DONALD TRUMP’S PEARL HARBOR DAY COUNTER-OFFENSIVE AGAINST OBAMA’S WAR ON CO2

DECEMBER 7, 2016

PEARL HARBOR

DAY

 
 
 
Obama's former EPA chief Lisa Jackson announcing on December 7, 2009 that Carbon Dioxide is a dangerous pollutant.
 
It was a terrible Day of Infamy for the people of this great country that cost us dearly. No, I'm not alluding to December 7, 1941 when the imperial air force of fanatical, fascist Japan attacked us at Pearl Harbor destroying warships and planes and killing and injuring thousands. I'm alluding to another December 7th attack against our country that started 68 years later and without a bullet being fired. An attack not launched by a foreign enemy or government against our military, but by a powerful, prominent American politician...an enemy within; a man of staggering stupidity and ideological blindness whose policies have made a mess of this country costing our economy trillions in growth and private investment, and millions of good paying jobs; and that enemy, that man, that blind, stupid, reckless fool is Barack Hussein Obama.
 
 
It was December 7, 2009 in Washington DC (day one of the UN Climate Change Conference at Copenhagen see) when Obama began a major leftist assault on our economy, productivity and use of energy. It was a shot heard across the country fired by then EPA head Lisa Jackson (see), and aimed at American commerce and business and, more specifically, the fossil fuel industry-provider of the cheapest, most efficient and wealth creating form of energy known to man that over the centuries have lifted billions out of poverty.
 
 
Jackson speaking for the Enemy-in-Chief insanely and without basis in scientific reality declared (in science's name and the public good) that Carbon Dioxide (a harmless, natural, beneficial gas vital to plant growth and life) was a noxious, evil, deadly "POLLUTANT;" "it was," she said, "a poisonous health and life threatening substance that is driving global warming and endangering the welfare of Americans and peoples everywhere." And she warned that "human CO2 emissions must be drastically regulated and curtailed if America (and humanity) is to survive and have a future."
 
 
Then following Jackson's call for draconian cuts in carbon emissions an administration official went even further. Warning Congress that if it failed to pass "cap and trade legislation" (to control in a market based way carbon emissions from businesses and organizations) that the president would act directly; that he would apply top down "command and control emergency measures" to cap and cut carbon emissions nationally. Meaning that he would ruthlessly enact by executive decree (using the Clean Air Act) massively complex and costly regulations to drastically reduce CO2 pollution.
 
 
And since that infamous December 7th day our blackmailing, climate extremist president has made good on his threats. When Democrat led Congress failed to pass Cap and Trade he went to war big time against fossil fuels and CO2 using his phone and pen.
 
  
 
Indeed, from 2009-2015 the EPA created 35 new major regulations to reduce emissions at a cost of $54 billion (a conservative estimate) to our economy (see). And emissions were reduced as America fell behind China as the greatest CO2 polluter on Earth (see).
 
 
 
But unhappy with the progress that he made Obama in 2014 rolled out with a new massive unconstitutional emissions cutting program. Called the "Clean Power Plan (CPP)" it was hailed by Obama "as the biggest and most important step we've ever taken to control climate change."  Which is beyond the powers of man.
 
 
The CPP has dozens of job killing, growth crushing regulations to limit carbon emissions at power plants by replacing cheaper and more efficient fossil fuels (to generate electricity) with more expensive and less reliable clean, renewable energy technologies (solar, wind, etc). The estimated economic cost of CPP in higher energy prices to consumers, working families and businesses is a whopping $479 billion over ten years (see).
 
 
 
It is estimated that  each one of the  6,000,000,000 human beings on this planet    exhales on average 1000 lbs per year of the "deadly pollutant" CO2 (see). That means that  collective humanity exhales about 6,000,000,000,000 lbs per year of the  gas, or 3,000,000,000 tons. In other words fossil fuels aren’t the only major source of carbon poisoning the air. And then there are billions of breathing animals.
 
And what would be accomplished for this price? Practically nothing: a slight, meaningless, miniscule reduction in CO2 levels compared to the immense greenhouse gas output worldwide-especially from dirty industrializing, populous third world states like China, India and Indonesia with their growing, massive use of fossil fuels (see).
 
 
Knowing that CPP would do little to lower overall world carbon output Obama nevertheless presses on believing that the great expense to Americans will pay off in the long run. How? By setting an example to other nations. Our cutting emissions at great cost to ourselves would inspire other nations to follow suit and make similar sacrifices to their wealth and standard of living. In short, America (and messiah Obama) would lead the way in saving the planet from (nonexistent) Catastrophic Anthropogenic (made caused) Global Warming (CAGW). And such is the imbecile we have in the White House who, thank God, will soon be gone.  
 
DECEMBER 7, 2016
 
  
 
But Wednesday December 7th (the 7th anniversary of Obama launching his massive EPA Pearl Harbor attack) something quite extraordinary happened: Donald Trump announced his choice for EPA chief: Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt. Pruitt, a conservationist (clean air and water guy), and AGW denier, who has battled for years the EPA's anti-fossil fuels and CO2 regime, is the perfect man for the job of dismantling and reversing Obama's destructive clean energy policies.
 
 
Pruitt is Donald Trump's counter-offensive against the aggressive, doomsday, warmunist enemy within:-Obama and the powerful environmental lobby. And the signs of Trump surmounting every obstacle and killing Obamunism are remarkably auspicious. For Trump is the 7th President from New York after FDR, our greatest wartime leader next to Lincoln who led our country to unconditional victory over Japan. And when the electorate made Trump its 45th President it fell right smack on the 84th anniversary of Roosevelt's defeat of Herbert Hoover*.
 
*November 8, 1932
 
 
Trump has a "Rendezvous with Destiny" to be the Republican FDR minus the New Deal.
 
This I believe is an unmistakable sign that the Left's worst fears about Trump and Pruitt are about to be realized; and that they're about to do to Obama's economically destructive, anti-business clean energy agenda what FDR and the US military did to the Japanese because of Pearl Harbor. Think of the Paris Climate Accord and the lawless Clean Power Plan as Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and you have a good idea of the horror that lies ahead for the insane, doomsday, messianic Left. 
  
 
The Apocalypse of the Left is near. If they can't save themselves how can they save the world?
  

RELATED

THE DIRTY, IRREVERSIBLE, CATACLYSMIC INDUSTRIALIZING OF THE THIRD WORLD, OR YES WE HAVE NO $44 TRILLION TO STOP IT 

HOPELESSHAGEN, HOLLYWOOD AND SIGNS OF DEMISE FOR GLOBAL WARMING POLITICS

 

FROM BAN THE HYDROGEN BOMB TO BANNING HYDROCARBON FUELS: THE LEFT’S FAILED GLOBAL SALVATION MOVEMENTS

THE WORSENING CRISIS OF THE GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS

 

THE MAZE RUNNER, SOLAR SCORCHING AND THE END OF CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM 

MUSCULAR AMERICA FIRST DONALD TAKES ON RED CHINA

 

 
 
 
Donald Trump's call with Taiwan's leader T'sia  Lng -wen.
 
IT APPEARS THAT MUSCULAR, ART OF THE DEAL, ANTI-COMMUNIST DONALD
 
has made his first, bold AMERICA FIRST move to eliminate our massive $300 billion, jobs killing trade deficit with Red China; and to defend FREE ASIA and the China Seas from their aggression.
 
 
 
No longer will the free capitalist economy of the world's mightiest nation bow to the "socialist market economies" of any freedom hating, one party, oppressive state.
 
 
 
 
ASS KISSING, GIRLIE MAN OBAMUNISM IS DEAD!
 
 
 
 The totalitarian Chicoms must be crapping  in their murdering Maoist pants. EVIL RESPECTS STRENGTH!  Donald Trump is the 21st century Ronald Reagan with the power to bring down Red China like Reagan the     evil Soviet Empire. If Trump should visit China it's tyrants won't dare give him the humiliating treatment it gave Obama.
 
BEFORE
 
 
 

 AFTER

POSTSCRIPT

 WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OBAMA AND THE RED CHINESE?

ANSWER

They're better at being communists.

 

POSTSCRIPT II 

The Dalai Lama Weighs in on Trump’s Presidency: ‘I Have No Worries’ | Mediaite

 

Why should he worry? The Dalai knows he has an ally in Donald Trump, and won’t have to come into the White House by the kitchen entrance anymore.

RELATED 

 
 

ONE CHEER FOR MAD DOG MATTIS AS DEFSEC

 

Mattis Pick Would Risk Confirmation Fight with Pro-Israel Groups-Breitbart.com

 
 
If George "Blood and Guts" Patton were alive today Trump would make him Secretary of Defense to demonstrate his seriousness about putting the fear of hell and destruction in our enemies, and making America strong, great and respected again. But absent Patton Trump believes he has his reincarnation in James "Mad Dog" Mattis. And perhaps he is right. But as a strong pro-Israel American Jew I cannot enthusiastically support Mattis' nomination like many Trump supporters are doing. Why?
 
 
Because he's a borderline anti-Zionist who backed Obama's harsh policies toward Israel and mistreatment of Bibi Netanyahu. Because like Obama and Kerry (and Clinton before him) Mattis blames the Jewish state for its ongoing decade's long conflict with the Palestinians. What this means is that like Obama, Clinton and Kerry Mattis believes in the lie that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas (a warmed over Arafat in disguise) is a real peace partner for Israel (as if he were an Anwar Sadat see) willing to end the conflict (which he's not). And Mattis wants to alter the perception of America's bias toward Israel (which "damages us with moderate Arabs," he says) by forcing Netanyahu to negotiate a two state solution with Abbas (which is not in his cards). Moreover, sounding like Jimmy Carter Mattis claims that Israel's settlements on the West Bank are turning it into an "Apartheid " state (which isn't true) and wants their complete dismantlement.
jamesmattismeme2
Truth is, it's Israel's existence as a Western, non-Moslem, infidel state on land once ruled by imperialist Islam, that underlies the 68 year old Arab/Moslem-Israeli conflict. Currently, from the Arab veiw point, there's only two possible solutions to this conflict: 1) Israel's conversion to Islam, or 2) it's annihilation; this latter solution is subdivided into the violent, radical, Hamas/Hezbollah/Iranian way of war; or the  slow, non-violent, long-term Abbas way of political, cultural and social subversion through mass Palestinian refugee immigration; this is Abbas's gradual, incremental one state solution where Israeli Jews will live as an oppressed minority in a larger Arab state (if they're lucky).
 
Hopefully Trump's pick for Secretary of State will reverse Obama's anti-Israel policies instead of continuing them like Mattis madly wants to do. One cheer for Mad Dog Mattis. Because of his bias toward Arabs he doesn't deserve anymore.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

BERSERKO PROGRESSIVE LEFT PREDICTS TRUMP WILL WORSEN OBAMA’S WEALTH GAP, KILL THE MIDDLE CLASS AND CAUSE A GREAT DEPRESSION

 

Obama admits 95% of income gains gone to top 1% - CNN Money 

 

Under Obama (the failed community, redistribution, social justice organizer) the Wall Street economy has mightily boomed breaking all sorts of records; while the Main Street economy has deplorably sagged financially breaking millions of working class families. Obama waged class warfare against the rich, but ironically his policies helped them to win. Yet despite his self-caused defeat Obama's still a hero to the progressive, anti-capitalist Left. Why? Because he's a likable, charismatic left-wing black man whose "heart is in the right place;" and whose failures are blamed on an obstructionist Congress, FOX News, and hostile right-wing talk shows that he couldn't overcome-showing a failure of leadership, governing skills and know how. Despite his fairly high approval rating Obama is perhaps the most popular failed president in American history-his biggest political failure of which was using his popularity to win the presidency for Hillary.

 

 

During Obama's reign of error (with a trickle growth economy so fragile and weak that the Fed, fearing a recession, won't dare raise interest rates) the rich have gotten vastly, hugely, enormously richer in a transfer of wealth to the top 1% unseen since the days of the "Robber Barons." And like the criminal, oppressive Castros (one of the richest robber baron families on Earth) Obama's lauded as a champion of the little guy by an insane, out of touch liberal media, academia, and the Democrat establishment. It's mind-boggling!

 

 

After the crash of 2008 wiped out trillions the rich, under Obama, have recovered magnificently seeing their fortunes rise galactically. This is due mainly to the greatest, fraudulent government manipulation of the stock market in US and world history-growing the millionaire's and billionaire's club while impoverishing the middle class and swelling the ranks of the poor.  And none of this is the Republicans' fault.

 

 

Obama_income_inequality_Fox News
 

Benefiting from the Obama/Bernanke/Yellin policies of near zero interest rates (robbing billions from savings accounts), multi-trillion dollar money printing (devaluing the dollar and hurting purchasing power), and quantitative easing (artificially boosting stock values to historic highs) the top 1% since 2009 increased its wealth by 11.2%+; while the rest of us poor suckers saw a mere increase of 0.2%. Indeed, under Obama's policies the top 1% took an astonishing, unprecedented 93 cents out of every new dollar earned; under Bush they took 65 cents; under Clinton 45 cents. That equates to a staggering 112% increase over the Clinton years (see) due mostly to a rigged, over bought stock market-a bubble that sooner or latter is going to burst and come down to earth. 

 

 

 

 

Indeed, and quite unexpectedly, Obama's economic, fiscal and monetary policies hugely aggravated the wealth gap paving the way for the revolt of the forgotten, collapsing, disappearing middle class-that underlie the rise of Bernie Sanders on the Left and Trump on the Right; and led to the defeat of Wall Street's big money darling:  corrupt, two-faced lying, pay to play Hillary.

 

 

But now because of billionaire Donald's super rich 1% cabinet picks the Obama kool-aid drinking, business hating Left are predicting the absolute, catastrophic worst for this country. Seven weeks before Trump takes office they think they see the future with perfect prophetic clarity when they've been dead wrong about this man all along: wrong about him not surviving the first GOP debate ("he'll be laughed off the stage," they said); wrong about him never being the GOP nominee ("it will be Cruz, Rubio or Kaisich ," they said); wrong that the sex tape and groping lies had ruined his electability ("it made Hillary more likable and electable," they said); wrong he had no path to 270, and would lose in a Goldwater-like landslide    dragging down the Republican Party with him. 

 

 
 

But despite their failed record of pre-election predictions the Left is doubling down. Now with infallible certainty they see the next great depression ahead impoverishing and gutting our country and world; they believe with Michael Moore and Dana Milbank that "11/9 Trump" is the new Herbert Hoover (a 9/11 disaster in the making, see); that during his presidency Trump will crash Obama's over inflated stock market and weak, low growth economy throwing millions out of work; that his protectionist policies will start an international trade war killing US exports; and that after four or eight years of Trump the declining, dying, vanishing middle class will completely disappear and be a thing of the past. For the Left Trump has replaced fossil fuels and climate change as the greatest menace to humanity-more terrifying than ISIS, al-Qaida and all Islamic terrorists combined.

 

 
 

And when America is reduced to rubble and dust Trump (backed by the army and cops) will repeal and replace our democracy with a one party, totalitarian, white supremacist oligarchy; and he'll sign an executive decree making himself president for eternity. And the only hope of stopping him is the desperate Jillary three state recount (see); or the Electoral College waking up and making Hillary president.

 

 

This is the thinking that's breaking the brains of the berserko, unhinged, anti-Trump Left. And because of this I stopped watching Hannity,  O'Reilly, Tucker and FOX. It's way more fun seeing Trump drive Blitzer, Matthews, Cuomo  and Joe completely batshit loco. 

 

RELATED

 

11/9 ANTI-TRUMP HYSTERIA ENGULFS THE LEFT WHEN 11/9 IS 9/11 REVERSE 

 

BARACK OBAMA: THE PRESIDENT WHO SAVED THE U.S. AND WORLD ECONOMY FROM A SECOND GREAT DEPRESSION?

 

MR. PRESIDENT: THE ECONOMY SUCKS BECAUSE YOU’RE A LEFTIST IGNORAMUS

 
 
 
 

CASTRO DIED ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF JFK KILLER LEE HARVEY OSWALD’S BURIAL AND DEATH -WHAT COULD IT MEAN?

 

 

In the center column between the pictures of JFK and LBJ it reads:

LEFTIST ACCUSED  

Figure in a Pro-Castro Group is Charged

 
Yesterday morning as I was replying to a comment posted by thunderbolt (see) about the multiple assassination attempts that Fidel Castro survived it dawned on me-as I wrote that Castro died within days of the 53rd anniversary of JFK's death-that the two deaths (JFK's and Castro's) were now strangely linked by Providence. How? By way of Lee Harvey Oswald. For Oswald (JFK's killer) on 11-24-1963 was assassinated by a distraught Jack Ruby as he was being escorted from a Dallas jail, and was buried the following day (the 25th) exactly 53 years to the day of Castro's death. Then it hit me that the main reason for Oswald killing Kennedy was for Castro's sake: to save the dictator and the Cuban Revolution from JFK's machinations to destroy him and his regime. And then I recalled from my studies that Castro likely had foreknowledge of Oswald's plot.
 
This was the subject of an excellent  book (right) written by former CIA analyst Brian Lattell that I read years ago. The book, "Castro's Secrets: The CIA and Cuba's Intelligence Machine" is based on declassified government documents and first-hand reports from Cuban spies who defected to America. Lattell sets out to prove that Castro's grievances in an interview with a US reporter that JFK was out to assassinate him is what triggered Oswald's plot to kill Kennedy. Lattell writes that in September 1963 while Oswald was in Mexico City trying to obtain a visa that would allow him and his wife to visit Cuba that he discussed his intention to kill Kennedy with several Cuban intel officers at the Cuban embassy; and that this is how Castro learned of the plot. Lattel doesn't allege that Castro's men assisted Oswald in any way; they simply knew what Oswald told them (of his intention to kill Kennedy) and wished him well. It was a lone wolf operation from start to finish with Castro, of course, hoping he'd succeed to eliminate JFK and his obsession with killing him. Castro must have been astounded that it worked.
 
 
Oswald in New Orléans handing out pro-Castro leaflets (below), before his trip to Mexico. it was in New Orléans that Oswald read the interview with Castro where he complained about the US assassination plots against him.
 
     
 
 
 And now it seems Latell was spot on. For late last week Providence has given us what I believe is an infallible sign that commie, Castro lover Lee Harvey Oswald and his plot to kill Kennedy was known to Castro; and that the sign was Castro's death strangely and meaningfully falling on the anniversary of Oswald's death and burial. It could be that in killing Kennedy Oswald saved Castro's life. Perhaps Providence spared Castro and allowed him to live to a ripe old age to show the world that godless, oppressive, totalitarian communism doesn't work. 
                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
RELATED 
 
 
 
 
 
 

CASTRO DEAD! WAS HE A VICTIM OF THE TRUMP EFFECT?

 
 
 
17 DAYS AFTER DONALD TRUMP'S HISTORIC ELECTION
 
  (see), on the 17th anniversary of Elian Gonzalez' rescue at sea (he was fleeing with his mom from an oppressive, communist, totalitarian regime), Cuba's 17th President Fidel Castro died (see)-a God-given Thanksgiving Day gift to his many freedom loving enemies worldwide. As soon as news of his death was released Friday night Cuban Americans (and anti-Castro whites) poured into the streets of Miami  to celebrate his demise-as I celebrate it hating him above all men in this hemisphere where he's caused so much havoc, suffering and death.
 
 
First it was Ho, then it was Hugo, now it's Castro burning in the hottest ring of Dante's Inferno.
.
But is it possible, could it be that the shock and awe of Trump's election so traumatized the frail and ailing dictator that it completely shattered his heath and hastened his end? In other words, if Hillary were elected instead would Castro be alive today happy in the faith she'd be a soft-on-communism Barack Obama (and Jimmy Carter) all over again? Preposterous you say? Maybe. But before you dismiss this as fantasy consider this:
 
With so many Castro loving leftists in severe emotional and mental distress over Trump's electoral success (some ending up in therapy to cope with their Trump induced anxieties) it's not inconceivable that I'm making sense. That sicko Castro (with a twisted mind more ill than his flesh) suffered a jolting, psychosomatic (mind-body) reaction to Trump's victory on the 8th. And after 17 days of anxiety and stress, wearing down what was left of his health and strength, Castro dropping dead finally succumbed to the Trump Effect.
 
 
 
Still think it's unlikely that Trump becoming the 45th President had nothing to do with Castro's death? I can't prove the connection of course; but I have discovered what could be a sign indicating may be right.  For when Castro died late Friday night it was the 845th month of Donald Trump's life (see). That's "45" as in Trump's president's number. Was this a mere "coincidence?" I'll let you decide.
 
 
 18 days before Castro's death Cuban Americans celebrated Janet Reno's death (she died in Miami). Ironically, on that very day Trump was at a rally in Sarasota, Florida condemning Castro for his brutal dictatorship (see); then the following day Cuban  Americans massively voted for Trump helping him win Florida. 
 
Oh, and by the way, one other "coincidence" worth noting was Janet Reno dying 24 hours before Trump's election (anticipating his 2000 election-like victory, see). It was this idiot Attorney General, with Bill and Hillary's insane blessing, who sent little Elian Gonzalas back to Cuba to be a slave of Castro's despotic regime. If at the time Trump were President he would have kept Elian in the States; and he'd be a free man today making something good of his life and his mother's sacrificial death. But alas, Reno and the Clintons saw to it that her death was meaningless and in vain. Thank God for the Cuban people that Hillary lost the presidency to a real friend of liberty.     
Donald Trump speaks at the Cuban-American National Foundation (11/15/1999) warning against lifting sanctions on Castro; and predicting that if he becomes President he'll be greatest ever for the Cuban people and work for their liberation.
 
Now if Raul Castro and his clan misbehaves toward the US and continues his failed, evil, oppressive "Socialism or Death" regime that keeps his people in bondage and poverty President Trump will tear to shreds Obama's worthless one way deal that's worth billions to them; and return the relationship to the cold war days where it should have remained.  
 
VIVA CUBA LIBRE!
 
 
 
TRUMP'S TOUGH COUNTER-OBAMA STATEMENT ON CASTRO'S DEATH
 

"Today, the world marks the passing of a brutal dictator who oppressed his own people for nearly six decades. Fidel Castro's legacy is one of firing squads, theft, unimaginable suffering, poverty and the denial of fundamental human rights. While Cuba remains a totalitarian island, it is my hope that today marks a move away from the horrors endured for too long, and toward a future in which the wonderful Cuban people finally live in the freedom they so richly deserve.

Though the tragedies, deaths and pain caused by Fidel Castro cannot be erased, our administration will do all it can to ensure the Cuban people can finally begin their journey toward prosperity and liberty. I join the many Cuban-Americans who supported me so greatly in the presidential campaign, including the Brigade 2506 Veterans Association that endorsed me, with the hope of one day soon seeing a free Cuba." 

 
  
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

THE JILL STEIN (OR JILLARY) RECOUNT: AN EXERCISE IN DESPERATE, LAUGHABLE, ANTI-TRUMP FUTILITY

 
 

THE COMPREHENSIVE FLORIDA VOTE RECOUNT IN 2000

(by a consortium of eight major news orgs led by the NY Times) reconfirmed that George W. Bush was the winner-but with slightly less than the original 537 votes that won him the election. Trump's smallest number of votes in the battleground states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan (targets of the Stein recount) was in Michigan with approximately 11,000*.

*2,279,543 Donald J. Trump, Republican
2,268,839 Hillary Clinton, Democratic
 
 
Though Stein miserably failed to become the first woman president she's hoping against hope by some miracle she can make history and do that for poor      heartbroken Hillary. A desperate, self-serving attempt to find some kind of meaning in her idiotic third party presidential run. But what Stein's doing is giving us the treat of seeing Hillary defeated for a third time.
 

In other words, using the 2000 election model where the Republican victor lost the popular vote Jill Stein's multi-million dollar recount appears to be worse than a desperate, laughable, foolish exercise in anti-Trump futility-a huge waste of time and money hopelessly raising hopes to reverse the outcome of the election, and keep America on the tragic downward globalist course path of economic, military and geopolitical decline. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/12/us/examining-vote-overview-study-disputed-florida-ballots-finds-justices-did-not.html

 

AND IN OTHER NEWS

 

 
 20161124_Donald_Trump_Todd_Ricketts_Getty.jpg
 
Todd Ricketts, conservative co-owner of the world championship Cubs, whose upset, come from behind victory (on the 68th anniversary of Truman's upset defeat of Dewey) in "Progressive" Stadium next to where "Comeback King" Trump was made his party's nominee, is likely to have a key place in the new administration of champions.
 
It takes your breath away.
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

TURNING #NOT MY PRESIDENT ON ITS HEAD-FOLLOWING THEIR LOGIC BARACK OBAMA IS AN ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT

 
 
 
United States presidential election, 2016
United States
2012 ←November 8, 2016→ 2020

538 members of the Electoral College
270 electoral votes needed to win
Turnout53.8%[1] Decrease 1.1 pp
 
Donald Trump August 19, 2015 3 by 2.jpg
Hillary Clinton by Gage Skidmore 2.jpg
NomineeDonald TrumpHillary Clinton 
PartyRepublicanDemocratic
Home stateNew YorkNew York
Running mateMike PenceTim Kaine
Projected electoral vote306[2]232[2]
States carried30 + ME-0220 + DC
Popular vote62,020,213[2]63,747,686[2]
Percentage47.08%48.15%
 
As Hillary Clinton continues to rack up more of the popular vote than media reviled Electoral College winner Donald Trump Michael Moore and millions of sore losing "Trump's not my president" Hillary fans believing they got royally screwed grow more strident and extreme in their hysterical rhetoric and rejection of Trump as the legitimate winner; and in the legitimacy of the Electoral College that gave him his astonishing victory.
 
 
In anti-Trump protests across the country that will converge in 60 days on Washington DC they complain that the Electoral College is an antiquated relic of the 18th century that should have been abolished long ago; that no other nation has such a system; that it's unfair, unsquare, unjust and undemocatic; that it doesn't truly represent the will and spirit of a democratic people; and that this can only be done by the popular vote.
 
 
 
Indeed, anti-Trumpers bitterly protest that if it weren't for the Electoral College Al Gore would have been the 43rd President, instead of the disastrous George W. Bush (see postscript); and Hillary would be the 45th President-elect, not the "inexperienced, menacing, unfit for command" Donald Trump-the anti-Bush Republican whose presidency will be "worse than Bush's" they warn. 
 
Fine. They've been robbed of two elections and aren't going to take it anymore. But let's do a thought experiment and test their idea of election justice. Let's accept the Trump haters' premise that the popular vote is the true, fair, just, moral, democratic vote-the only one that should count when choosing our presidents; and then let's rigorously apply it to the entire presidential election system including the primaries of both major parties. For how else, according to their views, could we have a truly, thoroughgoing democratic system? But here is where the anti-Trumpers are caught in a painful contradiction.
 
 
 
 
 
After winning the popular vote in the 2008 primaries but losing the delegate count (in a rigged process) a pissed off Hillary believing she was the real winner said in a TV interview: “I think we need to figure out how we can have a [primary] process that reflects the desire of the voters.”  
 
For if we apply the principle of the popular vote to the primary process it then means that the outcome of the 2008 Democratic primary (like this year's election) was invalid; that Barack Obama (like Donald Trump today) should not have won that race; that Hillary got screwed like she did on November 8th; and that she, not Obama, should be the 44th President finishing up her second term. For on June 7, 2008 when Hillary conceding defeat congratulated Obama on his victory she had 48% of the popular vote (like she has today) to Obama's 47% (like Trump has now). Indeed, Hillary beat Obama by 273,000 votes but had 294 fewer delegates; and that cost her the Democratic nomination and presidency.
 
In other words, Hillary was the real, true, just democratically elected victor of the 08 primary race; but  lost to Obama because of an antiquated delegate system (like the Electoral College) that should never have been, or abolished long ago.    
  
So why then does the legion of mad-as-hell Clinton voters who spurn Donald Trump as the legit President-elect accept Barack Obama as the 44th President when Hillary outvoted him in 2008 (and Obama gamed the system and stole the primary election, see)? It makes no sense. In all fairness to themselves and the nation all Clintonites should regard Obama's presidency as no more valid than Trump's. And if Hillary were the real winner in 2008, as they believe she should be today, what then? History would be very different now: Barack Obama, having defeated Donald Trump might now be President-elect and on his way to continuing Hillary's presidency and legacy. It's no fun being a Democrat these days.
 
POSTSCRIPT I
 
 
BTW, if the 2008 Democratic primary used the Electoral College system Hillary would have exceeded the 270 votes needed to win the election (see).
 
 
POSTSCRIPT II
 
AL GORE
 
 
Let us suppose that Al Gore who carried the popular vote 16 years ago won the election. What then? What difference would it have made? Not much. For the 9/11 attack which was five years in the planning (53 months under Bill Clinton) would have happened all the same (there was no actionable intel to stop it). Gore would have definitely ordered the invasion of Afghanistan, and possibly (though less likely) Iraq (see). The Great Recession and housing/credit crash would also have occurred bringing our economy close to ruin; for this was rooted in the reckless, affordable, subprime mortgage policies of the Clinton administration-the housing bubble started by Clinton (supported by Gore) to help the poor was unstoppable train wreck by the time Clinton left office (see and see).
 
 
What this means is that if President Gore had a second term he (like Bush) would have been blamed for the crash; and the public wanting change would have elected John McCain.
 
MEDIATE DEBATE
 
 
She didn't win the most delegates because the Clinton campaign neglected the caucuses, Tink Tink.
 
I know you can't answer the question that I posed without going to some lame inaccurate analogy which is what you guys do, but it's funny that whenever there is an issue that surrounds the rights of minorities conservatives always use the argument that they are just a tiny sliver of the population and why should society change for them.
 
Just face the facts--Senate Republicans represent fewer people than do Senate Democrats. House Republicans represent fewer people than do House Democrats but it can't last forever.
 
Trump will be the second Republican president in 16 years to take office after losing the popular vote.
 
Think about that.
 
The Republican party is dying and it's grasping at every straw to remain relevant.
 
 
LOL!!! The analogy, in reality, is strong! Hillary lost the race because she neglected to campaign as hard as Trump-especially in the rust belt states as hubby Bill urged her to do. From August 1st to Nov. 7th Trump held an astonishing 80 rallies (sometimes four a day) to Hillary's 39 or so. Why so few? Trump nailed it when said over and over: "She's lacking in energy, stamina and strength."
 
In an NBC interview last year Hillary said, and I quote, "I find campaigning incredibly exhausting (see)." And indeed she did. After the second debate Hillary was so fatigued (worn down by Trump's alleged "stalking") she couldn't make it unaided to her car. Hell, if sick, low energy Hillary had campaigned as hard as her tireless, indefatigable, Herculean foe she would have collapsed from extreme fatigue and finished up the race in a hospital bed. Remember on 9/11 when she fainted from a mere 77 degrees heat? Or were allergies the cause, or pneumonia, or the flu?
 
The true state of Hillary's health is still a closely guarded secret. But what's clear from her poorly run campaign is that she wasn't physically fit for the presidency. Her four years at State knocking herself out traveling around the world took its toll on her health. In fact, in 2010 she told Esquire Magazine that she found her job at State too exhausting, and she couldn't endure a second term (see).  
 
If the Great Depression didn't bury the Republican party then nothing will; and it will probably outlive the Democrat party. The GOP is here to stay and is undergoing a radical transformation under the leadership our unpredictable, gravity defying, pragmatic President-elect. Your predictions about Trump's disastrous candidacy crashing and burying the GOP is prelude to his triumphant presidency.
 
THE 2008 MICHIGAN VOTE
 
 
Obama won more total votes than Clinton in the contests where they both appeared on the ballot. Clinton won the popular vote only if you count votes from Michigan, where  Obama’s name did not appear on the ballot.
 
Any way you cut it, the candidates’ vote totals are within less than 1 percent of each other. Both candidates got roughly 18 million votes, but since four states don’t list official counts, the precise totals can’t be known.
 
So your links claim; "In other words, Hillary was the real, true, justly democratically elected victor of the 08 primary race" is a LIE!
 
 
So we're agreed that when Michigan is included Clinton won the popular vote over Obama in 08. Unless you can prove that Clinton was somehow responsible for Obama's exclusion from the Michigan ballot then Hillary, as she believed and publicly stated, won the popular vote.
 
Nevertheless, "Uncommitted" was on the Michigan ballot and was outvoted by Hillary 328,309 to 238,168 thus making her the clear, decisive winner.
 
Moreover, if the 2008 Democrat primary used the Electoral College system to decide the winner Clinton would have defeated Obama.
 
 
And lastly, in 2008 Obama provably gamed the delegate system and stole the election from Clinton. 
 
 
No wonder Hillary wished that Obama share the fate of Bobby Kennedy and be shot dead.
  
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 

BREAKING: TRUMP’S PLAN TO AVENGE HIMSELF ON HAMILTON CAST

 

 
 REPLACING HAMILTON WITH TRUMP CAN EASILY BE DONE
An 1862 act of Congress gives the secretary of the Treasury near-complete authority over the design and printing of paper currency (including the portrait), while Congress retains the power of coinage under the Constitution.
 
UPDATE
 
I have it on the good authority of a Trump insider that the very first act of his first 100 days President Trump will sign an executive order instructing his Treasury Secretary to replace Hamilton's portrait on the $10 bill with his own. And he'll be sending the very first Trump bill that rolls off the press to actor Brandon Victor Dixon-who plays Hamilton's killer Vice President Aaron Burr.

 
The question then is this:  when the Trump bills are printed will #BoycottTrump add it to their list of Trump things to boycott? Will they call on BoycottTrumpers not to carry or handle the new $10 Trump bills whenever possible?
 
 
Will we then see an epidemic of Trump haters burning Trump bills at anti-Trump rallies? And will President Trump retaliate by putting his portrait on all our currency? Coins included? No? Bet you $10 he would.
 
 
RELATED 
 
 
 

WHY TRUMP PICKING ROMNEY AS SEC. OF STATE WOULD BE BRILLIANT!

 

 
 
It's completely counter-intuitive and inconceivable that Donald Trump should even consider arch-Never Trumper Mitt Romney for the exalted cabinet post of Secretary of State. After Romney viciously attacked Trump calling him a "fraud and phony who lacked the temperament and judgment for the presidency," and who half voted for Hillary by voting for Gary Johnson, no way that Trump would reward him with so much power when others like John Bolton and Ruddy Giuliani are more deserving. Surely when Trump met with Romney yesterday it was for the sake of party unity; and as a grateful gesture to the governor for being quick to congratulate him on his historic victory (that he never thought possible).
 
 
But making the 69-year-old Governor Romney (from Massachusetts) America's 69th  Secretary of State (following former Massachusetts Senator Kerry) is unthinkable. Or is it? Is the unpredictable, shocking Donald Trump planning to shock the world again and outrage many hard-core anti-establishment followers by making insider, status quo Romney our nation's top diplomat? If so, why? How could that benefit Trump's "Make America Great Again," "Peace Through Strength" foreign policy?
 
 
This is how:  it would send a clear, ringing, unmistakable message to Trump's foreign policy critics that they are dead wrong about him: that he's not "Vladimir Putin's (or anyone's) puppet." For Trump would have picked for Secretary of State the hawkish 2012 GOP presidential candidate who warned Barack Obama in stark, cold war terms that Putin was America's geostrategic enemy number one; that he was a tough, fanatically committed, Russia first neo-imperialist hell-bent on making his country great again at America's expense; that Obama's naïve, butt kissing, reset appeasement policy to moderate and win over Putin was doomed to fail; and would only serve to embolden him to aggression and conquest.  And look what's happened since: Ukraine, Crimea, Syria, Snowden, deployment of nuclear capable missiles near the Russian-Polish border; Russian Syria-bound warplanes taking off from Iran; constant buzzing of American warships; Turkey's Erdogen (a NATO member) virtually begging Putin's forgiveness for shooting down a Russian military jet, etc.-this outraged Obama. 
 
 
Turkey's Erdogen with Putin trying to lift Russian sanctions on his country over downed Russian jet.
 
Hapless, feckless, pushover Obama has been the greatest enabler of post-Soviet Russian power of any US President. Putin has played Obama like a fiddle as American foreign policy burned. And Romney having nailed it has the credibility of being a realist on Putin and his strategic aims. And that would signal that Trump has no illusions about America's most powerful and determined foreign adversary.
 
Now I'm not predicting that Trump will do the seemingly unlikely thing of choosing Romney for State. So far he's been rewarding loyalists with key positions. I am however saying that if he does give Romney State it will be a brilliant and praiseworthy move that will strengthen party unity, show he's not surrounding himself with yes men and sychophants, silence his Democrat and media critics, and tell Mr. Putin: 'I'm Barack Obama's kick ass polar opposite and admirer of George Patton (a realist about Soviet post-war intentions); and I intend to play hard ball with you.'
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

STEVE BANNON’S CLIMATE CHANGE DENIALISM PROVES HE’S THE ULTIMATE, EVIL, TERRIFYING NAZI WE FEARED (SARCASM)

 

 
 
 
 

It's worse than we thought. Bannon's vicious attacks over the years on climate scientists, and AGW apostle Pope Francis, and denial of catastrophic global warming, makes him and his denialist ("AGW is a hoax") boss potentially more evil, dangerous and deadly than a thousand Adolf Hitlers and Joseph Goebbles. I'm not exaggerating! It was one thing for Hitler to kill millions of Jews, Gypsies and other innocents in death camps; its quite another thing to deny the settled, proven, certain science that's telling us that man's industrial CO2 emissions (soaring in third world countries) is catastrophically heating and imperiling the planet and putting all life at risk.

 

 

Indeed, Trump and Bannon hell-bent on satanically trashing Obama's doomsday, messianic driven green energy agenda and reversing his gains in cutting CO2 emissions, will be increasing the domestic production and burning of dirty, filthy, polluting fossil fuels-just to put a few rust belt rednecks back to work. It's insane! In true Nazi genocidal fashion this will trigger an intense, devastating, runaway greenhouse effect that will transform our hapless Earth into one vast apocalyptic gas chamber and smoking crematorium killing billions. Indeed, (like nearby hellish carbon rich Venus) the extreme, infernal, scorching oven like heat could make Earth uninhabitable for ages. You can't get anymore monstrous than this. 

 

Unless they're stopped Trump and Bannon will dig us straight into hell!

The incoming Trump/Bannon anti-science denial regime is a horrific sign that the Warmunist movement is doomed; that Obama was its last best hope and hurrah; and that outcast climate change nihilists like Guy McPherson got it right: "All is lost. Industrial-Capitalism has won.  We have reached the tipping point of no return in carbon pollution, and are living in the End Times of Planet Earth (see)."

The Fate of the Earth after eight polluting years of the monstrous Category Ten Trump/Bannon Regime. 

If you still don't comprehend the peril we're in

then read this alarming

news

 

THE COMING US AND GLOBAL COAL BOOM

 

 
 
 
 
To grasp the magnitude of the US coal industry's coming rebirth and resurrection I suggest you read the above Forbes article. It's about the reversal of Obama's insane global financing policies for non-renewable (fossil fuel) energy projects in third world countries. Our crackpot president believes that it is better for the world if hundreds and millions of poor people live in pre-modern times  without electricity than to use coal and gas to bring them into the modern age. So much for Obama's humanitarian concern for the poor. His mentally deranged policies are about to radically change.
 
RELATED

 

 
 
 

 

 
 
 
< p style="box-sizing: border-box; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; text-transform: none; color: #2a2e2e; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; margin: 0px 0px 15px; widows: 1; letter-spacing: normal; text-indent: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: center;"> 

MEDIA MATTERS DEBATE ON TRUMP AND THE JEWS, STEVE BANNON’S ALLEGED ANTI-SEMITISM AND THE PROPHET MOHAMMED’S VIOLENT JEW HATRED

 

Steve Bannon A White Nationalist Who "Hates Jews" Will Be Trump's Right-Hand Man In The White House · Media Matters ·

I posted a link to my blog on MM about Donald Trump, Steve Bannon and the Jews; and it triggered the following lively debate
 
 

DONALD TRUMP AND THE JEWS, AND WHAT KLANSMEN, NEO-NAZIS AND RADICAL MOSLEMS TRULY THINK OF HIM  

And, by the way, if the Moslem world were "anti-semitic" like Steve Bannon it would, as does pro-Zionist Bannon , accept Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state, and be at peace with it. And if Bannon is a "Jew hater," and thinks that Jews are an evil race, than why is he joining the pro-Israel, Jew friendly Trump Administration headed by a man who allowed his son and daughter to marry Jews? What "Jew hater" would do that?  Indeed, whoever heard of a pro-Zionist anti-Semite? There's no such animal.

http://www.apollospeaks.com/?p=20326

 

 

classicalmusiclover ApolloSpeaks  

Idiot troll thinks he is smart when he "substantiates" his claims with his own opinion blog.

Keeping walking, folks. Nothing to see here.

 

 

ApolloSpeaks  classicalmusiclover 

 

The "J" in Donald J. Trump stands for "Jew lover."

 

 

 classicalmusiclover 

 

The topic of the article is Steve Bannon. Bannon is no "Jew lover."

Your blog post mindlessly and incoherently repeats anti-Jewish and neo-Nazi memes from anti-Semitic white nationalists, including some that are anti-Trump. Yet, every well-known anti-Semitic organization still endorsed Trump. The phrase "Jew lover" is a phrase only used by anti-Semites.

In the past you have claimed to be an agnostic Jew. Were you lying?

 

ApolloSpeaks   classicalmusiclover

 

I'm a Jew loving Jew. When Judeophile Donald Trump is sworn into office he will be the closest thing this country ever had to a Jewish President.  This is too funny. You're an atheist  masquerading as a Presbyterian and call me an "agnostic Jew." Did you forget our

 little debate on Karen Armstrong and how I defended her belief in God and high regard for the Neo-Platonist Plotinus, a  mystical philosopher? Did you forget that I'm a Platonist? Was Plato

 agnostic? Then how can I be?

 

 

classicalmusiclover  ApolloSpeaks   

 

Unlike Karen Armstrong, you reject Islam as a legitimate religion the overwhelming majority of whose practitioners are peaceful.

 

Unlike Karen Armstrong, you are unable to distinguish violent extremists who violate religious tenets from people who actually follow the religion.

 

Unlike Karen Armstrong, you are unable to distinguish between science and religion.

 

 

Was Islam's founder the Prophet Mohammed a peaceful Gandhi like practitioner of Islam like Armstrong says? Or was he a violent, murdering, bloodthirsty, power mad, Jew hating, genocidal extremist nut?

  

 

Are you capable of anything other than simpleminded binary thinking? Apparently not! Mohammed included Jews and Christians among his allies, and the Koran describes them as cherished people of the Book. Indeed, Moses, Jesus, and Mary are all presented as Holy Prophets.

 

You seem to think you can cite Armstrong as an authority in one sentence then trash her as an idiot the next--by paraphrasing her ludicrously out of context.

 

 

 

 

When Mohammed and his followers migrated to Medina there was a thriving Jewish community divided into three prosperous tribes. When Mohammed died the only Jews left in that city were converts and slaves.

 

What happened in between was horrific pitiless, mass murdering genocide and ethnic cleansing. In short, Mohammed was no "Jew lover" or peace-loving, 7th century Mahatma Gandhi. If anything he was a 7th century predatory, Jew murdering Adolf Hitler-as Hitler was a 20th century predatory, Jew murdering Mohammed.

 

No wonder that Hitler is revered as the most popular infidel historical figure in the Moslem world today. What Hitler did to six million Jews in his death camps the vast majority of Moslems would like to do to Israel: turn it into one giant crematoria, burning every last Israeli Jew to death.

 

classicalmusiclover  ApolloSpeaks    

 

It's cute how you leave out all the details in between.

In the medieval Islamic world, Jews were allowed to live their lives free of harassment. In the medieval Christian world of the West, they were ghettoized and exterminated, blamed for the plague, and attacked in the name of the Crusades.

 

 

Mohammed tried to convert the Median Jews, failed, turned against them and pushed them into a desperate alliance with the Meccans- whose caravans Mohammed and his thieving, murdering, marauding jihadis were criminally plundering for loot.

 

In medieval times as long as infidel Jews paid the exorbitant, discriminatory, racist jizya (poll) tax (a criminal mafia like protection racket) they could hopefully live in relative peace as third class citizens in oppressive Moslem states. The only way for Jewish unbelievers to escape the punishing racist jizya was conversion.

 

classicalmusiclover  ApolloSpeaks

 

We've gone off topic. Tell me when will Donald Trump fire anti-Semite Steve Bannon?

 

  

 

Why would Trump fire a brilliant campaign strategist who was instrumental in getting him elected because lying, losing, pathetic morons like you (with zero hard evidence) slander him as being a Jew hater? Trump couldn't give a deuce what sore losing leftists thinks or says about Bannon. Trump is right about Bannon being as much of a

Judeophile as he is.

 

Bannon is a proven, pro-Zionist, Christian friend of Jewish Israel; and best friend of the very Jewish Andrew Breitbart when he was alive.

 

"Breitbart was born in Los Angeles, California, on February 1, 1969.[10] He was the adopted son of Gerald and Arlene Breitbart, a restaurant owner and banker respectively, and grew up in the affluent suburb of Brentwood, Los Angeles. He was raised Jewish; his adoptive mother had converted to Judaism when marrying his adoptive father.[11][12] He attended Hebrew school and had a bar mitzvah.[13]"

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

 

In short, there isn't an anti-semitic bone in Bannon's Jew loving body. If it were otherwise Breitbart wouldn't have had a bromance with him up until his death.     

 

 

Your ineptitude at selectively reading Wikipedia articles is once again fully on display.

 

So, Breitbart being Jewish means that none of the anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist memes and articles that Steve Bannon has willingly published is actually anti-Semitic or anti-Zionist?

 

The only question is: why are you so proud of your ignorance?

 

 

Hey, Trump-Bannon-Breitbart derangement nut. Where are these anti-Semitic articles? I've yet to see one from you? If Steve Bannon had a grain of Jew hatred in him Ivanka Trump and her Orthodox Jewish husband (they take Judaism very seriously) wouldn't have tolerated his position as CEO of the Trump campaign.

 

If this article debunking Bannon's Jew hatred doesn't enlighten your stupidity and ignorance (there's a stronger case for Obama being anti-sematic) nothing will.

 

https://spectator.org/the-smea...

 

 

Jeffrey Lord?

 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

Plutarchus  classicalmusiclover 

 

Good lord where does Lord go wrong?

 

 

 

 

From the moment he tries to discredit the historical parallels between the rise of Nazism and Trumpism.

 

Lord's argumentation is garbled and incoherent, rooted in self-serving ignorance. It's also pure opinion and allegation that tries to erase the demonstrable anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism of Breitbart's record of articles and headlines.

 

But I know why you look up to Lord as an intellectual thought leader: you agree with him and admire someone who is smarter than you are.

 

 

There are no valid parallels to the rise of Nazism in Germany and the populist Trump movement in America. For example anti-semitic violence from the start characterized the rise of Nazism in Germany. Jews were harnessed, beaten and terrorized by Nazi thugs in the streets of Munich, Berlin and elsewhere. Synagogues and Jewish shops were broken into, robbed and vandalized. Where are the parallels to the political rise of Donald Trump? Where is the Trump inspired anti-semitic violence sweeping over America? Or violence directed at any minority? 

 

Then there was Hitler's totalitarianism: his plan to centralize all political and economic power in a one party Nazi state headed by an all-powerful autocrat. Where are the parallels to Trump? His Jewish economic advisers (Larry Kudlow and Steve Moore) in fact are planning the very opposite of a Nazi-like command and control economy  where corporate heads are compelled by fear of imprisonment or death to serve the state and its interests. Slashing taxes, spending and federal regulations-shrinking the overbearing size, scope and reach of the federal government with its runaway deficit spending and debt driving the nation to bankuptcy (as Hitler was doing to Germany) is the opposite of Nazi economic policy.   In short, Trump's plan to balance the federal budget and decentralize Washington power (returning more of it to individuals, corporations and states) doesn't in the slightest parallel the rise of authoritarian fascist Nazism in Germany.

 

 You, my friend, with your Trump-Nazi comparisons, are a lying, slanderous, two-bit, partisan, anti-Trump political hack part of a colossally failed effort to demonize Trump into catastrophic defeat. Better luck next time.

 

 

 You are a simple-minded solipsist troll who is incapable of transcending binary thought patterns, or arguing without indulging the most ludicrous logical fallacies.

 

 

I love you too.  

 

POSTSCRIPT

 

 

 

 

Stop Bannon Protest Los Angeles (Joel Pollak / Breitbart News)

 

Why did ZOA invite Steve Bannon to its gala? Because he's a true, trusted, proven, loyal friend of the Jewish state of Israel.

That's why! As I said above, "There's no such animal as an anti-Semitic Zionist."

 

 

 

RELATED

 

ANTI-ZIONIST CLINTONS HONOR ISRAEL HATING WIFE OF PALESTINIAN TERRORIST WHO TEACHES NON-VIOLENT APPROACH TO DESTROYING JEWISH

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

11/9 ANTI-TRUMP HYSTERIA ENGULFS THE LEFT WHEN 11/9 IS 9/11 REVERSE

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Minhaj: Muslims Were Blamed for 9/11 and Now White America Will Be Blamed for 11/9 -- Vulture 

Donald Trump's earthquake election on the 9th day of November "11/9" is not the worst, most devastating 9/11 event since the collapse of the Twin Towers into a hellish pile of destruction and death. It is not the end of the world all over again as many hysterical, psyched out loons believe on the nauseating, violent, Trump hating left.

 
 

Absolutely to the contrary! Just as the numbers 1-1-9 are 9-1-1 reverse so is the odds defying historic day of Trump's astonishing victory on 11/9 the infamous, deadly, horrific day of 9/11 REVERSE. Conflating the two dates  like terrified, lunatic doomsday leftists are doing (and jubilant, radical anti-American Moslems) is just plain insane. Truth is Donald Trump becoming the 19th Republican to be President on 11/9 is logically, mathematically and symbolically the exact polar opposite to Osama bin Laden and the colossal destruction caused by his 19 jihadis on 9/11. Just compare what al Qaida did on 9/11 and in its history leading up it to Trump's history as a billionaire real estate developer. It's sobering. On 9/11 al-Qaida destroyed the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, two of the world's great skyscrapers, killing 3000 Americans at a cost of trillions; while prior to 11/9 Donald Trump built some of the world's great, tallest and most beautiful skyscrapers enriching and benefiting communities and cities across this land. 

Moveover, where on 9/11 al-Qaida also attacked the Pentagon in Washington DC killing 123, within earshot of that building Trump transformed the old post office pavilion into a great, opulent, luxury hotel providing jobs for hundreds. In short, al-Qaida are great destroyers, Trump's a great creator. There's no comparison.

In other words,

11/9 IS 9/11 REVERSE, STUPID!

 
 
 
View of Upper West Side Trump Skyscapers from the Hudson River.
 
 
 Trump Skyscrapers in South Florida and Chicago.
 
 

 And joining the freaked out chorus of delusional, frightened, doomsday Trump haters are (wouldn't you know it) ISIS, al-Qaida and violent, bloodthirsty jihadists everywhere. But unlike the terrified, mentally ill left these Moslems from hell are ecstatic about this week's election event. For after praying to Allah and consulting their Korans they've concluded that 11/9 is a blessing and God send; that it's a certain sign of divine intervention; that what al-Qaida began on 9/11, the defeat, downfall and destruction of the US, will be completed by Trump in the years ahead.

11/9 for them is an infallible sign that President Trump, whether he knows it or not, is an agent of Allah's imperial designs; that Allah is raising Trump to the presidency to bring down this country; to accomplish for Islam what jihadis tried and failed to do since 9/11. But here too the very opposite is true. What 11/9 is to 9/11 numerically (its opposite) Trump is to the horde of deadly Islamic jihadists. Just as 9/11 means to them a great jihadist victory then 11/9 (9/11 reversed) is symbolic of COUNTER-JIHAD. Indeed, Trump's threat to "bomb the hell out of 'em" should be taken seriously. For Trump (who honors Pershing, Patton and McArthur) "there's no substitute for victory." Unlike Obama and his world ending global warming fantasies Trump will give the defeat of jihad topmost priority. And as Trump has triumphed over every seeming insurmountable obstacle to win the presidency so will he use his great strength, stamina and energy to crush our jihadist enemies and turn 9/11 into a day they will greatly regret.

 
 

 Every negative prediction by anti-Trumpers on the right and left-that he'd not be the GOP nominee, that the gropper tape would finish him and he'd lose to lying crooked Hillary-have failed dismally. But learning nothing from these failures the left is at it again prophetically     warning that Trump's presidency will be a 9/11-like catastrophe that's beyond imagining. But "11/9," the date of Trump's election victory, suggests they have it wrong again; and after eight exciting, inventive, productive years of a glorious Trump presidency the only 9/11 they will see is the demise of their political creed. And that will be Trump's greatest victory.

 

POSTSCRIPT
(11-12-16)
 
 
"Likewise, the era that began abruptly on September 11, 2001, with the unprovoked onslaught of blood thirsty Muslims on one of the cultural jewels of Western society, culminated in the West finally getting the message, about 15 years later, on November 9, 2016, realizing there were dangerous beasts out there that needed to be put down, and, seeing that the traditional political leadership was not prepared to carry out the mission, picked a leader."
 

SOME OF MY MANY UNCANNY PREDICTIONS OF DONALD TRUMP'S UNLIKELY ELECTION VICTORY AND HILLARY CLINTON'S UNLIKELY DEFEAT 

Donald-Trump-wins-graphic.jpg

DONALD TRUMPOLEON: IS HE FATED TO DEFEAT HIS GOP RIVALS, CRUSH HILLARY (?) AND CONQUER THE WHITE HOUSE? 

DONALD TRUMP, THE CHAMPION CHICAGO CUBS AND THE YEAR OF THE UNDERDOG

DONALD TRUMP, HILLARY CLINTON AND THE HISTORY OF SAME STATE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES 

THE DEATH OF JANET RENO AND TOMORROW’S HISTORIC PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

IS HILLARY CLINTON UNDER A GEORGE MCGOVERN “CURSE?” WILL 2016 BE 1972 FOR HILLARY? 

DONALD TRUMP: THE “COMEBACK KING” OF THE CLINTON ERA REVERSES HIS FORTUNES AGAINST THE CLINTON MACHINE?

COULD THE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION AT THE WELLS FARGO CENTER PREFIGURE HILLARY’S DEFEAT DUE TO SCANDALS?

 

 

 
 
 
 
< p style="text-align: center;"> 

TRUMPQUAKE!!! WASHINGTON, WALL STREET, ISLAMISTS TREMBLE

 

 

     DONALD "THE BARBARIAN" TRUMP (HERCULES UNCHAINED) STORMED THE RAMPARTS OF OBAMASTAN
 
 
 
smashed through its iron gates and will soon be dismantling Obamunism, catastrophic doomsday warmunism, crony special interest capitalism, one way free trade globalism, greedy, self-serving Wall Street banksterism, anti-Judeo-Christian traditionalism, lying, truth hating, political correctnessism, illegal, open borders, one world immigrationism, softness in fighting radical Islamic extremism and he'll decimate    partisan, politicized media corruptionism. 
 
 
But, above all, Trump will clean out the Augean Stables ("drain the swamp") of Washington, stay the course, wrong direction status quoism reversing our country's economic, military and geopolitical decline - a huge Herculean undertaking that Trump provenly has the stamina, energy, strength and will power for.
 
 
Trump is an indefatigable force of nature. Clinton a spent force of exhausted, bankrupt liberalism. 
 
On January 20, 2017 this providential, patriotic, larger than life man will be sworn in as our Disruptor and Wrecking Ball-in-Chief to make America, and its forgotten, racially mixed working class majority, strong, prosperous and great again.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATINOS FOR TRUMP: THE MACHO FACTOR AND ELECTION UPDATES

 

 

LATINOS FOR TRUMP!

MAKE AMERICA MACHO AGAIN!

 

 

 

NEW EXIT POLL SHOWS AMERICANS WANT STRONG (MACHO) LEADER MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE

That could mean Trump winning far more support from Latino Americans than expected.

https://morningconsult.com/2016/11/08/voters-want-strong-leader-anything-else-exit-poll-shows/

 

 

 

DONALD TRUMP AND THE JEWS, AND WHAT KLANSMEN, NEO-NAZIS AND RADICAL MOSLEMS TRULY THINK OF HIM

 
 
 
If Neo-Nazi, Klu Klux Klansman Donald Trump is elected President the first four evil things he will do are the following: 1. break off diplomatic relations with Israel; 2. issue a statement denying the Holocaust was real; 3. shut down the Holocaust Museum in Washington; and 4. sign a secret executive order to revive Hitler's Final Solution and send every American Jew (including his Jewish family members) to death camps for extermination./sarc
 
 
Seriously people. Taken to its logical conclusion what else can "We've seen it all before" mean? 

 

 
 
 

NO WAY THIS MORON IS A TRUE TRUMP SUPPORTER!

Truth is Donald Trump loves Jews. He loves the Jewishness of his Jewish daughter; the Jewishness of his Jewish son-in-law; the Jewishness of his Jewish daughter-in-law; the Jewishness of his Jewish grandchildren. And above all, he loves the Jewishness of the Jewish state of Israel.

As for the Jews in the media who support Hillary and continually lie about Trump he knows that most if not all true, pro-Israel, American Jews (what's left of them) support him.

 

 

Former Ku Klux Klan Leader David Duke Claims Jews “Dominate Our Media” During Louisiana Senate Debate · Media Matters

 

HEY MR. DUKE, JEWS SEEM TO DOMINATE THE TRUMP FAMILY, THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION AND TRUMP'S PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN

Could it be that Donald Trump is a crypto Jew as some Klansmen, Neo-Nazis and radical Moslems believe? That he secretly converted to Judaism when daughter Ivanka became a Jew, and underwent ritual circumcision? Is he now fully Judaized?  Perhaps not. But the following is what Jew hating Klansmen, Neo-Nazis and radical Moslems really think of Donald Trump.    

The "J" in Donald J. Trump stands for JEW.

 
Though not Jewish Trump if elected President will be the closest thing to a Jew ever to occupy the White House.
 
THIS PROUD JEW PROUDLY STANDS WITH DONALD J. TRUMP!
RESET US/ISRAELI RELATIONS
FROM THE SETBACK OF THE OBAMA/CLINTON YEARS
AND MAKE THIS RELATIONSHIP GREAT AGAIN
TRUMP-PENCE 2016  

UPDATE (11-9-16)

Trump invites Netanyahu to the US at 'the first possible opportunity' just hours after the Israeli PM called the president-elect a 'true friend'- Daily Mail

Looks like Bibi Netanyahu will be the first world leader to meet with the President Elect, or just after he's sworn in.
POSTSCRIPT
 
 
 
 
cpusa-trump

KLAN ENDORSES TRUMP, COMMUNISTS ENDORSE CLINTON

When it comes to mass murder and crimes against humanity Communists with their systematic killing of tens of millions of people worldwide make Klansmen look like Chicago street thugs. But while the Klan today is an empty shell of its former horrific self Communist regimes in North Korea and Cuba (backed by the Communist Party USA) continue to kill, terrorize and imprison their people and threaten their neighbors with subversion, aggression and war.

 

 

Trump condemned the Klan endorsement as "repulsive." Hillary has yet to denounce her endorsement by the Communist Party USA. But why should she? Progressive leftist that she is Clinton believes that the hearts of Marx, Lenin and Mao were morally in the right place. They put "people and planet before profits (look at the booming economies of Cuba and N. Korea);" and believe in the BIG LIE of  statism that

GOVERNMENT IS THE ANSWER.

 

 

 
 
 


THE DEATH OF JANET RENO AND TOMORROW’S HISTORIC PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

 
 
 
 
Janet Reno, the nation's 78th Attorney General under Bill Clinton, and first woman to hold that office, died this morning at age 78 at her home in Miami. A long time friend of Hillary's Reno died just 24 hours before she'd know the political fate of her friend: whether she'd be elected the first female US President? Or be defeated by macho billionaire businessman Donald Trump?
 
 
 
 
The question is this: is Reno's sudden death by Parkinsons (a disease some suspect is afflicting Hillary) an auspicious sign for the Democratic nominee? Does Reno breaking the glass ceiling at the Justice Department herald Hillary doing the same for the Presidency? And that her death prophetically signaled Trump going down in defeat?  Or is Reno's death ominous of failure and political death for Hillary? Ominous like several other deaths suggest? Deaths like FDR and George McGovern? For Hillary launched her presidential campaign on the 70th anniversary of FDR's death* (she wants to be the female FDR see). And when her friend George McGovern died in October 2012 (shortly after the Benghazi raid) he was laid to rest on her 65th birthday (see).
 
*April 12, 2015. FDR died April 12, 1945.
 
 
 
 
My guess is that Janet Reno's sudden death today falling just short of tomorrow's election is a sign of failure and defeat for Hillary; that she will just fall short of winning in what perhaps will be a very close race. Why do I say this?  Because Reno was a native of Florida; and today November 7th is ominously for Hillary the 16th anniversary of the 2000 presidential race*where Republican George Bush beat Clinton backed Democrat Al Gore in a contest that went all the way to the Supreme Court and was decided in RENO'S HOME STATE.    
 
*It is also the 44th anniversary of the 1972 presidential race when Nixon decimated George McGovern. 
 
 
 
 
Now with Hillary and Trump running neck and neck in Florida (a key battle ground state) it could very well be that Reno's death this morning in Florida on the anniversary of the 2000 race prophetically anticipates the outcome of tomorrow's election. That the election of 16 years ago today (an auspicious political number for Trump,  see) is a model for the 2016 race. It could very well be that Florida once again in a nail bitter will decide tomorrow's winner and loser.
 
 
 
After years of estrangement Hillary campaigning with Al Gore in Miami. Gore warned the crowd against the upcoming election turning out like 2000 (see). 
 
In other words, Hillary like Gore could win the popular vote and Trump like Bush the electoral vote because of Florida again (Trump's second home). Or will some other one state decide the outcome, like Ohio did in 2004? Tomorrow we shall see if Reno's death in some sense has any relevance as a providential sign prefiguring a Trump victory.
 

THE FDR-NEW YORK FACTOR

Now if Donald Trump wins election in a close race, as I believe he will, he'll be the 7th New Yorker to be President after FDR-whose 84th anniversary of his victory over Hoover is tomorrow November 8th. And here too Janet Reno seems relevant. For she was born on July 21, 1938 during the Roosevelt Era (see). And amazingly she celebrated her 78th birthday on the very day Donald Trump gave his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention (see).  It would seem this is a sign that native New Yorker Donald Trump, not Chicago born Hillary, will be the 7th New Yorker after FDR to be President. 

 

RENO IS NARROWLY DEFEATED IN GOVERNOR'S PRIMARY RACE

 
 
Speaking of razor close elections it is fascinating to note that in 2002 Reno ran in the Democratic primary for governor of Florida ultimately hoping to unseat Jeb Bush. But she lost in a squeaker to her rival Bill McBride 44% to 44.4%. There were voting problems in the election, and Reno didn't concede defeat until a week later. 
 
 
Is this what lies in store for us tomorrow and in the days and weeks ahead? Post-election uncertainty and chaos like we had in 2000? With Trump or Clinton finding fault with the results and taking aggressive legal action to remedy it (Reno was a lawyer)? With the nation once again in political turmoil? Or if Hillary should win, which I strongly doubt, is Reno dying today a sign of legal and criminal problems plaguing a Hillary presidency? Problems stemming from her emails or corruption at her foundation or God knows what (see)? My gut tells me that regardless of tomorrow's outcome there will be much discontent and unrest on both sides. If that should happen hopefully things won't get too out of hand.
 
UPDATE
(11-9)
 
 INCREDIBLE! 
 
Similar to 2000 Trump took Florida in a squeaker; and like Bush lost the popular vote but won the electoral college.
 
RELATED
 
 

HILLARY CLINTON ANNOUNCES CANDIDACY FOR PRESIDENT ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF FDR’S DEATH. DOES THIS SIGNAL HER SUCCESS OR DEFEAT? 

IS HILLARY CLINTON UNDER A GEORGE MCGOVERN “CURSE?” WILL 2016 BE 1972 FOR HILLARY?

COULD THE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION AT THE WELLS FARGO CENTER PREFIGURE HILLARY’S DEFEAT DUE TO SCANDALS?

WHILE CLINTON-GORE BOMB OUT IN FLORIDA CLIMATE CHANGE MILLENNIALS RALLY TRUMP RALLY SOARS UP STATE

DONALD TRUMP, THE CHAMPION CHICAGO CUBS AND THE YEAR OF THE UNDERDOG

DONALD TRUMP, HILLARY CLINTON AND THE HISTORY OF SAME STATE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES 

DONALD TRUMP: THE “COMEBACK KING” OF THE CLINTON ERA REVERSES HIS FORTUNES AGAINST THE CLINTON MACHINE?

 
 
 
 
 

DONALD TRUMP, THE CHAMPION CHICAGO CUBS AND THE YEAR OF THE UNDERDOG

 

 

The Chicago Cubs in one of the greatest most memorable World Series ever played came back from a 3-1 deficit (making them the likely to lose underdogs) to defeat the Cleveland Indians 8-7 in the tenth inning of game 7. Of the 112 World Series played since 1903*the odds defying underdog Cubs were only the 7th** team in baseball history to achieve this amazing feat.

*There was no World Series in 1904 due to a boycott.

**1903 Boston Americans (Red Sox), down 1-3, won the World Series 5-3 over Pittsburgh (best of nine format see). 

 

 

 President Harry Truman at the opening game of the 1948 World Series.

As I wrote HERE the last time the defeated Indians were world champs was in the politically momentous year 1948-momentous because underdog, "give em hell" Harry Truman defeated favored-to-win New York Governor Tom Dewey after criss crossing the nation rallying the electorate to support him. Incredibly, Tuesday, November 2nd was the 68th anniversary of Truman's surprise, inconceivable 1948 victory (see).

 

 

Moreover, and amazingly, Tuesday was also the 2nd anniversary of Tampa Rays' manager Joe Maddon leaving the Rays and becoming the Cubs 60th skipper*. What a gift the baseball gods gave to this great sportsman. It couldn't happen to a nicer, finer, more deserving human being.

* On November 3, 2014 the Cubs officially announced that Maddon would be their new manager after signing a five-year $25 million contract the day before (see).

But the big question now is this: was the underdog Cubs extremely rare (once in every 16 years) World Series victory a prophetic sign for this uniquely chaotic unpredictable election year? In other words, as I asked before (see)

 

 "IS 2016 THE YEAR OF THE UNDERDOG?"

 

 

If the Chicago Cubs could come back from a 108 year World Series drought and a 3-1 deficit in this year's series then why can't battling, underdog, odds defying Donald Trump (called by the NY Times "The Comeback King" of the business world*) do a Harry Truman on November 8th and become the 45th President?

*A well deserved title as he reversed his collapsing business fortunes- foreshadowing what he'll do as President for our declining nation.

 

 

In other words, will New Yorker Donald Trump who was born during the Truman Era, in the same year that gave us two Presidents (Clinton and Bush see) be elected on November 8th-the 84th anniversary of New Yorker FDR's 1932 victory?

 

 Baseball signed by Trump supporter baseball great Pete Rose.

 

POSTSCRIPT I

THE AMAZING PREDICTION OF GIO

 

 

This is beyond belief. On November 4, 2014, two days after  Ray's manager Joe Maddon was hired by the Cubs to replace Rick Renteria, a Rays fan from Tampa named GIO (grew up an Indians' fan in Cleveland) tweeted that the 2016 World Series would be the Cubs vs. Indians, and go into extra inning in game seven. He didn't pick a winner but said jokingly that a world ending apocalypse would come before either team won.

 

However, what did come that very day (the 6th anniversary of Obama's 2008 election victory) was a nationwide Republican landslide where the Democrats lost the Senate, more seats in the House, several governorships, and hundreds of seats in state legislatures across the country. It was one of the greatest mid-term election gains of any party in US history (see). Will this be another victorious year for the GOP with Trump defeating Hillary? November 4, 2014 was an incomplete political apocalypse for Obama and the Dems. Will 2016 complete the unfinished work of 2014? Will an electorate fed up with the political status quo and hungry for new direction and change put a Republican in the White House again?

 

POSTSCRIPT ll

Plouffe: Trump Is Heaviest Presidential Candidate Since Taft

 

 

Prior to Tuesday's astonishing win the Cubs haven't won a World Series in 108 years. That was back in 1908, a presidential election year when Republican William H. Taft defeated Democratic rival William Jennings Bryan (see). It is interesting to note that David Plouffe (Obama's 2008 campaign manager) likened Donald Trump to Taft because of his weight. However, Taft was massively obese, The Donald is anything but. But was this too another auspicious sign of Trump's coming victory? That Trump like Republican Howard Taft will win the presidency in a year when the Chicago Cubs won the World Series*?

* The first World Series played during a presidential election year was in 1908.

 

POSTSCRIPT III

 

More Proof Donald Trump Can Win: The Chicago Cubs - TheStreet

by

Emily Stewart

Donald Trump's chances at winning the presidency move in correlation with gold prices, the Mexican peso and ... the Chicago Cubs? Major developments this election cycle -- the first presidential debate, the "Access Hollywood" tape, the FBI letter -- have swung prediction markets as well as the markets at large. As Trump's odds at the White House have improved on prediction markets like U.S.-based PredictIt, gold prices have tended to rise. The Mexican peso has weakened and the VIX futures, which measure volatility, increased. Trump's chances at besting Hillary Clinton on November 8 have at times followed another measure: the likelihood of the Chicago Cubs winning the World Series. On April 6 when the baseball season was just kicking off, the Cubs' odds on betting website OddsShark were 16%. Trump, with only Ted Cruz and John Kasich in the race, had odds of 19%. By the end of summer, the Cubs' chances at victory were 25%, and Trump's 30%. Still think Trump can't win? The Cubs just did.

POSTSCRIPT IV

Nate Silver Staffer Gave Cubs Worse Odds of Winning Series Than Trump the Presidency - NewsMax

This too is remarkable. Last Friday when the underdog Cubs were down in the series 3-1 and highly unlikely to win America's polling wizard Nate Silver (538) gave Trump a 1 in 3 chance of winning the presidency. Then a staffer in Silver's office giving the Cubs a 15% chance of beating Cleveland blogged that Donald Trump had a better chance of defeating Hillary and winning the presidency.

538 blew its World Series forecast. On Tuesday will its election forecast turn out the same way?

POSTSCRIPT V

 

The Chicago Cubs own the 2016 baseball world championship; and Donald Trump owns the majestic world-class Trump Tower Chicago the fourth tallest building in the US with the second highest residence (apartment or condo) in the world. It is interesting to note that this architectural wonder opened on January 30, 2009 just nine days after Chicagoland Barack Obama (and eight days after Chicago-born Hillary) were sworn into office (see). Just as Trump with his job creating enterprises have done more for Chicago's economy than Obama and Hillary combined so as President he'll do more for America than them.

DONALD TRUMP 2016!
 
FOR THE GREAT AMERICAN COMEBACK!
 
POSTSCRIPT VI
(posted 11-9-16)
 
 
THE COMEBACK, UNDERDOG CHICAGO CUBS,
 
owned by the pro-Trump Ricketts family, won the World Series in Cleveland; this is the city where underdog, "Comeback King" Donald Trump, at the Republican National Convention, was crowned the GOP's presidential nominee.
 
 
Pro-Trump Cub's owner Tom Ricketts (extreme left).
 
The GOP convention was held at Quicken Loans Arena in downtown Cleveland which is adjacent to Progressive Field, home of the Indians. (The two sports facilities are part of the same sports and entertainment complex, see). Now get this: the Indians' stadium is named "Progressive Field" because the Progressive Insurance Company (owned by political progressives, see) purchased the naming rights.
 
 
Gateway Sports and Entertainment Complex in Cleveland where Donald Trump won the GOP nomination for the presidency, and the Chicago Cubs won the World Series.
 
So this is what we have: the pro-Trump conservative owned Chicago Cubs defeated the Indians in a stadium named for political progressivism located in a sports complex where Donald Trump (who defeated progressive Hillary Clinton) was made the GOP's presidential nominee.  And, by the way, Quicken Arena was built in the 1990s during the Clinton era (see). You can't make this stuff up.
 
UPDATE
(11-24-16)
 
 
 20161124_Donald_Trump_Todd_Ricketts_Getty.jpg
 
Todd Ricketts, co-owner of the world championship baseball team whose upset, come from behind victory on the 68th anniversary of Truman's upset defeat of Tom Dewey is likely to have a key position in Donald "The Comeback King" Trump's Administration. Fascinating.

RELATED

THE CUBS-INDIANS WORLD SERIES AND THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RACE  
DONALD TRUMP: THE “COMEBACK KING” OF THE CLINTON ERA REVERSES HIS FORTUNES AGAINST THE CLINTON MACHINE?
 

COULD THE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION AT THE WELLS FARGO CENTER PREFIGURE HILLARY’S DEFEAT DUE TO SCANDALS?

1946 AND 1947: THE REMARKABLE YEARS DONALD TRUMP AND HILLARY CLINTON WERE BORN

HILLARY CLINTON ANNOUNCES CANDIDACY FOR PRESIDENT ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF FDR’S DEATH. DOES THIS SIGNAL HER SUCCESS OR DEFEAT?

DONALD TRUMP, HILLARY CLINTON AND THE HISTORY OF SAME STATE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES 

DONALD TRUMP, NEW YORK, THE BUSHES, HILLARY’S DILEMMA AND THE 19TH CENTURY NEW YORK CLINTON WHO LOST A PRESIDENTIAL RACE  

BERNIE SANDERS VS. HILLARY CLINTION: THE RACE FOR FDR’S OBSOLETE NEW DEAL LEGACY

IS HILLARY CLINTON UNDER A GEORGE MCGOVERN “CURSE?” WILL 2016 BE 1972 FOR HILLARY? 
 
 
 
 

JAMES COMEY, PLAMEGATE, SCOOTER LIBBY AND THE COMING INDICTMENT OF HILLARY CLINTON?

 

 
 

Late in the 11th hour of the 2016 presidential race, just 11 days from Election Day, and on the 11th anniversary of Scooter Libby's indictment in the Valerie Plame affair (10-28-05), FBI Director James Comey sent a blockbuster letter to Congress that he was reopening the criminal probe into Hillary Clinton's private email server. His reason was a new, troubling mega-cache of possibly thousands of Clinton-related emails (or a smoking gun*) found on text sexting perv Anthony Weiner's laptop.

*Could be, as some surmise, that the FBI did find a smoking gun as they were looking through Weiner's emails.

 
 

Jim Comey once said: "I don't care about politics.  I don't care about expediency. I don't care about friendship. I care about doing the right thing."

What is truly astonishing and seemingly ominous for Hillary is the "coincidence" of Comey sending this letter on the anniversary of Scooter Libby's indictment for obstruction of justice, perjury and other crimes in the Plame case. For as MSNBC's David Corn wrote (see), it was none other than then Acting Attorney General James Comey (of the Bush administration) who TRIGGERED the four year investigation into the criminal leak that outed Valerie Plame-a covert CIA agent (see). 

 
Valerie Plame (right) with husband Joe Wilson and good friend Hillary. 
 
Indeed, recusing himself (and the Justice Department) from the Plame scandal Comey in late 2003 appointed long time friend Patrick FitzGerald (the US Attorney in Chicago) as Special Independent  Prosecutor to investigate the case. And 21 months later (October 28, 2005) Scooter Libby was indicted on multiple felony crimes, and was later convicted and sentenced to 30 months in jail (commuted by President Bush). "Plamegate," as it came to be known, was to become the Bush administration's signature scandal.
 
 
Scooter Libby
 

That Comey is a pro-Trump partisan Republican hack in violation of the Hatch Act trying to influence the outcome of the election is utter nonsense-denied even by the White House. Indeed, what Comey did in Plamegate, and opposing central aspects Bush's domestic surveillance program, established his reputation for    being apolitical, and was key to Obama's decision to make him FBI chief.

 
 
Now if Comey reopening the investigation into Hillary's server on the anniversary of Scooter Libby's indictment isn't ominous enough for her than just as strange and perhaps significant is the day that Comey became the nation's 7th FBI chief. For that very same day, September 4, 2013, Anthony Weiner and wife Huma were celebrating his 49th birthday (see and see). 
 
 
 
The question is this: are the above two remarkable coincident events mere happenstance? Or are they signature effects of a Higher Power invisibly at work in our world using Comey, Weiner and his Molsem wife Huma to bring down Hillary and ruin her quest for the White House? Is the jig up for Hillary? Has her luck run out? After years of living above the law and getting away with murder has her high crimes and misdemeanors finally catching up with her?  Will history judge Comey's October Surprise, on top of all the Wikileaks stuff, as the straw that broke Hillary's political back and denied her the presidency? Indeed, regardless whether Hillary fails or succeeds next week, it looks like she's facing indictment and jail time like the hapless Scooter Libby-the only one in the Bush administration convicted of a crime in the Plamegate investigation triggered by Comey.  
 
DRAIN THE SWAMP!
 
 
 
UPDATE
(11-2-16)
 
 
Agents have found emails believed to have originated on Hillary Clinton's secret private illegally used server on Anthony Weiner's laptop. They say the emails are not duplicates and could potentially be classified in nature.
 
But it doesn't end there. Agents also told Fox that the laptops of Clinton aides Cherryl Mills and Heather Samuelson  (given limited immunity by the pro-Clinton Justice Dept.) have not been destroyed as originally thought; agents are combing through them looking for smoking guns. It seems Hillary is coming closer and closer to being Scooter Libbyed.  But not before Election Day.
 
UPDATES
(11-12-16)
 
 
Just when things couldn't seem to get any stranger I just learned that on November 7th (one day before the election) Scooter Libby got his law license back. 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 

THE CUBS-INDIANS WORLD SERIES AND THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RACE

 

 

The 2016 World Series is being fought between the Chicago Cubs and Cleveland Indians. The Cubs haven't been in a Fall Classic in 71 years since 1945. The Indians haven't won a World Series since 1948. In American political history 1945 and 1948 are historically significant years that could, maybe, possibly in a symbolic or oracular sense be relevant to the outcome of this election. This is what I mean.

1945 (the year we defeated the Nazis and Japanese) marked the end of a transformational political era: FDR-the last New Yorker to be President-died of a stroke while serving a fourth unprecedented term. And three years later in 1948 underdog President Harry Truman (FDR's   accidental successor) defeated favored to win New York Governor Tom Dewey to keep the Presidency.

 

Now if underdog candidate Donald Trump defies the odds (as he's been doing from the start of his historic campaign) and does a Harry Truman on November 8th he will be the first NATIVE New Yorker since FDR to be President. And if Trump wins not only will he be our 45th President but the 19th Republican to hold that office. These two numbers "19" and "45" gives us the year of FDR's death, and the last time the Cubs were in the World Series.  

 

Now if Donald Trump is fated to be the next Harry Truman then that would make Hillary the next Tom Dewey. And it so happens that Hillary and Dewey share two things in common: both held high elected office in New York State; and both were born outside the state: Dewey was born in Owosso, Michigan (see) and Hillary in Chicago, home of the Cubs (who now are down two games to one in the World Series and looking like losers). Moreover, by accident or design, Hillary launched her presidential campaign on April 12, 2015 (see): the 70th anniversary of FDR's death (the year the Cubs lost the World Series). Could this be an ominous sign for Chicago born Hillary that she's about to lose the chance of succeeding FDR as the next New Yorker to be President to an authentic, life long New Yorker like FDR?  Like 1948 will 2016 be the year of the political  underdog?

 
 

Yesterday when FBI Director Comey (born in New York) announced he'd be resuming the criminal probe into Hillary's email server, that night at Wrigley Field (first time the World Series was played there since 1945) the Cleveland Indians (the 1948 World Champs) defeated the Cubs 1 to 0 in a pitching duel squeaker. Could this in some strange, crazy way prefigure that underdog Donald Trump, due to Comey's reopened investigation, is fated to defeat Hillary in a squeaker or close race? Right now as I write the presidential race is tightening both nationally and in swing states; and a close race as in 1960 or 2000 when the incumbent party lost could very well happen ten days from now.

Who's going to win the World Series? I don't have a clue. I'm a life long Dodger fan and was crushed when they lost to the Cubs last week. However, as it now stands, the Cubs look like the losers and underdogs. That could change tonight if they even up the series. But If they should lose and fall behind the Indians 3-1 they will very definitely be the underdogs likely to lose. Only six teams in history have come back from a 3-1 deficit to take the championship. If that should happen and they win that would make 2016 the Year of the Underdog.  

DRAIN THE SWAMP!

VOTE FOR TRUMP!

FOR THE GREAT AMERICAN COMEBACK!

RELATED

COULD THE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION AT THE WELLS FARGO CENTER PREFIGURE HILLARY’S DEFEAT DUE TO SCANDALS?

HILLARY CLINTON ANNOUNCES CANDIDACY FOR PRESIDENT ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF FDR’S DEATH. DOES THIS SIGNAL HER SUCCESS OR DEFEAT,

DONALD TRUMP, HILLARY CLINTON AND THE HISTORY OF SAME STATE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES 

DONALD TRUMP, NEW YORK, THE BUSHES, HILLARY’S DILEMMA AND THE 19TH CENTURY NEW YORK CLINTON WHO LOST A PRESIDENTIAL RACE  

BERNIE SANDERS VS. HILLARY CLINTION: THE RACE FOR FDR’S OBSOLETE NEW DEAL LEGACY

< p style="text-align: center;">IS HILLARY CLINTON UNDER A GEORGE MCGOVERN “CURSE?” WILL 2016 BE 1972 FOR HILLARY? 

DONALD TRUMP, HILLARY CLINTON, RONALD REAGAN AND THE FINISHED HOTEL PROJECT NEAR THE WHITE HOUSE: DOES IT FORESHADOW A TRUMP PRESIDENCY?

 

"Under budget and ahead of schedule. So important. We don't hear those words so often, but you will," he said Trump at the hotel's ribbon cutting ceremony. "Today is a metaphor for what we can accomplish for this country."

 

Yesterday Donald Trump on Hillary Clinton's 69th birthday officially opened the Trump International Hotel at Washington DC. Was this by accident or design? Did Trump do this to rub Hillary's face in his success and make her look foolish for ridiculing his incredible business career? It would seem so. Crooked, corrupt, incompetent Hillary campaigning in Tampa took a cheap shot at Trump and his latest achievement saying (without proof) that he hired illegal Mexican aliens to build this project and furnished it with furniture mostly imported from Asia. And to strike back at Trump for the audacity of opening the hotel on her birthday Hillary trotted out Chef Jose Andres, a Spanish-American celeb businessman who backed out of opening a restaurant at the new hotel because of the "racist" comments Trump made about Mexicans. If you want a good laugh listened to his slanderous Trump derangement speech HERE.

 

Hillary and Trump hater Chef Jose Andreas.

I wonder what Chef Jose thinks of all those Latino Americans who agree with Trump on immigration and border security and will be voting for him in two weeks (see)? That they're not right in the head? Or that they're more American than Latino? Too assimilated and therefore not truly representative of the American Latino community? Striping Blacks and Latinos of racial and ethnic authenticity is how leftists treat them if they're right thinking conservatives.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY HILLARY,YOU'RE BEHIND IN THE POLLS

Hillary’s Birthday Rally in Tampa, FL Draws ~1000 People!  Above is a picture of Hillary’s birthday rally in Tampa, FL.The Clinton campaign expected “thousands”. But it appears they have to scale back these expectations. Said one observer, “they are...A mere 1000 Floridians in Tampa turn out to celebrate Hillary's 69th birthday yesterday. A local resident jokingly said "there are more people in the park when Hillary isn't there."

 Meanwhile, ironically, as a tired, worn out, sick Hillary was campaigning on her birthday in Florida she got word that the latest Bloomberg poll (as in Michael Bloomberg who backs her) had Trump topping her by two points in Florida (see). No surprise to me as I've predicted Trump taking the Sunshine State for very good empirical reasons: the sickest, most lifeless, least inspiring and corrupt Democrat presidential candidate in history isn't energizing or exciting enough voters-especially minorities as Politico warned (see).

"Trump is a fraud out to scam America!"

Now truly, if Trump were the awful, fraudulent, financially unsound businessman that Hillary and her media allies say he is then why did the General Services Administration pick him to renovate the Old Post Office and transform it into a luxury hotel with a 60 year lease? Why did Obama's GSA, after an exhaustive evaluation and vetting process, choose Trump for the project over some of the largest real estate companies and developers in the world (including Hilton Worldwide)? Surely the GSA knew of Trump's failures and bankruptcies, and his $916 million loss in the 90s. So why him? I don't know. But what is inarguable is that with the project completed on time and under budget-Hillary can denigrate it all she wants-the GSA picked the right man and organization for the job.

TRUMP, REAGAN AND THE OLD POST OFFICE

Now throughout the course of his campaign all of you have heard Trump boasting about winning the Old Post Office project from the government. But what you probably don't know is that Trump was awarded the deal on February 6, 2012, the 101st anniversary of Ronald Reagan's birth (see); and that the building's address 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue is just 500 numbers down the street from the White House at 1600, and 200 numbers from the Ronald Reagan Building at 1300 in between (see). Indeed, as the Old Post Office is the second tallest building in DC you can clearly see the White House from its higher floors. Now is winning this prime piece of historic real estate situated within earshot of the White House (and the Reagan Building) on the anniversary of Reagan's birth an auspicious sign for Trump? That he's walking in Reagan's footsteps and is on his way to the presidency? That now in the 16th month of his historic campaign (which started on 16th day of June) he's going to win 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue like he won the Old Post Office project down the street? With Trump defying the laws of political gravity and rising in the polls again I wouldn't bet against it. 

 POSTSCRIPT

1300 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE AND 13 DAYS TO ELECTION DAY

The Ronald Reagan Building

 As the Ronald Reagan Building at 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue is just up the street from the new Trump International Hotel yesterday's official opening on October 26th was 13 days from Election Day (see). Strangely, the number of days separating Reagan's election on November 4, 1980 from this Election Day is 13,154 (see). Moreover, from Reagan's inaugural on January 20, 1981 to the inaugural this January is 13,150 days (see). And lastly, on the day when Donald Trump was born Ronald Reagan was in his 12,913th day on this earth (see). By the way, it was in the 13th month of Trump's campaign at the Republican National Convention that he officially became the GOP nominee (see and see).
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

DONALD TRUMP: THE “COMEBACK KING” OF THE CLINTON ERA REVERSES HIS FORTUNES AGAINST THE CLINTON MACHINE?

 

,,,,,,,,,,

CLINTONS’ SECRET FIXER GOES PUBLIC ON HANNITY

 

In 2007 Michelle Obama campaigning for her husband took a veiled shot at the moral fitness of his rival for the presidency: crooked, lying, corrupt, sexually perverse Hillary Clinton.  She said:
 

“One of the things — the important aspects of this race — is role modeling what good families should look like. And my view is that if you can't run your own house, you certainly can't run the White House. Can't do it.”

I bring this up because the public is now again learning just how sickening, sordid, foul and corrupt Hillary and her husband are and unfit for the White House. I'm referring of course to the bombshell revelations of the National Enquirer from the Clintons' "fixer" and "bagman"-the man whose job it was to hide their sins and ugly scandals and pay off people to shut up. Last night on Hannity this mysterious Clinton insider, "Mr. Fix It" as he's called, courageously revealed his true identity. And I was amazed to learn it was someone I knew of: Jeff Daniel Rovin.
 
 
“The New York Times has become the National Enquirer, and the National Enquirer has become The New York Times,” Rovin said. “We’ve got to set the world right again.”
 
 Rovin is a magazine editor, free-lance writer, columnist  and prolific best-selling author. Among his 47 novels is "The Game" (made into a film starring Michael Douglas), and 12 Tom Clancy Op Center books-this includes the New York Times best seller "War of Eagles" which I read.
 
 
 
 
 
Indeed, this highly credible man tells about the Clintons' open polyamorous marriage, Bill's hookers, Hillary's lover and suicide victim Vince Forster, her bisexual affairs, the plots to destroy Monica Lewinsky and Bill's other "bimbos" and much, much more. Rovin claims he worked ten years doing dirty work for the sick, decaying, degenerate Clintons who want to pollute and desecrate the White House again. Not only was the Clinton White House an open fly zone, according to Rovin, but an open legs zone as well as Hillary was just as lecherous as her husband having a ball swinging both ways. Is it any wonder that after years of sexual excess both Clintons are so burnt out? Old beyond their years shadows of their former selves?
 
 
 CORRUPTER TOGETHER
 
Will this story gain traction and impact the campaign and help Donald Trump defeat the Clintons? Hopefully. There are over 36,000 grocery stores in this country most of which openly display the Enquirer and its front page for their shoppers to see. Between now and Election Day millions will see this story about the filthy, abhorrent, disgusting, perverse, sexually deviant Clintons. Drip, drip, drip. Every little ugly drip helps.
 
 
 

RECKLESS WAR HAWK NEO-CON HILLARY WANTS NO-FLY ZONE FOR SYRIA AND WAR WITH RUSSIA

 
 
 
 

 

 

 Hillary Clinton ridiculing Donald Trump at the Al Smith dinner said that he was "the strong horse that Vladimir Putin rides." Why did she say that? Principally because Trump is opposed to confronting Putin over Syria by creating a no-fly zone.  But wouldn't that make
      Barack Obama another horse that Putin's riding? For like Trump he too opposes a no-fly zone.
 

 

If you want to know why reckless, extremist, war mongering neo-cons like Bill Kristol prefer Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump to be the next Commander-in-Chief then read this exchange between Chris Wallace and Hillary at last week's debate on the issue of imposing an aerial blockade or no-fly zone over Syrian airspace. It's mind-boggling:

Wallace:

Secretary Clinton, you have talked about in the last debate and again today that you would impose a no-fly zone to try to protect the people of Aleppo and to stop the killing there. President Obama has refused to do that because he fears it’s gonna draw us closer and deeper into the conflict. And General Joseph Dunford, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, says you want to impose a no-fly zone, chances are you are going to get into a war, his words, with Syria and Russia. So the question I have is first, how do you respond to their concerns? Secondly, if you impose a no-fly zone and a Russian plane violates that, does President Clinton shoot that plane down?

Clinton:

Well Chris, first of all, I think a no-fly zone could save lives and hasten the end of the conflict. I am well aware of the really legitimate concerns you have expressed from both the president and the general. This would not be done just on the first day.This would take a lot of negotiation and it would also take making it clear to the Russians and the Syrians that our purpose is to provide safe zones on the ground. We've had millions of people leave Syria, and those millions of people inside Syria who’ve been dislocated. So I think we could strike a deal and make it very clear to the Russians and Syrians that this was something that we believe the best interests of the people on the ground in Syria. It would help us in the fight against ISIS.

 

 

For those of you who may not know, a no-fly zone (NFZ) is defined as a territory over which aircraft are not permitted to fly. It is a demilitarized zone or red line in the sky that prohibits military aircraft of a billigerent power from operating in that area. Aircraft that break the NFZ are shot down. That's it.   

 

 

Russian bomber in Turkish air space being blown out of the sky. Will President Hillary do this to Russian planes violating her Syrian NFZ?

In March 2011 Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and NATO (backed by neo-cons Kristol, John McCain and Lindsey Graham) imposed a NFZ over war torn Libya where there was an Arab Spring uprising against dictator Muammar      Kaddafy. What was the reason for the NFZ? To provide  "safe zones" on the ground for anti-Kaddafy rebels and civilians-to protect them from being targeted by Kaddafy's air force. So for whom does Hillary want to create "safe zones" in Syria with a nationwide NFZ? Like in Libya anti-regime rebels and innocent civilians. And to keep them safe from whose air force? Not ISIS' or al-Qaida's (they have no military planes); but from Putin's and Assad's deadly bombers.

 

Turkish Prime Minister Erdogen in Moscow apologizing to Putin for shooting down Russian plane

As General Dunford warns, Hillary's plan would likely lead to war with Russia (Iran and Hezbollah). Once the NFZ is  established it is nearly certain that Putin would test it like he did Turkish airspace last November (see) daring Hillary (as he did Erdogen) to shoot down his planes. If Hillary   (like Marco Rubeo, see) is betting against Putin breaching her red line in the sky fearing a war with the US then she is insanely mistaken. When Turkey downed the Russian jet Putin, retaliating with punishing economic sanctions, practically brought Erdogen to his knees; and because Turkey is a NATO member this diplomatic victory     increased Putin's growing international prestige. But if Putin were to intrude into Hillary's NFZ and loses one or more planes he'd have no choice but to respond militarily; for Russia has no economic leverage over the US like it does with Turkey. That Putin would likely risk a full-blown war and nuclear confrontation with the US is the position of General Dunford and others including, apparently, Barack Obama; for he fought with Hillary for years over her idea for a Syrian NFZ and rejected it as too risky. 
 
 
Not only does Hillary differ with Obama on imposing a NFZ over Syria, but unlike Obama she is threatening war with Iran to enforce the nuclear arms deal.
 
Indeed, after Obama's and Hillary's humiliating failure of resetting relations with Russia (predicted by me HERE and HERE) through idiotic, butt kissing appeasement which emboldened Putin anti-Russian hawk Hillary is on the warpath against him. It appears that as President, Hillary will be intent on doing what Obama attempted and failed to do with sanctions: put neo-imperialist Putin in his place and hopefully bring him down. This has been her steadfast position for years and has nothing to do with alleged Russian hacking of the DNC or Putin preferring Trump to her in this election (who can blame him?); these have served to aggravate Hillary's animus toward Putin who repeatedly betrayed her and Obama with Edward Snowden, the Ukraine, annexation of Crimea, nuclear cheating, and now with Syria-and short lived designed to fail cease fires. In short, hawkish, neo-con Hillary Clinton is on a personal mission to topple Putin and bring down Assad; and that makes her, as I've said, extremely, recklessly dangerous.
 
 
 
The reality is this: Bashar Assad is here to stay. Both Putin and Iran are hell-bent on keeping Assad, their strategic ally and partner, in power and obliterating the rebels aligned against him-that's non-negotiable. And if that means turning Aleppo or other Syrian cities into rubble (and killing thousands more civilians on top of the 500,000 already savagely killed) then so be it. Donald Trump accepts this reality, Hillary clearly does not. Trump wants to de-escalate tensions with Russia,  make peace with Syria, bring order and stability back to the country and stop the refugee crisis.  Hillary, on the other hand, is betting that she can beat Putin in a showdown over an aerial blockade of Syrian airspace like JFK bested Khrushchev with a naval blockade of Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis; and that she could bring down both Putin and Assad-as Kennedy brought down Khrushchev.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hillary Clinton must not be President. Like neo-con war hawks George Bush, Bill Kristol, John McCain and Lindsey Graham she is clearly too interventionist, dangerous and insane. The new cold war she started with Russia as Secretary of State would likely, if she were President, turn into a devastating hot war. As Green Party candidate     Jill Stein warns: 'Hillary's militant hostility toward Putin, fixation on a Syrian NFZ and willingness to chance nuclear war makes her unfit for the Presidency.'
 
 
 
 

TRUMP AND PENCE FOR PEACE

RELATED    

THE COMING COLLISION OF AMERICA AND RUSSIA?

THE TERRIBLE SIGN OVER NORWAY OF US/RUSSIAN CONFLICT BEFORE OBAMA RECEIVED PEACE PRIZE

 
 
 

 US/RUSSIA REACH DEAL ON UKRAINE ON BAY OF PIGS’ ANNIVERSARY 

 

THE FINAL PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE: AN AUSPICIOUS DAY FOR DONALD TRUMP? (UPDATES)

 

 
This past Sunday October 16th was the beginning of the 16th and final month of Donald Trump's 2016 volcanic campaign to achieve the impossible and win 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. As I've written before the most gravity defying, politically incorrect, unconventional presidential campaign in US history which started on June 16, 2015 (with illegal immigration and border security as key issues) began 16 days after Ann Coulter's terrific book "Adios America" was published, and 16 days before the shooting of Kate Steinlie in San Fransisco by a criminal Mexican alien. Amazingly. this brazen, in your face non-politician who first showed a real interest in running for president 16 years ago* went on (against staggering odds) to defeat 16 mostly professional political rivals for the GOP nomination. And victory virtually came on April 26th (the 16th week and 116th day of the year, seewhen Donald Trump swept five northeastern primary states. Amazingly, April 26th was also the 316th day of Trump's campaign (see).  
 
* In 2000 Trump started and quickly ended a campaign for the presidential nomination of the Reform Party (see). 
  
As I wrote HERE, HERE and HERE the number 16 throughout Trump's campaign has uncannily and almost consistently been auspicious for him. And on Sunday October 16th the Trump campaign, perhaps auspiciously, entered its 16th and final month (see). And today the day of the third and final presidential debate, the signs are looking outstanding for The Donald. 
 
Indeed, in addition to being in the 16th month of Trump's campaign, today Wednesday October 19th is the 4th day of the week, and the 4th day of the 16th month of the Trump campaign (see); 16, a square number, has 4 for its root (4x4=16); and 19, the number of this politically important October day, is the number of the next Republican President (from Lincoln to Bush there's been 18 to date).
 
It is also fascinating to note that on June 14, 2016 Donald Trump celebrated his 70th birthday; and today October 19th Trump is in the 128th day of his 70th year (see). This too seems significant in that 128 is a multiple of 16 8x. Also seeming significant is that 70 year old Trump is in the 70th week of his campaign (see) and in the 3670th week of his earthly life (see).  
 
This certainly looks like a radically lucky day for Donald Trump; more so than September 26th and October 9th the dates of the last two debates; and if it's as good as this amazing pattern of numbers suggests then 21 days from now (a multiple of 7 3x or 7+7+7, see) Donald Trump will be elected president; and 73 days later (see) on the 70th year, 7th month and 7th day of Trump's incredible life, he will be sworn in as the 45th President of the United States (see).
 
 
 
 
POSTSCRIPT
 
THE THOMAS & MACK CENTER
 
 
 
According to Wikipedia the Thomas & Mack Center of the University of Nevada, which will hold tonight's debate, was opened on the 16th day of December 1983. And as the debate is for the 45 Presidency of the United States oddly the address of the university is 4505 S. Maryland Parkway (see).
 
Moreover  Wikipedia also says that the city of Las Vegas was founded on May 15, 1905, and incorporated the 16th day of March 1911 (see); and that the state of Nevada entered the union in the 64th year of the 19th century. That's "64" as in 16x4 = 64. 
 
And lastly, it is fascinating to note that when the Thomas & Mack Center was first opened Donald Trump was in the 450th month of his life, which is exactly 13,700 days (see). You can't make this stuff up.
 
 
UPDATE
 
CNN AND LUNTZ FOCUS GROUPS DECLARE TRUMP WINNER OF DEBATE. AOL FLASH POLL HAS TRUMP CRUSHING CLINTON BY 15 POINTS. SUPER ACCURATE IBD POLL HAS TRUMP UP BY 1.  PROFESSOR NORPOTH DOUBLES DOWN ON TRUMP WIN.
 
 
 
 
 
ACCORDING TO NATE SILVER IBD WAS THE NATION'S MOST ACCURATE POLLSTER OF 2012 (SEE)
 
 
 
 
 
View image on Twitter
ripped off from infowars
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 

COULD THE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION AT THE WELLS FARGO CENTER PREFIGURE HILLARY’S DEFEAT DUE TO SCANDALS?

 
 
 
 
 
 
Several weeks ago I noted the irony of the corrupt, lawless Democratic Party holding their national convention to nominate the profoundly corrupt, crooked, establishment insider Hillary Clinton at a facility owned by Wells Fargo-which has since been rocked by a phony credit card accounts scandal. But could it be that the Democrat convention held at the Wells Fargo Center (WFC) is ominous of a major scandal about to rock the party and their scandal plagued nominee? Will Fate intervene in the closing weeks of the campaign with a severely damaging surprise (from Wikileaks, Hillary's email server, the Clinton Foundation or elsewhere) that will greatly damage or deal a death blow to the Clinton campaign? There are rumors flying about of a sexual bombshell about to drop on the Clintons more devastating than Trump's sex tape or groping allegations (see and see). Will this materialize just before or after Wednesday's final debate? Or will the bombshell (if it comes) be something quite unexpected?
 
 
 
Or could it be that on November 8th the lawless, corrupt Democrats will win a close election by voter fraud in one or several key battle ground states? As in 2000  will the outcome hinge on a single state that the Democrats will narrowly win by stuffing ballot boxes, using dead voters or some other criminal dirty tricks? If that should happen no way Donald Trump will bite the bullet and concede defeat like Nixon did in 1960 when the Kennedys, using the mob and crooked politicians, stole the election from him by winning Illinois and Texas (see). Trump has already warned that he'll fight like hell to the bitter end if the Democrats dare screw him; and we will have 2000 post-election chaos all over again. Is this what lies ahead?
 
THE 2000 GOP CONVENTION
 
 
 
What we do know, however, is this: 16 years ago when Florida decided the outcome of the 2000 race in favor of Bush over Gore the Republicans held their convention in Philadelphia as did the Democrats this year. In fact, they held it at the First Union Center owned by now defunct First Union Bank. Now here is where it gets truly fascinating. In 2001 First Union consummated a merger with Wachovia Bank; and in 2003 the First Union Center was renamed the Wachovia Center. Then in December 2008 guess who acquired Wachovia? WELLS FARGO (see).  And in 2010 the Wachovia Center was renamed WELLS FARGO CENTER.
 
 
In other words, in 2000 the year Republicans won the presidency in the closest race in US history (that went all the way to the Supreme Court) they held their convention in the exact same building and location the Democats held their's in July. The only difference is that First Union Bank, unlike Wells Fargo today, wasn't involved in a post-convention scandal. In fact, there was nothing illegal or scandalous about George Bush beating Gore; for this was done fair and square as even the pro-Gore Washington Post grudgingly admits (see).  
 
NUMERICAL COINCIDENCES
 
What's at stake on November 8th is the 45th Presidency of the United States. On September 8th Wells Fargo went public with its fake accounts scandal (see) causing its CEO to quit five weeks later. Now take a look at this: the Democrats started their convention at WFC on July 25th (see). From July 25th to September 8th is exactly 45 days (see). Could this be a sign that a scandal is in the works that will wreck Hillary Clinton's run for the 45th presidency? Amazingly, from the launch of Trump's incredible, gravity defying campaign on June 16, 2015 to the breaking of the Wells Fargo scandal on September 8th is exactly 450 days, a multiple of 45 10x (see). Is this an auspicious sign for the scandal damaged Trump that a greater scandal will rescue him and help him to the presidency?
 
Moreover, this is the 2016 race. From the launch of Hillary's presidential campaign on April 12, 2015 (the 70th anniversary of FDR's death) to September 8th is 1 year, 4 months and 28 days. That equals 16 months or 516 days     (see). Again is this a sign that the Wells Fargo scandal prophetically anticipates a campaign destroying scandal ahead for crooked, lying Hillary and the Corruptocratic Dems?
 
Or could it be that the damage has already been done? That Bill Clinton's past sexual scandals, Benghazi, the email server scandal, revelations from Wikileaks and elsewhere about the Clinton Foundation, Democratic dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders and the Trump campaign, and lie after lie after nauseating lie has taken its toll on Hillary and doomed her to defeat? We can only hope so.
 
Clinton blames James Comey for her loss; meaning that it was ultimately the self-caused email server scandal       (stemming from the Benghazi investigation) and lie after lie after lie that brought her down. 
 
Now, dear reader, do you see how amazingly ominous it was for the Dems to hold their convention in the Wells Fargo Center? BTW, the CEO of Wells Fargo who resigned due to the credit card accounts scandal was John Stumpf,   a name that strangely sounds like D. John Trump (see). Ain't that a kick in the head.
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

DONALD TRUMP AND THE RAPING OF AMERICA BY WASHINGTON, WALL STREET AND HILLARY’S GLOBAL ELITES

 
 
 
WITH THE WORLD GLEEFULLY RAPING AMERICA TO DEATH,
 
raiding our wealth, stealing our jobs and grabbing Lady Liberty by the crotch we need a patriotic leader with the will power, stamina and strength to take our country back and make it great again; to take on the criminally corrupt Washington-Wall Street-Media-Global Establishment and 1% special interests: those who rig economies and world markets to enrich themselves at everyone else's expense; the self-serving politicians, banksters, CEOs and international financial gangsters who have plunged us  into massive, crushing, bankrupting debt; who are imperiling our future to build a new world order of crony capitalist-progressive-socialist dread.
 
 
You're for her? Which her?
 
But the leader we desperately need is not weak, corrupt, crooked, two-faced, pro-TPP Hillary-the elite status quo establishment insider who wrecked US foreign policy making the world a more dangerous place for freedom and democracy; who dreams of recklessly replacing America's sovereignty with a borderless, free trade, North America Accord-NAFTA on coke and steroids. The multitude of closed factories (70,000 since NAFTA was signed) and millions of lost, good paying jobs are not bad enough for Hillary; fancying herself a great world citizen (like Obama)   she's hell-bent on building a new international power structure where America is just one of many mediocre states $trillions poorer than it is today with a lower standard of living for everyone but her and her elitist friends.
 
 
 
Indeed, the collapse of US foreign policy is prelude to Hillary's catastrophic presidency. Just look at her record as secretary of state and shutter: after failing to reset US/Russian relations and moderate radical terrorist Iran, after failing to build a democratic post-Kaddafy Libya and a stable and peaceful Iraq, after midwifing ISIS and turning Benghazi into a 9/11 deathtrap how can we trust Hillary with our national security and economic future? How is she qualified for the presidency when her instincts and judgment have proved so destructively bad? With $19 trillion in debt, $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities, a $900 billion trade deficit this nation is being plundered, raped and pillaged by foreign powers and global elites at every turn-and Hillary's their creature (as Bernie Sanders said) as conclusively proved by Wikileaks.
 
 
America must be renewed and rebuilt from within by a strong patriotic country first American defying the elites. The government and taxes must be slashed so that innovation and business can thrive; illegal immigration must cease and our porous borders closed so that our people have more and better paying jobs; the mad, dollar killing, money printing by the Fed must end, and interest rates must rise to revitalize the bank accounts of millions of depositors; and our enemies must know that if they dare  and f*ck with us and cross the line they'll be severely punished or die. America needs an epically strong, larger than life, risk taking leader in these critically troubling times; in no other way can we save the middle class and reverse our precipitous national decline.
 
 
 
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
 
DONALD TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT
 
OUR FREEDOM, JOBS, SECURITY AND FUTURE DEPEND ON IT
 
 
 
  
RELATED 
 
 
 
 
 

TRUMP SPEAKS LEWD, OBAMA DOES LEWD: HYPOCRITICAL PRESIDENT CAUGHT FLASHING ERECTION TO FEMALE REPORTERS ON CNN TAPE

 
 
 
 
What has Donald Trump actually, provably done more sexist, vulgar, lewd, disgusting and obscene than this shocking, indecent, shameless, offensive, adolescent locker room act by hypocritical Michelle's bawdy husband?
 
OBAMA CAUGHT IN THE LEWD
 
 It wasn't until I saw this video that I understood why some were calling Obama  "O'Boner."  
 
Listen to the women laughing, giggling at energized Obama and telling the female reporter who is standing in the way to "sit down!" so they can see it better.  I wonder, are these same women giggling over Trump's tape of 11 years ago? Or have they suddenly turned prude and are shocked? 
 
AND THEN THERE'S OUR MORALLY
     UPRIGHT HYPOCRITE-IN-CHIEF SHOWING HIS RESPECT FOR WOMEN WITH THE "P" WORD:
 
 
 
AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST THERE'S THIS BIT OF     RANK HYPOCRISY BY THE OBAMAS
 
cuy7oxgumaaexwv-jpg-large
thanx Bare Naked Islam (see and see)
 
 
 
 
SHORT SWEET 
DISQUS DEBATES
 
 
This is much worse, Apollo.
 
Contestants in a Miss Teen USA beauty pageant told BuzzFeed News that Trump walked into their dressing room while they were undressed. Trump walked into the changing area when several of them were completely naked. Some of the girls were as young as 15 years old and said they were distressed at his presence, calling it shocking and creepy. www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2...
 
LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!
 
MY REPLY
 
You lose. Walking into a women's dressing room (assuming Trump did it) is rude, not lewd. But flouting an erection to female reporters is both rude and lewd.
 
BTW, if Obama were to suddenly do a Bruce Jenner and believes that he's female are you okay with him using women's restrooms?
 

 GOPocalypse writes

 

No one cares about the WORD. We care about the implication that it's okay to put your hands on a woman without her permission. That's called ASSAULT. Please do try to keep up, Apollo.

 

MY REPLY

 

What Trump said was in jest. Or didn't you hear the laughter? He also said on Howard Stern (a bawdy comedy show) that he was a "sexual predator." I bet you stupidly treated that as a serious admission about his behavior.

  
ON OBAMA USING "P" WORD
 
GOPocalypse writes

Also, he was reading a quote. Are you willfully this ignorant or is it genuine stupidity?

 

MY REPLY

 

Thanks for telling me what I knew. Wonder if there were any children in the audience? If he objected to using the term he would have said "blank," or politely said " the P word."

 

 

 

WHILE CLINTON-GORE BOMB OUT IN FLORIDA CLIMATE CHANGE MILLENNIALS RALLY TRUMP RALLY SOARS UP STATE

 

 

 

 
Clinton and Gore fraudulently blaming Hurricane Matthew, the drought in California, flooding in Norfolk, Virginia and other things on anthropogenic (man made) global warming. Gore also warned  that if they didn't help Hillary carry Florida 2016 could turn out like 2000.
 
Finally after years of estrangement Al Gore and the Clintons buried their differences (Gore blamed the Monica Lewinsky scandal for his loss in 2000) and the guru and leader of the climate change derangement movement for saving planet earth from harmless CO2 emissions hit the campaign trail and went to bat for Hillary. The great reunion took place at the Kendall Campus of Miami Dade College (in the wake of Hurricane Matthew) in the very state that cost Gore the election. The purpose of the rally was to garner support from millennials (who mostly dislike Hillary and are increasingly turning to Trump, see) by focusing on non-existent, catastrophic, doomsday global warming.
 
 A 2014 poll commissioned by the Clinton Global Initiative and Microsoft found that by a 76% to 24% margin millennials care more about environmental issues than their parents (see); and that 66% believe the earth is getting warmer (which it is) and that human activity is responsible for it (how much if any is disputable). Now with most millennials believing with Gore and Clinton in man made global warming, and enrollment at MDC totaling 165,000 students (see), the turnout for their climate change rally was expected to be awesome. But it was a dud. Reports vary that an embarrassing, disappointing 1600 people or less showed up (see); that's less than 1% of MDC's student population. Given all the pre-rally media publicity for the event the terrible turnout is astonishing.
 
 
Millennials may believe in man caused global warming, but apparently few, very few share the Gore-Obama-Clinton doomsday alarmist hysteria: that the massive ongoing use of fossil fuels (the cheapest, best, most efficient form of energy) overshadows the national debt and global terrorism as the greatest threat to our national security-and it's imperiling mankind's existence. In other words, millennials aren't buying into the sci-fi lie fantasy and hoax that every extreme weather event (like hurricane Matthew) propagated by Gore, Obama, Clinton and other psyched out fanatics  is caused or influenced by driving your car, smoking a cigar or farting. 
 
 
 
Meanwhile, that same Tuesday at the other end of the state, battling, odds defying Donald Trump-who regards (and rightly so) catastrophic man-caused climate change as a leftist lie and hoax-held a massive rally of 20,000 plus cheering Floridians in Panama City ripping into sick, low energy (she could use some petro) Hillary. It was the largest political rally in that city's history, and included thousands of millennials who Trump (as I said) is increasingly winning over (see). Undoubtedly, if denialist Trump had held the rally where Clinton and Gore appeared he would have drawn the huge crowd that they were expecting. Perhaps Trump should go there to show just how weak and unlikable Hillary is in the area.
 
 
 
Indeed, before the flop of her rally in Kendall Team Clinton was in a panic over Florida. Despite millions spent on anti-Trump commercials their internal polling is apparently showing that voter enthusiasm for Hillary isn't there (especially with minorities, see); and that unless that changes they could lose the state. After Tuesday's debacle with millennials their panic must now be manic.
 
POSTSCRIPT
 
PANAMA CITY AND BAY COUNTY VS. KENDALL AND MIAMI DADE COUNTY
 
This population data is amazing. At his rally in Panama City Trump drew in excess of 20,000 supporters. Panama City, located in Bay County, has a population 36,000 (see), while Bay totals 168,000 (see). In other words, the 20,000 plus at Trump's rally was 6/10ths of Panama City's population, and a little less than 1/8th of Bay's population.
 
At their failed rally in Kendall Clinton and Gore drew at most 1600 supporters. Kendall, located in Miami Dade County, has a population of 75,000 (see), while Dade Miami totals 2.7 million (see). Not since Michael Dukakis have Democrats had a weaker candidate.
 
 
UPDATE
(Oct. 15)
 
NOW IT'S TIM KAINE'S TURN TO BOMB OUT IN MIAMI
 
 
 
 
 Some said that counted among the 50 attendees were Kaine's SS agents.
 
UPDATE
(Oct. 25)
 
Not to be outdone Tim Kaine's next Florida rally draws a butt kicking 30.
 
 
 
 
UPDATE
(Oct. 26)
 
Not surprisingly Trump is now reported to top Clinton in Florida.
 
 
 
 
 
hillary-trump-tampaTrump got 20,000 supporters out… Hillary 10x less.
 
 UPDATE
(11-9) 
 
Gore predicted that yesterday's election could turn out like 2000. And it did. Hillary like Gore took the popular vote, and Trump like Bush won the electoral vote.
 
AMAZING!
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

BRITISH FEMALE TV PERSONALITY SAYS : I’D RATHER BE GRABBED BY THE PUSSY THAN BE GOVERNED BY A PUSSY (POSTSCRIPT: MAJOR BLOW TO SEX TAPE PLOT)

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
It makes a lot of sense. Many, many, many times worse than what Trump jokingly said doing to a woman in a private locker room chat is being governed by a weak, physically sick pussy of a woman who as the feckless US Secretary of State made the world a deadlier and more dangerous place. Who together with her lead-from-behind, ass kissing, pussy hearted boss were the greatest enablers of post-Soviet Russian power and the terrorist state of Iran since the fall of the Soviet Union and the shah's reign. What is the sordid thought of a liberal Democrat 11 years ago to a world in chaos and turmoil worsening by the day as America declines economically (with low growth and ballooning debt), militarily (with a shrinking army, air force and navy) and geo-politically (with diminishing influence on world events). America the Great is falling; and a fourth term of much worse than Jimmy Carter (after Barack Obama) would be a national disaster and disgrace. 
 
 
 
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN LIKE REAGAN DID IN THE 80S
 
DEPUSSIFY THE WHITE HOUSE
 
DONALD TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT
 
STOP CHINA, RUSSIA, MEXICO AND IRAN
 
FROM KICKING LADY LIBERTY'S ASS
 
 
 POSTSCRIPT
 
MAJOR BLOW TO THE SEX TAPE PLOT!
 
THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF REPUBLICAN WOMEN ENDORSE DONALD TRUMP 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 

DONALD TRUMP: THE “COMEBACK KING” OF THE CLINTON ERA REVERSES HIS FORTUNES AGAINST THE CLINTON MACHINE?

 
 
 
 
 
 
It looks like what happened decades ago to Donald Trump is possibly happening again: the "Comeback King" of the 1990s who reversed his business fortunes from near complete collapse started at last night's debate the reversing his political fortunes after the worst two weeks of his gravity defying campaign. And irony of ironies just as the great reversal of Trump's crashing business took place during the Clinton years the reversal of his campaign against the Clintons is occurring a week after the New York Times (who dubbed him the "Come Back King") illegally published his tax returns from his failing business in the Clinton 90s. You can't make this stuff up.
 
 donald-trump-95-2 Moreover, Trump's political rebound after two ugly weeks occurred at George Washington University in St. Louis. Incredibly, the very first presidential debate held there was in 1992 when Bill Clinton, called the "Come Back Kid," ran for and won the presidency-achieving this despite damaging allegations of infidelity and sexual impropriety. Indeed, it seems that in an odd crazy way Donald Trump (who defeated George H. W. Bush's son Jeb in the primaries), is following in Bill Clinton's footsteps-as he defeated the elder Bush for the presidency.
 

 
 
Clearly the acrimonius second Trump-Clinton debate was the greatest, most memorable comeback of any candidate since Ronald Reagan's second debate with Walter Mondale 32 years ago. Afterwards, Reagan went on to defeat Mondale and his running mate New York Congresswoman Geraldine Ferraro-first female vice presidential candidate of a major party. 
 
And then there were the stage optics and aftermath which were terrible for Hillary; for it revealed (no surprise to many of us) just how unwell she is and physically unfit for the presidency. 
 
TRUMP'S STAMINA VS, HILLARY'S
 
 
 
Donald Trump stood firm last night like a strong, tall, unshakable oak for the duration of the debate-a tower of strength amidst a crumbling world-overshadowing sick, weak, low energy Hillary who spoke and sat, spoke and sat, spoke and sat through out the night to rest and recuperate from the thrashing she took. Good thing for her that the room temperature was under 77 as she might have fainted from the extreme heat like she did on 9/11.
 
You will notice in the clip that a badly weakened Hillary got in on the other side of the car away from the cameras, so we couldn't see what? The SS agents loading her in?
 
But her failure to compete on stage with Trump in the stamina contest wasn't the worst of it. Afterwards, as she was leaving the building, a depleted, shaken, beaten Hillary reeling from Trump's assault was unable to walk unaided on her own. Fearing she might fall Hillary was supported by her sick, frail husband as they walked down the hall and stairs leading to thier vehicle. Lucky for Hillary that she could sit during the debate. For the medical event that I wrongly predicted would happen in the first debate would certainly have happened last night.
 
 
 

 

ALEC BALDWIN VS. DONALD TRUMP ON THEIR DAUGHTERS’ ASSES, AND ASS KISSING OBAMA BOWING TO MISOGYNISTS

 

 
 
 
WHICH IS WORSE?
 
Liberal Democrat wild man Alec Baldwin violently lashing out at his 12 year old daughter on a phone message that she's a "rude little brainless pig" who needed to have her "ass straightened out"?
 
 
 
 
Or then liberal Democrat Donald Trump jokingly telling Howard Stern that his beautiful daughter Ivanka was "a piece of ass"?
 
 

 

AND THEN THERE'S OBAMA'S STAGGERING,    HYPOCRITICAL, ASS-KISSING OF MISOGYNISTS 

 

His shamelessly bowing to the sexist king of Saudi Arabia who rules over one of the most misogynistic and oppressive regimes on earth. 

 

 

His releasing to oppressive, radical, misogynistic Iran $150 billion as part of a worthless nuke deal.

 
 

And his bromance with vile, violent, disgusting, America hating, misogynist (women are "bitches," "pussies" and "whores") rapper Jay-Z. His music which serially degrades and objectifies women is a roadmap to racism, sexism and mayhem that has corrupted and ruined tens and thousands (a conservative estimate) of young lives.

But 11 years ago when liberal Democrat Donald Trump jokingly spoke demeaningly of a woman in private it's now the unforgivable sin of the century, and makes him unfit for the presidency.

POSTSCRIPT

THE VIEW

 
 

In 2006 Donald Trump appearing with daughter Ivanka on The View said jokingly that if he weren't Ivanka's dad he would date her. Neither the show's hosts nor its audience of millions objected to Trump's remark. It was said in jest  and was taken as such as everyone laughed and had a good time . 

But just three months after Trump launched his historic campaign his joke of nine years before was pounced on by the media as being lewd, sexist and incestuous. "He wanted to bang his daughter!" bellowed Alex Griswold of Mediaite. If Ivanka and her dad went on The View today and he had joked like that Woopi  and Joy would fake outrage and all hell would break loose on the show and across the media. The hypocrisy, as I said, is staggering.

CLASSY BJ BILL VS. HYPOCRITICAL CRASSY GUY TALK TRUMP (SARCASM)

CLASS

CRASS

 

 

 Keep in mind that in 2005 when Trump made those lewd remarks he was a liberal Democrat ("a liberal's liberal")-and friends of Bill and Hillary who, that same year, attended his wedding and showered him with gifts.

 

WHEN BILL CLINTON GOT BJS IN THE WHITE HOUSE FROM MONICA

he did it with charm, elegance and presidential class. But this crass, locker room, guy talk from Trump is beneath contempt.

HILLARY CLINTON 2016!

MAKE THE WHITE HOUSE

AN OPEN FLY ZONE 

AGAIN!

 

 
read more …
 

HYPOCRITICAL TRUMP  

Trump excoriates Hillary for being an all talk no action Washington/Wall Street political insider.  But Bill has actually groped women, Trump hasn't. And until that changes he's an all talk no action hypocrite.

 

 
Trump to Hillary:
 
My wife is my only lover. Who's yours?
 
Hillary to Trump:
 
Bill!
 
Trump to Hillary:
 
Liar! Bill is so sick, frail and wasted that sex with you would kill him.
 
 
 
Was it Bill's sexual excesses (continuing beyond his presidency)      that hurt his heart, ruined his health and aged him beyond his years? 
 
 
REMEMBER THIS?
 
 
It caused a firestorm of sexism charges that quickly died 
 out.
 
 
 

IS HURRICANE MATTHEW A GLOBAL WARMING CAUSED WEATHER EVENT?

 

Media Should Not Forget About Climate Change In Coverage Of Hurricane Matthew-MediaMatters

 

 

I live in the great, beautiful Sunshine State of Florida the most hurricane prone state in the Union. And back in 2005 in the wake of hurricane Wilma (a Category 5 that blew the roof off my vacated house in Ft. Lauderdale) screwball, doomsday, alarmists like Al Gore warned that it was a sign of much, much worse to come. They warned that if we failed to quickly and drastically cut the use of fossil fuels and CO2 emissions and aggressively move toward a green energy (low-carbon) future that by 2012 much of Florida would suffer terrible, unprecedented devastation; that hurricane after deadly hurricane (3s 4s and 5s) would slam us year after year until Florida became the Shambles State. Indeed, these alarmists urged Floridians like me to leave the state or risk the worst from catastrophic, man caused, climate change (AGW).
 
 
 
 
But together with other failed hysterical predictions like snowless northern winters, iceless Arctic summers and rising sea levels badly flooding coastal cities like New York, a hurricane ravaged Florida never materialize-leaving Gore and his ilk looking like a bunch of wolf crying fools. In fact, in the 165 years since scientists first started measuring and categorizing these storms (see chart below) 11 years without a deadly hurricane set a record both for Florida and the continental US; and as this record was completely out of line with climate computer models, and the theory of a catastrophically man-caused warming planet it was with great amusement that I read the following bit of pseudo-scientific left-wing propaganda about Matthew and the media in Media Matters:
 
"When record-breaking rainfall and flooding struck Louisiana in August, major newspapers like The New York Times and The Washington Post addressed how the devastation was in line with the predicted impacts of a warming planet, but the major TV networks’ nightly newscasts did not. As CNN senior media correspondent Brian Stelter notedat the time, it’s essential for media to explain that extreme weather events “are happening more often due to climate change and are more extreme due to climate change,” particularly in the “early stages” of covering a weather disaster.
 
Time will tell if the major television networks cover the relationship between climate change and Hurricane Matthew, but the scientific evidence is clear."
 
Scientific evidence that Matthew is caused by climate change is what? "Clear"? Really? For whom and on what planet? Truth is there's no scientific proof or certainty that Matthew's existence or intensity, or the existence or strength of any extreme weather event, is influenced by human CO2 emissions. It's mere speculation and impossible to prove. Indeed, if it were 1816 there's no reason to doubt that Matthew would be every bit the Category 3 hurricane it is today. "Clarity"  here doesn't mean scientific certainty; it means ideological certainty: the utterly stupid notion that every hurricane from Category 1-5 would be 0-4 if we lived in a low-carbon or zero carbon world.
 
Moreover, going back 106 years to 1910 (when scientists say that human behavior not nature became the dominant factor in warming the earth, see) despite the fact that global temperatures have steadily but minisculally increased from then to now, the number of strong Matthew-like storms making landfall (contrary to what alarmists say) has actually decreased. Indeed, from 1910 to the present I count (including Matthew) 61 deadly Category 3 to 5 hurricanes that made land fall wrecking havoc on us. But of these monster storms 37 or 60% hit us before 1963 when global temps were cooler; while the remaining 24 or 40% hit us since when global temps were warmer. As the last 58 years have been warmer than the preceding 58 how could there be a 20% reduction in high category hurricane events if warmer temps should multiply them? From the alarmist viewpoint it doesn't make sense; and because of that they ignore the fact of increased warmth and fewer hurricanes thinking that more carbon emissions will eventually change that and give them the destruction they foresee
  
Be that as it may, as you will see from the chronological hurricane chart below Media Matters has it all wrong. Their correlation between AGW and the frequency of bad hurricane events hitting the US mainland is completely and demonstrably false. A made up political lie or "HOAX" as Donald Trump would say.
 
But Gore and the alarmists are undeterred. After making fools of themselves over Wilma they're repeating their folly with Matthew saying that we've been lucky these last 11 years; and that Matthew is an unmistakable sign that Category 3s, 4s and 5s will be coming thick and fast to punish Florida and the U.S.   
 
 

Chronological List of All Hurricanes which Affected the Continental United States: 1851-2004.

YearMonthStates Affected and Category by StatesHighest Saffir-Simpson U.S. CategoryCentral Pressure (mb)Max. Winds (kt)Name
1851JunTX, C11977 mb80-----
1851AugFL, NW3; GA, 13960100“Great Middle Florida”
1852AugFL, SW1197780-----
1852AugAL, 3; MS, 3; LA, 2; FL, NW13961100“Great Mobile”
1852SepFL, SW1198570-----
1852OctFL, NW2; GA, 1296990“Middle Florida”
1853Oct *GA, 1196570-----
1854JunTX, S1198570-----
1854SepGA, 3; SC, 2; FL, NE13950100“Great Carolina”
1854SepTX, C2296990“Matagorda”
1855SepLA, 3; MS, 33950110“Middle Gulf Shore”
1856AugLA, 44934130“Last Island”
1856AugFL, NW2; AL, 1; GA, 1296990“Southeastern States”
1857Sep &NC, 1196180-----
1858SepNY, 1; CT, 1; RI, 1; MA, 1197680“New England”
1859SepAL, 1; FL, NW1198570-----
1860AugLA, 3; MS, 3; AL, 23950110-----
1860SepLA, 2; MS, 2; AL, 1296990-----
1860OctLA, 2296990-----
1861Aug *FL, SW1197070“Key West”
1861SepNC, 1198570“Equinoctial”
1861NovNC, 1198570“Expedition”
1865SepLA, 2; TX, N1296990“Sabine River-Lake Calcasieu”
1865OctFL, SW2; FL, SE1296990-----
1866JulTX, C2296990-----
1867JunSC, 1198570-----
1867OctLA, 2; TX, S1, N1; FL, NW1296990“Galveston”
1869AugTX, C2296990“Lower Texas Coast”
1869SepLA, 1198570-----
1869SepRI, 3; MA, 3; NY, 1; CT, 13963100“Eastern New England”
1869Oct &ME, 2; MA, 1296590“Saxby’s Gale”
1870JulAL, 1198570“Mobile”
1870Oct *FL, SW1, SE1197070“Twin Key West (I)”
1870OctFL, SW1197780“Twin Key West (II)”
1871AugFL, SE3, NE1, NW13955100-----
1871AugFL, SE2, NE1296590-----
1871SepFL, NW1198570-----
1873SepFL, NW1198570-----
1873OctFL, SW3, SE2, NE13959100-----
1874SepFL, NW1; SC, 1; NC, 1198570-----
1875SepTX, C3, S23960100-----
1876SepNC, 1; VA, 1198080-----
1876OctFL, SW2, SE1297390-----
1877SepLA, 1; FL, NW1198570-----
1877OctFL, NW3; GA, 13960100-----
1878SepFL, SW2, NE1; SC, 1; GA, 1297090-----
1878OctNC, 2; VA, 1; MD, 1; DE, 1; NJ, 1; PA, 1296390-----
1879AugNC, 3; VA, 23971100-----
1879AugTX, N2; LA, 2296490-----
1879SepLA, 33950110-----
1880Aug #TX, S33931110-----
1880AugFL, SE2, NE1, NW1297290-----
1880SepNC, 1198770-----
1880OctFL, NW1198570-----
1881AugGA, 2; SC, 1297090-----
1881SepNC, 2297590-----
1882SepFL, NW3; AL, 13949100-----
1882SepLA, 2; TX, N1296990-----
1882OctFL, NW1198570-----
1883SepNC, 2; SC, 1296590-----
1885AugSC, 3; NC, 2; GA, 1; FL, NE13953100-----
1886JunTX, N2; LA, 2297385-----
1886JunFL, NW2; GA, 1297385-----
1886JunFL, NW2297385-----
1886JulFL, NW1198570-----
1886AugTX, C44925135“Indianola”
1886Sep #TX, S1, C1197380-----
1886OctLA, 3; TX, N23955105-----
1887JulFL, NW1198175-----
1887Aug *NC, 1194665-----
1887SepTX, S2297385-----
1887OctLA, 1198175-----
1888JunTX, C1198570-----
1888AugFL, SE3, SW1; LA23945110-----
1888Sep &MA, TSTS98555-----
1888OctFL, NW2, NE1297095-----
1889SepLA, 1198570-----
1891JulTX, C1, N1197780-----
1891AugFL, SE1198570-----
1893AugNY, 1; VA, 1198675“Midnight Storm”
1893AugGA, 3; SC, 3; NC, 1; FL, NE13954100“Sea Islands”
1893SepLA, 2297385-----
1893OctLA, 4; MS, 2; AL, 24948115“Chenier Caminanda”
1893OctSC, 3; NC, 2; VA, 13955105-----
1894SepFL, SW2, NE1; SC, 1; VA, 1297590-----
1894OctFL, NW3; GA, 1; NY, 1; RI, 13955105-----
1895Aug #TX, S1197365-----
1896JulFL, NW2297385-----
1896SepRI, 1; MA, 1198570-----
1896SepFL, NW3, NE3; GA, 2; SC, 1; NC, 1; VA, 13960110-----
1897SepLA, 1; TX, N1198175-----
1898AugFL, NW1198570-----
1898AugGA, 1; SC, 1198075-----
1898OctGA, 4; FL, NE24938115-----
1899AugFL, NW2297985-----
1899AugNC, 33945105-----
1899OctNC, 2; SC, 2295595-----
1900SepTX, N44936125“Galveston”
1901JulNC, 1198370-----
1901AugLA, 1; MS, 1; AL, 1197380-----
1903SepFL, SE1, NW1197680-----
1903SepNJ, 1; DE, 1199070-----
1904SepSC, 1198570-----
1904OctFL, SE1198570-----
1906JunFL, SW1, SE1197975-----
1906SepSC, 1; NC, 1197780-----
1906SepMS, 2; AL, 2; FL, NW2; LA, 1295895-----
1906OctFL, SW3, SE33953105-----
1908May &NC, TSTS98955-----
1908JulNC, 1198570-----
1909JunTX, S2297285-----
1909JulTX, N33959100“Velasco”
1909Aug #TX, S1195565-----
1909SepLA, 3; MS, 23952105“Grand Isle”
1909OctFL, SW3, SE33957100-----
1910SepTX, S2296595-----
1910OctFL, SW2295595-----
1911AugFL, NW1; AL,1198570-----
1911AugSC, 2; GA, 1297285-----
1912SepAL, 1; FL, NW1198865-----
1912OctTX, S2297385-----
1913JunTX, S1198865-----
1913SepNC, 1197675-----
1913OctSC, 1198965-----
1915AugTX, N44945----“Galveston”
1915SepFL, NW11988---------
1915SepLA, 44931----“New Orleans”
1916JulMS, 3; AL, 33948---------
1916JulMA, 11--------------
1916JulSC, 11980---------
1916AugTX, S33948---------
1916OctAL, 2; FL, NW22972---------
1916NovFL, SW11--------------
1917SepFL, NW33958---------
1918AugLA, 33955---------
1919SepFL, SW4; TX, S44927---------
1920SepLA, 22975---------
1920SepNC, 11--------------
1921JunTX, C22979---------
1921OctFL, SW3, NE23952----“Tampa Bay”
1923OctLA, 11985---------
1924SepFL, NW11985---------
1924OctFL, SW11980---------
1925No-DeFL, SW11--------------
1926JulFL, NE22967---------
1926AugLA, 33955---------
1926SepFL, SE4, SW3, NW3; AL, 34935----“Great Miami”
1928AugFL, SE22--------------
1928SepFL, SE4, NE2; GA, 1; SC, 14929----“Lake Okeechobee”
1929JunTX, C11982---------
1929SepFL, SE3, NW23948---------
1932AugTX, N44941----“Freeport”
1932SepAL, 11979---------
1933AugTX, S2; FL, SE12975---------
1933AugNC, 2; VA, 22971---------
1933SepTX, S33949---------
1933SepFL, SE33948---------
1933SepNC, 33957---------
1934JunLA, 33962---------
1934JulTX, S22975---------
1935SepFL, SW5, NW25892----“Labor Day”
1935NovFL, SE22973---------
1936JunTX, S11987---------
1936JulFL, NW33964---------
1936SepNC, 22--------------
1938AugLA, 11985---------
1938SepNY, 3; CT, 3; RI, 3; MA, 33946----“New England”
1939AugFL, SE1, NW11985---------
1940AugTX, N2; LA, 22972---------
1940AugGA, 2; SC, 22970---------
1941SepTX, N33958---------
1941OctFL, SE2, SW2, NW22975---------
1942AugTX, N11992---------
1942AugTX, C33950---------
1943JulTX, N22969---------
1944AugNC, 11990---------
1944SepNC, 3; VA, 3; NY, 3; CT, 3; RI, 3; MA, 23947---------
1944OctFL, SW3, NE23962---------
1945JunFL, NW11985---------
1945AugTX, C22967---------
1945SepFL, SE33951---------
1946OctFL, SW11980---------
1947AugTX, N11992---------
1947SepFL, SE4, SW2; MS, 3; LA, 34940---------
1947OctGA, 2; SC, 2; FL, SE12974---------
1948SepLA, 11987---------
1948SepFL, SW3, SE23963---------
1948OctFL, SE22975---------
1949Aug *NC, 11980---------
1949AugFL, SE33954---------
1949OctTX, N22972---------
1950AugAL, 11980----Baker
1950SepFL, NW33958----Easy
1950OctFL, SE33955----King
1952AugSC, 11985----Able
1953AugNC, 11987----Barbara
1953SepME, 11---------Carol
1953SepFL, NW11985----Florence
1954AugNY, 3; CT, 3; RI, 3; NC, 23960----Carol
1954SepMA, 3; ME, 13954----Edna
1954OctSC, 4; NC, 4; MD, 24938----Hazel
1955AugNC, 3; VA, 13962----Connie
1955AugNC, 11987----Diane
1955SepNC, 33960----Ione
1956SepLA, 2; FL, NW12975----Flossy
1957JunTX, N4; LA, 44945----Audrey
1959JulSC, 11993----Cindy
1959JulTX, N11984----Debra
1959SepSC, 33950----Gracie
1960SepFL, SW4; NC, 3; NY, 3; FL, NE2, CT, 2;4930----Donna
1960SepMS, 11981----Ethel
1961SepTX, C44931----Carla
1963SepTX, N11996----Cindy
1964AugFL, SE22968----Cleo
1964SepFL, NE22966----Dora
1964OctLA, 33950----Hilda
1964OctFL, SW2, SE22974----Isbell
1965SepFL, SE3; LA, 33948----Betsy
1966JunFL, NW22982----Alma
1966OctFL, SW11983----Inez
1967SepTX, S33950----Beulah
1968OctFL, NW2, NE12977----Gladys
1969AugLA, 5; MS, 55909----Camille
1969SepME, 11980----Gerda
1970AugTX, S33945----Celia
1971SepLA, 22978----Edith
1971SepTX, C11979----Fern
1971SepNC, 11995----Ginger
1972JunFL, NW1; NY, 1; CT, 11980----Agnes
1974SepLA, 33952----Carmen
1975SepFL, NW33955----Eloise
1976AugNY, 11980----Belle
1977SepLA, 11995----Babe
1979JulLA, 11986----Bob
1979SepFL, SE2, NE2; GA, 2; SC, 22970----David
1979SepAL, 3; MS, 33946----Frederic
1980AugTX, S33945100Allen
1983AugTX, N33962100Alicia
1984Sep *NC, 33949100Diana
1985JulSC, 11100265Bob
1985AugLA, 1198780Danny
1985SepAL, 3; MS, 3; FL, NW33959100Elena
1985SepNC, 3; NY,3; CT,2; NH,2; ME,1394290Gloria
1985OctLA, 1197175Juan
1985NovFL, NW2296785Kate
1986JunTX, N1199075Bonnie
1986AugNC, 1199065Charley
1987OctFL, SW1199365Floyd
1988SepLA, 1198470Florence
1989AugTX, N1198670Chantal
1989SepSC, 44934120Hugo
1989OctTX, N1198375Jerry
1991AugRI, 2; MA, 2; NY, 2; CT, 2296290Bob
1992AugFL, SE5, SW4; LA, 35922145Andrew
1993Aug *NC, 33960100Emily
1995AugFL, NW2, SE1297385Erin
1995OctFL, NW33942100Opal
1996JulNC, 2297490Bertha
1996SepNC, 33954100Fran
1997JulLA, 1; AL, 1198470Danny
1998AugNC, 2296495Bonnie
1998SepFL, NW1198770Earl
1998SepFL, SW2; MS, 2296490Georges
1999AugTX, S33951100Bret
1999SepNC, 2295690Floyd
1999OctFL, SW1198770Irene
2002OctLA, 1196380Lili
2003JulTX, C1197980Claudette
2003SepNC, 2; VA, 1295790Isabel
2004Aug *NC, 1197270Alex
2004AugFL, SW4, SE1, NE1; SC,1; NC,14941130Charley
2004AugSC, 1198565Gaston
2004SepFL, SE2, SW1296090Frances
2004SepAL, 3; FL, NW33946105Ivan
2004SepFL, SE3, SW1, NW13950105Jeanne

2005 Wilma

< p style="text-align: left;">2016 Matthew

CRAZY OBAMACARE AND CRAZIER SINGLE PAYER SOCIALIZED HEALTHCARE

 
If Obamacare as Bill Clinton said (and Chuck Schumer and Chelsea Clinton inferred, see) is the "craziest thing in the world" because it unfairly "doubles premiums while cutting coverage in half" then what does that say about Barack Obama who proudly and adamantly insists that it's a "win win for all Americans;" and his "greatest achievement [and gift to this country] as president"?
 
 
Hillary defends failed Obamacare against Bernie Sander's failed single payer.
 
And what does that say about Hillary Clinton and the Democrats who still support this "train wreck" despite the terrible financial costs to millions of struggling middle class folks? Is this how status quo, Washington insider Hillary cares about working class families? By wanting to stay the course and continue what's hurting them and their kids? Where's the "I feel your pain" compassion in this?
 
After Democrats were decimated in the 2014 election Senator Chuck Schumer (anticipating Bill Clinton) craps on Obamacare as being a huge political and economic mistake.  
 
And if Obamacare is "crazy" then what about SINGLE-PAYER (Medicare-for-All) healthcare and it's sad fate in socialist Bernie Sander's blue state of Vermont? If Obamacare is "crazy" because it "doubles premiums" (when Obama promised $2500 in savings) then even crazier is single-payer government-run, socalized healthcare which was killed in Vermont because of its insane, economy ruining costs: A DOUBLING OF STATE TAXES.
 
The full range of Obama's flat-out lies about his greatest gift to the American people.
 
If it's crazy to support Obamacare because of its crushing costs to the disappearing middle class then it's just as crazy to nationalize Vermont's failure and want financially unsustainable single-payer for 300 million Americans. Imagine the devastating impact to our economy from doubling national taxes to pay for this monstrosity? But don't take my word for it; just read what the Democrat governor of Vermont says about his failure; and then tell me with a straight face that you're sane, or rationally humane for wanting socialized medicine for America.
 
Gov. Peter Shumlin is pictured. | AP Photo
 Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin announcing the death of single payer.
 
 
 
 
 POSTSCRIPT
 
Let's not forget that foreshadowing the collapse of Obamacare was the virtual repeal and replacement of Romneycare (Obamacare's prototype) in Massachusetts.
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 

BOMBSHELL! “SMART” HILLARY LIKE “SMART” TRUMP USES $700,000 LOSS TO “GAME SYSTEM” AND AVOID PAYING “FAIR SHARE” OF TAXES

 
 
 
Thus giving the "Big October Trump Surprise" a very short, sweet lifespan.

 

 
Clinton told supporters at one rally last week, "He [Trump] actually bragged about gaming the system to get out of paying his fair share of taxes. In fact, I think there's a strong probability he hasn't paid federal taxes in a lot of years. If not paying taxes makes him smart, what does that make all the rest of us?"
 
Just when shameless, crooked, hypocritical Hillary Clinton thought she'd finally found the damning issue (paying no taxes) that would finally bury Donald Trump and win the presidency along comes a bombshell revelation from her own tax returns: like The Donald she didn't pay her full "FAIR SHARE" of taxes for last year. Turns out that in 2015 "SMART" Hillary Rodham Trump SMARTLY used a loss of $700,000 to SMARTLY avoid paying certain taxes (that only dummies pay). It was "SMART" Donald Trump on a much smaller scale smartly "GAMING THE SYSTEM" and using Trump's "scandalous, immoral, un-American" TAX AVOIDANCE "SCHEME" to get out of paying her "FAIR SHARE." And even worse, the pro-Clinton New York Times (doing a Donald on the IRS) paid zero taxes in 2014. The Left just can't catch a break.
 
 
In other words, if Hillary were as rich as Trump, and her losses last year were as great as his in 1995 ($916 million) she would have aggressively used the same deductions and provisions in the tax code to avoid paying federal taxes for 18 years (if that's what Trump did). In short, crooked, lying, hypocritical Hillary would have had no compunction about sending zero tax dollars "to troops, schools, vets and healthcare." But what she did do last year was short them all thousands of dollars-along with millions by her partner in hypocrisy the New York Times.
 
 
 
 
 
So much for shameless, lying, hypocritical Hillary being holier, more ethical and American than Trump (and better suited for the presidency) because she released her tax returns. Like Trump Hillary hired the best bean counters money could buy to legally lighten and minimize her tax load as much as possible. If it's not wrong for Hillary on a smaller scale how could it be wrong for anyone on any scale no matter the size? Trump and Hillary (and the New York Times) are joined to the hip on "gaming the system" and paying as little in taxes as the law allows. But the good news for Hillary is this: she has a bit more money to pay her doctors to stop her fainting spells and coughing fits.
 
 
RELATED 
 
 

CORRUPT CLINTONS’ HYPOCRISY ON TAX CUTS, DEDUCTIONS AND LOOPHOLES FOR THE RICH, AND GRANTING PARDON TO CRIMINAL BILLIONAIRE FUGITIVE TAX CHEAT MARC RICH

 

 
 
 
Bill Clinton golfing it up with Donald Trump and Mayor Giuliani on a Trump National Golf Course.
 
BILL CLINTON'S 1997 TAXPAYER RELIEF ACT BENEFITING RICH AMERICANS LIKE DONALD TRUMP
 
Clinton's law did the following for the rich:
 
  • Lowered the top capital gains tax rate from 28 percent to 20 percent. This has saved  the top 10% of Americans (who own 80% of the stock market) hundreds and billions in taxes over the years.
  • Phased in an increase in the estate tax exemption from $600,000 to $1 million. This has enabled millions of wealthy Americans over the years to avoid paying billions in estate taxes.
  • Established Roth IRAs and increased the income limits for deductible IRAs. This has enabled millions of wealthy Americans to reduce their tax liability and save billions.
  • The extension of some expiring business tax provisions that continued to save corporations billions.
 
 
 
 
 
BUT THE CORRUPTION AND HYPOCRISY WORSEN
 
 
 
 
 
BILL CLINTON'S PARDON OF CRIMINAL TAX CHEAT AND OIL PROFITEER MARK RICH, AND HILLARY'S LAUGHABLE HYPOCRISY IN DEMONIZING DONALD TRUMP'S LEGAL TAX AVOIDANCE PRACTICES.
 
One of Bill Clinton's most scandalous acts as President was granting a presidential pardon to indicted billionaire, tax cheat and wanted fugitive Marc Rich just before he left office. As Jimmy Carter said this was payback to Rich for his generous donations to Bill Clinton's presidential campaigns, Hillary's senatorial run,  the Clinton Library Foundation and Democrat Party.
 
 
New York senatorial candidate Hillary Clinton shamelessly posing with Marc Rich's ex-wife and campaign donor Denise Rich.
 
 
Though Bill Clinton apologized for the Rich pardon he and Hillary continue to hugely benefit from it with millions in donations from Rich's friends (above) and associates to the Clinton Foundation and Hillary's presidential runs.  
 
  
WHICH IS WORSE?
 
Donald Trump legally taking advantage of deductions and loop holes in the tax code to avoid paying unnecessary taxes (practiced by millions of Americans)? Or Bill Clinton's corrupt payback pardoning (with Hillary's approval) of a notorious, criminal tax cheat; and backing laws allowing millionaires and billionaires like Trump from paying their "fair share" of taxes?
 

BILL AND HILLARY SIMULTANEOUSLY ILL WHILE THOUSANDS OF MILES APART IN FLORIDA AND ISRAEL

 

 Above: a frail, hoarse, painful to watch Bill Clinton at Peres funeral-9/30
 
Below: a tired, old, miserable looking, hoarse Hillary coughing again in Florida-9/30
 
 
 
It was at the Wells Fargo Center in Philadelphia (owned by a bank that was seven weeks away from being hit by a massive fraud scandal*) that scandalous Bill Clinton at the DNC delivered the keynote address of the evening praising his lying, crooked, mendacious wife Hillary. Called "weird and shocking" by MSNBC's Rachel Madow the former president tried to humanize in the speech his inauthentic, robotic, globalist wife and ensure us she was honest and trustworthy and the real agent of reform and change in the race; but instead of reinventing his low energy wife Bill gave one of the dullest and deadest speeches of his life.
 
*Isn't it odd that the party of political corruption
(Corruptocratic Party) who nominated for president one of the most corrupt and crooked (Wall Street ownedpoliticians in US history should hold its convention in of all places a facility owned by Wells Fargo?
 
 
 
 
Afterwards pundits remarked how Clinton's hands and voice were shaking; that he was unusually frail looking lacking energy, passion and strength; that he wasn't the Bill Clinton of old but a shadow and shell of his former self old beyond his 69 years. Gone was the warm, upbeat, optimistic, amiable charmer with the gleam in his eye who could talk you into anything. Indeed, of all the major speeches delivered at the DNC Bill Clinton's (next to his wife's which put him to sleep) was the weakest, lest inspiring and worst.
 
 
 
But the Bill Clinton I saw then was a dynamo compared to what I saw yesterday at Mount Herzl cemetery in Israel at Shimon Peres's funeral. Sickly, worn out, hoarse, and bleak (and clearing his throat occasionally) Bill Clinton feebly struggling through his speech (sounding as if half dead with one foot in the grave) praised the dead Israeli leader. As you can see in the video above it is very painful and pitiful to watch.
 
 
But while a sick, old, tired, burnt out Bill was listlessly giving his ineffective speech an exhausted miserable looking Hillary thousands of miles away in Ft. Pierce, Florida was (wouldn't you know it) back in form having an allergy or flu or pneumonia caused (take your pick) coughing attack-which she quickly suppressed with a lozenge before it got out of hand.
 
Obviously both Clintons are wearing themselves down battling against Donald "The Wall" Trump who has them tied in key swing states while taking a small dip in national post-debate polls. Politico reports that the Clinton campaign is in panic mode in Florida because internal polling shows a lack of enthusiasm for Hillary with black and minority voters (see). Team Clinton fears they won't get out the minority vote and lose Florida and the election to Trump. Before embarking to Israel in fact Bill was campaigning himself sick in Northern Florida. You could see from the video that it's taking its toll. Trump is unwearied, having more energy and stamina than both.
 
 
 
 

HILLARY RODHAM HOOVER: THE ECONOMIC STUPIDITY OF DANGEROUS, DUMB HILLARY

 
Hillarynomics =  Hoover-depression-nomics
 
When it comes to reversing our worsening economy (now in its 15th straight month of GDP decline, see) my question to Hillary Clinton supporters is this: if this presidential race were between Donald Trump and Herbert Hoover who would you choose? Would any one of you be foolish enough to vote for hapless Herbert whose fiscal and economic policies turned a recession into the Great Depression (the worst, longest, most tragic economic crisis in US history)?
 
The common sense answer is that the vast majority of them would roll the dice and prefer the untested, inexperienced, unconventional, flawed billionaire over the experienced Hoover who historians correctly rank as one of the top ten worst presidents ever. So then my next question to these folks is this:  If you'd never vote for Hoover over Trump then why would you vote for Hillary over him? For a President Clinton's fiscal and economic policies would make her the Herbert Hoover of the 21st century. And that would spell disaster.
 
 
 
 
For Clinton's economic plan to reverse Obama's weakening, trickle growth, bad jobs recovery-now (as I mentioned above) in its fifth quarter (15th straight month) of GDP decline-by soaking the rich (the most productive members of society) and corporations (job creators) with huge tax hikes and more stifling, growth inhibiting, job killing regulations is exactly what Herbert Hoover did in the early 1930s to end the depression; and the results were catastrophic.
 
 
 
It was liberal, progressive, big government interventionist Herbert Hoover who once famously said, "The trouble with Capitalism are Capitalists." And before he left office he punished them with a massive tax hike.
 
In 1932 with a Federal deficit in the billions Hoover decided to raise taxes so he could have more money to fund his stimulative recovery programs-which included a vigorous public works program for construction projects. And to that end Hoover signed into law the largest peacetime tax increase in our nation's history (see). Aimed mostly at the "greedy, selfish, capitalist rich" Hoover's Revenue Act more than doubled their tax rates from 25% to 63%. Prior to this the only comparable tax hike was Woodrow Wilson's war tax (Hoover worked in his administration) which astronomically raised top marginal rates from 8% to 73%, and was a huge factor in crashing the economy after the war.
 
However, instead of ending the depression, as he had hopped, and putting Americans back to work Hoover's policies made things critically worse. Indeed, the following year when FDR took office unemployment smashed all previous records and hit a historic high (never surpassed) of 25%.  But in spite of his failures Hoover remained undaunted an unrepentant. Cock sure that he did all the right things and that he put the economy on the right track he believed that his efforts would eventually bear fruit, and the American people would prosper again. 
 
 
The only thing we have to fear is not taxing, spending and regulating enough.
 
Hoover's successor FDR however disagreed. 'Yes Hoover was right to try and tax, spend and regulate his way out of the depression,' FDR believed. But his problem was this: he didn't tax, spend and regulate enough. He was too weak, timid and restrained in his use of government power to revive the economy. So FDR doubled down on Hoover's New Deal with a super New Deal. FDR would spend baby spend and relentlessly experiment and experiment and experiment with new costly big government programs until he found the solution to defeat the depression. This was a war for FDR and he was its general leading the charge against big business, Wall Street and his own wealthy class who, he believed, were conspiring against him and hording their wealth and keeping the economy depressed. So under FDR taxes, spending and regulations went up. From Hoover's 63% top marginal tax rate on the rich FDR raised it another 16 points to a whopping 79%; he then doubled corporate taxes from 12% to 24%; and on top of that he added an "Excess Profits Tax" just to make sure that corporations didn't horde the wealth they made.
 
 
 
The New Deal brought some relief, and much reform; but the promised robust recovery never materialized.
 
 
What Roosevelt did was so radical and crazy that it even alarmed Herbert Hoover who thought he had gone too far. And indeed he did. In 1937 the recovery collapsed and the bottom fell out of the New Deal. October 1937 saw another  market crash followed by a "recession within the depression" where 2 million workers lost their jobs. In short, it was 1929 all over again. And year after year, experiment after experiment, the depression dragged on until after Pearl Harbor when FDR, a leader born for war, created the Industrial-Military Complex and put America back to work making arms.
 
 
 
But Hillary Clinton an ignoramus on economics like Hoover and FDR wants to return to their failed tax, spend interventionist policies as if somehow this time defying the laws of economic gravity there'll be a different outcome. It's called insanity. 
 
 
Bill Clinton began the greatest housing/credit bubble in American history-which burst under George Bush who continued Clinton's reckless sub prime mortgage policies.
 
But if this doesn't alarm you maybe this will: Hillary vows if elected she's going to put husband Bill "in charge of reviving the [Obama's bad] economy." Why is this alarming? After all didn't Bill Clinton preside over the booming 90s where the economy was doing so well that the public was willing to forgive his scandal with Monica Lewinsky? But one must be alarmed because the housing/credit crash of 2008 was rooted in Clinton's Affordable Housing Program. In fact, much of the great economic growth of the 90s was due to two things: 1. the high tech revolution (which started before Clinton took office); and 2. putting millions of low income folks into homes they could ill afford. This gave them an artificial short cut to the middle class creating a false wealth effect in the general economy. Indeed, to this day Bill Clinton brags about the 7.7 million he lifted out of poverty. But doesn't breathe a word on the economically and financially reckless and ruinous way it was done.  
 
As I wrote HERE 5/6ths of the devastating housing bubble that burst in 2008 was created under Clinton; 1/6th under Bush-who reluctantly continued Clinton's policies. But the point is this: if HIllary wins the presidency we will have a political husband and wife team stuck in the failed economic policies of the 1930s; and who created a financially reckless housing program in the 90s for low income folks that nearly plunged the economy into a depression-where millions of homeowners lost their homes.
 
With the economy so bad that Fed Chief Janet Yellen is refusing to raise interest rates who do you want in the White House?
 
THE CHOICE FOR 2016 IS CLEAR
 
 
 
 
DONALD TRUMP  VS. HILLARY RODHAM HOOVER 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
READ THIS SHORT HISTORY OF THE UTTER TOTAL DISASTER OF HERBERT HOOVER'S LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE ECONOMIC RECOVERY PROGRAM
 
 
 
 
 
 

KELLYANNE CONWAY AND HER PREDICTION THAT DONALD TRUMP’S TRIUMPH AT THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF FORUM PREFIGURES HIS VICTORY AT HOFSTRA AND WINNING THE PRESIDENCY

 

 

Several days ago Kellyanne Conway, Donald Trump's campaign manager, said in a CNN interview that her boss would win the first presidential debate in New York today and go on to defeat Hillary Clinton for the presidency; she said that prefiguring Trump's coming victory (at today's NBC debate) was his performance in New York on September 7th at NBC's Commander-in-Chief Forum. Indeed defying expectations that the more experienced and knowledgeable Hillary would best him Trump literally crushed her looking far more competent,
professional and presidential. Indeed, later in an NBC poll a whopping 63% verses 37% (a landslide 26 point spread) said that Trump was the more impressive of the two. And indeed he was.
 
View image on Twitter What begins badly often ends badly. Was Hillary's defeat at the CIC Forum prelude to tonight and November?
 
Not surprisingly the signs for that day were highly auspicious  for Donald Trump. For the next Commander-in-Chief will be the 45th in our nation's history. And on September 7th at the Forum when Trump was outperforming Hillary it was exactly 1 year, 2 months and 23 days from June 16, 2015, the memorable day Donald Trump launched his historic campaign. Amazingly 1 year, 2 months and 23 days translates significantly into 450 days-significant because 450 is a multiple of 45 the number of our next President (see). This was an incredible "coincidence" for Trump who had a remarkable day beating the odds and towered above Hillary in public esteem.
 
 
 
Or was it more than just coincidence? Was it a Providential Sign that Kellyanne was right? That Trump's stunning victory at the Forum foreshadows a coming victory in tonight's debate, with the billionaire going on to win the next two debates and becoming our 45th President? 
 
Will this be the fate of the Clinton campaign after tonight's historic debate?
 
But there were several other "coincidences" that occurred that day that are fueling my growing optimism about Trump's unorthodox candidacy. First off, when Trump shellacked Hillary she was in the 16th month of her campaign (see). Was this a sign that her failure at the Forum prophetically anticipates her fate in November? That this incredible, extraordinary, never seen before election year of 2016 (being the 16th year of the 21st century) Hillary losing the Forum event in the 16th month of her campaign signals her failure in returning to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue with husband Bill? We can only hope so.
 
Moreover, on the day of the Forum Donald Trump was in the 64th week of his uncanny campaign. 64 is an interesting and seemingly relevant number in that it's a multiple of 16 4x. The number 16, as I have written about HERE and HERE, has been auspicious for Trump throughout his campaign. In fact, 16 months and 24 days from June 16, 2015 (the kick off date of Trump's campaign) brings us right smack to Election Day (see). Indeed, November 8, 2016 the final day of Trump's campaign is its 512th day-512 is a multiple of 16 32x. Another remarkable coincidence, or is it a Providential Sign that 2016 belongs to Trump? 
 
 
 Will New York's Donald Trump win the presidency on the 84th anniversary of New York's Franklin Roosevelt winning the presidency thus making him the next New Yorker after Roosevelt to be President?
 
But I'm not done. Both Trump and Clinton make their homes in New York State where the CIC Forum took place. Now 6 of our 44 presidents came from New York, with FDR being the 6th and last. Now because Trump and Clinton are New Yorkers the 45th POTUS will be the 7th politician to come from that state. The CIC Forum which the 70-year-old Trump unquestionably won fell on the 7th day of September. Now the November 8th election is exactly 63 days from the Forum; within this context 63 is an interesting number because it's multiple of 7 6x. Could this be a numeric sign that Trump who bested Clinton at the Forum will follow FDR, the 6th and last President from New York, and be numero 7?
 
Furthermore, FDR won the Presidency on November 8, 1932 (see); this coming November 8th, when for the 7th time a New Yorker will be elected President, it will be the 84th anniversary of FDR's victory (84 is a multiple of 7 12x). Will it be a Donald Trump victory? What Trump has in common with FDR is that (unlike Hillary) he's a native New Yorker born in the Empire State; and both were born into wealth with silver spoons in their mouths. Amazingly, when Trump was born in Queens, New York on June 14, 1946 it was exactly 64 years, 4 months and 16 days after FDR's birth (see). A seemingly propitious sign for Trump for reasons explained above.
 
JANUARY 20, 2017
 
 
 
Will Donald Trump be doing this on the 70th year of the 7th month of the 7th day of his incredible life?
 
But what about Kellyanne's prediction that the Commander-in-Chief Forum on September 7th points to Trump winning tonight's debate, and going on to seizing the presidency and taking the oath of office in January?
 
First off, as Kellyanne is working to making her 70-year-old boss the 7th President after FDR from the Empire State it just so happens that she's 49 years old-49 is 7 squared (7x7).
 
Secondly, as FDR was the 6th and last New Yorker to be President, and the next President will be the 7th New Yorker, it is fascinating to note that Kellyanne was born in 1967, the 67th year of the 20th century.  A seemingly auspicious sign that her boss will follow FDR 6 and be numero 7.
 
Thirdly, and I love this one, January 20, 2017 is Kellyanne's 50th birthday (see).
 
Fourthly, the next Republican President will be the 19th in our history. From Trump's September 7th NBC Forum victory to Inauguration Day is 19 weeks (see). In fact, from September 7th to tonight's first debate totals 19 days (see).
 
Fifthly, FDR, the last New Yorker to be POTUS, died in 1945.... a four digit number that gives us the numbers 45 (number of the next President) and 19 (the number of the next Republican President).  Remarkably, as Election Day is the 512th and final day of Trump's campaign (as explained above) and it falls on the 84th anniversary of FDR's 1932 election victory, amazingly the number 512 when multiplied by 38 generates 19456-a five digit number encoded with the year (1945) of FDR's death.
 
Sixthly, as the number 16 and its multiples (32, 64, etc.) have been auspicious for Donald Trump who very well might become the next New Yorker after FDR to be President, it is fascinating to note that FDR was the 32nd president becoming such in 1932-32 is double 16.  
 
Moreover, as FDR was the 6th and last New Yorker to be President, and Donald Trump may well be the 7th (giving us the numbers 6 & 7), amazingly on the day Trump was born it was precisely 4967 days from FDR's election in 1932 (see).  
 
And lastly, as I've written elsewhere, if the 70 year old Donald Trump makes it to the White House as the 7th New Yorker after FDR he will be exactly 70 years, 7 months and 7 days old when he takes the oath of office (see). Is this a sign from On High that Donald Trump has a "Rendezvous with Destiny" on January 20, 2017-when Kellyanne Conway turns 50? We shall see.
 
 
Pink Tilted Tiara And Number 45 Clip Art
 
 
 
 
UPDATE
 
 
View image on Twitter
 
 
SEE MY NEXT BLOG
 
for insightful political analysis of this latest extraordinary episode of the Donald Trump phenomenon. 
 
 
 
RELATED
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

THE HOFSTRA DEBATE: HILLARY WILL EITHER HAVE A VERY BAD LOW ENERGY NIGHT OR SUFFER ANOTHER MEDICAL EVENT

 

REFUTING THE FLAWED CAMPAIGN ANALYSIS OF A KOOL AID DRINKING CLINTONITE. AND PREDICTING SICK HILLARY'S DEFEAT IN TOMORROW'S HISTORIC      DEBATE

 

Apollo writes:

"What are SICK ILLARY's internal polls telling her that made her so bat sh*t crazy yesterday raving like a loon that her lead was too small? That it should be 50 points tall? What polling data is depressing her and making her seem that she's losing hope"

So, where are these "internal polls" that you and so many other Trump supporters have been telling me about? I keep asking to see them and no one can point me to them. In the absence of any evidence that they exist or, if they do, that they say what is claimed, I have to assume that it's just another talking point advanced by some right-wing blog or pundit somewhere, designed to give Trump supporters some hope where the current polling offers none.

But, for the sake of argument, let's assume that they do exist and say what is claimed. I would rather have internal polling be a cause for concern in an effort to generate improvement rather than the pat-on-the-back internal polling that convinced Mitt Romney that he would win easily, to the extent that he bought fireworks for a planned celebration and didn't even write a concession speech. Looks like Karl Rove was caught a bit off-guard, too. 😉

By the way, it looks like the media finally managed to find Trump's lost baggage and is showing us the unsettling contents.

The rest of what you said reminds of what was said about President Obama's re-election. The same claims of a lack of enthusiasm, baggage (the ACA), people staying home, etc., all based more on wishful thinking rather than any hard evidence. In fact, Hillary Clinton received far more votes than Trump in their respective primaries and, unlike Trump, has the enthusiastic support of the vast majority of her fellow party members, including her former rival, Bernie Sanders. She also has a substantial GOTV initiative, unlike Trump who, despite his claims to the contrary, can't even afford basic advertising.

At this point, I have to even wonder if Trump will receive more votes for him than against him.

"And poor SICK ILLARY doesn't have any [enthusiasm]."

And THERE we have it: The utter desperation of a party who has somehow managed to nominate the most unpopular presidential candidate in modern times, despised by even many in his own party: Wishing ill health on his opponent because he has no other path to victory.

I have to chuckle at what I've been reading lately: The best anyone can hope for now is that Trump doesn't "lose it" at the debates. The lowest bar set for any candidate, ever, and one that many are worried he won't be able to hurdle. I also enjoyed reading that Trump's support is exactly where it was months ago, composed of the same small number of die-hard (but very loud) supporters who won't abandon him no matter what, to use your phrase, "batsh*t crazy" things he says or does.

Don't despair, though. Ted Cruz has finally abandoned the only principle he ever had and has now endorsed Trump. As popular as Ted Cruz is, THAT should change a lot of minds. (LOL)

Hillary Clinton's lead increased again today in RCP's national polling average.

It also dropped, again today, in Nate Silver's election forecast.

At least he didn't lose any ground in the LA Times farcical joke of a poll, the only one he is currently leading. Other than the more than 50% drop he managed this week, I mean.

"Internal polling," heh.

Although I disagree with your assertions and conclusions, I do appreciate that you have been generally civil. Thank you.

MY REFUTATION

 

Is 2016 becoming 2008 all over again for Hillary? It looks that way.

 

Apparently you've done an outstanding job in ignoring all the signs of SICK LOW ENERGY MISERABLE HILLARY'S health and stamina decline; and in convincing yourself that she's wrong to feel so uncertain and depressed about her chances of success in November. Apparently you believe that this unsmiling, joyless woman has every reason to be the happy warrior: confident, sure and optimistic that she's unstoppably moving ahead to winning the presidency and continuing Obama's tragic legacy of ashes, dust and disaster. You've convinced yourself that the data she's seeing from her internal polling is all wrong; that she needs someone like you to do the analysis for her; and not listen to the likes of CNNs John Phillips who (having actually done the math that you refuse to do) sees this race as neck and neck-despite Hillary outspending Trump 5:1 in key battle ground states. 

http://www.ocregister.com/arti...

No my friend, this is a horse race that will be decided by the debates; and SICK PNEUMONIC HILLARY whose health has suffered greatly from 17 months of campaigning (light compared to Trump who did 32 rallies last month to her 11) seems to be losing the  confidence needed to win. But how can Hillary be confident when she's so physically ill; and when she failed so badly at the Commander-in-Chief Forum being crushed by Trump 63% to 37% for seeming more competent, professional and presidential  looking Trump crushed in the polls 63% to 37%? Often what begins bad ends bad, and Hillary was off to a terrible start.

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/donal...

Nate Silver gives Trump the edge in winning the presidency 50.9 to 49.1. The underlying reason for this must be showing up in depressed ILLARY'S internal polling.
 
 

Tell me, friend, when Hillary loses tomorrow's debate will sore losers like you blame it on Lester Holt not rescuing her like you blamed Matt Lauer for Hillary losing the CIC Forum?  

The truth is this: 2016 is looking more and more like the 2008 Democrat primaries where Hillary (she was healthy then) despite her vast experience and huge early lead, lost in a close race to a charismatic candidate who convinced voters wanting change that he was the real deal. Donald Trump is this election's Barack Obama; and status quo Hillary (the creäture of Washington, Wall Street, Big Banks, Big Pharma, Big Oil etc.) is losing heart and greatly fears this year will be 2008 redux. That much is certain from Thursday's crazy, robotic "50 points" union rant where ILLARY looked and sounded like an escapee from the nut house.

This is my prediction for tomorrow:  SICK ILLARY at best will be at her very low energy worst, and be way off her game-like she was at the DNC when her dull, joyless, uninspiring acceptance speech put poor husband Bill to sleep;  or at worse (and less likely) she'll suffer another medical event that, depending on its severity, could kill her candidacy. Hopefully for her the room temperature at Hofstra will be under 77 degrees to eliminate the chance of fainting again from extreme, unbearable heat. LOL!

Either way Donald Trump will dominate tomorrow's historic event as he did the Commander-in-Chief Forum 19 days before.

 BTW, how can anyone wish ill-health on a woman (old beyond her years) already terribly sick-whose energy, stamina and strength are so poor and unfit for the presidency that she'd fall flat on her ugly, lying, twitching face if she campaigned half as hard as Donald "The Wall" Trump?