LITTLE BUDDHIST WITH GIANT SOUL TAKES ON MOSLEM TERROR IN BURMA

MYANMAR (Burma): ‘Buddhist James Bond’ is single-handedly fighting his country’s biggest enemy – Muslims | BARE NAKED ISLAM

Kevin-Carroll-on-Rohingya-MuslimsA little monk with a giant soul. The terror of Moslem terrorists in Burma.

 

HIS HOLINESS THE WISE, ENLIGHTENED, COMPASSIONATE DALAI LAMA SAYS:
 
 "It's unfair to associate terrorism with Islam." Is it unfair and unBuddhistic then to fight Islamic terrorism like brave little magnificent Buddhist Ashin Wirathu  is doing in Burma? What would his Holiness have Buddhists do  when they've been violently murdered, tortured and raped and seen their temples incinerated  by Moslems for their faith? Would he have them meditate to find deeper levels of compassion, love, understanding and forgiveness? How would that stop a Moslem sword from slicing off your head? Turn your cheek when slapped. But when a Moslem draws his sword to kill you you better kill him first. And once he's dead then forgive him.
Buddhist woman beheaded by Muslims in Myanmar

Buddhist woman beheaded by Muslims in Myanma

 
His Holiness the Dalia Lama is a weak, pathetic, bleeding heart, climate change believing leftist  kook who unwittingly emboldens Moslem terror against Buddhists-a does his Holiness Pope Francis against Christians. There's nothing "holy" about seeing no evil in Islam. Nothing righteous, fair or good about fanning the flames of unholy Moslem terror with inaction, blind compassion and appeasing hugs. Anti-Jihadist Buddhists like Ashin Wirathu are the real holy men  more worthy than a thousand Dalai Lamas, Pope Francises and meditating  Buddhas.

 

AND NOW A WORD FROM OUR GREAT IDIOT LEADER

whose policies have set the Middle East ablaze with murderous Moslem rage.

‘Discrimination against a Rohingya (Moslems) or any other religious minority does not express the kind of country that Burma wants to be.’

President Barack Obama

QUESTION FOR DUMB ASS
 
How can Moslems peacefully coexist with Buddhists when they're souls are poisoned by the "religion of peace" with the divisive belief that Allah hates atheism and idol worship above all evils? 

 

RELATED

 
 

HOW OBAMA INSULTS 80% OF MOSLEMS BY DENYING THE ISLAMIC CHARACTER OF ISIS

Here’s what Muslims really think about ISIS when none of the Western media are anyhere in sight | BARE NAKED ISLAM

HORRIFYING!

80% OF MOSLEMS SUPPORT ISLAMIC STATE ACCORDING TO ALJAZEERA 

575x729xisis-poll-575x729.jpg.pagespeed.ic_.JVATElvjNKMLOq6mqlqB
 
80% of Sunni Moslems recalling the military greatness of Islam's past are enthralled by the exploits and conquests of Islamic State's Caliph abu al-Baghdadi. They see in him a resurrection of the ruthless, mass murdering Prophet Mohammed, and believe that his bold, fearless jihad is ordained from on high.
 
OH MY GOD! 
 
If, as Aljazeera claims, 80% of Moslems support the Islamic State,
and the Islamic State (as Obama says) isn't truly Islamic, doesn't  that mean that 80% of Moslems (1.2 billion people) aren't truly Islamic and are delusional to think so? Doesn't it mean that they misunderstand the Koran and have a distorted view of the faith and need be enlightened about its true meaning? And since the Islamic State is at war with America, and 80% of Moslems support it, doesn't it mean that they too are at war with America and hate this country and want it destroyed? How could that be after six and a half years of Obama's "Moslem Outreach Initiative" and telling the world in speech after speech that "Islam is a religion of peace" and that most Moslems are good, harmless, gentle, peace-loving people? 
 
Behold! The great enabler of Islamic State power.
 
And that raises another question: If 80% of Moslems support the Islamic State, and Obama says that it's not truly Islamic isn't he offending the 1.2 billion Moslems that believe it is truly Islamic no less than they're truly Islamic-sharing with ISIS  the same vision for Islam of imperial restoration of a super-caliphate state? This is frightening!  What is the world's most powerful man offending and insulting so many Moslems-telling them they're morons for thinking that they're Moslem-compared to Pam Geller and her Mohammed cartoons provoking two, lone jihadis to violence? By insulting 80% of Moslems isn't Obama turning himself into the world's most powerful recruiting tool  and poster boy for ISIS?  Can it be merely coincidental that Obama is President of the United States and  ISIS and radical Islam are surging, growing and advancing across the world like never before? Absolutely not! Obama is the gift to al-Qaida, ISIS  and radical Islam that keeps on giving. And unless Obama shuts his trap and stops insulting Moslems en masse the Global War On Islamic Terror could turn into a Global War Of Islam Against America.
 

MANKIND’S DEBT TO BUSH AND CHENEY FOR TOPPLING NUCLEAR TO BE SADDAM

 

If Bush and Cheney "lied" us into the Iraq War as Chris Matthews charges (which they did not) God bless them. Lies or no lies they saved the world from the horror of a nuclear armed Saddam.

It was anguishing for me last week watching crazy, cracked leftist Chris Matthews go berserk on former deputy director of the CIA Mike Morrel in trying to bully him into saying that Dick Cheney lied us into invading Iraq by claiming that Saddam Hussein had a nuclear bomb. From George Bush on down no one in the administration ever said, or intended to say, that Saddam was armed with nukes-with the exception of Cheney misspeaking on one occasion (which Matthews gleefully played for Morell out of context*) that "Saddam had a reconstituted nuclear bomb." What Cheney meant to say based on the faulty intel Mike Morell and the CIA provided to the administration was that "Saddam was reconstituting his nuclear weapons program" not that he had a "reconstituted nuclear bomb" when Saddam never had a nuke that could be reconstituted. 

*Later in that same interveiw with Tim Russert (3-16-2003) Cheney correcting himself said "it’s only a matter of time until he [Saddam] acquires nuclear weapons." And he was right.

CIA'S INTEL ON SADDAM NOT FAR WRONG

The CIA's intel in the early 2000s that Saddam was "reconstituting his nuclear weapons program," that put the fear of God in Bush (as it should have after 9/11), was wrong-but not far wrong. Saddam retained the services of his nuclear scientists and technicians keeping them on the government payroll while in possession of 550 metric tons of yellow cake uranium (see), with every intention of "reconstituting" his nuclear program when conditions warranted. In fact, we have it straight from the horse's mouth as Saddam himself came clean and admitted as much in 2004. For while a prisoner at Camp Cropper prison in Baghdad awaiting trial Saddam told George Piro, an FBI interrogator, that he was planning "to develop a nuclear capability in an incremental fashion (see)." In other words, Saddam would have eventually used his nuclear scientists and techs to turn his yellow cake uranium into fissile nuclear material for the bomb. And what prevented that frightful possibility thank God was George Bush's right decision to invade Iraq and topple Saddam-which his father should have done 12 years earlier.

 But there is more justifying Bush's war. Assuming for argument's sake that Bush chose not to use the authority granted him by Congress to invade Iraq and remove Saddam, and the dictator continuing in power went forward with his plans to reconstitute his nuclear weapons program by building a secret underground enrichment facility like Iran has at Fordow.  And assuming that the US or Israelis discovered the secret plant and destroyed it in air attacks-like Israel did to Saddam's Osirik plant in 1981, or mass murderer Assad's plant at Deir-ez-Zor, Syria in 2007 (see). Assuming  that America and Israel would have made it impossible for Saddam to build a nuclear arms facility what then?  Would that have finally discouraged the dictator and ended his quest for the bomb making an invasion unnecessary? The answer is NO.

With enemy Shia radical Iran next door enriching uranium for nuclear bomb making Saddam would never have-could not have-abandoned his nuclear ambitions. Giving up wasn't in Saddam's nature-12 years of defying the international community on practically everything proves as much. Unable to develop the bomb in Iraq Saddam would have no choice but to go offshore to build it. With his billions in petro dollars from rising oil prices Saddam would have went to the worst nuclear proliferator on the planet for the bomb: "Axis of Evil" ally North Korea. It would have been nothing for Saddam to dispatch his nuclear scientists and techs to the hard up, cash strapped Norks to lease one of their nuclear facilities to develop nuclear weapons (like Iran could do today); or to buy nukes off the shelf from the Norks like Saudi Arabia can do from Sunni ally Pakistan. Just like Saddam purchased undelivered (because of his imminent downfall) intermediary range ballistic missiles from the Norks before the war so could he have easily purchased North Korean made nukes once the hard up cash strapped Norks went nuclear. None of this should seem far-fetched to anyone. For no sooner did the Norks detonate their first nuclear device in 2006  than they were hard at work in Syria building an illegal nuke plant for Assad. 

George Bush and Dick Cheney deserve  credit and our lasting thanks for taking down Iraq's intransigent, unreformable,  power crazed  strong man who never relinquished his impossible dream of becoming the Joseph Stalin of the Middle East heading a unified, region-wide, nuclear armed pan-Arab state. Operation Iraqi Freedom saved us from a nuclear Saddam followed by a nuclear Uday, his sadistic insane murderous son.

Indeed, Republican presidential hopefuls instead of beating a retreat and joining the left in declaring the Iraq War a mistake should come out swinging and defend Bush and Cheney for saving mankind from the menace of a nuclear to be Saddam.

RELATED 

 
 

< p style="text-align: center;">WITHOUT REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN IT WILL ABSOLUTELY BECOME A NUCLEAR ARMED STATE

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA: THE FIRST JEWISH PRESIDENT AND HIS TWO CIRCUMCISIONS

Obama: I Have Been Called ‘The First Jewish President’ |  Atlas Shrugs 

Obama tries to be many things to many people:  a Moslem to Moslems who celebrates Ramadan with imams in the White House; a Christian to Christians lighting up the National Christmas Tree in DC;  an Iranian to Iranians celebrating  Nowruz the Persian New Year; and an irreligious secularist to those without God who worship power and the state. 

But Friday at a synagogue in downtown DC Obama offered proof to Jewish Americans that he's also one of them by citing his seven White House seders and two Jewish chiefs of staff. But what he didn't say (and his wife well knows) is that twice he's been circumcised by Israel's Prime Minister making him look like the world's biggest schmuck: the smack down in the White House on Israel's secure borders, and the speech before Congress on Iranian nukes. 

Now that Bibi Netanyahu has circumcised Obama  into the tribe  he can proudly and truthfully say that he's a Black American Jew along with such notables as Little Richard and Sammy Davis Junior.

IT’S GLOBAL WARMING, STUPID, NOT GLOBAL JIHAD

Nevermind terror, Obama tells the military global warming is imminent security threat by Andrew Malcolm - Investors.com

At the US Coast Guard Academy Wednesday Obama bored his audience with his unalarming alarmist rhetoric on global warming saying that it's  responsible for worsening the terrorist activities of Boko Haram and ISIS. What he left out was Iran's pursuit of nukes, Israel's refusal to make peace with Palestinians and Freddie Gray dying in a police van.
 

The only war Obama fears to lose for the sake of his legacy is not against ISIS, or al-Qaida or other radical Islamic groups. What he fears most is losing the global war against carbon emissions and man made, catastrophic, apocalyptic global warming. As his leftist imagination is haunted by devastating visions of climate Armageddon-with most of humanity perishing from rising seas, droughts, famines, disease, super-storms and every other bad weather event and calamity-what difference does all the murder and mayhem in the Middle East make by comparison? What difference does it make that Iran goes nuclear and gets the bomb? What's the worst Tehran can do with nukes? Bomb Israel and America killing millions when a universal holocaust will wipe them out along with billions if global warming's not reversed? A nuclear armed ISIS or Iran could never be the existential threat to humanity that climate change is.

Whether ISIS or Tehran know it or not we are all in the same doomed ship. They can expand over the region in their quest for power devouring as much land as they want. But In the end global warming will fry them or freeze them, drown them or bleed them, or blow them away by raging hurricanes and desert storms. Unless ISIS turn their wrath against green house gases and become anti-carbon pollution jihadists, unless they join the crusade to stop climate change dead in its tracks,  death will be their fate on a barren, desolate, rainless caliphate.

That is the vision that drives our bat sh*t crazy president; and why jihad is rising victoriously winning hearts and minds for Allah and Islam across the world. Because of unjustified, fantasy based, climate alarmism Obama lacks the will to stop it. And he'll continue being weak to the end of his presidency because delusionally for him fossil fuel caused global warming is the real, butt ugly terrorist enemy, and existential threat to humanity.

RELATED

IT’S GLOBAL WARMING TERRORISM, STUPID, NOT ISIS, AL-QAIDA AND ANOTHER 9/11
 
 
HOPELESSHAGEN, HOLLYWOOD AND SIGNS OF DEMISE FOR GLOBAL WARMING POLITICS
CLEAN ENERGY OR DIE! 
THE COMING OF CATASTROPHIC GLOBAL SCORCHING

 

HOW OBAMA DESTROYED IRAQ IN ONE EASY LESSON

 

 
The truth is this: If George Bush had a third term, or John McCain had defeated Obama in 2008,  US troops would not have completely left Iraq  and it would be a relatively stable, secure and peaceful place suffering nothing worse than cross border raids from ISIS in Syria with occasional deadly terror attacks on mostly soft Iraqi targets. In truth, the Iraq that Barack Obama inherited from Bush after US forces with Sunni help defeated al-Qaida would still exist improving daily with a proud, independent Iraqi people hopeful of a better future instead of a failing state descending into sectarian chaos overrun by ISIS and causing a national security emergency here at home. How do I know this? How can I be sure that Ted Cruz, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubeo and other GOP presidential hopefuls are speaking truth to power-power recklessly and destructively used when they accuse Obama of solely causing  the catastrophe that's engulfed Iraq since we left, and now threatens the US with ISIS' inspired terror of which Garland was prelude?
 
 
I know this because of Leon Panetta's damning autobiography. I know this because of $60 billion in US reconstruction aid for Iraq. I know this because of the immense power that Barack Obama possessed but stubbornly and insanely refused to use to keep US troops in Iraq in large or small numbers for years to come. 
 
  
What unused power did Obama have to coerce the government of Nouri Maliki and his parliamentary coalition of Shia lawmakers to keep US forces there for as long as necessary despite much political opposition? Answer: the power to bring down the Maliki government and decimate his coalition in parliament. What power was that? The tremendous leverage of $60 billion in promised US reconstruction aid, as Leon Panetta says in "Worthy Fights." Aid for thousands of needed projects for a New Iraq that Maliki and his Shiite parliamentarians promised their constituents for their votes. Projects for security and law enforcement, roads and bridges construction, water and sewage treatment plants, electricity production, hospitals, schools, housing, telecommunications and transportation systems.
 
 
 
Obama showing some guts and threatening to cut the funds for these vital projects (which he absolutely had the power to do) would have bent Nouri Maliki and his stiff necked political allies to his will and forced them (in defiance of Iran) to agree to keep US forces in Iraq on US TERMS in perpetuity. With few exceptions (like al Sadr) no way they would have resisted  Obama with the Damocles sword of political death hanging over them. But the only sword Obama would stupidly use was to cut the US military out of Iraq after a long eight year war for no better reason than to keep a campaign pledge (when he'd broken dozens) to win reelection for a disastrous second term.
 
 
Just as Nero fiddled as he burnt down Rome and killed thousands of Christians, so too does Zero fiddle as the Mideast burns and thousands of Christians perish.
 
 
POSTSCRIPT 
 
 
SEVEN QUESTIONS TO ASK LEFTISTS WHEN ARGUING ABOUT THE COLLAPSE OF IRAQ
 

IF OBAMA'S NOT TO BLAME

for secretly colluding with Iran in the 2010 Iraq election to ensure that Nouri Maliki continue as Prime Minister (after winning less seats than pro-US, national unity candidate Ayad Allawi) who then is to blame?

If Obama's not to blame for not using the leverage of $60 billion in US reconstruction aid to coerce Maliki and Shiite lawmakers into keeping US forces in Iraq on US terms who then is to blame?

Who is to blame for Obama's mad obsession to leave Iraq over the objections of his generals, secretary of defense, CIA director and possibly Hillary Clinton?

Who is to blame for Obama placing his reelection above the peace and security of Iraq, the Middle East and United States?

Who is to blame for Obama not knowing how to govern or to lead or negotiate or use power to our advantage on the world stage?

Who is to blame for Obama's great deficiencies as a President and human being?

Who is to blame for these things


RELATED

Leon Panetta criticizes Obama for Iraq withdrawal - CBS News

< p style="text-align: center;"> 

POPE FRANCIS AND THE MYTH OF PALESTINIAN NATIONALISM, THE VINDICATION OF ANTI-JIHADISM AND THE IRAQ WAR AND OTHER THOUGHTFUL COMMENTS

 

Islamic State Onslaught On Ramadi ‘Kills 500 In Two Days’ | Pamela Geller

 

 

WHILE SOFT ON ISLAMISM POPE FRANCIS

was canonizing into sainthood two Palestinian nuns in a vain attempt to placate Abbas and Hamas (like Obama has tried and failed to do with millions in US tax dollars and beating up on Israel) the Christian killing machine ISIS was taking Ramadi by storm murdering hundreds and plotting death and destruction within the US hell-bent on succeeding where Simpson and Soofi failed. 

pete1589 writes

The problem with this deaf, dumb and blind pope (I hate to say) is that unlike Abbas and Hamas he takes Palestinian Nationalism seriously-like our equally blind and foolish president, and many on the appeasing, soft on Islamic evil left. And he fatuously believes that by making saints of two wonderful Catholic "Palestinian" nuns that he's proving to Abbas (a pan-Arab nationalist and no real Palestinian) and Hamas (Islamic supremacists and no real Palestinians) that he's pro-Palestinian and deserves their love and respect and a place as an honest and trusted broker at the negotiating table when making peace with Israel.  But this is dangerously naive. For Islam and pan-Arab Nationalism are based on power and strength; and Abbas and Hamas have nothing but contempt for weak naive appeasers like Francis who they mock behind his back (as Hitler did Chamberlain after Munich). But they love it that  they've got Francis under their thumb; and that they can compel him to comply with their wishes by threatening to slit the throats of Christians-like was done to the now sainted "Palestinian" Mariam Baouardy by her spurned Moslem suitor.
 
Perhaps as a divine sign to Francis on how foolish he is was his canonizing of a brutalized Christian victim of Moslem violence in the presence of Abbas and savage Palestinians. For they would have likely done the same to Baouardy for the crime of a Christian rejecting Islam and marriage to a Moslem.
 
Gay execution in the Mideast.

Homosexual man from Nablus, living in Tel Aviv, pleads for asylum on the grounds of ‘well-founded fear of persecution’

 

ATTENTION LEFTISTS

who love Pope Francis for officially recognizing the Palestinian state. Think about this: You're enamored with an anti-gay pope for supporting violently repressive anti-gay Palestinian Moslems against the wishes of gay-rights respecting tolerant Israeli Jews. Unless you hate gays why would you love the pope for doing this? And why do you support Palestinian Statehood when  it would be a homophobic state like every other Moslem state? Are there too few such states in the world that you want another?

 

 
 
THE VINDICATION OF COUNTER JIHADISM 
 
hustler-1978-meat 
Pam Geller writes
 
"It is telling what the left will impale themselves on when it comes to free speech. Who is an icon of free speech to the left elite? Larry Flynt, Lenny Bruce, George (seven words) Carlin – the obscene, profane, morally depraved – this is held up on spiritual high. Good, decent people have been forced to endure the abject depravity of the left’s rotting, evil decay all in defense of free speech."
 
 
AND TO THAT I SAY
 
 It's incredible, but the morally depraved, anything goes, sexually perverse left actually believe that all they need do to make Moslems love them to death, and tolerate their Islamically offensive hedonist values, is to utter the magic words: "Islam is a religion of peace," "Not all Moslems are terrorists," "Geller and Spenser are Islamophobic bigots." By repeating this day in and out from thousands of places the left imagines that Moslems will be appeased; that they'll forgo their jihad against our morally sick culture and give up wanting to burn it to the ground. But they couldn't be more wrong. We are in a war to the death for the fate of the Earth. And that's why Geller, Spenser and counter jihadists in the end  will be vindicated.
 
 
 
 
 
THE VINDICATION OF THE IRAQ WAR
"Most Republicans now admit the Iraq war should not have been done so can it, you don’t need to be a leftist to admit the obvious about the biggest foreign policy blunder of the 21st century. If you’re saying the Iraqi government would have allowed troops to stay then you’re going to need proof for such a baseless claim because all the evidence shows otherwise, even Bush couldn’t do better than the 2008 status of forces agreement and he was lucky to even get that."
My reply
 
 Bush would never have stupidly joined forces with Iran in supporting the Sunni hating Maliki over the Sunni backed Shiite Alawi (the national unity candidate) in the 2010 election. If Bush had a third term (or McCain were president) Alawi would be PM, US forces would still be in Iraq, and they'd be no ISIS in that country today.
 
Moreover, in light of Iraq's "Axis of Evil" ally North Korea becoming a nuclear armed state (and the worst proliferator of nuclear technology on the planet) the Iraq War was  most likely a blessing saving the region and world from a nuclear armed Saddam.
 
 
 
 RELATED
 
 
 
 

CREATING THE COLLECTIVE MAN

is the essence of all totalitarian movements. Communism, Nazism, Islamism replaces the incomplete and miserable individuality of spiritually lost souls with a grand unifying historical purpose giving one a false sense of near superhuman strength, perfection and cosmic meaning. It is a poor substitute for developing one's intellectual and moral powers to the highest degree-the essence of the Judeo-Christian-Classical tradition that needs a culture changing revival.

 

 

 
 

IN RETROSPECT THE KILLING

of the isolated, impotent OBL had nothing more than symbolic value. While the Great Blunderer smote OBL with one hand (after 7 months of dithering) he was stupidly fanning the flames of resurgent radical 
Islam with the other hand. What a disastrous handling of things.

RELATED

 

 
 

 

MORE SHAMELESS LIES ABOUT BENGHAZI

The Obama administration holds that the Cairo protest inspired the Benghazi attack; and that the Cairo protest was a spontaneous response to the anti-Mohammed video; therefore, the video ultimately underlied and triggered the Benghazi attack. But this reasoning is bull. We know that the 9/11 Cairo protest was pre-planned by al Qaida operatives (headed by al-Qaida chief al-Zarahiri's son) who used the Mohammed video to increase the turnout. The event was designed to show the world that Obama was wrong. That al-Qaida was not "decimated and on the run" but was very much alive and on the march. Proof is that few of the Cairo protesters were calling for the death of the video maker; while most were violently chanting "Obama, Obama we are all Osama" as they stormed the embassy compound burning American flags and hanging Obama in effigy. 

RELATED

 

BARACK OBAMA, BENGHAZI, AND HIS MISSION ACCOMPLISHED FIASCO

 

 Turkey and United States condemn death sentences for former Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi and 105 of his Muslim Brotherhood - BARE NAKED ISLAM

THE RELEASE OF HOSNI MUBARAK AND HIS SONS FROM PRISON,

the coming execution of Morsi and 105 Moslem Brethren, the closing of 27,000 radical mosques, the call for an Islamic reformation to halt the spread of jihad and Islamism, celebrating Christmas Mass in a Coptic Church, pounding ISIS targets in Libya in the wake of mass murdering Christians, President al-Sisi is a hero for our time. A magnificent man and leader up there with Bibi Netanyahu as one of the two brightest lights of the Middle East.

 

 

WILL THE CHURCH CANONIZE PLO BOSS ABBAS AFTER POPE DECLARES HIM ANGEL OF PEACE? AND OTHER THINGS TO LAUGH AND THINK ABOUT

 

Pope calls “Palestinian” leader Abbas an “angel of peace" - Jihad Watch

Will this be the fate of Maumoud Abbas in the afterlife?
 

HOW DARE ANY ONE CRITICIZE POPE FRANCIS

for speaking the truth and calling Abbas an “angel of peace.” Did he not show the world how angelic he was when  he ended the murderous conflict between his secular pan-Arab PLO and Islamic supremacist Hamas? Are not the two at peace for over a year now? Who but an angelic being loved  and directed by God's special grace could have achieved such a miraculous feat? “Blessed are the peacemakers” says scripture. Surely in life blessed Abbas deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. And surely in death canonization as the Church’s first non-Catholic saint.  Listen to the Palestinian angel  himself talking about his plan for making peace with Israel:

 
SARC
 
POSTSCRIPT I
 
 
 
This is extraordinary. Just hours after I posted the above as a comment on Jihad Watch-at 5:37 am under the screen name Plutarchus7 (see)-Pope Francis canonized two Palestinian nuns: Marie-Alphonsine and Mariam of Jesus Crucified Baouardy-the first two Palestinian saints of modern times. And guess whose great presence graced the canonization ceremony? None other that the Angel of Peace himself: Mahmoud Abbas. You can't make this stuff up.
 
POSTSCRIPT II
 
 

Sister Mariam Baouardy, one of the two Palestinian nuns canonized yesterday by the pope, was a victim of Muslim violence. When she refused marriage and conversion to Islam by her Islamic suitor he flew into a rage and slit her throat. A nun dressed in blue picked her up in an ally where her body was dumped and bleeding to death and stitched her wounds. You can read about her amazing story of faith HERE.

 
Jalal ad-Din Rumi
 
IF ALL MOSLEMS WERE SUFIS,
and all Sufis were like the Persian poet Rumi (a radically interior self-realized mystic without a violent bone in his body) Islam would be a true religion of peace as far removed from the violent jihad of Mohammed (who was no Sufi) as the Morning Star from this Earth. But most Moslems are not Sufis. And most Sufis are not Rumis.
Click http://www.apollospeaks.com/?p=5413 for my article “Islam, Sufism and the Ground Zero Mosque.”
 
 
 

"As if Michiganistan isn’t already swarming with enough anti-American, anti-Christian, Arab Muslims, plans are in the works to flood Detroit with tens of thousands more Muslim invaders from Syria. (No Syrian Christians allowed)" - BNI

 
MAKE DETROIT'S THIRD WORLDING AND BANKRUPTCY THRICE AS PAINFUL
 
Turn Motor City into Camel City.
 
BTW, Detroit is Obamaville (see).
 
NEWS FROM THE FUTURE
 
 
BREAKING: Car accident in Motor Citistan kills  10 camels and five of their drivers sparking three days of riots as Citistan Bedouins  burned down two of there own tent villages. When a reporter asked a Bed spokesman  why his people destroyed their own property  he replied: "there is nothing else left in Detroit to destroy."
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
IN ITS TURBULANT, AGAINST THE ODDS,  67 YEAR HISTORY
 
Israel has passed through the storms of 15 wars (great and small) and a 1000 public relations disasters. What these puny leftist  BDSers hope to achieve with the economic pin pricks of very limited boycotts and sanctions is beyond me. If the annhilating  hatred  of a billion Moslems can't bring Israel down what can they  hope to do? Israel will be thriving on the day that each of them  dies with the pin pricks hardly noticed and long forgotten.
 
 
 

THE PROPHET MOHAMMED

was a victorious 7th century Adolf Hitler (as Hitler was a failed 20th century Mohammed). So how can Choudary (a Mohammed emulating Moslem supremacist) be a Gandhi or Mandela? The world is upside down.

 

 
 

IF ISLAMIC STATE CHIEF AL- BAGHDADI

weren't so atrociously evil his honesty about the true nature of Koranic-Sharia Islam would be refreshing.

 

 
  

THE ONLY BLOT

 

is in not executing this Moslem murderer yesterday.

 

 

 

 
 
May the FARCE be with you!
 
 
nike_swoosh_550154d2ddf2b32db50f296d
SO PUTTING YOUR FOOT IN A NIKE SHOE
 
is like having sex with a woman?  Is that what ISIS is implying? That's not been my experience.  I've been wearing Nikes for 30 years and never once did I feel aroused. /sarc

 

 
 
 
 

OBAMA MUST BE LAUGHING HIS ARSE OFF AT ISIS

Not because the security around him is the best in the world. For even if it should fail and ISIS captures Obama his head is so far up his butt that no sword or knife could reach it.

 

 

POPE FRANCIS THE FIRST: VICAR OF CHRIST? OR ALLAH’S FIRST POPE?

 
ON MAY 13TH POPE FRANCIS BOWED TO ALLAH AND ISLAM AND OFFICIALLY RECOGNIZED THE ANTI-CHRISTIAN JIHADIST STATE OF JEW HATING PALESTINE ONE DAY SHORT OF ISRAEL'S 67TH BIRTHDAY
 
 
This was a pathetic, unbiblical appeasement move by a spiritually weak and cowardly pope praying against hope that it will placate murdering, Koran driven jihadists and stop them from oppressing and killing Christians in the Palestinian Territories and  across the Arab Middle East (where their numbers are shrinking). What Francis is doing is dangerous and can only fan the flames of anti-Christian persecution and religious war.
 
Pope Francis Refers to State of Palestine on Holy Land Trip, Calls Mahmoud Abbas a Man of Peace
Pope Francis touches the wall that divides Jewish Jerusalem from Palestinian Bethlehem  which once was predominantly Christian until Palestinian policies of discrimination and persecution significantly shrunk its size (see).
 
Indeed, if I were a jihadist seeing the pope caving as he is I'd redouble my efforts to punish and  kill Christians believing that more Christian agony, suffering and death would give Israel's Moslem enemies more leverage over him and turn him in a radical anti-Israel direction-politically and nonviolently working for Israel's destruction when it has the only thriving Christian community in the region, and should be extolled as an example of how Christians should be treated (see). 
 
Pope Francis and Istanbul’s Grand Mufti Rahmi Yaran pray together in the Blue Mosque facing Mecca.
 
I hope it doesn't come to that but with this left leaning pope you can't be sure. For with him saying ad nauseum that "authentic Islam  and the  proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence," despite 1400 years to the contrary (see); that Jew hating Palestinian strong man Mahmoud Abbas is a "man of peace [and peace partner for Israel]-despite his alliance with  hate driven, violent, terrorist Hamas. Indeed, with the pope making such ridiculous interfaith gestures as washing the feet of a female Moslem prisoner in Rome-as if she were one of Christ's apostles  (see); and praying with muftis and imams toward Mecca at a mosque in Moslem conquered once Christian Constantinople (see), Francis just three years into his reign seems more like the Pope of Allah and Islam than the enemy of evil and the Vicar of  Christ. And this has got to stop.
 
POSTSCRIPT I
POPE FRANCIS AND THE BATTLE OF BADR
 
Siyer-i Nebi - Imam Ali und Hamza bei dem vorgezogenen Einzelkampf in Badr gegen die Götzendiener.jpg
   In the Battle of Badr Godly,  peace-loving, Gandhi-like Mohammad provoked a battle with the Meccan army who were dispatched to defend Meccan caravans that the thieving prophet of avarice and greed raided for booty.
 
On  March 13, 2013 when Francis was elected the 266th Pope it ominously fell on  the 1389th anniversary of  the Battle of Badr-an inauspicious day for his election. For Badr was a key battle fought between the Prophet Mohammed and his jihadi killing machine against the Meccan army protecting  Meccan caravans from Islamic killing and looting. Moslems consider Badr the turning point in Islamic history foreshadowing the faith's  inevitable, predestined global victory over infidel humanity, as promised by Allah in the Koran (see).
 
 
 
POSTSCRIPT II
ALLAH, POPE FRANCIS AND THE NUMBER 66
 
  
In the Arabic language (see above) Allah, the name of Islam's God, has a numeric value of 66. Oddly, Francis, the most conciliatory, appeasing and wrong headed pope in his interfaith approach to reconciling Moslems and Christians and fighting extremism, is the 266th  Pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church. That's the 66th number of the 200 series, the number that indicates Allah-a sign that the spineless, cowardly, submissive Francis, with all his detestable bowing, scraping, complying and surrendering to Islam is Allah's Pope and Islam's tool. In other words, like our dumb as bricks president, a well-meaning fool.
 
And Allah's 1st Pope. May 13, 2015, the day Allah's First Pope officially announced the Vatican's recognition of the Palestinian State it was the 11th month 29th  and final day of Israel's 66th year as a Jewish state. Moreover, Francis' first trip to the Middle East as Pope last year, when his meeting with Abbas and the Palestinians insultingly preceded his meeting with Netanyahu, Israel was 12 days into its 66th year.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

IS GEORGE ZIMMERMAN A SIGN THAT THE SIX BALTIMORE COPS WILL BE ACQUITTED OF ANY CRIME IN THE DEATH OF FREDDIE GRAY?

 

The bloodthirsty, race-obsessed, lynch mob left in Baltimore and across the land wanted badly and were denied their pound of innocent white man's  flesh first from George Zimmerman, a white/hispanic community watchman for killing unarmed Trayvon Martin in self-defense; then from Darren Wilson, a white Ferguson, Missouri policeman for shooting Michael Brown to death in self-defense; and then from Dan Panteleo, a white New York City cop for accidentally killing sick, obese Eric Garner who stupidly resisted arrest for selling illegal cigarettes. Though Martin, Brown and Garner were law breaking, good for nothing black men, ultimately responsible for their own deaths, the insane lynch mob left couldn't care less. Marching angrily through city streets (with rioting, looting, burning down stores and injuring and killing police) they demanded "No Justice No Peace" if either Zimmerman, Wilson or Panteleo weren't hung for killing three worthless pieces of scum-as if they were saints because their skin color.

 And now in Baltimore the violent cop-hating left came back with a roar looting, destroying property and injuring police and warning again they'd be "No Justice No Peace" if they're not served up  their pound of flesh from six Baltimore police for  the mysterious death of Freddie Gray: a worthless, drug dealing doper and thief who after being arrested for  allegedly carrying an illegal knife (and possibly for dope dealing) strangely died while in  police custody.  

To the delight of the out of control  Baltimore mob  amateur, inexperienced,  juvenile kid  prosecutor Marilyn Mosby claimed that Gray's arrest was unlawful because, contradicting police, his knife wasn't illegal (see). As the public hasn't seen the knife (and won't until the trial) no one knows for certain who is right.

 However, there appear to be SIGNS that the cop hating, criminal loving, lynch mob left is on its way to defeat again. That like Zimmerman, Wilson and Panteleo the Baltimore Six will be cleared of any crimes in Freddie Gray's death. Indeed, just ten days after Marilyn Mosby filed charges against The Six (ranging from illegal arrest to murder two) hated "racist killer" George Zimmerman came out of the blue and made news again; this time as the victim of an alleged violent crime where he could have wound up dead. Amazingly, Zimmerman, who no longer lives in Florida where he  killed Trayvon Martin and was wrongly tried for murder-was briefly back in the Sunshine State visiting his mom for Mother's Day when, according to police, a motorist who he knew, one Matthew Apperson, shot a bullet into his van shattering a window and just missing his head. Around the web I saw comment after comment by Zimerman hating leftists mourning that the shooter didn't hit and kill Zimmerman who deserved to die... for defending his life against a violent gangsta emulating thug who was trying to ground and pound him to death*. The left was"cheated" by providence as Zimmerman unhurt escaped with minor cuts from flying glass. The incident is being investigated with the shooter not arrested yet (see). 

*One such comment read:   "Too bad Mr. Apperson didn't spend more time at the target range."

But the question remains: does Zimmerman's sudden reappearance foreshadow what happened to his case? And that "Justice for Freddie" will go the way of "Justice for Trayvon"  with all six cops acquitted? Maybe, maybe not. But this amazing coincidence, significant as it seems, isn't the end of it. For just as startling was another Zimmerman-Gray related "sign" that occurred thirty days earlier on April 12th-the day when doper Freddie Gray was arrested for the 22nd time, and put in the police van that somehow caused fatal injuries to his neck and spine. For April 12th was just one day past the third anniversary of Florida prosecutor Angela Corey (a name that rhymes with Marilyn Mosby) caving to the lynch mob and filing the unwarranted charge of second degree murder against Zimmerman in Trayvon Martin's death. And on the following day, April 12th, Florida Judge Mark Herr (see) found Corey's politicized affidavit sufficient to establish probable cause-when there was none as Alan Dershowitz said (see). Now Dershowitz is back criticizing Mosby (Corey on steroids) for her inept handling of the Gray case; and predicting (as he did with Zimmerman) that the defendants will  be  exonerated  (see).

Indeed, it looks like George Zimmerman (a racially mixed man) is a sign that the racially mixed Baltimore Six (half white, half black) will be found not guilty when they go to trial. And the insane lynch mob left won't be getting its pound of flesh (a murder conviction)-which suits me fine. 

Obama says:  You know, if I had a second wife she'd look like

Then again, she could pass for my third daughter.

POSTSCRIPT 

THE BLACK RACIST MURDERERS OF FREDDIE GRAY (SARCASM)
 
That three of the six Baltimore cops who were involved in the arrest and death of Freddie Gray  happen to be black doesn't change the fact that this was a racist crime. Why? Because the American law enforcement and criminal justice systems are systemically white supremacist and anti-black. And blacks who join the system as cops, judges or whatever undergo a transformation corrupting them from real blacks into phony Uncle Toms. Indeed, all black cops are white racists inside. This means they are guilty as sin of anti-black crimes whenever they kill a black man, woman or child. Indeed, the three false black cops that wee involved in Freddie Gray's death should be hanged alongside their three white supremacist law enforcement brethren.
 
RELATED
 

TRAYVON MARTIN, ERIC GARNER, MICHAEL BROWN AND FREDDIE GRAY MIGHT BE ALIVE TODAY IF……

TRAYVON MARTIN AND HIS VIOLENT, HOMOPHOBIC, GANGSTA MASCULINITY

< p style="text-align: center;"> 

SAUDI KING SALMAN UNGRATEFULLY SNUBS OBAMA WHO BOWED TO HIS BROTHER FOR US/MOSLEM PEACE

 

 

AS PART OF HIS MOSLEM OUTREACH INITIATIVE

to repair US/ Islamic relations, and transform the Middle East into a region of peace after the damaging, destabilizing Bush years, President Obama in 2009 symbolically humbled himself before the Moslem world by bowing to then Saudi King Abdullah-taking a ton of flack from Republicans who piled on him for being un-American and unpresidential. And how does Abdullah's brother and successor King Salman repay Obama? By ungratefully tearing up his invitation to meet at the White House today and Camp David tomorrow. The audacity of the man embarrassing our well-meaning, peace-loving president who appointed himself Defender-of-Islam-in-Chief, and goes out of his way to avoid offending the Faith and making Moslems feel worse than they do due to centuries of military and geopolitical decline-which was not the promise of the Koran. Isn't all the crap Obama gets from Russia, China, Israel and Iran enough for one man? Apparently not as the Saudis unfairly add to the load of undeserved contempt burdening a President of lofty ideals whose heart is in the right place./sarc.

Six years ago on April Fools' Day 2009 Obama made a fool of himself by bowing to the Saudi king. Today the Saudi king made a fool of Obama by breaking a promise and bowing out of a White House meeting with him. 

Kidding aside. After Salman attended Gulf Council Cooperation summits as Saudi Crown Prince these past two years, in breaking his promise to Kerry and shredding Obama's invitation (sending his brother instead) he's clearly showing his contempt for the rudderless, chaos causing , declining US; and disapproval of Obama's inept handling of nuclear talks with Iran and his other costly blunders that's cauldronized the region. Who can blame the king for staying home and focusing on the Yemen war? For our pathological self-serving narcissist of a leader cares more about his pathetic legacy of weakness and retreat, and getting a worthless agreement with unappeasable, enemy forever, radical Iran than for the peace and security of the Middle East and planet-which he ultimately defines as cutting "deadly" carbon emissions that doesn't hurt a fly. Why waste your time with such a man?  There's nothing to be gained with him. Iran's Great Satan is the Saudis' Great

 

RELATED

THE PERILS OF A WAR WEARY NATION IN THE TRAGIC AGE OF BARACK OBAMA

TURKEY, OBAMA AND THE WORSENING CONFLICT WITH ISLAM, OR THE RE-CARTERIZATION OF US FOREIGN POLICY

WITHOUT REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN IT WILL ABSOLUTELY BECOME A NUCLEAR ARMED STATE

WHO ULTIMATELY IS TO BLAME FOR THE GARLAND ISIS SHOOTING? PAM GELLER, GEORGE BUSH OR BARACK OBAMA?

A MUST SEE VIDEO
 
 
Out of the Bush Derangement Syndrome of the radical left grew the Bush Derangement Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama who blames his predecessor for practically all of his failures from the worst economic recovery since the end of World War II  to the growing chaos in the Middle East and especially the deadly rise of ISIS-which struck its first violent blow in the US last week when two gunmen drove 1000 miles to Garland, Texas to kill Pam Geller, and massacre the Sharia defying participants of her "blasphemous" art contest. Indeed, if Bush's polices were responsible for ISIS' existence as Obama claims-he traces its origins to the invasion of Iraq (see) then Bush is ultimately to blame for the shooting in Garland-and the hundreds of hidden ISIS jihadis planning mayhem and death in the time ahead.
 
 
 
But this is untrue. Neither Bush nor Geller are ultimately to blame. For the  invasion of Iraq is unrelated as a cause of the Arab Spring which began in Tunisia over the death of a street vendor then spread virus-like to Egypt and Libya then finally to Syria challenging the regime of Bashir al-Assad. Inspired by Obama's betrayal of Mubarak in Egypt, and his military intervention in Libya to bring down Kaddafy, Syria's Sunni rebels and jihadists  drew inspiration and courage from the belief that they'd receive US military support in overthrowing the mass murderer Assad-and this energized their revolt with the will to brutally fight on to victory. And in fact in 2012 the rebels and jihadists did receive US military aid and training from which the rise of ISIS can be traced. In short, NO OBAMA NO ISIS, It's really that simple. If Obama, ignoring  the warnings of his generals, hadn't created a power vacuum in Iraq, and then armed jihadists in Syria to overthrow Assad, there'd be no Islamic State in Syria and Iraq today: no beheading of James Foley, no shooting in Garland, and no hidden ISIS terrorists ready to kill Americans for Allah, Islam and the death cult Caliphate.
 
 
No one knows better than Obama that he's mostly to blame for the creation of ISIS and its rampage of destruction and death across the Middle East. And history won't let him get away with scapegoating George Bush as there's too much incriminating evidence of folly. And perhaps as a sign that the 44th President (not the 43rd or Pam Geller) is ultimately to blame for the first ISIS shooting on US soil the precise number of days separating ISIS' declaration  of becoming the Islamic State and their first US terrorist act  in Texas last week totals to exactly 44 weeks giving us the cursed number of Obama's destructive presidency.
 
From Sunday, June 29, 2014 (declaration of Islamic State)
To Sunday, May 3, 2015 (Garland shooting)

Result: 308 days

Or 10 months, 4 days  Or 44 weeks  (see)

RELATED
PAMALA GELLER’S FREE SPEECH EVENT AND THE HAND OF GOD’S PROVIDENCE
BILL O’REILLY USES “ANTI-MOSLEM EXTREMIST” REVEREND GRAHAM (WHO HE ADMIRES) TO CONDEMN “ANTI-MOSLEM EXTREMIST” PAM GELLER (WHO HE DESPISES 
THE RELIGION OF PEACE ART CONTEST SHOOTING-ISIS’ WAR ON US HOMELAND BEGINS 
WHAT IF GAYS HELD A MOHAMMED ART EXHIBIT LIKE PAM GELLER’S AFDI?
 POSTSCRIPT
THE ISIS DEATH THREAT
by 
PAM GELLER
Look. I am sure you have heard about what happened in Garland, Texas. Two jihadists wanted to replicate and ramp up what happened in Paris, by murdering scores of patriotic Americans who were standing in defense of free speech. They were met with an utterly authentic response. The media has been waging jihad against the defenders of freedom, primarily me, but that's only a device they are using to destroy anyone who speaks against the sharia and jihad. In the wake of our Muhammad Art Exhibit and Cartoon Contest, ISIS issued a death threat against me. They called me khanzaar -- pig -- which is the word Muhammad used of his victims before he slaughtered Jews. They threatened to murder also anyone associated with me, anyone who defends me, and anyone who supports our work.
In other words, they've declared war against America.
The media, on the other hand, is aligned with the jihad force. They're cheering and agitating for my demise -- some news outlets have even asked me for my posthumous remarks. They have been viciously attacking me and Robert Spencer, blaming us for the attack on us.
They are not going to win. We are not going to let them win. If we had a responsible media, it would report on the positive developments in light of this terrorist attack: the jihadists were killed. By drawing them out, we exposed their network, without getting anyone killed. The FBI is now going after sources. They are gleaning intel from their computers as we speak. We smoked out a terror structure. The FBI has put more American terror suspects under constant surveillance following the deadly attack. Every city across the U.S. has "subjects of concern" under heightened scrutiny, and the military is taking the threat seriously enough to raise the threat level to Bravo -- the highest level since 9/11. The terror network that hit us has now expanded to include roots in Minneapolis.
People say we "provoked" the jihadis. But it has since come out that they were already looking for targets to hit. If they hadn't hit us, they would have hit a much less protected target, as did the jihadist Amedy Coulibaly in the Hyper Cacher kosher supermarket in Paris, and the jihadist Man Haron Monis in the Lindt Chocolat Cafe in Sydney, Australia. The jihadis in Garland weren't provoked by us -- they are already provoked. Our event just smoked them out. If we had not had such extensive security, many more people would have died -- either at our event or somewhere else. Instead, the only dead were two jihadis, and a jihad network is exposed.
All that from one little art exhibit.
With just one small, relatively obscure presentation, America has been made aware that the threat is here. America has been made aware of the virulence of the war on free speech. Obama cannot ignore and excuse terrorism that is committed in the name of Islam, and we exposed the quislings and apologists for jihad terror among the political, cultural and media elites.
This has come with an enormous cost.
We are now marked. Marked for life. And we need to take extraordinary measures to protect ourselves, and above all, our work for freedom. This involves costs that are so far beyond astronomical, they take our breath away.
Yet this is not negotiable. The NYPD and our own security team have told us in no uncertain terms that specific measures must be taken.
We cannot rely on the Obama administration. The FBI has not even bothered to contact us. Clearly, if we held positions the administration favored, we would be under guard sent by the government right now. But we do not.
That means that it's on us. And that means you, because we cannot do it without you. If you support our work, if you support the stand we have taken, we need your help now more than we ever did before. This is going to require a small army. And not just for the next month, but for the foreseeable future.
This is not just about protecting some people from being attacked and killed. This is about taking a stand and showing the world that violence, murder and threats will not win.
We need your help now more than ever. Now is the time. This is a gamechanger. This is a new era. Few have realized just how different everything is after Garland: now Americans will have to watch their back every time they do anything that Muslim fanatics think "offends Islam."
Strike a blow against that. Strike a blow for freedom. Every dime will be used for security -- nothing else. Send your tax-deductible donation via Paypal to americanfreedomdefense@aol.com -- go here. Or send to:
AFDI
1040 1st Ave. #121
New York, NY 10022
 

ISIS-fatwa-407x600

 

BILL O’REILLY USES “ANTI-MOSLEM EXTREMIST” REVEREND GRAHAM (WHO HE ADMIRES) TO CONDEMN “ANTI-MOSLEM EXTREMIST” PAM GELLER (WHO HE DESPISES)

 

 

Bill O'Reilly using the "praiseworthy" example of Reverend Franklin Graham to criticize and condemn Pam Geller and AFDI when their opposition to Islamic extremism is practically the same with the more influential and powerful Graham the more "inflammatory" and "dangerous" of the two by O'Reilly's own rules.

 

 

 

 
 If "evil"  Democratic Capitalism didn't stop Stalin and the Soviets from joining with Great Britain and the US to fight Nazi Germany during World War II why then would Pam Geller’s miniscule Mohammad free speech art event, as Bill O'Reilly says, alieanate the Egyptians and Jordanians when they need us to defeat the Islamonazis? As Mark Levin says "it make no sense."
 
Moreover, how could the Reverend Graham credibly fault Pam Geller for defying Islamic blasphemy laws and holding a free speech event critical of Islam and mocking Mohammad with satirical art when he's been so damningly critical of Islam (like his great father was of Communism) saying that "Islam is evil," that it’s a "religion of war, not peace," that "Mohammed came as a warrior to murder and  kill," "that he can't lead one to God and salvation" and that, for the sake of peace, "Christians must convert Moslems to Christ.” Graham's message, which I endorse, is far more offensive and inflammatory to Moslems than Pam Geller's (life saving) art show repeated a thousand times. But it gets worse.
 
In February Reverend Graham (sounding like a paranoid, witch-hunting John Birch-type McCathyite) said to O'Reilly "....one of the problems that we have in the West is that our governments, especially in Washington, have been infiltrated by Muslims who are advising the White House, who I think are part of the problem, and I see this also in Western Europe. They have gotten into the halls of power." Graham then said to O'Reilly "God sent his son Jesus Christ to earth to save Moslems."Did O'Reilly condemn these remarks and Graham's defiance of Sharia law (Islam forbids Christians from  proselytizing Moslems on pain of death) as offensive and inflammatory to Moslem sensibilities? As possibly wrecking US relations with moderate Arab states? As being unChristian and offensive to Jesus who'd condemn what Graham said if he were alive today? No! But an art show run by a smaller and less influential group than Billy Graham Ministries critical of Sharia in general and blasphemy laws in particular and O'Reilly is up in arms (watching out for the folks and US foreign policy?) practically condemning it in Jesus' name as if he were Pope? O'Reilly was way over the top and quite insane-like many on the Left who suffer from Geller Derangement Syndrome. What is clear is that "fair & balanced" Bill either condemn Reverend  Graham as well, or apologize to Pam Geller.
RELATED
PAMALA GELLER’S FREE SPEECH EVENT AND THE HAND OF GOD’S PROVIDENCE
THE RELIGION OF PEACE ART CONTEST SHOOTING-ISIS’ WAR ON US HOMELAND BEGINS  
WHAT IF GAYS HELD A MOHAMMED ART EXHIBIT LIKE PAM GELLER’S AFDI?

 

 

PAMALA GELLER’S FREE SPEECH EVENT AND THE HAND OF GOD’S PROVIDENCE

 

 
Bill O'Reilly, Laura Ingraham, Chris Matthews, Donald Trump unfairly slam Pam Geller all you want as being "irresponsible" and "reckless" for her art show this week mocking a prophet who hated free speech. But clear-headed Christians and Jews of FAITH will see GOD'S HAND in this "offensive" event fatally drawing like a magnet to their deaths two ticking terrorist time bombs pledged to the Islamic State who exploded into violence at the right time and in the right place-where their unjustified, savage, supremacist rage (against all things American) could do little or no harm. The longer these amateur martyrs for Allah waited for a sign to strike the more skilled they would have been in the execution of their crimes causing another Ft. Hood or Boston Marathon.  Unplanned by Pam, but directed from ON HIGH, her "inflammatory" show may have saved dozens of innocent lives. May there be thousands more like it across the world daring to defy a totalitarian law that must be discredited, defeated and destroyed for the freedom, progress and peace of  mankind.  
 
RELATED
 
 

WHAT IF GAYS HELD A MOHAMMED ART EXHIBIT LIKE PAM GELLER’S AFDI?

 

ATTENTION: LEFTIST OPPONENTS OF AFDI

Would you be opposed to homosexuals holding an inciteful, provocative 
offensive (to Islamic fundamentalists) Mohammed Art Exhibit and Contest offering a cash prize of $10,000 to an artist who depicts in the most effective and damning way the Gay-hating Prophet Mohammed torturing, brutalizing and killing homosexuals? And if there were jihadist violence at such an event who would you attribute it to? The Gay organizers who wanted to draw attention to the cruel and inhuman treatment of Gays in Moslem countries? Or to jihadist Moslems and their primitive, backward, medieval hatred and fear of homosexuals?

 

Rush Limbaugh Suggests President Obama Gave "Green Light" To Shooters In Garland, Texas | Video | Media Matters for America

DEBATING THE MOHAMMED EXHIBIT ON MEDIA MATTERS AND DEFENDING PAM GELLER

Captain Garrett  ApolloSpeaks

I'm a Democrat. I suppose that might qualify me as a "Leftist" to some. As an American I have the right to Freedom of Speech. That means the government can't tell me what I can, or cannot say. That doesn't mean everyone has to like what I say. Or that I have to like or support what is said by others. Hardly rocket science. So to answer what I think your rather silly rant was trying ask... You and Pamela are welcome to say anything you wish. You are free to make fun of all the religious leaders you wish. You are free to use your playmates as bait, all you wish. And others are free to be offended by it, if they wish. But no one is free to shoot you because you are idiots. I'm sure there's a statute in Texas about incitement to violence. If Texas doesn't think Pamela's Party qualified, that's a problem for Texas. I guess she'll just have to try again.

 

 

LOL!!!! If there is such a statute in Texas then Texas needs to suppress everything that Moslem fundamentalists morally, religiously and violently oppose: democracy (rule by the people not by God), gay rights, same-sex marriage, abortion, pornography, liquor, gender equality, any and all criticism of Islam and Mohammed, etc. Unless we appease them and live by their rules American Moslem fundies will always think violent thoughts against our free and open secular society as the first step to violent action, murder and mayhem.

 

 

Irony escapes you, I see. Yes, there are laws against incitement to violence. Even in Texas.

If there are any of these "fundamentalist Moslems" you are so afraid of in Texas, or anywhere else in the US, I haven't heard or seen them. If or when, they violently oppose anything, I'll be sure and call the cops. The two poor schmucks that came to Pam's Party don't seem to have demanded anything. They just committed suicide by Texas. Since that seems to be exactly what she intended, what seems to be the problem? Were you hoping for a better turn out?

 

 

The two poor schm*cks as you call them were committed, bloodthirsty jihadist ISIS savages (two of hundreds or more ticking time bombs in this country?) hell-bent on killing infidels for Allah, Islam and the Prophet. If they hadn't met their  violent end inadvertently doing no more harm (they intended worse) than grazing a security guard's ankle with a bullet they could have and most likely would have planned something just as horrendous that was safer for them to do: like shooting up a crowded mall, sports arena, movie theater, university campus or elementary school. Thank God for  Pam's "idiotic" exhibit. The two jihadi morons didn't anticipate how heavy ADFI's security would be. Their deaths made the event immensely and morally worthwhile: IT MOST LIKELY SAVED LIVES.

 

 

Oh Dear. You poor thing. That kind of fear is almost as dangerous as a couple of losers with rifles.

 

 

Jihadi losers with guns like Major Hassan who shot up Ft. Hood killing 13 people and an unborn child, and injuring more than 30? Jihadi losers like the Tsarnaev boys detonating two bombs during the Boston Marathon killing three, injuring 260 and causing millions in damage to the city? If it weren't for ADFI's Mohammed Exhibit Simpson and Soofi in time could have been, would likely have been (given their thirst for blood and martyrdom) the next deadly Nidal Hassan or Tsarnaev boys. Right?

 

semperhonesta  ApolloSpeaks 

 

I don't support violence. I do support free speech. I don't support Pamela Geller.But I'm also not a leftist, so...Use your false equivalencies and your twisted logic however you see fit.

 

semperhonesta 

 

What is exactly is your problem with Pam Geller then?

 

 

My biggest problem with her is simple: she is anti-islamic. I don't support much that starts with anti-. I am anti-anti.

 

 

 

Pam Geller is, as am I, very specifically "anti-Islamic supremacist," or "counterjihadist (same thing)," not simply "anti-Islamic." Moslems are divided into two groups: supremacists (which we oppose) and non-supremacists (true, peace-loving ecumenical Moslems). Supremacists are further divided into violent and nonviolent: overt violent jihadists (al-Qaida, Khomenists, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Taliban, ISIS, etc) and covert  nonviolent or stealth jihadists (the Saudis, CAIR, Imam Rauf, the Palestinian Authority, etc). Now my suggestion to you so that you're better informed on what ADFI truly is, is to do your research on "Islamic supremacism" so you don't make yourself look foolish by confusing it with "all Moslems." A mistake that we counterjihadists don't make whatever critics and detractors may say to the contrary. Okay?

 

 

Pam Geller would agree with you, I'm sure, but her past contradicts that.

First, about the Texas shooting, she claimed the attackers represent large numbers of American Muslims. "your everyday, run of the mill moderates praising mind-numbing savagery"

http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/04/...

She is the president of the American Freedom Defense Initiative, an anti-islamic hate group. She may claim to not hate muslims; just jihadists. The problem is she doesn't seem to know the difference. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...

 

ApolloSpeaks  semperhonesta 

 

Support for savage, anti-semitic Palestinian terror against Israel is demonstrably widespread in the American Moslem community. And where were the mass Moslem patriotic demonstrations showing support for this country against al-Qaida in the wake of 9/11? In the wake of the Ft Hood Massacre? In the wake of the Boston Marathon Bombings? And where is the call from American Imams and Mosques for the REFORMATION of Islam-like there is from the counterjihadist al Sisi Government in Egypt? These are very troubling signs that Pam Geller is right: Islamic supremacism is a powerful force in the American Moslem community as it is in the Moslem communities of England and Western Europe where there's a rising tide of anti-democratic Islamism and anti-infidel violence.

 

 ApolloSpeaks  semperhonesta

 

If, as you wrongly believe, that Geller hates all Moslems, making no distinction between them, then how do you account for her praise of Egyptian President al-Sisi (and the millions of Egyptian Moslems who support him) and his call for a "reformation of Islam" from JIHAD?

 

 

Here we go: McClatchy suggests limits on free speech after Texas Jihad shooting - Jihad Watch

 

The Next Art Exhibition to Apollospeaks 

 

The next art exhibition should be on something to do with the shrinking Middle East Christian community. Perhaps it can be of people or the churches before they were bombed and before the people were killed and mutilated.

How about an art exhibition of survivors from Islamic genocide, the Armenian holocaust. People resilient enough to survive “Islamaphobia” in action. Or perhaps an art exhibition on the moods of Asia Bibi…whilst in jail for the last five years for her serious crime of drinking water from a shared drinking vessel of muslims. Art can be a powerful tool in the fight against Islamic oppression. We either take a stand now or wait for their evil to flourish.

ApolloSpeaks to The Next Art Exhibition  
 May 5, 2015 at 12:50 pm

Excellent! And here’s an idea for the porno crowd. As pornography is outlawed by Islam how about an art exhibition/contest on Islamic Necrophilia? This would show drawings depicting Aisha making love to her dead husband (together with his sex slaves) six hours before his body grows cold. Now as dead men can’t get hard artists would have a field day inventing all sorts of sordid ways Aisha and Mo’s sex slaves could do it with him one last time before they die and are transformed into virgins for his pleasure in heaven

 

Wait a minute. Is it lawful in Islam for Moslem wives to have death sex with their deceased husbands? The reverse is permissible. But are women allowed? If not this could be an exhibition for the feminists as well.

 

 

RELATED

 

 
 

 

THE RELIGION OF PEACE ART CONTEST SHOOTING-ISIS’ WAR ON US HOMELAND BEGINS

     

Multiple shootings, possible bomb at AFDI/Jihad Watch free speech event in Texas | Atlas Shrugs

I think this is the winning cartoon
 
 SIXTEEN WEEKS AFTER THE CHARLIE HEBDO 12 WERE  KILLED IN FRANCE
 
 Mohammed's Religion of Islamic Peace violently struck again last night in Garland, Texas against the Spencer/Geller Mohammed Art Exhibit (and true freedom lovers everywhere) as two of its peace-loving, Koran inspired, Mohammed emulating jihadis-defending their Prophet of Peace from artistic blasphemy, criticism and mockery-lie peacefully dead bleeding in the street shot down in a peace-loving shoot out with infidel police. A security guard was hit in the leg then released from the hospital unharmed as police were fearful that the shooting might be followed by a peace-loving Islamic car bomb.
 
 Leading up to the shooting ISIS issued social media messages alerting their brethren here in the States (and south of the border) about the blasphemous crime of the Texas event and duty to retaliate-as Spencer and Geller are high on their hit list of hate. Was yesterday's failed attack (aimed at mass murder) the opening domestic shot of ISIS' war against the MECCA OF FREEDOM, the United States of America?  You bet it is.
 
The best kind of blood wetting American streets is from dead jihadists gunned down by police before they kill.
 
 
 RELATED
 

OBAMA TO AMERICANS IN YEMEN: HAPPY BIN LADEN KILL DAY, WE AIN’T COMING FOR YOU

 
 
 
They'll be no zero dark 30 rescue for our people stranded in Yemen.
 
OH, THE IRONY !
 
Five years ago this very day intrepid US Navy Seals risking life and limb in the dead of night invaded Pakistan to find and kill Osama Bin Laden-the most wanted and dangerous man on earth. For one brief shinning moment (after seven months of dithering and Hillary probably pulling out her hair) Obama showed some spine and ordered the storming of bin Laden's compound in Abbottabad. It wasn't "the most audacious plan in 500 years" as Biden said, exaggerating the difficulty of the mission (see). But it was a gutsy move nonetheless requiring a good amount of daring and risk taking. For the mission could easily have gone badly with all the Seals captured or killed by Pakistan and bin Laden getting away-not that we would have known about it.
 
 On February 11th Iran backed Houthi rebels seized the US Embassy in Yemen. it was the 36th anniversary of the Iranian Revolution.
 
But where is Obama's spine for rescuing hundreds of our people trapped in Yemen; hundreds who are in danger of being kidnapped for ransom, or captured, tortured and killed by al Qaida, ISIS or Iran backed rebels who are looking for them? Biden also said "Obama is willing to do the right thing and risk losing." Oh, really? We see that on display today with his message to our people in Yemen: 'You're on your own. We ain't coming for you. Don't expect a zero dark thirty rescue.' Perhaps that bold and praiseworthy action at Abbottabad used up what little guts Obama had when he became President-and shortly thereafter told the world what a weakling he'd be when one of his first audacious acts was to banish Churchill's bust from the White House.  It is the gutless anti-Churchill Obama (the real Obama) that's abandoning our people in Yemen perhaps to a terrible fate. All that we can do is pray for them.
 
 
 RELATED
 
 

WARNING!!! IRAN IS TO 21ST CENTURY AMERICA WHAT JAPAN WAS TO 20TH CENTURY AMERICA

 
If ever there was a PROVIDENTIAL SIGN on just how dangerously foolish and futile are US negotiations with fanatical terrorist nuclear Iran, and just how driven and hell-bent its Supreme ("God anointed") Leader is (and his murdering jihadist mullahs) on the destruction of our country, it was the terrible warning of Obama's meetiing with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe Tuesday at the White House. Indeed, as I wrote Wednesday (see), almost simultaneous to the meeting with the leader of a former monstrous totalitarian enemy-whose attack on Pearl Harbor plunged America into the nightmare of World War II-was the resumption of nuke talks with the Iranians in New York, and their illegal seizure of a Marshall Islands-flagged cargo ship in the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz.
 
 
As I wrote Wednesday the Japanese seized control of the Marshalls during World War I; and  from there partially launched their ultimately fatal  sneak attack on our country at Pearl Harbor-an act of war that ended with the necessary nuclear destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  The horrific nuking of these two cities broke the will of Imperial Japan to continue the war saving up to one million lives and bringing lasting peace between our two countries. Will the nuking of Iran be necessary to break its will to victory-which is stronger and surer than ever due to the confused policies and actions of the spineless, weak-willed blunderer in the White House?
 
 
Moreover,  adding to the ominousness of Tuesday was Iran seizing the Marshall's-flagged ship on the 63rd anniversary of the US ending its military occupation of Japan*while Japan's PM was meeting with the first US President born in Hawaii-the state to be that Japan attacked to start its devastating war with us. Also portentous was that Shinzo Abe's address to Congress Wednesday the 29th** (a first for a Japanese PM) came just eight weeks after Benjamin Netanyahu's Churchillian speech warning of Iran's nuclear ambitions and its geopolitical and security consequences if we continue to be weak with them.
 
*April 28, 1952 (see)
 
** April 29th was the 69th anniversary of the indicting of former Prime Minister of Japan Hideki Tojo and 28 former Japanese leaders for war crimes (see). Abe's grandfather, Nobusuke Kishi (PM of Japan from 1957-1960) was a member of Tojo's cabinet during the war (see).
 
Not every coincidence is fate. But it looks like Providence was very much present in the coincident events of this week in the Persian Gulf, New York and Washington DC warning us about the deadly mistakes we are making with Iran and the need for regime change in that country as the only possible way to peace.
 
RELATED
 

ATONING FOR COWARDICE AT YEMEN IRAN ATTACKS U.S. BY SEIZING MARSHALL ISLAND SHIP

Google Map
 

It must have been mortifying for imperial expanding nuclear Iran which has been besting our weak, butt kissing president on nuke negotiations to turn its gun boats and cargo vessels away from confronting the US fleet in Yemen Thursday with arms and supplies for the Houthi rebels. How dare Obama be so bold and suddenly show some balls by sending warships to the Arabian Sea and humiliating God's anointed nation chosen to save the world through  terror, blood and war? And to make atonement to Allah, Islam and the Iranian people for backing down from the Great Satan (Iran's and Islam's greatest foe) Revolutionary Guard patrol boats yesterday (under direct orders from Ayatollah Khamenei) illegally seized the Maersk Tigris a Marshal Island container ship in the Straits of Hormuz (where 20% of the world's oil flows). This was an act of war. For according to the seized ship's captain he was in international waters.
 
Obama with Japanese Prime Minister Abe at White House yesterday.
 
The Marshal Islands though a sovereign nation is by treaty a US protectorate-we have full authority and responsibility for its security and defense, and provide its people with millions in welfare benefits. That means an attack on the Marshal Islands is an attack on the US. Seizing a Marshall Island ship is equivalent to commandeering a US boat; and Obama (who ominously met with Japan's PM Abe yesterday*) should be up in arms over the contempt Iran is showing for him. But leaving office with no trophy greater than an unearned Nobel Peace Prize is his worse nightmare. Tears, tears.
 
*Ominous because the Japanese seized the Marshall Islands during World War I which they used to attack Pearl Harbor in 1941.
 
 
The Tigris is said to have a crew exclusively of East Europeans and Asians. But Fars (Iran's government news agency) is triumphantly reporting to Iran and world that the Tigris is a US ship with an American crew. They must be rejoicing in Tehran thinking another humiliating 444 day hostage crisis is at hand. "Death to America!" a million times over.  
 
 
"This criminal act," says anti-Iran hawk John McCain, "was clearly a provocation to the US." Coming just eight days after arresting Washington Post reporter Jason Rezaian on espionage Iran obviously timed and designed the Tigris' seizure to embarrass us during nuclear talks with John Kerry which restarted yesterday in New York. What will Obama do apart from uselessly and fecklessly sending a US destroyer (the Farragut) to the Straits to monitor the situation? He should show real backbone and, as John Bolton says, "break off negotiations with Iran until the ship is released," along with Jason Rezaian, I might add. If Obama fails to do this and continues his idiotic negotiations what Iran does next will be worse and worse until he's enmeshed in a Jimmy Carter like crisis.
 
RELATED
 
< p style="text-align: center;"> WITHOUT REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN IT WILL ABSOLUTELY BECOME A NUCLEAR ARMED STATE

IS ISLAM’S MALE GOD ALLAH A FEMALE DIETY IN DISGUISE? LIZ WARREN: PRINCESS TICKLEFEATHER AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS

 
 
 
WILD BILL IS NO PISS POOR ANTI-JIHADIST,
 
that's for sure. But it occurred to me while watching Bill's video that if Islam requires that men while peeing should be seated like women then could it be a sign that Allah, the Moon God of Mecca, might be a female deity like the Roman Diana, Greek Artemis and other luna deities of antiquity? As Islam permits TAQIYYA (lying and deception) could it be that Allah is deceiving his/her votaries and is a female deity disguised as a male god? Could Allah be in reality the pre-Islamic luna goddess Fatima (see below)? Perhaps the pathological masculinity of Moslem men, and male domination of Moslem society and women, have something to do with Allah (Fatima) hiding her gender.
 
Archaeological photo gallery of the Arabian Moon-
Fatima
Fatima was the moon goddess in pre-Islamic Arabia. Her name means The Creatress. She was also known as Source Of The Sun, Tree Of Paradise, the Moon, and Fate. She existed from the beginning of the material world (see).
 
 
 
 

 

HEADLINE SHOULD READ:

Princes TICKLEFEATHER'S First Attack On Hillary Clinton?

Is she on the warpath

to the

 ?

WHY TICKLEFEATHER?

Whenever Lizzy speaks don't you feel like this is being done to you?

  

The question however is this: is Lizzy Princess Ticklefeather?

Or is she

 

 ?

For those of you not old enough to remember, that's "Ticklefeather" as in the Howdy Doody Show.

 

POSTSCRIPT

Hey, Mr. Businessman, you didn't build your business.

But though the damn Cherokees refused to help me I built this

all by myself. 
 
 
 
 

I'M DUMBFOUNDED!

Quoting evil Moslem hate speech against Jews intended to incite Moslems to kill them as acts of religious worship pleasing to God is itself evil hate speech dangerous and morally wrong-though protected by the constitution? O'Reilly and Napolitano are pin heads on this issue.

 
 
 

WITH THE FAILURE OF OBAMA'S

Moslem Outreach Initiative to reconcile America and Islam in brotherly peace don't we need to look for alternatives? But as reconciliation is needed NOW perhaps we should turn to the Blind Sheikh? He's been in jail for 20 years. /sarc

 

 

Atlanta rapper Waka Flocka Flame announced that he's running for president and wants to be Lawgiver as well as Chief Executive. 

IF WAKA WAS COMPETING

with other young black men to be Obama's adopted son he'd beat out Trayvon Martin in a Flockan flash. "I AM CONGRESS!" That's the kind of  impudence that made Napoleon Emperor of France.

RELATED

 
 
 

BIG GOV'T SUPREMACISTS LIKE SOCIALIST OBAMA

have more in common with the totalitarian supremacist Khamenei than with limited government rule of law Republicans. Doubtless, Obama envies Khamenei his power.

 
 

 

THE 4DOOMED ECONOMIC POLICIES OF BARACK OBAMA AND THE END OF BIG GOV’T LIBERALISM

 Obama lacking  economic  sense, insight and 4sight is the 4th foolish President in US history to sign a 4doomed Keynesian stimulus  bill  .

On February 17, 2009  as George Bush's underreported V-shaped economic recovery was underway and in its second month (despite  Obama's belief that things were utterly bad and could get worse if drastic government action wasn't taken) Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). This was an $860 billion emergency fiscal spending (Keynesian) stimulus package (the biggest of its kind in history) which Obama and many economists (200 in number) confidently said was "BIG ENOUGH" to end the Great Recession (that was already ending) and jolt the economy into a booming, rip-roaring Reagan-like, jobs creating recovery (which hasn't happened). Hailed by Democrats and their media allies as the "new New Deal," and their darling Barack Obama as the "new FDR," liberals and Keynesian economists looked forward to vindication of their faith that "government is the answer," and that massive borrowing and deficit spending would significantly boost consumer demand, stimulate production, massively create good paying jobs, and with prosperity restored renew trust in the federal government-that had recently crashed the credit and housing markets. But it's 74 months since ARRA became law and the promised economic boom hasn't materialized and is nowhere in sight. 
 
 
Indeed, after 74 months of massive borrowing, spending and money printing, and artificially raising the Dow to stratospheric heights, what does Obama have to show for it? The worst recovery since the end of World War II; and the worst economy since the Great Depression. That is where the economy is, and if it doesn't get worse is likely to remain till the end of Obama's misguided, growth killing reign.
 
For after 74 months of government intervention consumers are still underspending, banks still underlending, businesses still underhiring and private investors are still under investing in new innovative job creating ideas. Indeed, consumers, banks, businesses and investors have little confidence in the economy as they fear worse days ahead due to trillions in growing debt and unfunded liabilities, tons of freedom crushing regulations, legions of illegals crossing our borders adding to an over burdened  welfare state, and an idiotic leftwing war on wealth and success in the name of fairness which hurts the poor and middle class. Never since the stuck-on-stupid, free market hating FDR has a president done so much to undercut the very recovery that he aimed for thinking he was doing the morally right things. Just like FDR Obama has abysmally failed to create the business and investment friendly climate of confidence, optimism and freedom that's needed for robust growth-like Reagan achieved in the 1980s with his Supply Side Revolution and faith in free markets that energized production and creativity and revived the jobs machine on a gigantic scale. 
 
 
 OBAMA'S  4DOOMED ECONOMIC POLICIES
 
Every government fiscal stimulus program worldwide designed by die hard Keynesian theorists to revive weak or badly distressed economies were 4doomed to fail before they began; and Obamanomics is no exception. For no government can spend its way back to prosperity and do for a complex economy what it can only do for itself when given the freedom it needs from government controls to florish and grow. Indeed, look at the ominous signs leading up to Obama's colossal stimulus becoming law:
 
Obama was born on the 4th day of August 1961 (44 years after the Russian Revolution). He became the 44th president of the US on the 4th day of November (which was the 44th week of the year). On January 28th-Obama's 8th day in office (4+4 = 8)-the House of Representatives by a vote of 244-188 passed the first version of ARRA (a 4 letter acronym). 16 days later (4x4 = 16) on Friday the 13th (the 44th day of the year) both the House and Senate passed the final version of ARRA amounting to $860 billion. 4 days later on February 17th in mile high Denver our spaced out President signed ARRA into law. Amazingly, February 17, 2009 was exactly 27,744 days from March 4, 1933 the day FDR was sworn into office, and his disastrous liberal New Deal tax and spend administration began (see). A remarkable coincidence for the 44th President believed to be the new FDR (which he is in economics not in war).
 
4doomed to fail from the start Obamanomics is another dismal chapter in the sad history of Liberal Keynesian Economics which began with Herbert Hoover and FDR's New Deal (Hooverism on steroids). Succeeding FDR, Gerald Ford and George W. Bush Obama was the 4th US president to apply Keynesian economic theory of government spending, deficits and debt to climb out of an economic hole*. And like his predecessors Obama failed as the theory now is finally discredited though there are holdouts galore in denial of reality. Even if the Clintons win back the White House and reign for eight years there won't and cannot be another stimulus bill as the last one (history's biggest) has miserably failed in its goals.
 
As the 45th President will inherit an unsustainbale national debt of $20 trillion making another large stimulus unpopular and impossible the only alternative to save us from national bankruptcy is Austerity (Tea Party) Economics-which unleashed the Roaring Twenties for Harding and Coolidge ending a Depression; an saved Sweden in the 1990s from utter socialist ruin.
 
The era of Big Government Liberalism that began with the New Deal is at an end. Obama is its last hurrah and death nell. And two unmistakable signs of its coming demise (apart from what's written above) were the deaths of Ted Kennedy and Mario Cuomo. But that is an article for another day.
 
*Ford had a Keynesian stimulus tax rebate program, and Bush had two of them.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
DETROIT IS OBAMAVILLE
 
 

IS EGYPT’S AL-SISI A CRYPTO-CHRISTIAN? YEMEN AND OBAMA’S RED LINE IN THE SEA AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS

 
 
 
President al-Sisi warmly greeted by Coptic Pope Tawadros II in Cairo's largest church.
 

On February 18th an Egyptian administrative court made history by upholding an unprecedented government edict issued by the moderate, Christian friendly,  anti-jihadist regime of President Abdel al-Sisi ordering the closing of 27,000 places of worship which were exclusively Moslem mosques (see). Why were none of the thousands of  Coptic churches included in the edict? Was it fair that only mosques and no churches were closed?

President al-Sisi greeted by Pope Francis at the Vatican

One dissonant voice on Facebook commenting on the ill-treatment of Moslems verses Christians under al-Sisi said: “Well done! Christians have lost the right to complain about their lesser status. Egypt is no longer a Muslim Nation -- it has turned Christian, or so it seems!” Another dissonant voice at the time was so outraged at the mosques' closings that he accused al-Sisi of being a crypto-Christian who secretly converted to the faith while serving as defense minister under radical Moslem Brotherhood President Morsi. For proof of his theory the commenter pointed to al-Sisi's historic visit on Christmas Eve to Egypt's largest Coptic church, a first for an Egyptian head of state. Also mentioned was al-Sisi's tight alliance with Coptic Pope Tawadros II, an enthusiastic supporter of  his pro-Coptic regime. To this couldd be added al-Sisi's bombing of ISIS targets in Libya shortly after these butchers beheaded 21 innocent Copts while praising Allah (see).

Could the angry commenter be right? Is al-Sisi an apostate from Islam making him the first Christian head of Egypt since its conquest by Moslems 14 centuries ago? We don't know. Until there's hard proof of al-Sisi's conversion a more likely explanation is that he's a real, genuine Egyptian nationalist (more so than were Sadat and Mubarak) patriotically carrying out his responsibilities as  President to protect the safety, security and property of all Egyptians regardless of faith. And that the closing of 27,000 mosques, verses not a single church, is due solely to their actual (or potentially) radical nature headed by extremist clerics poisoning their congregations with violence and hate against Christians and the Egyptian state. But that not one single church was closed (large or small) tells us that al-Sisi regards Christianity as more truly a religion of God's peace, and more beneficial to Egypt, than is the Islamic faith that he's courageously trying to reform against a growing storm.

White dove and cross.
 
 RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

IS THIS RED LINE TIME ALL OVER AGAIN?

Obama dared not cross the red line he'd drawn against the Assad regime (Iran's allies) when they used chemical weapons against rebels. Were the 11 US war ships sent to Yemen an unspoken warning to Iran not to continue their support of the Houthis or else the US would join forces with the Saudis and intervene in Yemen to stop them? As Pam says, Iran is banking on Obama bluffing and will do nothing to jeopardize the nuke talks. Hopefully they're wrong. Hopefully this time Obama will show some spine and act But I'm not counting on it.

PS. Maybe if the State Dept. gives Iran the $50 billion signing bonus they'll withdraw their ships?

 
 

AS DURING THE COLD WAR WITH SOVIET RUSSIA

the BIG LIE governing Obama in his peace talks with radical islamic jihadist Iran is that America and the West are the source of the tensions and mistrust that divide us. And that the key to achieving  peace is unilaterally changing our behavior and setting an example for our adversaries that will presumably win over their hearts and minds and moderate them. But the theocratic mullahs, like the Soviet communists, are ideological fanatics believing with prefect faith that they have the absolute answer to humanity's manifold problems and ills. And while fools like Obama seek peace through weakness and appeasement the enemy seeks victory and power begetting the nightmare and horrors of war.

 
 
4-15-2015
 

WELL, JUST IN TIME FOR THE 3RD ANNIVERSARY

of the Boston Marathon Bombing. And killing the same number of people. Dzhokhar must be sitting in his cell elated thinking it’s a sign from Allah certifying his deed. And his mother must be passing out candy, cakes and cookies believing Allah has avenged her two "wronged" sons.

 
ISN'T THIS THE SAME ANGELA MERKEL
 
who complained five years ago that "German multicultural society has utterly failed"? And wasn't she in main referring to Germany's 2.5 million mostly unassimilated Turks-just like in Austria? And isn't German hostility towards these unassilimated Turks caused by their open hatred and rejection of German secular culture?
 
 

"THE MORE THINGS CHANGE

the more they remain the same," said Michael Montaigne. Back in the 60s radical leftist loons shouted support for Communist North Vietnam and the Viet Cong. Then it was the murderer Ho Chi Minh . Today it's the murderer Bagh Da Di. The foreign enemy changes. But the enemy within stays the same hating this good country for no good reason; and loving  evil men and nations because they are insane .

 

 

ANOTHER KORAN INSPIRED

Islamic peacenik extending his warm loving ecumenical heart to unbelievers.

 

 
 

WHEN PAM THE TERRIBLE SPEAKS

she summons all the victims of Islam from ages past. As they are legion Moslems sense their presence and are filled with dread. Too bad on them./sarc

 

 

 
 
 

A SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN,

hate to say.

 

 
 
 

SO ONE OF HILLARY'S GREAT ACHIEVEMENTS

as First Lady, to make up for the failure of Hillarycare, was letting her unfaithful husband drive her into a life of sexual perversion. Now she wants to be President so that lesbians can shout from the housetops 'We have a President in the White House we can f--k.' They said that before when she was First Lady. and they'll do so again. Wouldn't that be lovely?

 

 
IT’S NOT THAT WE AMERICANS ARE ALONE IN OUR IGNORANCE OF ISLAM
 
Most of infidel humanity is ignorant of it. Not just in our time but in ages past. Why is it that since its birth 14 centuries ago Islam has had a public relations problem with the rest of the world? IGNORANCE.There’s no other reason. To know Islam is to love islam. And until we truly know it we will falsely hate it, or dislike it, or have mixed feelings about it. The cure is simple: study the Koran, pray to Allah and Mecca, hate Israel and America. Get into the spirit of Islam and you’ll see how truly wonderful it is. /sarc
 
Westman says 
 
Yes. Let’s see, if we recite the Quran continually, pray with verbal slights for Christians and Jews five times a day, order our “wives” to submit to relations, reject our parents and other infidels, hate music, avoid fun, bully infidels, and listen to loving Imams, we will finally fall into the loving arms of Muhammad and Allah.
 
That is called cult indoctrination.I remember something like this from Orwell’s 1984: “The face of Big Brother loomed large over the announcement and Winston felt his eyes fill with tears of joy and reconciliation. The last lesson had been learnt. “He loved Big Brother.”
 

ApolloSpeaks says

You’re approach is too radical. The process of Islamization-overcoming centuries of collective Islamophobia and bigotry-has to be gradual and not so abrupt. It’s like getting into a hot tub, you have to ease your way in: toes, feet, legs, butt… Be reasonable. A radical change in consciousness from infidel to Moslem could be alarming, and too much for the unbelieving mind overwhelming it with strange new ideas that could be misconstrued as evil, sin, inhumanity and crime. See what I mean?/sarc.

 

BARACK OBAMA’S SMEARING OF AMERICA AND ANTI-AMERICANISM IN HIS BUTT KISSING DIPLOMACY WITH IRAN

 
 11 days before the reelection of Ahmadenijad this is exactly what Barack Obama did in Cairo
 
If one wants to know how truly and disgracefully anti-American Barack Obama is in his soft, weak, appeasing, lead and bleed from behind approach to diplomacy and foreign policy there is no better place to start than with Iran who is aspiring to replace the US as the nuclear hegemon of the Middle East and is getting there with Obama's help. Obama as I pointed out Monday was the first sitting US President to acknowledge the US role in the 1953 overthrow of Iranian leader Mohammed Mossadegh who briefly succeeded Shah Raza Pahlavi as Iran's head of state. According to the narrative that we've heard for 36 years since the Shah's unfortunate downfall and death  Mossadegh was the legitimate, DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED Prime Minister of Iran. And because he was unfriendly to US and British interests during the Cold War (showing favor to the Soviet Union over the Free World) the US and British administrations of Dwight Eisenhower and Winston Churchill, secretly conspired to oust Mossedegh and return the pro-Western Shah to power. And this was done in an Iranian military led coup on August 19, 1953. Mossadegh was ousted from power tried for treason and sentenced to jail for three years and house arrest for life. This action by the US, we are told, toppling a democratically elected government and replacing it with a non-democratic near absolute monarch,  went against our democratic traditions, values and ideals; and was a sin against the people of Iran making it a dark and shameful chapter in our history. If only we had left well enough alone, the story goes, Iran might be a peaceful democratic republic today; and not a radical, menacing, terrorist, destabilizing nuclear aspiring Islamic state.
 
Hating the imperfect reality with all its flaws and sins the America Obama loves is an abstract idea in his childish mind. 
 
 Indeed,  eight months after the Shah was overthrown and Ayatolloh Khomeini ruled Iran-replacing his near absolute monarchy with a belligerent totalitarian Islamic regime-the US embassy in Tehran with over 60 Americans was seized by radical, pro-Khomeini, revolutionary students. This was the start of the Iran Hostage Crisis. The students (backed by Khomeini) cited three demands that the US must meet to release the hostages: 1) Return the Shah to Iran to stand trial. 2) Release billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets. And 3) Apologize for the interference in the internal affairs in Iran and the overthrow of Mossadegh. This last demand was truly bizarre. For the Ayatollah Khomeini in 1953, as I wrote and proved
HERE, hated the secularist reformer Mossadegh believing he was  Islam's enemy and unfit to rule;  backing the coup that brought him down Khomeini wanted the Shah restored to power believing he was better for the faith. The obvious reason for Khomeini backing this bogus demand was to simply enjoy the satisfaction of seeing the Great Satan grovelling at his feet-and not to satisfy a long-standing grievance about an overthrown Iranian government which he himself despised as evil and wanted destroyed.
 
Obama would ruin America More
If only Obama pissed on America more to the west he could end the drought in California.
 
But the Carter administration rejected all three demands and the hostage crisis dragged on for 444 agonizing days ending on the day Ronald Reagan took office-an auspicious omen for his magnificent,  history changing presidency. But from Jimmy Carter on no US President so much as acknowledged America's role in Mossadegh's downfall until, that is, the great anti-American leftist appeaser Barack Obama came to power.
 
Indeed, four months into his presidency the man who was ominiously elected on the 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis speaking from Cairo to the Moslem world finally at long last  conceded America's role in the 1953 coup, saying: 
  
"For many years, Iran has defined itself in part by its opposition to my country, and there is indeed a tumultuous history between us. In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government." 
 
Now subsequent to saying this Obama did three things to uselessly butt-kiss the implacable Iranian mullahs: 1) He refused to intervene in the anti-regime revolt which started 11 days later-this signalled to the mullahs that he had no desire to repeat the "mistake" the US made of toppling Mossadegh; 2) He had the CIA declassify documents detailing their role in the 1952 coup; and 3) He repeated what he said in Cairo at the UN.
 
The smell and taste of Islamist ass is the most beautiful thing in the world.
 
But this narrative of the US toppling a democratically elected Iranian government is a big ugly lie. As you will see below it is groundless leftwing anti-American propaganda designed to smear and discredit this country as a bad actor on the world stage doing evil things to other states. And Obama, the President of the United States, deliberately and insanely promoted this lie before Islam and the world to butt kiss the anti-American regime in Iran whose hostility toward us has zero to do with the 53 coup. What he did was  deplorable in the extreme.
 
 
Truth is Iran under the Shah was a near absolute constitutional monarchy, and not a democracy in any degree. The Shah was the final authority determining Iran's domestic and foreign policy, and his Prime Minister was his creature and servant slavishly carrying out his will. Indeed, the Shah owned his PMs, had absolute power over them and could make or break them at will. Under the Shah the undemocratic process of selecting PMs was as follows:  
 
The lower House of the Iranian Parliament (Majlis) would vote to nominate their choice for PM (this was a parliamentary not a democratic election);  the Shah would then either approve the nominee and appoint him, or reject him. If for whatever reason he was rejected the Parliament would then reconvene to vote on a new nominee. In other words, the final decision on who'd be PM rested exclusively with the Shah not with Parliament, or democratically with the Iranian people. And as the PM was the Shah's creature (having no political existence apart from him) he could dismiss him on a whim.
 
Iranian mob carrying Mossadegh in triumph after he illegally and unconstititionally deposed the Shah.
 
Prior to Mossedegh's tenure as PM he had ten predecessors who were appointed and dismissed, himself being one of them. The Shah dismissed Mossadegh because defying his policy and alliance with Great Britain he wanted to nationalize Iran's oil industry which was run by the Brits. But nationalization was popular with the Iranian people and Mossadegh's dismissal caused a nationwide uproar with millions of Iranians protesting for him in the streets. Fearing the mob and the possible violent overthrow of his monarchy the Shah reluctantly reinstated Mossadegh as PM.
 
But this show of weakness served only to embolden Mossadegh who adamantly and treasonously pressed on for nationalization until the Shah throwing caution to the wind had enough and dismissed him again for insubordination. Under Iranian law this was the official end of Mossadegh's prime ministership. But defying the Shah and disobeying the law (that he swore to uphold) Mossadegh refused to step down preferring instead to illegally drive the Shah from power-which he did by inciting mobs of Iranians to violence. The Shah fearing for his life fled Iran.
 
This unlawful action by Mossadegh made him a usurper: the illegal, unelected, dictator of Iran who shredded its constitution and forcefully replaced the Shah as head of the Iranian state assuming all of his monarchical powers, and becoming himself the law. It was like Napoleon seizing control of France and telling the nation, "I am the constitution!" In short, like Napoleon in France Mossadegh became the autocrat of Iran and not a democratically elected PM-as Obama lyingly and deplorably said in Cairo. And as the power this autocrat grabbed went to his head he became an oppressive tyrant who quickly made himself hated losing his friends, allies and the public.
 
 Indeed, no sooner did this vile man run the Shah out of Iran than he filled the jails with political opponents, illegally dissolved the senate, illegally shut down the Majlis (lower house), illegally dismissed the Supreme Court and illegally imposed a curfew on the nation (see). By the time the Iranian army had ousted Mossadegh the public had turned against him and welcomed back the Shah, as the lesser of two evils.
 
In other words, the US and Britain in assisting in Mossadegh's downfall was restoring Iran's legally constituted monarch to his rightful throne. It was nothing more complicated than that. Indeed, as the Shah remained the legal head of Iran while in exile (the constitution in his absence wasn't replaced, altered or amended) the intervention of the US and Great Britain was perfectly legal under international law as it had the blessing of the Shah.
 
Indeed, far from being a shameful episode in US and British history the downfall of Mossadegh (supported by Khomeini and the entire clerical establishment) was a blessing to Iran and US/UK strategic interests at the time. The shame and disgrace is on Obama and the Left for blatantly lying about Mossadegh and the nature of the coup turning it into a despicable unAmerican operation running contrary to our values and ideals. Barack Obama owes this nation a huge apology for smearing it and blackening its name to curry favor with the implacable, murdering, Islamically perverse medieval savages in Iran.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

BARACK OBAMA, THE US/IRANIAN CONFLICT AND HIS LIES ABOUT THE 1953 OVERTHROW OF MOSSADEGH (REVISED)

 
 
 
 
 
He [Mossadegh, below] was not a Muslim.....and I said...he will be slapped and it did not take long that he was slapped [in the 1953 coup] and if he had lasted he would have slapped Islam". -- Ayatollah Khomeini, 1980 speech
 
Mohammed Mossadegh: appointed prime minister by the Shah, not democratically elected like Obama and others claim.
 
Last week on Morning Joe liberal journalist Thomas Friedman (who has interviewed Barack Obama several times) made the preposterous remark that one of the most ignorant, blundering and feckless presidents in US history who's been wrong about practically everything has got it right about two important foreign policy issues: the Iranians and Palestinians. Indeed, Friedman  contends that Obama understands both issues better than Bibi Netanyahu and the Republican leadership combined; that he knows the mullahs and Palestinians from deep inside their Moslem souls; that he sees the US and world as they see it ; and understands their concerns and fears as if they were his own; i.e., as if he were Iran's Supreme Leader and Abu Abbas himself. After all of Obama's failures and disasters in foreign policy, and lack of respect worldwide, Friedman believes that he is an enlightened but misunderstood genius who could make peace with Iran-woo it away from Islamic extremism and turn it into a moderate, normal, non-nuclear state. And that he can succeed where Bill Clinton and other presidents have failed and broker a two state solution between Israelis and Palestinians....turning their mutual hostility into friendship and lasting peace. Friedman believes, that if only Netanyahu, John Boehner and the GOP would submit to Obama and let themselves be guided by his superior wisdom, judgment and insights it would greatly benefit the Middle East and world peace. And Friedman isn't alone in his opinion as there are many on the left who agree with him.
 
 
When I want to see the world as the mullahs see it I wrap myself in the Iranian flag of martyrdom, blood and jihad. Try it sometime. It's great.
 
Now to illustrate just how radically mistaken Friedman and the left are about Obama and why Netanyahu and the Republicans are right to distrust and reject his judgment let's analyze the basis of his supposed superior insight into the US/Iranian conflict:
 
"Let's remember," says Friedman, "that we, the United States, back in the ’50s, toppled Iran’s democratically-elected government. You know, there might be some reason these people actually want to get a weapon that will deter that from happening again." 
 
True. In 1953 there was a US/UK backed military coup in Iran toppling  Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh. However,  Iran was a constitutional monarchy not a democracy; and Mossadegh was appointed by the Shah not democratically elected. Mossadegh was toppled from power after he staged his own coup and drove the Shah into exile while assuming absolute dictatorial powers. The idea that Iran today would be a democracy if Mossadegh had remained in power is an anti-American fiction....adopted by Obama, Friedman and the anti-American idiot left. Be that as it may what you never hear from pro-Iranian apologists like Friedman and Obama is that the 53 coup was overwhelmingly supported and welcomed by most of Iran's clerical establishment, including the Ayatollah Khomeini.
 
Khomeini and the mullahs loathed Mossadegh and wanted him gone because he was perceived (rightly or wrongly) to be a progressive liberal secular reformer, and not a true God-fearing, Sharia abiding Moslem (as Khomenie says in the above quote). In other words, Moseddegh was seen as a modernizer sinfully committed to bringing Iran out of the Middle Ages and into the modern world-which Khomeini and the 10th century mullahs staunchly opposed. "Anyone not in the path of Islam is our enemy," said Khomeini. And that meant Mohammed Mossadegh.
 
In fact, Khomeini preferred the absolute monarchy of the Shah (the governing model of Mohammed) over a democracy or secular dictatorship (like Mossadegh temporarily had) as he thought it was better suited to protect Iran's Islamic heritage from the evils of modernity and reform. But that was not to be. As bad as Mossadegh was for Islam the Shah proved radically worse. The Shah who pledged to Khomeini and the clergy to uphold the faith and respect Islamic law instead out-secularized Mossadegh incurring Khomeini's undying wrath. Khomenie feeling betrayed went on a venomous jihad against the Shah that was so out of hand that he fled the country fearing for his life. In Khomeini's eyes the Shah and Mossadegh were two different forms of the same evil enemy of Iran and Islam; and he single mindedly dedicated his years in exile to stirring up and organizing opposition to the Shah to drive him from power. And with the helping hand of Jimmy Carter he succeeded.
 
Those are the historical facts ignored by Obama, Tom Friedman and others on the left who give themselves the false hope that peace with Iran is possible if only our two sides could overcome the hurdle of the 1953 (Khomeini backed) coup. But try as he may to heal the rift Obama can't prevail; for the coup has nothing to do with it.
 
To the amusement of the mullahs Obama lied to the world in Cairo about the big bad US toppling a DEMOCRATICALLY-elected Iranian government in 1953. What was toppled was the increasingly unpopular, anti-Western dictatorship of usurper Mohammed Mossadegh.
 
In his 2009 Moslem outreach speech from Cairo (oddly coinciding with the 20th anniversary of Ali Khamenei coming to power) Obama became the first sitting US President to acknowledge the 1953 coup. Then on August 19, 2013 (the 60th anniversary of the coup) Obama ordered the CIA to declassify detailed info on its involvement in the coup (see)Then on the following month at the UN Obama again for a second time referenced America's role in the coup as a major source of division and obstacle to peace, saying:
 
 "This mistrust has deep roots. Iranians have long complained of a history of US interference in their affairs, and America's role in overthrowing an Iranian government during the cold war."
 
As America is the sinner needing forgiveness and redemption  perhaps Obama should go to Tehran get down on his knees and abase himself before the world apologizing to Khamenei for the coup. But that too would fail.
 
 
The 1953 coup is not any more the underlying cause of the US/Iran divide than was the 1918 invasion of Northern Russia by Western forces (to defeat the Bolsheviks) the cause of the East-West conflict and Cold War. Just as Marxist-Leninist hatred of democratic capitalism is what drove Russia's conflict with the West so does Islamic supremacism and Koranic inspired hatred of non-Moslems underlie the US-Iran divide. The problem is Islam. It's really that simple. If Iran has alliances with non-Moslem states (like Russia, China and North Korea) it's because they're pragmatic and temporary as they are no less evil and hated by God (according to Khomenism) than is the US.
 
The mullahs are imperial restorationists aspiring to transform Iran (once a great empire) into a nuclear armed military superpower with the ultimate (utopian) goal of defeating modernity and conquering humanity in the victory of a one world Islamic state. As the delusional mullahs believe that God and history are on their side there is no reasoning, negotiating, appeasement or apologies that will change them. The only rational policy for fanatical terrorist totalitarian Iran is regime change. Its Islamonazi theocracy is an unreformable menace to the world and must be destroyed. As with the collapse of the Soviet Union hopefully this can happen without war.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

CAN A PRESIDENT CLINTON SUCCEED AT CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM WHERE OBAMA HAS MISERABLY FAILED?

 
 
There aren't "two ways." There isn't even ONE WAY that Hillary can reach voters and them care about climate change giving it priority above all things. It's a lost cause that she (and her husband) can't reverse. For six years now our weak, ineffective, feckless president (Warmunist Nutcase-in-Chief) has tried and failed to alarm the nation with his sincere but delusional apocalyptic fears about global warming Armageddon by turning it into an economic issue (with bankruptcy in the future because of extreme devastating weather events), a health issue (with everyone sick with respiratory ailments and disease), a hunger issue (with universal starvation caused by global drought) and above all a national security issue (vastly more urgent than the growing threat of global Islamic jihad and terror, ISIS' murderous rampage through Iraq and infiltration of Mexico, Putin's aggression in Ukraine and terrorist, death cult Iran's regionwide expansion and getting the bomb). Indeed, since Obama's been president he's failed to replace Bush's Global War on Islamic Terror with a public backed Global War on Fossil Fuels and CO2 Emissions as he has undercut his agenda by creating a safe haven for terrorists in Libya; and by withdrawing US forces from Iraq creating a vacuüm for ISIS, al-Qaida and menacing, Islamonazi Iran. Alarmism is growing over Islamic terror to post-9/11 highs, and not over "world ending" climate change and environmental issues thanks to the master of confusion and delusion in the White House-who can't seem to do anything right.
 
 
 Indeed, since Obama's been president the crazed, hysterical warmunist left (damaged by scandal, false predictions and stable global temperatures) has been in steep decline practically hitting rock bottom at 22nd place out of the 23 most important issues worrying voters in our time.  So how could tired old baggy eyed Hillary change this when she's a less gifted speaker than (the overrated) Obama with very little of his likability, charisma and charm? Hillary is Obama in white face and drag with none of his good qualities. If Obama couldn't communicate his science fiction  fears and delusions about the coming possible extinction of humanity, unless "deadly" CO2 emissions aren't drastically cut (on a national and global scale regardless of the economic costs), what can poor old tired mediocre Hillary do? What bold lies can she spin that Obama hasn't spun to terrify us into action? What tricks can she try that he hasn't done to stir up the slumbering, gas guzzling masses to a green revolution where they'll willingly sacrifice their standard of living to save the planet from far off doom? Clearly, Hillary Clinton hasn't got what it takes to energize voters and reverse this downward trend and make them care for the survival of the race against an imaginary climate change nightmare. And if (God forbid) she becomes president next year that's all for the best.
 
RELATED

HOW TO PREVENT FUTURE BOSTON BOMBINGS-THE LEFTIST APPROACH (SATIRE)

 

As I was looking through my Townhall archives today I came across this piece about the Boston Marathon Bombing. Inspired by Arianna Huffington I thought it would amuse you. 

FROM APOLLOSPEAKS' TOWNHALL ARCHIVES

 2013-04-26 09:12: --HOW TO PREVENT FUTURE BOSTON BOMBING -THE LEFTIST APPROACH 

 
  
Due to the misperception that America is at war with Islam (born from Iraq, Afghanistan, drone attacks, Pam Geller and the killing of the revered Moslem leader Osama bin Ladin) there are thousands of embittered young Moslems in the this country who like the Tsarnaev boys are ticking time bombs that could explode at any moment causing dozens of Boston Marathons or smaller crimes. What must we do to prevent this?
 
THE SOLUTION
 
Every adult American should make it their business to find a poorly assimilated Moslem youth like a Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and befriend him. And to ensure that he won't turn jihadist this is what you must do: Hug him tightly and don't let go until you squeeze all the hatred and violence out of him. But a word of caution: when hugging and squeezing him you need to be careful not to suffocate him to death. You don't want to kill the kid you're trying to help-though that too would prevent him from turning jihadist.
 
 
POSTSCRIPT
 

After Boston: Why It's Important That We Keep Asking 'Why?'

"A lot of the who, what, where, and how of the Boston bombing and what led up to it have already been answered and, no doubt, more details will eventually be filled in. The why, however, is the more elusive question. But it's also a crucial one....."

I posted the above article as a comment on Arianna's blog and got the following reply from this well meaning leftist loon:
 
LeftClique writes on HuffPo
 
You've made the most sensible remark I've seen
 
My reply
 
 Looks like the sarcasm didn't get through to you.
 
LeftClique replies
 
No, the sarcasm got through very clearly (hug him ... careful not to suffocate), but even without intending to, your remark made sense. Hate solves nothing, killing solves nothing. It will take compassion and understanding to end the violence. I want to be clear - I am not talking about not defending our country, but I am saying we are reaping what we have sown over the last 100 years. We lost a few hundred in Beirut, a few thousand on 9/11, three in Boston, but the Arabs have died by the thousands everyday just so we can have cheap gas.
 
My reply
 
There 's nothing morally wrong with hate as long as you hate the right things like all kinds of evil for example; or evil people like neo-Nazi white supremacist skin heads; or intolerant, totalitarian, murdering Islamic jihadists. Moreover, compassion and understanding are useless with such people as they are implacable, ideologically driven foes with the absolute truth hellbent on our subjugation or destruction. As with our enemies in WWII  our jihadist foes must be crushed, broken and defeated before there can be peace.
 
 
 COMMENTS, THOUGHTS AND WITTICISMS
  
 
AWWWWW
 
What good little jihadis the Tsarnaevs are, wanting to complete the unfinished work of the Times Square Bomber so that his jihad wouldn't be in vain.

Sudan: Muslim cleric says Israel behind Boston jihad bombings, Iran earthquake - Jihad Watch
OF COURSE IT WAS A JEWISH PLOT
 
the sign of which was the kid recuperating from his wounds in Boston's Beth Israel Hospital.
 
 
 NOW THAT THE BOSTON TERROR BOMBERS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS MOSLEM
 

will Obama designate their murderous mass casualty jihadist crime as Tax Day Sports Event Shopping Place Violence?

 
 Pam Geller writes:
 
"Like I said in a previous post, "self-radicalized" is a myth. There is always a mosque, a religious leader, the imprimatur of a Muslim cleric."
 
My Comment:
 
PAM ISN'T COMPLETELY CORRECT 
 
In the entire history of Islam there has been one "self-radicalized" Moslem: the Prophet Mohammed

 

 

BARACK OBAMA: THE MOST RECKLESS SPENDER EVER, NOT THE WORST TAXER

 

 
 
 

THIS COUNTRY HAS HAD BIG GOVERNMENT LIBERAL PRESIDENTS

like Hoover and Roosevelt who've been more ignorant and 
reckless than Obama in taxing Americans during a period of economic distress. But in ignorance and recklessness Obama is unsurpassed (the ruling all time king) when it comes to the borrowing, spending and printing of money, and in the controlling and regulating of business. Just as the stupid policies and leadership of Hoover and FDR prolonged the Great Depression and economic suffering of the American people, so is the equally stupid policies and leadership of Obama prolonging the worst and weakest recovery (some say there is no recovery) since the end of World War II-the worst six years since the Great Depression.  
If Obama finishes his presidency without a double dip recession it will be a miracle. But if that should happen this lying reckless ignoramus will blame "obstructionist" Republicans for not letting him tax and spend enough.

 

BUSH VS OBAMA

WHO IS THE MOST RECKLESS SPENDING HEAD OF STATE IN HISTORY?

 

 

To set the record straight on who's the most reckless spender of all time, Barack Obama or George Bush,  Obama just six days after signing the biggest stimulus spending bill in history pledged and predicted that by the end of his first term he'd cut in HALF Bush's record breaking deficit of $490 billion. He believed (and wrongly) that the stimulus would so supercharge and revive the US economy and put Americans back to work that the boom in consumption, economic activity and tax revenues would allow him to cut the deficit to $245 billion by 2012.

But the stimulus was a bust and the promised boom in consumption, jobs and revenue hasn't materialized. Six and a half years in office and we have a real unemployment rate of 10%, and the deficit while coming down from a staggering, historic $1.5 trillion under Obama is now $489 billion-little less than double the promised $245 billion. 

In short, Obama tripled the deficit then cut it in half adding gigantically to our unsustainable growing pulverizing national debt; and he has the audacity to say that halving his historic deficits is proof that "we are not going bankrupt (see)"? Let's just paint him as an economic jackass who wouldn't know a good fiscal, monetary and economic policy if he tripped over it. 

 

 

 RELATED

MR. PRESIDENT: THE ECONOMY SUCKS BECAUSE YOU'RE A LEFTIST IGNORAMUS 

< p style="text-align: center;">OBAMA’S FAILED STIMULUS AND BUSH’S UNDERREPORTED RECOVERY

BARACK OBAMA: PROTECTOR AND DEFENDER OF IRAN-IN-CHIEF

 
 
 
It's no secret that the Obama Administration opposes a military solution to ending Iran's nuclear ambitions and terrorist aggression in the Middle East; and is dead against Israel carrying out air strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities (and other military targets) like it did on Iraq's and Syria's nuke reactors in 1981 and 2007. In fact, it was reported last month that Obama thwarted a planned Israeli air force strike on Iran last year by threatening to act as Iran's proxy air force and shoot down Israeli jets (and murder their pilots) before they could reach their targets (see). As Israel and the US neither confirmed nor denied the report we don't know if it was true.
 
But what we do know now, and is very disconcerting, is that Obama in his negotiations with Iran for a framework agreement betrayed Israel by agreeing to lift the ban on conventional arms sales to Tehran. This allowed the Russians to legally go ahead with a planned sale of a sophisticated $800 million air defense missile system that was put on hold since 2010  when the deal was struck. This system would shield Iran's nuclear facilities from attacks. The concern that the Obama administration voiced over the sale complaining that it's "not constructive" is bull. It is inconceivable that Obama was surprised by the announcement Monday from Moscow. It was a foregone conclusion that once the ban was lifted Russia would go ahead with the sale as it desperately needs the cash because of sanctions and the drop in oil prices distressing Russia's economy.  
 
The sale was probably a concession given to Russia to get them on board for the framework agreement. What I wrote yesterday that the sale is a slap in the face to the US, and that Obama and Hillary are probably regretting their cancellation of the missile shield to Poland and Eastern Europe, no longer seems credible to me. If they could go back in time they'd probably stupidly cancel the deal all over again. In fact, Obama insanely opposes Poland building its own missile shield because the Russians are against it. Even with the Ukraine crisis Obama has learned nothing and still plays the appeasing fool to Putin's delight (see) .
 
As Obama opposes an Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear infrastructure (and is equally opposed to a US strike) this Russian missile deal makes it less likely. So why should Obama be concerned about this sale? He's Iran's Protector and Defender from Israel in Chief-he's got their back; and the mullahs should honor him with a special award to compliment his unearned peace prize.
 
 
 

IF I WERE A BILLIONAIRE AND WANTED TO ACQUIRE A NUCLEAR BOMB

where would I go? Which nuclear power would likely do business with me? Answer: Cash strapped North Korea, the worst nuclear proliferator on earth. This is the same North Korea whose relationship with Tehran goes back to 1989 when Khamenei came to power as Iran's Supreme Leader;  which has a dangerous Science & Technology Cooperation Agreement with Iran;  and was jointly working with Iranian nuclear scientists in building an illegal nuclear weapons facility at Deir al-Zour, Syria-that was happily destroyed by Israel. So let's cut through the crap: If Iran isn't already in possession of one or more nukes hidden away in North Korea it can easily build them there. Period!

 

POSTSCRIPT

DEBATE ON POLITICO ABOUT IRAN AND NORTH KOREA

Apollo, how much do you know about nuclear weapon construction? I know some, but I have degrees in physics and mathematics and a PhD in CS. Once a nation has 20% enriched U235 they can easily get to a crude thermonuclear device in 6-9 months. It would not be pretty but it will detonate.

Iran has had 20% enriched U235 for years. 90% of the cascading uranium hexafloride gas centrifuge work is already done. If they wanted a nuclear weapon they would already have one. And no intelligence agency in the world believes they have constructed such a bomb. So those are actual facts.

  •  
  • But what might the Iranians be enriching off shore with their Axis of Evil partners in North Korea-with whom they have a Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement?
    Does that even matter when Iran has enough U235 to construct 3 or more thermonuclear weapons on their own soil buried under hundreds of meters of granite? In case you had not noticed Iran has an actual source in the ground for yellow cake within their borders.
     
     
    And how can you be sure that Iran doesn't have a stockpile of nukes with their cash strapped nuclear partners in N. Korea, just like the Saudis likely have it with their partners in Pakistan?
     
    •  

    • Well, no intelligence agency in the world believes Iran has a thermonuclear weapon. And why would Iran even bother? They have much more minimally processed U235 within their nation than North Korea will ever ever have. And their technology is far advanced over the technology employed by North Korea. Don't be paranoid about things that even the Israeli intelligence services are not worried about.
    • Well then that probably explains why Iranian nuclear scientists are in N. Korea. Are you so naïve as to believe that Iran's 2012 Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement with the Norks has nothing to do with up grading their nuclear infrastructure into a state of the art weapons production system so that Iran can have off shore facilities to produce the most advanced and devastating nukes?
       RELATED

     

     

    THE FINAL TRANSFORMATION OF HILLARY CLINTON AFTER THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RACE

     
     
     If Hillary Clinton's four unproductive years as Obama's hard working, world traveling Secretary of State ravaged her health and beauty making her look like this: 
     
     

     

    What will she look like after nineteen grueling months of an exhausting, debilitating presidential campaign against "sadistic," "sexist,"  "mean-spirited," "hate driven," "fascist" Tea Party Republicans, and capitalist Koch Brothers' money?  What follows might not be exaggeration:
     
     
    But sickening as her final transformation will be what would make America ready for the nightmare of a Hillary presidency is not three seasons of Madame Secretary, but six seasons of this:
     
     
     Has the phenomenon of The Walking Dead paved the way for the Zombie Apocalypse of the White House? Hope not.
     
     

     

    PUTIN CRAPS ALL OVER OBAMA AND HILLARY WITH IRANIAN 
    MISSILE DEAL

    How Obama and Hillary must painfully regret the day they canceled the missile defense shield for Poland and Eastern Europe to kiss Vladimir Putin's unappeasable ass in a predictably foolish attempt to reset US/Russian relations. 648 days to go for the ongoing, progressive weakening of America as we decline economically, militarily and geopolitically while our enemies boldly advance across the world.  It's anguishing!

    On sale on E-Bay for a buck a copy.

     

    RELATED

     
     
    POSTSCRIPT I
     
     

    THE WALL STREET RECOVERY WILL NOT BE COMPLETE

    without eight full years of Hillary.

    HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT 2016!

    And add 20,000 points to the Dow.

     

     
     POSTSCRIPT II
     
    After 19 months of strenuous campaigning and wearing herself out Hillary could find herself in one of these:
     
     
    HELL (ary) ON WHEELS
     
     

    HILLARY CLINTON ANNOUNCES CANDIDACY FOR PRESIDENT ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF FDR’S DEATH. DOES THIS SIGNAL HER SUCCESS? OR THE DEATH OF NEW DEAL LIBERALISM?

     
     Will Hillary be the next President from the State of New York after FDR? Or is she the tired face of Liberalism symbolizing its exhaustion and demise after the wreckage of the Obama years?
     
    ON APRIL 12, 1945,
     
    upon the death of FDR, Harry Truman became the 33rd President of the United States.
     
    ON APRIL 12, 2015,
     
    on the 70th anniversary of FDR's death (33 days after her emailgate press conference) Hillary Clinton (born during the Truman Era) launched her campaign for the 45th President of the United States.
     
    FDR, the 44th Governor of New York, died in 1945. Hillary Clinton, former Senator from and resident of New York, is aspiring to succeed the 44th President and become number 45-which would make her the first President since FDR to come from New York.
     
    FDR was elected 32nd President on November 8, 1932. The election date for 2016 is November 8th: the 84th anniversary of FDR's landslide victory over Republican Herbert Hoover.
     
    FDR was born January 30, 1882. Hillary was born exactly 24,010 days later on October 26, 1947. 24,010 is a multiple of 70 343x. 70 is the number of years separating FDR's death and Hillary announcing her candidacy (see).
     
    When FDR was elected 32nd President he was 50 years, 9 months and 10 days old. This totals 18, 545 days (see). This five digit number ending in 45 could  indicate both the year FDR died and the next US President who'll be elected on the anniversary of FDR's victory.
     
    Are these auspicious signs pointing to Hillary's success for becoming the first female US President? They are very compelling indeed. But there are other signs equally as strong which seem ominous of defeat and the death of New Deal Liberalism.  Is Hillary announcing her candidacy on the anniversary of FDR's death one of these signs? I'll be writing about this in the weeks ahead.
     
    POSTSCRIPT
     
     If the nominee of the Republican Party wins the presidency he/she will be the 45th President and the 19th Republican to hold that office. This gives us the number 1945 the year of FDR's death. Interesting, no?
     
     
    RELATED
     
     

    MR. PRESIDENT: THE ECONOMY SUCKS BECAUSE YOU’RE A LEFTIST IGNORAMUS

     
    Just as economic ignoramus FDR's New Deal  prolonged the Great Depression so too has economic ignoramus Barack Obama's "new New Deal" prolonged a weak, trickle growth recovery verging on a double dip recession.
     
    With no end in sight to the worst economic recovery since the end of World War II  Barack Obama (who is causing this mess) is now having regrets that back in 2008 he failed to tell the American people just how bad the economic crisis was, and how long it would take for robust growth and prosperity to return (see).  Indeed, with the recovery showing signs of weakening because of his leftist policies and poor economic leadership (Obamacare, Dodd-Frank, EPA (fake climate change) regulations, Marxist anti-business/class warfare rhetoric, etc, which are inhibiting growth and jobs creation, seeObama is now back to blaming his favorite punching bag George Bush for the terrible housing and credit crash that his policies, in fact, didn't cause-Bill Clinton's reckless leftwing "affordable" housing policies that put millions of low-income families into homes they couldn't afford was the fountainhead and ultimate cause (see).
     
    Truth is, if Al Gore or John Kerry or Hillary or Obama himself were president in 2008 the government-caused housing crash would have happened all the same-government agencies (Fannie, Freddie and FHA) owned nearly 75% of all bad subprime mortgages (see).
     
     
    But that Obama underestimated the severity of the recession is an outright lie. In between his historic election and ill-omened inaugural Obama repeatedly said that the crisis caused by the crash "was unlike anything we have seen since the Great Depression";  and that the "hole we are in is so deep" that it would require "a massive government effort and spending stimulus" to dig our way out. But this too was a lie. The stimulus, as it turned out, was unnecessary and a huge unproductive waste of borrowed money. And though Obama claims that his policies saved us from another  depression this too is a provable self-serving lie.
     
     
    Obamanomics = Hocus Pocus Economics. A real stinker.
     
    Truth is, the beginning of the end of the Great Recession (as I wrote  HERE)
     began in December 2008 under George Bush-this was the start of the turnaround or V-shaped Bush recovery. After 18 months of recession the steady deepening contraction of GDP bottomed out and went into reverse. In fact, on the day of Obama's ill-omened inaugural the worst was behind us and the economy was energetically on the mend. True, hundreds and thousands of Americans were still losing jobs; but that was a lagging indicator as we were climbing out of the hole unaided by Obama's policies. But though the economy was improving that didn't stop Obama from resorting to fear mongering as he painted a dire, almost apocalyptic picture of our economic future if he didn't get his huge historic stimulus. "Unless we take immediate government action to rescue the economy we will have RECESSION WITHOUT END" warned Obama. But this too was a lie and an example of Obama's ignorance of basic US economic cyclic history.
     
     
    Truth is, throughout the course of the 19th century up to the onset of the Great Depression in the late 1920s America passed through numerous recessions and depressions without intervention from Washington to fix things. Indeed, the strongest government actions taken before Hoover's unprecedented interventions and jobs killing tax hikes-followed by FDR's tax and spend New Deal (Hooverism on steroids)-was Harding and Coolidge going in the opposite direction: massively slashing taxes, spending and federal regulations and ending the depression they inherited from Woodrow Wilson by unleashing the Roaring Soaring Prospering Twenties (see). When Harding took office unemployment was at 11.9%. Six years later under Coolidge it shrunk to an astonishing 1.5%-a record unmatched until World War II; and this miracle was accomplished by taking the government's boot off the neck of the US economy and letting it fix itself-something Obama learned from his Marxist training is impossible and insane .
     
     
    In fact, in the 1990s when socialist Sweden was on the verge of Greece-like  socialist bankruptcy and collapse-from massive socialist debt and a highly centralized socialist welfare economy-the Swedes did what Harding and Coolidge did in the 1920s to solve their crisis; and after a short period of adjustment and high unemployment (caused by the privatizing of state-run industries) the economy dramatically revived and thrived; and Sweden today has one of the strongest and most productive and freest economies in the world. In short, what saved socialist Sweden in the 1990s, and America in the early 1920s, is what FDR and his New Dealers, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and the crackpot statist progressive Left utterly loathe and say doesn't work: AUSTERITY (Tea Party) ECONOMICS (see).
     
    Obama is now running scared and fearing the worse for his economic legacy. At home consumers are underspending, banks are underlending, businesses are underhiring and entrepreneurs are under investing in new innovative ideas. After six years and trillions borrowed, spent and printed (with $18 trillion in fiscal debt and $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities) Obama has failed to restore confidence in the economy as both Wall Street and Main Street fear an uncertain catastrophic future. Indeed, one of the grimmest signs of Obama's failed economic leadership is that retail consumer spending (essential for a robust recovery) is only 29% of GDP vs. Ronald Reagan's astonishing 68% after eight years in office (see).
     
    And on top of Obama's trickle growth domestic economy which is weakening again there is a global economic slowdown troubling him and threatening our country (see). Indeed, Obama certainly fears (and rightly so)  that if this domestic and global trend continues the US economy could go into contraction causing a double dip recession before he leaves office. I had predicted this could happen HERE  from the ominous sign of Depression-born Roland Burris replacing Obama in the US Senate. Amazingly, when Burris was born on August 3, 1937 it was the very month that FDR's New Deal began to collapse and fail.
     
    In the final analysis just as FDR's ill-conceived anti-growth, punish the rich New Deal prolonged the Great Depression so is Obama's "new New Deal (Obamanomics)" prolonging the worst economic recovery in our lifetimes. Just as FDR was an economic ignoramus who didn't know how to grow the economy (doing all the wrong growth-killing things) so too is Barack Obama's failed government-is-the-answer Keynesian/welfare policies and socialist economic (punish success) ideology keeping the economy in a straight jacket, and posssibly leading it into another deep recession or much, much worse. 
     
    RELATED
     
     
     
     
     

    THE TSARNAEV BROTHERS AND THE BOSTON MARATHON 9/11 BOMBING: WILL DZHOKAR GIVE UP HIS ACCOMPLICES TO SAVE HIMSELF?

     

     
    In April 2002 eight year old Dzhokar Tsarnaev and his family arrive in Boston fleeing persecution in Chechnya. Dzhokar's older brother Tamerlan would join them two years later.
     
    On April 15, 2013 the Tsarnaev brothers, inspired by the 9/11 triple airplane bombings in New York and Washington DC, detonate two deadly homemade pressure cooker bombs at the festive Boston Marathon (it was Patriots' Day) killing three, injuring hundreds and causing millions in damage in what was the worst Islamic terror attack on US soil since 9/11.
     
     
     
    On April  8, 2015 (23 months after the bombing) Dzhokar Tsarnaev (showing no remorse) is found guilty in a Boston court on 30 federal charges. He faces the death penalty or life in prison.
     
    Dzhokar (born July 22, 1993, the year of the first World Trade Center bombing) arrived in America seven months after the devastating attack on 9/11.
     
     
    Seven months after the 11th anniversary of 9/11-the day of Benghazi when Dzhokar ironically becomes a naturalized US citizen-the Tsarnaev brothers terror bomb the 2013 Boston Marathon for Allah and Islam.
     
    On September 11, 2011 (one year to the date before Dzhokar becomes a US citizen and 19 weeks after bin Laden's death) Tamerlan allegedly went on a bloody killing spree slitting the throats of three young Jewish men (one a friend) in a Boston suburb apartment. Was this a sacrifial offering of "evil" Jews to Allah on the holiest day of modern jihadist history?
     
     
    Boston, the place of the Marathon Bombing (inspired by 9/11) was the city where American Airlines Flight 11 originated before it slammed into the World Trade Center initiating the 9/11 attack.
     
     
     
    After the Marathon Bombing the Tsarnaev boys were planning to bring their campaign of terror and death to Times Square in New York-following in a way the Boston to New York path of AA Flight 11. Luckily they didn't make it.
     
    To this day local and federal authorities are fairly certain that the Tsarnaevs had accomplices and didn't act alone. For the complicated assembling of the two bombs and the close proximity of the blasts were way beyond the Tsarnaevs' technical capabilities. If the Tsarnaevs were aided by other more professional terrorists (as seems to be the case) will Dzhokar give them up in a deal to escape the death penalty? I hope so. For it's likely that the accomplices will strike again. And this time it could be deadlier (see).
     
    RELATED
     
     

     OBAMA, BIN LADIN AND THE ULTIMATE CAUSE OF THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING

    THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING: THE WHY, THE MOTIVE, THE REASON, THE TRUTH 

    OMINOUS SIGNS OF A COMING HORRIFIC 9/11 ATTACK?

    ZUBEIDAT TSARNAEV: THE JIHAD MOM WHO MADE JIHAD KIDS

    FORWARD E-MAILS TO

    < p style="text-align: center;"> reninvest2013@aol.com

    KISSINGER AND SHULTZ REVERSE BACKING OBAMA, ISLAM’S WAR ON ISRAEL AND SPAIN, THE MOHAMMED CARTOON CONTEST, AND MORE

     

    Schultz and Kissinger

    George Shultz, Barack Obama and Henry Kissinger in an Oval Office meeting in 2013 when they backed Obama's negotiations with Iran.

    THE AUDACITY OF OBAMA

    comparing his horribly worse than bad Munich deal with the nuclear terror masters in Tehran to the Nixon-Kissinger and Reagan-Schultz negotiations with the Evil Empire in the 1970s and 80s. And now Kissinger and Shultz who backed Obama's Iran negotiations in 2013 (see) jointly write an op-ed piece showing just how delusional he is, and how distant and dangerous is his deal from their historic achievements. But what will Obama do? Now that Kissinger and Shultz have joined Scott Walker in opposition to his terrible deal will he smugly and arrogantly lecture them too as if they were amateurs in need of his superior experience and wisdom? Will he be so foolish? My guess is that he will.

    BTW, as Obamunists can't accuse Kissinger and Shultz of partisanship they will likely resort to smearing them as two senile old men (fossils) with damaged brains no longer competent in diplomacy and foreign policy analysis.

     

    Spain arrests 11 Muslims in thwarted jihad plot to attack Catalonia | Atlas Shrugs

     

    Moslem Spain and Portugal

     

    THE REASON FOR THIS PLANNED ATTACK IN SPAIN

    is what underlies 67 years of relentless bloodthirsty Arab jihad against the jewish state: Lands that once belonged to Islam are still owned by Islam and must be returned to Islam. And until they're Islamic again Islam is at war with them. Islam has a deed signed by God giving it ownership of Israel, Spain, Portugal, Sicily, Malta, etc. That deed is the Koran.

    But the world's greatest offender of a once proud Moslem owned land is Israel. Why? Because unlike Spain, Portugal and the others it is a Jewish state (Judaism is a corruption of Islam, Moslems believe) existing on the Arabian peninsula, the holy, sacred birth place of Islam; and that makes its existence a blow to Islamic supremacy and painful refutation of fundamental Islamic "truths." What "truths?" The "truths" that Islam's God, Prophet, Koranic Revelation and Faith are SUPREME over everything in this world-believers and infidels. The "truth" that Islam is God's greatest gift and answer to humanity (the solution to all problems). The "truth" that Islam is the purpose, aim and end of human history. The "truth" that the perfection of this earth and human society can only be, and will be, achieved in a one world Moslem state (God's plan for humanity from all eternity). 

    Israel's existence raises painful doubts about, and in truth refutes, these ancient Islamic verities telling Moslems that this is a pluralistic world of many faiths-Jewish, Christian, Moslem Hindu, Buddhist-and it's always going to be that way. And unless they accept the reality about Islam-that it isn't the answer to all of humanity's ills-Moslems could die by the millions in a civilizational war they can 't win.

    RELATED

     

     

     
     

    IF I COULD DRAW THIS WOULD BE MY PICTURE:

    The Prophet in the burning Arabian desert mounted on a swift black steed raising his blood stained sword to heaven and crying out to unbelievers: Believe in me or die! Believe in me or die! And if it pleases me to let you live I'll crush you with oppression!

    Now if I wanted to be amusing the picture wouldn't get past the censors.

     

     
     DAMN THAT GEORGE BUSH

     

    If he hadn't driven Saddam Hussein from power each ot these families would be $25, 000 richer. Damn him! /sarc

     

     

    BIBI’S DEFIANCE OF OBAMA. JOHN KERRY’S “GREATNESS,” ISLAM’S TOILET PAPER REVOLUTION AND MUCH, MUCH MORE

    Barack Obama rejects Benjamin Netanyahu’s call for Iran to recognize Israel - Kendall Breitman - POLITICO 

     
    Barack Obama is a man of staggering stupidity, blindness and weakness (the poorest of God's creatures ever to be president). And foremost of his failings and deficiencies is his lack of judgment and realism in foreign affairs which has thrown the world into chaos-his ideal world as it should be. 
     
    The audacity and ingratitude of Bibi Netanyahu defying Barack Obama on Iran at every turn after all the good things that he's done for Israel-like intervening in Israeli politics with Arabs and Leftists to oust Bibi from power. It's bad enough that Bibi is depriving Obama of a once in a lifetime historic peace deal with the savage, depraved, Jew-hating Palestinians-who after 67 years of Arab jihad still want victory over Israel not peace. But now that the Zionist darling of racist, sexist tea party Republicans, and warmongering Bill Kristol neocons, wants Obama to destroy his once in a lifetime historic breakthrough with Iran-to stop the nuclear mullahs from getting the bomb (which they already have in North Korea, see)-by making the deal contingent on recognizing Israel's existence. FAT CHANCE!
     
     It seems that Bibi's hatred of Obama is such that he wants him to leave office in utter humiliation-joining the Presidents' Hall of Shame with Jimmy Carter-with nothing more positive to show for his eight years of failure than an unearned Nobel Peace Prize-which he won for being a black man who wanted peace, but paved the way instead to turmoil, hell and war in the Middle East. When the next Howard Zinn writes the history of these times the biggest villain will be Bibi Netanyahu: the racist apartheid settlement building colonial Zionist thug./sarc
     
    RELATED
     
     
     
     
     
     
     FOR JOHN KERRY'S GREATNESS AS SECRETARY OF STATE:
     

    his historic achievement with Iran at Lausanne, and mystiic negotiations with GAIA on Climate Change-where he charmed her into dropping global temperatures with a James Taylor song-he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. That is to say, half of Barack Obama's unearned prize, or at least the lengthy chain.

     
     
     
     
     

    IF WE CAN ONLY GET OBAMA

    to go hunting with Dick Cheney.

     

     For those who don't know when Cheney was VP he accidently shot a friend while on a hunting trip. 

     

     
     
     
     

    ATLAS SHRUGS AND JIHAD WATCH

    make ApolloSpeaks' Top 50 Conservative Blogs of 2015. Both are tied for 1st place.

     

     
     
    Is Corker crazy? What terrorism?  There is no terrorism. Obama won the war on terrorism. /sarc

     

     

    "NO MENTION OF ISLAM, MOSLEMS, CHRISTIANS

    or Islamic extremism," says Gateway's Jim Hoft. But the radical terrorist Moslem extremists who brutally tyranize over the Iranian people, and put them in harms way by seeking to dominate the Middle East and becoming a nuclear power, constitute, for Obama, a real, authentic "Islamic Republic" that would have made Mohammed proud. Go figure.

     

     
     
    image_650_365
     
    AFTER CENTURIES OF ABYSMAL DECLINE
     
    it's good to see the Religion of God's Peace becoming creative again with this revival of Islam's artistic genius and spirit extolling the brotherhood of man. Wonder if Obama will make a late entry to show his goodwill toward Iran and love of Jews and Israel? Or will he have mullah-loving Valerie do it for him?

      

    GOOD NEWS! Turkey declares Muslims will now be allowed to use toilet paper (instead of just their left hand) when wiping their behinds | BARE NAKED ISLAM

    wc_papier

    HOORAH! PROGRESS AT LAST! A BIG HISTORIC BACKENDED BREAKTHROUGH REFORM OF ISLAM!
     
    But not enough to paper over the fact that Islam is the foulest religion on earth.
     
    koran_klopapier2
     When Islam allows the Koran to be printed on toilet paper and used to wipe a*s then I'll know that it's been truly reformed, modernized, and deserving of respect.
     
     
     
     
     
    EVEN THE MOST DIABOLICALLY EVIL PEOPLE

     

    can do something good and useful now and then. ISIS killing Palis is like Nazi scum killing Nazi sh*t. I relish it.

     
     
     
     
    LOOKS LIKE LOVELY NICOLE'S GOT A BAD CASE OF
     
    "Eyes Wide Shut."
     
    Perhaps she should change her last name to KITMAN?
     
     

    OBAMA’S “PEACE IN OUR TIME” MUNICH MOMENT IS ON HOLD. UNLIKE CHAMBERLAIN WITH HITLER HE HAS NOTHING REAL WITH IRAN

     
    This "peace in our time" Munich moment for Obama is on hold.
     
    Apart from what I posted Friday that theonazi terrorist Iran is already a nuclear power with access to North Korea's nuclear technology and bombs (just as the Saudis have access to Pakistan's) Barack Obama has yet to do with his "historic" agreement with the mullahs what Neville Chamberlain did immediately after he signed the  Munich Accords with Hitler: show the American people and world that he has a real signed joint deal .
     
    Indeed, in the early morning hours of September 30, 1938 Chamberlain signed a real, physical, one page agreement with Hitler, Mussolini and French Prime Minister Daladier ceding the predominately German Czechoslovak region of Sudetenland to Nazi Germany in exchange for peace. But Chamberlain wanted something more from Hitler: a memorandum of understanding about the accord that he could show the British people. Hitler consented and signed his name to the following: 
     
    "We regard the agreement signed last night and the Anglo-German Naval Agreement [of 1935] as symbolic of the desire of our two peoples never to go to war with one another again."
     
     It was this memo that Chamberlain later that day on his triumphal return from Munich was to wave over his head as achieving  "peace in our time" for the British people. But we have seen nothing comparable or concrete from Obama. Neither he nor Iran nor any of the P5+1 countries have produced so much as a memo signed with Iran about the joint agreement for a framework that Obama claims was finished and done. Indeed, it's four days since the meeting in Lausanne and Obama has showed us nothing real either in hand or on the White House website to substantiate there is a real written joint deal. Instead, we got a speech in the Rose Garden Tuesday and a radio address Saturday telling us what a great historic "once in a lifetime opportunity" John Kerry negotiated for our country (and his legacy). And unless the Republican led Congress acts to ratify the deal Iran will cross the nuclear threshold and get the bomb (that they already have in North Korea). And history will hold Republicans accountable as the one's who screwed up
     
    Iran's President Rouhani mocking Obama and his butt kissing concessions, and  "misunderstanding" of the framework agreement that he will enlighten him on.
     
    But then came the expected treachery. Iran poking its finger in Obama's eye contradicted his version of the deal on many key points. Contradicting Obama on the phased easing of nuclear related sanctions Iran's Foreign Minister Zarif said they only agreed to their IMMEDIATE termination. And contradicting Obama's claim that only 6000 of Iran's 19,000 centrifuges will be allowed to operate (to enrich uranium for the hell of it) Zarif said he agreed to no such thing. He said that Iran could limit itself to 6000, but that hasn't been decided. So what's the truth?  No body knows because unlike the perfectly transparent Neville Chamberlain Obama has produced nothing in writing for the world to see. What is certain is that Obama and the mullahs both are shameful, compulsive deceptive, world-class  liars who can't be trusted.
     
    What likely happened is that there was a verbal agreement on April Fools Day about the parameters of a deal, but nothing chiseled in stone. What is likely is that the chess playing Iranians pulled another bait and switch* on Obama on the 6000  centrifuges, and are using it as a new,  post-Lausanne  bargaining chip. That to avoid the embarrassment of getting no deal  Obama will have to lower the bar and cave in again and release Iran's economy from all nuclear related sanctions and restrictions IMMEDIATELY. In other words, the Iranians are holding the deal hostage to the immediate suspension of all sanctions. Meanwhile, Obama's  "peace in our time" Munich moment (literally speaking) is on hold.
     
    *Like when Iran agreed to send its enriched uranium to Russia then withdrew it.
     
    RELATED
     

    THE UNIQUELY BAD PRESIDENCY OF BARACK OBAMA, BACTERIA EATING JIHADI FLESH AND THE LONLINESS OF THE RADICAL ANTI-ISRAEL LEFT

    Susan Rice: “The fact that we have not had a successful [massive terrorist] attack on our homeland since 9/11 should not be diminished” | Atlas Shrugs

     
    WITH BARACK OBAMA'S NEW NEW DEAL STIMULUS AND MONEY PRINTING RECOVERY
     
    the worst since the end of World War II-showing  low GDP growth at about 2% per annum, poor and dwindling consumer spending and a shrinking work force; with Obamacare and its soaring insurance costs hurting the middle class, and making it so hugely unpopular that even Chuck Schumer admits it was a mistake (see); with Dodd-Frank discouraging lending, entrepreneurial investing and innovation vital to technological progress (see); with debt and unfunded entitlement and pension liabilities in the tens and trillions threatening the Detroiting (thirdworlding) of America; with Moslem Outreach and Russian Reset in shambles, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict worse than ever, the Middle East in utter chaotic flames, and an expanding, imperialistic, terrorist Iran getting the bomb and sanctions relief as rewards for its evil behavior,  the one bright spot in Obama's six failed years (according to Rice) is that we haven't had a massive 9/11 type attack where thousands were killed and skyscrapers lost. Okay. I'll give our lawless, lying, lousy president that much credit so far. But it's not enough to raise his presidency above the sub-zero mark making it so uniquely and destructively bad  it can only be compared to itself.
     
     
     
    Islamic-State-Raqqa-flesh-eating-disease-567597
     
    If this deadly flesh consuming plague called Leishmaniasis (rhymes with ISIS another type of virulent disease) continues to spread throughout the Islamic State (horribly ravaging and killing most if not all of its murdering jihadis and thugs) I propose that we award the parasites causing it Barack Obama's Nobel Peace Prize as this disease would be doing more for regional and world peace than he is.
     
     Let the world burn. I got my Nobel Prize, the only positive thing in my legacy.
     
     
    Pew numbers on US sympathy March 2015
     
    Gallup's latest poll on US support for Israel had a whopping seven out of ten Americans pro-Israel (see). The more recent  Pew poll above measures US support for Israel against its Palestinian enemies and in every racial, political and Christian religious group, except one, support for the Jewish state comes out ahead.  That one exception is the lunatic fringe of the Democrat party: the ultra liberal radical (anti-American) Israel-is-an-apartheid state left. 19% strongly favor Israel and 22% Palestinians. With the lunatics divided by only 3% that isn't a lot.
     
    As you can see those Americans wanting a one state solution with Israeli Jews living in oppression in a larger Arab-Palestinian state (the PA program) are relatively weak, powerless, frustratingly impotent and can do no more to hurt Israel than with pin prick attacks on its economy.
     
     
     
     WHEN THEY'RE CHANTING "DEATH TO AMERICA!"
     

    don't they realize that Allah is answering their prayers? And that his agent for destroying America is Barack Obama: The Grim Reaper of Liberty?

     

     

     

    WITHOUT REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN IT WILL ABSOLUTELY BECOME A NUCLEAR ARMED STATE

     
    Obama to Iran: if you like your nukes you can keep your nukes. And we'll sweeten the deal by lifting sanctions so you can keep (and continue to expand) your Islamic empire, if you like that too.
     
    JUST 14 HOURS AND 25 MINUTES AFTER APRIL FOOLS' DAY
     
     the worst and most dangerous appeasing head of state since Neville Chamberlain announced to the nation and world his historically bad peace-in-our-time Munich deal with Islamonazi terrorist Iran: that he's given up trying to stop them from becoming a nuclear armed state; and that he's giving them their economy back with the eventual lifting of all economic sanctions worth billions to finance their growing theonazi empire of oppression, terror and death.
     
     
    THE VERIFICATION AND TRANSPARENCY HOAX
    AND THE NUCLEAR NORKS
     

     What Obama didn't say-and knows to be true as it would make him look like the biggest fool since Hitler deceived Chamberlain-is that even if Iran becomes 100% transparent about its domestic nuclear program; even if the terrorist mullahs open up every inch of their vast $100 billion nuclear infrastructure to the most rigorous UN inspection and verification process, it won't stop them from getting the bomb. Why? Because just as the Saudis can easily acquire nukes from Pakistan (which they don't want to do but will if Iran goes nuclear, see) the mullahs can easily acquire them from their "Axis of Evil" partners in Stalinist North Korea-the worst nuclear proliferators on the planet. And if anyone is dumb enough to doubt this then they need to recall that just one year after the Norks detonated their first nuclear bomb they were hard at work (possibly with Iran) on building a nuclear weapons facility for Bashar Assad in Syria. This project was the "largest act of nuclear proliferation in history," said David Asher, George Bush's  coördinator for North Korea (see). The plant, however, was destroyed  by Israel* (see).

    *Because of the plant's illegal nature Assad  never filed a complaint with the UN about Israel violating Syria's airspace and destroying it.

    THE  IRAN-NORTH KOREA PACT

    The US has no way to shut down Iran's pathway to develop nukes in N.Korea.

    In fact, what Obama knows and wants kept hidden as it completely destroys his credibility of halting Iran's march to the bomb is that in 2012 Iran signed a scientific and technological cooperation agreement with North Korea (see and see). These two Axis of Evil states are evily working together on missile technology (for ICBMs which Iran has developed), and most likely nuclear weapons technology. Moreover, there is evidence that Assad (the worst mass murderer of the 21st century who used chemical weapons on his people) is still pursuing nuclear weapons with the Norks (see). Frighteningly, Iranian scientists are reported to have been present at both of  North Korea's nuclear detonations (see).

    Map: The site of a possible new nuclear facility in Syria.

     Radical terrorist jihadist Iran's nuclear ambitions cannot be constrained or controlled by any agreement-no more than was Hitler and the Nazis controlled by the Munich Accord before the outbreak of World War II. The genocidal mullahs are staying the course to a  deadly, mass  death-dealing nuclear armed state, and nothing can stop it but regime change. What we heard in the Rose Garden yesterday was a pathetic political smoke and mirrors charade for 2016 and his legacy. The goal of the negotiations was never to prevent Iran from getting the bomb, but to make the great amateur look like what he is not and can never be: a statesman.  Barack Obama is indeed the worst, weakest and most dangerously mendacious president in US history. Hoax and Change will not end until Obama's gone from the White House. And between now and then God help us.

    POSTSCRIPT

    The country that humiliated Jimmy Carter and America for 444 days with a hostage crisis will continue to humiliate this country and the 44th president till the end of his term. BTW, Obama's election on November 4, 2008 was the 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis. And his resounding defeat on November 4th of last year  was its 35th anniversary. That defeat foreshadowed the events of this week and the tragic time ahead. 
     
    RELATED
     
     
     

    NUCLEAR IRAN’S ARMY OF ISLAMIC PEACE ADVANCING TOWARD ISRAEL’S NORTHEAST BORDER

     Report: As Nuclear Deal Closes, Iranian Troops Headed to Israel’s Border | Atlas Shrugs

     
     
    ACCORDING TO BARACK OBAMA
     
    Islam is a "religion of peace." And the Islamic Republic of (theocratic) nuclear-to-be, fascist Iran-according to Obama (and as distinguished from phony, inauthentic, unIslamic warmongering ISIS)-is a real, true, authentic Islamic state practicing the real, true, authentic religion of Islamic peace as practiced by Mohammed-Islam's Prophet of Peace. Therefore, the Islamic Iranian forces of 10,000 strong that are approaching unIslamic Israel's godless northeast border are real, true, authentic Islamic soldiers practicing (as they peacefully march) the real, true, authentic religion of peace.
     
     
    In other words, these Iranian forces are an ARMY OF PEACE bringing peace and spreading peace wherever they peacefully go. Nothing to be alarmed about unless you're an irrational bigoted Moslem-hating Irano-Islamophobe like Netanyahu, Pam Geller and me. /sarc

     

     
     RELATED