BARACK OBAMA, JIMMY CARTER, NUCLEAR IRAN AND THE OMINOUS SIGN OF 444

   

 

On January 20, 1981, 20 minutes after Ronald Reagan was sworn in as the 40th President of the United States, the humiliating, agonizing Iran Hostage Crisis came to a sudden and unexpected end. Having started on November 4, 1979 (nine months into the Iranian Revolution) it lasted for 1 year,  2 months, and 17 days or 444 days (see). And since that memorable day the triplet number 444 became for this country a numeric symbol and sign of that crisis; a crisis ultimately caused by Reagan's predecessor Jimmy Carter a man of staggering stupidity and blindness who let himself be duped by the radical Shiite cleric Ayatollah Khomeini into thinking he was a Jeffersonian democrat wanting to replace the oppressive (but progressive) pro-Western constitutional monarchy of Shah Reza Pahlavi with a free and open Western type parliamentary democracy protecting the rights of minorities and women.

 

 

The Shah who banished Khomeini from Iran because of his subversive activities to overthrow his rule desperately tried to reason with Carter that he was being lied to and deceived and would live to regret it. He told Carter the truth about Khomeini: that he was a regressive, reactionary, Shiite fundamentalist who'd replace his progressive, modernizing pro-Western regime (an enlightened monarchy by 18th century standards) with a brutal, oppressive, anti-Western medieval theocracy where Khomeini would  be both Pope and King uniting the powers of church (mosque) and state in an absolute totalitarian dictatorship based on the 7th century Median model of the Prophet Mohammed.

 

But Carter ignored the Shah. Listening instead to reports that Khomeini was a "saintly man of God," a "Moslem Mahatma Gandhi"and "peace loving democratic reformer" who wouldn't hurt a fly, Carter withdrew his support from the Shah (who fled to Egypt) and let Khomeini come to power. But in doing so (as the Shah warned) Carter midwifed the anti-American, freedom hating Iranian Revolution which made the Koran, Sharia Law  and Jihad (war against all infidels) the basis of a new Iran far more oppressive and unjust than the Shah's regime. Indeed, no sooner did Khomeini seize power becoming Iran's Supreme Leader (Allah's absolute agent on Earth) than he viciously turned on America and Jimmy Carter. Demonizing our country as the "Great Satan," and enemy of Allah, Islam and all that's holy and good, Khomeini sent hundreds and thousands of his followers into the streets of Tehran chanting "Death to America!"  as they burned US flags and Carter in effigy. From the start of Khomeini's murderous, fanatical, jihadist regime ("war is good" is one of his famous sayings) there was a constant drum beat of anti-American propaganda and hate until November 4, 1979 disaster struck: a militant gang of pro-Khomeini college students stormed the US embassy in Tehran, and with Khomeini's blessing held our diplomats hostage while he ridiculed us daily as powerless, pathetic and weak. 

The hostage crisis was an act of Islamic Jihad (holy war) against the United States; it was the first such act since the Barbary Wars of the early 19th century when US merchantmen were captured by Islamic pirates and were either held hostage for ransom or put in chains the slaves of Moslem masters.

Therefore, the triplet number 444 in one respect is a symbol of evil* for our country-the evil of an implacable Islamic supremacist regime at war with America, modernity, and democratic freedom as inspired by the Koran** and the radical jihadist teachings of the Ayatollah Khomeini.

*On the other hand, the freeing of the hostages during Reagan's inaugural was very definitely an auspicious sign that Reagan's strong, unwavering anti-communist leadership would defeat the Soviet Union and liberate millions from its tyranny. Indeed, when multiplied by 4 444 gives us the number 1776 the year of America's revolutionary founding and liberation from Great Britain.

**The Koran is made up of 114 books, and this number 114 gives us the date 11-4 when the Koran inspired Iranian Hostage Crisis began.

 

But now 36 years into the dreadful jihadist Iranian Revolution and on the fatal date of July 14th (the anniversary of the terrifying, murderous French Revolution) in Vienna-a city once occupied by Nazi troops-and in a hotel (The Imperial) where the victorious Adolf Hitler stayed to celebrate his peaceful conquest of Austria, the worst, weakest and blindest US President since Jimmy Carter finalized a dangerous deal with genocidal Islamonazi Iran on its illegal nuclear weapons program. And strangely on that very day, as you shall see, the ominous number 444 providentially I believe reappeared connecting the day of Barack Obama's ill-starred election to his Munich-like nuke deal with Iran, portending great evil and woe for our country, the Middle East and world.

But before I venture into this it needs be said that the number 4, for whatever reason, as you will see, is the most significant and meaningful number in Barack Obama's political life; and is strangely written all over his policies and dealings with radical supremacist Shiite Iran. Here is what I mean.

 

OBAMA'S ELECTION

THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER

 

 

 Obama, who was born on the 4th day of August 1961 (44 years after the Russian Revolution*) was elected 44th President on November 4, 2008 (the 44th week of the year) which ominously landed on the 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis which painfully lasted for 444 days. Clearly, as you will see below, the day of Obama's election prefigured (as I predicted it would herethat Obama would be as weak and foolish in dealing with Iran as was hapless, gutless, senseless Jimmy Carter. And that Obama would surpass Carter as the greatest and most dangerous enabler of Iranian power.

*1917

 

THE 4TH MONTH OF APRIL

OBAMA BREAKS WITH BUSH ADMINISTRATION OVER IRAN

 

 
On the 8th* day of the 4th month of April 2009, following an Iran policy review, the Obama administration made its first fatal mistake with Iran by announcing it would participate fully in the P5+1 talks with them. This was a departure from the Bush administration’s policy requiring Iran to first meet UN demands to stop uranium enrichment before directly engaging in talks. Indeed, Obama's God awful, dangerous, legacy driven, appeasement nuclear deal, which greatly enhances the wealth and power of an aggressive, expansionary, totalitarian terror state  (a de facto nuclear power via its "Axis of Evil" partner North Korea, see) began with this foolish policy change.

*8 is a multiple of 4 twice, or 4+4.
 
 

THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE IN THE 4TH MONTH OF OBAMA'S PRESIDENCY

HIS MOSLEM OUTREACH INITIATIVE TO IRAN

 

 

Now exactly 4 months and 16* days into his first term (see) Barack Obama on the 4th day of June delivered his historic "New Beginning" speech in Cairo reaching out to the Islamic world in an attempt to heal US/Moslem relations which had been damaged during the Bush years. But as if it were a sign warning that his Mideast policies would achieve no such thing, that instead they'd greatly benefit Iran and exacerbate the regional conflict between Sunni and Shia started during the Bush years**, the date of the speech ominously fell on the 26th anniversary of Ali Khamenei succeeding his mentor Ayatollah Khomeini as the supreme religious and political head of Iran (see). Indeed, in retrospect and unplanned it seems that the "New Beginning" was mostly to benefit Iran as no Moslem country in the region has gained more from Obama. For Obama's policies on pro-Iran Iraq (premature withdrawal of our troops), pro-Iran Syria (non-intervention in the civil war) and Iran's nuclear weapons program (the lifting of sanctions, unfreezing of assets and giving them a pathway to a bomb) have enabled its power, wealth and military strength at the expense of US influence in the region and the power of the Sunni Moslem states (see).

* 16 is multiple of 4 4 times, or 4 squared (4x4).

**The Iraq War Resolution or H J Res 114 (giving us the number of books in the Koran and the date of the Iran Hostage Crisis) was passed by Congress on 10-10-2002. Amazingly, that day was  the 1322nd anniversary of the Battle of Karbala in present day Iraq-the first battle between Sunnis and Shiites in history (see and see). You can't make this stuff up.

 

OBAMA'S 144TH DAY IN OFFICE

IRAN'S GREEN MOVEMENT

But no sooner did Obama give his speech than 8 days later on June 12th* (the 144th day of the Obama administration, see) a rigged presidential election in Iran, which gave the unpopular Ahmadenijad a second term as president, caused massive protests in Tehran and across the country. Called the Green Movement it was violently suppressed with thousands of arrests and many deaths by police and government militia forces (see). But instead of rallying to the cause of freedom, as Ronald Reagan did for Lech Walesa and Poland's Solidarity Movement (see), Obama instead "ignored the Green Party's request for financial and other aid..... and squandered the opportunity to undermine the government," as Rick Santorum said (see). Indeed, Obama feared to vigorously speak out against the government crackdown least he rub the mullahs the wrong way and hurt his chances of kowtowing and appeasing his way to getting a nuke deal for his legacy 

*12 is a multiple of 4 thrice, or 4+4+4.

 

THE 4TH MONTH OF 2015

THE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT

 

On the 2nd day of the 4th month of April of this year (the 2264th* day of the Obama presidency, see), after 8 grueling days of negotiations Obama and Iran reached a framework agreement for containing its nuclear weapons program-which it continued to deny having. Oddly, the deadline date for these talks was March 31st. But the deadline was reached without an agreement and talks carried over into the 4th month of April. Indeed, thIs foolish framework was agreed upon on April 1st, April Fool's Day. But to avoid all the ridicule of announcing it then it was postponed to the following day. 

* 2264 is the 64th number of the 2200 series. 64 is the cube of 4 or 4x4x4.

 

THE 2444TH DAY

THE DEAL

BLOCKING IRAN'S 4 PATHWAYS TO A NUCLEAR BOMB?

Iran, of course (as I mentioned above), has a fifth pathway to a nuclear bomb with long time, Axis of Evil ally nuclear North Korea. In North Korea Iran can covertly do all of the above, and Barack Obama knows it.

This is truly, truly extraordinary and at the same time very frightening. We have seen that as a sign portending terrible things to come with our  deadly enemy "Death to America" radical Iran Barack Obama was elected 44th President on the 4th of November 2008. We saw that this date ominously coincided with 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis where American diplomats and their staff were held hostage by Iran for 444 days. Now this is the part that frightens me. If I add 2444 days to the date November 4, 2008 (2444 is encoded with the triplet number 444) it brings us to July 14, 2015 the dark day which will live in infamy when Barack Obama, the weakest and worst president since Jimmy Carter (who midwifed the Iranian Revolution that gave us the 444 day hostage crisis) finalized a deal with Islamonazi Iran on its nuclear weapons program.

Keep in mind (as I said above) that the deal was closed at the Imperial Hotel in Vienna where Adolf Hitler stayed in 1938 to celebrate his peaceful conquest of Austria; also keep in mind (as I said) that July 14th was the 226th anniversary of the failed and murderous French Revolution. Oddly, France was a signatory to this terrible deal. And France was the place where the Ayatollah Khomeini (founder of Iran's radical jihadlst regime) was living in exile before his return to Iran in early 1979. Could this too have oracular meaning signifying the ultimate failure or downfall of Iran's revolutionary regime? That the nuclear mullahs will miscalculate as a result of this deal and strike our country or Israel and incur the wrath of either or both suffering devastating consequences? Or will the Green Movement rise up again more powerful than before and this time succeed in toppling the evil mullah regime? That is the outcome all of us pray for.

Nevertheless, 444 is a portentous sign that this ill-conceived nuke deal with Iran, and the billions in appeasement funds we are insanely giving to them, will have evil consequences for our country and the region in the short term. For implacable, "Death to America," radical Iran, whether we want to admit it or not, is very much at war with us. What started with the hostage crisis where no Americans died evolved 4 years later into the suicidal terrorist killing of 241 US soldiers at the Marine barracks in Beruit executed by Hezbollah jihadis who Iran to this day honors as holy martyrs (see). Moreover, scores of US servicemen, 500 or more, were killed in Iraq and Afghanistan by Iran backed anti-US forces (see). And despite this "historic" nuke deal Iran's anti-US jihad goes on in Afghanistan as the mulllahs continue to supply the Taliban (and their al Qaida allies?) with arms, ammo, cash and training to kill more of our troops, as reported here.

 

ARGO

THE 44TH MONTH OF OBAMA'S PRESIDENCY

It is astonishingly ironic that just three weeks before Obama's ill-starred reelection (it was the 44th month of his presidency, see) that Warner Brothers released Ben Affleck's Acadamy Award winning "Argo" a film about the Iran Hostage Crisis (see).

This outstanding film, so it seems, was an ominous sign that if Obama were reelected president his second term would be as disastrous as Jimmy Carter's first term. And now with Obama's dangerous deal on Iran's nuclear program finalized on the 2444th day after his election (the 29th anniversary of the 444 day hostage crisis) we see that is unfortunately what is happening.  The re-Carterization of US foreign policy is now complete. God help us all.

 

RELATED

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA: THE GREAT ENABLER OF RADICAL IRAN

THE PERILS OF A WAR WEARY NATION IN THE TRAGIC AGE OF BARACK OBAMA 

TURKEY, OBAMA AND THE WORSENING CONFLICT WITH ISLAM, OR THE RE-CARTERIZATION OF US FOREIGN POLICY

OBAMA, TURKEY AND MY PREDICTION OF THE RE-CARTERIZATION OF US FOREIGN POLICY

WHAT OBAMA DOESN’T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT IRAN’S OFFSHORE NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES

HAS OBAMA’S NUKE DEAL WITH “AXIS OF EVIL” IRAN MADE HIM THE NEW RONALD REAGAN?

 

 FORWARD EMAILS TO

< p style="box-sizing: border-box; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; text-transform: none; color: #3f4549; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; margin: 0px 0px 15px; letter-spacing: normal; text-indent: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; border: 0px; padding: 0px;" align="center"> reninvest2013@aol.com

UNDERLYING HILLARY FATIGUE IS HILLARY’S FATIGUE (POLITICO DEBATE ADDED)

Chuck Todd: "There's Something Just Not Quite Right" About Hillary Clinton's Campaign | Video | RealClearPolitics

 
 
 
 
HILLARY CLINTON: A SPENT FORCE 
 

What's not right about Hillary's campaign is Hillary Clinton. She's not up to the task of running for president (or being president) and it shows on her old, tired, ill-looking face, and in speech after speech after dull, lifeless, uninspiring speech-which puts you to sleep they're so ineffectual, bloodless and weak. Rapidly aging, worn down and spent it's no secret why Hillary is a poorer candidate now than in 2008 when she was seven years younger and hadn't exhausted so much of her strength ranging the world as Obama's failed secretary of state. Those four, hard laborious years (pushing herself over the edge) of stress and strain and disappointment (and enduring an asinine prez) took their toll on Hillary's health aging her considerably beyond her 67 years. If she had stayed in the senate, instead of taking the bait and heading state, she'd have more  pizzazz and vigor today, and be a more dynamic candidate like the older Bernie Sanders whose zeal belies his age. But now she lacks the energy, stamina, health and strength for the grueling fights and battles ahead made worse by charges of lawlessness, scandals, cover-ups and lies (Benghazi, missing emails, the foundation, and the like) that she'll exhaustingly claim is part of a vast right-wing plot (of old, sexist Republican white men) to criminally deny America its first lady prez. But it's not going to work as America is looking for a trustworthy leader with good American values and moral strength-which excludes the nearly burnt out, mendacious Hillary.

Unfortunately for Hillary the more we see of her the less presidential and more diminished she seems. An incredible shrinking woman falling in public esteem. Fewer and fewer voters think she's fit for high office; or see her as Commander-in-Chief heading our armed forces in this time of growing crisis, and confronting Putin, al Qaida, Iran and cruel, sadistic ISIS.

Billed as one of the world's greatest women and an icon of power and success Hillary radiates neither quality as she struggles with her declining strength to seem positive, upbeat and optimistic. It's pathetic watching her trying to fake it and think she can make it while running from Fox and the press.

 Hillary is a boring, ineffective, wearisome candidate who can't excite her base like Obama did in 2008, and her charismatic husband 16 years earlier; hence her steady drop in the polls with independents who she needs to win. The bottom line for this woman is this: Hillary fatigue is growing because Hillary is fatigued. She is terribly, abysmally tired and America is tiring of her not being the awesome, majestic, dignified woman (another Margret Thatcher) of Media Matters, MSM, and her left-wing propaganda machine. More like Minnie Mouse than Margret Thatcher, that's who Hillary Clinton is.

 

 Getting harder and harder to choose as President.

 

POSTSCRIPT

POLITICO DEBATE

Hillary Clinton agrees to appear before Benghazi panel · Politico · Disqus

 

Your desperation is palpable.

 

Independents are turning away from Hillary in droves. Without them she's lost. And she's fallen behind the front running GOP candidates in several key swing states.Moreover, her unfavorability rating is more than twice that of Bernie Sanders 46% to 20%. This wasn't the case in 2007 when Hillary was soaring above McCain, Obama and everyone else, and the independents were with her.

 

 
Yes, I keep hearing this over and over again from republicans. I'm not even a big Hillary fan. I'd much rather see Sanders in there but I'm realistic and see that he has little to no shot in the long run. It's amazing what people will obsess on in hopes of seeing some bigger truth that doesn't exist. All these people who keep laser focusing on Hillary's unfavorability rating fail to address the fact that all of the candidates suffer from the exact same thing because this country is polarized thanks to all the hyperbole and manufactured rage that the media puts out there. If Sanders ever jumped ahead you could be darn sure the far right and their press would slam him to China and send his unfavorabilty rating through the roof. But, like Trump for the left, the right is delighted to see him in there causing a problem for that side.
 
The election isn't for another 16 months so anything can happen. But at this point, Hillary has been smart and pretty much kept quiet as the far right does its usual slamming of her. And through all of it, she sill sits comfortably ahead in the polls against anyone the right has to offer up (except for Bush in one poll - Fox News - what a shocker). Sure, things could change, but the whole idea of independents "turning away from Hillary in droves" is wishful thinking at its best. They may not be thrilled with her but they see the options out there and they only make her look better.
 
ApolloSpeaks  FactsNotFox  
What you're missing is a greatly diminished woman from 2007 who is old beyond her 67 years and lacks the vitality, strength and vigorous health of her former pre-SoS self. Her four years of traveling the world and pushing herself beyond her limits to achieve historic and significant things in foreign policy (for herself and the great amateur) took their toll. And it shows not only in her sadly aged face, but in her weak, lackluster, uninspiring speeches. Her "keeping quiet" and not exerting herself is by design as too much of an effort (like the older and healthier Bernie Sanders is showing) would be terribly exhausting for her. Don't take my word for it. Compare Hillary's early 2007 campaign speeches to her recent speeches. It's apples and oranges. She's not the same woman..Eight years ago she was a far more effective candidate with more energy, stamina, zest and appeal. She could be exciting then. But not anymore. The force is no longer with her. You'll see that I'm right as the campaign progresses. Underlying "Hillary Fatigue" is Hillary's fatigue. 
 
Again, this whole idea that she's old and worn down is a right wing talking point that ignores the fact that she has no reason to come out charging right now. The republicans are doing their patented job of destroying each other to pieces. Her best chance is to let them do their thing as she slowly builds towards early next year. Yes, of course she's older, we all slow down. But if you think you're dealing with a woman who's no longer energized I think you'll be in for a big surprise.
 
 
LOL!!! You say there's no good reason for Hillary Clinton (who is aspiring to be the leader of the Free World)  to boldly and fearlessly come out  at this time charging and show real leadership on serious questions about her character, honesty, trustworthiness and integrity? There's no reason at this time for Hillary to show the nation and world- Putin, China, ISIS and Iran-that she's an Iron Lady with the strength of will and character of a Margaret Thatcher, someone to be respected, feared, trusted and reckoned with? Oh you fool. If Hillary could come out charging she would. Any woman candidate with real strength of character wouldn't hesitate to dynamically and dramatically assert themselves at every opportunity like Thatcher did when running for PM, and in defending her government.
 
No real leader would stand idly by giving insipid campaign speeches while they sink like a rock in the polls because of unanswered questions about scandals, cover-ups, contradictions and lies. This woman has no fight in her. There's no fire in her belly. It was there in 2008. It was there early in her tenure as Secretary of State when she tackled the job with zeal. But it's not there now; and you can see and sense that it evaporated by the time she left office. Hillary has physically deteriorated and changed for the worse. Which is why pro-Clinton pundits like NBC's Chuck Todd worried about Hillary's downward polling trend said to Andrea Mitchell (who agreed with him): "There's something just not quite right with the Hillary Clinton campaign... there's nothing BIG, BOLD, BOOM." What's not right is Hillary. She's Minnie Mouse not a BIG BOLD BOOMING leader like Margaret Thatcher. They'll be no surprises for me, friend. The BIG BOLD non-existent HIllary in your head is not the greatly diminished, mediocre woman half-running for office. Sooner or later you'll be mugged by reality, Hilla-reality.
 
 
"There's no good reason for Hillary Clinton who is aspiring to be the leader of the Free World to boldly and fearlessly come out charging..."The election is sixteen months away. Sixteen months. This is all more media drama and hyperbolic talking points put out there to excite everyone and keep them tuning in. What Hillary does now will be forgotten like Donald Trump by this time next year. If she's lucky and plays it right, anyway.
 
 
The Clinton machine has built up an image of Hillary as one of the world's greatest women-a larger than life figure.. But the more the public sees the poor reality (the mediocre Hillary) the more disillusioned they become with her. They're not blown away, not overawed like they imagined they would be from all the hype. That's why Todd in his interview uses the adjectives "big" and "bold." This is the kind of extraordinary, remarkable, ideal woman Todd, Mitchell and others on the left want Hillary to be. But she's even less of that today than in 2008. You believe that such a women is innate in Hillary. That there's a giant inside her that she's intentionally hiding for some inexplicable reason. And that at the right time she will unleash this giant and surprise people like me and soar in the polls again winning the day. I say that you're mistaken. That you will wait forever to see this ideal Hillary because she doesn't exist.
 
 

RELATED 

THE FINAL TRANSFORMATION OF HILLARY CLINTON AFTER THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RACE

WAS THE BIRTH OF HILLARY’S FEMALE GRANDCHILD A SIGN SHE WAS BORN TO BE AMERICA’S FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT? 

BERNIE SANDERS VS. HILLARY CLINTION: THE RACE FOR FDR’S OBSOLETE NEW DEAL LEGACY 

 HILLARY CLINTON ANNOUNCES CANDIDACY FOR PRESIDENT ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF FDR’S DEATH. DOES THIS SIGNAL HER SUCCESS? OR HER DEFEAT AND THE DEATH OF NEW DEAL LIBERALISM

RESET AND OUTREACH: SIGNS OF REVERSAL FOR HILLARY’S PRESIDENTIAL DREAMS?

DID HILLARY’S POST-PRIMARY MEETING WITH OBAMA ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF RFK’S DEATH FORESHADOW THE COLLAPSE OF HER PRESIDENTIAL DREAMS

IS OBAMA ONCE AGAIN DOOMING HILLARY’S RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY? 

 RESET AND OUTREACH: SIGNS OF REVERSAL FOR HILLARY’S PRESIDENTIAL DREAMS?

OBAMA, HILLARY CLINTON, THE COLLAPSE OF IRAQ AND 2016

 

HAS OBAMA’S NUKE DEAL WITH “AXIS OF EVIL” IRAN MADE HIM THE NEW RONALD REAGAN?

 
 
 
REAGAN VS OBAMA ON IRAN
 
 Reagan broke the law to free 7 American hostages held by Iran backed Hezbollah terrorists And he certainly would have broke the law to free the 4 American prisoners held by Iran. What patriotic American President wouldn't?
 
Ronald Reagan was willing to break the law and illegally ship weapons through Israel to Iran to secure the release of seven US hostages held by Hezbollah in Lebanon. But Obama refused to use the tremendous leverage of $150 billion in frozen Iranian assets to secure the release of four innocent Americans held in Iranian jails. Reagan would have used the assets to free the prisoners, or broken the law to do so. And Obama wants to be regarded as the new Ronald Reagan comparing himself in his dealings with Iran to Reagan's negotiations with Gorbachev in ending the Cold War? It's mind-boggling!
 
 
The truth is the gap between Reagan's negotiations with Gorbachev and Obama's with Iran is so wide you can sail an oceanliner through it. But don't tell that to Obamunist liberals like Bill Scher. Scher a Contributor Editor to Politico and Contributor to Real Clear Politics posted an article on RCP absurdly  stating that Obama is the new Ronald Reagan and that he and Reagan "walked similar paths of peace." Scher, in fact, thinks that there's no substance to  charges made by Rush Limbaugh and other conservatives that Reagan would have walked out on Iranian negotiators like he did with Gorbachev and the Soviets at Reykjavík. In comparing Obama to Reagan Sher is hugely, hugely mistaken. He seems to know less about the real Ronald Reagan than he does  about the real Barack Obama. There's no Ronald Wilson Reagan in Barack Obama.  Compared to Reagan Obama is a mental and moral pipsqueak, his ideological, intellectual and moral opposite.
 
 
 
Indeed, can anyone imagine Nuclear Freeze Obama (he, Biden and Kerry participated in that hysterical leftist movement that Reagan rightly ignored) finding the courage and strength to walk out on Gorbachev at Reykjavik? Just as Obama canceled the missile defense shield for Poland and Eastern Europe (on the 70th anniversary of Stalin's invasion of Poland) to appease the unappeasable, unresettable Vladimir Putin so had he been President in the 1980s he would have likely canceled the deployment of Cruise and Pershing missiles in Europe to appease the millions of frightened protesters  and fearmongering Soviets. Or he would have canceled it out of fear that their deployment could start WW III like the soft-on-Soviet wussies believed at the time-and just like he now believes that the only alternative to his awful, bogus, dangerous nuke deal is war.
 
"Our enemies may be irrational, even outright insane,driven by nationalism, religion, ethnicity or ideology. They do not fear the United States for its diplomatic skills or the number of automobiles 
and software programs it produces. They respect only the firepower of our tanks, 
planes and helicopter gunships."
 
 
But foreshadowing the likely disastrous consequences of Obama's atrociously bad deal with Iran was his terrible nuclear arms reduction treaty that he made with then Russian President Dimitri Medeved in April 2010 (see). For just four years later Vladimir Putin, in defiance of the US and EU, ordered the invasion of Ukraine and annexation of Crimea. Now that the mullahs are emboldened by Obama's butt kissing deal we shouldn't be surprised to see some shocking act of aggression in the years ahead committed by them or a terrorist proxy.
 
But to return to Bill Scher's badly confused article equating anti-Reagan Obama with the 40th President the truth about Reagan's strong anti-Communist administration-where he relentlessly attacked the "Evil Empire" from every conceivable angle (economic, political, military, geostrategic) short of war-and his dealings with Gorbachev at Reykjavík is this:
 

Those eight strong years of Ronald Reagan (as Gorbachev admitted) brought the Soviets to their knees. He made them realize that their cause against the West was hopeless. And that is what ended the Cold War.

 

By the time Reagan got through with Gorbachev he was no longer a believing communist.

It's really that simple. Indeed, after Reagan's famous walk out on the Reykjavík Summit Gorbachev said that it forced him to realize (as if he had a revelation) that "a new world was possible." Meaning he now saw a world of peace without the East-West Conflict. In other words, Reykjavík shattered Gorbachev's ideological illusions. Reagan caused Gorbachev to lose faith in Marxist-Leninism the governing philosophy of the Soviet Union and evil dynamic underlying the Cold War. Indeed, Reykjavik made Gorbachev realize that the vision of the  inevitability of Communism triumphing over Democratic Capitalism in a Socialist world order at the end of history was a dangerous leftist utopian lie. And his disillusionment with Communism made real peace with the West possible as there was no longer any reason to continue the conflict. Indeed, those who hold, like myself, that Reagan's walkout at Reykjavik was the pivotal moment that ended the Cold War and liberated millions (the begining of the end) are 1000% correct

But for Bill Sher and those who wrongly see in Barack Obama a new Ronald Reagan defeating radical Iranian Shiite Islam (Khomenism) like Reagan defeated Soviet Communism my question to them  is this: who is the Ayatollah Gorbachev, the great Iranian democratic reformer who will replace the theocratic sharia state with individual rights and political liberty? Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei? If so has Khamenei and his regime reached the same point of ideological disillusionment with Islamism-Khomenism that Gorbachev and the Soviets did with Marxist-Leninism? Does Khamenei now realize that the imperialist vision of the Prophet Mohammed of a one world Moslem state (Islamic world domination) at the end of history (achieved through jihad) is as falsely utopian and ridiculous as Communism? Has Obama broken Khamenei's spirit and will to victory like Reagan broke Gorbachev's? Has he and the mullahs given up the fiction that the Koran is God's absolutely perfect and final revelation of truth to mankind like Gorbachev  and the Soviets once believed in the scientifically "infallible" Communist Manifesto? In other words, is Islam for the mullahs no longer the panacea and "ANSWER" to all of humanity's ills like Socialism was for Gorbachev and the Soviets? 

Or has Obama completely failed at this? That unlike Reagan with the Soviets he's been completely ineffective in changing the hearts and minds of Khamenei and the mullahs? That they are as ideologically and spiritually committed as ever to their revolution? That they are dead certain that God and history are on their side in the struggle against America, Israel and the West, and that victory will inevitably be their's?  I see no evidence that Khamenei is the Ayatollah Gorbachev and that his regime has changed direction. An enemy is defeated when they've lost the will to victory. I don't see this loss of will. "Death to America!" "Death to Israel!" The Iranian revolution and jihad goes on.  Iran is still an "Axis of Evil" state driven by Khomenism.

 

RELATED

WHAT DO RONALD REAGAN AND BARACK OBAMA HAVE IN COMMON? 

OBAMA THINKING HE’S REAGAN CRAZILY PREDICTS HILLARY CAN BE BUSH 41 

 

MR. OBAMA: DO A JIMMY CARTER WITH GITMO AND SAVE YOURSELF FROM BEING THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER (SATIRE)

Republican showdown over fate of Guantanamo - Austin Wright and Jeremy Herb - POLITICO

 

 

MR. PRESIDENT:

The completely worthless Jimmy Carter who presided over a post-Vietnam America in retreat, defeat and steep decline recently criticized your post-Iraq War, lead from behind, retreat and defeat foreign policy as a disaster far worse than his own. 'Not since the end of World War II,' implied Carter, 'has American power, influence, standing and prestige been at such a dangerously low ebb on the world stage." Now, Mr. President, you need to act and show the world that Carter is wrong about you; that when you leave office your foreign policy will be no better or worse than his; that they'll be practically indistinguishable for the great harm and little good that they've done to this country.

And what better way to accomplish this than by following up on your historic deal with nuclear-to-be, terrorist Iran, and normalizing relations with democracy hating communist Cuba (as you did today), than by doing a Jimmy Carter with Guantanamo Bay? Indeed, just as Carter gave the Panama Canal lands back to Panama now is the time, after closing Gitmo and freeing its inmates, to dismantle our naval base there and give it back to Cuba with compensation in the millions.

Indeed, Mr. President, make Cuba whole again like Carter made Panama whole (and Ariel Sharon Gaza). Heed Castro's just demand and return to his people what's rightfully theirs. The least harm they could do is replace our naval base with a Russian, Chinese or Iranian base (for their nuclear subs). Or maybe in the future when ISIS has a navy its terror ships will find a home there-a jihad port in the Western Hemisphere to threaten the US. Do this little thing, Mr. President, and you will leave office with head erect knowing that historians won't rank you the worst president ever; knowing you'll be tied with Jimmy Carter; knowing that between you and Abe Lincoln they'll be 41 instead of 42 presidents: misery loves company, Mr. President, and you and Carter will be on bottom looking with envy at everyone else  It's the least you can do for your legacy of ashes, disaster and choking  dust.

 

RELATED

TURKEY, OBAMA AND THE WORSENING CONFLICT WITH ISLAM, OR THE RE-CARTERIZATION OF US FOREIGN POLICY

REPLACE HAMILTON WITH CAITLYN ON $10 BILL AND SCREW BEN SHAPIRO (EXPLANATORY POSTSCRIPT ADDED)

 

"If you are cheering rather than praying for a man who has mutilated himself due to mental illness, you are part of the problem." - Ben Shapiro

 
 Zero Ben Shapiro and steaming hot transgender hero Caitlyn Jenner
 
Ben Shapiro is wrong, and should grow a pair and admit it. Caitlyn Jenner is a Profile of Courage and not a mentally ill leftist freak confused about her gender like Shapiro absurdly thinks. It takes balls for a man to mutilate his balls and become a hot ball-less voluptuous female babe. (Just look at her curvaceous Beyonce-like body and tell me you're not pining for love.) 
 
Indeed, if our girlie man prez had one once of Caitlyn's courage the monsters of ISIS would soon be defeated; and the dangerous surge in domestic ISIS jihadis would stop and quickly die.  But Obama is more like Shapiro than Jenner; and we are losing the war to these LGBT-hating 7th century retrograde savages.
 
 
 
Those who are looking to replace first treasury secretary  Alexander Hamilton on the $10 bill with an American woman of note need look no further as the obvious choice is national treasure Caitlyn Jenner-the PERFECT TEN for the New Age of 21st century anything goes once great degenerate America./sarcasm
 

Ripped off from Zero Hedge

 

POSTSCRIPT

 

DIDN'T I KNOW THAT JENNER IS STILL A MAN WHEN I WROTE THE ABOVE?

 

OF COURSE!

 

 
 

HE, BRUCE, IS STILL A MAN WITH PHONY BREAST IMPLANTS AND HORMONE SHOTS AND TEN HOURS FACIAL SURGERY. BTW HE STILL HAS BRUCE'S VOICE ALONG WITH HIS PENIS.  BRUCE IS A DELUSIONAL OLD FART OF A MAN 

 

APOLLO LOL

 

  

 

I was waiting for someone like you to tell me what I already know. My post was anticipatory written in advance of Jenner's complete transformation into a pathetic sexual freak. As Jenner's partial transformation doesn't change his inner emptiness and misery he will eventually want to finish it impelled by the illusion that it will give him the happiness that's painfully eluding him. And as Jenner loves and craves all the national attention he's been getting he will want to revive it after it's gone. What better way to grab the spotlight again than for Jenner to announce his "courageous" decision to go all the way with the knife and cut out his manhood mutilating himself into a sick, unnatural, perverse, surgically made woman. If this transition occurs before Obama leaves office he might award Jenner (in drag) with "The Presidential Medal of Freedom" in some special new category.

 

 

 

wsurfs .  ApolloSpeaks 

 

Bruce Jenner is NOT nutless...! He STILL has his male parts so your post doesn't wash..!



 
But for how long? As Bruce pathologically craves public attention once the intoxication of the limelight wears off and he's practically forgotten "courageously" completing his transition into Caitlyn is the only way he'll get it back. I'm predicting that the nut will be nutless.



QUESTIONS FOR OBAMA ON THE CHATTANOOGA SHOOTING AND THE SILENCE OF IRAN

 

Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Marziyeh Afkham strongly condemning the terrorist bombing attack on a French gas station killing one and injuring many.

 

QUESTION FOR BARACK OBAMA:

 

Why haven't your wonderful, celebrating, “denuked” peace partners in normalizing , moderating, truly Islamic Iran condemned Thursday's deadly terror attack in Chattanooga? Why are they silent when five brave, innocent, patriotic Marines were killed and two others wounded? Did they not recently condemn such attacks in and on other Western countries such as France and Italy? Then why are the mullahs mute about Chattanooga just days after you agreed to unfreeze $150 billion in frozen assets? Where's their gratitude? Where's their Islamic goodness and heart?

 

 Indeed, Mr. President,  in January Iran condemned the terrorist killing of the Charley Hebdo 12 in Paris (see); and likewise last month they  condemned a terror attack near Lyons where a jihadi carrying an ISIS flag detonated several small explosive devices at a gas station killing one and injuring many (see). And just last week Tehran was quick to condemn an ISIS car bomb attack on the Italian consulate in downtown Cairo which killed one civilian and wounded nine (see). Horrible, terrible crimes.

 

But on Chattanooga we hear nothing, Mr. President. Nothing. No tweets from Iran's Supreme Leader or from "moderate" President Rouhani expressing their condolences to America and the grieving families. Nothing. Not a word from Iran's  foreign ministry which issued the condemnation on the other three Western attacks. Why, Mr. President? Why? We thought you appeased the Iranians and satisfied most if not all of  the many grievances they hold against us? That you won over a good part of their hearts and minds? How could they be so cold and indifferent after all that you've done for them? Is it because they continue to delight in the killing of our "satanic" soldiers of which they killed and wounded  hundreds in Iraq and Afghanistan in terrorist attacks? Is it because they are secretly praising the radical Moslem killer and are hoping more like him  rise up and strike? Could it be that the only regret the mullahs have for the attack is that too few of our soldiers were killed? And that the killer was Sunni not Shiite?

You have a lot of explaining to do, Mr. President. A lot.

 

 

Navy sailor Randall Smith and Marines Carson Holmquist, Thomas Sullivan, David Wyatt and Skip Wells were killed by Islamic terrorist gunman Mohammad Abdulazeez because they were the "satanic" infidel soldiers of the US, enemies of Allah and Islam.

 

FORWARD EMAILS TO

reninvest2013@aol.com

 

 

 

< p style="vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; text-transform: none; color: #546673; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 16px; line-height: 1.55em; font-family: 'Source Sans Pro', 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; margin: 6px 0px 0px; letter-spacing: normal; text-indent: 0px; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: transparent; -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: center; background-color: #ffffff;"> 

WHAT OBAMA DOESN’T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT IRAN’S OFFSHORE NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES

 
 
Hitler in Vienna (1938, the year of Munich) addressing a cheering pro-Nazi crowd from the balcony of the Imperial Hotel where US and Iran concluded a worse than Munich like deal on Iran's nuclear weapons program (see). 
 
 
July 16, 1945. US detonates history's first nuclear bomb.
 
Just two days before the 70th anniversary of America exploding history’s first nuclear bomb*, in a city formerly occupied by Nazi Germany, at a hotel where a victorious Adolf Hitler resided, the US and Iran ominously finalized a “historic” but worthless agreement on Iran’s illegal nuclear weapons program. Obama claims that the deal shuts down EVERY pathway to Iran developing nuclear weapons. But what Obama doesn’t say or want you to know is that Iran can continue to enrich uranium and develop nukes secretly and with impunity thousands of miles away in a distant country friendly to its evil interests. What Obama doesn’t say or want you to know is that in 2012 Iran signed a Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement with its "Axis of Evil" partner nuclear North Korea. What Obama doesn’t want you or anyone to know is that this agreement covers military as well as civilian science and technology projects. What he doesn’t want you to know is that Iran has nuclear scientists and missile technicians in North Korea developing ICBMs for the Norks to carry their nuclear bombs across the pacific to the US.
*July 14th was the 226th anniversary of the FAILED French Revolution.
  
 
Mass murdering Syrian dictator Bashar al Assad receiving a delegation from North Korea. The Norks had an illegal covert nuclear program with Syria and most likely have one with Syria's partner Iran in North Korea.
 

Indeed, what Obama doesn’t want you to know is that when he says his agreement with Iran closes down all their pathways to a nuclear bomb he means only their domestic pathways,  not the pathways open to them in North Korea. And if anyone doubts that the hard up, cash strapped Norks wouldn’t share their nuclear facilities with Iran (or sell them nukes off the shelf) then they need to be enlightened. They need to know that in 2007 the Norks were hard at work in building a secret, illegal nuclear weapons plant in Syria for mass murdering dictator Bashar al-Assad which (thank God) was destroyed by Israel. Indeed,  that very project in Syria, which was making the Norks  millions, made them the world’s worst and most dangerous nuclear proliferators.

Just as Saudi Arabia is a de facto nuclear power via Pakistan so is Iran via North Korea.
 
Alarmingly, North Korea’s nukes are for sale on the international market. To ISIS, al-Qaida, drug cartels, crime syndicates, anyone with the cash that’s in the market for nukes will find a willing seller in North Korea. And for the last three years Iran and the world’s most dangerous nuclear proliferators have been secretly working on science and technology projects in North Korea. As North Korea was developing a nuclear weapons plant for Iran’s ally Syria only a fool would doubt that they’re not enriching uranium and building bombs for Iran, or doing this jointly with their scientists and technicians. In short, Obama’s deal with Iran like Hitler's with Chamberlain at Munich is a charade and sham that like Nazi Germany has made Iran a more powerful, confident and emboldened state. The only way to ultimately prevent the Islamonazi  jihadist mullahs from becoming a nuclea power is to destroy North Korea's nuclear facilities along with Iran's. Or topple the mullahs like we toppled Saddam.
 

RELATED

BORDER SECURITY CHAOS, ILLEGAL ALIEN CRIME AND THE PROVIDENTIAL CANDIDACY OF DONALD TRUMP

 
 
 
 Before Barack Obama became president we had border security chaos and much illegal alien crime. But since the start of his thinly disguised open borders presidency the crime problem of illegals has gotten progressively worse for the victimized American people who are now being aroused by Donald Trump's brash presidential candidacy. Just look at these statistics from the border state of Texas and shudder: 
 
"Since 2008," says former governor Rick Perry " 203,000 illegal immigrants have been put in Texas' jails, and those illegals have been responsible for 3000 murders and 8000 sexual assaults."  Perry also warns that since 2008 "a record number of illegals from Syria, Pakistan and Afghanistan have been apprehended at the U.S.-Mexico border (see)." If these stats don't alarm you nothing will.
 
Now I'm no fan of Donald Trump's. Since he announced his candidacy for 2016 the only thing I liked about him were his Miss America Pageants. But that has changed. Though he's currently tied with Jeb Bush  in the polls Trump won't be the GOP nominee for president because he's not a serious candidate. But it appears to me, as it should to you, that in the firestorm Trump's unleashed over the crisis of criminal illegal aliens killing, raping and assaulting our citizens that The Donald is doing the work of Providence. Why do I say this? Because of the extraordinary timing of June 16th when Trump announced his candidacy, and the meaningful coincident events just prior to and shortly after that date. This is what I mean, and it's fascinating:
 
 

 On June 16th Trump announced his 2016 candidacy for the 45th presidency and made border security and illegal alien criminals the focus of his campaign. 16 days before on June 1st (as if paving the way for Trump) Ann Coulter's brilliant and controversial  book (her best) on illegals "Adios, America" was published (see).  Then on July 1st, 16 days after Trump's announcement,  Francisco Sanchez, a 45 year old multiple deportee felon from Mexico, shot and killed  32* year old beautiful Kate Steinle on a San Francisco pier as she was walking with her father and a friend (see). Oddly, Sanchez was 16 days into his 3rd month of his legal but wrongful release from a San Francisco jail because of the city's dangerous sanctuary laws (see). The date of his release April 15th, was the second anniversary of the Boston Marathon Bombing. This is just one of many ominius signs that Moslem terrorists like the bloodthirsty Tsarnaev boys, or ISIS agents, are crossing into our country from Mexico for the purpose of massively killing and wounding innocent Americans (see).  The first and most compelling sign of a mass casualty terror attack originating from Mexico was the killing of 9/11 child Christina Taylor Green in the Tucson Massacre which I wrote about here.

*32 is a multiple of 16 2x.
 
 
But here is where it gets really profound. When  on June 16th Trump launched his bid for the White House little did he or anyone know that 8* years earlier in 2007-to that very date of June 16-the House of Representatives passed an amendment to a Homeland Security spending bill for the withholding of federal emergency services funds from all the 200+ sanctuary cities (see).
 
*8 is a factor of 16 2x.
 
 The bipartisan amendment (voted for by 50 Democrats) was sponsored by anti-illegal alien hardliner Tom Tancredo;  but to date it hasn't been passed by the Senate. This needs to be done ASAP so (for the safety and security of our citizens) we can get the ball rolling in putting the nation's sanctuary cities out of the sanctuary business. If Trump doesn't know about Tancredo's amendment hopefully he will soon learn of it and call on the Republican led Senate to pass it. And hopefully, God willing, we get a Republican in the White House in 2016 who will sign legislation banning sanctuary cities forever. 
 
 
 
As the number 16 recurs in this piece could it be a numerical sign pointing to the 16th year of the 21st century? A sign that Trump's candidacy prefigures that border security and illegal alien crime and terrorism coming from Mexico will become the dominant issue of the 2016 election? We shall see.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

OBAMA REPLACES CLINTON’S FAILED HOUSING PROGRAM FOR SLUMDOGS WITH SECTION 8 DIVERSITY IN SUBURBS

 

HUD ANNOUNCES FINAL RULE AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING

Our great, good, post-racial, progressive, egalitarian president who has done so much to boost the economy, improve race relations and lick poverty, and is steadily changing us into the "more perfect [dependency] Union" that he promised seven years ago, wants to continue his good work of social  transformation with a new housing diversity program for racist, mostly white suburbia. He wants to move poor, low-income slumdog losers with slumdog habits, values and mentalities (mostly mooching, crude, drug abusing,  welfare trash who suffer from  internalized poverty ) into high-end middle and upper class ritzy neighborhoods. What's his game? What does he hope to gain? Utopia, of course. He wants to take the slum out of slumdogs; to suburbanize and humanize them; to elevate their humanity and bring out the better angels deep within their nature. What could be wrong with that? You can't take the slum out of slumdogs when they're living in inner city ghetto filth.  It's so unfair and counter productive to keep them there. Something must be done to make them better citizens as everything else (including $trillions in handouts) has failed. But our mastermind president has come up with the answer: class warfare by class blending in suburbia.

Bill Clinton tried this and failed. His compassionate Affordable Housing Program which gave millions of poor slumdog families big, unaffordable sub prime loans crashed and burned (nearly collapsing the economy) with most of them defaulting and losing their suburban dream homes (and returning to the slums no better than before). But now our brilliant, world-class, social engineering leader has dreamed up the solution that Clinton should have seen: forcing middle and upper class communities to build low-income (Section 8) housing that would keep the slumdogs permanently there-with generation after generation of welfare dependents benefiting from the finer more socially advanced atmosphere. What's wrong with mixing losers with winners? Raw sewage with wine? In answering this question think of  liberal, progressive, Democrat Detroit coming to a community near you.

POSTSCRIPT

For those who might construe the above tirade as racist my defense is as follows:

It is inconceivable that any middle class family of any color or ethnicity would welcome Section 8 housing into their neighborhoods. Middle class blacks who have worked their butts off to free themselves from the hell of inner city life (so they can raise their kids in safety, decency and peace) would be just as opposed to Obama's program as any  middle class white, Latino or Asian family.  No hard working, law abiding family would want inner city slumdog scum moving anywhere near them. Like with Clinton's failed housing program Obama's is doomed to fail. For the poor and disadvantaged there are no shortcuts to the middle class.

 RELATED

BILL CLINTON: THE HOUSING BUBBLE KING OF ALL TIME 

 

FORWARD  EMAILS TO

< p style="text-align: center;">reninvest2013@aol.com

OBAMA’S COMPELLING VISION FOR DEFEATING RADICAL ISLAM: WORLD POLITICAL UNITY IN FIGHTING EARTH DESTROYING CLIMATE CHANGE

Obama on ISIS threat : ‘Ideologies are not defeated by guns, but by more compelling ideas and vision ’ |  Atlas Shrugs

The only compelling thing that came out of this presser is the reason why Barack Obama  nauseates55% of the military and is approved by a pathetic 15%-making him  the most loathed and disrespected Commander-in-Chief in US history. The men who shared the stage with him must have felt embarrassed to hell over his remarks about defeating ISIS with ideas. 

 

SO WHAT ARE OBAMA'S 

"COMPELLING VISION AND IDEAS" TO DEFEAT ISIS AND ISLAMIC EXTREMISM?

 Like Pope Francis he believes in a new world political order of Moslems and Infidels united in brotherly peace to defeat the greatest existential threat to mankind since Ronald Reagan's confrontational "Roll Back" policies against the Soviet Union brought us to the brink of nuclear war: Man Made Catastrophic Global Warming-a complete delusion based on proven, exaggerated, politically driven falsehoods about  "heat trapping carbon emissions" turning the atmosphere into a world destroying furnace.

BTW, Reagan's "Peace Through Strength" policies which bankrupted the Soviet Union (and which hysterical anti-Reagan alarmists like Obama, Biden and Kerry opposed in the 80s) ended the threat of nuclear war which hung over humanity like a Damocles Sword for decades. Just as Obama (and the nuclear freeze movement) was wrong about Reagan so is he (and the warmunists) wrong about carbon emissions threatening the existence of mankind, and being a worse threat than ISIS and Islamic Jihad.

Making carbon emissions the real enemy instead of Islamic Jihad is similar to Obama's mistake of demonizing Ronald Reagan and nuclear weapons as the real enemy of America and the world instead of Soviet communism-which, like Islamic Jihad today, aimed at world domination. Ironically and outrageously the worst and weakest president ever now claims to be the Democrat Ronald Reagan transforming America and the world for the better. It doesn't get any insaner than this.

 

RELATED

 FROM BAN THE HYDROGEN BOMB TO BANNING HYDROCARBON FUELS: THE LEFT’S FAILED GLOBAL SALVATION MOVEMENTS

 

POSTSCRIPT

 

 

 

IF BARACK OBAMA WERE THE 16TH PRESIDENT

of the United States he wouldn't have gone to war against the South to restore the Union and free the slaves. Instead, he would have tried to win the hearts and minds of Southerners by making eloquent speeches on the evils of slavery, that it had no place in the mid-19th century, and that Southerners weren't true Americans for having slaves. Does anyone doubt me on this?

 

 

OTHER THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS

 

 

HAS THE EPISCOPALIAN CHURCH FORGOT

that Jesus was a world renouncing ascetic with zero interest in the fleeting, ephemeral pleasures of sex? Or do they believe in the "queer Jesus" of homosexuals? A gay libertine who screwed his disciples and experienced no higher bliss or happiness than sexual orgasms? How do they reconcile Jesus' asceticism with the hedonistic, lust driven, dehumanizing lifestyle of gays? Jesus and gays are polar opposites. The Kingdom of God is found within, not in bodily orgasms and pleasures. But don't tell that to sex crazed "Christian" gays with their sick and slanderous belief in a "queer Jesus"; or to Episcopalian clerics who have completely lost the way.

 

 

 WHERE DOES CARTER GET THE AUDACITY TO THINK

that he's a first-rate expert on the subject of declining superpowers?/sarc.

 

 
 
THE FACT THAT YOU'RE POTUS,
 

doesn't preclude you from being a confused nut case when it comes to Islam. For example: "The [jihadist] Islamic State isn't Islamic," says Obama. But he repeatedly refers to jihadist Iran as "The Islamic Republic of Iran" as if the mullahs are practicing authentic Islam. Truth is the only difference between the Islamic State and the Islamic Republic of Iran is that the one is Sunni, and the other Shiite.

 

 
HOW MANY OF THESE UNMELTABLE, HATE FILLED, ANTI-ITALIAN MOSLEMS
 
are there in Italy? Answer: Enough for the Italian government to refuse to recognize Islam as a legitimate religion (contributing to the public good) alongside Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism and Buddhism.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 

OBAMA'S BANKRUPT SOCIALISTIC ILLINOIS FORESHADOWS

his bankrupt socialistic America. As the one goes so does the other if we stay the course of Obamunism-with Hillary swearing to do so.

 

 

THE COMING ANTI-US FLAG MOVEMENT? AND MY DEBATE ON BANNING THE FLAG THAT ANTICIPATED RUSH

 

 

Louis Farrakhan: 'We need to put the American flag down' | www.wpxi.com

American Flag Burned in Brooklyn War Memorial Park to Protest Racism Spur Controversy | NBC New York

   SofRepcolor062615

If George Soros and the radical progressive left were to follow-up on their on-line campaign to ban the Confederate flag (which collected 500,000 signatures, see) with banning and replacing the American flag-because to them it's a symbol of pure racist evil and white oppression just like the Confederate flag-how might they proceed? And what would they replace the flag with?

Indeed, if socialist billionaire  Soros were to devote millions of his capitalist wealth to starting a national anti-flag movement that would have any chance of success with the  they couldn't just scream like Black Muslim bigot Louis Farrakhan did last week that "We [black folk] have caught as much hell under that flag as under the Confederate flag... and it must come down!" And they couldn't have flag burning protests like a group of crazy radicals did in Brooklyn this week when they torched the Confederate and American flags because, as one protester said, they wanted to raise public awareness that  "American society at the moment is still structurally racist and white supremacist... and that it is an illusion that we live in a post-racial society.”

Indeed, if the anti-American, "compassionate" left which seems incapable of forgiving this country for slavery and Jim Crow (but not communist atrocities throughout history) were to succeed they would need to have at least the veneer of rationality with a coherent and compelling argument first proving that the Stars and Stripes is no better than the Confederate Stars and Bars;  and then suggesting a flag to replace it that the American people could accept and live with. But how might that happen?

To begin with the leaders of a national anti-flag movement might say it's not so much the 50 stars representing each of today's 50 states that offend their sensibilities and should concern all Americans of conscience pained by our slave and Jim Crow past. They might say that what makes the flag immoral and offensive like the Confederate flag is its 13 red and white stripes that have been there since the  Stars and Stripes was first authorized in 1777 . Why would these stripes be offensive to them? Because they represent the 13 original states 6 of which were slave and stayed that way for nearly 88 years where scores of blacks lived and died in oppression and misery. In other words, for the anti-flagers 6 of the 13 stripes taint and befoul today's American flag with white supremacist southern slavery making it essentially indistinguishable from the damnable racist Confederate flag.  And the continued national use of this flag, flying and displaying it everywhere and pledging allegiance to it, is intolerable and must end as it is unworthy of our 21st century country-which despite making much progress in curing itself of anti-black racism still has a long ways to go. 

So what solutions could the anti-flagers propose to purge the flag clean of this stain and make it politically correct and wholesome? Simply trashing it and replacing it with something radically different and new would be impractical and meet with stiff public and political resistance; for the flag in its current form is popular with most Americans. So with the popularity of the Stars and Stripes in mind  anti-flagers might pursue a more pragmatic course, a middle way of sorts between those Americans who love the flag and will defend it tooth and nail and those who want to trash it altogether because of our racist past and supposed racist present-with the left less racism is as bad as more racism. Indeed, what anti-flaggers might suggest is a compromise which keeps the Stars and Stripes but in such a way that would remove from it the stain and sin of slavery and other past wrongs done to blacks.

Indeed, to seem reasonable what the anti-flaggers could conceivably propose is redesigning the flag by subtracting  6 stripes from the 13 representing the 6 southern slave states and leaving 7 stripes representing the original free northern states. That would certainly stand a better chance of succeeding with the public than some  newfangled flag.

However, this solution could pose a problem. For all we know the 18th century flag makers could have assigned certain stripes to certain states. Indeed, as 7 stripes are red and  6 stripes white how could anti-flaggers be sure that the flag makers didn't assign the 7 red stripes to the 7 free northern states, and the remaining 6 white stripes to the 6 southern slaves states? In other words, should a new, pure, pristine non-racist flag only bear the 7 red stripes separated by thin black lines and no white stripes? Or should the area where the stripes are be made solid red with no separate discernible stripes? But this too might be a problem. For if it's done this way how could anti-flagers be sure that none of the red stripes represent southern slave states? For all they know the flag makers could have had the alphabet in mind when arranging the stripes assigning the first stripe to northern free Connecticut and the 13th and last to southern slave Virginia.

 As you can see purging the flag of every last trace of slavery and racism by eliminating certain stripes is too problematic. If just one stripe is left representing an original evil racist slave state the new flag like the old one with 13 stripes would be no more son-free than the Confederate flag. What then would the anti-flaggers do? Would they give up in despair in trying to repair the flag and go the difficult if not impossible route of inventing a new flag out of thin air that wouldn't fly with the public ? No. Short of trashing the flag completely there is one last alternative that keeps some of the flag when redesigning it and could satisfy the public: do away with the problematic stripes and keep the unproblematic stars. In other words, an American flag completely purged of the blemishes of slavery and racism would be one large banner of 50 white stars on a blue background with no stripes whatsoever. That is what a politically correct flag redeemed of slavery and racism would most likely look like to George Soros and the flag hating left.

POSTSCRIPT

CAIR: Consign Confederate Flag ‘to the Dustbin of History Along With the Nazi Swastika’ · CNSNews.com  

The Japanese Rising Sun flag has remained practically unchanged for 145 years and covers all  of Japan's atrocities and war crimes of World War II.

On June 22nd, anticipating Rush Limbaugh by several days, I predicted in a debate with leftists on CNS  that the left wouldn't stop with the trashing of the Confederate flag but would come after the American flag next.  The debate is as follows.

hamshoe  High Information Voter 

 The Confederate Battle Flag is a "symbol of an attempt to retain the evil institution of slavery."That's what secession was: an attempt to protect slavery. That's the heritage the flag celebrates: the willingness to take up arms against the US to protect the evil institution of slavery.

LOL!!! That's as stupid as wanting to ban every US flag before secession because every slave state was represented on it. Moreover, I must be a racist bigot slavery lover for having a replica of the original Old Glory of 1777 of 13 states hanging in my study. For 6 of the 13 states represented on the flag were slave states.

 

hamshoe  ApolloSpeaks 

 

"LOL!!! That's as stupid as wanting to ban every US flag before secession because every slave state was represented on it."

None of them were created expressly to signify the attempt to preserve slavery. Or are you arguing that secession was about something else?

Your study must be the single most under-used room in your home.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                   

 

Thanks for the amusing post. Every pre-secession American flag was a symbol that a nation half slave half free was morally acceptable. Or are you arguing that those flags represented something else? As you can see I'm making good use of my study where I'm now sitting and watching you lose this argument.

 

DIFFERENT THREAD

 

hamshoe  Prove it 

 

Oh, absolutely [the whole nation was complicit in the evil institution of slavery] , since before the founding of the nation. It was the fear that it [slavery] might be ending that prompted secession.

 

 

So now in the 21st century the the British Union Jack is still a symbol of monarchical oppression for us?

 

 

Well, seeing as the U.K still exists it has a more contemporary meaning.

 

And seeing that the old slave South no longer exists the Confederate flag can have a contemporary meaning of a nation that went to war with itself over a moral principle where right and justice prevailed; and the South redeeming itself rejoined the Union in freedom. That is what happened and is the Confederate flag's contemporary meaning. 

And, in that spirit of freedom, the South passed Jim Crow laws and did all it could to keep the former slaves and their descendants under its boot. Because of freedom.

In the spirit of freedom every emancipated black southerner was free to leave the South and live anywhere in the US to improve their fortunes-up North, out West wherever.That wasn't the case before the war.

 

No, it  [the Confederate flag} signifies the attempt to preserve the evil institution of slavery.

And treason.

The Stars and Stripes signify the triumph of justice, the Stars and Bars are the disgraced symbol of racism and evil.

 

 

The same could be said of the Union Jack symbolizing in the late 18th century the preservation by force of the evil tyrannical gov't of imperial British oppression in America. As the Civil War was the second phase of the American Revolution what the Union Jack symbolized in the late 18th century the Confederate flag symbolized in the mid-19th century.

 

Then there is the flag of Japan essentially unchanged since the 1870s. I guess today's Japanese are no different from the racist supremacist monsters who attacked us at Pearl Harbor and oppressed and killed millions in Asia because they have the same flag.

 

 

There are tenuous connections, and then there are wishful imaginings based on meaningless visual similarities.

The Confederacy was established precisely and definitively because of a fear that the institution of slavery was going to be abolished in the US. It was defeated and ceased to exist. Any further definition of it's meaning is what the conservative wing of historical thought used to derisively call "revisionist".

The American Civil War was not the second phase of the American War of Independence. The United States was already independent. The American civil war was an armed insurrection that attempted to preserve the evil institution of slavery.

Modern Japan is not the same as the country that attacked Pearl Harbor. That is to say, aside from minor differences like a complete change in their form of government and the renunciation of offensive military action.

The childish "but he did it too!" argument should have been left behind in elementary school.

 

 
We're at an impasse. You're morally offended by the Confederate flag because 150 years ago it meant (as it doesn't today) the enforcement of an evil system of slavery. Yet the vast majority of Southerners who still fly the flag, or proudly display it in some way, are no more white supremacists (or neo-Confederate reactionaries like Dylann Roof) than are today's Japanese who have kept the same red and white flag-once a symbol of Japanese racial supremacy and brutal imperialist conquest-for 145 years. Compared to the Japanese fascists of World War II the Confederate states were a nation of angels and saints.
 
The South went to war against the abolitionist North to keep their damnable slave system. But unlike fascist Japan the Confederacy wasn't a killing machine for a divine emperor and ancestral gods which attacked us at Pearl Harbor and overran Asia killing and enslaving millions. To paraphrase what you said: Modern Japan and the American South are not the same entities that attacked us at Pearl Harbor and the North at Ft. Sumter. If, however, there was no Civil War and the Confederacy with its slave system still existed the Stars and Bars would be as offensive to me as the evil system it represented.
 
You have an almost complete misconception of Civil War. It's overarching purpose was the revolutionary overthrow of the southern slave system, not a restoration of the old Union: the status quo ante of free and slave states.That brings the Civil War in line with the Revolutionary War which sort the overthrow of the existing tyrannical order and replacement with a more liberal form of government. Just as the British fought to keep their rule over the oppressed colonies so did the South fight to keep its rule over oppressed slaves.In fact Lincoln and the Abolitionists saw the Civil War as a continuation of the struggle for liberty which began in 1776, and the fulfillment of the Declaration of Independence with the Gettysburg Address as its extension. Amazingly, just as the First Revolutionary War ended in Virginia with the surrender of Cornwallis the Second Revolutionary War ended in that very state with the surrender of Lee. If this is "elementary school" thinking then I must be debating with a kindergarten tot.
 
 
 

 

  • OBAMA THINKING HE’S REAGAN CRAZILY PREDICTS HILLARY CAN BE BUSH 41

     

     

    When Barack Obama was running for the presidency in 2008 he wanted the public to believe that he'd be the "new Abe Lincoln" and "new JFK" rolled into one magnificent historic president. Then shortly after taking office when he signed into law his $800 billion stimulus bill to fix the economy (which was on the mend) he wanted us to believe he was the "new FDR" with a "new New Deal" for America. Now after six and a half years and having failed at being Lincoln, JFK and FDR (at least in foreign policy and fighting wars) this utterly delusional  and worthless man now wants us to believe that he's the Democrat Ronald Reagan transforming America into a more perfect Union and the world into a better and more peaceful place; and that like Reagan he'll have a worthy successor like GHW Bush to carry on his work.

     Indeed, if Obama had a Reagan-like presidency then Hillary for sure (or some other Democrat) would succeed him and be like Bush 41. But Obama is the great anti-Reagan, the ideological foe and polar opposite of that wonderfully wise and gifted man failing in every respect where Reagan was a success. Whereas Reagan knew how to govern, knew how to lead, knew how to negotiate (with domestic and foreign adversaries) and knew how to communicate effectively (raising public morale during a time of troubles with his infectious optimism and patriotic nationalism) Obama has miserably failed at all these things. Whereas Reagan had the judgment, instincts, character and courage to be president and was respected universally by friends and foes alike six years in office and  Obama is still a feckless, blundering, incompent fool whose terribly embarrassing presidency is the laughingstock of the world.

      Indeed, whilst Reagan like Obama inherited from his predecessor a country in economic, military and geostrategic decline unlike Obama Reagan turned us around transforming both the country and world making better what was worse and bringing down the Soviet state after a long Cold War. But because Obama's been no better than Reagan's shadow in practically everything (the economy, foreign policy and the national spirit which he depressed) he has transformed America and the world downwardly prolonging the worst recovery since World War II while emboldening all our enemies who are advancing across the world.

     Indeed, Obama is a worse president and failure than Reagan's predecessor Jimmy Carter who surprisingly agrees with right-wing critics that he has damaged America's power, credibility and prestige in the world making it a more dangerous place and our nation and freedom less safe and secure.

    Now as Obama when compared to Reagan is a mental and moral pipsqueak using his presidency as a model to predict that Hillary or some Democrat will follow him (like Bush 41 did Reagan) just doesn't work. A more reasonable model however with a better chance at predicting 2016 would be Dwight Eisenhower (another president Obama has falsely been compared to). For like Ike Obama has been a two term president; and like Ike Obama was elected and reelected on a November 4th and November 6th election date; and like Ike Obama's successor will be elected on a November 8th election date*. But unlike Ike Obama has been an abysmal failure. And though Ike was a successful two term Republican president he was followed into office by the Democrat John Kennedy who beat his popular VP Richard Nixon in a very close race.

    *The 2016 election falls on November 8th.

     

    Now given the disastrous course of Obama's presidency-which can only get worse in the months ahead as he's doubling down on stupid and going further and further to the left-doesn't it make better sense that like in 1960 a candidate for president from the opposite party will win the presidency? In other words, if a Democrat could win election during a successful Republican presidency then how much greater are the odds that a Republican will defeat Hillary (ofen compared to the mendacious Nixon) during the presidency of a God awful Democrat president? Using the Eisenhower model the odds for a Republican victory in 2016 look  very great indeed.

     

     

     

    THE CULTURAL CYCLES OF HISTORY, GAY MARRIAGE, SEXUAL PLEASURE AND THE CHOICE OF GAY OR STRAIGHT CHILDREN

     

     

     

    I FIND FAITH AND INSPIRATION IN GOD AND IN THE CULTURAL CYCLES OF HISTORY

     

     

    Roman hedonism and licence turning into Christian chastity, virtue and love of God. The libertinism of the Romantic era turning into Victorian self-discipline and restraint. When the destructive effects of today's insane, anything goes, radical individualism (worsened by economic misfortune which is coming) runs its terrible course Americans will come to their senses;  and recalling the values and principles that made us the super power of liberty we will revive them reverse our decline and decadence and restore our nations greatness. And when that happens the cultural conditions for a constitutional amendment  defining marriage as between a man and a woman will prevail, and we shall have normalcy again.

     

     

    COMPARED TO THE ANCIENTS TODAY'S GAYS ARE HISTORY'S BIGGEST ASS CLOWNS

    If we were to resurrect from the dead a homosexual from the Greco-Roman classical world he'd probably think that today's gays had lost their minds; and that the idea of same-sex marriage was unnatural, anti-social and bizarre. Gays from that period respected marriage as an exclusively heterosexual institution for the procreation and raising of children and never thought of appropriating it to themselves. As they couldn't procreate the marriage state served no useful purpose to them in terms of personal happiness or to society in adding anything good or of value.

    Indeed, gays from that period didn't feel like oppressed, victimized, emotionally incomplete second class citizens because they couldn't be legally married. Some of them even wrongly thought that male homosexual unions were superior to heterosexual unions. That women being the weaker, gentler, more sensitive sex weakened a man's moral fiber and mental strength, while men strengthened these qualities in each other. Those gays (perverse though they were) make today's gays look like emotionally adolescent imbeciles. Homosexuality is a form of sexual folly in any age or culture. But today's gays (and their straight supporters) are the biggest ass clowns of history.

     

     

    By 

    COMMENT

    IF PRO-GAY CONSERVATIVES

    think that the 5-4 ruling on same-sex marriage will change the sad reality that gays are mentally and physically the sickest and most diseased group of people in this country-that is to say, the most unhappiest and miserable Americans-then they are deluding themselves with an idealized view of gays that has nothing to do with the truth. Indeed, because of their great unhappiness gays will continue to be "sore winners," as George Will says. Indeed, not content with the 5-4 ruling (or any gains they have made as nothing appeases or pleases them) gays, as David Harsanyi warns, will press on to persecute, punish and socially pulverize those who oppose them and continue to speak the truth about their depraved practices and dehumanizing lifestyle. And that will be a cultural disaster.

    from the Greco-Roman world he'd probably think that today's gays had lost th

    By 

     

    Mark Salter

     

     COMMENT

     

    THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION

    'What is nature's reason for sexual pleasure?' settles the question whether homosexuality is natural, normal, healthy and good and morally equal to heterosexuality. The answer of course is an unqualified NO! By nature, and overriding everything else, sexual pleasure is nature's reward for procreation as human sexuality finds its greatest value, true purpose and fulfillment in bringing the beautiful gift of new life into this world. Anyone who sees dignity, worth and "beautiful rainbow colors" in sexual activity that dehumanizes, depresses and sickens those who practice it is an ignoramus on this subject, however well-meaning or (blindly) compassionate they are.

    If Mark Salter were to experiment and live a life of sexual depravity practicing anal and oral sex he'd inevitably come to grief understanding from the terrible, sanity destroying psychological effects how very wrong and damaging it is. And after going through hell he'd realize what the wisest men in history have understood and said: that a healthy society discourages these practices in its members.  

     

    GAY CHILDREN OR STRAIGHT CHILDREN?

    Ask any heterosexual supporter of gay marriage rights the following question: "If you want children and God came down from heaven and gave you a choice of having either gay kids or straight kids which would you choose?" What do you think most of them with great difficulty* would answer? And why would they answer "we'd prefer straight over gay kids?" Because most of them want biological grand children.

    *Whenever I put this question to libs in most cases I have to drag the right answer out of them.

     

    Scalia's Full Dissent on Same-Sex Marriage Rulin- Frontpage

     

    Scalia said that on Obamacare SCOTUS became SCOTUSCARE.

    What he didn't say is that on same-sex marriage SCOTUS became SCUMOTUS.

    s because they couldn't be legally married. Some of them even thought that male homosexuality was superior to heterosexual unions. That women being the weaker, gentler, more sensitive sex weakened a man's moral fiber and mental strength. Those gays (perverted though they were) make today's gays look like emotionally adolescent imbeciles. Homosexuality is a form of sexual folly in any age. But today's gays are the biggest a*s clowns of history.

    THE WEEK THAT HOPE AND CHANGE OBAMA WAS REBORN?

    After momentous week, Obama's presidency is reborn - Edward-Isaac Dovere - POLITICO

    "He sang. He wept. He cheered. And many say they finally saw the man who inspired them in '08."

    WITH A MASSIVELY UNPOPULAR HEALTHCARE LAW,

    worsening leftist-caused racial tensions, a weak trickle growth economy verging on recession with soaring trillions in debt and unfunded liabilities, a collapsing incoherent rudderless foreign policy that failed at Russian Reset, Moslem Outreach, Israeli-Palestinian peace, and is emboldening terrorist Iran and ISIS to expand their influence across the radicalized unstable Middle East Obama's presidency, despite so much wreckage and ruin says Dovere, has been reborn this week? Why? Because he sang at a church? Wept over a racist killing? Saw a Confederate flag taken down? And cheered two bad illegal Supreme Court decisions-one which gave unconstitutional marriage rights to unhappy, miserable sexual deviants as if they were heterosexuals? 

     

    As the most unfit to command president in US history (and the left's worse nightmare) leads America into economic, military and geopolitical decline what we saw this week was perhaps the last hurrah of the old "Hope and Change" Obama with an unsustainable bump. In other words, good week or not  the trajectory of Obama's failing presidency will continue its downward slide of  incompetence, blunders, bad decisions and lies toward a  legacy of ashes, disaster and dust . Obama's terrible presidency is an unmistakable sign the radical, spendthrift, anything goes left is in its end time.

     

    DEBATE ON OBAMA'S ACHIEVEMENTS

     

    rightwingersRmorons listing Obama's supposed "achievements" writes:

    Killed OBL

    Took out Gaddafi

    Lowered unemployment 30.76% (down 46.53% since 2009 peak caused by the Bush
    recession)

    Has a record 63 straight months of added jobs (broke all time record 11 times)

    2014 was America's best year of job growth since 1999

    Lowered the deficit 71%

    Ended the Iraq war

    Ended the Afghanistan war

    Veteran Unemployment Falls To 7-Year Low

    Black unemployment falls to 7-year low

    Obama on pace to have the most private sector jobs created
    in any single Presidential term ever

    DOW rose 127%

    S&P rose 157%

    Corporate profits up 174%

    Auto industry saved

    12 million new people got health insurance

    5.0 % GDP (Bush left at -8.9%)

    Highest consumer confidence in 9 years

    Job openings up 81%

    Most job openings since 2000

    12.6 million jobs created

    NET 7.46 million jobs (Bush was NET 1 million in 8 years)

    Uninsured Rate Drops to Lowest Level since The '90s. Down
    28% since ACA kicked in.

    Unemployment Benefits Applications Fall To 15-Year Low

    Strongest dollar in 10 years

    Had no major terrorist attacks

    Got Assad to turn over all his chemical weapons without a shot fired

    Got Iran to talk peace about nukes

    Has the lowest middle class taxes in 50 years

    Was the lowest govt spender in 60 years

    Broke a record for the reduction of govt workers.

    Record deportation of illegal aliens.

     

    MY REPLY

     

    Obama dithered for seven months before taking out OBL thus endangering the mission; and is indebted to Bush's counter terrorism program for finding OBL's courier in 2007. If Bush had a third term (or McCain were president) OBL would have been dead before Christmas 2010 (see).

    Obama regrets toppling Kaddafy as it caused the collapse of Libya into chaos,  the surge of radicalism across the country, and the pre-planned 9/11 attack on the Bengahzi consulate which killed four Americans (see).

    When using honest metrics Obama's real unemployment rate is at "11%," as Bernie Sanders says (see). Indeed, when millions of discouraged workers are added to Obama's fraudulent low jobless rate-as Sanders rightly does-he has the poorest jobs creation record for any recovery in the last 70 years (see). Obama's government is the answer, spend baby spend, anti-growth policies, and success punishing class warfare agenda, have been a lead blanket around the economy inhibiting innovation and growth; and created the most part-time and low paying jobs of any recovery since the end of WWII (see).

    Obama cut his own record-breaking $trillion deficits which is no accomplishment; and has failed to cut Bush's $480 billion deficit in half as promised in 2008. We're still accumulating huge amounts of bankrupting debt and entitlement liabilities in the unsustainable trillions, with Obama assuring us that there's no looming debt crisis (see).

    NOTE:

    With a frightening $18 trillion in fiscal debt and an even more frightening $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities what kind of budget did the most reckless spending head of state in history propose for 2015? According to the CBO a budget that would add a staggering $6 trillion in deficits over the next ten years (see).The proposal was so bizarre and deranged that the Senate quashed it in a 99-1 vote. When it comes to deficit spending and accumulating debt Barack Obama is George Bush gone completely insane.

    Driven by domestic reelection politics Obama ignored the warnings of his generals of Iraq returning  to pre-surge chaos if we withdrew our forces prematurely. In fact, he failed to  use the immense leverage he had of $60 billion in Iraq Reconstruction Funds to keep a contingency force in Iraq, as Leon Panetta sadly says in his autobiography (see).

    We are still fighting in Afghanistan as Iran supplies arms to the Taliban while Obama negotiates a dangerous, unserious, ridiculous nuke deal with them that makes us the laughing-stock of the world (see).

    Obama has a phony, Fed-manipulated, overpriced, record DOW deceptively achieved in part by lending cheap money to public firms to buy their own stocks (record-breaking buybacks, see) which is artificially inflating prices. This is a huge devastating market bubble in the making (see).

    Corporate profits are up under Obama. But this is due mostly to cost cutting measures not sales. Retail sales are a pathetic 29% of GDP under Obama. When Reagan left office ii was 68% Was 68% (see).

    Obama saved GM and Chrysler at a loss of billions to the taxpayer (see). The US auto industry (Ford, Toyota USA, Honda USA, Mercedes USA, etc,) would have survived the crash of both companies as consumer  demand for cars would have been unchanged.

    Meanwhile auto makers are  boosting sales with with  SUB PRIME loan programs. These are the same risky loans that tanked the housing market in 08 (see).

    Obama is trying to boost sagging home sales with billions in SUB PRIME mortgages given to credit poor borrowers through the FHA. After 08 sub prime housing crash this is completely irresponsible, reckless and insane. (see).

    Obamacare is hugely unpopular due to surging premiums and deductibles when steep savings were promised. Chuck Schumer and other Dems now admit that Obamacare was "a huge political mistake."

    Assad cheated on chemical weapons. He failed to dismantle his WMD production infrastructure, and keeps WMD scientists and techs on the gov't payroll; he most likely has hidden, undeclared stockpiles of WMD (see).

    Obama has phony, laughable deportation numbers that fraudulantly counts people turned away at the borders (see).

    Only 15% of active military personnel give Obama a favorable rating on leadership-the lowest of any president in memory (see).

    62% of Americans say Obama's America is on the wrong track; meaning that Obama is

    Clearly, Barack Hussein Obama is the worst president since Jimmy Carter. Or is it Herbert Hoover or James Buchanan? Take your pick. 

     

     

     RELATED

     

     

    THE GREATNESS OF BARACK OBAMA (SATIRE) 

     

    THE GREAT DEPRESSOR AND HIS SUB-ZERO PRESIDENCY

     

     

    OBAMA’S PYRRHIC HEALTHCARE VICTORY UPHELD BY SUPREME COURT WON’T HELP HILLARY

       

    CHUCK SCHUMER ON OBAMACARE:

    "A huge mistake."

    Responding to his constituents profound dissatisfaction with Obama's failing health care law (the most unpopular legislation in a generation and a Pyrrhic victory that wasn't worth it) Senator Schumer anticipating worse to come caved to political and economic reality and said after the devastating 2014 election:

    "Democrats acted wrongly in using their new mandate after the 2008 election to focus on the issue [of healthcare reform] rather than the economy at the height of a terrible recession..(see)"

    Indeed, it seems that Schumer devotes much of his time these days apologizing to New Yorkers for backing the expensive growth and jobs killing law instead of focusing on fixing the worse economy since the Great Depression to reverse the decline the eroding middle class-which Obamacare is hurting most.

    "After passing the stimulus," said Schumer," Democrats should have continued to propose middle-class-oriented programs and built on the partial success of the stimulus, but unfortunately Democrats blew the opportunity the American people gave them, We took their mandate and put all of our focus on the wrong 
    problem—health care reform."

    Schumer underscoring the utter political folly of Democrats turning the health insurance industry inside out and on its head, and causing so much chaos and economic pain, said: "Just about 5 percent of registered voters in the United States lacked health insurance before the implementation of the law. To have focused on a problem affecting such a small percentage of the electorate made no political sense."

    No sense, indeed. But what did he expect from a deaf, dumb and blind radical left community organizer who was recklessly hell-bent for the sake of "fairness" on getting that 5 percent insured regardless of the consequences to the recovery and the rest of America-who were mostly satisfied with their insurance and opposed reform. But being a socialist warrior for the underclass at war with success and everyone else Obama simply did what he had done for decades: he lied and lied and lied to the 95 percent that his law would keep the popular healthcare status quo while lowering costs and insuring every uninsured American-all 30 million of them. It was to be an unprecedented, historic win-win for everyone: healthcare heaven for all with everyone (rich, poor and in between) finally insured. What a legacy for posterity Obama envisioned for himself: up there with LBJ and Medicare. But Obama's promised heaven is now a political nightmare and hell for Democrats, and a worsening disaster for the middle class who have seen their work hours shrink and wages stagnate or drop as more of them turn to government assistance adding to the debt, and making our coming national bankruptcy increasingly more painful. 

     In short, like Obamanomics (another failed New Deal/Keynesian stimulus) and Dodd Frank (punishing banks for a corrupt government housing program started by Clinton which doesn't protect consumers) Obamacare (class warfare by health insurance means) was another thoughtless hoax and change, Obama-Democrat social justice lie that Schumer and other Dems are fleeing from in droves.

    But for 2016 the question now is this : will Hillary, like Schumer, Tom Harkin and other Dems, runaway too? So far she's been an enthusiastic supporter of the unpopular law attacking Republicans for wanting to repeal it and leave millions uninsured (see). But as things go from bad to worse for the working middle class with skyrocketing premiums and deductibles to pay for millions of uninsured Americans (most of whom don't have coverage yet) Hillary will have to turn on Obamacare and moving farther to the left join with Bernie Sanders and call for single payer, socialized, Medicare For All-a big government solution to Obama's big government debacle. But the problem there is that Medicare For Some will be bankrupt by 2026; single payer Medicare For all would speed that up to 2020 if we're lucky. As the public is wary of federal solutions Obamacare with sluggish economic growth, the debt explosion, a collapsing foreign policy and middle class , and the trust issue could be Hillary's political undoing.

    RELATED

    OBAMACARE IS CLASS WARFARE AND THE LAST HURRAH OF THE WAR ON POVERTY

    SEXUAL PERVERSION WINS IN SUPREMELY WRONG COURT

     
     
     
    But for how long? As the Klu Klux Kueers are now super emboldened to punish and persecute any American opposed to homosexuality as unnatural, immoral and sick, as polygamists, polyandrists, adult-child and every other nontraditional form of marriage will be wanting legalization, how long will it take before normal, natural, healthy straight Americans put a stop to this madness and demand a constitutional amendment defining marriage in the traditional sense? It can't happen too soon.
     
     
    MESSAGE TO GAY COUPLES
     
    Fear not! When this era of anything goes dehumanizing hedonism and sexual depravity runs its destructive course (as has often happened in history) and the American people coming to their senses (as they're slowly doing on abortion) support in Congress a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and woman, you gays who are married will be allowed to stay married until the day that you die.
     
    POSTSCRIPT
     
    FROM SCOTUS TO SCUMOTUS
     
     
     

    RADICAL RACIST OBAMA STEREOTYPES AND LIBELS WHITE AMERICA AS HOPELESSLY, INCURABLY, IMMUTABLY RACIST

     

    Though Obama threw Reverend Wright overboard in 2008 he kept aspects of his black supremacist ideology.
     

    Barack Obama sat in the pews of a radical racist church for 20 years listening to the rantings of a black supremacist preacher (steeped in the hateful teachings of Black Liberation Theology) who saw 9/11 and 3000 dead as divine punishment for slavery, Jim Crow and white America's nonexistent ongoing institutional oppression of blacks-millions of whom are trapped in poverty and degradation by the failed liberal welfare state. So I wasn't surprised to hear Obama this week libelling and stereotyping (less offensively than Wright) all white Americans as hopelessly, unredeemably, immutably racist.

     But before I get into that perhaps you'll recall that candidate Obama in March 2008-foreshadowing the racially divisive president he'd make, as I predicted then (see)-in his speech on Reverend Wright and race (to save his election campaign) threw his old, sick white grandmother under the bus comparing her to Wright because of her racist sins: "She feared black men," said Obama...."and occasionally uttered racial and ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe." (Did she God damn black America I wonder?)

    Now after this despicable speech (which the liberal media laughably compared to Lincoln's historic "Cooper Union Speech") Obama elaborating on his grandmother's racism said that it was "TYPICAL OF WHITE PEOPLE."  He said that racism was "bred into our experiences and doesn't go away..... and that's just the nature of race in our society."  In other words, while candidate Obama was smiling and lying and pledging to be a post-racial uniter and healer as president (another Mandela or Dr. King) he seems to have believed that trying to unite black and white in a harmoniously racial society wasn't possible. Why? Because like his racist grandmother all white people by nature (no matter how liberal they seem), are hopelessly and helplessly racist to some degree, and could never accept blacks as equal human beings. In fact, Obama's Wright speech was an ominous sign that as president he'd wage war against white America on behalf of blacks just like he did for decades on the streets of Chicago as a race hustling community agitator-like pressuring banks to make risky subprime loans to blacks (see). And indeed, no sooner did Obama take office than he fired the first shoot in this war by having Eric Holder condemn white Americans as "cowards when it comes to race" despite all the progress and financial sacrifices that were made to help blacks over the decades.

    In other words, as you will see below, it doesn't matter to extremists like Obama whether you're left or right, Republican or Democrat-or if you descended from immigrants who came to our shores from Ireland, Italy, Germany or France when the Civil War was decades past-if you're a white American of any ethnicity living anywhere in this land  you're blood is poisoned (like Obama's grandmother) with anti-black racism.

     Indeed, Obama's radicalism was even more pronounced in his pod cast interview with Marc Maron this week where after shocking many by using the "N" word he demonized white America-going beyond what he said in 2008-as hopelessly, helplessly and ineradicably racist. Just listen to this crap and cringe: 

    “The legacy of slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination" said Obama to Maron, "in almost every institution of our lives, you know, that casts a long shadow, and that’s still part of our DNA that’s passed on. We’re not cured of it..” 
     
     
     
    Racism is in our what? DNA. And passed on from whom to whom? Parents to children generation to generation. Whose DNA? Not that of black people, red people, yellow people, Hispanics or Arabs. It's only white people who are genetically racist, Obama seems to believe. Indeed, the belief that only whites are racist (that alone of all races they have a racist gene) is pure, hateful Reverend Wright black supremacism which, as I said above, Obama was exposed to for twenty years.
     
     
    Now as no one's DNA can be altered or changed, and anti-black racism is innate in every white American's genes they, according to Obama, are unalterably, incurably, inescapably racist. Though, in spite of this, there's been great progress since the Civil War in civil rights for blacks, as Obama admits, it has reached its limit going as far as it can in righting past injustices and wrongs. Ultimately, according to Obama, there is no cure for white racism;  no hope of us building a truly just society of racial equality. Though we've had a Civil War with 500,000 dead, civil rights legislation protecting blacks from bigotry in the public and private sectors, a War on Poverty costing  US tax payers $19 trillion since the mid 1960s, and reverse discrimination programs aimed at "white privlege" to even the score  it's still not enough for Obama and the unappeasable radicals on the left. The lot of them are sore winners never happy with any gains and always wanting more.  America's got to pay and keep on paying for past and ongoing sins until the greatest debtor nation on Earth goes broke and there's nothing left to give.
     
     
     
     
     RELATED
     

    OBAMA MAHARAJ JI: REVEREND WRIGHT AND THE SECRET OF OBAMA’S HYPNOTIC POWERS

     RACHEL DOLEZAL AND THE UNREDEEMABLE EVIL OF BEING WHITE

    LEFT-WING RACIST EXTREMISM AND THE MAKING OF DYLANN STORM ROOF

     
     
    Since the terrible Charleston church shooting last week we've learned a great deal about sick, delusional gunman Dylann Storm Roof from his website and friends. We've learned that his radicalization into an evil racist mass murderer began with the demonization of George Zimmerman as a bloodthirsty racist killer of an unarmed black teen by the insane, race obsessed, lynch mob left who to this day cry out for his hide though he committed no crime. It was in the super-charged atmosphere of racist hate created by the left where the innocent Mr. Zimmerman was judged guilty of murder deserving prison or death that Roof  took his first step in the jouney that would end in a masscare. For Root began to research "Black on White crime" and found tons of material on violent anti-white racism and murder that poisoned his soul drove him insane making a white supremacist of him. As he read through this stuff and obsessed over it and saw the media and racist left vilifying Zimmerman for defending himself against a violent, black, gangbanging thug he apparently began to fantasize in his sick, twisted   increasingly racist head the killing of blacks for revenge.
     
      But why did Roof wait so long to act? When he gunned down those nine sweet innocent church going blacks in that historic Charleston church it was 39 months after Trayvon Martin's self-defense death. Why didn't he act sooner to realize his warped fantasies and satisfy his lust for black blood?  Was it for lack of a weapon that he waited so long? In other words, if Root was armed back in 2012 would he have gone out and massacred blacks to avenge all the undeserved hate and violent rhetoric directed at Zimmerman? And all the black hate crimes against whites that go unreported by the press? Probably not. Roof was angry as hell with blacks for vilifying Zimmerman; but that wasn't enough to push him over the edge into murderous extremist rage; it wasn't enough to form in his growing racist neo-nazi brain the paranoid delusion that blacks were taking over America and dooming whites to subservience and bondage that needed a race war to prevent. No.That required something bigger and more frightful than anti- Zimmerman hate; that required the riots in Ferguson that were triggered by the racist lie that Michael Brown surrendered to Darren Wilson before he was shot; that required the protests in New York that were set off when Officer Pantaleo wasn't indicted for Eric Garner's self-caused death-and then two cops were killed by a Moslem black man in revenge; that required the mayhem and riots in Baltimore over worthless drug dealer Freddie Grey's death which most likely was unintentional when he was riding in a police van under arrest.
     
    Indeed, Dylann Roof's buddy Joseph Meek said while drinking with him one night that "Roof began ranting about Freddie Gray and Baltimore."  Baltimore it seems was the last straw for Roof; after Zimmerman, Ferguson and New York the anti-white, anti-cop Freddie Grey riots there completely unhinged him and decided his terrible fate. And now nine innocent blacks are dead in no small measure due to the deranged radical racist left and their hatred of America as an unjust and racist place.
     
    POSTSCRIPT
     
    THE APPERSON-ZIMMERMAN INCIDENT
     
     
    On Friday June 19th, two days after the Charlston church massacre which, as we have seen, is rooted in Trayvon Martin's death,  Matthew Apperson, the Florida man  who took a shot at George Zimmerman in a road rage incident in May nearly killing him, was charged by prosecutors with attempted second degree murder. Apparently Apperson was trying to finish the job started by Trayvon Martin who failed to kill Zimmerman as he was grounding and pounding his head on a concrete sidewalk. The timing is very strange (see).
     
    RELATED
     
     
     

    DEBATE ON THE POPE, NASA, BAD CLIMATE PREDICTIONS AND GLOBAL SCORCHING

    Does the 'Catholic vote' even exist? - Ben Schreckinger - POLITICO

    If you put Al Gore's face on Pope Francis it would hardly make a bit of difference.

     

    POPE IS LATE TO THE PARTY

    With the great scientific climate change "consensus" confounded by 18 unbroken 
    years of stagnant global temperatures and failed predictions of catastrophe (from a misunderstanding of carbon dioxide), with a 30 year cooling trend re-icing Antarctica, with Greenland covered with snow again, and temperatures in North America dropping, the Pope-trying to make the Church relevant by moving to the insane, carbon obsessed, humanity is doomed left, is dealing with yesterday's made up climate change crisis. And what is particularly pathetic is the Pope's utopian solution of a world political authority controlling the earth's resources and redistributing wealth from rich to poor nations. Like the man in the White House Pope Francis has chronic truth and reality problems that are making him one of history's worst popes.

    As a Catholic, I wonder where the Pope gets his information. It's possible that the Vatican's science "experts" who advise him are typical pawns for the climate-cult.

     

    ApolloSpeaks  L_Dave 

     

    It's likely that the Pope's science experts are divided on the issue; and that he went with the alarmists because it's the trend and good PR for the Church.

     

    There isn't a single Science Organization on Earth that shares your views. Why is that?

    http://opr.ca.gov/s_listoforga...

    You're also wrong about the 18 years of stagnant temperatures

    http://www.theguardian.com/env...
    http://www.scientificamerican....
    http://climate.nasa.gov/news/1...

     

    Practically every climate scientist is theorizing and debating 
    about the cause of the unexpected phenomenon called "THE GREAT PAUSE" in 
    LOWER ATMOSPHEREIC global temperatures-not surface temperatures. You're 
    confusing the two.

    Fact is, what we are putting into the atmosphere, according to 
    the RSS satellite record, isn't catastrophically heating it. Higher surface 
    temperatures (if they are happening) are not due to a rise in atmospheric 
    temperatures which haven't happened for 18 years.

     

    Nope...Read the article again.

    http://climate.nasa.gov/news/1...

    "Combine that with data from NASA's CERES sensor, which shows the rate of
    heat uptake by the whole planet is nearly constant, and it becomes 
    clear that the planet is still warming, even as the increase in surface 
    air temperatures lull temporarily."

     

     

    Which NASA are we to believe? The NASA that said before 2000 that US 
    temperatures were cooling since the 1930s, and that 1934 was much warmer than 
    1998? Or the NASA that completely reversed the data after 2000? That said US temperatures were warming since the 30s and that 1934 was much cooler 
    than 1998?

    NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

    NASA’s top climatologist said that the US had been cooling

    Whither U.S. Climate?
    By James Hansen, Reto Ruedy, Jay Glascoe and Makiko Sato — August 
    1999

    Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed 
    precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought.

    in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time 
    of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there 
    was a slight cooling throughout much of the country

    NASA GISS: Science 
    Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

    NOAA and CRU also reported no warming in the US during the century prior to 1989.

    February 04, 1989

    Last week, scientists from the United States Commerce Department’sNational 
    Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said that a study of temperature readings 
    for the contiguous 48 states over the last century showed there had been no 
    significant change in average temperature over that period. Dr. (Phil) 
    Jones said in a telephone interview today that his own results for the 48 states 
    agreed with those findings.

    New York Times

    Right after the year 2000, NASA and NOAA dramatically altered US climate history, 
    making the past much colder and the present much warmer. The animation below 
    shows how NASA cooled 1934 and warmed 1998, to make 1998 the hottest year in US 
    history instead of 1934. This alteration turned a long term cooling trend since 
    1930 into a warming trend.

    Source: NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000 | Real Science

     

    There you go again, posting political right wing websites. I got a novel idea if you want to gain support...Try posting links to websites by actual scientific organizations. I know that would be impossible for you because worldwide there isn't on single scientific organization that supports denialism :(

     
     

    Let me understand this. Before 2000 NASA wasn't a credible scientific organization on the subject of US global warming because it supported denialism? And since 2000 it became a credible entity for doing the politically correct thing and altering the data to agree with the useless, politically failing alarmism of climate change extremists who insanely turn a slight natural warming of the planet into a coming world ending, humanity killing apocalypse? What does such a far-fetched doomsday prophesy of future man-caused catastrophe (for which there is no 
    practical solution if it were true) have to do with rational, hard-headed, fact based science? NOTHING!

     

     Bill Brasky  ApolloSpeaks 

     

    Listen, if NASA has your panties in a jam, than ignore them. There are 200 other scientific organizations that say the exact same thing.

     

    ApolloSpeaks  Bill Brasky 

     

    You mean the 200 crackpot warmunist groups like NASA that got the science of carbon dioxide wrong? That based on an exaggerated, politically driven notion of its heat trapping nature have made all sorts of laughably bad embarrassing climate predictions about the catastrophic heating of the atmosphere (by two or three degrees or more) causing extreme weather events, like, for example: snowless winters in Great Britain, Canada and the Northern US by 2006. Or the 50 million people that were to be displaced by melting glaciers and rising sea levels by 2008. Or the malaria that would ravage the coastal areas of Spain, Italy and France by 2010. Or the worldwide droughts and crop failures causing global famine with millions starving to death before eating their kids by 2012. Or New York becoming the Venice of North America by 2015 with gondolas floating down 5th Avenue to the music of Vivaldi. Or Miami joining the lost continent of Atlantis at the bottom of the sea. Before my life is through do you think I could enjoy a summer vacation in Antarctica or the North Pole? Will man made global warming make Antarctica green again like it was 50 million years ago when Nature turned it into a tropical paradise with palm trees, turtles and honey bees?

    Now what all your 200 groups need do to save planet Earth from CO2 caused Waterworld is come up with $44 trillion (IPCC estimate) for redistribution to the developing third world to reverse its rip-roaring dirty industrialization-where coal-fired plants are springing up like weeds; and the use of polluting, gas guzzling cars is growing exponentially. Where are you warmunists going to get that kind of dough? From America, Europe, Japan which are drowning in entitlement debt? Or from a massive carbon tax to impoverish more of the middle class? Maybe you can get it from the Vatican Bank? Or the Pope can auction off some art for you: Michelangelos, Raphaels, Giottos, the Cistine Chapel ceiling. If not then a miracle you'll need to avert Climate Armageddon. Maybe the Pope can help you here and intercede with God to keep global temperatures down; or make coal, oil and fracking disappear along with carbon from the atmosphere. Good thing this holy man is your friend. When all else fails God is there to continue life on Earth despite man's climate sins until the dying Sun becomes a red giant expanding its radius 200 times turning Earth's surface into a burning sea of molten lava like Dante's seventh hell. It's what I call GLOBAL SCORCHING. Unlike your Waterworld bull Global Scorching is a real, catastrophic, science based, doomsday, climate change event. Pray for climate peace my friend, and that man conquers space across the stars before the dying Sun destroys him.

    Space is destiny

    It must be conquered

    On it depends our survival

    The Sun is a mortal star

    The Earth a perishable sphere

    And man a temporary earthling

    And that is the truth!

     

     

    RELATED

     

     

     
     
     

    RACHEL DOLEZAL AND THE UNREDEEMABLE EVIL OF BEING WHITE

     
     
    Why does this radical leftist, race obsessed, self-hating white woman prefer the fantasy of being black over the reality of her pure white biological heritage? Answer: she has an extreme pathological hatred of white people who she perceives and stereotypes as evil, unjust, unredeemable racist oppressors of blacks; and believes (in her deranged leftist mind) that identifying with blacks and their victimhood saves her from the sin and crime of being white....transforming her into a morally whole and just human being on the side of the angels and saints.  
     
    Dolezal's rage against whites  includes her good, decent white Christian parents (they adopted four black kids) who she accuses of racism because they're white wouldn't go along with her immoral charade .
     
    In other words, as absurd and crazy as it is, what Jesus is to Christians blackness is to Rachel Dolezal. Falsely claiming that she first discovered her inner blacknesss at age five she obviously believes that she's a black soul trapped in a white woman's body needing racial liberation. And being a social justice activist working for black causes trying to right racial wrongs isn't enough to free her. Freedom for Dolezal meant convincing the world of her blackness by lying about her parents and past and looking and acting the part of a black woman as much as was possible. In short, she needed others to believe she was black to believe it more strongly and bury herself deeper and deeper in the lie.
     
    Equating whiteness with evil and blackness with good (because victims are holier than oppressors) Rachel Dolezal has been trying to remake herself into a black woman in an absurd act of spiritual redemption.

     

    But reality finally caught up to Rachel Dolezal. After years of self-deception and profitably fooling the world of her blackness (advancing to an executive position in the NAACP and winning awards) Dolezal's white parents (who she racially hates) struck back and shattered her false persona which she now tragically clings to and  refuses to let go lest the intolerable reality of being white drags her back down to the netherworld of racial damnation and hell.
     
    I rejoice in this women's downfall as I do in all evil people. And evil Dolezal is as her hatred of whites (shared by too many blacks) is unjustified and poisons and divides our culture turning blacks against whites for past racial wrongs considered unforgivable because of the stupid belief it created  lasting damage and harm.  If anyone needs a psychiatrist it's the Rachel Dolezals of this world.
     
      
     
    RELATED
     
     
     
     
     
     

    HILLARY CLINTON: RESETTING THE NEW DEAL FOR 21ST CENTURY AMERICA

     

     

    ON THE 82ND ANNIVERSARY OF THE VERY LAST DAY

    of FDR's first One Hundred Days (6-13-1933), a weak, uninspiring, ineffectual Hillary Clinton (sounding like the Walking Dead) tacitly vowed on Roosevelt Island to rescue the worst economy since the Great Depression (with a real jobless rate of 11%*) with another "new New Deal." Nevermind that the old New Deal was a failure that prolonged the Great Depression for years; and that Obama's costly version (the biggest stimulus in history) has caused the weakest economic recovery since the end of World War II (now verging on a double dip recession). But with Hillary at the helm it will be different. She has a "rendezvous with destiny" to RESET the New Deal and make New Deal liberalism work at last.

    *As stated by Bernie Sander's in his Burlington kick off speech.

    America has had two New Deals, both were failures. Now Hillary is promising a third. Who is singing "Yesterday"?

    How? What's Hill's secret? Will she be guided by the spirits of FDR and Eleanor from the great beyond? Nah. There's actaully nothing mystical about it. Hillary's the wife of a president who presided over a roaring economic recovery that lifted millions out of poverty and created millions of good paying jobs. Never mind that that recovery was sparked by a technological revolution that started before her husband took office; never mind it was enhanced by a phony housing boom he caused by recklessly putting millions of low-income folks into homes they couldn't afford. Indeed, never mind the housing boom was a devastating bubble that crashed the economy costing America trillions, and the election of Obama and an America in progressive collapse and decline; it's Hillary to the rescue promising that government which is going broke and can't fix itself will fix everything that's broken: from unequal pay for women (which is a lie), to the GOP suppression of minority votes (another lie), to the catastrophic man-caused heating of the atmosphere (that's not happening); indispensible Hill promises a New Deal for a new America of shared propserity with a 21st century green economy that will work for all leaving no one behind-not even the filthiest down and out bum.

     

    And for those Hillary hating right-wing conspirators who deny that she had any significant foreign policy achievements as secretary of state she reminded us Saturday that she was present in the Situation Room when Barack Obama (after seven months of dithering) ordered the hit on Bin Laden that killed him dead. That more than made up for Benghazl when bin Laden virtually returned from the dead killing four Americans on 9/11-foreshadowing the resurgence of Islamic extremism across the region.

     

    RESET AMERICA!

    HILLARY CLINTON 2016!

     

    What she did for US/Russian relations

    and the peace and security of the Middle East

    she'll do for me and you and this once great country. 

     

    RELATED

     
     
     

    LET’S ETHNICALLY CLEANSE THE WEST BANK AND EAST JERUSALEM OF JEWS ALL OVER AGAIN

     
    One of the big, ugly easily disprovable lies of the anti-semitic BDS movement to destroy Israel, and promoted by our pro-Palestinian imbecile president ("the most Jewish who ever lived"), is that Israeli settlements on the West Bank and Jews living in East Jerusalem constitute an unjust, immoral, illegal occupation of Palestinian Arab lands, and violation of Palestinian human rights; and that all the Jews living there (because they are Jews) must collectively pack up and deport themselves (or be forcibly removed) because they have no legal or moral right to be there.
     
    And backing this lie are a slew of UN Resolutions. One such resolution (446) goes so far as to falsely accuse Israel of violating the Forth Geneva Convention by illegally transferring whole populations of Jews to Palestinian Arab lands (that Palis have never owned)-which in reality has never happened. As I argue below based on the reality and history of East Jerusalem and the West Bank before the Arab-Isreali War of 1948 Jews have an absolute moral and legal right to live there-as do the bigoted, intolerant, hate driven Palestinian Arabs who lack the moral maturity and humanity to live with them in peace and want them gone.
     
    I'll get straight to the point: 67 years ago Jordanian troops-while waging a Nazi-like war of annihilation with six other Jew hating Arab states to crush the new-born state of Israel-illegally invaded and seized control of the West Bank and East Jerusalem which had been-but were no longer- under the mandatory control of Great Britain. Then Jordan's anti-semitic Arab king, Abdullah I, wanting an exclusively Arab West Bank and East Jerusalem issued an illegal, human rights violating decree making it unlawful for Jews to live there-while Arabs were granted full Jordanian citizenship. The decree was followed by the forced illegal expulsion (ethnic cleansing) of thousands of Jews whose homes, lands and businesses were confiscated by Abdullah and his regime. And what did the UN do? Did they pass resolutions condemning this ethnic cleansing of Jews, or demanding compensation for the theft of their property and lands? NO! They acquiesced in the purge and did nothing.
      
    Then 19 years later justice came: after enduring the killing of thousands of Jews inside Israel from terrorist attacks launched in part from East Jerusalem and the West Bank Israel in a legal, justified defensive war against Jordan (and several other Arab states) invaded and conquered East Jerusalem and the West Bank ending Jordan's illegal occupation and racist regime. Then reversing Abdullah's ethnic cleansing decree Israel-to the outrage of Jew hating Jordanian Arabs (later called Palestinians)- RESTORED THE STATUS QUO ANTE and repopulated the West Bank and East Jerusalem with thousands of Jews who (contrary to what UN Resolution 442 says) VOLUNTARILY came to live there as they once had for centuries.  
     
    Now as Jordan's illegal, immoral and unjustified ethnic cleansing of Jews from the West Bank and East Jerusalem was completely ignored by the UN, and the subsequent Israeli conquest of those areas righted a great moral, legal and historic wrong against the Jewish people, resolutions such as 446 are BAD LAWS based on falsehoods and lies and are therefore invalid-as are all accusations of "land theft" "illegal occupation" "oppression" "apartheid" "colonization" etc. by Israel's Arab enemies and their deranged leftist allies.
     
    Indeed, as Israel necessarily seized the West Bank and East Jerusalem from an aggressive racist Arab regime for security reasons, and as the aggressor (Jordan) in violation of international law illegally conquered those lands (they belonged to no nation at the time and to this day are "disputed"), where then are the injustices and crimes attributed to Israel from seizing those lands? How do the Jewish victims of racism, cultural imperialism and religious intolerance returning to lands which they previously lived on for centuries and were unjustly expelled constitute "theft" "illegal occupation" and "colonization" of those lands?  
     
    Of course these charges are preposterous and false and should be dismissed as the racist ravings of bigoted Arab lunatics poisoned by centuries of theologically inspired hatred-and stupidly believed by useful leftist idiots who love to bleed for victims of injustice real or imagined. 
     
    The truth is this: in 1948 Jordan ethnically cleansed the West Bank and East Jerusalem of its Jewish inhabitants because they were Jews; and today the Palestinians (quoting the Koran) who claim to rightfully own  every inch of East Jerusalem and the West Bank want to return to the Jordanian policy of ethnic cleansing and purge both areas of Jews all over again.
     
    And if anyone reading this doubts that the Jewish character, for example, of the West Bank settlements is the fundamental reason for Palestinian hostility and rage then let him ask himself this simple question: would this hostility persist if the Israeli government replaced Jewish settlers with Arab-Moslem citizens from Israel in a mass population exchange? Of course not. As Palestinians (because of faith and race) regard Israeli Arabs as Palestinians the bogus issue of "illegal, occupying, colonialist Israelis" would suddenly disappear. In fact, if Jewish Israel were to surrender to Allah and convert en masse to Islam the decade's old Arab/Palestinian-Israeli conflict would be resolved once and for all. For Israel would no longer be an infidel state of filthy non-Moslem sinners desecrating the Arabian Peninsula (the birthplace of Islam), and making Moslems (with their medieval sensibilities) murderously mad.
     

    TEN YEARS OF BDS AND ISRAEL STANDS A TOWER OF STRENGTH (POSTSCRIPT ADDED ON BDS AND FRENCH POLITICS)

     

    On July 9, 2005, just one month into the 57th year of Israel's against-all-odds, miraculous existence as the Middle East's only functioning liberal democracy and modern state, 171 racist Palestinian organizations evilly banded together and launched the ill-fated "Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement" to undermine, delegitimize and destroy the Jewish state (because it's Jewish) by nonviolent economic and political means. Under the guise of international law the Palestinians (a people created to destroy Israel) are scheming to replace the world's only Jewish state with the world's 57th Moslem state (Palestine) because the one Jewish state is a terrible offense to medieval Moslem sensibilities and makes the Islamic world (one vast insane asylum) crazy with hatred and murderous rage.
     
     
    In other words, BDS is a thinly veiled attempt at a ONE STATE SOLUTION for resolving the decades' old  Arab/Palestinian-Israeli conflict where Democratic Israel with its Jewish majority and Arab Moslem minority (having the same  political, economic and social rights as Jews) would be reversed with a Jewish minority living in political, religious and economic oppression (if they're allowed to live al all) just like the shrinking Christian minority in freedom hating, human rights crushing Palestinian lands. 
     
    Now this Palestinian and leftist scheme for a new 57th Moslem state (dominating the once Jewish land of Israel) would be achieved by forcing Israel through international economic and political pressures (boycotts, divestments and sanctions) to recognize the so-called "right of return" of five million mostly poor, illiterate, unskilled, Jew hating Palestinian refugees (holed up in squalid refugee camps)  who were created by the Arab states when they invaded Israel in 1948 to crush the new born Jewish state.
     
     BDS is now in its tenth year of unjustified economic warfare against the Jewish state; and thought  it has done some damage to Israel's highly productive and innovative free market economy  it's not any closer to achieving its impossible goal of destroying and Islamizing Israel than it was in 2004 when it began. What makes BDS so foolish and futile is the common sense understanding among Israelis that suffering some economic pain is overwhelmingly preferable to a flood of savage Pali refugees plunging  the country into a devastating  civil war. In short, the Zionist state is here to stay. And  nothing short of nuking her into oblivion is going to change that.
     
     
     POSTSCRIPT
     
    Netanyahu and Hollande
     
    FRIENDLY DEBATES ON BDS, ISRAEL'S NUKES, AND HOLLANDE COURTING NETANYAHU FOR FRENCH JEWISH VOTES
     
     

    WHAT COULD BDS POSSIBLY DO

    to the democratic Jewish State of Israel that 15 wars great and small, and hundreds of public relations disasters couldn't do in 67 years? Israeli Jews are virtually unbreakable morally stronger than all their Moslem and leftist enemies combined. And they will outlast BDS like every other attempt to bring them down. You want BDS? Bring it on and watch it fail!

     

    That's not the point, it's having someone on the board of directors that has supported BDS, which is also spreading like wildfire on our own college campuses, who's supporters openly call for ending the Jewish state of Israel and discriminate against Jewish college students. BDS supporters rallied openly at UC Davis, shouting Allah Akbar at Jewish students. It is an anti-Semitic movement and should have no ties in any Jewish foundation!

     

     

    Nevertheless, do you really believe that these morally deranged lunatics have the remotest chance of realizing their wicked, hate driven dream of BDSing nuclear armed "Never Again" Jewish Israel into oblivion?

     

     

     

    Yeah, I do. They are part of a worldwide rising anti-Semitic movement who want to destroy Israel. Obama is leading the charge with his talks with Iran who want to blow Israel off the map. It's a scary time to be a Jew and the most dangerous time since WWII.

     

     

    Nuclear armed Israel is in a much stronger position to survive than nuclear North Korea that no one dares to attack. Israel's on shore/off shore arsenal of nuclear weapons (and ICBM capability) in the middle of the economically vital Middle East ensures its existence. Within minutes Israel could turn the region into a radioactive wasteland with millions dead, and plunge the world economy into a devastating depression. Jews did not have that kind of power during WWII. Check out the Samson Option.

     

     

    Unfortunately.....yes. They are well supported by the Left, the shameful UN and the European Union.Obama is onboard as well and has yet to do his greatest damage to Israel. Hang on, it's going to be a wild ride.

    Hopefully, Netanyahu will wake up and once BHO does his "non defense" of Israel and abandons them at the UN Security council, "for their own good". Maybe Israel will finally take the offensive, annex Judea and Samaria and tell the UN to piss off (which they should have done years ago).

    Time will tell....and it will be a matter of months. BHO will have his wrath delivered before his term expires. Most likely after he does his "newspeak" on his Iran deal - doing high 5's with his European BDS friends.......

    Today's Supreme Court decision just emboldens BHO even more.

     

      Fromafar

     

    Good news out of France yesterday (I didn't see this one coming): Hollande opposes BDS.

    Like I said earlier: the Israeli people that I know are virtually unbreakable, and prepared for any kind of challenge.

    BTW, an emboldened Obama is a more reckless Obama prone to make devastating mistakes out of desperation to escape a terrible legacy.

     

    About Hollande....wouldn't hold your breath. 
    I know what he said, but he has a believability quotient just above BHO.

    As to a more emboldened Obama....you are absolutely right!

     

     

    Within the context of a weak French economy Hollande's opposition to BDS looks very credible. France seems all prepared to step into the vacuum created by others-to reinvest where other's disinvest, etc. Vive La France! For now.`

     

     

     

    We can only both hope you're right....
    Hollander however is a far left ideologue, so again.....don't hold your breath.

     

     

    It's economic opportunism trumping ideology.

     

     

     Remember Apollo, this is the same French President that is trying to help Obama force a Palestinian State down the Israeli's throat. If anything, I take his move as a surreptitious way in preparation for the cous de gras they intend to deliver in the UN Security Council Chambers.The fur has not yet begun to fly. See my post above

     

    Both Hollande and Netanyahu are for a two state solution for resolving the Pali-Israeli conflict. Both oppose the radical pro-Palestinian BDS movement with its ONE STATE SOLUTION: gradual destruction of Israel through the so-called "right of return" of Palestinian refugees. Any genuine two state solution coming out of the UN that respects and recognizes Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state will be rejected by the Palestinians as not going far enough. They will run away from it just as they have every other two state solution whether coming from the UN or Israel. In the meantime, Israel and France will strengthen their economic ties as Hollande desperately tries to revive the French economy grabbing every opportunity that's available before the 2017 elections.

     

    Apollo, Apollo, Apollo.....
    I doubt that Netanyahu in his heart of hearts is for a "two state solution". It's more a "two state delusion".The Palestinians are no more interested in a "State" than the Arabs are interested in absorbing their Arab brethren into their societies. Palestinians are officially and heavily discriminated against by all Arab Governments.

    What the Palestinians want is, "a base of operations" to continue the original Jihad of the 20th Century to it's natural conclusion. If they wanted a "State", they've had three very good offers in the last 15 years. Not only were they rejected, but NOT ONCE even countered.

    I'm sure you know all of the above and believe what I'm saying about the Palestinians.If there is ever to truly be a "settlement" of this issue, it will have to be along the lines of what Caroline Glick or Martin Sherman have proposed.

    Israel will eventually be forced to annex Judea and Samaria (whether the world or even they! like it or not).It will be the only move they can make to defend themselves and when BHO is out of office, I expect it to happen.

    Hollande will scream as all of Europe will, but it must be done.

    The EU has prepared sanctions against Israel and are just waiting for the UN Sec. Council to adopt the Palestinian State (with the US abstaining) to impose them. BHO will tell the world, "it's for their own good".

    Keep your eye on this, I almost can guarantee it will happen. It may force Israel's hand sooner than would be advised, but they'll have to go on the offensive to defeat the fraud and show the UN up for the totally corrupt organization it has devolved into.

    Hollande will be right on the front lines of this. You give him FAR, FAR too much credit. Ultimately, he is a leftist, not a Capitalist and he'll be very willing to throw Israel under the bus.

     

     

     

    With Hollande being the most unpopular French President in modern history (his job approval rating is at 30%) and wanting reelection in 2017 he needs all the votes he can muster and that includes the Jewish vote-France has the third largest population of Jews in the world. Hence, Netanyahu's popularity with French Jews has made him into a power broker and valuable political asset to Hollande-or to any potential candidate for the French presidency. In fact, Nicolas Sarkozy, who seems to despise Netanyahu, paid him a visit this week in Jerusalem. Why? Sarkozy is thinking of challenging Hollande for the presidency and needs the Jewish vote. No way Hollande (at least for the next 23 months) is going to do anything to piss Bibi off at the UN or anywhere else. Vive La France! At least for the meantime.

     

    Fromafar  

     

    It's all for political expediancy.

    You seem to be in touch with your inner "Francophile".....:-)

    I hope yet again you are right. However, I wouldn't bet a farthing on it.

    In any event, if it even takes as long as when the "domestique politic" is sorted, the French will be all over the Israeli's.

    They can't help themselves. They seem to have an historic aversion to doing the right thing on a consistent basis.

     

     

     

    Yes, it's all expediency. Between now and May 2017 the name of the game in French politcs is appeasing Bibi and Israel. Ironic isn't it after Bibi defied Hollande and came to the Hebro rally, then walked out on him at the Paris synagogue? In retrospect that was a political mistake that Hollande now regrets and is trying to rectify.

     

    Fromafar ApolloSpeaks 

     

    The best news is that the French Presidential elections are NOT scheduled till a few months after BHO is in full retirement when we will hopefully have an Ameriphile in the White House.

    Before the end of this year, (EVEN IF it's BHO's LAST ACTION as POTUS), he will abandon Israel to the French Proposal at the UN Sec. Council. It's baked in the cake. BHO has telegraphed it repeatedly. I suppose there is some chance he'll do it between our Presidential election and the end of his term as to not jeopardize HRC's chances.

     

     

    Why are you so concerned about the French proposal when it requires that Palestinians  recognize Israel as a Jewish state? How many times has Abbas said "I will never recognize the Jewishness of Israel or a Jewish state"? Even if it clears the Security Council Arab intransigence will ensure it goes the way of its predecessors. It's not to be taken seriously.

     

    Fromafar 

     

    And this means?

     

    ks  Fromafar

     

    The desperate Mr. Hollande is playing politics to look like a statesman.  

     

     

    RELATED

     

  • BARACK OBAMA: AMERICA’S ANTI-ZIONIST “JEWISH” PRESIDENT

     

    "I think Prime Minister Netanyahu is somebody who’s predisposed to security, to think perhaps that peace is naive, to see the worst possibilities as opposed to the best possibilities in Arab partners or Palestinian partners. And so I do think right now those politics and those fears are driving the government’s response. And I understand it. But what may seem wise and prudent on the short term can actually end up being unwise over the long term."- - Barack Obama 2015  Interveiw
     

    “Palestine can never recognize Israel as a Jewish state......I have never and will never give up the right of return for Palestinian refugees”- Mahmoud Abbas

     

      "The Israeli demand for Palestinian recognition of a Jewish state as a condition in negotiations is a mistake and should be dropped." - Secretary of State John Kerry

     

    WHY WOULD THE CLOSEST THING TO A TEENAGER

     ever to sit in the White House want it known that he thinks he's the closest thing we've ever had to a Jewish president? Is it one last-ditch effort at public relations to repair his justified image with Israelis of being the most anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian US president in history? Is this Obama’s last desperate adolescent move at winning back the hearts and minds of Israelis and turning them against Bibi Netanyahu who he believes is depriving him and them of a peace deal with an implacably Jew-hating Arab people headed by Mahmoud Abbas: the anti-Zionist co-founder of the PLO who refuses to recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish State and wants a return of millions of Palestinian refugees to Israel as the central condition for peace? Is that what Obama is trying to do?

    Truth is Netanyahu and Israelis want peace-the same just peace Israel achieved with Egypt's Anwar Sadat and Jordan's King Hussein when both courageously "betrayed" the evil Arab cause and recognized the legitimacy of Zionism and Israel as the national homeland for the Jewish people. But Abbas and the Palestinians are hell-bent on victory and believe it can be their's. Hating Sadat and King Hussein for their “traitorous” peace  with Israel "peace" for Abbas means Jewish Israel's incremental political destruction. It means Israelis forgoing Zionism and allowing the return of every last Palestinian refugee and their descendents which would gradually undermine the Jewish character of Israel and turn it into an Arab-Moslem-Sharia run hell state with its Jewish minority living in oppression-just as the shrinking number of Christians now live in the Palestinian territories.

    Indeed, when John Kerry said last year that for the sake of peace it would be best if Netanyahu "drop the Jewish state demand" it signaled that he and Obama (though not daring to say it publicly) were on board with Abbas's evil scheme for a one state solution by flooding Israel with millions of Arab refugees that was caused by a pan-Arab war of annihilation against Israel. Indeed, if this weren’t so then why didn’t Kerry, to be fair, also tell Abbas that for peace it would be best to “drop the right of refugee return?” But about this so-called right there wasn’t a peep. Instead, Obama and Kerry have taken leave of their senses claiming  that Abbas (with his refugee scheme for destroying Israel) is a genuine and trustworthy “peace partner " as if he was another Sadat or King Hussein. But Netanyahu and Israel aren't deceived: Abbas is  a "peace partner" from hell with a plan of peace for peacefully taking down the Jewish state piece by piece. 

    But Obama and Kerry’s actions and inactions should surprise no one familiar with the anti-Israel Zionist-hating left. For like many on the left Obama and Kerry believe that  Jewish Israel's existence has been a disaster for US foreign policy, the peace and stability of the Middle East and the world; and that if Netanyahu and the Jews peacefully sacrificed their Zionism (and trying to maintain the Jewish character of Israel by controlled immigration) it would be for the greater good of the region and world and everyone would prosper. Indeed, if only Netanyahu (and the Jews), like Obama says, could overcome his security fears [of Jews living in a Palestinian state] and see the "best possibilities" of the Palestinians-meaning that they’re a good, noble, just and generous people; in other words, if only he and the Jews could learn to trust the Palestinians and agree to the return of millions of refugees as Abbas demands (and Arafat before him) as an absolute condition for peace (which Obama and Kerry tacitly endorse), then they'd see that their fears were unfounded; they'd see that living as a minority in a larger Arab-Palestinian-Moslem state would not be the nightmare of oppression and injustice they imagine. In a word,  Israeli Jews would see that the good, just, noble Palestinians would treat them with kindness, respect and equality, and protect their ethnic, religious and human rights. And everyone would live happily evermore.

    That Barack Obama from the start of his presidency has been anything but a honest broker in trying to negotiate a settlement between Israelis and Palestinians should be clear to the reader-as it is to the vast majority of Israelis who rightly despise him. Not once from his first day in office has Obama so much as criticized Mahmoud Abbas for making the massive return of refugees to Israel the main condition for peace. On the other hand, Bibi Netanyahu-Obama's scapegoat for failure-has relentlessly been criticized over border issues, expanding settlements, new home construction in East Jerusalem, Jewish state demand, and now for being blind to the "better possibilities" of Palestinians. In short, Obama like Abbas and the Palestinians, most Moslems worldwide, and the anti-Israel left won't be happy with Israel until it is willing to commit national suicide and agree to its own demise. And this deceptive anti-Zionist enemy of Israel has the audacity to say he's the closest thing this country ever had to a Jewish president? It's mind-boggling!

    RELATED

    Where did Obama learn to be a pro-Palestinian anti-Zionist? From his pro-Hamas mentor Reverend Wright, where else?

    Obama church published Hamas terror manifesto

    NETANYAHU’S SPEECH TO CONGRESS, MUNICH 1938 , ISAAC HERZOG AND 1999 REDUX

    BERNIE SANDERS VS. HILLARY CLINTION: THE RACE FOR FDR’S OBSOLETE NEW DEAL LEGACY

     

    On May 26TH junior socialist senator from Vermont Bernie "single payer, tax the rich to death" Sanders launched his radical 2016 presidential campaign challenging hypocritical,  corrupt, scandal plagued frontrunner Hillary Rodham  Clinton. Since Sander's launch enthusiasm has been growing for his candidacy among hard left Democat voters (such as Elizabeth Warren supporters) who loath the super wealthy elitist Clintons and  see them as too centrist to continue Barack Obama's unfinished agenda of political, social, economic and environmental transformation (see). Could the unthinkable happen again with Hillary losing in a close primary race to a candidate running to her left, or perceived as a more genuine and trustworthy progressive who will  soak the rich, grow the welfare state, redistribute more wealth to the poor, grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, keep us out of war and save the planet from climate change disaster? Instead of the Democrat Party having its first woman nominee for president will it get instead its first Jewish nominee-a son of Holocaust survivors? Nobody but God knows.

    Bernie Sanders kicking off his 2016 presidential campaign promising supporters (among other things) that he will expand Medicare for some (which is going bankrupt) into "single payer Medicare for all."

    But is providence dropping clues that Hillary is predestined for defeat, and is using  Sanders' candidacy to wreck her electoral hopes? In other words, is Sanders a sign foretelling  that end? If Sanders is too radical to become the nominee will the growing popularity of his candidacy with progressives nevertheless pull Hillary so far to the left (assuming she's the nominee)  that she'll end up irreversibly alienating the moderates and independents she'd need for victory? For the signs (if signs they be) are looking rather grim for Hillary. Consider the following and judge for yourself. 

    Hillary announced her candidacy for the Democrat nomination to run for the 45th presidency on April 12th in an insipid two minute YouTube video (see). As I wrote here April 12th was the 70th anniversary of Franklin Roosevelt's death-that year being the 45th of the 20th century, the most significant number in this presidential race. Now Roosevelt who was born and raised and achieved political success in New York State, where Hillary lives, was the last president to come from that state. Does Hillary therefore announcing her bid  for the 45th presidency on the death date of America's last president from New York in some mysterious way signal that this race will kill for good her presidential aspirations? That the next president from New York (if there is one in our future) will  be someone else? And that a strong Bernie Sanders' campaign is the stake that will be driven through Hillary's political heart?

    Interestingly enough Sanders like FDR (and unlike Hillary) was born and raised in New York. In fact, Sanders  was born in Brooklyn where Hillary, oddly, has her campaign headquarters (see).  Moreover,  unlike Hillary (born 1947) Sanders was born during FDR's presidency just 90 days short of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. And amazingly, as Hillary announced her candidacy on the 70th anniversary of FDR's death in 1945 Sanders (a man in his early 70s) officially launched his campaign not 44 days later or 46 days later but exactly, precisely 45 days later (see). Could this too be an  ominius sign for Hillary that though she were to win her party's nomination that radical left fired up Bernie will so  damage her with moderates and independents as to ruin her chances of becoming 45th president?  Or will some new criminal corruption scandal finally destroy her campaign?

    Whatever,  both candidates will be claiming to truly represent the New Deal liberalism of Franklin Roosevelt when in reality they'll both be running to FDR's far left. Sanders  has been warning (and Hillary would agree)  that "our nation [Barack Obama's America] is facing more serious crises than we've faced since the Great Depression." But will Sanders convince a majority in his party that he not Hillary is the more credible New Dealer and true heir to FDR's (failed) economic  legacy? And that he can and will do more than Hillary to punish corporate  greed, Wall Street banksters and the super rich to benefit  their helpless "victims"- the poor and struggling middle class families?      

    Roosevelt Island

    But not to be outdone by Sanders or any challenger Hillary will officially launch her campaign on June 13th in Four Freedoms Park on Roosevelt Island (named after FDR, see) to signify her committment to FDR's misguided belief that bold government action and experimentation  is the answer to economic distress, income inequality, unfairness and most every other crisis real or imagined; and that she more than Sanders (or any other candidate) is the true 21st century FDR (or Eleanor Roosevelt) running in this race; and that she knows better than her less  capable rivals how to expand and use the power of the federal government to fix everything that's unfair, wrong and broken in our country. In fact, to signal to the nation that she intends to be, or is destined to be (what Barack Obama failed to be) the second FDR with a new New Deal for saving America Hillary by design  it seems picked the highly significant date of June 13th to hold her first major campaign rally. For June 13th is the 82nd anniversary of the very last momentous day of FDR's First 100 Days of Action* where he signed into law a dozen bills to end the Great Depression-which dismally failed causing instead  a prolonging of the crisis until the militarization of the US economy put America back to work during  World War II.

    * From FDR's March 6th Presidential proclamation closing the nations banks to his June 13th "Home Owners Loan Act" is exactly 100 days (see).

     The race for FDR's obsolete New Deal legacy is on among regressive, reactionary, government supremacist Democrats. A legacy that in reality has no answers for America's current crises under the most reckless spending (New Dealer on steroids) president in history. With $18 trillion in debt and growing, and $100 trillion in unfunded Social Security, Medicare and pension liabilities, America is on an unsustainable course that can't continue without devastating domestic and global consequences.  Government spending, intervention and regulation are out of control and killing this nation driving it toward bankruptcy and ruin; and the Democrat solution is a "new New Deal II" after Obama's has failed. Now more than ever what Bill Clinton said in his 1996 State of the Union is true: "The era of big government is over."

    RELATED

     

    IN DEFENSE OF JEWS WEARING THE CRUSADER’S CROSS AND JEWISH MAILED FIST

     

     

    In the comment section of Friday's post INHISNAME wrote:
     
    "I’ve been wearing the Crusader’s Shield for years. Now I’ll be wearing the Jewish mailed fist."
     
    Responding, puggo cautioned:
     
    "You don’t want to do that. The Jewish mailed fist is a symbol of Jewish terror and fascism used by the terrorist Jewish Defense League, and the fascist Vladimir Jabotinsky the inspiration of Meir Kahane founder of JDL."
     
    Then jhutfedx sticking in his two cents wrote:
     
    "That’s stupid. But just as bad are Jews wearing the Crusader’s Shield worn by Christian soldiers who slaughtered Jews. Is that stupid or is that stupid?"
     
    Then along came BostonLib4Life posting a NY Times article written by atheist author Susan Jacoby (seeon the slaughter of innocent European Jews by Christian crusaders; and comparing the Crusader's Cross to the Nazi Swastika as if symbolizing the same evil for Jews.
     
    My response this morning was as follows:
     
    BL4L
     
    The overarching objective of the Crusades was a noble and righteous one: beating back the aggressive Moslem hordes of imperialistic Islam that savagely and brutally without provocation attacked and conquered for 300 years Christian lands killing multitudes of Christians (like is being done today) for the Koranic sin of not being Moslem.
     
    En route to the Holy Land terrible atrocities were committed by some not all crusaders against some not most European Jews. To indict the Crusades like Obama did, or the obvious Christian hating atheist author of the Times piece does, is anti-Crusades (anti-Christian) bigotry typical of gutless kumbaya New Age leftists who stupidly apologize for the Crusades, or completely demonize it, to uselessly appease implacable Moslem savages.
     
    Below (seeis a truer account of the excesses of the Crusades and the horrors unjustly suffered by a small minority of Europe's Jews which people like you (and Susan Jacoby) blow up into a full-fledged holocaust to discredit Christianity-whose conservative defender I am.
     
    And my answer to your question about the Crusader's Shield is "NO!" it is not the equivalent of the Nazi Swastika as the crusader's weren't medieval Nazis hell-bent on exterminating all Jews. I'll have more to say on this subject in a separate post."
     
     
    To the above I add:
     
    Modern Christian crusaders against Islamic suprematists are brothers in arms with Jewish anti-jihadists like me; for we are soldiers at war with the same totalitarian enemy in the conservative defense of Judeo-Christian-Classical Liberal values and ideals that are relentlessly under attack by violent and nonviolent Islamic jihadists (and leftists like you). I do not know of any modern Christian crusaders (like Robert Spencer, Wild Bill, Reverend Frank Graham, Sarah Palin or nanna, Christian Zionist, Pearls Before Swine or Krusader99, etc.) who are killing Jews or want to kill Jews like some but not most medieval crusaders did to some but not most European Jews-for not being Christian or for the killing of Christ. In fact, most if not all modern Christian crusaders are strong pro-Zionist supporters of Israel, oppose anti-Semiticism, and have no desire or designs to reconquer the Holy Land where Christians under a liberal democratic Jewish state live in peace practicing their faith without fear of persecution or death. As far as today's Christian crusaders are concerned the Holy Land is in good and trustworthy hands; and Israeli Jews are to be praised for having the only Christian community in the region that is growing and thriving. 
     
     
    As for the mailed Jewish fist it's a symbol of Never Again defiance against those Jew hating Moslem savages who want to finish the "Final Solution" of killing all Jews  that Hitler left undone. How that equates to "fascism" I'll never know.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    THE CRUSADER’S CROSS, THE PROPHET’S SWORD, ANTI-JIHAD ON HELL WHEELS AND MUCH, MUCH MORE

     

    UZBEKISTAN: Devout followers of Islam are beheading people there, too | BARE NAKED ISLAM

    LONG IS THE SWORD OF THE PROPHET
     
    A blade that reaches across nations
    In doing God's justice
    And making His enemies pay.
     
    A sword whose blade
    Will stop shedding blood
    When all of the world obeys.
     
    Long is the sword of the Prophet
    Will you be the next one slain?
     
     
     
     
    BNI WRITES:
     

    Wild Bill proudly wears the shield of the Crusader. As a Jew, I will proudly wear it as well.

     
    AND THIS PROUD JEW 
     
    joins BNI
     
    in wearing the Crusader's Cross,
     
     
    together with the mailed Jewish fist of  NEVER AGAIN defiance.
     
     
     
     
    FREE SPEECH ON HELL WHEELS
     
    11174251_438076186365678_4419628230491575076_oWill Pam Geller be dressed up as an ass-kicking patriotic biker tomorrow? That would give the free speech "BUT" pussies on the Left and Right something to howl about.
     
     
     
     
     
    ACTUALLY, THE LEFT'S CHIEF VILLAIN IS ISRAEL
     (and its defiant Churchillian Prime Minister)
     
    with Pam moving up to second place replacing the Tea Party or George W. Bush. These four constitute the Left's main scapegoats for their failure to hug and butt kiss the jihad out of Moslem supremacists, and achieve New Age peace, love and harmony with them.
     
     
     

    WAIT A MINUTE!

       I thought bin Laden and al Qaida declared war on America and killed thousands of our citizens because of our foreign policy-support of Israel, troops in Saudi Arabia, backing of moderate Arab regimes-and not because of who we are and our free, open  and democratic way of life? Not according to documents seized by our brave Navy Seals from bin Laden's Abbottabad compound. These cite abortion, homosexual marriage and intoxication, etc as reason enough to kill Americans by the millions. In other words, if there were no Israel or US troops in Islamic lands 9/11 with 3000 dead would have happened all the same. But this surprises no one except dumb ass, head in the sand liberals who blame Islamophobic bigots and  Mohammed cartoons-like they once blamed freedom-loving anti-Communist patriots for the Cold War. Pathetic.

     
     
     

    IT WAS MOSLEMS THAT DESTROYED CLASSICAL CIVILIZATION

    But that was not enough for them. Now they must destroy its ruins because their God with three daughters hates the sons and daughters of Olympian Zeus.

     

    A MUST SEE VIDEO ON THIS SUBJECT

     

    Obama: ‘The Values That Drive Our Brave Men and Women in Uniform Constant’ · CNSNews.com 

     

    THE COMMANDER WHO'S UNFIT TO BE CHIEF

    and loathed by our troops.

     

    MEANWHILE, THE LEFTIST VALUES THAT CONSTANTLY DRIVE OBAMA

    are so abhorrent to our fighting men and women that according to a Military Times survey (above) only 15% of active troops have any respect for him (see)-an all time low  for a Commander-in-Chief as he reeks uncertainty, confusion and weakness; and projects little or no patriotism believing himself an enlightened world citizen caring for all mankind-pointing to the fiction of climate change as proof of his great humanity.

    I'm certain that if a similar poll were taken with world leaders Obama's score would be even less. For he's universally perceived as a blundering amateur on the global stage leading America into economic, military and geo-strategic decline, and the world into turmoil.

     

    ‘Revitalizing’ Detroit with 50,000 Syrian Refugees? - Frontpage

     

    THE THIRD WORLDING OF BROKEN, BUSTED DEMOCRAT DETROIT (OBAMAVILLE)

    is about to get its crowning touch.  

     

    RELATED

     
     
     
     
     
     
    MOSLEM DUMPING GROUND? Australia pays Cambodia to take Muslim illegal aliens off its hands | BARE NAKED ISLAM 
    WHERE'S POL POT
     
    (and his killing fields) when we need him?
     
    A Holocaust of Jihadists is every Islamophobes dream.
     
     
     
     
     PAMELA GELLER WRITES:
     
    "President Barack Obama’s speech at a DC synagogue on Friday calling for a Palestinian state for Israel’s sake drew mixed responses from American Jewish groups. The liberal pro-Israel organization J Street applauded Obama’s remarks, delivered at Adas Israel Congregation in Washington DC to mark Jewish American Heritage Month, saying they were “a clear and forceful reminder that establishing a Palestinian state is necessary to safeguard Israel’s democracy and integral to Jewish values.” (TOI)
     

    OBAMA CALLED FOR A PALESTINIAN STATE FOR ISRAEL'S SAKE?

    Really? Wasn't it Obama who withdrew US forces from Iraq to appease Iran and for the sake of peace in the Middle East? Could you imagine the disaster if Israel blindly followed Obama into peace talks with the implacable, Jew hating Palestinians who still celebrate the assassination of Anwar Sadat for making peace with Israel? "For Israel's sake" my eye. Obama will go to his grave cursing Netanyahu for depriving him of an impossible peace and leaving him to sulk over a foreign policy legacy of ashes, disaster and dust. 

     

     
     
     

    WHAT SCANDAL?

    Obama and Hillary blatantly lied to the families of the Benghazi victims that an anti-Mohammed video inspired the attack-when both knew it was pre-planned to coincide with the 11th anniversary of al Qaida's greatest and deadliest victory. What could be scandalous about that? It was for the greater national and global good of Obama's reelection so he could turn the disaster of his first term into the catastrophe of his second.

     

     
     
    WHY 57 TERRORISTS
     
    and not 56 or 58 or some other number? Is there some reason for the number 57? Some Islamic reason? Was it chosen to reflect the number of Moslem states in the world which are 57  if we include the Palestinians? Is that the reason? And if so how many Gitmo terrorists will they want released next time? Double the number? That would make 114: one freed terrorist for each of the 114 books of the Koran .
     
     

    LITTLE BUDDHIST WITH GIANT SOUL TAKES ON MOSLEM TERROR IN BURMA

    MYANMAR (Burma): ‘Buddhist James Bond’ is single-handedly fighting his country’s biggest enemy – Muslims | BARE NAKED ISLAM

    Kevin-Carroll-on-Rohingya-MuslimsA little monk with a giant soul. The terror of Moslem terrorists in Burma.

     

    HIS HOLINESS THE WISE, ENLIGHTENED, COMPASSIONATE DALAI LAMA SAYS:
     
     "It's unfair to associate terrorism with Islam.*" Is it unfair and unBuddhistic then to fight Islamic terrorism like brave little magnificent Buddhist Ashin Wirathu  is doing in Burma? What would his Holiness have Buddhists do  when they've been violently murdered, tortured and raped and seen their temples incinerated  by Moslems for their faith? Would he have them meditate to find deeper levels of compassion, love, understanding and forgiveness? How would that stop a Moslem sword from slicing off your head? Turn your cheek when slapped. But when a Moslem draws his sword to kill you you better kill him first. And once he's dead then forgive him.
     
    * The Dalai Lama is an enlightened man on the subject of Buddhism. But when it comes to Islam too much of his consciousness dwells on his Root Chakra: the lowest of the seven psychic centers located between the anus and genitals.
     
    Buddhist woman beheaded by Muslims in Myanmar
      His Holiness the Dalia Lama is a weak, pathetic, bleeding heart, climate change believing leftist  kook who unwittingly emboldens Moslem terror against Buddhists-as does his Holiness Pope Francis against Christians. There's nothing "holy" about seeing no evil in Islam. Nothing righteous, fair or good about fanning the flames of unholy Moslem terror with inaction, blind compassion and appeasing hugs. Anti-Jihadist Buddhists like Ashin Wirathu are the real holy men  more worthy than a thousand Dalai Lamas, Pope Francises and meditating  Buddhas.

     

    AND NOW A WORD FROM OUR GREAT IDIOT LEADER

    whose policies have set the Middle East ablaze with murderous Moslem rage.

    ‘Discrimination against a Rohingya (Moslems) or any other religious minority does not express the kind of country that Burma wants to be.’

    President Barack Obama

    QUESTION FOR DUMB ASS
     
    How can Moslems peacefully coexist with Buddhists when they're souls are poisoned by the "religion of peace" with the divisive belief that Allah hates atheism and idol worship above all evils? 

     

    RELATED

     
     

    HOW OBAMA INSULTS 80% OF MOSLEMS BY DENYING THE ISLAMIC CHARACTER OF ISIS

    Here’s what Muslims really think about ISIS when none of the Western media are anyhere in sight | BARE NAKED ISLAM

    HORRIFYING!

    80% OF MOSLEMS SUPPORT ISLAMIC STATE ACCORDING TO ALJAZEERA 

    575x729xisis-poll-575x729.jpg.pagespeed.ic_.JVATElvjNKMLOq6mqlqB
     
    80% of Sunni Moslems recalling the military greatness of Islam's past are enthralled by the exploits and conquests of Islamic State's Caliph abu al-Baghdadi. They see in him a resurrection of the ruthless, mass murdering Prophet Mohammed, and believe that his bold, fearless jihad is ordained from on high.
     
    OH MY GOD! 
     
    If, as Aljazeera claims, 80% of Moslems support the Islamic State,
    and the Islamic State (as Obama says) isn't truly Islamic, doesn't  that mean that 80% of Moslems (1.2 billion people) aren't truly Islamic and are delusional to think so? Doesn't it mean that they misunderstand the Koran and have a distorted view of the faith and need be enlightened about its true meaning? And since the Islamic State is at war with America, and 80% of Moslems support it, doesn't it mean that they too are at war with America and hate this country and want it destroyed? How could that be after six and a half years of Obama's "Moslem Outreach Initiative" and telling the world in speech after speech that "Islam is a religion of peace" and that most Moslems are good, harmless, gentle, peace-loving people? 
     
    Behold! The great enabler of Islamic State power.
     
    And that raises another question: If 80% of Moslems support the Islamic State, and Obama says that it's not truly Islamic isn't he offending the 1.2 billion Moslems that believe it is truly Islamic no less than they're truly Islamic-sharing with ISIS  the same vision for Islam of imperial restoration of a super-caliphate state? This is frightening!  What is the world's most powerful man offending and insulting so many Moslems-telling them they're morons for thinking that they're Moslem-compared to Pam Geller and her Mohammed cartoons provoking two, lone jihadis to violence? By insulting 80% of Moslems isn't Obama turning himself into the world's most powerful recruiting tool  and poster boy for ISIS?  Can it be merely coincidental that Obama is President of the United States and  ISIS and radical Islam are surging, growing and advancing across the world like never before? Absolutely not! Obama is the gift to al-Qaida, ISIS  and radical Islam that keeps on giving. And unless Obama shuts his trap and stops insulting Moslems en masse the Global War On Islamic Terror could turn into a Global War Of Islam Against America.
     

    MANKIND’S DEBT TO BUSH AND CHENEY FOR TOPPLING NUCLEAR TO BE SADDAM

     

    If Bush and Cheney "lied" us into the Iraq War as Chris Matthews charges (which they did not) God bless them. Lies or no lies they saved the world from the horror of a nuclear armed Saddam.

    It was anguishing for me last week watching crazy, cracked leftist Chris Matthews go berserk on former deputy director of the CIA Mike Morrel in trying to bully him into saying that Dick Cheney lied us into invading Iraq by claiming that Saddam Hussein had a nuclear bomb. From George Bush on down no one in the administration ever said, or intended to say, that Saddam was armed with nukes-with the exception of Cheney misspeaking on one occasion (which Matthews gleefully played for Morell out of context*) that "Saddam had a reconstituted nuclear bomb." What Cheney meant to say based on the faulty intel Mike Morell and the CIA provided to the administration was that "Saddam was reconstituting his nuclear weapons program" not that he had a "reconstituted nuclear bomb" when Saddam never had a nuke that could be reconstituted. 

    *Later in that same interveiw with Tim Russert (3-16-2003) Cheney correcting himself said "it’s only a matter of time until he [Saddam] acquires nuclear weapons." And he was right.

    CIA'S INTEL ON SADDAM NOT FAR WRONG

    The CIA's intel in the early 2000s that Saddam was "reconstituting his nuclear weapons program," that put the fear of God in Bush (as it should have after 9/11), was wrong-but not far wrong. Saddam retained the services of his nuclear scientists and technicians keeping them on the government payroll while in possession of 550 metric tons of yellow cake uranium (see), with every intention of "reconstituting" his nuclear program when conditions warranted. In fact, we have it straight from the horse's mouth as Saddam himself came clean and admitted as much in 2004. For while a prisoner at Camp Cropper prison in Baghdad awaiting trial Saddam told George Piro, an FBI interrogator, that he was planning "to develop a nuclear capability in an incremental fashion (see)." In other words, Saddam would have eventually used his nuclear scientists and techs to turn his yellow cake uranium into fissile nuclear material for the bomb. And what prevented that frightful possibility thank God was George Bush's right decision to invade Iraq and topple Saddam-which his father should have done 12 years earlier.

     But there is more justifying Bush's war. Assuming for argument's sake that Bush chose not to use the authority granted him by Congress to invade Iraq and remove Saddam, and the dictator continuing in power went forward with his plans to reconstitute his nuclear weapons program by building a secret underground enrichment facility like Iran has at Fordow.  And assuming that the US or Israelis discovered the secret plant and destroyed it in air attacks-like Israel did to Saddam's Osirik plant in 1981, or mass murderer Assad's plant at Deir-ez-Zor, Syria in 2007 (see). Assuming  that America and Israel would have made it impossible for Saddam to build a nuclear arms facility what then?  Would that have finally discouraged the dictator and ended his quest for the bomb making an invasion unnecessary? The answer is NO.

    With enemy Shia radical Iran next door enriching uranium for nuclear bomb making Saddam would never have-could not have-abandoned his nuclear ambitions. Giving up wasn't in Saddam's nature-12 years of defying the international community on practically everything proves as much. Unable to develop the bomb in Iraq Saddam would have no choice but to go offshore to build it. With his billions in petro dollars from rising oil prices Saddam would have went to the worst nuclear proliferator on the planet for the bomb: "Axis of Evil" ally North Korea. It would have been nothing for Saddam to dispatch his nuclear scientists and techs to the hard up, cash strapped Norks to lease one of their nuclear facilities to develop nuclear weapons (like Iran could do today); or to buy nukes off the shelf from the Norks like Saudi Arabia can do from Sunni ally Pakistan. Just like Saddam purchased undelivered (because of his imminent downfall) intermediary range ballistic missiles from the Norks before the war so could he have easily purchased North Korean made nukes once the hard up cash strapped Norks went nuclear. None of this should seem far-fetched to anyone. For no sooner did the Norks detonate their first nuclear device in 2006  than they were hard at work in Syria building an illegal nuke plant for Assad. 

    George Bush and Dick Cheney deserve  credit and our lasting thanks for taking down Iraq's intransigent, unreformable,  power crazed  strong man who never relinquished his impossible dream of becoming the Joseph Stalin of the Middle East heading a unified, region-wide, nuclear armed pan-Arab state. Operation Iraqi Freedom saved us from a nuclear Saddam followed by a nuclear Uday, his sadistic insane murderous son.

    Indeed, Republican presidential hopefuls instead of beating a retreat and joining the left in declaring the Iraq War a mistake should come out swinging and defend Bush and Cheney for saving mankind from the menace of a nuclear to be Saddam.

    RELATED 

     
     

    < p style="text-align: center;">WITHOUT REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN IT WILL ABSOLUTELY BECOME A NUCLEAR ARMED STATE

    BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA: THE FIRST JEWISH PRESIDENT AND HIS TWO CIRCUMCISIONS

    Obama: I Have Been Called ‘The First Jewish President’ |  Atlas Shrugs 

    Obama tries to be many things to many people:  a Moslem to Moslems who celebrates Ramadan with imams in the White House; a Christian to Christians lighting up the National Christmas Tree in DC;  an Iranian to Iranians celebrating  Nowruz the Persian New Year; and an irreligious secularist to those without God who worship power and the state. 

    But Friday at a synagogue in downtown DC Obama offered proof to Jewish Americans that he's also one of them by citing his seven White House seders and two Jewish chiefs of staff. But what he didn't say (and his wife well knows) is that twice he's been circumcised by Israel's Prime Minister making him look like the world's biggest schmuck: the smack down in the White House on Israel's secure borders, and the speech before Congress on Iranian nukes. 

    Now that Bibi Netanyahu has circumcised Obama  into the tribe  he can proudly and truthfully say that he's a Black American Jew along with such notables as Little Richard and Sammy Davis Junior.

    IT’S GLOBAL WARMING, STUPID, NOT GLOBAL JIHAD

    Nevermind terror, Obama tells the military global warming is imminent security threat by Andrew Malcolm - Investors.com

    At the US Coast Guard Academy Wednesday Obama bored his audience with his unalarming alarmist rhetoric on global warming saying that it's  responsible for worsening the terrorist activities of Boko Haram and ISIS. What he left out was Iran's pursuit of nukes, Israel's refusal to make peace with Palestinians and Freddie Gray dying in a police van.
     

    The only war Obama fears to lose for the sake of his legacy is not against ISIS, or al-Qaida or other radical Islamic groups. What he fears most is losing the global war against carbon emissions and man made, catastrophic, apocalyptic global warming. As his leftist imagination is haunted by devastating visions of climate Armageddon-with most of humanity perishing from rising seas, droughts, famines, disease, super-storms and every other bad weather event and calamity-what difference does all the murder and mayhem in the Middle East make by comparison? What difference does it make that Iran goes nuclear and gets the bomb? What's the worst Tehran can do with nukes? Bomb Israel and America killing millions when a universal holocaust will wipe them out along with billions if global warming's not reversed? A nuclear armed ISIS or Iran could never be the existential threat to humanity that climate change is.

    Whether ISIS or Tehran know it or not we are all in the same doomed ship. They can expand over the region in their quest for power devouring as much land as they want. But In the end global warming will fry them or freeze them, drown them or bleed them, or blow them away by raging hurricanes and desert storms. Unless ISIS turn their wrath against green house gases and become anti-carbon pollution jihadists, unless they join the crusade to stop climate change dead in its tracks,  death will be their fate on a barren, desolate, rainless caliphate.

    That is the vision that drives our bat sh*t crazy president; and why jihad is rising victoriously winning hearts and minds for Allah and Islam across the world. Because of unjustified, fantasy based, climate alarmism Obama lacks the will to stop it. And he'll continue being weak to the end of his presidency because delusionally for him fossil fuel caused global warming is the real, butt ugly terrorist enemy, and existential threat to humanity.

    RELATED

    IT’S GLOBAL WARMING TERRORISM, STUPID, NOT ISIS, AL-QAIDA AND ANOTHER 9/11
     
     
    HOPELESSHAGEN, HOLLYWOOD AND SIGNS OF DEMISE FOR GLOBAL WARMING POLITICS
    CLEAN ENERGY OR DIE! 
    THE COMING OF CATASTROPHIC GLOBAL SCORCHING

     

    HOW OBAMA DESTROYED IRAQ IN ONE EASY LESSON

     

     
    The truth is this: If George Bush had a third term, or John McCain had defeated Obama in 2008,  US troops would not have completely left Iraq  and it would be a relatively stable, secure and peaceful place suffering nothing worse than cross border raids from ISIS in Syria with occasional deadly terror attacks on mostly soft Iraqi targets. In truth, the Iraq that Barack Obama inherited from Bush after US forces with Sunni help defeated al-Qaida would still exist improving daily with a proud, independent Iraqi people hopeful of a better future instead of a failing state descending into sectarian chaos overrun by ISIS and causing a national security emergency here at home. How do I know this? How can I be sure that Ted Cruz, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubeo and other GOP presidential hopefuls are speaking truth to power-power recklessly and destructively used when they accuse Obama of solely causing  the catastrophe that's engulfed Iraq since we left, and now threatens the US with ISIS' inspired terror of which Garland was prelude?
     
     
    I know this because of Leon Panetta's damning autobiography. I know this because of $60 billion in US reconstruction aid for Iraq. I know this because of the immense power that Barack Obama possessed but stubbornly and insanely refused to use to keep US troops in Iraq in large or small numbers for years to come. 
     
      
    What unused power did Obama have to coerce the government of Nouri Maliki and his parliamentary coalition of Shia lawmakers to keep US forces there for as long as necessary despite much political opposition? Answer: the power to bring down the Maliki government and decimate his coalition in parliament. What power was that? The tremendous leverage of $60 billion in promised US reconstruction aid, as Leon Panetta says in "Worthy Fights." Aid for thousands of needed projects for a New Iraq that Maliki and his Shiite parliamentarians promised their constituents for their votes. Projects for security and law enforcement, roads and bridges construction, water and sewage treatment plants, electricity production, hospitals, schools, housing, telecommunications and transportation systems.
     
     
     
    Obama showing some guts and threatening to cut the funds for these vital projects (which he absolutely had the power to do) would have bent Nouri Maliki and his stiff necked political allies to his will and forced them (in defiance of Iran) to agree to keep US forces in Iraq on US TERMS in perpetuity. With few exceptions (like al Sadr) no way they would have resisted  Obama with the Damocles sword of political death hanging over them. But the only sword Obama would stupidly use was to cut the US military out of Iraq after a long eight year war for no better reason than to keep a campaign pledge (when he'd broken dozens) to win reelection for a disastrous second term.
     
     
    Just as Nero fiddled as he burnt down Rome and killed thousands of Christians, so too does Zero fiddle as the Mideast burns and thousands of Christians perish.
     
     
    POSTSCRIPT 
     
     
    SEVEN QUESTIONS TO ASK LEFTISTS WHEN ARGUING ABOUT THE COLLAPSE OF IRAQ
     

    IF OBAMA'S NOT TO BLAME

    for secretly colluding with Iran in the 2010 Iraq election to ensure that Nouri Maliki continue as Prime Minister (after winning less seats than pro-US, national unity candidate Ayad Allawi) who then is to blame?

    If Obama's not to blame for not using the leverage of $60 billion in US reconstruction aid to coerce Maliki and Shiite lawmakers into keeping US forces in Iraq on US terms who then is to blame?

    Who is to blame for Obama's mad obsession to leave Iraq over the objections of his generals, secretary of defense, CIA director and possibly Hillary Clinton?

    Who is to blame for Obama placing his reelection above the peace and security of Iraq, the Middle East and United States?

    Who is to blame for Obama not knowing how to govern or to lead or negotiate or use power to our advantage on the world stage?

    Who is to blame for Obama's great deficiencies as a President and human being?

    Who is to blame for these things


    RELATED

    Leon Panetta criticizes Obama for Iraq withdrawal - CBS News

    < p style="text-align: center;"> 

    POPE FRANCIS AND THE MYTH OF PALESTINIAN NATIONALISM, THE VINDICATION OF ANTI-JIHADISM AND THE IRAQ WAR AND OTHER THOUGHTFUL COMMENTS

     

    Islamic State Onslaught On Ramadi ‘Kills 500 In Two Days’ | Pamela Geller

     

     

    WHILE SOFT ON ISLAMISM POPE FRANCIS

    was canonizing into sainthood two Palestinian nuns in a vain attempt to placate Abbas and Hamas (like Obama has tried and failed to do with millions in US tax dollars and beating up on Israel) the Christian killing machine ISIS was taking Ramadi by storm murdering hundreds and plotting death and destruction within the US hell-bent on succeeding where Simpson and Soofi failed. 

    pete1589 writes

    The problem with this deaf, dumb and blind pope (I hate to say) is that unlike Abbas and Hamas he takes Palestinian Nationalism seriously-like our equally blind and foolish president, and many on the appeasing, soft on Islamic evil left. And he fatuously believes that by making saints of two wonderful Catholic "Palestinian" nuns that he's proving to Abbas (a pan-Arab nationalist and no real Palestinian) and Hamas (Islamic supremacists and no real Palestinians) that he's pro-Palestinian and deserves their love and respect and a place as an honest and trusted broker at the negotiating table when making peace with Israel.  But this is dangerously naive. For Islam and pan-Arab Nationalism are based on power and strength; and Abbas and Hamas have nothing but contempt for weak naive appeasers like Francis who they mock behind his back (as Hitler did Chamberlain after Munich). But they love it that  they've got Francis under their thumb; and that they can compel him to comply with their wishes by threatening to slit the throats of Christians-like was done to the now sainted "Palestinian" Mariam Baouardy by her spurned Moslem suitor.
     
    Perhaps as a divine sign to Francis on how foolish he is was his canonizing of a brutalized Christian victim of Moslem violence in the presence of Abbas and savage Palestinians. For they would have likely done the same to Baouardy for the crime of a Christian rejecting Islam and marriage to a Moslem.
     
    Gay execution in the Mideast.

    Homosexual man from Nablus, living in Tel Aviv, pleads for asylum on the grounds of ‘well-founded fear of persecution’

     

    ATTENTION LEFTISTS

    who love Pope Francis for officially recognizing the Palestinian state. Think about this: You're enamored with an anti-gay pope for supporting violently repressive anti-gay Palestinian Moslems against the wishes of gay-rights respecting tolerant Israeli Jews. Unless you hate gays why would you love the pope for doing this? And why do you support Palestinian Statehood when  it would be a homophobic state like every other Moslem state? Are there too few such states in the world that you want another?

     

     
     
    THE VINDICATION OF COUNTER JIHADISM 
     
    hustler-1978-meat 
    Pam Geller writes
     
    "It is telling what the left will impale themselves on when it comes to free speech. Who is an icon of free speech to the left elite? Larry Flynt, Lenny Bruce, George (seven words) Carlin – the obscene, profane, morally depraved – this is held up on spiritual high. Good, decent people have been forced to endure the abject depravity of the left’s rotting, evil decay all in defense of free speech."
     
     
    AND TO THAT I SAY
     
     It's incredible, but the morally depraved, anything goes, sexually perverse left actually believe that all they need do to make Moslems love them to death, and tolerate their Islamically offensive hedonist values, is to utter the magic words: "Islam is a religion of peace," "Not all Moslems are terrorists," "Geller and Spenser are Islamophobic bigots." By repeating this day in and out from thousands of places the left imagines that Moslems will be appeased; that they'll forgo their jihad against our morally sick culture and give up wanting to burn it to the ground. But they couldn't be more wrong. We are in a war to the death for the fate of the Earth. And that's why Geller, Spenser and counter jihadists in the end  will be vindicated.
     
     
     
     
     
    THE VINDICATION OF THE IRAQ WAR
    "Most Republicans now admit the Iraq war should not have been done so can it, you don’t need to be a leftist to admit the obvious about the biggest foreign policy blunder of the 21st century. If you’re saying the Iraqi government would have allowed troops to stay then you’re going to need proof for such a baseless claim because all the evidence shows otherwise, even Bush couldn’t do better than the 2008 status of forces agreement and he was lucky to even get that."
    My reply
     
     Bush would never have stupidly joined forces with Iran in supporting the Sunni hating Maliki over the Sunni backed Shiite Alawi (the national unity candidate) in the 2010 election. If Bush had a third term (or McCain were president) Alawi would be PM, US forces would still be in Iraq, and they'd be no ISIS in that country today.
     
    Moreover, in light of Iraq's "Axis of Evil" ally North Korea becoming a nuclear armed state (and the worst proliferator of nuclear technology on the planet) the Iraq War was  most likely a blessing saving the region and world from a nuclear armed Saddam.
     
     
     
     RELATED
     
     
     
     

    CREATING THE COLLECTIVE MAN

    is the essence of all totalitarian movements. Communism, Nazism, Islamism replaces the incomplete and miserable individuality of spiritually lost souls with a grand unifying historical purpose giving one a false sense of near superhuman strength, perfection and cosmic meaning. It is a poor substitute for developing one's intellectual and moral powers to the highest degree-the essence of the Judeo-Christian-Classical tradition that needs a culture changing revival.

     

     

     
     

    IN RETROSPECT THE KILLING

    of the isolated, impotent OBL had nothing more than symbolic value. While the Great Blunderer smote OBL with one hand (after 7 months of dithering) he was stupidly fanning the flames of resurgent radical 
    Islam with the other hand. What a disastrous handling of things.

    RELATED

     

     
     

     

    MORE SHAMELESS LIES ABOUT BENGHAZI

    The Obama administration holds that the Cairo protest inspired the Benghazi attack; and that the Cairo protest was a spontaneous response to the anti-Mohammed video; therefore, the video ultimately underlied and triggered the Benghazi attack. But this reasoning is bull. We know that the 9/11 Cairo protest was pre-planned by al Qaida operatives (headed by al-Qaida chief al-Zarahiri's son) who used the Mohammed video to increase the turnout. The event was designed to show the world that Obama was wrong. That al-Qaida was not "decimated and on the run" but was very much alive and on the march. Proof is that few of the Cairo protesters were calling for the death of the video maker; while most were violently chanting "Obama, Obama we are all Osama" as they stormed the embassy compound burning American flags and hanging Obama in effigy. 

    RELATED

     

    BARACK OBAMA, BENGHAZI, AND HIS MISSION ACCOMPLISHED FIASCO

     

     Turkey and United States condemn death sentences for former Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi and 105 of his Muslim Brotherhood - BARE NAKED ISLAM

    THE RELEASE OF HOSNI MUBARAK AND HIS SONS FROM PRISON,

    the coming execution of Morsi and 105 Moslem Brethren, the closing of 27,000 radical mosques, the call for an Islamic reformation to halt the spread of jihad and Islamism, celebrating Christmas Mass in a Coptic Church, pounding ISIS targets in Libya in the wake of mass murdering Christians, President al-Sisi is a hero for our time. A magnificent man and leader up there with Bibi Netanyahu as one of the two brightest lights of the Middle East.

     

     

    WILL THE CHURCH CANONIZE PLO BOSS ABBAS AFTER POPE DECLARES HIM ANGEL OF PEACE? AND OTHER THINGS TO LAUGH AND THINK ABOUT

     

    Pope calls “Palestinian” leader Abbas an “angel of peace" - Jihad Watch

    Will this be the fate of Maumoud Abbas in the afterlife?
     

    HOW DARE ANY ONE CRITICIZE POPE FRANCIS

    for speaking the truth and calling Abbas an “angel of peace.” Did he not show the world how angelic he was when  he ended the murderous conflict between his secular pan-Arab PLO and Islamic supremacist Hamas? Are not the two at peace for over a year now? Who but an angelic being loved  and directed by God's special grace could have achieved such a miraculous feat? “Blessed are the peacemakers” says scripture. Surely in life blessed Abbas deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. And surely in death canonization as the Church’s first non-Catholic saint.  Listen to the Palestinian angel  himself talking about his plan for making peace with Israel:

     
    SARC
     
    POSTSCRIPT I
     
     
     
    This is extraordinary. Just hours after I posted the above as a comment on Jihad Watch-at 5:37 am under the screen name Plutarchus7 (see)-Pope Francis canonized two Palestinian nuns: Marie-Alphonsine and Mariam of Jesus Crucified Baouardy-the first two Palestinian saints of modern times. And guess whose great presence graced the canonization ceremony? None other that the Angel of Peace himself: Mahmoud Abbas. You can't make this stuff up.
     
    POSTSCRIPT II
     
     

    Sister Mariam Baouardy, one of the two Palestinian nuns canonized yesterday by the pope, was a victim of Muslim violence. When she refused marriage and conversion to Islam by her Islamic suitor he flew into a rage and slit her throat. A nun dressed in blue picked her up in an ally where her body was dumped and bleeding to death and stitched her wounds. You can read about her amazing story of faith HERE.

     
    Jalal ad-Din Rumi
     
    IF ALL MOSLEMS WERE SUFIS,
    and all Sufis were like the Persian poet Rumi (a radically interior self-realized mystic without a violent bone in his body) Islam would be a true religion of peace as far removed from the violent jihad of Mohammed (who was no Sufi) as the Morning Star from this Earth. But most Moslems are not Sufis. And most Sufis are not Rumis.
    Click http://www.apollospeaks.com/?p=5413 for my article “Islam, Sufism and the Ground Zero Mosque.”
     
     
     

    "As if Michiganistan isn’t already swarming with enough anti-American, anti-Christian, Arab Muslims, plans are in the works to flood Detroit with tens of thousands more Muslim invaders from Syria. (No Syrian Christians allowed)" - BNI

     
    MAKE DETROIT'S THIRD WORLDING AND BANKRUPTCY THRICE AS PAINFUL
     
    Turn Motor City into Camel City.
     
    BTW, Detroit is Obamaville (see).
     
    NEWS FROM THE FUTURE
     
     
    BREAKING: Car accident in Motor Citistan kills  10 camels and five of their drivers sparking three days of riots as Citistan Bedouins  burned down two of there own tent villages. When a reporter asked a Bed spokesman  why his people destroyed their own property  he replied: "there is nothing else left in Detroit to destroy."
     
    RELATED
     
     
     
     
    IN ITS TURBULANT, AGAINST THE ODDS,  67 YEAR HISTORY
     
    Israel has passed through the storms of 15 wars (great and small) and a 1000 public relations disasters. What these puny leftist  BDSers hope to achieve with the economic pin pricks of very limited boycotts and sanctions is beyond me. If the annhilating  hatred  of a billion Moslems can't bring Israel down what can they  hope to do? Israel will be thriving on the day that each of them  dies with the pin pricks hardly noticed and long forgotten.
     
     
     

    THE PROPHET MOHAMMED

    was a victorious 7th century Adolf Hitler (as Hitler was a failed 20th century Mohammed). So how can Choudary (a Mohammed emulating Moslem supremacist) be a Gandhi or Mandela? The world is upside down.

     

     
     

    IF ISLAMIC STATE CHIEF AL- BAGHDADI

    weren't so atrociously evil his honesty about the true nature of Koranic-Sharia Islam would be refreshing.

     

     
      

    THE ONLY BLOT

     

    is in not executing this Moslem murderer yesterday.

     

     

     

     
     
    May the FARCE be with you!
     
     
    nike_swoosh_550154d2ddf2b32db50f296d
    SO PUTTING YOUR FOOT IN A NIKE SHOE
     
    is like having sex with a woman?  Is that what ISIS is implying? That's not been my experience.  I've been wearing Nikes for 30 years and never once did I feel aroused. /sarc

     

     
     
     
     

    OBAMA MUST BE LAUGHING HIS ARSE OFF AT ISIS

    Not because the security around him is the best in the world. For even if it should fail and ISIS captures Obama his head is so far up his butt that no sword or knife could reach it.

     

     

    POPE FRANCIS THE FIRST: VICAR OF CHRIST? OR ALLAH’S FIRST POPE?

     
    ON MAY 13TH POPE FRANCIS BOWED TO ALLAH AND ISLAM AND OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZED THE ANTI-CHRISTIAN JIHADIST STATE OF JEW HATING PALESTINE ONE DAY SHORT OF ISRAEL'S 67TH BIRTHDAY
     
     
    This was a pathetic, unbiblical appeasement move by a spiritually weak and cowardly pope praying against hope that it will placate murdering, Koran driven jihadists and stop them from oppressing and killing Christians in the Palestinian Territories and  across the Arab Middle East (where their numbers are shrinking). What Francis is doing is dangerous and can only fan the flames of anti-Christian persecution and religious war.
     
    Pope Francis Refers to State of Palestine on Holy Land Trip, Calls Mahmoud Abbas a Man of Peace
    Pope Francis touches the wall that divides Jewish Jerusalem from Palestinian Bethlehem  which once was predominantly Christian until Palestinian policies of discrimination and persecution significantly shrunk its size (see).
     
    Indeed, if I were a jihadist seeing the pope caving as he is I'd redouble my efforts to punish and  kill Christians believing that more Christian agony, suffering and death would give Israel's Moslem enemies more leverage over him and turn him in a radical anti-Israel direction-politically and nonviolently working for Israel's destruction when it has the only thriving Christian community in the region, and should be extolled as an example of how Christians should be treated (see). 
     
    Pope Francis and Istanbul’s Grand Mufti Rahmi Yaran pray together in the Blue Mosque facing Mecca.
     
    I hope it doesn't come to that but with this left leaning pope you can't be sure. For with him saying ad nauseum that "authentic Islam  and the  proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence," despite 1400 years to the contrary (see); that Jew hating Palestinian strong man Mahmoud Abbas is a "man of peace [and peace partner for Israel]-despite his alliance with  hate driven, violent, terrorist Hamas. Indeed, with the pope making such ridiculous interfaith gestures as washing the feet of a female Moslem prisoner in Rome-as if she were one of Christ's apostles  (see); and praying with muftis and imams toward Mecca at a mosque in Moslem conquered once Christian Constantinople (see), Francis just three years into his reign seems more like the Pope of Allah and Islam than the enemy of evil and the Vicar of  Christ. And this has got to stop.
     
    POSTSCRIPT I
    POPE FRANCIS AND THE BATTLE OF BADR
     
    Siyer-i Nebi - Imam Ali und Hamza bei dem vorgezogenen Einzelkampf in Badr gegen die Götzendiener.jpg
       In the Battle of Badr Godly,  peace-loving, Gandhi-like Mohammad provoked a battle with the Meccan army who were dispatched to defend Meccan caravans that the thieving prophet of avarice and greed raided for booty.
     
    On  March 13, 2013 when Francis was elected the 266th Pope it ominously fell on  the 1389th anniversary of  the Battle of Badr-an inauspicious day for his election. For Badr was a key battle fought between the Prophet Mohammed and his jihadi killing machine against the Meccan army protecting  Meccan caravans from Islamic killing and looting. Moslems consider Badr the turning point in Islamic history foreshadowing the faith's  inevitable, predestined global victory over infidel humanity, as promised by Allah in the Koran (see).
     
     
     
    POSTSCRIPT II
    ALLAH, POPE FRANCIS AND THE NUMBER 66
     
      
    In the Arabic language (see above) Allah, the name of Islam's God, has a numeric value of 66. Oddly, Francis, the most conciliatory, appeasing and wrong headed pope in his interfaith approach to reconciling Moslems and Christians and fighting extremism, is the 266th  Pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church. That's the 66th number of the 200 series, the number that indicates Allah-a sign that the spineless, cowardly, submissive Francis, with all his detestable bowing, scraping, complying and surrendering to Islam is Allah's Pope and Islam's tool. In other words, like our dumb as bricks president, a well-meaning fool.
     
    And Allah's 1st Pope. May 13, 2015, the day Allah's First Pope officially announced the Vatican's recognition of the Palestinian State it was the 11th month 29th  and final day of Israel's 66th year as a Jewish state. Moreover, Francis' first trip to the Middle East as Pope last year, when his meeting with Abbas and the Palestinians insultingly preceded his meeting with Netanyahu, Israel was 12 days into its 66th year.
     
    RELATED
     
     
     
     
     

    IS GEORGE ZIMMERMAN A SIGN THAT THE SIX BALTIMORE COPS WILL BE ACQUITTED OF ANY CRIME IN THE DEATH OF FREDDIE GRAY?

     

    The bloodthirsty, race-obsessed, lynch mob left in Baltimore and across the land wanted badly and were denied their pound of innocent white man's  flesh first from George Zimmerman, a white/hispanic community watchman for killing unarmed Trayvon Martin in self-defense; then from Darren Wilson, a white Ferguson, Missouri policeman for shooting Michael Brown to death in self-defense; and then from Dan Panteleo, a white New York City cop for accidentally killing sick, obese Eric Garner who stupidly resisted arrest for selling illegal cigarettes. Though Martin, Brown and Garner were law breaking, good for nothing black men, ultimately responsible for their own deaths, the insane lynch mob left couldn't care less. Marching angrily through city streets (with rioting, looting, burning down stores and injuring and killing police) they demanded "No Justice No Peace" if either Zimmerman, Wilson or Panteleo weren't hung for killing three worthless pieces of scum-as if they were saints because their skin color.

     And now in Baltimore the violent cop-hating left came back with a roar looting, destroying property and injuring police and warning again they'd be "No Justice No Peace" if they're not served up  their pound of flesh from six Baltimore police for  the mysterious death of Freddie Gray: a worthless, drug dealing doper and thief who after being arrested for  allegedly carrying an illegal knife (and possibly for dope dealing) strangely died while in  police custody.  

    To the delight of the out of control  Baltimore mob  amateur, inexperienced,  juvenile kid  prosecutor Marilyn Mosby claimed that Gray's arrest was unlawful because, contradicting police, his knife wasn't illegal (see). As the public hasn't seen the knife (and won't until the trial) no one knows for certain who is right.

     However, there appear to be SIGNS that the cop hating, criminal loving, lynch mob left is on its way to defeat again. That like Zimmerman, Wilson and Panteleo the Baltimore Six will be cleared of any crimes in Freddie Gray's death. Indeed, just ten days after Marilyn Mosby filed charges against The Six (ranging from illegal arrest to murder two) hated "racist killer" George Zimmerman came out of the blue and made news again; this time as the victim of an alleged violent crime where he could have wound up dead. Amazingly, Zimmerman, who no longer lives in Florida where he  killed Trayvon Martin and was wrongly tried for murder-was briefly back in the Sunshine State visiting his mom for Mother's Day when, according to police, a motorist who he knew, one Matthew Apperson, shot a bullet into his van shattering a window and just missing his head. Around the web I saw comment after comment by Zimerman hating leftists mourning that the shooter didn't hit and kill Zimmerman who deserved to die... for defending his life against a violent gangsta emulating thug who was trying to ground and pound him to death*. The left was"cheated" by providence as Zimmerman unhurt escaped with minor cuts from flying glass. The incident is being investigated with the shooter not arrested yet (see). 

    *One such comment read:   "Too bad Mr. Apperson didn't spend more time at the target range."

    But the question remains: does Zimmerman's sudden reappearance foreshadow what happened to his case? And that "Justice for Freddie" will go the way of "Justice for Trayvon"  with all six cops acquitted? Maybe, maybe not. But this amazing coincidence, significant as it seems, isn't the end of it. For just as startling was another Zimmerman-Gray related "sign" that occurred thirty days earlier on April 12th-the day when doper Freddie Gray was arrested for the 22nd time, and put in the police van that somehow caused fatal injuries to his neck and spine. For April 12th was just one day past the third anniversary of Florida prosecutor Angela Corey (a name that rhymes with Marilyn Mosby) caving to the lynch mob and filing the unwarranted charge of second degree murder against Zimmerman in Trayvon Martin's death. And on the following day, April 12th, Florida Judge Mark Herr (see) found Corey's politicized affidavit sufficient to establish probable cause-when there was none as Alan Dershowitz said (see). Now Dershowitz is back criticizing Mosby (Corey on steroids) for her inept handling of the Gray case; and predicting (as he did with Zimmerman) that the defendants will  be  exonerated  (see).

    Indeed, it looks like George Zimmerman (a racially mixed man) is a sign that the racially mixed Baltimore Six (half white, half black) will be found not guilty when they go to trial. And the insane lynch mob left won't be getting its pound of flesh (a murder conviction)-which suits me fine. 

    Obama says:  You know, if I had a second wife she'd look like

    Then again, she could pass for my third daughter.

    POSTSCRIPT 

    THE BLACK RACIST MURDERERS OF FREDDIE GRAY (SARCASM)
     
    That three of the six Baltimore cops who were involved in the arrest and death of Freddie Gray  happen to be black doesn't change the fact that this was a racist crime. Why? Because the American law enforcement and criminal justice systems are systemically white supremacist and anti-black. And blacks who join the system as cops, judges or whatever undergo a transformation corrupting them from real blacks into phony Uncle Toms. Indeed, all black cops are white racists inside. This means they are guilty as sin of anti-black crimes whenever they kill a black man, woman or child. Indeed, the three false black cops that wee involved in Freddie Gray's death should be hanged alongside their three white supremacist law enforcement brethren.
     
    RELATED
     

    TRAYVON MARTIN, ERIC GARNER, MICHAEL BROWN AND FREDDIE GRAY MIGHT BE ALIVE TODAY IF……

    TRAYVON MARTIN AND HIS VIOLENT, HOMOPHOBIC, GANGSTA MASCULINITY

    < p style="text-align: center;"> 

    SAUDI KING SALMAN UNGRATEFULLY SNUBS OBAMA WHO BOWED TO HIS BROTHER FOR US/MOSLEM PEACE

     

     

    AS PART OF HIS MOSLEM OUTREACH INITIATIVE

    to repair US/ Islamic relations, and transform the Middle East into a region of peace after the damaging, destabilizing Bush years, President Obama in 2009 symbolically humbled himself before the Moslem world by bowing to then Saudi King Abdullah-taking a ton of flack from Republicans who piled on him for being un-American and unpresidential. And how does Abdullah's brother and successor King Salman repay Obama? By ungratefully tearing up his invitation to meet at the White House today and Camp David tomorrow. The audacity of the man embarrassing our well-meaning, peace-loving president who appointed himself Defender-of-Islam-in-Chief, and goes out of his way to avoid offending the Faith and making Moslems feel worse than they do due to centuries of military and geopolitical decline-which was not the promise of the Koran. Isn't all the crap Obama gets from Russia, China, Israel and Iran enough for one man? Apparently not as the Saudis unfairly add to the load of undeserved contempt burdening a President of lofty ideals whose heart is in the right place./sarc.

    Six years ago on April Fools' Day 2009 Obama made a fool of himself by bowing to the Saudi king. Today the Saudi king made a fool of Obama by breaking a promise and bowing out of a White House meeting with him. 

    Kidding aside. After Salman attended Gulf Council Cooperation summits as Saudi Crown Prince these past two years, in breaking his promise to Kerry and shredding Obama's invitation (sending his brother instead) he's clearly showing his contempt for the rudderless, chaos causing , declining US; and disapproval of Obama's inept handling of nuclear talks with Iran and his other costly blunders that's cauldronized the region. Who can blame the king for staying home and focusing on the Yemen war? For our pathological self-serving narcissist of a leader cares more about his pathetic legacy of weakness and retreat, and getting a worthless agreement with unappeasable, enemy forever, radical Iran than for the peace and security of the Middle East and planet-which he ultimately defines as cutting "deadly" carbon emissions that doesn't hurt a fly. Why waste your time with such a man?  There's nothing to be gained with him. Iran's Great Satan is the Saudis' Great

     

    RELATED

    THE PERILS OF A WAR WEARY NATION IN THE TRAGIC AGE OF BARACK OBAMA

    TURKEY, OBAMA AND THE WORSENING CONFLICT WITH ISLAM, OR THE RE-CARTERIZATION OF US FOREIGN POLICY

    WITHOUT REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN IT WILL ABSOLUTELY BECOME A NUCLEAR ARMED STATE

    WHO ULTIMATELY IS TO BLAME FOR THE GARLAND ISIS SHOOTING? PAM GELLER, GEORGE BUSH OR BARACK OBAMA?

    A MUST SEE VIDEO
     
     
    Out of the Bush Derangement Syndrome of the radical left grew the Bush Derangement Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama who blames his predecessor for practically all of his failures from the worst economic recovery since the end of World War II  to the growing chaos in the Middle East and especially the deadly rise of ISIS-which struck its first violent blow in the US last week when two gunmen drove 1000 miles to Garland, Texas to kill Pam Geller, and massacre the Sharia defying participants of her "blasphemous" art contest. Indeed, if Bush's polices were responsible for ISIS' existence as Obama claims-he traces its origins to the invasion of Iraq (see) then Bush is ultimately to blame for the shooting in Garland-and the hundreds of hidden ISIS jihadis planning mayhem and death in the time ahead.
     
     
     
    But this is untrue. Neither Bush nor Geller are ultimately to blame. For the  invasion of Iraq is unrelated as a cause of the Arab Spring which began in Tunisia over the death of a street vendor then spread virus-like to Egypt and Libya then finally to Syria challenging the regime of Bashir al-Assad. Inspired by Obama's betrayal of Mubarak in Egypt, and his military intervention in Libya to bring down Kaddafy, Syria's Sunni rebels and jihadists  drew inspiration and courage from the belief that they'd receive US military support in overthrowing the mass murderer Assad-and this energized their revolt with the will to brutally fight on to victory. And in fact in 2012 the rebels and jihadists did receive US military aid and training from which the rise of ISIS can be traced. In short, NO OBAMA NO ISIS, It's really that simple. If Obama, ignoring  the warnings of his generals, hadn't created a power vacuum in Iraq, and then armed jihadists in Syria to overthrow Assad, there'd be no Islamic State in Syria and Iraq today: no beheading of James Foley, no shooting in Garland, and no hidden ISIS terrorists ready to kill Americans for Allah, Islam and the death cult Caliphate.
     
     
    No one knows better than Obama that he's mostly to blame for the creation of ISIS and its rampage of destruction and death across the Middle East. And history won't let him get away with scapegoating George Bush as there's too much incriminating evidence of folly. And perhaps as a sign that the 44th President (not the 43rd or Pam Geller) is ultimately to blame for the first ISIS shooting on US soil the precise number of days separating ISIS' declaration  of becoming the Islamic State and their first US terrorist act  in Texas last week totals to exactly 44 weeks giving us the cursed number of Obama's destructive presidency.
     
    From Sunday, June 29, 2014 (declaration of Islamic State)
    To Sunday, May 3, 2015 (Garland shooting)

    Result: 308 days

    Or 10 months, 4 days  Or 44 weeks  (see)

    RELATED
    PAMALA GELLER’S FREE SPEECH EVENT AND THE HAND OF GOD’S PROVIDENCE
    BILL O’REILLY USES “ANTI-MOSLEM EXTREMIST” REVEREND GRAHAM (WHO HE ADMIRES) TO CONDEMN “ANTI-MOSLEM EXTREMIST” PAM GELLER (WHO HE DESPISES 
    THE RELIGION OF PEACE ART CONTEST SHOOTING-ISIS’ WAR ON US HOMELAND BEGINS 
    WHAT IF GAYS HELD A MOHAMMED ART EXHIBIT LIKE PAM GELLER’S AFDI?
     POSTSCRIPT
    THE ISIS DEATH THREAT
    by 
    PAM GELLER
    Look. I am sure you have heard about what happened in Garland, Texas. Two jihadists wanted to replicate and ramp up what happened in Paris, by murdering scores of patriotic Americans who were standing in defense of free speech. They were met with an utterly authentic response. The media has been waging jihad against the defenders of freedom, primarily me, but that's only a device they are using to destroy anyone who speaks against the sharia and jihad. In the wake of our Muhammad Art Exhibit and Cartoon Contest, ISIS issued a death threat against me. They called me khanzaar -- pig -- which is the word Muhammad used of his victims before he slaughtered Jews. They threatened to murder also anyone associated with me, anyone who defends me, and anyone who supports our work.
    In other words, they've declared war against America.
    The media, on the other hand, is aligned with the jihad force. They're cheering and agitating for my demise -- some news outlets have even asked me for my posthumous remarks. They have been viciously attacking me and Robert Spencer, blaming us for the attack on us.
    They are not going to win. We are not going to let them win. If we had a responsible media, it would report on the positive developments in light of this terrorist attack: the jihadists were killed. By drawing them out, we exposed their network, without getting anyone killed. The FBI is now going after sources. They are gleaning intel from their computers as we speak. We smoked out a terror structure. The FBI has put more American terror suspects under constant surveillance following the deadly attack. Every city across the U.S. has "subjects of concern" under heightened scrutiny, and the military is taking the threat seriously enough to raise the threat level to Bravo -- the highest level since 9/11. The terror network that hit us has now expanded to include roots in Minneapolis.
    People say we "provoked" the jihadis. But it has since come out that they were already looking for targets to hit. If they hadn't hit us, they would have hit a much less protected target, as did the jihadist Amedy Coulibaly in the Hyper Cacher kosher supermarket in Paris, and the jihadist Man Haron Monis in the Lindt Chocolat Cafe in Sydney, Australia. The jihadis in Garland weren't provoked by us -- they are already provoked. Our event just smoked them out. If we had not had such extensive security, many more people would have died -- either at our event or somewhere else. Instead, the only dead were two jihadis, and a jihad network is exposed.
    All that from one little art exhibit.
    With just one small, relatively obscure presentation, America has been made aware that the threat is here. America has been made aware of the virulence of the war on free speech. Obama cannot ignore and excuse terrorism that is committed in the name of Islam, and we exposed the quislings and apologists for jihad terror among the political, cultural and media elites.
    This has come with an enormous cost.
    We are now marked. Marked for life. And we need to take extraordinary measures to protect ourselves, and above all, our work for freedom. This involves costs that are so far beyond astronomical, they take our breath away.
    Yet this is not negotiable. The NYPD and our own security team have told us in no uncertain terms that specific measures must be taken.
    We cannot rely on the Obama administration. The FBI has not even bothered to contact us. Clearly, if we held positions the administration favored, we would be under guard sent by the government right now. But we do not.
    That means that it's on us. And that means you, because we cannot do it without you. If you support our work, if you support the stand we have taken, we need your help now more than we ever did before. This is going to require a small army. And not just for the next month, but for the foreseeable future.
    This is not just about protecting some people from being attacked and killed. This is about taking a stand and showing the world that violence, murder and threats will not win.
    We need your help now more than ever. Now is the time. This is a gamechanger. This is a new era. Few have realized just how different everything is after Garland: now Americans will have to watch their back every time they do anything that Muslim fanatics think "offends Islam."
    Strike a blow against that. Strike a blow for freedom. Every dime will be used for security -- nothing else. Send your tax-deductible donation via Paypal to americanfreedomdefense@aol.com -- go here. Or send to:
    AFDI
    1040 1st Ave. #121
    New York, NY 10022
     

    ISIS-fatwa-407x600

     

    BILL O’REILLY USES “ANTI-MOSLEM EXTREMIST” REVEREND GRAHAM (WHO HE ADMIRES) TO CONDEMN “ANTI-MOSLEM EXTREMIST” PAM GELLER (WHO HE DESPISES)

     

     

    Bill O'Reilly using the "praiseworthy" example of Reverend Franklin Graham to criticize and condemn Pam Geller and AFDI when their opposition to Islamic extremism is practically the same with the more influential and powerful Graham the more "inflammatory" and "dangerous" of the two by O'Reilly's own rules.

     

     

     

     
     If "evil"  Democratic Capitalism didn't stop Stalin and the Soviets from joining with Great Britain and the US to fight Nazi Germany during World War II why then would Pam Geller’s miniscule Mohammad free speech art event, as Bill O'Reilly says, alieanate the Egyptians and Jordanians when they need us to defeat the Islamonazis? As Mark Levin says "it make no sense."
     
    Moreover, how could the Reverend Graham credibly fault Pam Geller for defying Islamic blasphemy laws and holding a free speech event critical of Islam and mocking Mohammad with satirical art when he's been so damningly critical of Islam (like his great father was of Communism) saying that "Islam is evil," that it’s a "religion of war, not peace," that "Mohammed came as a warrior to murder and  kill," "that he can't lead one to God and salvation" and that, for the sake of peace, "Christians must convert Moslems to Christ.” Graham's message, which I endorse, is far more offensive and inflammatory to Moslems than Pam Geller's (life saving) art show repeated a thousand times. But it gets worse.
     
    In February Reverend Graham (sounding like a paranoid, witch-hunting John Birch-type McCathyite) said to O'Reilly "....one of the problems that we have in the West is that our governments, especially in Washington, have been infiltrated by Muslims who are advising the White House, who I think are part of the problem, and I see this also in Western Europe. They have gotten into the halls of power." Graham then said to O'Reilly "God sent his son Jesus Christ to earth to save Moslems."Did O'Reilly condemn these remarks and Graham's defiance of Sharia law (Islam forbids Christians from  proselytizing Moslems on pain of death) as offensive and inflammatory to Moslem sensibilities? As possibly wrecking US relations with moderate Arab states? As being unChristian and offensive to Jesus who'd condemn what Graham said if he were alive today? No! But an art show run by a smaller and less influential group than Billy Graham Ministries critical of Sharia in general and blasphemy laws in particular and O'Reilly is up in arms (watching out for the folks and US foreign policy?) practically condemning it in Jesus' name as if he were Pope? O'Reilly was way over the top and quite insane-like many on the Left who suffer from Geller Derangement Syndrome. What is clear is that "fair & balanced" Bill either condemn Reverend  Graham as well, or apologize to Pam Geller.
    RELATED
    PAMALA GELLER’S FREE SPEECH EVENT AND THE HAND OF GOD’S PROVIDENCE
    THE RELIGION OF PEACE ART CONTEST SHOOTING-ISIS’ WAR ON US HOMELAND BEGINS  
    WHAT IF GAYS HELD A MOHAMMED ART EXHIBIT LIKE PAM GELLER’S AFDI?