Trump is Fit
Let's see Hillary carry boxes of supplies to people.
Let's see Hillary unload a truck - of supplies her foundation paid for!
Let's see Hillary carry boxes of supplies to people.
Let's see Hillary unload a truck - of supplies her foundation paid for!
HILLARY'S "AMAZING" STAMINA AT GRUELING BENGHAZI HEARING?
Every so often when husband Bill is asked about Hillary's stamina and health he will pull from his hat last year's Benghazi hearing and glowingly say how she coolly and masterfully withstood 11 grueling hours of hard Republican questioning. But that's not what exactly happened. Forget about her five days missing in action prior to the hearing where she rested up conserving her energies while Bernie Sanders was campaigning his butt off; and forget that the questioning totaled 8 hours at most not 11 as there were three one hour breaks; truth is, the hearing was not the feat Bill Clinton makes it out to be; roughly half of the hearing was a love fest with fellow Democrats soft balling her; while the hard questions came mostly from three Republicans: Gowdy, Jordan and Pompeo.
But that was nine months ago when Hillary was vastly out polling Bernie Sanders and had done little campaigning herself; since then her exertions have clearly taken a toll on her health and is wearing her out-everyone but her blindest followers know it. This was evident from her DNC acceptance speech (one of the worst ever given) which was so insipid, unmoving, ineffective and dull that it embarrassingly put husband Bill to sleep.
Truth is if Hillary were to do as many press conferences and campaign as vigorous and hard as dauntless, dynamic, indefatigable Donald Trump she would collapse from extreme fatigue within a week. Think I'm exaggerating? As I wrote HERE in 2010 Hillary complained in an interview with Esquire that her job as Secretary of State was too exhausting, and that she couldn't and wouldn't continue in office another four years. If she had a second term at State, or just two more exhausting years, instead of "lying, crooked, low energy Hillary" we'd probably be calling her "no energy Hill."
Hillary giving a speech on national security in Virginia and looking like hell.
But the presidency is far more difficult and demanding than heading the State Department. If Hillary lacked the energy, strength and stamina for State how could she have it for the presidency? And how will she have it for the make or break debates with Donald Trump? Will she be running on empty by then and crash and burn physically and emotionally? Trump is a force of nature, a category four hurricane; Hillary is a spent liberal force in slow declining health that's becoming more apparent and difficult to hide. America will see the stark difference in late September when Trump and Hillary go one on one in New York. Mark my words, in that debate Trump will look like a strong, confident, forceful executive and leader; while Hillary (with worsening health) will look like Trump's weak, flabby, passive, barely competent personal secretary.
So the question, "Will Hillary's health crash before the September debate?" depends on the race tightening between now and then. If that should happen (and Trump is working like hell to make it happen) it will force Hillary to push herself harder and campaign more fiercely than is good for her health.
protesting CO2 pollution and becomes a CO2 polluter./sarc
MAKE AMERICA GREAT,
PROSPEROUS AND POWERFUL AGAIN!
ABANDON THIS FOR HILLARY
THE ARMY OF KILLER CONSTITUTIONALISTS
HILLARY IN 2008 TALKS ABOUT OBAMA BEING ASSASSINATED LIKE RFK
MARCH 3, 2016
THE JUSTLY ACQUITTED
Two articles ago I noted that the 2016 race for the 45th presidency of the United States is extraordinary not only because of political novice Donald Trump's gravity defying triumph in winning big the GOP nomination, and Hillary Clinton being the first female nominee of any major political party, but because these two historic figures are from the same state. This has rarely occurred in US presidential politics. In fact, of the 57 prior presidential contests same state candidates only happened a mere three times in 1860, 1920 and 1944.
Indeed, in 1860 former Republican Congressman Abe Lincoln of Illinois battled Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas for the 16th presidency. In 1920 Ohio Republican Senator Warren Harding fought Ohio Democratic Governor James Cox (FDR was his running mate) for the 29th presidency. And in 1944 New York Republican Governor Thomas Dewey challenged the 32nd president New York's Franklin Roosevelt for the White House.
Now though Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump like Roosevelt and Dewey are New Yorkers this year's same state race is more like the 1860 and 1920 races. For Hillary and Trump, like Lincoln, Douglas, Harding and Cox weren't incumbent presidents running for reelection. Whereas in 1944 FDR was the incumbent running to stay in office for an unprecedented fourth term. In fact, like Republican Donald Trump Lincoln and Harding were agents of change promising a new direction for the nation from the policies and unpopular presidencies of Democrats James Buchanan and Woodrow Wilson. Indeed, Lincoln ran and won on the Republican platform of stopping the expansion of slavery (which he achieved as president and much, much more); and Harding ran and won on the platform of ending the depression that engulfed the nation after World War I and restoring a robustly growing jobs creating economy-which he achieved as President by slashing taxes, federal spending and crushing regulations. However, though Governor Dewey ran as the change candidate against FDR's New Deal wanting to cut taxes, regulations and shrink the size of government (like Harding campaigned for after World War I) America was at war in Europe and the Pacific; and because a sick and ailing FDR was leading the nation to victory, voters wanting to stay the course reelected him for the third time.
Indeed, this year's same state race is more like 1920 than 1860 or 1944. Though in 1860 we were a terribly divided nation about to plunge into a Civil War over the issue of slavery, and there are growing racial divisions and tensions today with cops shooting blacks and visa versa; and though in 1944 we were in a world war like we are today but on a far smaller scale with Islamonazi enemies, the nation now as in 1920 is similar in that the central issue is jobs and economic distress. Though the economy isn't depressed as in 1920 it's clearly in a state of decline headed toward a crisis due to massive debt, runaway spending, high taxes and crushing anti-business regulations (the main reasons for the 1920 depression).
Moreover, 1920 is similar to 2016, and distinct from 1860 and 1944, in that like this election year the incumbent president Barack Obama (a former college professor) is in his second and last term; this too was the case with two term president Woodrow Wilson who, by the way, like Obama was a college professor. And one last similarity to the present race is that Donald Trump's running mate (Mike Pence) like Warren Harding's (Calvin Coolidge*) was the governor of a state.
*Cool Cal was governor of Massachusetts.
So the big question is this: will history repeat itself? Of the three past same state presidential races Republicans won the first two and lost the third. It's two to one in favor of Republicans; and of the three races the Republican year of 1920 is closer to 2016 than the other two years. However, one thing is clear: the 45th President of the United States will be the 7th from New York State after FDR. And by an astonishing and perhaps meaningful or prophetic coincidence if number 7 is Donald Trump instead of Hillary, when he's sworn into office on January 20, 2017 he will be exactly, precisely, amazingly 70 years, 7 months and 7 days old (see).
Could it be? Is it possible that Vladimir Putin is covertly intervening in US politics and aiding Donald Trump (most likely without his knowledge) in his quest for the presidency by doing what he can to undercut and stop Hillary Clinton? Only a fool would deny the possibility. After all, something similar happened in 1983 when Ted Kennedy on behalf of the Dems colluded with the Soviets in trying to defeat Ronald Reagan and elect Walter Mondale-who promised to restore detante and unilaterally freeze the production of nuclear weapons. This was a clear act of treason which Kennedy should have been held accountable for (see).
However, it is certain that Putin prefers Trump in the White House (who he flattered by calling him a "genius") over Hillary who he loathes like Obama. If Hillary is elected it's practically certain she'd be more difficult than Trump to deal with on the lifting of EU and US sanctions which were imposed after Russia annexed Crimea in March 2014. These sanctions, which are hurting Russia in the billions, include restrictions on major Russian state banks and corporations; and the blacklisting of dozens of Russian officials and firms accused of undermining Ukrainian sovereignty. It is practically certain that a Clinton presidency would make the lifting of sanctions contingent on Russia withdrawing its remaining troops from Ukraine, stop supplying anti-Ukrainian rebel separatists with money, training and arms; and lastly returning Crimea to Ukraine. And that would happen in stages.
But with Trump as president there's no telling what he'd be willing to do as he is unpredictable at this point. He did say confidently that he'd get on better with the Russian leader than Obama is doing; but that's about it. From Putin's viewpoint it's preferable for Russia to have a known unknown like Trump as president than a known known like Clinton (as Rumsfeld would say).
But last Friday on the 21st during his impassioned acceptance speech in Cleveland, Trump, as he was listing Hillary's foreign policy failures made one glaring and perhaps telling omission: Russia. Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, ISIS, and Clinton's overall disaster in the Middle East, were scathingly mentioned. But not a peep about her failure at Russian Reset, or blaming her for Russia's conflict with Ukraine and annexing of Crimea. Russian analysts could not have failed to notice this omission and probably took it as a sign, despite Ukraine and Crimea, of Trump's good will toward their country and its leader. Putin is certainly hoping that a Trump presidency would recognize Russia's ownership of the Crimean Peninsula and lift all sanctions in exchange for withdrawing its remaining troops from Ukraine, and cutting all aid to pro-Russian Ukrainian separatists.
Indeed, it was after Trump's speech on the following day (the 22nd) that Wikileaks posted the 20,000 DNC hacked emails that have thrown the Dems into pre-convention chaos, and forced Debby W. to resign as DNC chairperson, over evidence of their rigged pro-Clinton primary process. Coincidence? I'll let you be the judge of that. But one thing is clear: Putin does not want a third term of Barack Obama, and he'll do whatever he can to prevent it.
THE INVISIBILITY OF PROFESSIONAL HACKERS
TP = TRUE [TEA PARTY] PATRIOTS
When the single digits of the date 7-4-1776 are added together it gives us (as you shall see) the profoundly significant number 32, which is the number that signifies America, hence:
John Adams our 2nd President and Jefferson our 3rd died in reverse order that July 4th day giving us the number 32. In other words, as 3 precedes 2 in the number 32 Jefferson, the greater and more important of the two Founders, was the first to leave this world.
As if foreshadowing the order of their deaths the friendship of Jefferson and Adams began when they first met at the Second Continental Congress in May 1775. Amazingly at the time Jefferson (born April 13, 1743) was 32 years old.
Now as 32 is a number symbolic of the day this great country was founded and is the numerical value of the name America, and as it signifies the order of Jefferson’s and Adams’ death on a July 4th date, remarkably and amazingly the exact number of words comprising the Declaration of Independence (which the 3rd and 2nd Presidents wrote and defended) is 1322, with the number 32 at its center.
Now in keeping with this remarkable pattern of fives (and fives multiples and variations) the date July 4, 1776 fell on a Thursday, the 5th day of the week. Moreover, July 4, 1826, the day Jefferson and Adams died, was the 185th day of the year. Not does 185 end in 5and is divisible by 5 but it’s a variant of the number 5 because it is reducible to 5, hence: 1+8+5=14, 1+4=5.
Also fascinating is that the only two future Presidents to sign the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams (they were two of the 5 key Founders*), were members of the Committee of FIVE that was appointed to draft the document. The other three members were Ben Franklin, Roger Sherman and Robert Livingston.
*The other three were Washington, Franklin and Madison.
As Jefferson and Adam’s were the great pen and voice of the Revolution, the one writing the Declaration of Independence and the other defending it with his eloquence, concealed in the date July 4, 1776 is the all important year 1787 when the Constitution was completed and adopted by the 13 states and America became a Constitutional Republic, hence
1776 + 4 + 7 = 1787*
It is also important to note that Jefferson and Adams were the 18th and 48th signers of the Declaration respectively. The multiplication of these two numbers gives us a total that’s a multiple of 32, hence:
It is fascinating to note that Monroe the Jeffersonian (the student and lifelong friend of Jefferson) was succeeded to the presidency by John Quincy Adams, John Adams’ son. In other words, just as Thomas Jefferson succeeded John Adams to the presidency an Adams succeeded a Jeffersonian President*.
St. Augustine, following the ancient Greeks who believed that numbers (the basis of mathematics) rule the world, wrote that “Numbers are a universal language given to us by God for the confirmation of truth”-and, I might add, to justify His ways to us in this mathematically constructed, ordered and harmoniously designed universe. What was Divinely confirmed on July 4, 1826 with the near simultaneous deaths of Jefferson and Adams, and again on July 4, 1831 with the death of James Monroe, is that random, unplanned, chaotic chance had nothing to do with their deaths-nor was it the work of some impossible ingenious human conspiracy. Indeed, the July 4th deaths of these three Presidents confirm the existence of God giving evidence of His necessary being and mysterious and inscrutable governing of the universe and this nation. In other words, it is proof that Jefferson, Adams and Monroe died naturally under supernatural direction with an intelligent unifying principle coordinating their deaths as a sign that our country’s founding moment and Constitutional Republic were DIVINELY ORDAINED, as is our exceptionalism and glorious destiny as the greatest liberating force from tyranny in human history.
In celebration of God, Country and Liberty I wish you all a Happy 4th of July.
Not only did Hawaii (the 50th state) join the Union in the late 1950s but it did so exactly 6555 weeks from July 4, 1776, hence:
The numerological table used in this article is as follows:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
A B C D E F G H I
J K L M N O P Q R
S T U V W X Y Z
KSM's chief interrogator said otherwise:
If KSM gave interrogators "false info" the waterboarding and sleep deprivation would have continued until he had enough and became cooperative.
The al-Qaeda leader who suffered the harshest interrogations tried to stop his ordeal by giving false information about plots to attack Heathrow Airport and Canary Wharf, according to the Senate report.
Ten days after his capture, he was waterboarded for the first of what became 183 times. Under this relentless pressure, KSM “provided information on the Heathrow Airport and Canary Wharf plotting”. There was no suggestion of even trying to use other methods first, says the report. KSM, the acknowledged mastermind of the September 11 attacks, was then subjected to “facial and abdominal slaps, the facial grab, stress positions, standing sleep deprivation” and “rectal rehydration”. On the same day as KSM’s arrest in Pakistan on 1 March 2003, CIA headquarters authorised the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques”. Within two hours of the capture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed – known as “KSM” – the head of interrogations at CIA “Detention Site Cobalt” sent an email saying “let’s roll with the new guy”.
The cherry picked, politicized Democrat minority senate report on Bush's EITs was thoroughly rebutted and discredited by several former CIA chiefs who put up the web site "CIA SAVED LIVES." The Dem report ignored every piece of info (from 6 million docs) that contradicted its false conclusion that Bush's program was useless in facilitating detainee cooperation and gathering actionable intel to thwart terror attacks and save lives.
The skewed report was also rebutted by the Republican majority report; and then by Obama's own CIA Chief John Brennen. Why do you think Brennen wasn't fired from his job after issuing his critique or at least rebuked by Obama? Because he told the truth-as did out going DefenseSec Leon Panetta when he said that info extracted from terror detainees using EITs played a role in tracking down bin Laden.
Days after the raid in Abbottabad, former Attorney General Michael Mukasey wrote an op-ed titled “The Waterboarding Trail to Bin Laden.” The intelligence that led to the raid, Mukasey asserted,began with a disclosure from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), who broke like a dam under the pressure of harsh interrogation techniques that included waterboarding. He loosed a torrent of information — including eventually the nickname of a trusted courier of bin Laden.6
It later became apparent that this account was wrong. KSM hadn’t revealed the courier’s alias. According to an American official familiar with KSM’s interrogation, KSM wasn’t asked about al-Kuwaiti until the fall of 2003, months after his waterboarding had concluded.7 KSM reportedly acknowledged having known al-Kuwaiti but told his interrogators al-Kuwaiti was “retired” and of little significance.
CIA'S TORTURE BY PROXY/RENDITION PROGRAM STARTED WITH CLINTON/GORE
(H/T FOB Tycz)
SEE FOR YOURSELF
RELATED< p style="text-align: center;">“CRAZY” TRUMP ATTACKS GEORGE BUSH OVER 9/11 AND IRAQ. BUT IS HE CRAZY LIKE A FOX?
Pope Francis silently praying with gay-hating Moslem clerics toward Mecca the anti-gay capital of the world.
So now we have the mentally deranged progressive leftist head of the once high and holy Roman Catholic Church (no longer the bulwark of Judeo-Christian values) apologizing for the Church's past treatment of gays and futily begging them for forgiveness. Why is it futile? Because most homosexuals will treat this as not going far enough, and remain hostile to the Church until ending its prohibition on same-sex marriage the pope himself officiates a gay wedding at the Vatican.
After Latino Pope Francis sees religion of peace Islam killing dozens of Latino gays in Orlando he begs gays to forgive the Church for past mistreatment instead of begging Islam to stop killing and persecuting gays. Today the greatest threat to gays comes from Islam, not Christianity. The Orlando gay massacre was emblematic of that.
But the Church's first Latino pope giving this apology 15 days after dozens of gay Latino men were killed by a gay Moslem jihadist can't be a coincidence. The pope was undoubtedly moved to compassion by the event which is why he made his statement. But in light of Orlando perhaps Francis should issue a second apology to gays for saying that "Islam is a religion of peace," and for what he did two years ago when visiting Islamist Turkey. For while at a mosque in Istanbul Francis closed his eyes and silently prayed to God. That wouldn't have been so bad except that with the Moslem clerics who were present Francis was facing toward Mecca as if he were a Moslem worshipper. Now that's MECCA as in the ANTI-GAY CAPITAL OF THE WORLD. For Mecca is the holiest city in Islam (the most anti-gay religion in the world); and it's located in Saudi Arabia perhaps the most anti-gay country in the world where homosexuality is considered a crime against God and nature, and gays are flogged, tortured, castrated and jailed, and legally killed in vigilante violence. In other words, in Mecca and across Saudi Arabia Moslems have the right and license to kill gays: to beat, stone or torture them to death with absolute impunity and the blessings of the faith (see).
Now Francis issuing an apology for the Church's past mistreatment of gays in wake of the Orlando shooting and after praying toward Mecca where they're brutally mistreated (like the Church did in the Middle Ages) is utter extreme hypocrisy. If Francis means what he says then he must denounce Islam as a religion of war against gays, and apologize that his prayer toward Mecca was a big moral mistake.
Moslems who denounce Islam's brutal treatment of gays must cease praying toward Mecca where anti-gay violence carried out in Allah's name (since Mohammed's day) is the law of the land.
A THRILLED HILLARY CLINTON JUMPING UP AND DOWN
and gushing with joy said that this court ruling was a victory for women's rights. REALLY? Was it a victory for unborn female children and their God-given right to life?
IF I DIDN'T TREMBLE AT THE THOUGHT OF GETTING HIT WITH HER BROOM
I'd call Hillary a b*tch all day long.\sarc
Though McCain was to later clarify his statement saying that "Obama's security policies and not him personality was responsible for Orlando (see)" nevertheless McCain on both occasions was disingenuously and self-servingly speaking a half truth. Indeed, the full inconvenient truth which he doesn't want you to know and could hurt is reelection to a fifth term in the Senate is summed up in the following precise demonstrable equation:
THE LIBYAN WAR + WITHDRAWAL FROM IRAQ = THE CREATION OF ISIS.
Indeed (as I explain HERE and HERE), remove from the equation the disastrous Obama/Clinton decision to intervene militarily in Libya (with a NO FLY ZONE and bombings to assist Libyan rebels in defeating Kaddafy) and the Syrian rebels certain that Obama and NATO would intervene on their behalf wouldn't have risen up against Assad with such destructive and murderous ferocity. In other words, if Obama's Libyan (and Egyptian*) policies hadn't turned relatively peaceful protests for democratic reform into an armed insurrection to topple Assad Syria would be very much at peace today with no massive displacement of Syrians creating a refugee crisis-and very real and deadly threats of refugee terrorism in America and the West.
*Obama's desertion of long time friend and US ally Hosni Mubarak for the radical Moslem Brotherhood then desertion of US ally Kaddafy for Libyan rebels emboldened anti-Baathist forces in Syria to arm and rise up against the anti-US Assad regime.
But what hypocritical John McCain doesn't want you to know, or hopes you've forgotten, is that he (and`Lindsey Graham) was gung-ho for regime change in Libya and deposing Kaddafy. As Rand Paul said in his blistering critique McCain (and Graham) supported the Obama/Clinton Libyan War to the hilt; and then representing the anti-Assad rebels, which included al-Qaida (later to become ISIS), he and Graham urged Obama to replicate in Syria what he did in Libya: set up a NO FLY ZONE and bomb Assad to weaken his regime in his war against the rebels. But Obama disappointing the rebels who were certain of US intervention because of Assad's atrocities (which they provoked and committed themselves) would do no such thing*. They were deceived. With Obama wanting a nuke deal with Assad's allies in Iran there was no way he was going to chance jeopardizing that by bringing down Assad; or worse still risk getting into a military conflict with pro-Assad Putin in Russia.
*It was shortly after Obama ominously announced on March 19, 2011 (the eighth anniversary of the Iraq War) that the US and NATO would intervene in Libya and set up a No Fly Zone that anti-Assad violence broke out in Syria with the burning down of Baath Party headquarters in the city of Daraa (see and see).
The sad truth is this: when Obama and Clinton took office there was no ISIS caliphate; and it would have stayed that way had they not gone to war against Kaddafy in Libya; and Obama had used the tremendous leverage he had of $BILLIONS in Iraq Reconstruction Funds to keep US troops in Iraq on US terms (as Leon Panetta said he could have done if he had the will, see). The terrible truth is this: Obama and Clinton were the unwitting parents (father and mother) of evil, murdering, terrorist ISIS; and John McCain to a lesser degree was complicit in its horrible birth (on the Syrian side). And in this way, by the law of unintended consequences, Obama, Hillary and McCain were indirectly (not directly or personally) responsible for the 49 dead victims of the ISIS inspired Orlando gay nightclub massacre-the worst Islamic terrorist attack since 9/11-almost certainly anticipating worse horrors to come. I think most of you would agree with me when I say that with Obama retiring in January it's time for John McCain to call it quits and join him.
The lying pro-Taliban father of gay mass murderer Omar Mateen tried to hide his son's radicalization and homosexuality.