IT’S THE JEWISHNESS OF ISRAEL STUPID, NOT HER “COLONIALISM”

 

The radical progressive Left love oppressed and victimized peoples (so long as they're not Christians or Jews) and range the world looking for victims of injustice to fight for, bleed for, and feel intense, burning compassion for (their great master virtue which is no virtue at all). And one such "oppressed, victimized people" are Palestinian Arabs-arguably the most regressive, savage and worthless people on earth who define their collective existence as a genocidal war against modern, progressive, democratic Jewish Israel in the name of God, the Koran and the Prophet of conqest and war.

Now according to the radical Left the poor, miserable, wretched Palestinians are the pure, good, innocent victims of Israeli-Zionist injustice and imperialism. For example, New Republic writer John Judis in his recent article "Who Bears More Responsibility for the War in Gaza (see)" claims that the war's ultimate, underlying cause is evil, oppressive, Zionist "COLONIZATION" which must end to achieve peace. "Israel," says Judis, " is one of the world’s last colonial powers, and the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza are its unruly subjects." And he then goes on to say that Islamo-Nazi terrorist Hamas (a branch of the totalitarian Moslem Brotherhood allied with Nazi Germany in World War II) and Arab-Nationalist Fascist Fatah (the Jew-hating terrorist PLO) are "anti-colonial movements." That is to say that essentially Hamas and Fatah are fighting Israeli oppression and Western colonial imperialist injustice  and therefore are morally sound, legitimate, liberation movements worthy of leftist compassion and support.

 Of course pro-American Israel is not an imperialist colonial Western power for the simple reason that it doesn't rule over any lands not legitimately, morally and historically it's own. When Israel reached its territorial max from its astonishing victory in the Six Days War (having wrested the Sinai and Gaza from Egypt, the Golan Heights from Syria and the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan) it legally took those lands fighting a defensive war against an aggressive enemy hell-bent on its total destruction.  This is not what colonial powers do as they conquer by force foreign lands for territorial gain and then settle them with their own people. A good example of colonization would be the Prophet Mohammad's marauding Moslem hordes murderously sweeping over the Arabian Peninsula and Middle East in the 7th century conquering and colonizing Christian lands (Palestine, Syria, Egypt etc.) with unwanted Arab-Moslem settlers. 

But let's assume for arguments sake that Judis and the Left are right,  and that Israel is the last colonial Western power stealing, colonizing and illegally occupying Palestinian lands; and that like all oppressed foreign ruled peoples Palestinians want freedom and self-determination. But on closer examination the central problem that Palestinians have with Israel is not so much that it's a  "colonial power," but that it specifically is a JEWISH colonial power.

 For 400 years starting in 1516 Arab Palestine was colonized, occupied and ruled  by the Ottoman Turks with hardly a peep of protest from its Arab population until World War I. This was because like the Palestinian Arabs the Turks were Sunni Moslems belonging to the same sect of Islam. Though control of Palestine changed hands from the Mumluks to the Turks everything else remained the same. Palestine continued to be governed by the Koran and Sharia law with Moslem men being first class subjects, their women second class subjects, and Jews and Christians third class subjects paying higher taxes, subject to harassment and periodic violence, and excluded from military and government service. The Arab nationalist revolt against the Turks during World War I (led by pro-Zionist Lawrence of Arabia) was a manufactured not spontaneous uprising engineered by the British to drive the Turks from the region. If the Turks hadn't sided with Germany and the Axis Powers during the war the Ottoman Empire might not have dissolved, and Palestine might still be a colony of Turkey with an obedient, docil majority Arab population. 

 Do you see what I mean that colonization (if true) isn't what enrages Palestinian Arabs (whose ancestors conquered and colonized Christian ruled Palestine)  so much as it is infidel Zionist Jews that rule-Jews who Arabs are brainwashed to believe are Allah's and Islam's greatest and most dangerous enemy in league with the darkest forces of hell for the destruction of Islam. Indeed, Jewish Israel's existence has unleashed their worst fears that Islam is in terrible, critical, deadly peril, that Satan (using Israel) is winning the war in destroying their faith, and that their glorious conquering past is lost to them forever never to be restored. Tears. Tears.

 Now since Israel's unbelief more than its supposed colonizing of alleged Palestinian lands is what drives anti-Israel Moslem rage and jihad this war can quickly be terminated and reconciliation achieved if Israel renounces Judaism and converts to Sunni Islam. If that were to happen all Moslem grievances against Israel would disappear as the faithful would take Israel's Islamization as a divine  sign from Allah confirming the political and religious supremacy of their faith; and that the victorious vision of the prophet that dominates the Koran: of a one world Islamic state at the end of history, is at hand. 

What the above proves, as I've said before,  is that the 66 year jihad against Israel is driven by racism, cultural imperialism and religious intolerance-all forms of injustice. And that Jewish Israel's existence on what was once Moslem lands, and not West Bank settlements, is itself a form of illegal colonization and occupation according Islam and the Koran. 

POSTSCRIPT I 

WEST BANK SETTLEMENTS

If the Jewish "settlers" on the West Bank, who are said by many to be illegal colonizing occupiers of Palestinian lands, were to be replaced by Israeli Moslems the Palestinians would embrace the new Israeli inhabitants as the rightful owners of those lands and the issue of illegal West Bank settlements would quickly disappear.

POSTSCRIPT II

Below is a debate I initiated on Judis's blog about his blindness to the religious dimensions of the Arab/Pali/Islamo-Israeli conflict (see).

 

IT NEVER CEASES TO AMAZE ME

 

how leftists like John Judis ignore thousands of years of Islamic imperial conquest, expansionism and colonizing wars and make a big deal of Jewish settlements on the West Bank as if it's the crux of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Truth is if the current Jewish settlers on the West Bank were  replaced by Israeli Moslems the Palis would not see them as "occupiers" but the rightful owners because of their Islamic faith.

Xenophon
 
 

@apollospeaks77 

So if your argument is that all Sunni Muslims are forever content to be ruled by other Sunni Muslims whatever their ethno-nationality, then how do you explain the Sunni Kurdish pursuit of political autonomy from Sunni Muslim Turkey and from Sunni-ruled Iraq (prior to 2003)?

 
apollospeaks77
 
 

@Xenophon @apollospeaks77

 Apples and oranges again. The Sunni Kurds wanted an independent state from the Turks and Arabs for centuries. While the Arab populations living under Turkish rule (within and outside Palestine) were completely docile and content making no distinction between their Arab and Turkish rulers. So long as they were ruled by Sunni Moslems it was acceptable to them. Going back to the time of Mohammed if the Jews of Medina had surrendered to Allah and accepted him (M) as their prophet (he worked tirelessly to convert them even adopting [some of] their rituals) they wouldn't have suffered his murderous wrath.Instead, Mohammed would have praised the Islamified Jews embracing them as brothers-as would every Sunni cleric from Egypt to Qatar embrace the Islamic State of Israel as a miracle from God thus ending the Arab/Islamic-Israeli conflict. Keep in mind that the 1948 Arab war of annihilation against the infant Jewish state was strictly defined in religious terms as JIHAD (holy war) against the unclean, filthy, impure infidel. If Israel had converted to the faith, washing itself clean of its religious Jewishness before declaring independence, there would have been no holy war against her.

 

 Xenophon replies

@apollospeaks77 @Xenophon

Wrong.

 

"The Kurdish nationalist struggle first emerged in the late 19th century when a unified movement demanded the establishment of a Kurdish state. Revolts did occur sporadically but only decades after the Ottoman centralist policies of the 19th century began did the first modern Kurdish nationalist movement emerge with uprising led by a Kurdish landowner and head of the powerful Shemdinan family, Sheik Ubeydullah. In 1880, Ubeydullah, demanded political autonomy or outright independence for Kurds and the recognition of a Kurdistan state without interference from Turkish or Persian authorities.'

 

Kurdish nationalism is a function of the modern period--late 19th and 20th centuries--just like Arab nationalism, Palestinian nationalism, Turkish nationalism or, for that matter, Zionism.

 

apollospeaks77 
 

@Xenophon @apollospeaks77

 

The roots of Kurdish nationalism transcend the 19th century; but you are right that it came to fruition then, in the atmosphere of the great 19th century Euro-nationalist movements. Now while Kurdish nationalism was an authentic spontaneous unified movement there was nothing comparable to it  among the Arabs. Arab nationalism was the invention of British imperialism poorly midwifed by Lawrence and King Faisal (both enlightened pro-Western, pro-Zionist visionaries) to rid the Middle East of Ottoman rule. Arab nationalism was a failure, and Palestinian nationalism a fiction. There is no distinctive Palestinian culture. What unifies the Arabs of the West Bank and Gaza is a burning hatred of Jewish Israel feed by racism, cultural imperialism and religious intolerance. Authentic nationalism cannot be defined around the negative goal of destroying another people; and that sums up so-called Palestinian nationalism-a form of anti-Semitism. Futhermore, as the so-called Palestinian people are slowly dying from a declining birthrate and emigration (there's no work, no life, no hope, no future in poor, sick, miserable "Palestine") there will not be, in my opinion, a Palestinian state. It's too late. The Palis missed their chance at a state when Yassir Arafat blew up the Oslo peace process to save his skin-to avoid, as he feared, sharing the fate of Yitzak Rabin

 

 Xenophon replies

@apollospeaks77 @Xenophon

 

"The roots of Kurdish nationalism transcend the 19th century;  but you are right that it came to fruition in the atmosphere of the great 19th century Euro-nationalist movements."

What do you mean when you say that the roots transcend the 19th century?  What are you talking about specifically?  

"Palestinian nationalism a fiction. There is no distinctive Palestinian culture. What unifies the Arabs of the West Bank and Gaza is a burning hatred of Jewish Israel feed by racism"

Nonsense.  The truth is that Palestinians saw themselves as part of Greater Syria.  This is documented by the findings of the King-Crane Commission in 1919.  When they were detached from Syria to suit the needs of the French, British and Zionists, they began to develop a new identity.  Just as when Americans were detached--by the width of an ocean--from England, THEY too developed a new identity.  Whether you find their culture distinctive or not or admirable or not is utterly irrelevant.  Their identity is their identity and no less authentic just because someone else wants their land and would therefore like to pretend that they were alway unworthy of it anyway.  Where do you come up with such nonsense?

It is certainly true that hostility to the Jewish colonists who came to take control of their land has been a key part of their emerging identity.  And why wouldn't it be?  How do you think most national identities are formed?  It's time you read the Old Testament if you want to see an example of ethnic hatred as an intrinsic part of national identity.  

And of course, the identities of European nations were all in part about animosity towards other European nations.  Stop demanding that the Palestinians meet some arbitrary and mostly fictional standard that the Israel Lobby sets for them.

 

 apollospeaks77

 @Xenophon @apollospeaks77

 

The Kurdish people didn't spring into existence in the 19th century.

We have it on the good authority of Yassir Arafat that Palestinian nationalism is a strategic weapon devised  by pan-Arab Nationalists like himself for the political, nonviolent, incremental destruction of the Jewish state, and the eventual creation of a unified pan-Arab nation across the Middle East. On the Hamas side this newly invented  fictional people is a weapon to violently destroy the Jewish state as part of a greater pan-Islamic, Moslem Brotherhood plan to unify the Middle East under the banner of radical Islam. With regressive, bitter, Jew-hating leaders like the pan-Arab Nationalist PA and pan-Islamic Brotherhood Hamas is it any wonder that the so-called Palestinian people are headed for destruction dying a slow painful demographic death?

Meanwhile, after 66 years of war, crisis and PR disasters, and against all odds, Jewish, Zionist, victorious Israel is thriving like never before outliving all of its enemies as one after the other goes to the grave in bitter defeat cursing her success and greatness. Tears. Tears.

 

Xenophon

 
 

@apollospeaks77 @Xenophon

"this newly invented  fictional people"

You do understand that that phrase is a contradiction in terms, don't you?  If a people is "newly invented," then it exists which means it can't be fictional.  

"is it any wonder that the so-called Palestinian people are headed for destruction dying a slow painful demographic death?"

No, not surprising at all and that's a point I have made throughout this string.  A principal goal of Zionism and the state of Israel is, in essence, to bring about the demographic death of the Palestinians though all means possible--military operations, economic strangulation, cultural destruction.  This is one of your better points.

I have to laugh at the rest of your post though.  I mean, if your only real point was to celebrate Israeli victory and the destruction of all who stand in the way of the Chosen People's achievement of its Triumph des Willens, then why didn't you just say so in the first place and I could have avoided a waste of time attempting to engage in actual discussion?  I suppose I have to admit that RdB basically warned me of that many comments ago.

 

apollospeaks77

 

But as Yassir Arafat said the Palestinian people have no real existence apart from it's temporary  strategic  usefulness in destroying, by degrees,  the Jewish State of Israel.. Once that's accomplished Palestinianism (a means to a greater end) will disappear and the real work will begin of building a single pan-Arab Nation across the Mideast. What was  overarchingly real for Arafat, what he ultimately lived for (as it is for his successors) wasn't the building of a Jew- hating, anti-Zionist, purely destructive Palestinian state, but a positive, creative, regionwide Arab Supremacist Nation. What is a little dinky  Palestinian state compared to that? In the final analysis Palestinianism is liquidated by its pan-Arab leaders.

apollospeaks77

@Xenophon @apollospeaks77

 By the way,if this planned Zionist destruction of West Bank and Gaza Arabs were true then they'd be doing it to  the Moslem-Arab community inside Israel. Truth is, the so-called Pali people are self-destructive and don't need some Zionist plot to end their miserable existence.


But as Yassir Arafat said the Palestinian people have no real existence apart from it's temporary  strategic  usefulness in destroying, by degrees,  the Jewish State of Israel.. Once that's accomplished Palestinianism (a means to a greater end) will disappear and the real work will begin of building a single pan-Arab Nation across the Mideast. What was  overarchingly real for Arafat, what he ultimately lived for (as it is for his successors) wasn't the building of a Jew- hating, anti-Zionist, purely destructive Palestinian state, but a positive, creative, regionwide Arab Supremacist Nation. What is a little dinky  Palestinian state compared to that? In the final analPalestinianism iFORWARD EMAILS T reninvest2013@aol.com

29 thoughts on “IT’S THE JEWISHNESS OF ISRAEL STUPID, NOT HER “COLONIALISM”

  1. Well said Apollo. The colonial Turks were welcomed by the colony of Arab transplants in 16th century Palestine because of their Sunniism.

    1. That Islam is an imperialistic religion that grew by colonial conquest and war is ignored by Judis and the hypocritical, pro-Isamist, scumsucking, lying left. Pathetic.

      1. The little itsy bitsy teeny winnie colonialism of Israel on the West Bank (which is no colonialism) is bad. But the gigantic worldwide colonialism of Islam is good. Go figure.

      2. Imperialistic Islamic clerics want to impose Sharia Law on the entire world and Zionists are bad guys for building new homes on the West Bank and East Jerusalem. It’s anguishing.

  2. Not one word about the rights of the Palestinian people. They certainly deserve more than only to survive in ghettos controlled by Israel, being harassed and discriminated on all possible levels, while their lands are shrinking continously because of the illegal land theft. The Jews themselves lived under much better conditions under the British mandate, and still they rebelled against this! How can any one blame the Palestinians for rebelling?

    1. They don’t have the right to destroy Israel though the Koran gives it to them. And until they see that the Koran is wrong and dangerous then abiding by it and attacking Israel will lead them again and again and again into catastrophe.

  3. Islam’s not an imperialistic religion. Only the Western World and Christianity have been imperialistic. Right? Wrong!!!!!!!!!

    The Truth about Islamic Crusades and Imperialism – American Thinker

    The Timeline of the Islamic Crusades before the Christian Crusades

    630 Two years before Muhammad’s death of a fever, he launches the Tabuk Crusades, in which he led 30,000 jihadists against the Byzantine Christians. He had heard a report that a huge army had amassed to attack Arabia, but the report turned out to be a false rumor. The Byzantine army never materialized. He turned around and went home, but not before extracting ‘agreements’ from northern tribes. They could enjoy the ‘privilege’ of living under Islamic ‘protection’ (read: not be attacked by Islam), if they paid a tax (jizya).

    This tax sets the stage for Muhammad’s and the later Caliphs’ policies. If the attacked city or region did not want to convert to Islam, then they paid a jizya tax. If they converted, then they paid a zakat tax. Either way, money flowed back to the Islamic treasury in Arabia or to the local Muslim governor.

    632—634 Under the Caliphate of Abu Bakr the Muslim Crusaders reconquer and sometimes conquer for the first time the polytheists of Arabia. These Arab polytheists had to convert to Islam or die. They did not have the choice of remaining in their faith and paying a tax. Islam does not allow for religious freedom.

    633 The Muslim Crusaders, led by Khalid al—Walid, a superior but bloodthirsty military commander, whom Muhammad nicknamed the Sword of Allah for his ferocity in battle (Tabari, 8:158 / 1616—17), conquer the city of Ullays along the Euphrates River (in today’s Iraq). Khalid captures and beheads so many that a nearby canal, into which the blood flowed, was called Blood Canal (Tabari 11:24 / 2034—35).

    634 At the Battle of Yarmuk in Syria the Muslim Crusaders defeat the Byzantines. Today Osama bin Laden draws inspiration from the defeat, and especially from an anecdote about Khalid al—Walid. An unnamed Muslim remarks: ‘The Romans are so numerous and the Muslims so few.’ To this Khalid retorts: ‘How few are the Romans, and how many the Muslims! Armies become numerous only with victory and few only with defeat, not by the number of men. By God, I would love it . . . if the enemy were twice as many’ (Tabari, 11:94 / 2095). Osama bin Ladin quotes Khalid and says that his fighters love death more than we in the West love life. This philosophy of death probably comes from a verse like Sura 2:96. Muhammad assesses the Jews: ‘[Prophet], you are sure to find them [the Jews] clinging to life more eagerly than any other people, even polytheists’ (MAS Abdel Haleem, The Qur’an, Oxford UP, 2004; first insertion in brackets is Haleem’s; the second mine).

    634—644 The Caliphate of Umar ibn al—Khattab, who is regarded as particularly brutal.

    635 Muslim Crusaders besiege and conquer of Damascus

    636 Muslim Crusaders defeat Byzantines decisively at Battle of Yarmuk.

    637 Muslim Crusaders conquer Iraq at the Battle of al—Qadisiyyah (some date it in 635 or 636)

    638 Muslim Crusaders conquer and annex Jerusalem, taking it from the Byzantines.

    638—650 Muslim Crusaders conquer Iran, except along Caspian Sea.

    639—642 Muslim Crusaders conquer Egypt.

    641 Muslim Crusaders control Syria and Palestine.

    643—707 Muslim Crusaders conquer North Africa.

    644 Caliph Umar is assassinated by a Persian prisoner of war; Uthman ibn Affan is elected third Caliph, who is regarded by many Muslims as gentler than Umar.

    644—650 Muslim Crusaders conquer Cyprus, Tripoli in North Africa, and establish Islamic rule in Iran, Afghanistan, and Sind.

    656 Caliph Uthman is assassinated by disgruntled Muslim soldiers; Ali ibn Abi Talib, son—in—law and cousin to Muhammad, who married the prophet’s daughter Fatima through his first wife Khadija, is set up as Caliph.

    656 Battle of the Camel, in which Aisha, Muhammad’s wife, leads a rebellion against Ali for not avenging Uthman’s assassination. Ali’s partisans win.

    657 Battle of Siffin between Ali and Muslim governor of Jerusalem, arbitration goes against Ali

    661 Murder of Ali by an extremist; Ali’s supporters acclaim his son Hasan as next Caliph, but he comes to an agreement with Muawiyyah I and retires to Medina.

    661—680 the Caliphate of Muawiyyah I. He founds Umayyid dynasty and moves capital from Medina to Damascus

    673—678 Arabs besiege Constantinople, capital of Byzantine Empire

    680 Massacre of Hussein (Muhammad’s grandson), his family, and his supporters in Karbala, Iraq.

    691 Dome of the Rock is completed in Jerusalem, only six decades after Muhammad’s death.

    705 Abd al—Malik restores Umayyad rule.

    710—713 Muslim Crusaders conquer the lower Indus Valley.

    711—713 Muslim Crusaders conquer Spain and impose the kingdom of Andalus. This article recounts how Muslims today still grieve over their expulsion 700 years later. They seem to believe that the land belonged to them in the first place.

    719 Cordova, Spain, becomes seat of Arab governor

    732 The Muslim Crusaders stopped at the Battle of Poitiers; that is, Franks (France) halt Arab advance

    749 The Abbasids conquer Kufah and overthrow Umayyids

    756 Foundation of Umayyid amirate in Cordova, Spain, setting up an independent kingdom from Abbasids

    762 Foundation of Baghdad

    785 Foundation of the Great Mosque of Cordova

    789 Rise of Idrisid amirs (Muslim Crusaders) in Morocco; foundation of Fez; Christoforos, a Muslim who converted to Christianity, is executed.

    800 Autonomous Aghlabid dynasty (Muslim Crusaders) in Tunisia

    807 Caliph Harun al—Rashid orders the destruction of non—Muslim prayer houses and of the church of Mary Magdalene in Jerusalem

    809 Aghlabids (Muslim Crusaders) conquer Sardinia, Italy

    813 Christians in Palestine are attacked; many flee the country

    831 Muslim Crusaders capture Palermo, Italy; raids in Southern Italy

    850 Caliph al—Matawakkil orders the destruction of non—Muslim houses of prayer

    855 Revolt of the Christians of Hims (Syria)

    837—901 Aghlabids (Muslim Crusaders) conquer Sicily, raid Corsica, Italy, France

    869—883 Revolt of black slaves in Iraq

    909 Rise of the Fatimid Caliphate in Tunisia; these Muslim Crusaders occupy Sicily, Sardinia

    928—969 Byzantine military revival, they retake old territories, such as Cyprus (964) and Tarsus (969)

    937 The Ikhshid, a particularly harsh Muslim ruler, writes to Emperor Romanus, boasting of his control over the holy places

    937 The Church of the Resurrection (known as Church of Holy Sepulcher in Latin West) is burned down by Muslims; more churches in Jerusalem are attacked

    960 Conversion of Qarakhanid Turks to Islam

    966 Anti—Christian riots in Jerusalem

    969 Fatimids (Muslim Crusaders) conquer Egypt and found Cairo

    c. 970 Seljuks enter conquered Islamic territories from the East

    973 Israel and southern Syria are again conquered by the Fatimids

    1003 First persecutions by al—Hakim; the Church of St. Mark in Fustat, Egypt, is destroyed

    1009 Destruction of the Church of the Resurrection by al—Hakim (see 937)

    1012 Beginning of al—Hakim’s oppressive decrees against Jews and Christians

    1015 Earthquake in Palestine; the dome of the Dome of the Rock collapses

    1031 Collapse of Umayyid Caliphate and establishment of 15 minor independent dynasties throughout Muslim Andalus

    1048 Reconstruction of the Church of the Resurrection completed

    1050 Creation of Almoravid (Muslim Crusaders) movement in Mauretania; Almoravids (aka Murabitun) are coalition of western Saharan Berbers; followers of Islam, focusing on the Quran, the hadith, and Maliki law.

    1055 Seljuk Prince Tughrul enters Baghdad, consolidation of the Seljuk Sultanate

    1055 Confiscation of property of Church of the Resurrection

    1071 Battle of Manzikert, Seljuk Turks (Muslim Crusaders) defeat Byzantines and occupy much of Anatolia

    1071 Turks (Muslim Crusaders) invade Palestine

    1073 Conquest of Jerusalem by Turks (Muslim Crusaders)

    1075 Seljuks (Muslim Crusaders) capture Nicea (Iznik) and make it their capital in Anatolia

    1076 Almoravids (Muslim Crusaders) (see 1050) conquer western Ghana

    1085 Toledo is taken back by Christian armies

    1086 Almoravids (Muslim Crusaders) (see 1050) send help to Andalus, Battle of Zallaca

    1090—1091 Almoravids (Muslim Crusaders) occupy all of Andalus except Saragossa and Balearic Islands

    1094 Byzantine emperor Alexius Comnenus I asks western Christendom for help against Seljuk invasions of his territory; Seljuks are Muslim Turkish family of eastern origins; see 970

    1095 Pope Urban II preaches first Crusade; they capture Jerusalem in 1099

    1. Your timeline is so true. Islam is a religion that has conquered peoples throughout the world. They do this by creating terror, beheadings, hijackings, intimidations, threats, bombings. The radicals have also hijacked the moderates, or peaceful muslims, who are afraid to speak up for truth, and peace. The religion of Islam is supposed to represent love, peace, non-violence, but infact we are seeing more and more of just the opposite. The peaceful law abiding muslims are in between a rock and a hard spot. They must hold their tongues, and not expose their fellow brothers who murder, and suppress the civilized word, for fear of their lives, or families lives, being snuffed out. We are already seeing honor killings in America. These muslims do not abide by the laws of the country they live in. The United States is the most wonderful free country in the world, with opportunities for all. How dare they come to our land, and create chaos, and disobey our laws. I wish they would go back to the middle-east where death and destruction are a common way of life!

      The big deception is that the moderates, are being told to allow Islam to gradually take over all races and nations, because in the end, Islam and Allah will dominate Christians, Hindus, Budists, Jews, and Catholics. Those who do not submit to Islam will be killed or beheaded. This is NOT A RELIGION OF LOVE AND PEACE, AND THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE WHO REALIZE THIS, AND NOT FOOLED.

  4. Bingo Bingo Bingo! If Israel were to replace on its West Bank settlements Israeli Jews with Israeli Arab-Muslims all talk about illegal colonial settlements would disappear as if the issue never existed.

  5. SHUT THIS SITE DOWN!

    It makes too much sense. Speaks too much truth. Makes Libs and Islamists very , very mad.

  6. The Jewishness of Israel is a crime against Allah and Islam. And that’s why Hamas rockets are raining down on my people.

  7. I am amazed at the raw ignorance of the left. Hamas has said continually that they will wipe Israel off the map. They send rockets into populated areas before Israel fires a shot. They have tunnels from Gaza into Israel, and Israeli army uniforms to wear when they go through the tunnels to attack Israel. They got cement while telling Israel they were building hospitals and schools , all the while they were digging the tunnels . They breaks all cease fire agreements. They store their rockets in schools and hospitals. They are proud that the Palestinians are dying , they can charge Israel of killing innocents . Palestine elected Hamas, which is a terrorist organization , so they knew what would occur.
    These are blood thirsty, monsters sent by Satan. And the left continues to take the side of Satan, and we may all have to pay for that betrayal.

  8. You are brainwashed by zionism apollo and don’t know any facts about the land of Palestine, its people, its civilization, its history. Please learn before you spread your disgustingly false, ignorant statement that “Palestinian nationalism is a fiction” and that the Palestinian people do not exist. Denying the existence of a real historic people is racism criminal to me

    1. It is you who are the ignoramus. We have it on the good authority of former PLO head Yassir Arafat that there is no Palestinian people; and that the idea of Palestinian nationalism is a means to the end of destroying Israel for the triumph of pan-Arab Nationalism across the Middle East. See my debate with Xenophon above and enlighten yourself.

  9. “They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy’s armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in… It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America.”
    – George Washington

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>