spending to 2% of GDP, Croatian Minister of Defense Damir Krstičević stated that a decision on Croatian Air Force can help Croatia meet the target, increasing defense expenditure from current 1,23% of GDP. At this moment, only seven NATO members has no air force. Reaching the 2% target would mean increasing the defense budget by 400 million USD (2,8 billion HRK). Currently, United States are responsible for 70% of NATOs military capabilities. Mattis has also stated that “Americans cannot care more for the future of your children than you can”.
 
 
29.03.2017
 

Lithuania is determined to increase its defense spending amid US calls to meet the alliance's 2 percent defense spending target, Lithuanian Foreign Minister Linas Linkevicius told reporters on Tuesday.

2-17-17

 

“Security is not cheap. Otherwise the price is the entire country,” Bergmanis said. “Latvia’s government is committed to increase the country’s defense budget to 2% of GDP next year. As Latvia’s defense minister, I will fight to ensure this decision is not changed.”

 
 
April 26, 2017
 
The former eastern bloc nation of 7 million people is revamping its military amid calls from U.S. PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP for NATO members to meet the alliance’s spending guidelines. The EU’s poorest country is worried about increasing threats from Islamic State and has raised concerns about potential calls for autonomy among ethnic Turks. Russia’s takeover of Crimea and the Ukraine conflict have rattled the whole region.
 
 
 16.02.2017
 
PRAGUE (Sputnik) – The deal, signed on the sidelines of the NATO defense ministerial in Brussels, Belgium on Wednesday, will ensure tight cooperation between the 4th Czech Rapid Deployment Brigade and the German 10th Armoured (Panzer) Division, Ceske Noviny said.
 
 

March 22, 2017 WASHINGTON, Mar 21 — RIA Novosti. Turkey will increase defense spending in 2017, and thus closer to the goal to allocate 2% of its budget on defense, said Tuesday the Minister of foreign Affairs of Turkey Mevlut Cavusoglu.

 
Romania has become the first NATO member since the election of pro-NATO Donald Trump to spend 2% of GDP on defense-bringing the number of 2% nations up to five.
 
Romania increased defense spending to 2% of GDP
 

Last week, Romanian President Klaus Iohannis signed into law Romania’s annual budget, which for the first time provides for a defense authorization share equal to 2% of GDP. The budget drafted by the Government of Romania had received prior approval by the Parliament and the defense authorization provisions have been unanimously supported by all political parties.....

 

 

Russian President Vladimir Putin acknowledged on Friday that he wants NATO to "fall apart," as he criticized President Trump for urging allies to increase their defense spending.

"[T]hey should completely be falling apart, that will help," Putin said during the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. "But we don't see that falling [apart] just yet."

June 28, 2017

Trump effect? Europe's defense spending to rise faster in 2017 | Reuters

By Robin Emmott | BRUSSELS

Europe and Canada will raise defense spending at the fastest pace for three years in 2017, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said on Wednesday, partly aimed at showing the United States they are committed to shouldering more costs.

 
 
 

DONALD TRUMP AND THE DEATH OF CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM-A PROSE POEM

 
 
 

WHERE ARE THE SNOWLESS NORTHERN GLOBAL WARMING WINTERS?

 

The freakish iceless August Arctic summers? Where's the gondolas sailing down Fifth Ave past Macy's, Saks and Trump Tower? Where's  the rainlessness and devastating droughts wiping out forests, farmlands, plants and crops? Where are the coastal floodings displacing millions driving them up mountaintops? Where's the acidifying of the seas killing all fish, marine life, algae and sea weed? And desertification, what happened with that? turning soil into dry lifeless sand where nothing can grow to feed insects, animals or man?

 

 photo b2000e42-7caa-49f7-b4b5-04bddab00cdf_zpseyhdx1pr.jpg

 

Unless CO2 was drastically cut by 2016 millions were to perish from famines, heatwaves, floods and disease. What happened to all the destruction and death-the runaway extreme weather events-predicted expertly by doomsday scientists? Thank God they were wrong and Armageddon's not coming; and the world is thriving, greening and pleasantly warming.

 

The truth is this: Earth's complex climate is changing for the better; but not if you're a capitalist hating warmunist with a one world, eco-fascist, anti-oil agenda.

 

 

WHAT DONALD THE GREAT DID TODAY IS A SIGN:

CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM'S IN IT'S ARMAGEDDON

 

END TIME

 

 

 

 

POSTSCRIPT

HANSEN AND TRUMP AGREE

James Hansen, father of climate change awareness, calls Paris talks 'a fraud' | Environment | The Guardian

                
 
 

EX-NASA SCIENTIST JAMES HANSEN SAYS PARIS ACCORD IS "BULL SH*T" AND "FRAUD"

Hansen, arguably the leading scientific voice of the global warming movement, said that the Paris Accord was "useless for reversing human CO2 emissions because it's based on promises, and lacks an enforcement mechanism." Isn't that what Trump is saying coming from as different direction?

In other words, both men are agreed that the Paris Accord (with more signatures) is another worthless Kyoto; for like Kyoto it won't stop the massive growing use of fossil fuels - the cheapest, most efficient, and wealth creating form of energy known to man - especially in industrializing third world states that won't go green unless we pay them billions...which isn't going to happen.

RELATED

CATASTROPHIC HELIOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING VS. CATASTROPHIC ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING: WHICH IS THE REAL APOCALYPSE?