OBAMA TO AMERICANS IN YEMEN: HAPPY BIN LADEN KILL DAY, WE AIN’T COMING FOR YOU

 
 
 
They'll be no zero dark 30 rescue for our people stranded in Yemen.
 
OH, THE IRONY !
 
Five years ago this very day intrepid US Navy Seals risking life and limb in the dead of night invaded Pakistan to find and kill Osama Bin Laden-the most wanted and dangerous man on earth. For one brief shinning moment (after seven months of dithering and Hillary probably pulling out her hair) Obama showed some spine and ordered the storming of bin Laden's compound in Abbottabad. It wasn't "the most audacious plan in 500 years" as Biden said, exaggerating the difficulty of the mission (see). But it was a gutsy move nonetheless requiring a good amount of daring and risk taking. For the mission could easily have gone badly with all the Seals captured or killed by Pakistan and bin Laden getting away-not that we would have known about it.
 
 On February 11th Iran backed Houthi rebels seized the US Embassy in Yemen. it was the 36th anniversary of the Iranian Revolution.
 
But where is Obama's spine for rescuing hundreds of our people trapped in Yemen; hundreds who are in danger of being kidnapped for ransom, or captured, tortured and killed by al Qaida, ISIS or Iran backed rebels who are looking for them? Biden also said "Obama is willing to do the right thing and risk losing." Oh, really? We see that on display today with his message to our people in Yemen: 'You're on your own. We ain't coming for you. Don't expect a zero dark thirty rescue.' Perhaps that bold and praiseworthy action at Abbottabad used up what little guts Obama had when he became President-and shortly thereafter told the world what a weakling he'd be when one of his first audacious acts was to banish Churchill's bust from the White House.  It is the gutless anti-Churchill Obama (the real Obama) that's abandoning our people in Yemen perhaps to a terrible fate. All that we can do is pray for them.
 
 
 RELATED
 
 

WARNING!!! IRAN IS TO 21ST CENTURY AMERICA WHAT JAPAN WAS TO 20TH CENTURY AMERICA

 
If ever there was a PROVIDENTIAL SIGN on just how dangerously foolish and futile are US negotiations with fanatical terrorist nuclear Iran, and just how driven and hell-bent its Supreme ("God anointed") Leader is (and his murdering jihadist mullahs) on the destruction of our country, it was the terrible warning of Obama's meetiing with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe Tuesday at the White House. Indeed, as I wrote Wednesday (see), almost simultaneous to the meeting with the leader of a former monstrous totalitarian enemy-whose attack on Pearl Harbor plunged America into the nightmare of World War II-was the resumption of nuke talks with the Iranians in New York, and their illegal seizure of a Marshall Islands-flagged cargo ship in the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz.
 
 
As I wrote Wednesday the Japanese seized control of the Marshalls during World War I; and  from there partially launched their ultimately fatal  sneak attack on our country at Pearl Harbor-an act of war that ended with the necessary nuclear destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  The horrific nuking of these two cities broke the will of Imperial Japan to continue the war saving up to one million lives and bringing lasting peace between our two countries. Will the nuking of Iran be necessary to break its will to victory-which is stronger and surer than ever due to the confused policies and actions of the spineless, weak-willed blunderer in the White House?
 
 
Moreover,  adding to the ominousness of Tuesday was Iran seizing the Marshall's-flagged ship on the 63rd anniversary of the US ending its military occupation of Japan*while Japan's PM was meeting with the first US President born in Hawaii-the state to be that Japan attacked to start its devastating war with us. Also portentous was that Shinzo Abe's address to Congress Wednesday the 29th** (a first for a Japanese PM) came just eight weeks after Benjamin Netanyahu's Churchillian speech warning of Iran's nuclear ambitions and its geopolitical and security consequences if we continue to be weak with them.
 
*April 28, 1952 (see)
 
** April 29th was the 69th anniversary of the indicting of former Prime Minister of Japan Hideki Tojo and 28 former Japanese leaders for war crimes (see). Abe's grandfather, Nobusuke Kishi (PM of Japan from 1957-1960) was a member of Tojo's cabinet during the war (see).
 
Not every coincidence is fate. But it looks like Providence was very much present in the coincident events of this week in the Persian Gulf, New York and Washington DC warning us about the deadly mistakes we are making with Iran and the need for regime change in that country as the only possible way to peace.
 
RELATED
 

ATONING FOR COWARDICE AT YEMEN IRAN ATTACKS U.S. BY SEIZING MARSHALL ISLAND SHIP

Google Map
 

It must have been mortifying for imperial expanding nuclear Iran which has been besting our weak, butt kissing president on nuke negotiations to turn its gun boats and cargo vessels away from confronting the US fleet in Yemen Thursday with arms and supplies for the Houthi rebels. How dare Obama be so bold and suddenly show some balls by sending warships to the Arabian Sea and humiliating God's anointed nation chosen to save the world through  terror, blood and war? And to make atonement to Allah, Islam and the Iranian people for backing down from the Great Satan (Iran's and Islam's greatest foe) Revolutionary Guard patrol boats yesterday (under direct orders from Ayatollah Khamenei) illegally seized the Maersk Tigris a Marshal Island container ship in the Straits of Hormuz (where 20% of the world's oil flows). This was an act of war. For according to the seized ship's captain he was in international waters.
 
Obama with Japanese Prime Minister Abe at White House yesterday.
 
The Marshal Islands though a sovereign nation is by treaty a US protectorate-we have full authority and responsibility for its security and defense, and provide its people with millions in welfare benefits. That means an attack on the Marshal Islands is an attack on the US. Seizing a Marshall Island ship is equivalent to commandeering a US boat; and Obama (who ominously met with Japan's PM Abe yesterday*) should be up in arms over the contempt Iran is showing for him. But leaving office with no trophy greater than an unearned Nobel Peace Prize is his worse nightmare. Tears, tears.
 
*Ominous because the Japanese seized the Marshall Islands during World War I which they used to attack Pearl Harbor in 1941.
 
 
The Tigris is said to have a crew exclusively of East Europeans and Asians. But Fars (Iran's government news agency) is triumphantly reporting to Iran and world that the Tigris is a US ship with an American crew. They must be rejoicing in Tehran thinking another humiliating 444 day hostage crisis is at hand. "Death to America!" a million times over.  
 
 
"This criminal act," says anti-Iran hawk John McCain, "was clearly a provocation to the US." Coming just eight days after arresting Washington Post reporter Jason Rezaian on espionage Iran obviously timed and designed the Tigris' seizure to embarrass us during nuclear talks with John Kerry which restarted yesterday in New York. What will Obama do apart from uselessly and fecklessly sending a US destroyer (the Farragut) to the Straits to monitor the situation? He should show real backbone and, as John Bolton says, "break off negotiations with Iran until the ship is released," along with Jason Rezaian, I might add. If Obama fails to do this and continues his idiotic negotiations what Iran does next will be worse and worse until he's enmeshed in a Jimmy Carter like crisis.
 
RELATED
 
< p style="text-align: center;"> WITHOUT REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN IT WILL ABSOLUTELY BECOME A NUCLEAR ARMED STATE

IS ISLAM’S MALE GOD ALLAH A FEMALE DIETY IN DISGUISE? LIZ WARREN: PRINCESS TICKLEFEATHER AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS

 
 
 
WILD BILL IS NO PISS POOR ANTI-JIHADIST,
 
that's for sure. But it occurred to me while watching Bill's video that if Islam requires that men while peeing should be seated like women then could it be a sign that Allah, the Moon God of Mecca, might be a female deity like the Roman Diana, Greek Artemis and other luna deities of antiquity? As Islam permits TAQIYYA (lying and deception) could it be that Allah is deceiving his/her votaries and is a female deity disguised as a male god? Could Allah be in reality the pre-Islamic luna goddess Fatima (see below)? Perhaps the pathological masculinity of Moslem men, and male domination of Moslem society and women, have something to do with Allah (Fatima) hiding her gender.
 
Archaeological photo gallery of the Arabian Moon-
Fatima
Fatima was the moon goddess in pre-Islamic Arabia. Her name means The Creatress. She was also known as Source Of The Sun, Tree Of Paradise, the Moon, and Fate. She existed from the beginning of the material world (see).
 
 
 
 

 

HEADLINE SHOULD READ:

Princes TICKLEFEATHER'S First Attack On Hillary Clinton?

Is she on the warpath

to the

 ?

WHY TICKLEFEATHER?

Whenever Lizzy speaks don't you feel like this is being done to you?

  

The question however is this: is Lizzy Princess Ticklefeather?

Or is she

 

 ?

For those of you not old enough to remember, that's "Ticklefeather" as in the Howdy Doody Show.

 

POSTSCRIPT

Hey, Mr. Businessman, you didn't build your business.

But though the damn Cherokees refused to help me I built this

all by myself. 
 
 
 
 

I'M DUMBFOUNDED!

Quoting evil Moslem hate speech against Jews intended to incite Moslems to kill them as acts of religious worship pleasing to God is itself evil hate speech dangerous and morally wrong-though protected by the constitution? O'Reilly and Napolitano are pin heads on this issue.

 
 
 

WITH THE FAILURE OF OBAMA'S

Moslem Outreach Initiative to reconcile America and Islam in brotherly peace don't we need to look for alternatives? But as reconciliation is needed NOW perhaps we should turn to the Blind Sheikh? He's been in jail for 20 years. /sarc

 

 

Atlanta rapper Waka Flocka Flame announced that he's running for president and wants to be Lawgiver as well as Chief Executive. 

IF WAKA WAS COMPETING

with other young black men to be Obama's adopted son he'd beat out Trayvon Martin in a Flockan flash. "I AM CONGRESS!" That's the kind of  impudence that made Napoleon Emperor of France.

RELATED

 
 
 

BIG GOV'T SUPREMACISTS LIKE SOCIALIST OBAMA

have more in common with the totalitarian supremacist Khamenei than with limited government rule of law Republicans. Doubtless, Obama envies Khamenei his power.

 
 

 

THE 4DOOMED ECONOMIC POLICIES OF BARACK OBAMA AND THE END OF BIG GOV’T LIBERALISM

 Obama lacking  economic  sense, insight and 4sight is the 4th foolish President in US history to sign a 4doomed Keynesian stimulus  bill  .

On February 17, 2009  as George Bush's underreported V-shaped economic recovery was underway and in its second month (despite  Obama's belief that things were utterly bad and could get worse if drastic government action wasn't taken) Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). This was an $860 billion emergency fiscal spending (Keynesian) stimulus package (the biggest of its kind in history) which Obama and many economists (200 in number) confidently said was "BIG ENOUGH" to end the Great Recession (that was already ending) and jolt the economy into a booming, rip-roaring Reagan-like, jobs creating recovery (which hasn't happened). Hailed by Democrats and their media allies as the "new New Deal," and their darling Barack Obama as the "new FDR," liberals and Keynesian economists looked forward to vindication of their faith that "government is the answer," and that massive borrowing and deficit spending would significantly boost consumer demand, stimulate production, massively create good paying jobs, and with prosperity restored renew trust in the federal government-that had recently crashed the credit and housing markets. But it's 74 months since ARRA became law and the promised economic boom hasn't materialized and is nowhere in sight. 
 
 
Indeed, after 74 months of massive borrowing, spending and money printing, and artificially raising the Dow to stratospheric heights, what does Obama have to show for it? The worst recovery since the end of World War II; and the worst economy since the Great Depression. That is where the economy is, and if it doesn't get worse is likely to remain till the end of Obama's misguided, growth killing reign.
 
For after 74 months of government intervention consumers are still underspending, banks still underlending, businesses still underhiring and private investors are still under investing in new innovative job creating ideas. Indeed, consumers, banks, businesses and investors have little confidence in the economy as they fear worse days ahead due to trillions in growing debt and unfunded liabilities, tons of freedom crushing regulations, legions of illegals crossing our borders adding to an over burdened  welfare state, and an idiotic leftwing war on wealth and success in the name of fairness which hurts the poor and middle class. Never since the stuck-on-stupid, free market hating FDR has a president done so much to undercut the very recovery that he aimed for thinking he was doing the morally right things. Just like FDR Obama has abysmally failed to create the business and investment friendly climate of confidence, optimism and freedom that's needed for robust growth-like Reagan achieved in the 1980s with his Supply Side Revolution and faith in free markets that energized production and creativity and revived the jobs machine on a gigantic scale. 
 
 
 OBAMA'S  4DOOMED ECONOMIC POLICIES
 
Every government fiscal stimulus program worldwide designed by die hard Keynesian theorists to revive weak or badly distressed economies were 4doomed to fail before they began; and Obamanomics is no exception. For no government can spend its way back to prosperity and do for a complex economy what it can only do for itself when given the freedom it needs from government controls to florish and grow. Indeed, look at the ominous signs leading up to Obama's colossal stimulus becoming law:
 
Obama was born on the 4th day of August 1961 (44 years after the Russian Revolution). He became the 44th president of the US on the 4th day of November (which was the 44th week of the year). On January 28th-Obama's 8th day in office (4+4 = 8)-the House of Representatives by a vote of 244-188 passed the first version of ARRA (a 4 letter acronym). 16 days later (4x4 = 16) on Friday the 13th (the 44th day of the year) both the House and Senate passed the final version of ARRA amounting to $860 billion. 4 days later on February 17th in mile high Denver our spaced out President signed ARRA into law. Amazingly, February 17, 2009 was exactly 27,744 days from March 4, 1933 the day FDR was sworn into office, and his disastrous liberal New Deal tax and spend administration began (see). A remarkable coincidence for the 44th President believed to be the new FDR (which he is in economics not in war).
 
4doomed to fail from the start Obamanomics is another dismal chapter in the sad history of Liberal Keynesian Economics which began with Herbert Hoover and FDR's New Deal (Hooverism on steroids). Succeeding FDR, Gerald Ford and George W. Bush Obama was the 4th US president to apply Keynesian economic theory of government spending, deficits and debt to climb out of an economic hole*. And like his predecessors Obama failed as the theory now is finally discredited though there are holdouts galore in denial of reality. Even if the Clintons win back the White House and reign for eight years there won't and cannot be another stimulus bill as the last one (history's biggest) has miserably failed in its goals.
 
As the 45th President will inherit an unsustainbale national debt of $20 trillion making another large stimulus unpopular and impossible the only alternative to save us from national bankruptcy is Austerity (Tea Party) Economics-which unleashed the Roaring Twenties for Harding and Coolidge ending a Depression; an saved Sweden in the 1990s from utter socialist ruin.
 
The era of Big Government Liberalism that began with the New Deal is at an end. Obama is its last hurrah and death nell. And two unmistakable signs of its coming demise (apart from what's written above) were the deaths of Ted Kennedy and Mario Cuomo. But that is an article for another day.
 
*Ford had a Keynesian stimulus tax rebate program, and Bush had two of them.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
DETROIT IS OBAMAVILLE
 
 

IS EGYPT’S AL-SISI A CRYPTO-CHRISTIAN? YEMEN AND OBAMA’S RED LINE IN THE SEA AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS

 
 
 
President al-Sisi warmly greeted by Coptic Pope Tawadros II in Cairo's largest church.
 

On February 18th an Egyptian administrative court made history by upholding an unprecedented government edict issued by the moderate, Christian friendly,  anti-jihadist regime of President Abdel al-Sisi ordering the closing of 27,000 places of worship which were exclusively Moslem mosques (see). Why were none of the thousands of  Coptic churches included in the edict? Was it fair that only mosques and no churches were closed?

President al-Sisi greeted by Pope Francis at the Vatican

One dissonant voice on Facebook commenting on the ill-treatment of Moslems verses Christians under al-Sisi said: “Well done! Christians have lost the right to complain about their lesser status. Egypt is no longer a Muslim Nation -- it has turned Christian, or so it seems!” Another dissonant voice at the time was so outraged at the mosques' closings that he accused al-Sisi of being a crypto-Christian who secretly converted to the faith while serving as defense minister under radical Moslem Brotherhood President Morsi. For proof of his theory the commenter pointed to al-Sisi's historic visit on Christmas Eve to Egypt's largest Coptic church, a first for an Egyptian head of state. Also mentioned was al-Sisi's tight alliance with Coptic Pope Tawadros II, an enthusiastic supporter of  his pro-Coptic regime. To this couldd be added al-Sisi's bombing of ISIS targets in Libya shortly after these butchers beheaded 21 innocent Copts while praising Allah (see).

Could the angry commenter be right? Is al-Sisi an apostate from Islam making him the first Christian head of Egypt since its conquest by Moslems 14 centuries ago? We don't know. Until there's hard proof of al-Sisi's conversion a more likely explanation is that he's a real, genuine Egyptian nationalist (more so than were Sadat and Mubarak) patriotically carrying out his responsibilities as  President to protect the safety, security and property of all Egyptians regardless of faith. And that the closing of 27,000 mosques, verses not a single church, is due solely to their actual (or potentially) radical nature headed by extremist clerics poisoning their congregations with violence and hate against Christians and the Egyptian state. But that not one single church was closed (large or small) tells us that al-Sisi regards Christianity as more truly a religion of God's peace, and more beneficial to Egypt, than is the Islamic faith that he's courageously trying to reform against a growing storm.

White dove and cross.
 
 RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

IS THIS RED LINE TIME ALL OVER AGAIN?

Obama dared not cross the red line he'd drawn against the Assad regime (Iran's allies) when they used chemical weapons against rebels. Were the 11 US war ships sent to Yemen an unspoken warning to Iran not to continue their support of the Houthis or else the US would join forces with the Saudis and intervene in Yemen to stop them? As Pam says, Iran is banking on Obama bluffing and will do nothing to jeopardize the nuke talks. Hopefully they're wrong. Hopefully this time Obama will show some spine and act But I'm not counting on it.

PS. Maybe if the State Dept. gives Iran the $50 billion signing bonus they'll withdraw their ships?

 
 

AS DURING THE COLD WAR WITH SOVIET RUSSIA

the BIG LIE governing Obama in his peace talks with radical islamic jihadist Iran is that America and the West are the source of the tensions and mistrust that divide us. And that the key to achieving  peace is unilaterally changing our behavior and setting an example for our adversaries that will presumably win over their hearts and minds and moderate them. But the theocratic mullahs, like the Soviet communists, are ideological fanatics believing with prefect faith that they have the absolute answer to humanity's manifold problems and ills. And while fools like Obama seek peace through weakness and appeasement the enemy seeks victory and power begetting the nightmare and horrors of war.

 
 
4-15-2015
 

WELL, JUST IN TIME FOR THE 3RD ANNIVERSARY

of the Boston Marathon Bombing. And killing the same number of people. Dzhokhar must be sitting in his cell elated thinking it’s a sign from Allah certifying his deed. And his mother must be passing out candy, cakes and cookies believing Allah has avenged her two "wronged" sons.

 
ISN'T THIS THE SAME ANGELA MERKEL
 
who complained five years ago that "German multicultural society has utterly failed"? And wasn't she in main referring to Germany's 2.5 million mostly unassimilated Turks-just like in Austria? And isn't German hostility towards these unassilimated Turks caused by their open hatred and rejection of German secular culture?
 
 

"THE MORE THINGS CHANGE

the more they remain the same," said Michael Montaigne. Back in the 60s radical leftist loons shouted support for Communist North Vietnam and the Viet Cong. Then it was the murderer Ho Chi Minh . Today it's the murderer Bagh Da Di. The foreign enemy changes. But the enemy within stays the same hating this good country for no good reason; and loving  evil men and nations because they are insane .

 

 

ANOTHER KORAN INSPIRED

Islamic peacenik extending his warm loving ecumenical heart to unbelievers.

 

 
 

WHEN PAM THE TERRIBLE SPEAKS

she summons all the victims of Islam from ages past. As they are legion Moslems sense their presence and are filled with dread. Too bad on them./sarc

 

 

 
 
 

A SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN,

hate to say.

 

 
 
 

SO ONE OF HILLARY'S GREAT ACHIEVEMENTS

as First Lady, to make up for the failure of Hillarycare, was letting her unfaithful husband drive her into a life of sexual perversion. Now she wants to be President so that lesbians can shout from the housetops 'We have a President in the White House we can f--k.' They said that before when she was First Lady. and they'll do so again. Wouldn't that be lovely?

 

 
IT’S NOT THAT WE AMERICANS ARE ALONE IN OUR IGNORANCE OF ISLAM
 
Most of infidel humanity is ignorant of it. Not just in our time but in ages past. Why is it that since its birth 14 centuries ago Islam has had a public relations problem with the rest of the world? IGNORANCE.There’s no other reason. To know Islam is to love islam. And until we truly know it we will falsely hate it, or dislike it, or have mixed feelings about it. The cure is simple: study the Koran, pray to Allah and Mecca, hate Israel and America. Get into the spirit of Islam and you’ll see how truly wonderful it is. /sarc
 
Westman says 
 
Yes. Let’s see, if we recite the Quran continually, pray with verbal slights for Christians and Jews five times a day, order our “wives” to submit to relations, reject our parents and other infidels, hate music, avoid fun, bully infidels, and listen to loving Imams, we will finally fall into the loving arms of Muhammad and Allah.
 
That is called cult indoctrination.I remember something like this from Orwell’s 1984: “The face of Big Brother loomed large over the announcement and Winston felt his eyes fill with tears of joy and reconciliation. The last lesson had been learnt. “He loved Big Brother.”
 

ApolloSpeaks says

You’re approach is too radical. The process of Islamization-overcoming centuries of collective Islamophobia and bigotry-has to be gradual and not so abrupt. It’s like getting into a hot tub, you have to ease your way in: toes, feet, legs, butt… Be reasonable. A radical change in consciousness from infidel to Moslem could be alarming, and too much for the unbelieving mind overwhelming it with strange new ideas that could be misconstrued as evil, sin, inhumanity and crime. See what I mean?/sarc.

 

BARACK OBAMA’S SMEARING OF AMERICA AND ANTI-AMERICANISM IN HIS BUTT KISSING DIPLOMACY WITH IRAN

 
 11 days before the reelection of Ahmadenijad this is exactly what Barack Obama did in Cairo
 
If one wants to know how truly and disgracefully anti-American Barack Obama is in his soft, weak, appeasing, lead and bleed from behind approach to diplomacy and foreign policy there is no better place to start than with Iran who is aspiring to replace the US as the nuclear hegemon of the Middle East and is getting there with Obama's help. Obama as I pointed out Monday was the first sitting US President to acknowledge the US role in the 1953 overthrow of Iranian leader Mohammed Mossadegh who briefly succeeded Shah Raza Pahlavi as Iran's head of state. According to the narrative that we've heard for 36 years since the Shah's unfortunate downfall and death  Mossadegh was the legitimate, DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED Prime Minister of Iran. And because he was unfriendly to US and British interests during the Cold War (showing favor to the Soviet Union over the Free World) the US and British administrations of Dwight Eisenhower and Winston Churchill, secretly conspired to oust Mossedegh and return the pro-Western Shah to power. And this was done in an Iranian military led coup on August 19, 1953. Mossadegh was ousted from power tried for treason and sentenced to jail for three years and house arrest for life. This action by the US, we are told, toppling a democratically elected government and replacing it with a non-democratic near absolute monarch,  went against our democratic traditions, values and ideals; and was a sin against the people of Iran making it a dark and shameful chapter in our history. If only we had left well enough alone, the story goes, Iran might be a peaceful democratic republic today; and not a radical, menacing, terrorist, destabilizing nuclear aspiring Islamic state.
 
Hating the imperfect reality with all its flaws and sins the America Obama loves is an abstract idea in his childish mind. 
 
 Indeed,  eight months after the Shah was overthrown and Ayatolloh Khomeini ruled Iran-replacing his near absolute monarchy with a belligerent totalitarian Islamic regime-the US embassy in Tehran with over 60 Americans was seized by radical, pro-Khomeini, revolutionary students. This was the start of the Iran Hostage Crisis. The students (backed by Khomeini) cited three demands that the US must meet to release the hostages: 1) Return the Shah to Iran to stand trial. 2) Release billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets. And 3) Apologize for the interference in the internal affairs in Iran and the overthrow of Mossadegh. This last demand was truly bizarre. For the Ayatollah Khomeini in 1953, as I wrote and proved
HERE, hated the secularist reformer Mossadegh believing he was  Islam's enemy and unfit to rule;  backing the coup that brought him down Khomeini wanted the Shah restored to power believing he was better for the faith. The obvious reason for Khomeini backing this bogus demand was to simply enjoy the satisfaction of seeing the Great Satan grovelling at his feet-and not to satisfy a long-standing grievance about an overthrown Iranian government which he himself despised as evil and wanted destroyed.
 
Obama would ruin America More
If only Obama pissed on America more to the west he could end the drought in California.
 
But the Carter administration rejected all three demands and the hostage crisis dragged on for 444 agonizing days ending on the day Ronald Reagan took office-an auspicious omen for his magnificent,  history changing presidency. But from Jimmy Carter on no US President so much as acknowledged America's role in Mossadegh's downfall until, that is, the great anti-American leftist appeaser Barack Obama came to power.
 
Indeed, four months into his presidency the man who was ominiously elected on the 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis speaking from Cairo to the Moslem world finally at long last  conceded America's role in the 1953 coup, saying: 
  
"For many years, Iran has defined itself in part by its opposition to my country, and there is indeed a tumultuous history between us. In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government." 
 
Now subsequent to saying this Obama did three things to uselessly butt-kiss the implacable Iranian mullahs: 1) He refused to intervene in the anti-regime revolt which started 11 days later-this signalled to the mullahs that he had no desire to repeat the "mistake" the US made of toppling Mossadegh; 2) He had the CIA declassify documents detailing their role in the 1952 coup; and 3) He repeated what he said in Cairo at the UN.
 
The smell and taste of Islamist ass is the most beautiful thing in the world.
 
But this narrative of the US toppling a democratically elected Iranian government is a big ugly lie. As you will see below it is groundless leftwing anti-American propaganda designed to smear and discredit this country as a bad actor on the world stage doing evil things to other states. And Obama, the President of the United States, deliberately and insanely promoted this lie before Islam and the world to butt kiss the anti-American regime in Iran whose hostility toward us has zero to do with the 53 coup. What he did was  deplorable in the extreme.
 
 
Truth is Iran under the Shah was a near absolute constitutional monarchy, and not a democracy in any degree. The Shah was the final authority determining Iran's domestic and foreign policy, and his Prime Minister was his creature and servant slavishly carrying out his will. Indeed, the Shah owned his PMs, had absolute power over them and could make or break them at will. Under the Shah the undemocratic process of selecting PMs was as follows:  
 
The lower House of the Iranian Parliament (Majlis) would vote to nominate their choice for PM (this was a parliamentary not a democratic election);  the Shah would then either approve the nominee and appoint him, or reject him. If for whatever reason he was rejected the Parliament would then reconvene to vote on a new nominee. In other words, the final decision on who'd be PM rested exclusively with the Shah not with Parliament, or democratically with the Iranian people. And as the PM was the Shah's creature (having no political existence apart from him) he could dismiss him on a whim.
 
Iranian mob carrying Mossadegh in triumph after he illegally and unconstititionally deposed the Shah.
 
Prior to Mossedegh's tenure as PM he had ten predecessors who were appointed and dismissed, himself being one of them. The Shah dismissed Mossadegh because defying his policy and alliance with Great Britain he wanted to nationalize Iran's oil industry which was run by the Brits. But nationalization was popular with the Iranian people and Mossadegh's dismissal caused a nationwide uproar with millions of Iranians protesting for him in the streets. Fearing the mob and the possible violent overthrow of his monarchy the Shah reluctantly reinstated Mossadegh as PM.
 
But this show of weakness served only to embolden Mossadegh who adamantly and treasonously pressed on for nationalization until the Shah throwing caution to the wind had enough and dismissed him again for insubordination. Under Iranian law this was the official end of Mossadegh's prime ministership. But defying the Shah and disobeying the law (that he swore to uphold) Mossadegh refused to step down preferring instead to illegally drive the Shah from power-which he did by inciting mobs of Iranians to violence. The Shah fearing for his life fled Iran.
 
This unlawful action by Mossadegh made him a usurper: the illegal, unelected, dictator of Iran who shredded its constitution and forcefully replaced the Shah as head of the Iranian state assuming all of his monarchical powers, and becoming himself the law. It was like Napoleon seizing control of France and telling the nation, "I am the constitution!" In short, like Napoleon in France Mossadegh became the autocrat of Iran and not a democratically elected PM-as Obama lyingly and deplorably said in Cairo. And as the power this autocrat grabbed went to his head he became an oppressive tyrant who quickly made himself hated losing his friends, allies and the public.
 
 Indeed, no sooner did this vile man run the Shah out of Iran than he filled the jails with political opponents, illegally dissolved the senate, illegally shut down the Majlis (lower house), illegally dismissed the Supreme Court and illegally imposed a curfew on the nation (see). By the time the Iranian army had ousted Mossadegh the public had turned against him and welcomed back the Shah, as the lesser of two evils.
 
In other words, the US and Britain in assisting in Mossadegh's downfall was restoring Iran's legally constituted monarch to his rightful throne. It was nothing more complicated than that. Indeed, as the Shah remained the legal head of Iran while in exile (the constitution in his absence wasn't replaced, altered or amended) the intervention of the US and Great Britain was perfectly legal under international law as it had the blessing of the Shah.
 
Indeed, far from being a shameful episode in US and British history the downfall of Mossadegh (supported by Khomeini and the entire clerical establishment) was a blessing to Iran and US/UK strategic interests at the time. The shame and disgrace is on Obama and the Left for blatantly lying about Mossadegh and the nature of the coup turning it into a despicable unAmerican operation running contrary to our values and ideals. Barack Obama owes this nation a huge apology for smearing it and blackening its name to curry favor with the implacable, murdering, Islamically perverse medieval savages in Iran.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

BARACK OBAMA, THE US/IRANIAN CONFLICT AND HIS LIES ABOUT THE 1953 OVERTHROW OF MOSSADEGH (REVISED)

 
 
 
 
 
He [Mossadegh, below] was not a Muslim.....and I said...he will be slapped and it did not take long that he was slapped [in the 1953 coup] and if he had lasted he would have slapped Islam". -- Ayatollah Khomeini, 1980 speech
 
Mohammed Mossadegh: appointed prime minister by the Shah, not democratically elected like Obama and others claim.
 
Last week on Morning Joe liberal journalist Thomas Friedman (who has interviewed Barack Obama several times) made the preposterous remark that one of the most ignorant, blundering and feckless presidents in US history who's been wrong about practically everything has got it right about two important foreign policy issues: the Iranians and Palestinians. Indeed, Friedman  contends that Obama understands both issues better than Bibi Netanyahu and the Republican leadership combined; that he knows the mullahs and Palestinians from deep inside their Moslem souls; that he sees the US and world as they see it ; and understands their concerns and fears as if they were his own; i.e., as if he were Iran's Supreme Leader and Abu Abbas himself. After all of Obama's failures and disasters in foreign policy, and lack of respect worldwide, Friedman believes that he is an enlightened but misunderstood genius who could make peace with Iran-woo it away from Islamic extremism and turn it into a moderate, normal, non-nuclear state. And that he can succeed where Bill Clinton and other presidents have failed and broker a two state solution between Israelis and Palestinians....turning their mutual hostility into friendship and lasting peace. Friedman believes, that if only Netanyahu, John Boehner and the GOP would submit to Obama and let themselves be guided by his superior wisdom, judgment and insights it would greatly benefit the Middle East and world peace. And Friedman isn't alone in his opinion as there are many on the left who agree with him.
 
 
When I want to see the world as the mullahs see it I wrap myself in the Iranian flag of martyrdom, blood and jihad. Try it sometime. It's great.
 
Now to illustrate just how radically mistaken Friedman and the left are about Obama and why Netanyahu and the Republicans are right to distrust and reject his judgment let's analyze the basis of his supposed superior insight into the US/Iranian conflict:
 
"Let's remember," says Friedman, "that we, the United States, back in the ’50s, toppled Iran’s democratically-elected government. You know, there might be some reason these people actually want to get a weapon that will deter that from happening again." 
 
True. In 1953 there was a US/UK backed military coup in Iran toppling  Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh. However,  Iran was a constitutional monarchy not a democracy; and Mossadegh was appointed by the Shah not democratically elected. Mossadegh was toppled from power after he staged his own coup and drove the Shah into exile while assuming absolute dictatorial powers. The idea that Iran today would be a democracy if Mossadegh had remained in power is an anti-American fiction....adopted by Obama, Friedman and the anti-American idiot left. Be that as it may what you never hear from pro-Iranian apologists like Friedman and Obama is that the 53 coup was overwhelmingly supported and welcomed by most of Iran's clerical establishment, including the Ayatollah Khomeini.
 
Khomeini and the mullahs loathed Mossadegh and wanted him gone because he was perceived (rightly or wrongly) to be a progressive liberal secular reformer, and not a true God-fearing, Sharia abiding Moslem (as Khomenie says in the above quote). In other words, Moseddegh was seen as a modernizer sinfully committed to bringing Iran out of the Middle Ages and into the modern world-which Khomeini and the 10th century mullahs staunchly opposed. "Anyone not in the path of Islam is our enemy," said Khomeini. And that meant Mohammed Mossadegh.
 
In fact, Khomeini preferred the absolute monarchy of the Shah (the governing model of Mohammed) over a democracy or secular dictatorship (like Mossadegh temporarily had) as he thought it was better suited to protect Iran's Islamic heritage from the evils of modernity and reform. But that was not to be. As bad as Mossadegh was for Islam the Shah proved radically worse. The Shah who pledged to Khomeini and the clergy to uphold the faith and respect Islamic law instead out-secularized Mossadegh incurring Khomeini's undying wrath. Khomenie feeling betrayed went on a venomous jihad against the Shah that was so out of hand that he fled the country fearing for his life. In Khomeini's eyes the Shah and Mossadegh were two different forms of the same evil enemy of Iran and Islam; and he single mindedly dedicated his years in exile to stirring up and organizing opposition to the Shah to drive him from power. And with the helping hand of Jimmy Carter he succeeded.
 
Those are the historical facts ignored by Obama, Tom Friedman and others on the left who give themselves the false hope that peace with Iran is possible if only our two sides could overcome the hurdle of the 1953 (Khomeini backed) coup. But try as he may to heal the rift Obama can't prevail; for the coup has nothing to do with it.
 
To the amusement of the mullahs Obama lied to the world in Cairo about the big bad US toppling a DEMOCRATICALLY-elected Iranian government in 1953. What was toppled was the increasingly unpopular, anti-Western dictatorship of usurper Mohammed Mossadegh.
 
In his 2009 Moslem outreach speech from Cairo (oddly coinciding with the 20th anniversary of Ali Khamenei coming to power) Obama became the first sitting US President to acknowledge the 1953 coup. Then on August 19, 2013 (the 60th anniversary of the coup) Obama ordered the CIA to declassify detailed info on its involvement in the coup (see)Then on the following month at the UN Obama again for a second time referenced America's role in the coup as a major source of division and obstacle to peace, saying:
 
 "This mistrust has deep roots. Iranians have long complained of a history of US interference in their affairs, and America's role in overthrowing an Iranian government during the cold war."
 
As America is the sinner needing forgiveness and redemption  perhaps Obama should go to Tehran get down on his knees and abase himself before the world apologizing to Khamenei for the coup. But that too would fail.
 
 
The 1953 coup is not any more the underlying cause of the US/Iran divide than was the 1918 invasion of Northern Russia by Western forces (to defeat the Bolsheviks) the cause of the East-West conflict and Cold War. Just as Marxist-Leninist hatred of democratic capitalism is what drove Russia's conflict with the West so does Islamic supremacism and Koranic inspired hatred of non-Moslems underlie the US-Iran divide. The problem is Islam. It's really that simple. If Iran has alliances with non-Moslem states (like Russia, China and North Korea) it's because they're pragmatic and temporary as they are no less evil and hated by God (according to Khomenism) than is the US.
 
The mullahs are imperial restorationists aspiring to transform Iran (once a great empire) into a nuclear armed military superpower with the ultimate (utopian) goal of defeating modernity and conquering humanity in the victory of a one world Islamic state. As the delusional mullahs believe that God and history are on their side there is no reasoning, negotiating, appeasement or apologies that will change them. The only rational policy for fanatical terrorist totalitarian Iran is regime change. Its Islamonazi theocracy is an unreformable menace to the world and must be destroyed. As with the collapse of the Soviet Union hopefully this can happen without war.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

CAN A PRESIDENT CLINTON SUCCEED AT CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM WHERE OBAMA HAS MISERABLY FAILED?

 
 
There aren't "two ways." There isn't even ONE WAY that Hillary can reach voters and them care about climate change giving it priority above all things. It's a lost cause that she (and her husband) can't reverse. For six years now our weak, ineffective, feckless president (Warmunist Nutcase-in-Chief) has tried and failed to alarm the nation with his sincere but delusional apocalyptic fears about global warming Armageddon by turning it into an economic issue (with bankruptcy in the future because of extreme devastating weather events), a health issue (with everyone sick with respiratory ailments and disease), a hunger issue (with universal starvation caused by global drought) and above all a national security issue (vastly more urgent than the growing threat of global Islamic jihad and terror, ISIS' murderous rampage through Iraq and infiltration of Mexico, Putin's aggression in Ukraine and terrorist, death cult Iran's regionwide expansion and getting the bomb). Indeed, since Obama's been president he's failed to replace Bush's Global War on Islamic Terror with a public backed Global War on Fossil Fuels and CO2 Emissions as he has undercut his agenda by creating a safe haven for terrorists in Libya; and by withdrawing US forces from Iraq creating a vacuüm for ISIS, al-Qaida and menacing, Islamonazi Iran. Alarmism is growing over Islamic terror to post-9/11 highs, and not over "world ending" climate change and environmental issues thanks to the master of confusion and delusion in the White House-who can't seem to do anything right.
 
 
 Indeed, since Obama's been president the crazed, hysterical warmunist left (damaged by scandal, false predictions and stable global temperatures) has been in steep decline practically hitting rock bottom at 22nd place out of the 23 most important issues worrying voters in our time.  So how could tired old baggy eyed Hillary change this when she's a less gifted speaker than (the overrated) Obama with very little of his likability, charisma and charm? Hillary is Obama in white face and drag with none of his good qualities. If Obama couldn't communicate his science fiction  fears and delusions about the coming possible extinction of humanity, unless "deadly" CO2 emissions aren't drastically cut (on a national and global scale regardless of the economic costs), what can poor old tired mediocre Hillary do? What bold lies can she spin that Obama hasn't spun to terrify us into action? What tricks can she try that he hasn't done to stir up the slumbering, gas guzzling masses to a green revolution where they'll willingly sacrifice their standard of living to save the planet from far off doom? Clearly, Hillary Clinton hasn't got what it takes to energize voters and reverse this downward trend and make them care for the survival of the race against an imaginary climate change nightmare. And if (God forbid) she becomes president next year that's all for the best.
 
RELATED

HOW TO PREVENT FUTURE BOSTON BOMBINGS-THE LEFTIST APPROACH (SATIRE)

 

As I was looking through my Townhall archives today I came across this piece about the Boston Marathon Bombing. Inspired by Arianna Huffington I thought it would amuse you. 

FROM APOLLOSPEAKS' TOWNHALL ARCHIVES

 2013-04-26 09:12: --HOW TO PREVENT FUTURE BOSTON BOMBING -THE LEFTIST APPROACH 

 
  
Due to the misperception that America is at war with Islam (born from Iraq, Afghanistan, drone attacks, Pam Geller and the killing of the revered Moslem leader Osama bin Ladin) there are thousands of embittered young Moslems in the this country who like the Tsarnaev boys are ticking time bombs that could explode at any moment causing dozens of Boston Marathons or smaller crimes. What must we do to prevent this?
 
THE SOLUTION
 
Every adult American should make it their business to find a poorly assimilated Moslem youth like a Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and befriend him. And to ensure that he won't turn jihadist this is what you must do: Hug him tightly and don't let go until you squeeze all the hatred and violence out of him. But a word of caution: when hugging and squeezing him you need to be careful not to suffocate him to death. You don't want to kill the kid you're trying to help-though that too would prevent him from turning jihadist.
 
 
POSTSCRIPT
 

After Boston: Why It's Important That We Keep Asking 'Why?'

"A lot of the who, what, where, and how of the Boston bombing and what led up to it have already been answered and, no doubt, more details will eventually be filled in. The why, however, is the more elusive question. But it's also a crucial one....."

I posted the above article as a comment on Arianna's blog and got the following reply from this well meaning leftist loon:
 
LeftClique writes on HuffPo
 
You've made the most sensible remark I've seen
 
My reply
 
 Looks like the sarcasm didn't get through to you.
 
LeftClique replies
 
No, the sarcasm got through very clearly (hug him ... careful not to suffocate), but even without intending to, your remark made sense. Hate solves nothing, killing solves nothing. It will take compassion and understanding to end the violence. I want to be clear - I am not talking about not defending our country, but I am saying we are reaping what we have sown over the last 100 years. We lost a few hundred in Beirut, a few thousand on 9/11, three in Boston, but the Arabs have died by the thousands everyday just so we can have cheap gas.
 
My reply
 
There 's nothing morally wrong with hate as long as you hate the right things like all kinds of evil for example; or evil people like neo-Nazi white supremacist skin heads; or intolerant, totalitarian, murdering Islamic jihadists. Moreover, compassion and understanding are useless with such people as they are implacable, ideologically driven foes with the absolute truth hellbent on our subjugation or destruction. As with our enemies in WWII  our jihadist foes must be crushed, broken and defeated before there can be peace.
 
 
 COMMENTS, THOUGHTS AND WITTICISMS
  
 
AWWWWW
 
What good little jihadis the Tsarnaevs are, wanting to complete the unfinished work of the Times Square Bomber so that his jihad wouldn't be in vain.

Sudan: Muslim cleric says Israel behind Boston jihad bombings, Iran earthquake - Jihad Watch
OF COURSE IT WAS A JEWISH PLOT
 
the sign of which was the kid recuperating from his wounds in Boston's Beth Israel Hospital.
 
 
 NOW THAT THE BOSTON TERROR BOMBERS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS MOSLEM
 

will Obama designate their murderous mass casualty jihadist crime as Tax Day Sports Event Shopping Place Violence?

 
 Pam Geller writes:
 
"Like I said in a previous post, "self-radicalized" is a myth. There is always a mosque, a religious leader, the imprimatur of a Muslim cleric."
 
My Comment:
 
PAM ISN'T COMPLETELY CORRECT 
 
In the entire history of Islam there has been one "self-radicalized" Moslem: the Prophet Mohammed

 

 

BARACK OBAMA: THE MOST RECKLESS SPENDER EVER, NOT THE WORST TAXER

 

 
 
 

THIS COUNTRY HAS HAD BIG GOVERNMENT LIBERAL PRESIDENTS

like Hoover and Roosevelt who've been more ignorant and 
reckless than Obama in taxing Americans during a period of economic distress. But in ignorance and recklessness Obama is unsurpassed (the ruling all time king) when it comes to the borrowing, spending and printing of money, and in the controlling and regulating of business. Just as the stupid policies and leadership of Hoover and FDR prolonged the Great Depression and economic suffering of the American people, so is the equally stupid policies and leadership of Obama prolonging the worst and weakest recovery (some say there is no recovery) since the end of World War II-the worst six years since the Great Depression.  
If Obama finishes his presidency without a double dip recession it will be a miracle. But if that should happen this lying reckless ignoramus will blame "obstructionist" Republicans for not letting him tax and spend enough.

 

BUSH VS OBAMA

WHO IS THE MOST RECKLESS SPENDING HEAD OF STATE IN HISTORY?

 

 

To set the record straight on who's the most reckless spender of all time, Barack Obama or George Bush,  Obama just six days after signing the biggest stimulus spending bill in history pledged and predicted that by the end of his first term he'd cut in HALF Bush's record breaking deficit of $490 billion. He believed (and wrongly) that the stimulus would so supercharge and revive the US economy and put Americans back to work that the boom in consumption, economic activity and tax revenues would allow him to cut the deficit to $245 billion by 2012.

But the stimulus was a bust and the promised boom in consumption, jobs and revenue hasn't materialized. Six and a half years in office and we have a real unemployment rate of 10%, and the deficit while coming down from a staggering, historic $1.5 trillion under Obama is now $489 billion-little less than double the promised $245 billion. 

In short, Obama tripled the deficit then cut it in half adding gigantically to our unsustainable growing pulverizing national debt; and he has the audacity to say that halving his historic deficits is proof that "we are not going bankrupt (see)"? Let's just paint him as an economic jackass who wouldn't know a good fiscal, monetary and economic policy if he tripped over it. 

 

 

 RELATED

MR. PRESIDENT: THE ECONOMY SUCKS BECAUSE YOU'RE A LEFTIST IGNORAMUS 

< p style="text-align: center;">OBAMA’S FAILED STIMULUS AND BUSH’S UNDERREPORTED RECOVERY

BARACK OBAMA: PROTECTOR AND DEFENDER OF IRAN-IN-CHIEF

 
 
 
It's no secret that the Obama Administration opposes a military solution to ending Iran's nuclear ambitions and terrorist aggression in the Middle East; and is dead against Israel carrying out air strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities (and other military targets) like it did on Iraq's and Syria's nuke reactors in 1981 and 2007. In fact, it was reported last month that Obama thwarted a planned Israeli air force strike on Iran last year by threatening to act as Iran's proxy air force and shoot down Israeli jets (and murder their pilots) before they could reach their targets (see). As Israel and the US neither confirmed nor denied the report we don't know if it was true.
 
But what we do know now, and is very disconcerting, is that Obama in his negotiations with Iran for a framework agreement betrayed Israel by agreeing to lift the ban on conventional arms sales to Tehran. This allowed the Russians to legally go ahead with a planned sale of a sophisticated $800 million air defense missile system that was put on hold since 2010  when the deal was struck. This system would shield Iran's nuclear facilities from attacks. The concern that the Obama administration voiced over the sale complaining that it's "not constructive" is bull. It is inconceivable that Obama was surprised by the announcement Monday from Moscow. It was a foregone conclusion that once the ban was lifted Russia would go ahead with the sale as it desperately needs the cash because of sanctions and the drop in oil prices distressing Russia's economy.  
 
The sale was probably a concession given to Russia to get them on board for the framework agreement. What I wrote yesterday that the sale is a slap in the face to the US, and that Obama and Hillary are probably regretting their cancellation of the missile shield to Poland and Eastern Europe, no longer seems credible to me. If they could go back in time they'd probably stupidly cancel the deal all over again. In fact, Obama insanely opposes Poland building its own missile shield because the Russians are against it. Even with the Ukraine crisis Obama has learned nothing and still plays the appeasing fool to Putin's delight (see) .
 
As Obama opposes an Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear infrastructure (and is equally opposed to a US strike) this Russian missile deal makes it less likely. So why should Obama be concerned about this sale? He's Iran's Protector and Defender from Israel in Chief-he's got their back; and the mullahs should honor him with a special award to compliment his unearned peace prize.
 
 
 

IF I WERE A BILLIONAIRE AND WANTED TO ACQUIRE A NUCLEAR BOMB

where would I go? Which nuclear power would likely do business with me? Answer: Cash strapped North Korea, the worst nuclear proliferator on earth. This is the same North Korea whose relationship with Tehran goes back to 1989 when Khamenei came to power as Iran's Supreme Leader;  which has a dangerous Science & Technology Cooperation Agreement with Iran;  and was jointly working with Iranian nuclear scientists in building an illegal nuclear weapons facility at Deir al-Zour, Syria-that was happily destroyed by Israel. So let's cut through the crap: If Iran isn't already in possession of one or more nukes hidden away in North Korea it can easily build them there. Period!

 

POSTSCRIPT

DEBATE ON POLITICO ABOUT IRAN AND NORTH KOREA

Apollo, how much do you know about nuclear weapon construction? I know some, but I have degrees in physics and mathematics and a PhD in CS. Once a nation has 20% enriched U235 they can easily get to a crude thermonuclear device in 6-9 months. It would not be pretty but it will detonate.

Iran has had 20% enriched U235 for years. 90% of the cascading uranium hexafloride gas centrifuge work is already done. If they wanted a nuclear weapon they would already have one. And no intelligence agency in the world believes they have constructed such a bomb. So those are actual facts.

  •  
  • But what might the Iranians be enriching off shore with their Axis of Evil partners in North Korea-with whom they have a Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement?
    Does that even matter when Iran has enough U235 to construct 3 or more thermonuclear weapons on their own soil buried under hundreds of meters of granite? In case you had not noticed Iran has an actual source in the ground for yellow cake within their borders.
     
     
    And how can you be sure that Iran doesn't have a stockpile of nukes with their cash strapped nuclear partners in N. Korea, just like the Saudis likely have it with their partners in Pakistan?
     
    •  

    • Well, no intelligence agency in the world believes Iran has a thermonuclear weapon. And why would Iran even bother? They have much more minimally processed U235 within their nation than North Korea will ever ever have. And their technology is far advanced over the technology employed by North Korea. Don't be paranoid about things that even the Israeli intelligence services are not worried about.
    • Well then that probably explains why Iranian nuclear scientists are in N. Korea. Are you so naïve as to believe that Iran's 2012 Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement with the Norks has nothing to do with up grading their nuclear infrastructure into a state of the art weapons production system so that Iran can have off shore facilities to produce the most advanced and devastating nukes?
       RELATED

     

     

    THE FINAL TRANSFORMATION OF HILLARY CLINTON AFTER THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RACE

     
     
     If Hillary Clinton's four unproductive years as Obama's hard working, world traveling Secretary of State ravaged her health and beauty making her look like this: 
     
     

     

    What will she look like after nineteen grueling months of an exhausting, debilitating presidential campaign against "sadistic," "sexist,"  "mean-spirited," "hate driven," "fascist" Tea Party Republicans, and capitalist Koch Brothers' money?  What follows might not be exaggeration:
     
     
    But sickening as her final transformation will be what would make America ready for the nightmare of a Hillary presidency is not three seasons of Madame Secretary, but six seasons of this:
     
     
     Has the phenomenon of The Walking Dead paved the way for the Zombie Apocalypse of the White House? Hope not.
     
     

     

    PUTIN CRAPS ALL OVER OBAMA AND HILLARY WITH IRANIAN 
    MISSILE DEAL

    How Obama and Hillary must painfully regret the day they canceled the missile defense shield for Poland and Eastern Europe to kiss Vladimir Putin's unappeasable ass in a predictably foolish attempt to reset US/Russian relations. 648 days to go for the ongoing, progressive weakening of America as we decline economically, militarily and geopolitically while our enemies boldly advance across the world.  It's anguishing!

    On sale on E-Bay for a buck a copy.

     

    RELATED

     
     
    POSTSCRIPT I
     
     

    THE WALL STREET RECOVERY WILL NOT BE COMPLETE

    without eight full years of Hillary.

    HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT 2016!

    And add 20,000 points to the Dow.

     

     
     POSTSCRIPT II
     
    After 19 months of strenuous campaigning and wearing herself out Hillary could find herself in one of these:
     
     
    HELL (ary) ON WHEELS
     
     

    HILLARY CLINTON ANNOUNCES CANDIDACY FOR PRESIDENT ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF FDR’S DEATH. DOES THIS SIGNAL HER SUCCESS? OR THE DEATH OF NEW DEAL LIBERALISM?

     
     Will Hillary be the next President from the State of New York after FDR? Or is she the tired face of Liberalism symbolizing its exhaustion and demise after the wreckage of the Obama years?
     
    ON APRIL 12, 1945,
     
    upon the death of FDR, Harry Truman became the 33rd President of the United States.
     
    ON APRIL 12, 2015,
     
    on the 70th anniversary of FDR's death (33 days after her emailgate press conference) Hillary Clinton (born during the Truman Era) launched her campaign for the 45th President of the United States.
     
    FDR, the 44th Governor of New York, died in 1945. Hillary Clinton, former Senator from and resident of New York, is aspiring to succeed the 44th President and become number 45-which would make her the first President since FDR to come from New York.
     
    FDR was elected 32nd President on November 8, 1932. The election date for 2016 is November 8th: the 84th anniversary of FDR's landslide victory over Republican Herbert Hoover.
     
    FDR was born January 30, 1882. Hillary was born exactly 24,010 days later on October 26, 1947. 24,010 is a multiple of 70 343x. 70 is the number of years separating FDR's death and Hillary announcing her candidacy (see).
     
    When FDR was elected 32nd President he was 50 years, 9 months and 10 days old. This totals 18, 545 days (see). This five digit number ending in 45 could  indicate both the year FDR died and the next US President who'll be elected on the anniversary of FDR's victory.
     
    Are these auspicious signs pointing to Hillary's success for becoming the first female US President? They are very compelling indeed. But there are other signs equally as strong which seem ominous of defeat and the death of New Deal Liberalism.  Is Hillary announcing her candidacy on the anniversary of FDR's death one of these signs? I'll be writing about this in the weeks ahead.
     
    POSTSCRIPT
     
     If the nominee of the Republican Party wins the presidency he/she will be the 45th President and the 19th Republican to hold that office. This gives us the number 1945 the year of FDR's death. Interesting, no?
     
     
    RELATED
     
     

    MR. PRESIDENT: THE ECONOMY SUCKS BECAUSE YOU’RE A LEFTIST IGNORAMUS

     
    Just as economic ignoramus FDR's New Deal  prolonged the Great Depression so too has economic ignoramus Barack Obama's "new New Deal" prolonged a weak, trickle growth recovery verging on a double dip recession.
     
    With no end in sight to the worst economic recovery since the end of World War II  Barack Obama (who is causing this mess) is now having regrets that back in 2008 he failed to tell the American people just how bad the economic crisis was, and how long it would take for robust growth and prosperity to return (see).  Indeed, with the recovery showing signs of weakening because of his leftist policies and poor economic leadership (Obamacare, Dodd-Frank, EPA (fake climate change) regulations, Marxist anti-business/class warfare rhetoric, etc, which are inhibiting growth and jobs creation, seeObama is now back to blaming his favorite punching bag George Bush for the terrible housing and credit crash that his policies, in fact, didn't cause-Bill Clinton's reckless leftwing "affordable" housing policies that put millions of low-income families into homes they couldn't afford was the fountainhead and ultimate cause (see).
     
    Truth is, if Al Gore or John Kerry or Hillary or Obama himself were president in 2008 the government-caused housing crash would have happened all the same-government agencies (Fannie, Freddie and FHA) owned nearly 75% of all bad subprime mortgages (see).
     
     
    But that Obama underestimated the severity of the recession is an outright lie. In between his historic election and ill-omened inaugural Obama repeatedly said that the crisis caused by the crash "was unlike anything we have seen since the Great Depression";  and that the "hole we are in is so deep" that it would require "a massive government effort and spending stimulus" to dig our way out. But this too was a lie. The stimulus, as it turned out, was unnecessary and a huge unproductive waste of borrowed money. And though Obama claims that his policies saved us from another  depression this too is a provable self-serving lie.
     
     
    Obamanomics = Hocus Pocus Economics. A real stinker.
     
    Truth is, the beginning of the end of the Great Recession (as I wrote  HERE)
     began in December 2008 under George Bush-this was the start of the turnaround or V-shaped Bush recovery. After 18 months of recession the steady deepening contraction of GDP bottomed out and went into reverse. In fact, on the day of Obama's ill-omened inaugural the worst was behind us and the economy was energetically on the mend. True, hundreds and thousands of Americans were still losing jobs; but that was a lagging indicator as we were climbing out of the hole unaided by Obama's policies. But though the economy was improving that didn't stop Obama from resorting to fear mongering as he painted a dire, almost apocalyptic picture of our economic future if he didn't get his huge historic stimulus. "Unless we take immediate government action to rescue the economy we will have RECESSION WITHOUT END" warned Obama. But this too was a lie and an example of Obama's ignorance of basic US economic cyclic history.
     
     
    Truth is, throughout the course of the 19th century up to the onset of the Great Depression in the late 1920s America passed through numerous recessions and depressions without intervention from Washington to fix things. Indeed, the strongest government actions taken before Hoover's unprecedented interventions and jobs killing tax hikes-followed by FDR's tax and spend New Deal (Hooverism on steroids)-was Harding and Coolidge going in the opposite direction: massively slashing taxes, spending and federal regulations and ending the depression they inherited from Woodrow Wilson by unleashing the Roaring Soaring Prospering Twenties (see). When Harding took office unemployment was at 11.9%. Six years later under Coolidge it shrunk to an astonishing 1.5%-a record unmatched until World War II; and this miracle was accomplished by taking the government's boot off the neck of the US economy and letting it fix itself-something Obama learned from his Marxist training is impossible and insane .
     
     
    In fact, in the 1990s when socialist Sweden was on the verge of Greece-like  socialist bankruptcy and collapse-from massive socialist debt and a highly centralized socialist welfare economy-the Swedes did what Harding and Coolidge did in the 1920s to solve their crisis; and after a short period of adjustment and high unemployment (caused by the privatizing of state-run industries) the economy dramatically revived and thrived; and Sweden today has one of the strongest and most productive and freest economies in the world. In short, what saved socialist Sweden in the 1990s, and America in the early 1920s, is what FDR and his New Dealers, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and the crackpot statist progressive Left utterly loathe and say doesn't work: AUSTERITY (Tea Party) ECONOMICS (see).
     
    Obama is now running scared and fearing the worse for his economic legacy. At home consumers are underspending, banks are underlending, businesses are underhiring and entrepreneurs are under investing in new innovative ideas. After six years and trillions borrowed, spent and printed (with $18 trillion in fiscal debt and $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities) Obama has failed to restore confidence in the economy as both Wall Street and Main Street fear an uncertain catastrophic future. Indeed, one of the grimmest signs of Obama's failed economic leadership is that retail consumer spending (essential for a robust recovery) is only 29% of GDP vs. Ronald Reagan's astonishing 68% after eight years in office (see).
     
    And on top of Obama's trickle growth domestic economy which is weakening again there is a global economic slowdown troubling him and threatening our country (see). Indeed, Obama certainly fears (and rightly so)  that if this domestic and global trend continues the US economy could go into contraction causing a double dip recession before he leaves office. I had predicted this could happen HERE  from the ominous sign of Depression-born Roland Burris replacing Obama in the US Senate. Amazingly, when Burris was born on August 3, 1937 it was the very month that FDR's New Deal began to collapse and fail.
     
    In the final analysis just as FDR's ill-conceived anti-growth, punish the rich New Deal prolonged the Great Depression so is Obama's "new New Deal (Obamanomics)" prolonging the worst economic recovery in our lifetimes. Just as FDR was an economic ignoramus who didn't know how to grow the economy (doing all the wrong growth-killing things) so too is Barack Obama's failed government-is-the-answer Keynesian/welfare policies and socialist economic (punish success) ideology keeping the economy in a straight jacket, and posssibly leading it into another deep recession or much, much worse. 
     
    RELATED
     
     
     
     
     

    THE TSARNAEV BROTHERS AND THE BOSTON MARATHON 9/11 BOMBING: WILL DZHOKAR GIVE UP HIS ACCOMPLICES TO SAVE HIMSELF?

     

     
    In April 2002 eight year old Dzhokar Tsarnaev and his family arrive in Boston fleeing persecution in Chechnya. Dzhokar's older brother Tamerlan would join them two years later.
     
    On April 15, 2013 the Tsarnaev brothers, inspired by the 9/11 triple airplane bombings in New York and Washington DC, detonate two deadly homemade pressure cooker bombs at the festive Boston Marathon (it was Patriots' Day) killing three, injuring hundreds and causing millions in damage in what was the worst Islamic terror attack on US soil since 9/11.
     
     
     
    On April  8, 2015 (23 months after the bombing) Dzhokar Tsarnaev (showing no remorse) is found guilty in a Boston court on 30 federal charges. He faces the death penalty or life in prison.
     
    Dzhokar (born July 22, 1993, the year of the first World Trade Center bombing) arrived in America seven months after the devastating attack on 9/11.
     
     
    Seven months after the 11th anniversary of 9/11-the day of Benghazi when Dzhokar ironically becomes a naturalized US citizen-the Tsarnaev brothers terror bomb the 2013 Boston Marathon for Allah and Islam.
     
    On September 11, 2011 (one year to the date before Dzhokar becomes a US citizen and 19 weeks after bin Laden's death) Tamerlan allegedly went on a bloody killing spree slitting the throats of three young Jewish men (one a friend) in a Boston suburb apartment. Was this a sacrifial offering of "evil" Jews to Allah on the holiest day of modern jihadist history?
     
     
    Boston, the place of the Marathon Bombing (inspired by 9/11) was the city where American Airlines Flight 11 originated before it slammed into the World Trade Center initiating the 9/11 attack.
     
     
     
    After the Marathon Bombing the Tsarnaev boys were planning to bring their campaign of terror and death to Times Square in New York-following in a way the Boston to New York path of AA Flight 11. Luckily they didn't make it.
     
    To this day local and federal authorities are fairly certain that the Tsarnaevs had accomplices and didn't act alone. For the complicated assembling of the two bombs and the close proximity of the blasts were way beyond the Tsarnaevs' technical capabilities. If the Tsarnaevs were aided by other more professional terrorists (as seems to be the case) will Dzhokar give them up in a deal to escape the death penalty? I hope so. For it's likely that the accomplices will strike again. And this time it could be deadlier (see).
     
    RELATED
     
     

     OBAMA, BIN LADIN AND THE ULTIMATE CAUSE OF THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING

    THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING: THE WHY, THE MOTIVE, THE REASON, THE TRUTH 

    OMINOUS SIGNS OF A COMING HORRIFIC 9/11 ATTACK?

    ZUBEIDAT TSARNAEV: THE JIHAD MOM WHO MADE JIHAD KIDS

    FORWARD E-MAILS TO

    < p style="text-align: center;"> reninvest2013@aol.com

    KISSINGER AND SHULTZ REVERSE BACKING OBAMA, ISLAM’S WAR ON ISRAEL AND SPAIN, THE MOHAMMED CARTOON CONTEST, AND MORE

     

    Schultz and Kissinger

    George Shultz, Barack Obama and Henry Kissinger in an Oval Office meeting in 2013 when they backed Obama's negotiations with Iran.

    THE AUDACITY OF OBAMA

    comparing his horribly worse than bad Munich deal with the nuclear terror masters in Tehran to the Nixon-Kissinger and Reagan-Schultz negotiations with the Evil Empire in the 1970s and 80s. And now Kissinger and Shultz who backed Obama's Iran negotiations in 2013 (see) jointly write an op-ed piece showing just how delusional he is, and how distant and dangerous is his deal from their historic achievements. But what will Obama do? Now that Kissinger and Shultz have joined Scott Walker in opposition to his terrible deal will he smugly and arrogantly lecture them too as if they were amateurs in need of his superior experience and wisdom? Will he be so foolish? My guess is that he will.

    BTW, as Obamunists can't accuse Kissinger and Shultz of partisanship they will likely resort to smearing them as two senile old men (fossils) with damaged brains no longer competent in diplomacy and foreign policy analysis.

     

    Spain arrests 11 Muslims in thwarted jihad plot to attack Catalonia | Atlas Shrugs

     

    Moslem Spain and Portugal

     

    THE REASON FOR THIS PLANNED ATTACK IN SPAIN

    is what underlies 67 years of relentless bloodthirsty Arab jihad against the jewish state: Lands that once belonged to Islam are still owned by Islam and must be returned to Islam. And until they're Islamic again Islam is at war with them. Islam has a deed signed by God giving it ownership of Israel, Spain, Portugal, Sicily, Malta, etc. That deed is the Koran.

    But the world's greatest offender of a once proud Moslem owned land is Israel. Why? Because unlike Spain, Portugal and the others it is a Jewish state (Judaism is a corruption of Islam, Moslems believe) existing on the Arabian peninsula, the holy, sacred birth place of Islam; and that makes its existence a blow to Islamic supremacy and painful refutation of fundamental Islamic "truths." What "truths?" The "truths" that Islam's God, Prophet, Koranic Revelation and Faith are SUPREME over everything in this world-believers and infidels. The "truth" that Islam is God's greatest gift and answer to humanity (the solution to all problems). The "truth" that Islam is the purpose, aim and end of human history. The "truth" that the perfection of this earth and human society can only be, and will be, achieved in a one world Moslem state (God's plan for humanity from all eternity). 

    Israel's existence raises painful doubts about, and in truth refutes, these ancient Islamic verities telling Moslems that this is a pluralistic world of many faiths-Jewish, Christian, Moslem Hindu, Buddhist-and it's always going to be that way. And unless they accept the reality about Islam-that it isn't the answer to all of humanity's ills-Moslems could die by the millions in a civilizational war they can 't win.

    RELATED

     

     

     
     

    IF I COULD DRAW THIS WOULD BE MY PICTURE:

    The Prophet in the burning Arabian desert mounted on a swift black steed raising his blood stained sword to heaven and crying out to unbelievers: Believe in me or die! Believe in me or die! And if it pleases me to let you live I'll crush you with oppression!

    Now if I wanted to be amusing the picture wouldn't get past the censors.

     

     
     DAMN THAT GEORGE BUSH

     

    If he hadn't driven Saddam Hussein from power each ot these families would be $25, 000 richer. Damn him! /sarc

     

     

    BIBI’S DEFIANCE OF OBAMA. JOHN KERRY’S “GREATNESS,” ISLAM’S TOILET PAPER REVOLUTION AND MUCH, MUCH MORE

    Barack Obama rejects Benjamin Netanyahu’s call for Iran to recognize Israel - Kendall Breitman - POLITICO 

     
    Barack Obama is a man of staggering stupidity, blindness and weakness (the poorest of God's creatures ever to be president). And foremost of his failings and deficiencies is his lack of judgment and realism in foreign affairs which has thrown the world into chaos-his ideal world as it should be. 
     
    The audacity and ingratitude of Bibi Netanyahu defying Barack Obama on Iran at every turn after all the good things that he's done for Israel-like intervening in Israeli politics with Arabs and Leftists to oust Bibi from power. It's bad enough that Bibi is depriving Obama of a once in a lifetime historic peace deal with the savage, depraved, Jew-hating Palestinians-who after 67 years of Arab jihad still want victory over Israel not peace. But now that the Zionist darling of racist, sexist tea party Republicans, and warmongering Bill Kristol neocons, wants Obama to destroy his once in a lifetime historic breakthrough with Iran-to stop the nuclear mullahs from getting the bomb (which they already have in North Korea, see)-by making the deal contingent on recognizing Israel's existence. FAT CHANCE!
     
     It seems that Bibi's hatred of Obama is such that he wants him to leave office in utter humiliation-joining the Presidents' Hall of Shame with Jimmy Carter-with nothing more positive to show for his eight years of failure than an unearned Nobel Peace Prize-which he won for being a black man who wanted peace, but paved the way instead to turmoil, hell and war in the Middle East. When the next Howard Zinn writes the history of these times the biggest villain will be Bibi Netanyahu: the racist apartheid settlement building colonial Zionist thug./sarc
     
    RELATED
     
     
     
     
     
     
     FOR JOHN KERRY'S GREATNESS AS SECRETARY OF STATE:
     

    his historic achievement with Iran at Lausanne, and mystiic negotiations with GAIA on Climate Change-where he charmed her into dropping global temperatures with a James Taylor song-he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. That is to say, half of Barack Obama's unearned prize, or at least the lengthy chain.

     
     
     
     
     

    IF WE CAN ONLY GET OBAMA

    to go hunting with Dick Cheney.

     

     For those who don't know when Cheney was VP he accidently shot a friend while on a hunting trip. 

     

     
     
     
     

    ATLAS SHRUGS AND JIHAD WATCH

    make ApolloSpeaks' Top 50 Conservative Blogs of 2015. Both are tied for 1st place.

     

     
     
    Is Corker crazy? What terrorism?  There is no terrorism. Obama won the war on terrorism. /sarc

     

     

    "NO MENTION OF ISLAM, MOSLEMS, CHRISTIANS

    or Islamic extremism," says Gateway's Jim Hoft. But the radical terrorist Moslem extremists who brutally tyranize over the Iranian people, and put them in harms way by seeking to dominate the Middle East and becoming a nuclear power, constitute, for Obama, a real, authentic "Islamic Republic" that would have made Mohammed proud. Go figure.

     

     
     
    image_650_365
     
    AFTER CENTURIES OF ABYSMAL DECLINE
     
    it's good to see the Religion of God's Peace becoming creative again with this revival of Islam's artistic genius and spirit extolling the brotherhood of man. Wonder if Obama will make a late entry to show his goodwill toward Iran and love of Jews and Israel? Or will he have mullah-loving Valerie do it for him?

      

    GOOD NEWS! Turkey declares Muslims will now be allowed to use toilet paper (instead of just their left hand) when wiping their behinds | BARE NAKED ISLAM

    wc_papier

    HOORAH! PROGRESS AT LAST! A BIG HISTORIC BACKENDED BREAKTHROUGH REFORM OF ISLAM!
     
    But not enough to paper over the fact that Islam is the foulest religion on earth.
     
    koran_klopapier2
     When Islam allows the Koran to be printed on toilet paper and used to wipe a*s then I'll know that it's been truly reformed, modernized, and deserving of respect.
     
     
     
     
     
    EVEN THE MOST DIABOLICALLY EVIL PEOPLE

     

    can do something good and useful now and then. ISIS killing Palis is like Nazi scum killing Nazi sh*t. I relish it.

     
     
     
     
    LOOKS LIKE LOVELY NICOLE'S GOT A BAD CASE OF
     
    "Eyes Wide Shut."
     
    Perhaps she should change her last name to KITMAN?
     
     

    OBAMA’S “PEACE IN OUR TIME” MUNICH MOMENT IS ON HOLD. UNLIKE CHAMBERLAIN WITH HITLER HE HAS NOTHING REAL WITH IRAN

     
    This "peace in our time" Munich moment for Obama is on hold.
     
    Apart from what I posted Friday that theonazi terrorist Iran is already a nuclear power with access to North Korea's nuclear technology and bombs (just as the Saudis have access to Pakistan's) Barack Obama has yet to do with his "historic" agreement with the mullahs what Neville Chamberlain did immediately after he signed the  Munich Accords with Hitler: show the American people and world that he has a real signed joint deal .
     
    Indeed, in the early morning hours of September 30, 1938 Chamberlain signed a real, physical, one page agreement with Hitler, Mussolini and French Prime Minister Daladier ceding the predominately German Czechoslovak region of Sudetenland to Nazi Germany in exchange for peace. But Chamberlain wanted something more from Hitler: a memorandum of understanding about the accord that he could show the British people. Hitler consented and signed his name to the following: 
     
    "We regard the agreement signed last night and the Anglo-German Naval Agreement [of 1935] as symbolic of the desire of our two peoples never to go to war with one another again."
     
     It was this memo that Chamberlain later that day on his triumphal return from Munich was to wave over his head as achieving  "peace in our time" for the British people. But we have seen nothing comparable or concrete from Obama. Neither he nor Iran nor any of the P5+1 countries have produced so much as a memo signed with Iran about the joint agreement for a framework that Obama claims was finished and done. Indeed, it's four days since the meeting in Lausanne and Obama has showed us nothing real either in hand or on the White House website to substantiate there is a real written joint deal. Instead, we got a speech in the Rose Garden Tuesday and a radio address Saturday telling us what a great historic "once in a lifetime opportunity" John Kerry negotiated for our country (and his legacy). And unless the Republican led Congress acts to ratify the deal Iran will cross the nuclear threshold and get the bomb (that they already have in North Korea). And history will hold Republicans accountable as the one's who screwed up
     
    Iran's President Rouhani mocking Obama and his butt kissing concessions, and  "misunderstanding" of the framework agreement that he will enlighten him on.
     
    But then came the expected treachery. Iran poking its finger in Obama's eye contradicted his version of the deal on many key points. Contradicting Obama on the phased easing of nuclear related sanctions Iran's Foreign Minister Zarif said they only agreed to their IMMEDIATE termination. And contradicting Obama's claim that only 6000 of Iran's 19,000 centrifuges will be allowed to operate (to enrich uranium for the hell of it) Zarif said he agreed to no such thing. He said that Iran could limit itself to 6000, but that hasn't been decided. So what's the truth?  No body knows because unlike the perfectly transparent Neville Chamberlain Obama has produced nothing in writing for the world to see. What is certain is that Obama and the mullahs both are shameful, compulsive deceptive, world-class  liars who can't be trusted.
     
    What likely happened is that there was a verbal agreement on April Fools Day about the parameters of a deal, but nothing chiseled in stone. What is likely is that the chess playing Iranians pulled another bait and switch* on Obama on the 6000  centrifuges, and are using it as a new,  post-Lausanne  bargaining chip. That to avoid the embarrassment of getting no deal  Obama will have to lower the bar and cave in again and release Iran's economy from all nuclear related sanctions and restrictions IMMEDIATELY. In other words, the Iranians are holding the deal hostage to the immediate suspension of all sanctions. Meanwhile, Obama's  "peace in our time" Munich moment (literally speaking) is on hold.
     
    *Like when Iran agreed to send its enriched uranium to Russia then withdrew it.
     
    RELATED
     

    THE UNIQUELY BAD PRESIDENCY OF BARACK OBAMA, BACTERIA EATING JIHADI FLESH AND THE LONLINESS OF THE RADICAL ANTI-ISRAEL LEFT

    Susan Rice: “The fact that we have not had a successful [massive terrorist] attack on our homeland since 9/11 should not be diminished” | Atlas Shrugs

     
    WITH BARACK OBAMA'S NEW NEW DEAL STIMULUS AND MONEY PRINTING RECOVERY
     
    the worst since the end of World War II-showing  low GDP growth at about 2% per annum, poor and dwindling consumer spending and a shrinking work force; with Obamacare and its soaring insurance costs hurting the middle class, and making it so hugely unpopular that even Chuck Schumer admits it was a mistake (see); with Dodd-Frank discouraging lending, entrepreneurial investing and innovation vital to technological progress (see); with debt and unfunded entitlement and pension liabilities in the tens and trillions threatening the Detroiting (thirdworlding) of America; with Moslem Outreach and Russian Reset in shambles, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict worse than ever, the Middle East in utter chaotic flames, and an expanding, imperialistic, terrorist Iran getting the bomb and sanctions relief as rewards for its evil behavior,  the one bright spot in Obama's six failed years (according to Rice) is that we haven't had a massive 9/11 type attack where thousands were killed and skyscrapers lost. Okay. I'll give our lawless, lying, lousy president that much credit so far. But it's not enough to raise his presidency above the sub-zero mark making it so uniquely and destructively bad  it can only be compared to itself.
     
     
     
    Islamic-State-Raqqa-flesh-eating-disease-567597
     
    If this deadly flesh consuming plague called Leishmaniasis (rhymes with ISIS another type of virulent disease) continues to spread throughout the Islamic State (horribly ravaging and killing most if not all of its murdering jihadis and thugs) I propose that we award the parasites causing it Barack Obama's Nobel Peace Prize as this disease would be doing more for regional and world peace than he is.
     
     Let the world burn. I got my Nobel Prize, the only positive thing in my legacy.
     
     
    Pew numbers on US sympathy March 2015
     
    Gallup's latest poll on US support for Israel had a whopping seven out of ten Americans pro-Israel (see). The more recent  Pew poll above measures US support for Israel against its Palestinian enemies and in every racial, political and Christian religious group, except one, support for the Jewish state comes out ahead.  That one exception is the lunatic fringe of the Democrat party: the ultra liberal radical (anti-American) Israel-is-an-apartheid state left. 19% strongly favor Israel and 22% Palestinians. With the lunatics divided by only 3% that isn't a lot.
     
    As you can see those Americans wanting a one state solution with Israeli Jews living in oppression in a larger Arab-Palestinian state (the PA program) are relatively weak, powerless, frustratingly impotent and can do no more to hurt Israel than with pin prick attacks on its economy.
     
     
     
     WHEN THEY'RE CHANTING "DEATH TO AMERICA!"
     

    don't they realize that Allah is answering their prayers? And that his agent for destroying America is Barack Obama: The Grim Reaper of Liberty?

     

     

     

    WITHOUT REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN IT WILL ABSOLUTELY BECOME A NUCLEAR ARMED STATE

     
    Obama to Iran: if you like your nukes you can keep your nukes. And we'll sweeten the deal by lifting sanctions so you can keep (and continue to expand) your Islamic empire, if you like that too.
     
    JUST 14 HOURS AND 25 MINUTES AFTER APRIL FOOLS' DAY
     
     the worst and most dangerous appeasing head of state since Neville Chamberlain announced to the nation and world his historically bad peace-in-our-time Munich deal with Islamonazi terrorist Iran: that he's given up trying to stop them from becoming a nuclear armed state; and that he's giving them their economy back with the eventual lifting of all economic sanctions worth billions to finance their growing theonazi empire of oppression, terror and death.
     
     
    THE VERIFICATION AND TRANSPARENCY HOAX
    AND THE NUCLEAR NORKS
     

     What Obama didn't say-and knows to be true as it would make him look like the biggest fool since Hitler deceived Chamberlain-is that even if Iran becomes 100% transparent about its domestic nuclear program; even if the terrorist mullahs open up every inch of their vast $100 billion nuclear infrastructure to the most rigorous UN inspection and verification process, it won't stop them from getting the bomb. Why? Because just as the Saudis can easily acquire nukes from Pakistan (which they don't want to do but will if Iran goes nuclear, see) the mullahs can easily acquire them from their "Axis of Evil" partners in Stalinist North Korea-the worst nuclear proliferators on the planet. And if anyone is dumb enough to doubt this then they need to recall that just one year after the Norks detonated their first nuclear bomb they were hard at work (possibly with Iran) on building a nuclear weapons facility for Bashar Assad in Syria. This project was the "largest act of nuclear proliferation in history," said David Asher, George Bush's  coördinator for North Korea (see). The plant, however, was destroyed  by Israel* (see).

    *Because of the plant's illegal nature Assad  never filed a complaint with the UN about Israel violating Syria's airspace and destroying it.

    THE  IRAN-NORTH KOREA PACT

    The US has no way to shut down Iran's pathway to develop nukes in N.Korea.

    In fact, what Obama knows and wants kept hidden as it completely destroys his credibility of halting Iran's march to the bomb is that in 2012 Iran signed a scientific and technological cooperation agreement with North Korea (see and see). These two Axis of Evil states are evily working together on missile technology (for ICBMs which Iran has developed), and most likely nuclear weapons technology. Moreover, there is evidence that Assad (the worst mass murderer of the 21st century who used chemical weapons on his people) is still pursuing nuclear weapons with the Norks (see). Frighteningly, Iranian scientists are reported to have been present at both of  North Korea's nuclear detonations (see).

    Map: The site of a possible new nuclear facility in Syria.

     Radical terrorist jihadist Iran's nuclear ambitions cannot be constrained or controlled by any agreement-no more than was Hitler and the Nazis controlled by the Munich Accord before the outbreak of World War II. The genocidal mullahs are staying the course to a  deadly, mass  death-dealing nuclear armed state, and nothing can stop it but regime change. What we heard in the Rose Garden yesterday was a pathetic political smoke and mirrors charade for 2016 and his legacy. The goal of the negotiations was never to prevent Iran from getting the bomb, but to make the great amateur look like what he is not and can never be: a statesman.  Barack Obama is indeed the worst, weakest and most dangerously mendacious president in US history. Hoax and Change will not end until Obama's gone from the White House. And between now and then God help us.

    POSTSCRIPT

    The country that humiliated Jimmy Carter and America for 444 days with a hostage crisis will continue to humiliate this country and the 44th president till the end of his term. BTW, Obama's election on November 4, 2008 was the 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis. And his resounding defeat on November 4th of last year  was its 35th anniversary. That defeat foreshadowed the events of this week and the tragic time ahead. 
     
    RELATED
     
     
     

    NUCLEAR IRAN’S ARMY OF ISLAMIC PEACE ADVANCING TOWARD ISRAEL’S NORTHEAST BORDER

     Report: As Nuclear Deal Closes, Iranian Troops Headed to Israel’s Border | Atlas Shrugs

     
     
    ACCORDING TO BARACK OBAMA
     
    Islam is a "religion of peace." And the Islamic Republic of (theocratic) nuclear-to-be, fascist Iran-according to Obama (and as distinguished from phony, inauthentic, unIslamic warmongering ISIS)-is a real, true, authentic Islamic state practicing the real, true, authentic religion of Islamic peace as practiced by Mohammed-Islam's Prophet of Peace. Therefore, the Islamic Iranian forces of 10,000 strong that are approaching unIslamic Israel's godless northeast border are real, true, authentic Islamic soldiers practicing (as they peacefully march) the real, true, authentic religion of peace.
     
     
    In other words, these Iranian forces are an ARMY OF PEACE bringing peace and spreading peace wherever they peacefully go. Nothing to be alarmed about unless you're an irrational bigoted Moslem-hating Irano-Islamophobe like Netanyahu, Pam Geller and me. /sarc

     

     
     RELATED
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    GENOCIDAL PALESTINIANS JOIN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT TO PURSUE WAR CRIMES JIHAD AGAINST PEACE-LOVING, HUMANE, DEMOCRATIC ISRAEL (UPDATE ADDED)

    Terror state Palestine joins International Criminal Court to press war crimes charges against Israel | Atlas Shrugs

    IS PROVIDENCE MOCKING THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY (AND UNITED NATIONS)  

    for joining the ICC on April Fools' Day? It would seem so. So far this foolish move (which will do zero to change the status quo of self-caused poverty, oppression and Palestinian misery) has painfully cost the PA a monthly transfer of $120 million in tax revenues it collects from Israel. And if that's not bad enough Lindsey Graham, Rand Paul and other Republican senators are threatening to cut off $400 million in crucial annual US aid to the PA if it pursues war crimes jihad against Israel (see).

    Now in the event that the PA succeeds in getting the ICC prosecutor to file war crimes charges against certain Israeli citizens unless those charged are extradited to the Hague and placed under ICC arrest (which Israel would never consent to) there won't be or can't be a trial. Why? Because ICC rules prohibit the court from trying anyone in absentia. And no trial means no verdict guilty or not. In fact, all that the PA has to gain from getting certain Israelis charged is the propaganda value that Israel is harboring possible criminals sort by the ICC for war crimes, and is obstructing justice for its noncompliance with an arrest warrant. And that's it.

     

     Now you can see the the irony of the ICC accepting PA membership on April Fools' Day. With so little to gain and so much to lose the PA joining the ICC is an incredibly stupid, largely worthless, counter productive move in the foolish, ongoing 67 year war to destroy the Jewish state.

     

    UPDATE 

    Israel Unfreezes Palestinian Authority Tax Funds - Inside Israel - News - Arutz Shev 

    I just learned of this. Faced with a deteriorating Palestinian security and economic situation PM Netanyahu unfroze the tax funds he was withholding as punishment for the PA joining the ICC. But unappeased by this humanitarian gesture Abbas and the PA appear to be staying the course with the ICC.
     
    I first learned about Israel's punitive action in an article posted on  Mondoweiss (see).  The article stated that the Palis had a backup plan: a safety net of emergency funds provided by the Arab League so that they could pursue their war crimes jihad against Israel in peace. But apparently that didn't work out very well; the Arab League, perhaps, found it too expensive; and Netanyahu decided to release the  funds to bring relief from the suffering that the freeze was causing. This happened on the March 27th. As of today Mondoweiss made no mention of it. Wonder why?

    KERRY TURNS TO ALLAH TO SAVE NUKE DEAL WITH IRAN

     
     
     John Kerry silently praying to Allah at Lausanne.
     

    IF TOMORROW COMES AND GOES

    and nothing happens in Lausanne in nuke talks with Iran-no framework, no deal, no nothing-don't blame it on Bibi Netanyahu and his "anti-Obama" speech to Congress-or on his unexpected "racist" reelection two weeks ago; nor blame it on the 47 senators and their "treasonous" letter to Iran-making them worse than a platoon of  Bo Berghdahls; nor will France be to blame-retaliating for Obama's no-show at the Hebdo march; nor blame it on the Iranophobic Saudis whose king Obama bowed to six years ago-where's their gratitude?. No, not even Iran will be to blame despite the bait and switch it pulled today on sending its enriched uranium to Russia-testing the limits of Obama's butt-kissing desperation. 

    (thanx popeye)

    You heard it from the horse's mouth: the blame will be ALLAH'S AND ALLAH'S ALONE, "for everything that happens is His Will," says the High Holy Koran, God's ultimate revelation of truth. And if you're fool enough to disbelieve in a God then blame it on catastrophic CLIMATE CHANGE deranging people and driving them mad. For If it can turn virtuous women into filthy whores then it can lead peaceful nations into war.

     

    OBAMA TO IRAN: Okay, I get it. If you like your enriched uranium you can keep your enriched uranium. Just promise not to make a bomb on my watch. .

    WAS FRANCE’S THWARTING OF IRAN NUKE DEAL THE REAL REASON OBAMA SKIPPED THE PRO-HEBDO RALLY?

     Report: President Obama Threatens France For Not Supporting Iranian Nuclear Deal… | The Last Refuge

     

    French President Francois Hollande feted by the Obamas last year at White House. The date was February 11th- the 35th anniversary of the Iranian Revolution which has caused so much death and destruction in the world,  and will cause more if Iran gets the bomb.

    When Barack Obama leaves office in 2017 he desperately wants to do so with at least one significant achievement in foreign policy under his belt to compliment his historic achievement in domestic policy: Obamacare, his signature legislation. Before he was sworn in as president Obama imagined that his presidency would be diplomatically and gloriously rich in accomplishments rivaling the globally transforming presidency of Ronald Reagan who brought down the Soviet Union and won the Cold War-which seemed impossible at the start of his presidency. Using soft power, smart power, multilaterialism, appeasement and avoiding stupid (what a joke) the Great Blundering Appeaser believed he'd finish his presidency with the following major accomplishments:
     

    1) End the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan-we're still fighting in both countries with no end in sight.

    2) Reset relations with Russia that were ruined by the war with pro-western democratic Georgia and the liberation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia-Russia went to war against pro-western democratic Ukraine and liberated then annexed Crimea.

    3) Make peace between Israelis and Palestinians with a two state solution -since Obama's been president Israel has twice gone to war with Hamas in Gaza; and Prime Minister Netanyahu has sworn they'd be no Palestinian State while he's in power.

    4) End Iran's nuclear weapons program-this is being negotiated as I write.

    Indeed, of the four great diplomatic achievements Obama envisioned in his future only one remains a possibility: stopping Iran from getting the bomb-and that is going very badly. To date, despite all the spin about the "successful" Interim Agreement signed with Iran in 2012 (and Iran cheated on, see), Obama has gotten practically nowhere in his negotiations with the mullahs; and he's destroyed what little credibility he had as a deal maker when he prematurely lifted billions of dollars in sanctions on Iran (getting nothing in return). Frighteningly, Iran's vast and growing $100 billion plus nuclear weapons infrastructure-which includes hardened underground bomb making facilities, and perhaps one or more secret sites-is still in tact with spinning centrifuges enriching uranium as it builds ICBMs to deliver its nukes across oceans and seas to Europe and America.
     
     
    Indeed, as Iranian power lethally grows across the Middle East (and around the world) turning the Shiite Crescent into a Full Blazing Shia Sun of terror and blood, and as it draws ever closer to becoming the menacing nuclear North Korea of the Middle East, a miserable, mad Barack Obama faced with a foreign policy legacy worse than Jimmy Carter's is seemingly more desperate for a deal than is Iran (see).
     
    Indeed, as the March 31st deadline approaches Obama is panicking and striking out at allies who disapprove of his bad and dangerous peace-in-our-time Munich-like deal that isn't linked to Iran's criminal behavior (its sponsorship of terror abroad and human rights abuses at home) and simply freezes and doesn't dismantle (without enforcement and verification) its nuclear program. And the worst of these friendly offenders isn't Israel (which has no seat at the negotiating table) but leftist socialist economically  struggling France that is part of the P5 +1 group and which I wrote about HERE and HERE.
     
    French President Francois Hollande, left, shakes hands with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi during a meeting in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. (AP Photo/Yoan Valat, Pool) 
     
    But since I last wrote on this subject I've learned that prospects for a deal have gotten worse for the Obama regime. For Egypt (which Obama has stupidly alienated) has joined Saudi Arabia and the other Sunni Arab states hostile to Tehran and closed a multi-billion dollar arms deal with France-thus strengthening the leverage that the anti-Iran axis has over France (see). Reports of the US bullying France to get on board its dangerous bad deal train wreck are probably true. But the consequences to France of doing so could cost them billions in arms sales it can ill afford due to a weak economy.
     
     
     
    Judging from the way Washington is treating France it is likely that the real reason Obama skipped the pro-Hebdo rally in Paris last winter was because of the Hollande government's thwarting of the Iran nuke deal. Obama couldn't care less about France's economic woes or that France's conservatives are gaining strength in the polls;  of utmost importance to him  is his legacy and getting just about any kind of deal by March 31st that he can celebrate as a victory for peace with Iran's radical Islamic regime-that defines peace as IMPERIAL RESTORATION OF THE PERSIAN EMPIRE and  WORLD DOMINATION OF ISLAM. 
     
     
      

     

    OBAMA MUST APOLOGIZE TO AMERICA FOR THE BERGDAHL SCANDAL

    Obama deeply bowing to Japanese Emperor Akihito possibly as a symbolic gesture for the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki which shortened the war and saved a million lives. And now he must apologize to the nation for Bowe Berghdahl and the release of the Taliban Five.

     

    MR. PRESIDENT, YOU TRAVELED AROUND THE WORLD APOLOGIZING FOR AMERICA

    bowing and scraping before emperors and kings, believing you were doing the right and noble thing and fixing the damaged image of this country caused by your predecessor. And now you need to humble yourself before the American people and apologize for trading five bloodthirsty Taliban murderers for a worthless America-hating deserter responsible for the death of up to 14 brave soldiers. And then you need apologize to the dead soldiers' families for the White House photo op with the deserter's parents where you ignorantly took credit for his release as if it were a good and  praiseworthy deed. And lastly you must apologize to the deserter's platoon mates who you wrongly smeared as "swiftboating liars" for honestly telling the truth about his crimes. APOLOGIZE OR RESIGN, Mr. President. With only 15 percent of the military respecting you save what little remains of your honor.

     

     

    RELATED

    JUNE 30, 2009: THE OMINOUS DAY BO BERGDAHL DESERTED

    BOWE BERGDAHL: HERO OF THE RADICAL LEFT

    WHY BO BERGDAHL SHOULD HATE PRESIDENT OBAMA

     

     
    Not only does this worst of all US presidents think that he's the 4th greatest ever, but laughably he now likens himself to Spiderman-the only thing this spider spins is a
     
     
    The truth is this:
     
    OBAMA IS TO AMERICA
    WHAT A VILLAIN WITH KRYPTONITE IS TO SUPERMAN
     
     
     
     
     
     

     RELATED

    THE GREATNESS OF BARACK OBAMA (SATIRE)

     THE GREAT DEPRESSOR AND HIS SUB-ZERO PRESIDENCY

    BARACK OBAMA AND THE WORLD’S MOST BEAUTIFUL SOUND

    LEADING U.S. UNIVERSITY RANKS OBAMA 5TH BEST PRESIDENT

    THE ANNIVERSARY OF CLINTON’S APPEASEMENT BOMBING OF SERBIA FOR ISLAM AND OTHER MISTAKES AND MISERABLE THINGS

     
     
     
    nato bombing Serbia
      On March 24, 1999, Bill Clinton unleashed a disastrous NATO air campaign against Yugoslavia, against the Christian Serbs, against a sovereign nation that did not pose a threat to members of the alliance.
     
    WHILE BILL CLINTON WAS ATTEMPTING TO APPEASE
     
    the Islamic world (and radical terrorists like Osama bin Laden) by showing how much he cared for Moslems and felt their pain in Bosnia and Kosovo-by attacking and killing Christian Serbs (our WW1 & 2 allies)-bin Laden and al Qaida unimpressed went ahead with their monstrous plans for 9/11. And now Clinton and his lying, lawless, incompetent wife (who turned the Benghazi consulate into a 9/11 death trap) want to return to the White House? The 9/11 Benghazi attack was a sign and reminder to the nation of Bill Clinton's responsibility for 9/11; and how he insanely preferred killing innocent Christian Serbs (defending themselves from Moslem jihadists allied to bin Laden) to protecting the homeland by going after al-Qaida. The Clintons can't be trusted with our national security. Returning them to the White House would be a catastrophe.
     
    RELATED
     
     

     

    SO DEMOCRATIC IDEALS ARE UPHELD BY WHO MR. PRESIDENT?

    The theocratic Khomenists of Iran? The pan-Arab Nationalists of the West Bank? The Islamic supremacists of Gaza? The Moslem Brotherhood of Egypt? The neo-Ottomans of Turkey? Are these models of democratic principles, values and ideals that Netanyahu and Israel could learn from, Mr. President? Could they learn about these things from you? Not in a 1000 years. It's you who needs to learn from them.

     
     
    Screen Shot 2015-03-19 at 11.30.24 PM
     
    AFTER THE SIGNING OF THE MUNICH PACT

     Hitler mocked Chamberlain in private for being such an easily deceived fool. But Iran's Islamonazi leadership knows no such restraint. Their contempt for our weak, gutless, ineffective president (shared by most world leaders) is such that they openly mock him by telling the world how desperate he is for a deal, destroying a fake US aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf, chanting death to America; and now we learn of their plans for a nuclear EMP attack over the US to shut down and paralyze this country. And in his self-degrading, butt kissing attempt to get a bad deal for his legacy our hopeless putz of a pres goes back for more and more and more humiliation. Obama is like a long-suffering abused wife whose capacity for hurt is endless. Pathetic!
     
     
     
    This isn't an incomplete picture of Denis McDonough.
                           
    HEY, DENIS
     

    I predict that 50 years from now the Jewish population of the Jewish West Bank in Jewish Judea and Samaria will be a robust 700,000 plus Jews. And no one will remember you and the stupid things you said today to a group of stupid leftwing Jewicidal Jews.

     
     
     
    View image on Twitter
     

    SURE JEH, ANYTHING YOU SAY

    And Mohammed was the George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison of Islam rolled into one great democratic prophet of progress, justice and freedom.

     

     
     
    WHAT’S NEXT?
     
    Replacing the Declaration of Independence with a Declaration of Surrender to Allah, Islam and the prophet of darkness, bondage and chains?
     
     
     

     

    REDUCING TO UTTER IDIOCY THE RADICAL LEFT’S ANTI-ISRAEL BIGOTRY

       

    The man on the left tells his people,"If you like your doctor and healthcare plan you can keep them." The man on the right tells his people, "If you like East Jerusalem and your West Bank settlements you can keep them." The one is a cowardly leader that lies and lies and lies; the other is a man of  enormous courage and integrity who means what he says and says what he means. So much for Peter Beinard a stupid liberal American  Jew who wants to punish Israel for daring to deny fascist racist intolerant Palestinians a terrorist state next door.

    THE ULTIMATE ARGUMENT AGAINST THE RADICAL LEFT ON THE MORAL SUPERIORITY OF ISRAEL IN THE MIDDLE EAST

    Radical Leftists (like our idiot ill-starred president) are morally blind, mentally deranged,  well-meaning fools who search the wide world over looking for victims of oppression and injustice (real or imagined) to cry over and bleed for to feel morally  superior and alive. And high on their list of so-called victims are savage, racist, intolerant, liberal-hating Palestinians. Arguably the world's most despicable people in  the Palestinians were created by Israel's Arab enemies after the catastrophe of the Six Days War for use as a weapon and propaganda tool  to delegitimize the Jewish State and eventually destroy her. That the Palestinians (who didn't exist before 1967) were invented for this evil end is proved by the words of PLO executive Zahir Muhsein, who frankly told a Dutch newspaper in 1977:

    "The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a
    Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle
    against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality
    today there is no difference between Jordanians,
    Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and
    tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of
    a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand
    that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian
    people' to oppose Zionism. 

    "For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state
    with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa.
    While as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa,
    Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we
    reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even
    a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan." 

    (PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein, in a 1977
    interview with the Dutch newspaper Trouw.) 
     
     Now while uniting  a liberated Palestine (meaning Israel) to Jordan is no longer the PLO's overarching aim  (Jordan has a peace treaty with Israel and wants no part of this scheme)  the annihilation of Israel remains the PLO's goal under the genocidal  dictatorship of Mahmoud  Abbas-like Yasser Arafat a vicious, vile, Jew-hating Arab-Nazi supremacist with a deceptively friendlier face. Now to delegitimize Israel the radical idiot Left has bought into the big insane PLO lie that it is a "racist, warmonger, oppressive, apartheid, theocratic state carrying out genocide on an indigenous people." Indeed, the radical Left's vision  of Israel as a tyrannical monster of social, racial and economic injustice (a kind of nuclear armed apartheid South Africa of the Middle East) is bigoted, perverse and easily refuted by the following simple argument that I use in debate:
     
    THE ARGUMENT
     
     
    Let's suppose that you (Mr. Leftist) were a practicing Hindu yogi married to an atheist with a son who was gay and a beautiful, sexy teenage daughter with gorgeous legs who loved wearing mini skirts. And let's suppose (for whatever reason) you had to live in the Middle East with your choice of countries to live in (including the Palestinian Territories), what country would you choose? The country that would be the most respectful, tolerant and accepting of your Hindu (polytheistic pagan) faith, your wife's atheism, your son's homosexuality and your daughter's dressing style. Right? In other words, the country that would be safest for you and your family to live in; where each of you could be yourselves (be what you want to be pursuing your happiness and dreams) without fear of violence, persecution or death. Right? In short, you'd choose the country that was the most enlightened, progressive, modern, tolerant of minorities and CIVILIZED. Right? And of all the countries in the Middle East which would that be? Saudi Arabia? Egypt? Lebanon? Kuwait? Jordan? The Palestinian West Bank? Gaza? Or Israel?
     
    I posted this argument in the comment section of the Beinart article and it started this thread which I'm certain will interest you
     
    This is another trite tactic used by Israeli propagandists. They tout Israel as the only western style democracy in the region, but when critics of Israel hold it up to western democratic standards they say "look at Syria" "look at Iran" "look at Saudi Arabia" Which is it? Are you the best repressive middle Eastern regime, or the worst western style democracy? You can't have it both ways.
     
    Nobody in the West, other than antisemites, would have any problem with Israel if it weren't for the settlements and the (now transparent) policy of apartheid designed to displace the people who stand in the way of your ethnic majority.
     
    An "enlightened" democracy doesn't need to oppress or silence people in order to protect a specific religious or ethnic majority. This is the very opposite of "enlightenment."
     
     
     
    It's typical of useful leftist idiots duped by lying Palestinian propaganda to blame the Palestinian-Israeli conflict on "Israeli settlements" on the West Bank when the Palestinian Liberation Organization was formed in May 1964, three years before the 1967 War when there were NO SETTLEMENTS. "Settlements" are the excuse for the ongoing conflict not the underlying ideological Arab-Islamo cause as the historical record shows.
     
    BTW, that Israeli Jews have no RIGHT to settlements on the West Bank or to own East Jerusalem ignores the fact that prior to the 1948 War the West Bank and East Jerusalem were populated by Jews and Arabs. After the war, with Jordan having seized the West Bank and East Jerusalem, only Arabs were living there. WHY? What happened to the West Bank and East Jerusalem Jews? They were expelled by the Jordanians with their homes, businesses and farm lands seized by greedy, thieving, filthy Arabs-in the tradition of the thieving Prophet Mohammed whose evil example provided the moral justification for this theft.
     
     
    Why does any of that matter? The boundaries of Israel were established in 1948. What they have "settled" since then they took by force. Going forward, they need a negotiated adjustment to that boundary, recognized by international law.
     
     
    LOL!!! If the boundaries of Israel were settled in 1948 to the satisfaction of its Arab enemies why then did they continue their JIHAD (Koran inspired Holy War) against Israel? Why then did Syria, Jordan and Egypt repeatedly send murdering armed terrorist thugs into Israel (acts of war) to kill its citizens? Why then did these countries support the PLO (sworn to the annihilation of Israel) when it was founded three years before the 67 War and seizure of the West Bank, Golan Heights and Sinai in a defensive war against aggressor enemies? Because Israel's Arab enemies continued their unjustified jihad against Israel after 1948...giving Israel an absolute moral right and justification to expand its borders by force for the protection and security of its citizens. No other nation would have done less.
     
     
    Why does any of that matter? The boundaries of Israel were established in 1948. What they have "settled" since then they took by force. Going forward, they need a negotiated adjustment to that boundary, recognized by international law.
     
     
    LOL!!! If the boundaries of Israel were settled in 1949 to the satisfaction of its Arab enemies why then did they continue their JIHAD (Koran inspired Holy War) against Israel? Why then did Syria, Jordan and Egypt repeatedly send murdering armed terrorist thugs into Israel (acts of war) to kill its citizens? Why then did these countries support the PLO (sworn to the annihilation of Israel) when it was founded three years before the 67 War and seizure of the West Bank, Golan Heights and Sinai in a defensive war against aggressor enemies? Because Israel's Arab enemies continued their unjustified jihad against Israel after 1949...giving Israel an absolute moral right to expand its borders by force for the protection and security of its citizens. No other nation would have done less.
     
     
    Absolute moral right?
     
    I guess by that standard the US is morally justified in annexing Japan and kicking out all the Japanese people
     
     
     
    But the Japanese unconditionally surrendered and allowed us to transform them from savage medieval imperialist barbarians into a peaceloving liberal free market democratic people-a danger to no one.
     
     
     
     19 HOURS, NO ANSWER
     
    Thumbnail
    (thanx Nanna)

    IS FRANCE DRIVING OBAMA TO DESPAIR OVER IRAN NUKE DEAL?

     
     
    John Kerry in France with singer James Taylor ironically singing "If You Got A Friend." Ironically because France is proving very unfriendly to him and Obama in nuke negotiations with Iran.
     
    Nine days from now on March 31st (the sixth anniversary of Bibi Netanyahu becoming Israel's 9th Prime Minister) a political framework for stopping theofascist Iran from developing the ultimate weapon of terror and death to advance their growing regional and global power  is supposed to be reached. But things are looking grim. Unsurprisingly it's being reported that the French (whose President was opposed to Netanyahu coming to his country when Islamic gunmen killed the Charlie Hebdo 12 and Jews in a Kosher Deli) is opposed to the deal in its current form (like Netanyahu they too think it's bad) and is taking a very tough line that must be driving Obama to despair. We don't know what the French are objecting to or demanding in terms of further restrictions. But the reason for the tough line (as I said HERE) is the economic leverage that Saudi Arabia and other Sunni Gulf states have over the French on arms sales. For the French (whose economy is in recession) more important than Obama's bad deal with Iran (which they might have gone along with under normal circumstances) is keeping its multi billion dollar arms business with the Saudis.  It will be fascinating to see if nothing is achieved by the 31st giving Netanyahu a kind of victory 14 days from his landslide reelection, on the anniversary of his becoming PM.
     
    BIDEN ON CAMPAIGN TRAIL OUTDOES NETANYAHU'S "RACISM"
     
     
    During his campaign Bibi Netanyahu warned his political base to get out in force because "Arab voters are streaming in quantity to the polling stations," with left-wing groups "bringing them in buses." And this created an international uproar accusing him  of anti-Arab racisism and wanting to turn Israel's Arabs into  the enemy-which too many of them are.  But when Biden while campaigning in  2012  made this awful racist remark about Republicans to a black audience it practically went unnoticed by the mainstream press.
      
     
     Republicans want to put you all [blacks] back in chains?
     
    RELATED
     
     
     

    OBAMA FEELING BETRAYED BY ISRAEL THREATENS A DOOMED-TO-FAIL TWO STATE SOLUTION AT UN

     

    Barack Obama: a desperate man with time running out on his achievement poor presidency threatening Israel with a UN resolution on a two state solution it doesn't give him a deal.

    NetanjahuHandy

    Following Britain's David Cameron, Canada's Stephen Harper, Australia's Tony Abbot and the leaders of Germany, Italy,  Spain and other EU states it seems that our feckless, blundering, lead-from-behind president was dragged kicking and screaming Thursday to congratulate Bibi Netanyahu on his historic, landslide election victory-when the Israeli people said no to 1999 and the catastrophic mistake they made by removing him from office in favor of Ehud Barak: the so-called peace candidate from Israel's delusional Left who tried and predictably failed to negotiate a two state solution with Yasser Arafat that ended in the disaster of the Second Intifada.

     
    On Tuesday Israelis said no to giving up East Jerusalem for "peace;" no to a return to indefensible pre-1967 borders for "peace;" no to a right of return of millions of Palestinian refugees for "peace;" and no to bad deal Barack's Munich appeasement talks with Iran that's turned him into an international joke as it's not stopping their nuclear weapons program and terrorist expansion in the region.
     
     
    The Israeli people have spoken and want Bibi Netanyahu to stay the course in defying US pressure and world opinion to compromise with unappeasable, implacable, hate driven enemies-medieval death cult Moslem savages, and Arab supremacist racists who can't tolerate the existence of the Jewish State and religiously live for its Nazi destruction.
     
    Against the Palestinians and their useful leftist Western idiots the people of Israel rose up Tuesday and said
     
    NO!
    NEVER AGAIN!
    BIBI IS RIGHT!
    THE WORLD IS WRONG!
    WE WILL DEFY YOU TO THE END! 
     
    But unsurprisingly and contemptuously Obama is ignoring them. In his stupid little petty vindictive narcissistic Chicagoland brain he feels personally betrayed by the Israeli people as if they stabbed him in the back for being their good and loyal friend. After everything he's done for them they repay him by reinstating as PM the man he hates most in this world: his nemesis Bibi Netanyahu who slapped him down in public and humiliates him time and time again.
     
    Look at what Obama's done for Israel and feel the poor man's pain: At Cairo before the Moslem world he declared his commitment to a safe and secure Israel, and keeping its unbreakable bond with America. And showing that he meant what he said Obama has sent billions in military aid to Israel making it more secure from its Moslem enemies than ever. Indeed, this aid included funds for the development of the Iron Dome anti-missile system which protected innocent Israelis from deadly Hamas missile attacks; and for its Arrow Weapon System to counter long-range ballistic missiles that could rain down death on Israeli cities from Iran, ISIS or other more distant enemy states. In fact, Obama claims that America's military assistance to Israel during his presidency has exceeded any other president's in history; and that this proves his friendship to the Israeli people and that he's "got their back (see)." And Bibi Netanyahu showing his gratitude for what Obama has done said this:
     
     “Thank you for unequivocally affirming Israel’s sovereign right to defend itself by itself against any threat. Thank you for enhancing Israel’s ability to exercise that right through generous military assistance, revolutionary missile defense programs, and unprecedented security and intelligence cooperation.

    Thank you, Mr. President, for upholding the Jewish people’s right to a Jewish state in our historic homeland, and for boldly defending that right at the United Nations. And thank you for strengthening the unbreakable alliance between our two nations during your Presidency.” [March 20, 2013]

     

    On the following day Israeli President Shimon Peres awarding Obama the Presidential Medal of Distinction (in Israel) said this at the ceremony:

    This [Presidential Medal of Distinction] speaks to your tireless work to make Israel strong. And peace possible. Your presidency has given the close ties between Israel and the United States a new height. A sense of intimacy. A vision for the future. The people of Israel are particularly moved by your unforgettable contribution to their security. To defending our skies. To the collaboration in the domain of intelligence, which is the right way to preempt bloodshed. The diplomatic and military bonds between us have reached an unprecedented level.”

    All this praise from the two highest Israeli leaders would have been enough for any US president for benefiting a true, trusted friend and ally. But Barack Hussein Obama isn't just any US president. From the day he entered office he was obsessed with the notion that he'd succeed where his predecessors had failed. And that he'd be the one who'd make history and broker a two state solution between Palestinians and Israel. 

     

     

    But 70 days into office an anvil fell on Obama's unrealistic head:  Bibi Netanyahu became Israel's prime minister making reasonable demands on the extremist Palestinians that made negotiations for a two state solution unfeasible: "recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish State," said Bibi, "and give up demands for East Jerusalem and a right of return for millions of Palestinian refugees." And what did Obama do in response to this? What he's done with many of our enemies: he went into appeasement mode thinking he could change Bibi's mind in moderating his demands, and pulled out all the stops in giving aid to Israel.

    But it failed. Bibi, though thankful to Obama for all the aid, was not about to repeat the mistakes of Ehud Barak with a Palestinian leadership that differed little in character from Yasser Arafat. Obama was mortified. He had bent over backwards to accommodate Israel and been its good friend not because it was the right thing to do, but with an ulterior motive that Netanyahu rightly refused to respect. Stupidly thinking in his confused leftist mind that Netanyahu not the Palestinians was the obstacle to peace, and that Israel had a real peace partner in Mahmoud Abbas (as if he were another Anwar Sadat) Obama would then work behind the scenes with American political operatives in Israel to bring Netanyahu down. And that failed too making Obama look weak, ineffective and foolish.

     

    Besides himself with rage over feeling betrayed Obama is now threatening as a last resort to go to the UN Security Council for a resolution on a two state solution. But that didn't work in 1947 when the partition of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states (accepted by the Jews) was rejected by the Arab League who chose war instead and lost. And it isn't going to work now as Israel will absolutely not return to the pre-1967 borders giving sworn Moslem-Arab Jew hating enemies more land; and there is no one who can force Israel to do so-especially with the unbreakable courageous defiant Bibi Netanyahu at the helm of a nuclear armed state that could devastate the Middle East in minutes and sink the world economy.

    In short, the worse case scenario for Israel is using the Samson Option (rattling the nuclear sabre in private) to end any proposed damaging UN sanctions for noncompliance with a two state resolution. And realistically, who would risk the lives of millions and a world-wide depression for the despicable, hate driven, medieval Palestinians becoming a state with East Jerusalem for its capital? Obama? Russia? China? France? This is why a UN resolution on a two state solution (if it ever happens) will fail; and Obama again will be defeated by Netanyahu adding to his  legacy of folly and failure.

     

     

     

    IS BIBI NETANYAHU A LIAR FOR REJECTING THE TWO STATE SOLUTION WHICH HE AFFIRMED SIX YEARS AGO AND RECENTLY TO CONGRESS? AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS

     
     
     
     Netanyahu 2009
     
    There are two free peoples living side by side in this small land, with good neighborly relations and mutual respect, each with its flag, anthem and government, with neither one threatening its neighbor's security and existence.``
     
    Netanyahu May 2011
     
    “In any peace agreement that ends the conflict, some settlements [on the West bank] will end up beyond Israel’s borders.......We will be very generous on the size of a future Palestinian state … I am willing to make painful compromises to achieve this historic peace."
     
    Netanyahu US Congress March 2015
     
    Text of PM Bibi Netanyahu's recent speech to the US Congress
    "We must also find a way to forge a lasting peace with the Palestinians. Two years ago, I publicly committed to a solution of two states for two peoples: A Palestinian state alongside the Jewish state.
    I am willing to make painful compromises to achieve this historic peace. As the leader of Israel, it is my responsibility to lead my people to peace.
    This is not easy for me. I recognize that in a genuine peace, we will be required to give up parts of the Jewish homeland. " 
     
    Netanyahu Campaign 2015
     
    Declares definitively that if he was returned to office he would never establish a Palestinian state

     

    IS BIBI NETANYAHU A LIAR

    as the Daily Kos and many on the Left are saying because he reversed his position on a two state solution and now rejects the establishment of a Palestinian state? No way! Six years ago Netanyahu offered the Palestinians the following two state solution, which they rejected: First, Palestinians recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish State; and second, they drop their demands for East Jerusalem as their capital, and the right of return for millions of Palestinian refugees (which would effectively destroy the Jewish nature and character of Israel). In his offer only the West Bank settlements were negotibale (the "painful concessions"). As Bibi's solution was rejected by the Palestinian leadership (Abbas and Hamas)-and he patiently gave them six years to reconsider-how does withdrawing the offer (the only one acceptable to him and Likud) make him a liar? How can you make peace with a people who want a right of return for millions of refugees as this would destroy the possibility of a two state solution and eventually turn Israel into a Palestinian state with a Jewish minority subject to an Arab majority?

    Anyway, it would be absolutely hypocritical of Obama to punish Israel at the UN or anywhere for reversing HIS two state solution when he has known Netanyahu's stringent position all along, and its continued rejection by the intransigent Palestinians.

     

    Sarcasm
     
     

    AT LAST, AXIS OF EVIL OBAMA

    has found the true, authentic "religion of peace" Islamic State that ISIS (at its best) could never be. Now that Iran is no longer a terror state it's the "More Perfect Union" of the Middle East. The new shinning Medina upon a hill that would make Mohammed proud. Ayatollah Khamenei is the new prophetic voice of God-the vessel of Allah's redemption, goodness and grace on Earth heading a social justice republic of equality, virtue and love. Will Obama's kowtowing to Iran earn him the honor of following Putin and meeting Khamenei face-to-face-who, as a rule, doesn't allow infidel leaders within a mile of him unless their pro-Iran? Obama (like Putin) is now a friend of the Islamic Revolution; and perhaps Khamenei's in the mood to make another exception and grant him an audience.

    Peace at last!

    Peace at last!

    Thank God Almighty we have peace at last!

    By the way, it did wonders for the security of South Korea when Bush removed the nuclear Norks from the terror list.

    Putin receives the honor of being the first infidel leader to meet with a Supreme Leader of Iran. Will Khamenei grant the same to Obama? Or is he too contemptibe for Khamenei?

    RELATED

    WILL OBAMA MEET WITH KHAMENEI IN TEHRAN FOR HIS SUPREME MUNICH MOMENT?

     

     
     
     

    THE MENTAL AND MORAL MIDGET

    in the White House is fighting a losing battle against a larger than life Jewish leader who is favored by Heaven to continue as Israel's PM. As the wounded  narcissistic nut case doubles down on his personal vendetta against Netanyahu, his victory Tuesday will prove to be a tragic foreshadowing of worse humiliations and setbacks to come. If Obama doesn't accept the reality of Netanyahu's wisdom and moral clarity on Iran and the Palestinians he will finish his days a broken man in deep regret with a foreign policy legacy of ashes and dust.

     

     
    Is this a new cold war? Just leave it to  dumb ass Obama  to get into a cold war with an ally. But wasn't this the same Obama who repeatedly said that the bond between the US and Israel is indissoluble?
     
     
     
    Is a rightwing military dictatorship coming to America as it did with August Pinochet in Chile?
     

    THE LEFT'S WAR ON POLICE

    is part of a radical left George Soros (seescheme to destroy what's left of our Judeo-Christian constitutional capitalist order by reducing it to chaos, and replacing it with a leftwing socialist dictatorship. What's wrong with this scheme is that the breakdown of law and order would most likely push the public farther to the law and order right with a right-wing military dictatorship taking power that would utterly crush the left and put men like Soros in jail. A good example would be the Pinochet government in Chile and its harsh crackdown on the pro-Cuban communist supporters of Salvador Allende-a Marxist senator turned president like Barack Obama. Allende's socialist agenda made a predictable shambles of Chile's economy and divided the country into warring camps.

    Chilian Marxist President Allende with Cuba's Fidel Castro.

    RELATED

     THE MAN WITH THE MIDDLE NAME “HUSSEIN,” OR BARACK HUSSEIN ALLENDE

     
      Iran’s Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei, said: “The Zionist regime is a regime whose pillars are extremely shaky and is doomed to collapse.” 
     
     
    THE SAMSON OPTION AGAIN
     
     The quote from Khamenei (a sick frail man with cancer) sounds like Samson in the bible bringing down the temple of the Philistines upon himself. If Israel should be faced with collapse from its enemies it will exercise the Samson Option and destroy Iran and the entire Moslem Middle East in a nuclear holocaust....where (to paraphrase Jonathan Schell) the Arab living will envy the Arab dead (see).
     
     
     
     
     

    IN RETALIATION REPUBLICANS

    should move the Keystone pipeline project to Israel. Or ban all electric cars, solar panels and windpower farms to incease CO2 output in anticipation of an Al Gore run for the presidency. /sarc

     

     
    Screen Shot 2015-03-17 at 10.56.14 AM
     
     

    GIVE THIS KID JEWISH JUSTICE!

    Find the kid then put him in a sealed, air tight room with ten fat Jews with flatulence problems wearing gas masks and fart until he begs for mercy.

     

     

     It is said that a picture is worth a 1000 words. But this one is worth a 1000 woes as Obama's presidency in the end will come crashing down on his head with the realization that he'd been wrong all along; and that the foibles of his predecessor won't help him with his legacy.

    NETANYAHU’S SPEECH TO CONGRESS, MUNICH 1938 , ISAAC HERZOG AND 1999 REDUX

    On Saturday February 7, 2009 (the 38th day of the year*) just four days after radical terrorist Shiite Iran entered the Space Age by launching its first orbiting satellite (see), and three days before two Russian and US satellites were totally obliterated in an unprecedented collision over Siberia (see) Vice President Joe Biden (born 49 weeks into World War II**) was in Munich, Germany (symbol of war causing duplicity, naïvety and appeasement) foolishly offering Iran and Russia olive branches of peace. Rightly called by Heritage Foundation's Nile Gardiner "one of the weakest projections of U.S. leadership on foreign soil in recent memory (see)" Biden's speech foreshadowed the misjudgments, strategic blunders and foreign policy disasters to come, and are now being compounded. 
    *38 is 1938 abbreviated.

     **Biden was born November 20, 1942. 

    Then on March 31-7 weeks from Biden's February 7th Munich speech-on the 70th day of the Obama presidency Bibi Netanyahu (for the second time in 9 years) became Israel's 9th Prime Minister. Ominously the dates February 7 and March 31, 2009 were 70 years, 4 months and 70 years 6 months from September 29, 1938. That was the day of historic infamy and folly when Neville Chamberlain, mistaking Hitler for a statesman and Nazi Germany for a normal European power with legitimate political grievances, agreed to the Munich Pact ceding the Sudetenland to Germany.
    Now fast forward six years later to Netanyahu's recent address to Congress-his 3rd address on the 3rd day of the 3rd month of March during his 3rd term as prime minister*. Sounding like Winston Churchill warning that the Munich Pact was a bad deal for Great Britain and the peace of Europe Netanyahu warned about the catastrophe that awaits the Middle East and world peace if radical jihadist Islamic Iran's nuclear weapons program isn't completely shut down along with their global terrorist activities. 

    *Since his 1st term in the 90s Netanyahu has had two consecutive term. He's now running for a 3rd consecutive term .

     Now here is where it gets profound. The speech which started at precisely 11:11 am with the first "thank you" ran for approximately 40 minutes to the last "thank you" and (when the 7 Hebrew words from Deuteronomy 31:6 are added) amazingly totalled up to 3876* words. What is amazing and seems ominous and could be prophetic about the speech's word count (apart from its prescient message) is that 3876, whch is headed by the number 38, is a multiple of 1938 twice (1938 + 1938 = 3876) giving us the year of the disastrous Munich Pact.

    *Strangely, Netanyahu's speech was 76 years from the 1938 signing of the Munich Pact  (see).

    BIDEN , KERRY AND ISAAC HERZOG MEET IN MUNICH 
    On  February 7, 2015, exactly six years to the date of Biden's portentous Munich speech (and on a Saturday as in 2009) Joe Biden and John Kerry met with Israeli opposition leader, so-called peace candidate, Isaac Herzog in Munich-obviously to discuss policy issues and the administrations support for his election run against Netanyhau for the prime-ministership (see). 
    Herzog's party (Zionist Union) who recently pulled ahead of Netanyahu's Likud Party  in the polls and could possibly win would likely be as disastrous for Israel as was Ehud Barak who defeated Netanyahu in 1999 in a landslide-and whose naïve Chamberlain-like weakness in negotiating an impossible peace (blindly brokered by Bill Clinton) with Jew hating, Arab Nazi Yasser Arafat (thinking he turned moderate) led to the catastrophe of the Second Intifada where hundreds were killed and injured.
    It is perhaps a providential warning to the Israeli people that from the Munich meeting between Biden, Kerry and Herzog on Februray 7 (the 38th day of the year) to tomorrow's election on March 17 is amazingly  and ominously exactly 38 DAYS.
    Reinforcing, I believe, the above tragic sign of coming Munich-like disasters for Israel if Herzog replaces Netanyahu there is the unsettling fact that tomorrow's election is just one day short of the 146th anniversary of Neville Chamberlain's birth*.
     *Born March 18, 1869. 
     To summarize the above: from the 38th day of 2009 when Biden gave his appeasement speech in Munich, to Bibi Netanyahu's third speech to Congress totaling 3876* words (twice 1938), to Biden and Kerry's meeting with the weak, dovish, Barak clone  Isaac Herzog at Munich on the 38th day of the year-38 days before tomorrow's election-the defeat of Netanyahu has the Munich disaster written all over it. Which should surprise no one as our unrealistic, self-deceived, foreign policy failed president is hell-bent on repeating Bill Clinton's blunder of trying to force Israel into a two state solution with an enemy who wants a single Arab/Moslem state and victory over Jews.
    * As the Munich Pact was agreed to in the 38th year of the 20th century (on the 29th day of September) it was 76 years from Netanyahu's speech-which is oddly reflected in the number 3876 (see). By the way, March 17 is the 76th day of the year.
    OBAMA, HERZOG AND SEPTEMBER 29, 1938
     
    The Munich Pact was agreed to by Hitler, Chamberlain, Mussolini and French premier Daladier late in the evening of September 29, 1938, and was signed in the early morning hours of the following day (see).  Now when Obama won the presidency on November 4, 2008 it was on the 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis-anticipting his intractable problems with Iran (see).
    This crisis which painfully humiliated the US for 444 days (and was the opening shot of radical Islamic jihad against our country and the West) resulted from Jimmy Carter abandoning the US friendly Shah and letting Islamic supremacists come to power thinking they were liberal democrats. Now as this same Chamberlain-like naivety guides Barack Obama's negotiations with Iran (he now calls the mullahs "US allies" and its leadership "moderate" and no longer sponsoring terror) and his backing of Isaac Herzog's party in Israel, it is fascinating to note that the number 29 (another symbol of Munich appeasement giving us the day not the year) dominates these relationships. This can be seen in the birth dates of Obama and Herzog, and elsewhere as you will see below, hence: 
     Obama was born 8-4-1961 and Herzog ten months earlier on 9-22-1960 (see).

    8+4+1+9+6+1 = 29

    9+2+2+1+9+6+0 = 29

    The birth dates of both Obama and Herzog total 29 corresponding to the 29th day of September 1938 when the Munich Pact was agreed to; and to the 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis when Obama was elected president-as he's repeating with Iran the same Munich-like appeasement that characterized Chamberlain's relationship with Hitler.
    ELECTION DAY MARCH 17, 2015, AND MUNICH 29
    The question now is this: with Isaac Herzog overtaking Netanyahu in the polls (due mostly to a weak Israeli economy) could tomorrow's election be 1999 all over again with Netanyahu being defeated by a weak Chamberlain-like dovish candidate like Ehud Barak? Only God knows what the outcome will be; but I may have discovered numeric signs that warn Israel of a catastrophe if Herzog becomes Israel's tenth prime minister (sharing it with Tzipi Livini). What follows is truly amazing and possibly ominous.

     From  Thursday, September 22, 1960 (Isaac Herzog's birth)

    To Tuesday, March 17, 2015 (The Israeli election)

    Result: 19,899 days (see).

    You will notice that number of days separating Isaac Herzog's birth from election day has the year 1999 encoded in it-the year Ehud Barak defeated Netanyahu.  Moreover, in calculating the number of days separating Ehud Barak's birth from Herzog's we get what looks like another inauspicious sign:   

    From Thursday, February 12, 1942 (Ehud Barak's birth) (see) 

    To Thursday, September 22, 1960 (Isaac Herzog's birth)

    Result: 6797 days (see). 

    Why is this number inauspicious? Add up the digits,

    6+7+9+7 = 29

    But there is more. In counting the number of days from Netanyahu's birth to tomorrow's election this is what results:

    FromFriday, October 21, 1949 (Netanyahus's birth)

    To Tuesday, March 17, 2015

    Result: 23,888 days (see)

    Now add up the digits

    2+3+8+8+8 = the unlucky inauspicious Munich 29.

    If Netanyahu doesn't continue as Israel's prime minister until Obama leaves office (and he's replaced by a pro-Israel president) these next 22 months could be an Obama-Herzog created hell for Israel-like it was under Clinton when peace negotiations broke down between Ehud Barak and the evil Yasser Arafat.
    POSTSCIPT
    For those interested in checking my word count of Netanyahu's speech to Congress below is the Washington Post transcript. However, to get the proper count you need to eliminate the advertisements together with the words (APPLAUSE) (LAUGHTER) and (SPEAKING IN HEBREW).
    The complete transcript of Netanyahu’s address to Congress - The Washington Post 
    RELATED
     
     
     
     
     

    WHY BARACK OBAMA IS WORSE THAN NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN AND ALL GREAT APPEASERS IN HISTORY COMBINED

     
    Hitler's Nazi troops victoriously marching through the streets of Prague.
     
     On this day of March 15th 76 years ago when Hitler's Nazi army shredded the Munich Pact signed just 23 weeks before and nonviolently invaded the frightened Czechoslovakian provinces of Bohemia and Moravia taking over the country, it opened Neville Chamberlain's eyes to what a fool he'd been in treating Hitler as a normal European statesman with legitimate post-war grievances that could be appeased-and he began the rearming of Great Britain preparing for war.
     
    But after appeasement and appeasement, embarrassment after embarrassment, and failure after failure in trying to get Iran to moderate its behavior and give up its ambition of becoming the nuclear armed terrorist hegemon of the Middle East: after brutally crushing the anti-mullah pro-US  democratic revolution in Tehran, after swallowing up Baghdad upon US troops deserting Iraq, after supporting Bashar Assad with Hezbollah jihadists and arms as he was mass murdering and gassing the Syrian people in the tens and thousands; after supplying Taliban insurgents with weapons to kill US  troops and after watching the fall of the US friendly regime in Yemen to Iranian backed rebels what does Barack Obama do? Does it open his eyes to what a fool he's been in treating radical terrorist theonazi Iran with a sensitivity and respect unbecoming a great power? NO!  Instead, after six long years of DEATH TO AMERICA and countless verbal attacks and ridicule Barack Obama has his idiot wife celebrate the Iranian New Year of Nowruz in the White House. It's mind boggling.
     
     
     As Obama's extreme radical weakness in dealing with enemies goes beyond Iran to include Russia, China, Cuba and the Moslem Brotherhood, as he has made the world a more dangerous place for freedom, human rights and peace he stands as a uniquely towering figure among history's foolish appeasers...so much so that he can only be compared to himself.
     
    On this day, the 76th anniversary of the Nazi invasion of Prague, I declare  to the world that the Obama/Chamberlain analogy is dead, as Obama has taken ass-kissing appeasement to a whole new level of insanity.
     
     
     
     POSTSCRIPT I
     
     
     
    REPUBLICANS, TREMBLE!
     
     
    The weakest, most clueless, most ineffective president in US history (the leader who just 15% of the military respects and no one fears) is daring you to cross the red line and interfere with his failing appeasement negotiations with radical fanatical terrorist Iran. Cross that line and he will strike you with all the girlie man blows his gutless soul can muster. CROSS AT YOUR PERIL GOP! Don't say you haven't been warned.
     
    POSTSCRIPT II
     
    COLUTZUS
     
     
    Hank Frost comments:
     
    "Excellent post and true: Obama towers above all past appeasers. He’s the Appeasement Colossus."
     
    My reply:
     

    Actually Obama is a COLUTZUS: a colossal klutz. Or, in the immortal words of William Shakespeare:

    Cassius:
    Why, man, he [Obama] doth bestride the narrow world
    Like a COLUTZUS , and all past appeasers
    Walk under his huge legs, and peep about…..

     
    RELATED
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    IS FRANCE AND SAUDI ARABIA DOOMING OBAMA’S IRAN NUKE DEAL AT THE UN?

     
     
     
     
    French President Hollande and the Saudis.
     
     
    I owe my readers an apology for what I previously wrote on this page and deleted. What I said about the UN Security Council was only partially true. It is true that the Obama administration will fail to bypass Congress and get the UNSC to sanction and turn into international law any bad Chamberlain- like "peace in our time" Munich deal it makes with radical terrorist Islamonazi Iran. But this won't be done as I wrongly supposed by Jordan, Nigeria and Malaysia (three of the fifteen council members) voting against the treaty. For what  is required to pass it are nine votes, which Obama absolutely has. But what Obama doesn't have and desperately needs are all five permanent members of the UNSC, each one of which has veto power over  any resolution, measure or treaty.
     
    Indeed, Obama can ridicule Netanyahu and the 47 Republican senators all he wants; and the left can rage that there's a vast right-wing conspiracy afoot to deprive Obama of a framework or treaty with Iran because he's black or we hate his guts. But at the UNSC his real problem is with one of its five permanent members who will almost certainly resist any bad appeasement deal Obama wants with Iran; and that country is France with its socialist president Francois Hollande.
     
    France which has given Obama so much trouble in the P5+1 talks with Iran, and was utterly shocked to the point of contempt when Obama eased sanctions on Iran with getting nothing in return (an obviously stupid desperate Munich appeasement move), will only settle for a treaty where Iran agrees to completely end its enrichment of uranium and dismantle its nuclear weapons making capabilities. Why would France be so stringent in its demands? Because the economically distressed French (they're suffering a recession) are in the pocket of Iran's powerful Sunni enemies, namely Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Kuwait, the Emirates and other Sunni gulf states.
     
    Indeed, unfortunately for the Obama administration Saudi Arabia and some of these other countries have multibillion dollar contracts with France to purchase weapons and military equipment; and they won't tolerate France voting in favor of  a deal that guarantees (as Netanyahu warned Congress) "Iran getting the bomb any time in the future." NO IRAN BOMB EVER! That is their policy. Indeed, there's no way that the economically distressed French would risk their lucrative arms contracts with this Saudi led coalition to support a bad US-Iran nuke deal. And this is why the French as I write are not on board with the Obama administration with Kerry saying that "more work needs to be done to get to where France and the US want to be." Where they ideally want to be is where the Saudis, the Israelis, Jordan, Egypt and the other Sunni states want Iran to be: giving up its nuclear ambitions completely and absolutely. But that isn't going to happen as Iran is hell-bent on getting the bomb and continuing its expansion across the Middle East and global sponsoring of terror. It's either all or nothing with the Saudi led coalition.  Either the mullahs give up their quest of becoming a nuclear armed state with ICBM capabilities, or they'll be no deal at the P5+1 talks and at the UNSC with France walking out like Reagan on Gorbachev at Reykjavik.
     
    In short, if Obama wants to take his Iran deal to the UN it will give the Saudi led Sunni coalition tremendous leverage over it practically guaranteeing its failure. In other words, without a deal approved by Saudi Arabia Obama doesn't have France or stand a chance in getting his "peace in our time" moment. 
     
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
     
    Meanwhile, our super-butt kissing, peace-through-weakness, get-a-deal-at-any-price-with-Iran-president observed the Iranian New Year of Nowruz in the White House hoping it would move the heart of Iran's cancer eaten supreme leader.
     
     
     
    Works like a charm every time.
     
     
     
     
    RELATED
     
     
     
     
     

    MY “TREASONOUS” LETTER TO IRAN’S SUPREME LEADER AYATOLLAH ALI KHAMENEI (POSTSCRIPT: JOHN KERRY: 48TH TRAITOR)

     

     

    To Ayatollah Khamenei Supreme leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran:

     As a concerned citizen of the United States of America this is to warn you in no uncertain terms of the possible consequences to Iran and your regime if you continue your nuclear weapons program, global terrorist activities and building of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) which can threaten my country with nuclear attacks. Indeed, unless you agree to the complete dismantling and destruction of your uranium enrichment facilities (nuclear weapons making infrastructure), and stop the funding, training and arming of Islamic terrorist groups in the Middle East and beyond, any agreement that you conclude unilaterally (not radified by Congress) with the Obama Administration will be meaningless, invalid, non-binding, and will be revoked by a future Republican President. Moreover, the new President with the backing of Congress will likely move to reimpose the full range of economic sanctions prematurely lifted by this Administration with possible painful and costly additions. 
     
    But it gets worse, sir. Be warned that the new Republican President may request from Congress and be granted a WAR RESOLUTION ACT against your country making regime change the official policy of the United States, and granting him the authority to 1) launch military strikes against your nuclear facilities and other military targets, and 2) to invade your country to topple your regime and end your oppressive autocratic rule.
     
    I pray, sir, that this letter will bring you to your senses about the likely devastating consequences to you and your regime if a bad deal is reached with this Administration. BEND OR BE BROKEN!  What happened to Saddam could happen to you. The American people are losing patience. You have been warned.
     
    Sincerely,
     
    At great risk to my life and liberty,
     
    ApolloSpeaks
     
     
     
      POSTSCRIPT I
     
    The letter sent by the 47 Republican Senators to the Iranians  is protected as free speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution and could have been legally and lawfully sent by any American speaking as a citizen just as I do in my letter above. If the Senators' letter is "treasonous" then so is mine. However, those accusing the Senators of "treason"  are either ignorant of the Constitution or are leftist liars smearing good men who want to shut down debate on Obama's bad butt kissing deal .
     
     POSTSCRIPT II
     
    JOHN KERRY: 48TH TRAITOR
     
     
     
    If the 47 Republican Senators are irresponsibly and traitorously undermining US foreign policy for saying that an agreement with Iran would not be legally binding then what does that make John Kerry for saying the same thing? Now there are 48 traitors. Is this utterly laughably incoherent of Kerry or what?
     
    POSTSCRIPT III
     
    One man is the supreme leader of Iran, the other is the supreme joke of America. 

    REPUBLICANS’ LETTER TO IRAN, MSNBC AND AIR AMERICA AND OBAMA’S BOYCOTT OF BIBI’S SPEECH

     

     

     

    Republican Letter to Iran to Sabotage Nuclear Talks Could Backfire | The New Republic

     

    Does anyone recall Ted Kennedy's outrageous collusion (making common cause) with the Soviets in trying to defeat Ronald Reagan in the 1984 election (see)? And wasn't Teddy Obama's mentor and kingmaker thinking he was the "new JFK"? Moreover, isn't it Obama who's "sabotaging" US foreign policy by being the greatest and mots dangerous enabler of Iranian power since  worthless Jimmy Carter deserted the pro-West Shah for America-hating Ayatollah Khomenie....thinking he was a Jeffersonian democrat?  If it weren't  for Jimmy Carter would there be a radical genocidal terrorist Iran threatening America, Israel and the Sunni Middle East with nuclear armed jihadist martydom and Armageddon? "LET IRAN BURN SO LONG AS ISLAM PREVAILS," said the Jeffersonian Khomenie who triggered an eight year war with Saddam Hussein where one million were killed and an equal number injured. Who then was the ultimate saboteur of US foreign policy in the region? And who is continuing his disgraceful legacy of weakness, appeasement and utter rank stupidity?

    Come to think of it if Obama can't negotiate with Republicans why should we expect anything but failure in negotiating with unappeasable jihadist enemies who want to destroy us for Allah, Islam and a Moslem world government-an idiotic but dangerous utopian dream like a socialist one world borderless state? Anything less than Iran stopping enrichment and the dismantling of its nuclear weapons infrastructure and ICBM capabilities is failure requiring a military solution. If the people of Iran don't rise up and overthrow their Islamonazi masters war is coming.

     

     

    DEMOCRATS COLLUDE WITH SOVIETS TO UNDERMINE REAGAN

    What harm is a letter by 47 Republican Senators explaining to Iranians how our constitutional system works compared to the Democrats in the 1980s colluded with the Soviets in stiring up massive worldwide nuclear war hysteria to undermine Reagan's tough anti-Soviet policies (that won the Cold War)?

     

    DEBATES ON THE NEW REPUBLIC

    magboy47
     
     

    @ApolloSpeaks2. 'DOES ANYONE RECALL TED KENNEDY'S COLLUSION WITH THE SOVIETS?'

    Does anyone recall the collusion of the whole Republican Party with the government of Iran?  Eh? 

     
    ApolloSpeaks2
     
     

    @magboy47 @ApolloSpeaks2 Teddy represented the entire Democrat Party which, by the way, colluded with the Soviets in whipping up mass nuclear war hysteria over Reagan's tough anti-Soviet policies (which won the Cold War).

    magboy47
     
     

    @ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47 Reagan caved to his own hysteria.  After WWIII almost started over an incident in 1983, Reagan, in a panic, initiated nuclear disarmament with the Soviets.  Do your homework.

     
     
    ApolloSpeaks2
     
     

    @magboy47 @ApolloSpeaks2 lol!!!

    It was Reagan's momentous, courageous epoch-making walkout on Gorbachev at Reykjavík in 1986 (after 45 minutes) that was the beginning of the end of the Cold War. As Gorby said: "I realized then that a new world was possible." Then several years later Gorby admitted that "Ronald Reagan spent the Soviet Union into bankruptcy."

     
     
     
     

    @ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47 Teddy Kennedy's free-lance nuclear diplomacy in 1984 represented "the entire Democrat Party"?  Didn't the Democrats have a Presidential nominee in 1984 (Walter something or other), who was not in favor of a nuclear freeze or other pro-Soviet gestures the way Kennedy was?  And what about Al Gore, Sam Nunn and approximately half to 2/3 of the Democratic Congressional delegation, who were also not exactly on board with détente with the Soviets in 1984?

    You are entitled to your opinions about how Reagan spent the Soviets into oblivion or stared them down in nuclear negotiations.  You are not entitled to your own facts about Democratic foreign policy in 1984.

     
    ApolloSpeaks2
     
     

    @Widldboy @ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47Walter Mondale absolutely campaigned for a nuclear freeze in 1984-the Democrat Party was overwhelmingly for it by at least 90% with Gore and Nunn among the few  exceptions.The Dems,  liberal media and Soviets had millions marching across the country and world for a unilateral nuclear freeze and against deployment of missile defense systems in Europe. Reagan laughed them off as weak, frightened, well-meaning fools and went on to peacefully defeat the Soviets and transform the world.

    Republican opposition to and obstruction of Obama and his policies is kid stuff compared to the titanic forces allied against Reagan. What a man! Compared to Reagan Obama is a moral and mental pipsqueak.

     

    FranzLiebkind
     
     

    @ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47@CeceliaHolland 

    The beginning of the end of the Cold War came at the beginning--with Kennan's "Long Telegram" of 1946. It captured the 45-year strategy, adopted even by presidents who had rejected it publicly on the campaign trail, that fatally weakened the USSR.

     

     

    @FranzLiebkind @ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47 @CeceliaHolland Reagan opposed containment, coexistence and détente. His policy was "roll back." He wanted victory over the Soviets and an end to the Cold War, and achieved it by relentlessly hitting them from every conceivable angle (economic, political, strategic) short of war. George Kennan was so freaked out by Reagan's radical change of strategy that he fought him tooth and nail believing with the nuclear freeze loons that he was the most dangerous man on earth. I give Reagan 70% of the credit for finally collapsing the Soviet Empire. Ted Kennedy overwhelmed by the magnitude of Reagan's success said it best, "Ronald Reagan won the Cold War." And so he did.


    http://redirect.disqus.com/url?impression=b0d3e166-c7e9-11e4-96a6-002590853080&forum=1422873&thread=3583993461&url=https://disqus.com/by/Lordwhiteman/?utm_source=reply&utm_medium=email&utm_content=avatar:QAR-etkLQMBqRbBQAookDziKok8&variant=active&experiment=digests&behavior=click&post=1901046534&type=notification.post.registered&event=email

    Lordwhiteman

    You do know the Pythia where high on hallucinogenic gases when they spoke for Apollo.

     

     
    Avatar

    And what were the liberal left and media high on when they went hysterical over Ronald Reagan's sober, sane victorious anti-Soviet policies? Perhaps they were all sniffing glue?

     

     Why Fox News Is Winning | Comments | RealClearPolitics

     

    MSNBC the LEAST trusted cable network. Great work guys. I'm sure you're proud of yourselves. Below is your fate if you stay your lying leftist course.
     
     
    FOX ROCKS!  
     
    IT'S THE GOLD STANDARD
     

    for cable news. Fair, balanced and unafraid to challenge the liberal media, the Democrat Party and the big leftist lies about America, government and the world. And unless MSNBC emulates Fox reporting more of the real news and not propagandizing for Democrats and Progressives it could go the way of Air America (remember them) into the crapper of leftist history.

     

    RELATED 

     THE ASTONISHING AIR AMERICA/KEITH OLBERMANN “COINCIDENCE”

     

     
     

    WHY DO I BELIEVE OBAMA

    when he said that he boycotted Bibi Netanyahu’s address to Congress but read the transcript? Because you can’t hear the thunderous pro-Bibi ovations from the transcript-which would have greatly upset our thinned skinned, Netanyahu-hating president.

     

    JOHN BOEHNER MUST INVITE EGYPT’S PRESIDENT AL-SISI TO ADDRESS CONGRESS

     Watch VIDEO: Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi speaks to Fox News’ Bret Baier in Cairo on the failure of American leadership - Atlas Shrugs

    ATTN: JOHN BOEHNER
      

    It is critically, urgently, absolutely important that you invite President al-Sisi to address Congress (like you did Bibi Netanyahu) on the subject of Obama's virtual desertion of Egypt and its allies in their struggle with ISIS, al-Qaida, the Moslem Brotherhood and all radical Islamic supremacist groups. The American public needs to hear this great man to understand the terrible danger Obama's weak leadership is putting us in and what needs to be done. You did a great patriotic thing by inviting  Netanyahu to speak on the perils of Iran's nuclear weapons capabilities and growing regional power. Now follow-up with al-Sisi!

     

    Tweet John Boehner and tell him you want him to invite President al-Sisi to address Congress like Netanyahu,