If Biden follows Obama into the White House we'd have a fourth term of Jimmy Carter at a time when Carter says America is a collapsing superpower losing influence on the world stage (see).
If Biden follows Obama into the White House we'd have a fourth term of Jimmy Carter at a time when Carter says America is a collapsing superpower losing influence on the world stage (see).
Just two days from the 77th anniversary of the disastrous Munich Agreement (that rewarded an evil, aggressive, genocidal regime with territory and prestige, and set the stage for World War II and millions dead) Benjamin Netanyahju addressed the UN prophetically warning about the advance of radical Islam in the Middle East, and the worthless Munich-like nuclear deal with Islamonazi terrorist Iran and its continued evil behavior. Midway into the speech Netanyahu stunned the world and stopped speaking for 44 seconds-wherein he stared coldly and hauntingly at the UN Assemby protesting with his silence their silence over Iran's recent pledges to destroy the Jewish state (for the crime of being infidel) and liquidate or expel every last one of its Jewish citizens.
Full UN Speech
The following day Netanyahu sat down to talk with Fox’s Greta Van Susteren about Iran, the nuclear weapons deal and the worsening turmoil in the Middle East. Toward the end of the interview when Greta turned to her guest’s UN speech she said: "In terms of your UN speech on Iran you had a 45 seconds silence....." Netanyahu interrupting corrected her and said "44 [seconds] ."
This correction was extraordinary, and was a window (as you'll see below) into Netanyahu's unspoken reason for the silence . But as for Greta’s slight mistake it was caused by Fox and MSM first reporting that Bibi’s silent stare (the signature moment of his speech) lasted a total of 45 seconds. Then the BBC followed by other news outlets made the correction to 44 seconds with the BBC clocking it at precisely 44:14 (see).
But why did Netanyahu bother to correct his host over something so seemingly insignificant, petty and trifling as one mere fleeting second? What difference would it have made to him or to anyone if he'd kept silent about it and didn't interrupt his host? In other words, why should one second of time be of such importance to Netanyahu that he wanted Greta and her great audience to have no doubts about the exact duration of his stare?
The most likely and logical explanation, the one that makes the most sense, is that the speech and 44 seconds of silence were primarily aimed at the weak, incompetent, blundering fool in the White House whose presidency number is 44. But the question is this: was it by design that the stare lasted 44 seconds and not 43 or 45? Was Netanyahu silently counting the seconds as he disdainfully looked over the assembly hoping the media would pick up on it? Or was it by accident or providence that it happened with Netanyahu being surprised by the coincidence and believing (being a man of faith) that it had prophetic significance for America’s 44th president?
Suggesting to me that the 44 seconds were possibly providential and an ominous sign for Obama warning about the terrible consequences of his policies is that October 1st, the day of Bibi’s speech, was the 44th president’s 2446th day in office : a four digit number with 44 at its center (see). And that Bibi on that same day was in the 3441th week of his time on this earth: another four digit number with 44 at its center (see)
As the 44 silent seconds was midway in Netanyahu’s UN speech, and the number 44 appears twice at the center (middle) of two numbers related to both men on the day of the speech, this coincidence could very well be a signature effect of a Higher Power warning Obama to heed Netanyahu as he would a Hebrew Prophet, or pay a terrible price to his legacy and leave office in disgrace as one of the worst and most destructive American presidents ever.
Blessed are the illegal latino aliens for they shall inherit the Southwestern United States with help from one world, open border, global citizen saints.
Blessed is the social justice-loving egalitarian Left for they shall make rich the sinless, victimized, underprivileged poor by impoverishing the sinful, exploiting, greedy, 1% rich, at gun point.
Blessed are homosexuals-as long as they are Catholic priests they can sin all they want, and should not be judged lest ye be judged and made impotent by God.
Blessed are the apocalyptic warmunists for they shall save the imperiled, disintegrating, over heating Earth from evil industrial capitalist polluters one carbon molecule at a time.
Blessed are the Palestinians (and their leader Mahmoud Abbas) who one day shall live in peace with Jews when Israel is wiped off the map and replaced by a truly democratic Palestinian state.
Blessed are the real, devout, Koran-directed Moslems for they have no violence, war or hate in them, and show the way of peace, tolerance, justice and love for we Crusader Christians, and the entire Infidel world.
Blessed is retiring House Speaker Boehner for he shall know the bounty of God's grace after four years of crucifixion in right-wing congressional Obama-hating hell.
Thus ends the short, sweet Social Gospel of Francis the First for the new 21st century Church to make God's kingdom a reality on a clean, green, socially just, Israel free, one world (borderless) government Earth. And here we were thinking for ages that the kingdom of heaven was in heaven within. Amen.
But there are a few, very few, exceptions to the rule who we could entrust with the job without question; who'd respect the Constitution and Judeo-Christian-Classical Tradition; who'd work their hearts out to renew our nation, restore its power and wealth and make us truly great again; who'd call our Moslem enemies by their right name, would not let Iran get the bomb, ISIS stand or Israel fall. Who'd be as much despised by the media as George Bush and Ronald Reagan, and have issued a thousand fatwas against him for his reformed, privatized, moderate faith. Who is this great American I'm referring to so effusively? None other than the fearless, esteemed, patriotic, pro-Israel veteran of the US Navy, the one, the only ..... this man HERE.
< p style="text-align: center;">POPE FRANCINE
Israel makes Khamenei's head explode with nuclear intensity.
(Thanks to Dr. Doomsday.)
Gays hung by their necks until dead in Iran.
< p style="text-align: center;">
The answer to the question is an unqualified NO! Barack Hussein Obama could not have made a better deal on containing Iran's nuclear program and ambitions. Seriously people, use your imaginations and empathetically put yourself in Obama's difficult place. If, like him, you were a moral and mental midget (the great, gutless, unfit to command appeasing amateur on the world stage) who doesn't know how to govern, lead, negotiate, interact with people. fight wars or communicate effectively; if like him you stupidly believed that the mullahs have legitimate grievances against the US that must and can be appeased to win their trust and friendship (as Kerry recently said, see) could you have realistically made a better deal? Of course not. So stop complaining that Obama isn't Reagan and that Vienna wasn't Reykjavik, and cut this piss poor president some slack. Obama is the great anti-Reagan and no better deal was in him. As bad as it is what we got is Obama at his very damn diplomatic disastrous best creating a stronger, bolder more confident Iran more certain than ever that God and history are on their side in the struggle against America, Israel, the West and their regional Sunni enemies.
BECAUSE BIBI NETANYAHU IS DENYING OBAMA
an impossible peace deal with the Palestinians for his epically disastrous foreign policy legacy it seems that Israel has been replaced by Iran as America's best, dearest and closest friend in the region. Indeed, and as a reward for making Obama look like a world-class statesman Iran is to receive more funds than Israel has in US aid in 67 years.
President Rouhani and UK’s new ambassador to Iran.
However, predictably Khamenie and the implacably anti-US mullahs aren't reciprocating the gift of their huge windfall. Apparently it's not enough for them, and they want more. For they have denied a US request to reopen its embassy in Tehran when this was granted to the Brits last week. This rebuff was a deliberate ploy to humiliate Obama who they despise. Why? My guess is that the mullahs seeing how pathetically weak and desperate Obama is to normalize relations with them (it means more to Obama than to them) are smartly making it contingent on getting more concessions from him (see). And my guess is that they'll succeed. For Obama wants to leave office praising himself for completing the job with the illusion of normalized relations with a jihadist regime that (like the Nazis in the late 1930s) is doubling down on its disastrous course of expansion and regional domination.
My gripe with the great, good Bibi Netanyahu is that he exercised way too much restraint in the justified self-defense killing of Palestinians in last year's Gaza War. 2000 died when it should have been 200,000 or more. I'm not saying this because I'm a bloodthirsty American Jew and want to see Jew-hating Palestinians die en masse. Truth is I can't see any other way to end this conflict.
To end World War II (for which there was no diplomatic solution) and completely crush the German and Japanese will to victory took the killing of over 1,000,000 civilians. Similarly (in the absence of a diplomatic solution) the Pali-Israeli conflict will have to be resolved militarily with the terrible, crushing demoralizing death of hundreds and thousands of Palestinians who are brainwashed with the insane belief that they have an absolute Islamic right (written in the Koran) to ownership of all Israeli lands. If this conflict is to end, Israel's policy must be one of blitzkrieg like FDR's, Truman's and Churchill's policy of utter devastation with the intransigent Germans and Japanese (governments and peoples). There is no other foreseeable way to peace. In other words:
MAKE THEM BLEED UNTIL THEY CRY FOR PEACE!
AND IF THEY CRY NOT LET THEM BLEED TO DEATH!
If Hamas should resume their rocket attacks on Israel killing and injuring Israeli citizens Netanyahu should unleash the full fury of the IDF and turn Gaza City into a ghost town of rubble, ashes and dust.
WHAT DO ISLAM AND NAZISM HAVE IN COMMON?
Mohammad was a successful 7th century Adolf Hitler. Hitler was an unsuccessful 20th century Mohammad. Hitler's caliphate lasted 12 short years. Mohammed's Reich is 14 centuries old.
ONLY IN THE BIZZARO WORLD
of the anti-anti-jihadist (see-no-evil-in-Islam) left can someone hit a home run for truth against Islamonazi supremacism and strikeout.
DO YOU SEE
what Islamic over intoxication can do to you?
Donald Trump (no limited government conservative) has the audacity and gigantic overwhelming sweeping self-confident ego of a Napoleon, and his ruthless, obsessive, single-minded will to win. But will he triumph?
Some of what follows about Donald Trump and his surprisingly soaring poll numbers and strong run for the presidency (I didn't think he'd get this far) is taken from my piece "Border Security Chaos, Illegal Alien Crime and the Providential Candidacy of Donald Trump (see)." However, this piece which greatly expands on that is not an endorsement of Trump's candidacy nor a prediction of his success. However, as Trump seizing the Republican nomination and becoming President is now a real possibility the question is this: is the menagerie of fascinating, uncanny "coincidences" that I've discovered about Trump's forceful, brash, ruthless, Napoleonic-like candidacy the signature effects or signs of a Higher Power that he's destined to glory? In other words, is Trump's strong, aggressive, indomitable personality, fervent patriotic nationalism and titanic commitment to restoring America's greatness what this country needs after eight years of precipitous, ruinous, deliberate decline under the weak, pathetic, sickening, un-American Barack Obama?
America and the Free World need a strong, inspiring, optimistic, pro-American leader dedicated to secure borders, law and order, national restoration and rebuilding the economy and military. But is Donald Trump who’s never held elective office and is currently more heat than light the right man for this Herculean undertaking? We shall know in due course.
TRUMP, ANN COULTER, KATE STEINLE, EL CHAPO AND SANCTUARY CITIES
Making illegal immigration and border security his key issues Trump declared his candidacy on June 16th for the Republican nomination in 2016 to be the next President living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. As you will see from what follows "16" is Trump's auspicious number and may be a Providential Sign that he's destined for the presidency.
Indeed, On June 1st, 16 days before Trump kicked off his campaign, Ann Coulter came out with “Adios America” her outstanding, controversial, bestselling book on the crisis of illegal immigration (what I call the "Disease of Borderporosis (see)". Coulter is now an ardent Trumpian as she sees in the billionaire real estate tycoon a serious, energetic, indefatigable patriot wanting to end the plague of illegal immigration and restore America’s prosperity, power and greatness.
Then 16 days after he declared his White House run Providence seemed to intervene to elevate Trump and his border security crusade with a tragedy that shocked the nation. On July 1st beautiful, innocent 32 year old Kate Steinle was shot dead by 45 year old Francisco Sanchez on a pier in San Franscisco-one of many US sanctuary cities. Sanchez, a multiple deportee felon from Mexico, was 16 days into the 3rd month of his legal but wrongful release from a local jail because of the city's dangerous sanctuary laws. Strangely, Kate Steinle's age 32 (16 doubled) is the exact number of States with sanctuary cities (see).
Then shortly after Kate Steinle's death Trump’s campaign got another boost when on July 11th Mexican drug lord Joaquin Guzman, aka El Chapo, escaped from a maximum security prison. Trump quickly made political hay of this by tweeting:
"El Chapo and the Mexican drug cartels use the border unimpeded like it was a vacuum cleaner, sucking drugs and death right into the U.S."
El Chapo responded by offering a $100 million reward for Trump's death. Now as “16” appears to be Trump’s auspicious number it's applicable here as well. For it so happens that July 11th fell on the 192nd day of the year. 192 is a multiple of 16 12x (see).
TRUMP'S IMMIGRATION REFORM PLAN
Trump at the border.
16 AND ELECTION DAY 2016
Trump (b. June 14, 1946) who announced his candidacy on June 16th will be exactly 25, 716 days old on Election Day (11-08-2016 see). Moreover, from June 16, 2015 to Election Day spans exactly 512 days. 512 is a multiple of 16 32x. Incredibly, 512 days translates into 16 months of calendar time (see).
DONALD TRUMP: 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE US?
When Trump began his campaign on June 16th for the 45th presidency it was in the 3600th week of his awesomely successful life (see). 3600 is a multiple of 45 80x.
As mentioned above, Francisco Sanchez, the criminal alien who murdered Kate Stenile and gave Trump's border security driven campaign a tremendous boost is 45 years old.
TRUMP AND GEORGE H. W. BUSH
When on June 14, 1989 Donald Trump celebrated his 45th birthday it was the 145th day of George H. W. Bush's presidency (see). Bush, a Republican, was the last presidential candidate to win election on a November 8th election date. Moreover, Bush (b. 6-12-1924) celebrates his birthday two days before Trump.
TRUMP, BILL CLINTON AND GEORGE W. BUSH
America has had two presidents born in the year 1946: Bill Clinton (b. August 19, 1946) and George W. Bush (b. July 6, 1946). If Trump (b. June 14, 1946) wins in 2016 he will be the third. Now assuming that the country sends Trump to the White House then this trio of 1946 born Presidents will run consecutively in reverse order from the youngest Clinton born in August, to Bush born in July, to Trump (the oldest of the three) born in June. Oddly, and amazingly, Bush's and Clinton's birthdays are separated by total of 44 days (see); and Trump's and Bush's birthdays by exactly half that or 22 days (see). Moreover, Trump’s and Clinton’s birthdays are 66 days from each other (see). A nice neat arithmetic progression.
Furthermore, (and this is fascinating) just as Trump was 22 days old when George W. Bush was born Bush's father GHW (b. June 12, 1924) ironically was 22 years old when Trump was born (see). Could this be a sign that Trump will be the next Republican President after the two Bushes?
TRUMP, THE ROOSEVELTS AND NEW YORK
If Donald Trump wins both the GOP nomination and presidency in 2016 he'll be the first New Yorker since Franklin Roosevelt to be President. Roosevelt, the 32nd President (32 is double 16), was elected on November 8, 1932. If Trump triumphs in 2016 it will be on the 84th anniversary of FDR's crushing victory over Republican Herbert Hoover.
Moreover, if FDR (b. January 30, 1882) were alive on the day of Donald Trump's birth he would have been precisely 64 years, 4 months and 16 days old. 64 is a multiple of 16 4x, 4 is the square root of 16, and the remaining 16 days speaks for itself (see). Are these signs that Trump is DESTINED to be America's next President from New York after FDR?
Moreover, June 16th was the 167th day of the year (the 67th number of the 100 series, see). If Trump wins the presidency on the anniversary of FDR's landslide 1932 victory he will be the 7th President from New York after FDR (the 6th). Trump will also be 70 years old*.
*If Trump wins the presidency he will be 70 years, 7 months and 7 days old at his inaugural. (see).
FDR’S DEATH IN 1945
FDR, the last US President from New York, died in 1945. Now if Trump triumphs in 2016 not only will he be the 45th President but, in its 162 year history, he’ll also be the Republican Party's 19th President. This gives us the numbers 19 and 45 indicating the year of FDR’s death.
Furthermore, a President Trump will be the first Republican President from New York since Teddy Roosevelt who Trump resembles in his vigorous, manly, bold straightforward personality and patriotic, make America great nationalism.
BTW, If Trump is sworn in as President on January 20, 2017 it will be approximately 116 years from TR becoming President on William McKinley's death in 1901.
RONALD REAGAN AND THE OLD POST OFFICE PAVILLION
You've heard Trump bragging about the lease that he won from the “Obama Administration” for redeveloping the Old Post Office Pavillion in Washington DC. What you probably don't know is that Trump won this deal on February 6, 2012, the 101st anniversary of Ronald Reagan's birth; and that the building's address 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue is just 500 numbers down the street from the White House at 1600 . Is winning this prime piece of historic real estate situated with earshot of the White House on the anniversary of Reagan's birthday a favorable sign for Trump that he is on his way to the presidency (see)? I wouldn't bet against it.
DONALD TRUMP VS. HILLARY CLINTON
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are the front running presidential candidates of their respective parties. A contest between the two would be like a high powered lawn mower verses a weak rancid weed. Trump though 69 is in excellent health a killer full of zeal, optimism and animal spirits; Hillary though slightly younger than Trump is old beyond her years with less than half of his stamina and energy-worn down by a job where she traveled the world doing nothing for her country but much for the corrupt, criminal Clinton Foundation. The Clinton's cannot do to the immensely wealthy kick-ass Trump what Team Obama did to the nicer, gentlier, moderate Mitt Romney-who ran away from his success like a wimp. But are there signs suggesting, pointing to, indicating that in a duel between Trump and Hillary Trump would win? I believe there is. But I'll let you be the judge of that. This is what I found:
On the day that Hillary was born (October 26, 1947) Donald Trump was enjoying the 500th day of his infant life. Why could that be auspicious for Trump and ominous for Hillary? Well, do the math. As there are roughly 30 days in a month 500 days divided by 30 gives us how many months? Did I hear 16 (see)? Need I go on?
*BTW, the Turkish born pilot was born in the late 1970s when Carter was president.
THE ULTIMATE, IRREFUTABLE ARGUMENT AGAINST IRAN NUKE DEAL
When Mohammed first, at heaven's command,
Arose from burning desert sands
This was a sign to every land
That Islam is their Fate.
And the holy jinn ecstatically
Sang this triumphant strain:
Mohammed is the way.
All Brits shall ever ever ever
Be his slaves.
Britons not so blest as He
Must in their turn
Fall on their knees.
To Allah and his Prophet fall
While Islam triumphs eternally
The dread and envy of them all.
Mohammed is the way.
All Brits shall ever ever ever
Be his slaves.
Still mightier shall Mohammed rise
More dreadful from each enemy blow
More deadly, deadly than before.
His sword shall tear apart the sky
And reign down hell upon his foes,
His victory assured.
Mohammed is the way.
All Brits shall ever ever ever
Be his slaves.
Haughty infidels shall never tame,
And fail to bring the Prophet down,
And will but rouse God's wrathful flame
As they work their woe to His renown.
Mohammed is the way.
All Brits shall ever ever ever
Be his slaves.
Our jihadis with perfect freedom found,
Shall to God's happy realm repair.
Blest with 72 pure virgins crowned,
Now that Islam's conquered the world down here.
Mohammed is the way.
All men shall ever ever ever
Be his slaves.
Yesterday the AP reported the earth shattering news (anxiously awaited by cheering warmunists) from NASA and the Japan Meteorological Agency (making climate change deniers like myself seem like fools) that the month of July-when Barack Obama signed a phony, historic nuke deal with Islamofascist Iran-was the hottest month on record.
"The average [global] temperature in July," says the report, "was 61.86 degrees Fahrenheit [ouch! that’s really hot], beating the previous global record set in 1998 and again in 2010 [I didn’t see this listed in Guinness] by about one-seventh of a degree [I feel feverish just reading about it].” “That's a large margin for weather records" we are assured. But it gets worse. "The first seven months of 2015 were the hottest January-to-July span on record [despite record US snow, ice and cold causing first quarter negative GDP growth]).” Alarmingly, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration climate scientist Jake Crouch told The Associated Press “it's quite likely that 2015 will end up the hottest year on record, beating last year."
Now if that doesn't send shock waves up your spine that we're turning Earth into a fire-ball that will in time consume all life in a climate change conflagration it can only mean one thing: you're an inhumane, right-wing, Fox brainwashed, science-hating, Republican dolt who wants to see California wither and die from endless drought, and humanity vanish in a 100 years-and not just from melting glaciers causing water world. If catastrophic climate change doesn’t kill our rogue species “biological extinction”-the mass extinction of animals-will; or a thousand other human caused crises (see).
But speaking of peace-loving, nonnuclear, normalizing Iran climate change apparently has hit that country very hard. For the sizzling month of July (when Obama gave the mullahs $150 billion to supercharge their red-hot blazing terrorist murder machine) the heat index hit an astonishing, unbearable, sweltering 163F (temp =115F, dew pt=90F see). In fact, according to Iran’s meteorological service (as reported last February), “with the exception of just three years, Iran has experienced 23 consecutive years of reduced rainfall and increases in temperature.” This has put a severe strain on Iran's water supply “causing a crisis in 14 cities including Tehran.” "If this crisis continues," says former Agriculture Minister Issa Kalantari, "Iran could become an uninhabitable ghost town in 30 years (see)." Actually, I know a lot of people inside and outside of Israel (myself included) who are praying that this happens. Catastrophic, man-made global warming can't be all that bad if it wipes out radical, terrorist, genocidal Iran-the worst of all bad actors in the Middle East, and one of the evilest regimes on earth.
Kidding aside. This report that has warminusts telling us deniers “we told you so” is only a half truth. These record-breaking temperatures are indeed occurring, but only on the ground not up in the air. They are SURFACE not ATMOSPHERIC temperatures. This isn’t a distinction without a difference as warmunists would have us believe. The difference, in fact, is huge.
Contrary to global warming theory the billions upon billions of tons of heat trapping CO2 and other green house gases that “heedless,” “polluting,” fossil fuel burning humanity is emitting into the air isn’t catastrophically heating the lower atmosphere. Defying UN computer models and apocalyptic warmunist predictions global atmospheric temperatures have been flat as a pancake for 19 plus years (see). Instead of increasing by the predicted three or four degrees fahrenheit or more, atmospheric temperatures are where they were in 1996. What this means is that this “record breaking” rise in surface temperatures is unrelated to anything we humans are putting into the atmosphere. There’s absolutely no causal link between the two. The heat trapping capabilities of CO2, methane and other GHGs gases have been greatly, greatly unscientifically politically exaggerated by leftwing climate zealots who see themselves on a mission to save the world by cutting emissions no matter the cost to the global economy and people's lives. What’s causing surface temperatures to rise is most likely the Sun ignored by warmunists because its colossal heat and energy output can’t be controlled.
For those unfamiliar with warmunist theory, lies and apocalyptic delusions about CO2 emissions imperiling mankind’s future the following will, I'm sure, prove helpful:
CO2 ON MARS AND EARTH
The atmosphere of Mars which has surface temperatures ranging from -225 degrees F to 95 degrees F is composed of 96% carbon dioxide, 2% nitrogen and 0.146% oxygen. The atmosphere of Earth which has surface temperatures ranging from -138 degrees F to 135 degrees F is composed of 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen and a mere 0.039% carbon dioxide. Now if carbon dioxide traps so much reflected heat from the Sun then why is Mars with an atmosphere of 96% CO2 far colder than Earth which has less than 1% CO2? After all, carbon dioxide is carbon dioxide; its capabilities on Mars, Venus, Jupiter and Saturn are no different from that on Earth. The answer of course is that factors other than CO2 are heavily controlling the climate and impacting the surface temperature of both planets. Indeed, though despite the wealth of scientific evidence that CO2 plays a very tiny, insignificant role in climate change, it is hugely for political reasons grossly exaggerated by warminists. Now what those other factors are that warmuists completely ignore (and will curse you for) are Earth’s closer proximity to the Sun by 49 million miles; and SURFACE PRESSURE which you can read about HERE.
In sum, what warminists are praising as good news for their declining movement of lies and falsehoods is actually bad news for them. Without a catastrophic heating of the atmosphere (which isn't happening) rising surface temperatures are further proof that they are wrong; and puts another nail in the coffin of their absurd, hysterical, "world saving" cause.
FOWARD EMAILS TO< p style="text-align: center;">email@example.com
RELATEDWHY ISLAM WANTS TO DESTROY ISRAEL
President Obama stood by his claim that Republicans opposed to the Iran nuclear deal are making common cause with the most anti-western powers in Iranian society,in an interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria on Sunday.
“What I said is absolutely true factually,” Obama said. “The truth of the matter is, inside of Iran, the people most opposed to the deal are the Revolutionary Guard, the Quds Force, hardliners who are implacably opposed to any cooperation with the international community. And there’s a reason for that, because they recognize that if, in fact, this deal gets done, that rather than them being in the driver’s seat with respect to the Iranian economy, they are in a weaker position.”
EU government ministers and business leaders are racing to begin new era of cooperation with Tehran – regardless of what US and Israeli sceptics say.
It went unreported by MSN (and was strangely ignored by FOX), and no GOP candidates peeped a word about it at Thursday's debates, that on May 26th when straight shooting, social democrat, Clinton challenger Bernie Sanders kicked off his presidential campaign with a hard-hitting speech in Burlington, Vermont he said (11 minutes into his speech) that the American people were being deceived about the state of the US economy. Indeed, after bemoaning the disappearing middle class, the dire drop in median income, the growing poverty and people working two or three jobs to make ends meet Sanders dropped a bomb and said about Obama's unemployment rate:
" Don't believe what you read in the papers. Truth is the REAL unemployment rate in this country is close to 11 per cent!"
Huh? That's more than double the official BLS rate of 5.3% that Obama is touting as evidence of his great history making recovery. That he, Barack Obama, with the largest government spending stimulus package of all time not only saved the US economy from plunging into a second Great Depression (which Bush actually did with TARP), but that he has spent his way to a strong recovery and is putting America back to work which no government anywhere has ever done. "Democratic economic policies," said Obama, " has produced a record streak in private sector jobs growth of 12.8 million jobs over 64 straight months."
OBAMA THINKS HE'S MADE HISTORY
It's just simply amazing. What neither Hoover nor FDR could do for ten years during the 1930s, nor the Japanese, Greeks, Spanish, Italians, Brits, Irish and Portuguese, he, Obama, has triumphantly achieved for 21st century America. Both Hoover and FDR believing that government was the answer tried and miserably failed to tax and spend their way out of the Great Depression. And the Japanese with two lost decades of recession after recession and poor economic growth believe the same thing and is still spending beyond its means. But, as it turns out, they weren't wrong-at least not in theory. Government spending was and is and always will be the answer. But Hoover, FDR, the Greeks, Brits and Japanese failed because, unlike Obama who learned from the past, they spent way too little. They didn't go where Obama boldly went using an awesome, unprecedented $830 billion to dig the country out of its hole. That is the secret Obama wants us to believe.
But here is Bernie Sanders breaking ranks with Obama, Democrats and Hillary (who vows to continue Obama's economic policies)claiming that after 64 months and trillions borrowed, printed and spent we have an actual jobless rate in the double digits, as if close to zero progress has been made in ending the Great Recession; as if Obama is FDR and Hoover all over again repeating the same mistakes; as if the recovery is fake and we are being lied to again as with Obamacare, Dodd-Frank, al Qaida's decimation and record deportees. What's going on here?
Is Sanders who voted for Obama's stimulus lying about the 11% for political gain? Or is it evidence as some say that this senior citizen is senile and losing his grip? Or is it that he's being misled by bad advisors who got the numbers wrong? Neither lying nor senile nor misled Sanders is fearlessly looking at economic reality and boldly telling the truth about the real, sad state of joblessness in America that Obama lies about daily.
BILL CLINTON'S NEW METRICS FOR CALCULATING UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
"There are statistics and lying statistics." And Obama, arguably the most mendacious president in US history, is using decades old, politically driven, smoke and mirrors metrics (started by Bill Clinton) to calculate the jobless rate and make it look significantly better than it is-a practice that continued throughout the Bush years and is now being used by Obama to hide the failure of his stimulus to trigger the promised, robust, Reagan-like recovery. Truth is, Obama is Hoover and FDR all over again; he chose a model (Keynesiansm) to fix our economy that's failed for everyone who's tried it; and his economy remains the worst since the Great Depression. But Sanders who's running for the presidency against Bill Clinton's wife to his credit will have none of this lie; and is willing to speak the truth whatever the political cost and blowback from Obama and fellow Dems.
But what is this lie that was continued by Bush and now by Obama with glee? It is this: real, hurting unemployed Americans who can't find work in Obama's pathetic, weak, trickle growth economy and have given up looking (and these number millions) are not counted as unemployed like they were until 22 years ago; called "discouraged workers" they are excluded from the official jobless rate of 5.3% as if like unicorns they don't exist. However, tell any one of these "discouraged workers" that they're not officially considered unemployed and they'll think that you're nuts because it's so nonsensical.
But how did this fraudulent method, or statistical trickery, of excluding millions of jobless workers from the unemployment rolls come about? From what my researches have uncovered it all started with Bill Clinton's large, ill-considered tax hike of 1993. Clinton inherited from George H. W. Bush an economic recovery of 22 straight months of economic growth driven by the Hi-Tech Revolution that was steaming ahead, growing the economy and creating lots of jobs; wanting to bring down the deficit and balance the budget (one of the good things about his presidency) Clinton signed into law two large tax hikes on the rich and upper middle class increasing the former 31%-39.6%, and the latter for from 31% to 36%.
Now experience teaches and common sense knows that tax hikes (any hikes large or small) have a contractionary effect on economic growth; and the Clinton tax was no exception. Because of his taxes the booming hi-tech driven recovery slowed down preventing the creation of hundreds and thousands of additional jobs (see); and in 1994 Clinton lost the House to Newt Gingrich and the GOP as a result. Alarmed that the unintended consequences of the new taxes could cost him reelection Clinton apologized for it regretting that it was too big (see). And then Slick Willy did something underhanded to make up for the slowdown: someone in the Bureau of Labor Statistics came up with an ingenious idea of making the unemployment rate look significantly better than it was. This was achieved by removing the above mentioned "discouraged workers" from the official unemployment rate (now called U-3) and moving them to a separate category (U-5) as if it were a kind of shell game.
Now in 1994 when the transition to the new Clinton metrics was made joblessness was cut roughly in half from 1.1 million at the end of 1993 to 500,000 over the course of the next year as 600,000 "discourage workers" magically disappeared from the unemployment rolls. This dropped the jobless rate more than a full point for Clinton from 6.8% to 5.5% thus burying the job stunting slowdown from his wrong headed tax hikes (see).
SANDERS VS. HILLARY
It's going to be fascinating watching Sanders and Clinton at the Democrat primary debates slugging it out over the economy. For the Clintons carrying water for Obama have praised his economic leadership. Believing that the stimulus was a success Bill Clinton said at the 2012 DNC:
"Obama changed the course of a weak economy which suffered the biggest collapse since the Great Depression [due in main to Clinton's housing policies]; he stopped the slide into depression [it was Bush's TARP that did that] and put us on the long road to recovery [this began before Obama took office]......He put a floor under the [Clinton caused] crash. He began the long, hard road to recovery [the V-shaped recovery began in December 2008] and laid the foundation for a modern, more well-balanced economy that will produce millions of good new jobs, vibrant new businesses and lots of new wealth for innovators [which hasn't happened] (see).
But getting back to Sanders vs. Hillary. How will Hillary during tseehe primary debates handle Sanders' economic honesty, that Obamanomics is a failure and that the real unemployment rate is close to 11% and not the Obama/Clinton 5.3%? When Sanders goes through the history (as I did) of Bill Clinton changing the metrics for calculating unemployment (falsifying it to make his presidency look better) that is going to make for one hell of an interesting debate, and a learning event for the American people.
"If you are cheering rather than praying for a man who has mutilated himself due to mental illness, you are part of the problem." - Ben Shapiro
Indeed, what Obama doesn’t want you to know is that when he says his agreement with Iran closes down all their pathways to a nuclear bomb he means only their domestic pathways, not the pathways open to them in North Korea. And if anyone doubts that the hard up, cash strapped Norks wouldn’t share their nuclear facilities with Iran (or sell them nukes off the shelf) then they need to be enlightened. They need to know that in 2007 the Norks were hard at work in building a secret, illegal nuclear weapons plant in Syria for mass murdering dictator Bashar al-Assad which (thank God) was destroyed by Israel. Indeed, that very project in Syria, which was making the Norks millions, made them the world’s worst and most dangerous nuclear proliferators.
On June 16th Trump announced his 2016 candidacy for the 45th presidency and made border security and illegal alien criminals the focus of his campaign. 16 days before on June 1st (as if paving the way for Trump) Ann Coulter's brilliant and controversial book (her best) on illegals "Adios, America" was published (see). Then on July 1st, 16 days after Trump's announcement, Francisco Sanchez, a 45 year old multiple deportee felon from Mexico, shot and killed 32* year old beautiful Kate Steinle on a San Francisco pier as she was walking with her father and a friend (see). Oddly, Sanchez was 16 days into his 3rd month of his legal but wrongful release from a San Francisco jail because of the city's dangerous sanctuary laws (see). The date of his release April 15th, was the second anniversary of the Boston Marathon Bombing. This is just one of many ominius signs that Moslem terrorists like the bloodthirsty Tsarnaev boys, or ISIS agents, are crossing into our country from Mexico for the purpose of massively killing and wounding innocent Americans (see). The first and most compelling sign of a mass casualty terror attack originating from Mexico was the killing of 9/11 child Christina Taylor Green in the Tucson Massacre which I wrote about here.
Our great, good, post-racial, progressive, egalitarian president who has done so much to boost the economy, improve race relations and lick poverty, and is steadily changing us into the "more perfect [dependency] Union" that he promised seven years ago, wants to continue his good work of social transformation with a new housing diversity program for racist, mostly white suburbia. He wants to move poor, low-income slumdog losers with slumdog habits, values and mentalities (mostly mooching, crude, drug abusing, welfare trash who suffer from internalized poverty ) into high-end middle and upper class ritzy neighborhoods. What's his game? What does he hope to gain? Utopia, of course. He wants to take the slum out of slumdogs; to suburbanize and humanize them; to elevate their humanity and bring out the better angels deep within their nature. What could be wrong with that? You can't take the slum out of slumdogs when they're living in inner city ghetto filth. It's so unfair and counter productive to keep them there. Something must be done to make them better citizens as everything else (including $trillions in handouts) has failed. But our mastermind president has come up with the answer: class warfare by class blending in suburbia.
Bill Clinton tried this and failed. His compassionate Affordable Housing Program which gave millions of poor slumdog families big, unaffordable sub prime loans crashed and burned (nearly collapsing the economy) with most of them defaulting and losing their suburban dream homes (and returning to the slums no better than before). But now our brilliant, world-class, social engineering leader has dreamed up the solution that Clinton should have seen: forcing middle and upper class communities to build low-income (Section 8) housing that would keep the slumdogs permanently there-with generation after generation of welfare dependents benefiting from the finer more socially advanced atmosphere. What's wrong with mixing losers with winners? Raw sewage with wine? In answering this question think of liberal, progressive, Democrat Detroit coming to a community near you.
For those who might construe the above tirade as racist my defense is as follows:
It is inconceivable that any middle class family of any color or ethnicity would welcome Section 8 housing into their neighborhoods. Middle class blacks who have worked their butts off to free themselves from the hell of inner city life (so they can raise their kids in safety, decency and peace) would be just as opposed to Obama's program as any middle class white, Latino or Asian family. No hard working, law abiding family would want inner city slumdog scum moving anywhere near them. Like with Clinton's failed housing program Obama's is doomed to fail. For the poor and disadvantaged there are no shortcuts to the middle class.
FORWARD EMAILS TO< p style="text-align: center;">firstname.lastname@example.org
The only compelling thing that came out of this presser is the reason why Barack Obama nauseates55% of the military and is approved by a pathetic 15%-making him the most loathed and disrespected Commander-in-Chief in US history. The men who shared the stage with him must have felt embarrassed to hell over his remarks about defeating ISIS with ideas.
WHERE DOES CARTER GET THE AUDACITY TO THINK
that he's a first-rate expert on the subject of declining superpowers?/sarc.