The 18 yr 8 month global cooling trend (the so-called "pause") interrupted by a powerful warming El Nino. Now that El Nino has ended will the cooling trend resume despite 400 plus ppm of CO2 in the air? I'm betting it will.
DISQUS-MEDIA MATTERS DEBATE
QUESTION FOR TRUMP-HATING OBAMUNISTS
WHICH IS WORSE?
I REPEAT FROM FRIDAY
President Kennedy's Bay of Pigs fiasco (in his first 100 days), with its 118 dead anti-Castro commandos, 360 wounded, and 1200 captured prisoners? Or President Trump's temporary setback in repealing and replacing "CRAZY (Bill Clinton)," "MISTAKEN (Chuck Schumer)," "TRAINWRECK (Max Baucus)" imploding Obamacare?
Indeed, if nothing worse happens to our 45th President in the next 45 days he will have a more successful first 100 days than did JFK. Moreover, if in the next 45 days Trump and the GOP implement JFK type, across the board, supply-side tax cuts on individuals and corporations (that sent the 60's economy soaring) GDP growth will easily more than double in the years ahead adding $10 trillion to our flat to failing economy; and that will win Trump a second term, just as JFK would have won had he lived.
TRUMP/JFK PARALLELS AND COINCIDENCES
Bill Gates, Chris Matthews (in a sober moment) and others have likened Donald Trump to JFK; and they were right in doing so as you shall see from the following parallels, analogies and coincidences:
1.Trump like JFK was born into great wealth and privilege.
2. Both are Geminis.
3. Both came from the northeastern United States.
4. Both have glamorous, classy, intelligent wives.
5. In 1946, the year Trump was born, JFK started his political career running for and winning a seat in the House of Representatives.
6. On November 5, 1946 when JFK won his House seat Donald Trump, the future 45th President, was 145 days old (see)*.
7. 45 is a multiple of 15 3x. On the day Donald Trump was born JFK was 1515 weeks old. 1515 is a factor of the number 4545 3x (see)*.
8. Trump was elected president in a tight race on the 56th anniversary of JFK's close victory over Richard Nixon (11-08-1960)*.
9. 20455 days separate both elections-a five digit number encoded with the number 45 (see)*.
10. JFK's and Trump's president numbers (35 and 45) end in the number 5.
11. Both men succeeded popular two term presidents of the opposing party.
12. Both became president when their respective parties controlled both houses of congress.
13. Both believe in the efficacy of creative tax cuts to stimulate robust economic growth.
14. Both are pro-military, peace through strength, patriotic nationalists.
15. Both came into office having trouble with an aggressive, imperialist, hostile Russia.
For those of my readers who believe in God, and that America is a special nation under His Providential guidance, I ask you this: is it possible that JFK's close victory over Richard Nixon on a November 8th election date prophetically anticipated that the 45 president would also win in a close race on that same date, and like JFK not be of the incumbent party?
There are many signs that I discovered showing that the President is a Providential Man. Could this also be one of them?
DONALD TRUMP AND HIS WEALTHY, PRIVILEGED PREDECESSORS
As Trump haters mock and ridicule the President for his good fortune of being born into privilege and wealth it is fascinating to note that he is the fifth consecutive president elected on November 8 that was born this way. These other fortunate presidents were as follows: GHW Bush (Nov. 8, 1989), John F. Kennedy (Nov. 8, 1960), Franklin Roosevelt (Nov. 8, 1932), and Teddy Roosevelt (Nov. 8, 1904). Three of the five, Trump and the two Roosevelts, were born in New York; and the remaining two, Bush and Kennedy, were born in Massachusetts. All five hail from the great northeast; and the first four (anticipating Trump I believe) were successful presidents*.
*George H. W. Bush was one of the most successful one term presidents in US history.
BTW, in 1892, before Teddy Roosevelt's election, Grover Cleveland was elected on Nov. 8. Though not born into wealth Cleveland was a New Jersey born resident of New York at the time of his election.
Vermontcare on the ash heap of history.
See my prediction of Obamacare's inevitable repeal and demise based on the 18th century repeal of the Stamp Act. This ancient sign of liberty from unfair taxation and oppression shows that Obamacare was doomed from the start and doesn't have a future.
I posted this on Disqus:
WE'RE IN THE FIRST 100 DAYS OF 8 EPOCH MAKING MAGA TRUMP YEARS
THE TRUMP H8ERS REPLY
The Great Rust Belt Revolt. Former steel workers, coal miners and party line Democrats put Trump in the White House, and will keep him there because of a coming booming high growth economy.
If this past historic election has so pathetically unhinged and collectively broken the brains of the Trump derangement political and media Left then what will they and their senseless "resistance" be like after eight successful Trump years? How far will they plunge into political and moral madness when a rejuvenated and richly prospering middle class (declining for decades) votes in 2020 to continue the Trump presidency? Then votes again in 2024 to continue his legacy?
The Liberal Brain four months after Trump's election. What will it be like after eight years of his presidency?
Many Trump haters across the net unable to bear the thought of just four Trump years (imagining there could be no worse or crueler fate) childishly fantasize that he'll be gone in ten months or less impeached for this or that offense; or assassinated by a Moslem, climate change nut, or illegal immigrant. But as we learned from eight years of the impeached sexual predator and perjurer Bill Clinton the economy is destiny for presidents however flawed their characters. And all that big, bad "deplorable" Trump needs do to remain the Left's archenemy-in-chief for two terms (and ensure Republican congressional rule) is to double the national GDP, and reverse the worse recovery since the 1930s.
Indeed, and this is instructive, during the 1930s progressive, liberal (Teddy Roosevelt Republican) Herbert Hoover tried to tax, spend and regulate his way out of the Great Depression he helped create; and then FDR doubling down on Hoover's failed policies (he didn't go far enough FDR thought) prolonged the Depression until the great war. In short, the New Deal (which collapsed in 1937 from taxation, unionization and excessive regulation) was simply Hooverism on steroids (the one being the other in embryo).
Barack Obama (an economic ignoramus like Hoover and FDR), who stupidly thought the New Deal was a national success, fancied himself the new FDR with a new and greater New Deal for America -to end the Great Recession (which was ending when he took office). He, Barack Obama, would outspend FDR and Hoover combined, and every other US president in peacetime who tried to tax, spend and regulate their way out of economic distress. The size not the substance of the program was the answer. The more billions spent the better.
And the result, believed Obama, would be historic: the greatest, grandest, most gigantic recovery ever recorded-far outdoing Ronald Reagan's high growth recovery in the 1980s. Indeed, the Obama years with its staggering $800 billion stimulus would go down in history as a new era of US economic growth and prosperity - that would be emulated the world over and ignite a global boom. Not only was Obama going to lower the rising seas, he was going to raise mankind's standard of living in every clime and country. But that was not to be. Obama taxed and taxed and taxed, spent and spent and spent, kept interest rates low, printed trillions (he backed Bernanke and the Fed) and enacted thousands of new rules and regulations to control economic activity, and what did we get? The rich got fantastically richer from a rigged, soaring, overpriced stock market (see), and government boomed at the expense of Mainstreet as the economy of the middle class lagging far behind continued to decline with millions going broke (see).
Indeed, while the federal government from 2009 to 2016 grew by 16% (see) the annual average growth rate of GDP was a trickle in comparison: a weak, pathetic, mediocre 1.48%-the lowest of the last 11 presidents. The Obama stimulus was another big government/Keynesian failure (hopefully the last of its kind) that grew the national debt, not the economy and the middle class. Obama who lyingly claimed that his policies saved us from a depression (Bush's TARP did that) told voters that they should be glad things weren't worse - as Hillary campaigned to stay the course which proved a fatal political mistake. As economic anxiety and discontent ran high (causing the rise of Trump and Bernie Sanders) it's no wonder Hillary lost with working men and women in the rust belt states: these forgotten Americans were in revolt against the Washington/Wall Street/Globalist status quo that Hillary coddled. They wanted change, voted Trump and won't be sorry - already they're seeing results.
Indeed, the robust economy promised by Obama that never materialized (due to his growth killing policies) is there simmering beneath the surface waiting to volcanically erupt; waiting for the pro-growth, pro-business, America first policies of Donald Trump. Maganomics is Obamanomics in reverse: it puts economic growth above growing government, and the creation of new wealth over the spending and spreading of it. For Obama (as for FDR) government was the business of America, the primary engine of growth; for Trump, as for Coolidge (a great economic success story), it's BUSINESS with a capital "C"-Free Market Capitalism should and must be America's primary business for restoring the economy.
Because of clueless Obama's ignorant policies there's a tremendous amount of pent up growth inherent our economy that Trump is hell-bent on unleashing. Throughout the campaign Trump promised to deliver 4% GDP growth and create 25 million new jobs over a ten year period. And he wasn't bullshitting. Indeed, if Trump can simply double Obama's weak, pathetic 1.48% GDP to 3% or slightly less (easy to do) that would ensure his feared (by the Left) political success; it would add a massive $10 trillion to our $20 trillion economy increasing its size by a whopping 33%, and create 20 million new jobs. That means at least 12 years of Republicans ruling the White House and continued control of Congress. And as long as Trump's successor keeps to his MAGA agenda (unlike Bush 41's eschewing of Reagan) he will be a two term president.
Trump's victory over Hillary has transformed the political Left into one vast insane asylum of hysteria, hate and murderous rage. What will they be like when they lose to Trump (and the GOP) again and again and again with eight in your face defiant years haranguing, ridiculing and tormenting them? They'll be lots of riots and blood in the streets until like sick, low energy Hillary (in the last days of her failing campaign) they're completely worn down and exhausted by this man.
The vicious out of control anti-Trump derangement media has been reporting for months that the FBI and other intel agencies have been digging for evidence using wiretaps and secret surveillance that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia in interfering with the 2016 election; and that this may have tipped the outcome in Donald Trump's favor (which I disprove HERE ). Indeed, a scared sh*tless, panicking Barack Obama frightened at the thought that the hated, "deplorable" Donald Trump would succeed him in office and decimate his legacy pulled out all the stops to find the smoking gun that would criminally link him to Russia (or other crimes) and destroy his candidacy. And if that meant abusing his power and ordering legal or illegal wiretaps on Trump (which he has the authority to do see), then so be it. The terrible end of Trump being president justified and excused the immoral, politically driven (if not exactly criminal) means of bringing him down.
Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!
Indeed, "Desperate men do desperate things." And as the race drew closer to election day with a gravity defying Trump running strong, lying, lawless (see) Obama's desperation to stop him grew into an insane obsession; and as a last desperate resort he abused his powers and spied on Trump. Indeed, when sifting through and carefully analyzing the news reports from the credible sources cited above you will see that Donald Trump's shocking March 4th tweets accusing Obama of a McCarthyite political witch hunt to destroy him was JUSTIFIED.
How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy! 7:02 AM - 4 Mar 2017
Indeed, in an explosive, eventful October after the failure of the strategically released Access Hollywood tape, and coordinated multiple groping allegations, a psyched out Obama (at his wits end) made one last pre-election day move to bring down Trump and irreparably damage his campaign. The story as reported by the Guardian, HeatStreet and the New York Times is as follows:
Back in June of last year (before the Republican Convention) Obama's Justice Department and the FBI believed that a private computer server in Trump Tower (Trump's campaign headquarters) was linked to several Russian banks, and was being used in the commission of possible financial/banking crimes that somehow posed a threat to our national security. The DOJ and FBI seeking a warrant from the FISA Court against Trump drew up an affidavit ( apparently citing him as a potential Russian agent or spy) requesting permission to tap his server and phones. But the ridiculous request was denied because it failed to establish probable cause.
Now here is where the story gets extremely fishy and loses credibility. According to HeatStreet in October just weeks before the election the DOJ and FBI submitted a second request to FISA for a tap warrant for Trump's server. Because this new request was drawn differently ("more narrowly" says the report) it met the court's criteria for a warrant, and it was granted. This is what HeatStreet said:
Now really, does this make any logical or even political sense? Why did Loretta Lynch and the FBI wait so long (five months) to rewrite the request to FISA when they could have immediately done so in June hours or days after the first request was denied? This way, not needlessly wasting precious time, Obama's DOJ (race obsessed Loretta Lynch), out for blood and wanting to stop ("white supremacist Islamophobic racist") Donald Trump and torpedo his campaign, would have started taping his alleged Russian linked server weeks before the GOP Convention; and if any crime, dirt or whatever was discovered it could have been used to wreck havoc on Trump, throw the Convention into chaos and possibly deny him the nomination.
Indeed, surely it could not have taken AG Lynch and FBI five months to figure out what to do after the initial application for the surveillance warrant was denied. With the server at Trump Tower possibly and potentially being the solution and key to stopping and defeating Trump (after everything else failed) it makes no sense for Lynch to procrastinate so long - to wait so close to the election in October before taking the appropriate measures (rewriting the affidavit) in getting the FISA warrant.
Indeed, as I said, it makes no logical or political sense for Lynch and the FBI to do in October what they could have easily done five months before in June - unless, of course, the story in whole or in part is untrue and a cover up. What I mean is this: After the first FISA request in June was denied Obama and Lynch were stuck. Contrary to what we're being told Lynch could not have improved the original affidavit that FISA rejected in June; they were unable to rewrite it (or "narrow it," as HeatStreet said) to show probable cause that Trump was some kind of Russian agent or spy and national security threat. In other words, what they did in June was the best they could do. They couldn't go back to the court a second time as they had nothing more convincing to show it.
Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway told Fox News that "credible news sources" suggested there might have been politically motivated activity during the campaign that has yet to be divulged. "Trump is POTUS," said Conway "and has information that the rest of us do not."
What am I inferring then? That there was no tap placed on Trump's server and phones? That it's fake news? No! President Trump in his tweets acknowledged that the tap did occur just as is stated and suggested in the above articles - but without a Trump related FISA warrant and court approval. The Washington Post after months of trying to confirm the October warrant couldn't do so (see)." WAPO failed because the October warrant is fake, phony news and doesn't exist.
The publisher of the Newsmax Media website, Christopher Ruddy, a friend of Trump's, wrote Sunday the president told him, "This [Towergate] will be investigated. It will all come out. I will be proven right."
But the Trump server, so it seems, was nevertheless tapped - tapped immorally if not illegally by a deeply distressed Barack Obama who saw the unthinkable unfolding before his eyes: the "nightmare" of a Trump presidency moving closer and closer to becoming a reality. Indeed, an alarmed Obama rightly understood that if Trump against all odds could politically emerge unscathed from Gropergate (which should have destroyed him) then he could go all the way to the White House. And thus was born the desperate idea (FISA Court be damned) of Obama deeming Trump a potential foreign spy (a danger to national security); and going to Loretta Lynch for approval in placing a covert tap on Trump's server and phones to find a criminal 11th hour link tying him to Russia. It was late in the race and there was nowhere left for Obama (Clinton and the Democrats) to go. "Nothing ventured nothing gained." Obama abusing his power turned Trump into the victim of a politically motivated unjustified surveillance investigation under the pretext that he was a possible Russian spy and national security threat. But that miserably failed like everything else that was tried. And now Trump is President rubbing Obama's face in the feces of his lies and subversive crimes and promising to prove them in time. As it says in the Zero Hedge piece, "Trump may have the last laugh."
ALLOWING THE PRESIDENT TO ORDER WIRE TAPS
Trump is "Putin's puppet," "his useful fool," "his idiot and stooge" read the above pre-election headlines by Trump haters and concerned critics. But if what was negatively said of candidate Trump (based on his pro-Russian rhetoric and lack of criticism about neo-imperialist Vladimir Putin's sins) turns out to be true of President Trump what then? History tells us that he will join a club of useful idiot president stooges who were naïve about and dangerously soft on Russia, and paid a steep price for their blind trust and folly. These presidents are as follows:
First there was the gullible, butt kissing liberal Democrat appeaser Franklin Roosevelt who called implacable, mass murdering Russian strongman Joseph Stalin (allied to Hitler for several years) "Uncle Joe" to humanize him. FDR's weakness and naivety with good old "Uncle Joe" at Yalter (where Stalin had him bugged) emboldened the autocrat to dominate the war ravaged nations of eastern Europe and half of Germany after the war causing decades of misery and oppression to millions. This started the very dangerous 45 year-long Cold War that led to costly wars for us in Korea and Vietnam (which killed 100,000 US troops combined) and nearly went nuclear in 1962 over the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Then 66 years later came the weak, butt kissing, ultra appeasing liberal Democrat Jimmy Carter. Ridiculously declaring that we had "overcome our inordinate fear of Communism" (as the Soviet Union was expanding its power and influence across the world) Carter made concession after concession to implacable Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev and paid the price when the Red Army brutally invaded Afghanistan - this gave birth to al-Qaida, 9/11 and the war on terror that we are still fighting today.
Then 32 years later came another clueless, butt kissing, liberal Democrat Barack Obama. Obama having learned nothing from the Russian invasion of Georgia declared ominously in Munich (city of war causing weakness) an appeasement policy for "resetting U.S./Russian relations." Obama, stupidly believing that "Reset" was a historic success, and he'd won over the heart, mind, friendship and trust of Vladimir Putin with his bowing, scraping and concessions, assured us during a debate with Mitt Romney that "Russia was not our enemy or a geostrategic threat." Obama (the third and fourth terms of Jimmy Carter) was made to look like history's biggest fool since Neville Chamberlain when Russia invaded Ukraine, annexed Crimea then assisted Syria's Bashir "the Butcher" Assad in horrific genocide.
The big question now is this: three American presidents have been the useful gullible idiot stooges of Russian imperialism. But will there now be a fourth? Will Donald Trump who was a liberal Democrat (and the seventh president from New York after FDR) be the Republican Shemp of American politics and repeat the mistakes of FDR, Carter and Obama? Will we see this?
Unless Putin does a 180 and becomes a real friend and ally of the U.S. (which is unlikely) I hope not.
BUT PERHAPS THE FOLLOWING ARE SIGNS THAT THIS ABASEMENT OF AMERICA UNDER TRUMP (HARD TO IMAGINE) WON'T HAPPEN
*It's no mere coincidence that on October 7th, when Julian Assange published the DNC/Podesta emails it was one hour after the Access Hollywood tape surfaced (see). It is also interesting to note that October 7th was Vladimir Putin's 64rd birthday (see).
THE COMEY EFFECT
"Did the re-opening of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email server [on Oct. 28] have a negative impact, positive impact or no impact on your feelings toward Hillary Clinton as a candidate for President? "
And the result was:
Negative impact 30%
Positive impact 8
No impact 58
Not sure 4
Now according to Zogby 30% or 40.5 million voters had their feelings negatively impacted by Comey's 11th hour Hillary probe, which dominated the news cycle for nine days. And while 83% of these or 33.6 million already made up their minds who to vote for the question is this: did the remaining 17% or 6.9 million undecided voters decide the election for Trump based on the Comey effect? At first glance it would seem so. For if we evenly divide these 6.9 million undecideds between each of the 50 states it comes to 138, 000 voters per state. Now with Trump's close victories in each of the three swing states that won him the White House way under 138,000 votes (Pennsylvania 44,000, Wisconsin 23,000 and Michigan 10,000) it would appear that James Comey was Trump's kingmaker -- as Hillary Clinton believes.
TOP VOTER ISSUES
But Hillary is greatly, greatly mistaken. For when we factor in Zogby's data on the top issues that concerned voters (and especially the undecideds) we learn that Trump could have likely lost only one of the three key states due to the Comey Effect. In other words, as you will see, if Comey hadn't renewed the investigation into Hillary Trump would have won the electoral vote anyway.
According to Zogby top issues for voters were as follows:
You will notice that the top issue "Economy/Jobs" at 32% is followed by an issue relevant to the Comey Effect, "Trust/Truthfulness," and this intensely concerned 11% of the voters. Now 11% of the 6.9 million voters who were negatively impacted by the Comey Effect and were likely swayed by the trust issue to vote for Trump (or one of the third-party candidates) over Hillary was 759,000 votes.
But the question again is this: did the 11% influenced by Comey win the presidency (as Hillary and others believe) for Donald Trump? The answer is an emphatic NO! Whichever way I crunched the numbers (there's only two ways of doing this) it didn't add up to a win for Hillary.
For example, using the simple method of equally dividing the 759,000 Comey influenced/trust votes between each of the 50 states it gives us 15,180 votes per state. And 15,180 is only more (by 5180) than the margin of Trump's victory in one of the three key swing states: Michigan (10,000 votes). Giving Michigan with its 16 electoral votes to Hillary does nothing to change the outcome of the election.
However, when I used a more sophisticated method where I worked out the math on a state by state basis the result, beginning with Pennsylvania remained unchanged:
2,970,733 - Trump votes
505,024 - 17% undecided
151,507 - 30% Comey effect
16,665 -11% trust top issue
44,000 - Trump's margin of victory
1,405,284 - Trump votes
238,898 - 17% undecided
71,669 - 30% Comey effect
7883 - 11% trust top issue
23,000 - T's margin of victory
2,279,543 - Trump votes
387,522 -17% undecided
116,256 - 30% Comey effect
14,867 - 11% trust top issue
10,000 - Trump's margin of victory
As you can see when taking the percentage of undecided voters in each of the three key swing states where Trump narrowly won, and then further reducing that number to Comey Effect voters, then reducing that to trust issue voters, again only in Michigan does it appear that the Comey Effect could have been the decisive factor helping Trump. In Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, as with the other 27 states Trump won, the overriding issue that put him over the top was the economy and jobs. In only one state Michigan does it appear it was the trust issue influenced by the short-lived Comey probe.
In sum, if there were no stolen DNC WikiLeaks emails, nor the 11th hour FBI Clinton email probe, Donald Trump would be exactly where he is today: 45th President of the United States -- but with less controversy about his historic, astonishing PROVIDENTIAL victory.
But wait...no President since Herbert Hoover has been more destructive to his party than Obama. Since 2009 Democrats have lost the House, the Senate, the Presidency, 14 governorships, over 900 seats in state legislatures, and the next Supreme Court nominee (with Ginsburg to follow?). And now they're on the verge of losing more and worsening the disaster if they make Keith Ellison DNC chief-which is fine with me.
MAKE ELLISON HEAD OF THE DNC
TO CONTINUE OBAMA'S DESTRUCTIVE PARTY LEGACY
PRESIDENT TRUMP'S FIVE POINT MAGA PLAN FOR ECONOMIC RENEWAL
At exactly 5:45 PM the beautiful wife of the 45th President kicked off the rally by reading the Lord's Prayer.
Yesterday in the battleground state that was the start of the greatest, odds defying presidential campaign victory in U.S. history, on the day that World Trade Center terrorist, Sheik Abdel-Rahman (inspiration for 9/11) died, and repentant abortionist Norma McCorvey (Jane Doe in Roe v Wade) also died (God bless her soul), President Trump at a mega MAGA post-inaugural rally unofficially launched his 2020 reelection campaign -- as he blasted the corrupt enemy news media, murdering Moslem jihadists, obstructionist Democrat senators and usurping federal judges (reading them the immigration law they unconstitutionally ignored); and taking to task a failed, "Hope is Dead," un-American president who left behind a terrible "MESS": a country in economic, military and geopolitical decline where hostile anti-American states are advancing on all sides.
GET USED TO IT LEFT!
WE'RE IN THE FIRST TUMULTUOUS 100 DAYS OF EIGHT GREAT DONALD TRUMP YEARS
LONG LIVE MAGA MAN!
THE TOM BRADY OF AMERICAN COMEBACK POLITICS
AND GOD BLESS
AND IN OTHER NEWS
AS THE ISLAMIC FAITH IS PROFOUNDLY AND FUNDAMENTALLY
pro-Life and anti-LGBT (in no Moslem country do gays have civil rights and women absolute abortion rights) my question to Democrats and Secular Progressives is this: how is expanding the number of LGBT hating pro-LIfe Moslems (in Islamic Law abortion (unless the mother's life is at risk) and homosexuality are crimes against God) good for the cause of women's and LGBT rights? How is it progressive and humane to our women and gays to allow a flood of regressive, medieval, anti-modern Moslems into this country?
To put it another way, if Syria were a predominately Christian country (as it was before the 11th century) with millions of gay-hating, pro-Life, Bible believing orthodox and fundamentalist Christian refugees would you be comfortable with giving hundreds and thousands of them asylum here when many of you consider the Christian Right a threat to democracy? When like most Moslems they oppose atheism, gay marriage, drug legalization, pornography, pre-marital sex, prostitution and godless secularism? When many of you fear that the Christian Right subversively has an anti-constitutional agenda to transform our nation into an oppressive, theocractic religious state? Truthfully now, would you want to increase their numbers?
Don't you know that the vast majority of Moslems in every Islamic country are fundamentalists? That they believe in the inerrancy, absolute veracity and divine perfection of the Koran and Hadith? And that their ideal form of government is the Prophet Mohammed's 7th century Median caliphate where he collapsed the separation between church (mosque) and state, and had supreme, absolute political and religious power as if he were God? In short, don't you know that Islam at its core is anti-democratic? And that given the choice between democratic freedom or being ruled by Mohammed in a master-slave autocratic state most Moslems would choose the later?
Don't you know that the divine, holy, inerrant Koran teaches that Jews and Christians are hated by God as betrayers of and traitors to His plan to unify humanity under His rule in a one world Moslem state? That their religions are a perverse and distorted form of monotheism? That Islam is the true monotheistic faith as it was given by God to Abraham, and recovered (with God's help) by Mohammed? Don't you know that this radical Islamic fundamentalist supremacism is the underlying cause of 9/11, the violent rise of ISIS and the bloody Arab-Israeli conflict going back 68 years? How is increasing the number of these anti-liberal, progress resisting, modernity hating, unmeltable ignoramuses good for the safety, security and unity of our country? How is it good for interfaith relations, constitutional norms and American principles, values and ideals? Divided as we are how is deepening and worsening our divisions a good and desirable thing? Where's the benefit in this? Where's the logic? Please, help me to understand!
Not only does the Left choose Islam over gays and women, they chose it over Jews. As a Jew and Zionist I have common cause with pro-Trump LGBT folks and pro-Trump feminists not just to back the President's partial, limited 90 day ban on Moslem immigrants and refugees; but in an outright, total, permanent, unlimited ban until Islam undergoes a reformation like Judaism and Christianity did. This country's three million Moslems are more than enough. For Islam's hatred of Jews (going back to its lunatic Jew-hating, genocidal founder) is far greater than its hatred of gays, and its sexist contempt for women. No more Moslems! End their immigration now! That's my policy.
BTW, Trump is implementing the same policies that ended the Wilson Depression, prevented a sixth post-WWII recession in the mid-1960s, ended the stagflation of the early 1980s, and prevented socialist Sweden from collapsing into a Greek-like socialist catastrophe in the 90s.
this country after years of decline and fall. Indeed, 45 minutes from the end of Obama's presidency the 45th President, with Melania at his side, graciously escorted the Obamas to "Marine One" where it lifted off and left DC at 12:45. Astonishing!