OBAMA MUST APOLOGIZE TO AMERICA FOR THE BERGDAHL SCANDAL

Obama deeply bowing to Japanese Emperor Akihito possibly as a symbolic gesture for the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki which shortened the war and saved a million lives. And now he must apologize to the nation for Bowe Berghdahl and the release of the Taliban Five.

 

MR. PRESIDENT, YOU TRAVELED AROUND THE WORLD APOLOGIZING FOR AMERICA

bowing and scraping before emperors and kings, believing you were doing the right and noble thing and fixing the damaged image of this country caused by your predecessor. And now you need to humble yourself before the American people and apologize for trading five bloodthirsty Taliban murderers for a worthless America-hating deserter responsible for the death of up to 14 brave soldiers. And then you need apologize to the dead soldiers' families for the White House photo op with the deserter's parents where you ignorantly took credit for his release as if it were a good and  praiseworthy deed. And lastly you must apologize to the deserter's platoon mates who you wrongly smeared as "swiftboating liars" for honestly telling the truth about his crimes. APOLOGIZE OR RESIGN, Mr. President. With only 15 percent of the military respecting you save what little remains of your honor.

 

 

RELATED

JUNE 30, 2009: THE OMINOUS DAY BO BERGDAHL DESERTED

BOWE BERGDAHL: HERO OF THE RADICAL LEFT

WHY BO BERGDAHL SHOULD HATE PRESIDENT OBAMA

 

 
Not only does this worst of all US presidents think that he's the 4th greatest ever, but laughably he now likens himself to Spiderman-the only thing this spider spins is a
 
 
The truth is this:
 
OBAMA IS TO AMERICA
WHAT A VILLAIN WITH KRYPTONITE IS TO SUPERMAN
 
 
 
 
 
 

 RELATED

THE GREATNESS OF BARACK OBAMA (SATIRE)

 THE GREAT DEPRESSOR AND HIS SUB-ZERO PRESIDENCY

BARACK OBAMA AND THE WORLD’S MOST BEAUTIFUL SOUND

LEADING U.S. UNIVERSITY RANKS OBAMA 5TH BEST PRESIDENT

THE ANNIVERSARY OF CLINTON’S APPEASEMENT BOMBING OF SERBIA FOR ISLAM AND OTHER MISTAKES AND MISERABLE THINGS

 
 
 
nato bombing Serbia
  On March 24, 1999, Bill Clinton unleashed a disastrous NATO air campaign against Yugoslavia, against the Christian Serbs, against a sovereign nation that did not pose a threat to members of the alliance.
 
WHILE BILL CLINTON WAS ATTEMPTING TO APPEASE
 
the Islamic world (and radical terrorists like Osama bin Laden) by showing how much he cared for Moslems and felt their pain in Bosnia and Kosovo-by attacking and killing Christian Serbs (our WW1 & 2 allies)-bin Laden and al Qaida unimpressed went ahead with their monstrous plans for 9/11. And now Clinton and his lying, lawless, incompetent wife (who turned the Benghazi consulate into a 9/11 death trap) want to return to the White House? The 9/11 Benghazi attack was a sign and reminder to the nation of Bill Clinton's responsibility for 9/11; and how he insanely preferred killing innocent Christian Serbs (defending themselves from Moslem jihadists allied to bin Laden) to protecting the homeland by going after al-Qaida. The Clintons can't be trusted with our national security. Returning them to the White House would be a catastrophe.
 
RELATED
 
 

 

SO DEMOCRATIC IDEALS ARE UPHELD BY WHO MR. PRESIDENT?

The theocratic Khomenists of Iran? The pan-Arab Nationalists of the West Bank? The Islamic supremacists of Gaza? The Moslem Brotherhood of Egypt? The neo-Ottomans of Turkey? Are these models of democratic principles, values and ideals that Netanyahu and Israel could learn from, Mr. President? Could they learn about these things from you? Not in a 1000 years. It's you who needs to learn from them.

 
 
Screen Shot 2015-03-19 at 11.30.24 PM
 
AFTER THE SIGNING OF THE MUNICH PACT

 Hitler mocked Chamberlain in private for being such an easily deceived fool. But Iran's Islamonazi leadership knows no such restraint. Their contempt for our weak, gutless, ineffective president (shared by most world leaders) is such that they openly mock him by telling the world how desperate he is for a deal, destroying a fake US aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf, chanting death to America; and now we learn of their plans for a nuclear EMP attack over the US to shut down and paralyze this country. And in his self-degrading, butt kissing attempt to get a bad deal for his legacy our hopeless putz of a pres goes back for more and more and more humiliation. Obama is like a long-suffering abused wife whose capacity for hurt is endless. Pathetic!
 
 
 
This isn't an incomplete picture of Denis McDonough.
                       
HEY, DENIS
 

I predict that 50 years from now the Jewish population of the Jewish West Bank in Jewish Judea and Samaria will be a robust 700,000 plus Jews. And no one will remember you and the stupid things you said today to a group of stupid leftwing Jewicidal Jews.

 
 
 
View image on Twitter
 

SURE JEH, ANYTHING YOU SAY

And Mohammed was the George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison of Islam rolled into one great democratic prophet of progress, justice and freedom.

 

 
 
WHAT’S NEXT?
 
Replacing the Declaration of Independence with a Declaration of Surrender to Allah, Islam and the prophet of darkness, bondage and chains?
 
 
 

 

REDUCING TO UTTER IDIOCY THE RADICAL LEFT’S ANTI-ISRAEL BIGOTRY

   

The man on the left tells his people,"If you like your doctor and healthcare plan you can keep them." The man on the right tells his people, "If you like East Jerusalem and your West Bank settlements you can keep them." The one is a cowardly leader that lies and lies and lies; the other is a man of  enormous courage and integrity who means what he says and says what he means. So much for Peter Beinard a stupid liberal American  Jew who wants to punish Israel for daring to deny fascist racist intolerant Palestinians a terrorist state next door.

THE ULTIMATE ARGUMENT AGAINST THE RADICAL LEFT ON THE MORAL SUPERIORITY OF ISRAEL IN THE MIDDLE EAST

Radical Leftists (like our idiot ill-starred president) are morally blind, mentally deranged,  well-meaning fools who search the wide world over looking for victims of oppression and injustice (real or imagined) to cry over and bleed for to feel morally  superior and alive. And high on their list of so-called victims are savage, racist, intolerant, liberal-hating Palestinians. Arguably the world's most despicable people in  the Palestinians were created by Israel's Arab enemies after the catastrophe of the Six Days War for use as a weapon and propaganda tool  to delegitimize the Jewish State and eventually destroy her. That the Palestinians (who didn't exist before 1967) were invented for this evil end is proved by the words of PLO executive Zahir Muhsein, who frankly told a Dutch newspaper in 1977:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a
Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle
against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality
today there is no difference between Jordanians,
Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and
tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of
a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand
that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian
people' to oppose Zionism. 

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state
with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa.
While as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa,
Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we
reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even
a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan." 

(PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein, in a 1977
interview with the Dutch newspaper Trouw.) 
 
 Now while uniting  a liberated Palestine (meaning Israel) to Jordan is no longer the PLO's overarching aim  (Jordan has a peace treaty with Israel and wants no part of this scheme)  the annihilation of Israel remains the PLO's goal under the genocidal  dictatorship of Mahmoud  Abbas-like Yasser Arafat a vicious, vile, Jew-hating Arab-Nazi supremacist with a deceptively friendlier face. Now to delegitimize Israel the radical idiot Left has bought into the big insane PLO lie that it is a "racist, warmonger, oppressive, apartheid, theocratic state carrying out genocide on an indigenous people." Indeed, the radical Left's vision  of Israel as a tyrannical monster of social, racial and economic injustice (a kind of nuclear armed apartheid South Africa of the Middle East) is bigoted, perverse and easily refuted by the following simple argument that I use in debate:
 
THE ARGUMENT
 
 
Let's suppose that you (Mr. Leftist) were a practicing Hindu yogi married to an atheist with a son who was gay and a beautiful, sexy teenage daughter with gorgeous legs who loved wearing mini skirts. And let's suppose (for whatever reason) you had to live in the Middle East with your choice of countries to live in (including the Palestinian Territories), what country would you choose? The country that would be the most respectful, tolerant and accepting of your Hindu (polytheistic pagan) faith, your wife's atheism, your son's homosexuality and your daughter's dressing style. Right? In other words, the country that would be safest for you and your family to live in; where each of you could be yourselves (be what you want to be pursuing your happiness and dreams) without fear of violence, persecution or death. Right? In short, you'd choose the country that was the most enlightened, progressive, modern, tolerant of minorities and CIVILIZED. Right? And of all the countries in the Middle East which would that be? Saudi Arabia? Egypt? Lebanon? Kuwait? Jordan? The Palestinian West Bank? Gaza? Or Israel?
 
I posted this argument in the comment section of the Beinart article and it started this thread which I'm certain will interest you
 
This is another trite tactic used by Israeli propagandists. They tout Israel as the only western style democracy in the region, but when critics of Israel hold it up to western democratic standards they say "look at Syria" "look at Iran" "look at Saudi Arabia" Which is it? Are you the best repressive middle Eastern regime, or the worst western style democracy? You can't have it both ways.
 
Nobody in the West, other than antisemites, would have any problem with Israel if it weren't for the settlements and the (now transparent) policy of apartheid designed to displace the people who stand in the way of your ethnic majority.
 
An "enlightened" democracy doesn't need to oppress or silence people in order to protect a specific religious or ethnic majority. This is the very opposite of "enlightenment."
 
 
 
It's typical of useful leftist idiots duped by lying Palestinian propaganda to blame the Palestinian-Israeli conflict on "Israeli settlements" on the West Bank when the Palestinian Liberation Organization was formed in May 1964, three years before the 1967 War when there were NO SETTLEMENTS. "Settlements" are the excuse for the ongoing conflict not the underlying ideological Arab-Islamo cause as the historical record shows.
 
BTW, that Israeli Jews have no RIGHT to settlements on the West Bank or to own East Jerusalem ignores the fact that prior to the 1948 War the West Bank and East Jerusalem were populated by Jews and Arabs. After the war, with Jordan having seized the West Bank and East Jerusalem, only Arabs were living there. WHY? What happened to the West Bank and East Jerusalem Jews? They were expelled by the Jordanians with their homes, businesses and farm lands seized by greedy, thieving, filthy Arabs-in the tradition of the thieving Prophet Mohammed whose evil example provided the moral justification for this theft.
 
 
Why does any of that matter? The boundaries of Israel were established in 1948. What they have "settled" since then they took by force. Going forward, they need a negotiated adjustment to that boundary, recognized by international law.
 
 
LOL!!! If the boundaries of Israel were settled in 1948 to the satisfaction of its Arab enemies why then did they continue their JIHAD (Koran inspired Holy War) against Israel? Why then did Syria, Jordan and Egypt repeatedly send murdering armed terrorist thugs into Israel (acts of war) to kill its citizens? Why then did these countries support the PLO (sworn to the annihilation of Israel) when it was founded three years before the 67 War and seizure of the West Bank, Golan Heights and Sinai in a defensive war against aggressor enemies? Because Israel's Arab enemies continued their unjustified jihad against Israel after 1948...giving Israel an absolute moral right and justification to expand its borders by force for the protection and security of its citizens. No other nation would have done less.
 
 
Why does any of that matter? The boundaries of Israel were established in 1948. What they have "settled" since then they took by force. Going forward, they need a negotiated adjustment to that boundary, recognized by international law.
 
 
LOL!!! If the boundaries of Israel were settled in 1949 to the satisfaction of its Arab enemies why then did they continue their JIHAD (Koran inspired Holy War) against Israel? Why then did Syria, Jordan and Egypt repeatedly send murdering armed terrorist thugs into Israel (acts of war) to kill its citizens? Why then did these countries support the PLO (sworn to the annihilation of Israel) when it was founded three years before the 67 War and seizure of the West Bank, Golan Heights and Sinai in a defensive war against aggressor enemies? Because Israel's Arab enemies continued their unjustified jihad against Israel after 1949...giving Israel an absolute moral right to expand its borders by force for the protection and security of its citizens. No other nation would have done less.
 
 
Absolute moral right?
 
I guess by that standard the US is morally justified in annexing Japan and kicking out all the Japanese people
 
 
 
But the Japanese unconditionally surrendered and allowed us to transform them from savage medieval imperialist barbarians into a peaceloving liberal free market democratic people-a danger to no one.
 
 
 
 19 HOURS, NO ANSWER
 
Thumbnail
(thanx Nanna)

IS FRANCE DRIVING OBAMA TO DESPAIR OVER IRAN NUKE DEAL?

 
 
John Kerry in France with singer James Taylor ironically singing "If You Got A Friend." Ironically because France is proving very unfriendly to him and Obama in nuke negotiations with Iran.
 
Nine days from now on March 31st (the sixth anniversary of Bibi Netanyahu becoming Israel's 9th Prime Minister) a political framework for stopping theofascist Iran from developing the ultimate weapon of terror and death to advance their growing regional and global power  is supposed to be reached. But things are looking grim. Unsurprisingly it's being reported that the French (whose President was opposed to Netanyahu coming to his country when Islamic gunmen killed the Charlie Hebdo 12 and Jews in a Kosher Deli) is opposed to the deal in its current form (like Netanyahu they too think it's bad) and is taking a very tough line that must be driving Obama to despair. We don't know what the French are objecting to or demanding in terms of further restrictions. But the reason for the tough line (as I said HERE) is the economic leverage that Saudi Arabia and other Sunni Gulf states have over the French on arms sales. For the French (whose economy is in recession) more important than Obama's bad deal with Iran (which they might have gone along with under normal circumstances) is keeping its multi billion dollar arms business with the Saudis.  It will be fascinating to see if nothing is achieved by the 31st giving Netanyahu a kind of victory 14 days from his landslide reelection, on the anniversary of his becoming PM.
 
BIDEN ON CAMPAIGN TRAIL OUTDOES NETANYAHU'S "RACISM"
 
 
During his campaign Bibi Netanyahu warned his political base to get out in force because "Arab voters are streaming in quantity to the polling stations," with left-wing groups "bringing them in buses." And this created an international uproar accusing him  of anti-Arab racisism and wanting to turn Israel's Arabs into  the enemy-which too many of them are.  But when Biden while campaigning in  2012  made this awful racist remark about Republicans to a black audience it practically went unnoticed by the mainstream press.
  
 
 Republicans want to put you all [blacks] back in chains?
 
RELATED
 
 
 

OBAMA FEELING BETRAYED BY ISRAEL THREATENS A DOOMED-TO-FAIL TWO STATE SOLUTION AT UN

 

Barack Obama: a desperate man with time running out on his achievement poor presidency threatening Israel with a UN resolution on a two state solution it doesn't give him a deal.

NetanjahuHandy

Following Britain's David Cameron, Canada's Stephen Harper, Australia's Tony Abbot and the leaders of Germany, Italy,  Spain and other EU states it seems that our feckless, blundering, lead-from-behind president was dragged kicking and screaming Thursday to congratulate Bibi Netanyahu on his historic, landslide election victory-when the Israeli people said no to 1999 and the catastrophic mistake they made by removing him from office in favor of Ehud Barak: the so-called peace candidate from Israel's delusional Left who tried and predictably failed to negotiate a two state solution with Yasser Arafat that ended in the disaster of the Second Intifada.

 
On Tuesday Israelis said no to giving up East Jerusalem for "peace;" no to a return to indefensible pre-1967 borders for "peace;" no to a right of return of millions of Palestinian refugees for "peace;" and no to bad deal Barack's Munich appeasement talks with Iran that's turned him into an international joke as it's not stopping their nuclear weapons program and terrorist expansion in the region.
 
 
The Israeli people have spoken and want Bibi Netanyahu to stay the course in defying US pressure and world opinion to compromise with unappeasable, implacable, hate driven enemies-medieval death cult Moslem savages, and Arab supremacist racists who can't tolerate the existence of the Jewish State and religiously live for its Nazi destruction.
 
Against the Palestinians and their useful leftist Western idiots the people of Israel rose up Tuesday and said
 
NO!
NEVER AGAIN!
BIBI IS RIGHT!
THE WORLD IS WRONG!
WE WILL DEFY YOU TO THE END! 
 
But unsurprisingly and contemptuously Obama is ignoring them. In his stupid little petty vindictive narcissistic Chicagoland brain he feels personally betrayed by the Israeli people as if they stabbed him in the back for being their good and loyal friend. After everything he's done for them they repay him by reinstating as PM the man he hates most in this world: his nemesis Bibi Netanyahu who slapped him down in public and humiliates him time and time again.
 
Look at what Obama's done for Israel and feel the poor man's pain: At Cairo before the Moslem world he declared his commitment to a safe and secure Israel, and keeping its unbreakable bond with America. And showing that he meant what he said Obama has sent billions in military aid to Israel making it more secure from its Moslem enemies than ever. Indeed, this aid included funds for the development of the Iron Dome anti-missile system which protected innocent Israelis from deadly Hamas missile attacks; and for its Arrow Weapon System to counter long-range ballistic missiles that could rain down death on Israeli cities from Iran, ISIS or other more distant enemy states. In fact, Obama claims that America's military assistance to Israel during his presidency has exceeded any other president's in history; and that this proves his friendship to the Israeli people and that he's "got their back (see)." And Bibi Netanyahu showing his gratitude for what Obama has done said this:
 
 “Thank you for unequivocally affirming Israel’s sovereign right to defend itself by itself against any threat. Thank you for enhancing Israel’s ability to exercise that right through generous military assistance, revolutionary missile defense programs, and unprecedented security and intelligence cooperation.

Thank you, Mr. President, for upholding the Jewish people’s right to a Jewish state in our historic homeland, and for boldly defending that right at the United Nations. And thank you for strengthening the unbreakable alliance between our two nations during your Presidency.” [March 20, 2013]

 

On the following day Israeli President Shimon Peres awarding Obama the Presidential Medal of Distinction (in Israel) said this at the ceremony:

This [Presidential Medal of Distinction] speaks to your tireless work to make Israel strong. And peace possible. Your presidency has given the close ties between Israel and the United States a new height. A sense of intimacy. A vision for the future. The people of Israel are particularly moved by your unforgettable contribution to their security. To defending our skies. To the collaboration in the domain of intelligence, which is the right way to preempt bloodshed. The diplomatic and military bonds between us have reached an unprecedented level.”

All this praise from the two highest Israeli leaders would have been enough for any US president for benefiting a true, trusted friend and ally. But Barack Hussein Obama isn't just any US president. From the day he entered office he was obsessed with the notion that he'd succeed where his predecessors had failed. And that he'd be the one who'd make history and broker a two state solution between Palestinians and Israel. 

 

 

But 70 days into office an anvil fell on Obama's unrealistic head:  Bibi Netanyahu became Israel's prime minister making reasonable demands on the extremist Palestinians that made negotiations for a two state solution unfeasible: "recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish State," said Bibi, "and give up demands for East Jerusalem and a right of return for millions of Palestinian refugees." And what did Obama do in response to this? What he's done with many of our enemies: he went into appeasement mode thinking he could change Bibi's mind in moderating his demands, and pulled out all the stops in giving aid to Israel.

But it failed. Bibi, though thankful to Obama for all the aid, was not about to repeat the mistakes of Ehud Barak with a Palestinian leadership that differed little in character from Yasser Arafat. Obama was mortified. He had bent over backwards to accommodate Israel and been its good friend not because it was the right thing to do, but with an ulterior motive that Netanyahu rightly refused to respect. Stupidly thinking in his confused leftist mind that Netanyahu not the Palestinians was the obstacle to peace, and that Israel had a real peace partner in Mahmoud Abbas (as if he were another Anwar Sadat) Obama would then work behind the scenes with American political operatives in Israel to bring Netanyahu down. And that failed too making Obama look weak, ineffective and foolish.

 

Besides himself with rage over feeling betrayed Obama is now threatening as a last resort to go to the UN Security Council for a resolution on a two state solution. But that didn't work in 1947 when the partition of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states (accepted by the Jews) was rejected by the Arab League who chose war instead and lost. And it isn't going to work now as Israel will absolutely not return to the pre-1967 borders giving sworn Moslem-Arab Jew hating enemies more land; and there is no one who can force Israel to do so-especially with the unbreakable courageous defiant Bibi Netanyahu at the helm of a nuclear armed state that could devastate the Middle East in minutes and sink the world economy.

In short, the worse case scenario for Israel is using the Samson Option (rattling the nuclear sabre in private) to end any proposed damaging UN sanctions for noncompliance with a two state resolution. And realistically, who would risk the lives of millions and a world-wide depression for the despicable, hate driven, medieval Palestinians becoming a state with East Jerusalem for its capital? Obama? Russia? China? France? This is why a UN resolution on a two state solution (if it ever happens) will fail; and Obama again will be defeated by Netanyahu adding to his  legacy of folly and failure.

 

 

 

IS BIBI NETANYAHU A LIAR FOR REJECTING THE TWO STATE SOLUTION WHICH HE AFFIRMED SIX YEARS AGO AND RECENTLY TO CONGRESS? AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS

 
 
 
 Netanyahu 2009
 
There are two free peoples living side by side in this small land, with good neighborly relations and mutual respect, each with its flag, anthem and government, with neither one threatening its neighbor's security and existence.``
 
Netanyahu May 2011
 
“In any peace agreement that ends the conflict, some settlements [on the West bank] will end up beyond Israel’s borders.......We will be very generous on the size of a future Palestinian state … I am willing to make painful compromises to achieve this historic peace."
 
Netanyahu US Congress March 2015
 
Text of PM Bibi Netanyahu's recent speech to the US Congress
"We must also find a way to forge a lasting peace with the Palestinians. Two years ago, I publicly committed to a solution of two states for two peoples: A Palestinian state alongside the Jewish state.
I am willing to make painful compromises to achieve this historic peace. As the leader of Israel, it is my responsibility to lead my people to peace.
This is not easy for me. I recognize that in a genuine peace, we will be required to give up parts of the Jewish homeland. " 
 
Netanyahu Campaign 2015
 
Declares definitively that if he was returned to office he would never establish a Palestinian state

 

IS BIBI NETANYAHU A LIAR

as the Daily Kos and many on the Left are saying because he reversed his position on a two state solution and now rejects the establishment of a Palestinian state? No way! Six years ago Netanyahu offered the Palestinians the following two state solution, which they rejected: First, Palestinians recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish State; and second, they drop their demands for East Jerusalem as their capital, and the right of return for millions of Palestinian refugees (which would effectively destroy the Jewish nature and character of Israel). In his offer only the West Bank settlements were negotibale (the "painful concessions"). As Bibi's solution was rejected by the Palestinian leadership (Abbas and Hamas)-and he patiently gave them six years to reconsider-how does withdrawing the offer (the only one acceptable to him and Likud) make him a liar? How can you make peace with a people who want a right of return for millions of refugees as this would destroy the possibility of a two state solution and eventually turn Israel into a Palestinian state with a Jewish minority subject to an Arab majority?

Anyway, it would be absolutely hypocritical of Obama to punish Israel at the UN or anywhere for reversing HIS two state solution when he has known Netanyahu's stringent position all along, and its continued rejection by the intransigent Palestinians.

 

Sarcasm
 
 

AT LAST, AXIS OF EVIL OBAMA

has found the true, authentic "religion of peace" Islamic State that ISIS (at its best) could never be. Now that Iran is no longer a terror state it's the "More Perfect Union" of the Middle East. The new shinning Medina upon a hill that would make Mohammed proud. Ayatollah Khamenei is the new prophetic voice of God-the vessel of Allah's redemption, goodness and grace on Earth heading a social justice republic of equality, virtue and love. Will Obama's kowtowing to Iran earn him the honor of following Putin and meeting Khamenei face-to-face-who, as a rule, doesn't allow infidel leaders within a mile of him unless their pro-Iran? Obama (like Putin) is now a friend of the Islamic Revolution; and perhaps Khamenei's in the mood to make another exception and grant him an audience.

Peace at last!

Peace at last!

Thank God Almighty we have peace at last!

By the way, it did wonders for the security of South Korea when Bush removed the nuclear Norks from the terror list.

Putin receives the honor of being the first infidel leader to meet with a Supreme Leader of Iran. Will Khamenei grant the same to Obama? Or is he too contemptibe for Khamenei?

RELATED

WILL OBAMA MEET WITH KHAMENEI IN TEHRAN FOR HIS SUPREME MUNICH MOMENT?

 

 
 
 

THE MENTAL AND MORAL MIDGET

in the White House is fighting a losing battle against a larger than life Jewish leader who is favored by Heaven to continue as Israel's PM. As the wounded  narcissistic nut case doubles down on his personal vendetta against Netanyahu, his victory Tuesday will prove to be a tragic foreshadowing of worse humiliations and setbacks to come. If Obama doesn't accept the reality of Netanyahu's wisdom and moral clarity on Iran and the Palestinians he will finish his days a broken man in deep regret with a foreign policy legacy of ashes and dust.

 

 
Is this a new cold war? Just leave it to  dumb ass Obama  to get into a cold war with an ally. But wasn't this the same Obama who repeatedly said that the bond between the US and Israel is indissoluble?
 
 
 
Is a rightwing military dictatorship coming to America as it did with August Pinochet in Chile?
 

THE LEFT'S WAR ON POLICE

is part of a radical left George Soros (seescheme to destroy what's left of our Judeo-Christian constitutional capitalist order by reducing it to chaos, and replacing it with a leftwing socialist dictatorship. What's wrong with this scheme is that the breakdown of law and order would most likely push the public farther to the law and order right with a right-wing military dictatorship taking power that would utterly crush the left and put men like Soros in jail. A good example would be the Pinochet government in Chile and its harsh crackdown on the pro-Cuban communist supporters of Salvador Allende-a Marxist senator turned president like Barack Obama. Allende's socialist agenda made a predictable shambles of Chile's economy and divided the country into warring camps.

Chilian Marxist President Allende with Cuba's Fidel Castro.

RELATED

 THE MAN WITH THE MIDDLE NAME “HUSSEIN,” OR BARACK HUSSEIN ALLENDE

 
  Iran’s Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei, said: “The Zionist regime is a regime whose pillars are extremely shaky and is doomed to collapse.” 
 
 
THE SAMSON OPTION AGAIN
 
 The quote from Khamenei (a sick frail man with cancer) sounds like Samson in the bible bringing down the temple of the Philistines upon himself. If Israel should be faced with collapse from its enemies it will exercise the Samson Option and destroy Iran and the entire Moslem Middle East in a nuclear holocaust....where (to paraphrase Jonathan Schell) the Arab living will envy the Arab dead (see).
 
 
 
 
 

IN RETALIATION REPUBLICANS

should move the Keystone pipeline project to Israel. Or ban all electric cars, solar panels and windpower farms to incease CO2 output in anticipation of an Al Gore run for the presidency. /sarc

 

 
Screen Shot 2015-03-17 at 10.56.14 AM
 
 

GIVE THIS KID JEWISH JUSTICE!

Find the kid then put him in a sealed, air tight room with ten fat Jews with flatulence problems wearing gas masks and fart until he begs for mercy.

 

 

 It is said that a picture is worth a 1000 words. But this one is worth a 1000 woes as Obama's presidency in the end will come crashing down on his head with the realization that he'd been wrong all along; and that the foibles of his predecessor won't help him with his legacy.

NETANYAHU’S SPEECH TO CONGRESS, MUNICH 1938 , ISAAC HERZOG AND 1999 REDUX

On Saturday February 7, 2009 (the 38th day of the year*) just four days after radical terrorist Shiite Iran entered the Space Age by launching its first orbiting satellite (see), and three days before two Russian and US satellites were totally obliterated in an unprecedented collision over Siberia (see) Vice President Joe Biden (born 49 weeks into World War II**) was in Munich, Germany (symbol of war causing duplicity, naïvety and appeasement) foolishly offering Iran and Russia olive branches of peace. Rightly called by Heritage Foundation's Nile Gardiner "one of the weakest projections of U.S. leadership on foreign soil in recent memory (see)" Biden's speech foreshadowed the misjudgments, strategic blunders and foreign policy disasters to come, and are now being compounded. 
*38 is 1938 abbreviated.

 **Biden was born November 20, 1942. 

Then on March 31-7 weeks from Biden's February 7th Munich speech-on the 70th day of the Obama presidency Bibi Netanyahu (for the second time in 9 years) became Israel's 9th Prime Minister. Ominously the dates February 7 and March 31, 2009 were 70 years, 4 months and 70 years 6 months from September 29, 1938. That was the day of historic infamy and folly when Neville Chamberlain, mistaking Hitler for a statesman and Nazi Germany for a normal European power with legitimate political grievances, agreed to the Munich Pact ceding the Sudetenland to Germany.
Now fast forward six years later to Netanyahu's recent address to Congress-his 3rd address on the 3rd day of the 3rd month of March during his 3rd term as prime minister*. Sounding like Winston Churchill warning that the Munich Pact was a bad deal for Great Britain and the peace of Europe Netanyahu warned about the catastrophe that awaits the Middle East and world peace if radical jihadist Islamic Iran's nuclear weapons program isn't completely shut down along with their global terrorist activities. 

*Since his 1st term in the 90s Netanyahu has had two consecutive term. He's now running for a 3rd consecutive term .

 Now here is where it gets profound. The speech which started at precisely 11:11 am with the first "thank you" ran for approximately 40 minutes to the last "thank you" and (when the 7 Hebrew words from Deuteronomy 31:6 are added) amazingly totalled up to 3876* words. What is amazing and seems ominous and could be prophetic about the speech's word count (apart from its prescient message) is that 3876, whch is headed by the number 38, is a multiple of 1938 twice (1938 + 1938 = 3876) giving us the year of the disastrous Munich Pact.

*Strangely, Netanyahu's speech was 76 years from the 1938 signing of the Munich Pact  (see).

BIDEN , KERRY AND ISAAC HERZOG MEET IN MUNICH 
On  February 7, 2015, exactly six years to the date of Biden's portentous Munich speech (and on a Saturday as in 2009) Joe Biden and John Kerry met with Israeli opposition leader, so-called peace candidate, Isaac Herzog in Munich-obviously to discuss policy issues and the administrations support for his election run against Netanyhau for the prime-ministership (see). 
Herzog's party (Zionist Union) who recently pulled ahead of Netanyahu's Likud Party  in the polls and could possibly win would likely be as disastrous for Israel as was Ehud Barak who defeated Netanyahu in 1999 in a landslide-and whose naïve Chamberlain-like weakness in negotiating an impossible peace (blindly brokered by Bill Clinton) with Jew hating, Arab Nazi Yasser Arafat (thinking he turned moderate) led to the catastrophe of the Second Intifada where hundreds were killed and injured.
It is perhaps a providential warning to the Israeli people that from the Munich meeting between Biden, Kerry and Herzog on Februray 7 (the 38th day of the year) to tomorrow's election on March 17 is amazingly  and ominously exactly 38 DAYS.
Reinforcing, I believe, the above tragic sign of coming Munich-like disasters for Israel if Herzog replaces Netanyahu there is the unsettling fact that tomorrow's election is just one day short of the 146th anniversary of Neville Chamberlain's birth*.
 *Born March 18, 1869. 
 To summarize the above: from the 38th day of 2009 when Biden gave his appeasement speech in Munich, to Bibi Netanyahu's third speech to Congress totaling 3876* words (twice 1938), to Biden and Kerry's meeting with the weak, dovish, Barak clone  Isaac Herzog at Munich on the 38th day of the year-38 days before tomorrow's election-the defeat of Netanyahu has the Munich disaster written all over it. Which should surprise no one as our unrealistic, self-deceived, foreign policy failed president is hell-bent on repeating Bill Clinton's blunder of trying to force Israel into a two state solution with an enemy who wants a single Arab/Moslem state and victory over Jews.
* As the Munich Pact was agreed to in the 38th year of the 20th century (on the 29th day of September) it was 76 years from Netanyahu's speech-which is oddly reflected in the number 3876 (see). By the way, March 17 is the 76th day of the year.
OBAMA, HERZOG AND SEPTEMBER 29, 1938
 
The Munich Pact was agreed to by Hitler, Chamberlain, Mussolini and French premier Daladier late in the evening of September 29, 1938, and was signed in the early morning hours of the following day (see).  Now when Obama won the presidency on November 4, 2008 it was on the 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis-anticipting his intractable problems with Iran (see).
This crisis which painfully humiliated the US for 444 days (and was the opening shot of radical Islamic jihad against our country and the West) resulted from Jimmy Carter abandoning the US friendly Shah and letting Islamic supremacists come to power thinking they were liberal democrats. Now as this same Chamberlain-like naivety guides Barack Obama's negotiations with Iran (he now calls the mullahs "US allies" and its leadership "moderate" and no longer sponsoring terror) and his backing of Isaac Herzog's party in Israel, it is fascinating to note that the number 29 (another symbol of Munich appeasement giving us the day not the year) dominates these relationships. This can be seen in the birth dates of Obama and Herzog, and elsewhere as you will see below, hence: 
 Obama was born 8-4-1961 and Herzog ten months earlier on 9-22-1960 (see).

8+4+1+9+6+1 = 29

9+2+2+1+9+6+0 = 29

The birth dates of both Obama and Herzog total 29 corresponding to the 29th day of September 1938 when the Munich Pact was agreed to; and to the 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis when Obama was elected president-as he's repeating with Iran the same Munich-like appeasement that characterized Chamberlain's relationship with Hitler.
ELECTION DAY MARCH 17, 2015, AND MUNICH 29
The question now is this: with Isaac Herzog overtaking Netanyahu in the polls (due mostly to a weak Israeli economy) could tomorrow's election be 1999 all over again with Netanyahu being defeated by a weak Chamberlain-like dovish candidate like Ehud Barak? Only God knows what the outcome will be; but I may have discovered numeric signs that warn Israel of a catastrophe if Herzog becomes Israel's tenth prime minister (sharing it with Tzipi Livini). What follows is truly amazing and possibly ominous.

 From  Thursday, September 22, 1960 (Isaac Herzog's birth)

To Tuesday, March 17, 2015 (The Israeli election)

Result: 19,899 days (see).

You will notice that number of days separating Isaac Herzog's birth from election day has the year 1999 encoded in it-the year Ehud Barak defeated Netanyahu.  Moreover, in calculating the number of days separating Ehud Barak's birth from Herzog's we get what looks like another inauspicious sign:   

From Thursday, February 12, 1942 (Ehud Barak's birth) (see) 

To Thursday, September 22, 1960 (Isaac Herzog's birth)

Result: 6797 days (see). 

Why is this number inauspicious? Add up the digits,

6+7+9+7 = 29

But there is more. In counting the number of days from Netanyahu's birth to tomorrow's election this is what results:

FromFriday, October 21, 1949 (Netanyahus's birth)

To Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Result: 23,888 days (see)

Now add up the digits

2+3+8+8+8 = the unlucky inauspicious Munich 29.

If Netanyahu doesn't continue as Israel's prime minister until Obama leaves office (and he's replaced by a pro-Israel president) these next 22 months could be an Obama-Herzog created hell for Israel-like it was under Clinton when peace negotiations broke down between Ehud Barak and the evil Yasser Arafat.
POSTSCIPT
For those interested in checking my word count of Netanyahu's speech to Congress below is the Washington Post transcript. However, to get the proper count you need to eliminate the advertisements together with the words (APPLAUSE) (LAUGHTER) and (SPEAKING IN HEBREW).
The complete transcript of Netanyahu’s address to Congress - The Washington Post 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 

WHY BARACK OBAMA IS WORSE THAN NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN AND ALL GREAT APPEASERS IN HISTORY COMBINED

 
Hitler's Nazi troops victoriously marching through the streets of Prague.
 
 On this day of March 15th 76 years ago when Hitler's Nazi army shredded the Munich Pact signed just 23 weeks before and nonviolently invaded the frightened Czechoslovakian provinces of Bohemia and Moravia taking over the country, it opened Neville Chamberlain's eyes to what a fool he'd been in treating Hitler as a normal European statesman with legitimate post-war grievances that could be appeased-and he began the rearming of Great Britain preparing for war.
 
But after appeasement and appeasement, embarrassment after embarrassment, and failure after failure in trying to get Iran to moderate its behavior and give up its ambition of becoming the nuclear armed terrorist hegemon of the Middle East: after brutally crushing the anti-mullah pro-US  democratic revolution in Tehran, after swallowing up Baghdad upon US troops deserting Iraq, after supporting Bashar Assad with Hezbollah jihadists and arms as he was mass murdering and gassing the Syrian people in the tens and thousands; after supplying Taliban insurgents with weapons to kill US  troops and after watching the fall of the US friendly regime in Yemen to Iranian backed rebels what does Barack Obama do? Does it open his eyes to what a fool he's been in treating radical terrorist theonazi Iran with a sensitivity and respect unbecoming a great power? NO!  Instead, after six long years of DEATH TO AMERICA and countless verbal attacks and ridicule Barack Obama has his idiot wife celebrate the Iranian New Year of Nowruz in the White House. It's mind boggling.
 
 
 As Obama's extreme radical weakness in dealing with enemies goes beyond Iran to include Russia, China, Cuba and the Moslem Brotherhood, as he has made the world a more dangerous place for freedom, human rights and peace he stands as a uniquely towering figure among history's foolish appeasers...so much so that he can only be compared to himself.
 
On this day, the 76th anniversary of the Nazi invasion of Prague, I declare  to the world that the Obama/Chamberlain analogy is dead, as Obama has taken ass-kissing appeasement to a whole new level of insanity.
 
 
 
 POSTSCRIPT I
 
 
 
REPUBLICANS, TREMBLE!
 
 
The weakest, most clueless, most ineffective president in US history (the leader who just 15% of the military respects and no one fears) is daring you to cross the red line and interfere with his failing appeasement negotiations with radical fanatical terrorist Iran. Cross that line and he will strike you with all the girlie man blows his gutless soul can muster. CROSS AT YOUR PERIL GOP! Don't say you haven't been warned.
 
POSTSCRIPT II
 
COLUTZUS
 
 
Hank Frost comments:
 
"Excellent post and true: Obama towers above all past appeasers. He’s the Appeasement Colossus."
 
My reply:
 

Actually Obama is a COLUTZUS: a colossal klutz. Or, in the immortal words of William Shakespeare:

Cassius:
Why, man, he [Obama] doth bestride the narrow world
Like a COLUTZUS , and all past appeasers
Walk under his huge legs, and peep about…..

 
RELATED
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

FRANCE, SAUDI ARABIA AND OBAMA’S DOOMED IRAN DEAL AT THE UN

 
 
 
 
French President Hollande and the Saudis.
 
 
I owe my readers an apology for what I previously wrote on this page and deleted. What I said about the UN Security Council was only partially true. It is true that the Obama administration will fail to bypass Congress and get the UNSC to sanction and turn into international law any bad Chamberlain- like "peace in our time" deal it makes with radical terrorist Islamonazi Iran. But this won't be done as I wrongly supposed by Jordan, Nigeria and Malaysia (three of the fifteen council members) voting against the treaty. For what  is required to pass it are nine votes, which Obama absolutely has. But what Obama doesn't have and desperately needs are all five permanent members of the UNSC each one of which has veto power over  any resolution, measure or treaty.
 
Indeed, Obama can ridicule Netanyahu and the 47 Republican Senators all he wants; and the left can rage that there's a vast right-wing conspiracy afoot to deprive Obama of a treaty with Iran because he's black or they hate his guts. But at the UNSC his real problem is with one of its five permanent members who will almost certainly veto any bad appeasement deal Obama makes with Iran; and that country is France with its socialist president Francois Hollande.
 
France which has given Obama so much trouble in the Iran P5+ talks and was utterly shocked to the point of contempt when Obama lifted sanctions on Iran with getting nothing in return (an obviously stupid desperate appeasement move) will only settle for a treaty where Iran agrees to completely end its enrichment of uranium and dismantle its nuclear weapons making capabilities. Why would France be so stringent in its demands? Because the economically distressed French (they're suffering a recession) are in the pocket of Iran's powerful Sunni enemies, namely Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the Emirates and other Sunni Gulf states.
 
Indeed, unfortunately for the Obama administration these countries have multibillion dollar contracts with France to purchase weapons and military equipment; and they won't tolerate France voting in favor of  a deal that guarantees (as Netanyahu warned Congress) "Iran getting the bomb any time in the future." NO IRAN BOMB EVER! That is their policy. Indeed, there's no way that the economically hurting French would risk their lucrative arms contracts with this Saudi led coalition to support a bad US-Iran deal. And this is why the French as I write are not on board with the Obama administration with Kerry saying that more work needs to be done to get to where France and the US want to be. Where they ideally want to be is where the Saudis, the Israelis, Jordan, Egypt and the other Sunni states want Iran to be: giving up its nuclear ambitions completely and absolutely. But that isn't going to happen as Iran is hell bent on getting the bomb and continuing its expansion across the Middle East and global terrorist activities. It's either all or nothing with the Saudi led coalition  Either the mullahs give up their quest of becoming a nuclear armed state with ICBM capabilities, or they'll be no deal at the UNSC. 
 
In short, if Obama wants to take his Iran deal to the UN  it will give the Saudi led Sunni coalition tremendous leverage over it practically guaranteeing its failure. In other words, without a deal approved by Saudi Arabia Obama doesn't have France. And without France an internationally binding UN sanctioned agreement is impossible.
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
 
Meanwhile, our super-butt kissing, peace-through-weakness, get-a-deal-at-any-price-with-Iran-president observed the Iranian New Year of Nowruz in the White House hoping it would move the heart of Iran's cancer eaten supreme leader.
 
 
 
Works like a charm every time.
 
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 
  
 

MY “TREASONOUS” LETTER TO IRAN’S SUPREME LEADER AYATOLLAH ALI KHAMENEI (POSTSCRIPT: JOHN KERRY: 48TH TRAITOR)

 

 

To Ayatollah Khamenei Supreme leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran:

 As a concerned citizen of the United States of America this is to warn you in no uncertain terms of the possible consequences to Iran and your regime if you continue your nuclear weapons program, global terrorist activities and building of Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) which can threaten my country with nuclear attacks. Indeed, unless you agree to the complete dismantling and destruction of your uranium enrichment facilities (nuclear weapons making infrastructure), and stop the funding, training and arming of Islamic terrorist groups in the Middle East and beyond, any agreement that you conclude unilaterally (not radified by Congress) with the Obama Administration will be meaningless, invalid, non-binding, and will be revoked by a future Republican President. Moreover, the new President with the backing of Congress will likely move to reimpose the full range of economic sanctions prematurely lifted by this Administration with possible painful and costly additions. 
 
But it gets worse, sir. Be warned that the new Republican President may request from Congress and be granted a WAR RESOLUTION ACT against your country making regime change the official policy of the United States, and granting him the authority to 1) launch military strikes against your nuclear facilities and other military targets, and 2) to invade your country to topple your regime and end your oppressive autocratic rule.
 
I pray, sir, that this letter will bring you to your senses about the likely devastating consequences to you and your regime if a bad deal is reached with this Administration. BEND OR BE BROKEN!  What happened to Saddam could happen to you. The American people are losing patience. You have been warned.
 
Sincerely,
 
At great risk to my life and liberty,
 
ApolloSpeaks
 
 
 
  POSTSCRIPT I
 
The letter sent by the 47 Republican Senators to the Iranians  is protected as free speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution and could have been legally and lawfully sent by any American speaking as a citizen just as I do in my letter above. If the Senators' letter is "treasonous" then so is mine. However, those accusing the Senators of "treason"  are either ignorant of the Constitution or are leftist liars smearing good men who want to shut down debate on Obama's bad butt kissing deal .
 
 POSTSCRIPT II
 
JOHN KERRY: 48TH TRAITOR
 
 
 
If the 47 Republican Senators are irresponsibly and traitorously undermining US foreign policy for saying that an agreement with Iran would not be legally binding then what does that make John Kerry for saying the same thing? Now there are 48 traitors. Is this utterly laughably incoherent of Kerry or what?
 
POSTSCRIPT III
 
One man is the supreme leader of Iran, the other is the supreme joke of America. 

REPUBLICANS’ LETTER TO IRAN, MSNBC AND AIR AMERICA AND OBAMA’S BOYCOTT OF BIBI’S SPEECH

 

 

 

Republican Letter to Iran to Sabotage Nuclear Talks Could Backfire | The New Republic

 

Does anyone recall Ted Kennedy's outrageous collusion (making common cause) with the Soviets in trying to defeat Ronald Reagan in the 1984 election (see)? And wasn't Teddy Obama's mentor and kingmaker thinking he was the "new JFK"? Moreover, isn't it Obama who's "sabotaging" US foreign policy by being the greatest and mots dangerous enabler of Iranian power since  worthless Jimmy Carter deserted the pro-West Shah for America-hating Ayatollah Khomenie....thinking he was a Jeffersonian democrat?  If it weren't  for Jimmy Carter would there be a radical genocidal terrorist Iran threatening America, Israel and the Sunni Middle East with nuclear armed jihadist martydom and Armageddon? "LET IRAN BURN SO LONG AS ISLAM PREVAILS," said the Jeffersonian Khomenie who triggered an eight year war with Saddam Hussein where one million were killed and an equal number injured. Who then was the ultimate saboteur of US foreign policy in the region? And who is continuing his disgraceful legacy of weakness, appeasement and utter rank stupidity?

Come to think of it if Obama can't negotiate with Republicans why should we expect anything but failure in negotiating with unappeasable jihadist enemies who want to destroy us for Allah, Islam and a Moslem world government-an idiotic but dangerous utopian dream like a socialist one world borderless state? Anything less than Iran stopping enrichment and the dismantling of its nuclear weapons infrastructure and ICBM capabilities is failure requiring a military solution. If the people of Iran don't rise up and overthrow their Islamonazi masters war is coming.

 

 

DEMOCRATS COLLUDE WITH SOVIETS TO UNDERMINE REAGAN

What harm is a letter by 47 Republican Senators explaining to Iranians how our constitutional system works compared to the Democrats in the 1980s colluded with the Soviets in stiring up massive worldwide nuclear war hysteria to undermine Reagan's tough anti-Soviet policies (that won the Cold War)?

 

DEBATES ON THE NEW REPUBLIC

magboy47
 
 

@ApolloSpeaks2. 'DOES ANYONE RECALL TED KENNEDY'S COLLUSION WITH THE SOVIETS?'

Does anyone recall the collusion of the whole Republican Party with the government of Iran?  Eh? 

 
ApolloSpeaks2
 
 

@magboy47 @ApolloSpeaks2 Teddy represented the entire Democrat Party which, by the way, colluded with the Soviets in whipping up mass nuclear war hysteria over Reagan's tough anti-Soviet policies (which won the Cold War).

magboy47
 
 

@ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47 Reagan caved to his own hysteria.  After WWIII almost started over an incident in 1983, Reagan, in a panic, initiated nuclear disarmament with the Soviets.  Do your homework.

 
 
ApolloSpeaks2
 
 

@magboy47 @ApolloSpeaks2 lol!!!

It was Reagan's momentous, courageous epoch-making walkout on Gorbachev at Reykjavík in 1986 (after 45 minutes) that was the beginning of the end of the Cold War. As Gorby said: "I realized then that a new world was possible." Then several years later Gorby admitted that "Ronald Reagan spent the Soviet Union into bankruptcy."

 
 
 
 

@ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47 Teddy Kennedy's free-lance nuclear diplomacy in 1984 represented "the entire Democrat Party"?  Didn't the Democrats have a Presidential nominee in 1984 (Walter something or other), who was not in favor of a nuclear freeze or other pro-Soviet gestures the way Kennedy was?  And what about Al Gore, Sam Nunn and approximately half to 2/3 of the Democratic Congressional delegation, who were also not exactly on board with détente with the Soviets in 1984?

You are entitled to your opinions about how Reagan spent the Soviets into oblivion or stared them down in nuclear negotiations.  You are not entitled to your own facts about Democratic foreign policy in 1984.

 
ApolloSpeaks2
 
 

@Widldboy @ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47Walter Mondale absolutely campaigned for a nuclear freeze in 1984-the Democrat Party was overwhelmingly for it by at least 90% with Gore and Nunn among the few  exceptions.The Dems,  liberal media and Soviets had millions marching across the country and world for a unilateral nuclear freeze and against deployment of missile defense systems in Europe. Reagan laughed them off as weak, frightened, well-meaning fools and went on to peacefully defeat the Soviets and transform the world.

Republican opposition to and obstruction of Obama and his policies is kid stuff compared to the titanic forces allied against Reagan. What a man! Compared to Reagan Obama is a moral and mental pipsqueak.

 

FranzLiebkind
 
 

@ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47@CeceliaHolland 

The beginning of the end of the Cold War came at the beginning--with Kennan's "Long Telegram" of 1946. It captured the 45-year strategy, adopted even by presidents who had rejected it publicly on the campaign trail, that fatally weakened the USSR.

 

 

@FranzLiebkind @ApolloSpeaks2 @magboy47 @CeceliaHolland Reagan opposed containment, coexistence and détente. His policy was "roll back." He wanted victory over the Soviets and an end to the Cold War, and achieved it by relentlessly hitting them from every conceivable angle (economic, political, strategic) short of war. George Kennan was so freaked out by Reagan's radical change of strategy that he fought him tooth and nail believing with the nuclear freeze loons that he was the most dangerous man on earth. I give Reagan 70% of the credit for finally collapsing the Soviet Empire. Ted Kennedy overwhelmed by the magnitude of Reagan's success said it best, "Ronald Reagan won the Cold War." And so he did.


http://redirect.disqus.com/url?impression=b0d3e166-c7e9-11e4-96a6-002590853080&forum=1422873&thread=3583993461&url=https://disqus.com/by/Lordwhiteman/?utm_source=reply&utm_medium=email&utm_content=avatar:QAR-etkLQMBqRbBQAookDziKok8&variant=active&experiment=digests&behavior=click&post=1901046534&type=notification.post.registered&event=email

Lordwhiteman

You do know the Pythia where high on hallucinogenic gases when they spoke for Apollo.

 

 
Avatar

And what were the liberal left and media high on when they went hysterical over Ronald Reagan's sober, sane victorious anti-Soviet policies? Perhaps they were all sniffing glue?

 

 Why Fox News Is Winning | Comments | RealClearPolitics

 

MSNBC the LEAST trusted cable network. Great work guys. I'm sure you're proud of yourselves. Below is your fate if you stay your lying leftist course.
 
 
FOX ROCKS!  
 
IT'S THE GOLD STANDARD
 

for cable news. Fair, balanced and unafraid to challenge the liberal media, the Democrat Party and the big leftist lies about America, government and the world. And unless MSNBC emulates Fox reporting more of the real news and not propagandizing for Democrats and Progressives it could go the way of Air America (remember them) into the crapper of leftist history.

 

RELATED 

 THE ASTONISHING AIR AMERICA/KEITH OLBERMANN “COINCIDENCE”

 

 
 

WHY DO I BELIEVE OBAMA

when he said that he boycotted Bibi Netanyahu’s address to Congress but read the transcript? Because you can’t hear the thunderous pro-Bibi ovations from the transcript-which would have greatly upset our thinned skinned, Netanyahu-hating president.

 

JOHN BOEHNER MUST INVITE EGYPT’S PRESIDENT AL-SISI TO ADDRESS CONGRESS

 Watch VIDEO: Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi speaks to Fox News’ Bret Baier in Cairo on the failure of American leadership - Atlas Shrugs

ATTN: JOHN BOEHNER
  

It is critically, urgently, absolutely important that you invite President al-Sisi to address Congress (like you did Bibi Netanyahu) on the subject of Obama's virtual desertion of Egypt and its allies in their struggle with ISIS, al-Qaida, the Moslem Brotherhood and all radical Islamic supremacist groups. The American public needs to hear this great man to understand the terrible danger Obama's weak leadership is putting us in and what needs to be done. You did a great patriotic thing by inviting  Netanyahu to speak on the perils of Iran's nuclear weapons capabilities and growing regional power. Now follow-up with al-Sisi!

 

Tweet John Boehner and tell him you want him to invite President al-Sisi to address Congress like Netanyahu, 
 

 

OBAMA REVEALS HIS ANNIHILATING HATRED OF ISRAEL WITH MALLEY APPOINTMENT

 Obama Appoints Man He Fired for Hamas Contacts as Middle East Coordinator | FrontPage Magazine

 

 

Obama's annihilating hatred of Israel most likely began when he joined Reverend Wright's Israel-hating, pro-Hamas racist church and continues today as is evident with the recent appointment of anti-Israel peace activist Robert Malley to head the Mideast desk for the National Security Council. Malley who was part of Bill Clinton's negotiating team for the failed Israeli-Palestinian peace talks in the late 1990s (sabotaged by Arafat who feared for his life) afterwards wrote a series of vicious anti-Israel articles blaming Israel for the failure. In other words, Malley was given this position because like Obama he insanely believes that the Palestinians are ready to make peace with Israel, and have been since Yasser Arafat headed the Palestinian Authority. In other words,  Obama and Malley insanely believe that Israel (since the 1990s) is the obstacle to peace, not the Palestinians who refuse to recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish State and want it to perish.

Malley like Obama and Abbas backs Hamas.

However, the good news is that Malley is a sign that if Netanyahu should lose on March 17th it will be the late 1990s all over again with Abbas (like Arafat) rejecting every generous Israeli offer for peace short of Israel committing national suicide by agreeing to the so-called right of return for millions of Palestinian refugees. And when peace talks breakdown and fail again Malley will write article after lying article blaming Israel for the failure because it refused to destroy itself-which is what Obama, Malley and the radical anti-Israel left pray for and want but will never see.
 
 
 
RELATED
 
 

OBAMA AT SELMA: AMERICA’S FAILED BIRACIAL PRESIDENT (POSTSCRIPT ADDED)

NewsAol

Obama at Selam: 'Our union is not yet perfect'

OBAMA IS AMERICA'S FIRST BIRACIAL PRESIDENT

He is mulatto: half black American, half white American. That is the truth as I said HERE.  And when Obama describes himself as "Afro-American" as if that's the whole of him and there's nothing more he insults white Americans as if there's something wrong with his white half, that it was a mistake, something to be ashamed of, something diseased that's unworthy of him. In short, for Obama white + black = black. and that is a lie. Obama wrote a book called "Dreams From My [black] Father." But Obama had a white mother with dreams. What was wrong with her dreams? Why didn't he write about them too? Were they too white for him? Apparently.

A biracial president should be a force for unity, good and racial peace. But not Barack Obama-who won an unearned Nobel Peace Prize and whose policies have undermined world stability and peace. Though Obama promised to be a post-racial uniter he has miserably failed at this because he prefers his Black half over his White half taking up Black causes no matter how false, unjust and divisive. He chose the violent crazed drug abusing thief Trayvon Martin over George Zimmerman who Martin nearly killed trying to pound and ground him into unconsciousness. He chose the violent crazed drug abusing thief Michael Brown over Darren Wilson who Brown wanted to kill grabbing for his gun and charging at him like a mad wounded bull.

In his speech yesterday at Selma Obama said "This Union is not yet perfect." Truth is this Union under his presidency is less perfect and worse off than before. Emblematic of his presidency is broken, busted Democrat  Detroit which Obama said would not go bankrupt (beacuse he saved the auto industry) and did. He said the same thing of this country assuring us that our growing mountain of unsustainable debt was not a looming crisis that would bankrupt us (see)

 Obama doesn't know how to make this country better. That is a difficult thing to achieve, and way beyond his ken as he completely lacks the wisdom for it. Moving in the opposite direction Obama divides black from white, Moslem from Christian, rich from poor, illegal alien from citizen. The March in Selma fifty years ago was led by Martin Luther King a great black civil rights leader who considered his blackness the least important part of his being. Who said it was "character" that mattered, the moral quality of a man's soul and inner being, not race, not skin color, not mortal flesh and blood-the mere shadow of man's immortal nature.

In 2008 then candidate Obama gave his Democrat acceptance speech on the 45th anniversary of Dr. King's "I Have A Dream Speech" signaling that as president he'd live up to King's example and ideals. But since his inaugural it's sickening to see how distant Obama is from King. That he's a moral midget in comparison with nothing of King's spiritual greatness, gravitas and strength. Six years in office and Barack Obama still doesn't know how (or care) to be the president of all the people. Still doesn't know who or what he really is. Still hasn't  discovered his true humanity and inner worth as he tends to put skin color above everything-which petty, ignorant, small-minded people do.  

In this way Obama resembles the radical, race obsessed Jeremiah Wright his spiritual mentor for twenty years-a man driven by hatred of whites the polar opposite of Dr. King. Was it Wright who made Obama ashamed to be biracial? Ashamed to be half white preferring the dreams of his black father to his white mother? Truth is we have a president who's more like the sick, ugly, white hating Wright than Martin Luther King, and it's a king size catastrophe.

POSTSCRIPT

 

IF BLACK AMERICA

was as good, decent, law abiding and productive as White America and Asian America there wouldn't be this "fear of police" problem that Ms. Jones complains about in her letter. As every Conservative (Black, White, Hispanic, Asian) knows the moral renewal of Black America (traditional Judeo-Christian values and the work ethic) is the ONLY ANSWER.

RELATED

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND HIS ANTI-WHITE, ANTI-MULATTO RACISM

< p style="text-align: center;">MIA LOVE: TRAILBLAZING REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVE LAWMAKER

THE TRIUMPH OF GLOBAL WARMING IDEOLOGY OVER THE REALITY OF GLOBAL TERROR & IRAN PLAYING THE CLIMATE CHANGE GAME TO LOOK NORMAL

   

What is the overarching reason for Barack Obama covering up evidence back in 2011 that al-Qaida was anything but being decimated? His reelection was one reason. But it goes much further than that. Before Obama took office he was ideologically hell-bent on doing two things: 1) diminishing the very real threat of global Islamic terrorism believing (or wanting to believe) this was dangerously exaggerated by the Bush Administration; and 2) augmenting the phony, creeping, destructive threat of so-called catastrophic man-made global warming-which a terrified Obama deeply believes is imperiling the world. And after six years of doomsday climate change alarmism what does Obama have to show for it? Due to his disastrous lack of leadership and blunder after blunder in foreign policy Islamic terrorism is surging world-wide with an alarmed public giving it the topmost place over all other issues; while concern for global warming (according to PEWhas dropped from 13th to 22nd place-a huge defeat for the ineffective Obama and world saving climate change fanatics.

Public’s Policy Priorities for 2015

Public’s Policy Priorities for 2015

Yet despite this Obama is stubbornly staying the course on global warming hoping against hope that enemies like Iran will see the light and join him in the fight (become a partner) to save the Earth and give up their terrorism and nuclear ambitions. And playing Obama for a fool Tehran is deceptively pretending to oblige him while they build the ultimate weapon of terror and death and expand their influence across the world-caring nothing for cutting carbon emissions as they produce more and more fossil fuels to burn.

 

Here are two examples of Iranian climate change propaganda to decieve Obama, the World Bank (for funds) and world community that Iran is normalizing:

 
 "The Islamic Republic, one of the developing world’s 15 biggest emitters of green house gases, may launch carbon bourse to improve efficiency and cut emissions."
 
This was announced in early 2014 and never happened.

 

Top Iran official warns of climate change - Al-Monitor: the Pulse of the Middle East

Not only is death cult Iran enriching uranium for "peaceful energy projects" (like the annihilation of Israel)  but they claim that Allah has been punishing them with drought and rising temperatures which they need to reverse lest Iran turn into an "uninhabitable ghost town." Of course the lying cheating genocidal mullahs haven't produced a single study to support their doomsday claim as it's 100% bull-like Osama bin Laden's late conversion to climate change science (see).

 (thanks SilverMoonTx)

RELATED

WHY THE GLOBAL WARMING MOVEMENT NEEDS GOD TO STOP CLIMATE ARMAGEDDON 

 

A SICK, CANCER EATEN AYATOLLAH KHAMENEI IRONICALLY SPENDS PURIM CRITICALLY ILL IN HOSPITAL

 IRANIAN DICTATOR Ayatollah Khamenei hospitalized in critical condition from cancer | BARE NAKED ISLAM
 
khamenei hospital
Sick in soul, sick in body perhaps this evil man is on his death bed about to experience the horror of 72 foul ragged decaying toothless shrieking skeletal hags in hell wanting him for a lover.
 
As reported in the Jerusalem Post (and I learned on Bare Naked Islam this morning) Iran's Supreme Leader (Allah's ultimate vessel of Islamic redemption on Earth), who is constantly raging at Israel as being an evil "cancer" on the Middle East "that must be cut out " and eradicated (see),  is slowly and painfully dying of prostate cancer that can't be cured or cut out. Unofficial reports say that Khamenie (75) has less than two years to live as the disease is spreading throughout his enfeebled, hate-filled body. Too bad on him. And ironically Khamenei was being hospitalized while Netanyahu was giving his historic Churchillian speech on his genocidal regime-and while Jews were observing Purim which celebrates the victory of Persian Jews over an evil state minister (Haram*) who wanted to exterminate them. Looks like Khamenie like his ugly predecessor (and Nasser, Assad, Arafat, Saddam and other Moslem enemies of israel) is going to die without seeing his vision of Israel's destruction realized. 
 
*Glen Judo Chop on Disqus, and Zalman in the comment section, pointed out that I misspelled Haman as "Harman". But isn't it true that Haman wanted to Harman Jews?
 

 

The Jerusalem Post reported:

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is currently hospitalized in serious condition at a hospital in Tehran, according to unofficial reports.

Khamenei is suffering from prostate cancer that has reportedly spread to the rest of his body.

Earlier this week, the French newspaper Le Figaro quoted Western intelligence officials as saying that the cancer was discovered about ten years ago. “The cancer is in stage four, in other words has spread.” Doctors estimate “he has two years left to live.”

On September 8, Khamenei underwent surgery and it was then that doctors discovered the fatal situation.

In Iran, however, his condition is not public, and only those close to him know how bad the situation is. One such person is one of his six children, his 45-year-old son Mugtaba Khamenei, who has major political clout in the country. 

72  Annie Robbins are waiting for Ayatollah Khamenei in Allah's Garden of Delights.
 

BILL DE BLASIO AND THE COMING OF NATIONAL ALL FAITHS DAY AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS

Mayor De Blasio to Close NYC Schools for Muslim Holidays | Atlas Shrugs

 

https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/

 

ALL FAITHS DAY 

 

Behind Christians, Jews and Moslems New York City  has a large Hindu (Indian) and Buddhist (Chinese-Korean) population. Why shouldn't De Blasio consider their religious sensitivies and close public schools in observance for Hindu and Buddhist holidays? And why stop there? Why not holidays for Mormons, Wiccans, Satanists, atheists (Christopher Hitchens' death day when he became nothing comes to mind) and Jehovah Witnesses? Taken to its logical conclusion secular leftists like De Blasio (whose real religion is Progressivism worshipping the State as their God) are paving the way for all religious groups in the city wanting an official holiday for themselves-with this eventually spreading to Philadelphia, Chicago, San Fransisco, Dallas and Los Angeles, etc. And the cacophony and chaos this will cause locally and nationally will be so great (with children missing too many school days) that the solution will have to be the end of all religious holidays and their collapse into a single day of celebrating all religions called:

 

ALL FAITHS DAY 

 

 

WE ARE ALL ONE

 

WE ARE ALL ONE

 

WE ARE ALL ONE

 

ONE ONE ONE 

 

 

JacktheRipper  writes on Atlas Shrugs

 

That's a brilliant suggestion. Of course the muslims would object to that equality and want to kill us, but who cares? they'll always want to kill us anyway.

  

 

THE TRUTH

Islamic jihad and terror aren't a perversion of islam. It is Islam that's a perversion of Judeo-Christian monotheism replacing true God with a projection of a mad man's ruthless will to power and violent conquest.

 

 

 

 

WHY SHOULD OBAMA WAIT FOR THE IRANIANS

or ISIS or anyone else to trimphantly raise the flag of Islam over the White House when he can beat them to the punch? Since Obama believes that “Islam has been woven into the fabric of our country since its founding” why not show the Moslem world that he means what he says? Why not weave the symbol of Islam into the fabric of our flag? Why not replace the 50 stars with Islam’s Star and Crescent? What a splendid outreach gesture to Islam that would make. It would blow the Moslem world away.

 

 
 
Alisa Doctoroff, radical leftist President of the United Jewish Appeal  complains
 
"…the inequalities between Arabs and Jews in Israel are staggering, with Arab Israelis experiencing significantly higher rates of poverty and unemployment than their Jewish neighbors.”
 
I SAY
 
the Arab world is one vast backward dysfunctional shit hole of ignorance, poverty, filth, barbarism and death. And the Israeli Arab community is the shit hole of Israel. As Islam's medieval denigration of life in this world in favor of the afterlife (heaven is everything  earth is nothing) causes social and economic stagnation why should the social and economic inferiority of Israel's Arabs to its Jews surprise anyone? And why should Israel be blamed for it (for the rank medievalness of Arab culture)?
 
  
 
 

AL SISI IS A REVOLUTION!

My esteem for him just grew another mile.

 
 
 
 

IF MORSI AND THE BROTHERHOOD WERE STILL IN POWER

the great Sphinx and pyramids might have suffered the same fate; and the song "You Belong To Me" by the Duprees would have been robbed of meaning. 

 

A beautiful old romantic tune, no? Does any of the crap you hear today stir your feelings  like  this?

 

 
 
 

WHENEVER FRANKLIN GRAHAM SPEAKS OUT

on political and religious issues he proves himself a worthy successor of his great, great dad .

 

 
 
 

BARACK OBAMA WAS A POTHEAD

The brain damage he sustained from smoking weed is evident in his immature, incoherent, chaos causing presidency.

 

 

 
obama nobel
 

THE ONLY PEACE PRIZE OBAMA DESERVED

was the "Religion of Peace" prize.

 

 

HE WHO LIVES BY OBAMA

 

shall die by Obama (politically speaking).

 

Queers Against Israeli Apartheid QuAIA is Dead | Atlas Shrugs

 

AS ALL ISRAELI QUEERS KNOW

 Israeli Apartheid is a queer idea.
 
 

 

A SCHMUCK

who concentrates the full force of his mental powers in his middle finger and wants to be taken seriously. Glad to see him go.

 

 

NICOLAS SARKOZY ON BARACK OBAMA’S REALITY PROBLEM

Bibi Netanyahu wasn't the first world leader to call into question Barack Obama's competence in handling foreign affairs. Long before yesterday's reality based speech on "axis of evil" nuclear Iran French President Nicolas Sarkozy shocked and embarrassed Obama when he publicly criticized him as suffering from a reality problem when it came to decision making-which Obama has failed at again and again from the premature withdrawal of US troops from Iraq to the premature lifting of sanctions on Iran to all the failed appeasement moves he's made with Vladimir Putin.

Two years later when Assad was mass murdering his people (with Iranian and Russian support) and Obama-deluding himself with the prediction that the tyrant would soon fall-did nothing, Sarkozy mocking him said  to the press "he's not a leader but a follower." And so he is. Ironically, Sarkozy would lead our hapless, ill-starred president into the misadventure in Libya which cost us Chris Stevens and three other Americans, and a stable and unified Libya-now being overrun by al Qaida, ISIS and other prospering terrorist groups.  

Below is a short article I posted on Townhall about Sarkozy speaking out on Obama's reality problem which reminded me of a famous wake up scene from a popular hollywood film-that now seems more appropriately applicable to Bibi's powerful "bad deal" speech. 

FROM APOLLOSPEAKS' TOWNHALL ARCHIVES

2009-10-07 15:58:47 -- NICOLAS SARKOZY ON BARACK OBAMA'S REALITY PROBLEM

 
 
When a frustrated Nicolas Sarkozy spoke truth to an embarrassed Obama in France this week and said: “We live in the real world, not a virtual one. And the real world expects us to make decisions,” it reminded me of this famous scene from one of America's most beloved movies (click).
 
Obama's Unicorn
 
RELATED
 

COURAGEOUS NETANYAHU EXPOSES OBAMA’S DANGEROUS STUPIDITY AND WEAKNESS WITH IRAN

BIBI NETANYAHU HAS COURAGEOUSLY EXPOSED TO ALL THE WORLD 

Barack Hussein Obama for the weak, dangerous, blundering, reckless, rank amateur that he is. And standing shoulder to shoulder with Netanyahu are the vast majority of US lawmakers, 55% of the US military*, and 65% of Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans** all of whom give Obama a well deserved Grade D as Commander-in- Chief. Add to this the disillusionment of most Americans with Obama's handling of foreign policy (seeand you have a president with no credibility in world affairs blindly midwifing the deadliest and most dangerous Islamic regime on earth in becoming a nuclear armed terrorist state. Even if it means destroying Iran with nuclear weapons it must not get the bomb. 

*According to The Military Times 55% disapprove of Obama and only 15% approve-an all time low (see).

**According to the Kaiser Foundation 65% of Iraq and Afghan war vets approve of George W. Bush as Commander in Chief. Only 42% approve of Obama (see).

RELATED

THE RISE OF NUCLEAR IRAN 

FORWARD EMAILS TO

reninvest2013@aol.com

< p style="text-align: center;">-

DEBATES ON MONDOWEISS WITH ANNIE ROBBINS ON NETANYAHU’S SPEECH TO CONGRESS AND ISRAEL’S REGIONAL MORAL SUPERIORITY

 

 

Annie Robbins is a loathsome, self-hating San Francisco liberal Jew and Editor-at Large for Mondoweiss: a despicable ultra-left, anti-Israel  hate site. Robbins, like savage medieval anti-semitic Moslem supremacists, believes that modern, democratic Jewish Israel (the greatest force for freedom, progress and peace in the Middle East) is an evil oppressive colonial power with no moral right to exist because of its refusal to make peace with the  hate-driven, genocidal Palestinians (who define peace with Israel as its destruction). And Israel's destruction is what  Annie Robbins (like most radical leftists) wants insanely preferring in its place  an illiberal, sick, dysfunctional, corrupt Palestinian terror  state oppressing a Jewish minority or killing it off. In other words, when it comes to  the Arab/Palestinian-Israeli conflict you can't get anymore deranged than Annie Robbins. 

 Below are two  brief debates between me and Robbins before she had me banned from Mondoweiss for being a troublesome, pro-Israel gadfly who couldn't be bested or beaten in argument. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ApolloSpeaks

            January 24, 2015,

WHERE WAS THE OUTRAGE ON THE DEMOCRATIC  LEFT WHEN IN 2007
 
then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (without approval of the Bush administration [and knowledge of Israel's PM]) grossly violated protocol and led a congressional delegation to Damascus to negotiate a  peace deal between Syria and Israel, as if she were the Secretary of State? As I recall Harry Reid , Hillary Clinton, MSM (and probably Barack Obama) praised Pelosi for her efforts to promote peace between the two countries because Bush [for no fault of his] had miserably failed .
 

Annie Robbins

she was the speaker of the house. this is the equivalent of John Boehner or Eric Cantor leading a delegation to israel without asking the president’s permission. happens all the time. in fact aipac arranges these trips regularly. romney went there without asking Obama’s permission too. it doesn’t violate protocol for members of congress to visit other countries without asking permission of the israel lobby.

nice try, no cigar.

ApolloSpeaks

Apples and oranges. Pelosi went to Damascus not just on a mere visit but in a kind of unofficial [self-appointed] diplomatic capacity* (without authorization from the White House) to specifically rekindle peace talks between Israel and Syria as if she were Condi Rice. That was the  last time she tried this stunt  as she failed and made a complete fool of herself. That was a far more serious breach of protocol** than Netanyahu’s upcoming visit. You need to work on your reading comprehension skills so you don’t embarrass yourself like this again.

*At the time Bush withdrew his Ambassador to Syria.

*It was later learned that Netanyahu did inform the Obama Administration of Boehner's invitation to  speak to Congress. 

Annie Robbins

an unofficial diplomatic capacity (without authorization from the White House)

so that’s your standard of unofficial diplomatic capacity? LOL. good to know. You need to work on your comprehension skills so you don’t embarrass yourself like this again..

Apollospeaks

Please define the word “diplomacy.” Then tell us how it doesn’t apply to what Pelosi was trying to accomplish in Damascus with Assad. This is Polisci 101 stuff.

 Annie Robbins 

now you’re playing partisan politics considering Reps. Frank Wolf, Joe Pitts and Robert Aderholt met with Assad in Damascus the day before she arrived and like them, there was nothing she said there that was against stated american policy goals.

unlike this latest deplorable and unprecedented “invitation*” there’s nothing unprecedented (or highly unusual) about high ranking officials (and sometimes not so high ranking) including congresspeople making trips to visit foreign leaders outside the purview of the white house. (as i mentioned they go to israel all the time, often sans seeking “authorization” from the WH). example link to huffingtonpost.com
link to huffingtonpost.com 

* Unprecedented? In 1996 Bill Clinton invited Shimon Peres to the White House one month before the election to bolster his sagging campaign against Netanyahu - Apollo

your pelosi argument here is a diversion anyway, because the analogy you’re making doesn’t pertain to netanyahu’s action (which happens to be the topic -and it’s highly likely this “idea” came from team netanyahu, either dermer or the PM himself), but house speaker boehner. your analogy involves what is or isn’t considered normal protocol for congressional diplomacy.  whereas netanyahu is a foreign leader w/a policy pitted against w/a policy pitted against the prez.pelosi didn't invite assad to address congress against the will of bush. so there's your apples and oranges. the criticism all over the talk shows today are not about boehner.he did what's now expected of lobby pushovers, it's netanyahu's chutzpa that being criticized.

ApolloSpeaks

The policy goals of the Bush administration were to restart peace talks between Syria and Israel [over the Golan Heights]. Because the administration wasn’t making progress Pelosi decided unilaterally-without so much as consulting the administration or Israeli PM Olmert-to step in to reanimate the process.

As the Obama administration has made zero progress in stopping Iran from building the bomb and containing its drive for regional hegemony it’s time for a new and tougher approach. Hence, Netanyahu’s address to Congress making the case to reimpose punishing sanctions at an opportune time when  declining oil prices are severly hurting Iran's economy. Both Republicans and Democrats who want to reimpose sanctions got it right [and Netanyahu is aligned with them]. Apples and apples. The analogy is as clear as day. 

 Robbins never replied.

 

 
In this piece Mondoweiss blogger Anthony Loewenstein asserts that Israel, the most tolerant and pluralistic nation in the Middle East, "is not a good model" for  tolerance and pluralism. And that European Jews thinking of migrating to Israel because of rising Islamic anti-semitism are better off staying there as if Israel were unworthy of them and more unsafe.
 
 Commenting on Lowenstein's article someone called Mooser wrote that because Israel isn't a perfect model of tolerance and pluralism it was "a historical error to give the Jews their own country," as if Israel were completely void of value-like its worthless  Palestinian neighbors.
 
To this I replied 
 
 January 25, 2015, 12:17 am
 

How could the most admirable nation in the Middle East, a model of freedom, progress, justice and peace to the region, be "a historical error?" Given Israel's moral, intellectual and spiritual superiority over its primitive, dysfunctional, strife torn, savage neighbors its existence would seem to be a historical necessity. No?

Annie Robbins

the most admirable nation in the Middle East

link to haaretz.com

BBC poll: Israel among world’s least popular nations

The annual BBC World Service poll finds …only countries less popular than Israel are North Korea, Pakistan and Iran.

its existence would seem to be a historical necessity. No

ApolloSpeaks

Annie Robbins notes above that Israel just bearly beats out North Korea in a BBC world popularity poll. I wasn’t aware of that. Then should Hollywood do a sequel to “The Interview” where Rogen and Franco assassinate Netanyahu? Maybe not. As Israel technologically is light years ahead of the Norks a cyber terror attack on Sony would be ten times as devastating. /sarc

Annie Robbins

 "I wasn’t aware of that. Then should Hollywood do a sequel to “The Interview” where Rogen and Franco assassinate Netanyahu?"

your comeback is outdated — so last year. everybody already thought of that immediately – and not just the blogs either.

link to washingtonpost.com

MY ANSWER

CENSORED AND SUPPRESSED

UPDATED, not "outdated" Annie. But seriously, instead of the world's opinion about Israel give us your opinion. Tell us what you think not what others think. Is Israel or isn't Israel  the most admirable nation in the region? Or to put it differently, if you had a family of four with a husband and two kids (one straight the other gay) and you had to live in the Middle East which country would you choose? Israel? One of its Arab neighbors? Iran? The Islamic State? If you ignore the question (which you'll probably do like before) I'll take it to be an admission that we're in agreement about the world's opinion of Israel being radically stupid and wrong;  and that Israel would be your first choice because it's the best nation in the region (the closest politically, culturally, progressively and economically to the US) for you and your family to live safely and in peace.

 

NETANYAHU, IRAN AND THE END OF NUCLEAR SADDAM: OR DESTROY THE MULLAHS LIKE WE DID SADDAM AND IRAN WON’T GET THE BOMB (POSTSCRIPT ADDED ON NUCLEAR SAUDI ARABIA)

 
 
 
TOMORROW MARCH 3, 2015
 
is the 44th president's 2233rd day in office (see). This four digit number of two doublet numbers preceding 44 (22 and 33) is a multiple of 7 giving us the highly significant number 319 (the number of weeks in Obama's presidency). 319 like 9/11 is a significant number in the history of the Global War on Terror in that it gives us the month (3) and day (19) when in 2003 the US (Washington time) launched its preëmptive war (Shock and Awe) against Saddam Hussein for his noncompliance for 12 years with 17 UN resolutions on WMDs and other violations. The purpose of Bibi Netanyahu's speech tomorrow is to prevent the nightmare of a nuclear armed Iran (a regional and world necessity) just as we stopped Iraq from becoming a nuclear power (which I'll prove below). As the hapless, blundering, inept Obama administration is failing badly in moderating stopping Iran the only option left is to devastate its nuclear facilities with a massive sustained military attack-more than 1500 targets have been identified for such a mission.
 
 Saddam's yellowcake uranium.
 
Now  those who disagree with my assertion that "the Iraq War stopped Saddam from acquiring the bomb" are greatly, greatly confused and mistaken. Why do I say this? Because knowing what we know today if Saddam had stayed in power chances are (with 90% certainty) that he would by now have gone nuclear. How do I know this? Because Saddam retained the services of his nuclear scientists and technicians keeping them on the government payroll with every intention of using them to build the bomb. Because Saddam owned 550 metric tons of yellow cake uranium (sold to Canada in 2008) with every intention of using it to build the bomb (see). Moreover, and most importantly, on October 9, 2006 Saddam's "evil axis" Stalinist ally communist North Korea detonated its first nuclear device becoming the 9th nation to do so. And ominously the following year the nuclear Norks were hard at work in murdering fascist Iran-backed Syria building a secret plutonium nuclear weapons plant, which Israel, thank God, destroyed.
 
  
Now on 3-19-2003 at the start of the Iraq War the price of oil was $20 per barrel. Two years later that doubled to $40 per barrel. By 2008 oil shot up to $100 per barrel. If there was no Iraq War and  Saddam had stayed in power he would have amassed hundreds and billions in petro-dollars which he would have certainly used to turn Iraq into a nuclear armed state. No way Saddam would have stood idly by and watched his enemies in Iran build the bomb knowing that once they had it, it could mean the end of his regime and his dream of becoming the unifying Joseph Stalin of the Middle East.
 
 
Indeed, If what I'm saying here seems far-fetched because neither Israel nor the US would have allowed Saddam to rebuild his nuclear weapons plants, or build  new ones in secret (Israel destroyed the Osiraq plant in 1981) what everyone seems to have overlooked is that Saddam had another option nuclearizing Iraq: BUILD THE BOMB IN NORTH KOREA. The poor cash strapped Norks would have enthusiastically welcomed Saddam's offer to build the Bomb in their country for billions, then smuggle it into Iraq. And by now the Norks would have produced at least several for him.
 
 
The great feckless appeaser in the White House  has bent over backwards accommodating Iran in trying to stop it from weaponizing uranium and building ICBMs, but to no avail. I imagine that he and Kerry even tried to uselessly persuade the mullahs about the common threat humanity faces from global warming and the need to join forces to survive. Indeed, hell-bent on becoming the hegemon of Middle East and a great world power-believing that God and history are on their side-Islamic Iran needs the bomb to fulfill its purpose and destiny. And from their unwillingness to halt the enriching of uranium the Iranians  have made it perfectly clear to the world that nothing short of military force will stop them.
 
POSTSCRIPT I
 
 
Samson pushing the pillars of the temple

 

IF THIS REPORT IS TRUE,

and Obama threatened to join forces with Islamonazi terrorist Iran and shoot down Israeli jets en route to destroy its nuclear facilities, all that Bibi Netanyahu had to do to put the fear of God into Obama was give him this warning:   "Shooting down our jets, Mr. President, would leave us no choice but to exercise the dreaded SAMSON OPTION and nuke Iran as a last resort (see)."

 POSTSCRIPT II
 
SAUDI ARABIA AND NUCLEAR PAKISTAN
 
BTW, for those who doubt my theory that if  there was no Iraq War Iraq by now would have been a nuclear military power just keep one thing in mind:  if the Saudis want the bomb all they need do is purchase it from nuclear Pakistan-just as  Saddam would have  done from nuclear North Korea.
 

IS ERIC HOLDER AN IGNORANT, DIVISIVE, UNENLIGHTENED, RACIALLY OBSESSED MORAN? OR AM I A FOUL, TWISTED, WHITE SUPREMACIST NUT POISONED BY FOX NEWS?

 

 
 
Screen Shot 2015-02-28 at 3.17.35 PM
 Wish they would drown in their white-hating racist tears.
 
Is outgoing Attorney General Eric "Americans are racial cowards" Holder an ignorant, divisive, unenlightened, racially obsessed moron? The answer to the question is an unqualified "YES." And here is incontrovertible proof not based so much on what Holder has said and done, but on a philosophical understanding of human nature.
 
 
 
The physical body is the vehicle of man's deathless, immortal, intellectual soul which is its life-giving principle and form. This makes the body the smallest and least important part of man's nature and being as it depends on the soul for its existence in this world. And the smallest and least important part of man's physical being (having immeasurably less value than the brain, heart, lungs, liver, kidneys and other vital oragns) is skin color.
 
Now racially obsessed men like Barack Obama and Eric Holder (be they White, Black, Hispanic, Arab, Asian, etc) are ignorant, divisive,  immature, unenlightened,  small-minded human beings (regressives not progressives) who reduce the true dignity and worth of man (his intellectual and spiritual nature) not just to mortal, perishable, ephemeral flesh (the body is the passing image and shadow of the soul) but to its smallest, basest, least important part: stupid, senseless skin color which we can't take with us to heaven.
 
Now in calling Obama and Holder "ignorant, unenlightened, morans..." because of their obsession with skin color and race (they're the John Birchers of racism seeing anti-black racism everywhere) am I being a foul twisted racist nut poisoned by Fox News and driven by hate like I've been accused of on occasion? Or am I being wise, realistic and philosophically sane seeing with unprejudiced, color blind, wide open eyes these two infantile leftists for the regressives they really, truly and stupidly are? in judging them am I using the immoral measure and yardstick of white supremacism and hate (I'm a Jewish conservative white man)? Or am I simply, justly and rigorously applying a right understanding of human nature which every rational man and woman does? Go ahead. Make my day. Try and prove that I'm racist.
 
 
 

 

HOLDER ON LOWERING LEGAL CIVIL RIGHTS STANDARDS TO JAIL INNOCENT NON-BLACK KILLERS OF VIOLENT BLACKS  LIKE ZIMMERMAN AND WILSON. PATHETIC!

 
 
 
HOLDER SAYS READ "MALCOLM X ."
APOLLO SAYS READ 
 
 
 
No Conservative's library is complete without this
magnificent Renaissance classic-and cure for all types of racism.
 

RELATED

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND HIS ANTI-WHITE, ANTI-MULATTO RACISM

 

MESSAGE TO AL SHARPTON: WHITE GUILT IS DEAD. BLACKS ARE ON THEIR OWN.

BARACK OBAMA AND THE END OF WHITE LIBERAL GUILT

FORWARD EMAILS TO

< p style="text-align: center;">reninvest2013@aol.com

WHAT A HISTORIC DEAL ON IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAM WILL LOOK LIKE (SARCASM)

 
 
 AFTER A DEAL IS SIGNED BETWEEN THE US AND IRAN A TRIUMPHANT, ECSTATIC BARACK OBAMA WILL LIKELY SAY THIS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE:
 
 Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, a Moslem of enormous  integrity and peace, assured us in this historic agreement that was signed today that nuclear weapons are against God's Will; and that no Islamic state can be truly Islamic if it has the bomb and joins the Nuclear Age. But let me be perfectly clear:  under Islamic Law uranium enrichment is perfectly legal and permitted so long as it falls short of building a bomb. The two should not be confused. Keep in mind that If America, during World War II, had limited its nuclear program to enriching uranium we would never have destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing thousands of Japanese. The same holds true for Iran today. Indeed, this agreement with Khamenei guarantees that the Islamic Republic will remain truly Islamic and nuke free; and following God's Will  go no further than lawfully enriching uranium in peace. That means no nuking of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. That means no ICBMS hitting New York and Washington DC. That means Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan relieved. If not, if Khamenei dares to break this deal, flout Islamic Law and illegally build the bomb be certain that the consequences to him and his regime will be swift and severe. For Allah will be angered beyond measure, show him no mercy and preëmptively bring him down before he can strike anyone. Till then we have peace in our time. Till then I have earned my Nobel Prize. Now it's on to Moscow for talks with Putin about Ukraine and restoring US/Russian peace. Ayatollah Khamenei said he'd help us here.
  
 

 

 

 

RELATED

 

 

CLINTON AND BUSH, THE TWO WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMBINGS AND THE DEATH OF OSAMA BIN LADEN

 

 
Yesterday was the 22nd anniversary of the first bombing of the World Trade Center by death loving Islamic terrorists-a good account of which you can find HERE at Atlas Shrugs. But as I was thinking about that bombing and its relation to the 9/11 event (which it foreshadowed) I made a number of  extraordinary discoveries that my readers will find fascinating. Here is what I found:
 
 The full date of the 9/11 event in numbers is 9/11/2001. The number 2001 is a variant of 3 (2+0+0+1=3). Now if we combine 3 with 911 to form the four digit number 9113 then reverse it to 3119 incredibly (by chance or providence) we get the EXACT number of days separating the first World Trade Center bombing from the devastating second attack, hence:
 
From: Friday, February 26, 1993
To Tuesday, September 11, 2001

Result: 3119 days

Or 8 years, 6 months, 16 days, or 445 weeks and 4 days (see).

 
 
 Fascinating, no? Also fascinating are the exact number of days separating the births of the very two presidents whose weak-on-terror policies helped midwife the 9/11 event. For George W. Bush born July 6, 1946 and Bill Clinton born August 19, 1946 are separated by exactly 44 days. Oddly, when al Qaida struck America on 9/11 Osama ben Laden (born March 10, 1957) was 44 years old.
 
From: Sunday, March 10, 1957

To, Tuesday, September 11, 2001

Result: 16,256 days

Or 44 years, 6 months, 1 day, or 2322 weeks (see)

 

 
Also fascinating is that when 44 is multiplied by 80 it yields the number 3520. This is extraordinary in that 3520 is the EXACT number of days separating the 9/11 event from Osama bin Laden's death on May 2, 2011.
 

From: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
To, Monday, May 2, 2011

Result: 3520 days

 Or 9 years, 7 months, 21 days, or 502 weeks and 6 days (see).

 
Oddly, bin Laden was killed by Navy Seal commandos as they acted on an order given by America's 44th President.
 

RELATED

GEORGE BUSH, THE HUDSON RIVER MIRACLE AND HIS 9/11 PRESIDENCY

 

OBAMA AND THE TUCSON MASSACRE: THE 9/10 MAN IN A 9/11 WORLD

DICK CHENEY, WINSTON CHURCHILL AND FDR: WARNINGS FROM AN OLD CONSERVATIVE WARRIOR

 
FORWARD EMAILS TO

JOHN KERRY IS WRONG: BIBI NETANYAHU WAS PUBLICLY FOR IRAQ WAR BUT PRIVATELY AGAINST IT

 

 
Just one day before the 22nd anniversary of the first World Trade Center bombing as nuclear-to-be Islamonazi Iran was showing its respect for Obama and America by destroying a fake US aircraft carrier in a war game John F. Kerry bashed Bibi Netanyahu's opposition to a BAD US/Iran nuke deal as being as wrongheaded as his backing of the Iraq War-which Kerry voted for and supported as a presidential candidate.
 
But this is not exactly the truth. Truth is (and what no one is talking about) Bibi Netanyahu in 2003 (and the entire Israeli government) privately opposed the Iraq War as completely wrongheaded while publicly supporting it out of deference to the super pro-Israel Bush administration. Indeed, just before the Iraq War Netanyahu was the foreign minister of the anti-Iran Israeli government of Ariel Sharon that warned George Bush that attacking Iraq would destabilize the balance of power in the region in favor of Iran, and urged him instead to attack Iran as being the greater threat to US interests and regional peace.  This story was reported seven years ago by Garath Porter in  Asia Times, and is as follows:
  •  
    Israeli PM Ariel Sharon and President George W. Bush
Israel urged US to attack Iran - not Iraq
By Gareth Porter 
WASHINGTON –Israeli officials warned the George W Bush administration that an invasion of Iraq would be destabilizing to the region and urged the United States instead to target Iran as the primary enemy, according to former Bush administration official Lawrence Wilkerson.
Wilkerson, then a member of the US State Department's policy planning staff and later chief of staff for secretary of state Colin Powell, recalled in an interview that the Israelis reacted immediately to indications that the Bush administration was thinking of war against Iraq. After the Israeli government picked up the first signs of that intention, said Wilkerson, "The Israelis were telling us Iraq is not the enemy - Iran is the enemy."
Wilkerson describes the Israeli message to the Bush administration in early 2002 as being, "If you are going to destabilize the balance of power, do it against the main enemy."
The warning against an invasion of Iraq was "pervasive" in Israeli communications with the US administration, Wilkerson recalled. It was conveyed to the administration by a wide range of Israeli sources, including political figures, intelligence, and private citizens.
Wilkerson noted that the main point of their communications was not that the US should immediately attack Iran, but that "it should not be distracted by Iraq and Saddam Hussein" from a focus on the threat from Iran.
The Israeli advice against using military force against Iraq was apparently triggered by reports reaching Israeli officials in December 2001 that the Bush administration was beginning serious planning for an attack on Iraq. Journalist Bob Woodward revealed inPlan of Attack that on December 1, 2001, secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld had ordered the Central Command chief, General Tommy Franks, to come up with the first formal briefing on a new war plan for Iraq on December 4. That started a period of intense discussions of war planning between Rumsfeld and Franks.
Soon after Israeli officials got wind of that planning, Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon asked for a meeting with Bush primarily to discuss US intentions to invade Iraq. In the weeks preceding Sharon's meeting with Bush on February 7, 2002, a procession of Israeli officials conveyed the message to the US administration that Iran represented a greater threat, according to a Washington Post report on the eve of the meeting.
Israeli defense minister Fouad Ben-Eliezer, who was visiting Washington with Sharon, revealed the essence of the strategic differences between Jerusalem and Washington over military force. He was quoted by the Post as saying, "Today, everybody is busy with Iraq. Iraq is a problem ... But you should understand, if you ask me, today Iran is more dangerous than Iraq."
Sharon, who was incapacitated by a stroke last year, never revealed publicly what he said to Bush in the February 7 meeting. But Yossi Alpher, a former adviser to prime minister Ehud Barak, wrote in an article in The Forward last January that Sharon advised Bush not to occupy Iraq, according to a knowledgeable source. Alpher wrote that Sharon also assured Bush that Israel would not "push one way or another" regarding his plan to take down Saddam.
Alpher noted that Washington did not want public support by Israel and in fact requested that Israel refrain from openly supporting the invasion in order to avoid an automatic negative reaction from Iraq's Arab neighbors.
After that meeting, the Sharon government generally remained silent on the issue of an invasion of Iraq. A notable exception, however, was a statement on August 16, 2002, by Ranaan Gissin, an aide to Sharon. Ranaan declared, "Any postponement of an attack on Iraq at this stage will serve no purpose. It will only give [Saddam] more of an opportunity to accelerate his program of weapons of mass destruction."
As late as October 2002, however, there were still signs of continuing Israeli grumbling about the Bush administration's obsession with taking over Iraq. Both the Israel Defense Forces' chief of staff and its chief of military intelligence made public statements that month implicitly dismissing the Bush administration's position that Saddam's alleged quest for nuclear weapons made him the main threat. Both officials suggested that Israel's military advantage over Iraq had continued to increase over the decade since the Gulf War as Iraq had grown weaker.
The Israeli chief of military intelligence, Major-General Aharon Farkash, said Iraq had not deployed any missiles that could strike Israel directly and challenged the Bush administration's argument that Iraq could obtain nuclear weapons within a relatively short time. He gave an interview to Israeli television in which he said army intelligence had concluded that Iraq could not have nuclear weapons in less than four years. He insisted that Iran was as much of a nuclear threat as Iraq.
Israeli strategists generally believed that taking down the Saddam Hussein regime could further upset an Iran-Iraq power balance that had already tilted in favor of Iran after the US defeat of Saddam's army in the 1991 Gulf War. By 1996, however, neo-conservatives with ties to the Likud Party in Israel were beginning to argue for a more aggressive joint US-Israeli strategy aimed at a "rollback" of all of Israel's enemies in the region, including Iran, but beginning by taking down Saddam and putting a pro-Israeli regime in power there.
That was the thrust of the 1996 report of a task force led by Richard Perle for the right-wing Israeli think-tank the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, and aimed at the Likud prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
But most strategists in the Israeli government and the Likud Party - including Sharon himself - did not share that viewpoint. Despite agreement between neo-conservatives and Israeli officials on many issues, the dominant Israeli strategic judgment on the issue of invading Iraq diverged from that of US neo-conservatives because of differing political-military interests.
Israel was more concerned with the relative military threat posed by Iran and Iraq, whereas neo-conservatives in the Bush administration were focused on regime change in Iraq as a low-cost way of leveraging more ambitious changes in the region. From the neo-conservative perspective, the very military weakness of Saddam's Iraq made it the logical target for the use of US military power.
Gareth Porter is a historian and national-security policy analyst. His latest book, Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam, was published in June 2005.
(Inter Press Service)
 

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND HIS ANTI-WHITE, ANTI-MULATTO RACISM

 

 

It is a lie that Barack Obama is a Black man. He's a biracial Mulatto sprung from the womb of a racially pure White woman and fathered by a racially pure Black man. That is the reality. That is the truth. That is who and what Barack Obama racially is. He belongs to the Mulatto Race-the half white/black race. That Obama identifies himself as a Black man is a lie meant to deceive people and fool history. That he should prefer his Black half over his White half is both anti-White and anti-Mulatto racism. If Obama were truly liberal and racially honest, just and fair he'd define himself racially as Mulatto: as much White as Black, equally proud to be both, equally loving both races and all Black/White Mulattoes. But that's not what he does. Instead Obama plays the race card on himself; instead he discriminates against Whites and Mulattoes in his own person unfairly, unjustly denigrating both as if they were racially inferior to Blacks. That makes him a Black Supremacist like the New Black Panthers, Louis Farrakhan and his America-damning racist mentor Reverend Wright-who thinks Jesus was Black and that all Whites are devils hated and cursed by God.

 

 

 

 

Like it or not Obama isn't America's first Black president. Like it or not he's the closest we've come to having such a president. History should not, must not credit him with being the first. That is a lie. This should come as a relief to Black people. For the worst president ever is not really one of them, and is no reflection on their race. 

 

BLACK AMERICA

 

(at the risk of seeming anti-Mulatto)  

 

 

DISOWN OBAMA NOW!

 

 

BECAUSE HE'S GOING DOWN

 

 

 

 

POSTSCRIPT

 

 

 
 

 

BARACK OBAMA:

"If I had a son he wouldn't be CJ Pearson. This young man wasn't me 35 years ago."

 

AOSean

Poor kid is probably already getting death threats...

 

Worse still the IRS is targeting him for an audit.

 

 

47871_CJ-Pearson-001-1

 

Phuture writes

 

CJ Pearson for President. That little kid blew me away.

 

My reply

 

CJ PEARSON 2016

FOR AMERICA’S FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT

  •  
  •  

     

     RELATED

     

     

    IN DEFENSE OF MSNBC’S BIRACIAL CHEERIOS TWEET (SARCASM)

     

     

    DEBATING THE FATE OF CHRIS HITCHENS IN THE AFTERLIFE ON JIHAD WATCH

    As I've been writing on the subject of Atheism lately this I'm sure will interest my readers. Originally published on Townhall it was a debate  I had on Jihad Watch and Pajamas Media at the end of 2011 where I speculated on the fate of Christopher Hitchens (who recently died) in the afterlife.

    FROM APOLLOSPEAKS' TOWNHALL ARCHIVES

    2011-12-18 11:24--(ORIGINALLY) MY DEBATE ON JIHAD WATCH ABOUT CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS' FATE IN THE AFTERLIFE

    One of the great gods of atheism is dead uneasily dwelling in the spiritual world and shaking his atheist faith. It is a baptism of fire that will purge him of error and make a better and wiser soul of him. No matter how much he ate, drank,  screwed, smoked, learned, and raged at God and religion Hitchens could never fill the emptiness inside him. An emptiness that only God could ultimately fill (as religious people know) as  He is our greatest happiness and highest good.

    NOTE

    I hadn't realized till now that there are quite a few atheists posting comments on Jihad Watch. As on Frontpage and elsewhere I posted "Christopher Hitchens In The Afterlife" here and got this mostly hostile response:

     

    ApolloSpeaks says

    December 16, 2011 at 8:48 am

    CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS IN THE AFTERLIFE

    How I wish I was there in the spiritual realm to see Chris Hitchens’ astonishment that his mind had survived his untimely death; that he is very much alive in the spiritual state that he’d mocked all his life as a primitive fiction of “evil religion;” that there’s more to existence than flesh. Is he disappointed to know that he was wrong for so long, that his crude, inexorable materialism was a hoax? Does he unhappily feel cheated that he wasn’t obliterated, dissolved into nothingness like he rigidly thought? Is he saddened to know that religion was right, that he’s an undying, immortal, imperishable soul? Is he cursing his state craving nihilism instead which he believed was his fate in the end? How’s he handling the truth that God exists, and that he owes his great mind and existence to Him? Hitchens’ soul must be in intellectual turmoil as his life of unbelief ill-prepared him for death. And so must it be for all atheistic materialists who’ll have the truth thrust upon them in the end.

    gravenimage replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    Apollo Speaks wrote:

    Is he disappointed to know that he was wrong for so long, that his crude, inexorable materialism was a hoax? Does he unhappily feel cheated that he wasn't obliterated...

    I very much doubt it, Apollo. If the afterlife of Christopher Hitchens is as you imagine, I'm sure he would be fascinated at a new adventure...

    Christopher Hitchens was a hero. I salute him.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from gravenimage

    After a difficult period of adjustment where he accepts the new reality of a disembodied state (which he formally thought impossible) the experience will [as you say] become a wonderful new adventure for him.

    lilredbird writes

    ApolloSpeaks, this Comments section has resonated with expressions of regret at the passing of Christopher Hitchens, a staunch defender of freedom of thought and a opponent of the imposition of all forms of supernaturalist metaphysics on those who do not share such beliefs. It was such a consolation to read so many respectful and sincere tributes.

    Then you came along with your childish rant, imagining him waking up in an "afterlife" with your god presumably chanting Nyah-nyah-nah-nah-nyah. Do you have any idea how smug and vindictive you sound?

    We atheists hear this all the time and there is no way to express how tired we are of the silly taunts, to say nothing of the backhanded compliments about how amazing it is that we fight for freedom even though we have no souls and "don't believe in anything" (as a religious "friend" of mine puts it).

    May I refer you to Ole Hartling's comment, though I doubt you are willing to hear it. Thank you, Ole, for that quote of Hitch's, which says what I feel so much better than I ever can. If only more of the "religious" were willing to listen and secure enough to take his request to heart.


    Religion friendly atheist author S.E. Cupp

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from lilredbird

    Hitchens atheism was positively vindictive, unhinged, and hateful. He didn't just want to throw out the baby with the bath, he wanted to boil the baby in oil and eat it for dinner. Compare him to the lovely S.E. Cupp, a sensible, balanced, non-militant atheist who understands, and wrote about, the essential connection between the Judeo-Christian Tradition and our great nation and civilization. I'm not nearly as hard on Hitch as he was about reasonable, universal, ancient truths about God, immortality, and a moral law of right and wrong that he's now painfully and sorrowfully discovering to be true in the purgatory of his afterlife experience.

    Kinana of Khaybar replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    ApolloSpeaks,

    You disgrace only yourself, by gloating over Hitchens' death. Your irrational and unwarranted threat against atheists, at the end of your comment, is noted.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from Kinana of Khaybar

    Am I disgracefully gloating over Hitchens' death? I think not. I believe that Hitch is passing through the Purgatory of the after life he so militantly denied on his way to the loving peace and grace that passeth understanding.

    StephenA55 replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    ApolloSpeaks writes:

    "He also saw the Christian threat, the Jewish threat, the Hindu threat, and the Buddhist threat. All religion was toxic and a threat to this man, who now sees what a fool he has been."

     You are welcome to your view. He was actually much more nuanced than your gross over-simplification suggests.

    "Hitchens' soul must be in intellectual turmoil as his life of unbelief ill-prepared him for death. And so must it be for all atheistic materialists who'll have the truth thrust upon them in the end."

    His life of unbelief was the perfect preparation for death. Better than living in perpetual fear of an eternal agony in Hades. What could be better than living life to the full; free of nagging guilt from inherited sin; in accordance to moral tenets evolved by a rational mind that can easily surpass in goodness those biblical commands in the OT.

    The NT is better, but when you select from the bible then you are using your own judgement, and are ready to put that musty volume to one side.

    Merry Christmas, and a happy, well-lived life to you.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from StephenA55

    You say that "Hitchens life of unbelief was the perfect preparation for death." Are you using your head on this one my friend? Think about it. The death Hitchens prepared himself for intellectually and morally was eternal death and oblivion, the complete, everlasting extinction of consciousness-an absolute materialist's fiction. As the death Hitchens underwent wasn't what he imagined or foresaw how then was he prepared for it? How are you preapred for it?

    Tim Reynolds replied to comment from lilredbird

    Well said, LRB....

    I wondered at first that ApolloSpeaks was having a larf but obviously not. He/she's a sad indicator of the lengths that people will go to qualify their fantasies. Self-delusion is a wonderful thing and with it, anything is possible, including this type of crap. It shows an under-lying insecurity quite common in religionists of all faiths. They hate to see any kind of challenge to their belief-system and will react in the most bizarre fashion. You only have to look at islam and the almost-as-dreadful christian far-right, with their smug interpretation of scripture and the assumption of righteousness.

    In the end it's all 'borrowed-plummage'.

    "Religion poisons Everything".


    ApolloSpeaks
     relied to Tim Reynolds 

    Tim Reynolds writes

    "They [religious believers] hate to see any kind of challenge to their belief-system and will react in the most bizarre fashion."

    How is my reaction to the death of the boldest, most outspoken, and offensive militant atheist of our time bizarre? I think most any believer in an afterlife would be fascinated to learn how Hitchens is taking to his unexpected experience; to a spiritual state which he believed with unshakable faith was a childish, evil, degrading fiction that mankind must outgrow. How is that bizarre?

    Jan replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    '' ....a moral law of right and wrong that he's now painfully and sorrowfully discovering to be true in the purgatory of his afterlife experience.''

    Do you really think you speak for *God* ??

    If we're going to talk about right and wrong, then I would submit that Hitch spoke about what *he* believed to be right and wrong, and he was blazingly honest in what he said. And his beliefs about 'a moral law' are just as much valid as yours, if not more so.

    I would bet, if there is a God, He would like and appreciate Hitch more than the self-righteous attitudes of people like you. When you have achieved as much as Hitch, and risked as much, then you may have the right to judge his *earthly* achievements - as for the afterlife, if there is one, that is for *God* to judge, not you. Pharisee.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from Jan

    Jan writes

    "Do you really think you speak for *God* ??"

    My reply

    No. I speak from my soul about another human soul who foolishly believed he came from nothing and would return to nothing and shortened his life by his destructive excesses. If you honor the genius of Christopher Hitchens and believe that he was an asset to this country and the world then you must fault him for his nihilistic philosophy-the bad ideas that drove him to drink, chain smoking, and God knows what else, and deprived the world prematurely of his genius.

    Edna Pierce | Thanks, Robert Spence, for honoring Hitchens.

    He'll be greatly missed.

    And, ApolloSpeaks, you are indeed disgracefully gloating. All you seem to be preoccupied with is what you suppose Hitchens is enduring in imaginary supernatural realms. It's fairly disgusting, and even worse, silly.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from Edna Pierce

    What kind of "disgraceful gloating" is it that sees Hitchens' afterlife experience as a kind of necessary shock treatment (some would call it tough love) to purge his mind of error and fill it with truth and great happiness? I'm hoping for the best for him, am I not?

    StephenA55 writes

    Apollo Speaks says,

    "You say that "Hitchens life of unbelief was the perfect preparation for death." Are you using your head on this one my friend? Think about it. The death Hitchens prepared himself for intellectually and morally was eternal death and oblivion, the complete, everlasting extinction of consciousness-an absolute materialist's fiction. Since the death Hitchens has isn't what he foresaw how then was he prepared for it?"

    Well, how do you prepare for an afterlife!?

    I won't bother because it would be a waste of my limited time here in this life. If it does happen I'll be ready. Unless it requires a lifetime of humble prayer, worship and other grovelling. If God wants that then I will argue that he should have given better evidence for his existence. And why should an omnipotent being be so needy?

    Of course there is no afterlife. Nothing to worry about. Take it easy AS, you have all you need. Just enjoy your one life, it's all anyone ever gets, but it's all you need.

    He'll be greatly missed.

    Aristotle believed that man could not live a truly good life without God.

    ApolloSpeaks 

    StephenA asks

    "Well, how do you prepare for an afterlife!?"

    Everything in moderation; and the contemplation of God (man's highest good and happiness) as Aristotle said in his Nicomachean Ethics.

    David Dowse | December 18, 2011 10:34 AM | Reply

    Apollo- you are in error.

    "Jan asks

    Do you really think you speak for *God* ??

    No. I speak from my soul about another human soul who foolishly believed he came from nothing and would return to nothing and shortened his life by his destructive excesses. If you honor the genius of Christopher Hitchens and believe that he was an asset to this country and the world then you must fault him for his nihilistic philosophy-the bad ideas that drove him to drink, chain-smoking, and God knows what else, and deprived the world prematurely of his genius.

    Read your post again, with all its questionable presumptions, then let me know, and we'll argue.

    Never mind, for the moment, the man's supposed excesses, in your view, or his "religious" bent - it is not for us to judge - we may, however, judge his work, which was prolific and astounding.

    Let him rest in peace.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from David Dowse 

    THE MOHAMMED OF ATHEISM

    Yes, his output was astounding. Even more astounding for a thoughtful man of the mind was his pathological hatred of God and all things spiritual. It was as though the God Idea had broken half of his astounding brain. His wanting to destroy religion (a throwback to the ghastly French Revolution) betrayed his insecurity and weakness of faith in atheism. He needed to have everyone believe as he believed so he could believe more strongly. This former communist could never fully free himself from totalitarianism. In a certain sense he was the mad Mohammad of atheism waging jihad with his pen and tongue for a sword.

    StephenA55 replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks 

    Hitch did not hate God.

    How could he hate God when he did not believe that God exists?

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from StephenA55 

    Hitchens hated the GOD IDEA. For him it was the most toxic, poisonous, and destructive thing in existence. The man who once believed that communism was the one solution to all the world's problems became an anti-God maniac believing that mankind's salvation greatly depended on eradicating God and religion from the earth. A world free of God and religion was Hitchens' life mission and utopian dream.

    StephenA55 replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    I would say that you exaggerate a great deal.

    His writings on religion were well thought out, clear and reasoned. To call him a maniac on the grounds of his speaking for rationalism as opposed to supernaturalism is absurd.

    He was also well aware that he would never see a world without religion in his lifetime. His views were expressed with passion, certainly, but he was touched by the warmth of his reception in the bible belt when on his speaking tours; that was not the response of a fanatic.

    He was a humane man who understood the need of many people to believe in God.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from StephenA55 

    The God Idea was Hitchen's Great Satan, Ultimate Evil, mankind's worse and most destructive invention from which sprung most of our problems and ills. He was so blinded with hate for God, and the concept of a human soul and afterlife, that he couldn't see the slightest good in any religion or spiritual philosophy. That Hitchens displayed warmth toward friendly believers on occasion did nothing to deter him from his insane mission or soften his fanatical atheism. Till the end he remained hell-bent on his cause. To see Hitchens in perspective, and just how irrational and unhinged he was, study up on S.E. Cupp a sensitive, humane and understanding atheist who wrote a book against the Hitchens of the world and their mindless attack on the Judeo-Christian (Classical) tradition the bedrock of our civilization.

    Debate on Pajamas Media

    From Sam to Apollo:

    And how will you feel Apollo when you get there [to heaven] and truly understand that despite all of Hitchens’ atheism and dismissal of the eternal while he was alive, the Creator still loves him just as much as he loves you despite your lifetime of devotion?
    (Luke 15)

    Apollo to Sam:

    Like you I understand this in the here and now: that God is love (wisdom and justice) and loves his creatures and creations. I understand that despite his insane war against God (Divine Reason), and his nihilistic belief in the ultimate nothingness of existence, Hitchens still has life and being and the use of his mind and faculties by God's grace and the reality of the material and spiritual universe that He created. Having unexpectedly survived the death of his flesh Hitchens must be in a state of profound anguish and regret that he used his great intellect to no good end, in the service of big lies and very bad ideas: that God is nonexistent; that the physical world is ultimate reality; that everything comes from and returns to nothing. Now that Hitch’s disembodied state is painfully refuting his most cherished beliefs I am sure that he repents having lived his life in error spreading lies about the universe and its Creator. If he sincerely regrets his past mistakes and sins God I'm sure in his Mercy will forgive him.

    Posted on Huffington Post: 

    Christopher Hitchens' life was all sound and fury. And since he was an atheistic nihilist who believed that existence was an accident (that everything came from and returned to nothing with the Big Bang being a random unplanned event) by his own materialist philosophy he was an idiot telling a tale signifying nothing.

    No replies

    Posted on Atlas Shrugs

    CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS

    Loved the man and hated him. Loved his defense of freedom against the enemies of America and Western Man. Hated his militant atheism and his intemperate, brutal and savage attacks on all things religious and spiritual-from a God of incalculable creative power who can be known by direct experience, down to the indestructible human soul made in God's intellectual image. Right now Hitchens is most likely in torment (what Catholics and the Book of Maccabees call Purgatory) as the survival of his great mind after death is painfully refuting and shattering his atheistic materialism.

    No replies

     

    RUDY GIULIANI AND WHAT OBAMA MEANS BY “PATRIOTISM,” AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS

     
     
     
     Screen Shot 2015-02-21 at 9.44.24 AM
      
     

    DOES OBAMA LOVE AMERICA?

    He loves a romantic idea of America in his detached, professorial, abstract, theoretic, absurd leftist mind-America transformed into an egalitarian, cradle to grave, utopian welfare state-and childishly hates the reality with its inequalities, inequities and imperfections. Obama's patriotism (love of country) was aptly summed up by black American Communist singer Paul Robeson: "Patriotism means never being satisfied with your country [until it's perfect]." That is Obama's patriotism. That is his creed. That's how he loves this country. And it's unrealistic, unpatriotic, un-American and immature.

     Anti-American Utopian Communist Idealist Paul Robeson.

     

    RELATED

    FLAGLESS IN BERLIN

     

     

     
     

     

    GEORGE BUSH'S PATRIOTISM: I love my country (as it is) right or wrong.

    BARACK OBAMA'S PATRIOTISM; I'll love my country when it's PERFECT: only right and never wrong. Only Left not Right. Until then it sucks.

     

     
     

    BEWARE AMERICA! TEA PARTY TERROR ON THE RISE CALLING FOR VIOLENT FISCAL RESTRAINT AND BALANCED BUDGET JIHAD

    The extreme right-wing Tea Party is threatening terrorist austerity measures to save this country (so they say) from becoming a broken, bankrupt, socialist Greece with blood in the streets. Obama’s moderate, mainstream, transformational dream of a "MORE PERFECT ENTITLEMENT UNION" is in jeopardy. To realize this TRUE AMERICAN DREAM we must SPEND BABY SPEND, going deeper and deeper and deeper into debt, until we reach the promised land of cradle to grave welfare heaven. How can we save Obama's DREAM from the vast right-wing Tea Party terrorist austerity conspiracy?

    HILLARY CLINTON 2016 TO RESET AMERICA /sarc

     
     
     
     

    AMERICA ISN'T ABOVE CRITICISM

    But a true American loves his country right or wrong-as he loves his father, mother, sisters, brothers, uncles, aunts, cousins and friends right or wrong. That's what being a patriot means. But for truly devout Moslem Americans (who define themselves as citizens of Islam) this country will never be right (with God), and hatefully always be unGodly, perverse and wrong, until it's Islamized from border to border and coast to coast.

    Stop the Islamization of America NOW!

     

     
    OBAMA MOSUL MYSTERY SOLVED
     
    Obama by revealing the plan to retake Mosul is foolishly hoping that ISIS will see how serious he is and leave the city so our soldiers won't have to fight. But ISIS isn't leaving. They will stay there and go down fighting if necessary suffering the glorious death of  holy martyrs in a righteous cause, and pleasing Allah by killing as many Americans as possible.
     
     
     

    WHAT IS STUPID MR. BROOKS,

    and very dangerous, is Obama embracing as friends those Islamic supremacists who (like the Moslem Brethren) have a nonviolent approach to destroying us-at least for now.

     

    MAYBE THESE MOSLEM MEN

    should do what the 4th century Church Father Origen did to bring his sexual nature under control: castrate themselves.

    WE SHALL HAVE PEACE WITH ISLAM LIKE WE DO WITH GERMANY AND JAPAN

     
     
    The closest thing we have to a Moslem president is emboldening Jihad-Islam like never before in modern times and intensifying this new world war.  
     
    Truth is the Islam of the Prophet Mohammed has been at war with infidel humanity ever since that fateful day Mohammed (to save his faith from poverty and extinction) picked up his sword and looted his first Meccan caravan in Allah's name. From that first success at banditry and grand theft the terrible warlord Mohammed was born along with his empire of blood and death that spread across Arabia and beyond like an all consuming pestilence.
     
     The true Mohammed isn't the solution to the problem. He is the problem.
     
    And against all reality and history our idiot, appeasing, outreach nut of a  president believes that Mohammed was a prophet of peace (a 7th century Christ or Gandhi or Martin Luther King) when he was a menace to all infidels....and is still so today as millions of supremaicist Moslems-poisoned by his violent deeds and words of hate-see that first looted caravan as emblematic of humanity and a licence for conquest.
     
     The most beautiful smell in the world.
     
    Whether Obama likes it or not, admits it or not, is revolted by it or not the violent subversive imperialist Islam of Mohammed is the enemy. And we'll be at war with this enemy until we crush its will to victory and defeat it like Fascist Japan and Nazi Germany. Even if victory means killing millions of Moslems like we did Germans and Japanese Mohammed's Islam will be defeated and we shall have peace.
     
     
    POSTSCRIPT
     
    IS OBAMA MOSLEM?
     
     
    I can't blame anyone for suspecting that Obama might be a cypto-Moslem. It is clear that he wants Moslems to believe he's one of them. But his Secular Progressivism and left-wing relativist values make him unconvincing, and in part underlie his unpopularity in the Moslem world. For what traditional, mainstream, normative Moslem is pro-gay rights, pro-gay marriage, pro-partial birth abortion, pro-pot and champions women's rights? If Obama is Moslem he has reformed himself into being a mere caricature of one. In fact, with his radical left-wing politics and hedonistic (1960s) counterculture values Obama wouldn't last a day if he lived in the Moslem world. Most "religion-of-peace" Moslems would consider him a phony, Westernized, hypocritical believer profoundly and irredeemably corrupted by ungodly anti-Islamic values-the menacing enemy within-and would want him dead, jailed or banished from their society.
     
    In sum, Obama is a Secular Progressive Liberal disguised as a Christian sending signals to Moslems that he's really one of them. That is his act. And it's  failing.
     
     
    RELATED
     
     
     

    ATHEIST MORALITY AND THE COLD BLOODED MURDER OF THE CHAPEL HILL THREE (POSTSCRIPT ADDED ON DEBATE WITH ATHEISTS)

     
     
    This insightful article by Daniel Greenfield inspired me to write the following piece which I posted in the comment section and to which he kindly responded with a very interesting reply (posted below) about Dostoevsky and Christopher Hitchens.
     

     

    ANGRY MILITANT ATHEIST CRAIG HICKS' COLD BLOODED MURDER

    of three Chapel Hill students had everything to do with his atheism and disbelief in God and nothing to do with his victims being Moslem. It's all very simple to understand. If God (the Supreme Being) doesn't exist-as He doesn't for Hicks or any materialistic atheist-then there is no absolute, objective, extramental moral law of right and wrong for Hicks to follow, abide by, guide and constrain him. In other words, there is no being higher than Hicks, no God to ultimately judge his actions and hold him accountable for his crimes and sins; no after life of rewards or punishments determined by his choices in this life. Right and wrong are a matter of opinion and subjective belief for Hicks making him a law unto himself-with no authority (family, school, church or state) outside or over him. Whatever Hicks decides, believes, feels is good and evil, right and wrong, just and unjust is the only valid moral code for him. Hicks is his own god and lawgiver obeying nothing but his free, autonomous, liberated will-and if that means murder or any kind of  crime then so be it.

    In other words, as Dostoevsky said in his masterpiece The Brothers Karamazov "If there is no God, then all things are permitted." There are no rules to live by, no moral laws to follow, no higher authority to answer to and obey. Murder may be illegal and wrong according to conventional man-made rules and laws-which is someone's morality imposed on society-and killing someone could land you in jail and end your life in the electric chair if you're unlucky to get caught. But murdering another human being-erasing his existence which will end forever when he dies -is never in itself evil, immoral, unjust or wrong. We're all fated for extinction and it matters little when it comes. For in a world of random meaningless unguided chance, where life springs from nothing and returns to nothing, where there's no Intelligent Uncaused First Cause or Designer, no underlying purposeful teleological order-no ultimate measurer and architect of all things-nothing that lives (no animal and human being) has a right to life. For such a right would be innate in man, essential to his being, implying a giver of rights or Creator-a figment of man's imagination and need to believe according to atheists like Hicks.

    Now as morality for atheists like Hicks is a matter of personal opinion, feeling and belief-making him a law unto himself-killing someone who pisses him off, or angers him in a simmering dispute over a parking space that reaches a boiling point, is good, right and just if Hicks believes it so.

    In sum, Hicks' atheism (or anti-theism) was morally essential to his triple murder; while the religious belief of his victims (abhorrent as that was to Hicks) was incidental to their deaths-a mere chance accident. In fact, if we replace the three Moslem students with atheists like Hicks-hating God and despising all religions like him-they'd be just as dead today for angering him. 

     

    "GREAT post!.........and you really went to the Oracle on these type of issues with your Dostoevsky quote. In his book the Possessed(or Demons in some translations)...Dostoevsky's nihilist character Kirilov makes the declaration......"If there is no God.........then I am God." And speaking of these New Atheists...........when Christopher Hitchens wrote his book...."god is not great"...........and he wanted to make his most powerful case against God.......who did he steal from? You got it............DOSTOEVSKY!  He basically hijacks the chapter "Rebellion" from? The Brothers Karamazov. But Hitchens didn't understand that Dostoevsky refutes his own argument later in the novel."

     
     
     
    POSTSCRIPT
     
    Debate on Jihad Watch
     
    (SEE)
     
     
    Don McKeller writes:
     
     
    "What a bizarre world you live in, ApolloSpeaks. So just because somebody is too intelligent to believe in imaginary dieties (sic), somehow that means that they feel free to murder innocent people and have no morality or ethics? Does it not occur to you that atheists have moms and dads and brothers and sisters and can fall in love? And because they have those things, does it not occur to you that they can appreciate and care about other human beings and what happens to them? And that they can be empathetic to other people? And therefore have very strong and good ethics and personal morality and understandings of justice and decency? Of course you haven’t thought any of this out at all, have you? No, because the atheist is the person who tells you there is no Santa Clause and no god and no heaven and that makes you scared. Really scared — because you can’t make any logical argument or prove them wrong in any way. So therefore, in your little mind, that person must be evil by nature. What a sad little world you live in."
     
    My reply:
     
    The only atheists I respect philosophically are those who logically, consistently and relentlessly apply the principle of moral relativism and believe that there are as many valid moralities and moral codes as there are individuals who invent them; and refuse to be judgmental of anyone’s morality, behavior or beliefs like theists are. In being judgmental the theist at least is logical as he consistently applies the principle of moral absolutism measuring everyone by a single standard of right and wrong. But for an atheist who denies the existence of a supreme being with an extramental absolute moral law to do this-not respecting the moral autonomy of others and sits in judgment over them as if his standards alone are valid and morally sound-completely contradicts the principle of moral relativism as he stupidly and unconsciously looks like a theist. In short, the atheist who says that I or Hicks or anyone is morally wrong is a fool.
     
    BTW, it's not I who am afraid. It's you who are afraid. Afraid to be a thoroughgoing atheist taking the principle of moral relativism to its logical conclusion of radical individual moral autonomy, or moral anarchy and chaos.
     
    DEBATE ON THE TELEGRAPH
     
     
     
     
    "We are indeed fortunate--and equally so your argument--that no Christian ever commits murder."
     
    My reply:
     
    If we take the atheist's principle of moral relativism to its absolute logical conclusion then THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS MURDER IN REALITY. If I kill you for whatever reason I've simply taken your life with no moral qualification of right or wrong. Atheists who judge my killing you as evil or wrong are thinking in absolute moral terms like the theists they despise and ridicule. Such people are torn between moral relativism and moral absolutism and can't seem to make up their minds which way to go.
     
     

    HARF CALLS FOR JOBS IN MIDEAST ON ANNIVERSARY OF FAILED STIMULUS, ERIC HOLDER’S CONFUSION, AND ISIS’ CHIEF CHANNELING MOHAMMED, ETC.

    State Dept. Spokeswoman: ISIS Needs Jobs | Atlas Shrugs

    YESTERDAY WAS THE SIXTH ANNIVERSARY

    of Obama's failed, historic $860 billion stimulus bill (the largest of its kind) that was to trigger a robust Reagan-like jobs creating recovery like nothing ever seen in American and world history. What a sorry way to celebrate that day than with this clueless State Dept clown saying a jobs program for the people in the Middle East is needed to defeat ISIS.

    However, if Harf wants to be taken seriously she should propose something like reinstituting the military draft. That's the jobs program that could give hundreds and thousands of Americans work weaponizing them into deadly soldiers killing and destroying their way to victory over genocidal ISIS putting their death cult caliphate out of its misery.

     

     
     

    HOLDER'S MENTAL CONFUSION

    It's like Ralph Peters said on Fox yesterday "If in naming the enemy terminology doesn't matter [as Holder says] then why not call them Islamic extremists"? By stubbornly refusing to name the enemy Obama creates a divisive issue that distracts us from the war we're in-when we should be focused like a lasar beam on winning. No American wartime president has been this stupid and inept. Even Bush who said that "Islam was a religion of peace" identified the enemy as Islamic extremists-and on one occasion called them "Islamofascists (which he got hell for)." Again I say, with good reason 85% of our military contemptuously believe Obama is an awful Commander-in-Chief and have no confidence in his weak,  rudderless, demoralizing leadership which makes them sick.

     

     
    PAM WRITES:
     

    "No matter how much accommodation, self-censorship, and appeasement to Muslim sensitivities it is never enough." That is very true.  As absolute world power is the end and aim of fundamentalist Islam, for Islamic supremacists (like the Moslems at CAIR) who seek that end a glass that isn't full to overflowing is as good as empty. In short, not having it all is as good as nothing. For nothing short of the ultimate world triumph of Islam can vindicate their supremacist faith.

     

     

    THE TERRIBLE TRUTH ABOUT ISIS

    Deadly, murdering, genocidal Caliph Al-Baghdadi channels the infernal prophet Mohammed from his place in hell like no one else in Islam today. That’s why thousands are flocking to his banner of death dreaming of self-sacrifice and martyrdom in a war to make Islam a great power again.

     

     
     
    After reading this article by radical leftist Israel hater Philip Weiss  one is left with the impression that it's Netanyahu, not vicious Jew hating Islamonazis, who is making the Jews of Western Europe feel unsafe and causing them to leave. Anti-Zionist Jews like Weiss want a diminishing Jewish population in Israel-not a growing one-which in time, they hope, will be outnumbered by Israeli Arabs and end the Jewish State-hence his concern over Netanyahu's message to Europe's Jews. Weiss reminds me of Yassir Arafat begging Russia to stop the emigration of Russian Jews to Israel. The Jewish population of Israel is edging upwards while over in the Palestinian territories the fertility rate is in decline due to their  shrinking economy making large families too costly (see). Perhaps the PA and Hamas will soon start drawing on Palestinian refugees to cope with their growing demographic problem. Over time this could solve the refugee problem. Weiss and the anti-Israel left just can't win.
     
    BTW, Weiss has banned me from his site.
     
     
    What do 700 UK artists hope to achieve what 7 Arab armies failed to do 67 years ago?
     
     
     
     
     
    Obama bowed to the Japanese emperor. Truman A-bombed him into submission and humbled him. Would Obama have done that if he was the 33rd President?
     
     
     
     
     
    WHICH IS MORE DISGUSTING AND OFFENSIVE TO NORMAL PEOPLE?
     
    A Gay Pride Parade of perverts, queers and sickos celebrating their disgusting, filthy, dehumanizing vices? Or a public display of wild frenzied  Moslem freaks insanely flagellating themselves believing that they're pleasing God when only filthy demons delight in such things, as St Augustine said in the City of God.
     
     
     
     
     
    The Religion of Islamic Peace has had serious ongoing PR problems for 1400 years-with infidel humanity fearing and hating it more than any other faith. Why? Because every year of its existence Islam has been hijacked by radicals like ISIS posing as Moslems, I guess. /sarc
     
     

    JUST AS THE MURDERED CHRISTIAN COPTS

    in Libya were just ordinary Egyptian citizens to Obama. So this desecrated Christian Church would be just an ordinary Florida house of worship to him -unless, of course, it was a black church; then for Obama it would be a horrendous racist crime unrelated to Christianity. As Bill Clinton said in his post-9/11 speech in yesterday's piece "Christianity is still paying for the sins of the Crusades"-white Christianity that is.

     

     
     
     
    IT WAS A HARD DAYS NIGHT
     
    for this Moslem NOWHERE MAN.
     
    JamesonRocks adds,
     
    "Well, you know those moozies – they’re crazy EIGHT DAYS A WEEK…"

     

    BILL CLINTON IS BARACK OBAMA IN WHITE FACE WITH MORE SMARTS, CUNNING AND CHARM

       

    Critique of Bill Clinton's errors on the Crusades.

    WHO IS BILL CLINTON?

    Barack Hussein Obama in white face with more intelligence, charm and political cunning. Look at the comparison: 

    Anticipating Obama Bill Clinton said in response to the USS Cole bombing that killed 17 Americans that true Islam "had nothing to do with this atrocity or any act of terrorism." And sounding as if Islam was as American as apple pie (when it's our totalitarian opposite and enemy) Clinton said "there is nothing in Islam that would be destructive to our way of life, and that it's in harmony with the best of Western ideals." If so where is one Moslem country with a liberal, American-like democracy with division of powers, a free market system and equal rights for minorities? After 1400 years there should be at least one-but there's none. And what we see instead in Western Europe is a rising tide of anti-Western Islamic hatred hell-bent on turning the continent back to the Middle Ages of political oppression, injustice and moral darkness.

    BILL CLINTON ON THE CRUSADES

    57 days after the 9/11 disaster (57 is the number of Moslem countries) Bill Clinton anticipating by 13 years Obama's equating of the Christian Crusades with ISIS' genocidal killing rampage blamed the Crusades (and atrocities committed by Christians against Moslems who'd been slaughtering and enslaving Christians for centuries) as an important underlying factor for 9/11 and Moslem hatred of the West; and (as if he were the pope) Clinton apologized to Islam for it.

    Truth is if there hadn't been the Crusades the Soviets would still have invaded Afghanistan giving birth to al Qaida and the 9/11 event. For radical Islam's fanatical aim isn't to settle a score over the Crusades or any other grievance; its aim is IMPERIAL RESTORATION: reversing Islam's 500 year decline and restoring it as a great world power (caliphate) as a means to the greater end of world domination-the prophetic promise of the power mad, Hitler-like warlord Mohammed.

    CLINTON AND 9/11

    Indeed, this is the same soft-on-terror Bill Clinton who like Obama learning nothing from the explosive growth of Islamic extremism during his presidency (treating it as a common crime problem not an ideological/military conflict like Nazism and Communism) learned nothing from the first World Trade Center bombing, and the massive terror attacks in Saudi Arabia, East Africa and Yemen that followed-and handed George Bush the badly weakened national security system that al Qaida defeated on 9/11 killing 3000 innocent Americans.

    CLINTON AND NETANYAHU

    Moreover, Obama's hostility to Israeli PM Bibi Netanyahu was matched by Bill Clinton in the 1990s when he intervened in Israeli politics to effect Netanyahu's defeat against his weaker leftist Labor opponent Ehud Barak. That led to the failure of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks and the catastrophe of the Second Palestinian Intifada where thousands died.

    CLINTON AND THE HOUSING CRASH

     And lastly, this same Bill Clinton (an economic dumb ox slightly brighter than Obama) started the gigantic housing bubble (biggest in US history) that unstoppably grew exponentially during the Bush years and crashed the US economy as I wrote about HERE and HERE.  If Bill Clinton hadn't been president there would have been no 08 crash, and no disastrous Obama presidency.

     

    Bill Clinton: U.S. to Blame for Mexican Drug Violence | CNS News

     

    Now Bill Clinton is apologizing to Mexico for its escalating drug violence but hasn't yet offered one word of apology to the American people for 9/11 and the housing/finacial crash of which he was the fountainhead. And now this terrible, awful, reckless, lying man wants to return to the White House with his tired old worn out failed ex-Secretary of State wife to continue his legacy of liberal weakness, folly, confusion and destruction.

    RELATED

     

     

    IS SISTER OF SLAIN MOSLEM CHAPEL HILL STUDENT A JIHADIST? (UPDATE: BARAKAT’S BROTHER WAS ISLAMIST)

     
     
     
    Craig Stephen Hicks a religion hating radically left militant atheist who saw only evil in the God Idea but didn't hate all religions equally-prefering Islam and Moslems to Christians and their faith-shot and killed three students who  were incidentally Moslem over (what appears to be) a long simmering parking space dispute having nothing to do with their faith.
     
    But Dr. Mohamad Abu-Salha, father of two of the slain students and father-in-law of the third, disputes this. Believing that the murder of his kin was a "hate crime" he blames it on a deadly atmosphere of Moslem hate created by an anti-Moslem news media "bombarding every American every day with news about what they call Islamic terrorism, none of which is Islamic at all." In other words, if the media following our see-no-evil-in-Islam president had only censored itself not referring to Islamic terrorists as being Moslem Hicks might have thought differently of  Moslems, not  committed his "hate" crime and the three Moslem students would be alive today.
     

    What this says about Dr. Salha is that he takes his religion very seriously and (like Obama) thinks it a religion of justice and peace unfairly under attack by ignorant bigots. In other words, like Obama Dr. Salha is completely blind to 14 centuries of Islamic jihad rooted in the prophet or war whose name he bears and is the source of the deadly acts of Moslem jihadists.

     But contradicting Dr. Salha Dr. Suzanne Barakat, sister of one of the three slain students, blames Hick's crime on the controversial film American Sniper and its depiction of killing al Qaida terrorists by hero sniper Chris Kyle claiming that it diminishes the humanity of Moslems or dehumanizes them-making them look like vile despicable creatures worthy of death.

     Which is it then? Are radicals who kill in Allah's name real Moslems or not? And if they are  Moslem practicing true Islam in their crimes, as Ms. Barakat seems to believe, then what does that say about her? That prior to al Qaida terrorists being killed by Chris Kyle in Iraq they did nothing that diminished their humanity and dehumanized them? That their atrocities and crimes against US soldiers and fellow Moslems were Islamically justified? That in her eyes they were good Moslem men  who no more deserved death than did her brother? And that Chris Kyle should have left them alone free to kill American  soldiers at will? It sounds to me that the grieving Ms. Barakat, unlike the moderate Dr. Solha, is an Islamic supremacist who sided with al Qaida in Iraq during the war, and may now side with ISIS and the cause of radical Islam across the world.

    In short, this Moslem woman needs to be watched. If she embraces the ideology of Islamic supremacist jihad as I suspect, and blames the death of her brother on the film American Sniper and its depiction of justified and necessary killing of inhuman Moslem scum, she may be looking to avenge herself for her brother's death and strike out at this country in the name of Allah and Islam.

    UPDATE

    ChaimBenLevin just posted the following in the comment section about Barakat's brother:

    "Apollo. Your suspicions are confirmed. Barakat’s slain brother was a fucking Jew hating  pro-Islamist  9/11 truther."

    http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/02/12/well-well-looks-like-one-of-the-so-called-innocent-muslim-students-who-was-gunned-down-had-some-very-pro-islamic-terrorism-leanings-himself/

     

     

    CHRIS CUOMO POUNDS JUDGE MOORE AND SOUNDS ATHEIST, IN DEFENSE OF BRIAN WILLIAMS, THE CHAPEL HILL HATE CRIME? AND OTHER NONSENSICAL THINGS

     

    Un-American, anti-Constitutional Chris Cuomo arguing like a Marxist atheist with Judge Moore that our rights are from man not God.
     
    The late Mario Cuomo, a Liberal Roman Catholic Democat, believed in the biblical teaching as taught by his Church of an unwritten moral law of right and wrong that comes from God and is implanted in our souls before birth. And he admitted as much when he publicly stated his confused position on abortion: that he personally believed in the Church teaching that abortion was murder and morally wrong violating God's laws and the unborn's right to life. But that he also believed it was just as wrong to impose his religious beliefs on those who thought differently on the issue; and that the decision to murder the unborn should reside with individual women as allowed by Row v. Wade. Consequently, Cuomo was tolerant of the anti-abortion movement and never accused its members (as Obama and radical leftists do) of waging a war against women and wanting to oppress them.
     
    But Cuomo's tolerance is completely missing from his son Chris on the issue of same sex marriage. As we learned from his lengthy debate on CNN with Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy "Ten Commandments" Moore (a hero  to social and religious conservatives) only regressive bigots oppose gay marriage; and that "God's law against gays" is an imaginary projection of their bigotry and hate. Gone is Chris Coumo's Catholic upbringing and education from elementary school to Jesuit run Fordam University. Gone are Church teachings of a moral law innate in man requiring sexual sobriety for happiness and health. Gone is the Declaration of Independence which correctly states that our rights (and those of the unborn) originate from God. In fighting with Judge Moore over his decision to stop the issuing of marriage licences to gays in his state, no matter how much proof Moore offered (going back more than  a century) that his actions had judicial precedent and were perfectly legal under federal and state law, the ideological, politically correct, obsessive Cuomo (putting on a show for his few CNN fans) just couldn't accept it. Though gay marriage isn't the law of the land and it's against the Constitution of Alabama those like Judge Moore who stand  in its way (rejecting every form of marriage other than the traditional) are no better, to Chris Cuomo, than racial bigots practicing immoral, unjustified, irrational discrimination-homophobics driven by fear and hate, not principles based on Nature and Nature's God.
      
    What a far cry from his dad. If this were Mario Cuomo he'd have been more  civil and conciliatory on about gay marriage and said 'Though I personally agree with Church teaching that marriage should be between one man and one woman, and that same sex marriage is immoral, unnatural and wrong (as is homosexuality) I nevertheless think it's also wrong to impose this view on society and stop gays who want to marry from doing so.'  Unlike the son Marion Cuomo would have respected Judge Moore's court decisions and faith and not insinuated that he was a bigot driven by obsolete views and hate.
     
     But still, the Cuomos are CINOS (Catholics In Name Only) with the son (both of them) worse than the dad possibly being an atheist in disguise as he seems to believe that right and wrong are invented by man and not by Almighty God-the absolute measure of all things.

     

     
     
     

    IN DEFENSE OF BRAIN WILLIAMS

    If MSM gives Barack Obama a free pass on his compulsive lying about everything: healthcare, NSA snooping, deporting illegal aliens, the unemployment rate,  corruption at the IRS,  al Qaida's decimation and the War on Terror being won why should Brian Williams be punished for his lies? Which is worse? A President lying about healthcare, the IRS and al Qaida and thinking himself some kind of messiah? Or a newsman inventing stories about coming under rocket fire, or suffering dysentery during Katrina to make himself look bigger than he is? If a non-stop, serial lying Barack Obama can continue as President despite his severe truth and reality problems and lead the country and world into chaos, and he's revered by NBC who helped elect and reelect him, then why should Williams be suspended from his job, or possibly lose it because of his intermittent lies? What's fair about that?

     

     

    Embedded image permalink

    YOU WILL NOTICE

    that Obama is being hung in effigy with Jimmy Carter. Stands to reason. Obama is the greatest enabler of Iranian power since Carter mistook the evil Ayatollah Khomeini for a Jeffersonian democrat and Moslem saint. Carter midwifed the Iranian Revolution. Obama is midwifing a nuclear Iran and its expansion into a regional empire. But the Iranians are so barbaric, cruel and wicked that instead of showing gratitude to Carter and Obama they want to hang them dead. And Obama calls them "The Islamic Republic of Iran." I guess wanting him dead is true Islam.

     
    OUTRAGEOUS! Obama’s State Department Orders Marines To Destroy Their Weapons And Evacuate Yemen UNARMED! | The Gateway Pundit

     

    A RADICAL LEFTIST MILITANT ATHEIST NUT,

    who hates the God Idea and all religions equally, shot three people because they were Moslem? I don't buy it. If so  why didn't he go on a shooting spree killing every Moslem in sight until he weas stopped? Or walk into a mosque and gun down dozens of believers while at prayer?  Why would he limit himself to three victims if he lusted for Moslem blood? It doesn't make sense. I'm going with the parking dispute driving this guy mad with the victims accidentally being Moslem and not essential to the crime.

    BTW. leftist websites like pro-Islamist Mondoweiss and Loonwatch so badly want this murder to be an Islamophobic hate crime that they omit to mention Hick's militant atheism and espousal of leftwing causes like gay marriage. And when metrosexual Chris Hayes of MSNBC said that Chapel Hill was the "Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown moment for Moslems" he may have absolutely nailed it. For neither Martin nor Brown were victims of hate crimes.

    Lovelife writes on Media Matters

    "The killing of those kids was nothing short of a fox/media induced hate crime. That bastard is a terrorist just like Eric "the fiend" Frein .... Remember him? The liberal media sure doesn't."

    My unanswered reply:

    You're right, Lovelife. Where else but Fox would someone so disturbed as Hicks get his militant atheism, and hatred of homophobic rightwing Christians?/sarc. 

     

     
    ”I'M SHOCKED! SHOCKED! SHOCKED I TELL YOU!
     
    A radical leftist loon preferring Moslems to Christians?

     

     

    WHAT MR. PRESIDENT

    no post-mortem adoption? Moron!

     

    Obama’s Sad, Sick Selfie Stick | Atlas Shrugs

     

    Obama using selfie stick

     

    THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

    is both the longest running Amateur Hour show since Ted Mack, and the longest running clown show since Howdy Doody. In fact, as a clown Obama is an unfunny pathetic amateur sadder than depression hobo Emmett Kelly.

     

     

     
    RICHIUTTO IS RIGHT! CONSUMER SPENDING OVER THE HOLIDAYS
     
    was a disaster (worse than 2013) and continues to be poor into the new year. This despite consumer sentiment at a ten year high-due mainly to the dramatic drop in gas prices creating the illusion that the economy is returning to normal. It is not. Practically everything else is happy talk and lies  as Steve Richiutto notes.
     

    ELIJAH CUMMINGS AND THE RELIGION OF GOVERNMENT-OR GOVERNMENT AS SOUL FOOD

     
     
     

    Government is Congressman Cumming's holy religion as it is for all secular progressive liberals. Government is their Supreme Being, their God of Love, their moral absolute, their saving messiah and redeemer from the evils of this world (especially conservatism). For liberals like Cummings government is the source of all truth, wisdom and moral goodness which alone feed, nourish and sustain the human soul (or brain if they're materialists) curing it of ignorance, error and the misery of sin (like opposition to gay rights, abortion and open borders).

    Forget your Bibles Old and New; forget your Plato, Plutarch and Cicero. Forget Moses, Jeremiah, Jesus and the saints. Forget anything that brings you closer in mind and spirit to the one true living God (including prayer). Cummings hath spoken: there's no salvation outside of the state-no soul food to be gotten anywhere except what's given us mortals by the federal government-the center of the universe and lord of creation. Your true spiritual teachers and guides on earth aren't rabbis, priests, gurus and sages, but Congressmen like Cummings, Judges like Ginsburg and Presidents like Obama (once hailed the messiah). These alone will enlighten your mind with truth, elevate your moral nature with compassion (the left's master  virtue) and make you happy, whole and good-giving you a purpose in life to boot: ending poverty and racism with social injustice egalitarianism; and ending the horror of world destroying global warming (the terror of the ages). The great God government can do it all if it's given enough money and power.

    This is not a new idea. The Religion of Government is as old as the French Revolution which attempted to abolish Christianity from society closing down and destroying churches, ending the Catholic mass, killing priests and nuns in droves by beheading and hacking them to death (like ISIS does today).

    Sisters from the Order of St. Joseph being led to the guillotine by anti-clerical French Revolutionaries.
     

    While our Founding Fathers and Framers were separating Church and State French Revolutionaries were replacing the Church with the State-with an atheistic "Religion of Reason" administered by men like Cummings-a preposterous idea that catastrophically failed then and is failing today right under Cumming's Judeo-Christian hating liberal snoot.

    In our 238 glorious years never have the once great industrious, productive American people been more dependent on government for services and material things-for realizing the Good Life called the American Dream through the State; and never have they been more ignorant, senseless, sinful and miserable given up to sexual excess, drugs, drink and eating disorders. After decades of experimentation in government dependency with trillions redistributed in unearned wealth the STATE has proved itself once more (as it did in France, Russia North Korea, Cuba, etc.) to be a false God with a false faith and messianic pretensions failing at perfecting society which is liberalism's impossible goal. Instead of nourishing and sustaining our souls (which no government can do as we can't "live by bread alone") it corrupts and degrades us weakening our mental and moral powers, undermining good character (as FDR warned) and turning us into dopes-look at this lost generation of poorly educated dumbed down kids-it's a joke.

     Slums of Detroit.

    As a microcosm of what the Religion of Government is doing to us nationally look at broken, busted, bankrupt Detroit-an impoverished, depraved Third World-like sh*t hole liberal city of rising crime, violence, drug abuse, illiteracy, sexual lunacy, disease and death. Then look at Chicago the murder capital of the US. With $18 trillion in federal debt and growing, and $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities, the Detroiting of America is tragically underway as more and more Americans come under government's destructive sway-growing the state at the cost of freedom and shrinking the private sector where wealth is made.

    The Religion of Government (like liberalism in general) doesn't work; it's a false God that's exhausted, broken and dying dragging with it into bankruptcy and oblivion leftist politicians like Congressman Cummings-ironically named "Elijah" after the fierce biblical enemy of false prophets, idols and gods.

    Prophet Elijah smashing the idols of the false god Baal.
     

     The Age of Liberalism is over, It's finished with, done. And a new and glorious chapter in our country's heroic history is about to begin.

     

     

     

    OBAMA INSANELY BELIEVES IRAN MIGHT NOT BE BUILDING THE ISLAMIC BOMB BECAUSE OF ISLAM

    Obama: Iran Won’t Pursue Nuclear Weapons Because It’s ‘Contrary to Their Faith’ | Atlas Shrugs

    PRESIDENT OBAMA:
     
    The issues now are sufficiently narrowed and sufficiently clarified where we're at a point where they need to make a decision. We are presenting to them in a unified fashion, the P5+1 supported by a coalition of countries around the world are presenting to them a deal that allows them to have peaceful nuclear power but gives us the absolute assurance that is verifiable that they are not pursuing a nuclear weapon. 

    And if in fact what they claim is true, which is they have no aspiration to get a nuclear weapon, that in fact, according to their Supreme Leader, it would be contrary to their faith to obtain a nuclear weapon, if that is true, there should be the possibility of getting a deal. They should be able to get to yes. But we don't know if that's going to happen.
     
    JIMMY CARTER ABANDONED THE SHAH
     

    on the belief that the Ayatollah Khomeini was a humane and saintly man and a Jeffersonian democrat who’d replace monarchy with democracy in Iran. And in so doing he unleashed the rise of Islamic Jihad in the Middle East and millions of deaths. If Obama believes in the possibility that Khomeini’s successor isn’t pursuing the bomb because it’s a sin against Allah and Islam then why continue negotiations? If Iran has nuclear aspirations nothing will stop them short of destroying the regime. If Khameine believes that Allah frowns upon nuclear weapons and thinks them a sin then Iran isn't pursuing the bomb, and in enriching uranium and building ICBMs is playing a game of strategic ambiguity-like Saddam played with WMDs. Either way negotiations are an exercise in futility...an idiot's game as the mullahs remain a rising imperialistic terror regime that must be destroyed.

    But let's be realistic. Iran has spent over $100 billion on its nuclear program and is hell bent on getting the bomb and delivering it to us . That is the reality no matter how much Tehran tries to disguise it and confuse us. And Obama in allowing for the possibility that the disguise might be reality, and Iran on religious grounds (despite the enrichment and ICBMs) isn't pursuing the bomb shows that he's hopelessly hoping against hope and grasping at straws. Obama is the greatest enabler of Iranian power since Jimmy Carter's stupidity and naivety midwifed radical jihadist Iran. Now Obama is aiding the mullahs in midwifing a nuclear Iran and becoming the North Korea of the Middle East-a nuclear menace to the world; and they must be stopped!

     

    OBAMA’S HISTORICAL IGNORANCE, 9/10 MENTALITY, FAILURE TO SAVE AMERICA AND OTHER GRIM THOUGHTS

     
     
     
     HISTORY LESSON WASTED
     
    Does anyone think that the President who, not once but TWICE, made the shrouding of Christian symbols at Georgetown University a condition for speaking there is going to care about the historical truth of the Crusades? HELL NO! The Moslem perception of the Crusades (adopted by the Left) as Christianity's ORIGINAL SIN against Islam-history's first great infamous act of unjustified ISLAMOPHOBIA by the Christian West-is one of the reasons for Obama's actions at Georgetown, declaration of America as no longer Christian and anti-Crusade remarks at the Prayer Breakfast. Moreover, it could very well be that Obama considers the oppression of Christians across the Moslem world as karmic retribution for the Crusades.  As Christians are the most targeted minority for persecution in the Middle East Obama has voiced little support for them. And though at the Prayer Breakfast he mentioned Christians persecuted in Nigeria when it came to ISIS only Yazidis not Christians were mentioned.
     
     
     
     
     AFTER HEARING THIS
     

    only a fool would say that fear of Obama is overblown. Obama is a 9/10 president in a post-9/11 world (George Bush and Bill Clinton before 9/11) and very dangerous in his ignorance, arrogance, weakness and self-lies.

     

     
     
     

    OBAMA'S AMERICA IS NO BETTER THAN ISIS?

    What does that mean? America is so irredeemably evil-so lost to justice and hardened in sin-that a two term radically left Alinskyite president can't save it.

     

     

    MORE ANTI-WEST HATE TALK FROM OBAMA'S "MOST TRUSTED" FOREIGN "ALLY"

    Anti-West Statements By Turkish President Erdogan And PM Davutoglu: Muslim Countries Must ‘Unite And Defeat The Successors Of Lawrence Of Arabia'; ‘No One Will Be Able To Stop’ The Rise Of Islam In Europe

    muslim confabAt the PUIC, Istanbul. Yeni Akit, January 21, 2015.
    Lawrence of Arabia was a Zionist of Arabia believing that the restoration of Israel in Palestine was a regional necessity for its progress towards modernity. And that is absolutely what Israel is despite its demonization by enemies and global unpopularity. Neo-Ottoman Islamist Turks like Erdogan will never forgive Lawrence for driving the Turks from Arabia and making the necessary rise of Israel possible. And he dreams that in revenge Islamic supremacists will conquer Europe. What a fool!  Islamists and Jihadists can't even reconquer Palestine. 

     

     
    combo coexist
    French street artist Combo was physically assaulted over his latest art work. Photo: Combo Culture Kidnapper/Facebook
     

    MOSLEMS TO FRENCH COEXIST ARTIST:

    Desist! Or cease to exist!

     

     

    VIDEO Obama: Murdered Paris Jews Were Just Random Victims | Atlas Shrugs

     

     

    FRENCHMEN

    who were randomly born Jews and were randomly at a Parisian deli that randomly served and sold kosher food to Jews, were randomly shot by Jew haters randomly belonging to a Jew hating religion randomly founded by a Jew hating prophet who also randomly killed Jews who ate kosher food randomly far from Paris.

    Now it's all beginning ti make sense.

     

     
     

    ISRAELS EXISTENCE TERRIFIES THE MOSLEM WORLD

    causing doubts about Islamic revelation, purpose and truth-which makes that woman a terrorist like all Israeli Jews./sarc

     

     

    SEND JIHAD JOHN'S DADDY TO JORDAN

    where he'll get swift, immediate, well deserved justice. In fact, send all Gitmo innmates there for speedy executions.

     

    Litigation Jihad: Muslim Workers Sue Hertz Again, This Time for “Islamofauxbia” | Atlas Shrugs

     

    THEY WON'T STOP SUING HERTZ

     

    until they're in the driver's seat owning it, or driving it into oblivion.

     

     

     

     

    WHITE HATING RACISTS WAKE UP!

    As I predicted the Black Lives Matter Movement would have a short life like Occupy Wall Street. As of today BLM is practically DEAD!

     

    OBAMA’S CRAZY ARGUMENT FOR THE MORAL EQUIVALENCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND ISIS (POSTSCRIPT: ATHEIST PRAISES CHRISTIANITY)

     

     
    The political Left (founded on the messianic notion that government can perfect human society)  is one vast insane asylum of moral and intellectual confusion; and Barack Obama (the Left's worst nightmare) is its most prominent (narcissistic) mental case. Take for example his argument for the moral equivalence of Christianity and ISIS:
     
     
    Because of the atrocities committed by Christians in the name of Christ during the antI-Islam Medieval Crusades (which America had nothing to do with), and during the periods of American slavery and Jim Crow (which Christians were at the forefront of fighting), Christian America is no better than murderous, sadistic Christian-hating ISIS. Therefore, no American should get on his "high [righteous] horse" and feel moral outrage and anger over ISIS' horrific crimes. For we too as  Christians have just as much evil to answer for in history.
     
     
     Wait a minute. Didn't Obama say in 2009 that "America is no longer a Christian nation"?
     
     
     Can someone make sense of this for me before I go stark raving mad.
     
     

    POSTSCRIPT:

    ATHEIST BRAINIAC PRAISES CHRISTIANITY

     

    Brainiac writing in the comment section said: "Let’s not forget that although Christians have committed atrocities in the past, and may commit some in the future they have done much to stop atrocities, racism, inequalities, perhaps more than any other religion

    Slavery, and atrocities committed on people is not new. Slavery has been around for quite a while, and many other races besides blacks have been slaves, and have had atrocities committed upon them. Blacks in Africa practiced a brutal slavery. And not just slavery, look at the atrocities around the world from that pilot being burned to sexual slavery of young people to one faction or group brutally wiping out some other faction. On balance no religion has done more good for the human race than Christianity. And I, brainiac, am an atheist."

     Brainaic isn't the first or only atheist to find value in Christianity: the Left's most hated religion. Conservative political commentator and ATHEIST S.E. Cupp wrote a controversial book excoriating the liberal media's jihad against Christianity.

     

     
     

    CRUSADERS AND ISLAMONAZIS, OBAMA’S CRYPTO ISLAMISM? IRAN RISING AND PALI POND SCUM

     
    Michael Ramirez Cartoon(Ripped off from Gateway Pundit.)

     

    WITH MOSLEM OUTREACH IN SHAMBLES,

    (like the rest of his foreign policy) and his popularity in the Middle East no better than George Bush's, Obama needed another Neville Chamberlain moment (he's had dozens of them) to pathetically remind Moslems how much he loves and respects Islam. But no one is listening. Moslems can no more respect Obama than our military and for the same reason: he's a coward and weakling with no warrior-no Mohammed-in him.

    THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHRISTIAN CRUSADERS AND ARMY OF ISIS

    The Christian Crusaders waged a defensive war against Islamic aggression. ISIS are Islamic aggressors at war with all infidels and Moslems in their way. It's that simple.

     

    Obama: “We are summoned to push back against those who would distort our religion for their nihilistic ends”

     EITHER OBAMA IS A CRYPTO MOSLEM

    or he’s trying to deceive Moslems into thinking he’s crypto to boost his popularity in the Middle East-his ratings there are about equal to Bush’s. Either way it won’t help. If he couldn’t become the darling of the region with his Cairo speech what could a butt-kissing Chamberlain moment do?

     

    Official Palestinian Authority TV quotes Qur’an: Jews are “apes and pigs" - Jihad Watch”

     

    IF ISRAEL, A LIGHT UNTO THE SICK, DYSFUNCTIONAL, DESPOTIC MIDDLE EAST,

    the freest, most progressive and productive nation in the region, is a country of Jewish “apes and pigs” than what does that make Palestinian annihilationists? Is pond scum too generous a term?

     

     

    JORDAN LEARNED ITS LESSON

    about releasing terrorists when they freed monster jihadist (forerunner of al-Baghdadi ) Abu al-Zarqawi in 1999. But we've learned nothing from that and continue to release Gitmo inmates equal to Zarqawi in evil.

      

     
     
     
     
     
     

    WHEN OBAMA WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT ON 11-04-2008

    it was the 29th anniversary of the Iranian Hostage Crisis-a prophetic sign anticipating he'd be the greatest enabler of radical Iranian power since hapless Jimmy Carter. And what did Carter's abandoning of the pro-US Shah for Ayatollah Khomeine lead to in the region? A horrific eight year war between Iran and Iraq where one million died and millions were injured. With over 200,000 dead in Syria and ISIS killing thousands for Islam one million dead could be reached in half the time. And now Iran is getting the bomb. It's frightening.

     

     

     

    EARLY IN HIS PRESIDENCY

     
    I predicted that Barack Obama-because of his shameless mendacity and unfitness to command-would end up in the "Presidents' Hall of Shame." Does anyone doubt that he's already there?

     

     

    FAR MORE PERVERSE THAN HOMOSEXUALS

    are those who want to kill them for their sins.

     

     

     

    AMERICAN SNIPER VS. AMERICAN DESERTER, RIGHT EYELESS HARRY REID’S BAD KARMA AND GREECE’S NEW RADICAL LEFT GOV’T


    Michael Moore: ‘Passion of Christ’ Crowd Behind Box-Office Success of ‘American Sniper’ | The Gateway Pundit

    Deserter Bowe Bergdahl's hatred of America  was so great that he wanted to end his US citizenship and become a citizen of Afghanistan or Pakistan believing that either country was morally superior to America and more worthy of his lofty spiritual soul.

    WHY DOESN'T OBESE ANTI-AMERICAN BIGOT MICHAEL MOORE

    zip it about Chris Kyle's alleged anti-Arab racism and psychopathic right-wing savagery and try to outdo the box office success of American Sniper with a film about leftist hero Bo Bergdahl called American Deserter. Let's see how well that does at the box office; or if it wins any Oscar nominations like his last laughable flops ridiculing capitalism and extolling Castro's Communist healthcare system .

     

    FIRST PHOTO: Battered Harry Reid on Senate Floor | The Gateway Pundit

    After losing his position of Senate Majority Leader on November 4th ( the 28th anniversary of winning his senate seat)  Harry Reid (58 days later) injured and possibly lost his right eye in a freak excercise accident. 

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ELzxsAuMnuI/Sk5RE7RJxpI/AAAAAAAABAc/p4sdD-E8XTM/s400/three_blind_mice.gif

     

    BACK IN 2009 WHEN DEMOCRATS

    ruled the Executive Branch and Congress I referred to the Unholy Leftist Power Trinity of Obama, Pelosi and Reid as the "Three Blind Mice" because of their staggering stupidity and blindness in domestic and foreign policy. Little did I imagine that one of the three might be physically half blind in six years. You will notice that the injury Reid sustained was to his RIGHT eye. Could this be Karmic Justice for viciously poking the Right in the eye all these years? For preventing the Senate from voting on 350 bills passed by Congress and lyingly calling them "obstructionists"? For his defamation of fellow Mormon Mitt Romney as a "tax cheat"?  For demonizing the Tea Party as "racists" and  his insane tirades against  the "unAmerican radical" Koch Brothers ? I'm surprised nobody blamed the Kochs for Harry's injury accusing them of booby trapping  the resistance bands on his treadmill

    RELATED

    Hating on Harry Reid - Kenneth P. Vogel - POLITICO.com 

     

    Obama Expresses Sympathy for New Radical Left Greek Govt. “You Cannot Keep Squeezing Countries” | The Gateway Pundit

    THE ECONOMIC IGNORAMOUS-IN-CHIEF

    is urging broken, busted Socialist Greece-which taxed, spent,  borrowed and lied its way into national bankruptcy and blood in the streets (as we're doing)-to double down on spending when it didn't work for us in the 1930s, isn't working now and hasn't worked for Japan in 22 years. What will save Greece is what saved Socialist Sweden from Grecification in the 1990s: AUSTERITY ECONOMICS. Sweden faced with fiscal, financial and economic collapse drastically slashed taxes, spending, regulations, pensions and privatized national industries, and within five years restored prosperity. Austerity Economics works. Sweden is proof. Obama is a worthless, tax and spend, government-is-the-answer leftist jerk.

    RELATED