IMAM OBAMA SAYS,
"ISIL is not “Islamic.” No religion condones the killing of innocents. And the vast majority of ISIL’s victims have been Muslim."
If you want to know which state in the Moslem world Barack Obama regards as authentically, authoritatively, truly Islamic, the state which he seems to use as a gold standard in judging which Moslem nations are Islamically correct and right with Allah and the Koran- the state, in effect, that the "unIslamic" Islamic State of self-styled caliph Abu al-Baghdadi must copy as a model if Obama is to recognize it as truly and rightly Islamic-then look no further than Iran.
I kid you not. The mullocracy of Iran (that oppressive, Jew-hating, genocidal, misogynist, homophobic, theonazi terrorist state that threatens Israel with nuclear extinction, and provides terrorist Hamas with deadly missiles to kill Jews; that, in fact, threatens America with death and destruction and was behind the killing of 240 US troops in Beirut, and hundreds, maybe thousands of our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan) is for Barack Obama a true Moslem nation and credit to the faith worthy of honor, distinction and emulation.
For on March 20, 2009 (his 59th day in office) Barack Obama in a three minute message of good will and peace (made on the occasion of the Persian new year) recognized Iran as no longer part of an "evil axis" of dangerous rogue-terrorist states, but as truly and authentically Islamic. For twice in that now forgotten message our Outreacher and Defender of True Islam-in-Chief (with the utmost respect) became the first US president ever to call Iran, and I quote, the "ISLAMIC REPUBLIC (see)."
But that was not the only time Obama mentioned by name "The Islamic Republic of Iran." 76 days later in his historic Moslem Outreach Speech in Cairo, Obama again called Iran the "ISLAMIC REPUBLIC (see)." However, conspicuously absent from that speech was any mention of Afghanistan as the "ISLAMIC REPUBLIC" though that is it's official name (see). In fact (and this is astonishing) in none of his speeches about Afghanistan (no matter how important the occasion) has Obama ever called it the ISLAMIC REPUBLIC (see and see). And the same apparently goes for the ISLAMIC REPUBLIC of Pakistan, a close ally of the US like its neighbor to the west. Iran and only Iran gets this treatment as if it were a model Islamic state that Americans should respect and esteem-and ISIS copy and imitate-and not disparage as George Bush did when he called it "EVIL." On this point, as on so many others in rudderless Obama's confused, inconsistent, incoherent foreign policy, he has much explaining to do.
FROM APOLLOSPEAKS' TOWNHALL ARCHIVES
2011-12-05 13:04 --WAS SYRIA'S BASHAR ASSAD COMPLICIT WITH AL QAIDA IN 9/11?
Like father like son. It seem that Bashar inherited the terrorist gene from his mass murdering dad.
There wasn't a scintilla of evidence linking Syria with Al-Qaida and 9/11 until John Crewdson, a senior correspondent of the Chicago Tribune, claimed to have obtained a "classified report from the office of German Chancellor Angela Merkel" stating (among other things) that Mohammed Atta and the leaders of the mass causality attack placed 66 calls to Syria after they'd arrived in this country. The report was given to Cresson in early March shortly before the eruption of Arab Spring protests against Bashar al-Assad. To date, however, the hijackers connection to Syria has not been explained (see). However, while hard evidence linking Assad to 9/11 is still lacking there are compelling signs suggesting an operational connection in a way similar to my discoveries joining Kaddafy to the Pan Am/Lockerbie bombing (see). But before I delve into these omens and signs let's briefly review what is known about Assad's connection to Al-Qaida in the post-9/11 era.
Indeed, Syria, which has been on the State Department's list of proactive state sponsors of international terror since 1979 (see), has well known links to Al-Qaida. Ryan Mauro, assistant director of intelligence of The Counter Terrorism Electronic Warfare and Intelligence Centre, wrote the following about Assad's deadly relationship to Bin Laden's group:
"Many international Al-Qaeda plots have Syrian links. The head of the Al-Qaeda-affiliated Groupe Islamique Combattant Marocain, which claimed responsibility for the suicide bombings in Casablanca in May 2003 [killing 45 people], trained in Syria.
 The prosecutor in the trial of the terrorists who attacked Madrid in 2004 suspects Groupe Islamique Combattant Marocain member Hassan el-Haski of involvement in the train bombings. In May 2004, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's lieutenants and, perhaps Zarqawi himself, held meetings on Syrian territory to plan terrorism in Iraq aimed at provoking sectarian violence. Syria harbored and refused to extradite Suleiman Khaled Darwish, Zarqawi's second-in-command and, reportedly, a liaison between Al-Qaeda and Syrian military intelligence. (see)."
Now if Syria was a stomping ground for Al-Qaida in the post-9/11 era then isn't it likely they operated from that country before 9/11 communicating with Atta and his gang while training in America for their suicidal mission? For before 9/11 Al-Qaida distinguished itself with deadly attacks against the US such as the two East African embassy bombings and the explosion that ripped a hole in the USS Cole killing 17 sailors. Surely these successful attacks were enough to qualify Al- Qaida as a valuable asset (along with Hezbollah and Hamas) to the anti-US/Israel fascist Assad regime.
Moreover, Syria is an authoritarian police state where its security forces know practically every member of every terrorist gang in its midst. In other words, those 66 stateside phone calls made to Syria by 9/11 hijackers were most likely received by Al-Qaida operatives inside Syria known to the regime and with its blessing and backing.
The signs seeming to link Assad to 9/11 are as follows:
BASHAR AL-ASSAD'S DAY OF BIRTH
This violent, brutal, scheming dictator who is the faithful ally of genocidal, terrorist, 9/11 complicit Iran*, and has killed over 4000 protestors calling for democratic reforms or an end to his regime, was celebrating his 36th birthday when Al-Qaida destroyed the Twin Towers in New York and attacked the Pentagon in DC. Amazingly, and perhaps providentially, Assad was born on September 11, 1965 with the 9/11 attack occurring just 421 days from his coronation as Syria's new autocrat**.
**Assad succeeded his father as Syria's dictator on July 17, 2000.
36 OR JIHAD SQUARED
In the history of Islamic Jihad going back 1400 years to Islam's deluded, violent, militant founder there has never been a day of victorious destruction like 9/11. Never on a single day of suprmemacist warfare against infidels have Moslem jihadists wrecked more havoc in lives and treasure than when they attacked and collapsed the Twin Towers and smashed into the Pentagon. Apart from 3000 dead the total cost of the event to the US alone was in the trillions (see).
Now as Jihad in mainstream Islam is the 6th pillar of the faith (a religious public duty See) and 9/11 was an act of Jihad raised to a new and frightening degree of violence, terror and warfare it was a day when Jihad in a very real sense was squared multiplying its horrors and atrocities beyond anything previously imagined or known. In other words, in mathematical and symbolic terms 6 being the number of Jihad 6x6 or 36 (6 squared) could serve as a numeric symbol for Jihad on 9/11*.
*It is interesting to note that Al Qaida, the terrorist group that gave us 9/11, was born on 8/11 in the year 1988. Moreover, the date 8/11/1988 has an overall value of 36 the number of Jihad squared, hence:
Now what is fascinating about the 9/11 event coinciding with Assad's 36th birthday (not his 35th or 37th) is that the number 36* (Jihad Squared) is a factor of two five digit numbers that give us the exact infamous date 9-11-2001, hence:
* It is interesting to note that 36 or 6x6 gives us two 6s or 66, the number of phone calls John Crewdson's report says the 9/11 hijackers made into Syria from the US.
Now did Al Qaida plan the mass causality attack to coincide with Assad's birthday out of gratitude for his assistance in the plot? Probably not. But the coincidence is amazing and I believe revealing as a providential sign indicating that Assad was complicit in the crime.
9/11 AND THE DAY OF ASSAD'S CORONATION
As I stated above Bashar al-Assad succeeded his father as autocrat of Syria on July 17, 2000 exactly 421 days before the 9/11 attack. Now in linking Assad to 9/11 the number 421 is significant in that it is a factor of the number 191134 454x which once again gives us the date 9/11 and something more. For not only is 911 encoded in this number but it terminates in the two digit number 34, the numeric value of Bashar al-Assad's name, hence:
BASHAR AL-ASSAD *
211819 13 11114=34
*Bashar al-Assad is the commonly accepted way to spell the dictator's name in english.
Now while the number 34 is numerically symbolic of Assad's full name and he was born in the year 1965 (the 65th year of the 20th century) it is interesting to note that the number of days separating Crewdson's article from the 9/11 event on Assad's birthday is 3465*. Is this mere coincidence or a sign from providence indicating Assad's complicity in 9/11? You decide.
*September 11, 2001 to March 8, 2011 (the publishing of Crewdson's article) = 3465 days (see).
The numerological system used in this piece is as follows:
Sept. 5, 2014: Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks to the scholarship recipients of the Telmex Foundation during the annual Mexico XXI Century event. AP
Friday September 5th, in the 67th month of the failing Obama presidency, Hillary Clinton, our failed, ineffective 67th secretary of state, announced that she'd make a decision to run for the presidency sometime in early 2015-when, oddly, she'll be 67 years old. Now both Hillary and Obama were abroad that day: Hillary was in Mexico-a bad friend with no respect for our sovereign borders who assists its citizens, and children from Central America, to illegally invade our land bringing crime, disease, welfare dependency and probably Moslem terrorists to wreak havoc here. And more significantly Obama was in Wales discussing with NATO allies two disastrous consequences of the failed Obama/Clinton foreign (appeasement) policies: "RESET" with Russia, and "OUTREACH" to Islam. For "RESET" emboldened Vladimir Putin to start a military conflict with Ukraine to keep it from joining the EU and eventually NATO. The outcome was the annexation of Crimea and now possibly Eastern Ukraine as Putin triumphantly to national acclaim defies Obama and the EU laughing at their warnings and sanctions. And "OUTREACH" emboldened the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood and its violent revolt against Bashir Assad (who's killed upwards of 200,000 Syrians to date) which in combination with our devastating pre-mature withdrawal from Iraq (an "OUTREACH" move to appease Moslems) created the Islamonazi terror army ISIS.
FORWARD EMAILS TO
But we've seen this doomsday movie before. For the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) scare is a leftist variation of the ban the bomb movement (BTB) where the lunatic fringe insanely believed that America was the cause of the Cold War with Russia-which could get hot; and that if we hadn't built the bomb the Soviets wouldn't have it (they built it out of fear); and that if this country unilaterally disarmed and became nuke free Russia (no longer feeling threatened by a nuclear armed US) would follow suit and peace would reign and humanity saved from World War III-a world ending nuclear holocaust where "the living would envy the dead," as Jonathan Schell said. And what was the outcome? We didn't disarm, there was no war, and the Soviet Union peacefully disappeared-taking with it the threat of nuclear war-as they were its cause.
The science is settled.
The speech by former US Vice-President Al Gore was apocalyptic. ‘The North Polar ice cap is falling off a cliff,’ he said. ‘It could be completely gone in summer in as little as seven years. Seven years from now.’
Those comments came in 2007 as Mr Gore accepted the Nobel Peace Prize for his campaigning on climate change.
But seven years after his warning, The Mail on Sunday can reveal that, far from vanishing, the Arctic ice cap has expanded for the second year in succession – with a surge, depending on how you measure it, of between 43 and 63 per cent since 2012.
To put it another way, an area the size of Alaska, America’s biggest state, was open water two years ago, but is again now covered by ice.
The most widely used measurements of Arctic ice extent are the daily satellite readings issued by the US National Snow and Ice Data Center, which is co-funded by Nasa. These reveal that – while the long-term trend still shows a decline – last Monday, August 25, the area of the Arctic Ocean with at least 15 per cent ice cover was 5.62 million square kilometres.
This was the highest level recorded on that date since 2006 (see graph, right), and represents an increase of 1.71 million square kilometres over the past two years – an impressive 43 per cent.
Other figures from the Danish Meteorological Institute suggest that the growth has been even more dramatic. Using a different measure, the area with at least 30 per cent ice cover, these Changereveal a 63 per cent rise – from 2.7 million to 4.4 million square kilometres.
who said to Roger Cohen at a dinner party in 2009 that Barack Obama was a " chess grandmaster on the world stage (see)?" What was he thinking at the time I wonder? Or better still what was he drinking at the party? The "chess grandmaster" is a grand flop making the world dangerous for democracy and freedom.
I came across this forgotten article as I was looking through my Townhall archives. It's about a failed Russian ICBM test in the White Sea that lit up the Norwegian skies with a spectacular light show just prior to Barack Obama's trip to Oslo to accept his undeserved Nobel Peace Prize. At the time I interpreted the event to be a second heavenly sign ominously foreshadowing the failure of Obama's appeasement policies with Russia, and the consequential collapse of relations into a new Cold War with the very dangerous neo-Stalinist Vladimir Putin (see It was also a sign to the Nobel Committee that awarding its peace prize to a well-meaning but undeserving naif like Obama was an act of folly which they would regret and forever be ridiculed for. And look what's become of the world since
In his acceptance speech for the Nobel Prize Obama said this bit of nonsense:
"Some wars may be necessary, but they can never be glorious. And on a certain level they are folly (see)."
As acts of folly and foolishness by nations are never necessary and can be wisely avoided how then can wars of necessity (just wars of defense against evil for example) fought for a nation's survival ever be folly? Wouldn't it be folly not to fight such wars and surrender to the enemy letting injustice and evil prevail? Imagine what the world would be like today if we refused to fight the Nazis and Japs during World War II? Imagine what would happen to the Middle East and world peace if ISIS-the Nazi-like army of brutal Islamic aggression-wasn't opposed and defeated. And when such wars are fought and won how can victory over evil not be glorious with the victors swelling with patriotic pride?
This is the blundering, incompetent, muddle-headed fool that was given the Nobel Peace Prize and is now leading this country and the world into worsening conflict and war. God help us if our mounting conflict with Russia over the Ukraine turns into a nuclear test of wills as it did over 50 years ago with the Cuban Missile Crisis. With Obama in charge, lacking the courage and strength of the stalwart John Kennedy, we would surely lose with Obama backing down and elevating the evil, Hitler-like barbarian Putin-whose ambitions to restore Russia's power and greatness would go unchecked and make the world less of a 21st century place.
2009-12-12 11:35:14 - THE TERRIBLE SIGN OF US/RUSSIAN CONFLICT BEFORE OBAMA ACCEPTS PEACE PRIZE
POSTSCRIPT: Added August 27, 2014
As I noted above there are 302 days separating the Siberian satellite catastrophe from the Russian missile mishap over Norway. Amazingly the number of days separating the births of Vladimir Putin from Barack Obama are 3223, the numbers 3 & 2 appearing twice in the four digit figure-an uncanny correspondence of numbers emblematic of the destined clash between Putin's Russia and Obama's America.
From Tuesday, February 10, 2009 (Siberian satellite crash)
To Wednesday, December 9, 2009 (Russian ICBM mishap)
Result: 302 days
Or 9 months, 29 days, or 43 weeks (rounded down)
From: Tuesday, October 7, 1952 (Putin’s birth date)
To Friday, August 4, 1961 (Obama’s birthdate)
Result: 3223 days
Or 8 years, 9 months, 28 days, or 460 weeks (rounded down)
Now as the appeaser Barack Obama is to the unappeasable aggressor Vladimir Putin just as Neville Chamberlain was to Hitler it is fascinating to note that just as half of the numbers in the four digit figure 3223 are two 3s so is it in the number of days separating Chamberlain's from Hitler's birth, hence:
Result: 7338 days
Or 20 years, 1 month, 2 days, or 1048 weeks (rounded down)
But here is where it gets very profound. For when the number 7338 is divided by 6 the product is a number whose last three digits are identical to the last three digits of 3223, hence
7338 divided by 6 = 1223
These uncanny numeric signs signify the correspondence between these four historical figures and are very troubling as they seem to portend cataclysmic events (see).
The above signs are all the more reason why Barack Obama must resign from office and let Joe Biden take command as he would make a stronger leader better suited for the critical challenges ahead.
TO CHECK MY CALCULATIONS CLICK
Draft Of Upcoming IPCC Report Presents Stark View Of The Future As Climate Change Rages On
With good reason Barack Obama has become the Putter President-in-Chief caring little about public criticism over his excessive time on the green, and his outrageous trip there Thursday after expressing his grief over the brutal jihadist execution of James Foley by the Islamic State. Obama is overwhelmed and is cracking under the growing strain of his scandal ridden, crisis heavy, failing leftist presidency. Indeed, the most unpresidential, naïve, and lawless president in US history, the man who doesn't know how to govern our great and indispensable country, lead and defend the civilized world against barbarians and savages, negotiate with adversaries foreign and domestic, who has lost the trust and confidence of the public and is taken seriously by fewer and fewer people left, right and center; in short, this tragedy in motion is being mentally, emotionally and physically broken as the country descends into chaos.
Obama may have the intestinal strength for community organizing and agitating, to be editor and president of the Harvard Law Review, to teach constitutional law, and for being a mostly absent state and US senator; but he doesn't have the stuff for the presidency-especially at a time of worsening domestic turmoil and international strife with a thousand ills converging on his head as his party and media abandon him to his sorry fate.
Again I say OBAMA IS OVERWHELMED and learning to loath his job preferring the peace and calm of the golf course where, as Dick Cheney said "he'd prefer to be"(or partying with his Hollywood friends) because it's an escape from the mess he's created from his ignorance, arrogance, duplicity and folly. For the presidency is now a source of more anguish and pain than pleasure and joy to Obama as it takes its toll on his mental state and physical health-reflected in his grey, gaunt and sickly looks, mental confusion and weakening communication skills. As Obama's animal spirits weren't vigorous to begin with what little nature has given him is being bled away.
The (mostly exaggerated) Obama magic is gone; the rose has withered and died and what's left are the thorns tearing his flesh and bleeding him to death as the White House turns into a hell house and political success to dust. In short, Obama's cross is crushing him, wearing him down and making him ill-draining the life and strength out of him. And with worse, much worse ahead I see him either resigning from office or (God forbid) ending up dead.
Keep in mind that Obama is the third sitting US senator elected president-an ominous sign; for his predecessors Warren Harding and John Kennedy died while in office. The scandal-plagued Harding died from a stroke, and Kennedy from an assassin's bullet. Oddly and eerily Obama's maternal grandmother Madelyn Dunham (who died of cancer less than 48 hours before his historic but ill-starred election) was born in 1922* during the Harding Administration (see); in fact, November 2, 2008 (the day of Dunham's death) was the 143rd anniversary of Harding's birth-and 87 years from the day he won the presidency*. Furthermore, and just as ominous, when Obama was born on August 4, 1961 it was the 28th week of John Kennedy's ill-fated presidency. These are hardly auspicious signs of Obama finishing his second miserable term.
*Harding won the presidency on his birthday.
Will Obama do a Richard Nixon and resign not from scandals or crimes? Will he become gravely ill like Harding and die? Or (God forbid) will he be killed by an assassin-most likely a Moslem if Allah so wills? What is certain is that his presidency no longer serves a useful purpose except for damaging the Left, and for the GOP whose endless gift he is. Obama's catastrophically bad presidency has set in motion the renewal and reawakening of this nation after leading it into peril and decline. As the danger to our nation grows so will the breaking of his spirit and physical health. As the past and present are prelude to worse if Obama were wise he'd call it quits today and resign, and work on a project that wouldn't hurt a fly: like the building of his presidential library on a golf course in Hawaii.
On this spot I will build my library.
FORWARD EMAILS TO
IN HIS FECKLESS THREE MINUTE STATEMENT YESTERDAY
on ISIS practicing the ancient, time-honored Moslem tradition of decapitating enemy infidels our clueless president thunderously said
“THERE’S NO PLACE FOR ISIS IN THE 21ST CENTURY.”
Oh really, Mr. President? Then what about terrorist Hamas? What about the terrorist Moslem Brotherhood? What about the terror masters of Tehran, Hezbollah and the Taliban? Do they belong in the 21st Century? Yes? No? You won’t answer. Okay then tell us this: What century does ISIS belong in if not this one? Don’t know? Can’t answer? Stumped? Then permit me to help you with your cluelessness: it belongs to the 7th century when an evil, cruel, bloodthirsty, power-mad barbarian named Mohammed raised his blood stained sword to heaven and swore endless war upon the world until it was subdued; and then seeming to rise out of nowhere he blazed a conquering path of terror, blood and war across a frightened Middle East-slaughtering, beheading, torturing, mass murdering Christians, Jews, pagans and every other unbeliever that got in his way refusing to bend to his will.
In ISIS' commander al-Baghdadi millions of enthralled believers worldwide recognize in his ruthless, quick, astonishing military feats and rise the long awaited and prayed for resurrection of the prophet Mohammed-the glory of the 7th century now among us spreading horror and mayhem like the prophet and his armies-wanting to replace the modern world with an oppressive, impoverishing medieval caliphate centered in Baghdad. And that makes Baghdadi far more menacing and dangerous than ten Osama bin Ladens.
Back to Iraq!
Back to the battlefield!
If Baghdadi wants war let’s give it to him!
ISIS, HAMAS AND ISLAMIC INTOLERANCE
Obama in his statement on Jim Foley's Islamically lawful and correct decapitation condemned ISIS' intolerance of other religions saying that "ISIS kills Christians and Yazidis simply because they practice another faith." Well Mr. President that is why the Arab world has been at war with Israel for 66 years. That is why Hamas daily calls and prays for Israel's destruction, fires rockets into its towns and cities and digs terror tunnels to abduct and kill its citizens. Face the truth Mr. President: ISIS and Hamas are two sides of the same evil politico-religious ideology that in your own words "has to be extracted so its cancer doesn't spread."
Hillary: You're f*cking up the country and the world Obama.
Obama: Worried about not being First Bitch-in-Chief Hillary?
Hillary: How dare you use the B word with me!
Obama: How dare you criticize my policies when I'm the 4th greatest president in history, even outranking your husband ().
THOUGH IT'S HAPPENING
much sooner than I thought (see) the Clintons are turning against Barack Obama and his hugely unpopular and disastrous presidency-with Obama fighting back with "horse shit." Anticipating that worst is coming for the incendiary Middle East Hillary is blaming Obama for both Syrian dictator Bashir Assad's (the worst mass murderer of the 21st century) survival in power, and the dangerous rise of genocidal ISIS, sweeping through Iraq like Mohammad's armies across Arabia-no wonder Al Baghdadi is a rock star. Hillary claims that like war-hawk, GOP, neo-cons John McCain and Lindsey Graham (and Penetta and Petraeus in the administration) she was interventionist in Syria wanting to heavily arm anti-regime rebels regardless of who got what. But while secretary of state (the wife of the impeached president who lied to America about Monica and whose weak-on-terror policies and affordable housing program set the stage for 9/11 and the housing/credit crash of 2008) passionately backed Obama's disastrous do nothing policy in Syria (see). Combine that with the insane resetting of relations with Putin (who she now calls another Hitler) and Hillary Clinton looks like a loser for 2016.
Do I hear a bid of $5?.... $4 then?
But making things worse for Hill was husband Bill's pro-Obama speech at the 2012 DNC -which will come back to haunt them (see). In that speech Clinton not only praised Obama for his hugely unpopular Obamacare fiasco, but for his economic, fiscal and monetary policies which are making the rich richer while impoverishing the Middle Class- thus aggravating income disparity as prices rise, wages fall and the economy bearly grows. Will Bill criticize Obamanomics after falsely claiming that it saved us from a second Great Depression? Or will they blame the worst recovery since the Great Depression on the GOP not passing a $400 billion jobs bill after the failure of the $860 billion stimulus to do the trick?
Indeed, my friends, it looks like déjà vu all over again. Just as Barack Obama ruined Hillary's run for the White House in 2008 so he seems to be doing it again with his lying, feckless, worse-than-Watergate, longest-running-amateur-hour presidency.
FOWARD EMAILS TO
FROM APOLLOSPEAKS TOWNHALL ARCHIVES
2010-03-08 10:58 -- HURT LOCKER, IRAQ'S ELECTION AND THE RETURN TO PRE-SURGE CHAOS
On the 7th day of March, Iraq's national election day, just 12 days before the 7th anniversary of Shock and Awe (March 19) Hurt Locker (a pro-military film about the Iraq War) takes six Oscars at the Academy Awards (including Best Film and Director). Moreover, March 7th was the 411th day (13th month) of the Obama administration and the 66th day of the year (see). [See Postscript II below].
Two things in particular jump out at me: the number 411 and Hurt Locker:
411 is the number 114 reversed giving us the date of Obama's election on 11-4-2008 (the 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis).
114 is also the number given to the Iraq War Resolution which authorized President Bush to use military force to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Congress passed this bill on 10-10-2002, the 1322nd anniversary of the Battle of Karbala (present day Iraq), the first military clash between Sunnis and Shiites foreshadowing the sectarian strife tearing apart Iraq and the region today.
Hurt Locker was originally released on September 4, 2008 in Venice, Italy (see). This coincided with the Republican National Convention where Vietnam War hero John McCain accepted his party's nomination to run for president. The hero of Hurt Locker, Sergeant William James (a bomb disposal expert) after leaving the army for civilian life returns to Iraq for another tour of duty.
Hurt Locker's first showing in Italy on the day Vietnam War hero John McCain accepted the GOP nomination is one of many portentous signs pairing Iraq and Vietnam. It is significant that in his acceptance speech McCain recounted the near fatal day of October 26, 1967 when his plane went down in flames over North Vietnam and he was taken prisoner-the start of a brutal ordeal he would heroically endure for 5 years. This date itself is ominous for Iraq's fortunes in the post-occupation period; for it was the 20th anniversary of Great Britain ending its military occupation of that country; it was also the day of Hillary Clinton's birth, Obama's Secretary of State*. In 2003 (after 56 years) the British returned to Iraq as partners of the United States...as we might return after we leave.
*Hillary was born 10-26-1947.
Allah, Al Sadr and the End of Democracy in Iraq
March 7th was the 66th day of the year. The number 66 in the Arabic language is the numeric value of the word ALLAH Islam's name for God. The imposing of Sharia (Allah's) Law is advancing throughout Southern Iraq aggravating Iraqi hostility toward the US and the West. If this trend continues and more of the country goes Sharia it will ruin Iraq's chances of becoming a force for moderation, progress and stability in the region.
I'll give Barack Obama a bit of credit for opposing lying leftist screwballs like Nancy Pelosi and Jimmy Carter and blaming cruel, murdering, genocidal Hamas for the catastrophe in Gaza-and stating that they are useless for achieving a durable peace with Israel. But that's as far as it goes. In condemning Hamas for its 3500 rocket attacks from mostly civilian population centers, and building dozens of terror tunnels to sneak into Israel to kill and kidnap Jews, the most partisan and politcized president in US history (and the most anti-Israel) was bowing to US public opinion and bi-partisan Congressional support which solidly backs the Jewish state against Hamas's ongoing aggression. Undoubtedly, if the reverse were the case with public opinion and Congress running against Israel the cowardly, amoral, unprincipled Obama would most likely be condemning Netanyahu (who he personally hates) for the 1200 Gazan deaths and 10,000 destroyed buildings and calling for his immediate resignation.
But after rightly condemning Hamas for its atrocities and crimes Obama blew it for himself and revealed how deceptively anti-Israel he is when he praised Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinian Authority (in contrast to Hamas) for the great work they are doing for their people; and reiterated the utterly false, disproven, laughable notion that Abbas (and the PA) is a real counter-part and peace partner for Israel committed to a two state solution-as if he were another peace-loving Anwar Sadat (the model for making peace with Israel). But Obama knows Abbas is no Sadat (if he were they'd be peace by now). He knows that Abbas and Hamas are joined by the hip in their annihilating hatred of Israel differing only on means not ends for achieving its demise. Obama knows that if this weren't so Abbas and Hamas couldn't have settled their differences and reconciled as they'd have nothing in common to join them. Indeed, Obama knows that Abbas is Hamas in disguise (a stealth jihadist) with the difference that he's a pan-Arab supremacist who is realistic about nuclear armed Israel's military capabilities, and that Palestinians are too weak to defeat her in war; and that she can only be destroyed slowly in stages by nonviolent political means. While Hamas, on the other hand, are Islamic supremacist lunatics intoxicated by a false triumphalism inspired by blind faith that Israel, despite her overwhelming strength, can and will be defeated militarily ; and that if they endlessly keep up the armed struggle and show Allah how indefatigable they are, in time he will bless them with victory turning Israel into an Islamic state.
Indeed, Obama knows from the failure of the 2007 Israeli/PA peace talks that Abbas (unlike Sadat) isn't serious about a just and lasting peace with Israel as he rejected then prime minister's Ehud Olmert's generous plan (going beyond Ehud Barak's offer to Arafat) for a two state solution. This called for giving the Palestinians 94% of the West Bank with land swaps in the Negev, East Jerusalem for a capital, control of the Temple Mount and a limited return of 5000 Palestinian refugees to Israel (see).
Obama knows from Abbas's intransigence on refusing to recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state. and insisting on an absolute right of return of Palestinian refugees (all 4 million of them) that he is hell-bent on destroying Israel as a Jewish state. Indeed, Obama knows that Abbas will continue to resist being Israel's peace partner unless it's willing to cave on the right of return and commit national suicide-which is exactly what Obama would like Israel to ideally do. For like most radical leftists Obama believes that the world and Middle East would be better off without Israel-just as he believes that a weakened and diminished America is better for the world.
In sum, Hamas is a pan-Islamic terrorist group (a branch of the revolutionary Moslem Brotherhood) dedicated to Israel's violent overthrow and replacement by a totalitarian Moslem state which at a later date will be merged with a larger Islamic caliphate. The Palestinian Authority is a pan-Arab Nationalist non-terrorist group dedicated to Israel's peaceful piece by piece destruction and replacement by an Arab dictatorship-which at a later date will be merged with a unified, regionwide Arab nation. What this means is that Obama's continued praise of PA chief Abbas as a real peace partner for Israel is incontrovertible proof that he is shamefully and despicably Abbas's useful idiot leftist ally for Israel's political demise-which doesn't have a prayer of succeeding as long as Israel's PMs are no nonsense, hard-headed realists like Bibi Netanyahu.
on Lincoln's Bible to project the image that he'd be the most honest and trustworthy president since Abraham Lincoln. But five years in office has proved he's Lincoln's polar opposite-the most mendacious president in US history smiling and lying his way to a legacy of ashes and dust. Compared to Lincoln Obama is a moral and mental pipsqueak unworthy to be a shadow of his shadow.
AUGUST 4, 2014
IT'S THE BIRTHDAYS OF OBAMA AND ELISION TODAY
Two leftist enemies of Israel born two years apart and sworn to Israel's destruction. America's first black president with Moslem family roots; and our first Moslem Congressman sworn in on the Koran by Nancy Pelosi who says Hamas is a humanitarian organization. I wish them all long lives to see Israel grow greater and thrive and still exist after the day that each of them dies.
IF YOU WANT TO UNDERSTAND WHY
the Italian gov't refuses to recognize Islam as a legitimate religion and denies it religious tax status Pam's report says it all.
For more on this subject read my
THE GOOD NEWS IS
there's one less school in Gaza to teach jihad to kids and turn them into Arab-Nazi Jew-hating monsters.
Yeah cuz the last thing the world needs is education....
Indoctrinating children with the supremacist ideology of endless jihad against Israel and infidels is education? All such schools are inhuman places of hate and war that should be destroy
And what direct experience do you have with the UNRWA schools' curriculum and teachings? None. You're being swayed by propaganda and spreading this stuff around even though you have zero actual knowledge of it. The Palestinian population is actually more educated and more "western" than in other parts of the world. Kids are watching the Cartoon Network there, a lot of people speak good English, there's a strong literary tradition, teenagers want to go out to nightclubs and live normally. They don't need some extremist Jihadi curriculum to learn to hate Israel; Israel's military offensives do an awfully good job at that by themselves.
Arab children indoctrinated with the toxic Koran and its cover to cover hatred of Jews as Allah's most hated and diabolical enemy (because they rejected the fake prophet Mohammed) hated Israel from its birth and backed the failed Arab war of annihilation against her. That war was strictly defined in Islamic terms as JIHAD: a holy war of total destruction demanded by God as an absolute political and religious duty; and that same insane call to war (based on racism, cultural imperialism and religious intolerance) against the non-Islamic Jewish State is senselessly drummed into the heads of every Palestinian child by parents, teachers, political leaders and imams; and there isn't a single stitch of evidence that UNWRA schools are changing that and civilizing Pali kids with modern thought. For if they did murderous mad Jew-hating Hamas wouldn't allow them to exist.
Who's spewing hatred now? LOL. You sound like one of those fire and brimstone preachers on tv. I recommend trying some relaxation techniques.
To paraphrase Cicero: Extremism in the hatred of evil is no sin. And I hate Islamic supremicism with extreme prejudice.
Tell that to the MILLIONS and MILLIONS of HONEST people of the WORLD....that know the TRUTH....Israel is a ZIONIST TERRORIST STATE!
In Photos: Worldwide protest against Israeli attack [GENOCIDE] on Gaza!
LOL!!! Zionist Israel is a TERROR to its pan-Arab Nationalist and Islamic supremacist enemies.who use the Arabs of the West Bank and Gaza in their losing ideological war to destroy her. 66 years and 16 wars later and Israel is stronger, more prosperous and invulnerable than ever. Meanwhile life for the poor, wretched, hate-filled Arabs in Gaza and the West Bank grows more miserable and bleak as their families shrink in size and their populations and incomes decline.
While nutballs on the useful idiot Left rage against an imaginary collective punishment of Palestinians in Gaza calling Jews mass murderers and exterminating Nazis Jewish annihilationism is taught in Palestinian schools and has become a serious second religion with them and defining characteristic of their despicable, hate-driven, anti-Semitic culture.
Can there be a worse and deadlier form of collective punishment than ethnic cleansing and genocide? Can there be any greater crime and injustice against humanity than the physical extermination of an entire people or race driven by unjustified hatred and bigotry? Yet the Palestinians of Gaza (more properly Gazans), who are said by bleeding heart leftist crazies to be the poor, suffering, collective victims of Israel's "inhuman, heartless, barbaric" blockades, restrictions and war policies are for the physical extermination of every Jew in Israel and beyond. My view on the so-called collective punishment of Palestinians is this:
If what is needed for the collective security of the Israeli people against Hamas terrorists (with their missiles, suicide bombers, kidnappers and gunmen) hurts and inconveniences the Palestinians who voted them into power-and support their genocidal supremacist crusade for collective punishment of Israel (for the crime of having an "unlawful" un-Islamic Jewish State)-then it's too damn bad. Their so-called "collective punishment" is self-caused and justly deserved-a consequence of their annihilating hatred of Israel and the Jewish race for medieval racial, cultural, and religious reasons that no civilized human being would accept or tolerate.
ISRAEL: THE NEW NAZI STATE
It doesn't get crazier than this. There was a time when Zionism (Jewish nationalism) was simply and unfairly equated with racism because Israel is a state principally established for Jews-though it's a multi-ethnic, multi-religious, rule of law, democratic society with equal rights and protections for all. But now Zionism is equated by Palestinians and their Islamic and leftist friends with (of all things) "HITLERISM" and "NAZISM". This is crazy because Adolf Hitler and the Nazis are revered throughout the Arab world as Allah's most beloved and honored infidels (see). This is because of Hitler's great love and respect of Moslems and his violent hatred of Jews (he financed anti-Jewish jihadis in Palestine) and the diabolical feat of killing six million of them. Where else but in the insane, regressive, perverse Middle East would people designate their enemies (the Jews) who they want to destroy with the names of infidels they honor and love because of their success in killing Jews?
Many of us America-loving conservatives think of Barack Obama negatively as the negation of all that we believe in; as our polar opposite and antagonist in practically everything: an anti-American president and hater of this country and its founding principles, values, ideals and Constitution-the elements that make us a nation so unique, exceptional and extraordinary in goodness that we can only be compared to ourselves; and this is not an extreme wingnut view of Obama as the evidence for it from his past and tenure in office is overwhelming. For in Obama's unrealistic, utopian, ideologically clouded mind America is a failing society that falls abysmally short of the perfect, abstract, impossible ideal-the enemy of what's good, reasonable and real-of a classless egalitarian society of fairness, shared wealth and social justice; and it's this idealistic vision of America as it should be that blindly and pigheadedly drives Obama's lawlessness, hyper-partisanship, arrogance, mendacity and disastrous foreign and domestic policies.
POST AMERICAN, POST CONSTITUTIONAL PRESIDENT
And because of Obama's hostility and contempt for all things traditionally American, and our great power, might and wealth, he's been called a "Post-American, Post-Constitutional President"-a characterization which is correct but not final or complete. For Obama is something more radical, dangerous and extreme which underlies his immigration lies and lax border security and enforcement policies that are causing so much chaos with illegal aliens and undermining our sovereignty.This is what I mean:
OBAMA'S ONE WORLD BERLIN SPEECH
In July 2008 when Obama was in Berlin giving his speech to a crowd of 200,000 enraptured Germans conspicuously absent from the stage (in contrast to the famous Berlin speeches of Reagan and JFK) were the flags of America and Germany. Obama went flagless that day, and this was by design for it was a message of what kind of president he'd be if elected. For Obama came to Berlin that day not simply as an American citizen but (more truly and importantly) as he said "a citizen of the world." And later in the speech we were given insight into what he meant by "world citizen" when said:
"The walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down."
When Reagan was in Berlin he told Gorbachev to tear down the wall that divided the city. When Obama was there he told the world to tear down the walls and boundaries dividing them.
THE FICTION OF WORLD CITIZENSHIP
Now of course, in reality, there are no "world citizens." In reality humanity is divided into those who live as citizens of free, self-governing, rule of law societies where the state is the servant of the people protecting their rights and liberties; and those who are subjects living in oppression and slavery to the state with the people serving their masters. For example the peoples of America, Israel, Great Britian and France are free, self-governing citizens of those countries. While the peoples of Cuba, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Gaza live as unfree oppressed subjects serving the aims of the state and their rulers. That means if someone could be a legal member of all 200 nations having passports for each one he/she still wouldn't qualify as a "world citizen" because not all countries are democratic and free. For the universal passports holder would simultaneously be the free citizen of the US and Great Britain and the oppressed subject of the Saudi monarchy and dictatorship of communist Cuba.
THE UNITED STATES OF HUMANITY
Now Obama knows that in reality he's not a world citizen and that there are no world citizens. But that doesn't mean the term doesn't have meaning for him and his fellow radicals. For radical progressive humanitarian leftists like Obama this world of divided nation states and peoples pursuing their own national interests and sometimes clashing with each other and violently in war is not the world as it should be...the world of the revolutionary future: the post-nation state world order where peoples and nations aren't divided, where there's no walls or boundaries separating them, where they work together in concert pursuing the same goals, aims and ends. In short, a world where all borders are erased and there is a single united one world democratic society and government: a UNITED STATES OF HUMANITY* where each nation is a state in a united global democratic community with every member of the human race a world or planetary citizen. In other words, the "world citizen" of today is a leftist ideologue who hates the world as it is with its poverty, racism, conflicts and wars and works for the world of tomorrow-the world as it should and ought to be with humanity living in harmony, equality, prosperity and peace.
Radical leftists like Obama who fancy themselves as more than mere citizens of America (though they only own one passport) justify their view of world citizenship by saying that their primary concern (what they ultimately live for) is the good, well-fare and happiness of all mankind-and not for the narrow interests of a single nation viz. the United States. Consequently they despise Americanism and belief in our exceptionalism, and regard any sort of nationalism as selfish, small-minded and divisive dividing people from people, race from race, nation from nation causing poverty, conflict, war and every other evil. According to progressives nationalism and the nation state are what's wrong with the world and must be abolished-for them there is only one race, THE HUMAN RACE and ideally there should be only one nation of world citizens living under one democratic world government in peace sharing all material wealth equally and having the right to live where they please. This is the ideal world of the late Howard Zinn the communist writer and intellectual fraud who wrote the popular Peoples History of the United States, a propaganda book of mostly lies about this country and its history designed to disillusion Americans with their country and cure them of the disease of patriotic nationalism with one world democratic egalitarian humanitarianism-the view of healthy, enlightened, politically correct human beings. This perverse subversive nonsense is being taught in our schools and universities and infects the entire radical Left from Obama on down.
AMERICA MUST LEAD THE WAY TO THE NEW BORDERLESS WORLD ORDER
Indeed, for Obama and the Left the United States' stature and power only has value and meaning as a means to the greater global good and new age end of abolishing all borders and nations in a one world democratic social state where all countries demilitarize and surrender their sovereignty to the all-powerful world governing body (out of the UN)-which, if it were possible, would be a corrupt tyranny of colossal proportions. Now because of its superpower status and immense prestige America, the Left believes, is the ideal nation to set an example for the world by being the first to erase its borders welcoming anyone into this country who wants to come. They believe that this would inspire other nations to follow our lead triggering a global anti-border movement where national boundaries would fall like dominoes and people could suddenly live wherever they please giving birth to Obama's post-nation state world order that he alluded to in his Berlin speech.
Of course this is well-meaning ideological insanity. The economic and social chaos that an open borders America would cause with its tsunami of poorly skilled, illiterate immigrants and criminals from Mexico, Central America and elsewhere would shock the world, get nowhere as a movement, and quickly die as the President and Congress responding to the deafening, hysterical public outcry would quickly shut down the borders.
LEFTIST OPEN HOME POLICY
Obama and the Left are at war with an orderly legal immigration system with secure borders ultimately for the sake of a borderless planet of world citizens where everyone can travel and move around from place to place without passports or restrictions. But I say to Obama and the Left if you want America to set an example for the rest of the world and pioneer this post-nation borderless revolutionary earth then it's only right that you lead the way and begin by setting an example for America. If you want an open door policy for immigrants assuring us it will do wonders for our economy and society and humanity then prove your point by starting with your homes. Knock down the fences that divide you from your neighbors and have an open door policy allowing anyone indiscriminately to live with you and your families who wants to; any good or bad person; any law-abiding man or criminal; any drug abusing homeless bum or sexual pervert. Open your doors and compassionate hearts to humanity and let's see how that works out for you.
If Bibi Netanyahu and his national unity government stay the course and continue to resist pressure from the idiotic, pro-Moslem Brotherhood, save-Islamonazi-Hamas Obama Administration and continues its military operations in Gaza until Hamas is completely crushed and destroyed as its governing head, what then? Who would fill the political and military void? Some like outgoing Defense Intelligence Agency head Michael Flynn (see), warn that "if Hamas were destroyed and gone, we would probably end up with something much worse;" and that something says Flynn might be dreaded, mass murdering, terrorist ISIS-jihadists so violent and monstrous in their war to carve out a caliphate in the region that they've been denounced by al-Qaida for their savagery. Indeed, with good reason Flynn and others worry about ISIS replacing Hamas for the terror masters recently twittered that they have designs on Gaza and intend to join the holy struggle there against the Jews saying:
"It is only matter of time and patience before it [ISIS] reaches Palestine to fight the barbaric Jews and kill them..."
After witnessing ISIS ruthlessly establishing a terror state across parts of Iraq and Syria its crazy not to think they don't mean what they say and that they are hell-bent in joining the Palestinian struggle against Israel. But "It's only a matter of time" means that the worse-than-al-Qaida-terror-group can't do this now as it's focused on trying to conquer Iraq and defend its territorial gains in Syria from the Assad regime.
But assuming the worse if Hamas is defeated and destroyed; assuming that ISIS sends its jihadis into Gaza to replace Hamas and become its government incorporating it into its growing caliphate, what then? Would crushing Hamas have been a mistake that Israel would regret? ABSOLUTELY NOT! In fact, ISIS ruling Gaza is preferable to Hamas. It could be that ISIS' rule over Gaza would be more brutal, tyrannical-a worse human rights nightmare for the Gazan people. But it wouldn't be worse for the security of the Jewish State. Why? Because ISIS is a radical anti-Shiite army at war with Iran (as well as Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and all moderate Arab states) and wouldn't be receiving arms, rockets and funds from them like Hamas had. As much as the mullahs hate Israel and want her destroyed providing weapons and missiles to ISIS would almost certainly backfire and wind up being used against them and their allies in Syria and Iraq.
In other words, ISIS ruling Gaza would be Hamas without the rockets and therefore less of a threat to Israeli civilians and security. ISIS snipers, kidnappers and suicide bombers occasionally slipping into Israel could happen, but that's about it. Moreover, ISIS and the Palestinian Authority would be in conflict with little possibility of rapprochement. Indeed, due to the PA's secularism and nonviolent approach to destroying Israel (through politics, diplomacy and propaganda) an alliance with ISIS would be virtually impossible.
In short, there is nothing worse for Israel than Hamas ruling Gaza. For what appears to be the very worse case scenario of Israel destroying Hamas only to be replaced by ISIS is in reality a more desirable outcome than Hamas continuing in power.
Is Obama a powerless lame duck?
The radical progressive Left love oppressed and victimized peoples (so long as they're not Christians or Jews) and range the world looking for victims of injustice to fight for, bleed for, and feel intense, burning compassion for (their great master virtue which is no virtue at all). And one such "oppressed, victimized people" are Palestinian Arabs-arguably the most regressive, savage and worthless people on earth who define their collective existence as a genocidal war against modern, progressive, democratic Jewish Israel in the name of God, the Koran and the Prophet of conqest and war.
Now according to the radical Left the poor, miserable, wretched Palestinians are the pure, good, innocent victims of Israeli-Zionist injustice and imperialism. For example, New Republic writer John Judis in his recent article "Who Bears More Responsibility for the War in Gaza (see)" claims that the war's ultimate, underlying cause is evil, oppressive, Zionist "COLONIZATION" which must end to achieve peace. "Israel," says Judis, " is one of the world’s last colonial powers, and the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza are its unruly subjects." And he then goes on to say that Islamo-Nazi terrorist Hamas (a branch of the totalitarian Moslem Brotherhood allied with Nazi Germany in World War II) and Arab-Nationalist Fascist Fatah (the Jew-hating terrorist PLO) are "anti-colonial movements." That is to say that essentially Hamas and Fatah are fighting Israeli oppression and Western colonial imperialist injustice and therefore are morally sound, legitimate, liberation movements worthy of leftist compassion and support.
Of course pro-American Israel is not an imperialist colonial Western power for the simple reason that it doesn't rule over any lands not legitimately, morally and historically it's own. When Israel reached its territorial max from its astonishing victory in the Six Days War (having wrested the Sinai and Gaza from Egypt, the Golan Heights from Syria and the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan) it legally took those lands fighting a defensive war against an aggressive enemy hell-bent on its total destruction. This is not what colonial powers do as they conquer by force foreign lands for territorial gain and then settle them with their own people. A good example of colonization would be the Prophet Mohammad's marauding Moslem hordes murderously sweeping over the Arabian Peninsula and Middle East in the 7th century conquering and colonizing Christian lands (Palestine, Syria, Egypt etc.) with unwanted Arab-Moslem settlers.
But let's assume for arguments sake that Judis and the Left are right, and that Israel is the last colonial Western power stealing, colonizing and illegally occupying Palestinian lands; and that like all oppressed foreign ruled peoples Palestinians want freedom and self-determination. But on closer examination the central problem that Palestinians have with Israel is not so much that it's a "colonial power," but that it specifically is a JEWISH colonial power.
For 400 years starting in 1516 Arab Palestine was colonized, occupied and ruled by the Ottoman Turks with hardly a peep of protest from its Arab population until World War I. This was because like the Palestinian Arabs the Turks were Sunni Moslems belonging to the same sect of Islam. Though control of Palestine changed hands from the Mumluks to the Turks everything else remained the same. Palestine continued to be governed by the Koran and Sharia law with Moslem men being first class subjects, their women second class subjects, and Jews and Christians third class subjects paying higher taxes, subject to harassment and periodic violence, and excluded from military and government service. The Arab nationalist revolt against the Turks during World War I (led by pro-Zionist Lawrence of Arabia) was a manufactured not spontaneous uprising engineered by the British to drive the Turks from the region. If the Turks hadn't sided with Germany and the Axis Powers during the war the Ottoman Empire might not have dissolved, and Palestine might still be a colony of Turkey with an obedient, docil majority Arab population.
Do you see what I mean that colonization (if true) isn't what enrages Palestinian Arabs (whose ancestors conquered and colonized Christian ruled Palestine) so much as it is infidel Zionist Jews that rule-Jews who Arabs are brainwashed to believe are Allah's and Islam's greatest and most dangerous enemy in league with the darkest forces of hell for the destruction of Islam. Indeed, Jewish Israel's existence has unleashed their worst fears that Islam is in terrible, critical, deadly peril, that Satan (using Israel) is winning the war in destroying their faith, and that their glorious conquering past is lost to them forever never to be restored. Tears. Tears.
Now since Israel's unbelief more than its supposed colonizing of alleged Palestinian lands is what drives anti-Israel Moslem rage and jihad this war can quickly be terminated and reconciliation achieved if Israel renounces Judaism and converts to Sunni Islam. If that were to happen all Moslem grievances against Israel would disappear as the faithful would take Israel's Islamization as a divine sign from Allah confirming the political and religious supremacy of their faith; and that the victorious vision of the prophet that dominates the Koran: of a one world Islamic state at the end of history, is at hand.
What the above proves, as I've said before, is that the 66 year jihad against Israel is driven by racism, cultural imperialism and religious intolerance-all forms of injustice. And that Jewish Israel's existence on what was once Moslem lands, and not West Bank settlements, is itself a form of illegal colonization and occupation according Islam and the Koran.
WEST BANK SETTLEMENTS
If the Jewish "settlers" on the West Bank, who are said by many to be illegal colonizing occupiers of Palestinian lands, were to be replaced by Israeli Moslems the Palestinians would embrace the new Israeli inhabitants as the rightful owners of those lands and the issue of illegal West Bank settlements would quickly disappear.
Israel can show no reciprocal benefits and gains from granting Palestinians autonomy (and other efforts to make peace) as they continue their violent anti-Israel Koran inspired jihad (backed by most Moslem states) kidnapping and murdering Israeli Jews and launching missile attacks on Israeli towns and cities-which have sparked two bloody wars in Gaza (2008 and 2014) where hundreds have been killed and injured with property damage in the millions. Driven by racism, cultural imperialism and religious intolerance the implacable Palestinians are hell-bent on Israel's destruction and will settle for nothing less.
What this means in summation is this: when it comes to peacemaking in the Middle East Israel has the best record of any nation being the greatest force for peace, justice and stability in the region. Anyone who believes otherwise and can prove me wrong showing me a greater peacemaker in the region will receive a $1000 cash reward.
If Saul Alinsky had been alive on the historic night of November 4, 2008 the old, feeble 99 year old Chicagoan radical might have died in Grant Park from a massive coronary as his greatly aged socialist heart might not have been able to endure the excitement, euphoria and jubilation of Barack Hussein Obama winning the presidency. For Obama is an absolute, head to toe, fanatically crazed, crackpot Alinskyite-or ALINSKY STEALTH SOCIALIST (ASS)-plotting, conniving and lying at every turn to undermine, pull down, subvert and diminish our horribly unjust, polluting, racist, oppressive free enterprise system and replace it with THE UTOPIAN DREAM: a state created all-inclusive egalitarian progressive paradise of social, economic, green energy using equals with shared wealth, open borders, and the end of America as a nation-state and warmongering global superpower.
Indeed, Election Day 2008 would have been the happiest moment and apogee of Saul Alinsky’s anti-American radical life; a day of dreamed political fulfillment which he undoubtedly would have likened to the Russian Revolution of 90 years before-believing that president 44, his faithful black disciple and Chicago community agitator, was the nonviolent, American version of Vladimir Lenin; and that his vision of a bloodless socialist revolution-working by stealth and deceit through the system-had finally come.
ALINSKY, OBAMA AND THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION
Saul David Alinsky was born January 30, 1909 (Franklin Roosevelt’s 27th birthday) to Russian Jewish immigrants in Chicago eight years before the Russian Revolution. Barack Obama, his disciple and future 44th US president, was born August 4, 1961 the year when the totalitarian Soviet state, founded in 1917, would celebrate its 44th anniversary of trying and failing to create heaven on earth through an omnipotent, monstrously oppressive, centralized socialist state.
Though Obama’s Alinsky Revolution and transformational agenda (now in its sixth year) is going the predictable way of all such ventures and miserably failing it is fascinating to note that the number of days separating the births of Alinsky and Obama are exactly 19,179 (see note below)- a five digit number encoded with the ominous number 1917 signifying the terrible year during World War I when Lenin and his Bolshevik gangsters seized control of Russia in what was to be the greatest failed social experiment in human history-an experiment which Aliniskyites like Obama insanely want to repeat over and over and over again (in different variations) hoping against hope by some miracle or accident they will finally succeed.
Result: 19,179 days
You will notice that 19,179, which gives us the revolutionary year 1917, is 52 years, 6 months and 5 days. 52 is a variant of the number 7 (5+2 =7), and 6 + 5 = 11. 11-7-1917 is the complete date denoting the start of the Russian Soviet Socialist Revolution.
FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS
Now on December 31, 1905, 160 weeks (40 x 4 = 160) before Saul Alinsky’s birth, future pro-Soviet mentor of Barack Obama Frank Marshall Davis was born. Born and raised in Arkansas City, Kansas Davis (a black communist poet and writer) became a community organizer and member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) in Saul Alinsky’s Chicago on April 14, 1943 when he was 37 years old (37x12 =444) ; and in 1948 (at the suggestion of fellow black communist Paul Robeson) Davis moved to Honolulu, Hawaii to continue his subversive work. In the mid-1970s (the decade of Alinsky’s death ) Obama's grandfather Stanley Dunham introduced his grandson to Davis believing he’d make a good role model for him. Amazingly, Dunham and Davis lived some 50 miles apart in Kansas before migrating to Hawaii where they first met; and retracing Davis’s steps Obama become a community organizer in Chicago-Davis most likely inspired him in this.
Now here is where it gets profound as providence, I believe, has given us a certain sign that the 44th President of the United States is not just an Alinsky Stealth Socialist but FRANK DAVIS’S IDEOLOGICAL CLONE-and that Obama at heart (in reality and truth) is every bit the communist quack his black pro-Soviet mentor was.
For in 1943 when Davis joined the Chicago chapter of the CPUSA his membership number was 47544-a five digit number ending in 44 Obama’s presidency number. But utterly mind-boggling is the fact that when Obama was sworn in as our 44th president he was exactly 47 years, 5 months and 16 days old (see note below). What is mind-boggling is that 47, the number of years, and 5, the number of months, exactly correspond to the first three digits of Davis’s Communist Party number. But it doesn’t end there. Amazingly, 16, the remaining number of days, is the square of 4 or 4 x 4 giving us two fours as in the doublet number 44.
You couldn’t ask for a more powerful numeric sign that US Communist Party member 47544 (the undisguised communist Frank Davis) given our system of checks and balances, would be governing much like his disciple Barack Obama (just as intransigently, arrogantly, immaturely and ineptly-but probably less timidly (more openly and honestly) if he were president 44.
Friday, August 4, 1961 (Obama's birth)
To, Tuesday, January 20, 2009 (Obama's election)
Result: 47 years, 5 months, 16 days (see)
BARACK OBAMA SR AND ANN DUNHAM
Like Frank Davis Obama’s mother and father, Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Sr., were both pro-Soviet communist haters of America like their son wanting to transform, socialize and replace the system. Now as Dunham and Obama saw Russia not America as the truly exceptional nation and hope for the world fate, in late 1960, brought them together in a Russian language class at Hawaii University where they fell in love. They married in February 1961 and their son Barack Jr was born six months later.
Now Barack Obama Sr. was born in Kenya in the significant and extraordinary year of 1936. This was significant in that, following Franklin Roosevelt, it anticipates his son’s reelection to a second term despite a bad economy; and is extraordinary for his being the father of the 44th president. I say this because the number 1936 is 44 squared, or 44 x 44 (see)-as if it were Obama Sr’s destiny to father the future, two term 44th US president.
Now there is nothing relevant to Barack Obama’s political destiny as our first cypto-communist president in his mother’s date of birth. But on the day his mother died, and the number of days separating her birth and death, something truly remarkable and relevant appears. For in the decade that the Soviet Union ceased to exist, exactly 3 years, 10 months and 12 days after it disappeared from history, Ann Dunham died on 11-7-1995-the 78th anniversary of the Russian Revolution-an amazing day for the mother of America’s first radical left Alinskyite president to die.
But just as amazing are the number of days separating Ann Dunham’s birth from her death; for these total to exactly 19336-a five digit number encoded with the year 19336 indicating the start of Franklin Roosevelt’s presidency and the New Deal*, and 19(3)36 the year of FDR’s reelection with a bad economy and (as we saw above) the square of 44 (44x44) denoting her son’s presidency number.
*After Obama’s inauguration in 2009 the liberal media called him the “New FDR” with a “new New Deal” for America.
But there’s more. From the day of Ann Dunham’s death (the 78th anniversary of the Russian Socialist Revolution) to her son’s election as 44th president was 4746 days. Another strange coincidence as Obama at age 46 seized his party’s nomination for president; and then won the presidency at age 47.
From: Sunday, November 29, 1942 (Dunham’s birth)
To, Tuesday, November 7, 1995 (Dunham’s death)
Result: 19,336 days (see)
From: Tuesday, November 7, 1995 (Dunham's death)
To, Tuesday, November 4, 2008 (Obama's election)
Result: 4746 days (see)
BARACK OBAMA AND THE DEATH OF THE UTOPIAN DREAM
If the feeble, frail 99 year old Saul Alinsky had managed to survive the excitement and jubilation of Obama’s 2008 election and were still alive today he’d probably be on his death bed dying of grief at his epically failing disciple and the cataclysmic mess he’s making of this country and the revolution. Six years into Obama’s radical left presidency and Alinsky would be miserable over the rising tide of failures, scandals, and crises overwhelming him and the country: the economy, healthcare, border chaos, the VA, Benghazi and IRS scandals, the rise of ISIS, Russian aggression, mass murder in Syria, Israel’s invasion of Gaza, etc . Indeed, with the progressive messiah losing his trust and credibility with the American people Alinsky would be sick unto death and frightened for the socialist future; frightened that he was wrong about his disciple; frightened he was the wrong man with the wrong stuff at the right time in history for seizing the revolutionary moment when building the omnipotent nanny state was possible.
Indeed, Obama's falling painfully short of the transformational expectations that he raised as a candidate and president-elect; falling painfully short of the standard set by Alinsky himself for a revolutionary leader: the great charismatic personality who exudes confidence, power and vision; who enthralls the masses with his rhetoric and bends them to his will as they eat out of his hand. For the mediocre Barack Obama is not such a man and could never be such a man: he’s charismatic light and a poor, ineffective speaker who projects an image of weakness, cluelessness, confusion, uncertainty and drift. By now Alinsky’s image of Obama, the fantasy view of a national and world social redeemer held by millions during the campaign, would be shattered as he fails every test of character and leadership and sinks like a stone in domestic and international esteem...with fewer and fewer people taking him seriously.
Indeed, by now Alinsky would be disillusioned with Obama and dying of grief; he’d be moaning that the revolution is imperiled and Obama, the Savior of Hope and Change, has become its worst nightmare-setting back by generations all the progress that’s been made in radicalizing the government, the universities, the media and culture. No, Alinsky’s jubilation on Election Day would have evaporated by now as doubt and gloom set in that he’s lived his life in vain; and that his vision of a bloodless revolution in America is gone forever never to return ruined by Barack Obama who's causing
THE DEATH OF THE UTOPIAN DREAM.
BARACK OBAMA IS THE SIGN
THE LEFT IS INITS END TIME
"THERE'S NOT A SINGLE STITCH OF EVIDENCE
that the microseismic events caused by fracking (equivalent to dropping a gallon of milk on the floor) has influence over major seismic activity" says Stanford University Geophysicist and hydraulic fracturing expert Mark Zoback-a former Obama administration Energy Department advisor (see). Indeed, frigging anti-fracking nuts can't name one single major earthquake caused by fracking-which originate from stess buildup occuring miles below the surface (well below where fracking is done). NOT ONE!
NEVERTHELESS, FRACKING HAS ITS OTHER PERILS
AND MUST STOP NOW TO AVOID SUCH
1. Reduced dependency on foreign oil.
2. Increased employment
3. Economic growth
Fracking strikes at the heart of Obama's (the Left's) crackpot scheme to create a more perfect dependency Union on government and must be lied about, demonized and outlawed. To this I say: