Could it be? Is it possible that Vladimir Putin is covertly intervening in US politics and aiding Donald Trump (most likely without his knowledge) in his quest for the presidency by doing what he can to undercut and stop Hillary Clinton? Only a fool would deny the possibility. After all, something similar happened in 1983 when Ted Kennedy on behalf of the Dems colluded with the Soviets in trying to defeat Ronald Reagan and elect Walter Mondale-who promised to restore detante and unilaterally freeze the production of nuclear weapons. This was a clear act of treason which Kennedy should have been held accountable for (see).

However, it is certain that Putin prefers Trump in the White House (who he flattered by calling him a "genius") over Hillary who he loathes like Obama. If Hillary is elected it's practically certain she'd be more difficult than Trump to deal with on the lifting of EU and US sanctions which were imposed after Russia annexed Crimea in March 2014. These sanctions, which are hurting Russia in the billions, include restrictions on major Russian state banks and corporations; and the blacklisting of dozens of Russian officials and firms accused of undermining Ukrainian sovereignty. It is practically certain that a Clinton presidency would make the lifting of sanctions contingent on Russia withdrawing its remaining troops from Ukraine, stop supplying anti-Ukrainian rebel separatists with money, training and arms; and lastly returning Crimea to Ukraine. And that would happen in stages. 


But with Trump as president there's no telling what he'd be willing to do as he is unpredictable at this point. He did say confidently that he'd get on better with the Russian leader than Obama is doing; but that's about it. From Putin's viewpoint it's preferable for Russia to have a known unknown like Trump as president than a known known like Clinton (as Rumsfeld would say). 

But last Friday on the 21st during his impassioned acceptance speech in Cleveland, Trump, as he was listing Hillary's foreign policy failures made one glaring and perhaps telling omission: Russia.  Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, ISIS, and Clinton's overall disaster in the Middle East, were scathingly mentioned. But not a peep about her failure at Russian Reset, or blaming her for Russia's conflict with Ukraine and annexing of Crimea. Russian analysts could not have failed to notice this omission and probably took it as a sign, despite Ukraine and Crimea, of Trump's good will toward their country and its leader. Putin is certainly hoping that a Trump presidency would recognize Russia's ownership of the Crimean Peninsula and lift all sanctions in exchange for withdrawing its remaining troops from Ukraine, and cutting all aid to pro-Russian Ukrainian separatists.

Indeed, it was after Trump's speech on the following day (the 22nd) that Wikileaks posted the 20,000 DNC hacked emails that have thrown the Dems into pre-convention chaos, and forced Debby W. to resign as DNC chairperson, over evidence of their rigged pro-Clinton primary process.  Coincidence? I'll let you be the judge of that. But one thing is clear: Putin does not want a third term of Barack Obama, and he'll do whatever he can to prevent it.  





Those who are claiming that the hacked DNC emails came from Russia and ultimately from Putin (and this includes the FBI) are lying. It is very probable that professional Russian hackers working with the Kremlin were behind the job for the reasons stated above; but being that these were highly skilled professionals they erase all traces of their hacking so that it can't be traced back to them. In other words, when they exit the server they leave no footprints behind and become invisible. In other words, until the hackers reveal who they are and admit to the deed their identities are unknowable and a matter of speculation.


(Robinson: "It Was An Angry Speech For Angry People")

Clinton to call on Black Lives Matter at Dem convention | TheHill



of the 35 million Americans tuned into Donald Trump's historic 75 minute, double barn burner acceptance speech Thursday a whopping 75% were supportive of him. So much for GOP disunity. In other words, at least 26 million Americans are dark, divisive, mad-as-hell, "crude, racist, xenophobic, fascist" anti-establishment Donald Trumps wanting to take back America from the spinelss pc appeasers, America last globalists and self-serving special interests. Apparently, 75% share Trump's fear and pessimism that Obama's America sucks big time; that it's losing its greatness and is working against them; that Obama's nation with its rigged, booming, middle class hurting stock market and financial system overwhelmingly favoring the rich is in economic, military and geopolitical decline; and that it's losing the War on Islamic Terror in a world that is spinning out of control and is falling apart due to the absence of strong US leadership.  There is much to be angry about-righteously angry.



Obviously these 26 million reject as delusional the sunny, bright, optimistic, rainbows and unicorn Obamunism that things are much better than they seem; that though growing fossil fuel use is dooming the planet (a complete pseudo-scientific lie), and there's an epidemic of murderous gun violence (this is only true in our lawless, anarchical black inner cities) that the nation and world, nevertheless, are more peaceful, less violent and prosperous today than at any time in history; that America is greater, stronger and more respected now than ever  (does any of this make sense?); that the public is being deceived by MSM, Fox, Hannity,  Limbaugh and Trump; that all the wonderful, uplifting, good news of Obama's stellar historic achievements-from ending two wars (when we're still fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan), to the millions getting health insurance (at a huge cost to jobs and a dying middle class), to saving the economy from depression (which was done by George Bush with TARP)-are being drowned out and obfuscated by all the bad sensationalist news of a few random cop killings, some isolated, unconnected, lone wolf "religion of peace"  terror attacks, and a weakening economy of under 2% growth ("the fault of a global slowdown," not of trillions in debt, high taxes, massive anti-business regulations and poor demoralizing economic leadership). 

Under George Bush polls showing that the US was on the wrong track reached a high of 67% in 2008. Under Obama it's exceeded that reaching 73% in September 2011. Today it's at 70% up from 65% a few short months ago (see) .

Now if these 26 million angry Americans-part of the 224 million (or 70%) that see Obama and Washington leading us in the wrong direction-don't want to trash all the great, good, transformational change that Obama has made these last eight years (in building "A More Perfect [Dependency] Union" of increasing poverty and hardship for millions) they must stay the course with progressive, hopeful, "stronger together," low energy, weak, establishment Hillary-who made such a mess of US foreign policy. 

Indeed, Hillary promises to continue Obama's good work and add to his glowing legacy (of ashes and dust) a new, glorious chapter of national greatness for posterity. And to help her write this new chapter she's calling on the race obsessed, anti-cop, capitalist hating Marxist leaders of Black Lives Matter-with their positive, inspiring, unifying vision of a white supremacist America that's oppressing millions of blacks and keeping them in poverty and degradation-trapped in dysfunctional, strife-torn inner city hell holes that worsen by the day as its victims cry out for police and white blood.

Needless to say Obama, Hillary and the Dems are misreading the American people; they've learned nothing from the rise of anti-establishment outsiders Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump; and if present economic, racial, foreign policy and national security trends continue on their downward course they're going to pay a bitter price on Election Day. From now to then the anger and fear over America's decline can only grow, along with the national Trump movement.

And BTW if Eugene Robinson wants to hear a red hot, divisive, angry white man then he should listen to any one of Bernie Sander's scorching, America sucks socialist speeches. Bernie garnered 13 million primary votes; and millions of these are mad-as-hell with Hillary, Kaine and the DNC that plotted to defeat their dear, beloved, crackpot hero for being unelectably too extreme.





That 2016 is perhaps the most unusual presidential election year in American history goes without saying made that way officially Tuesday night with the nomination of billionaire businessman and political novice Donald Trump. But what also makes it unusual is that the two candidates of the major parties are from the state of New York. That has never happened before in American history. And now a New Yorker will be living in the White House which hasn't happened in 71 years when Franklin Roosevelt died in office 71 years ago.
Oddly, on the Democratic side the race for that party's nomination boiled down to Bernie Sanders who was born in Brooklyn, New York and moved to Vermont in his late 20s. And Chicago born Hillary Clinton, who, as First Lady, moved to New York in January 2000 so she could run for US senator of that state. But unlike Bernie and Hillary Donald Trump was born in New York and remains a New Yorker having been one for 70 years.
Now when Hillary as First Lady won the US senate seat from New York it was on November 7, 2000. That was the day that Republican Texas governor George W. Bush defeated vice president Al Gore for the presidency in the closest race in US history. Indeed, the Democrats after two successful terms of Bill Clinton (he left office with a 66% approval rating) amazingly lost the White House when they should have kicked butt. Now Hillary Clinton in 2008 after failing to succeed two terms of Republican Bush is hoping to break the pattern started by Bush and win the White House while a two term president of the same party is in power.
Indeed, Hillary is hoping to become the first presidential candidate since George HW Bush in 1988 to win an election for the incumbent party and continue in the White House. When that happened it fell on a November 8th election date which is the date for this year's contest. However, George HW had the advantage of following the larger than life, very popular Ronald Reagan, a super successful transformational two term Republican President who left office with a 63% Gallop approval rating. The American people loved Reagan and wanted him for a third term in the person of his very loyal VP.
Indeed, unlike today with a weak economy showing signs of deterioration, a world in increasing turmoil and suffering, and domestic Islamic and anti-cop violence and terror on the rise, George H.W. Bush inherited a very unified, prospering and happy nation, and a stable post-Cold War world. Indeed, though two term president Barack Obama (the great anti-Reagan and divider) has been a dismal failure Hillary is lyingly claiming the contrary: that Obama's been a great president with a record of worthy achievements and is vowing to continue his sorry legacy of ashes and dust.
To be sure, the only way Hillary can win in November is by convincing voters that she'd be the lesser of two evils. And that though Trump is offering change which millions desperately want he'd be far worse than Obama-and worse then herself. Or that somehow Trump would return the nation to "disastrous" Republican or Bush era policies that caused the housing crisis and nearly collapsed the economy. However,  that would be an awfully hard case to make since Trump has established himself as radically anti-establishment (GOPe), as well as viciously anti-Bush. With the Bushes having ditched the Convention it will prove nearly impossible for Hillary and the Dems to make a credible case (as was done to McCain and Romney) that Trump will be George W's third term.
When asked about the amount of 
 Dewitt Clinton on a $1000 bill.
I've written about this before (see) and it's worth repeating that Hillary isn't the first US senator from New York with the name Clinton to run for the presidency. In 1812 governor and former US senator Dewitt Clinton from New York ran for the presidency against James Madison on the Federalist Party ticket. He lost in a close race.





As I've previously written, on the 16th day of June 2015 (16 days from the publication of Ann Coulter's book "Adios, America" on illegal immigration, and 16 days before an illegal alien killed Kate Steinle in San Francisco) Donald Trump (16 months from Election Day 2016) announced his run for 1600 Pennsylvania Ave-making illegal immigration and border security the focus of his campaign (see and see).

*Today, July 18th, the start of the RNC when Donald Trump will be nominated the Republican presidential nominee, is 114 days to Election Day or 16 weeks (see).

I also wrote (see) that the important date of April 26th*, when Trump won five northeastern primary states virtually making him the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, fell on the 316th day of his campaign-which oddly was the 116th day or 16th week of the year (see). Moreover, as I  noted, not only was April 26th the 316th day of Trump's historic campaign it was also auspiciously its 45th week-the number of the next President.
* April 26th was  Melania Trump's 46th birthday (see)  .
 The GOP has joined the Hair Club For Real Men.
But it wasn't until the following week with Trump's victory in Indiana (when Cruz and Kasich called it quits) that Trump effectively secured the nomination as announced by Reince Priebus (see). Oddly, Indiana (which ranks 16th in population) was the 19th state to join the Union doing so in 1816, the 16th year of the 19th century. By the way, the next Republican to live in the White House will be the 19th in American history (see).
Is Trump to Clinton what Obama was too McCain eight years ago? The "Hope & Change" candidate? The hope he can stop and reverse Obama's change?
Needless to say the prospering state of Indiana (a conservative economic model for the nation) was politically propitious for Trump; and now auspiciously he's picked its very successful governor Mike Pence as his running mate. Amazingly, on Friday when Trump announced his selection of Pence it was 116 days or 16 weeks to Election Day (see). And when on Saturday at the Hilton Trump and Pence* appeared together publicly for the first time it was the 16th day of July.
*It's also interesting to note that Governor Pence was born on a Sunday and Donald Trump on a Friday. Sunday and Friday are the 1st and 6th days of the week giving us the numbers 1 & 6 (see).
No one but God knows who the next President and VP will be. But could the above numeric patterns of 16s in this 16th year of the 21st century be a providential sign that conservative Republican Mike Pence will prove a big factor in Trump winning the presidency? We can only hope so. But there appear to be other signs suggesting that Pence will  prove to be a valuable asset for Trump in November. These are as follows:
What Trump and FDR have in common (besides being born and raised in New York) is their patriotic nationalism, indomitable strength and the immense drive to win.
Donald Trump is a native of New York a state that has produced 6 of our 44 presidents (see). This means that if elected in November Trump at age 70 would be the 7th New Yorker to be President following Franklin Roosevelt who was the 6th*. Now by chance or providence Mike Pence was born June 7, 1959 or the 6th month and 7th day of 1959 giving us the numbers 6 &7. Moreover, when Pence was born Donald Trump was in his 667th week on this earth (see)**.
*Oddly if Trump wins the presidency he will be sworn into office on the 70th year, 7th month and 7th day of his amazing life (see).
**When Trump began his candidacy on June 16, 2015 it was the 167th day of the year-the 67th number of the 100 series (see).
Furthermore, as I mentioned elsewhere, FDR was elected the 6th New York resident to be President on November 8, 1932. In other words, this November 8th* will be the 84th** anniversary of FDR's landslide victory over Herbert Hoover. And lastly, as the number 16 seems to be politically auspicious for Trump, he's now within striking distance of following FDR into the White House as the 7th President from New York, it just so happens that FDR was the 32nd President of the United States-32 is 16 doubled.
*On Election Day November 8th Donald Trump will be exactly 25,716 days old-a five digit number ending in 16. BTW, 8 is half 16 (see).
*84 years translates into 1008 months of calendar time (84x12=1008). 1008 is a multiple of 16 63 times.
And lastly, underscoring the significance of Indiana for Donald Trump as a possible sign of triumph in November was Hillary Clinton's loss of that state to Bernie Sanders (the populist Donald Trump of the Left) in an upset victory- which I wrote about HERE. Did underdog Bernie's defeat of Hillary in Indiana foreshadow underdog Donald being helped by Indiana's Mike Pence to defeat Hillary in November? As of today with the Baton Rouge and Dallas cop killings, the jihadist massacres in France and Orlando and the weakening of the economy (three straight quarters of GDP decline) things are looking brilliant for "the law and order," give-ISIS-hell, "make America great and safe again" presidential candidate and his terrific running mate.

Pence the Con is a gift for the Dems and will sink Trump and the Republican Party!  Here's why:

Pense's stand on some key issues

Abortion: As governor, Pence signed into law a sweeping bill banning abortion if a fetus has a "genetic abnormality" such as Down syndrome and holding doctors legally liable if they had knowingly performed such procedures. The law also required that aborted fetal tissue be buried or cremated. A federal judge blocked the law from going into effect.

The environment: Pence has frequently expressed skepticism about the reality of climate change and fought back against key environmental acts designed to curb carbon emissions. In 2014, he told NBC's Chuck Todd that he doesn't know if climate change "is a resolved issue in science today." He wrote a letter to President Obama in 2015 saying he wouldn't comply with new Environmental Protection Agency regulations for coal plants.

Guns: Pence has an "A" rating from the NRA, and while in Congress he regularly voted with the gun lobby. That included voting against an assault weapons ban — something Trump has mentioned supporting during this election.

Immigration: In a December tweet, Pence called Trump's ban on Muslims entering the United States "offensive and unconstitutional." He has, though, supported strict immigration measures and opposed the resettlement of Syrian refugees in Indiana.

LGBT rights: Pence helped pass one of the nation's first "religious freedom" laws that protected people and businesses who wanted to refuse service to LGBT people if they cited religious objections. After businesses pulled out of expansion plans into the state, Pence faced immense pressure to roll back the law, which he did. Trump has actually been fairly open when it comes to rights for gay and transgender people.

Trade: Pence has offered support for the Trans Pacific Partnership, which Trump has routinely attacked, going so far as to call it a "rape" of the country. Pence in 2014 said, "Trade means jobs, but trade also means security. The time has come for all of us to urge the swift adoption of the Trans Pacific Partnership."




Pence will sink Trump like GHW Bush sank Reagan: Bush opposed Reaganomics (ridiculing it as "voodoo economics"), was pro-Detente (thought Reagan's anti-communism extreme), voted for the Civil Rights Amendment which Reagan opposed. The American people chose Reagan over Carter and cared nothing about Bush's anti-Reagan positions, and Reagan's alleged racism, because he projected an image of strength promising to restore America's greatness at a time when we were in economic, military and geopolitical decline.

BTW, according to Pew Research of the top 14 national issues gun control ranks 5th, immigration 6th, race relations 10th, global trade 11th, environment (climate change) 12th, abortion 13th, and LBGT issues dead last in 14th place. The top four issues: the economy, terrorism, foreign policy and healthcare (Obamacare is hugely unpopular) favor Trump-Pence over Hillary and the Dems.




On the day that Barack Obama and John Kerry were festively congratulating themselves on the first anniversary of their completely worthless $150 billion nuke deal with Islamo-nazi "Death to America" terrorist Iran terrorism struck Nice, France ruining their day of appeasement, stupidity and infamy. A Moslem suicide terrorist armed with an 18 ton refrigerator truck bearing guns and grenades plowed into a large crowd of pedestrians at full speed walking on a promenade celebrating Bastille Day killing 84 and injuring more.
As yesterday July 14th was France's July 4th (Independence Day) the innocent victims of the Islamist attack were celebrating "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," the values of the French Revolution and Democracy. But for the mass murdering terrorist, Tunisian born Mohamed Bouhlel, Bastille Day was a godless day that comes from hell hated by God with murderous rage which he became a channel for. 
For "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity" are unIslamic values that conflict with the Koran (Islam's constitution of tyranny)-a declaration of endless war against democracy and infidel humanity until the later are conquered and the former is no more.
This jihadist who went on the rampage was a soldier of Allah in a 1400 year old war unleashed by the Prophet Mohammed to advance the political and religious supremacy of Islam. Not "Liberty" but despotism and slavery. Not "Equality" but the oppression of minorities (women, gays, Christians, Jews, pagans). Not "Fraternity" but US versus THEM division, conflict and hate. That is what Mohammed Bouhlel  was fighting for when he martyred himself after killing liberty loving Frenchmen in droves. And that too is what Iran is fighting for in their jihad against America, Israel and the Democratic West.
Yesterday was the second worst July 14th in human history. The first just one year before was worse as it saw a weak, self-serving, appeasing US president looking to his legacy expanding Iran's capabilities to spread its evil influence and power across the region and world. It also didn't stop them getting the bomb. Go a head 
 and prove me
Oh look! A Jihadist armed with a large speeding 18 ton truck just killed at least 84 people causing the same number of deaths (and injuring more) than the Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, San Bernardino and Aurora shooters combined. He now holds the world's record  for one single man mass murdering others exceeding the record held by Anders Breivik in Norway by seven deaths. It's horrific what one bloodthirsty Islamic terrorist with a truck can do. I guess those like our befuddled president who reduce mass shootings to a gun control problem need now to restrict who gets truck drivers licenses because truck jihad copy cats are coming.



Obama: "Islam Is A Religion That Preaches Peace" | Video | RealClearPolitics

Obama Administration Imposes Transgenderism Nationwide - Breitbart

Above is a Moslem man cross dressed as a Moslema (Moslem woman). If he's a violent, radical, bloodthirsty jihadist who thinks he's transgender Obama, Clinton and the PC Left would deny that his self-identity as Moslem was valid; but they would validate his self-identity as a female.

If an extremely violent, bloodthirsty, sadistic man who enjoys making people suffer or killing them thinks he's transgender (believes he's a woman trapped in a male body who experiences the world like a female) Obama, Hillary and the PC Left (rejecting the truth that he has a treatable mental obsession, fantasy or disorder    see) would urge us to accept him (violence and all, and despite the gap between his mentality and genetic reality) as really, truly, authentically female.

But if an equally violent man strongly self-identifies as Moslem, and kills in the name of his God and faith, Obama, Hillary and the Left would deny that he's truly, really, authentically Islamic. In other words, no matter how strongly a violent Moslem (jihadist) feels like a Moslem, sees the world and experiences life as a Moslem-no matter if he's a frequent mosque goer and practices all the rituals of the faith-to Obama, Hillary and the Left his religious identity isn't valid, and he's a fake.

Indeed, leftists would have us believe  that a jihadist's self-identity as Moslem was a mental obsession and fantasy out of whack with true Islamic reality; and that he shouldn't be respected as truly Moslem, but stigmatized as a perverter of the faith-no matter how badly we might offend him.



What does transgenderism and liberalism have in common? Both are treatable mental disorders. I should know. I was once a liberal.

In truth, for Obama, Hillary and the Left a Moslem man isn't truly Moslem unless he's a harmless, peace-loving, progressive liberal like themselves. This of course would exclude Mohammed, the warlord founder of the faith, who was a mass murdering terrorist thug; and who (among his many atrocities and crimes) completed the ethnic cleansing of Medina of Jews by ordering the beheading of hundreds of Jewish men in front of their women and children. BTW, the Jewish women and children were sold into slavery; the only Jewish man who survived that "religion of peace" massacre was a convert to Islam (see).




But it gets worse. Adding to the leftist confusion and incoherence of who is truly Moslem Obama rejects as Islamic the violent terrorist Islamic State (ISIS) but accepts as genuinely Islamic violent radical terrorist Iran, which he deferentially refers to as the ISLAMIC REPUBLIC.


In other words, for Obama, Hillary and the Left violent terrorist "Death to America and Israel" Iran practices true "religion of peace" Islam, as if it's an exemplary model of what an Islamic state should be. Is it any wonder why US foreign policy is in such incoherent disarray and is leading America and the world deeper and deeper into peril and tragedy? And who is it that wants to stay the course and continue Obama's legacy in foreign policy?  Hillary Clinton, one of its brilliant authors and architects. And she says Donald Trump is a dangerous man? 





As Commander-in-Chief Donald Trump wants to equal or surpass in brutality and inspiring fear Saddam Hussein when fighting our Islamic terrorist enemies. But Hillary, on the contrary, wants to continue in the way of another Hussein with the first name Barack, a reluctant warrior weak in the use of force when fighting merciless, menacing Islamic jihad. Which of the two candidates is more suitable to lead us in the war against a fanatical enemy hell-bent on our destruction? An enemy every bit as evil, power mad and bloodthirsty as the Nazis and Japanese who we fire bombed and nuked into surrender, submission and defeat?  
Would she have preferred they used the Koran as a guide? 
When Ginsberg was sworn in as a supreme she swore to God  to uphold the Constitution. How could she do that when she doesn't believe in it? And (like Obama) would like to tear it up and replace it with something radically different?




If America the great, good and beautiful is in reality an ugly, evil "White Supremacist Nation" politically, socially and economically rigged to keep blacks in poverty, oppression, degradation and sin then how did   black American Barack Obama become the most powerful black man in all of human history? Isn't Obama's astonishing success in becoming a two term US President proof that "White Supremacist America" is a complete lie? That it only exists in the mind's of racially obsessed America-hating Leftists, grievance spewing race pimps and the low info   ignorant? And that the millions of blacks living in poverty and despair in our depressed, lawless, strife-torn inner cities is largely self-caused-having zero to do with racist cops, racist courts and a so-called "white racist controlled"  political, social and economic system?
Surely if Barack Obama could rise so high in prominence, power and wealth any black person with the will to succeed and surmount what racial difficulties exist (every society has them) can achieve the American Dream and live a good a rewarding life-as many blacks do. 
And as Black Lives Matter is based on the outrageous lie of a White Supremacist America that criminally discriminates against blacks using cops, courts and economic discrimination to kill and massively jail them and keep them down why would Martin Luther King, a man of God with enormous integrity and character who loved the truth and hated lies, favor BLM and march with them? King's Civil Rights Movement was from heaven, BLM is from hell; King (who opposed the Black Panthers in his day, seewouldn't  have legitimized them like Obama has done.
Alveda King niece of MLK.
If Martin Luther King were President instead of Barack Obama he would never have invited "No Justice, No Peace" "Fry Cops Like Bacon"  BLM leaders to the White House like Obama did . It's more than likely he'd have denounced BLM (like he did Huey Newton and the Black Panthers) as a [GODLESS] movement of divisive, mindless, insane race haters just like his niece Minister Alveda King ( speaking authoritatively in her uncle's name) is doing.
"Godless," now? Goodness you are full of yourself. Won't that come as a surprise to the pastors and priests marching in peaceful protest with BLM?
As Alveda King says her great uncle put God (the Divine Author of our Individual Rights and Liberties) at the center of the 1960s Civil Rights Movement and used Him (the Creator and Father of the human race) as a unifying principle to join blacks, whites and everyone else together.
What is BLM's unifying principle? If not God then what? Without such a powerful compelling principle how could BLM hope to succeed? With most Americans hostile to BLM, seeing it as a radical movement of divisive, violent, toxic, anti-white race haters (its public image) how does it expect to succeed like King's inclusive, peaceful, nonviolent, "God is Love" mainstream movement?
MLK's children: MLK III and Minister Bernice King. They talk the talk about BLM, but won't walk the walk and march with them.
How presumptuous of you and O'Reilly. It just so happens that
MLK's son and daughter both say he would have supported BLM. In fact His son said his dad would be "PROUD' of BLM. But, then, surely they don't know their own father as well as you and Bill O'Reilly..
Well, that was embarrassing for you and Billy. 😉
Actions always speak louder than words, friend. Where is the actual, active, passionate support of Bernice King and MLK III for BLM? Since it started three years ago how many BLM meetings, rallies and marches have they attended? How much money have they raised for the cause? Obama invited BLM's leaders to the White House. But when have the King children invited them to their homes? To date the Kings' support for BLM seems more lip (perhaps to appease friends and relatives who support it) than anything real and concrete.
And, BTW, like Alveda King Bernice is a Christian minister and pro-life, pro-family, anti-gay social conservative; and like Alveda she has nothing philosophically in common with the secular progressive, Marxist leaning BLM leadership-and its simplistic reduction of all       black socio-economic problems to the lie of White Racism. Hence, in her interview with Amy Goodman (which you linked) King commends BLM for "bringing attention to the suffering of blacks," and that's it; her praise goes know further; as King understands that underlying the problems and pathologies plaguing black inner cities (poverty, gang violence, drug abuse, illiteracy, broken families and schools)
is a profound crisis of values; and because the solution is spiritual not political or racial what she doesn't say is that BLM has the right answers-which it absolutely doesn't.
So now you see into the minds and hearts of MLK's children, not just MLK?
Goodness, you've tangled yourself up here. I will pray for you.
People should be judged by what they do or fail to do, not by what they say. What's striking is the gulf between the Kings' very few words of support for BLM and their actions in supporting it which to date are non-existent. Compare them to their father and the anti-war movement. MLK not only passionately spoke out against the Vietnam War and in support of the anti-war movement he participated in its marches and rallies (despite the frequent violence) demanding an end to the war.
After three years and dozens and dozens of BLM rallies across the country demanding an end to anti-black police violence the Kings have kept aloof from the cause not going to a single rally. What sensible person based on a few words of support for BLM followed by such glaring inaction would interpret it, as you do, as a sign of resounding support? It would seem that you're grasping at straws and reading too much into their words. Instead of a passionate commitment to BLM their support seems quite less than lukewarm.
In sum, Bill O'Reilly is correct: just as Bernice King and MLK III haven't marched with BLM neither would their father. And if he were President the White House would be off-limits to them-as well as Al Sharpton and every other deranged "racism-is-everywhere" Leftist ideologue.












Newt Gingrich: 'It is more dangerous to be black in America'-USA Today' 



But as statistics overwhelmingly and tragically show blacks have  far more to fear from each other than from whites, or from anyone else in America. Why? Because of the unique nationwide collapse of entire black communities into lawlessness, anarchy and anything goes immorality with black on black murder, rape, theft and violent crime worsening by the year the nightmare of deadly, strife-torn inner city life. Why? It's not anti-black bigotry or cops killing blacks (both of which have greatly declined over the last 50 years) that's causing blacks to violently turn on each other with such vicious animosity. The cause is a cancer inside the black America called welfare liberalism.

Indeed,  this crisis is caused by desperate, bankrupt, scapegoating liberals who demonize white Americans as differing little in their mentalities from old Jim Crow Democrats; and exploit the largely self-caused ills and miseries that plague blacks to keep alive the myth that we're a racist nation of privileged white supremacists that's rigged against blacks and oppress them. This utterly false, groundless, divisive lie (disproved by America making Obama the most powerful black man in human history) is advanced to avoid responsibility for the colossal failure of the liberal welfare state-a corrupt and dehumanizing system that traps millions in generational poverty and a web of social pathologies, hopelessness and racist lies.  

And the solutions proposed by race obsessed liberals and our clueless, divisive, pro-BLM president are what? Not the moral regeneration of black America starting with the individual and personal responsiblity; not teaching young people to become good productive law-abiding citizens with respect for authority; not ending the spiritually corrosive poison of government dependency that destroys character, the work ethic and the incentive to marry and raise kids normally; what they propose are  useless measures that keep the welfare status quo alive such as gun control, reining in police, reforming the criminal justice system and more money for war on poverty programs when trillions have been spent to no avail.

Apart from too few black conservatives in politics, the media, academia and church ministries blacks have no one to lead them out of poverty, illiteracy, drug abuse, crime and the plague of out of wedlock births. As thousands of angry, deluded blacks march across the country protesting the lie of institutional racism and anti-black police violence cops are killed and hurt and the streets of Chicago, Baltimore and South Central LA run red with blood as blacks kill blacks in droves.

The Age of Liberalism is over, bankrupt, finished, done. After 50 years of the War on Poverty moving all the ways to the radical LEFT with catastrophic results blacks have nowhere left to go but RIGHT. Black America is ready for a revolution. In the years ahead you will see an increasing number blacks waking up to the truth about welfare liberalism and joining our ranks realizing that their last best hope for social, economic and spiritual renewal is American Conservatism.





(This piece is about the Clinton/Gingrich Welfare Reform Bill)




(Reposted from November 6, 2015) 


jonah_goldberg.jpgMorgan Freeman, Don Lemon, 
 In his October 30 National Review column Jonah Goldberg invoked the two politicians' family backgrounds to justify his observation that Ben Carson may be "more authentically African-American" than Obama, pointing to the fact that "Obama's mother was white and he was raised in part by his white grandparents," while Carson "grew up in Detroit, the son of a very poor, very hard-working single mother"
When I posted the comment below on Media Matters it sparked a number of  lively debates on racism, welfare, inner city life,  Martin Luther King and much more.
In an interview with NPR to promote his latest film, The 
Magic of Belle Isle, the popular Oscar-winning actor [Morgan Freedman] said that people “conveniently 
forget that Barack had a mama, and she was white — very white American, Kansas, middle of America There was no argument about who he is or what he is. America's first black president hasn't arisen yet. He’s not America’s first black president — he’s America’s first mixed-race president.”

And if someone with Obama's coloration and features were to walk into a room right now, what percentage of Americans, Black or White, would immediately assume that he was a White man? Racism is situational. Glenn Beck said that Obama had "a deep-seated hatred for white people." In our culture, President Obama is defined as Black by those who would not see him as White. That and the fact that he was born in Kenya, according to morons like Donald Trump.


ApolloSpeaks  blessed56 


Even more idiotic than Trump's harmless birtherism is 

our utterly ignorant moron of a president telling comedian Marc Maron the dangerous divisive racist lies that racism is genetic in White America; that Whites are innately anti-black, that it's passed on from generation to generation "through their DNA." If that were true then how does this imbecile account for the fact that our predominantly White "genetically racist" society made him the most powerful black man in human history? With good reason Beck said what he did. Only an anti-White racist could make such a hateful, false statement.


classicalmusiclover  ApolloSpeaks


You do realize that Obama's reference to "in our DNA" was a metaphor, not an assertion that racism is literally genetic, don't you?

It's actually a very common metaphor for "part of our culture and upbringing."

As the old song goes, "you've got to be carefully taught." That's how it is passed on.



So it's only metaphorical that Obama is supporting an overtly black racist movement organized on the proven leftist lie that America is a white supremacist society with cops across the country leading a murderous race war against poor, suffering, innocent, victimized blacks? In other words, we shouldn't take his support literally?


classicalmusiclover  ApolloSpeaks 


There is a lot of potted right-wing ideology and distortion in your comment. And you turn the "Black Lives Matter" movement into such a caricature that it can only be a strawman.


White supremacism runs deep in American history. It is real. That doesn't mean that America is necessarily a white supremacist society, but it does mean that there are unacknowledged anti-black biases that often go unacknowledged and have had a corrosive structural effect. Nowhere is this clearer than in policing and in the disproportionate incarceration rates.


Your literalism will be your undoing; it certainly is your unmasking as an idiot.


calls Obama a “Halfrican-



And it was only metaphorical that Obama sat in the pews of a racist church for 20 years listening to the ravings of his black supremacist mentor (so hateful Oprah couldn't stand him) that God hates the white race? And blacks (God's chosen people) are destined to rule? Oh, that's right, the compulsive liar wasn't there when Wright gave his hateful incendiary sermons.





And it was only metaphorical that Obama supported a violent homophobic black racist gangsta wannabe [Trayvon Martin] who murderously tried to ground and pound an innocent community watchman into unconsciousness and death thinking (as Rachel Jeantel told Piers Morgan) that he was "a gay predator out to rape him"? How despicable, shameful and hypocritical of Obama to say "If I had a son he'd look like Trayvon." Truth is he wouldn't have let his eldest daughter date such a sick, twisted, dangerous kid (see).


And let's not forget that Eric Holder was metaphorically speaking when he said in 2009 that Americans are a "nation of cowards" on racial issues-despite a devastating Civil War claiming 500,000 lives, nationwide support for the 1960s Civil Rights Movement, and a $19 trillion War On (mostly black) Poverty.


BTW, the moral collapse of our inner city ghettos (largely caused by the corrosive social welfare state as FDR warned) disproportionally into the most violent and lawless places in America is what underlie the "disproportionate black incarceration rate." "White Racism" is a scapegoat to hide the catastrophic failure of liberal social welfare policies (with trillions in transferred funds) to end poverty and improve black lives. Instead of the promised conquest of poverty we have more of it and worse than ever as inner city life (once decent, law-abiding communities with strong families and work values) are now progressive created war zones, hell holes and wastelands. The road to hell (and a third world America) is paved with liberal compassion.


NYC, Brooklyn and Queens





Obama said racism is endemic (that is what is meant by the metaphor "in our DNA") to the US, not specifically white people. That is only "patently false" if we ignore...

- slavery

- the Indian Wars

- Native American reservations

- segregation

- Japanese internment camps

- Jim Crow laws

- socioeconomic inequality

- voter suppression efforts

- unequal mandatory sentencing laws

- disparate treatment from law enforcement

- chronic poverty

- housing discrimination

- declaring blacks to be only a fraction of a human being in our Constitution

- the 1790 Naturalization Act barring non-whites from becoming citizens

- discrimination against darker Southern European immigrants in the first part of the 20th century

- the intense concern of Trump supporters with immigrants from Latin America, but not the many undocumented coming from Eastern Europe

- the proliferation of violent white supremacist groups

- lynching

- the KKK

- poll taxes

- prohibitions against interracial marriage

- disparate loan practices from banks

- the fact that many citizens continue to hold discriminatory views toward other ethnic groups

- "Yellow Peril" racism against Chinese immigrants- the Chinese Exclusion Act

- the Alien Land Law restricting what property Asians buy

- the formation of the Native American Party (aka the Know Nothing party) on purely racist grounds

- the National Origins Formula in immigration law, designed to limit immigration from non-Nordic countries

- the Mexican Repatriation program, which forcefully removed US citizens and sent them to Mexico

- racist Tea Party depictions of Obama

- birtherism


So yeah, except for all of that and numerous other incidents I must leave off for the sake of brevity, it is "patently false." If we reduce all of US history to a single day in November, 2008, there is absolutely no racism in this country




Bull! Obama was literally referring to the contemporary genetic racism of white Americans against blacks, and no other group. But do tell me, why did you exclude from your list of white racism the white man created liberal welfare state that traps millions of blacks in poverty, degradation, oppression and sin? That's destroyed inner city communities, families, schools, churches and work values; that's turned black ghetto's into war zones and morally dehumanizing lawless wastelands of crime, violence, drug abuse, illiteracy, one parent homes, disease and death? How could you treat something so provably destructive to millions of black Americans as not being racist?


And where is black racism on your list?


Where's the violent Black (supremicist) Panthers with their insane call for a suicidal race war? Where's Farrakhan and the white hating, anti-semitic Nation of Islam? Where's the Afro-centric racist churches like the sh*t hole Obama sat in for 20 years? Where's your mention of James Cone and his poisonous Black Liberation Theology with its black Christ and white hating God? Where's Black Lives Matter with its bullsh*t race war of cops against blacks that is worsening the nightmare of inner city life as cops are inhibited from doing their jobs in enforcing the law?


And where are race hustlers and grievance pimps like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson on your list? Evil men who thrive on black misery while infecting black minds with the big lie that America is racially rigged against them? Why aren't they on your list?


Consider this post an addition to your one-sided, hate driven, pathetic racist list making it more balanced, rounded, complete and fair.



"Why did you exclude from your list of white racism the white created liberal welfare state that traps millions of blacks in poverty, degradation, oppression and sin?"


Yes...blacks had full equality...full rights...full access...equal opportunity...until the The Great Society created a problem that did not exist...



The remedy for poverty isn't government dependency which FDR warned was "an opiate that corrupts moral character"-creating moral and spiritual poverty and all the social pathologies that spring from it











Learning to distinguish between good and evil, right and wrong, what we ought and out not do. In other words, choosing to be good citizens. It's not anymore complicated than that.









It would mean the moral regeneration of inner city community and family life which has disintegrated into anarchy, lawlessness and violence on a horrific scale never before seen in this country.


 RobRBarron  ApolloSpeaks let's cut federal aid to the inner cities even more...including health care and education...

It's worked so well to date...

lawlessness and violence on a horrific scale never before seen in this country.

You weren't alive in the 60's, eh?




The Wire (2002) Poster



I was very much alive then. And as any old-timer living in our inner city ghettos will tell you community spirit, religious values, the tight-knit two parent family structure and respect for authority (parents, schools, churches, gov't, police, courts) has catastrophically eroded. I strongly recommend that you see the HBO award winning crime drama series "The Wire" for an education into the nightmare of contemporary inner city life. This outstanding series about inner city Baltimore is considered so authentic and authoritative that some major colleges and universities like Harvard use it in sociology courses. It will tear your heart out.


Moreover, welfare should be a temporary measure: a trampoline to a self-reliant and productive life, not a trap and a way of generational life.



There it is! Another one so poorly informed that he repeats the lie about "generational welfare" and "lifelong welfare." What's next a story about the people you have seen pulling into Social Services in their brand new BMW and going home to watch The Price is Right on their 72 inch surround sound TV?

There is a LIFETIME limit of 24 months and in somestates 20 months on the length of time one can receive welfare.

It is possible to receive SNAP and Medicaid benefits for extended periods but most of those are children, the elderly and people who work full time for such generous and benevolent employers as Walmart but aren't paid enough to live on.

Ignorance can be excused if one makes the effort to educate oneself. If the problem is stupidity, well, that just can't be fixed.



Intergenerational Transmission of Welfare Dependency 



There is no comparison between disability insurance and welfare, they are completely different things. Nowhere in this country is there more than a 24 month LIFETIME cap on welfare benefits and most who avail themselves of it, AS A LAST RESORT, never use that entire 24 months.

That wasn't even worthy of a "nice try," it was just a pathetic attempt to find something that justifies your desire to feel superior to others. I have never encountered anyone with a need to feel superior who was superior to anyone.




LOL!!! This study (one of many many many) proves beyond doubt that if parents become welfare dependents, the likelihood of their children eventually becoming welfare recipients (creating a destructive, degrading, work ethic eroding, welfare-entitlement mentality) also increases. This study uses DI as emblematic of the greater problem caused by the totality of such programs. Fact is (as the study shows) when parents are awarded just DI, the likelihood that one of their adult children will participate in DI rises by "5 percentage points over the next five years, and 11 percentage points over the next decade." DI combined with other anti-poverty welfare programs has a multiplying effect on these percentages.

FYI the reason for Bill Clinton's "Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996" was to the break the cycle of welfare dependency which creates the intergenerational welfare mentality and culture and its attendant social pathologies that have decimated our inner cities and lost the War on Poverty despite $19 trillion in redistributed wealth over the last 50 years. The liberal welfare state is not just a failure it's going broke and going the way of its European counterparts unsustainably supporting a great and growing mass of unemployed/unproductive recipients many of whom are poorly skilled, uneducated immigrants. 

I just love ropeadoping libs. Here's a few more (racist) studies that you can howl about.

Now who's the poorly informed, stuck on stupid ignoramus?



Why do you hate black people so much? Did one cut you off in the parking lot last week?



Along with my black conservative friends I hate radical






Your mother must be so proud her darling son is so full of hatred.

And tell me more about how your best friend is black



My best black friend doesn't consider himself black. He treats his skin color as the lowest, basest, and least important part of his being, as do all rational blacks and human beings.



So he is a self-hating African-American. Interesting.

Are you a self-hating Jew?




Like Martin Luther King he puts his spiritual humanity above his skin color and race. But maybe you're too much of a leftwing materialist to understand this. 



 AronLump  ApolloSpeaks 


You said he considered his skin color the basest part of his person.


You didn't say it was the factor of least concern.


Words have meaning, you know.


(And FYI, had this been 1968, you would have been one of the people cheering at Dr King's assassination.)



Which is more important to your life and well-being, your skin color or your brain, lungs, heart, kidneys and other vital organs?

In the early 60s I was a teenage admirer of JFK living in New York. In the late 60s I was a radical counterculture lefty destroying myself and trashing New York.




Your question is completely irrelevant.

Your statement is very likely false.



And you're the typical left-wing moral coward. I'll answer the question for you. You're vital organs are more important than your skin color. And going further the soul (spirit) that gives your body life is more important than your vital organs. And by "soul (mental and moral faculties)" is what Dr. King meant by the famous words " the content of our characters." "Character" (which transcends race, ethnicity and gender) for King (and every black conservative) is the very essence of our beings-the most important and highest part of our humanity; what distinguishes us from the animals and beasts. When you die you can't take your skin color, body and vital organs with you to heaven; but you do take your soul, mind, spirit, character.


"Character is destiny" it determines your path in life. Those blacks, whites and others who give supreme value to skin color are lost to their spiritual humanity (the essence of their beings) and are among the worst members of their race. In other words, what you consider "irrelevant" was of the utmost importance to Martin Luther King as it is for all black conservatives. There is a crisis today of character in black America. Way too many blacks are making bad moral choices, becoming bad citizens and ending up dead or in jail. Those who think this is "irrelevant" are useless, worthless, ignorant fools, and are part of the problem.


MLK was no conservative.

But nice try.

Beyond that, tl;dr.





Martin Luther King, the God-loving, Christ worshiping, faith over race Baptist minister, was no traditional morality hating, anything goes, secular progressive. If he were alive today, like his daughter Bernice, he'd be against abortion, gay marriage, pornography, legalization of pot, the Black Panthers, Black Liberation Theology, the Nation of Islam, Afro-centric ministers like Rev. ("God damn America") Wright and the violent, sick,"kill the cops" BLM movement. Moreover, he wouldn't be too keen about America's first black (racially divisive demagogic) president

In other words, for the man who said:

“Bound by the chains of his own sin and finiteness, man needs a Savior…. Man cannot save himself, for man is not the measure of all things and humanityis not God.”

they'd be no place in the secularized (God is government) Democrat Party today.



You are the poster child for the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

Remind me, why was MLK in Nashville when he was shot?

And what's the 'Democrat Party?'




In his last

sermon before he died Martin Luther King said

 "I just want to do God's will."

From a theological and moral perspective what did MLK mean by the term "God"? As King's understanding of God

was the directing principle of

his civil rights activities and life the answer

to  this question is key to understanding

his character (who he truly was). Answer

my question and then I'll answer yours.


AronLump  ApolloSpeaks


Here's a hint: he was in Nashville marching with striking union sanitation workers.


Unlike conservatism, progressives are happy to welcome all comers, from anti-theists to evangelicals.


Do you honestly expect me to answer the question 'what is God?'




Progressives are happy to welcome anyone who embraces the progressive agenda, just as conservatives welcome anyone (gays, atheists, Moslems) who embrace conservatism.



I notice you addressed neither of the other points you mentioned.

And the Republican is explicitly opposed to both atheism and Islam.

What's the matter, coward: afraid to admit why Dr King was in Memphis?




As King himself indicated in his last sermon before his death he was in Memphis because he believed he was doing "God's will." And for no other higher reason.


Atheist Free Market Republicans


Conservative Atheist S.E. Cupp


The pro-Republican Islamic Free Market Institute


Conservative Moslem Republican Dr. Zuhdi Jasser


Every properly informed, clear thinking American, and human beings everywhere (Moslem and non-Moslem) oppose Political Islam/Islamic Supremacism with its oppressive, totalitarian union of mosque and state and endless war against all infidels


"Democrat Party" should read Demo-Rat Party.

Sorry for the confusion.




Sultan Knish: The Death of the American Welfare State



What difference would it make if innocent, cleared of all crimes Hillary weren't President? A great, great deal. Based on her exemplary record as secretary of state judge for yourselves what we the people would be missing.
hillary reset button
After resetting US foreign policy from the disaster of the Bush years this indispensable woman and national treasure is hell-bent on doing for you, me and this great country what she did for US/Russian relations, and the peoples of Georgia, Ukraine and Crimea.
What she did for Ambassador Stevens, his staff and the consulate in lawless, anarchical, unsafe Benghazi.
 What she did for US allies Hosni Mubarak
Colonel Muammar Kaddafy.
What she did for the people of Iran in reining in the radical, expansionist, "Death to America," nuclear, genocidal oppressive mullahs.
What she did in transforming the extremist Moslem Brethren into moderate, freedom loving, pro-Western liberals by hugging and kissing the jihad out of them.
And lastly,
what she did for post-Saddam sectarian-torn Iraq,
pro-US sectarian-torn Yemen,
post-Kaddafy tribal-torn Libya,
and Bashir Assad's "reformed" Alawite Syria (that still hasn't surrendered its chemical weapons).
Violence In The Middle East Stock Photo
And let's not forget what she did for the peace and
stability of the Greater Middle East-
once the cradle (but no more thanks to her) of murderous, unIslamic Moslem terror.
With a record of achievements
so stunning as this how could we as voters in good conscience deny Hillary the White House-so her ever faithful, loving, virtuous husband can turn it into an
 The theme of Hillary's historic campaign shouldn't be 
In conclusion, come November keep in mind that it will take 16 years to reset America from the catastrophe of the Bush years, and finish building Barack Obama's More Perfect Big Government Dependency Union of Moochers and Losers. And that after eight years of shredding the Constitution we're only half way there. 


 Presidents Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and James Monroe

 That our nation’s leaders and destiny are under the watchful eye of God Almighty and His special Providence was Divinely and infallibly revealed to us, as Daniel Webster said (see), when John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, the second and third Presidents (the two Founding Fathers most responsible for the writing and ratification of the Declaration of Independence) died just hours apart in 1826 on the 50th anniversary of Independence Day-the historic, world-changing day that they founded. What has gone unnoticed in this amazing event is the uncanny numerical signs given to us that day especially in the correspondence between the date July 4, 1776, when Congress adopted the Declaration, and the two principle Founder’s (Jefferson and Adams) near simultaneous deaths. What I mean is this:

When the single digits of the date 7-4-1776 are added together it gives us (as you shall see) the profoundly significant number 32, which is the number that signifies America, hence:



1459931=32 (see notes)

 Mere chaotic coincidence? If that was all, perhaps. But there is more, much more. Read on and judge for yourself:

John Adams our 2nd President and Jefferson our 3rd died in reverse order that July 4th day giving us the number 32. In other words, as 3 precedes 2 in the number 32 Jefferson, the greater and more important of the two Founders, was the first to leave this world.

As if foreshadowing the order of their deaths the friendship of Jefferson and Adams began when they first met at the Second Continental Congress in May 1775. Amazingly at the time Jefferson (born April 13, 1743) was 32 years old.

Now as 32 is a number symbolic of the day this great country was founded and is the numerical value of the name America, and as it signifies the order of Jefferson’s and Adams’ death on a July 4th date, remarkably and amazingly the exact number of words comprising the Declaration of Independence (which the 3rd and 2nd Presidents wrote and defended) is 1322, with the number 32 at its center.

Moreover, as the number 32 by addition is reducible to the number 5 (3+2=5) incredibly Jefferson and Adams died approximately 5 hours apart, the one dying around 1 pm and the other at 6:20 pm. Also incredible is that 1 pm to 6:20 pm equals 320 minutes (32 10x). And just as uncanny is the fact Jefferson and Adams died on the 50th celebration of July 4th-50 being a multiple of 5 10x.

Now in keeping with this remarkable pattern of fives (and fives multiples and variations) the date July 4, 1776 fell on a Thursday, the 5th day of the week. Moreover, July 4, 1826, the day Jefferson and Adams died, was the 185th day of the year. Not does 185 end in 5and is divisible by 5 but it’s a variant of the number 5 because it is reducible to 5, hence: 1+8+5=14, 1+4=5.

Furthermore, as mentioned above, Jefferson and Adams first met and became friends at the Second Continental Congress held in May 1775 when Jefferson was 32 years old. May is the 5th month of the year.

Also fascinating is that the only two future Presidents to sign the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams (they were two of the 5 key Founders*), were members of the Committee of FIVE that was appointed to draft the document. The other three members were Ben Franklin, Roger Sherman and Robert Livingston.

*The other three were Washington, Franklin and Madison.

Moreover, the Declaration that Jefferson and Adams composed (the later playing a minor role) is made up of 5 distinct parts: the introduction, the preamble, the body, which can be divided into two sections, and the conclusion.

Other signs of what I believe is God’s supernatural presence and signature effect in the founding of our country, and in the astonishing deaths of Jefferson and Adams, are as follows:

Shortly before he expired a sick and ailing John Adams strangely uttered the mysterious words “Thomas Jefferson survives.” Could it be that Adams’ had a vision of Jefferson’s disembodied spirit and that it seemed so life like and real to him that he spoke these words believing he had seen him in the flesh? Whatever, these words are part of the mystery of Adams’ and Jefferson’s “coincidental” deaths in more ways than one. For in keeping with the significant numbers 3 and 2 Adams’ statement is composed of 23 letters (32 reversed) which exactly corresponds with the numeric value of Jefferson’s birth date, hence:


As Jefferson and Adam’s were the great pen and voice of the Revolution, the one writing the Declaration of Independence and the other defending it with his eloquence, concealed in the date July 4, 1776 is the all important year 1787 when the Constitution was completed and adopted by the 13 states and America became a Constitutional Republic, hence

1776 + 4 + 7 = 1787*

Remarkably, the numbers in the historic year 1787 collapse into the number 23, which is further reducible to 5 hence:

1+7+8+7=23 ,2+3=5

*There were exactly 74 delegates to the Constitutional Convention a number signifying  the month (7) and day (4) of our founding.

It is also important to note that Jefferson and Adams were the 18th and 48th signers of the Declaration respectively. The multiplication of these two numbers gives us a total that’s a multiple of 32, hence:

18x48=864 or 32x27


James Monroe was the third and last President to die on July 4th . What is remarkable about this, and a sign that his death was Providentially arranged and designed like Jefferson’s and Adams’, is that while Adams and Jefferson were the 2nd and 3rd Presidents, numbers that total 5, Monroe himself was the 5th President-2 removed from Jefferson and 3 from Adams. Incredibly, the 5th President died in 1831, exactly 5 years to the date of Jefferson’s and Adams’ deaths on the 55th anniversary of Independence Day-55 is a multiple of 5 11x.

It is fascinating to note that Monroe the Jeffersonian (the student and lifelong friend of Jefferson) was succeeded to the presidency by John Quincy Adams, John Adams’ son. In other words, just as Thomas Jefferson succeeded John Adams to the presidency an Adams succeeded a Jeffersonian President*.

*Just as the addition of 2 (signifying John Adams’ presidency) and 3 (signifying Jefferson’s presidency) equals 5 (signifying Monroe’s presidency), so the multiplying of 2 and 3 equals 6 the presidency number of John Quincy Adams.

St. Augustine, following the ancient Greeks who believed that numbers (the basis of mathematics) rule the world, wrote that “Numbers are a universal language given to us by God for the confirmation of truth”-and, I might add, to justify His ways to us in this mathematically constructed, ordered and harmoniously designed universe. What was Divinely confirmed on July 4, 1826 with the near simultaneous deaths of Jefferson and Adams, and again on July 4, 1831 with the death of James Monroe, is that random, unplanned, chaotic chance had nothing to do with their deaths-nor was it the work of some impossible ingenious human conspiracy. Indeed, the July 4th deaths of these three Presidents confirm the existence of God giving evidence of His necessary being and mysterious and inscrutable governing of the universe and this nation. In other words, it is proof that Jefferson, Adams and Monroe died naturally under supernatural direction with an intelligent unifying principle coordinating their deaths as a sign that our country’s founding moment and Constitutional Republic were DIVINELY ORDAINED, as is our exceptionalism and glorious destiny as the greatest liberating force from tyranny in human history.

In celebration of God, Country and Liberty I wish you all a Happy 4th of July.


The 3rd President Thomas Jefferson was the first to die on July 4th. The 2nd President John Adams was the 2nd President to die on July 4th. The 5th President James Monroe was the 3rd and last President to die on July 4th. This produces the number 325. 325 is a multiple of 13 5x. 13 is the number of colonies turned independent states on July 4, 1776. Moreover, 325 is a factor in the number 17875 a 5 digit number encoded with the year 1787 when America became a Constitutional Republic-325 x 55 = 17875. Isn't it odd that it was on the 55th anniversary of July 4th that James Monroe died.


Thomas Jefferson, the first US President to die on July 4th, was President in 1808 when our nation celebrated its 32nd Independence Day. Amazingly, 7-4-1808 was the 7th year and 4th month (corresponding to July 4th) of Jefferson's two term presidency.


Regal Eagle writes:

Mabye there’s something to this number 5. We’re a nation of 50 states, and our flag has 50 5 pointed stars. Just sayin.

X-MAN replies:

 And Hawaii, the last and 50th state to enter the Union, did so in the late 1950s.

My reply:

Not only did Hawaii (the 50th state) join the Union in the late 1950s but it did so exactly 6555 weeks from July 4, 1776,  hence:

July-4-1776 to August 21, 1959 (Hawaii joins the Union) is 183 years, 1 month and 17 days, that equates to 2197 months, or 66,886 days, or 9555 weeks (see).


The numerological table used in this article is as follows:

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9



S T U V W X Y Z 





“I will go so far as to say Donald Trump is the ISIS candidate. He inflames the passions of people in the West to perform Islamophobia, to draw recruits to them, to make them say ‘This is what America is.'”
Malcolm Nance




ISIS owes its existence to the catastrophically failed foreign policy of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton as expressed in the above irrefutable equation as I absolutely proved HERE. Why then would ISIS favor the aggressive, tough talking, I'm-going-to-bomb-the-hell-out-of-'em, Patton admiring Trump over Hillary who is pledging to be weak-on-terror, see-no-evil-in-Islam, lead from behind, butt kissing Obama's third term? ISIS no more favors Hillary than the Ayatollah Khomeini and Soviets favored Reagan over Carter in 1980. Just as Obama and Hillary midwifed ISIS and the greatest expansion of jihad influence and terror since 9/11 so did Carter mid wife Iran's Khomeinists regime and the greatest expansion of Soviet influence and power since the start of the Cold War.

In other words (as Donald Rumsfeld would say), why would ISIS favor the known known Hillary (who has put them on the map) over the known unknown Trump (who could be their worst nightmare)? Indeed, on the basis of their Moslem immigration policies alone (Trump wanting a temporary ban to prevent jihadist infiltrators from entering this country, and Hillary recklessly wanting to increase Moslem immigration) ISIS sympathizers in November will be casting their votes for Hillary.

Come to think of it, since jihadists following their manly, macho warrior prophet Mohammed are woman hating chauvinists why would ISIS want an alpha male member of the stronger sex to lead America over a woman? Does that make any sense? Malcolm Nance is a fool.









It is 1984 for Moslems in Japan as it should be for the subversive 1400 year old political religion with unlimited global aspirations that's been at war with unbelievers from the moment Mohammed received his deadly revelations on Islamic supremacism from the pit of hell.



Indeed, indeed, indeed. In the world war with TOTALITARIAN ISLAM

Japan (once the Islamo-fascist-like enemy of the United States) is

leading the way 






Cartoonists DESTROY the Clinton-Lynch Meeting (You'll LOVE It)...

Bill to Loretta:

 "If it weren't for me appointing you to a Federal judgeship you'd be carrying my bags and bringing me coffee. And before you dare indict my wife think very carefully what happened to Vince Foster. Don't try me, Loretta. I'm not golfing around...And by the way, how's the grand kids?"





the reason for America's economic, military, geopolitical and moral decline? With a nation in such turmoil that millions of angry, frightened middle class Americans slipping into poverty and losing the American Dream have turned to Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump for answers? Liberal ideas are triumphing and our nation is going to pot; and that's why millions of us are




< p style="box-sizing: border-box; font-size: 15px; font-family: Georgia, Times, serif; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal; margin: 0px 0px 15px; line-height: 21px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: center;"> 



During the GOP debates Donald Trump let it be known that he was no fan of George W. Bush. Sounding like a Bush derangement leftist he blamed President Bush for the 9/11 attack when neither Bush nor Bill Clinton had any actionable intel about the plot (see); and then he accused the former President of lying about Saddam Hussein's WMDs when Bush, like Clinton before him (and every other country) was deceived by Saddam into believing he was hiding his still missing stockpile (see).
But apparently one aspect of the Bush administration that Trump esteems and would like to revive is the use of waterboarding, sleep deprivation and other tactics used in Bush's successful counter-terrorism program to extract critical life saving information from top terrorist detainees.
At a recent rally in Ohio when talking about the horrific ISIS suicide bombings in Istanbul that left 40 dead and five times as many injured Trump shouted out to a cheering crowd "What do you think about waterboarding?" And followed up saying, "I like it a lot, but don't think it's tough enough."
In the past Trump has said that as Commander-in-Chief to save American lives he'd use "torture" on captured terrorists. And if that failed he'd then take it to a higher level and threaten the detainee's "families" with either injury or death to force them to cooperate. It is interesting to note that in the 1990s former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, as a last resort, ended a murderous nationwide terrorist campaign that killed 1200 people (he escaped assassination) by radical al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya by going after the terrorists' families (see). "If you continue killing Egyptians your wives, sons and daughters are going to die," warned Mubarak. And after carrying out his threat they stopped their killing spree frightened for the lives of their loved ones.
 Polls show that by a staggering 2:1 margin Americans favor torture as a tactic in the war on terror to keep them, their families and country safe, and had no problem with the Bush program (see).
But strictly speaking Bush's use of water boarding, sleep deprivation, lengthy exposure to ear-splitting music, etc. doesn't qualify as "torture." They were medically supervised Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EITs) falling short of what torture truly is. Consequently, Barack Obama's DOJ (headed by Eric Holder) could find no prosecutable criminal wrongdoing in Bush's successful program.
What follows is a debate on this issue on Media Matters where my "Bush was a torturing war criminal" opponent didn't fare so well.
iron jihadist will; after which he sang like a canary giving interrogators a treasure trove of info on planned terror attacks in the US and al-Qaida's international operations.
After two intensive investigations Barack Obama's DOJ (headed by Eric Holder) couldn't find the crime of "torture" committed by anyone in the Bush administration.
And all of KSMs "intelligence" turned out to be false.


ApolloSpeaks   B747 

KSM's chief interrogator said otherwise:

If KSM gave interrogators "false info" the waterboarding and sleep deprivation would have continued until he had enough and became cooperative.

B747  ApolloSpeaks 

False confessions: 

The al-Qaeda leader who suffered the harshest interrogations tried to stop his ordeal by giving false information about plots to attack Heathrow Airport and Canary Wharf, according to the Senate report.

Ten days after his capture, he was waterboarded for the first of what became 183 times. Under this relentless pressure, KSM “provided information on the Heathrow Airport and Canary Wharf plotting”. There was no suggestion of even trying to use other methods first, says the report. KSM, the acknowledged mastermind of the September 11 attacks, was then subjected to “facial and abdominal slaps, the facial grab, stress positions, standing sleep deprivation” and “rectal rehydration”. On the same day as KSM’s arrest in Pakistan on 1 March 2003, CIA headquarters authorised the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques”. Within two hours of the capture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed – known as “KSM” – the head of interrogations at CIA “Detention Site Cobalt” sent an email saying “let’s roll with the new guy”.

The cherry picked, politicized Democrat minority senate report on Bush's EITs was thoroughly rebutted and discredited by several former CIA chiefs who put up the web site "CIA SAVED LIVES." The Dem report ignored every piece of info (from 6 million docs) that contradicted its false conclusion that Bush's program was useless in facilitating detainee cooperation and gathering actionable intel to thwart terror attacks and save lives. 

The skewed report was also rebutted by the Republican majority report; and then by Obama's own CIA Chief John Brennen. Why do you think Brennen wasn't fired from his job after issuing his critique or at least rebuked by Obama? Because he told the truth-as did out going DefenseSec Leon Panetta when he said that info extracted from terror detainees using EITs played a role in tracking down bin Laden.

Panetta: ‘Enhanced interrogation’ had role in bin Laden raid - NY Daily News   

Days after the raid in Abbottabad, former Attorney General Michael Mukasey wrote an op-ed titled “The Waterboarding Trail to Bin Laden.” The intelligence that led to the raid, Mukasey asserted,began with a disclosure from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), who broke like a dam under the pressure of harsh interrogation techniques that included waterboarding. He loosed a torrent of information — including eventually the nickname of a trusted courier of bin Laden.6

It later became apparent that this account was wrong. KSM hadn’t revealed the courier’s alias. According to an American official familiar with KSM’s interrogation, KSM wasn’t asked about al-Kuwaiti until the fall of 2003, months after his waterboarding had concluded.7 KSM reportedly acknowledged having known al-Kuwaiti but told his interrogators al-Kuwaiti was “retired” and of little significance.


That was just a small piece of what KSM is said to have divulged. And as OBL was relatively isolated and impotent and no longer much of a threat killing him was a matter simple justice for what he'd done with no benefits for fighting the war on terror. Unfortunately, in retrospect, OBL's death did nothing to demoralize and stop al Qaida as they subsequently metastasized, grew stronger than ever and spawned ISIS. What a terrible legacy lying "al Qaida is decimated"       weak-on-terror Obama is leaving behind.








(H/T FOB Tycz)


Fact Sheet: Extraordinary Rendition | American Civil Liberties Union 





Pope Francis says Christians should apologize to gay people -

 Pope Francis silently praying with gay-hating Moslem clerics toward Mecca the anti-gay capital of the world.

So now we have the mentally deranged progressive leftist head of the once high and holy Roman Catholic Church (no longer the bulwark of Judeo-Christian values) apologizing for the Church's past treatment of gays and futily begging them for forgiveness. Why is it futile? Because most homosexuals will treat this as not going far enough, and remain hostile to the Church until ending its prohibition on same-sex marriage the pope himself officiates a gay wedding at the Vatican.  

After Latino Pope Francis sees religion of peace Islam killing dozens of Latino gays in Orlando he begs gays to forgive the Church  for past mistreatment instead of begging Islam to stop killing and persecuting gays. Today the greatest threat to gays comes from Islam, not Christianity. The Orlando gay massacre was emblematic of that.

But the Church's first Latino pope giving this apology 15 days after dozens of gay Latino men were killed by a gay Moslem jihadist can't be a coincidence. The pope was undoubtedly moved to compassion by the event which is why he made his statement. But in light of Orlando perhaps Francis should issue a second apology to gays for saying that "Islam is a religion of peace," and  for what he did two years ago when visiting Islamist Turkey. For while at a mosque in Istanbul Francis closed his eyes and silently prayed to God. That wouldn't have been so bad except that with the Moslem clerics who were present Francis was facing toward Mecca as if he were a Moslem worshipper. Now that's MECCA as in the ANTI-GAY CAPITAL OF THE WORLD. For Mecca is the holiest city in Islam (the most anti-gay religion in the world); and it's located in Saudi Arabia perhaps the most anti-gay country in the world where homosexuality is considered a crime against God and nature, and gays are flogged, tortured, castrated and jailed, and legally killed in vigilante violence. In other words, in Mecca and across Saudi Arabia Moslems have the right and license to kill gays: to beat, stone or torture them to death with absolute impunity and the blessings of the faith (see).

Now Francis issuing an apology for the Church's past mistreatment of gays in wake of the Orlando shooting and after praying toward Mecca where they're brutally mistreated (like the Church did in the Middle Ages) is utter extreme hypocrisy. If Francis means what he says then  he must  denounce Islam as a religion of war against gays, and apologize that his prayer toward Mecca was a big moral mistake.

Moslems who denounce Islam's brutal treatment of gays must cease praying toward Mecca where anti-gay violence carried out in Allah's name (since Mohammed's day) is the law of the land.


Right-Wing Media Use The Worst Anti-LGBT Massacre In American History To Lecture The LGBT Community-MediaMatters


to ramp up the immigration of LGBT-hating Moslems from Syria-one of the very worst oppressor nations of homosexuals (see). Worse still Obama has reduced the vetting process of these ISIS infiltrated refugees from 18-24 months to just three months. This is to speed up the time to settle as many refugees as possible before Obama leaves office. Why the rush? To impress the UN and show them what a fine job he's done; for he apparently has hopes of becoming its Secretary General when he leaves office. In other words, Obama's Syrian refugee policy is entirely self-serving putting his post-presidential ambitions above the safety and security of the American people. Tell me this isn't recklessly irresponsible and insane? Tell me Obama doesn't deserve to die at the hands of Islamic terrorists for putting Americans at such risk.

 BTW, if Obama could win the Nobel Peace Prize nine months into his presidency with no record as a peacemaker then it's very likely he'll be the next UN chief after making a terrible mess of the world; afterall, his heart was in the right place.


Trump Claims Obama Supports Terrorists, Echoing Breitbart’s Debunked Talking Point · Media Matters  




of Islamo-nazi Khomenist Iran and lied to the American people that it's leaders were "moderate" and "peaceful" while aiding and abetting the Assad regime in the mass slaughter of Syrians How shameful!

BTW, Obama blatantly lied that he shut down every one of Iran's pathways to building the bomb. What he doesn't want you to know is that Iran has an OFFSHORE pathway for going nuclear with one of its terrorist allies. Read the following and see for yourself




Well, it’s about time someone pointed out the elephant in the room. No real religion calls for the kind of violence, terrorism, hatred, and inhumanity that Islam represents and therefore should lose its official designation as a religion in the civilized world. Not surprisingly, designated terrorist group CAIR wants to “re-educate” this lawmaker.


So why should any other nations with hostile Moslem populations? 



Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion restrictions | TheHill  


and gushing with joy said that this court ruling was a victory for women's rights. REALLY? Was it a victory for unborn female children and their God-given right to life?

It’s Not Just Trump Fans; His Media Supporters Also Call Clinton A “Bitch-"MediaMatters


I'd call Hillary a b*tch all day long.\sarc


Wow that was both incoherent and lame



I know. Hillary is such an ineffective weakling only a lame brain would fear a whack from her powerless broom.





Forget about Donald Trump and his one year old white supremacist, anti-Moslem, "Mexicans are murders and rapists" presidential campaign. America's extreme racism and Islamophobia are much older than Trump's run. They go back deep into our past and are, as   Barack Obama said "Part of our national DNA." Proof that we're supremely racist, Islamophobic and worse is that we've made a black man with Moslem family roots and a Middle Eastern name the most powerful black man in human history./sarc








 Since late May crony, crooked, incompetent Hillary (left) and Princess Lizzie Ticklefeather (right) have been blasting Donald Trump as a heartless cut throat businessman for saying in 2006 that if the housing market should crash he'd make a fortune. Though Trump won't disclose how much a profited he nevertheless owes every cent of it to Bill Clinton whose reckless affordable housing program for the poor underlied the crash.  A great controversy stirring campaign tactic would be for Trump to publicly thank Bill for the crash that added to his wealth.
The credit/housing crash of 2008 that wiped out trillions in wealth for millions of Americans and nearly collapsed our financial system and caused a depression had many moving parts. But the prime mover of the crisis (the fountainhead and ultimate source) who set it in motion was Bill Clinton and his Government/Wall Street Housing Partnership to revitalize the flat housing market he inherited from George H. W. Bush.
Behold the great bubble maker who made Trump richer from the housing crash.
Called the National Homeownership Strategy (see) Clinton sort to quickly and dramatically boost the national home ownership rate from 63% to an astonishing historic 70% in just a few short years. Hoping to reach his ambitious goal by the end of his second term (and go down in history as the Great Home Ownership President) Clinton targeted millions of low-income families who dreamed of being home owners  but couldn't qualify or afford mortgages for lack of good credit or income and savings. So compassionate, big-hearted Bill feeling their pain of wanting the American dream of home ownership but couldn't afford it decided to launch a new economic and financial social justice revolution: to instantaneously lift millions of low-income families out of poverty and into the middle class. It was Clinton's version of the War on Poverty by other means; instead of government handouts and growing the welfare state (which he reformed) costing tax payers billions banks and mortgage firms would issue millions of risky loans to poor folks giving them a short cut to the middle class and American dream; and for many years it worked like a dream, until it predictably became a national    nightmare.
Indeed, Clinton with help from government sponsored mortgage firms (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made mortgages affordable to the poor on a massive scale by democratizing credit and treating them as if they were creditworthy 700 FICA score borrowers: with little or nothing down and a small fee to the lender and wallah, a subprime mortgage for $100,000 plus homes would be theirs (see and see). It was only fair thought progressive compassionate Bill that they should be treated like richer folks; for  
 like most liberals believe all human beings (rich, poor, in between)   have an equal right to home ownership. Now with Fannie and Freddie (headed by compassionate, caring, bleeding heart libs like Bill) massively buying and backing these loans from banks and mortgage firms (removing the risk and hazard of issuing them) Bill Clinton nearly reached his goal making him the greatest HOUSING BUBBLE KING of all. Indeed, when his presidency ended in 2001 the gigantic doomed to burst housing bubble (the homeownership rate) was at 68%-up 5 points when he took office in 93. No wonder the economy was surging during the Clinton years; and despite Monicagate and all the lies Bill left office flying high with a 66% approval rating-just beating Ronald Reagan.
From 1993 to 2006 the home ownership bubble grew from 63% to 69%-5% under Clinton 1% under Bush. This means that Clinton owned 5/6ths of the bubble-the majority of it. 
Indeed, as Bill Clinton brags and boasts today (and Hillary is always reminding us) the country greatly prospered during the 90s, and especially the nation's poor as 7.7 million of them were lifted out of poverty-a historic achievement by any measure. But Clinton avoids like death mentioning his secret on how he achieved such astounding  success: his Affordable Housing Program where recklessly discarding decades of safe, traditional, time-tested lending practices he subprime loaned his way to a housing boom that continued under a desperate, struggling George Bush (he saw a possible crash ahead and tried to prevent it, see) reaching 69% in 2006. Then the tide in home sales declined and two years later disaster struck as the Clinton/Bush bubble went bust with millions losing trillions in wealth and sinking into poverty reversing all the gains of the Clinton/Bush years. Indeed, millions of  people defaulted on their loans and many of the 7.7 million lost their homes along with their middle class rank.
That part of the story the Clintons don't want you to know because Bill's blind, reckless, stupid liberal ambition (his feel your pain compassion to end poverty, share wealth and leave office with a booming economy using risky subprime loans) nearly wrecked the economy for all.  The road to hell is paved with good intentions, and Bill Clinton was one of its most foolish travelers. Let the truth be known.
Hillary who tried and failed to reset US foreign policy (making it worse with her weak and feckless leadership and bad decisions) now promises to reset America after the disaster of the Obama years by continuing his failed policies.
And now with an anemic economy almost flat on its back of under 2% growth, and a disappearing middle class (which accelerated under Obama) Bill Clinton and the Mrs. want to return to the White House using him as her economic czar in charge of revitalizing the economy. God help us all if she beats out Trump this fall. For who knows what crazy reckless screwball schemes Clinton will dream up again.


It looks like my theory about gay Moslem mass murderer Omar Mateen (which I wrote about  HERE) might very well be factually true. An alleged gay lover of Mateen's who calls himelf Miguel has anonymously come forward telling the FBI and Univision that the derranged jihadist was out for revenge against gays when he murdered 49 people and injured 53 at a gay bar in Orlando. I had surmised, and rightly it seems, that Omar's experience with gay sex had turned very ugly deeply wounding him emotionally; and this I believed is what triggered his murderous rampage fueled and reinforced by his Islamic faith.
Omar Mateem killed gays for revenge and his personal salvation.
And sure enough the mysterious Miguel told Univision that after Omar foolishly and recklessly had unprotected sex with two Hispanic men one of them freaked him out and made him unhinged  by telling him he was HIV positive. And everything went down hill from there. After many years of  trying and failing to find true love and happiness in gay relationships it had all come to naught. Believing after so many disappointments that he might be infected with deadly AIDS by an irresponsible and dangerous gay who treated him like worthless dirt (a mere sexual receptical for his sinful lusts) a dehumanized Omar "felt rejected and used by them,"  Miguel told Univision. That was it. That one last bad experience (perhaps the worst as there were surely others) was the last straw for Omar; he had had it with homosexuals and gay bars. Not only did this depravity prove a dead-end for finding happiness in life, it was now like deadly poison to him and something to be expunged. Indeed, when Miguel asked his depressed, disillusioned and angry friend what he was going to do Omar ominously replied, "I'm going to make them pay for what they did to me." Omar was out for blood and wanted revenge; and thus was born the anti-gay jihadist driven by rage and the need for redemption to kill and hurt as many gays possible.
al-Tirmidhi, Sunan 1:152 – [Muhammad said] “Whoever is found conducting himself in the manner of the people of Lot [sodomites], kill the doer who does it and the receiver to whom it is done.”
 As being gay turned into a punishing experience and living hell for him Omar's upbringing in the Moslem faith came into play. Recalling what he'd heard and learned from his radical Moslem gay-hating dad, and from anti-gay imams in his schools and mosques, he must have become deeply guilty and aggrieved that he ignored what he'd heard as they were warnings of what he'd suffer. For he heard from the Prophet Mohammed (God's ultimate messenger of truth) that homosexuality was a cardinal sin and major offense against Allah (a heterosexual god who in Arab lore had fathered three daughters with a goddess); he also heard that gays were barred from heaven being exclusively a place for heterosexual men and women; and that Allah's reward for virtuous Moslem men was an eternity of bliss with dozens of radiant voluptuous never aging virgins giving them pleasure. Recalling these things Omar the miserable depraved sick sinning gay (this is what Islam told him he was) understood that heaven was closed to him upon death.
Islamic heaven is heterosexual.
Indeed, it meant that the hell he was suffering from his sexually deviant life was prelude to infinitely worse in the after life. Omar had defiled himself with ungodly sex; and if he failed to make amends and do what's right his immortal soul would be lost in hell forever in unendurable torment.
and "martyrs.... Enter heaven.." - Surah 3:140-43
Indeed, wanting to save himself from a terrible fate Omar desired to become what Islam demanded that he be: a good, straight Moslem man and atone for his sins earning Allah's love, forgiveness and grace; and redeeming oneself in the faith could be done one of two ways: Omar could stop being gay and simply go straight and live a righteous life devoting himself to his wife and child leaving his sins in the past. But overcoming such sins requires great will power, courage and moral strength which Omar unfortunately seems to have lacked. As he couldn't control his sexual urges no matter how hard he tried (going to mosque three or four times a week, praying to Allah for guidance and strength) Omar came to believe that the conventional Islam of ritual worship wasn't the answer or path; and the only alternative left to him-the only way out to make peace with God and conquer his sins-was violent murderous HOLY JIHAD. Going the way of  ISIS, al Qaida, the Taliban and others (who were killing infidel sinners the world over) Omar would became a warrior for Allah killing gays for his salvation.
As homosexuality in Islam is a grievous, soul-damning sin punishable by death (in all 57 Moslem states gays are oppressed) Omar would redeem and fix his damaged soul by becoming Allah's sword in slaying homosexuals. By killing gays en masse and martyring himself he'd kill forever the gay sinner inside him. Indeed, freeing his soul from sin and  purging it clean of the past Omar would rise from the ashes of his death reborn a pure, good, holy heterosexual Moslem man. And Allah proud of what he'd done in his name and for his fame Omar would enter paradise rewarded with the gift of endless carnal bliss as promised in the Koran.
My prediction that the Baltimore Six would be aquitted like George Zimmerman





An angry John McCain running for reelection in Arizona accused President Obama's premature, reckless, unnecessary withdrawal of US troops from Iraq of midwifing (giving birth to) the radical terrorist Islamic State that gay Moslem killer Omar Mateen swore allegiance to before he martyred himself to death. McCain's exact words were:
"Barack Obama is directly responsible for it [Orlando shooting], because when he pulled everybody out of Iraq, al-Qaida went to Syria, became ISIS, and ISIS is what it is today thanks to Barack Obama's failures, utter failures, by pulling everybody out of Iraq... 

So the responsibility for it lies with President Obama and his failed policies."

Though McCain was to later clarify his statement saying that "Obama's security policies and not him personality was responsible for Orlando (see)" nevertheless McCain on both occasions was disingenuously and self-servingly speaking a half truth. Indeed, the full inconvenient truth which he doesn't want you to know and could hurt is reelection to a fifth term in the Senate is summed up in the following precise demonstrable equation:


Indeed (as I explain HERE and HERE), remove from the equation the disastrous Obama/Clinton decision to intervene militarily in Libya (with a NO FLY ZONE and bombings to assist Libyan rebels in defeating Kaddafy) and the Syrian rebels certain that Obama and NATO would intervene on their behalf wouldn't have risen up against Assad with such destructive and murderous ferocity. In other words, if Obama's Libyan (and Egyptian*) policies hadn't turned relatively peaceful protests for democratic reform into an armed insurrection to topple Assad Syria would be very much at peace today with no massive displacement of Syrians creating a refugee crisis-and very real and deadly threats of refugee terrorism in America and the West.

*Obama's desertion of long time friend and US ally Hosni Mubarak for the radical Moslem Brotherhood then desertion of US ally Kaddafy for Libyan rebels emboldened anti-Baathist forces in Syria to arm and rise up against the anti-US Assad regime


But what hypocritical John McCain doesn't want you to know, or hopes you've forgotten, is that he (and`Lindsey Graham) was gung-ho for regime change in Libya and deposing Kaddafy. As Rand Paul said in his blistering critique McCain (and Graham) supported the Obama/Clinton Libyan War to the hilt; and then representing the anti-Assad rebels, which included al-Qaida (later to become ISIS), he and Graham urged Obama to replicate in Syria what he did in Libya: set up a NO FLY ZONE and bomb Assad to weaken his regime in his war against the rebels. But Obama disappointing the rebels who were certain of US intervention because of Assad's atrocities (which they provoked and committed themselves) would do no such thing*. They were deceived. With Obama wanting a nuke deal with Assad's allies in Iran there was no way he was going to chance jeopardizing that by bringing down Assad; or worse still risk getting into a military conflict with pro-Assad Putin in Russia.

*It was shortly after Obama ominously announced on March 19, 2011 (the eighth anniversary of the Iraq War) that the US and NATO would intervene in Libya  and set up a No Fly Zone that anti-Assad violence broke out in Syria with the burning down of Baath Party headquarters in the city of Daraa  (see and see). 

The sad truth is this: when Obama and Clinton took office there was no ISIS caliphate; and it would have stayed that way had they not gone to war against Kaddafy in Libya; and Obama had used the tremendous leverage he had of $60 billion in Iraq Reconstruction Funds to keep US troops in Iraq on US terms (as Leon Panetta said he could have done if he had the will, see). The terrible truth is this: Obama and Clinton were the unwitting parents (father and mother) of evil, murdering, terrorist ISIS; and John McCain to a lesser degree was complicit in its horrible birth (on the Syrian side). And in this way,  by the law of unintended consequences, Obama, Hillary and McCain were indirectly (not directly or personally) responsible for the 49 dead victims of the ISIS inspired Orlando gay nightclub massacre-the worst Islamic terrorist attack since 9/11-almost certainly anticipating worse horrors to come. I think most of you would agree with me when I say that with Obama retiring in January it's time for John McCain to call it quits and join him.










  In a video posted on Facebook early this morning, Seddique Mateen (pictured) said his 29-year-old son, Omar Mateen, shouldn¿t have gone on the killing spree because ¿God himself will punish those involved in homosexuality¿

The lying pro-Taliban father of gay mass murderer Omar Mateen tried to hide his son's radicalization and homosexuality.

Shortly after mass murdering gay jihadist Omar Mateen martyred himself while killing 49 mostly gay Americans at Pulse nightclub in Orlando his father Seddique (a radical pro-Taliban Islamist) told NBC News that his son wasn't a radical Moslem; and that contrary to reports that he was gay he actually hated gays to the point of being enraged by them; and that his murderous anti-gay rampage was triggered by the sight of two gay men kissing (see). 
But subsequently we learned that this wasn't true. For not only did Omar swear allegiance to ISIS, but he was no stranger to seeing gay men hug and kiss as he'd been a patron at the Pulse for many years where that's normally done. In other words, the father blatantly lied obviously to cover up the truth about his son's homosexuality. Why? The most likely reason is that being a devote Moslem who lived by the Koran Seddique was ashamed that Omar was gay-a grievous sin in Islam punishable by death.
al-Tirmidhi, Sunan 1:152 – [Muhammad said] “Whoever is found conducting himself in the manner of the people of Lot [sodomites], kill the doer who does it and the receiver to whom it is done.”
Indeed, Seddique didn't want the truth be known that like weak permissive infidel parents he failed in his duty as a Moslem dad and tolerated Omar's damning, Allah-hating      soul destroying sins; for Islamic law gave him the right and obligation to severely punish him: to beat the homosexuality out of him if reason failed, or even kill him if necessary (allowed by Islamic law) as he was   dishonoring and disgracing his family and Islam. In short, by making his son seem violently anti-gay Seddique was trying to save face with his pro-Taliban family, friends, peers and contacts abroad; and with the vast majority of Moslems worldwide who are strongly anti-gay*. That is the most likely explanation for the lie. But there could be something deeper and more sinister that Seddique was trying to hide: that he or a relative or family friend had a hand in corrupting his son and making him gay.
*Gays are oppressed and discriminated against in all 57 Moslem states (see).
Afghan boy with child abusing pederast.
This theory is not far-fetched. For the Mateens came here in the 1980s as refugees from Afghanistan to escape the brutal war there. But they didn't come alone. They arrived with a group of relatives, friends and acquaintances bringing with them their Afghan values, customs and ideas. But one of those customs (perhaps the worst) was the cultural practice of "bacha bazi" Persian for "boy play," or what we call pederasty: the sexual abuse of young boys (see). Given that this ancient perverse practice is widespread in Afghanistan it is probable that Omar was its victim as a child here in the States; that abused by his father or an uncle or a family friend he was used as a boy toy (sexual play thing) and suffered deep psychological scars. Indeed, Omar's conflicting homosexuality and horrific jihad strike against gays could have ultimately been rooted in bacha bazi, his sexual abuse as a kid.
According to Islamic law (the words of the Prophet Mohammed) for the purification of the soul from the damning sin of homosexuality Mateen in mass slaughtering gays as a blood sacrifice to Allah did exactly the right thing.
What is perfectly clear however is that Omar failed to find happiness in his gay relations (as he failed to find it in his marriage) and quite possibly was deeply and emotionally wounded by the experience. Perhaps his last gay relationship was so painful and horribly bad that it sent him over the edge into an anti-gay rage that drove him to his evil deed.
 The Islamic Center of Fort Pierce in Fort Pierce Florida
 Omar Mateen's mosque in Ft. Pierce where he prayed up to four times a week.
What is also clear is that before he turned violent Omar was trying to peacefully find redemption on the ritual side of Islam. Becoming more religious than he'd ever been Omar's imam said that he was attending mosque three to four times a week praying ardently trying to be a good Moslem and get right with God (see). But apparently it didn't work. Hard as he prayed and humbled himself before Allah, begging him for a sign of forgiveness and grace, nothing happened, nothing came-Allah seemed unresponsive ignoring his pleas and Omar grew frustrated, desperate and enraged.
Indeed, the happiness he missed in gay sex he couldn't find in normative, conventional, mainstream Islam either. Try as he may he couldn't remove the sense of guilt and shame he incurred from defiling himself with sexual acts that brought him grief and were forbidden by his faith. Omar must have come to believe that Allah was profoundly unhappy with him; and finding the way to change that and earn his saving love and grace became a spiritual obsession driving him to dangerous extremes. And thus was born the deadliest American Moslem jihadist in history.
Indeed, unable to find redemption in his mosque Omar turned to unconventional means: to savage bloody murderous jihad (as taught by ISIS, al Awlaki, al-Qaida and    the Taliban) as a last resort and hope to save his hell bound soul. With prefect fanatical faith he believed that jihad was the answer and only path for him; that martyring himself for the faith while killing dozens of sexual sinners like himself (as a blood sacrifice to Allah) would kill the sin inside him, atone for his past and purify his soul making it acceptable to God-and earning him the gift and blessing of paradise. And the more gays he killed the greater the reward, as each life taken would please God the more.  And when his bloody deed was done 49 innocents lie dead making it the deadliest jihadist attack since 9/11. And Omar's soul where is it now? In torment for his horrific crime more lost, wretched and damned than ever.


al-Tirmidhi, Sunan 1:152 – [Muhammad said] “Whoever is found conducting himself in the manner of the people of Lot [sodomites], kill the doer who does it and the receiver to whom it is done.”



In most of the world's 57 Moslem states homosexuality is officially regarded as a crime against God and nature and is legally punishable by imprisonment, torture, mutilation or death. The one big exception though is Turkey where same sex sexual activity has been legally protected and tolerated for more than a 150 years (see postscript below). Turkish gays, lesbians and bisexuals, however, can be legally discriminated against and denied housing, employment and any goods and services based on their sexual orientation. Moreover, harassment and violence against LGBT folks is growing in Turkey as the country becomes increasingly re-Islamized under Islamist President Erdogen (see). In other words, in Turkey if you're gay and want to survive it's best to be very discreet and hide your shame.



  Indeed, repression, violence and economic discrimination against homosexuals in Moslem countries is not radical extremist fundamentalist Islam (a distortion, perversion or hijacking of the faith) like Obama, Clinton and liberals want us to believe; far from it, the "Religion of Peace" and its war against gays is normative, moderate, traditional, common, mainstream everyday Islam based on the words and deeds of the Prophet Mohammed as cited in the above Hadith where he condemns them to death. And practically every Moslem immigrant in this country (like Omar Mateen's homosexual hating dad) comes here with an anti-homosexual mindset: a deep pitiless ingrained cultural hatred and loathing of homosexuals that, inspired by the Prophet's words, could become horribly violent and deadly. Indeed, everyone of Omar Mateen's 49 mostly gay victims (killed for the glory of Allah and Islam) would have suffered death or imprisonment (where few return alive) in war-torn Afghanistan where his pro-Taliban parents came from (see).


 Gay teen stoned to death in Somalia.

 Indeed, moderate Islam = the repression and punishment of homosexuals by either imprisonment (long jail terms), death (by the state or unprosecuted vigilantes) or social and economic discrimination (housing, employment, military service etc). How then is opening the floodgates of Moslem immigration like Obama, Clinton and Dems want to do (especially from Syria one of the world's worst anti-gay states, see) good for the safety, security and well-being of the LGBT Donald Trump says? 



If libs and LGBT people think it's bad enough that there are tens and millions of anti-homosexual Americans (Christians, Jews and social conservatives like myself) who want to roll back gay marriage and other LGTB gains why would they want to increase their numbers with more homo hating Moslems from abroad? How does that serve their interests and advance their cause? What happened in Orlando should be a rousing wake up call to the LGBT community.  What would serve them (and every unbeliever in this country) is Donald Trump in the White House preëmptively keeping out Moslems like the Mateens.




(especially from Syria)(





Ripped off from BareNakedIslam





Since posting this piece it has come to my attention that consensual same sex love is legally protected in two other Moslem countries: Indonesia and the Palestinian territories (not really a country). However, unlike Turkey where unnatural sexual acts are protected for all Turks everywhere this is not the case in Indonesia and the Pali territories; in the later legal protection only applies to gays living in the West Bank, not in Hamas controlled Islamist Gaza. In Indonesia gay and lesbian sex is criminalized in the provinces of Aceh and South Sumatra but nowhere else. But as in Turkey economic and housing discrimination against gays is perfectly legal throughout Indonesia and the Pali territories.






Gay Muslim: Islam is no religion of peace-JIhad Watch



Parvez Sharma

As Islam is at war with gays like no religion on earth today why does this gay man stay in the faith knowing how evil it is for his kind with no hope of a reformation for some time to come?







Orlando Gunman’s Father Says Son Got Angry After Seeing Men Kissing | Mediaite 


Like Moslem Gay-hating father like Moslem Gay-hating son. The father fantasized about punishing and killing Gays. The son turned those fantasies into reality.

Homosexuals hanging out at a Gay nightclub in downtown Tehran./sarc.



Religion of Peace Moslems in Raqqa, Syria wanting to see if this  
sharia court condemned homosexual was a fairy who'd sprout wings and fly (this is why they  throw them from roof tops). Of course he remained wingless as he fell screaming to his horrible undeserved  death.


Do they not understand that unlike Judaism and Christianity Islam hasn't undergone an evolutionary liberal reformation? And that increasing the number of Moslems in this country puts Gays and LGBT people at greater risk of being killed or injured in other homophobic/anti-LGBT mass murder terrorist attacks?



This murderous Gay hating Religion of Peace Sufi Moslem cleric (revered throughout the Sunni Middle East) is a popular TV personality with a show on Al-Jazeera watched by millions. Qaradawi who dreams of martyring himself while shooting Jews to death in Jerusalem was chosen by the Obama administration to mediate peace talks between the US and Gay killing Taliban (see and see). 



 Genocidal anti-Gay jihad (the purging and eradication of homosexuality from society) is practiced in most of the world's 57 Moslem states. 



Gee, it is the Christian Right that has blocked civil rights and protections for LGBT folks. Are you unaware of American Christian Churches promoting LGBT Death in other countries? For example, Rick Warren and Uganda, Scott Lively and Uganda, etc. Jerry Falwell blamed 9/11 on gays amongst others. Pat Robertson blames pretty much anything he doesn't like on LGBTs. And lets not forget the wonderful bathroom laws being passed by Christian family values politicians. Let's not forget all the hate crimes committed right here in the U.S. by Christians against LGBTs, a simple search will show you an extensive list. So I would theorize that American Christianity is Profoundly Anti-homosexual.






Gay pride parade in Jewish Liberal Democratic Israel. One of many reasons why Palestinian Religion of Peace Moslems want to destroy Israel and kill or oppress every single Jew, Gay and Straight.


ApolloSpeaks   samsid


Name for me the predominately Moslem countries where LGBT people can live openly in safety and in peace without fear of violence and persecution. Now name for me the predominately Christian and Jewish countries where they can live that way. Then explain to me why the latter numbers in the dozens while the former numbers in the







That's 57 ZEROS

(including the Palestinian territories).


Why? Why are the vast majority of the world's 1.6 billion Moslems, living in these 57 Moslem states, violently and mercilessly anti-LGBT? Why do they support and tolerate the legal killing, mutilation and incarceration of LGBT people for their sexual behavior and mental obsessions? Then explain to me why it's good for the safety and security of the American LGBT community for the Federal Government to increase the size of the American Moslem community with a steady influx of immigrants originating from these 57 anti-LGBT states? Should the vetting process include screening out Moslems who say in the name of Allah, the Prophet and Islam they are anti-LGBT, and that LGBT people should be legally repressed like they are in Moslem lands? I'm for that! Are you?





Weak lying low energy crooked Hillary (do you notice how fatigued she looks and sounds lately?) faced with possible defeat in November from unpredictable, indefatigable, gravity defying GOP nominee Donald Trump warned  yesterday that Trump's campaign slogan "Make America Great Again" are, and get this, "code words for taking America backwards." This is truly amusing. For at this time last year when Trump launched his campaign and pledged to renew America's greatness this country (with no little help from Hillary at state) was regressing: moving backwards economically, militarily and geopolitically-retreating from the world and throwing it into turmoil.
Interestingly however during the 2008 campaign Hillary while in New Hampshire with tears in her eyes rightly predicted that decline would be America's fate with Barack Obama as head of state. Indeed, an emotional Hillary admitting that she was fatigued from the stress and strain of vying with Obama (she's eight years older and tires more easily now) choked up and said:
"We have so many opportunities in this country and I don't want to see us fall backwards....I see what's happening and we have to reverse it."
Then alluding to Obama as being unqualified to reverse our decline and make it worse Hillary said:
"Some of us are right and some of us are wrong; some of us are ready and some are not; some of us know  what we'll do on day one, and some of us haven't thought that through enough."
In other words, Barack Obama wasn't right for the job, ready for the job, prepared to do the job. He didn't have the knowledge and experience to reverse our decline and renew America's wealth, strength and greatness. And she was right about him but wrong about herself as being the one to turn us around or prevent us from getting worse. For Clinton, as Obama's weak, feckless, incompetent secretary of state didn't know what to do from day one and was partners with him in our continued decline showing herself unfit for command-not only lacking the judgement for the presidency (Russia, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Iran, China, North Korea, ISIS and the refugee crisis) but also lacking as Trump says "the strength, stamina and energy for the job"-not being up to its trying demands.
Just watch Hillary in the coming weeks and months ahead as the pressures of campaigning and need to exert herself take its toll on her health and strength-while her tireless opponent out runs her looking more fit to be president; and more credible as a patriotic force for restoring this country and making it great again.

After five months of strenuous campaigning against Trump and wearing herself out Hillary could find herself in one of these by Election Day.



Fox Host Doubts "The Historical Value" Of Clinton Becoming First Female Presidential Nominee


Greg Gutfeld: "It Comes Off To Me As Really Drab ... It's Like You Won A Trip On Wheel Of Fortune And It's To Venezuela" 


to be the presidential nominee of a major US political party is historic like Obama eight years earlier becoming the first black to achieve that. Hillary has made the history books and no one can take that away from her.

But as the Obama presidency has had zero or negative value in making America a better, stronger and more prosperous country, and the world a more stable, peaceful and less dangerous place-as both are worse off today than when Obama took office-then Hillary vowing to continue Obama's policies and legacy of failure can only mean she'll have zero or negative value in reversing the decline of the Obama years.

The place where historical value really counts is not in being the first black, woman, Hispanic or Jew to be president but how you use the power of the office. Obama has used his power to make things worse for America and the world and Hillary (as she says at every turn) wants to stay the course. Her historic election as the first woman US  president will mean that the DEVALUATION of America will continue.


To say our country is no better, stronger or more prosperous and that the world is no more stable or peaceful after President Obama is simply wrong. To make that statement is to express either utter ignorance or shameless lies. Say what you will about Obama, but don't make stuff up just because you're still pissed he won twice.

Exactly no one with any common sense or objectivity believes the nonsense of your post.

Was Jimmy Carter lying when he said (differing with Obama and agreeing with Trump) that America is in "decline? That we are steadily losing our economic and geopolitical greatness and growing less powerful and influential on the world stage?

Or was Bill Clinton lying when he recently said (disagreeing with Obama) that "unlike when I was president many things are coming apart in the world.. and the economy could be dragged back [into a recession] ...."

Or is Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton lying when (disagreeing with Obama) that the "crisis of the disappearing middle class" has gotten worse these last eight years? That under Obama the rich are getting richer and the middle class and poor are getting poorer? And that more Americans are living in poverty today than in 2009 when Obama became president?

If Obama's presidency has been a success then how do you account for the rise of Donald Trump on the Right and Bernie Sanders on the Left and the tens and millions of angry and frightened Americans who support them? Are all these millions lying when they say that they're financially worse off today than when Obama took office? Are they lying when they say in poll after poll in huge numbers that the country is on the wrong track? And that they fear that things will go from bad to worse unless there's a radical change of direction? In short, if Obama has done so well as president how do you explain the massive angst, fear, discontent and pessimism? Was there anything like this at the end of the successful Reagan and Clinton presidencies? No. Why? because we're a nation in decline.



In Interview With Fox’s Bret Baier, Clinton Delivers Rambling Non-Answer on Economy | Mediaite








Billions spent by Hoover and FDR on public works projects added to the national debt but couldn't trigger a robust recovery and end the Great Depression.

Trillions spent by Japan over 20 years on infrastructure projects adding hugely to its national debt (230% of GDP) and it's economy remains flat moving in and out of recessions.

Our economy needs long-term high paying jobs. Not short-term infrastructure projects that have never worked in any country to end an economic crisis or revive a weak economy. In short, we must repair our roads and bridges, but for fixing a bad economy its useless.

What other brilliant ideas does Hillary have to save us from the worst recovery since the Great Depression? As president she vowed to put husband Bill in charge of achieving what Obama has failed to do: creating robust growth like we had in the 1990s. Now that would be great. But there are two small problems. Driving the Clinton economic boom was the hi-tech revolution which started under George H.W. Bush, and the Gov't/Wall Street Affordable Housing Partnership that started the subprime housing/credit bubble that burst in 2008-nearly causing another depression.

In other words, Hillary is completely clueless and bankrupt of ideas on fixing the economy.




"You missed one thing, Apollo: She's going to create renewable energy jobs - just like Obama. Solyndra Redux?"

ApolloSpeaks   Lori Hollywood 

Yeah. She's going to solarize America with one billion newly installed solar panels. But every renewable energy job replaces a job in the fossil fuel industry adding nothing to the economy.

You are correct. However, my point is that this was an Obama idea that failed, not something different.


Yes! Absolutely! Let's continue what doesn't work hoping to get a better result. Einstein's definition of INSANITY.



Hillary Clinton Calls Donald Trump a ‘Fraud,' Accuses Him of ‘Scam’ in Trump University - ABC News

Imagine being accused of fraud and scamming people (before there's a trial) by crooked, lying, hypocritical Hillary who's under a multi-phased criminal investigation by 147 FBI agents for the alleged criminal use of her email server while Secretary of State, and possible criminal corruption at the Clinton Foundation? The two class action suits against Trump University accusing it of fraud-of deceiving "students" who paid big bucks to learn Donald Trump's "secrets of business and real estate success" and failed to succeed losing money instead was hardly a scam.
God damn!  This is not why I went to college!
It was no more a scam, in fact, than college and university students who pay thousands in tuition fees, graduate with degrees but end up flipping burgers at McDonalds or waiting tables at Red Lobster or finding no work at all. As with all such schools Trump U had graduates who succeeded in varying degrees and are thankful for what they learned; and others who failed because of their shortcomings or bad luck and angrily believe that they were cheated-that they wasted their time and money learning things, passing tests and getting degrees that proved useless to them.
Is it possible that nothing in all this Trump U material is useful for making a fortune?
"Fraud" will be tough to prove given the Trump U students who did succeed; who having rigorously applied the principles and things that they learned made a good life for themselves and their families. Fact is there is a class of students who succeeded because of Trump U and are gratful for the experience; and perhaps there is another class that failed and think they got burned and angrily blame Trump when their shortcomings were to blame. Truth is, going to the best and most prestigious schools on earth (Hartford, Oxford, Yale, Princeton) can't make you rich. Without great ambition and a winning attitude that never quits learning is useless.
is by sealing our borders, enforcing the law and deporting illegals. This could create up to one million jobs for black Americans.
On March 14, 2001 white supremacist, anti-Moslem bigot Donald Trump presented Muhammad Ali with the Humanitarian Award of United Cerebral Palsy at its annual dinner in New York City.  Was Trump color blind that day?. 
in his past was a thousand times more of a hate filled racist in his life than Donald Trump. Fortunately Ali in time redeemed himself of his bigotries. But Trump is said to be a white supremacist racist because David Duke, the Klu Klux Klan and neo-Nazis support his candidacy. However, by the same token Trump then is a black supremacist racist because Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam (Ali's old group) supports his candidacy and temporary ban on Moslems (see).
(as he did of Nelson Mandela) that he was "a powerful force for reconciliation and peace in the world." But unfortunately for Obama (a Nobel Peace Prize winner) when he dies no one will  praise him thus as he has been a powerful force for division and turmoil in the world reconciling no one and bringing peace nowhere.




On January 15, 2009 several hours before George W. Bush delivered his farewell speech to the nation (with its focus on national security and the War on Terror) the nation was in awe as an unmistakable, God sent miracle occured in New York City where 3000 Americans died seven years before: US Airways Flight 1549 with 155 people aboard fell from the sky due to mechanical problems and crash or splashed landed in the freezing cold Hudson River.
Amazingly and miraculously there were no fatalities and only minor injuries as every passenger and crew member aboard was safely rescued. One of the passengers, John Howell of North Carolina, was the brother of a 9/11 first responder-one of 343 fireman who died at Ground Zero. Incredibly, after the plane was evacuated (as if directed by God's hand) it drifted down river and came to rest just above Battery Park within earshot of Ground Zero where Howell's brother died. Occuring just hours before George Bush's last speech I saw in this incredible event-of 1549's Captain Sullenberger (a Texan) landing the distressed plane safely-a Providential Tribute to the leadership and policies of Texan George Bush, who in the dangerous post-9/11 era (with al Qaida planning new attacks) steered our country to safety with his counter-terrorism leadership and policies   (see).
But what was certainly a divine tribute to the presidency of George Bush was an ominous warning to his successor Barack Obama-a warning to stay Bush's course and continue his policies at home and abroad in fighting al Qaida and radical Islam.
Then as if to reinforce this warning and make it crystal clear Providence just 28 days later seemed to speak again-but this time through an awful heartrending tragedy. For on February 12th a commercial jetliner, Continental Air Flight 3407, crash landed in upstate New York killing everyone aboard. And incredibly just as Flight 1549 had the brother of a 9/11 victim aboard, among Flight 3407's 45 dead passengers was 9/11 widow and activist Beverly Eckert-who just six days before (on the 98th anniversary of Ronald Reagan's birth*) met with Obama at a White House (see). 
*Reagan was born February 6, 1911.
Barack Obama meets 9/11 widow and activist Beverly Eckert six days before her death on February 6, 2009, the 98th anniversary of Ronald Reagan's birth . 
There can be little doubt about it: this disaster which killed a famous 9/11 widow who had recently met with Obama on Ronald Reagan's birthday was a warning to him in the strongest possible terms to adopt Reagan's Peace Through Strength foreign policy and his predecessor's successful counter-terrorism model for keeping this country safe from mass murdering jihadists. But this Obama hasn't done, and the consequences globally so far have been horrendous. For ISIS (nonexistent when Obama took office), a reenergized al-Qaida (despite Osama bin Ladin's death) and other jihdist groups are on the march like never before in a world that's growing more chaotic, dangerous and deadly.
And as if coming full circle in reverse to the miracle of Flight 1549 it appears Obama has been warned again for one last time about the possible devastating consequences to our homeland from his perilous weak-on-terror policies and poor feckless incompetent leadership. For on May 27th, just hours after dishonoring our World War II troops (living and dead) by tacitly apologizing at Hiroshima for the war shortening nuking of two Japanese cities, a vintage World War II warplane (a PT-47 Thunderbolt which flew in the Pacific war) crash landed in the Hudson River close to where Flight 1549 went down* (see).  
*Flight 1549 went down roughly abeam West 50th St. PT-47 went down a little over a mile up river abeam West 79th St.
But this time there were no miracles, no survivors, no sign of divine tribute to the president. For its pilot went down with the plane to his death drowning when it hit the river and sank. The pilot, Bill Gordon of Key West, Florida (the state Bush was visting on 9/11) was a world class acrobatic flyer who miraculously survived a similar terrifying crash in 2009 in up state New York. But he would not survive this crash as if Providence portentously timed it for Obama's trip to Japan as a warning sign of coming tragedy if he doesn't reverse his badly flawed approach to foreign policy and national security. There's no sense in speculating about what
 havoc our enemies could be planning; but with the deadly crash of P-47 coinciding with Obama's trip to Hiroshima where a nuclear bomb was dropped it might (God forbid) be massive and horrific perhaps involving WMDs.  
That the tragedy of PT-47 is providentially linked to Obama and his policies is also suggested by the number 44 (Obama's presidency number) which twice appears on the plane. For if you take a magnifying glass and read the plane's Air Force Serial Number just below the cockpit you will see that it says 44-90447. Are you listening, Mr. President? Just as flights 1549 and 3407 appear to be warnings about massive terrorist strikes during your presidency so it seems is PT-47.


When he crashes into icebergs they shatter to bits as he sails ahead at breakneck speed smashing every obstacle in his way to the 45th presidency.
When Obama in Japan said that Trump is "rattling world leaders" he included himself among the rattled. For we amusingly saw the other day a rattled Obama in Indiana, when bashing Trump for Hillary, losing his cool when the teleprompter failed, stammering and stuttering like a bumbling fool. Oddly, Indiana was the state where Trump virtually won the GOP race.
 "If we turn against each other...based on divisions of race....or religion...if if if if if if if if if if if if if if if if ....if if if if if if if if we fall for...ya know..a bunch a.....okie doke....just because it uh eh uh ya know eh it uh.....ya know it it it it uh sounds funny er....the tweets are....provocative......then we're not going to build on the progress that we started."
Trump is deeply inside Obama's worried head as the obsessive nightmare daily grows that Hillary is too weak, flawed and old to stop him. Indeed, from now till election day Obama will be desperately campaigning against Trump as if he were running for reelection and keep intact his tragic legacy of ashes, dust and tears.
The question then is this: if Obama fails and Inaugural Day is a "Make America Great Again" patriotic extravaganza will he and his family boycott the event saying that they reject the decision of the [white racist] electorate, and in good conscience can't attend? I wouldn't put it past him.
And, by the way, isn't  
a great nickname for him?


Forgive us your majesty for bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Obama's historic but misguided visit to Hiroshima last week was in reality a continuation and completion of what he tacitly started on November 13, 2009:  his "I'm sorry we nuked Japan" apology tour which began with his very low near 90 degree bow to Emperor Akihito (as embarrassingly seen above) which grossly violated presidential protocol and so puzzled the world while nauseating many Americans. There is no other logical explanation for why the most powerful man on earth (who heads the nation that defeated Japan in World War II) bowed with such humility and deference to a powerless figurehead monarch whose role in Japan is merely ceremonial.
An unbowing Obama with Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama before he met with Akihito.
Indeed, why did Obama intentionally look so subservient to the powerless Akihito as if he were his subject and not so much as lowered his head in respect to Japan's then Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama (or later to PM Abe) when they met?  If Obama's reason for bowing so humbly to Akihito was to simply show respect (as the White House said) then where was his respect for Hatoyama whose position in Japan as head of state and commander-in-chief overshadows the powerless monarch? Indeed, as Japan's most powerful man Hatoyama deserved at least the same respectful bow if not something more profound-like dropping to his hands and knees and kissing his feet. But at their first meeting Obama simply smiled at Hatoyama and shook his hand (as seen above) while standing perfectly erect-which he did when he first met with Prime Minister Abe.
An unbowing Obama shaking hands with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at their fist meeting.
Ronald Reagan greeting Emperor Hirohito with a handshake.
The reason for Obama's odd, uncalled for behavior toward Akihito (which certainly surprised him) is no mystery: he was the son of Hirohito the Japanese emperor that Truman brought to his knees forcing him to unconditionally surrender Japan and end the war by nuking two Japanese cities. Indeed, because of their horrific and frightful capacity for destruction Obama and the Left want to abolish nuclear weapons from the earth believing that their creation was a tragic mistake and shouldn't have happened. In other words, Franklin Roosevelt should never have developed the bomb; and Harry Truman should not have dropped it. As the existence of nuclear weapons for leftists like Obama is a great evil (now superseded by human CO2 emissions) that potentially threatens the existence of mankind, in bowing to Akihito he was expiating his feelings of guilt, shame and remorse for Hiroshima and Nagasaki-which he likely believes (as many leftists do) were unforgivable crimes against humanity.
And when Obama last week became the first US president to visit Hiroshima-meeting with and hugging survivors of relatives who died there (many of whom want an apology from the US)-he was bringing to completion what he pathetically started with Akihito seven years before.
But, contrary to what Obama and the Left stupidly believe, the birth of nuclear warfare at Hiroshima was anything but a dark and evil day for humanity. Nuclear weapons in fact (as you'll see below) have on balance been a providential blessing to mankind benefiting the cause of world peace like nothing else in modern history.
 Obama apologizing for Hiroshima with a hug to the relative of an A-bomb victim.
"Seventy-one years ago, on a bright cloudless morning," said Obama at Hiroshima, "death fell from the sky and the world was changed."
 Indeed, the world was changed that day but not for the worse as Obama mindlessly believes. For what fell from the sky was the beginning of peace as Hiroshima with its 100,000 dead was the beginning of the end of the worst, deadliest and costliest war in human history. Indeed, what began with Hiroshima was concluded by the nuking of Nagasaki after which a devastated Hirohito fearing millions would die from repeat attacks (threatened by a bluffing Truman) surrendered unconditionally to the US putting the fate of his country completely in our hands. And rising from the ashes of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was born a new and far better Japan transformed by America's command and helping hand into a peace-loving, highly industrious, prosperous liberal democracy-a great friend to America and asset to the world.
Totally oblivious to Obama and the Left is that these 71 years of the  Nuclear Age compared to the 71 years before have been immensely more peaceful. Not only did nuclear weapons end World War II but they prevented a third world war between the US led democratic capitalist west and the Soviet led totalitarian socialist east (the conflict was ended without firing a single shot).  In fact, since Hiroshima and Nagasaki there have been no Great Power Wars (not a single one!) as if they've become a thing of the past. Just look at the facts:
The 71 years prior to the nuking of Japan saw the Russo-Turkish War (1877-1878), the Serbio-Bulgarian War (1885), the Greco-Turkish War (1897), the Russo-Japanese War (1901), the two Balkan Wars (1912-1913); and, of course, World Wars I and II the most horrific wars in human history where up to 100 million people (mostly civilians) died.
But since the "terrible" dawn of the Nuclear Age only small wars not great ones have been fought: the wars in Korea and Vietnam, several Arab-Israeli wars, the Iran-Iraq War, two Gulf Wars and Afghanistan, etc.  
At Hiroshima Obama ignorantly said, 
"We may not realize this goal [abolishing nuclear weapons] in my lifetime, but persistent effort can roll back the possibility of catastrophe."
 Abolishing nuclear weapons and rolling back history to the status quo ante of the pre-Nuclear Age would return mankind to the catastrophic period of Great Power Wars where great nations unbridled and unchecked by the mutually assured destruction of nuclear war would likely start terrifying world wars all over again.  Who wants that?
In short, the Nuclear Age has meant more peace and less war; the pre-Nuclear Age less peace and far greater and worse war. Those like Obama who want to abolish nuclear weapons, fault this country for their creation and use, and want to return mankind to the terrible era before Hiroshima and Nagasaki are well meaning but muddle-headed, morally confused unAmerican fools. THE BOMB was invented by the United States to end the worst war in history, and to make sure that such wars never happen again. And so far it has worked.

President Eisenhower: regret or apology:

"During his recitation of the relevant facts, I had
been conscious of a feeling of depression and so I voiced to him my
grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was
already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely
unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our country should
avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment
was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American
lives. . . ."


Our war policy toward Japan set by Franklin Roosevelt, supported by both Houses of Congress (with few dissenting voices) and continued by President Truman was "UNCONDITIONAL VICTORY." This meant UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER of the Japanese: surrender without conditions upon our terms alone (a non-negotiated peace) where the Japanese completely put themselves and their entire empire (which was still largely intact in China) in our power and under our control.

It wasn't until after Nagasaki, and the fear of more Nagasakis, that our policy of "unconditional surrender" was accepted by Hirohito and the political and military leadership of Japan. It was then and only then that the Empire of Imperial Japan ceased to exist and we achieved "Unconditional Victory."




 We are a rudderless nation
Without purpose and aim
Adrift on a sea of growing crises.
Recklessly steered
By a mad drunken sailor
Into icebergs and storms.
Staying the course
To disaster.
(Ripped off from John Hawkins)
If these quotes don't terrify the pants off of you then it means
you're a drunken, heedless, delusional fool like the president believing that America is a nation of inexhaustible wealth that can spend baby spend without consequence to infinity. 
1) What would you think of a person who earned $24,000 a year but spent $35,000? Suppose on top of that, he was already $170,000 in debt. You'd tell him to get his act together -- stop spending so much or he'd destroy his family, impoverish his kids and wreck their future. Of course, no individual could live so irresponsibly for long. But tack on eight more zeroes to that budget and you have the checkbook for our out-of-control, big-spending federal government. -- John Stossel
2) John Kitchen of the U.S. Treasury and Menzie Chinn of the University of Wisconsin published a study in 2010 entitled:Financing U.S. Debt: Is There Enough Money in the World -- and At What Cost? The fact that sane men are even asking this question ought to be deeply disturbing. As to the answer, foreign official holdings of U.S. Treasury securities have usually been less than 5 percent of the rest of the world's GDP. By 2009, they were up to 7 percent. By 2020, Kitchen and Chinn project them to rise to 19 percent of the rest of the world's GDP, which they say Whether the rest of the world will want to do it is another matter. A future that presumes the rest of the planet will sink a fifth of its GDP into U.S. Treasuries is no future at all. But on Big Government's streetcar named Desire we have come to depend on the kindness of strangers. --Mark Steyn

3) The Federal Reserve is propping up the entire U.S. economy by buying 61 percent of the government debt issued by the Treasury Department, a trend that cannot last, Lawrence Goodman, a former Treasury official and current president of the Center for Financial Stability, writes in a Wall Street Journal opinion article published Wednesday. -- Newsmax
4) In fact, in 2006, the Census Bureau found only 2.2 million households earning more than $250,000. And most of those are closer to the Lubbock city manager than to Carlos Slim, income-wise. To jump from the 50th to the 51st percentile isn’t that tough; jumping from the 96th to the 97th takes a lot of schmundo. It’s lonely at the top.

But say we wanted to balance the budget by jacking up taxes on Club 250K. That’s a problem: The 2012 deficit is forecast to hit $1.1 trillion under Obama’s budget. (Thanks, Mr. President!) Spread that deficit over all the households in Club 250K and you have to jack up their taxes by an average of $500,000 -- which you simply can’t do, since a lot of them don’t have $500,000 in income to seize. Most of them are making $250,000 to $450,000 and paying about half in taxes already. You can squeeze that goose all day, but that’s not going to make it push out a golden egg. ....Every time you raise the threshold for eating the rich, you get a much, much smaller serving of meat on the plate — but the deficit stays the same. The long division gets pretty ugly. You end up chasing a revenue will-o’-the-wisp. -- Kevin Williamson

5) Within a decade, the United States will be spending more of the federal budget on its interest payments than on its military. You read that right: more on debt service than on the armed services. According to the CBO's 2010 long-term budget outlook, by 2020 the government will be paying between 15 and 20 percent of its revenues in debt interest. Whereas defense spending will be down between 14 and 16 percent. -- Mark Steyn
6) (In Pennsylvania, a) single mom is better off earning gross income of $29,000 with $57,327 in net income & benefits than to earn gross income of $69,000 with net income and benefits of $57,045." -- From Gary Alexander, Secretary of Public Welfare, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
7) For every 1.65 employed persons in the private sector, 1 person receives welfare assistance. For every 1.25 employed persons in the private sector, 1 person receives welfare assistance or works for the government. ...The punchline: 110 million privately employed workers; 88 million welfare recipients and government workers and rising rapidly. -- Tyler Durden
8) My name’s Ronnie Bryant, and I’m a mine operator…. I’ve been issued a [state] permit in the recent past for [waste water] discharge, and after standing in this room today listening to the comments being made by the people…. [pause] Nearly every day without fail — I have a different perspective — men stream to these [mining] operations looking for work in Walker County. They can’t pay their mortgage. They can’t pay their car note. They can’t feed their families. They don’t have health insurance. And as I stand here today, I just … you know … what’s the use? I got a permit to open up an underground coal mine that would employ probably 125 people. They’d be paid wages from $50,000 to $150,000 a year. We would consume probably $50 million to $60 million in consumables a year, putting more men to work. And my only idea today is to go home. What’s the use? I don’t know. I mean, I see these guys — I see them with tears in their eyes — looking for work. And if there’s so much opposition to these guys making a living, I feel like there’s no need in me putting out the effort to provide work for them. So as I stood against the wall here today, basically what I’ve decided is not to open the mine. I’m just quitting. Thank you. -- Ronnie Bryant
9) Wyatt Emerich of The Cleveland Current analyzes disposable income and economic benefits among several key income classes and comes to the stunning (and verifiable) conclusion that "a one-parent family of three making $14,500 a year (minimum wage) has more disposable income than a family making $60,000 a year.
10) The typical husband and wife who reach age 66 and qualify for Social Security -- Starting next year, this typical couple, receiving the average benefit, will begin collecting a combination of cash and health-care entitlement benefits that will total $1 million over their remaining expected lifetime.

According to my calculations based on government data, such married couples will begin receiving monthly Social Security checks that will, on average, total about $550,000 after inflation. They will receive health-care services paid for by Medicare that, on average, will total another $450,000 after inflation. The benefactors will be a generation of younger workers who are trying to support themselves and their families while paying taxes to finance the rest of government spending.

...Medicare premiums paid by senior citizens once covered half of the cost of physician and related services. They now cover one-fourth. Copayments once covered nearly 40% of these services’ costs. They now cover only 20%. -- Joe Cogan

11) The CBO numbers foresee net interest payments rising from 9 percent of revenue to 36 percent in 2030, then to 58 percent in 2040, and up to 85 percent in 2050. If that trajectory holds, we'll be spending more than the planet's entire military budget on debt interest. But forget mid-century because, unless something changes, whatever goes by the name of "America" under those conditions isn't worth talking about. -- Mark Steyn
12) The total present value of payments expected under Social Security and Medicare beyond what is expected to be collected under current tax laws is about $100 trillion. One way to put that amount of money in context is to note that it is about twice the amount of all the net private assets that exist in America today. To answer cw’s question directly, the best back-of-envelope estimate is that meeting this unfunded portion of our Social Security and Medicare commitments would require roughly an immediate 80 percent increase in federal income taxes, sustained forever. — Jim Manzi
13) The total fiscal overhang of our federal, state, and local governments — their combined debt and unfunded liabilities — is around $140 trillion, and growing. That is about twice the annual economic output of human civilization, and nearly the value of all the financial assets in the world. It is something close to a mathematical certainty that those debts and obligations will not be made good on at their present value. -- Kevin Williamson
 Admiral Mike Mullen, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for Bush and Obama, said, "Our unsustainable long term national debt [which is growing faster than the economy] is the greatest threat to our national security (see) ." And he is absolutely right.




Congress Must Censure President Obama over Hiroshima Speech - Breitbart


"Let's do away with nuclear weapons which ended World War II and prevented a third world war between Capitalism and Socialism (where the later was the evil aggressor). Let's return human history to the pre-nuclear age of Great Powers Wars when the earth was turned into an ocean of blood and death ." This sums up Obama's utterly mindless message at Hiroshima, and jihad against nuclear bombs which so far have done great good in terms of international peace and no real harm to mankind.


Obama is a man of staggering stupidity, blindness and naivety showing a stunning lack of reality unseen before in a Commander-in-Chief in our 240 year history. From reset with Russia to ignoring his generals and prematurely pulling out of Iraq (when he had the leverage to keep our troops there on US terms) American foreign policy is in a shambles as the world descends into chaos and hell. And still trusting in his judgment which has failed this country and world so badly he goes off to Japan to embarrass our country again by tacitly apologizing to the Japanese (which he symbolically did by bowing to its emperor in 2009*) for winning a war we didn't begin by nuking Japan into peace. "Death rained down from the skies and the world was changed" says this lame brain fool about Hiroshima and Nagasaki. What changed was ending the deadliest, costliest, most devastating war in human history and in a way that saved perhaps millions of lives (2 million Japanese soldiers, 1 million militia) from a horrific ground invasion.

*The only way to make sense of Obama bowing to the powerless son of mass murderer Japanese supremacist emperor Hiroito  is to apologize for ending the war with nuclear bombs-as if it were a worse atrocity and crime than the unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbor and the butchering and slaughter of 11 million Asians (mostly civilians) during the war. 

But if Obama had been our 33rd President rest assured he'd not have dropped the bomb and changed the world for the better-from a condition of war with Japan to one of unconditional surrender, peace and friendship. No. This idiot would have continued the war possibly for years against a people preferring death to the humiliation and shame of defeat-willing to sacrifice themselves massively for their emperor, ancestors, racial gods and national pride. Unless faced with nuclear annihilation Japan would not have surrendered unconditionally until defeated in a devastating land war. The nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki crushed Japan's will to fight which saved countless lives.


 Dresden after firebombing

Imagine a sitting president visiting Dresden, Germany, which was fire bombed into burning rubble killing tens and thousands, honoring the monstrous Nazi war machine and war dead*? Was the savage, brutal, fanatic army of mass murdering Imperial Japan, with its horrific racist record of atrocities and war crimes second only to the Nazis, worthy of honor? Imagine Lincoln going to a Civil War battlefield to honor dead Confederate soldiers who killed tens and thousands of Union troops in defense of the evil institution of slavery.

*I know about Ronald Reagan's controversial visit to Bitburg military cemetery.
But he did that as a favor to Chancellor Helmut Kohl a loyal anti-Communist ally of America's in the Cold War who Reagan paid  back for agreeing to the deployment of Pershing and Cruise missiles in Germany against massive opposition from the peace movement.
Of the 140,000 nuked to death in Hiroshima how many were thrilled to learn about their sneak attack victory at Pearl Harbor? And how many wanted more and greater Pearl Harbors and supported their country's war of aggression up until the bomb dropped on them? Only weak minded fools believe that they didn't deserve Hiroshima and Nagasaki and more A-bomb attacks if they didn't surrender, and we should feel guilt, shame and sorrow for doing it.

Only the honorable are worthy of honor. Who but an imbecile or evil man honors depraved and wicked soldiers fighting to the death for an evil cause who justly died? What difference does it make if they're  killed with bullets or incinerated by nukes (as a last resort when all else fails). Who but an imbecile and fool does this just before a Memorial Day weekend when we honor our war dead? It is inarguably insane! No wonder Obama is so loathed by our service men and women (and had three Defense Secretaries quit on him) with only 15% approving of his leadership and job. What Obama did in bowing to emperor Hirohito's son in 2009, and said at Hiroshima yesterday was disgraceful in the extreme and should be censured by Congress immediately so that no future president does it again! 


In the comment section this morning danceringgrandma posted this criticism:

"Apollo, stop lying about Obama at Hiroshima. He wasn't honoring fallen Japanese soldiers.. He was honoring all those who perished and were injured in that criminally immoral bombing which was unnecessary and shouldn't have happened."


As Truman said in nuking Hiroshima we destroyed its usefulness to the enemy in their unjustified war against us. In feeling remorse over the bombing because it gave birth to the nuclear age (where there's been more world peace than before Hiroshima) Obama was implying (typical of anti-American leftists) that the US made a bad mistake that we should feel guilty for; and those killed in the blast (everyone including soldiers and militarized civilians-the  citizen militia trained to kill our invading troops) deserve to be honored as innocent victims as if one and all were as blameless as children despite their backing of the war. In other words, Obama was honoring the monsters together with the innocent making no distinction between them treating all equally as the criminally wronged victims of the evil US bomb. Pathetic.



The Progressive Liberal FDR created the nuclear bomb. The Progressive Liberal Harry Truman detonated the first nuke then dropped it twice on Japan vaporizing tens and thousands.

Were it not for Progressive Liberalism they'd be no nuclear bombs or Nuclear Age; and our country wouldn't be in danger of Moslem jihadists getting the bomb and killing us by the millions.


and must be destroyed before it creates deadlier weapons of mass destruction to kill millions and obliterate mankind. /sarc



First he's spurned and berned by Hillary; then he's spurned and berned by Trump. No one wants to debate The Bern as his socialist revolution to save America from greedy industrial polluting capitalism is reaching its end and berning out. All that promised free stuff going up in flames with millions feeling cheated and berned. Bern's only hope is Hillary being indicted and berning down her campaign. But then Bern will be berned by Joe Biden who Obama will back to the hilt throwing the Democrat Party into complete turmoil.

Socialism is a big bad lie. Bernie Sanders is a socialist. Therefore, Bernie is a big bad liar.  


Socialists like Bernie believe that human society is PERFECTIBLE; but it's not self-perfectible and needs government (run by people like him) to perfect it.

But how can imperfect human government, run by flawed politicians and bureaucrats PERFECT imperfect human society peopled by flawed human beings?










It is certain that stubborn, unbending, free stuff socialist loon Bernie "last ballot" Sanders, who's in the race for the Democratic nomination to the bitter end (till the last ballot is counted at the  convention) is damaging front-runner Hillary Clinton's chances of beating Donald Trump in November. Sanders, who is virtually unelectable because of his radical socialist views (35% of Americans stupidly believe in socialism while the wiser 50% do not), weather he knows it or not and likes it or not, is an unwilling and unwitting ally of the 1% real estate capitalist tycoon against Hillary. Indeed, key polls show Trump significantly catching up to Hillary and in some instances surpassing her with voters. And this in part is due to Bernie's relentless campaign against her (that grows in intensity by the day) as a business-as-usual establishment Democrat and puppet of Wall Street and corporate greed-while the country cries out for reform and change. Indeed, ignoring the reality that he's trailing far behind in delegates free stuff, utopian Bernie boldly presses on convinced from the polls that he's the one to beat Trump not his Democratic foe; and that by some miracle (possibly Hillary's indictment which he's certainly praying for) he'll become his party's nominee and first Jewish president completing the disastrous job of national transformation begun by Obama.
Meanwhile, crooked, untrustworthy, low energy Hillary pounded daily by Trump and Sanders (and in fear of the FBI investigation despite appearances) is not holding up well. Visibly frustrated and physically weakening she looks more weary, tired and aged by the day as she slips in the polls against the supremely confident and tireless Trump. What shape will Hillary be in 60 days when the convention begins? Perhaps it's best that she uses these two months to rest up like she did for five days before her Benghazi hearing.
But could it be that Donald Trump unexpectedly clinching the Republican nomination yesterday is an auspicious sign on just how much and effective an ally Sanders is? And that he might be irreparably hurting Hillary and killing her bid for the presidency? For by providence or chance yesterday, the 26th of May, was Bernie's anniversary of launching his candidacy with his rousing speech in Burlington where he was mayor (see). And by providence or chance when Sanders' kicked off his candidacy it was 45 days from April 12th (see) when Hillary (on the 70th anniversary of FDR's death) began her run for the 45th presidency. Could it be that yesterday Trump (on Bernie's campaign anniversary) becoming the de facto GOP nominee is a sign that the socialist is advancing his path to the 45th presidency-thus making him the first New Yorker by birth and residence since FDR to be President? FDR, by the way, won the presidency on a November 8th election date, the date of this year's election.
It is also worth noting, and very odd indeed, that yesterday May 26th was the 147th day of the year (see). Odd because (as I wrote about HERE) 47 appears to be a terribly unlucky number for the 1947 born Hillary. As I wrote there's been two presidents (Clinton and Bush) who like Trump were born in 1946, and two presidents (JFK and Nixon) who started their careers in politics that year-making 1946 a propitious year to be born for a presidential candidate. But 1947 has proved not to be such a lucky year for such candidates. For Hillary and Romney (also born in 47) failed three times to reach the White House: Romney and Hillary in 2008, and Romney again in 2012. Is Hillary destined to be the Democratic Mitt Romney this year? It's looking more and more that way as Sanders and Trump wear her down.
But what is truly astonishing is that yesterday, the 147th day of the year, when Trump became the GOP nominee, strangely coincides with the exact number of FBI agents (147) Comey has investigating Hillary. Could this be an omninous sign of things to come for her? If it is, if she's indicted for crimes, then Joe Biden could be the  Democratic candidate as socialist Bernie despite the polls (as I said above) is unelectable against Donald Trump. Biden, by the way, is the 47th VP.
On the day that Trump became the GOP's 19th presidential  nominee, one year from the start of Sanders campaign, both men agreed in principle to have a cross party debate, unprecedented in American political history. You can't make this stuff up. If it happens the event will be billed Capitalism vs Socialism. And as a preview of what to expect Trump, unlike Hillary, will use the utter failure of Single Payer Socialist Healthcare in Bernie's home state in Vermont (its costs were prohibitive and never got off the ground, see) to completely discredit him as he insanely wants this failure for the nation.
And as the issue of our staggering fiscal debt of $19 trillion was never raised during the Democrat debates (Dems think that America is inexhaustibly rich) Trump will use it to crush Sanders who wants to expand the size of our runaway spendthrift government another 40% to create his utopian nanny super state. When brash politically incorrect Trump confidently predicts that he'll win the debate he's 1000% correct.  Sanders doesn't have a fighting chance as socialism is regressive and impoverishing and capitalism progressive and enriching  having lifted billions out of poverty in 200 years. If this great political event occurs Trump will score big with independents as radical extremist crazy Sanders will make him look ultra sane and reasonable by comparison.
Also Trump insists that the debate be used to raise $10 million for charity; and smartly the big mean ungentlemanly misogynist (he hates men too except for himself) wants it for " women's issues."  Perhaps the funds should go to breast cancer research. Both candidates could certainly agree on that.
Meanwhile, if the debate goes forward Hillary will be eating her heart out that she didn't keep her word and debate Sanders as the event will make her look irrelevant going into the June 7th primaries; and with her leading Bernie by just 2 percentage points in California a loss there would be a huge last minute blow to her campaign. As I said above Bernie is Trump's best political ally for beating Hillary in the fall.




Increased violence against women

because of Trump's

misogyny and


The situation is getting desperate and everyone is looking away. The murder, rape and domestic violence rates of the American female community have soared since Donald Trump began his repugnant campaign of building walls, kicking balls and every unspeakable evil. How could his popularity with women be inching up and Hillary's falling when their safety and security in our streets, homes and workplaces, due to Trump, is steadily eroding-as recent studies and news stories show? Have the women of America gone nuts? Don't they know that Trump is now Commander-in-Chief of the GOP's Nuclear War on Women? Apparently not. Apparently there's been a media black out on the rising number of women dying from Trump inspired hatred and violence. For whatever reason (sexist or not) the media's coverage of growing violence across the land (since Trump started running) focuses on Blacks, Moslems and Latinos only. And as Trump is at war with China and Japan (over the trade deficit) Asian Americans will soon be under attack-with Toyotas and Hondas smashed and trashed a is the 80s. But how do we explain the media's silence about women as the topmost of Trump's battered and terrorized victims?



Where is Hillary and her army of feminist warriors on this issue? Why aren't they castigating the press for this blackout? Are they afraid to piss them off and lose support? I guess I'm just a lone voice in the wilderness. But do hear me out about the catastrophic impact of Trumpism on women as it could save the life of a dear one. For since Trump announced his candidacy not only is anti-women violence rising but so is female unemployment, poverty and suicides. When Trump's powerful voice speaks ill of a woman many feel so devalued and demeaned that some have killed themselves to escape the shame. Amazing is Trump's power over them. Moreover, the two million women who slipped into poverty from the start of Obama's presidency has jumped another mill in the last ten months since the start of Trump's victorious run.  Don't be fooled. There's no coincidence here. The Trump Effect is real and dangerously growing. More than any other minority Trump is lethal to the ladies-a lady killer physically. Indeed, as a sign of things to come Trump's mother nearly died when she gave birth to him as he punched his way out of her womb a year after WW II.



And what if, God forbid, the unthinkable happens and Trump beats the indispensable Hillary (the last best hope for womankind) and becomes President? It will internationalize the Trump Effect spilling across our open borders putting billions of women in peril. Why reverse the little gains made in women's rights in third world states? Why make the suffering of women Islamically worse in Moslem lands where they're treated like dirt? If Hillary loses to Trump male chauvinism and patriarchy will return to the West with a vengeance, and aggravate it where it's still the rule hurting the chance of reform. 




Stop Trump's Nuclear War on Women and make American history, vote Hillary Clinton for Femident. She will end the disastrous Trump Effect and reset American women like she fixed US/Russian relations by winning over Putin. And after 16 years of two faithful boring presidents there will be the excitement of turning the White House into an Open Fly Zone again-if you know what I mean.


Ain't she sweet!







‘They Didn’t Raise Their Son Right’: George Zimmerman Goes After Trayvon Martin’s Parents · Mediaite · Disqus

As I've said  HERE, HERE and  HERE  it was Karmic Justice, the moral law of cause and effect, that brought George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin together on the night of February 26, 2012 getting the latter killed as he was trying to beat a frantic Z to death with his furious racist, homophobic fists. The underlying cause of the conflict was not Z doing his job as a community watchman and reporting to police the very suspicious T (who was't walking straight home that fateful night like Z haters want you to believe); nor was it Z following T at a safe distance for police (expected of a watchman) then looking for him when he bolted and disappeared (but didn't run home where he was to watch the NBA all star game). No. The underlying cause was a good, innocent black kid gone bad corrupted by a collapsing black culture into utter cruelty, barbarism, savagery and sin that glorifies murder and violence. Unfortunately T, who was so charming and sweet at age 12, came to emulate and idealize the worst kind of black filth and trash: lawless anti-social gangstas and gang bangers-young and older black men who disrespect and hate authority (family, school, church, police and government) believing that they're laws unto themselves. These lawless anarchists and criminals believe that anything they want to do is right and good; and that no one has the right to stand in their way and put limits and restraints on them; and those who do are the enemy; hence, Trayvon's twitter account name:
Trayvon's transformation from a good little kid into a violent aggressor that got him killed like thousands of morally corrupt black kids each year-in the epidemic of violent black teen deaths sweeping over our inner cities.
"NO_LIMIT_NIGGA" means that T was defiantly opposed to any outside force or authority directing his life and limiting his desires, passions and appetites. Such kids are full of anger and rage and could fly off the handle into murderous violence just by looking at them badly. But Z was doing worse that fatal day; beyond merely looking at T he was following him and being intrusively offensive in the extreme; and add to that that Z might be a gay predator out to rape him (as friend Rachel Jeantel told Piers Morgan) and that made him deserving of the severest punishment: crippling injuries or death for his terrible disrespect.
 And this mad obsession with Z-the "creepy ass [homo] cracka [rapist] who was "stalking" him-is what most likely got Trayvon  killed that night-and yes, his upbringing in a broken single parent home certainly contributed to his moral ruination, as Z says. Bottom line, if Trayvon was a good, decent, law-abiding, authority respecting, normal kid he wouldn't have been in Sanford that night suspended from school and karmically fated to die-suspiciously walking about just as the gun carrying, off duty Z drove by. Indeed, a well behaved Trayvon would be alive today and we wouldn't know his name and that of George Zimmerman (which would have been the case if Z had been black). As Trayvon was a ticking time bomb with a combustible heart one wonders whose life providence may have saved because of his early death.

But Z is back in the news making headlines again; and this time it's for the sale of the life saving gun he used to kill Trayvon-which the Justice Department returned to him after a failed 33 month investigation to find racial bigotry and hate in what Z truly and rightly believed was a deadly but necessary deed.
Reuters reported Friday the good news that Z hit the jackpot and sold his life saving gun for $250,000. This sale was well beyond the gun's market value making it one of the greatest sale for a single gun in history. And the anti-Zimmerman haters are fuming with some imagining that the buyer is a white supremacist, confederate flag waving nazi who'd like to shove black people into ovens or put them in chains again. Z says that part of the sale proceeds will go to helping policemen who fall victim to Black Lives Matter inspired violence; and stopping Hillary Clinton from bringing her war on guns to the White House-if Z had no gun he'd likely be dead or crippled for life.
If God came down from Heaven and made a deal with the Martins telling them that he would return Trayvon to them if they give up the millions that they made from his death, but that he'd return just as he left with all his flaws and sins (i.e. the same bad, troubled kid) what do you think they would do?  Keep their wealth and tell God to bug off? Or would they gladly sacrifice their riches and welcome back Trayvon flaws and all?
I also love it that Z used the spotlight to criticize his arch enemies Tracy Martin and Sabrina Fulton (Trayvon's divorced parents) who head the deranged, racist "Justice for Trayvon" lynch mob that demonized Z lying that he killed their son in cold blood and was the racist killer of the century. In an interview Z said that Trayvon would be alive today if  his folks did a better job raising him-and he is right. But there are way too many black parents like the Martins who are responsible for the tidal wave of death and destruction that's engulfing young black men-as they're killed by the thousands every year shot to death mostly by blacks. Z killing Trayvon was emblematic of that.
  If George Zimmerman had Trayvon's skin color his death would have been an  unimportant ten second news story on the local news with no murder charges brought against him and no trial. And there would not have been a national "Justice For Trayvon" movement making his parents rich; nor would there be 
Black Lives Matter which rose from Zimmerman's acquittal claiming that it was racist and devalued black lives.
Below are two debates from a dozen or so I recently had on  with George Zimmerman haters. The first debate is wide-ranging and covers many aspects of the case and ends with a new approach to the 911 call where Zimmerman is heard screaming for his life. The second debate (the briefer of the two) disputes the widely held leftist view that Z is a text book sociopath and violence prone psycho-a dangerous man and ticking time bomb who should be behind bars.


it was Trayvon Martin's violent, homophobic, gangsta masculinity that likely got him killed. 

For the story click


According to Rachel, Trayvon also told Zimmerman to get off of him, so Zimmerman grabbed him. What do you have to say about that?



Rachel Jeantel on balance wasn't credible. She lied and repeatedly contradicted herself which is why the jury ignored her (muddled) testimony and the prosecution lost the case. Besides, eye-witness John Good saw Trayvon pinning Z to the ground and beating him as Z was fighting for his life and crying for help. Z had six injuries and T his gunshot wound (shot from under him as experts testified). Z's injuries were consistent with the defense's position that T was the violent aggressor in the conflict maliciously intending harm to Z.
 Except that Rachel Jeantel WAS a credible witness when she said that Trayvon called Zimmerman a "creepy asscracker."
It's called.... the prosecution sent all of their witnesses out to the stand with no preparation....
There was no proof whatsoever that Trayvon had been shot from the bottom. Don't even try to bring up Vincent Di Maio's testimony when Di Maio admitted he ran no experiments.
" Z's injuries were consistent with the defense's position" And that's why the defense tried multiple times to change Zimmerman's story at the trial..
And the experiments that showed Trayvon was shot from a different angle and that Z's six wounds were self-inflicted were......?
Wasn't it Jeantel who told defense attorney West that Trayvon made it home that night to his father's house, and it was there that the conflict took place? When it was 90-100 yards up the walk path in front of eyewitness John Good's house?
The bottom of the following map of Twin Lakes shows how utterly absurd and incredulous the prosecution's star witness was and why she failed so badly.
Anthony ApolloSpeaks  
"And the experiments that showed Trayvon was shot from a different angle and that Z's six wounds were self-inflicted were?" Did the prosecution even try, since they DIDN'T EVEN PREPARE, AND THEY NEGLECTED AND EVEN INSULTED THEIR OWN WITNESSES?
"Wasn't it Jeantel who told West that Trayvon made it home that night to his father's house" She said that Trayvon was "by his daddy's house" which doesn't literally mean that he was right there at the door. Surely, Chad Joseph never said he was back at the house, and Trayvon didn't leave his snacks there and bring a weapon back with him.


The "prosecution not preparing their own witnesses" is the excuse used by Z haters for the lack of any evidence proving malicious intent. Like the Sanford PD neither the local prosecutor nor the FBI nor the State prosecutor had any evidence proving malice to confute Z's claim that he acted legally and morally in self-defense. The trial was driven by politics not evidence-it was a political trial which Governor Scott was forced into by a race obsessed liberal media and political elite convinced that Z was a racist killer getting away with the murder of an innocent unarmed black kid. 
And when the trial was over and the DOJ continued the FBI's investigation into civil rights violations, after a 33 months and finding zilch they returned to Z the gun he used to legally and morally kill T.
Really, Anthony, what do you know that everyone else missed?
"And the DOJ, after a 33 month long investigation, returned Z's gun because Holder and Lynn could find no evidence that it was used in a crime." Because civil rights violations are a much higher bar, so what?
"Like the Sanford PD, the local prosecutor and FBI the State Prosecutor didn't have a single piece of evidence to confute Z's claim that he acted in self-defense. "
Oh, yeah, the police sure did a decent investigation. They found that Trayvon and Zimmerman had arms and a neck like Plastic Man, when Zimmerman shot Trayvon on the grass lawn ten feet away from the concrete sidewalk... OH WAIT
They sure found it strange when Zimmerman adamantly refused to see a doctor for his scratches...OH WAIT.
They actually waited for the autopsy results to come out on Trayvon after a few hours.... OH WAIT.
They actually gave Zimmerman a polygraph, and asked him several specific questions about the scuffle and shooting...they so didn't just give him a "voice stress analysis" and only as two very vague questions... OH WAIT..
They drug tested Zimmerman... OH WAIT
They didn't coach Zimmerman when Zimmerman said that the screams "doesn't even sound like me" ....OH WAIT..
They had Zimmerman lie down on the floor to demonstrate how he was able to bend his arm and aim the gun with one hand while lying on his back, without the recoil breaking his arm on the ground...OH WAIT
They asked Zimmerman about what happened to the bushes that he said Trayvon tackled him from... OH WAIT...
What else did they NOT miss? *SARCASM*
LOL!!! How many wounds did Z have? Where were they located and how did he get them? Were they self-inflicted? Did they miraculously materialize from the thin air like a stigmata? Was John Good lying or hallucinating when he saw the stronger, superior, athletic Trayvon in a commanding position on top of the much weaker Z beating away at him with Z crying for help? John Good saw no gun in Z's hands. Trayvon never cried that Z had a gun as he was whacking him. Luckily Z managed to get to his weapon and stop the assault before it turned really deadly.
The Sanford PD investigation was superseded by the FBI investigation and a parallel Florida Department of Law Enforcement investigation. When neither could find evidence incriminating Z the Justice Dept stepped in and the FBI opened a parallel civil rights investigation. They turned up nothing.
Then came the indictment by Angela Corey's office with her lead investigator Dale Gilbreath questioned by O'Mara during the April 12th bond hearing. Though the affidavit said that "Zimmerman confronted Martin and a struggle ensued," Gilbreath contradicting that admitted to O'Mara that his office had no evidence of who confronted who or threw the first punch. In other words, the charge of second degree murder was bogus from the start and eventually collapsed in court for lack of evidence as it should have.
Most any armed person in Z's place would have used his/her gun to equalize the difference in animal power and strength between themselves and a superior and pitiless assailant. The evidence was overwhelming that Z acted in self-defense and escaped severe injuries or possible death and that it was T who had malicious intent and was the CRIMINAL in the conflict.  And six jurors hearing testimonies and reviewing the evidence for 19 days agreed finding Z's killing of Trayvon morally and legally justified.
The Feds did not look for evidence to try Zimmerman for the case. They looked for civil rights violations which are a higher bar than manslaughter.
"Gilbreath contradicting that admitted to O'Mara that his office had no evidence who confronted who or threw the first punch. "
Mark O'Mara also mentioned the "who threw the first punch" at the trial, to raise reasonable doubt in order to help get Zimmerman off.
Who threw the first punch, and there weren't many punches thrown because neither Zimmerman and *MORE IMPORTANTLY, NOR TRAYVON* had bruises, swelling, cuts, breaks, or other injuries to their knuckles, wrists, nor hands (they wrestled around) *DOESN'T MATTER* even though there was the testimony that Trayvon told Zimmerman to get off of him (and even Juror B37 admitted that she believed Zimmerman was the initial aggressor.
*WHAT MATTERS* is the law of self defense, which says you must be in *reasonable fear of imminent serious bodily injury or death*
Claiming that you had to shoot someone to keep your head, bald like ZImmerman's was or not, from being grabbed in a vice grip hands and repeatedly smashed dozens of times onto a concrete sidewalk...
does *NOT* meet the requirements for self-defense. Period
The defense is *NOT* going to tell the jury that, because they're trying to get their defendant off. And Zimmerman's defense lawyers were *DEFINITELY NOT* going to mention the evidence that Zimmerman was *NOT* having his head bashed on concrete when he shot Martin, because he shot Martin on the grass lawn a significant distance away from the concrete, to the jury.
It's up to the prosecution to mention the evidence that Zimmerman did not have his head bashed on the concrete when he shot Trayvon and the law of self-defense.
The biggest reasons for why Zimmerman was found "not guilty" was because the prosecution mentioned NEITHER to the jury...
Z's trial was about "Self-Defense vs Second Degree Murder." And six juriors came down on the side of self-defense acquitting Z of murder. Each of those jurors putting themselves vicariously in Z's place would have acted no differently.They concluded from the evidence that Z's life was in danger as he was pinned down by a young man of superior energy and strength pounding away at him as eyewitness John Good said-who, btw saw the altercation move to the concrete sidewalk. As Z (the weak, slow, fat, unathletic martial arts failure) felt his life was threatened by the stronger man on top of him he cried out for help repeatedly (as John Good said). Those were authentic cries of desperation by a man frightened for his life. Who under such terrtible duress carrying a gun wouldn't have  used it in self-defense?
Though Juror B37 thought that Z might have been the initial aggressor (she could not know for sure) she nevertheless gathered from the evidence that Z's life was in peril during the fight, and agreed with the other five jurors that shooting T was justified.
There is nothing the prosecution could have done differently that would have changed the outcome in their favor. The evidence was so overwhelmingly compelling, conclusive and clear that Z felt imperiled (fearing for his life) throughout the ordeal; and that Z shot T without malice strictly in self-defense.
BTW in March 2012 the DOJ started its own criminal investigation of Z. After Z's acquittal it started the 33 month civil rights investigation.
"There is nothing the prosecution could have done differently that would have caused a different outcome. The evidence was overwhelming, conclusive and clear that Z felt imperiled (fearing for his life) throughout the ordeal; and that there was no malicious intent in shooting T, that it was strictly in self-defense." 
That Zimmerman shot Trayvon on the lawn yards away from the concrete sidewalk. That Trayvon had no injuries to his hands, knuckles or wrists. That Zimmerman himself plus the voice analysis plus the autopsy concluded that it was NOT Zimmerman screaming on the tape. Some evidence supporting Zimmerman.
The voice analysts you refer to (whoever they are) were wrong . Eye witness John Good heard no cries from T. An FBI voice-recognition scientist testifying at the pre-trial hearing said that "he didn't believe it was possible to identify who was screaming in the background of a 911 call." He said "because the screaming voice was affected by distress or emotion, there was no way to compare it to reasonable, natural speech and come up with correct answers." But John Good heard the 18 seconds of screams and it was coming exclusively from Z-battling to free himself from T. PERIOD!
"he voice analysts were wrong ." *ROLFMAO*
at 21:35 You can hear Zimmerman HIMSELF "screaming" *ROLFMAO*
LOL!!! Now you've really stepped in it. The voice analysis expert that I quoted, Hirotaka Nakasone, was an expert witness for the prosecution in the Z trial. During his testimony he said, and I quote, that the 18 seconds of screams on the tape (eye and ear witnessed by John Good) were made by someone "under extreme duress and in a life threatening situation." When Z gave his weak reenactment he was not in the same highly stressful psychological state pumped up with adrenaline and fearing for his life. An extreme, heart pounding, situation like that could put any voice through a radical transformation. In fact, Z's screams were so remote from his normal speaking voice that (as you say) he couldn't recognize that they were his.
With John Good physically present at the scene witnessing a violent T on top of Z and hearing up close his frantic screams for help; and Nakasone asserting that the screams were coming from someone in a life threatening situation, with good reason Z was acquitted of murder. For the jury was rightly persuaded that Z's psychological state was one of stark raving terror; and while in that state he managed to get his gun and end what was terrifying him: T's vicious life threatening assault. No way given Good's and Nakasone's accounts (and add to this Vincent DiMaios expertise on gunshot wounds) that the prosecution could have elicited a guilty verdict out of the jury. Hell, no jury in the world would have convicted Z with witnesses like these. NONE!
"An extreme, heart pounding, situation like that could put any voice through a radical transformation. In fact, Z's screams were so remote from his normal speaking voice he couldn't recognize that they were his." ..... Because they weren't his, genius.
Here's a question for you. Did Zimmerman appear to be shaken up whatsoever after the "harrowing life threatening encounter?" 
Of Jonathan Manalo "He testified that Zimmerman did not appear in shock shortly after the shooting and was very calm." 
Does that sound like someone who had just been screaming for their life a second earlier, despite the fact that 1) no one would scream when they have a gun and are trying to use it 2) the screams ended immediately at the exact instant the shot was fired 3)since Zimmerman had no significant injuries and Trayvon had in injuries to his hands AND Zimmerman shot Trayvon on the grass lawn yards away from the concrete, Trayvon was doing nothing to Zimmerman (while the ex-bouncer, MMA trained and multiple weight classes heavier Zimmerman likely had scrawny ass Trayvon in a restraining hold when he shot him)? 4) The voice analysis proved it WASN'T ZImmerman 5) Zimmerman HIMSELF said IT WASN"T ZIMMERMAN SCREAMING 6) Trayvon's autopsy showed he had pneumothorax which means that if anyone would stop at the EXACT INSTANT IT WOULD BE TRAYVON 7) Zimmerman claimed that he didn't even know he had shot him?
First off I was playing with you when I seemed to buy your lie about Zimmerman not recognizing his voice on the 911 call-as you know he said no such thing. It was Tracy Martin who told Officer Chris Serano (overheard by Officer Singleton) that it wasn't his son screaming; on the stand he contradicted them claiming he said that he wasn't sure at the time that the screams were T's but after hearing the tape 20 times was certain they were his. Of course, the defense produced a string of witnesses identifying the screaming voice as Z's.


Secondly, there are certain personality types that can quickly return to a state of near calm after a traumatic experience. Once it's over it's as if it never happened and you can't tell they were in distress. It's been noted how consistently calm and emotionless Zimmerman was throughout the trial. When the verdict was read he smiled a bit, but it didn't seem to phase him. Z is a cold fish who on rare occasions has angry outbursts. But for the most part he's "MR COOL" as friends and relations say.



Nationally renowned forensic expert Vincent DaMaio reviewing all the evidence and drawing on decades of gunshot experience said that T's gunshot wound was consistent with Z's testimony; that he shot Z while being straddled by him. John Good saw T straddling Z and hitting him while Z was crying for help. Good testified that he yelled "what's going on" and told Trayvon to "stop it."


Prosecution witness neighbor Jennifer Laura testified that she and her husband heard Good from her house yell " What's going on." This confirms that Good was there an eye and ear witness to an overpowering athletic (former football player) Trayvon beating on Z who feared for his life and screamed .


That Z was a weight lifter and skilled in Mixed Martial Arts is a blatant lie. That Z might have had the very athletic T in a head lock or restraint hold when he shot him" is laughable.  Z's MMA instructor Adam Pollock (owner of the kickboxing gym where Z worked out) testified that the "grossly obese," "unathletic" Z had flunked his martial arts classes and had no aptitude for fighting. On a scale of 1 to 10 Pollock gave Z a next to zero "1" for athletic ability. Pollock also testified that


"He [Z] was an overweight, large man when he came to us, a very pleasant, very nice man, but physically soft and predominantly fat, not a lot of muscle, not a lot of strength." He also testified that Z came to the gym to lose weight and get in shape [not develop fighting skills]."



What other lies are you going to uselessly dish up about Z? Bring it on so I can knock them down one by one!


Anthony  ApolloSpeaks 


Okay, little buddy, I understand that the shooting happened 4 years ago, Zimmerman's trial was almost three years ago and he was found "not guilty," as was Casey and OJ before him, and double jeopardy laws say that none of them can be retried.


Stop trying to legitimize Zimmerman's acquittal. The facts were that it had far, *FAR* less to do with "there was no evidence against Zimmerman," or "Zimmerman was really innocent," and far, *FAR* more to do with the incompetence of the prosecutors who only took the case for political reasons (the initial prosecutor and the eventual prosecutor, the late Norm Wolfinger and Angela Corey, were both conservative Republicans, by the way


, then overcharged and underprosecuted Zimmerman.

As Lisa Bloom, who's one of the, and probably only legal experts to have actually interviewed the witnesses and jurors after the trial (hell, she spent more time talking to the prosecution's witnesses than the PROSECUTION DID! The prosecution didn't even prepare their own God damned witnesses) mentioned that the prosecution had Zimmerman's interviews with the detective for over a year and didn't once take notice of the fact that Zimmerman had his gun not in his front waistband, but his back hip. Of course the detectives not only didn't notice it either but also never once told Zimmerman to lay down and reenact it, you people like you will maintain that the detectives and the prosecution did such a great job.



The boring, empty, leftist refrain that "the prosecution didn't prepare their witnesses" is the excuse of racially obsessed Zimmerman haters who can't accept the reality of Trayvon Martin's and what a bad little out of control morally corrupt kid he was-corrupted by a decaying black culture of gangsta rappers and gang bangers into lawlessness, drug abuse, anarchy and deadly violence with a body count of young black men piled to the sky; a type of badly corrupted kid who'd fly into a rage if you looked at him the wrong way. Hell, Z was doing "worse" that fatal day: he (a possible gay predator) was following T an offense deserving T's fists punching and punishing Z's body and face.


LOL!!! How should the prosecution have prepared John Good who saw the conflict move on to the concrete sidewalk with Z screaming more frantically for his life? Was Good a lying racist? Was he hallucinating? You avoid Good for good reason: he's a reality check on your idiotic theory that Z acted with hatred and malice; a theory which is totally laughable within the context of Z's history as a responsible and conscientious community watchman-which is why Twin Lakes made him the coordinator with police for creating the watch program. It's only fools and idiots who believe that Z was so reckless and insane that after calling police who were on their way to apprehend and question the suspicious T that he was willing to sacrifice his life and liberty, and everything good he was working for, by killing a worthless nothing of a kid.


Do yourself a favor friend and get an education on the Trayvon Martins and Michael Browns of the world and see the award-winning HBO crime show "The Wire." It's about the sickening reality of black inner city life and the Martins and Browns who are killed every deadly day. The Wire is so painfully authentic and real that it's taught in college sociology classes. And that's all I have to say to you.



What's BEYOND boring is you wingnuts and your fantasies that have NO basis in reality. It was said DURING THE DAMN TRIAL that it was OBVIOUS the prosecution didn't spend ANY time with their witnesses before the trial other words... THEY DID NOT PREPARE THEIR OWN WITNESSES.


"ad little out of control morally corrupt kid he was-corrupted by a decaying black culture of gang bangers into lawlessness" NOW your showing your racism even more explicitly, wingnut. No proof whatsoever that Martin had anything to do with "gang bangers" because he certainly would have been armed and wouldn't have hesitated to shoot Zimmerman the second Zimmerman grabbed him. Smoking some pot, taking sophomoric pictures flipping the bird, and having some mischief at school while trying to straighten up for his mechanics classes are things that MANY PEOPLE HAVE DONE AS TEENAGERS. So I guess, according to you, We're ALL "corrupted gang bangers." You cons are full of crap.


Yet, you not only don't find ANYTHING wrong with Zimmerman's LONG history of assaulting and threatening people, you also don't find anything wrong with the fact that HIS OWN FAMILY accused him of sexual molestation (guess it's because YOU'VE done the same thing yourself, huh? Yeah, admit it, you wingnut deviant)


As for John Good, I have no idea why they prosecution chose to have him as a witness when he admitted to not seeing all what he claimed to have seen. Again that's your idea of the prosecutors being the best around, which is as big of a joke as you are.


"Do yourself a favor friend and get an education on the Trayvon Martins and Michael Browns " Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin are two totally different cases. Brown's case was in broad daylight with multiple witnesses and DNA evidence along with an officer who kept his same story.


Martin's was at night with no witnesses who saw the whole thing, and a REAL THUG NAME ZIMMERMAN who CHANGED HIS STORY THEN REFUSED TO SPEAK who had a LONG HISTORY of assaulting and threatening people, INCLUDING A POLICE OFFICER...


And that's all I have to say about you, little wingnut.








ApolloSpeaks  Anthony 




Trayvon screaming: Help! Help! He's got a gun! Help! Help! He wants to kill me! Help! Somebody, help! AHHHHHHHHH! Bang. Silence.


Stupid little Trayvon forgot to mention Z's gun in his 18 + seconds of screams. What was he smoking? Must have been memory impairing weed. LOL!!!!  




 Because Anthony had no answer or theory to explain why Trayvon Martin failed to mention the gun that was causing him to scream for his life (or why it took 18* seconds for Z to shoot him) his reply was very nasty, too unsavory to post here.  


*One expert says that the screaming which started before the 911 call was for approximately 40 seconds with the recording capturing 18 seconds of it. So if it was T that was screaming fearing he'd be shot then it took Z 40 seconds to shoot him which is absurd-unless T was struggling with Z for the gun. But eyewitness John Good saw no gun or struggle for it.