PROVIDENCE USES OBAMA’S DEPARTURE FROM DC TO SIGNAL THE LEGITIMACY OF TRUMP’S PRESIDENCY

 

 
 
EX- PRESIDENT OBAMA DEPARTS WASHINGTON 45 MINUTES
AFTER THE 45TH PRESIDENT
IS SWORN INTO
OFFICE
 
 
 
 At 12:41 Obama boards "Marine One." At 12:44 the propellers start spinning. At 12:45 it's lift off. Click the WAEX link above and see
the two C-Span videos clocking the minutes.
 
Trump waving goodbye
 
Millions of Trump derangement nuts living in an alternate reality may deny, from hatred and bigotry, that Donald Trump is Barack Obama's legitimate political successor; deny that he's the real 45th President; deny that he's entitled to the exalted office he now holds and occupies. But on this nation's 58th inauguration God shaming Trump haters into   total blithering idiocy told us something radically different: exactly 45 minutes after the legitimately elected Donald Trump was legally sworn in as 45th President Providence authoritatively signaled from on high that he is the legit U.S. President in God's eyes. 
 
 
 
For Providence unmistakably signaled to this nation that the billionaire, America First, patriotic populist (flaws and all) is God's agent of change for reversing and renewing
   this country after years of decline and fall. Indeed, 45 minutes from the end of Obama's presidency the 45th President, with Melania at his side, graciously escorted the Obamas to "Marine One" where it lifted off and left DC at 12:45. Astonishing!
 
 
 
 
DISQUS DEBATES
 
 
I drove by 6 roadsigns on highway 111, and they all said "45" on them. 111 x 6 = 666! This is an unmistakable sign that Lord Trump is the Anti-Christ. Prove me wrong.
 
 
Trump is a trinity of 7s man, not a trinity of 6s.
 
On Jan. 20 he was exactly 70 years, 7 months and 7 days old; and the 7th President after FDR to hail from the State of New York.
 
From and including: Friday, June 14, 1946 (Trump's birth date)
To and including: Friday, January 20, 2017
Result: 25,789 days
 
Or 70 years, 7 months, 7 days including the end date (see).
 
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 

It rained during Donnie's inauguration, which means his Presidency is likely frowned upon by the Big G.O.D because the Bible.

 

 

It drizzled on and off Friday; but it rained heavily at FDR's second inaugural (the first held on Jan. 20th).

 
 RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

THE COMING EPOCH EIGHT YEAR PRESIDENCY OF DONALD J. TRUMP, THE REPUBLICAN FDR

 

On the 16th month of his historic campaign, which started June 16, 2015, Donald Trump, after defeating 16 GOP opponents, won the 2016 presidential race for 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Now 70 years, 7 months and 7 days from his birth (see) Donald Trump is about to become the 7th President after FDR to come from  New York: the Empire State. This man has EMPIRE greatness written all over him.  
 
I am the man who predicted that Donald Trump, defying the laws of political gravity and against staggering opposition and odds, would conquer by the strength of his stamina, energy, passion and will every obstacle in his way to the Presidency. Though I wasn't alone in predicting Trump's "impossible" "never will happen" success no one had done it quite like I have: interpreting numbers, dates, coincidences and events as signs and signature effects of a Higher Power indicating that Trump was a Providential Man destined for the White House. That like Ronald Reagan after the decline of the Carter years Trump is the right man at the right time in the right place in history for a nation needing renewal, uplift and radical change. And now hours away from Trump's inaugural when he becomes the 45th President I predict from the following signs that his first term will be much like his hell raising, raucous, unconventional, rise to power: a shocking, disrupting, odds defying success; and that four years from now in 2020 he'll be reelected to a second term to continue his work in reversing our decline and making this nation great again.
 
 1946: AN AUSPICIOUS YEAR FOR US PRESIDENTS 
 
 
As I previously wrote here and here, Donald Trump is the third U.S. President to be born in the year 1946. In fact, as you will see, beginning with John Kennedy's election in 1960 1946 has proved to be an auspicious year for five US Presidents, three of whom have been reelected-with Donald Trump destined to be the fourth.
 
 
 
 
Indeed, like presidents Bill Clinton and George Bush Donald Trump was born in the very good post-war year of 1946; and like Clinton and Bush Trump, I am certain, will be reelected to a second term four years from now. But it's more wonderfully complex than that. For incredibly, Clinton (b. 8-19-46) and Bush (b. 7-6-46) were born 44 days apart (see); and Trump, the older of the three (b. 6-14-46), was born 22 days before Bush (see) and 66 before Clinton (see). This amazing, elegant, arithmetical progression (22, 44, 66) of doublet (twin) numbers for three presidents (born consecutively in June, July and August of the same year) cannot be dismissed as meaningless happenstance. Not in the light of the astounding events of this past year. For doublet numbers have back to back identical numbers and indicate in this context two, four-year, back to back terms for Donald Trump-as it seems to have meant for Bush and Clinton.
  
HARRY TRUMAN 33RD PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.
 
 
 
  
Bush and Clinton, born 44 days apart and serving two full 4 year terms, came into this world when Harry Truman was President. Truman, the 33rd President (who served just short of two full terms) was the THIRD president in US history to bear a doublet number. Now, amazingly, a THIRD President, Donald Trump born under Truman (like two term Clinton and Bush) is about to replace 55 year old Barack Obama, the 44th U.S. President. Do you think this is happening by chance as if Trump were a freak accident? HELL NO! There is definitely a providential pattern of synchronized coincidences here, as we've seen before with other presidents (see).
 
 
 
Look at it this way: Donald Trump who was born just prior to Clinton and Bush (who came into this world 44 days apart) is not only following them into the presidency, but he's replacing Barack Obama the 44th President; and like Clinton and Bush Obama had two, back to back 4 year (doublet) terms. And so will Donald Trump.
 
Indeed, it looks like doublet numbers are mysteriously and providentially "lucky" for Trump (as was the number 16 throughout his 2016 campaign see); and among fortunate doublet numbers for      Trump is the election year 2020...which will be as victorious for him as was 1996 for Clinton, 2004 for Bush and 2012 for Obama. But there's more.
 
TRUMAN, EISENHOWER, TRUMP AND MIKE PENCE
 
 
Democrat Harry Truman, President 33, was followed into office by Republican Dwight Eisenhower. Eisenhower served two full terms as will, I am sure, his admirer Donald Trump-who is intent on repairing Ike's crumbling interstate highway system.
 
 
Indeed, a compelling sign that Trump is destined for a two term presidency-that he'll be to Obama (44) what Ike was to Truman (33)- is Vice President Mike Pence (see). For when Pence was born on June 7, 1959 it was six months, or 2330 days, into Eisenhower's second term (see). As you can see 2330 is encoded with the doublet number 33 signifying, I believe, that Pence will be a two term VP, and his boss a two term President like Ike.
 
 
Moreover, not only was the Eisenhower presidency in its 2330th   day when Pence was born but Donald Trump himself was 12 years, 11 months and 25 days old. That translates into 155 months, or 677 weeks-two three digit numbers that end in auspicious, two term doublets (see).
 
 
But Mike Pence is a sign of things to come in other respects. For example the 2016 presidential election which made him VP was the first time since 2000 that the winner won without carrying the popular vote. And on November 7, 2000, when Bush beat Gore in a squeaker, Mike Pence won his first Congressional race after several failures. And in 2004 when Bush won reelection Pence was reelected as well.

Moreover, in 2004, during that year's campaign when George Bush won a second term, Donald Trump turned 58 years old. Oddly the 2016 presidential race, won by Trump, was the 58th* in our history. This, it seems, is another sign that Trump, like George Bush, will be a two term president. *Trump Tower, Trump's campaign headquarters where he planned his victory, has 58 floors (see).

JOHN KENNEDY, RICHARD NIXON AND 1946
 
 
As I previously wrote, two of our 45 presidents, John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon, started their political careers in the auspicious year 1946. For that year both ran for and won House seats in the 80th U.S. Congress. Richard Nixon the 37th President was reelected in 1972; and though Kennedy was assassinated in office he would have easily won reelection in 1964-as will Donald Trump in 2020.
 
Indeed, when Trump won the election on November 8th it fell smack on the 56th anniversary of JFK's victory over Nixon (see).  And like JFK Trump succeeded a popular two term president of the opposing party. And, on a minor note, like JFK (the 35th President) Trump's president's number 45 ends in 5. But there's more.
 
 
When Donald Trump was born on June 14, 1946 John Kennedy was 29 years and 17 days old; this translates into 1515 weeks, an interesting and auspicious doublet number (see); interesting because when multiplied by 3 1515 becomes 4545. Did JFK'a age at Trump's birth foreshadow that he'd be the 45th President, and be reelected to a second (doublet) term? I believe so. 
 
As JFK was 29 at Trump's birth it is fascinating to note that when this number is doubled (29 + 29) it totals 58, the number of the 2016 presidential race. Also fascinating is that if JFK had lived he would have won reelection on November 3, 1964: the 45th presidential race in our history-and falling on the date November 3rd, the date of the 2020 race (see).
 
1946 = 2020
 
As I said above 2020, the year of the next presidential election, is itself a doublet number which, I believe, is highly auspicious for Trump. If you doubt this has any credence then look at it this way: when we add up the digits in the number 1946 (year of Trump's birth) it totals 20: 1+9+4+6 = 20. 20 is a factor of the number 2020 101x giving us the next presidential election year.
 
Moreover, (and more compelling as a sign) when we add up the individual presidents' numbers of each of the five presidents linked to 1946-Kennedy (35), Nixon (37), Clinton (42), Bush (43) and Trump (45)-we get a grand total of 202. 202 is a factor of the number 2020 10x.
 
The above appear to be two more signs that the 1946 born Donald Trump is fated to serve two full terms.
 
SAME STATE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES
 
 
As I wrote previously here, when Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton squared off for the presidency it was the fourth time in American political history that two candidates of major parties from the same state opposed each other. The previous three are as follows: Lincoln-Douglas from Illinois in 1860; Harding-Cox from Ohio in 1920; and Roosevelt-Dewey from New York in 1944.
 
 
Now Republican Lincoln defeated Democrat Douglas and won a second term in 1864; Republican Harding defeated Democrat Cox and (because of a booming economy) would have easily won a second term in 1924 had he lived; and FDR who was finishing up a historic third term defeated Thomas Dewey and, undoubtedly,     would have been elected to a fifth term had he lived.
 
DONALD TRUMP THE REPUBLICAN FDR
 
 
Donald Trump has a "Rendezvous With Destiny" to be the Republican FDR.
 
As I mentioned above, when Trump is sworn in as President tomorrow he will be 70 years, 7 months and 7 days old (see); he will also be the 7th President after FDR to come from the state of New York.
 
Indeed, when Trump won the presidency on November 8th it was the 84th anniversary of FDR's triumph over Herbert Hoover. 84, by the way, is a multiple of 7 12x. And if we add together Trump's president's number 45 to FDR's 32 it totals 77. Another auspicious doublet sign for Trump that like FDR he'll have more than one term as president.
 
 

Moreover, Donald Trump's father Fred (b. 10-11-1905) was born during the second term of Teddy Roosevelt's presidency (see)*. TR like his younger cousin Franklin was a New Yorker.

 

Furthermore, Fred Trump married Mary Anne MacLeod (Donald's mother) in 1936. That was the year FDR won reelection to a second term.

Amazingly in 1999  when Fred Trump died it was at his home in New Hyde Park, New York. New Hyde Park was FDR's birthplace, and 1999 was Bill Clinton's second term.

It's fascinating to note that it was during Bill Clinton's second term that he appointed Trump's older sister Maryanne to the US Court of Appeals. Maryanne was born in 1937, the first year of FDR's second term (see).

The above providentially signifies, I believe, that Trump is destined to be the Republican FDR (without the New Deal); and he will win reelection on November 3, 2020 just like FDR did on that very date in 1936 (see).
 
45X45 = 2025
 
And last but not least (you can't make this stuff up) the square of Trump's presidency number 45 gives us 2025 (45x45 = 2025). That marks the year of President Trump's retirement after completing the second term of his two term presidency.
 
ONE DAY MORE
TO EIGHT TRUMP YEARS
 
 
 
 
 
 
POSTSCRIPT I
 
 
 
Of our five former living presidents (Jimmy Carter, George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama) only George H. W. Bush was absent from Trump's inaugural. This I believe was another sign of a two term Trump presidency. For Bush, a one term Republican President, won office on November 8, 1988, exactly 28 years from the date of Donald Trump's election. I'm interpreting Bush's absence to mean that Trump won't be sharing his political fate of being a one term Republican President.     
 
POSTSCRIPT II
 
 
 
 
 
 
JUNE 2016 TRUMP HAS 37% APPROVAL RATING
 
WINS PRESIDENCY
 
 
JANUARY 20, 2017 TRUMP HAS 37% APPROVAL RATING
 
WINS REELECTION 2020
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

[REPOST AND REVISED] OBAMA, BIN LADIN AND THE ULTIMATE CAUSE OF THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING

 
 
Jihad There are misconceptions
 
 
                                   
 
            ****
                          Wonderful, magnificent, beautiful, horrific! Best film                           of the year! Brought tears to my eyes.
 
       
                                     
 
                         
                                       
 Some, like Tom Brokaw, are inclined to blame the Boston bombing on drone strikes, and the collateral killing of many innocent Moslems. Others blame Iraq and Afghanistan and the thousands of Moslems who have died from those wars. Still others blame it on our longstanding friendship with the Jewish state of Israel; or on Gitmo not being closed as Obama promised at the start of his presidency. But the recent surge of al-Qaida inspired violence can only have one ultimate cause overlooked by Brokaw et al: The US invasion of a Moslem country from an occupied Moslem land to kill a revered Moslem leader (gunning him down like a dog) in blasphemous violation of Moslem Law and the high and holy Koran-God's ultimate revelation of wisdom and truth to man.
 
                               
                                  
 
If only Obama hadn't ordered the killing of isolated, impotent Osama bin Laden there wouldn't have been riotous, 9/11, pro-bin Laden protests across the Moslem world; Ambassador Stevens and three aides wouldn't have been brutally killed; the Algerian energy plant wouldn't have been seized and 85 dead; and the Tsarnaev brothers wouldn't have blown up the Boston Marathon with that poor Moslem kid facing the death penalty or life in prison. If only we hadn't killed bin Laden and let him live out his days in peace, impotent and isolated in his hideout from al Qaida, how different things would be today. Or would they?  
 
                                  
 

Drone strikes, the Iraq and Afghan wars, the rebirth of Israel, Gitmo and bin Ladin's death, etc. if these things hadn't happened Islam would still be in a desperate state of profound moral and political crisis having lost its caliphate and great world standing after 500 years of decline-casting doubt on its divine election as God's chosen faith for all mankind. Mohammed and the first fanatical jihadists were for killing, deceiving and subverting their way to establishing Islam as a great world empire, and as a means to a greater end: world domination.
 
 
                             
 
 
Today's jihadists (Sunnis and Shiites) are fighting and dying for IMPERIAL RESTORATION: killing, deceiving and subverting their way to making Islam a greatly feared and respected imperial power again...so at long last it could be positioned to achieving its divinely appointed historical mission: a one world, totalitarian, medieval, sharia ruled Moslem state. And it is this that ultimately explains jihadist attacks great and small in today's world: the Boston bombing, Ft. Hood, 9/11 and all of the other Islamist atrocities and crimes plaguing our time. 

Death to jihad! Death to Islamism! Death to Moslem intolerance and supremacy! the greatest threat to progress and freedom facing mankind. We're in a war to the death for the fate of the Earth with medieval savages who mustn't prevail. And as with the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, the Second World War and Cold War this is a cause worth fighting and giving one's life for.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
THE TSARNAEV BROTHERS AND ISLAM: THE RELIGION OF WORLD PEACE
 
 
 
 
 
 

BARACK OBAMA AND REX TILLERSON: BOTH REFUSE TO CALL PROVEN WAR CRIMINALS, WAR CRIMINALS

 

 
 
T Rex shaking the bloody hand of Russian President Vladimir Putin who supports with soldiers, money and arms the mass murdering war criminal Bashar al-Assad.
 
THE TILLISON CONFIRMATION HEARING
 
 
Vladimir Putin is a thug, murderer and war criminal; and nowhere are these charges more strikingly evident than in Syria where Russian planes have brutally killed hundreds if not thousands of innocent civilians in Aleppo and elsewhere. Tillerson, grilled by anti-Russian hawk Marco Rubio at his confirmation hearing, diplomatically resisted calling Putin a "war criminal" saying that "he may very well be that; but I haven't seen all the facts to make that  judgment." 
 
 
https://sylg1.wordpress.com/2016/09/26/gimme-a-ticket-for-an-aeroplane/
 
Obama shaking the bloody hand of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani who supports with soldiers, money and arms the mass murdering war criminal Bashar al- Assad.
 
But when, since the start of the Syrian civil war has Obama condemned Islamofacist, terrorist Iran-Russia's partner in murder and crime-who's joined to the hip with Putin in backing mega mass murderer Bashar Assad, the worst war criminal of this century? When has he condemned Iran's military complicity in the mass killing, wounding and displacement of Syrian civilians by Iran's Revolutionary Guards who are fighting alongside Syrian troops? Never has Obama been so much as critical of the U.S. hating mullahs either in their regional proxy wars, or their military support of the Taliban (who are killing our troops with their weapons), or during their violent suppression of the democratic Green Revolution in 2009.
 
 
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for idiots like Obama to reward it.
 
Instead, Obama looking to his legacy and not wanting Iran to build nukes on his watch (which they're likely doing with North Korea see) bought them off with the following outrageous appeasement gifts: 1) ignoring the Green Revolution; 2) leaving Iraq and turning it into an Iranian vassal state; 3) lifting costly sanctions that were hurting its economy; and 4) returning $150 billion-which Iran is using in part to keep Assad in power, and his killing machine going 24/7.
 
If this isn't sick enough, after condemning Islamic terrorism multiple times as being un-Islamic, and Moslem terrorists as false Moslems, Obama, with respect, has repeatedly referred to Iran as "the Islamic Republic"-as if it practiced true ("religion of peace") Islam, and was a model and credit to the faith. And this man was given a Nobel peace prize? And he was cheered by thousands at his farewell address as a man who "ended two wars," and made the world a more peaceful place? And Trump and his followers are called "deporables?" Aren't lying, hypocrisy and weakness (that emboldens aggression in bad world actors) deplorable and a disgrace? Only mad men and fools would applaud such mendacity and incompetence in a leader.
 
 
Not only is Obama the greatest enabler of post-Soviet Russian power since the fall of the Soviet Union, he's also the greatest enabler of terrorist, expansionist, murdering Iran since Jimmy Carter  caused the fall of the shah and the rise of the monster Khomeini. It doesn't get anymore deplorable than this.
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

BARACK OBAMA: FROM VLADIMIR PUTIN’S USEFUL IDIOT BITCH TO 11TH HOUR ANTI-PUTIN HAWK

 

 

IN JULY 2009 A CONFIDENT JOE BIDEN PREDICTED THAT IF RUSSIAN  STRONGMAN

Vladimir Putin dared to step out of line (like he did with aggression against Georgia) that Barack Obama "a man with STEEL IN HIS SPINE" would slap Putin down and showing him who's boss "BEND PUTIN TO HIS WILL." But since Biden's prediction Putin has turned our "SPINE OF STEEL" president (and his reset appeasement policies) into a 21st century Neville Chamberlain fiasco exploiting his weaknesses, naïvety and incompetence in world affairs; and advancing Russia's interests at US expense.

politics The Edward Snowden Showdown

 
politics Russia  moves troops into Ukraine
 

Indeed, a defiant and emboldened Putin crapping in Obama's face gave asylum to traitor Edward Snowden, invaded Ukraine, annexed Crimea, deployed nuke capable missiles to EU borders, sold surface to air missiles to Islamofascist Iran, is maintaining Bashar Assad (the greatest mass murderer of this century) in power with ally Iran, repeatedly violated cease fire deals, and bombed Aleppo into rubble killing thousands.

 

And in multiple acts of war against the U.S. Putin ordered the massive cyber hacking of the White House, State Dept., Defense Dept., Energy Dept., NASA, NOAA, the IRS and more. And Putin, despite financial sanctions and an economy in recession from the oil market crash (see below), is standing stronger, taller and more powerful than ever; a hero to his people for standing up to and besting Obama and the U.S. .

PUTIN'S SUPPORT OF OBAMA

 
Comrade: Together we will make Russia great again.
 
 

Moreover, while it's true that Putin supported Donald Trump's presidential candidacy with hacks and other attacks* (which had zero effect on the economy driven rust belt outcome) it's also true that he supported 1000% Obama's reset policy; indeed, Putin strung Obama along and encouraged reset concessions every step of the way seeing that it could advance his neo-imperialist aims to make Russia great again. 

*The DNC/Podesta Wikileaks emails were released starting on October 7th- Vladimir Putin's 64th birthday.

 

This makes Obama one of the most idiotic, blundering appeasers in world history-arguably worse than Neville Chamberlain. For Chamberlain caught on to Hitler quickly. But by late October 2012 (four years into his presidency) Obama, willfully deceived that he won over Putin as an ally and friend, slapped down Mitt Romney as being "stuck in a Cold War mentality" for saying Putin was our geostrategic enemy number one. 

 

 

With eight days left to his failed presidency again I say Obama is finishing as the greatest enabler of post-Soviet Russian power since the fall of the Soviet Union; and the worst, most lax and dangerous cyber security president in our history. Obama with his ill-advised, doomed to fail, butt kissing Russian reset policy has proved to be a weak, feckless, SPINELESS fool of the useful, cowardly, idiotic Left; a curse to this country and the cause of freedom around the world.

From Putin's leftist bitch to 11th hour anti-Putin hawk Barack Obama will soon be replaced by Peace Through Strength Reagan-like Donald J. Trump as a new era in American greatness begins.

 

  DISQUS DEBATES

 

Hypocritesnotwelcome  ApolloSpeaks  

You're terribly  misinformed. I'll help you. Obama's sanctions have devastated the russian economy, a -3% contraction. 
Putin needs the sanctions lifted, that's why he wanted Trump.

You're welcome.

 

 

What is Russia's chief commodity? OIL AND GAS. O&G comprise 68% of Russia's exports. What happened to oil and gas prices since 2014? They collapsed plunging Russia's economy into a recession. If the sanctions were lifted tomorrow Russia's recession would remain.

However, neither the crash of the oil/gas market nor sanctions have moderated Putin's aggressive behavior or altered his expansionary foreign policy.

http://www.businessinsider.com/russia-oil-and-gas-dependence-chart-2014-7

That's exactly why they need to pump more oil. When you make less per barrel you need to sell more to make more. Get it? That's why they need exxon rex to help extract more oil.and the sanctions lifted.....gezzuz man....

The sanctions are about restrictions on foreign investment as well. russian needs more investment. Further more Putin him self has admitted the sanctions are hurting,

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2016/10/21/putin-admits-sanctions-sapping-russia/#6c1e61a119fd

ApolloSpeaks  Hypocritesnotwelcome 

LOL!!! Study the laws of supply and demand. The very opposite is happening. Russia and OPEC are cutting oil production to end the recession causing oil glut that's hurting all of them.

http://www.businessinsider.com/problem-with-opec-production-cut-20171

 

BTW, Putin is playing politics with the sanctions using them to blame Obama for the recession, when the real cause is the massive oil glut. If the oil glut wasn't the problem Putin wouldn't be cutting production in concert with Saudi Arabia and OPEC to drive up prices.

 

JacksonEuler  ApolloSpeaks  

so you feel Obama's response was too light? What will Trump do to correct that other than invite the Russian ambassador to his inauguration and seek to roll back sanctions?

ApolloSpeaks  JacksonEuler 

 

 

Read the "Art of the Deal." No way Trump will "roll back sanctions" unless he gets something of equal or greater value in return. The days of ass kissing reset appeasement are over.

 

RELATED

 

 
 
 

BARACK OBAMA’S FLAT TO FAILING ECONOMY AND THE HERBERT HOOVERING OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY

 

The Great Democratic Crack-Up of 2016 - The New York Times

 
 
Not since Herbert Hoover has a US President done more political damage to his party than Barack Obama.  And on November 8, 2016, the 84th  anniversary of Hoover's defeat by FDR, Donald Trump, the 7th President from New York after FDR, won election.
 
This blog is written for those stuck on stupid, kool-aid drinking Liberals who think that Barack Obama's presidency has been an amazing, smashing economic blessing and success for this country and its working class families. Who believe against the facts that it was Obama who ended the Great Recession in June 2009 (it was still George Bush's economy and V-shaped December recovery see); that his policies stabilized the U.S. financial system (Bush's TARP did that); saved GM and Chrysler from collapse (Bush's TARP did that); prevented a second Great Depression (Bush's TARP did that); caused a record-breaking Dow (Fed manipulation is doing that see); and created millions of good paying quality jobs (America is massively underemployed (see) with part-time and low paying service industry jobs that have ignited a middle class revolt).
 
 
If there were any truth to what Libs believe about their anointed, glorified "Hope and Change" progressive, world saving messiah (sea levels are still rising) the Democrat Party wouldn't be cracking up like shattered glass looking like Herbert Hoover's GOP in 1933-when it collapsed into political bankruptcy and depression, and stayed there for a solid generation.
 
 
In 25 states Republicans control the governorship, state senates and houses. Democrats have this trifecta in only six states. Moreover, Republicans control an astonishing 69 of 99 state legislatures up from 39 in 2009.
 
MY QUESTION TO LIBS:
 
If Obama the genius, the brilliant, the great, the mastermind in economics who rivals Lord Keynes, has such a robust, strong, kick ass economy then why has he been such a Hoover-like, Category 7 political disaster for his party? Why under his all-wise and knowing command did his party lose the House and Senate? Why did it lose 12 governorships and 30 state legislatures and a total in 50 states of 913 legislature seats-losing more of these seats than any two term president since the end of World War II?  
 
 
And why did Obama lose the presidency, and the next Supreme Court nominee, to a man he utterly deplores and opposed passionately campaigning against him from coast to coast-warning his base that his legacy was on the line, and that all he accomplished could be destroyed? How could such a magnificent political success story lose so catastrophically in 2010, 2014 and in 2016? Indeed, how could he avoid going down in history as the great wrecking ball of the Democrat Party? The Herbert Hoover* of the 21st century?
 
*By coincidence Obama and Hoover were born in the month of August. Their birthdays are six days apart.
  
 
 
 
 
THE REVOLT OF THE MIDDLE CLASS
 
 
Furthermore, If the economy is doing so fantastically great how do you Libs account for the massive, angry, mad as hell rise of economic nationalism and anti-global populism on both the Left (Bernie Sanders) and Right (Donald Trump)? When have we ever seen in a presidential election (when the economy was healthy) two populist movements driven by millions simultaneously rising up in revolt wanting reform and radical change? It's unheard of.
 
  
Indeed, how do you Libs account for the 76 million mostly middle class voters (Sanders and Trump supporters combined) rejecting Washington, Wall Street and the economic status quo of corruption, power and greed? In other words, given your belief that the economy is doing fine how do you explain why 56% of 135 million voters (including Johnson and Stein) are up in arms against Obamanomics, Obamacare, the Trans Pacific Partnership and Wall Street's Fed driven, rigged market boom that's making the rich richer? Why if this country is in such good shape did 70% on Election Day say we were on the wrong track and wanted a course change? Because we're a rudderless nation dangerously adrift on a sea of growing troubles directed by a crackpot captain steering us into disaster.
 
 
 
Tell me Libs where is the political and electoral evidence backing your claim of a strong economy lifting all boats and benefiting the nation? There is none. It's all in your brains made up like Obama's lying claim that he's "ENDED TWO WARS (see)" or "Obamacare works doing for the people what he promised. Truth is if Obama had half the economic success that Ronald Reagan had  then his prediction that he was the Democrat Reagan and that Hillary would be George H.W. Bush (succeeding him in office) would have been realized-and we wouldn't be hearing about Russian hacking. But in reality what he is, is a two term Herbert Hoover to be succeeded in office by the Republican FDR (see below).
 
 
 Now, don't you Libs feel foolish defending policies that have hugely benefited Washington, Wall Street and the rich (the political, economic and financial elites)? But not Main Street and the disappearing, collapsing, forgotten middle class (see)? Policies of a radical, left-wing, divisive, hyper-partisan, lying Democrat President who never learned how to govern, lead, negotiate, interact with people or tell the truth? Who is leaving office with his party in ruins as if it's the GOP in 1933? The economy may not be depressed, but Obama's broken, bankrupt, "Hope is Dead" party is out of gas.
 
 
In the final analysis, Barack Obama is leaving behind a legacy of ashes, disaster and dust, and, most of all, Donald Trump-voted by the people to repeal and reverse his policies and clean up his mess. The Democrat Party has been Hooverized as the GOP has found its center-right FDR (a tax cutting, under budget, charismatic, deficit hawk) to stop  America's economic descent (and amassing of crushing debt) and make us great, strong, solvent, safe, respected and prosperous again.  
 
 
 
Trump's "Rendezvous With Destiny " is to be the Republican FDR.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 

CHUCKIE THE FLIP FLOPPING HEAD CLOWN AND HIS CRAZY OBAMACARE FOLLIES

 
Laughable, flip-flopping Chuckie the Clown, who was for Obamacare before he was against it and now is for it all over again, warns that its forthcoming repeal by the Trump led GOP will be a "chaotic disaster" (like the Democrat Party) and "Make America Sick Again. "Make America Sick Again"? What in blazes does this    catchphrase mean?  That the status quo (pre-Obamacare) health insurance ante, which most Americans were happy with and wanted to keep, was a national sickness and disease? Why? Because a minority lacked insurance? Is that how he defines the term "sick" in this context? That when the crazy, crack pot, community organizer (a bigger clown than Chuckie) came into office with his growth crushing, regressive, social justice agenda (to create a More Perfect Dependency Union) the healthcare system was an unhealthy, broken, rotten mess because it was unfair some lacked insurance?   Is that what Clown Chuckie means? And that Obamacare was the cure for fixing what had always been "sick" by finally giving millions of moochers free insurance (at everyone else's expense)? 
 
 
 
Chuckie the Clown says that pre-Obamacare America was a "sick" place, because 15% of Americans lacked health insurance. But in 2014 he said that giving those 15% insurance was a mistake. How can anyone take him seriously?
 
And those opposed to Obama's plan of universal coverage (60% said CNN in March 2010*) what of them? Were they sick in their brains for wanting to keep healthcare unchanged because it was working for them and their families? And what precisely was their sickness if it wasn't bodily? They were mean, cruel, cold-hearted SOBs who didn't bleed enough for the poor despite trillions spent on welfare handouts over many years? With the government       going bankrupt from debt, and the middle class itself trillions in debt, when is enough enough for these clowns? If returning to a better past for the vast and badly hurting middle class (a nation without Obamacare) is what Head Clown Chuckie means by "Making America Sick Again" then so be it. It's a "sickness" most Americans were happy with and which they'll soon be having again thanks to the election and a Republican majority government that keenly     feels their pain.
 
*When Obamacare became law.
 
 
'Repealing of Obamacare will cost the economy 10 million jobs, sink us into a depression, cause mass starvation, worsen global warming and bring on Armageddon.' The slogan "Making America Sick Again" is the beginning of a Democrat fear and smear campaign to alarm America on the perils of repealing ACA.
 
But let's take a walk down memory lane when Chuckie became momentarily sane (see). It was November 25, 2014, three weeks after the landslide GOP midterm debacle gave Obama and the Dems a second shellacking with the loss of the Senate and more House seats. Chuckie said something radically different then which outraged Obama and fellow Dems. After a rude awakening to the reality of the Obamacare train wreck (and its huge cost to Democrats) Schumer shockingly withdrawing his support threw it under the bus saying "it was a huge mistake." At the National Press Club in Washington he said:
 
"The plight of uninsured Americans and the hardships caused by unfair insurance company practices certainly needed to be addressed, but it was not the change we were hired to make. Americans were crying out for the end to the recession, for better wages and more jobs, not changes in health care. This makes sense, considering 85 percent of all Americans got their health care from either the government, Medicare, Medicaid, or their employer. And if health care costs were going up, it really did not affect them. The Affordable Care Act was aimed at the 36 million Americans [15% or 5% of voters] who were not covered. It has been reported that only a third of the uninsured are even registered to vote."
 
In 2013 Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D–MT) warned that Obamacare would be a train wreck (see).
 
Chuckie here is sick to death over what Obamacare did to his party since 2010. Obama looking to his legacy and wanting to benefit at any cost the uninsured 15% (so he could look compassionate to history) took his eye off the economy that was weakly sputtering along and led his party into political bankruptcy, and a deep black hole. As Chuckie said it was a politically and strategically stupid mistake to reform a system that was working well for most folks (85%); and to radically change it (uncertain of the effect) when the economy was still in distress with millions of middle class families struggling to make ends meet. Indeed, delusional Obama and the Dems had convinced themselves that Obamacare was an economic program that would succeed where the $800 billion stimulus had failed: it would magically trigger a robust recovery creating high growth and "4 million good paying jobs" as Pelosi clownishly said (see) .
 
 "Obamacare is Stimulus ll, " said Pelosi. But like Stimulus I all it did was stimulate more federal debt worsening generational theft (see).
 
But predictably Obamacare had the opposite effect: it hurt growth, damaged business and killed jobs making the vanishing middle class far worse off. For Obamacare is progressive, impoverishing socialist class warfare by health insurance means (see); it is the latest  chapter in LBJ's disastrous "War on Poverty" that cost taxpayers trillions. Instead of creating new wealth it redistributed billions in health insurance from haves to have-nots regardless of the pain and economic costs; and the painful costs to middle class folks in higher premiums, deductibles and full time work has been staggering. So much so that it cost the Dems the House in 2010, the Senate in 2014 and now the Presidency. Indeed, the Dems are now on life support; Obamacare made them SICK AGAIN.
 
  

Would Bill Clinton stand next to a sign that read “Make America Sick Again”?

Elaborating on the essential unfairness and financial burden of Obamacare to the vast, struggling, declining middle class Chuckie's friend Bill Clinton soberly said:
 
"So you've got this CRAZY system where all of a sudden 25 million more people have health care and then the people who are out there busting it, sometimes 60 hours a week [the working middle class], wind up with their premiums doubled and their coverage cut in half. It's the CRAZIEST thing in the world."
 
And Chelsea Clinton anticipating her dad pretty much said the same thing:
 

 

 
 
And because there’s no essential difference Obamacare is going into the dust bin of history like Romneycare. 
 
If Obamacare is the "craziest thing in the world (see)" then what does that make Obama and the Dems? That they were out of their skulls when they forced it down our throats and made it law. Indeed, by 2010 Romneycare (Obamacare's prototype and model) was failing in Massachusetts to keep costs down; and it got so critically bad that it was repealed and replaced two years later by price controls (the last resort when all else failed, see). And so is it with Obamacare which has failed to bend the cost curve as promised-it's rising every year (see). And that has got to end.
 
 
And so is my broken brain.
 
Now flip flopping Chuckie suffering a relapse into mental derangement and unreality is in favor of crazy Obamacare again; he is hoping that replacing it with free market solutions proves so hurtful and sickeningly bad that the public will come back to his party wanting single payer socialist-care instead-which, by the way, as Chuckie knows, crashed and burned in Bernie the Bozo's state of  Vermont. Ain't that a kick in the head.  
 
 
 
76 MILLION WANT OBAMACARE REPEALED AND REPLACED
 
 
That's right. You heard me. Contrary to the polls up to 76 million Americans are unhappy with Obamacare and want it repealed and replaced. Where did I get this figure from? It's the number of Americans that voted for Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump combined*....both of whom called for repealing Obamacare and replacing it with different solutions. Indeed, opposition to Obamacare is massive. And now we're at the end of a brief era where sick Obamacare (class healthcare warfare) will be gone forever and replaced with something healthier, better and fairer.
 
*Bernie got 13 million primary votes; Trump got 63 million on Election Day.
 
 
 
 
Didn't we avoid "Making America Sick Again" by keeping sick, low energy, crooked iLLary out of the White House?
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 

TRUMP’S APPROVAL RATING SOARS AS HIS PATRIOTIC OPTIMISM INFECTS THE COUNTRY

,

President-Elect Trump Is Historically Unpopular; His Press Coverage Should Reflect That-Media Matters

 John Nichols at The Nation, “It's absurd to claim that [Trump's] administration and this Congress enjoy enthusiastic popular support. They don’t.”

The Pew Research poll that came out December 9th had Trump's approval rating as President-elect at a mere 41%, with 55% disapproving. In the Media Matters' article Eric Boehlert gleefully  points out that Trump's rating compared to Obama's (72%), Bush II's (50%) , Clinton's (62%) and Bush I's (65%) is historically low for an incoming president. The implication is that pre-inaugural Donald is already a failure foreshadowing an awful presidency worse than George Bush's.

BUT

 
 

Trump effect’ on economy: Consumer confidence at 15-year high | The Columbus Dispatch

 

But Pew is not the only post-election poll on Trump. The latest Bloomberg national poll for December 16th tells a different and more convincing tale (more in sync with the soaring historic Dow* and consumer confidence surge). For it has Trump's approval rating 9 points higher than Pew at 50%-up from 33% in August. That's a whopping 17 point shift in less than five months (see); an amazing, historic turnaround.

*If the Fed hadn't raised interest rates the Dow would now be at 20,000.

 
Moreover, with Obama's Bloomberg approval rating at 56% (up from 51% in August) it's a mere 6 points higher than Trump's.
 
Bob Englehart, CagleCartoons.com
 
It's amazing that despite the 24/7 White House/media post-election partisan campaign to delegitimize Trump's victory (as engineered by Moscow and with help from Comey) how quickly Trump is closing the favorability gap between himself and Obama. In less than five months Trump has slashed Obama's lead by 66% (two-thirds) from 18 points to 6. At this rate Trump's approval rating should be neck and neck with (or slightly ahead of) Obama's by Inauguration Day-when Trump will take the country in a radically new direction.
 
THE TRUMP EFFECT ON DIRECTION OF NATION
 
 
And speaking of America's direction there's more good news for Donald Trump. Because of his infectious patriotic optimism and relentless can do winning attitude he's changing the mentality of the country. Indeed, Bloomberg reports that 49% of the public think America's headed in the wrong direction; while that's still too high it's down a precipitous 19 points from 68% in August. Indeed, the poll states that 37% of the public now believe America is on the right track; that's up from 25% in August-a double-digit 12 point shift. Not too shabby considering the gloom and doom media predictions on everything from the economy and markets crashing under Trump, to a world war with Islam, and the ravages of climate change killing millions in floods, droughts, famines and plagues. 
 
 
 
HOPE
 
may be dead for the vindictive, petty, back stabbing, sore losing Obamas, and their broken, divisive party of defeatists, extremists and pessimists. But HOPE is making a strong comeback as Donald Trump "The Comeback King" takes command. I look forward to a soaring economy lifting all boats along with President Trump's approval rating.
 RELATED
 
 
 

THE DEATH OF JANET RENO AND TOMORROW’S HISTORIC PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

IS HILLARY CLINTON UNDER A GEORGE MCGOVERN “CURSE?” WILL 2016 BE 1972

 

FOR HILLARY? 

DONALD TRUMP, HILLARY CLINTON, RONALD REAGAN AND THE FINISHED HOTEL PROJECT NEAR THE WHITE HOUSE: DOES IT FORESHADOW A TRUMP PRESIDENCY?

< p style="box-sizing: border-box; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; text-transform: none; color: #141412; text-align: center; font: 16px/24px 'Source Sans Pro', Helvetica, sans-serif; margin: 0px 0px 24px; widows: 1; letter-spacing: normal; background-color: #ffffff; text-indent: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">...............

2016 WHITE MIDDLE CLASS BACKLASH BASED ON ECONOMIC DECLINE NOT REACTIONARY RACIST POLITICS

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
I am sick to death of hearing race obsessed, "Hope is Dead," New Deal/Great Society losers like Van Jones and John Harwood analyzing the gravity defying triumph of Donald Trump on Election Day as a regressive racial backlash by angry white voters against Barack Obama, America's first black president. I'm sick of hearing that white voters after making Obama the most powerful black man in world history (electing and reelecting him by large margins) suddenly sloughed off their "white guilt," regrew racist horns and went charging after him in the person of Hillary Clinton (Obama in white face and drag). I'm sick of hearing that white Americans fearing the rise of minorities and blacks and the loss of political and economic power did a 180 in November and elected Donald Trump-a "white racist supremacist billionaire" to "take back America" for them.  
 
THE RACIST ELECTIONS THAT WEREN'T
 
But we've heard variations on this racism meme before. Indeed, in 2008 before the market crash decided the election for Obama and John McCain was topping him in the polls the Van Jones and Harwoods despaired that white America was still too racist (had made too little progress since Jim Crow) to elect a perfectly good and qualified black man president. But they were wrong. Obama won and won big collecting the most popular votes (69 million) of any presidential candidate in our history. 
 
 
 
But come 2012 the Harwoods and Van Jones worried anew that the white electorate (who massively voted for Obama and change in 2008 wanting anyone but George Bush II) would backslide and turn against him because of race. For arising since the last election was the angry white tea party movement and birtherism "stirring racial passions" to reverse 2008 and end Obama's ruinous reign; this despite his "stella achievements" in the economy, ending a war, getting bin Laden and financial and healthcare reform. They said that though Obama saved our economy from a second Great Depression (which was bull), and it was better than what he inherited from Bush (which was true), they warned that the weak recovery was being exploited by a vast right-wing racist conspiracy to make Obama a one term president. But they were wrong again as Obama won a second though less impressive election that year.  
 
THE RACIST ELECTION THAT WAS?
 
But now he lost, and in the most humiliating way. Campaigning hard for Hillary Obama pleaded with his base that "it would be a personal insult to my legacy [meaning him personally] if voters didn't back Hillary and elect her president." And the Harwoods and Van Jones are back with their anti-American analyses of an evil racial backlash to explain this undeserved insult to poor wounded defeated    Obama. There reasoning goes something like this: 
 
With the economy booming, unemployment under 5%, millions of new jobs created, low inflation and gas prices, and a record Dow at 19,000 reflecting great business success, only an upsurge of white bigotry, hatred and fear can explain the unlikely rise and victory of "white nationalist bigot" Donald Trump.
 
 
 
Indeed, across the internet I hear it said by grieving heartbroken Leftists that they were stupid, blind and too dismissive of Trump; that they made the mistake of treating him as a laughable joke who they couldn't respect and take seriously-even when he won the GOP nomination. Indeed, his nomination, they believed, meant an easy win for Hillary despite all her baggage, unlikability and sins. In short, Trump was an unelectable God send for them to elect Hillary.
 
 
Moreover, they blame themselves for being too complacent of all the underlying subtle racism still in the country. They were deceived or misled, they say, by Obama's eight years into forgetting our dark racist past, and how black and progressive success has always produced white male backlash and rage. They blame themselves for thinking that two terms of Obama meant that bigotry was practically dead; that citizens wearing suits, capable of holding a job and walking upright could also still be racists, religiously intolerant, misogynistic and homophobic. In short, they underestimated Trump and over estimated the progress that was made in ridding the country of racism. Indeed, they bemoan not giving enough heed to Black Lives Matter and its warning that racism was very much alive in this country institutionally and personally; and for ignoring the signs that were springing up everywhere (Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Eric Garner, etc.) they paid a heavy price on Election Day. Tears, tears.
 
THE RISE OF BERNIE SANDERS AND DONALD TRUMP
 
 
 

There's been a massive transfer of wealth from the 99% to the top 1%. We've got to bring that money back to working families.


But missing from this analysis is any explanation of Bernie Sanders whose millions of backers were mostly middle class whites (see). Was Bernie, the radical economic and social justice progressive, a racist for leading a mostly white populist movement of angry white voters wanting change? Wanting what eight long years of Obama and $trillions borrowed, spent and printed didn't do for them? They voted for Obama twice and in 2008 gave him margins of 10-20 points in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania (the states that made Trump President); but his didn't work for them as promised. They felt forgotten, left out, betrayed; many of them had been Occupy Wall Streeters raging against the millionaires and billionaires that were prospering under Obama while their fortunes either stagnated or dwindled. And they rallied to Bernie because he too like Trump offered hope and change from Obama's massive failures.  
 
IT'S ECONOMIC NATIONALISM AND ANTI-GLOBALISM, NOT RACISM STUPID
 
 
 
Indeed, underlying the rise of Sanders on the Left and Trump on the Right was essentially the same message of economic nationalism and anti-globalism, not racism. Put Americans first and the rest of the world last. Globalism was hurting all Americans; but these white Americans felt it more keenly due to the epic loss of factory and manufacturing jobs; and they had had enough. They were mad as hell and Sanders and Trump pledged to put a stop to it and make them economically secure and strong again. In other words, if the mostly white middle class Trump movement was racist then so was  Bernie Sanders' counterpart. No. Obama's happy talk and phony statistics (denied by both Trump and Sanders) about his low growth, bad jobs, pro-Wall Street economy couldn't fool the millions of white Americans suffering from decline, uncertainty and loss of faith in the future. And the real economic stats bear this out.
 
THE CRISIS OF THE DISAPPEARING MIDDLE CLASS
 
Indeed, under Obama the "Crisis of the Disappearing Middle Class" which has been progressing for decades has accelerated and worsened:
 
 
 
 
.
 
 
Share of adults living in middle-income households is falling
 
 
GDP during the Obama years has been the worst of the last 11 Presidents (see): 
 
 
30 years of decline in productivity and Obama’s non-recovery: 
 
 
20161202_GrowthSlowdown_chart
 
THIS IS WHAT DRIVES THE MOSTLY WHITE MIDDLE CLASS POPULISM BEHIND SANDERS AND TRUMP
 
 
 
THE VICTORY OF DONALD TRUMP IS A REMINDER OF THE INCREDIBLE UNBEATABLE POWER OF ECONOMIC POPULISM IN AN ERA OF DECLINE
 
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 

DONALD TRUMP: THE AMAZING “COINCIDENCE” OF HIS ELECTION AND THE 1995 JERUSALEM EMBASSY ACT, AND THE END OF THE TWO STATE SOLUTION

 

TO EAST JERUSALEM
 
DEAR PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP,
 
To demonstrate America's solidarity with the democratic Jewish state of Israel in its existential struggle with Islamo-Arab racist supremacy, and murderous anti-Jewish jihad, please sir do the following in your first historic 100 days: relocate the US embassy in Tel Aviv to East Jerusalem not West Jerusalem; and move it as close as possible to the Holy Temple Mount.
 
 
Make it abundantly clear to the world Sir that the United States is radically reversing the pro-Palestinian policies of the Obama administration, and 68 years of US policy on the status of Jerusalem (see); and that it now recognizes only one, united, undivided Jerusalem as the political, cultural, religious and eternal capital of the Israeli state and Jewish people everywhere. One united capital for one united people in one united homeland till the end of time.
 
 
As for the reaction of implacable, deranged, Jew hating Palestinians? It will be violent with possible terror attacks and Jews being killed and injured; and with massive Gaza and West Bank demonstrations burning US and Israeli flags, and you, Sir, in effigy. But how would that differ much from the present turmoil?
 
 
 
 
As for the world's reaction? The embassy move will be universally and fervently condemned as violating International Law as decided by the United Nations; and some countries undoubtedly will recall their ambassadors from Washington in protest. But the furor will quickly die down. For the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is overshadowed in the region by the worsening deadly Sunni-Shiite divide (aggravated by Obama's Libya, Iraq and Iran policies), and no longer has the importance and urgency it once had-as Bibi Netanyahu has repeatedly stated. 
 
 
 
And as jihadist, terrorist, Shiite Iran grows in power and influence destabilizing the region it will inevitablely draw America, Israel and the Sunni states closer together in an anti-Iran alliance-as the Palestinian cause to destroy Israel practically drops off the map.
 
 
 
 And Sir, in case you haven't made up your mind to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, then hopefully the following signs will convince you that this is your DESTINY; that the time is right for this to happen; and that 21 years of inaction on the Jerusalem Embassy Act, and 68 years on the status of Jerusalem,  must now come to an end.
Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995
Great Seal of the United States
Long title
An act to provide for the relocation of the United States Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, and for other purposes.
Acronyms(colloquial)
JEA
Enacted by
Effective
November 8, 1995.
Citations
Public law
Statutes at Large
109 Stat. 398
Codification
Acts amended
None
Titles amended
None
U.S.C.sections created
None
Legislative history
 

You will notice Sir that the Jerusalem Embassy Act passed by the 104th Congress in 1995 is PUBLIC LAW 104-45, ending in your president's number. And it appears that by an Act of Providence 104-45 became law on the auspicious date of NOVEMBER 8TH-21 years to the very day of you becoming 45th President of the United States. This can't be accidental.

Moreover, and just as fascinating, on the very day that 104-45 became law you Sir were exactly 18,045 days old-that's the 45th number of the 18,000 series. This too can't be accidental.

From and including: Friday, June 14, 1946
To and including: Wednesday, November 8, 1995

Result: 18,045 days

It is 18,045 days from the start date to the end date, end date included

Or 49 years, 4 months, 26 days including the end date (see).  

 

This should put to rest any doubts that you may have Sir. Be confident that moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem is the right thing to do for our country, Israel and, in the long run, peace. Strike out in a new direction Sir and history will praise you.

 

   POSTSCRIPT

 

    DAVID FRIEDMAN   

 

 

 

 

Donald Trump's Hanukkah gift to the people of Israel was nominating David Melech Friedman as the U.S. Ambassador to their country.

 

On December 15th President-elect Trump nominated attorney and campaign advisor David Friedman as America's next Ambassador to Israel. Friedman, an Orthodox Jew, supports moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and expanding settlements on the West Bank; and he also strongly believes  in a "one state solution" to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. This is where Israel would annex all or some parts of the West Bank; and where there's no possibility of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.

 

David Friedman: Trump would support Israeli annexation of parts of West Bank - Israel News - Haaretz.com

 

Now according to Mr. Friedman, and this is exciting, Donald Trump would thumb his nose at the Palestinian leadership, and practically the entire world, and support annexation of parts of the West Bank. Now if true what that means is that Trump rejects the notion of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital; and that if and when he moves the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem he could defiantly (poking the Palis in the eye) place it in the eastern part of the city. That will be a day of celebration for me and millions.

 

 

 

 

RELATED

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

BARACK OBAMA, JEWISH SETTLEMENTS AND THE IGNORANCE OF THE LEFT ON THE CAUSES OF THE MOSLEM-ISRAELI CONFLICT

 
 
 

Obama's got Israel's back.

What an ignorant, despicable, backstabbing, devious, coward Obama is! And who does he think he's fooling? Less than 24 hours before Hanukkah (adding insult to in jury) he refused to block an immoral, unjustified, worthless pro-Palestinian UN resolution condemning as illegal growing Jewish settlements on Israeli owned lands; and he did this after hypocritically vetoing a similar measure in 2011. Why the sudden change in policy? It wasn't in response to any major shift in Israel's settlement program. Indeed, the pace of settlement building on the West Bank and in East Jerusalem today differs little from what it was six years ago when Obama vetoed its condemnation. So why now and not then? Only politics, meanspiritness, and ignorance explain it.
 
 
He forgot to add that the suffering is largely self-caused.
 
Though Obama in a pro-Palestinian UN speech in September 2009 condemned Israeli settlements as illegal he vetoed the Security Council resolution in 2011 to avoid giving Republicans an issue that could hurt his reelection the following year. In short, he didn't want to risk alienating millions of Jewish and pro-Israel voters and the influential Israeli Lobby (God bless them). Indeed,  it is certain that  Obama would have vetoed this second resolution had it come up for a vote before November 8th. There is no way he would have risked giving Donald Trump an issue that could have hurt Hillary with pro-Israel voters. In fact, Hillary herself took measures not the alienate the large pro-Israel public by making sure that the words "settlements" and "occupation" weren't mentioned in the Democratic Party platform (see).
    
 
The murdering genocidal racist folks Obama gave $150 billion to wipe out Israel for a worthless nuke deal that even John Podesta said was a 21st century Munich mistake. 
 
But with the election now past and the Dems having little or nothing to lose Obama-wanting to show his disdain for Netanyahu and his defiant ongoing expansion of settlements (which he ignorantly believes are an obstacle to peace)-abstained from Friday's vote allowing it to pass 14 to zip. Netanyahu is right to suspect that Obama colluded with the UN Security Council on this. It was probably orchestrated and preplanned weeks or months in advance. With no political price to pay Obama must have secretly pledged to Egypt and the other Security Council states that he wouldn't veto the anti-settlement measure so long as it was introduced after the election. And shamefully and ignorantly he kept his pledge. It's the only thing that makes sense.
 
 
 
Palestinians are opposed to all Jewish settlements. That includes Tel Aviv, Haifa, the Negev and all of Jewish Israel which, according to Islamic law, is in violation of God's will.
 
 But Friday's abstention not only stabbed Netanyahu and the Israeli people in the back, it revealed (emblematic of the pro-Palestinian, soft on terror, insane Left) Obama's cluelessness and ignorance of the true causes underlying the decades old Palestinian-Israeli conflict and Israels older conflict with Islam. Indeed, the causes are ancient and deep with settlements barely scratching the surface.
 
 
The sign should read:
"For my religious peace of mind Israel must be destroyed because its existence causes me to doubt the fundamentals of my faith."
 
The principle, primary, underlying cause going back to the anti-Zionist riots and killing of Jews in 1930s Palestine is summed up in one word: ISLAM. But if like Obama you're a politically correct ideologue stupidly fixed on the falsehood that "there is no evil in Islam," and that it's a "religion of justice and peace" then what drives this deadly conflict will elude you; and you'll foolishly blame it on peripheral things like  settlements, checkpoints, security walls, boycotts and the like.
 
 
 
Mohammed was the murdering, conquering, Jew hating Hitler of the 7th century. Hitler was the murdering, conquering, Jew hating Mohammed of the 20th century.
 
Truth is the Palestinians are a Moslem people, and they take their religion very, very seriously. And they are taught by their religion and prophet that Jewish Israel's very existence is in violation of GOD'S WILL or Islamic (sharia) law; they're taught that the land that the "filthy, impure, intruding infidel Jews" claim for their national homeland (Tel Aviv, Haifa and all of Jerusalem
 belong exclusively and absolutely to Islam. In fact, Palestinians and all Moslems generally are indoctrinated (instilled) with the belief that they own the deed to the land of Israel, a deed signed and given to them by God himself: the Holy Koran. And from their primitive, reactionary, medieval viewpoint they are correct. Interpreted literally the Koran is a deed to the land of Israel.
 
 
For the Koran teaches that any land any where that was conquered and colonized by Moslems (even if they've been expelled) eternally (by divine right) belongs to them. And that goes for other lands Islam once ruled: Spain, Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia, Romania, Moldova, parts of India, etc.; whether their infidel inhabitants know it or not all these lands once ruled by Moslems still in truth, and by God's will, belong to to them; and Islam will not rest until these lands are Islamized again. But Israel tops the list of lands (temporarily) lost to Islam. For it was in Jerusalem on the Temple Mount that Mohammed, according to the Koran, was miraculously transported and mounted a winged horse and flew to heaven. And Israel is close to the Arabian Peninsula,the birth place of Islam.
 
 
"Israel must die for Islam to live in peace." That's how these savage,    medieval monsters think.
 
But there's a deeper theological reason for Islam's violent hostility to Israel's existence, which ignorant delusional ideologues like Obama are oblivious to. For not only does Jewish Israel's existence breach Islamic law, it's very existence is a refutation of Islamic truths. And this is what really drives Moslems insane. The core premise of Islam (what makes it unique and distinctive among monotheistic faiths) is that it's the true, pure, authentic, unvarnished monotheism of Abraham (the ultimate and final revelation of God's truth to man)-and that Judaism (and Christianity) is its distortion or perversion. Indeed, Mohammed didn't regard himself as the founder of a new faith, but as the restorer of an ancient faith lost to the world because of the rebelliousness and disobedience of the Jews-God's most hated people.
 
 
 
 
But it gets worse. The Koran and Hadiths teach that the Jews loss of their homeland and exile were divine punishment for distorting Abraham's faith and disobeying God. And within a century of Mohammed's death Islam's conquest of Israel was seen by believers as a providential sign of Islam's supremacy over Judaism and all other faiths; and that Mohammed's claim to prophethood was valid and sane.
 
 
 
So imagine the intellectual and emotional blow devout Moslems experienced when contary to Koranic law and teaching Israel was restored after 2000 years. Called "the catastrophe" by Palestinians it was a direct challenge to Mohammed's claim to prophethood; that he was the last and final messenger of God (superior to all the Hebrew prophets and Moses himself) with the absolute and final revelation of saving truth to man. The very notion that Islam is the answer to all of humanity's manifold problems and ills, and that the purpose of history was its conquest of the world for a just and lasting peace,  were put in doubt by Israel's return to history. In other words, Israel's existence drives true believing Moslems insane because it raises painful doubts about the fundamentals of their faith: about Mohammed's place in history, Islam's relation to other faiths, and the inerrancy of the Koran believed to be the most perfect and complete of God's revelations. In short, either Islam is the ANSWER or it's not. And Israel's existence after 68 years (against staggering odds) says it is not.
 
Hopefully, now you understand why since 1948 Islam has been at war with Israel and seeks it's total  destruction; why in 1947 the Islamic world rejected the UN's proposed two state solution of dividing Palestine into Jewish and Arab/Moslem states; and why to this day most Palestinians and Moslems reject a two state solution and will settle for nothing short of Israel's destruction, which they pray for every day. 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 

FROM “HOPE AND CHANGE” TO “HOPE IS DEAD”-THE RISE AND FALL OF BARACK OBAMA

 
 
 
Obama is so lost in the ridiculously exalted opinion he has of himself that it blinds him to all the harm and wreckage he's done. So he blames it on those who for very sound reasons opposed his politics and policies.
 
It doesn't get anymore pathetic than this. If President Obama who rose to power on a messianic wave of "Hope and Change" was the resounding success story that he claims then why for God's sake is he behaving like a failure? What happy, successful, consequential President proud of his achievements and confident of his place in history leaves office after eight glorious years sounding like a miserable, bitter, petulant loser? Like a badly beaten man, wounded and betrayed? It's unheard of!
 
 
After eight years of vilification by the liberal media and Dems neither Ronald Reagan nor George Bush ever once publicly complained about their treatment and pains. They had the fortitude and moral strength to gracefully take every blow and rise above it showing the world they were stronger and better than the slings and arrows shot at them by their foes.
 
 
Obama once boasted that he was the Democrat Ronald Reagan-the Gipper of the Left. Where? On what world? Though millions worldwide marched against Reagan and his hardline anti-Soviet policies-demonizing him as a reckless nuclear cowboy leading mankind into Armageddon (and despite Democrats colluding with Russia to stop him see)-Reagan, always the happy, cheerful, optimistic warrior never let it sour him or get him down. And in the end he triumphed big time. How then is Obama Reagan?
 
 
The angry, deranged, delusional Left wrote books about hating Bush to death; and they produced a full length fictional film "The Death of a President" about his assassination in Chicago by a gunman; but not once did he bellyache or complain. Say what you like about Bush's presidency, there was much dignity and grace in the man deserving much respect. But there's little or none in Barack Obama. Soured, whining and mad he's turned the waning days of his presidency into one, big, sickening bellyache. His two terms as America's first black Pres didn't turn out as planned; and his critics and adversaries are to blame. They refused to obey and coöperate with policies they deemed  bad. Shame on them for their bigotry and racism. "The party of Lincoln is dead," says the Left; its treatment of Obama is proof of it-as if he were perfect.
 
 
 
Indeed, imagining himself the 21st century Reagan who'd infallibly be followed in office by a member of his party (like Bush 41 did Reagan) Obama can't come to grips with reality and his self-inflicted fate: that he's not the exalted, enlightened singular soul he thought he was with a character and destiny like Lincoln, FDR, Reagan and the greats. He feels cheated and lost as if all hope were gone and his presidency a waste with a legacy of ashes, dust and despair; that the imperiled world God chose him to save from fossil fuels, rising seas and climate change is now inevitably doomed to the grave. The forces of darkness conspired against him and prevailed proving themselves stronger than the God who anointed him at birth savior of men; he had a mandate from heaven, so he believed, to build a more perfect dependency union-a cradle to grave transformational nanny state-the true American dream. But that was not to be. He got no further than Obamacare which the public hates. No wonder why Bernie Sanders was incensed and millions supported him. The great progressive made too little progress for their tastes.
 
 
 
 
From "Hope and Change" to "Hope is Dead" it's the rise and fall of Barack Hussein Obama-as the world draws near to its end. But don't worry folks. Before it's curtains for America and the human race history will record that Fox, Republicans, Limbaugh and Putin are to blame as the nightmare reign of Donald Trump (the anti-Obama) begins.
 
HURRAY!
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
SHORT DISQUS DEBATE
 
 
BARACK OBAMA:
 
THE MOST POPULAR FAILED PRESIDENT IN US HISTORY
 .
 
Reagan is the only President in history to leave office wiith an approval rating as high as Obama. Telling the trutyh about you filthy vulgar bigots is needed to keep you from lying. Whining is what the coward you elected does every day. He is not man enough to accept he lost by 3 million votes and spends all day crying. Obama showed more dignity then that bigot Trump ever did. He was gracious and told other to cooperate. The way trump whines you would think he lost.
 
Obama has more dignity in the head of his Trouser Snake than you bigot nasty liars have in your whole family. If only linocln could bring Sherman back to burn all you bigots again.
 

 

Obama is arguably the most popular failed president in US history. If not why then did his wife say that "all hope is dead"? Those are the words of failure and loss, not success.

 

BTW, one of our very greatest Presidents Harry Truman left office with a 36% approval rating. Would you rank Obama

above the President who brought WW II to an end, and stopped the Soviet Union from swallowing up Western Europe because he left office with a low approval rating? What achievements of Obama's tops Truman's? Understanding his high place in history Truman left office with his head held high and without complaint. But not Obama who unlike Truman had a second term as President.'

 

Obama's poor domestic and foreign policy legacy is in peril because he supported a candidate to replace him who opposed change and wanted to stay the course. The voters wanting change said "no" to Obama/Clinton and handed Trump a large electoral and geographical upset victory.

Trump's so-called "whining" is a defense of the Electoral College system that elected him 45th President against those who want to change it. Understandably he wants to keep the EC because what elected him president against staggering odds will likely reelect him.

 

BTW, it's leftists like you, not Donald Trump who are crying and whining over the 2.8 million votes insisting insanely that Hillary is the real winner when she lost fair and square.

 

 

RELATED

 

BARACK OBAMA: TRANSFORMATIONAL PRESIDENT OR FORTUNE’S TRAGIC FOOL? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OBAMA TO REAGAN AND FDR

 

THE RISE AND FALL OF BARACK OBAMA: THE END OF NEW DEAL/GREAT SOCIETY LIBERALISM AND COUNTERCULTURE SIXTIES RADICALISM

 

THE 2014 ELECTION: WINNING FOR THE GIPPER, THE GREAT REVERSAL, MITCH MCCONNELL RISES

 

NO HUDSON RIVER MIRACLE FOR OBAMA: WWII PLANE CRASHES IN HUDSON KILLING PILOT WHEN OBAMA DISHONORS GREATEST GENERATION AT HIROSHIMA 

 

WHAT IF BARACK OBAMA WAS PRESIDENT DURING WORLD WAR TWO? 

 

PAM GELLER, GONE WITH THE WIND AND THE 1936 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

 

THE TRUMPSLIDE AND OBAMA’S FAILED HILLARY/ BUSH 41 PREDICTION VS. MY TRUMP-JFK PREDICTION

 

Now that the anti-Trump derangement nuts failed to reverse the  outcome of the 2016 election (with the Jillary Recount and great Electoral College revolt backfiring and making Trump's victory slightly stronger) let's take a comprehensive look at Trump's  triumph which on balance was a landslide.

 
For anti-Electoral College Trump haters the Constitution is living, breathing toilet paper.
 

Indeed, the most feared and hated President-elect ever by the political Left won 62.9 million votes; this set a record for a Republican candidate by just under 1 million votes*. No mean feat considering the extent, scope and power of the maligning bipartisan forces aligned against him.  Indeed, Trump's gravity defying miraculous win against staggering odds (which looks like the work of Providence) was the greatest upset political victory since certain to lose, underdog Harry Truman beat Thomas Dewey 68 years ago.

*Trump beat Bush's record of just over 62 million votes set in 2004 by approximately 900,000 votes (see).

 
trump-electors

But Trump's victory was more historic and greater than Truman's. For Truman had the advantage of being President, victoriously ending the worst war in human history and continuing the legacy of the immensely popular and revered FDR. But Trump never held elected office or ran in a political campaign; what he did have however was a flamboyant and super successful business and reality TV show career, great political instincts, untiring energy, an unbreakable iron will, effective communication skills, and the gift of a weak, unlikable, corrupt, low energy opponent who couldn't keep pace with him. And that combination of gifts and circumstances were enough to make Trump the third President-elect born during the Truman era; and the 7th to come from New York State after FDR.

In the end Trump pulled off a decisive electoral victory and staggering geographical sweep; and that created a

TRUMPSLIDE!      

geographic-landslide    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

@CNN is so embarrassed by their total (100%) support of Hillary Clinton, and yet her loss in a landslide, that they don't know what to do.

 
Donald Trump won the popular vote in 30 of 50 states, or 60% of the states vs. Hillary's 40%. That is a landslide. And out of 3141 counties across the land Trump won a whopping 2600 (flipping 200 that went for Obama in 2012), or 83% vs. Hillary's 17% (an all time low). That too was a landslide.
 
 
 
 
Now in the popular vote Hillary bested Trump by 2.8 million votes giving her a 2% lead. But this 2% came mostly if not exclusively from one lone state: deep blue leftist sanctuary California (overrun by over 3 million illegal, pro-Democrat aliens) where Hillary won a colossal, historic 8.7 million votes, 4.3 million more than Trump. This exceeded Hillary's overall popular vote lead by 1.5 million votes. How many of those votes were cast by illegals we don't know just yet (see).  But what we do know is that without California Hillary would have lost the popular vote by 1.4 million (see).
 
Outside California, Hillary Clinton lost the popular vote by 1.4 million to Donald Trump. (ZUMAPRESS.com/Newscom)

In CA they give drivers licenses to illegals; and they have motor voter registration. It's not particularly controversial to say they voted en masse.

Also in the popular vote Trump did 50% or better in 23 of the 50 states, while Hillary achieved that in only 11 states. That too was a landslide.  Also a landslide was Trump's 304 electoral votes vs. Hillary's 227. Indeed, this 77 point difference gave Trump about 57% of the electoral vote vs. Hillary's 43%, a double-digit 14% margin. How is that not a landslide?
 
 
Moreover, Trump's 304 electoral votes was the most of any GOP presidential candidate since 1988 when Vice President George H.W. Bush, with 426 votes, crushed Democrat Michael Dukakis. On the other hand, Hillary's 227 electoral votes was the least of any Democrat candidate since 1988 when Dukakis won a mere 111 votes.
 
Now though Bush's 1988 landslide was hugely greater than Trump's, it wasn't a win he had to work his butt off like Trump had to do. For Bush was the VP of one of the greatest presidents in American history: Ronald Reagan-who ended the perilous Cold War and left office with a booming, high growth, good jobs economy that greatly benefited the middle class. As Bush vowed to stay Reagan's course it was virtually impossible for him not to win, and win big. 
 
 
 
 
BARACK OBAMA: THE NEW RONALD REAGAN?
 
And this brings me to the subject of Obama's failed prediction for 2016 that he made last year. For some time now Obama (the great anti-Reagan) has laughably fancied himself the Democratic version of Ronald Reagan. Indeed, like Reagan Obama believes he's a great historical world figure; that like Reagan he's been a transformational president making a huge positive impact on American and world history. This claim rests on the following seven claims: getting bin Laden (after 7 months of dithering indecisiveness, and wasn't the beginning of the end of al-Qaida as claimed); ending two wars (a flat-out lie); stopping Iran from getting the bomb (he just kicked the can down the road, and who knows what Iran and nuclear North Korea are secretly doing); the passing of Obamacare (was unpopular then and is so today); the Paris Climate Accord (based on hysterical catastrophic pseudo-science); saving the US auto industry from collapse (he co-saved with Bush only GM and Chrysler); and lastly his claim that the $800 billion stimulus prevented a second Great Depression (in reality Bush did that with TARP). 
 
 
In Obama's delusional mind he's the 21st century Ronald Reagan and loved as much as Reagan was. And based on this belief he imagined that the American people wanted a continuation of his presidency (like they did Reagan's). Indeed, cock sure that 2016 would be 1988 for him and Hillary Obama predicted that on November 8, 2016 (the 28th anniversary of Bush's defeat of Dukakis) Hillary would defeat the GOP nominee.
     
 
MY PREDICTION THAT 2016 WOULD BE MORE LIKE 1960 THAN 1988
 
But compared to Ronald Reagan Obama is a mental and moral pipsqueak; in contrast to 1988 the US economy and foreign policy of 2016 are a mess; and, consequently, most Americans wanted change. Moreover, candidate Clinton was no physically healthy, honest, ethical, scandal free George H.W. Bush. Differing from Obama I wrote that a better model for predicting the outcome of this year's election was 1960 not 1988 (see). This was the year when the charismatic northeastern Democrat JFK defeated the less likable, charmless Richard Nixon, who'd been the Republican Vice President of the very popular Dwight Eisenhower. Oddly, the 1960 election like this year's fell on a November 8th election date. And when the votes were counted JFK in a narrow victory won 303 electoral votes (one less than Trump's), or 58% to Nixon's 42% (nearly identical with Hillary's). Amazing, isn't it? Oh, by the way, 1946, the year of Trump's birth, is when both JFK and Nixon began their careers in politics (see).
 
 RELATED
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

OBAMA’S FAKE “BOOMING” ECONOMY AND THE PRO-GROWTH, BUSINESS FRIENDLY TRUMP PRESIDENCY

 

 

This is beyond belief insane. The desperate narrative being spun by the brain broken Ben Whites of the anti-Trump Left before Inauguration Day is that our lucky President-elect is inheriting a "booming" economy from Barack Obama-who fixed what was broken by Bush and the Republicans; that compared to eight years ago the economy is so healthy, sound, robust and strong that it's the "envy of the world;" that it's anything but the "worst recovery since the Great Depression," that Rush and Hannity endless complain of; that it's not the anemic, pathetic, trickle growth, bad jobs, declining wage and productivity disaster Trump (and Bernie Sanders) campaigned on backed by millions of  hurting, struggling, forgotten middle class Americans craving change as their fortunes shrank.
 
 
White glowingly writes:  "today's economy is in a radically different position from the one President-elect Barack Obama found himself in 2008 with markets crashing, the financial crisis spinning out of control and joblessness headed toward 10 percent."
 
 
What White says was true for most of post-crash September 2008. But truth be told when Obama took office the very worst was past as the economy he inherited from Bush was on the mend (see). According to the BEA the V-shaped GDP recovery (the beginning of the end of every recession) started in December 2008; then (according to BLS) this was followed in April by the V-shaped jobs recovery when the economy started to gain instead of losing jobs. By June 2009 (still Bushes economy) the Great Recession was over having zero to do with Obama's massive, historic $800 billion stimulus (which took a year to impact the economy). And the stimulus proved to be a hugely expensive and wasteful dud.
 
 
Indeed, the billions in stimulus funds given to states and taxpayers to stimulate spending on infrastructure projects (the shovel ready jobs that weren't ready), and buying goods and services was mostly used to pay down debt-not create jobs and grow the economy. By the end of 2010 (when most of the stimulus was spent) the recovery was so painfully weak that Obama (shocking the Left) extended the much vilified Bush tax rates another two years; he did this because he feared (under advisement from Christina Romer and Larry Summers) that a tax hike with the recovery so weak would reverse it, cause a double dip recession and cost him reelection. In short, the Obama stimulus (falsely claimed by him to have prevented a second Great Depression) was a monumental waste of money, stimulating only our ballooning debt.
 
 
Obama's monetary policy-low interest rates, massive money printing, quantitative easing and stock buybacks (which underlie the rigged 19,000 Dow and booming Wall Street economy)-has increased the wealth of the top 1% by billions; and robbed millions of poor and middle class folks out of billions in interest earnings on their bank accounts. And he complains about wealth inequality? HYPOCRITE!
 
But the Ben Whites on CNN and MSN assure us the economy is doing just great. They cite the 4.6% unemployment rate (lowest since 2007), inflation at 1.6%, and a soaring, record breaking historic 19,000 Dow as evidence of robust, kick ass growth and Obama's economic success. "Without Obama where would we now be?" these imbeciles ask.
 
 
 
But the 4.6% jobless rate (rejected by both Trump and Sanders as bogus that leaves out millions of long-term unemployed (see), the low inflation rate (that leaves out energy, food and clothing), and the sky-high Dow (artificially created by low interest rates, massive money printing and record buybacks) are out of sync with harsh economic and fiscal realities that fill most sane people with dread.
 
 
 
The worrisome truth is this: if the economy was so strong (miles from the Great Recession) then interest rates wouldn't be so abysmally low at under 1% (it's been that way for ten years now). If all the happy talk about the economy were reality based rates would be at 5%, where they were before the start of the 18 month recession. .75% interest rates after ten years in which time $trillions have been borrowed, spent and printed is an infallible indicator on just how weak the economy is; how out of sync with reality the jobless and inflation rates and Dow are; and how fearful Fed Chief Janet Yellen is that raising rates too high could crash the economy all over again. And just what are the underlying weaknesses of the economy that so worries Yellen, myself and others?
 
 
To begin with (as we learn from a recent Gallup report see)  American productivity has been declining for 30 years (it's now at 1% growth per annum and falling); and neither Republicans nor Democrats have stopped and reversed it. And while America's been growing less productive and poorer the entitlement state (the largest part of the Federal budget) has been vastly expanding (9.5% per year) along with growth crushing regulations (costing $250 billion annually, and hundreds of billions more on waste, fraud and illegal immigrants. Moreover, we have declining incomes with a staggering $66 trillion in bankrupting debt ($24 trillion in federal and state and $42 trillion in private/consumer debt). We are the greatest debtor nation in world history on an unsustainable course; and this is what the Obama koolaid drinkers call a healthy, robust victorious economy? And what Obama congratulates himself on week after week along with saying that he's "ended two wars"? The man is worse than stupid, he's delusional.
 
 
As Obama has spent the last seven years playing the community organizer and focusing on redistributing (not creating) wealth, and spreading the poison of government dependency (expanding the welfare state that traps millions in poverty) soon like Greece before it crashed we're reaching the tipping point of no return where takers will outnumber makers (moochers overshadowing tax payers) in a crisis culture of collapsing dependency and strife.Yet everything is sweetness and light.
 
 
 
You get the picture. Despite appearances to the contrary Trump is inheriting a colossal, unsustainable mess. A progressively weakening economy bordering on a disaster (like Trump says) masked by happy talk, lies, statistical trickery and market manipulation to create a false wealth effect. But millions of forgotten Americans on the Right and Left aren't fooled. The more they hear the economy praised the more they puke. For they know that it's really the Wall Street economy being praised, which has vastly enriched the 1%, not Main Street's which has gained average working folks dreck.
  
Blest are we to have an incoming pro-growth, fiscally conservative ("under budget ahead of schedule") president who sees through the bull and understands the danger that we're in. The right man at the right time in history to reverse our economic, military and geopolitical decline that's imperiling our prosperity, security and national strength, and make America strong, secure, feared, respected and great again.  
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
                                     

HYPOCRITE OBAMA’S INTERFERENCE WITH FOREIGN ELECTIONS AND HIS LAX CYBER SECURITY ADMINISTRATION INVITING RUSSIAN ATTACKS

 
 
 
Atheist Paul Krugman praying for a miracle to keep Deporable Donald (the "Siberian Candidate") from the White House.
 
An angry and outraged Paul Krugman (who still bitterly thinks that Bush lost the 2000 election) believes that the 2016 presidential race was very badly "tainted"-which is his polite way of saying "covered in mud." Why? Because his ideologically pure candidate Hillary lost to someone he fears and loathes like no President-elect in his lifetime. Unwilling to see the truth on how weak and awful a candidate Hillary was; and that Trump's underdog, Trumanesque victory was part of a GOP wave that continued the 2014 landslide, Krugman resorts to conspiracy theories about Russian hackers from the Kremlin influencing the outcome of the election. It's as if it were 1960 and Krugman was a John Bircher crediting the subversive Kremlin with JFK's victory. 
 
 
 
 Vice-president Joe Biden told NBC on October 16 that retaliation for Russia’s hacking attacks “will be at the time of our choosing, and under the circumstances that will have the greatest impact”.
 
But assuming that Krugman and the anti-Trump left are correct, that the Russians made Trump the 45th President-elect, then how can they avoid not pinning the blame ultimately on Obama? Isn't national security the president's constitutional duty and chief domain? Isn't it his responsibility to combat and counterattack cyber warfare from hostile foreign governments and entities? Indeed, how can Krugman et al not fault Obama for 2016 when he miserably failed to launch a punishing, devastating counterattack two years ago when Russian hackers breached White House security? Because Obama failed to strike back, teaching the Kremlin a lesson they'd never forget, emboldened they did it again and cost Hillary the election. Indeed, Joe Biden's threat in October to massively retaliate against Russia for Wikileaks was too little too late (see). 
 
 
Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee said: "I think it was a mistake earlier frankly [for Obama] not to react more forcefully to Russian hacking. I think those kind of -- that lack of deterrence invited the Russians to meddle some more and consider they could do this with impunity."
 
  

Indeed, where was Biden's and Obama's outrage and alarm two years ago over this act of war and espionage targeting the White House? Where was Klugman, the Times and the rest of the watchdog media? If it was Bush's White House that was hacked the media would have rightly raised hell over it turning it into a major cyber security scandal to embarrass him. But because Obama's White House was the victim the story went underreported to avoid making him look weak and incompetent. And what were the consequences? As Adam Schiff said: "It invited the Russians to meddle some more believing they could do so with impunity."  

In other words, if what Klugman and other Trump haters are alleging is the truth, that Russia hacked DNC emails to hurt Hillary and help Trump, the blame falls mostly on  Obama. PERIOD!

 
 
 

And how can Obama with a straight face fault Russia for allegedly interfering with our election when he's done that himself on occasion? And to allies no less? In 2014 Obama tried to sway the Israeli election against Bibi Netanyahu with well-funded (by US tax dollars) anti-Bibi operatives in Israel working to advance Isaac Herzog's Zionist Union Party to victory (see). 

And more recently the meddling mendacious moron publicly threatened the British people with economic consequences if they dared vote to leave the European Union. It doesn't get anymore hypocritical than this.

 
 
 

And then there's the issue of US cyber attacks and spying on allies and friends (like the European Union and Germany) that went on under Obama's nose, and would have continued (or may still be going on) had Eric Snowden not blown the whistle. What goes around comes around.

Can anyone produce a single voter who was swayed by Wikileaks (and/or James Comey) to vote for Donald Trump? Just one?

Indeed, if in the unlikely event the massive DNC/Podesta Wikileaks dump swayed the election in Trump's favor (making Julian Assange the culprit not Russia) the blame nonetheless falls squarely on Obama's incompetence in protecting our country. Perhaps if more of his focus had been on strengthening cyber security, not on the imaginary, doomsday "national and global security threat" of [so-called] man-made global warming, Hillary might be President-elect.

 
10 ways the Democratic primary has been rigged from the start
 

But in truth, the only election this year that was certainly, absolutely badly "tainted" was the DNC rigging the democrat primaries for Hillary against Bernie. Before the primary voting began 400 superdelegates were already pledged to Hillary. And the head of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz (a Clinton surrogate) pressured another 300 superdels to back Hillary. Hillary didn't win her party's nomination by democratic means and stole the election from Bernie (as hers was stolen by Obama in 2008). What is Hillary's actual theft compared to Wikileaks or James Comey allegedly and unprovably winning the election for Trump? 

We'll never know for sure what the outcome of a Trump-Sanders race would have been. But every major poll showed Sanders topping Trump by higher points than Hillary. And surely anti-globalist, populist Bernie with his message of economic nationalism for the forgotten working man would have done better than Hillary in the Rust Belt states where she lost the race.

However, in reality, what gave Donald Trump his landslide electoral victory (he won the popular vote in 60% of the states) was his blazing, defiant, outlandish, indefatigable WILL TO POWER-which weak, feckless, low energy Hillary couldn't match. I predicted last year that Hillary wouldn't keep pace with Trump if both were the nominees; and that's what happened. From August 1st to November 7th Trump held approximately 100 large rallies (up to four per day) to Hillary's less than 50 (see); that was her limit beyond which could have proved perilous to her health (she complained to NBC she found campaigning terribly exhausting).

Assange, Russia and Comey be damned! In the end it was force of nature, Herculean Trump's great energy, stamina and strength that moved mountains; that impressed the Republican and Independent electorate, swept them into an anti-establishment frenzy and propelled him to victory-sending millions of Dems into despair.

And here we are five weeks after election day with snowflake leftist Bill DeBlasio (emblematic of the mental breakdown of the left) offering therapy to city workers suffering from distress. Proving conclusively that liberalism is a mental disorder, and that he has no future as mayor; as four successful Trump years will send him to a psych ward stark raving mad.

RELATED

 
 

TURNING #NOT MY PRESIDENT ON ITS HEAD. FOLLOWING THEIR LOGIC BARACK OBAMA IS AN ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT 

11/9 ANTI-TRUMP HYSTERIA ENGULFS THE LEFT WHEN 11/9 IS 9/11 REVERSE

THE DEATH OF JANET RENO AND TOMORROW’S HISTORIC PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

DONALD TRUMP, THE CHAMPION CHICAGO CUBS AND THE YEAR OF THE UNDERDOG

THE JILL STEIN (OR JILLARY) RECOUNT: AN EXERCISE IN DESPERATE, LAUGHABLE, ANTI-TRUMP FUTILITY

HOW TO SAVE CLEAN, GREEN, MESSIANIC WARMUNISM FROM THE WORLD DAMNING, DIRTY ENERGY TRUMP-PRUITT-TILLERSON REGIME

 

 
 
 
The Greenhouse Gas Gang of Three
 
 

QUESTION?  

 

How can we save clean, green, messianic   Warmunism (humanity's last best hope for climate    justice and peace) from the fascist, dirty, aggressive, big oil energy regime of Trump, Pruitt and Tillerson? What needs to be done to ensure its survival so it can continue its fight for the fate of the Earth, and a clean energy future?  

ANSWER

 Put it on the

Endangered Species List

together with

winter, snow and skiing
 

icebergs, polar caps and glaciers

penguins, polar bears and seals

 

above sea level coastal cities

AND

the Al Gores and DiCaprios of the world

 

Was the survival of their movement the topic of discussion at Trump's surprise meetings with these two great dedicated greenies?    

OR

(hat tip Sue2) 

did Trump convince them he was friendly to their cause? But for political reasons is hiding it? And that his $trillion plans for massively repairing America's crumbling infrastructure, and building a border security wall, are    scientifically valid DECARBONIZATION PROJECTS      using millions of tons of concrete to suck billions of tons of CO2 from the atmosphere?

 
 
 
WHAT BUILD BABY BUILD DONALD TRUMP HAS DONE TO FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE 
 
 
NOW WHAT HE PLANS TO DO
 
 
 

 

DISQUS DEBATE 

WHY DID DONALD TRUMP MEET WITH AL GORE AND DICAPRIO?

Was it to calm their fears that in reality he's not a climate denier? That he supports their cause but hides it for political reasons? And that his plans to fix America's crumbling infrastructure is a massive, Earth saving, scientifically valid DECARBONIZATION PROJECT?

SCWofTX ✔Trump Train  ApolloSpeaks   

To make it plain that they no longer have a chair at the WH table.

 

 

If that were so Gore wouldn't have said afterwards that he found his meeting with Trump "productive" and "extremely interesting."

SCWofTX ✔Trump Train  ApolloSpeaks 

Then said to be continued which means he made no headway

ApolloSpeaks   SCWofTX ✔Trump Train

Gore said the purpose of the meeting (set up by Trump not requested by Gore) was a "sincere search for common ground." If Trump had no intention of making peace with Wamunists why would he meet with two of their best known leaders?

SCWofTX ✔Trump Train  ApolloSpeaks   

Trump did not call him in to speak to him his daughter did and Gore made it a point to stop by Trumps office...Just tried to make it seem like Trump called him in

ApolloSpeaks   SCWofTX ✔Trump Train

Do you think Ivanka set up the meeting in defiance of her dad? Or that she's a whacko greenie?

 
 

RELATED

DONALD TRUMP’S PEARL HARBOR DAY COUNTER-OFFENSIVE AGAINST OBAMA’S WAR ON CO2 

 

THE DIRTY, IRREVERSIBLE, CATACLYSMIC INDUSTRIALIZING OF THE THIRD WORLD, OR YES WE HAVE NO $44 TRILLION TO STOP IT 

HOPELESSHAGEN, HOLLYWOOD AND SIGNS OF DEMISE FOR GLOBAL WARMING POLITICS

 

FROM BAN THE HYDROGEN BOMB TO BANNING HYDROCARBON FUELS: THE LEFT’S FAILED GLOBAL SALVATION MOVEMENTS

THE WORSENING CRISIS OF THE GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS

 

THE MAZE RUNNER, SOLAR SCORCHING AND THE END OF CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM 

< p style="box-sizing: border-box; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; text-transform: none; color: #141412; text-align: center; font: 16px/24px 'Source Sans Pro', Helvetica, sans-serif; margin: 0px 0px 24px; widows: 1; letter-spacing: normal; background-color: #ffffff; text-indent: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"> 

DONALD TRUMP’S PEARL HARBOR DAY COUNTER-OFFENSIVE AGAINST OBAMA’S WAR ON CO2

DECEMBER 7, 2016

PEARL HARBOR

DAY

 
 
 
Obama's former EPA chief Lisa Jackson announcing on December 7, 2009 that Carbon Dioxide is a dangerous pollutant.
 
It was a terrible Day of Infamy for the people of this great country that cost us dearly. No, I'm not alluding to December 7, 1941 when the imperial air force of fanatical, fascist Japan attacked us at Pearl Harbor destroying warships and planes and killing and injuring thousands. I'm alluding to another December 7th attack against our country that started 68 years later and without a bullet being fired. An attack not launched by a foreign enemy or government against our military, but by a powerful, prominent American politician...an enemy within; a man of staggering stupidity and ideological blindness whose policies have made a mess of this country costing our economy trillions in growth and private investment, and millions of good paying jobs; and that enemy, that man, that blind, stupid, reckless fool is Barack Hussein Obama.
 
 
It was December 7, 2009 in Washington DC (day one of the UN Climate Change Conference at Copenhagen see) when Obama began a major leftist assault on our economy, productivity and use of energy. It was a shot heard across the country fired by then EPA head Lisa Jackson (see), and aimed at American commerce and business and, more specifically, the fossil fuel industry-provider of the cheapest, most efficient and wealth creating form of energy known to man that over the centuries have lifted billions out of poverty.
 
 
Jackson speaking for the Enemy-in-Chief insanely and without basis in scientific reality declared (in science's name and the public good) that Carbon Dioxide (a harmless, natural, beneficial gas vital to plant growth and life) was a noxious, evil, deadly "POLLUTANT;" "it was," she said, "a poisonous health and life threatening substance that is driving global warming and endangering the welfare of Americans and peoples everywhere." And she warned that "human CO2 emissions must be drastically regulated and curtailed if America (and humanity) is to survive and have a future."
 
 
Then following Jackson's call for draconian cuts in carbon emissions an administration official went even further. Warning Congress that if it failed to pass "cap and trade legislation" (to control in a market based way carbon emissions from businesses and organizations) that the president would act directly; that he would apply top down "command and control emergency measures" to cap and cut carbon emissions nationally. Meaning that he would ruthlessly enact by executive decree (using the Clean Air Act) massively complex and costly regulations to drastically reduce CO2 pollution.
 
 
And since that infamous December 7th day our blackmailing, climate extremist president has made good on his threats. When Democrat led Congress failed to pass Cap and Trade he went to war big time against fossil fuels and CO2 using his phone and pen.
 
  
 
Indeed, from 2009-2015 the EPA created 35 new major regulations to reduce emissions at a cost of $54 billion (a conservative estimate) to our economy (see). And emissions were reduced as America fell behind China as the greatest CO2 polluter on Earth (see).
 
 
 
But unhappy with the progress that he made Obama in 2014 rolled out with a new massive unconstitutional emissions cutting program. Called the "Clean Power Plan (CPP)" it was hailed by Obama "as the biggest and most important step we've ever taken to control climate change."  Which is beyond the powers of man.
 
 
The CPP has dozens of job killing, growth crushing regulations to limit carbon emissions at power plants by replacing cheaper and more efficient fossil fuels (to generate electricity) with more expensive and less reliable clean, renewable energy technologies (solar, wind, etc). The estimated economic cost of CPP in higher energy prices to consumers, working families and businesses is a whopping $479 billion over ten years (see).
 
 
 
It is estimated that  each one of the  6,000,000,000 human beings on this planet    exhales on average 1000 lbs per year of the "deadly pollutant" CO2 (see). That means that  collective humanity exhales about 6,000,000,000,000 lbs per year of the  gas, or 3,000,000,000 tons. In other words fossil fuels aren’t the only major source of carbon poisoning the air. And then there are billions of breathing animals.
 
And what would be accomplished for this price? Practically nothing: a slight, meaningless, miniscule reduction in CO2 levels compared to the immense greenhouse gas output worldwide-especially from dirty industrializing, populous third world states like China, India and Indonesia with their growing, massive use of fossil fuels (see).
 
 
Knowing that CPP would do little to lower overall world carbon output Obama nevertheless presses on believing that the great expense to Americans will pay off in the long run. How? By setting an example to other nations. Our cutting emissions at great cost to ourselves would inspire other nations to follow suit and make similar sacrifices to their wealth and standard of living. In short, America (and messiah Obama) would lead the way in saving the planet from (nonexistent) Catastrophic Anthropogenic (made caused) Global Warming (CAGW). And such is the imbecile we have in the White House who, thank God, will soon be gone.  
 
DECEMBER 7, 2016
 
  
 
But Wednesday December 7th (the 7th anniversary of Obama launching his massive EPA Pearl Harbor attack) something quite extraordinary happened: Donald Trump announced his choice for EPA chief: Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt. Pruitt, a conservationist (clean air and water guy), and AGW denier, who has battled for years the EPA's anti-fossil fuels and CO2 regime, is the perfect man for the job of dismantling and reversing Obama's destructive clean energy policies.
 
 
Pruitt is Donald Trump's counter-offensive against the aggressive, doomsday, warmunist enemy within:-Obama and the powerful environmental lobby. And the signs of Trump surmounting every obstacle and killing Obamunism are remarkably auspicious. For Trump is the 7th President from New York after FDR, our greatest wartime leader next to Lincoln who led our country to unconditional victory over Japan. And when the electorate made Trump its 45th President it fell right smack on the 84th anniversary of Roosevelt's defeat of Herbert Hoover*.
 
*November 8, 1932
 
 
Trump has a "Rendezvous with Destiny" to be the Republican FDR minus the New Deal.
 
This I believe is an unmistakable sign that the Left's worst fears about Trump and Pruitt are about to be realized; and that they're about to do to Obama's economically destructive, anti-business clean energy agenda what FDR and the US military did to the Japanese because of Pearl Harbor. Think of the Paris Climate Accord and the lawless Clean Power Plan as Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and you have a good idea of the horror that lies ahead for the insane, doomsday, messianic Left. 
  
 
The Apocalypse of the Left is near. If they can't save themselves how can they save the world?
  

RELATED

THE DIRTY, IRREVERSIBLE, CATACLYSMIC INDUSTRIALIZING OF THE THIRD WORLD, OR YES WE HAVE NO $44 TRILLION TO STOP IT 

HOPELESSHAGEN, HOLLYWOOD AND SIGNS OF DEMISE FOR GLOBAL WARMING POLITICS

 

FROM BAN THE HYDROGEN BOMB TO BANNING HYDROCARBON FUELS: THE LEFT’S FAILED GLOBAL SALVATION MOVEMENTS

THE WORSENING CRISIS OF THE GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS

 

THE MAZE RUNNER, SOLAR SCORCHING AND THE END OF CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISM 

MUSCULAR AMERICA FIRST DONALD TAKES ON RED CHINA

 

 
 
 
Donald Trump's call with Taiwan's leader T'sia  Lng -wen.
 
IT APPEARS THAT MUSCULAR, ART OF THE DEAL, ANTI-COMMUNIST DONALD
 
has made his first, bold AMERICA FIRST move to eliminate our massive $300 billion, jobs killing trade deficit with Red China; and to defend FREE ASIA and the China Seas from their aggression.
 
 
 
No longer will the free capitalist economy of the world's mightiest nation bow to the "socialist market economies" of any freedom hating, one party, oppressive state.
 
 
 
 
ASS KISSING, GIRLIE MAN OBAMUNISM IS DEAD!
 
 
 
 The totalitarian Chicoms must be crapping  in their murdering Maoist pants. EVIL RESPECTS STRENGTH!  Donald Trump is the 21st century Ronald Reagan with the power to bring down Red China like Reagan the     evil Soviet Empire. If Trump should visit China it's tyrants won't dare give him the humiliating treatment it gave Obama.
 
BEFORE
 
 
 

 AFTER

POSTSCRIPT

 WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OBAMA AND THE RED CHINESE?

ANSWER

They're better at being communists.

 

POSTSCRIPT II 

The Dalai Lama Weighs in on Trump’s Presidency: ‘I Have No Worries’ | Mediaite

 

Why should he worry? The Dalai knows he has an ally in Donald Trump, and won’t have to come into the White House by the kitchen entrance anymore.

RELATED 

 
 

ONE CHEER FOR MAD DOG MATTIS AS DEFSEC

 

Mattis Pick Would Risk Confirmation Fight with Pro-Israel Groups-Breitbart.com

 
 
If George "Blood and Guts" Patton were alive today Trump would make him Secretary of Defense to demonstrate his seriousness about putting the fear of hell and destruction in our enemies, and making America strong, great and respected again. But absent Patton Trump believes he has his reincarnation in James "Mad Dog" Mattis. And perhaps he is right. But as a strong pro-Israel American Jew I cannot enthusiastically support Mattis' nomination like many Trump supporters are doing. Why?
 
 
Because he's a borderline anti-Zionist who backed Obama's harsh policies toward Israel and mistreatment of Bibi Netanyahu. Because like Obama and Kerry (and Clinton before him) Mattis blames the Jewish state for its ongoing decade's long conflict with the Palestinians. What this means is that like Obama, Clinton and Kerry Mattis believes in the lie that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas (a warmed over Arafat in disguise) is a real peace partner for Israel (as if he were an Anwar Sadat see) willing to end the conflict (which he's not). And Mattis wants to alter the perception of America's bias toward Israel (which "damages us with moderate Arabs," he says) by forcing Netanyahu to negotiate a two state solution with Abbas (which is not in his cards). Moreover, sounding like Jimmy Carter Mattis claims that Israel's settlements on the West Bank are turning it into an "Apartheid " state (which isn't true) and wants their complete dismantlement.
jamesmattismeme2
Truth is, it's Israel's existence as a Western, non-Moslem, infidel state on land once ruled by imperialist Islam, that underlies the 68 year old Arab/Moslem-Israeli conflict. Currently, from the Arab veiw point, there's only two possible solutions to this conflict: 1) Israel's conversion to Islam, or 2) it's annihilation; this latter solution is subdivided into the violent, radical, Hamas/Hezbollah/Iranian way of war; or the  slow, non-violent, long-term Abbas way of political, cultural and social subversion through mass Palestinian refugee immigration; this is Abbas's gradual, incremental one state solution where Israeli Jews will live as an oppressed minority in a larger Arab state (if they're lucky).
 
Hopefully Trump's pick for Secretary of State will reverse Obama's anti-Israel policies instead of continuing them like Mattis madly wants to do. One cheer for Mad Dog Mattis. Because of his bias toward Arabs he doesn't deserve anymore.
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

BERSERKO PROGRESSIVE LEFT PREDICTS TRUMP WILL WORSEN OBAMA’S WEALTH GAP, KILL THE MIDDLE CLASS AND CAUSE A GREAT DEPRESSION

 

Obama admits 95% of income gains gone to top 1% - CNN Money 

 

Under Obama (the failed community, redistribution, social justice organizer) the Wall Street economy has mightily boomed breaking all sorts of records; while the Main Street economy has deplorably sagged financially breaking millions of working class families. Obama waged class warfare against the rich, but ironically his policies helped them to win. Yet despite his self-caused defeat Obama's still a hero to the progressive, anti-capitalist Left. Why? Because he's a likable, charismatic left-wing black man whose "heart is in the right place;" and whose failures are blamed on an obstructionist Congress, FOX News, and hostile right-wing talk shows that he couldn't overcome-showing a failure of leadership, governing skills and know how. Despite his fairly high approval rating Obama is perhaps the most popular failed president in American history-his biggest political failure of which was using his popularity to win the presidency for Hillary.

 

 

During Obama's reign of error (with a trickle growth economy so fragile and weak that the Fed, fearing a recession, won't dare raise interest rates) the rich have gotten vastly, hugely, enormously richer in a transfer of wealth to the top 1% unseen since the days of the "Robber Barons." And like the criminal, oppressive Castros (one of the richest robber baron families on Earth) Obama's lauded as a champion of the little guy by an insane, out of touch liberal media, academia, and the Democrat establishment. It's mind-boggling!

 

 

After the crash of 2008 wiped out trillions the rich, under Obama, have recovered magnificently seeing their fortunes rise galactically. This is due mainly to the greatest, fraudulent government manipulation of the stock market in US and world history-growing the millionaire's and billionaire's club while impoverishing the middle class and swelling the ranks of the poor.  And none of this is the Republicans' fault.

 

 

Obama_income_inequality_Fox News
 

Benefiting from the Obama/Bernanke/Yellin policies of near zero interest rates (robbing billions from savings accounts), multi-trillion dollar money printing (devaluing the dollar and hurting purchasing power), and quantitative easing (artificially boosting stock values to historic highs) the top 1% since 2009 increased its wealth by 11.2%+; while the rest of us poor suckers saw a mere increase of 0.2%. Indeed, under Obama's policies the top 1% took an astonishing, unprecedented 93 cents out of every new dollar earned; under Bush they took 65 cents; under Clinton 45 cents. That equates to a staggering 112% increase over the Clinton years (see) due mostly to a rigged, over bought stock market-a bubble that sooner or latter is going to burst and come down to earth. 

 

 

 

 

Indeed, and quite unexpectedly, Obama's economic, fiscal and monetary policies hugely aggravated the wealth gap paving the way for the revolt of the forgotten, collapsing, disappearing middle class-that underlie the rise of Bernie Sanders on the Left and Trump on the Right; and led to the defeat of Wall Street's big money darling:  corrupt, two-faced lying, pay to play Hillary.

 

 

But now because of billionaire Donald's super rich 1% cabinet picks the Obama kool-aid drinking, business hating Left are predicting the absolute, catastrophic worst for this country. Seven weeks before Trump takes office they think they see the future with perfect prophetic clarity when they've been dead wrong about this man all along: wrong about him not surviving the first GOP debate ("he'll be laughed off the stage," they said); wrong about him never being the GOP nominee ("it will be Cruz, Rubio or Kaisich ," they said); wrong that the sex tape and groping lies had ruined his electability ("it made Hillary more likable and electable," they said); wrong he had no path to 270, and would lose in a Goldwater-like landslide    dragging down the Republican Party with him. 

 

 
 

But despite their failed record of pre-election predictions the Left is doubling down. Now with infallible certainty they see the next great depression ahead impoverishing and gutting our country and world; they believe with Michael Moore and Dana Milbank that "11/9 Trump" is the new Herbert Hoover (a 9/11 disaster in the making, see); that during his presidency Trump will crash Obama's over inflated stock market and weak, low growth economy throwing millions out of work; that his protectionist policies will start an international trade war killing US exports; and that after four or eight years of Trump the declining, dying, vanishing middle class will completely disappear and be a thing of the past. For the Left Trump has replaced fossil fuels and climate change as the greatest menace to humanity-more terrifying than ISIS, al-Qaida and all Islamic terrorists combined.

 

 
 

And when America is reduced to rubble and dust Trump (backed by the army and cops) will repeal and replace our democracy with a one party, totalitarian, white supremacist oligarchy; and he'll sign an executive decree making himself president for eternity. And the only hope of stopping him is the desperate Jillary three state recount (see); or the Electoral College waking up and making Hillary president.

 

 

This is the thinking that's breaking the brains of the berserko, unhinged, anti-Trump Left. And because of this I stopped watching Hannity,  O'Reilly, Tucker and FOX. It's way more fun seeing Trump drive Blitzer, Matthews, Cuomo  and Joe completely batshit loco. 

 

RELATED

 

11/9 ANTI-TRUMP HYSTERIA ENGULFS THE LEFT WHEN 11/9 IS 9/11 REVERSE 

 

BARACK OBAMA: THE PRESIDENT WHO SAVED THE U.S. AND WORLD ECONOMY FROM A SECOND GREAT DEPRESSION?

 

MR. PRESIDENT: THE ECONOMY SUCKS BECAUSE YOU’RE A LEFTIST IGNORAMUS

 
 
 
 

CASTRO DIED ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF JFK KILLER LEE HARVEY OSWALD’S BURIAL AND DEATH -WHAT COULD IT MEAN?

 

 

In the center column between the pictures of JFK and LBJ it reads:

LEFTIST ACCUSED  

Figure in a Pro-Castro Group is Charged

 
Yesterday morning as I was replying to a comment posted by thunderbolt (see) about the multiple assassination attempts that Fidel Castro survived it dawned on me-as I wrote that Castro died within days of the 53rd anniversary of JFK's death-that the two deaths (JFK's and Castro's) were now strangely linked by Providence. How? By way of Lee Harvey Oswald. For Oswald (JFK's killer) on 11-24-1963 was assassinated by a distraught Jack Ruby as he was being escorted from a Dallas jail, and was buried the following day (the 25th) exactly 53 years to the day of Castro's death. Then it hit me that the main reason for Oswald killing Kennedy was for Castro's sake: to save the dictator and the Cuban Revolution from JFK's machinations to destroy him and his regime. And then I recalled from my studies that Castro likely had foreknowledge of Oswald's plot.
 
This was the subject of an excellent  book (right) written by former CIA analyst Brian Lattell that I read years ago. The book, "Castro's Secrets: The CIA and Cuba's Intelligence Machine" is based on declassified government documents and first-hand reports from Cuban spies who defected to America. Lattell sets out to prove that Castro's grievances in an interview with a US reporter that JFK was out to assassinate him is what triggered Oswald's plot to kill Kennedy. Lattell writes that in September 1963 while Oswald was in Mexico City trying to obtain a visa that would allow him and his wife to visit Cuba that he discussed his intention to kill Kennedy with several Cuban intel officers at the Cuban embassy; and that this is how Castro learned of the plot. Lattel doesn't allege that Castro's men assisted Oswald in any way; they simply knew what Oswald told them (of his intention to kill Kennedy) and wished him well. It was a lone wolf operation from start to finish with Castro, of course, hoping he'd succeed to eliminate JFK and his obsession with killing him. Castro must have been astounded that it worked.
 
 
Oswald in New Orléans handing out pro-Castro leaflets (below), before his trip to Mexico. it was in New Orléans that Oswald read the interview with Castro where he complained about the US assassination plots against him.
 
     
 
 
 And now it seems Latell was spot on. For late last week Providence has given us what I believe is an infallible sign that commie, Castro lover Lee Harvey Oswald and his plot to kill Kennedy was known to Castro; and that the sign was Castro's death strangely and meaningfully falling on the anniversary of Oswald's death and burial. It could be that in killing Kennedy Oswald saved Castro's life. Perhaps Providence spared Castro and allowed him to live to a ripe old age to show the world that godless, oppressive, totalitarian communism doesn't work. 
                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
RELATED 
 
 
 
 
 
 

CASTRO DEAD! WAS HE A VICTIM OF THE TRUMP EFFECT?

 
 
 
17 DAYS AFTER DONALD TRUMP'S HISTORIC ELECTION
 
  (see), on the 17th anniversary of Elian Gonzalez' rescue at sea (he was fleeing with his mom from an oppressive, communist, totalitarian regime), Cuba's 17th President Fidel Castro died (see)-a God-given Thanksgiving Day gift to his many freedom loving enemies worldwide. As soon as news of his death was released Friday night Cuban Americans (and anti-Castro whites) poured into the streets of Miami  to celebrate his demise-as I celebrate it hating him above all men in this hemisphere where he's caused so much havoc, suffering and death.
 
 
First it was Ho, then it was Hugo, now it's Castro burning in the hottest ring of Dante's Inferno.
.
But is it possible, could it be that the shock and awe of Trump's election so traumatized the frail and ailing dictator that it completely shattered his heath and hastened his end? In other words, if Hillary were elected instead would Castro be alive today happy in the faith she'd be a soft-on-communism Barack Obama (and Jimmy Carter) all over again? Preposterous you say? Maybe. But before you dismiss this as fantasy consider this:
 
With so many Castro loving leftists in severe emotional and mental distress over Trump's electoral success (some ending up in therapy to cope with their Trump induced anxieties) it's not inconceivable that I'm making sense. That sicko Castro (with a twisted mind more ill than his flesh) suffered a jolting, psychosomatic (mind-body) reaction to Trump's victory on the 8th. And after 17 days of anxiety and stress, wearing down what was left of his health and strength, Castro dropping dead finally succumbed to the Trump Effect.
 
 
 
Still think it's unlikely that Trump becoming the 45th President had nothing to do with Castro's death? I can't prove the connection of course; but I have discovered what could be a sign indicating may be right.  For when Castro died late Friday night it was the 845th month of Donald Trump's life (see). That's "45" as in Trump's president's number. Was this a mere "coincidence?" I'll let you decide.
 
 
 18 days before Castro's death Cuban Americans celebrated Janet Reno's death (she died in Miami). Ironically, on that very day Trump was at a rally in Sarasota, Florida condemning Castro for his brutal dictatorship (see); then the following day Cuban  Americans massively voted for Trump helping him win Florida. 
 
Oh, and by the way, one other "coincidence" worth noting was Janet Reno dying 24 hours before Trump's election (anticipating his 2000 election-like victory, see). It was this idiot Attorney General, with Bill and Hillary's insane blessing, who sent little Elian Gonzalas back to Cuba to be a slave of Castro's despotic regime. If at the time Trump were President he would have kept Elian in the States; and he'd be a free man today making something good of his life and his mother's sacrificial death. But alas, Reno and the Clintons saw to it that her death was meaningless and in vain. Thank God for the Cuban people that Hillary lost the presidency to a real friend of liberty.     
Donald Trump speaks at the Cuban-American National Foundation (11/15/1999) warning against lifting sanctions on Castro; and predicting that if he becomes President he'll be greatest ever for the Cuban people and work for their liberation.
 
Now if Raul Castro and his clan misbehaves toward the US and continues his failed, evil, oppressive "Socialism or Death" regime that keeps his people in bondage and poverty President Trump will tear to shreds Obama's worthless one way deal that's worth billions to them; and return the relationship to the cold war days where it should have remained.  
 
VIVA CUBA LIBRE!
 
 
 
TRUMP'S TOUGH COUNTER-OBAMA STATEMENT ON CASTRO'S DEATH
 

"Today, the world marks the passing of a brutal dictator who oppressed his own people for nearly six decades. Fidel Castro's legacy is one of firing squads, theft, unimaginable suffering, poverty and the denial of fundamental human rights. While Cuba remains a totalitarian island, it is my hope that today marks a move away from the horrors endured for too long, and toward a future in which the wonderful Cuban people finally live in the freedom they so richly deserve.

Though the tragedies, deaths and pain caused by Fidel Castro cannot be erased, our administration will do all it can to ensure the Cuban people can finally begin their journey toward prosperity and liberty. I join the many Cuban-Americans who supported me so greatly in the presidential campaign, including the Brigade 2506 Veterans Association that endorsed me, with the hope of one day soon seeing a free Cuba." 

 
  
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

THE JILL STEIN (OR JILLARY) RECOUNT: AN EXERCISE IN DESPERATE, LAUGHABLE, ANTI-TRUMP FUTILITY

 
 

THE COMPREHENSIVE FLORIDA VOTE RECOUNT IN 2000

(by a consortium of eight major news orgs led by the NY Times) reconfirmed that George W. Bush was the winner-but with slightly less than the original 537 votes that won him the election. Trump's smallest number of votes in the battleground states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan (targets of the Stein recount) was in Michigan with approximately 11,000*.

*2,279,543 Donald J. Trump, Republican
2,268,839 Hillary Clinton, Democratic
 
 
Though Stein miserably failed to become the first woman president she's hoping against hope by some miracle she can make history and do that for poor      heartbroken Hillary. A desperate, self-serving attempt to find some kind of meaning in her idiotic third party presidential run. But what Stein's doing is giving us the treat of seeing Hillary defeated for a third time.
 

In other words, using the 2000 election model where the Republican victor lost the popular vote Jill Stein's multi-million dollar recount appears to be worse than a desperate, laughable, foolish exercise in anti-Trump futility-a huge waste of time and money hopelessly raising hopes to reverse the outcome of the election, and keep America on the tragic downward globalist course path of economic, military and geopolitical decline. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/12/us/examining-vote-overview-study-disputed-florida-ballots-finds-justices-did-not.html

 

AND IN OTHER NEWS

 

 
 20161124_Donald_Trump_Todd_Ricketts_Getty.jpg
 
Todd Ricketts, conservative co-owner of the world championship Cubs, whose upset, come from behind victory (on the 68th anniversary of Truman's upset defeat of Dewey) in "Progressive" Stadium next to where "Comeback King" Trump was made his party's nominee, is likely to have a key place in the new administration of champions.
 
It takes your breath away.
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 

TURNING #NOT MY PRESIDENT ON ITS HEAD-FOLLOWING THEIR LOGIC BARACK OBAMA IS AN ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT

 
 
 
United States presidential election, 2016
United States
2012 ←November 8, 2016→ 2020

538 members of the Electoral College
270 electoral votes needed to win
Turnout53.8%[1] Decrease 1.1 pp
 
Donald Trump August 19, 2015 3 by 2.jpg
Hillary Clinton by Gage Skidmore 2.jpg
NomineeDonald TrumpHillary Clinton 
PartyRepublicanDemocratic
Home stateNew YorkNew York
Running mateMike PenceTim Kaine
Projected electoral vote306[2]232[2]
States carried30 + ME-0220 + DC
Popular vote62,020,213[2]63,747,686[2]
Percentage47.08%48.15%
 
As Hillary Clinton continues to rack up more of the popular vote than media reviled Electoral College winner Donald Trump Michael Moore and millions of sore losing "Trump's not my president" Hillary fans believing they got royally screwed grow more strident and extreme in their hysterical rhetoric and rejection of Trump as the legitimate winner; and in the legitimacy of the Electoral College that gave him his astonishing victory.
 
 
In anti-Trump protests across the country that will converge in 60 days on Washington DC they complain that the Electoral College is an antiquated relic of the 18th century that should have been abolished long ago; that no other nation has such a system; that it's unfair, unsquare, unjust and undemocatic; that it doesn't truly represent the will and spirit of a democratic people; and that this can only be done by the popular vote.
 
 
 
Indeed, anti-Trumpers bitterly protest that if it weren't for the Electoral College Al Gore would have been the 43rd President, instead of the disastrous George W. Bush (see postscript); and Hillary would be the 45th President-elect, not the "inexperienced, menacing, unfit for command" Donald Trump-the anti-Bush Republican whose presidency will be "worse than Bush's" they warn. 
 
Fine. They've been robbed of two elections and aren't going to take it anymore. But let's do a thought experiment and test their idea of election justice. Let's accept the Trump haters' premise that the popular vote is the true, fair, just, moral, democratic vote-the only one that should count when choosing our presidents; and then let's rigorously apply it to the entire presidential election system including the primaries of both major parties. For how else, according to their views, could we have a truly, thoroughgoing democratic system? But here is where the anti-Trumpers are caught in a painful contradiction.
 
 
 
 
 
After winning the popular vote in the 2008 primaries but losing the delegate count (in a rigged process) a pissed off Hillary believing she was the real winner said in a TV interview: “I think we need to figure out how we can have a [primary] process that reflects the desire of the voters.”  
 
For if we apply the principle of the popular vote to the primary process it then means that the outcome of the 2008 Democratic primary (like this year's election) was invalid; that Barack Obama (like Donald Trump today) should not have won that race; that Hillary got screwed like she did on November 8th; and that she, not Obama, should be the 44th President finishing up her second term. For on June 7, 2008 when Hillary conceding defeat congratulated Obama on his victory she had 48% of the popular vote (like she has today) to Obama's 47% (like Trump has now). Indeed, Hillary beat Obama by 273,000 votes but had 294 fewer delegates; and that cost her the Democratic nomination and presidency.
 
In other words, Hillary was the real, true, just democratically elected victor of the 08 primary race; but  lost to Obama because of an antiquated delegate system (like the Electoral College) that should never have been, or abolished long ago.    
  
So why then does the legion of mad-as-hell Clinton voters who spurn Donald Trump as the legit President-elect accept Barack Obama as the 44th President when Hillary outvoted him in 2008 (and Obama gamed the system and stole the primary election, see)? It makes no sense. In all fairness to themselves and the nation all Clintonites should regard Obama's presidency as no more valid than Trump's. And if Hillary were the real winner in 2008, as they believe she should be today, what then? History would be very different now: Barack Obama, having defeated Donald Trump might now be President-elect and on his way to continuing Hillary's presidency and legacy. It's no fun being a Democrat these days.
 
POSTSCRIPT I
 
 
BTW, if the 2008 Democratic primary used the Electoral College system Hillary would have exceeded the 270 votes needed to win the election (see).
 
 
POSTSCRIPT II
 
AL GORE
 
 
Let us suppose that Al Gore who carried the popular vote 16 years ago won the election. What then? What difference would it have made? Not much. For the 9/11 attack which was five years in the planning (53 months under Bill Clinton) would have happened all the same (there was no actionable intel to stop it). Gore would have definitely ordered the invasion of Afghanistan, and possibly (though less likely) Iraq (see). The Great Recession and housing/credit crash would also have occurred bringing our economy close to ruin; for this was rooted in the reckless, affordable, subprime mortgage policies of the Clinton administration-the housing bubble started by Clinton (supported by Gore) to help the poor was unstoppable train wreck by the time Clinton left office (see and see).
 
 
What this means is that if President Gore had a second term he (like Bush) would have been blamed for the crash; and the public wanting change would have elected John McCain.
 
MEDIATE DEBATE
 
 
She didn't win the most delegates because the Clinton campaign neglected the caucuses, Tink Tink.
 
I know you can't answer the question that I posed without going to some lame inaccurate analogy which is what you guys do, but it's funny that whenever there is an issue that surrounds the rights of minorities conservatives always use the argument that they are just a tiny sliver of the population and why should society change for them.
 
Just face the facts--Senate Republicans represent fewer people than do Senate Democrats. House Republicans represent fewer people than do House Democrats but it can't last forever.
 
Trump will be the second Republican president in 16 years to take office after losing the popular vote.
 
Think about that.
 
The Republican party is dying and it's grasping at every straw to remain relevant.
 
 
LOL!!! The analogy, in reality, is strong! Hillary lost the race because she neglected to campaign as hard as Trump-especially in the rust belt states as hubby Bill urged her to do. From August 1st to Nov. 7th Trump held an astonishing 100 rallies (sometimes four a day) to Hillary's less than 50. Why so few? Trump nailed it when said over and over: "She's lacking in energy, stamina and strength."
 
In an NBC interview last year Hillary said, and I quote, "I find campaigning incredibly exhausting (see)." And indeed she did. After the second debate Hillary was so fatigued (worn down by Trump's alleged "stalking") she couldn't make it unaided to her car. Hell, if sick, low energy Hillary had campaigned as hard as her tireless, indefatigable, Herculean foe she would have collapsed from extreme fatigue and finished up the race in a hospital bed. Remember on 9/11 when she fainted from a mere 77 degrees heat? Or were allergies the cause, or pneumonia, or the flu?
 
The true state of Hillary's health is still a closely guarded secret. But what's clear from her poorly run campaign is that she wasn't physically fit for the presidency. Her four years at State knocking herself out traveling around the world took its toll on her health. In fact, in 2010 she told Esquire Magazine that she found her job at State too exhausting, and she couldn't endure a second term (see).  
 
If the Great Depression didn't bury the Republican party then nothing will; and it will probably outlive the Democrat party. The GOP is here to stay and is undergoing a radical transformation under the leadership our unpredictable, gravity defying, pragmatic President-elect. Your predictions about Trump's disastrous candidacy crashing and burying the GOP is prelude to his triumphant presidency.
 
THE 2008 MICHIGAN VOTE
 
 
Obama won more total votes than Clinton in the contests where they both appeared on the ballot. Clinton won the popular vote only if you count votes from Michigan, where  Obama’s name did not appear on the ballot.
 
Any way you cut it, the candidates’ vote totals are within less than 1 percent of each other. Both candidates got roughly 18 million votes, but since four states don’t list official counts, the precise totals can’t be known.
 
So your links claim; "In other words, Hillary was the real, true, justly democratically elected victor of the 08 primary race" is a LIE!
 
 
So we're agreed that when Michigan is included Clinton won the popular vote over Obama in 08. Unless you can prove that Clinton was somehow responsible for Obama's exclusion from the Michigan ballot then Hillary, as she believed and publicly stated, won the popular vote.
 
Nevertheless, "Uncommitted" was on the Michigan ballot and was outvoted by Hillary 328,309 to 238,168 thus making her the clear, decisive winner.
 
Moreover, if the 2008 Democrat primary used the Electoral College system to decide the winner Clinton would have defeated Obama.
 
 
And lastly, in 2008 Obama provably gamed the delegate system and stole the election from Clinton. 
 
 
No wonder Hillary wished that Obama share the fate of Bobby Kennedy and be shot dead.
  
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 

BREAKING: TRUMP’S PLAN TO AVENGE HIMSELF ON HAMILTON CAST

 

 
 REPLACING HAMILTON WITH TRUMP CAN EASILY BE DONE
An 1862 act of Congress gives the secretary of the Treasury near-complete authority over the design and printing of paper currency (including the portrait), while Congress retains the power of coinage under the Constitution.
 
UPDATE
 
I have it on the good authority of a Trump insider that the very first act of his first 100 days President Trump will sign an executive order instructing his Treasury Secretary to replace Hamilton's portrait on the $10 bill with his own. And he'll be sending the very first Trump bill that rolls off the press to actor Brandon Victor Dixon-who plays Hamilton's killer Vice President Aaron Burr.

 
The question then is this:  when the Trump bills are printed will #BoycottTrump add it to their list of Trump things to boycott? Will they call on BoycottTrumpers not to carry or handle the new $10 Trump bills whenever possible?
 
 
Will we then see an epidemic of Trump haters burning Trump bills at anti-Trump rallies? And will President Trump retaliate by putting his portrait on all our currency? Coins included? No? Bet you $10 he would.
 
 
RELATED 
 
 
 

WHY TRUMP PICKING ROMNEY AS SEC. OF STATE WOULD BE BRILLIANT!

 

 
 
It's completely counter-intuitive and inconceivable that Donald Trump should even consider arch-Never Trumper Mitt Romney for the exalted cabinet post of Secretary of State. After Romney viciously attacked Trump calling him a "fraud and phony who lacked the temperament and judgment for the presidency," and who half voted for Hillary by voting for Gary Johnson, no way that Trump would reward him with so much power when others like John Bolton and Ruddy Giuliani are more deserving. Surely when Trump met with Romney yesterday it was for the sake of party unity; and as a grateful gesture to the governor for being quick to congratulate him on his historic victory (that he never thought possible).
 
 
But making the 69-year-old Governor Romney (from Massachusetts) America's 69th  Secretary of State (following former Massachusetts Senator Kerry) is unthinkable. Or is it? Is the unpredictable, shocking Donald Trump planning to shock the world again and outrage many hard-core anti-establishment followers by making insider, status quo Romney our nation's top diplomat? If so, why? How could that benefit Trump's "Make America Great Again," "Peace Through Strength" foreign policy?
 
 
This is how:  it would send a clear, ringing, unmistakable message to Trump's foreign policy critics that they are dead wrong about him: that he's not "Vladimir Putin's (or anyone's) puppet." For Trump would have picked for Secretary of State the hawkish 2012 GOP presidential candidate who warned Barack Obama in stark, cold war terms that Putin was America's geostrategic enemy number one; that he was a tough, fanatically committed, Russia first neo-imperialist hell-bent on making his country great again at America's expense; that Obama's naïve, butt kissing, reset appeasement policy to moderate and win over Putin was doomed to fail; and would only serve to embolden him to aggression and conquest.  And look what's happened since: Ukraine, Crimea, Syria, Snowden, deployment of nuclear capable missiles near the Russian-Polish border; Russian Syria-bound warplanes taking off from Iran; constant buzzing of American warships; Turkey's Erdogen (a NATO member) virtually begging Putin's forgiveness for shooting down a Russian military jet, etc.-this outraged Obama. 
 
 
Turkey's Erdogen with Putin trying to lift Russian sanctions on his country over downed Russian jet.
 
Hapless, feckless, pushover Obama has been the greatest enabler of post-Soviet Russian power of any US President. Putin has played Obama like a fiddle as American foreign policy burned. And Romney having nailed it has the credibility of being a realist on Putin and his strategic aims. And that would signal that Trump has no illusions about America's most powerful and determined foreign adversary.
 
Now I'm not predicting that Trump will do the seemingly unlikely thing of choosing Romney for State. So far he's been rewarding loyalists with key positions. I am however saying that if he does give Romney State it will be a brilliant and praiseworthy move that will strengthen party unity, show he's not surrounding himself with yes men and sychophants, silence his Democrat and media critics, and tell Mr. Putin: 'I'm Barack Obama's kick ass polar opposite and admirer of George Patton (a realist about Soviet post-war intentions); and I intend to play hard ball with you.'
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

STEVE BANNON’S CLIMATE CHANGE DENIALISM PROVES HE’S THE ULTIMATE, EVIL, TERRIFYING NAZI WE FEARED (SARCASM)

 

 
 
 
 

It's worse than we thought. Bannon's vicious attacks over the years on climate scientists, and AGW apostle Pope Francis, and denial of catastrophic global warming, makes him and his denialist ("AGW is a hoax") boss potentially more evil, dangerous and deadly than a thousand Adolf Hitlers and Joseph Goebbles. I'm not exaggerating! It was one thing for Hitler to kill millions of Jews, Gypsies and other innocents in death camps; its quite another thing to deny the settled, proven, certain science that's telling us that man's industrial CO2 emissions (soaring in third world countries) is catastrophically heating and imperiling the planet and putting all life at risk.

 

 

Indeed, Trump and Bannon hell-bent on satanically trashing Obama's doomsday, messianic driven green energy agenda and reversing his gains in cutting CO2 emissions, will be increasing the domestic production and burning of dirty, filthy, polluting fossil fuels-just to put a few rust belt rednecks back to work. It's insane! In true Nazi genocidal fashion this will trigger an intense, devastating, runaway greenhouse effect that will transform our hapless Earth into one vast apocalyptic gas chamber and smoking crematorium killing billions. Indeed, (like nearby hellish carbon rich Venus) the extreme, infernal, scorching oven like heat could make Earth uninhabitable for ages. You can't get anymore monstrous than this. 

 

Unless they're stopped Trump and Bannon will dig us straight into hell!

The incoming Trump/Bannon anti-science denial regime is a horrific sign that the Warmunist movement is doomed; that Obama was its last best hope and hurrah; and that outcast climate change nihilists like Guy McPherson got it right: "All is lost. Industrial-Capitalism has won.  We have reached the tipping point of no return in carbon pollution, and are living in the End Times of Planet Earth (see)."

The Fate of the Earth after eight polluting years of the monstrous Category Ten Trump/Bannon Regime. 

If you still don't comprehend the peril we're in

then read this alarming

news

 

THE COMING US AND GLOBAL COAL BOOM

 

 
 
 
 
To grasp the magnitude of the US coal industry's coming rebirth and resurrection I suggest you read the above Forbes article. It's about the reversal of Obama's insane global financing policies for non-renewable (fossil fuel) energy projects in third world countries. Our crackpot president believes that it is better for the world if hundreds and millions of poor people live in pre-modern times  without electricity than to use coal and gas to bring them into the modern age. So much for Obama's humanitarian concern for the poor. His mentally deranged policies are about to radically change.
 
RELATED

 

 
 
 

 

 
 
 
< p style="box-sizing: border-box; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; text-transform: none; color: #2a2e2e; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; margin: 0px 0px 15px; widows: 1; letter-spacing: normal; text-indent: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: center;"> 

MEDIA MATTERS DEBATE ON TRUMP AND THE JEWS, STEVE BANNON’S ALLEGED ANTI-SEMITISM AND THE PROPHET MOHAMMED’S VIOLENT JEW HATRED

 

Steve Bannon A White Nationalist Who "Hates Jews" Will Be Trump's Right-Hand Man In The White House · Media Matters ·

I posted a link to my blog on MM about Donald Trump, Steve Bannon and the Jews; and it triggered the following lively debate
 
 

DONALD TRUMP AND THE JEWS, AND WHAT KLANSMEN, NEO-NAZIS AND RADICAL MOSLEMS TRULY THINK OF HIM  

And, by the way, if the Moslem world were "anti-semitic" like Steve Bannon it would, as does pro-Zionist Bannon , accept Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state, and be at peace with it. And if Bannon is a "Jew hater," and thinks that Jews are an evil race, than why is he joining the pro-Israel, Jew friendly Trump Administration headed by a man who allowed his son and daughter to marry Jews? What "Jew hater" would do that?  Indeed, whoever heard of a pro-Zionist anti-Semite? There's no such animal.

http://www.apollospeaks.com/?p=20326

 

 

classicalmusiclover ApolloSpeaks  

Idiot troll thinks he is smart when he "substantiates" his claims with his own opinion blog.

Keeping walking, folks. Nothing to see here.

 

 

ApolloSpeaks  classicalmusiclover 

 

The "J" in Donald J. Trump stands for "Jew lover."

 

 

 classicalmusiclover 

 

The topic of the article is Steve Bannon. Bannon is no "Jew lover."

Your blog post mindlessly and incoherently repeats anti-Jewish and neo-Nazi memes from anti-Semitic white nationalists, including some that are anti-Trump. Yet, every well-known anti-Semitic organization still endorsed Trump. The phrase "Jew lover" is a phrase only used by anti-Semites.

In the past you have claimed to be an agnostic Jew. Were you lying?

 

ApolloSpeaks   classicalmusiclover

 

I'm a Jew loving Jew. When Judeophile Donald Trump is sworn into office he will be the closest thing this country ever had to a Jewish President.  This is too funny. You're an atheist  masquerading as a Presbyterian and call me an "agnostic Jew." Did you forget our

 little debate on Karen Armstrong and how I defended her belief in God and high regard for the Neo-Platonist Plotinus, a  mystical philosopher? Did you forget that I'm a Platonist? Was Plato

 agnostic? Then how can I be?

 

 

classicalmusiclover  ApolloSpeaks   

 

Unlike Karen Armstrong, you reject Islam as a legitimate religion the overwhelming majority of whose practitioners are peaceful.

 

Unlike Karen Armstrong, you are unable to distinguish violent extremists who violate religious tenets from people who actually follow the religion.

 

Unlike Karen Armstrong, you are unable to distinguish between science and religion.

 

 

Was Islam's founder the Prophet Mohammed a peaceful Gandhi like practitioner of Islam like Armstrong says? Or was he a violent, murdering, bloodthirsty, power mad, Jew hating, genocidal extremist nut?

  

 

Are you capable of anything other than simpleminded binary thinking? Apparently not! Mohammed included Jews and Christians among his allies, and the Koran describes them as cherished people of the Book. Indeed, Moses, Jesus, and Mary are all presented as Holy Prophets.

 

You seem to think you can cite Armstrong as an authority in one sentence then trash her as an idiot the next--by paraphrasing her ludicrously out of context.

 

 

 

 

When Mohammed and his followers migrated to Medina there was a thriving Jewish community divided into three prosperous tribes. When Mohammed died the only Jews left in that city were converts and slaves.

 

What happened in between was horrific pitiless, mass murdering genocide and ethnic cleansing. In short, Mohammed was no "Jew lover" or peace-loving, 7th century Mahatma Gandhi. If anything he was a 7th century predatory, Jew murdering Adolf Hitler-as Hitler was a 20th century predatory, Jew murdering Mohammed.

 

No wonder that Hitler is revered as the most popular infidel historical figure in the Moslem world today. What Hitler did to six million Jews in his death camps the vast majority of Moslems would like to do to Israel: turn it into one giant crematoria, burning every last Israeli Jew to death.

 

classicalmusiclover  ApolloSpeaks    

 

It's cute how you leave out all the details in between.

In the medieval Islamic world, Jews were allowed to live their lives free of harassment. In the medieval Christian world of the West, they were ghettoized and exterminated, blamed for the plague, and attacked in the name of the Crusades.

 

 

Mohammed tried to convert the Median Jews, failed, turned against them and pushed them into a desperate alliance with the Meccans- whose caravans Mohammed and his thieving, murdering, marauding jihadis were criminally plundering for loot.

 

In medieval times as long as infidel Jews paid the exorbitant, discriminatory, racist jizya (poll) tax (a criminal mafia like protection racket) they could hopefully live in relative peace as third class citizens in oppressive Moslem states. The only way for Jewish unbelievers to escape the punishing racist jizya was conversion.

 

classicalmusiclover  ApolloSpeaks

 

We've gone off topic. Tell me when will Donald Trump fire anti-Semite Steve Bannon?

 

  

 

Why would Trump fire a brilliant campaign strategist who was instrumental in getting him elected because lying, losing, pathetic morons like you (with zero hard evidence) slander him as being a Jew hater? Trump couldn't give a deuce what sore losing leftists thinks or says about Bannon. Trump is right about Bannon being as much of a

Judeophile as he is.

 

Bannon is a proven, pro-Zionist, Christian friend of Jewish Israel; and best friend of the very Jewish Andrew Breitbart when he was alive.

 

"Breitbart was born in Los Angeles, California, on February 1, 1969.[10] He was the adopted son of Gerald and Arlene Breitbart, a restaurant owner and banker respectively, and grew up in the affluent suburb of Brentwood, Los Angeles. He was raised Jewish; his adoptive mother had converted to Judaism when marrying his adoptive father.[11][12] He attended Hebrew school and had a bar mitzvah.[13]"

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

 

In short, there isn't an anti-semitic bone in Bannon's Jew loving body. If it were otherwise Breitbart wouldn't have had a bromance with him up until his death.     

 

 

Your ineptitude at selectively reading Wikipedia articles is once again fully on display.

 

So, Breitbart being Jewish means that none of the anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist memes and articles that Steve Bannon has willingly published is actually anti-Semitic or anti-Zionist?

 

The only question is: why are you so proud of your ignorance?

 

 

Hey, Trump-Bannon-Breitbart derangement nut. Where are these anti-Semitic articles? I've yet to see one from you? If Steve Bannon had a grain of Jew hatred in him Ivanka Trump and her Orthodox Jewish husband (they take Judaism very seriously) wouldn't have tolerated his position as CEO of the Trump campaign.

 

If this article debunking Bannon's Jew hatred doesn't enlighten your stupidity and ignorance (there's a stronger case for Obama being anti-sematic) nothing will.

 

https://spectator.org/the-smea...

 

 

Jeffrey Lord?

 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

Plutarchus  classicalmusiclover 

 

Good lord where does Lord go wrong?

 

 

 

 

From the moment he tries to discredit the historical parallels between the rise of Nazism and Trumpism.

 

Lord's argumentation is garbled and incoherent, rooted in self-serving ignorance. It's also pure opinion and allegation that tries to erase the demonstrable anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism of Breitbart's record of articles and headlines.

 

But I know why you look up to Lord as an intellectual thought leader: you agree with him and admire someone who is smarter than you are.

 

 

There are no valid parallels to the rise of Nazism in Germany and the populist Trump movement in America. For example anti-semitic violence from the start characterized the rise of Nazism in Germany. Jews were harnessed, beaten and terrorized by Nazi thugs in the streets of Munich, Berlin and elsewhere. Synagogues and Jewish shops were broken into, robbed and vandalized. Where are the parallels to the political rise of Donald Trump? Where is the Trump inspired anti-semitic violence sweeping over America? Or violence directed at any minority? 

 

Then there was Hitler's totalitarianism: his plan to centralize all political and economic power in a one party Nazi state headed by an all-powerful autocrat. Where are the parallels to Trump? His Jewish economic advisers (Larry Kudlow and Steve Moore) in fact are planning the very opposite of a Nazi-like command and control economy  where corporate heads are compelled by fear of imprisonment or death to serve the state and its interests. Slashing taxes, spending and federal regulations-shrinking the overbearing size, scope and reach of the federal government with its runaway deficit spending and debt driving the nation to bankuptcy (as Hitler was doing to Germany) is the opposite of Nazi economic policy.   In short, Trump's plan to balance the federal budget and decentralize Washington power (returning more of it to individuals, corporations and states) doesn't in the slightest parallel the rise of authoritarian fascist Nazism in Germany.

 

 You, my friend, with your Trump-Nazi comparisons, are a lying, slanderous, two-bit, partisan, anti-Trump political hack part of a colossally failed effort to demonize Trump into catastrophic defeat. Better luck next time.

 

 

 You are a simple-minded solipsist troll who is incapable of transcending binary thought patterns, or arguing without indulging the most ludicrous logical fallacies.

 

 

I love you too.  

 

POSTSCRIPT

 

 

 

 

Stop Bannon Protest Los Angeles (Joel Pollak / Breitbart News)

 

Why did ZOA invite Steve Bannon to its gala? Because he's a true, trusted, proven, loyal friend of the Jewish state of Israel.

That's why! As I said above, "There's no such animal as an anti-Semitic Zionist."

 

 

 

RELATED

 

ANTI-ZIONIST CLINTONS HONOR ISRAEL HATING WIFE OF PALESTINIAN TERRORIST WHO TEACHES NON-VIOLENT APPROACH TO DESTROYING JEWISH

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

11/9 ANTI-TRUMP HYSTERIA ENGULFS THE LEFT WHEN 11/9 IS 9/11 REVERSE

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Minhaj: Muslims Were Blamed for 9/11 and Now White America Will Be Blamed for 11/9 -- Vulture 

Donald Trump's earthquake election on the 9th day of November "11/9" is not the worst, most devastating 9/11 event since the collapse of the Twin Towers into a hellish pile of destruction and death. It is not the end of the world all over again as many hysterical, psyched out loons believe on the nauseating, violent, Trump hating left.

 
 

Absolutely to the contrary! Just as the numbers 1-1-9 are 9-1-1 reverse so is the odds defying historic day of Trump's astonishing victory on 11/9 the infamous, deadly, horrific day of 9/11 REVERSE. Conflating the two dates  like terrified, lunatic doomsday leftists are doing (and jubilant, radical anti-American Moslems) is just plain insane. Truth is Donald Trump becoming the 19th Republican to be President on 11/9 is logically, mathematically and symbolically the exact polar opposite to Osama bin Laden and the colossal destruction caused by his 19 jihadis on 9/11. Just compare what al Qaida did on 9/11 and in its history leading up it to Trump's history as a billionaire real estate developer. It's sobering. On 9/11 al-Qaida destroyed the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, two of the world's great skyscrapers, killing 3000 Americans at a cost of trillions; while prior to 11/9 Donald Trump built some of the world's great, tallest and most beautiful skyscrapers enriching and benefiting communities and cities across this land. 

Moveover, where on 9/11 al-Qaida also attacked the Pentagon in Washington DC killing 123, within earshot of that building Trump transformed the old post office pavilion into a great, opulent, luxury hotel providing jobs for hundreds. In short, al-Qaida are great destroyers, Trump's a great creator. There's no comparison.

In other words,

11/9 IS 9/11 REVERSE, STUPID!

 
 
 
View of Upper West Side Trump Skyscapers from the Hudson River.
 
 
 Trump Skyscrapers in South Florida and Chicago.
 
 

 And joining the freaked out chorus of delusional, frightened, doomsday Trump haters are (wouldn't you know it) ISIS, al-Qaida and violent, bloodthirsty jihadists everywhere. But unlike the terrified, mentally ill left these Moslems from hell are ecstatic about this week's election event. For after praying to Allah and consulting their Korans they've concluded that 11/9 is a blessing and God send; that it's a certain sign of divine intervention; that what al-Qaida began on 9/11, the defeat, downfall and destruction of the US, will be completed by Trump in the years ahead.

11/9 for them is an infallible sign that President Trump, whether he knows it or not, is an agent of Allah's imperial designs; that Allah is raising Trump to the presidency to bring down this country; to accomplish for Islam what jihadis tried and failed to do since 9/11. But here too the very opposite is true. What 11/9 is to 9/11 numerically (its opposite) Trump is to the horde of deadly Islamic jihadists. Just as 9/11 means to them a great jihadist victory then 11/9 (9/11 reversed) is symbolic of COUNTER-JIHAD. Indeed, Trump's threat to "bomb the hell out of 'em" should be taken seriously. For Trump (who honors Pershing, Patton and McArthur) "there's no substitute for victory." Unlike Obama and his world ending global warming fantasies Trump will give the defeat of jihad topmost priority. And as Trump has triumphed over every seeming insurmountable obstacle to win the presidency so will he use his great strength, stamina and energy to crush our jihadist enemies and turn 9/11 into a day they will greatly regret.

 
 

 Every negative prediction by anti-Trumpers on the right and left-that he'd not be the GOP nominee, that the gropper tape would finish him and he'd lose to lying crooked Hillary-have failed dismally. But learning nothing from these failures the left is at it again prophetically     warning that Trump's presidency will be a 9/11-like catastrophe that's beyond imagining. But "11/9," the date of Trump's election victory, suggests they have it wrong again; and after eight exciting, inventive, productive years of a glorious Trump presidency the only 9/11 they will see is the demise of their political creed. And that will be Trump's greatest victory.

 

POSTSCRIPT
(11-12-16)
 
 
"Likewise, the era that began abruptly on September 11, 2001, with the unprovoked onslaught of blood thirsty Muslims on one of the cultural jewels of Western society, culminated in the West finally getting the message, about 15 years later, on November 9, 2016, realizing there were dangerous beasts out there that needed to be put down, and, seeing that the traditional political leadership was not prepared to carry out the mission, picked a leader."
 

SOME OF MY MANY UNCANNY PREDICTIONS OF DONALD TRUMP'S UNLIKELY ELECTION VICTORY AND HILLARY CLINTON'S UNLIKELY DEFEAT 

Donald-Trump-wins-graphic.jpg

DONALD TRUMPOLEON: IS HE FATED TO DEFEAT HIS GOP RIVALS, CRUSH HILLARY (?) AND CONQUER THE WHITE HOUSE? 

DONALD TRUMP, THE CHAMPION CHICAGO CUBS AND THE YEAR OF THE UNDERDOG

DONALD TRUMP, HILLARY CLINTON AND THE HISTORY OF SAME STATE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES 

THE DEATH OF JANET RENO AND TOMORROW’S HISTORIC PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

IS HILLARY CLINTON UNDER A GEORGE MCGOVERN “CURSE?” WILL 2016 BE 1972 FOR HILLARY? 

DONALD TRUMP: THE “COMEBACK KING” OF THE CLINTON ERA REVERSES HIS FORTUNES AGAINST THE CLINTON MACHINE?

COULD THE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION AT THE WELLS FARGO CENTER PREFIGURE HILLARY’S DEFEAT DUE TO SCANDALS?

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
< p style="text-align: center;"> 

TRUMPQUAKE!!! WASHINGTON, WALL STREET, ISLAMISTS TREMBLE

 

 

     DONALD "THE BARBARIAN" TRUMP (HERCULES UNCHAINED) STORMED THE RAMPARTS OF OBAMASTAN
 
 
 
smashed through its iron gates and will soon be dismantling Obamunism, catastrophic doomsday warmunism, crony special interest capitalism, one way free trade globalism, greedy, self-serving Wall Street banksterism, anti-Judeo-Christian traditionalism, lying, truth hating, political correctnessism, illegal, open borders, one world immigrationism, softness in fighting radical Islamic extremism and he'll decimate    partisan, politicized media corruptionism. 
 
 
But, above all, Trump will clean out the Augean Stables ("drain the swamp") of Washington, stay the course, wrong direction status quoism reversing our country's economic, military and geopolitical decline - a huge Herculean undertaking that Trump provenly has the stamina, energy, strength and will power for.
 
 
Trump is an indefatigable force of nature. Clinton a spent force of exhausted, bankrupt liberalism. 
 
On January 20, 2017 this providential, patriotic, larger than life man will be sworn in as our Disruptor and Wrecking Ball-in-Chief to make America, and its forgotten, racially mixed working class majority, strong, prosperous and great again.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATINOS FOR TRUMP: THE MACHO FACTOR AND ELECTION UPDATES

 

 

LATINOS FOR TRUMP!

MAKE AMERICA MACHO AGAIN!

 

 

 

NEW EXIT POLL SHOWS AMERICANS WANT STRONG (MACHO) LEADER MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE

That could mean Trump winning far more support from Latino Americans than expected.

https://morningconsult.com/2016/11/08/voters-want-strong-leader-anything-else-exit-poll-shows/

 

 

 

DONALD TRUMP AND THE JEWS, AND WHAT KLANSMEN, NEO-NAZIS AND RADICAL MOSLEMS TRULY THINK OF HIM

 
 
 
If Neo-Nazi, Klu Klux Klansman Donald Trump is elected President the first four evil things he will do are the following: 1. break off diplomatic relations with Israel; 2. issue a statement denying the Holocaust was real; 3. shut down the Holocaust Museum in Washington; and 4. sign a secret executive order to revive Hitler's Final Solution and send every American Jew (including his Jewish family members) to death camps for extermination./sarc
 
 
Seriously people. Taken to its logical conclusion what else can "We've seen it all before" mean? 

 

 
 
 

NO WAY THIS MORON IS A TRUE TRUMP SUPPORTER!

Truth is Donald Trump loves Jews. He loves the Jewishness of his Jewish daughter; the Jewishness of his Jewish son-in-law; the Jewishness of his Jewish daughter-in-law; the Jewishness of his Jewish grandchildren. And above all, he loves the Jewishness of the Jewish state of Israel.

As for the Jews in the media who support Hillary and continually lie about Trump he knows that most if not all true, pro-Israel, American Jews (what's left of them) support him.

 

 

Former Ku Klux Klan Leader David Duke Claims Jews “Dominate Our Media” During Louisiana Senate Debate · Media Matters

 

HEY MR. DUKE, JEWS SEEM TO DOMINATE THE TRUMP FAMILY, THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION AND TRUMP'S PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN

Could it be that Donald Trump is a crypto Jew as some Klansmen, Neo-Nazis and radical Moslems believe? That he secretly converted to Judaism when daughter Ivanka became a Jew, and underwent ritual circumcision? Is he now fully Judaized?  Perhaps not. But the following is what Jew hating Klansmen, Neo-Nazis and radical Moslems really think of Donald Trump.    

The "J" in Donald J. Trump stands for JEW.

 
Though not Jewish Trump if elected President will be the closest thing to a Jew ever to occupy the White House.
 
THIS PROUD JEW PROUDLY STANDS WITH DONALD J. TRUMP!
RESET US/ISRAELI RELATIONS
FROM THE SETBACK OF THE OBAMA/CLINTON YEARS
AND MAKE THIS RELATIONSHIP GREAT AGAIN
TRUMP-PENCE 2016  

UPDATE (11-9-16)

Trump invites Netanyahu to the US at 'the first possible opportunity' just hours after the Israeli PM called the president-elect a 'true friend'- Daily Mail

Looks like Bibi Netanyahu will be the first world leader to meet with the President Elect, or just after he's sworn in.
POSTSCRIPT
 
 
 
 
cpusa-trump

KLAN ENDORSES TRUMP, COMMUNISTS ENDORSE CLINTON

When it comes to mass murder and crimes against humanity Communists with their systematic killing of tens of millions of people worldwide make Klansmen look like Chicago street thugs. But while the Klan today is an empty shell of its former horrific self Communist regimes in North Korea and Cuba (backed by the Communist Party USA) continue to kill, terrorize and imprison their people and threaten their neighbors with subversion, aggression and war.

 

 

Trump condemned the Klan endorsement as "repulsive." Hillary has yet to denounce her endorsement by the Communist Party USA. But why should she? Progressive leftist that she is Clinton believes that the hearts of Marx, Lenin and Mao were morally in the right place. They put "people and planet before profits (look at the booming economies of Cuba and N. Korea);" and believe in the BIG LIE of  statism that

GOVERNMENT IS THE ANSWER.

 

 

 
 
 


THE DEATH OF JANET RENO AND TOMORROW’S HISTORIC PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

 
 
 
 
Janet Reno, the nation's 78th Attorney General under Bill Clinton, and first woman to hold that office, died this morning at age 78 at her home in Miami. A long time friend of Hillary's Reno died just 24 hours before she'd know the political fate of her friend: whether she'd be elected the first female US President? Or be defeated by macho billionaire businessman Donald Trump?
 
 
 
 
The question is this: is Reno's sudden death by Parkinsons (a disease some suspect is afflicting Hillary) an auspicious sign for the Democratic nominee? Does Reno breaking the glass ceiling at the Justice Department herald Hillary doing the same for the Presidency? And that her death prophetically signaled Trump going down in defeat?  Or is Reno's death ominous of failure and political death for Hillary? Ominous like several other deaths suggest? Deaths like FDR and George McGovern? For Hillary launched her presidential campaign on the 70th anniversary of FDR's death* (she wants to be the female FDR see). And when her friend George McGovern died in October 2012 (shortly after the Benghazi raid) he was laid to rest on her 65th birthday (see).
 
*April 12, 2015. FDR died April 12, 1945.
 
 
 
 
My guess is that Janet Reno's sudden death today falling just short of tomorrow's election is a sign of failure and defeat for Hillary; that she will just fall short of winning in what perhaps will be a very close race. Why do I say this?  Because Reno was a native of Florida; and today November 7th is ominously for Hillary the 16th anniversary of the 2000 presidential race*where Republican George Bush beat Clinton backed Democrat Al Gore in a contest that went all the way to the Supreme Court and was decided in RENO'S HOME STATE.    
 
*It is also the 44th anniversary of the 1972 presidential race when Nixon decimated George McGovern. 
 
 
 
 
Now with Hillary and Trump running neck and neck in Florida (a key battle ground state) it could very well be that Reno's death this morning in Florida on the anniversary of the 2000 race prophetically anticipates the outcome of tomorrow's election. That the election of 16 years ago today (an auspicious political number for Trump,  see) is a model for the 2016 race. It could very well be that Florida once again in a nail bitter will decide tomorrow's winner and loser.
 
 
 
After years of estrangement Hillary campaigning with Al Gore in Miami. Gore warned the crowd against the upcoming election turning out like 2000 (see). 
 
In other words, Hillary like Gore could win the popular vote and Trump like Bush the electoral vote because of Florida again (Trump's second home). Or will some other one state decide the outcome, like Ohio did in 2004? Tomorrow we shall see if Reno's death in some sense has any relevance as a providential sign prefiguring a Trump victory.
 

THE FDR-NEW YORK FACTOR

Now if Donald Trump wins election in a close race, as I believe he will, he'll be the 7th New Yorker to be President after FDR-whose 84th anniversary of his victory over Hoover is tomorrow November 8th. And here too Janet Reno seems relevant. For she was born on July 21, 1938 during the Roosevelt Era (see). And amazingly she celebrated her 78th birthday on the very day Donald Trump gave his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention (see).  It would seem this is a sign that native New Yorker Donald Trump, not Chicago born Hillary, will be the 7th New Yorker after FDR to be President. 

 

RENO IS NARROWLY DEFEATED IN GOVERNOR'S PRIMARY RACE

 
 
Speaking of razor close elections it is fascinating to note that in 2002 Reno ran in the Democratic primary for governor of Florida ultimately hoping to unseat Jeb Bush. But she lost in a squeaker to her rival Bill McBride 44% to 44.4%. There were voting problems in the election, and Reno didn't concede defeat until a week later. 
 
 
Is this what lies in store for us tomorrow and in the days and weeks ahead? Post-election uncertainty and chaos like we had in 2000? With Trump or Clinton finding fault with the results and taking aggressive legal action to remedy it (Reno was a lawyer)? With the nation once again in political turmoil? Or if Hillary should win, which I strongly doubt, is Reno dying today a sign of legal and criminal problems plaguing a Hillary presidency? Problems stemming from her emails or corruption at her foundation or God knows what (see)? My gut tells me that regardless of tomorrow's outcome there will be much discontent and unrest on both sides. If that should happen hopefully things won't get too out of hand.
 
UPDATE
(11-9)
 
 INCREDIBLE! 
 
Similar to 2000 Trump took Florida in a squeaker; and like Bush lost the popular vote but won the electoral college.
 
RELATED
 
 

HILLARY CLINTON ANNOUNCES CANDIDACY FOR PRESIDENT ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF FDR’S DEATH. DOES THIS SIGNAL HER SUCCESS OR DEFEAT? 

IS HILLARY CLINTON UNDER A GEORGE MCGOVERN “CURSE?” WILL 2016 BE 1972 FOR HILLARY?

COULD THE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION AT THE WELLS FARGO CENTER PREFIGURE HILLARY’S DEFEAT DUE TO SCANDALS?

WHILE CLINTON-GORE BOMB OUT IN FLORIDA CLIMATE CHANGE MILLENNIALS RALLY TRUMP RALLY SOARS UP STATE

DONALD TRUMP, THE CHAMPION CHICAGO CUBS AND THE YEAR OF THE UNDERDOG

DONALD TRUMP, THE MAGNIFICIENT 7 AND THE AMAZING SIGN I SAW WHICH MIGHT SIGNAL A TRUMP VICTORY

DONALD TRUMP, HILLARY CLINTON AND THE HISTORY OF SAME STATE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES 

DONALD TRUMP: THE “COMEBACK KING” OF THE CLINTON ERA REVERSES HIS FORTUNES AGAINST THE CLINTON MACHINE?

 
 
 
 
 

DONALD TRUMP, THE CHAMPION CHICAGO CUBS AND THE YEAR OF THE UNDERDOG

 

 

The Chicago Cubs in one of the greatest most memorable World Series ever played came back from a 3-1 deficit (making them the likely to lose underdogs) to defeat the Cleveland Indians 8-7 in the tenth inning of game 7. Of the 112 World Series played since 1903*the odds defying underdog Cubs were only the 7th** team in baseball history to achieve this amazing feat.

*There was no World Series in 1904 due to a boycott.

**1903 Boston Americans (Red Sox), down 1-3, won the World Series 5-3 over Pittsburgh (best of nine format see). 

 

 

 President Harry Truman at the opening game of the 1948 World Series.

As I wrote HERE the last time the defeated Indians were world champs was in the politically momentous year 1948-momentous because underdog, "give em hell" Harry Truman defeated favored-to-win New York Governor Tom Dewey after criss crossing the nation rallying the electorate to support him. Incredibly, Tuesday, November 2nd was the 68th anniversary of Truman's surprise, inconceivable 1948 victory (see).

 

 

Moreover, and amazingly, Tuesday was also the 2nd anniversary of Tampa Rays' manager Joe Maddon leaving the Rays and becoming the Cubs 60th skipper*. What a gift the baseball gods gave to this great sportsman. It couldn't happen to a nicer, finer, more deserving human being.

* On November 3, 2014 the Cubs officially announced that Maddon would be their new manager after signing a five-year $25 million contract the day before (see).

But the big question now is this: was the underdog Cubs extremely rare (once in every 16 years) World Series victory a prophetic sign for this uniquely chaotic unpredictable election year? In other words, as I asked before (see)

 

 "IS 2016 THE YEAR OF THE UNDERDOG?"

 

 

If the Chicago Cubs could come back from a 108 year World Series drought and a 3-1 deficit in this year's series then why can't battling, underdog, odds defying Donald Trump (called by the NY Times "The Comeback King" of the business world*) do a Harry Truman on November 8th and become the 45th President?

*A well deserved title as he reversed his collapsing business fortunes- foreshadowing what he'll do as President for our declining nation.

 

 

In other words, will New Yorker Donald Trump who was born during the Truman Era, in the same year that gave us two Presidents (Clinton and Bush see) be elected on November 8th-the 84th anniversary of New Yorker FDR's 1932 victory?

 

 Baseball signed by Trump supporter baseball great Pete Rose.

 

POSTSCRIPT I

THE AMAZING PREDICTION OF GIO

 

 

This is beyond belief. On November 4, 2014, two days after  Ray's manager Joe Maddon was hired by the Cubs to replace Rick Renteria, a Rays fan from Tampa named GIO (grew up an Indians' fan in Cleveland) tweeted that the 2016 World Series would be the Cubs vs. Indians, and go into extra inning in game seven. He didn't pick a winner but said jokingly that a world ending apocalypse would come before either team won.

 

However, what did come that very day (the 6th anniversary of Obama's 2008 election victory) was a nationwide Republican landslide where the Democrats lost the Senate, more seats in the House, several governorships, and hundreds of seats in state legislatures across the country. It was one of the greatest mid-term election gains of any party in US history (see). Will this be another victorious year for the GOP with Trump defeating Hillary? November 4, 2014 was an incomplete political apocalypse for Obama and the Dems. Will 2016 complete the unfinished work of 2014? Will an electorate fed up with the political status quo and hungry for new direction and change put a Republican in the White House again?

 

POSTSCRIPT ll

Plouffe: Trump Is Heaviest Presidential Candidate Since Taft

 

 

Prior to Tuesday's astonishing win the Cubs haven't won a World Series in 108 years. That was back in 1908, a presidential election year when Republican William H. Taft defeated Democratic rival William Jennings Bryan (see). It is interesting to note that David Plouffe (Obama's 2008 campaign manager) likened Donald Trump to Taft because of his weight. However, Taft was massively obese, The Donald is anything but. But was this too another auspicious sign of Trump's coming victory? That Trump like Republican Howard Taft will win the presidency in a year when the Chicago Cubs won the World Series*?

* The first World Series played during a presidential election year was in 1908.

 

POSTSCRIPT III

 

More Proof Donald Trump Can Win: The Chicago Cubs - TheStreet

by

Emily Stewart

Donald Trump's chances at winning the presidency move in correlation with gold prices, the Mexican peso and ... the Chicago Cubs? Major developments this election cycle -- the first presidential debate, the "Access Hollywood" tape, the FBI letter -- have swung prediction markets as well as the markets at large. As Trump's odds at the White House have improved on prediction markets like U.S.-based PredictIt, gold prices have tended to rise. The Mexican peso has weakened and the VIX futures, which measure volatility, increased. Trump's chances at besting Hillary Clinton on November 8 have at times followed another measure: the likelihood of the Chicago Cubs winning the World Series. On April 6 when the baseball season was just kicking off, the Cubs' odds on betting website OddsShark were 16%. Trump, with only Ted Cruz and John Kasich in the race, had odds of 19%. By the end of summer, the Cubs' chances at victory were 25%, and Trump's 30%. Still think Trump can't win? The Cubs just did.

POSTSCRIPT IV

Nate Silver Staffer Gave Cubs Worse Odds of Winning Series Than Trump the Presidency - NewsMax

This too is remarkable. Last Friday when the underdog Cubs were down in the series 3-1 and highly unlikely to win America's polling wizard Nate Silver (538) gave Trump a 1 in 3 chance of winning the presidency. Then a staffer in Silver's office giving the Cubs a 15% chance of beating Cleveland blogged that Donald Trump had a better chance of defeating Hillary and winning the presidency.

538 blew its World Series forecast. On Tuesday will its election forecast turn out the same way?

POSTSCRIPT V

 

The Chicago Cubs own the 2016 baseball world championship; and Donald Trump owns the majestic world-class Trump Tower Chicago the fourth tallest building in the US with the second highest residence (apartment or condo) in the world. It is interesting to note that this architectural wonder opened on January 30, 2009 just nine days after Chicagoland Barack Obama (and eight days after Chicago-born Hillary) were sworn into office (see). Just as Trump with his job creating enterprises have done more for Chicago's economy than Obama and Hillary combined so as President he'll do more for America than them.

DONALD TRUMP 2016!
 
FOR THE GREAT AMERICAN COMEBACK!
 
POSTSCRIPT VI
(posted 11-9-16)
 
 
THE COMEBACK, UNDERDOG CHICAGO CUBS,
 
owned by the pro-Trump Ricketts family, won the World Series in Cleveland; this is the city where underdog, "Comeback King" Donald Trump, at the Republican National Convention, was crowned the GOP's presidential nominee.
 
 
Pro-Trump Cub's owner Tom Ricketts (extreme left).
 
The GOP convention was held at Quicken Loans Arena in downtown Cleveland which is adjacent to Progressive Field, home of the Indians. (The two sports facilities are part of the same sports and entertainment complex, see). Now get this: the Indians' stadium is named "Progressive Field" because the Progressive Insurance Company (owned by political progressives, see) purchased the naming rights.
 
 
Gateway Sports and Entertainment Complex in Cleveland where Donald Trump won the GOP nomination for the presidency, and the Chicago Cubs won the World Series.
 
So this is what we have: the pro-Trump conservative owned Chicago Cubs defeated the Indians in a stadium named for political progressivism located in a sports complex where Donald Trump (who defeated progressive Hillary Clinton) was made the GOP's presidential nominee.  And, by the way, Quicken Arena was built in the 1990s during the Clinton era (see). You can't make this stuff up.
 
UPDATE
(11-24-16)
 
 
 20161124_Donald_Trump_Todd_Ricketts_Getty.jpg
 
Todd Ricketts, co-owner of the world championship baseball team whose upset, come from behind victory on the 68th anniversary of Truman's upset defeat of Tom Dewey is likely to have a key position in Donald "The Comeback King" Trump's Administration. Fascinating.

RELATED

THE CUBS-INDIANS WORLD SERIES AND THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RACE  
DONALD TRUMP: THE “COMEBACK KING” OF THE CLINTON ERA REVERSES HIS FORTUNES AGAINST THE CLINTON MACHINE?
 
DONALD TRUMP, THE MAGNIFICIENT 7 AND THE AMAZING SIGN I SAW WHICH MIGHT SIGNAL A TRUMP VICTORY
 

COULD THE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION AT THE WELLS FARGO CENTER PREFIGURE HILLARY’S DEFEAT DUE TO SCANDALS?

1946 AND 1947: THE REMARKABLE YEARS DONALD TRUMP AND HILLARY CLINTON WERE BORN

HILLARY CLINTON ANNOUNCES CANDIDACY FOR PRESIDENT ON THE ANNIVERSARY OF FDR’S DEATH. DOES THIS SIGNAL HER SUCCESS OR DEFEAT?

DONALD TRUMP, HILLARY CLINTON AND THE HISTORY OF SAME STATE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES 

DONALD TRUMP, NEW YORK, THE BUSHES, HILLARY’S DILEMMA AND THE 19TH CENTURY NEW YORK CLINTON WHO LOST A PRESIDENTIAL RACE  

BERNIE SANDERS VS. HILLARY CLINTION: THE RACE FOR FDR’S OBSOLETE NEW DEAL LEGACY

IS HILLARY CLINTON UNDER A GEORGE MCGOVERN “CURSE?” WILL 2016 BE 1972 FOR HILLARY? 
 
 
 
 

JAMES COMEY, PLAMEGATE, SCOOTER LIBBY AND THE COMING INDICTMENT OF HILLARY CLINTON?

 

 
 

Late in the 11th hour of the 2016 presidential race, just 11 days from Election Day, and on the 11th anniversary of Scooter Libby's indictment in the Valerie Plame affair (10-28-05), FBI Director James Comey sent a blockbuster letter to Congress that he was reopening the criminal probe into Hillary Clinton's private email server. His reason was a new, troubling mega-cache of possibly thousands of Clinton-related emails (or a smoking gun*) found on text sexting perv Anthony Weiner's laptop.

*Could be, as some surmise, that the FBI did find a smoking gun as they were looking through Weiner's emails.

 
 

Jim Comey once said: "I don't care about politics.  I don't care about expediency. I don't care about friendship. I care about doing the right thing."

What is truly astonishing and seemingly ominous for Hillary is the "coincidence" of Comey sending this letter on the anniversary of Scooter Libby's indictment for obstruction of justice, perjury and other crimes in the Plame case. For as MSNBC's David Corn wrote (see), it was none other than then Acting Attorney General James Comey (of the Bush administration) who TRIGGERED the four year investigation into the criminal leak that outed Valerie Plame-a covert CIA agent (see). 

 
Valerie Plame (right) with husband Joe Wilson and good friend Hillary. 
 
Indeed, recusing himself (and the Justice Department) from the Plame scandal Comey in late 2003 appointed long time friend Patrick FitzGerald (the US Attorney in Chicago) as Special Independent  Prosecutor to investigate the case. And 21 months later (October 28, 2005) Scooter Libby was indicted on multiple felony crimes, and was later convicted and sentenced to 30 months in jail (commuted by President Bush). "Plamegate," as it came to be known, was to become the Bush administration's signature scandal.
 
 
Scooter Libby
 

That Comey is a pro-Trump partisan Republican hack in violation of the Hatch Act trying to influence the outcome of the election is utter nonsense-denied even by the White House. Indeed, what Comey did in Plamegate, and opposing central aspects Bush's domestic surveillance program, established his reputation for    being apolitical, and was key to Obama's decision to make him FBI chief.

 
 
Now if Comey reopening the investigation into Hillary's server on the anniversary of Scooter Libby's indictment isn't ominous enough for her than just as strange and perhaps significant is the day that Comey became the nation's 7th FBI chief. For that very same day, September 4, 2013, Anthony Weiner and wife Huma were celebrating his 49th birthday (see and see). 
 
 
 
The question is this: are the above two remarkable coincident events mere happenstance? Or are they signature effects of a Higher Power invisibly at work in our world using Comey, Weiner and his Molsem wife Huma to bring down Hillary and ruin her quest for the White House? Is the jig up for Hillary? Has her luck run out? After years of living above the law and getting away with murder has her high crimes and misdemeanors finally catching up with her?  Will history judge Comey's October Surprise, on top of all the Wikileaks stuff, as the straw that broke Hillary's political back and denied her the presidency? Indeed, regardless whether Hillary fails or succeeds next week, it looks like she's facing indictment and jail time like the hapless Scooter Libby-the only one in the Bush administration convicted of a crime in the Plamegate investigation triggered by Comey.  
 
DRAIN THE SWAMP!
 
 
 
UPDATE
(11-2-16)
 
 
Agents have found emails believed to have originated on Hillary Clinton's secret private illegally used server on Anthony Weiner's laptop. They say the emails are not duplicates and could potentially be classified in nature.
 
But it doesn't end there. Agents also told Fox that the laptops of Clinton aides Cherryl Mills and Heather Samuelson  (given limited immunity by the pro-Clinton Justice Dept.) have not been destroyed as originally thought; agents are combing through them looking for smoking guns. It seems Hillary is coming closer and closer to being Scooter Libbyed.  But not before Election Day.
 
UPDATES
(11-12-16)
 
 
Just when things couldn't seem to get any stranger I just learned that on November 7th (one day before the election) Scooter Libby got his law license back. 
 
RELATED