Here's a simple, rational, fact based lesson in climate science for your education: This good, great, fruitful Earth (that's getting greener from the increase of CO2) is in an INTERGLACIAL EPOCH: a period between two ICE AGES of global warming deglaciation where glaciers and ice sheets normally melt and sea levels rise causing some flooding in coastal areas worldwide. But don't you worry your little, hysterical doomsday heads off. Kevin Costner's Waterworld is not around the bend. No need to build arks to save humanity and animals just yet. Depending on the Sun (not anything man does) it could be centuries before Manhattan becomes a floating city like Venice with eco-friendly gondolas instead of gas guzzling cabs riding down 5th Avenue picking up fares. But by then (if such great flooding there be) millions would have fled inland to safety.

But be warned! In 10,000 years or more monster glaciers will return to Manhattan with a vengeance. Polar bears and penguins will overrun the frozen island as planet Earth (cooled by a drop in solar activity) once again enters the BIG CHILL: a long, dark, cold period of brutal, frigid, bone chilling temperatures causing global crop failures and mass starvation - all the horrors predicted in the 1970s during the ice age scare.
Over a period of thousands of years the ice grew covering New England, New York City and all of North America. Then about 18,000 years ago the massive glaciers began to recede and have been shrinking ever since due mainly to increased solar activity causing natural deglaciation.
So my dear, good, world saving warmunists enjoy the warmer weather, it won't last forever. And when it's gone our freezing, starving, sicker, short-lived descendants will look back on us with envy as a golden age of CLIMATE HEAVEN - praying to God, Gaia or whomever for global warming, melting ice and rising seas again.
Yours truly,

"The Earth is in an INTERGLACIAL EPOCH (between two ice ages) of global warming deglaciation .."

No, that explanation doesn't work, Apollo. For one, the recent rise in temperatures is about 10-times higher than the natural rate emerging from a glaciation.




Oh? Really!? Don't be so sure. A peer-reviewed paper by Rutgers Professor Yair Rosenthal (no AGW skeptic) found that the Medieval Warm Period (WMP) was global in scope; and the Pacific Ocean at that time was warmer than today's Pacific by 1.7 degrees Fahrenheit - though atmospheric CO2 was 280 ppm (40% lower than today).
Rosenthal also found that the Little Ice Age was global as well and cooler than previously thought and caused the oceans to lose a tremendous amount of heat which is now being replenished.
Another MWP reconstruction by Prof. Hong Yan of the prestigious Chinese Academy of Sciences similarly found very warm temperatures in the Western Pacific, China Sea and on the Chinese mainland.

Backing Yan's work is yet another peer-reviewed paper from the Chinese Academy of Sciences that reconstructed temperatures in China for 2000 years and found significant warming during the MWP, and 1000 years earlier during the Roman Warm Period.

Two other fascinating MWP reconstructions for the Southwestern United States (California, Arizona, Colorado etc.) found two devastating mega droughts lasting a total of 420 years with sweltering temperatures of 3 degrees F higher than today (complimenting the higher Pacific Ocean temps discovered by Rosenthal). With a drier and hotter climate imagine what wild fires were like then? God!
This is a study of severe periods of medieval drought further east toward the Mississippi:
There is also some evidence that during the MWP the sea level was higher in the Pacific than it is today - from greater deglaciation of course.

"A peer-reviewed paper by Rutgers Professor Yair Rosenthal (no AGW skeptic) found that the Medieval Warm Period was global in scope"
Haven't looked at that paper but, sorry, even if he did claim that doesn't mean that the consensus of scientific opinion has changed. There are still people publishing papers claiming that they see Cold Fusion or that Einstein's theory of relativity is all wrong, too.
Rosenthal et al and many other studies (I referenced five of hundreds) have completely debunked the hypothesis (consensus view) that the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) wasn't global, but limited to the North Atlantic region (see). These studies destroy the consensus that Modern Warming because of anthropogenic (man caused) CO2 is UNIQUE in that it's GLOBAL.
Well, I'm a Ph.D. scientist and although climate science isn't my field I do regularly pursue the scientific journals for general news and I haven't seen any news announcing that MWP has been shown to be a global phenomenon - and I'm pretty sure that I would have seen the news story if it existed because that would be pretty big news.
We'll then Mr. Ph'd you'll have to study the papers I referenced and draw your own conclusions. And while you're at it take a look at this huge scientific compilation of mostly MWP reconstructions (in the hundreds) done all over the world, and put in the form of a Google map. The red balloons are where significant warming was found.
I looked at a couple and see no claims of their disputing the fact that MWP was a local phenomenon. For example, there is nothing in the Farmer, et., al. 2005 abstract which suggests that MWP was global. This map has all the appearance of being the work of someone who scattered data points all over the globe based on the regional area covered by a particular paper but who never actually read the papers nor their abstracts to see if they supported his or her point.
Guess not everyone with Ph'ds are good at connecting simple dots. Connect all the data points (red balloons) and what you get is a global phenomenon - north to south (pole to pole), east to west - of significant warming lasting centuries.





  1. The global warming scam was designed for one thing and one thing only… To transfer your money into the globalists’ bank accounts.

    1. It’s basically pay to play. you want grant money sure we want you to promote global warming theories. You scratch our back we scratch yours.

  2. Some past crazy ideas about climate ……….

    1974 – ‘Melt the Arctic with Black Soot to Stop Global COOLing’ -https://www.newspapers.com/… and https://realclimatescience….
    1974 – ‘Global COOLing Causes Drought, Floods, Tornadoes, Hurricanes’ – http://archives.chicagotrib
    1974 – ‘New Ice Age to Begin Soon’ – https://www.newspapers.com/
    1972 – ‘COLDer For the Next Two Centuries’ – https://news.google.com/new
    1972 – ‘Ice Free Arctic by 2000’ – https://realclimatescience….
    1972 – ‘New Ice Age Coming’ – http://archive.nationalgeog… and https://realclimatescience….
    1971 – NASA – ‘Greenhouse Effect Not Possible’ – http://vademecum.brandenber… and https://realclimatescience….
    1969 – ‘North Pole an Open Sea by 1990’ – https://realclimatescience….
    1961 – NYT – ‘Scientists Agree World is COLDer’ – https://timesmachine.nytime… and https://realclimatescience….
    1958 – ‘No Ice – Ships Will Sail over North Pole’ – https://realclimatescience….
    1955 – ‘Sea Level Will Rise 100 Feet’ – https://www.newspapers.com/
    1952 – ‘Ice Caps Melting – Will Swamp Seaports’ – http://trove.nla.gov.au/new
    1947 – ‘Oceans Will Rise to Catastrophic Proportions’ -http://trove.nla.gov.au/new…
    1940 – ‘North Pole Getting Warmer’ – http://trove.nla.gov.au/new
    1935 – NYT – ‘Glaciers Melting Faster than Ever’ – https://timesmachine.nytime
    1932 – ‘Glaciers are Shrinking’ – http://trove.nla.gov.au/new
    1923 – ‘North Pole Going to Melt Entirely?’ – https://realclimatescience….
    1922 – ‘Glaciers Disappear’ – https://www.newspapers.com/
    1903 – ‘Glaciers Disappearing 50 Feet Per Day

  3. Two weeks of blistering cold across America is weather but two days of .heat in aussie is climate change. The North Pole is still frozen and that was not suppose to happen after 2015 ; the north east is frozen and covered in snow that too was not suppose to happen after 2015. Hell Florida had snow, that too was never suppose to happen ever.

  4. Prof Howard “Cork” Hayden on Climate Change

    “If the science were as certain as climate activists pretend, then there would be precisely one climate model, and it would be in agreement with measured data. As it happens, climate modelers have constructed literally dozens of climate models. What they all have in common is a failure to represent reality, and a failure to agree with the other models. As the models have increasingly diverged from the data, the climate clique have nevertheless grown increasingly confident — from cocky in 2001

  5. We are a good bit warmer, and we’re warming now, but we’re still in recovery from the medieval “Little Ice Age” when people ice skated on the Thames. Life is much harder when its colder–there was far less cropland to grow food in and glaciers moved across the Alps and Scandinavia so rapidly as to bury whole villages. There’s all kinds of research that’s been done about it if you google medieval “Little Ice Age,” and it’s all very interesting.

  6. The worst thing for our climate is overpopulation, but the lefties that believe in the climate hoopla are the ones trying to get immigrants that breed like rabbits more opportunities to do so, while funded by taxpayers!

    I guess they wouldn’t be liberal if they weren’t hypocrites.

    1. The population goal is demographics; to skew the population IQ to around ’80’ so the masses don’t question their Authority! …and keep voting Democrat.

          1. The so called higher places of learning have devolved right before our eyes, in short order at that! They no longer encourage free thought, heavy debate or true learning. When one can get a “degree” (and I use that term with derision) in social justice there is zero credibility in our universities and colleges nationwide.

            1. It has gotten utterly insane. The inmates are now running the asylum at so many “luniversities.” They’ve Orwellianly morphed into exactly the opposite of what universities were developed and intended to be – places to broaden ones horizons, challenge one’s assumptions, learn critical thinking skills and HOW to learn.

              Instead they’ve disgustingly morphed into intolerant indoctrination centers for victim mentality, identity politics, and anti-American sentiment. It seems like every time I turn around I’m reading about yet another “professor” whom I wouldn’t let teach my dog their ideas are so racist and insane.

              Just a few of the many disgraceful disgusting examples:

              Brown University to allow students to ‘self-identify’ as persons of color

              False charges of racism earn one college a libel suit

              Black Lives Matter protesters shout down speech by…the ACLU

              MAGA hat thief explodes at college officials: ‘He’s recording me like I’m the criminal!’

              College Calls Police On Student Who Said ‘Tranny’ On Radio

              University event highlights 14 ways ‘whiteness’ oppresses society


              FGCU [Florida Gulf Coast University] police presence planned for start of ‘White Racism’ class Yet more blatant, nasty, divisive, disgraceful racism by a univeristy and professor.

              Meritocracy is a ‘tool of whiteness,’ claims math professor

              American Indian Prof Threatened White Student Over Support Of Aztec Mascot

              “…San Diego State University lecturer Oscar “Ozzie” Monge threatened to lower white student Crystal Sudano’s grade after she signaled her support of the school’s Aztec mascot…

              The California Department of Justice found Monge guilty of three of the four accusations levied against him … had racially discriminated against Sudano, racially harassed the student, and racially retaliated against her. The department did not find Monge guilty of the final allegation, disability-based discrimination.

              Monge has strongly supported SDSU’s trashing of its Aztec mascot, saying it represents cultural appropriation… the school senate voted to end its use in November, [but] the vote was contested since a student council had elected to maintain it just seven months earlier.

              The lecturer called Sudano “racist” for wearing a t-shirt displaying the mascot and claimed that her braided hair constituted cultural appropriation in Facebook messages…“The AS (Associated Students) is something else that confuses me…the way it’s structured, the way it runs and how damned white it is,”… Monge also objected to Sudano’s use of the phrase “totem pole” when the white student explained why all individuals’ opinions deserved to be heard “no matter how low on the totem pole you are.”

              “Monge retaliated against Sudano…after she complained to [him] about his discriminatory and harassing conduct, and appeared to undermine Monge’s thesis in the mascot resolution debate,” said the California DOJ. “Monge told Sudano that her grade would be lowered, ultimately causing her to seek a constructive withdrawal from [his] class.”

              “It is quite easy to argue that ‘whiteness’ is synonymous with evil,” said Monge to investigators, denying any misconduct….”

              ‘This is an actual emergency’: Let’s all watch a law professor melt down over Robert Mueller’s (rumored) firing

              ‘Jingle Bells’ rooted in racism, Boston University professor says

              Idiocracy: Williams College president: The real threat to free speech isn’t far-left students silencing speakers on campus

              “… The real threats, you’ll be shocked to hear, are not the students shouting down speakers, berating professors, erasing messages they disagree with, threatening violence, and generally demanding a safe space where no one rejects their intersectional politics. No, the real threat is from outsiders who “bully” them into acting that way….

              The New McCarthyism: Dr. Jordan Peterson Labeled ‘Hitler’ By Liberal Profs

              Is the Star Spangled Banner Racist? “The objective genius writers and editors at Salon.com – supported by a lecturer in the Department of African American studies at the University of Maryland who really should know better – are busy parroting the latest far-left Only Black Lives Matter non-historians who have recently discovered pro-slavery references in what is now being claimed to be a racist National Anthem. And they’d be right, too, except that’s not what Francis Scott Key was writing about. Not at all. Salon might be forgiven for not knowing this, but Professor Jason Nichols really should (and possibly does) know better….”

              Controversial Drexel Professor Blames Texas Shooting on ‘Whiteness’

              Having ‘white nuclear family’ promotes white supremacy, says New York professor, report says

              City University of New York [CUNY] sociology professor… Jessie Daniels… saying that white families promote racism by default.

              The professor began her argument saying she learned that “the white-nuclear family is one of the most powerful forces supporting white supremacy,” adding that that families “reproducing white children” are “part of the problem” as they facilitate white supremacy in the country, Campus Reformreported….

              tweeted: “I mean, if you’re a white person who says they’re engaged in dismantling white supremacy but … you’re forming a white family (and) reproducing white children that ‘you want the best for’ – how is that helping [and] not part of the problem?” … ended her arguement suggesting that “white people” should confront their racism and stop perpetuating inequality by leaving their homes for their children.

              “Until white people are ready to confront their own family’s racism (and) participation in systemic white supremacy, it’s not getting dismantled,” she wrote. “Beyond just calling out interpersonal racism, white people who want to be engaged in the work need to ask themselves about housing wealth.”… “White people: do you own your home? When you die, where’s wealth in that house going? If it’s to your children, you’re reproducing (inequality).”…

              Professor: ‘The English language is sexist’

              Profs: Math Classes ‘Inaccessible And Oppressive’ To StudentsTeachers must “live out social justice commitments’ to fight privilege in the classroom, they say

              University of Illinois Math Professor Claims Math, Algebra And Geometry Promote ‘White Privilege’. Also that:

              “…evaluations for math proficiency perpetuates discrimination against minority students, if they do worse than their white counterparts. Rochelle Gutierrez argues in a newly published math education book for teachers that they must be aware of the identity politics surrounding the subject of mathematics.

              “On many levels, mathematics itself operates as Whiteness,” she argues with complete sincerity, according to Campus Reform. “Who gets credit for doing and developing mathematics, who is capable in mathematics, and who is seen as part of the mathematical community is generally viewed as White.”…

              She concludes her argument with the claim that all knowledge is “relational,” or is, in other words, relative. “Things cannot be known objectively; they must be known subjectively.”” [little hint, silly professor – math isn’t subjective, it is objective. It also has zero to do with the color of ones skin or what culture one happened to grow up in. Now wake up and smell reality.]

              Berkeley Students Protest Exam, Demand ‘Take Home Essay’ Because White Privilege And Stuff Rather than throwing them out for disrupting class, professor tells them he resects them and admires them for getting up and doing this – although at least he didn’t cave to their insane demands. Those students then walked out – so who knows if he failed them or if he later DID cave to their demands or give them a make up exam or what.

              UNVL professor insanely blames Trump for Las Vegas mass shooting, when shooter’s motivation isn’t even known yet.

              Pennsylvania State University-Brandywine professor Angela Putman: Believing in Hard Work and Meritocracy is bad – it’s White Ideology. Her resulting conclusion published on Thursday was that “meritocracy”, or the belief that people should rise based on the fruits of their own labor, is a “white ideology.” Campus Reform

Leave a Reply