DEMOCRAT POLLSTER’S POST-ELECTION POLL FINDS “COMEY EFFECT” AND “RUSSIAN-WIKI EFFECT” DIDN’T EFFECT OUTCOME OF ELECTION

Zogby Analytics --Post election poll results

James Zogby

Enraged, deranged, vicious "Not My President" Trump haters who feel cheated that Hillary Clinton lost the election and blame it on a combination of Russian interference using hacked DNC emails, and Jim Comey's renewed 11th hour  probe into Hillary's emails will hate this excellent underreported post-election poll that proves them flat out wrong. Professional pollster James Zogby (a radically left, pro-Clinton, Democrat Arab American) took a scientific poll on November 16th (eight days after the election) to determine when voters made their decision for whom to vote for. What Zogby found was this:

When did you make your decision for whom to vote for President?

A year ago 26%
More than a month ago 39
During the presidential debates 18
In the last week before voting 8 
In the 24 hours before voting 4
In the voting booth 3
Not sure 3

26% (29 million voters) made up their minds one year before the election; 39% (52 million) made up their minds prior to October 7th, the day the massive Russian-DNC-WikiLeaks email dump began; 18% (24 million) made their decision based on the three Trump-Clinton debates (September 26th, October 10th, and October 20th). In sum, according to Zogby 83% of voters (112 million out of 135 million) were completely uninfluenced by the WikiLeaks emails.

 

 

But what of the remaining 17% or 23 million voters who were still undecided after the last presidential debate, and made up their minds in the final days and hours of the campaign? Most analysts agree that this was the group that decided the election for change agent Donald Trump over establishment candidate Hillary Clinton; that late in the day they broke for Trump in the battle ground, swing states that mattered (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan), and where Hillary was out polling him right up to the end. But why did these swing state voters break for Trump? 

Fancy Bear logo.jpg

Fancy Bear

l

 

THE RUSSIAN DNC/PODESTA HACK

 Indeed, did the steady drip drip drip of the Wiki-emails throughout October disillusion hundreds and thousands of Hillary leaning voters in the three swing states causing them to vote for anyone but her, or not vote at all depriving her of crucial votes to the benefit of Trump?

 

The answer is an emphatic NO!. For many reasons it's practically impossible that WikiLeaks mattered with late undecided voters; and this is born out by Zogby who makes mention of a "Comey effect" in his polling data (which I'll get to later), but not of a "Wiki effect." Why the one and not the other when both were and still are hotly debated  topics? The answer is simple: unlike the "Comey effect" Zogby, when questioning voters, couldn't find a "Wiki effect." Either Zogby found that the impact of the stolen Hillary related emails was too slight to have any post-election interest; or it was completely nonexistent; and this is understandable given the nature of the emails.

Indeed, while the DNC/Podesta emails did provide the basis for a lot of negative stories about Hillary (and hilarious right-wing mockery and propaganda) they were no more harmful to her campaign than annoying little pin pricks; they weren't politically damaging like the criminal probe into her server and emails that she lied about to the public and unsuccessfully tried to the cover up. In comparison the emails were as nothing to the electorate who were accustomed to hearing much worse about Hillary.

 

SEXUAL ASSAULT ALLEGATIONS VS. EMBARRASSING EMAILS

 

 

Look at it this way, if Donald Trump's infamous, lewd Hollywood Access groper tape, (which surfaced an hour before Jullian Assange published the DNC/Podesta emails), and subsequent multiple sexual assault allegations, failed to politically hurt or stop him (though a majority of voters believed they were true, see) what fatal political damage could Hillary have suffered from the Wiki stuff?

Indeed, which is worse and more offensive for turning off actual or potential voters? Trump's groper/assault scandal where women are demeaned as sexual objects and playthings? Or emails showing John Podesta bad mouthing Hillary and questioning her judgment? Or Hillary saying she wanted "a hemispheric borderless common market," "single payer healthcare," and that as President she'd implement gun control by executive order"? In other words, if "gropergate" scarcely hurt Trump with late voters then what significant electoral harm could the Wiki-emails caused Hillary?

 

PUTIN THE KINGMAKER?

 

 

So where does that leave Vladimir Putin? True, he (and his Kremlin hackers) tried to interfere with the election  preferring Trump to Hillary. True he hoped that the Wiki-emails would help Trump's cause and even perhaps, serving as a distraction, counter the negative effects of the Hollywood Access tape*. But was Putin Trump's kingmaker? Absolutely not! And because Putin and the Wiki-emails had zero to do with Trump's victory Zogby couldn't find evidence of a "Wiki Effect" among the voters he questioned.

*It's no mere coincidence that on October 7th, when Julian Assange published the DNC/Podesta emails it was one hour after the Access Hollywood tape surfaced (see). It is also interesting to note that October 7th was Vladimir Putin's 64rd birthday (see).

 THE COMEY EFFECT

 
Now while Zogby couldn't find a "Wiki effect" negatively impacting voters about Hillary (which he certainly looked for when questioning them) he did find a fairly substantial "Comey Effect" in 38% or 51 million voters. But as I will attempt to prove using Zogby's polling data the Comey Effect may have somewhat changed the electoral vote count, but not the outcome of the election.
 
Zogby asked voters the following:
 

"Did the re-opening of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email server  [on Oct. 28] have a negative impact, positive impact or no impact on your feelings toward Hillary Clinton as a candidate for President? "

And the result was:

Negative impact 30%
Positive impact 8
No impact 58
Not sure 4  

Now according to Zogby 30% or 40.5 million voters had their feelings negatively impacted by Comey's 11th hour Hillary probe, which dominated the news cycle for nine days. And while 83% of these or 33.6 million already made up their minds who to vote for the question is this: did the remaining 17% or 6.9 million undecided voters decide the election for Trump based on the Comey effect? At first glance it would seem so. For if we evenly divide these 6.9 million undecideds between each of the 50 states it comes to 138, 000 voters per state. Now with Trump's close victories in each of the three swing states that won him the White House way under 138,000 votes (Pennsylvania 44,000,  Wisconsin 23,000 and Michigan 10,000) it would appear that James Comey was Trump's kingmaker -- as Hillary Clinton believes.

TOP VOTER ISSUES

But Hillary is greatly, greatly mistaken. For when we factor in Zogby's data on the top issues that concerned voters (and especially the undecideds) we learn that Trump could have likely lost only one of the three key states due to the Comey Effect. In other words, as you will see, if Comey hadn't renewed the investigation into Hillary Trump would have won the electoral vote anyway.

According to Zogby top issues for voters were as follows:

Economy/jobs 32%
Taxes 5
Syria 1
Immigration 7
Trust/Truthfulness 11
Terrorism 8
The Environment 5 
Energy 1
The budget deficit 6
Social security 6
Medicare/Medicaid 4
Obamacare 8
Other (specify) 8 

 

You will notice that the top issue "Economy/Jobs" at 32% is followed by an issue relevant to the Comey Effect, "Trust/Truthfulness," and this intensely concerned 11% of the voters. Now 11% of the 6.9 million voters who were negatively impacted by the Comey Effect and were likely swayed by the trust issue to vote for Trump (or one of the third-party candidates) over Hillary was 759,000 votes.

But the question again is this: did the 11% influenced by Comey win the presidency (as Hillary and others believe) for Donald Trump? The answer is an emphatic NO! Whichever way I crunched the numbers (there's only two ways of doing this) it didn't add up to a win for Hillary.

For example, using the simple method of equally dividing the 759,000 Comey influenced/trust votes between each of the 50 states it gives us 15,180 votes per state. And 15,180 is only more (by 5180) than the margin of Trump's victory in  one of the three key swing states: Michigan (10,000 votes). Giving Michigan with its 16 electoral votes to Hillary does nothing to change the outcome of the election.

According to The Daily Telegraph Corey Lewandowski said that Comey's late investigation into Hillary related emails gave the Trump campaign "a little spring in their step." And so it did. But just a little; not enough to make a decisive difference.
 

However, when I used a more sophisticated method where I worked out the math on a state by state basis the result, beginning with Pennsylvania remained unchanged:

PENNSYLVANIA  

2,970,733 - Trump votes

505,024 - 17% undecided

151,507 - 30% Comey effect

16,665 -11% trust top issue

44,000 - Trump's margin of victory

WISCONSIN

1,405,284 - Trump votes 

238,898 - 17% undecided

71,669 - 30% Comey effect

7883 - 11% trust top issue

23,000 - T's margin of victory

MICHIGAN

2,279,543 - Trump votes

387,522 -17% undecided

116,256 - 30% Comey effect

14,867 - 11% trust top issue

10,000 - Trump's margin of victory

  As you can see when taking the percentage of undecided voters in each of the three key swing states where Trump narrowly won, and then further reducing that number to Comey Effect voters, then reducing that to trust issue voters, again only in Michigan does it appear that the Comey Effect could have been the decisive factor helping Trump. In Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, as with the other 27 states Trump won, the overriding issue that put him over the top was the economy and jobs. In only one state Michigan does it appear it was the trust issue influenced by the short-lived Comey probe.  

In sum, if there were no stolen DNC WikiLeaks emails, nor the 11th hour FBI Clinton email probe, Donald Trump would be exactly where he is today: 45th President of the United States -- but with less controversy about his historic, astonishing PROVIDENTIAL victory.

 RELATED

 

2016 WHITE MIDDLE CLASS BACKLASH BASED ON ECONOMIC DECLINE NOT REACTIONARY RACIST POLITICS

 
 

It's True: WikiLeaks dumped Podesta emails hour after Trump video surfaced | PolitiFact

 

WILL TRUMP WIN REELECTION WITH LOWEST APPROVAL RATING OF ANY PRESIDENT IN HISTORY?

 
 
If you are sick and tired and bored to death as I am of hearing Trump haters shouting with glee about the President's low approval ratings (as if it's some kind of post-election victory)  then read the following for a dose of MAGA reality and inspiration.
 
 
Of Trump's last nine predecessors (going back to Ike) Ronald Reagan had the lowest early approval rating at just under 50%. And he turned out to be the greatest of them.
 
DONALD TRUMP HAD THE LOWEST APPROVAL RATING
 
of any presumptive Republican or Democrat presidential nominee in history. Then Trump had the lowest approval of rating of any Republican or Democrat nominee in history. Then he had the lowest approval rating of any candidate elected President in U.S. history. Then he had the lowest approval rating of any President-elect in U.S. history. Then he had the lowest approval rating of any inaugurated President in U.S. history. Now he has the lowest approval rating of any post-inaugural President in U.S. history. The question now is this: when Trump wins a second term will he have the lowest approval rating of any reelected U.S. President in history?
 
 POLLS BE DAMNED!  
 
THEY JUST DON'T APPLY TO THIS UNUSUAL MAN!
 
I say it again: Donald Trump and his Administration are the odds busting, gravity defying Tom Brady and New England Patriots of American politics.
 
 
GET USED TO IT TRUMP HATERS!
 
We're in the FIRST 100 DAYS of eight
strong, unstoppable,
 MAGA TRUMP
YEARS
 
.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

IS KIETH ELLISON CHOSEN BY ALLAH AND BARACK OBAMA TO HEAD THE DNC AND STOP THE “RACIST” TRUMP PRESIDENCY? (SARCASM)

 
 
 
 
 
 
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA,
 
the Secular Progressive, was the closest thing this nation ever had to a Moslem President. And 24 months before he took office Keith Ellison (born exactly 24 months after Obama on the same date*) was sworn in as America's first Moslem Congressman**. Could it be, is it possible that this is a sign from All Wise, All Knowing, Almighty, Compassionate Allah that Ellison is His choice (and Obama's) to head the DNC? And that he'd be as great for his party as was Obama? And he'll stop the "Islamophobic racist" presidency of Donald Trump, whom Ellison wants to impeach for his travel ban on Moslems and other bad things? 
 
* Obama and Ellison share the same birthday (August 4) two years apart (see and see).
 
**Ellison was sworn in as congressman on January 3, 2007. 24 months and 18 days later Obama was sworn in as President (see).
 
 
 
Forget neo-Nazi David Duke's KKK endorsement of Ellison. Support from Bernie Sanders, the self-hating socialist Jew from Brooklyn, proves that the congressman is no Israel hating anti-Semite like his right wing critics slanderously say. If Ellison is acceptable to Bernie no Jewish liberal should oppose him because he's of the Moslem faith.

But wait...no President since Herbert Hoover has been more destructive to his party than Obama. Since 2009 Democrats have lost the House, the Senate, the Presidency, 14 governorships, over 900 seats in state legislatures, and the next Supreme Court nominee (with Ginsburg to follow?).  And now they're on the verge of losing more and worsening the disaster if they make Keith Ellison DNC chief-which is fine with me.
 
 
 
YES, IT'S A SIGN
 
FROM ALLAH DIVINE
 
STICK IT TO TRUMP
 
AND HIS "ANTI-MOSLEM PRESIDENCY"
 
MAKE ELLISON HEAD OF THE DNC
 
TO CONTINUE OBAMA'S DESTRUCTIVE PARTY LEGACY
 
 
BUT I'M NOT DONE
 
 
While Ellison wants Trump impeached for his so-called Moslem travel ban, the plan it turns out (in its earlier more universal "racist" version) was endorsed by none other than Ellison's mentor in Islam: Louis Farrakhan-who strangely likes Donald Trump. You can't make this stuff up.
 
 
 ****************************
 
AND IN OTHER NEWS
 
 
 
MY GOD!  
 
Did the enemy anti-Trump kamikaze media learn nothing from their devastating defeat in 2016? That was their Okinawa. What's next is their Hiroshima (2018) followed by their Nagasaki (2020)
 
 
THEN
 
  
 
PEACE
 
 
 
******************************************
 
 
 
HOW MUCH MORE CHAOS CAN THIS COUNTRY TAKE?
 
We had 16 months of a chaotic Trump presidential campaign suffering setback after setback like the Chicago Cubs in the World Series and defying the odds winning the Presidency. Are we now going to have 48 months of a chaotic Trump Presidency suffering setback after setback like the Patriots in the Super Bowl and again beating the odds winning reelection? I'd bet the barn on it.  
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 

DONALD TRUMP’S FIVE POINT MAGANOMICS PLAN FOR REVERSING THE WORST RECOVERY SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION, SAVING THE MIDDLE CLASS AND WINNING REELECTION

 

PRESIDENT TRUMP'S FIVE POINT MAGA PLAN FOR ECONOMIC RENEWAL

DEREGULATION

DEPORTATION

REPATRIATION

TAX REFORMATION

TRADE RENEGOTIATION

 

 

TRUMP'S PATH TO 270 ELECTORAL VOTES IN 2020

 

will be easier for him than it was last year because of the following  five point plan to radically reverse and energize our weak, trickle growth, bad jobs, high debt, overly regulated economy. 

 

POINT ONE

 

DEREGULATION

 

Red Tape Rising: Six Years of Escalating Regulation Under Obama | The Heritage Foundation

 

 

Repealing Obama's massive, growth inhibiting regulatory policies and anti-business executive orders (EPA's Clean Power Plan, Obamacare, Dodd Frank, etc.) will greatly unleash the pent up growth and huge productive power of Capitalism from federal restraints and add a conservatively estimated $100 billion per year to the economy.

 

 POINT TWO

 

DEPORTATION

 

 

Illegal Immigration Costs U.S. $113 Billion a Year, Study Finds | Fox News

 

 

The mass deportation of illegal aliens will save American taxpayers up to $100 billion on education, medical care, incarceration and welfare costs. It will also drive up wages (create better paying jobs for low skilled, poorly educated Americans) as they'll be less people competing for low end jobs with employers forced to pay higher wages (at least the minimum wage) to attract legal workers as the supply of illegal aliens dry up (see). 

 

POINT THREE 

 

REPATRIATION

 

 

 

The repatriating of $2.5 trillion of horded offshore U.S. corporate profits will be used for investment and job creating business expansion, while raking in at least $218 billion in new government revenues.

 

POINT FOUR

 

TAX REFORMATION

 

 

 

The implementation of JFK-like pro-growth, pro-business, pro-family tax reform policies will hugely boost investment, productivity ($150 billion in higher output) and jobs creation while surging the government's revenue stream, as it did in the booming mid to late 1960s.

 

 

 

 Keep in mind these very same principles and policies ended the Wilson Depression of the early 1920s; likely prevented a sixth post-war recession in the 1960s (that Kennedy feared and was trying to avoid); ended the scourge of stagflation (economic stagnation with inflation) in the 1980s; and rescued socialist Sweden from Greek-like socialist financial and economic collapse in the 1990s. 

 

POINT FIVE

 

TRADE RENEGOTATION

 

What a Redo of NAFTA Could Mean For the Future of US-Canada Trade | Fortune.com

 

 

 

 

And lastly, the renegotiation of NAFTA and other bad trade deals to create a two way level playing field will dramatically reduce our trade deficit, grow exports and create jobs.

 

 

 

These anti-Liberal/Obamunist policies is how Donald Trump (continuing the legacies of Harding/Coolidge, JFK and Reagan) will reverse the worst and weakest economic recovery since the Great Depression, and create a roaring, soaring, high growth, all boats lifting economy.

 

In sum

 

MAGANOMICS 

 

absolutely will  

 

MAKE AMERICA PROSPEROUS AGAIN 

 

create a positive environment for business investing

 

rebuild our nation's crumbling infrastructure

 

unleash our staggering energy potential

 

save the vanishing middle class

 

and win the President a second term 

to complete what

he began  

 

RELATED

BARACK OBAMA’S FLAT TO FAILING ECONOMY AND THE HERBERT HOOVERING OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY

 

BARACK OBAMA: THE PRESIDENT WHO SAVED THE U.S. AND WORLD ECONOMY FROM A SECOND GREAT DEPRESSION?

OBAMA’S FAILED STIMULUS AND BUSH’S UNDERREPORTED RECOVERY 

 

DEBATE WITH AN “ACCREDITED (KRUGMANITE) ECONOMIST” ON “SOCIALIST” SWEDEN AND AUSTERITY ECONOMICS

TRUMP’S TRIUMPHANT MEGA MAGA “CHANGE FOR THE AGES” POST-INAUGURATION RALLY

 

 At exactly 5:45 PM the beautiful wife of the 45th President kicked off the rally by reading the Lord's Prayer.

Yesterday in the battleground state that was the start of the greatest, odds defying presidential campaign victory in U.S. history, on the day that World Trade Center terrorist, Sheik Abdel-Rahman (inspiration for 9/11) died, and repentant abortionist Norma McCorvey (Jane Doe in Roe v Wade) also died (God bless her soul), President Trump at a mega MAGA post-inaugural rally unofficially launched his 2020 reelection campaign -- as he blasted the corrupt   enemy news media, murdering Moslem jihadists, obstructionist Democrat senators and usurping federal judges (reading them the immigration law they unconstitutionally ignored); and taking to task a failed, "Hope is Dead," un-American president who left behind a terrible "MESS": a country in economic, military and geopolitical decline where hostile anti-American states are advancing on all sides.

GET USED TO IT LEFT!

WE'RE IN THE FIRST TUMULTUOUS 100 DAYS OF EIGHT GREAT DONALD TRUMP YEARS

 LONG LIVE MAGA MAN!

THE TOM BRADY OF AMERICAN COMEBACK POLITICS

 AND GOD BLESS

THE USA

 

 

 RELATED

PROVIDENCE USES OBAMA’S DEPARTURE FROM DC TO SIGNAL THE LEGITIMACY OF TRUMP’S PRESIDENCY

THE COMING EPOCH EIGHT YEAR PRESIDENCY OF DONALD J. TRUMP, THE REPUBLICAN FDR 

DONALD TRUMPOLEON: IS HE FATED TO DEFEAT HIS GOP RIVALS, CRUSH HILLARY (?) AND CONQUER THE WHITE HOUSE?

DONALD TRUMP AND THE MEANING OF THE COMEBACK CUBS AND PATRIOT VICTORIES FOR HIS PRESIDENCY

 

 

THE DEATH OF NANCY REAGAN AND THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RACE

 

HILLARY CLINTON AND THE FASCINATING HISTORY OF POPULAR VOTE WINNERS WHO LOST THE PRESIDENCY   

 
 
 

ANTI-TRUMP OBSTRUCTION MANIA AND ITS FUTILITY IN STOPPING TRUMP’S MAGA AGENDA AND WAR ON ISLAMIC TERROR

 

President Trump Reacts to Court Ruling on Travel Ban: See You In Court. The Security of our Nation is at Stake - Breitbart

Trump hating, obstructionist Judge James Robart

The anti-Trump obstructionist justices of the Ninth Circuit Court

Once upon a time liberalism was a treatable, curable mental disorder -- the cure for which was repeatedly getting mugged by reality until one became sensible. My cure came during the malaise and misery days of the Jimmy Carter years: the Iran Hostage Crisis, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan,  and the economic, military and geopolitical decline of this country turned me into a common sense, healthy minded, right thinking Ronald Reagan conservative. And I wasn't alone. But that was then. Now the malady of liberalism is chronically worse; today it is an untreatable, malignant brain eating disease that no dose of hard reality (however massive, strong and shattering) can cure. 

An instructive contemporary example of a hopelessly stupid brain eaten liberal is Jean Claude Juncker (above), head of the European Union. In the wake of the deadly jihadist truck attack on a crowded Christmas Berlin market that killed 12 and injured 50 last year Juncker said, and I quote, "that the best way to fight [Islamic] extremism is not with the rhetoric of exclusion [hatred of Islamic evil, mass, murder, intolerance and bigotry] that helps the extremists, but by [turning one's cheek and] continuing to receive migrants."

 

In other words, the rhetoric of inclusion, love and open borders, welcoming more anti-Western Moslems into our midst, is the best way to fight ISIS and al Qaida and all forms of murderous, militant, jihadist terror. In short, brain eaten liberals like Juncker believe that godless secular progressive humanism (regarded as a crime against God by normative Islam) is the answer; that if we hug Moslems hard enough and show them compassion, empathy and understanding, we will squeeze the jihad, hatred and distrust out of them and turn them into modern, civilized, 21st century people.

And such was the thinking of Barack Hussein Obama who, during his weak-on-terror-reign-of-error, responded to 13 deadly homeland Moslem terror attacks that killed 90 and injured 389 (see)*, and I5 foiled terrorist plots that would have killed and injured hundreds more, by boosting Moslem immigration by the hundreds and thousands (see and see). Reality be damned! Instead of being realistic about Islam (and the hundreds and millions of hate driven active and passive jihadists and fundamentalists worldwide)  pretend that it's a religion of peace, love and justice and tigers will magically turn into harmless pussy cats. 

*Also during Obama's reign the FBI was tracking 1000 plus jihadist suspects,  refugee chaos and crime engulfed Europe (see), and he received warnings from the FBI, CIA and NSA (and now from Bashar Assad) of ISIS and al Qaida infiltrating Syrian and other Mideast refugee flows (see).

And such is the mentality of James Robart and the three brain eaten, anti-Trump, left coast, obstructionist judges who usurping the absolute authority of the President (as given to him by Congress) to stop any and all foreigners from traveling and migrating to our country (U.S.C 1182 see) blocked a perfectly legal, moderate, reasonable executive order temporarily halting travel and immigration from seven dangerous Moslem lands: Iran, which sponsors terrorism (and is complicit with the Taliban in killing U.S. troops in Afghanistan (see); and Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Yemen, Libya and Sudan which are overrun by deadly terrorist violence.

Global Terrorism Index - Wikipedia
RANK[2][3]COUNTRYSCORECHANGE IN SCORE
(ACTUAL YEAR 2015 TO 2016)
1 Iraq9.96Increase 0.20
2 Afghanistan9.44Increase 0.238
3 Nigeria9.31Increase 1.018
4 Syria8.61Increase 0.027 [4]
5 Egypt8.108Decrease 0.458
6 Yemen8.076Increase 0.358 [5]
7 Sudan7.484Increase 8.486
8 Somalia7.6Increase 0.48
9 Libya7.29Increase 0.966
10 Thailand7.279Increase 0.096

6 of Trump's 7 dangerous Moslem countries for immigration have the honor of being in the top 9 of the Global Terrorism Index (see).

And how did these four partisan political hacks in black robes justify their illegal usurpation of executive and congressional power? By ignoring USC 1182 (the governing law of the ban) and creating out of thin air new, outrageous, unheard of laws protecting a new class of victims from big, bad "anti-Moslem" Donald Trump: the peoples of these seven Moslem countries. What did they do? Made the U.S. Constitution the law for Somalis, Iraqis, Iranians, etc. They virtually conferred on non-resident aliens (lacking visa and green cards) first amendment, equal protection and due process rights as if they were US citizens living or traveling abroad with the rights to enter this country at will. Indeed, it's as if these judges erased our borders with these countries and added seven new states to the 50 we already have. Judges can't get any crazier, irresponsible and dangerous than this. 

Boston judge’s ruling unblocking Trump travel ban highlights arguments the White House is likely to make on appeal | Beesquare

 

Massachusetts District Judge  Nate Gorton got it right: He found that there is a rational reason for the Trump administration’s policies. That federal Immigration and Naturalization Act [see Addendum] gives the president broad power over immigration. "The President's order," said Gorton, "provides a reasonably conceivable state of facts (which concerns national security) that could provide a rational basis for the classification. Accordingly, this Court declines to encroach upon the delicate policy judgment inherent in this immigration decision.”

I wonder, would these "so called judges" (who are social justice workers and legislators in disguise) have done the same to President Obama had he issued this executive order? Not a chance! They would have respected it in Obama's case, just like Judge Gorton did with President Trump. Indeed, contrary to Robart's and the Ninth's abuse of judicial power Gorton (citing, quoting and referencing USC 1182) dismissed a suit brought by the ACLU against Trump's ban ruling that it was (as we see above) perfectly legal, lawful and constitutionally sound (see). 

But Robart's and the Ninth's contempt for and hatred of Trump was greater than their respect for the President's office, the Congress, the law and national security; so they unlawfully challenged Trump's authority by illegally creating new laws to restrain him as if they were lawmakers in Congress.

ISIS jihadists must have been firing their weapons and cheering wildly over the 9th Circuit's decision, as it now makes it easier for them to slip into this country to work havoc.

And it's because of insane, reckless, radical rulings like this (putting partisan politics above the constitution and national security) that the Ninth Circuit is the worst of the worst of the country's 11 Circuit Courts -- having (because of their poor judgment) the highest reversal or failure rate (80%) in appeal decisions argued before the Supremes, with many unanimous 9-0 rulings (see).

BUT THE QUESTION NOW IS THIS:

WHAT WILL BE THE FATE OF PRESIDENT TRUMP'S CONSTITUTIONALLY LEGAL, SO-CALLED ANTI-MOSLEM SEVEN NATION TRAVEL AND IMMIGRATION BAN?

The same fate as the confirmation of so-called "racist" Senator Sessions as Attorney General, and Trump's other constitutionally legal cabinet appointees:

VICTORY DELAYED BY HATE DRIVEN ANTI-TRUMP POLITICAL  OBSTRUCTIONISTS  

Jeff Sessions being sworn in as AG on February 9th, the same day that the obstructionist 9th Circuit Court upheld Robart's unconstitutional stay on Trump's ban prefigures its inevitable vindication and victory.

Judge Neil Gursuch 

Indeed, the 9th Circuit Court ruling on the 9th day of February is, I believe, a sign to the administration to delay appealing the ruling to the Supremes until Judge Gorsuch is confirmed and there are 9 justices on the bench. That's to play it safe as a 4-4 deadlock would leave the 9th's ruling in tact. But if in the meantime the administration rewrites and revises the executive ban and goes back to the 9th with a stronger case (as it seems to be doing), it will make no difference; like the first appeal, which was doomed from the start, it will fail all over again as these obstructionist judges are hell-bent on dealing Trump another defeat to make him look bad.  But it won't stop him. The score like the Super Bowl is Courts 27 Trump 3. And we all know how that turned out.

 But isn't it great fun watching powerless, frustrated Democrat senators, liberal left coast activist judges, hysterical doomsday crackpot warmunists, the gotcha anti-Trump media, progressive university and union heads, criminal sabotaging NSA leakers         and millions of angry, foul-mouthed, violent protesters trying to stop this odds busting, gravity defying, Tom Brady-like President from advancing his MAGA Agenda and war on radical Islam?

Million man anti-Reagan protest in New York

It reminds me of the millions of frightened nuclear freeze loons who uselessly opposed and marched against Ronald Reagan as he was renewing America's economic and military greatness and defeating the Soviet Union. The vast left-wing anti-Trump forces are an army of moral and mental midgets with pee shooters firing spit balls at an unsinkable battleship preparing to blast them to political kingdom come.  

 
ADDENDUM
 
Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 states: “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”
 
POSTSCRIPT
 
 
These are only 72 from the Trump/Obama 7 violent terror plagued countries whose plots have been foiled possibly saving hundreds of lives. How many more Moslem fundamentalist immigrants from Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Sudan, etc are now plotting deadly attacks with bullets,     bombs, trucks, machetes and knives?
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

OBAMA UNDERMINES SUPREME COURT WITH LIES ABOUT CITIZENS UNITED RULING, MAKES TRUMP LOOK PERFECTLY RESPECTFUL AND FIT FOR OFFICE

 
 
 
 
"Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections."
 
"Experts" on the US judiciary and Constitutional Law horrified at President Trump "disrespecting" rogue Judge James Robart and the purely political decision to halt his popular, rational, temporary national security ban on immigrants from seven Moslem countries (effecting only 15% of the world's Moslem population) designated (by the Obama administration) as terrorist hotspots are coming out of the woodwork to castigate Trump and question his integrity and fitness for office-as if he has no right to criticize judges. One expert told NBC News that:
 
"The concern is that repeated attacks on individual judges could diminish the confidence that people have that judges are ruling on cases in accordance with the law"
 
Another expert said "
 
"I don't know whether he [Trump] deliberately wants to delegitimize the courts..... It is possible he lashed out in an unthinking way. But certainly the effect is to damage public confidence in the judicial system."
 
And still another said:
 
""He may go down in history as somebody who ran a brilliant campaign but disgraced himself in office. The 'so-called judge' insult was just stupid and reflects badly on his knowledge of the legal system."
 
But where were these experts and their grave concerns about damaging the judicial system when a blatantly lying, conniving Barack Obama playing politics at his 2010 State of the Union lashed out in a fiery attack on five Supreme Court Justices ( Roberts, Scalia, Alito, Kennedy and Thomas) for their so-called "unconstitutional ruling" in the Citizens United case on campaign finance reform? Where did they question Obama's integrity, credibility and fitness for office when he made a completely false, straw man argument that the ruling "reversed 100 years of law" and "lifted a ban (which is still in place) on foreign, off shore corporations, and foreign special interests spending without limit on US elections."
 
If Obama (a so-called "professor" of Constitutional Law) wasn't intentionally lying to humiliate (for no good reason) these five justices then it meant he's an ignoramus on basic, simple, US corporate law; and that he didn't know that the US subsidiaries of foreign companies, incorporated under US law, operating on US soil, employing US workers and earning US dollars are 100% US companies with the same rights as US national comoanies. He didn't know, for example that Toyota USA is every bit as much a US car manufacturer as let's say Ford USA -- as Ford in Japan is a domestic Japanese (not a US) company.
 
 
But whether Obama was right or wrong never before in US history has a President used the State of the Union to publicly humiliate Supreme Court Justices-to the wild applause of irresponsible Democrat lawmakers who were present. What utter hypocrites are Obama and the Dems for piling on Trump for his perfectly lawful and moderate executive order; and calling a radical (pro-Black Lives Matter) leftist federal judge a "so-called judge" when he was simply calling into question his judgement on the issues of terrorist infiltration, national security and lawful use of executive power. Compared to what Obama did in 2010 Trump looks completely and totally respectful of the judicial system; and far more responsible and fit for the office of the presidency.
 
PERIOD!
 
RELATED
 
 
BERNIE SANDERS CIRCUMCISED A THIRD TIME
 
 
Bernie (a disgraceful self-hating socialist Jew) was circumcised first at birth. Then by Hillary. Now by Ted Cruz in his CNN debate on healthcare where, America sucks Bernie ("we're not a compassionate nation," he says) villainized a small (struggling) business owner for not being able to AFFORD health insurance for herself and her workers; and empathetically said that those opposed to Obamacare and Single Payer "want people to die."  
 
What Cruz failed to mention, and should have to slap down Bernie even harder (and does he need it) is the underreported story that Single Payer Socialist Healthcare collapsed in his home state of Vermont. It required a doubling of state taxes in order to work and was rejected by Vermontans-one of the most liberal people of any state in the Union.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

DONALD TRUMP AND THE MEANING OF THE COMEBACK CUBS AND PATRIOT VICTORIES FOR HIS PRESIDENCY

 

 
 
 
 
 
 Tom Brady, the Donald Trump of the NFL, said after the Super Bowl …" We faced a lot of adversity this year and overcame it with a lot of mental toughness." And, of course, so did Donald Trump on the battlefield of politics as he went through a grueling 16 month presidential campaign and came out on top as did Brady in the Superbowl. Strong souls like Trump and Brady thrive on conflict and adversity and never quit until they win. 
 
The victorious Chicago Cubs in the 2016 World Series came back from a 3 games to 1 deficit, the greatest that is possible in that classic, to become the seventh team in 112 years to achieve that; and similarly the victorious New England Patriots in the Superbowl came back from an utterly staggering 25 point deficit, the greatest in that classic's 51 year history possibly never to be equaled or surpassed; and both championship teams are strongly connected to the greatest, odds defying, underdog political phenomenon in US history since Harry Truman: Donald John "Comeback King" Trump-who is linked to both teams at the top by way of their supportive, Republican billionaire owners. And just as the Cubs victory as I showed HERE was an unmistakable sign prefiguring Trump's unlikely presidential election, similarly the Patriots' miraculous win anticipates his unlikely reelection in 2020 after a period of crisis and adversity.
 
 
The Cubs and Patriots were two Trump associated miracles.
 
Now I am a lifelong baseball fan not a football fan and never watched the Super Bowl. But on Superbowl Sunday because of the political dimension to the game (leftist nutjobs tried and failed to turn quarterback Tom Brady against Donald Trump (see)) I made an exception and watched it. And I'm glad that I did. For it was the most thrilling, jaw dropping sports event I ever saw; and, as you will see, it is emblematic and has meaning (like the World Series) for the course of Donald Trump's presidency.
 
 
 
 
Indeed, prior to the game I wondered if the outcome of the World Series would repeat itself in this world championship football event. Thinking analogically I wondered would the Patriots (a team owned by Bob Kraft, Trump's dear friend of 20 years) be the World Champ Chicago Cubs redux-a team owned by the pro-Trump   (see) Ricketts family (Todd Ricketts is Trump's Under Secretary of Commerce)?
 
 
Trump with friend Bob Kraft
 
 
Trump with friend Todd Ricketts
 
Indeed, I wondered: would the Patriots defeat the Atlanta Falcons in a manner similar to the Cubs coming from a 3-1 game deficit (just a week before the election and anniversary of Truman beating Dewey) to beat the Cleveland Indians? In other words, would the Falcons be the first to score in the game (like the Indians won the first game of the World Series), and then go on to score big (just as the Indians had done winning the next two out of three games) against the Patriots before they'd collapse like the Indians and lose making the Patriots football's World Champion Cubs?
 
 
 
 
 
 Hillary Falcon Clinton with Patriot Don
 
And it happened pretty much as I imagined and hoped it would. The Falcons were the first to score in the second quarter making it a 7-0 game; then scoring again making it 14-0. It was then I heard one of the Fox sportscasters say that "no team in the 50 years of Super Bowl history ever came back from a 14-0 deficit to win. 10-0, yes," he said "14-0, no." And to make matters worse, and more impossible for the Patriots, the Falcons scored again pulling ahead by a crushing  21 to 0, with the struggling Patriots managing to score a pitiful 3 points by halftime.
 
Super Bowl 51: New England Patriots vs Atlanta Falcons in photos
 
But in the third quarter the disaster grew significantly worse for the Patriots: the Falcons scored again making it a 28-3 game, thus widening their lead to a seemingly unreachable 25 huge points. "But it ain't over till it's over." As I never gave up hope for the Cubs, or for Trump on election night, I didn't give way to despair that the Patriots were finished and couldn't like Trump and the Cubs pull off an improbable, odds defying upset victory.
 
Super Bowl 51: New England Patriots vs Atlanta Falcons in photos
 
And then like the Cubs winning two straight games to even the series with the Indians at 3 a piece Tom Brady and the Patriots achieved something greater, bordering on the miraculous: after playing like amateurs they came alive and scored 25 straight points (7 in the third quarter and 18 in the fourth) to tie the game 28-28 and take it into overtime* -- where running back James White (ironically number 28) scored a two yard touchdown making the Patriots world champs again.
 Tom-Brady-jubo-020517-Getty-FTR.jpg
 
And when White scored and the Patriots won "the greatest game ever in Super Bowl history" I was thunderstruck by the similarity to the 7th game of the World Series-also "the greatest 7th game in history." For like the Patriots and Falcons going into overtime the Cubs and Indians with the game tied at 6 battled on into extra innings; then at the top of the tenth Ben Zorbrist delivered his tie breaking double driving in the 7th run.
 
 
As with the Cubs the Patriots' astounding victory was, I believe, providentially related to the Trump presidency as an auspicious sign of things to come after a period of setbacks, trouble and crises. Indeed, the victory of the pro-Trump, Ricketts' owned Cubs was to Election Day what the greater, more astonishing victory of the pro-Trump, Kraft owned Patriots is to the challenging time ahead for the President leading up to the 2020 election-which he will win having earned it by keeping his promise of
 
MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
 
 
 
Indeed, there are many propitious signs pointing to a second term for President Trump (see); but the Patriots' steep, unprecedented, come from behind, unbelievable climb out of a virtual football abyss in so short a time is the most striking and compelling sign of all. Those who support this President and his MAGA AGENDA must keep this game in mind when it seems that fortune has deserted him, and all seems lost. MARK MY WORDS, a time of terrible troubles is going to challenge President Trump to the utmost of his powers-and it could be starting now. Conquering adversity is a pattern with this man: in the 90s during the Clinton era he reversed and saved from bankruptcy his badly faltering real estate empire; and was hailed by the New York Times for his accomplishment as the "Comeback King (see);" and then during his 16 month presidential campaign he came back from extreme, brutal, unprecedented adversity (that would have discouraged, broken and crushed most candidates) to defeat Bill Clinton's corrupt, low energy, lying wife. I'll say it again to be clear: 
 
WE'RE IN THE FIRST 100 DAYS OF EIGHT GREAT TRUMP YEARS  
 
The World Series and Super Bowl are the signs that the Administration are the Patriots and Cubs rolled into one; and Donald Trump is Tom Brady and Ben Zorbrist quarter backing touchdowns and batting in game winning runs as he heads into the storm and toward the President's Hall of Fame.
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
< p style="text-align: center;">HILLARY CLINTON AND THE FASCINATING HISTORY OF POPULAR VOTE WINNERS WHO LOST THE PRESIDENCY  

IF I WERE A WHITE NEO-NAZI SUPREMACIST I’D BE GUNNING FOR DONALD TRUMP (SARCASM)

 

 
SPICER IS RIGHT IN DENYING THAT TRUMP IS A WHITE SUPREMACIST, WHICH MUST MAKE MANY NEO-NAZIS VERY MAD.
 
 
 
INDEED, IF I WERE A WHITE NEO-NAZI SUPREMACIST I'D BE GUNNING FOR DONALD TRUMP
 
WHY?
 
For betraying the cause of the superior, chosen, God-anointed, destined for world rule master white race. How? By denying that whites are innately superior to blacks and all other races; by honoring Black History Month and praising anti-Confederate Frederick Douglas and anti-Jim Crow Martin Luther King; by keeping the ugly bust of MLK in the Oval Office overlooking the president's desk; by putting "crazy," "angry" Ben Carson in the cabinet; by not pardoning heroic anti-black killer Dylan Roof; by vowing "to take care of our [mooching] Afro-American citizens," and fixing black inner cities with a "New Deal" costing billions-when trillions have been given them; by wanting to cut black-on-black crime and the soaring murder rate-it's way too low; by twice backing Jesse Jackson for President, and donating heavily to his Rainbow/Push Coalition (a grievous, unforgivable, monstrous sin see); by lifting the ban on blacks and Jews in his Palm Beach golf course; by being a filthy Jew lover (allowing Ivanka to marry a Jew) and strongly supporting Israel-we're with the Arabs on this; and by making Jeff Sessions Attorney General -- he put Klansman in jail, and sent one to the electric chair.
 
 
And worst of all Trump had the effrontery to order pizza from Herman Caine, and say that "Apprentice Celebrity" bitch Omorosa was a "nice person." Thank God I'm not a White Neo-Nazi Supremacist or else I might become the next John Wilkes Booth.
 
 
 

How To Get Away With White Supremacy In Trump's White House-MediaMatters

LIKE DONALD TRUMP AND STEVE BANNON I AM A WHITE PRO AMERICAN NATIONALIST

My black friends are black pro-American nationalists. My Hispanic friends are Hispanic pro-American nationalists. My yellow skinned friends are Asian pro-American nationalists. My wife and lady friends are female pro-American nationalists. My 19 year old son is a teenage pro-American nationalist. My dog is a canine pro-American nationalist (he barks and wags his tail when he hears the Star Splangled Banner).

 

Guess that makes us all deplorable, right-wing, fascist, pro-American supremacists right down to my pro-USA dog.

RELATED

 

US COPS, COURTS AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM BEST IN THE WORLD

2016 WHITE MIDDLE CLASS BACKLASH BASED ON ECONOMIC DECLINE NOT REACTIONARY RACIST POLITICS

< p style="text-align: center;">CONSERVATISM: THE LAST BEST HOPE FOR BLACK AMERICA (POSTSCRIPT: DEBATE ON RACISM, WELFARE, GENERATIONAL POVERTY

HILLARY CLINTON AND THE FASCINATING HISTORY OF POPULAR VOTE WINNERS WHO LOST THE PRESIDENCY

 

 
Over the course of the 2016 presidential campaign I have posted dozens of articles on this site anticipating and predicting from numerical coincidences, synchronous events and other extraordinary signs a Donald Trump victory in November; and concluding from the odds defying, historic, earthshaking outcome that Trump is a Providential Man and that Hillary was DESTINED to lose to him. 
 
But the other day the question occurred to me: was Hillary Clinton meant to lose in the unusual, frustrating and painful way that she did? Winning the national popular vote but losing the absolute majority of electoral votes?  The answer it seems is yes. The manner of her lose was foreordained.
 
 
Indeed, of our 58 presidential elections 2016 was only the fifth time in American history that the winner of the popular vote lost the election. And when I researched the four previous elections (1824, 1876, 1888 and 2000) looking for patterns and signs of intelligent design I discovered a complex of what appears to be signature effects of a Higher Power (chance can't explain it) prefiguring Hillary's fate: that she was destined to join Andrew Jackson, Samuel Tilden, Grover Cleveland and her husband's vice president, Al Gore as the fifth presidential candidate to win the popular vote but not make it to the White House. Beginning with the fateful day of Hillary Clinton's birth this is what I found. 
 
Hillary Clinton was born on October 26, 1947 (see) - a date, so it turns out, that has great significance in the history of unfortunate presidential candidates like her. For that day marked the 123rd anniversary of the start of what is inarguably the most amazing and unique presidential election in our history. This was when, for the first time, that the candidate who won the popular vote didn't become president. And that candidate was none other than Andrew Jackson, future founder of the Democratic Party and 7th President of the United States.
 
 
Now in the 1824 election the date October 26th was the first day of seven weeks of national voting (ending December 2nd) where the American people attempted but failed to choose their sixth president from one of four candidates: John Quincy Adams, Andrew Jackson, William Crawford and Henry Clay. The voters failed to pick a winner because they failed to give any one of the four the required majority of 131 electoral votes that were needed at the time to win.
 
 
Indeed, when the votes were counted General Andrew Jackson, who was favored to win, outdid his three rivals, JQ Adams chief among them, in every category: he topped Adams in the popular vote 41% to 31%; topped him in the number of states won 12 to 7 (there were only 24 states at the time); and topped him in electoral votes 99 to 89. But because Jackson came up 32 votes short of the 131 needed, for the first time in American history (as required by the Constitution) the election was decided by the House of Representatives.  And there on February 9, 1825 213 Congressmen amazingly voted John Q. Adams the 6th President of the U.S. giving him 13 of the 24 states and Jackson 7 (see).
 
 
In other words, the incredible, unprecedented, never to be repeated 1824 election, which started precisely 123 years to the day of Hillary Clinton's birth, was the first in US history where the winner of the popular vote lost the election-as Hillary was to do 192 years later when defeated by Donald Trump. You can't make this stuff up.
 
 "
Now in the presidential race of 1876 (the 23rd in our history for the 19th presidency) Republican Rutherford Hayes defeated popular vote winner Democratic Governor Samuel Tilden by one electoral vote (see). Now Tilden like Hillary Clinton was a Democrat from New York (see). And as Tilden's loss made Hayes the 19th President (see), Hillary's loss made Donald Trump history's 19th Republican President (see). An amazing correspondence.
 
 
Moreover, as it was Hillary being Barack Obama's Secretary of State that played a large role in dooming her candidacy (because of Benghazi, emailgate, the collapse of US foreign policy and the job weakening her health) it is fascinating to note that Tilden died on August 4, 1886-exactly 75 years to the date of Barack Obama's birth*.  
 
*Obama was born August 4, 1961. 
 
 
That brings us to the presidential race of 1888, the third where the loser, like Hillary Clinton, won the popular vote. And that loser, President Grover Cleveland (who lost to Indiana's Benjamin Harrison) was, like Tilden and Hillary, a Democrat from New York. Moreover, as the Hayes-Tilden presidential race was the 23rd in our history Harrison's defeat of Cleveland made him the 23rd President (see)-an interesting coincidence. But even more interesting and incredible as a sign of things to come was Harrison's running mate, Levi Morton, himself from New York (see). For Morton was born in 1824, the first time ever the popular vote winner lost a presidential election. And sure enough it happened again with popular vote winner Grover Cleveland becoming the Andrew Jackson of the race. And astonishingly, as a sign of things to come for 2016, the winning 1888 Republican ticket had candidates from the states of New York and Indiana, but with the President and VP in alternate places.
 
President Harrison (Indiana)
Vice President Morton (New York)
 
 
President Trump (New York)
Vice President Pence (Indiana)
 
 
Those of you who have been following my writings on this amazing election know that the number 16 has been strangely auspicious for Donald Trump  (seesee and see). You know that when Trump announced his candidacy on June 16, 2015, making illegal immigration and border security key issues, that it was 16 days from Ann Coulter publishing her best-selling book on this subject; that it was 16 days from Kate Steinlie's murder by an illegal Mexican alien; you know that it was 16 months from Election Day, that Trump defeated 16 GOP candidates and a Democratic rival who was born on the 16th month of his life (and destined not to live in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue again).
 
And now adding to this remarkable, absolutely providential numerical pattern was the election of 1888-which wonderfully in many parts, as we've seen, corresponds to the election of 2016 in that the GOP candidate ran against a Democrat from New York; the GOP ticket had candidates from New York and Indiana; and they won the election while losing the popular vote. Indeed, that late 19th century election occurred 128 years before November 8th; and 128 is a multiple of 16 8x.  If this isn't the Work of Providence then
 
GOD BLESS CHANCE!
 
But I'm not done.
 
 
Gore warned during a mid-October Hillary Clinton campaign rally that Trump would send the U.S. careening toward a climate 'catastrophe'
Gore on October 11th campaigning for the first time with Hillary in Florida warning the crowd of a repeat of the 2000 election. For once a Gore prediction came true (partially) as Hillary, like Gore, won the popular vote but lost the election.
 
16 years before Hillary Clinton became the 5th candidate to win the popular vote and lose the White House Al Gore, her husband's Vice President, very definitely prefigured her political fate. For as Hillary lost the battle for the 45th presidency to Donald Trump (who the  electoral vote) Gore, the 45th Vice President, lost the electoral vote to George Bush in Florida. In other words, Gore's loss to Bush foreshadowed Clinton's loss to Trump; and oddly both Bush and Trump were born in 1946, 22 days apart (see and see); while Hillary and Gore (born late 1947 and early 1948) were born 22 weeks apart (see). But there's more.
 
THE DEATH OF JANET RENO
 
 
 
This too is mind-blowing. On November 7, 2016, 24 hours before the election, Janet Reno died at her home in Miami, Florida; this timely death gave us a late 11th hour sign on the 16th anniversary of the 2000 election (which was decided in Florida), and on the 140th anniversary of the 1876 election (in part decided in Florida), who would win the election the next day: Donald Trump like George Bush and Rutherford Hayes defeating a Democrat without the popular vote. Here's the article I wrote on November 7th surmising that Reno's death was an ominous sign for Hillary signaling defeat. It makes fascinating reading, and I believe is further proof that the manner of Hillary's defeat (winning the popular vote) was providential not accidental. Judge for yourself.
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

THE INSANE, INCOHERENT ALLIANCE OF THE PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL LEFT AND REGRESSIVE FUNDAMENTALIST ISALM

 

AS THE ISLAMIC FAITH IS PROFOUNDLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY 

pro-Life and anti-LGBT (in no Moslem country do gays have civil rights and women absolute abortion rights) my question to Democrats and Secular Progressives is this: how is expanding the number of LGBT hating pro-LIfe Moslems (in Islamic Law abortion (unless the mother's life is at risk) and homosexuality are crimes against God) good for the cause of women's and LGBT rights? How is it progressive and humane to our women and gays to allow a flood of regressive, medieval, anti-modern Moslems into this country?

To put it another way, if Syria were a predominately Christian country (as it was before the 11th century) with millions of gay-hating, pro-Life, Bible believing orthodox and fundamentalist Christian refugees would you be comfortable with giving hundreds and thousands of them asylum here when many of you consider the Christian Right a threat to democracy? When like most Moslems they oppose atheism, gay marriage, drug legalization, pornography, pre-marital sex, prostitution and godless secularism? When many of you fear that the Christian Right subversively has an anti-constitutional agenda to transform our nation into an oppressive, theocractic religious state? Truthfully now, would you want to increase their numbers?

 

Don't you know that the vast majority of Moslems in every Islamic country are fundamentalists? That they believe in the inerrancy, absolute veracity and divine perfection of the Koran and Hadith? And that their ideal form of government is the Prophet Mohammed's 7th century Median caliphate where he collapsed the separation between church (mosque) and state, and had supreme, absolute political and religious power as if he were God? In short, don't you know that Islam at its core is anti-democratic? And that given the choice between democratic freedom or being ruled by Mohammed in a master-slave autocratic state most Moslems would choose the later?

Don't you know that the divine, holy, inerrant Koran teaches that Jews and Christians are hated by God as betrayers of and traitors to His plan to unify humanity under His rule in a one world Moslem state? That their religions are a perverse and distorted form of monotheism? That Islam is the true monotheistic faith as it was given by God to Abraham, and recovered (with God's help) by Mohammed? Don't you know that this radical Islamic fundamentalist supremacism is the underlying cause of 9/11, the violent rise of ISIS and the bloody Arab-Israeli conflict going back 68 years? How is increasing the number of these anti-liberal, progress resisting, modernity hating, unmeltable ignoramuses good for the safety, security and unity of our country? How is it good for interfaith relations, constitutional norms and American principles, values and ideals? Divided as we are how is deepening and worsening our divisions a good and desirable thing? Where's the benefit in this? Where's the logic? Please, help me to understand!

 

POSTSCRIPT

Not only does the Left choose Islam over gays and women, they chose it over Jews. As a Jew and Zionist I have common cause with pro-Trump LGBT folks and pro-Trump feminists not just to back the     President's partial, limited 90 day ban on Moslem immigrants and refugees; but in an outright, total, permanent, unlimited ban until Islam undergoes a reformation like Judaism and Christianity did. This country's three million Moslems are more than enough. For Islam's hatred of Jews (going back to its lunatic Jew-hating, genocidal founder) is far greater than its hatred of gays, and its sexist contempt for women. No more Moslems! End their immigration now! That's my policy.

RELATED

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

IF DONALD TRUMP WANTS TO BE “TORTURER-IN-CHIEF” I SAY, WITH MOST AMERICANS, “HURRAH!” [REVISED REPOST]

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
During the GOP debates last year Donald Trump let it be known that he was no fan of George W. Bush. Sounding like a Bush derangement leftist he unfairly blamed the former president for the well concealed 9/11 attack when neither Bush nor Bill Clinton had any actionable intel on the plot (see); and then he accused Bush of lying about Saddam Hussein's WMDs when Bush, like Clinton before him (and every other country) was deceived by Saddam into believing he was hiding his still missing deadly stockpile (see and see).
 
 
But apparently one aspect of the Bush administration that Trump esteems, embraces wholeheartedly and would like to revive is the use of waterboarding, sleep deprivation and other methods used in Bush's successful counter-terrorism program-to extract critical, life saving, actionable information from top, high value terrorist detainees.
 
 
At a rally in Ohio last summer when talking about the horrific ISIS suicide bombings in Istanbul that killed 40 Trump shouted out to a cheering crowd "What do you think about waterboarding?" And followed up saying, "I like it a lot, but don't think it's tough enough."
 
 
In the past Trump has said that as Commander-in-Chief to save American lives he'd use "torture" on captured terrorists. And if that failed he'd then take it to a higher level and threaten the detainee's "families" with either injury or death to force them to cooperate. It is interesting to note that in the 1990s former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, as a last resort, ended a murderous nationwide terrorist campaign that killed 1200 people (he escaped assassination) by radical al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya by going after their  families (see). "If you continue killing Egyptians your wives, sons and daughters are going to die," warned Mubarak. And after carrying out his threat, frightened for the lives of their loved ones, al-Islamiyya stopped its killing spree, and became a non-violent political group. 
 
 Polls show that by a staggering 2:1 margin Americans have no problem with the Bush EIT program (see); and favor torture as a tactic in the war on terror to keep them, their families and country safe.
 
 
But strictly speaking Bush's use of water boarding, sleep deprivation, lengthy exposure to ear-splitting music, etc. doesn't qualify (as Trump indicated yesterday) as "torture." They were medically supervised Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EITs) falling short of what torture truly is. Consequently, Barack Obama's DOJ (headed by Eric Holder) after an extensive three-year investigation of Bush's program couldn't find a single prosecutable crime. Why? Because no crimes were committed-the methods used were perfectly moral, legal, safe and justified (see). 
 
 
José Rodriguez Jr.

José Rodriguez Jr. The man who broke KSM.

 
Now that Trump is President and has access to classified information on Bush's program he's reading about its triumphs in hurting al Qaida and saving lives; and is convinced more than ever that it worked and will work for him as a last resort when captured terrorists refuse to talk.
 
 
Indeed, Trump has read how it took 183 legal, medically supervised waterboardings (six times per day for a month), and 180 straight hours of sleep deprivation, to break the iron jihadist murdering will of Khalid Sheikh Muhammed, mastermind of the 9/11 attack. Trump read in great detail how after enduring the justified punishment and pain KSM betraying Allah, Islam and the Koran (which sanctions torture, murder, genocide and any crime to further the faith) sang like a canary giving up a treasure trove of info on planned terror attacks in the US, and al-Qaida's international operations.  After reading about this and other successes, and speaking to experts on the subject, Trump, I believe, is hell bent on reviving secretly Bush's program (or doing worse if need be) when captured, high value jihadists are uncooperative in spilling out their terrorist guts.
 
We waterboarded terrorists with no intention of hurting them; but ISIS drowns their prisoners to death. And morons on the Left in the millions see no difference between them.
 
I don't buy for a second Trump's charade of deferring to Mattis; or that Mattis himself is opposed to such methods when they are necessary. The "no torture principle" is not absolute and inviolable to real patriots and rational people. Even John McCain, the great opponent of torture, is quoted as saying that in a ticking bomb situation where a terrorist with information is captured "we gotta do what we gotta do." In such emergency situations torture becomes a moral and national security necessity; and not to use it is cowardice and a crime.  What is clear is that Donald Trump is no girlie man like his stupid, feckless, weak-on-terror predecessor and will torture bloodthirsty Moslem savages when needed to save American lives and defeat Islamonazi jihad.  
 
 

POSTSCRIPT

 

Clinton scolds Trump for advocating torture-WashPost

 

 

HILLARY CONVENIENTLY FORGOT

THAT THE CIA'S TORTURE BY PROXY/RENDITION PROGRAM STARTED  WITH HUSBAND BILL     

SEE FOR YOURSELF

Fact Sheet: Extraordinary Rendition | American Civil Liberties Union 

 
What this means is that Clinton paved the way for Bush's Enhanced Interrogation Program. 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 

DONALD TRUMP, WARREN HARDING AND THE RETURN TO AMERICAN NORMALCY REVOLUTION

 

 

 

As of Inauguration Day this country has done a complete political 180 such like we have not seen in nearly a century. We've gone from an Islam First, world citizen, open borders, anti-Israel, tax and spend, redistributionist, weak-on-crime, pro-AGW President, who opposed American greatness and exceptionalism as bad for this country and the world, to the opposite extreme: a proud "America First," U.S. citizen, Islamorealist, closed borders, pro-Israel, tax and deficit cutting, law and order, put welfare poor to work, anti-AGW President who is hell-bent on making America uniquely and exceptionally great again.
 
 
 
Indeed, the closest historical analogy to this political 180 is the shift from Woodrow Wilson to Warren Harding in 1921: from a borderless, one world, progressive, big government globalist (a two term Democrat, pro-League of Nations president) to Republican, anti-League, conservative, small government Warren Harding. During the 1920 presidential race Harding ran against Wilsonian idealism (like Trump Obamunism) as a crazy, crackpot, abnormality that put America on a ruinous path of economic  and national decline. 
 
 
 
Candidate Harding's message to American voters was as follows:
 
"America's present need is not heroics, but healing; not nostrums, but normalcy; not revolution, but restoration; not agitation, but adjustment; not surgery, but serenity; not the dramatic, but the dispassionate; not experiment, but equipoise; not submergence in internationality, but sustainment in triumphant nationality."
 
 "Restoration" of American values or Americanism vs. a revolution to transform us into something radically different through "experimentation" and social engineering; and "sustainment in triumphant nationality" vs.  subordinating our country to international laws and institutions (like the UN); this sums up Donald Trump's defiant "America Firsteconomic populism and anti-globalism. 
 
The Forgotten Depression
 
 
Moreover, Harding like Trump ran against and defeated an opponent from the same state (rare in US history see); and won election on four key issues: the economy, restoring tariffs, limiting immigration and intervention in foreign wars.
 
 
 
Indeed, Wilson's high tax, spendthrift, regulatory regime was strangling American business, industry and productivity. The economy was in a depression with 12% unemployment, and the American worker was hurting badly. Harding also opposed the slashing of custom tariffs that were benefiting other countries at US expense; he also (like most Americans) had it with unfettered immigration and wanted it temporarily restricted to assimilate the flood of millions of immigrants already here. And lastly, he pledged a strong America at home that wouldn't intervene abroad as it had in World War I-a costly war in lives and treasure which had become hugely unpopular. 
 
 
 
 
Unlike Trump Harding was elected in a crushing landslide victory. But no sooner did he assume office than he slashed taxes, spending and regulations (which ended Wilson's depression and unleashed the roaring, soaring, immensely productive Twenties); and signed the "Immigration Restriction Act (see)." Amazingly, this bill was revised years later by Calvin Coolidge to include a complete ban on immigration from all Arab and Middle Eastern countries (see). Though Harding died in office his policies renewed America and reversed its decline; and in 1924 his successor Calvin Coolidge won election in a landslide.
 
 
Indeed, though Donald Trump was the most outlandish and alarming (to the establishment) presidential candidate ever seen his administration like Harding's is in reality a  REVOLUTIONARY RETURN TO AMERICAN NORMALCY after the radical, destructive, left-wing nuttiness of the Obama years. We are in the first 100 days of eight victorious Donald Trump years. The economy is destiny, stupid; it's going to be a roaring, smoking, red-hot powerhouse of entrepreneurship, innovation, productivity and job creating success. The Great American Comeback is at hand! I'll bet the barn on it.
 
 
 
FACEBOOK DEBATE
 
 
Yes, electing Harding was the single worst mistake American voters ever made. At least until they elected Trump - we don't know yet whether Trump will be even more catastrophic.
 
Wilson wanted Hoover (the most popular Progressive of that time) to seek the Democrat nomination with FDR as his running mate.With the economy in depression that would have worked out just fine.

http://www.apollospeaks.com/?p=14156ll

https://www.amazon.com/Forgot.../dp/1451686463/ref=sr_1_1...

BTW, Trump is implementing the same policies that ended the Wilson Depression, prevented a sixth post-WWII recession in the mid-1960s, ended the stagflation of the early 1980s, and prevented socialist Sweden from collapsing into a Greek-like socialist catastrophe in the 90s.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

THE GREAT HOOVER/FDR 1920S DEPRESSION THAT COULD HAVE BEEN

DEBATE WITH AN “ACCREDITED (KRUGMANITE) ECONOMIST” ON “SOCIALIST” SWEDEN AND AUSTERITY ECONOMICS

PROVIDENCE USES OBAMA’S DEPARTURE FROM DC TO SIGNAL THE LEGITIMACY OF TRUMP’S PRESIDENCY

 

 
 
EX- PRESIDENT OBAMA DEPARTS WASHINGTON 45 MINUTES
AFTER THE 45TH PRESIDENT
IS SWORN INTO
OFFICE
 
 
 
 At 12:41 Obama boards "Marine One." At 12:44 the propellers start spinning. At 12:45 it's lift off. Click the WAEX link above and see
the two C-Span videos clocking the minutes.
 
Trump waving goodbye
 
Millions of Trump derangement nuts living in an alternate reality may deny, from hatred and bigotry, that Donald Trump is Barack Obama's legitimate political successor; deny that he's the real 45th President; deny that he's entitled to the exalted office he now holds and occupies. But on this nation's 58th inauguration God shaming Trump haters into   total blithering idiocy told us something radically different: exactly 45 minutes after the legitimately elected Donald Trump was legally sworn in as 45th President Providence authoritatively signaled from on high that he is the legit U.S. President in God's eyes. 
 
 
 
For Providence unmistakably signaled to this nation that the billionaire, America First, patriotic populist (flaws and all) is God's agent of change for reversing and renewing
   this country after years of decline and fall. Indeed, 45 minutes from the end of Obama's presidency the 45th President, with Melania at his side, graciously escorted the Obamas to "Marine One" where it lifted off and left DC at 12:45. Astonishing!
 
 
 
 
DISQUS DEBATES
 
 
I drove by 6 roadsigns on highway 111, and they all said "45" on them. 111 x 6 = 666! This is an unmistakable sign that Lord Trump is the Anti-Christ. Prove me wrong.
 
 
Trump is a trinity of 7s man, not a trinity of 6s.
 
On Jan. 20 he was exactly 70 years, 7 months and 7 days old; and the 7th President after FDR to hail from the State of New York.
 
From and including: Friday, June 14, 1946 (Trump's birth date)
To and including: Friday, January 20, 2017
Result: 25,789 days
 
Or 70 years, 7 months, 7 days including the end date (see).
 
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 

It rained during Donnie's inauguration, which means his Presidency is likely frowned upon by the Big G.O.D because the Bible.

 

 

It drizzled on and off Friday; but it rained heavily at FDR's second inaugural (the first held on Jan. 20th).

 
FACEBOOK
 
Paul Mayo · 
 
Yeah Apollo, God gave us Trump, same as he gave us Hitler, Stalin, Idi Amin, Ted Bundy, GW Bush, Saddam, and other mass murderers. Now will your God help get rid of him?
 
·
 
 
Paul Mayo     If it was chance that gave us Trump, then God bless chance.
 
 
 RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

THE COMING EPOCH EIGHT YEAR PRESIDENCY OF DONALD J. TRUMP, THE REPUBLICAN FDR

 

On the 16th month of his historic campaign, which started June 16, 2015, Donald Trump, after defeating 16 GOP opponents, won the 2016 presidential race for 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Now 70 years, 7 months and 7 days from his birth (see) Donald Trump is about to become the 7th President after FDR to come from  New York: the Empire State. This man has EMPIRE greatness written all over him.  
 
I am the man who predicted that Donald Trump, defying the laws of political gravity and against staggering opposition and odds, would conquer by the strength of his stamina, energy, passion and will every obstacle in his way to the Presidency. Though I wasn't alone in predicting Trump's "impossible" "never will happen" success no one had done it quite like I have: interpreting numbers, dates, coincidences and events as signs and signature effects of a Higher Power indicating that Trump was a Providential Man destined for the White House. That like Ronald Reagan after the decline of the Carter years Trump is the right man at the right time in the right place in history for a nation needing renewal, uplift and radical change. And now hours away from Trump's inaugural when he becomes the 45th President I predict from the following signs that his first term will be much like his hell raising, raucous, unconventional, rise to power: a shocking, disrupting, odds defying success; and that four years from now in 2020 he'll be reelected to a second term to continue his work in reversing our decline and making this nation great again.
 
 1946: AN AUSPICIOUS YEAR FOR US PRESIDENTS 
 
 
As I previously wrote here and here, Donald Trump is the third U.S. President to be born in the year 1946. In fact, as you will see, beginning with John Kennedy's election in 1960 1946 has proved to be an auspicious year for five US Presidents, three of whom have been reelected-with Donald Trump destined to be the fourth.
 
 
 
 
Indeed, like presidents Bill Clinton and George Bush Donald Trump was born in the very good post-war year of 1946; and like Clinton and Bush Trump, I am certain, will be reelected to a second term four years from now. But it's more wonderfully complex than that. For incredibly, Clinton (b. 8-19-46) and Bush (b. 7-6-46) were born 44 days apart (see); and Trump, the older of the three (b. 6-14-46), was born 22 days before Bush (see) and 66 before Clinton (see). This amazing, elegant, arithmetical progression (22, 44, 66) of doublet (twin) numbers for three presidents (born consecutively in June, July and August of the same year) cannot be dismissed as meaningless happenstance. Not in the light of the astounding events of this past year. For doublet numbers have back to back identical numbers and indicate in this context two, four-year, back to back terms for Donald Trump-as it seems to have meant for Bush and Clinton.
  
HARRY TRUMAN 33RD PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.
 
 
 
  
Bush and Clinton, born 44 days apart and serving two full 4 year terms, came into this world when Harry Truman was President. Truman, the 33rd President (who served just short of two full terms) was the THIRD president in US history to bear a doublet number. Now, amazingly, a THIRD President, Donald Trump born under Truman (like two term Clinton and Bush) is about to replace 55 year old Barack Obama, the 44th U.S. President. Do you think this is happening by chance as if Trump were a freak accident? HELL NO! There is definitely a providential pattern of synchronized coincidences here, as we've seen before with other presidents (see).
 
 
 
Look at it this way: Donald Trump who was born just prior to Clinton and Bush (who came into this world 44 days apart) is not only following them into the presidency, but he's replacing Barack Obama the 44th President; and like Clinton and Bush Obama had two, back to back 4 year (doublet) terms. And so will Donald Trump.
 
Indeed, it looks like doublet numbers are mysteriously and providentially "lucky" for Trump (as was the number 16 throughout his 2016 campaign see); and among fortunate doublet numbers for      Trump is the election year 2020...which will be as victorious for him as was 1996 for Clinton, 2004 for Bush and 2012 for Obama. But there's more.
 
TRUMAN, EISENHOWER, TRUMP AND MIKE PENCE
 
 
Democrat Harry Truman, President 33, was followed into office by Republican Dwight Eisenhower. Eisenhower served two full terms as will, I am sure, his admirer Donald Trump-who is intent on repairing Ike's crumbling interstate highway system.
 
 
Indeed, a compelling sign that Trump is destined for a two term presidency-that he'll be to Obama (44) what Ike was to Truman (33)- is Vice President Mike Pence (see). For when Pence was born on June 7, 1959 it was six months, or 2330 days, into Eisenhower's second term (see). As you can see 2330 is encoded with the doublet number 33 signifying, I believe, that Pence will be a two term VP, and his boss a two term President like Ike.
 
 
Moreover, not only was the Eisenhower presidency in its 2330th   day when Pence was born but Donald Trump himself was 12 years, 11 months and 25 days old. That translates into 155 months, or 677 weeks-two three digit numbers that end in auspicious, two term doublets (see).
 
 
But Mike Pence is a sign of things to come in other respects. For example the 2016 presidential election which made him VP was the first time since 2000 that the winner won without carrying the popular vote. And on November 7, 2000, when Bush beat Gore in a squeaker, Mike Pence won his first Congressional race after several failures. And in 2004 when Bush won reelection Pence was reelected as well.

Moreover, in 2004, during that year's campaign when George Bush won a second term, Donald Trump turned 58 years old. Oddly the 2016 presidential race, won by Trump, was the 58th* in our history. This, it seems, is another sign that Trump, like George Bush, will be a two term president. *Trump Tower, Trump's campaign headquarters where he planned his victory, has 58 floors (see).

JOHN KENNEDY, RICHARD NIXON AND 1946
 
 
As I previously wrote, two of our 45 presidents, John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon, started their political careers in the auspicious year 1946. For that year both ran for and won House seats in the 80th U.S. Congress. Richard Nixon the 37th President was reelected in 1972; and though Kennedy was assassinated in office he would have easily won reelection in 1964-as will Donald Trump in 2020.
 
Indeed, when Trump won the election on November 8th it fell smack on the 56th anniversary of JFK's victory over Nixon (see).  And like JFK Trump succeeded a popular two term president of the opposing party. And, on a minor note, like JFK (the 35th President) Trump's president's number 45 ends in 5. But there's more.
 
 
When Donald Trump was born on June 14, 1946 John Kennedy was 29 years and 17 days old; this translates into 1515 weeks, an interesting and auspicious doublet number (see); interesting because when multiplied by 3 1515 becomes 4545. Did JFK'a age at Trump's birth foreshadow that he'd be the 45th President, and be reelected to a second (doublet) term? I believe so. 
 
As JFK was 29 at Trump's birth it is fascinating to note that when this number is doubled (29 + 29) it totals 58, the number of the 2016 presidential race. Also fascinating is that if JFK had lived he would have won reelection on November 3, 1964: the 45th presidential race in our history-and falling on the date November 3rd, the date of the 2020 race (see).
 
1946 = 2020
 
As I said above 2020, the year of the next presidential election, is itself a doublet number which, I believe, is highly auspicious for Trump. If you doubt this has any credence then look at it this way: when we add up the digits in the number 1946 (year of Trump's birth) it totals 20: 1+9+4+6 = 20. 20 is a factor of the number 2020 101x giving us the next presidential election year.
 
Moreover, (and more compelling as a sign) when we add up the individual presidents' numbers of each of the five presidents linked to 1946-Kennedy (35), Nixon (37), Clinton (42), Bush (43) and Trump (45)-we get a grand total of 202. 202 is a factor of the number 2020 10x.
 
The above appear to be two more signs that the 1946 born Donald Trump is fated to serve two full terms.
 
SAME STATE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES
 
 
As I wrote previously here, when Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton squared off for the presidency it was the fourth time in American political history that two candidates of major parties from the same state opposed each other. The previous three are as follows: Lincoln-Douglas from Illinois in 1860; Harding-Cox from Ohio in 1920; and Roosevelt-Dewey from New York in 1944.
 
 
Now Republican Lincoln defeated Democrat Douglas and won a second term in 1864; Republican Harding defeated Democrat Cox and (because of a booming economy) would have easily won a second term in 1924 had he lived; and FDR who was finishing up a historic third term defeated Thomas Dewey and, undoubtedly,     would have been elected to a fifth term had he lived.
 
DONALD TRUMP THE REPUBLICAN FDR
 
 
Donald Trump has a "Rendezvous With Destiny" to be the Republican FDR.
 
As I mentioned above, when Trump is sworn in as President tomorrow he will be 70 years, 7 months and 7 days old (see); he will also be the 7th President after FDR to come from the state of New York.
 
Indeed, when Trump won the presidency on November 8th it was the 84th anniversary of FDR's triumph over Herbert Hoover. 84, by the way, is a multiple of 7 12x. And if we add together Trump's president's number 45 to FDR's 32 it totals 77. Another auspicious doublet sign for Trump that like FDR he'll have more than one term as president.
 
 

Moreover, Donald Trump's father Fred (b. 10-11-1905) was born during the second term of Teddy Roosevelt's presidency (see)*. TR like his younger cousin Franklin was a New Yorker.

 

Furthermore, Fred Trump married Mary Anne MacLeod (Donald's mother) in 1936. That was the year FDR won reelection to a second term.

Amazingly in 1999  when Fred Trump died it was at his home in New Hyde Park, New York. New Hyde Park was FDR's birthplace, and 1999 was Bill Clinton's second term.

It's fascinating to note that it was during Bill Clinton's second term that he appointed Trump's older sister Maryanne to the US Court of Appeals. Maryanne was born in 1937, the first year of FDR's second term (see).

The above providentially signifies, I believe, that Trump is destined to be the Republican FDR (without the New Deal); and he will win reelection on November 3, 2020 just like FDR did on that very date in 1936 (see).
 
45X45 = 2025
 
And last but not least (you can't make this stuff up) the square of Trump's presidency number 45 gives us 2025 (45x45 = 2025). That marks the year of President Trump's retirement after completing the second term of his two term presidency.
 
ONE DAY MORE
TO EIGHT TRUMP YEARS
 
 
 
 
 
 
POSTSCRIPT I
 
 
 
Of our five former living presidents (Jimmy Carter, George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama) only George H. W. Bush was absent from Trump's inaugural. This I believe was another sign of a two term Trump presidency. For Bush, a one term Republican President, won office on November 8, 1988, exactly 28 years from the date of Donald Trump's election. I'm interpreting Bush's absence to mean that Trump won't be sharing his political fate of being a one term Republican President.     
 
POSTSCRIPT II
 
 
 
 
 
 
JUNE 2016 TRUMP HAS 37% APPROVAL RATING
 
WINS PRESIDENCY
 
 
JANUARY 20, 2017 TRUMP HAS 37% APPROVAL RATING
 
WINS REELECTION 2020
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

[REPOST AND REVISED] OBAMA, BIN LADIN AND THE ULTIMATE CAUSE OF THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING

 
 
Jihad There are misconceptions
 
 
                                   
 
            ****
                          Wonderful, magnificent, beautiful, horrific! Best film                           of the year! Brought tears to my eyes.
 
       
                                     
 
                         
                                       
 Some, like Tom Brokaw, are inclined to blame the Boston bombing on drone strikes, and the collateral killing of many innocent Moslems. Others blame Iraq and Afghanistan and the thousands of Moslems who have died from those wars. Still others blame it on our longstanding friendship with the Jewish state of Israel; or on Gitmo not being closed as Obama promised at the start of his presidency. But the recent surge of al-Qaida inspired violence can only have one ultimate cause overlooked by Brokaw et al: The US invasion of a Moslem country from an occupied Moslem land to kill a revered Moslem leader (gunning him down like a dog) in blasphemous violation of Moslem Law and the high and holy Koran-God's ultimate revelation of wisdom and truth to man.
 
                               
                                  
 
If only Obama hadn't ordered the killing of isolated, impotent Osama bin Laden there wouldn't have been riotous, 9/11, pro-bin Laden protests across the Moslem world; Ambassador Stevens and three aides wouldn't have been brutally killed; the Algerian energy plant wouldn't have been seized and 85 dead; and the Tsarnaev brothers wouldn't have blown up the Boston Marathon with that poor Moslem kid facing the death penalty or life in prison. If only we hadn't killed bin Laden and let him live out his days in peace, impotent and isolated in his hideout from al Qaida, how different things would be today. Or would they?  
 
                                  
 

Drone strikes, the Iraq and Afghan wars, the rebirth of Israel, Gitmo and bin Ladin's death, etc. if these things hadn't happened Islam would still be in a desperate state of profound moral and political crisis having lost its caliphate and great world standing after 500 years of decline-casting doubt on its divine election as God's chosen faith for all mankind. Mohammed and the first fanatical jihadists were for killing, deceiving and subverting their way to establishing Islam as a great world empire, and as a means to a greater end: world domination.
 
 
                             
 
 
Today's jihadists (Sunnis and Shiites) are fighting and dying for IMPERIAL RESTORATION: killing, deceiving and subverting their way to making Islam a greatly feared and respected imperial power again...so at long last it could be positioned to achieving its divinely appointed historical mission: a one world, totalitarian, medieval, sharia ruled Moslem state. And it is this that ultimately explains jihadist attacks great and small in today's world: the Boston bombing, Ft. Hood, 9/11 and all of the other Islamist atrocities and crimes plaguing our time. 

Death to jihad! Death to Islamism! Death to Moslem intolerance and supremacy! the greatest threat to progress and freedom facing mankind. We're in a war to the death for the fate of the Earth with medieval savages who mustn't prevail. And as with the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, the Second World War and Cold War this is a cause worth fighting and giving one's life for.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
THE TSARNAEV BROTHERS AND ISLAM: THE RELIGION OF WORLD PEACE
 
 
 
 
 
 

BARACK OBAMA AND REX TILLERSON: BOTH REFUSE TO CALL PROVEN WAR CRIMINALS, WAR CRIMINALS

 

 
 
T Rex shaking the bloody hand of Russian President Vladimir Putin who supports with soldiers, money and arms the mass murdering war criminal Bashar al-Assad.
 
THE TILLISON CONFIRMATION HEARING
 
 
Vladimir Putin is a thug, murderer and war criminal; and nowhere are these charges more strikingly evident than in Syria where Russian planes have brutally killed hundreds if not thousands of innocent civilians in Aleppo and elsewhere. Tillerson, grilled by anti-Russian hawk Marco Rubio at his confirmation hearing, diplomatically resisted calling Putin a "war criminal" saying that "he may very well be that; but I haven't seen all the facts to make that  judgment." 
 
 
https://sylg1.wordpress.com/2016/09/26/gimme-a-ticket-for-an-aeroplane/
 
Obama shaking the bloody hand of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani who supports with soldiers, money and arms the mass murdering war criminal Bashar al- Assad.
 
But when, since the start of the Syrian civil war has Obama condemned Islamofacist, terrorist Iran-Russia's partner in murder and crime-who's joined to the hip with Putin in backing mega mass murderer Bashar Assad, the worst war criminal of this century? When has he condemned Iran's military complicity in the mass killing, wounding and displacement of Syrian civilians by Iran's Revolutionary Guards who are fighting alongside Syrian troops? Never has Obama been so much as critical of the U.S. hating mullahs either in their regional proxy wars, or their military support of the Taliban (who are killing our troops with their weapons), or during their violent suppression of the democratic Green Revolution in 2009.
 
 
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for idiots like Obama to reward it.
 
Instead, Obama looking to his legacy and not wanting Iran to build nukes on his watch (which they're likely doing with North Korea see) bought them off with the following outrageous appeasement gifts: 1) ignoring the Green Revolution; 2) leaving Iraq and turning it into an Iranian vassal state; 3) lifting costly sanctions that were hurting its economy; and 4) returning $150 billion-which Iran is using in part to keep Assad in power, and his killing machine going 24/7.
 
If this isn't sick enough, after condemning Islamic terrorism multiple times as being un-Islamic, and Moslem terrorists as false Moslems, Obama, with respect, has repeatedly referred to Iran as "the Islamic Republic"-as if it practiced true ("religion of peace") Islam, and was a model and credit to the faith. And this man was given a Nobel peace prize? And he was cheered by thousands at his farewell address as a man who "ended two wars," and made the world a more peaceful place? And Trump and his followers are called "deporables?" Aren't lying, hypocrisy and weakness (that emboldens aggression in bad world actors) deplorable and a disgrace? Only mad men and fools would applaud such mendacity and incompetence in a leader.
 
 
Not only is Obama the greatest enabler of post-Soviet Russian power since the fall of the Soviet Union, he's also the greatest enabler of terrorist, expansionist, murdering Iran since Jimmy Carter  caused the fall of the shah and the rise of the monster Khomeini. It doesn't get anymore deplorable than this.
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

BARACK OBAMA: FROM VLADIMIR PUTIN’S USEFUL IDIOT BITCH TO 11TH HOUR ANTI-PUTIN HAWK

 

 

IN JULY 2009 A CONFIDENT JOE BIDEN PREDICTED THAT IF RUSSIAN  STRONGMAN

Vladimir Putin dared to step out of line (like he did with aggression against Georgia) that Barack Obama "a man with STEEL IN HIS SPINE" would slap Putin down and showing him who's boss "BEND PUTIN TO HIS WILL." But since Biden's prediction Putin has turned our "SPINE OF STEEL" president (and his reset appeasement policies) into a 21st century Neville Chamberlain fiasco exploiting his weaknesses, naïvety and incompetence in world affairs; and advancing Russia's interests at US expense.

politics The Edward Snowden Showdown

 
politics Russia  moves troops into Ukraine
 

Indeed, a defiant and emboldened Putin crapping in Obama's face gave asylum to traitor Edward Snowden, invaded Ukraine, annexed Crimea, deployed nuke capable missiles to EU borders, sold surface to air missiles to Islamofascist Iran, is maintaining Bashar Assad (the greatest mass murderer of this century) in power with ally Iran, repeatedly violated cease fire deals, and bombed Aleppo into rubble killing thousands.

 

And in multiple acts of war against the U.S. Putin ordered the massive cyber hacking of the White House, State Dept., Defense Dept., Energy Dept., NASA, NOAA, the IRS and more. And Putin, despite financial sanctions and an economy in recession from the oil market crash (see below), is standing stronger, taller and more powerful than ever; a hero to his people for standing up to and besting Obama and the U.S. .

PUTIN'S SUPPORT OF OBAMA

 
Comrade: Together we will make Russia great again.
 
 

Moreover, while it's true that Putin supported Donald Trump's presidential candidacy with hacks and other attacks* (which had zero effect on the economy driven rust belt outcome) it's also true that he supported 1000% Obama's reset policy; indeed, Putin strung Obama along and encouraged reset concessions every step of the way seeing that it could advance his neo-imperialist aims to make Russia great again. 

*The DNC/Podesta Wikileaks emails were released starting on October 7th- Vladimir Putin's 64th birthday.

 

This makes Obama one of the most idiotic, blundering appeasers in world history-arguably worse than Neville Chamberlain. For Chamberlain caught on to Hitler quickly. But by late October 2012 (four years into his presidency) Obama, willfully deceived that he won over Putin as an ally and friend, slapped down Mitt Romney as being "stuck in a Cold War mentality" for saying Putin was our geostrategic enemy number one. 

 

 

With eight days left to his failed presidency again I say Obama is finishing as the greatest enabler of post-Soviet Russian power since the fall of the Soviet Union; and the worst, most lax and dangerous cyber security president in our history. Obama with his ill-advised, doomed to fail, butt kissing Russian reset policy has proved to be a weak, feckless, SPINELESS fool of the useful, cowardly, idiotic Left; a curse to this country and the cause of freedom around the world.

From Putin's leftist bitch to 11th hour anti-Putin hawk Barack Obama will soon be replaced by Peace Through Strength Reagan-like Donald J. Trump as a new era in American greatness begins.

 

  DISQUS DEBATES

 

Hypocritesnotwelcome  ApolloSpeaks  

You're terribly  misinformed. I'll help you. Obama's sanctions have devastated the russian economy, a -3% contraction. 
Putin needs the sanctions lifted, that's why he wanted Trump.

You're welcome.

 

 

What is Russia's chief commodity? OIL AND GAS. O&G comprise 68% of Russia's exports. What happened to oil and gas prices since 2014? They collapsed plunging Russia's economy into a recession. If the sanctions were lifted tomorrow Russia's recession would remain.

However, neither the crash of the oil/gas market nor sanctions have moderated Putin's aggressive behavior or altered his expansionary foreign policy.

http://www.businessinsider.com/russia-oil-and-gas-dependence-chart-2014-7

That's exactly why they need to pump more oil. When you make less per barrel you need to sell more to make more. Get it? That's why they need exxon rex to help extract more oil.and the sanctions lifted.....gezzuz man....

The sanctions are about restrictions on foreign investment as well. russian needs more investment. Further more Putin him self has admitted the sanctions are hurting,

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2016/10/21/putin-admits-sanctions-sapping-russia/#6c1e61a119fd

ApolloSpeaks  Hypocritesnotwelcome 

LOL!!! Study the laws of supply and demand. The very opposite is happening. Russia and OPEC are cutting oil production to end the recession causing oil glut that's hurting all of them.

http://www.businessinsider.com/problem-with-opec-production-cut-20171

 

BTW, Putin is playing politics with the sanctions using them to blame Obama for the recession, when the real cause is the massive oil glut. If the oil glut wasn't the problem Putin wouldn't be cutting production in concert with Saudi Arabia and OPEC to drive up prices.

 

JacksonEuler  ApolloSpeaks  

so you feel Obama's response was too light? What will Trump do to correct that other than invite the Russian ambassador to his inauguration and seek to roll back sanctions?

ApolloSpeaks  JacksonEuler 

 

 

Read the "Art of the Deal." No way Trump will "roll back sanctions" unless he gets something of equal or greater value in return. The days of ass kissing reset appeasement are over.

 

RELATED

 

 
 
 

BARACK OBAMA’S FLAT TO FAILING ECONOMY AND THE HERBERT HOOVERING OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY

 

The Great Democratic Crack-Up of 2016 - The New York Times

 
 
Not since Herbert Hoover has a US President done more political damage to his party than Barack Obama.  And on November 8, 2016, the 84th  anniversary of Hoover's defeat by FDR, Donald Trump, the 7th President from New York after FDR, won election.
 
This blog is written for those stuck on stupid, kool-aid drinking Liberals who think that Barack Obama's presidency has been an amazing, smashing economic blessing and success for this country and its working class families. Who believe against the facts that it was Obama who ended the Great Recession in June 2009 (it was still George Bush's economy and V-shaped December recovery see); that his policies stabilized the U.S. financial system (Bush's TARP did that); saved GM and Chrysler from collapse (Bush's TARP did that); prevented a second Great Depression (Bush's TARP did that); caused a record-breaking Dow (Fed manipulation is doing that see); and created millions of good paying quality jobs (America is massively underemployed (see) with part-time and low paying service industry jobs that have ignited a middle class revolt).
 
 
If there were any truth to what Libs believe about their anointed, glorified "Hope and Change" progressive, world saving messiah (sea levels are still rising) the Democrat Party wouldn't be cracking up like shattered glass looking like Herbert Hoover's GOP in 1933-when it collapsed into political bankruptcy and depression, and stayed there for a solid generation.
 
 
In 25 states Republicans control the governorship, state senates and houses. Democrats have this trifecta in only six states. Moreover, Republicans control an astonishing 69 of 99 state legislatures up from 39 in 2009.
 
MY QUESTION TO LIBS:
 
If Obama the genius, the brilliant, the great, the mastermind in economics who rivals Lord Keynes, has such a robust, strong, kick ass economy then why has he been such a Hoover-like, Category 7 political disaster for his party? Why under his all-wise and knowing command did his party lose the House and Senate? Why did it lose 12 governorships and 30 state legislatures and a total in 50 states of 913 legislature seats-losing more of these seats than any two term president since the end of World War II?  
 
 
And why did Obama lose the presidency, and the next Supreme Court nominee, to a man he utterly deplores and opposed passionately campaigning against him from coast to coast-warning his base that his legacy was on the line, and that all he accomplished could be destroyed? How could such a magnificent political success story lose so catastrophically in 2010, 2014 and in 2016? Indeed, how could he avoid going down in history as the great wrecking ball of the Democrat Party? The Herbert Hoover* of the 21st century?
 
*By coincidence Obama and Hoover were born in the month of August. Their birthdays are six days apart.
  
 
 
 
 
THE REVOLT OF THE MIDDLE CLASS
 
 
Furthermore, If the economy is doing so fantastically great how do you Libs account for the massive, angry, mad as hell rise of economic nationalism and anti-global populism on both the Left (Bernie Sanders) and Right (Donald Trump)? When have we ever seen in a presidential election (when the economy was healthy) two populist movements driven by millions simultaneously rising up in revolt wanting reform and radical change? It's unheard of.
 
  
Indeed, how do you Libs account for the 76 million mostly middle class voters (Sanders and Trump supporters combined) rejecting Washington, Wall Street and the economic status quo of corruption, power and greed? In other words, given your belief that the economy is doing fine how do you explain why 56% of 135 million voters (including Johnson and Stein) are up in arms against Obamanomics, Obamacare, the Trans Pacific Partnership and Wall Street's Fed driven, rigged market boom that's making the rich richer? Why if this country is in such good shape did 70% on Election Day say we were on the wrong track and wanted a course change? Because we're a rudderless nation dangerously adrift on a sea of growing troubles directed by a crackpot captain steering us into disaster.
 
 
 
Tell me Libs where is the political and electoral evidence backing your claim of a strong economy lifting all boats and benefiting the nation? There is none. It's all in your brains made up like Obama's lying claim that he's "ENDED TWO WARS (see)" or "Obamacare works doing for the people what he promised. Truth is if Obama had half the economic success that Ronald Reagan had  then his prediction that he was the Democrat Reagan and that Hillary would be George H.W. Bush (succeeding him in office) would have been realized-and we wouldn't be hearing about Russian hacking. But in reality what he is, is a two term Herbert Hoover to be succeeded in office by the Republican FDR (see below).
 
 
 Now, don't you Libs feel foolish defending policies that have hugely benefited Washington, Wall Street and the rich (the political, economic and financial elites)? But not Main Street and the disappearing, collapsing, forgotten middle class (see)? Policies of a radical, left-wing, divisive, hyper-partisan, lying Democrat President who never learned how to govern, lead, negotiate, interact with people or tell the truth? Who is leaving office with his party in ruins as if it's the GOP in 1933? The economy may not be depressed, but Obama's broken, bankrupt, "Hope is Dead" party is out of gas.
 
 
In the final analysis, Barack Obama is leaving behind a legacy of ashes, disaster and dust, and, most of all, Donald Trump-voted by the people to repeal and reverse his policies and clean up his mess. The Democrat Party has been Hooverized as the GOP has found its center-right FDR (a tax cutting, under budget, charismatic, deficit hawk) to stop  America's economic descent (and amassing of crushing debt) and make us great, strong, solvent, safe, respected and prosperous again.  
 
Donald Trump will succeed because the economy is destiny and Trumpnomics will TRIUMPH!
 
 
 
Trump's "Rendezvous With Destiny " is to be the Republican FDR.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 

CHUCKIE THE FLIP FLOPPING HEAD CLOWN AND HIS CRAZY OBAMACARE FOLLIES

 
Laughable, flip-flopping Chuckie the Clown, who was for Obamacare before he was against it and now is for it all over again, warns that its forthcoming repeal by the Trump led GOP will be a "chaotic disaster" (like the Democrat Party) and "Make America Sick Again. "Make America Sick Again"? What in blazes does this    catchphrase mean?  That the status quo (pre-Obamacare) health insurance ante, which most Americans were happy with and wanted to keep, was a national sickness and disease? Why? Because a minority lacked insurance? Is that how he defines the term "sick" in this context? That when the crazy, crack pot, community organizer (a bigger clown than Chuckie) came into office with his growth crushing, regressive, social justice agenda (to create a More Perfect Dependency Union) the healthcare system was an unhealthy, broken, rotten mess because it was unfair some lacked insurance?   Is that what Clown Chuckie means? And that Obamacare was the cure for fixing what had always been "sick" by finally giving millions of moochers free insurance (at everyone else's expense)? 
 
 
 
Chuckie the Clown says that pre-Obamacare America was a "sick" place, because 15% of Americans lacked health insurance. But in 2014 he said that giving those 15% insurance was a mistake. How can anyone take him seriously?
 
And those opposed to Obama's plan of universal coverage (60% said CNN in March 2010*) what of them? Were they sick in their brains for wanting to keep healthcare unchanged because it was working for them and their families? And what precisely was their sickness if it wasn't bodily? They were mean, cruel, cold-hearted SOBs who didn't bleed enough for the poor despite trillions spent on welfare handouts over many years? With the government       going bankrupt from debt, and the middle class itself trillions in debt, when is enough enough for these clowns? If returning to a better past for the vast and badly hurting middle class (a nation without Obamacare) is what Head Clown Chuckie means by "Making America Sick Again" then so be it. It's a "sickness" most Americans were happy with and which they'll soon be having again thanks to the election and a Republican majority government that keenly     feels their pain.
 
*When Obamacare became law.
 
 
'Repealing of Obamacare will cost the economy 10 million jobs, sink us into a depression, cause mass starvation, worsen global warming and bring on Armageddon.' The slogan "Making America Sick Again" is the beginning of a Democrat fear and smear campaign to alarm America on the perils of repealing ACA.
 
But let's take a walk down memory lane when Chuckie became momentarily sane (see). It was November 25, 2014, three weeks after the landslide GOP midterm debacle gave Obama and the Dems a second shellacking with the loss of the Senate and more House seats. Chuckie said something radically different then which outraged Obama and fellow Dems. After a rude awakening to the reality of the Obamacare train wreck (and its huge cost to Democrats) Schumer shockingly withdrawing his support threw it under the bus saying "it was a huge mistake." At the National Press Club in Washington he said:
 
"The plight of uninsured Americans and the hardships caused by unfair insurance company practices certainly needed to be addressed, but it was not the change we were hired to make. Americans were crying out for the end to the recession, for better wages and more jobs, not changes in health care. This makes sense, considering 85 percent of all Americans got their health care from either the government, Medicare, Medicaid, or their employer. And if health care costs were going up, it really did not affect them. The Affordable Care Act was aimed at the 36 million Americans [15% or 5% of voters] who were not covered. It has been reported that only a third of the uninsured are even registered to vote."
 
In 2013 Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D–MT) warned that Obamacare would be a train wreck (see).
 
Chuckie here is sick to death over what Obamacare did to his party since 2010. Obama looking to his legacy and wanting to benefit at any cost the uninsured 15% (so he could look compassionate to history) took his eye off the economy that was weakly sputtering along and led his party into political bankruptcy, and a deep black hole. As Chuckie said it was a politically and strategically stupid mistake to reform a system that was working well for most folks (85%); and to radically change it (uncertain of the effect) when the economy was still in distress with millions of middle class families struggling to make ends meet. Indeed, delusional Obama and the Dems had convinced themselves that Obamacare was an economic program that would succeed where the $800 billion stimulus had failed: it would magically trigger a robust recovery creating high growth and "4 million good paying jobs" as Pelosi clownishly said (see) .
 
 "Obamacare is Stimulus ll, " said Pelosi. But like Stimulus I all it did was stimulate more federal debt worsening generational theft (see).
 
But predictably Obamacare had the opposite effect: it hurt growth, damaged business and killed jobs making the vanishing middle class far worse off. For Obamacare is progressive, impoverishing socialist class warfare by health insurance means (see); it is the latest  chapter in LBJ's disastrous "War on Poverty" that cost taxpayers trillions. Instead of creating new wealth it redistributed billions in health insurance from haves to have-nots regardless of the pain and economic costs; and the painful costs to middle class folks in higher premiums, deductibles and full time work has been staggering. So much so that it cost the Dems the House in 2010, the Senate in 2014 and now the Presidency. Indeed, the Dems are now on life support; Obamacare made them SICK AGAIN.
 
  

Would Bill Clinton stand next to a sign that read “Make America Sick Again”?

Elaborating on the essential unfairness and financial burden of Obamacare to the vast, struggling, declining middle class Chuckie's friend Bill Clinton soberly said:
 
"So you've got this CRAZY system where all of a sudden 25 million more people have health care and then the people who are out there busting it, sometimes 60 hours a week [the working middle class], wind up with their premiums doubled and their coverage cut in half. It's the CRAZIEST thing in the world."
 
And Chelsea Clinton anticipating her dad pretty much said the same thing:
 

 

 
 
And because there’s no essential difference Obamacare is going into the dust bin of history like Romneycare. 
 
If Obamacare is the "craziest thing in the world (see)" then what does that make Obama and the Dems? That they were out of their skulls when they forced it down our throats and made it law. Indeed, by 2010 Romneycare (Obamacare's prototype and model) was failing in Massachusetts to keep costs down; and it got so critically bad that it was repealed and replaced two years later by price controls (the last resort when all else failed, see). And so is it with Obamacare which has failed to bend the cost curve as promised-it's rising every year (see). And that has got to end.
 
 
And so is my broken brain.
 
Now flip flopping Chuckie suffering a relapse into mental derangement and unreality is in favor of crazy Obamacare again; he is hoping that replacing it with free market solutions proves so hurtful and sickeningly bad that the public will come back to his party wanting single payer socialist-care instead-which, by the way, as Chuckie knows, crashed and burned in Bernie the Bozo's state of  Vermont. Ain't that a kick in the head.  
 
 
 
76 MILLION WANT OBAMACARE REPEALED AND REPLACED
 
 
That's right. You heard me. Contrary to the polls up to 76 million Americans are unhappy with Obamacare and want it repealed and replaced. Where did I get this figure from? It's the number of Americans that voted for Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump combined*....both of whom called for repealing Obamacare and replacing it with different solutions. Indeed, opposition to Obamacare is massive. And now we're at the end of a brief era where sick Obamacare (class healthcare warfare) will be gone forever and replaced with something healthier, better and fairer.
 
*Bernie got 13 million primary votes; Trump got 63 million on Election Day.
 
 
 
 
Didn't we avoid "Making America Sick Again" by keeping sick, low energy, crooked iLLary out of the White House?
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 

TRUMP’S APPROVAL RATING SOARS AS HIS PATRIOTIC OPTIMISM INFECTS THE COUNTRY

,

President-Elect Trump Is Historically Unpopular; His Press Coverage Should Reflect That-Media Matters

 John Nichols at The Nation, “It's absurd to claim that [Trump's] administration and this Congress enjoy enthusiastic popular support. They don’t.”

The Pew Research poll that came out December 9th had Trump's approval rating as President-elect at a mere 41%, with 55% disapproving. In the Media Matters' article Eric Boehlert gleefully  points out that Trump's rating compared to Obama's (72%), Bush II's (50%) , Clinton's (62%) and Bush I's (65%) is historically low for an incoming president. The implication is that pre-inaugural Donald is already a failure foreshadowing an awful presidency worse than George Bush's.

BUT

 
 

Trump effect’ on economy: Consumer confidence at 15-year high | The Columbus Dispatch

 

But Pew is not the only post-election poll on Trump. The latest Bloomberg national poll for December 16th tells a different and more convincing tale (more in sync with the soaring historic Dow* and consumer confidence surge). For it has Trump's approval rating 9 points higher than Pew at 50%-up from 33% in August. That's a whopping 17 point shift in less than five months (see); an amazing, historic turnaround.

*If the Fed hadn't raised interest rates the Dow would now be at 20,000.

 
Moreover, with Obama's Bloomberg approval rating at 56% (up from 51% in August) it's a mere 6 points higher than Trump's.
 
Bob Englehart, CagleCartoons.com
 
It's amazing that despite the 24/7 White House/media post-election partisan campaign to delegitimize Trump's victory (as engineered by Moscow and with help from Comey) how quickly Trump is closing the favorability gap between himself and Obama. In less than five months Trump has slashed Obama's lead by 66% (two-thirds) from 18 points to 6. At this rate Trump's approval rating should be neck and neck with (or slightly ahead of) Obama's by Inauguration Day-when Trump will take the country in a radically new direction.
 
THE TRUMP EFFECT ON DIRECTION OF NATION
 
 
And speaking of America's direction there's more good news for Donald Trump. Because of his infectious patriotic optimism and relentless can do winning attitude he's changing the mentality of the country. Indeed, Bloomberg reports that 49% of the public think America's headed in the wrong direction; while that's still too high it's down a precipitous 19 points from 68% in August. Indeed, the poll states that 37% of the public now believe America is on the right track; that's up from 25% in August-a double-digit 12 point shift. Not too shabby considering the gloom and doom media predictions on everything from the economy and markets crashing under Trump, to a world war with Islam, and the ravages of climate change killing millions in floods, droughts, famines and plagues. 
 
 
 
HOPE
 
may be dead for the vindictive, petty, back stabbing, sore losing Obamas, and their broken, divisive party of defeatists, extremists and pessimists. But HOPE is making a strong comeback as Donald Trump "The Comeback King" takes command. I look forward to a soaring economy lifting all boats along with President Trump's approval rating.
 RELATED
 
 
 

THE DEATH OF JANET RENO AND TOMORROW’S HISTORIC PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

IS HILLARY CLINTON UNDER A GEORGE MCGOVERN “CURSE?” WILL 2016 BE 1972

 

FOR HILLARY? 

DONALD TRUMP, HILLARY CLINTON, RONALD REAGAN AND THE FINISHED HOTEL PROJECT NEAR THE WHITE HOUSE: DOES IT FORESHADOW A TRUMP PRESIDENCY?

< p style="box-sizing: border-box; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; text-transform: none; color: #141412; text-align: center; font: 16px/24px 'Source Sans Pro', Helvetica, sans-serif; margin: 0px 0px 24px; widows: 1; letter-spacing: normal; background-color: #ffffff; text-indent: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">...............

2016 WHITE MIDDLE CLASS BACKLASH BASED ON ECONOMIC DECLINE NOT REACTIONARY RACIST POLITICS

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
I am sick to death of hearing race obsessed, "Hope is Dead," New Deal/Great Society losers like Van Jones and John Harwood analyzing the gravity defying triumph of Donald Trump on Election Day as a regressive racial backlash by angry white voters against Barack Obama, America's first black president. I'm sick of hearing that white voters after making Obama the most powerful black man in world history (electing and reelecting him by large margins) suddenly sloughed off their "white guilt," regrew racist horns and went charging after him in the person of Hillary Clinton (Obama in white face and drag). I'm sick of hearing that white Americans fearing the rise of minorities and blacks and the loss of political and economic power did a 180 in November and elected Donald Trump-a "white racist supremacist billionaire" to "take back America" for them.  
 
THE RACIST ELECTIONS THAT WEREN'T
 
But we've heard variations on this racism meme before. Indeed, in 2008 before the market crash decided the election for Obama and John McCain was topping him in the polls the Van Jones and Harwoods despaired that white America was still too racist (had made too little progress since Jim Crow) to elect a perfectly good and qualified black man president. But they were wrong. Obama won and won big collecting the most popular votes (69 million) of any presidential candidate in our history. 
 
 
 
But come 2012 the Harwoods and Van Jones worried anew that the white electorate (who massively voted for Obama and change in 2008 wanting anyone but George Bush II) would backslide and turn against him because of race. For arising since the last election was the angry white tea party movement and birtherism "stirring racial passions" to reverse 2008 and end Obama's ruinous reign; this despite his "stella achievements" in the economy, ending a war, getting bin Laden and financial and healthcare reform. They said that though Obama saved our economy from a second Great Depression (which was bull), and it was better than what he inherited from Bush (which was true), they warned that the weak recovery was being exploited by a vast right-wing racist conspiracy to make Obama a one term president. But they were wrong again as Obama won a second though less impressive election that year.  
 
THE RACIST ELECTION THAT WAS?
 
But now he lost, and in the most humiliating way. Campaigning hard for Hillary Obama pleaded with his base that "it would be a personal insult to my legacy [meaning him personally] if voters didn't back Hillary and elect her president." And the Harwoods and Van Jones are back with their anti-American analyses of an evil racial backlash to explain this undeserved insult to poor wounded defeated    Obama. There reasoning goes something like this: 
 
With the economy booming, unemployment under 5%, millions of new jobs created, low inflation and gas prices, and a record Dow at 19,000 reflecting great business success, only an upsurge of white bigotry, hatred and fear can explain the unlikely rise and victory of "white nationalist bigot" Donald Trump.
 
 
 
Indeed, across the internet I hear it said by grieving heartbroken Leftists that they were stupid, blind and too dismissive of Trump; that they made the mistake of treating him as a laughable joke who they couldn't respect and take seriously-even when he won the GOP nomination. Indeed, his nomination, they believed, meant an easy win for Hillary despite all her baggage, unlikability and sins. In short, Trump was an unelectable God send for them to elect Hillary.
 
 
Moreover, they blame themselves for being too complacent of all the underlying subtle racism still in the country. They were deceived or misled, they say, by Obama's eight years into forgetting our dark racist past, and how black and progressive success has always produced white male backlash and rage. They blame themselves for thinking that two terms of Obama meant that bigotry was practically dead; that citizens wearing suits, capable of holding a job and walking upright could also still be racists, religiously intolerant, misogynistic and homophobic. In short, they underestimated Trump and over estimated the progress that was made in ridding the country of racism. Indeed, they bemoan not giving enough heed to Black Lives Matter and its warning that racism was very much alive in this country institutionally and personally; and for ignoring the signs that were springing up everywhere (Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Eric Garner, etc.) they paid a heavy price on Election Day. Tears, tears.
 
THE RISE OF BERNIE SANDERS AND DONALD TRUMP
 
 
 

There's been a massive transfer of wealth from the 99% to the top 1%. We've got to bring that money back to working families.


But missing from this analysis is any explanation of Bernie Sanders whose millions of backers were mostly middle class whites (see). Was Bernie, the radical economic and social justice progressive, a racist for leading a mostly white populist movement of angry white voters wanting change? Wanting what eight long years of Obama and $trillions borrowed, spent and printed didn't do for them? They voted for Obama twice and in 2008 gave him margins of 10-20 points in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania (the states that made Trump President); but his didn't work for them as promised. They felt forgotten, left out, betrayed; many of them had been Occupy Wall Streeters raging against the millionaires and billionaires that were prospering under Obama while their fortunes either stagnated or dwindled. And they rallied to Bernie because he too like Trump offered hope and change from Obama's massive failures.  
 
IT'S ECONOMIC NATIONALISM AND ANTI-GLOBALISM, NOT RACISM STUPID
 
 
 
Indeed, underlying the rise of Sanders on the Left and Trump on the Right was essentially the same message of economic nationalism and anti-globalism, not racism. Put Americans first and the rest of the world last. Globalism was hurting all Americans; but these white Americans felt it more keenly due to the epic loss of factory and manufacturing jobs; and they had had enough. They were mad as hell and Sanders and Trump pledged to put a stop to it and make them economically secure and strong again. In other words, if the mostly white middle class Trump movement was racist then so was  Bernie Sanders' counterpart. No. Obama's happy talk and phony statistics (denied by both Trump and Sanders) about his low growth, bad jobs, pro-Wall Street economy couldn't fool the millions of white Americans suffering from decline, uncertainty and loss of faith in the future. And the real economic stats bear this out.
 
THE CRISIS OF THE DISAPPEARING MIDDLE CLASS
 
Indeed, under Obama the "Crisis of the Disappearing Middle Class" which has been progressing for decades has accelerated and worsened:
 
 
 
 
.
 
 
Share of adults living in middle-income households is falling
 
 
GDP during the Obama years has been the worst of the last 11 Presidents (see): 
 
 
30 years of decline in productivity and Obama’s non-recovery: 
 
 
20161202_GrowthSlowdown_chart
 
THIS IS WHAT DRIVES THE MOSTLY WHITE MIDDLE CLASS POPULISM BEHIND SANDERS AND TRUMP
 
 
 
THE VICTORY OF DONALD TRUMP IS A REMINDER OF THE INCREDIBLE UNBEATABLE POWER OF ECONOMIC POPULISM IN AN ERA OF DECLINE
 
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 

DONALD TRUMP: THE AMAZING “COINCIDENCE” OF HIS ELECTION AND THE 1995 JERUSALEM EMBASSY ACT, AND THE END OF THE TWO STATE SOLUTION

 

TO EAST JERUSALEM
 
DEAR PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP,
 
To demonstrate America's solidarity with the democratic Jewish state of Israel in its existential struggle with Islamo-Arab racist supremacy, and murderous anti-Jewish jihad, please sir do the following in your first historic 100 days: relocate the US embassy in Tel Aviv to East Jerusalem not West Jerusalem; and move it as close as possible to the Holy Temple Mount.
 
 
Make it abundantly clear to the world Sir that the United States is radically reversing the pro-Palestinian policies of the Obama administration, and 68 years of US policy on the status of Jerusalem (see); and that it now recognizes only one, united, undivided Jerusalem as the political, cultural, religious and eternal capital of the Israeli state and Jewish people everywhere. One united capital for one united people in one united homeland till the end of time.
 
 
As for the reaction of implacable, deranged, Jew hating Palestinians? It will be violent with possible terror attacks and Jews being killed and injured; and with massive Gaza and West Bank demonstrations burning US and Israeli flags, and you, Sir, in effigy. But how would that differ much from the present turmoil?
 
 
 
 
As for the world's reaction? The embassy move will be universally and fervently condemned as violating International Law as decided by the United Nations; and some countries undoubtedly will recall their ambassadors from Washington in protest. But the furor will quickly die down. For the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is overshadowed in the region by the worsening deadly Sunni-Shiite divide (aggravated by Obama's Libya, Iraq and Iran policies), and no longer has the importance and urgency it once had-as Bibi Netanyahu has repeatedly stated. 
 
 
 
And as jihadist, terrorist, Shiite Iran grows in power and influence destabilizing the region it will inevitablely draw America, Israel and the Sunni states closer together in an anti-Iran alliance-as the Palestinian cause to destroy Israel practically drops off the map.
 
 
 
 And Sir, in case you haven't made up your mind to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, then hopefully the following signs will convince you that this is your DESTINY; that the time is right for this to happen; and that 21 years of inaction on the Jerusalem Embassy Act, and 68 years on the status of Jerusalem,  must now come to an end.
Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995
Great Seal of the United States
Long title
An act to provide for the relocation of the United States Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, and for other purposes.
Acronyms(colloquial)
JEA
Enacted by
Effective
November 8, 1995.
Citations
Public law
Statutes at Large
109 Stat. 398
Codification
Acts amended
None
Titles amended
None
U.S.C.sections created
None
Legislative history
 

You will notice Sir that the Jerusalem Embassy Act passed by the 104th Congress in 1995 is PUBLIC LAW 104-45, ending in your president's number. And it appears that by an Act of Providence 104-45 became law on the auspicious date of NOVEMBER 8TH-21 years to the very day of you becoming 45th President of the United States. This can't be accidental.

Moreover, and just as fascinating, on the very day that 104-45 became law you Sir were exactly 18,045 days old-that's the 45th number of the 18,000 series. This too can't be accidental.

From and including: Friday, June 14, 1946
To and including: Wednesday, November 8, 1995

Result: 18,045 days

It is 18,045 days from the start date to the end date, end date included

Or 49 years, 4 months, 26 days including the end date (see).  

 

This should put to rest any doubts that you may have Sir. Be confident that moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem is the right thing to do for our country, Israel and, in the long run, peace. Strike out in a new direction Sir and history will praise you.

 

   POSTSCRIPT

 

    DAVID FRIEDMAN   

 

 

 

 

Donald Trump's Hanukkah gift to the people of Israel was nominating David Melech Friedman as the U.S. Ambassador to their country.

 

On December 15th President-elect Trump nominated attorney and campaign advisor David Friedman as America's next Ambassador to Israel. Friedman, an Orthodox Jew, supports moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and expanding settlements on the West Bank; and he also strongly believes  in a "one state solution" to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. This is where Israel would annex all or some parts of the West Bank; and where there's no possibility of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.

 

David Friedman: Trump would support Israeli annexation of parts of West Bank - Israel News - Haaretz.com

 

Now according to Mr. Friedman, and this is exciting, Donald Trump would thumb his nose at the Palestinian leadership, and practically the entire world, and support annexation of parts of the West Bank. Now if true what that means is that Trump rejects the notion of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital; and that if and when he moves the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem he could defiantly (poking the Palis in the eye) place it in the eastern part of the city. That will be a day of celebration for me and millions.

 

 

 

 

RELATED

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

BARACK OBAMA, JEWISH SETTLEMENTS AND THE IGNORANCE OF THE LEFT ON THE CAUSES OF THE MOSLEM-ISRAELI CONFLICT

 
 
 

Obama's got Israel's back.

What an ignorant, despicable, backstabbing, devious, coward Obama is! And who does he think he's fooling? Less than 24 hours before Hanukkah (adding insult to in jury) he refused to block an immoral, unjustified, worthless pro-Palestinian UN resolution condemning as illegal growing Jewish settlements on Israeli owned lands; and he did this after hypocritically vetoing a similar measure in 2011. Why the sudden change in policy? It wasn't in response to any major shift in Israel's settlement program. Indeed, the pace of settlement building on the West Bank and in East Jerusalem today differs little from what it was six years ago when Obama vetoed its condemnation. So why now and not then? Only politics, meanspiritness, and ignorance explain it.
 
 
He forgot to add that the suffering is largely self-caused.
 
Though Obama in a pro-Palestinian UN speech in September 2009 condemned Israeli settlements as illegal he vetoed the Security Council resolution in 2011 to avoid giving Republicans an issue that could hurt his reelection the following year. In short, he didn't want to risk alienating millions of Jewish and pro-Israel voters and the influential Israeli Lobby (God bless them). Indeed,  it is certain that  Obama would have vetoed this second resolution had it come up for a vote before November 8th. There is no way he would have risked giving Donald Trump an issue that could have hurt Hillary with pro-Israel voters. In fact, Hillary herself took measures not the alienate the large pro-Israel public by making sure that the words "settlements" and "occupation" weren't mentioned in the Democratic Party platform (see).
    
 
The murdering genocidal racist folks Obama gave $150 billion to wipe out Israel for a worthless nuke deal that even John Podesta said was a 21st century Munich mistake. 
 
But with the election now past and the Dems having little or nothing to lose Obama-wanting to show his disdain for Netanyahu and his defiant ongoing expansion of settlements (which he ignorantly believes are an obstacle to peace)-abstained from Friday's vote allowing it to pass 14 to zip. Netanyahu is right to suspect that Obama colluded with the UN Security Council on this. It was probably orchestrated and preplanned weeks or months in advance. With no political price to pay Obama must have secretly pledged to Egypt and the other Security Council states that he wouldn't veto the anti-settlement measure so long as it was introduced after the election. And shamefully and ignorantly he kept his pledge. It's the only thing that makes sense.
 
 
 
Palestinians are opposed to all Jewish settlements. That includes Tel Aviv, Haifa, the Negev and all of Jewish Israel which, according to Islamic law, is in violation of God's will.
 
 But Friday's abstention not only stabbed Netanyahu and the Israeli people in the back, it revealed (emblematic of the pro-Palestinian, soft on terror, insane Left) Obama's cluelessness and ignorance of the true causes underlying the decades old Palestinian-Israeli conflict and Israels older conflict with Islam. Indeed, the causes are ancient and deep with settlements barely scratching the surface.
 
 
The sign should read:
"For my religious peace of mind Israel must be destroyed because its existence causes me to doubt the fundamentals of my faith."
 
The principle, primary, underlying cause going back to the anti-Zionist riots and killing of Jews in 1930s Palestine is summed up in one word: ISLAM. But if like Obama you're a politically correct ideologue stupidly fixed on the falsehood that "there is no evil in Islam," and that it's a "religion of justice and peace" then what drives this deadly conflict will elude you; and you'll foolishly blame it on peripheral things like  settlements, checkpoints, security walls, boycotts and the like.
 
 
 
Mohammed was the murdering, conquering, Jew hating Hitler of the 7th century. Hitler was the murdering, conquering, Jew hating Mohammed of the 20th century.
 
Truth is the Palestinians are a Moslem people, and they take their religion very, very seriously. And they are taught by their religion and prophet that Jewish Israel's very existence is in violation of GOD'S WILL or Islamic (sharia) law; they're taught that the land that the "filthy, impure, intruding infidel Jews" claim for their national homeland (Tel Aviv, Haifa and all of Jerusalem
 belong exclusively and absolutely to Islam. In fact, Palestinians and all Moslems generally are indoctrinated (instilled) with the belief that they own the deed to the land of Israel, a deed signed and given to them by God himself: the Holy Koran. And from their primitive, reactionary, medieval viewpoint they are correct. Interpreted literally the Koran is a deed to the land of Israel.
 
 
For the Koran teaches that any land any where that was conquered and colonized by Moslems (even if they've been expelled) eternally (by divine right) belongs to them. And that goes for other lands Islam once ruled: Spain, Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia, Romania, Moldova, parts of India, etc.; whether their infidel inhabitants know it or not all these lands once ruled by Moslems still in truth, and by God's will, belong to to them; and Islam will not rest until these lands are Islamized again. But Israel tops the list of lands (temporarily) lost to Islam. For it was in Jerusalem on the Temple Mount that Mohammed, according to the Koran, was miraculously transported and mounted a winged horse and flew to heaven. And Israel is close to the Arabian Peninsula,the birth place of Islam.
 
 
"Israel must die for Islam to live in peace." That's how these savage,    medieval monsters think.
 
But there's a deeper theological reason for Islam's violent hostility to Israel's existence, which ignorant delusional ideologues like Obama are oblivious to. For not only does Jewish Israel's existence breach Islamic law, it's very existence is a refutation of Islamic truths. And this is what really drives Moslems insane. The core premise of Islam (what makes it unique and distinctive among monotheistic faiths) is that it's the true, pure, authentic, unvarnished monotheism of Abraham (the ultimate and final revelation of God's truth to man)-and that Judaism (and Christianity) is its distortion or perversion. Indeed, Mohammed didn't regard himself as the founder of a new faith, but as the restorer of an ancient faith lost to the world because of the rebelliousness and disobedience of the Jews-God's most hated people.
 
 
 
 
But it gets worse. The Koran and Hadiths teach that the Jews loss of their homeland and exile were divine punishment for distorting Abraham's faith and disobeying God. And within a century of Mohammed's death Islam's conquest of Israel was seen by believers as a providential sign of Islam's supremacy over Judaism and all other faiths; and that Mohammed's claim to prophethood was valid and sane.
 
 
 
So imagine the intellectual and emotional blow devout Moslems experienced when contary to Koranic law and teaching Israel was restored after 2000 years. Called "the catastrophe" by Palestinians it was a direct challenge to Mohammed's claim to prophethood; that he was the last and final messenger of God (superior to all the Hebrew prophets and Moses himself) with the absolute and final revelation of saving truth to man. The very notion that Islam is the answer to all of humanity's manifold problems and ills, and that the purpose of history was its conquest of the world for a just and lasting peace,  were put in doubt by Israel's return to history. In other words, Israel's existence drives true believing Moslems insane because it raises painful doubts about the fundamentals of their faith: about Mohammed's place in history, Islam's relation to other faiths, and the inerrancy of the Koran believed to be the most perfect and complete of God's revelations. In short, either Islam is the ANSWER or it's not. And Israel's existence after 68 years (against staggering odds) says it is not.
 
Hopefully, now you understand why since 1948 Islam has been at war with Israel and seeks it's total  destruction; why in 1947 the Islamic world rejected the UN's proposed two state solution of dividing Palestine into Jewish and Arab/Moslem states; and why to this day most Palestinians and Moslems reject a two state solution and will settle for nothing short of Israel's destruction, which they pray for every day. 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 

FROM “HOPE AND CHANGE” TO “HOPE IS DEAD”-THE RISE AND FALL OF BARACK OBAMA

 
 
 
Obama is so lost in the ridiculously exalted opinion he has of himself that it blinds him to all the harm and wreckage he's done. So he blames it on those who for very sound reasons opposed his politics and policies.
 
It doesn't get anymore pathetic than this. If President Obama who rose to power on a messianic wave of "Hope and Change" was the resounding success story that he claims then why for God's sake is he behaving like a failure? What happy, successful, consequential President proud of his achievements and confident of his place in history leaves office after eight glorious years sounding like a miserable, bitter, petulant loser? Like a badly beaten man, wounded and betrayed? It's unheard of!
 
 
After eight years of vilification by the liberal media and Dems neither Ronald Reagan nor George Bush ever once publicly complained about their treatment and pains. They had the fortitude and moral strength to gracefully take every blow and rise above it showing the world they were stronger and better than the slings and arrows shot at them by their foes.
 
 
Obama once boasted that he was the Democrat Ronald Reagan-the Gipper of the Left. Where? On what world? Though millions worldwide marched against Reagan and his hardline anti-Soviet policies-demonizing him as a reckless nuclear cowboy leading mankind into Armageddon (and despite Democrats colluding with Russia to stop him see)-Reagan, always the happy, cheerful, optimistic warrior never let it sour him or get him down. And in the end he triumphed big time. How then is Obama Reagan?
 
 
The angry, deranged, delusional Left wrote books about hating Bush to death; and they produced a full length fictional film "The Death of a President" about his assassination in Chicago by a gunman; but not once did he bellyache or complain. Say what you like about Bush's presidency, there was much dignity and grace in the man deserving much respect. But there's little or none in Barack Obama. Soured, whining and mad he's turned the waning days of his presidency into one, big, sickening bellyache. His two terms as America's first black Pres didn't turn out as planned; and his critics and adversaries are to blame. They refused to obey and coöperate with policies they deemed  bad. Shame on them for their bigotry and racism. "The party of Lincoln is dead," says the Left; its treatment of Obama is proof of it-as if he were perfect.
 
 
 
Indeed, imagining himself the 21st century Reagan who'd infallibly be followed in office by a member of his party (like Bush 41 did Reagan) Obama can't come to grips with reality and his self-inflicted fate: that he's not the exalted, enlightened singular soul he thought he was with a character and destiny like Lincoln, FDR, Reagan and the greats. He feels cheated and lost as if all hope were gone and his presidency a waste with a legacy of ashes, dust and despair; that the imperiled world God chose him to save from fossil fuels, rising seas and climate change is now inevitably doomed to the grave. The forces of darkness conspired against him and prevailed proving themselves stronger than the God who anointed him at birth savior of men; he had a mandate from heaven, so he believed, to build a more perfect dependency union-a cradle to grave transformational nanny state-the true American dream. But that was not to be. He got no further than Obamacare which the public hates. No wonder why Bernie Sanders was incensed and millions supported him. The great progressive made too little progress for their tastes.
 
 
 
 
From "Hope and Change" to "Hope is Dead" it's the rise and fall of Barack Hussein Obama-as the world draws near to its end. But don't worry folks. Before it's curtains for America and the human race history will record that Fox, Republicans, Limbaugh and Putin are to blame as the nightmare reign of Donald Trump (the anti-Obama) begins.
 
HURRAY!
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
SHORT DISQUS DEBATE
 
 
BARACK OBAMA:
 
THE MOST POPULAR FAILED PRESIDENT IN US HISTORY
 .
 
Reagan is the only President in history to leave office wiith an approval rating as high as Obama. Telling the trutyh about you filthy vulgar bigots is needed to keep you from lying. Whining is what the coward you elected does every day. He is not man enough to accept he lost by 3 million votes and spends all day crying. Obama showed more dignity then that bigot Trump ever did. He was gracious and told other to cooperate. The way trump whines you would think he lost.
 
Obama has more dignity in the head of his Trouser Snake than you bigot nasty liars have in your whole family. If only linocln could bring Sherman back to burn all you bigots again.
 

 

Obama is arguably the most popular failed president in US history. If not why then did his wife say that "all hope is dead"? Those are the words of failure and loss, not success.

 

BTW, one of our very greatest Presidents Harry Truman left office with a 36% approval rating. Would you rank Obama

above the President who brought WW II to an end, and stopped the Soviet Union from swallowing up Western Europe because he left office with a low approval rating? What achievements of Obama's tops Truman's? Understanding his high place in history Truman left office with his head held high and without complaint. But not Obama who unlike Truman had a second term as President.'

 

Obama's poor domestic and foreign policy legacy is in peril because he supported a candidate to replace him who opposed change and wanted to stay the course. The voters wanting change said "no" to Obama/Clinton and handed Trump a large electoral and geographical upset victory.

Trump's so-called "whining" is a defense of the Electoral College system that elected him 45th President against those who want to change it. Understandably he wants to keep the EC because what elected him president against staggering odds will likely reelect him.

 

BTW, it's leftists like you, not Donald Trump who are crying and whining over the 2.8 million votes insisting insanely that Hillary is the real winner when she lost fair and square.

 

 

RELATED

 

BARACK OBAMA: TRANSFORMATIONAL PRESIDENT OR FORTUNE’S TRAGIC FOOL? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OBAMA TO REAGAN AND FDR

 

THE RISE AND FALL OF BARACK OBAMA: THE END OF NEW DEAL/GREAT SOCIETY LIBERALISM AND COUNTERCULTURE SIXTIES RADICALISM

 

THE 2014 ELECTION: WINNING FOR THE GIPPER, THE GREAT REVERSAL, MITCH MCCONNELL RISES

 

NO HUDSON RIVER MIRACLE FOR OBAMA: WWII PLANE CRASHES IN HUDSON KILLING PILOT WHEN OBAMA DISHONORS GREATEST GENERATION AT HIROSHIMA 

 

WHAT IF BARACK OBAMA WAS PRESIDENT DURING WORLD WAR TWO? 

 

PAM GELLER, GONE WITH THE WIND AND THE 1936 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

 

THE TRUMPSLIDE AND OBAMA’S FAILED HILLARY/ BUSH 41 PREDICTION VS. MY TRUMP-JFK PREDICTION

 

Now that the anti-Trump derangement nuts failed to reverse the  outcome of the 2016 election (with the Jillary Recount and great Electoral College revolt backfiring and making Trump's victory slightly stronger) let's take a comprehensive look at Trump's  triumph which on balance was a landslide.

 
For anti-Electoral College Trump haters the Constitution is living, breathing toilet paper.
 

Indeed, the most feared and hated President-elect ever by the political Left won 62.9 million votes; this set a record for a Republican candidate by just under 1 million votes*. No mean feat considering the extent, scope and power of the maligning bipartisan forces aligned against him.  Indeed, Trump's gravity defying miraculous win against staggering odds (which looks like the work of Providence) was the greatest upset political victory since certain to lose, underdog Harry Truman beat Thomas Dewey 68 years ago.

*Trump beat Bush's record of just over 62 million votes set in 2004 by approximately 900,000 votes (see).

 
trump-electors

But Trump's victory was more historic and greater than Truman's. For Truman had the advantage of being President, victoriously ending the worst war in human history and continuing the legacy of the immensely popular and revered FDR. But Trump never held elected office or ran in a political campaign; what he did have however was a flamboyant and super successful business and reality TV show career, great political instincts, untiring energy, an unbreakable iron will, effective communication skills, and the gift of a weak, unlikable, corrupt, low energy opponent who couldn't keep pace with him. And that combination of gifts and circumstances were enough to make Trump the third President-elect born during the Truman era; and the 7th to come from New York State after FDR.

In the end Trump pulled off a decisive electoral victory and staggering geographical sweep; and that created a

TRUMPSLIDE!      

geographic-landslide    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

@CNN is so embarrassed by their total (100%) support of Hillary Clinton, and yet her loss in a landslide, that they don't know what to do.

 
Donald Trump won the popular vote in 30 of 50 states, or 60% of the states vs. Hillary's 40%. That is a landslide. And out of 3141 counties across the land Trump won a whopping 2600 (flipping 200 that went for Obama in 2012), or 83% vs. Hillary's 17% (an all time low). That too was a landslide.
 
 
 
 
Now in the popular vote Hillary bested Trump by 2.8 million votes giving her a 2% lead. But this 2% came mostly if not exclusively from one lone state: deep blue leftist sanctuary California (overrun by over 3 million illegal, pro-Democrat aliens) where Hillary won a colossal, historic 8.7 million votes, 4.3 million more than Trump. This exceeded Hillary's overall popular vote lead by 1.5 million votes. How many of those votes were cast by illegals we don't know just yet (see).  But what we do know is that without California Hillary would have lost the popular vote by 1.4 million (see).
 
Outside California, Hillary Clinton lost the popular vote by 1.4 million to Donald Trump. (ZUMAPRESS.com/Newscom)

In CA they give drivers licenses to illegals; and they have motor voter registration. It's not particularly controversial to say they voted en masse.

Also in the popular vote Trump did 50% or better in 23 of the 50 states, while Hillary achieved that in only 11 states. That too was a landslide.  Also a landslide was Trump's 304 electoral votes vs. Hillary's 227. Indeed, this 77 point difference gave Trump about 57% of the electoral vote vs. Hillary's 43%, a double-digit 14% margin. How is that not a landslide?
 
 
Moreover, Trump's 304 electoral votes was the most of any GOP presidential candidate since 1988 when Vice President George H.W. Bush, with 426 votes, crushed Democrat Michael Dukakis. On the other hand, Hillary's 227 electoral votes was the least of any Democrat candidate since 1988 when Dukakis won a mere 111 votes.
 
Now though Bush's 1988 landslide was hugely greater than Trump's, it wasn't a win he had to work his butt off like Trump had to do. For Bush was the VP of one of the greatest presidents in American history: Ronald Reagan-who ended the perilous Cold War and left office with a booming, high growth, good jobs economy that greatly benefited the middle class. As Bush vowed to stay Reagan's course it was virtually impossible for him not to win, and win big. 
 
 
 
 
BARACK OBAMA: THE NEW RONALD REAGAN?
 
And this brings me to the subject of Obama's failed prediction for 2016 that he made last year. For some time now Obama (the great anti-Reagan) has laughably fancied himself the Democratic version of Ronald Reagan. Indeed, like Reagan Obama believes he's a great historical world figure; that like Reagan he's been a transformational president making a huge positive impact on American and world history. This claim rests on the following seven claims: getting bin Laden (after 7 months of dithering indecisiveness, and wasn't the beginning of the end of al-Qaida as claimed); ending two wars (a flat-out lie); stopping Iran from getting the bomb (he just kicked the can down the road, and who knows what Iran and nuclear North Korea are secretly doing); the passing of Obamacare (was unpopular then and is so today); the Paris Climate Accord (based on hysterical catastrophic pseudo-science); saving the US auto industry from collapse (he co-saved with Bush only GM and Chrysler); and lastly his claim that the $800 billion stimulus prevented a second Great Depression (in reality Bush did that with TARP). 
 
 
In Obama's delusional mind he's the 21st century Ronald Reagan and loved as much as Reagan was. And based on this belief he imagined that the American people wanted a continuation of his presidency (like they did Reagan's). Indeed, cock sure that 2016 would be 1988 for him and Hillary Obama predicted that on November 8, 2016 (the 28th anniversary of Bush's defeat of Dukakis) Hillary would defeat the GOP nominee.
     
 
MY PREDICTION THAT 2016 WOULD BE MORE LIKE 1960 THAN 1988
 
But compared to Ronald Reagan Obama is a mental and moral pipsqueak; in contrast to 1988 the US economy and foreign policy of 2016 are a mess; and, consequently, most Americans wanted change. Moreover, candidate Clinton was no physically healthy, honest, ethical, scandal free George H.W. Bush. Differing from Obama I wrote that a better model for predicting the outcome of this year's election was 1960 not 1988 (see). This was the year when the charismatic northeastern Democrat JFK defeated the less likable, charmless Richard Nixon, who'd been the Republican Vice President of the very popular Dwight Eisenhower. Oddly, the 1960 election like this year's fell on a November 8th election date. And when the votes were counted JFK in a narrow victory won 303 electoral votes (one less than Trump's), or 58% to Nixon's 42% (nearly identical with Hillary's). Amazing, isn't it? Oh, by the way, 1946, the year of Trump's birth, is when both JFK and Nixon began their careers in politics (see).
 
 RELATED
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

OBAMA’S FAKE “BOOMING” ECONOMY AND THE PRO-GROWTH, BUSINESS FRIENDLY TRUMP PRESIDENCY

 

 

This is beyond belief insane. The desperate narrative being spun by the brain broken Ben Whites of the anti-Trump Left before Inauguration Day is that our lucky President-elect is inheriting a "booming" economy from Barack Obama-who fixed what was broken by Bush and the Republicans; that compared to eight years ago the economy is so healthy, sound, robust and strong that it's the "envy of the world;" that it's anything but the "worst recovery since the Great Depression," that Rush and Hannity endless complain of; that it's not the anemic, pathetic, trickle growth, bad jobs, declining wage and productivity disaster Trump (and Bernie Sanders) campaigned on backed by millions of  hurting, struggling, forgotten middle class Americans craving change as their fortunes shrank.
 
 
White glowingly writes:  "today's economy is in a radically different position from the one President-elect Barack Obama found himself in 2008 with markets crashing, the financial crisis spinning out of control and joblessness headed toward 10 percent."
 
 
What White says was true for most of post-crash September 2008. But truth be told when Obama took office the very worst was past as the economy he inherited from Bush was on the mend (see). According to the BEA the V-shaped GDP recovery (the beginning of the end of every recession) started in December 2008; then (according to BLS) this was followed in April by the V-shaped jobs recovery when the economy started to gain instead of losing jobs. By June 2009 (still Bushes economy) the Great Recession was over having zero to do with Obama's massive, historic $800 billion stimulus (which took a year to impact the economy). And the stimulus proved to be a hugely expensive and wasteful dud.
 
 
Indeed, the billions in stimulus funds given to states and taxpayers to stimulate spending on infrastructure projects (the shovel ready jobs that weren't ready), and buying goods and services was mostly used to pay down debt-not create jobs and grow the economy. By the end of 2010 (when most of the stimulus was spent) the recovery was so painfully weak that Obama (shocking the Left) extended the much vilified Bush tax rates another two years; he did this because he feared (under advisement from Christina Romer and Larry Summers) that a tax hike with the recovery so weak would reverse it, cause a double dip recession and cost him reelection. In short, the Obama stimulus (falsely claimed by him to have prevented a second Great Depression) was a monumental waste of money, stimulating only our ballooning debt.
 
 
Obama's monetary policy-low interest rates, massive money printing, quantitative easing and stock buybacks (which underlie the rigged 19,000 Dow and booming Wall Street economy)-has increased the wealth of the top 1% by billions; and robbed millions of poor and middle class folks out of billions in interest earnings on their bank accounts. And he complains about wealth inequality? HYPOCRITE!
 
But the Ben Whites on CNN and MSN assure us the economy is doing just great. They cite the 4.6% unemployment rate (lowest since 2007), inflation at 1.6%, and a soaring, record breaking historic 19,000 Dow as evidence of robust, kick ass growth and Obama's economic success. "Without Obama where would we now be?" these imbeciles ask.
 
 
 
But the 4.6% jobless rate (rejected by both Trump and Sanders as bogus that leaves out millions of long-term unemployed (see), the low inflation rate (that leaves out energy, food and clothing), and the sky-high Dow (artificially created by low interest rates, massive money printing and record buybacks) are out of sync with harsh economic and fiscal realities that fill most sane people with dread.
 
 
 
The worrisome truth is this: if the economy was so strong (miles from the Great Recession) then interest rates wouldn't be so abysmally low at under 1% (it's been that way for ten years now). If all the happy talk about the economy were reality based rates would be at 5%, where they were before the start of the 18 month recession. .75% interest rates after ten years in which time $trillions have been borrowed, spent and printed is an infallible indicator on just how weak the economy is; how out of sync with reality the jobless and inflation rates and Dow are; and how fearful Fed Chief Janet Yellen is that raising rates too high could crash the economy all over again. And just what are the underlying weaknesses of the economy that so worries Yellen, myself and others?
 
 
To begin with (as we learn from a recent Gallup report see)  American productivity has been declining for 30 years (it's now at 1% growth per annum and falling); and neither Republicans nor Democrats have stopped and reversed it. And while America's been growing less productive and poorer the entitlement state (the largest part of the Federal budget) has been vastly expanding (9.5% per year) along with growth crushing regulations (costing $250 billion annually, and hundreds of billions more on waste, fraud and illegal immigrants. Moreover, we have declining incomes with a staggering $66 trillion in bankrupting debt ($24 trillion in federal and state and $42 trillion in private/consumer debt). We are the greatest debtor nation in world history on an unsustainable course; and this is what the Obama koolaid drinkers call a healthy, robust victorious economy? And what Obama congratulates himself on week after week along with saying that he's "ended two wars"? The man is worse than stupid, he's delusional.
 
 
As Obama has spent the last seven years playing the community organizer and focusing on redistributing (not creating) wealth, and spreading the poison of government dependency (expanding the welfare state that traps millions in poverty) soon like Greece before it crashed we're reaching the tipping point of no return where takers will outnumber makers (moochers overshadowing tax payers) in a crisis culture of collapsing dependency and strife.Yet everything is sweetness and light.
 
 
 
You get the picture. Despite appearances to the contrary Trump is inheriting a colossal, unsustainable mess. A progressively weakening economy bordering on a disaster (like Trump says) masked by happy talk, lies, statistical trickery and market manipulation to create a false wealth effect. But millions of forgotten Americans on the Right and Left aren't fooled. The more they hear the economy praised the more they puke. For they know that it's really the Wall Street economy being praised, which has vastly enriched the 1%, not Main Street's which has gained average working folks dreck.
  
Blest are we to have an incoming pro-growth, fiscally conservative ("under budget ahead of schedule") president who sees through the bull and understands the danger that we're in. The right man at the right time in history to reverse our economic, military and geopolitical decline that's imperiling our prosperity, security and national strength, and make America strong, secure, feared, respected and great again.  
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
                                     

HYPOCRITE OBAMA’S INTERFERENCE WITH FOREIGN ELECTIONS AND HIS LAX CYBER SECURITY ADMINISTRATION INVITING RUSSIAN ATTACKS

 
 
 
Atheist Paul Krugman praying for a miracle to keep Deporable Donald (the "Siberian Candidate") from the White House.
 
An angry and outraged Paul Krugman (who still bitterly thinks that Bush lost the 2000 election) believes that the 2016 presidential race was very badly "tainted"-which is his polite way of saying "covered in mud." Why? Because his ideologically pure candidate Hillary lost to someone he fears and loathes like no President-elect in his lifetime. Unwilling to see the truth on how weak and awful a candidate Hillary was; and that Trump's underdog, Trumanesque victory was part of a GOP wave that continued the 2014 landslide, Krugman resorts to conspiracy theories about Russian hackers from the Kremlin influencing the outcome of the election. It's as if it were 1960 and Krugman was a John Bircher crediting the subversive Kremlin with JFK's victory. 
 
 
 
 Vice-president Joe Biden told NBC on October 16 that retaliation for Russia’s hacking attacks “will be at the time of our choosing, and under the circumstances that will have the greatest impact”.
 
But assuming that Krugman and the anti-Trump left are correct, that the Russians made Trump the 45th President-elect, then how can they avoid not pinning the blame ultimately on Obama? Isn't national security the president's constitutional duty and chief domain? Isn't it his responsibility to combat and counterattack cyber warfare from hostile foreign governments and entities? Indeed, how can Krugman et al not fault Obama for 2016 when he miserably failed to launch a punishing, devastating counterattack two years ago when Russian hackers breached White House security? Because Obama failed to strike back, teaching the Kremlin a lesson they'd never forget, emboldened they did it again and cost Hillary the election. Indeed, Joe Biden's threat in October to massively retaliate against Russia for Wikileaks was too little too late (see). 
 
 
Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee said: "I think it was a mistake earlier frankly [for Obama] not to react more forcefully to Russian hacking. I think those kind of -- that lack of deterrence invited the Russians to meddle some more and consider they could do this with impunity."
 
  

Indeed, where was Biden's and Obama's outrage and alarm two years ago over this act of war and espionage targeting the White House? Where was Klugman, the Times and the rest of the watchdog media? If it was Bush's White House that was hacked the media would have rightly raised hell over it turning it into a major cyber security scandal to embarrass him. But because Obama's White House was the victim the story went underreported to avoid making him look weak and incompetent. And what were the consequences? As Adam Schiff said: "It invited the Russians to meddle some more believing they could do so with impunity."  

In other words, if what Klugman and other Trump haters are alleging is the truth, that Russia hacked DNC emails to hurt Hillary and help Trump, the blame falls mostly on  Obama. PERIOD!

 
 
 

And how can Obama with a straight face fault Russia for allegedly interfering with our election when he's done that himself on occasion? And to allies no less? In 2014 Obama tried to sway the Israeli election against Bibi Netanyahu with well-funded (by US tax dollars) anti-Bibi operatives in Israel working to advance Isaac Herzog's Zionist Union Party to victory (see). 

And more recently the meddling mendacious moron publicly threatened the British people with economic consequences if they dared vote to leave the European Union. It doesn't get anymore hypocritical than this.

 
 
 

And then there's the issue of US cyber attacks and spying on allies and friends (like the European Union and Germany) that went on under Obama's nose, and would have continued (or may still be going on) had Eric Snowden not blown the whistle. What goes around comes around.

Can anyone produce a single voter who was swayed by Wikileaks (and/or James Comey) to vote for Donald Trump? Just one?

Indeed, if in the unlikely event the massive DNC/Podesta Wikileaks dump swayed the election in Trump's favor (making Julian Assange the culprit not Russia) the blame nonetheless falls squarely on Obama's incompetence in protecting our country. Perhaps if more of his focus had been on strengthening cyber security, not on the imaginary, doomsday "national and global security threat" of [so-called] man-made global warming, Hillary might be President-elect.

 
10 ways the Democratic primary has been rigged from the start
 

But in truth, the only election this year that was certainly, absolutely badly "tainted" was the DNC rigging the democrat primaries for Hillary against Bernie. Before the primary voting began 400 superdelegates were already pledged to Hillary. And the head of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz (a Clinton surrogate) pressured another 300 superdels to back Hillary. Hillary didn't win her party's nomination by democratic means and stole the election from Bernie (as hers was stolen by Obama in 2008). What is Hillary's actual theft compared to Wikileaks or James Comey allegedly and unprovably winning the election for Trump? 

We'll never know for sure what the outcome of a Trump-Sanders race would have been. But every major poll showed Sanders topping Trump by higher points than Hillary. And surely anti-globalist, populist Bernie with his message of economic nationalism for the forgotten working man would have done better than Hillary in the Rust Belt states where she lost the race.

However, in reality, what gave Donald Trump his landslide electoral victory (he won the popular vote in 60% of the states) was his blazing, defiant, outlandish, indefatigable WILL TO POWER-which weak, feckless, low energy Hillary couldn't match. I predicted last year that Hillary wouldn't keep pace with Trump if both were the nominees; and that's what happened. From August 1st to November 7th Trump held approximately 100 large rallies (up to four per day) to Hillary's less than 50 (see); that was her limit beyond which could have proved perilous to her health (she complained to NBC she found campaigning terribly exhausting).

Assange, Russia and Comey be damned! In the end it was force of nature, Herculean Trump's great energy, stamina and strength that moved mountains; that impressed the Republican and Independent electorate, swept them into an anti-establishment frenzy and propelled him to victory-sending millions of Dems into despair.

And here we are five weeks after election day with snowflake leftist Bill DeBlasio (emblematic of the mental breakdown of the left) offering therapy to city workers suffering from distress. Proving conclusively that liberalism is a mental disorder, and that he has no future as mayor; as four successful Trump years will send him to a psych ward stark raving mad.

RELATED

 
 

TURNING #NOT MY PRESIDENT ON ITS HEAD. FOLLOWING THEIR LOGIC BARACK OBAMA IS AN ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT 

11/9 ANTI-TRUMP HYSTERIA ENGULFS THE LEFT WHEN 11/9 IS 9/11 REVERSE

THE DEATH OF JANET RENO AND TOMORROW’S HISTORIC PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

DONALD TRUMP, THE CHAMPION CHICAGO CUBS AND THE YEAR OF THE UNDERDOG

THE JILL STEIN (OR JILLARY) RECOUNT: AN EXERCISE IN DESPERATE, LAUGHABLE, ANTI-TRUMP FUTILITY

HOW TO SAVE CLEAN, GREEN, MESSIANIC WARMUNISM FROM THE WORLD DAMNING, DIRTY ENERGY TRUMP-PRUITT-TILLERSON REGIME

 

 
 
 
The Greenhouse Gas Gang of Three
 
 

QUESTION?  

 

How can we save clean, green, messianic   Warmunism (humanity's last best hope for climate    justice and peace) from the fascist, dirty, aggressive, big oil energy regime of Trump, Pruitt and Tillerson? What needs to be done to ensure its survival so it can continue its fight for the fate of the Earth, and a clean energy future?  

ANSWER

 Put it on the

Endangered Species List

together with

winter, snow and skiing
 

icebergs, polar caps and glaciers

penguins, polar bears and seals

 

above sea level coastal cities

AND

the Al Gores and DiCaprios of the world

 

Was the survival of their movement the topic of discussion at Trump's surprise meetings with these two great dedicated greenies?    

OR

(hat tip Sue2) 

did Trump convince them he was friendly to their cause? But for political reasons is hiding it? And that his $trillion plans for massively repairing America's crumbling infrastructure, and building a border security wall, are    scientifically valid DECARBONIZATION PROJECTS      using millions of tons of concrete to suck billions of tons of CO2 from the atmosphere?

 
 
 
WHAT BUILD BABY BUILD DONALD TRUMP HAS DONE TO FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE 
 
 
NOW WHAT HE PLANS TO DO
 
 
 

 

DISQUS DEBATE 

WHY DID DONALD TRUMP MEET WITH AL GORE AND DICAPRIO?

Was it to calm their fears that in reality he's not a climate denier? That he supports their cause but hides it for political reasons? And that his plans to fix America's crumbling infrastructure is a massive, Earth saving, scientifically valid DECARBONIZATION PROJECT?

SCWofTX ✔Trump Train  ApolloSpeaks   

To make it plain that they no longer have a chair at the WH table.

 

 

If that were so Gore wouldn't have said afterwards that he found his meeting with Trump "productive" and "extremely interesting."

SCWofTX ✔Trump Train  ApolloSpeaks 

Then said to be continued which means he made no headway

ApolloSpeaks   SCWofTX ✔Trump Train

Gore said the purpose of the meeting (set up by Trump not requested by Gore) was a "sincere search for common ground." If Trump had no intention of making peace with Wamunists why would he meet with two of their best known leaders?

SCWofTX ✔Trump Train  ApolloSpeaks   

Trump did not call him in to speak to him his daughter did and Gore made it a point to stop by Trumps office...Just tried to make it seem like Trump called him in

ApolloSpeaks   SCWofTX ✔Trump Train

Do you think Ivanka set up the meeting in defiance of her dad? Or that she's a whacko greenie?

 
 

RELATED

DONALD TRUMP’S PEARL HARBOR DAY COUNTER-OFFENSIVE AGAINST OBAMA’S WAR ON CO2 

 

THE DIRTY, IRREVERSIBLE, CATACLYSMIC INDUSTRIALIZING OF THE THIRD WORLD, OR YES WE HAVE NO $44 TRILLION TO STOP IT 

HOPELESSHAGEN, HOLLYWOOD AND SIGNS OF DEMISE FOR GLOBAL WARMING POLITICS

 

FROM BAN THE HYDROGEN BOMB TO BANNING HYDROCARBON FUELS: THE LEFT’S FAILED GLOBAL SALVATION MOVEMENTS

THE WORSENING CRISIS OF THE GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS

 

THE MAZE RUNNER, SOLAR SCORCHING AND THE END OF CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM 

< p style="box-sizing: border-box; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; text-transform: none; color: #141412; text-align: center; font: 16px/24px 'Source Sans Pro', Helvetica, sans-serif; margin: 0px 0px 24px; widows: 1; letter-spacing: normal; background-color: #ffffff; text-indent: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"> 

DONALD TRUMP’S PEARL HARBOR DAY COUNTER-OFFENSIVE AGAINST OBAMA’S WAR ON CO2

DECEMBER 7, 2016

PEARL HARBOR

DAY

 
 
 
Obama's former EPA chief Lisa Jackson announcing on December 7, 2009 that Carbon Dioxide is a dangerous pollutant.
 
It was a terrible Day of Infamy for the people of this great country that cost us dearly. No, I'm not alluding to December 7, 1941 when the imperial air force of fanatical, fascist Japan attacked us at Pearl Harbor destroying warships and planes and killing and injuring thousands. I'm alluding to another December 7th attack against our country that started 68 years later and without a bullet being fired. An attack not launched by a foreign enemy or government against our military, but by a powerful, prominent American politician...an enemy within; a man of staggering stupidity and ideological blindness whose policies have made a mess of this country costing our economy trillions in growth and private investment, and millions of good paying jobs; and that enemy, that man, that blind, stupid, reckless fool is Barack Hussein Obama.
 
 
It was December 7, 2009 in Washington DC (day one of the UN Climate Change Conference at Copenhagen see) when Obama began a major leftist assault on our economy, productivity and use of energy. It was a shot heard across the country fired by then EPA head Lisa Jackson (see), and aimed at American commerce and business and, more specifically, the fossil fuel industry-provider of the cheapest, most efficient and wealth creating form of energy known to man that over the centuries have lifted billions out of poverty.
 
 
Jackson speaking for the Enemy-in-Chief insanely and without basis in scientific reality declared (in science's name and the public good) that Carbon Dioxide (a harmless, natural, beneficial gas vital to plant growth and life) was a noxious, evil, deadly "POLLUTANT;" "it was," she said, "a poisonous health and life threatening substance that is driving global warming and endangering the welfare of Americans and peoples everywhere." And she warned that "human CO2 emissions must be drastically regulated and curtailed if America (and humanity) is to survive and have a future."
 
 
Then following Jackson's call for draconian cuts in carbon emissions an administration official went even further. Warning Congress that if it failed to pass "cap and trade legislation" (to control in a market based way carbon emissions from businesses and organizations) that the president would act directly; that he would apply top down "command and control emergency measures" to cap and cut carbon emissions nationally. Meaning that he would ruthlessly enact by executive decree (using the Clean Air Act) massively complex and costly regulations to drastically reduce CO2 pollution.
 
 
And since that infamous December 7th day our blackmailing, climate extremist president has made good on his threats. When Democrat led Congress failed to pass Cap and Trade he went to war big time against fossil fuels and CO2 using his phone and pen.
 
  
 
Indeed, from 2009-2015 the EPA created 35 new major regulations to reduce emissions at a cost of $54 billion (a conservative estimate) to our economy (see). And emissions were reduced as America fell behind China as the greatest CO2 polluter on Earth (see).
 
 
 
But unhappy with the progress that he made Obama in 2014 rolled out with a new massive unconstitutional emissions cutting program. Called the "Clean Power Plan (CPP)" it was hailed by Obama "as the biggest and most important step we've ever taken to control climate change."  Which is beyond the powers of man.
 
 
The CPP has dozens of job killing, growth crushing regulations to limit carbon emissions at power plants by replacing cheaper and more efficient fossil fuels (to generate electricity) with more expensive and less reliable clean, renewable energy technologies (solar, wind, etc). The estimated economic cost of CPP in higher energy prices to consumers, working families and businesses is a whopping $479 billion over ten years (see).
 
 
 
It is estimated that  each one of the  6,000,000,000 human beings on this planet    exhales on average 1000 lbs per year of the "deadly pollutant" CO2 (see). That means that  collective humanity exhales about 6,000,000,000,000 lbs per year of the  gas, or 3,000,000,000 tons. In other words fossil fuels aren’t the only major source of carbon poisoning the air. And then there are billions of breathing animals.
 
And what would be accomplished for this price? Practically nothing: a slight, meaningless, miniscule reduction in CO2 levels compared to the immense greenhouse gas output worldwide-especially from dirty industrializing, populous third world states like China, India and Indonesia with their growing, massive use of fossil fuels (see).
 
 
Knowing that CPP would do little to lower overall world carbon output Obama nevertheless presses on believing that the great expense to Americans will pay off in the long run. How? By setting an example to other nations. Our cutting emissions at great cost to ourselves would inspire other nations to follow suit and make similar sacrifices to their wealth and standard of living. In short, America (and messiah Obama) would lead the way in saving the planet from (nonexistent) Catastrophic Anthropogenic (made caused) Global Warming (CAGW). And such is the imbecile we have in the White House who, thank God, will soon be gone.  
 
DECEMBER 7, 2016
 
  
 
But Wednesday December 7th (the 7th anniversary of Obama launching his massive EPA Pearl Harbor attack) something quite extraordinary happened: Donald Trump announced his choice for EPA chief: Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt. Pruitt, a conservationist (clean air and water guy), and AGW denier, who has battled for years the EPA's anti-fossil fuels and CO2 regime, is the perfect man for the job of dismantling and reversing Obama's destructive clean energy policies.
 
 
Pruitt is Donald Trump's counter-offensive against the aggressive, doomsday, warmunist enemy within:-Obama and the powerful environmental lobby. And the signs of Trump surmounting every obstacle and killing Obamunism are remarkably auspicious. For Trump is the 7th President from New York after FDR, our greatest wartime leader next to Lincoln who led our country to unconditional victory over Japan. And when the electorate made Trump its 45th President it fell right smack on the 84th anniversary of Roosevelt's defeat of Herbert Hoover*.
 
*November 8, 1932
 
 
Trump has a "Rendezvous with Destiny" to be the Republican FDR minus the New Deal.
 
This I believe is an unmistakable sign that the Left's worst fears about Trump and Pruitt are about to be realized; and that they're about to do to Obama's economically destructive, anti-business clean energy agenda what FDR and the US military did to the Japanese because of Pearl Harbor. Think of the Paris Climate Accord and the lawless Clean Power Plan as Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and you have a good idea of the horror that lies ahead for the insane, doomsday, messianic Left. 
  
 
The Apocalypse of the Left is near. If they can't save themselves how can they save the world?
  

RELATED

THE DIRTY, IRREVERSIBLE, CATACLYSMIC INDUSTRIALIZING OF THE THIRD WORLD, OR YES WE HAVE NO $44 TRILLION TO STOP IT 

HOPELESSHAGEN, HOLLYWOOD AND SIGNS OF DEMISE FOR GLOBAL WARMING POLITICS

 

FROM BAN THE HYDROGEN BOMB TO BANNING HYDROCARBON FUELS: THE LEFT’S FAILED GLOBAL SALVATION MOVEMENTS

THE WORSENING CRISIS OF THE GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS

 

THE MAZE RUNNER, SOLAR SCORCHING AND THE END OF CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM 

MUSCULAR AMERICA FIRST DONALD TAKES ON RED CHINA

 

 
 
 
Donald Trump's call with Taiwan's leader T'sia  Lng -wen.
 
IT APPEARS THAT MUSCULAR, ART OF THE DEAL, ANTI-COMMUNIST DONALD
 
has made his first, bold AMERICA FIRST move to eliminate our massive $300 billion, jobs killing trade deficit with Red China; and to defend FREE ASIA and the China Seas from their aggression.
 
 
 
No longer will the free capitalist economy of the world's mightiest nation bow to the "socialist market economies" of any freedom hating, one party, oppressive state.
 
 
 
 
ASS KISSING, GIRLIE MAN OBAMUNISM IS DEAD!
 
 
 
 The totalitarian Chicoms must be crapping  in their murdering Maoist pants. EVIL RESPECTS STRENGTH!  Donald Trump is the 21st century Ronald Reagan with the power to bring down Red China like Reagan the     evil Soviet Empire. If Trump should visit China it's tyrants won't dare give him the humiliating treatment it gave Obama.
 
BEFORE
 
 
 

 AFTER

POSTSCRIPT

 WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OBAMA AND THE RED CHINESE?

ANSWER

They're better at being communists.

 

POSTSCRIPT II 

The Dalai Lama Weighs in on Trump’s Presidency: ‘I Have No Worries’ | Mediaite

 

Why should he worry? The Dalai knows he has an ally in Donald Trump, and won’t have to come into the White House by the kitchen entrance anymore.

RELATED 

 
 

ONE CHEER FOR MAD DOG MATTIS AS DEFSEC

 

Mattis Pick Would Risk Confirmation Fight with Pro-Israel Groups-Breitbart.com

 
 
If George "Blood and Guts" Patton were alive today Trump would make him Secretary of Defense to demonstrate his seriousness about putting the fear of hell and destruction in our enemies, and making America strong, great and respected again. But absent Patton Trump believes he has his reincarnation in James "Mad Dog" Mattis. And perhaps he is right. But as a strong pro-Israel American Jew I cannot enthusiastically support Mattis' nomination like many Trump supporters are doing. Why?
 
 
Because he's a borderline anti-Zionist who backed Obama's harsh policies toward Israel and mistreatment of Bibi Netanyahu. Because like Obama and Kerry (and Clinton before him) Mattis blames the Jewish state for its ongoing decade's long conflict with the Palestinians. What this means is that like Obama, Clinton and Kerry Mattis believes in the lie that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas (a warmed over Arafat in disguise) is a real peace partner for Israel (as if he were an Anwar Sadat see) willing to end the conflict (which he's not). And Mattis wants to alter the perception of America's bias toward Israel (which "damages us with moderate Arabs," he says) by forcing Netanyahu to negotiate a two state solution with Abbas (which is not in his cards). Moreover, sounding like Jimmy Carter Mattis claims that Israel's settlements on the West Bank are turning it into an "Apartheid " state (which isn't true) and wants their complete dismantlement.
jamesmattismeme2
Truth is, it's Israel's existence as a Western, non-Moslem, infidel state on land once ruled by imperialist Islam, that underlies the 68 year old Arab/Moslem-Israeli conflict. Currently, from the Arab veiw point, there's only two possible solutions to this conflict: 1) Israel's conversion to Islam, or 2) it's annihilation; this latter solution is subdivided into the violent, radical, Hamas/Hezbollah/Iranian way of war; or the  slow, non-violent, long-term Abbas way of political, cultural and social subversion through mass Palestinian refugee immigration; this is Abbas's gradual, incremental one state solution where Israeli Jews will live as an oppressed minority in a larger Arab state (if they're lucky).
 
Hopefully Trump's pick for Secretary of State will reverse Obama's anti-Israel policies instead of continuing them like Mattis madly wants to do. One cheer for Mad Dog Mattis. Because of his bias toward Arabs he doesn't deserve anymore.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

BERSERKO PROGRESSIVE LEFT PREDICTS TRUMP WILL WORSEN OBAMA’S WEALTH GAP, KILL THE MIDDLE CLASS AND CAUSE A GREAT DEPRESSION

 

Obama admits 95% of income gains gone to top 1% - CNN Money 

 

Under Obama (the failed community, redistribution, social justice organizer) the Wall Street economy has mightily boomed breaking all sorts of records; while the Main Street economy has deplorably sagged financially breaking millions of working class families. Obama waged class warfare against the rich, but ironically his policies helped them to win. Yet despite his self-caused defeat Obama's still a hero to the progressive, anti-capitalist Left. Why? Because he's a likable, charismatic left-wing black man whose "heart is in the right place;" and whose failures are blamed on an obstructionist Congress, FOX News, and hostile right-wing talk shows that he couldn't overcome-showing a failure of leadership, governing skills and know how. Despite his fairly high approval rating Obama is perhaps the most popular failed president in American history-his biggest political failure of which was using his popularity to win the presidency for Hillary.

 

 

During Obama's reign of error (with a trickle growth economy so fragile and weak that the Fed, fearing a recession, won't dare raise interest rates) the rich have gotten vastly, hugely, enormously richer in a transfer of wealth to the top 1% unseen since the days of the "Robber Barons." And like the criminal, oppressive Castros (one of the richest robber baron families on Earth) Obama's lauded as a champion of the little guy by an insane, out of touch liberal media, academia, and the Democrat establishment. It's mind-boggling!

 

 

After the crash of 2008 wiped out trillions the rich, under Obama, have recovered magnificently seeing their fortunes rise galactically. This is due mainly to the greatest, fraudulent government manipulation of the stock market in US and world history-growing the millionaire's and billionaire's club while impoverishing the middle class and swelling the ranks of the poor.  And none of this is the Republicans' fault.

 

 

Obama_income_inequality_Fox News
 

Benefiting from the Obama/Bernanke/Yellin policies of near zero interest rates (robbing billions from savings accounts), multi-trillion dollar money printing (devaluing the dollar and hurting purchasing power), and quantitative easing (artificially boosting stock values to historic highs) the top 1% since 2009 increased its wealth by 11.2%+; while the rest of us poor suckers saw a mere increase of 0.2%. Indeed, under Obama's policies the top 1% took an astonishing, unprecedented 93 cents out of every new dollar earned; under Bush they took 65 cents; under Clinton 45 cents. That equates to a staggering 112% increase over the Clinton years (see) due mostly to a rigged, over bought stock market-a bubble that sooner or latter is going to burst and come down to earth. 

 

 

 

 

Indeed, and quite unexpectedly, Obama's economic, fiscal and monetary policies hugely aggravated the wealth gap paving the way for the revolt of the forgotten, collapsing, disappearing middle class-that underlie the rise of Bernie Sanders on the Left and Trump on the Right; and led to the defeat of Wall Street's big money darling:  corrupt, two-faced lying, pay to play Hillary.

 

 

But now because of billionaire Donald's super rich 1% cabinet picks the Obama kool-aid drinking, business hating Left are predicting the absolute, catastrophic worst for this country. Seven weeks before Trump takes office they think they see the future with perfect prophetic clarity when they've been dead wrong about this man all along: wrong about him not surviving the first GOP debate ("he'll be laughed off the stage," they said); wrong about him never being the GOP nominee ("it will be Cruz, Rubio or Kaisich ," they said); wrong that the sex tape and groping lies had ruined his electability ("it made Hillary more likable and electable," they said); wrong he had no path to 270, and would lose in a Goldwater-like landslide    dragging down the Republican Party with him. 

 

 
 

But despite their failed record of pre-election predictions the Left is doubling down. Now with infallible certainty they see the next great depression ahead impoverishing and gutting our country and world; they believe with Michael Moore and Dana Milbank that "11/9 Trump" is the new Herbert Hoover (a 9/11 disaster in the making, see); that during his presidency Trump will crash Obama's over inflated stock market and weak, low growth economy throwing millions out of work; that his protectionist policies will start an international trade war killing US exports; and that after four or eight years of Trump the declining, dying, vanishing middle class will completely disappear and be a thing of the past. For the Left Trump has replaced fossil fuels and climate change as the greatest menace to humanity-more terrifying than ISIS, al-Qaida and all Islamic terrorists combined.

 

 
 

And when America is reduced to rubble and dust Trump (backed by the army and cops) will repeal and replace our democracy with a one party, totalitarian, white supremacist oligarchy; and he'll sign an executive decree making himself president for eternity. And the only hope of stopping him is the desperate Jillary three state recount (see); or the Electoral College waking up and making Hillary president.

 

 

This is the thinking that's breaking the brains of the berserko, unhinged, anti-Trump Left. And because of this I stopped watching Hannity,  O'Reilly, Tucker and FOX. It's way more fun seeing Trump drive Blitzer, Matthews, Cuomo  and Joe completely batshit loco. 

 

RELATED

 

11/9 ANTI-TRUMP HYSTERIA ENGULFS THE LEFT WHEN 11/9 IS 9/11 REVERSE 

 

BARACK OBAMA: THE PRESIDENT WHO SAVED THE U.S. AND WORLD ECONOMY FROM A SECOND GREAT DEPRESSION?

 

MR. PRESIDENT: THE ECONOMY SUCKS BECAUSE YOU’RE A LEFTIST IGNORAMUS

 
 
 
 

CASTRO DIED ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF JFK KILLER LEE HARVEY OSWALD’S BURIAL AND DEATH -WHAT COULD IT MEAN?

 

 

In the center column between the pictures of JFK and LBJ it reads:

LEFTIST ACCUSED  

Figure in a Pro-Castro Group is Charged

 
Yesterday morning as I was replying to a comment posted by thunderbolt (see) about the multiple assassination attempts that Fidel Castro survived it dawned on me-as I wrote that Castro died within days of the 53rd anniversary of JFK's death-that the two deaths (JFK's and Castro's) were now strangely linked by Providence. How? By way of Lee Harvey Oswald. For Oswald (JFK's killer) on 11-24-1963 was assassinated by a distraught Jack Ruby as he was being escorted from a Dallas jail, and was buried the following day (the 25th) exactly 53 years to the day of Castro's death. Then it hit me that the main reason for Oswald killing Kennedy was for Castro's sake: to save the dictator and the Cuban Revolution from JFK's machinations to destroy him and his regime. And then I recalled from my studies that Castro likely had foreknowledge of Oswald's plot.
 
This was the subject of an excellent  book (right) written by former CIA analyst Brian Lattell that I read years ago. The book, "Castro's Secrets: The CIA and Cuba's Intelligence Machine" is based on declassified government documents and first-hand reports from Cuban spies who defected to America. Lattell sets out to prove that Castro's grievances in an interview with a US reporter that JFK was out to assassinate him is what triggered Oswald's plot to kill Kennedy. Lattell writes that in September 1963 while Oswald was in Mexico City trying to obtain a visa that would allow him and his wife to visit Cuba that he discussed his intention to kill Kennedy with several Cuban intel officers at the Cuban embassy; and that this is how Castro learned of the plot. Lattel doesn't allege that Castro's men assisted Oswald in any way; they simply knew what Oswald told them (of his intention to kill Kennedy) and wished him well. It was a lone wolf operation from start to finish with Castro, of course, hoping he'd succeed to eliminate JFK and his obsession with killing him. Castro must have been astounded that it worked.
 
 
Oswald in New Orléans handing out pro-Castro leaflets (below), before his trip to Mexico. it was in New Orléans that Oswald read the interview with Castro where he complained about the US assassination plots against him.
 
     
 
 
 And now it seems Latell was spot on. For late last week Providence has given us what I believe is an infallible sign that commie, Castro lover Lee Harvey Oswald and his plot to kill Kennedy was known to Castro; and that the sign was Castro's death strangely and meaningfully falling on the anniversary of Oswald's death and burial. It could be that in killing Kennedy Oswald saved Castro's life. Perhaps Providence spared Castro and allowed him to live to a ripe old age to show the world that godless, oppressive, totalitarian communism doesn't work. 
                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
RELATED 
 
 
 
 
 
 

CASTRO DEAD! WAS HE A VICTIM OF THE TRUMP EFFECT?

 
 
 
17 DAYS AFTER DONALD TRUMP'S HISTORIC ELECTION
 
  (see), on the 17th anniversary of Elian Gonzalez' rescue at sea (he was fleeing with his mom from an oppressive, communist, totalitarian regime), Cuba's 17th President Fidel Castro died (see)-a God-given Thanksgiving Day gift to his many freedom loving enemies worldwide. As soon as news of his death was released Friday night Cuban Americans (and anti-Castro whites) poured into the streets of Miami  to celebrate his demise-as I celebrate it hating him above all men in this hemisphere where he's caused so much havoc, suffering and death.
 
 
First it was Ho, then it was Hugo, now it's Castro burning in the hottest ring of Dante's Inferno.
.
But is it possible, could it be that the shock and awe of Trump's election so traumatized the frail and ailing dictator that it completely shattered his heath and hastened his end? In other words, if Hillary were elected instead would Castro be alive today happy in the faith she'd be a soft-on-communism Barack Obama (and Jimmy Carter) all over again? Preposterous you say? Maybe. But before you dismiss this as fantasy consider this:
 
With so many Castro loving leftists in severe emotional and mental distress over Trump's electoral success (some ending up in therapy to cope with their Trump induced anxieties) it's not inconceivable that I'm making sense. That sicko Castro (with a twisted mind more ill than his flesh) suffered a jolting, psychosomatic (mind-body) reaction to Trump's victory on the 8th. And after 17 days of anxiety and stress, wearing down what was left of his health and strength, Castro dropping dead finally succumbed to the Trump Effect.
 
 
 
Still think it's unlikely that Trump becoming the 45th President had nothing to do with Castro's death? I can't prove the connection of course; but I have discovered what could be a sign indicating may be right.  For when Castro died late Friday night it was the 845th month of Donald Trump's life (see). That's "45" as in Trump's president's number. Was this a mere "coincidence?" I'll let you decide.
 
 
 18 days before Castro's death Cuban Americans celebrated Janet Reno's death (she died in Miami). Ironically, on that very day Trump was at a rally in Sarasota, Florida condemning Castro for his brutal dictatorship (see); then the following day Cuban  Americans massively voted for Trump helping him win Florida. 
 
Oh, and by the way, one other "coincidence" worth noting was Janet Reno dying 24 hours before Trump's election (anticipating his 2000 election-like victory, see). It was this idiot Attorney General, with Bill and Hillary's insane blessing, who sent little Elian Gonzalas back to Cuba to be a slave of Castro's despotic regime. If at the time Trump were President he would have kept Elian in the States; and he'd be a free man today making something good of his life and his mother's sacrificial death. But alas, Reno and the Clintons saw to it that her death was meaningless and in vain. Thank God for the Cuban people that Hillary lost the presidency to a real friend of liberty.     
Donald Trump speaks at the Cuban-American National Foundation (11/15/1999) warning against lifting sanctions on Castro; and predicting that if he becomes President he'll be greatest ever for the Cuban people and work for their liberation.
 
Now if Raul Castro and his clan misbehaves toward the US and continues his failed, evil, oppressive "Socialism or Death" regime that keeps his people in bondage and poverty President Trump will tear to shreds Obama's worthless one way deal that's worth billions to them; and return the relationship to the cold war days where it should have remained.  
 
VIVA CUBA LIBRE!