WHY SHOULD MOSLEMS BE OFFENDED BY THE PHRASE “ISLAMIC TERROR” WHEN THEIR NEAR PERFECT, GOD FILLED PROPHET WAS A TERRORIST?

To the reader: I found this piece from Sept. 2016  in my draft folder. For some reason I never posted it, and now do so.

O’Reilly: No ‘Rational Muslim’ Would Find the Phrase ‘Islamic Terror’ Offensive · Mediaite ·

O'REILLY IS WRONG!

Unfortunately these "rational Moslems" are far between and few in number in the Islamic world. Unfortunately most Moslems are offended and many even violently enraged when they hear the phrase "Islamic terror." Why? Because they want the world of non-Moslem infidels to believe that Islam is "a religion of world peace" and keep hidden the terrible truth about their faith and its dear, beloved, God inspired Prophet Mohammed. A man so holy according to Islamic law that he was higher than the angels and the closest being to God. The man, in fact, who was the father of Islamic jihad and terror - a mass murdering thug - who among many of his horrific atrocities and crimes ethnically cleansed Medina of its large Jewish population by either killing, expelling or enslaving them selling them like cattle for gain. 

 

Indeed, when this "man of peace" died the terrible truth is that the only Jews left in Medina were either slaves or converts to Islam. Mohammed, in truth, was a 7th century Jew hating Adolf Hitler; just as Hitler (an Islamophile) was a 20th century Jew hating Mohammed. Moslems shouldn't be offended by the phrase "Islamic terror" but by their bloodthirsty, power mad, intolerant, murdering prophet, who gave it reality and meaning. 

If speaking the truth about Islam offends Moslems - that it's rooted in the teachings and deeds of a terrorist who turned his followers into a killing machine for God - then so be it.

O'Reilly says, "Everybody knows most Muslims are not violent people.”

Yet his buddy Trump wants to ban all Muslims from entering the country.

 

ApolloSpeaks   Clovis4 

 

With over 100 million Moslems supporting ISIS, and the US intel community (Comey, Clapper, Brennen, etc) warning that ISIS jihadis are infiltrating Moslem refugee flows, Trump's temporary ban is a national security necessity.

CLICK

SHOCKING PEW POLL REVEALS THAT NUCLEAR PAKISTAN COULD POTENTIALLY JOIN ISIS DEATH CULT STATE

 

What does that have to do with my post?

What does your inaccurate post have to do with Trump's policy on a temporary ban such like Obama had in place for Iraqi refugees in 2011?

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/...

 

America cannot elect a fat-shaming misogynist as president | TheHill

CALLING A FAT WOMAN FAT IS MISOGYNISTIC, DEMEANING AND UNACCEPTABLE

But letting thousands of misogynistic/homophobic Moslem fundamentalist refugees into this country (which isn't good for the safety of women and gays) is the politically correct and American thing to do. Go figure.

OzzieIsaacs  ApolloSpeak

Boring troll bores me.

let me know if you ever get around to a cogent defense of Trump's stupidity, rather than pivoting into your fear of the mooslum.

 

ApolloSpeaks   OzzieIsaacs

How is stating facts about Islam's universal, age-old practice of misogyny and murderous hatred of gays a "fear" of Islam? Give me a cogent defense of Hillary Clinton's stupid management of the state department and foreign policy; or her utterly stupid economic and tax proposals which go back to Herbert Hoover and FDR's failed New Deal.

Your gish galloping all over this thread is as boring as it is pointless.

Pivoting to your irrational hatred of Muslims is not a defense of Trump's tasteless comments about Machado.

What is irrational about hating the evil of radical Islamic jihad and terrorism?

What is tasteful about being a filthy, disgusting porn star?

Like I said, you don't recognize your own stupidity.

You don't even seem willing to acknowledge the fact that Machado has never starred in pornography. The worst you could say on that front is that she posed nude for a magazine... just like Donald Trump's own wife has.

I stand corrected on the porn.. But what are a few "tasteless" remarks (if true) about this criminal Machado woman (she drove a getaway car in a murder) compared to Bill Clinton's sordid desecration of the White House with Monica Lewinski, his misogynistic sexual abuse of women (including allegations of rape), and Hillary's attempt to destroy them (along with Lewinski)? Which is more tasteless?

How is pointing out Christian conservatives fear of LGBT people a problem? 

I'm not Christian. But how is expanding the community of LGBT haters in this country by letting in a flood of Syrian and other Moslem refugees good for LGBT folks?

RELATED

ISLAM: “THE RELIGION OF PEACE” AT WAR WITH HOMOSEXUALS AND LGBT PEOPLE

IS ISLAM ATHEISM DISGUISED AS JEWISH MONOTHEISM

 
 
 
 

 

11 thoughts on “WHY SHOULD MOSLEMS BE OFFENDED BY THE PHRASE “ISLAMIC TERROR” WHEN THEIR NEAR PERFECT, GOD FILLED PROPHET WAS A TERRORIST?

  1. The actual truth is that Islam is at war with everyone on planet Earth who has not yet submitted to the will of Allah as they see it…

    1. So why do Muslims kill other Muslims? Boredom?

      Because death just means so very much to them. They get off on it.

  2. The prime target of Islamic jihad is the destruction and subjugation of Western Civilization. We need to kill them before they kill us.

      1. You are correct based on history. Islam encourages converting or killing ALL kaffirs. Muslims kill even Buddhists, who arguably belong to the most peaceful religion on earth. Muslims invaded India 1400 years ago, and have slaughtered more Hindu’s by orders of magnitude than sum of all Christians murdered by Muslims in Western countries.

  3. ISLAM IS the PROBLEM.

    MUSLIMS ARE the PROBLEM

    There are no “Moderate” Muslims.

    Islam is a barbaric religion of HATE and DEATH.

Leave a Reply