COURAGEOUS NETANYAHU EXPOSES OBAMA’S DANGEROUS STUPIDITY AND WEAKNESS WITH IRAN

Uncategorized

BIBI NETANYAHU HAS COURAGEOUSLY EXPOSED TO ALL THE WORLD 

Barack Hussein Obama for the weak, dangerous, blundering, reckless, rank amateur that he is. And standing shoulder to shoulder with Netanyahu are the vast majority of US lawmakers, 55% of the US military*, and 65% of Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans** all of whom give Obama a well deserved Grade D as Commander-in- Chief. Add to this the disillusionment of most Americans with Obama's handling of foreign policy (see) and you have a president with no credibility in world affairs blindly midwifing the deadliest and most dangerous Islamic regime on earth in becoming a nuclear armed terrorist state. Even if it means destroying Iran with nuclear weapons it must not get the bomb. 

*According to the Military Times 55% disapprove of Obama and only 15% approve-an all time low (see).

**According to the Kaiser Foundation 65% of Iraq and Afghan War vets approve of George W. Bush as Commander in Chief. Only 42% approve of Obama (see).

RELATED

THE RISE OF NUCLEAR IRAN 

FORWARD EMAILS TO

reninvest2013@aol.com

< p style="text-align: center;">-

DEBATES ON MONDOWEISS WITH ANNIE ROBBINS ON NETANYAHU’S SPEECH TO CONGRESS AND ISRAEL’S REGIONAL MORAL SUPERIORITY

Uncategorized

 

 

Annie Robbins is a loathsome, self-hating San Francisco liberal Jew and Editor-at Large for Mondoweiss: a despicable ultra-left, anti-Israel  hate site. Robbins, like savage medieval anti-semitic Moslem supremacists, believes that modern, democratic Jewish Israel (the greatest force for freedom, progress and peace in the Middle East) is an evil oppressive colonial power with no moral right to exist because of its refusal to make peace with the  hate-driven, genocidal Palestinians (who define peace with Israel as its destruction). And Israel's destruction is what  Annie Robbins (like most radical leftists) wants insanely preferring in its place  an illiberal, sick, dysfunctional, corrupt Palestinian terror  state oppressing a Jewish minority or killing it off. In other words, when it comes to  the Arab/Palestinian-Israeli conflict you can't get anymore deranged than Annie Robbins. 

 Below are two  brief debates between me and Robbins before she had me banned from Mondoweiss for being a troublesome, pro-Israel gadfly who couldn't be bested or beaten in argument. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ApolloSpeaks

            January 24, 2015,

WHERE WAS THE OUTRAGE ON THE DEMOCRATIC  LEFT WHEN IN 2007
 
then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (without approval of the Bush administration [and knowledge of Israel's PM]) grossly violated protocol and led a congressional delegation to Damascus to negotiate a  peace deal between Syria and Israel, as if she were the Secretary of State? As I recall Harry Reid , Hillary Clinton, MSM (and probably Barack Obama) praised Pelosi for her efforts to promote peace between the two countries because Bush [for no fault of his] had miserably failed .
 

Annie Robbins

she was the speaker of the house. this is the equivalent of John Boehner or Eric Cantor leading a delegation to israel without asking the president’s permission. happens all the time. in fact aipac arranges these trips regularly. romney went there without asking Obama’s permission too. it doesn’t violate protocol for members of congress to visit other countries without asking permission of the israel lobby.

nice try, no cigar.

ApolloSpeaks

Apples and oranges. Pelosi went to Damascus not just on a mere visit but in a kind of unofficial [self-appointed] diplomatic capacity* (without authorization from the White House) to specifically rekindle peace talks between Israel and Syria as if she were Condi Rice. That was the  last time she tried this stunt  as she failed and made a complete fool of herself. That was a far more serious breach of protocol** than Netanyahu’s upcoming visit. You need to work on your reading comprehension skills so you don’t embarrass yourself like this again.

*At the time Bush withdrew his Ambassador to Syria.

*It was later learned that Netanyahu did inform the Obama Administration of Boehner's invitation to  speak to Congress. 

Annie Robbins

an unofficial diplomatic capacity (without authorization from the White House)

so that’s your standard of unofficial diplomatic capacity? LOL. good to know. You need to work on your comprehension skills so you don’t embarrass yourself like this again..

Apollospeaks

Please define the word “diplomacy.” Then tell us how it doesn’t apply to what Pelosi was trying to accomplish in Damascus with Assad. This is Polisci 101 stuff.

 Annie Robbins 

now you’re playing partisan politics considering Reps. Frank Wolf, Joe Pitts and Robert Aderholt met with Assad in Damascus the day before she arrived and like them, there was nothing she said there that was against stated american policy goals.

unlike this latest deplorable and unprecedented “invitation*” there’s nothing unprecedented (or highly unusual) about high ranking officials (and sometimes not so high ranking) including congresspeople making trips to visit foreign leaders outside the purview of the white house. (as i mentioned they go to israel all the time, often sans seeking “authorization” from the WH). example link to huffingtonpost.com
link to huffingtonpost.com 

* Unprecedented? In 1996 Bill Clinton invited Shimon Peres to the White House one month before the election to bolster his sagging campaign against Netanyahu - Apollo

your pelosi argument here is a diversion anyway, because the analogy you’re making doesn’t pertain to netanyahu’s action (which happens to be the topic -and it’s highly likely this “idea” came from team netanyahu, either dermer or the PM himself), but house speaker boehner. your analogy involves what is or isn’t considered normal protocol for congressional diplomacy.  whereas netanyahu is a foreign leader w/a policy pitted against w/a policy pitted against the prez.pelosi didn't invite assad to address congress against the will of bush. so there's your apples and oranges. the criticism all over the talk shows today are not about boehner.he did what's now expected of lobby pushovers, it's netanyahu's chutzpa that being criticized.

ApolloSpeaks

The policy goals of the Bush administration were to restart peace talks between Syria and Israel [over the Golan Heights]. Because the administration wasn’t making progress Pelosi decided unilaterally-without so much as consulting the administration or Israeli PM Olmert-to step in to reanimate the process.

As the Obama administration has made zero progress in stopping Iran from building the bomb and containing its drive for regional hegemony it’s time for a new and tougher approach. Hence, Netanyahu’s address to Congress making the case to reimpose punishing sanctions at an opportune time when  declining oil prices are severly hurting Iran's economy. Both Republicans and Democrats who want to reimpose sanctions got it right [and Netanyahu is aligned with them]. Apples and apples. The analogy is as clear as day. 

 Robbins never replied.

 

 
In this piece Mondoweiss blogger Anthony Loewenstein asserts that Israel, the most tolerant and pluralistic nation in the Middle East, "is not a good model" for  tolerance and pluralism. And that European Jews thinking of migrating to Israel because of rising Islamic anti-semitism are better off staying there as if Israel were unworthy of them and more unsafe.
 
 Commenting on Lowenstein's article someone called Mooser wrote that because Israel isn't a perfect model of tolerance and pluralism it was "a historical error to give the Jews their own country," as if Israel were completely void of value-like its worthless  Palestinian neighbors.
 
To this I replied 
 
 January 25, 2015, 12:17 am
 

How could the most admirable nation in the Middle East, a model of freedom, progress, justice and peace to the region, be "a historical error?" Given Israel's moral, intellectual and spiritual superiority over its primitive, dysfunctional, strife torn, savage neighbors its existence would seem to be a historical necessity. No?

Annie Robbins

the most admirable nation in the Middle East

link to haaretz.com

BBC poll: Israel among world’s least popular nations

The annual BBC World Service poll finds …only countries less popular than Israel are North Korea, Pakistan and Iran.

its existence would seem to be a historical necessity. No

ApolloSpeaks

Annie Robbins notes above that Israel just bearly beats out North Korea in a BBC world popularity poll. I wasn’t aware of that. Then should Hollywood do a sequel to “The Interview” where Rogen and Franco assassinate Netanyahu? Maybe not. As Israel technologically is light years ahead of the Norks a cyber terror attack on Sony would be ten times as devastating. /sarc

Annie Robbins

 "I wasn’t aware of that. Then should Hollywood do a sequel to “The Interview” where Rogen and Franco assassinate Netanyahu?"

your comeback is outdated — so last year. everybody already thought of that immediately – and not just the blogs either.

link to washingtonpost.com

MY ANSWER

CENSORED AND SUPPRESSED

UPDATED, not "outdated" Annie. But seriously, instead of the world's opinion about Israel give us your opinion. Tell us what you think not what others think. Is Israel or isn't Israel  the most admirable nation in the region? Or to put it differently, if you had a family of four with a husband and two kids (one straight the other gay) and you had to live in the Middle East which country would you choose? Israel? One of its Arab neighbors? Iran? The Islamic State? If you ignore the question (which you'll probably do like before) I'll take it to be an admission that we're in agreement about the world's opinion of Israel being radically stupid and wrong;  and that Israel would be your first choice because it's the best nation in the region (the closest politically, culturally, progressively and economically to the US) for you and your family to live safely and in peace.

 

NETANYAHU, IRAN AND THE END OF NUCLEAR SADDAM: OR DESTROY THE MULLAHS LIKE WE DID SADDAM AND IRAN WON’T GET THE BOMB

Uncategorized
 
 
 
TOMORROW MARCH 3, 2015
 
is the 44th president's 2233rd day in office (see). This four digit number of two doublet numbers preceding 44 (22 and 33) is a multiple of 7 giving us the highly significant number 319 (the number of weeks in Obama's presidency). 319 like 9/11 is a significant number in the Global War on Terror in that it gives us the month (3) and day (19) when in 2003 the US (Washington time) launched its preëmptive war (Shock and Awe) against Saddam Hussein for his noncompliance for 12 years with 17 UN resolutions on WMDs and other violations. The purpose of Bibi Netanyahu's speech tomorrow is to prevent the nightmare of a nuclear armed Iran-a regional and world necessity-just as we stopped Iraq from becoming a nuclear power (which I'll prove below). As the hapless, blundering, inept Obama administration is failing badly in stopping Iran the only option left is to devastate its nuclear facilities with a massive military attack
 
 Saddam's yellowcake uranium.
 
Now  those who disagree with my assertion that "the Iraq War stopped Saddam from acquiring the bomb" are greatly, greatly confused and mistaken. Why do I say this? Because knowing what we know today if Saddam had stayed in power chances are he would by now have gone nuclear. How do I know this? Because Saddam retained the services of his nuclear scientists and technicians keeping them on the government payroll with every intention of using them to build the bomb. Because Saddam owned 550 metric tons of yellow cake uranium (sold to Canada in 2008) with every intention of using it to build the bomb (see). Moreover, and most importantly, on October 9, 2006 Saddam's "evil axis" Stalinist ally communist North Korea detonated its first nuclear device becoming the 9th nation to do so. And ominously the following year the nuclear Norks were hard at work in murdering fascist Iran-backed Syria building a secret plutonium nuclear weapons plant (which Israel, thank God, destroyed).
 
  
Now on 3-19-2003 at the start of the Iraq War the price of oil was $20 per barrel. Two years later that doubled to $40 per barrel. By 2008 oil shot up to $100 per barrel. If Saddam had stayed in power he would have amassed hundreds and billions of dollars in oil revenues-much of  which he would have dedicated to turning Iraq into a nuclear power. No way Saddam would have stood idly by and watched his enemies in Iran build the bomb knowing that once they had it, it could mean the end of his regime.
 
 
Indeed, If what I'm saying here seems far-fetched because neither Israel nor the US would have allowed Saddam to rebuild his nuclear weapons plants or build  new ones in secret (Israel destroyed the Osiraq plant in 1981) what everyone seems to have overlooked is that Saddam had another option: BUILD THE BOMB IN NORTH KOREA. The poor cash strapped Norks would have enthusiastically welcomed Saddam's offer to build the Bomb in their country for billions, then smuggle it into Iraq. And by now the Norks would have produced at least several for him.
 
 
The great feckless appeaser in the White House  has bent over backwards accommodating Iran in trying to stop it from weaponizing uranium, but to no avail. I imagine that he and Kerry even tried to uselessly persuade the mullahs about the common threat humanity faces from global warming and the need to join forces to survive. Indeed, hell-bent on becoming the hegemon of Middle East and a great world power-believing that God and history are on their side-Islamic Iran needs the bomb to fulfill its purpose and destiny. And from their unwillingness to halt the illegal enriching of uranium the Iranians  have made it perfectly clear to all that nothing short of military force will stop them.
 
 
 
Samson pushing the pillars of the temple

 

IF THIS REPORT IS TRUE,

and Obama threatened to join forces with Islamonazi terrorist Iran and shoot down Israeli jets en route to destroy its nuclear facilities, all that Bibi Netanyahu had to do to put the fear of God into Obama was give him this warning:   "Shooting down our jets, Mr. President, would leave us no choice but to exercise the dreaded SAMSON OPTION and nuke Iran as a last resort (see)."

 

 
 

IS ERIC HOLDER AN IGNORANT, DIVISIVE, UNENLIGHTENED, RACIALLY OBSESSED MORAN? OR AM I A FOUL, TWISTED, WHITE SUPREMACIST NUT POISONED BY FOX NEWS?

Uncategorized
 

 
 
Screen Shot 2015-02-28 at 3.17.35 PM
 Wish they would drown in their white-hating racist tears.
 
Is outgoing Attorney General Eric "Americans are racial cowards" Holder an ignorant, divisive, unenlightened, racially obsessed moron? The answer to the question is an unqualified "YES." And here is incontrovertible proof not based so much on what Holder has said and done, but on a philosophical understanding of human nature.
 
 
 
The physical body is the vehicle of man's deathless, immortal, intellectual soul which is its life-giving principle and form. This makes the body the smallest and least important part of man's nature and being as it depends on the soul for its existence in this world. And the smallest and least important part of man's physical being (having immeasurably less value than the brain, heart, lungs, liver, kidneys and other vital oragns) is skin color.
 
Now racially obsessed men like Barack Obama and Eric Holder (be they White, Black, Hispanic, Arab, Asian, etc) are ignorant, divisive,  immature, unenlightened,  small-minded human beings (regressives not progressives) who reduce the true dignity and worth of man (his intellectual and spiritual nature) not just to mortal, perishable, ephemeral flesh (the body is the passing image and shadow of the soul) but to its smallest, basest, least important part: stupid, senseless skin color which we can't take with us to heaven.
 
Now in calling Obama and Holder "ignorant, unenlightened, morans..." because of their obsession with skin color and race (they're the John Birchers of racism seeing anti-black racism everywhere) am I being a foul twisted racist nut poisoned by Fox News and driven by hate like I've been accused of on occasion? Or am I being wise, realistic and philosophically sane seeing with unprejudiced, color blind, wide open eyes these two infantile leftists for the regressives they really, truly and stupidly are? in judging them am I using the immoral measure and yardstick of white supremacism and hate (I'm a Jewish conservative white man)? Or am I simply, justly and rigorously applying a right understanding of human nature which every rational man and woman does? Go ahead. Make my day. Try and prove that I'm racist.
 
 
 

 

HOLDER ON LOWERING LEGAL CIVIL RIGHTS STANDARDS TO JAIL INNOCENT NON-BLACK KILLERS OF VIOLENT BLACKS  LIKE ZIMMERMAN AND WILSON. PATHETIC!

 
 
 
HOLDER SAYS READ "MALCOLM X ."
APOLLO SAYS READ 
 
 
 
No Conservative's library is complete without this
magnificent Renaissance classic-and cure for all types of racism.
 

RELATED

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND HIS ANTI-WHITE, ANTI-MULATTO RACISM

 

MESSAGE TO AL SHARPTON: WHITE GUILT IS DEAD. BLACKS ARE ON THEIR OWN.

BARACK OBAMA AND THE END OF WHITE LIBERAL GUILT

FORWARD EMAILS TO

< p style="text-align: center;">reninvest2013@aol.com

WHAT A HISTORIC DEAL ON IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAM WILL LOOK LIKE (SARCASM)

Uncategorized
 
 
 AFTER A DEAL IS SIGNED BETWEEN THE US AND IRAN A TRIUMPHANT, ECSTATIC BARACK OBAMA WILL LIKELY SAY THIS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE:
 
 Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, a Moslem of enormous  integrity and peace, assured us in this historic agreement that was signed today that nuclear weapons are against God's Will; and that no Islamic state can be truly Islamic if it has the bomb and joins the Nuclear Age. But let me be perfectly clear:  under Islamic Law uranium enrichment is perfectly legal and permitted so long as it falls short of building a bomb. The two should not be confused. Keep in mind that If America, during World War II, had limited its nuclear program to enriching uranium we would never have destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing thousands of Japanese. The same holds true for Iran today. Indeed, this agreement with Khamenei guarantees that the Islamic Republic will remain truly Islamic and nuke free; and following God's Will  go no further than lawfully enriching uranium in peace. That means no nuking of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. That means no ICBMS hitting New York and Washington DC. That means Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan relieved. If not, if Khamenei dares to break this deal, flout Islamic Law and illegally build the bomb be certain that the consequences to him and his regime will be swift and severe. For Allah will be angered beyond measure, show him no mercy and preëmptively bring him down before he can strike anyone. Till then we have peace in our time. Till then I have earned my Nobel Prize. Now it's on to Moscow for talks with Putin about Ukraine and restoring US/Russian peace. Ayatollah Khamenei said he'd help us here.
  
 

 

 

 

RELATED

 

 

CLINTON AND BUSH, THE TWO WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMBINGS AND THE DEATH OF OSAMA BIN LADEN

Uncategorized
 

 
Yesterday was the 22nd anniversary of the first bombing of the World Trade Center by death loving Islamic terrorists-a good account of which you can find HERE at Atlas Shrugs. But as I was thinking about that bombing and its relation to the 9/11 event (which it foreshadowed) I made a number of  extraordinary discoveries that my readers will find fascinating. Here is what I found:
 
 The full date of the 9/11 event in numbers is 9/11/2001. The number 2001 is a variant of 3 (2+0+0+1=3). Now if we combine 3 with 911 to form the four digit number 9113 then reverse it to 3119 incredibly (by chance or providence) we get the EXACT number of days separating the first World Trade Center bombing from the devastating second attack, hence:
 
From: Friday, February 26, 1993
To Tuesday, September 11, 2001

Result: 3119 days

Or 8 years, 6 months, 16 days, or 445 weeks and 4 days (see).

 
 
 Fascinating, no? Also fascinating are the exact number of days separating the births of the very two presidents whose weak-on-terror policies helped midwife the 9/11 event. For George W. Bush born July 6, 1946 and Bill Clinton born August 19, 1946 are separated by exactly 44 days. Oddly, when al Qaida struck America on 9/11 Osama ben Laden (born March 10, 1957) was 44 years old.
 
From: Sunday, March 10, 1957

To, Tuesday, September 11, 2001

Result: 16,256 days

Or 44 years, 6 months, 1 day, or 2322 weeks (see)

 

 
Also fascinating is that when 44 is multiplied by 80 it yields the number 3520. This is extraordinary in that 3520 is the EXACT number of days separating the 9/11 event from Osama bin Laden's death on May 2, 2011.
 

From: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
To, Monday, May 2, 2011

Result: 3520 days

 Or 9 years, 7 months, 21 days, or 502 weeks and 6 days (see).

 
Oddly, bin Laden was killed by Navy Seal commandos as they acted on an order given by America's 44th President.
 

RELATED

GEORGE BUSH, THE HUDSON RIVER MIRACLE AND HIS 9/11 PRESIDENCY

 

OBAMA AND THE TUCSON MASSACRE: THE 9/10 MAN IN A 9/11 WORLD

DICK CHENEY, WINSTON CHURCHILL AND FDR: WARNINGS FROM AN OLD CONSERVATIVE WARRIOR

 
FORWARD EMAILS TO

JOHN KERRY IS WRONG: BIBI NETANYAHU WAS PUBLICLY FOR IRAQ WAR BUT PRIVATELY AGAINST IT

Uncategorized

 

 
Just one day before the 22nd anniversary of the first World Trade Center bombing as nuclear-to-be Islamonazi Iran was showing its respect for Obama and America by destroying a fake US aircraft carrier in a war game John F. Kerry bashed Bibi Netanyahu's opposition to a BAD US/Iran nuke deal as being as wrongheaded as his backing of the Iraq War-which Kerry voted for and supported as a presidential candidate.
 
But this is not exactly the truth. Truth is (and what no one is talking about) Bibi Netanyahu in 2003 (and the entire Israeli government) privately opposed the Iraq War as completely wrongheaded while publicly supporting it out of deference to the super pro-Israel Bush administration. Indeed, just before the Iraq War Netanyahu was the foreign minister of the anti-Iran Israeli government of Ariel Sharon that warned George Bush that attacking Iraq would destabilize the balance of power in the region in favor of Iran, and urged him instead to attack Iran as being the greater threat to US interests and regional peace.  This story was reported seven years ago by Garath Porter in  Asia Times, and is as follows:
  •  
    Israeli PM Ariel Sharon and President George W. Bush
Israel urged US to attack Iran - not Iraq
By Gareth Porter 
WASHINGTON –Israeli officials warned the George W Bush administration that an invasion of Iraq would be destabilizing to the region and urged the United States instead to target Iran as the primary enemy, according to former Bush administration official Lawrence Wilkerson.
Wilkerson, then a member of the US State Department's policy planning staff and later chief of staff for secretary of state Colin Powell, recalled in an interview that the Israelis reacted immediately to indications that the Bush administration was thinking of war against Iraq. After the Israeli government picked up the first signs of that intention, said Wilkerson, "The Israelis were telling us Iraq is not the enemy - Iran is the enemy."
Wilkerson describes the Israeli message to the Bush administration in early 2002 as being, "If you are going to destabilize the balance of power, do it against the main enemy."
The warning against an invasion of Iraq was "pervasive" in Israeli communications with the US administration, Wilkerson recalled. It was conveyed to the administration by a wide range of Israeli sources, including political figures, intelligence, and private citizens.
Wilkerson noted that the main point of their communications was not that the US should immediately attack Iran, but that "it should not be distracted by Iraq and Saddam Hussein" from a focus on the threat from Iran.
The Israeli advice against using military force against Iraq was apparently triggered by reports reaching Israeli officials in December 2001 that the Bush administration was beginning serious planning for an attack on Iraq. Journalist Bob Woodward revealed inPlan of Attack that on December 1, 2001, secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld had ordered the Central Command chief, General Tommy Franks, to come up with the first formal briefing on a new war plan for Iraq on December 4. That started a period of intense discussions of war planning between Rumsfeld and Franks.
Soon after Israeli officials got wind of that planning, Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon asked for a meeting with Bush primarily to discuss US intentions to invade Iraq. In the weeks preceding Sharon's meeting with Bush on February 7, 2002, a procession of Israeli officials conveyed the message to the US administration that Iran represented a greater threat, according to a Washington Post report on the eve of the meeting.
Israeli defense minister Fouad Ben-Eliezer, who was visiting Washington with Sharon, revealed the essence of the strategic differences between Jerusalem and Washington over military force. He was quoted by the Post as saying, "Today, everybody is busy with Iraq. Iraq is a problem ... But you should understand, if you ask me, today Iran is more dangerous than Iraq."
Sharon, who was incapacitated by a stroke last year, never revealed publicly what he said to Bush in the February 7 meeting. But Yossi Alpher, a former adviser to prime minister Ehud Barak, wrote in an article in The Forward last January that Sharon advised Bush not to occupy Iraq, according to a knowledgeable source. Alpher wrote that Sharon also assured Bush that Israel would not "push one way or another" regarding his plan to take down Saddam.
Alpher noted that Washington did not want public support by Israel and in fact requested that Israel refrain from openly supporting the invasion in order to avoid an automatic negative reaction from Iraq's Arab neighbors.
After that meeting, the Sharon government generally remained silent on the issue of an invasion of Iraq. A notable exception, however, was a statement on August 16, 2002, by Ranaan Gissin, an aide to Sharon. Ranaan declared, "Any postponement of an attack on Iraq at this stage will serve no purpose. It will only give [Saddam] more of an opportunity to accelerate his program of weapons of mass destruction."
As late as October 2002, however, there were still signs of continuing Israeli grumbling about the Bush administration's obsession with taking over Iraq. Both the Israel Defense Forces' chief of staff and its chief of military intelligence made public statements that month implicitly dismissing the Bush administration's position that Saddam's alleged quest for nuclear weapons made him the main threat. Both officials suggested that Israel's military advantage over Iraq had continued to increase over the decade since the Gulf War as Iraq had grown weaker.
The Israeli chief of military intelligence, Major-General Aharon Farkash, said Iraq had not deployed any missiles that could strike Israel directly and challenged the Bush administration's argument that Iraq could obtain nuclear weapons within a relatively short time. He gave an interview to Israeli television in which he said army intelligence had concluded that Iraq could not have nuclear weapons in less than four years. He insisted that Iran was as much of a nuclear threat as Iraq.
Israeli strategists generally believed that taking down the Saddam Hussein regime could further upset an Iran-Iraq power balance that had already tilted in favor of Iran after the US defeat of Saddam's army in the 1991 Gulf War. By 1996, however, neo-conservatives with ties to the Likud Party in Israel were beginning to argue for a more aggressive joint US-Israeli strategy aimed at a "rollback" of all of Israel's enemies in the region, including Iran, but beginning by taking down Saddam and putting a pro-Israeli regime in power there.
That was the thrust of the 1996 report of a task force led by Richard Perle for the right-wing Israeli think-tank the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, and aimed at the Likud prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
But most strategists in the Israeli government and the Likud Party - including Sharon himself - did not share that viewpoint. Despite agreement between neo-conservatives and Israeli officials on many issues, the dominant Israeli strategic judgment on the issue of invading Iraq diverged from that of US neo-conservatives because of differing political-military interests.
Israel was more concerned with the relative military threat posed by Iran and Iraq, whereas neo-conservatives in the Bush administration were focused on regime change in Iraq as a low-cost way of leveraging more ambitious changes in the region. From the neo-conservative perspective, the very military weakness of Saddam's Iraq made it the logical target for the use of US military power.
Gareth Porter is a historian and national-security policy analyst. His latest book, Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam, was published in June 2005.
(Inter Press Service)
 

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND HIS ANTI-WHITE, ANTI-MULATTO RACISM

Uncategorized

 

 

It is a lie that Barack Obama is a Black man. He's a biracial Mulatto sprung from the womb of a racially pure White woman and fathered by a racially pure Black man. That is the reality. That is the truth. That is who and what Barack Obama racially is. He belongs to the Mulatto Race-the half white/black race. That Obama identifies himself as a Black man is a lie meant to deceive people and fool history. That he should prefer his Black half over his White half is both anti-White and anti-Mulatto racism. If Obama were truly liberal and racially honest, just and fair he'd define himself racially as Mulatto: as much White as Black, equally proud to be both, equally loving both races and all Black/White Mulattoes. But that's not what he does. Instead Obama plays the race card on himself; instead he discriminates against Whites and Mulattoes in his own person unfairly, unjustly denigrating both as if they were racially inferior to Blacks. That makes him a Black Supremacist like the New Black Panthers, Louis Farrakhan and his America-damning racist mentor Reverend Wright-who thinks Jesus was Black and that all Whites are devils hated and cursed by God.

 

 

 

 

Like it or not Obama isn't America's first Black president. Like it or not he's the closest we've come to having such a president. History should not, must not credit him with being the first. That is a lie. This should come as a relief to Black people. For the worst president ever is not really one of them, and is no reflection on their race. 

 

BLACK AMERICA

 

(at the risk of seeming anti-Mulatto)  

 

 

DISOWN OBAMA NOW!

 

 

BECAUSE HE'S GOING DOWN

 

 

 

 

POSTSCRIPT

 

 

 
 

 

BARACK OBAMA:

"If I had a son he wouldn't be CJ Pearson. This young man wasn't me 35 years ago."

 

AOSean

Poor kid is probably already getting death threats...

 

ApolloSpeaks  AOSean •

Worse still the IRS is targeting him for an audit.

 

 

47871_CJ-Pearson-001-1

 

Phuture writes

 

CJ Pearson for President. That little kid blew me away.

 

My reply

 

CJ PEARSON 2016

FOR AMERICA’S FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT

  • • 

    •  

     

     RELATED

     

     

    IN DEFENSE OF MSNBC’S BIRACIAL CHEERIOS TWEET (SARCASM)

     

     

    DEBATING THE FATE OF CHRIS HITCHENS IN THE AFTERLIFE ON JIHAD WATCH

    Uncategorized

    As I've been writing on the subject of Atheism lately this I'm sure will interest my readers. Originally published on Townhall it was a debate  I had on Jihad Watch and Pajamas Media at the end of 2011 where I speculated on the fate of Christopher Hitchens (who recently died) in the afterlife.

    FROM APOLLOSPEAKS' TOWNHALL ARCHIVES

    2011-12-18 11:24--(ORIGINALLY) MY DEBATE ON JIHAD WATCH ABOUT CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS' FATE IN THE AFTERLIFE

    One of the great gods of atheism is dead uneasily dwelling in the spiritual world and shaking his atheist faith. It is a baptism of fire that will purge him of error and make a better and wiser soul of him. No matter how much he ate, drank,  screwed, smoked, learned, and raged at God and religion Hitchens could never fill the emptiness inside him. An emptiness that only God could ultimately fill (as religious people know) as  He is our greatest happiness and highest good.

    NOTE

    I hadn't realized till now that there are quite a few atheists posting comments on Jihad Watch. As on Frontpage and elsewhere I posted "Christopher Hitchens In The Afterlife" here and got this mostly hostile response:

     

    ApolloSpeaks says

    December 16, 2011 at 8:48 am

    CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS IN THE AFTERLIFE

    How I wish I was there in the spiritual realm to see Chris Hitchens’ astonishment that his mind had survived his untimely death; that he is very much alive in the spiritual state that he’d mocked all his life as a primitive fiction of “evil religion;” that there’s more to existence than flesh. Is he disappointed to know that he was wrong for so long, that his crude, inexorable materialism was a hoax? Does he unhappily feel cheated that he wasn’t obliterated, dissolved into nothingness like he rigidly thought? Is he saddened to know that religion was right, that he’s an undying, immortal, imperishable soul? Is he cursing his state craving nihilism instead which he believed was his fate in the end? How’s he handling the truth that God exists, and that he owes his great mind and existence to Him? Hitchens’ soul must be in intellectual turmoil as his life of unbelief ill-prepared him for death. And so must it be for all atheistic materialists who’ll have the truth thrust upon them in the end.

    gravenimage replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    Apollo Speaks wrote:

    Is he disappointed to know that he was wrong for so long, that his crude, inexorable materialism was a hoax? Does he unhappily feel cheated that he wasn't obliterated...

    I very much doubt it, Apollo. If the afterlife of Christopher Hitchens is as you imagine, I'm sure he would be fascinated at a new adventure...

    Christopher Hitchens was a hero. I salute him.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from gravenimage

    After a difficult period of adjustment where he accepts the new reality of a disembodied state (which he formally thought impossible) the experience will [as you say] become a wonderful new adventure for him.

    lilredbird writes

    ApolloSpeaks, this Comments section has resonated with expressions of regret at the passing of Christopher Hitchens, a staunch defender of freedom of thought and a opponent of the imposition of all forms of supernaturalist metaphysics on those who do not share such beliefs. It was such a consolation to read so many respectful and sincere tributes.

    Then you came along with your childish rant, imagining him waking up in an "afterlife" with your god presumably chanting Nyah-nyah-nah-nah-nyah. Do you have any idea how smug and vindictive you sound?

    We atheists hear this all the time and there is no way to express how tired we are of the silly taunts, to say nothing of the backhanded compliments about how amazing it is that we fight for freedom even though we have no souls and "don't believe in anything" (as a religious "friend" of mine puts it).

    May I refer you to Ole Hartling's comment, though I doubt you are willing to hear it. Thank you, Ole, for that quote of Hitch's, which says what I feel so much better than I ever can. If only more of the "religious" were willing to listen and secure enough to take his request to heart.


    Religion friendly atheist author S.E. Cupp

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from lilredbird

    Hitchens atheism was positively vindictive, unhinged, and hateful. He didn't just want to throw out the baby with the bath, he wanted to boil the baby in oil and eat it for dinner. Compare him to the lovely S.E. Cupp, a sensible, balanced, non-militant atheist who understands, and wrote about, the essential connection between the Judeo-Christian Tradition and our great nation and civilization. I'm not nearly as hard on Hitch as he was about reasonable, universal, ancient truths about God, immortality, and a moral law of right and wrong that he's now painfully and sorrowfully discovering to be true in the purgatory of his afterlife experience.

    Kinana of Khaybar replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    ApolloSpeaks,

    You disgrace only yourself, by gloating over Hitchens' death. Your irrational and unwarranted threat against atheists, at the end of your comment, is noted.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from Kinana of Khaybar

    Am I disgracefully gloating over Hitchens' death? I think not. I believe that Hitch is passing through the Purgatory of the after life he so militantly denied on his way to the loving peace and grace that passeth understanding.

    StephenA55 replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    ApolloSpeaks writes:

    "He also saw the Christian threat, the Jewish threat, the Hindu threat, and the Buddhist threat. All religion was toxic and a threat to this man, who now sees what a fool he has been."

     You are welcome to your view. He was actually much more nuanced than your gross over-simplification suggests.

    "Hitchens' soul must be in intellectual turmoil as his life of unbelief ill-prepared him for death. And so must it be for all atheistic materialists who'll have the truth thrust upon them in the end."

    His life of unbelief was the perfect preparation for death. Better than living in perpetual fear of an eternal agony in Hades. What could be better than living life to the full; free of nagging guilt from inherited sin; in accordance to moral tenets evolved by a rational mind that can easily surpass in goodness those biblical commands in the OT.

    The NT is better, but when you select from the bible then you are using your own judgement, and are ready to put that musty volume to one side.

    Merry Christmas, and a happy, well-lived life to you.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from StephenA55

    You say that "Hitchens life of unbelief was the perfect preparation for death." Are you using your head on this one my friend? Think about it. The death Hitchens prepared himself for intellectually and morally was eternal death and oblivion, the complete, everlasting extinction of consciousness-an absolute materialist's fiction. As the death Hitchens underwent wasn't what he imagined or foresaw how then was he prepared for it? How are you preapred for it?

    Tim Reynolds replied to comment from lilredbird

    Well said, LRB....

    I wondered at first that ApolloSpeaks was having a larf but obviously not. He/she's a sad indicator of the lengths that people will go to qualify their fantasies. Self-delusion is a wonderful thing and with it, anything is possible, including this type of crap. It shows an under-lying insecurity quite common in religionists of all faiths. They hate to see any kind of challenge to their belief-system and will react in the most bizarre fashion. You only have to look at islam and the almost-as-dreadful christian far-right, with their smug interpretation of scripture and the assumption of righteousness.

    In the end it's all 'borrowed-plummage'.

    "Religion poisons Everything".


    ApolloSpeaks     relied to Tim Reynolds 

    Tim Reynolds writes

    "They [religious believers] hate to see any kind of challenge to their belief-system and will react in the most bizarre fashion."

    How is my reaction to the death of the boldest, most outspoken, and offensive militant atheist of our time bizarre? I think most any believer in an afterlife would be fascinated to learn how Hitchens is taking to his unexpected experience; to a spiritual state which he believed with unshakable faith was a childish, evil, degrading fiction that mankind must outgrow. How is that bizarre?

    Jan replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    '' ....a moral law of right and wrong that he's now painfully and sorrowfully discovering to be true in the purgatory of his afterlife experience.''

    Do you really think you speak for *God* ??

    If we're going to talk about right and wrong, then I would submit that Hitch spoke about what *he* believed to be right and wrong, and he was blazingly honest in what he said. And his beliefs about 'a moral law' are just as much valid as yours, if not more so.

    I would bet, if there is a God, He would like and appreciate Hitch more than the self-righteous attitudes of people like you. When you have achieved as much as Hitch, and risked as much, then you may have the right to judge his *earthly* achievements - as for the afterlife, if there is one, that is for *God* to judge, not you. Pharisee.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from Jan

    Jan writes

    "Do you really think you speak for *God* ??"

    My reply

    No. I speak from my soul about another human soul who foolishly believed he came from nothing and would return to nothing and shortened his life by his destructive excesses. If you honor the genius of Christopher Hitchens and believe that he was an asset to this country and the world then you must fault him for his nihilistic philosophy-the bad ideas that drove him to drink, chain smoking, and God knows what else, and deprived the world prematurely of his genius.

    Edna Pierce | Thanks, Robert Spence, for honoring Hitchens.

    He'll be greatly missed.

    And, ApolloSpeaks, you are indeed disgracefully gloating. All you seem to be preoccupied with is what you suppose Hitchens is enduring in imaginary supernatural realms. It's fairly disgusting, and even worse, silly.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from Edna Pierce

    What kind of "disgraceful gloating" is it that sees Hitchens' afterlife experience as a kind of necessary shock treatment (some would call it tough love) to purge his mind of error and fill it with truth and great happiness? I'm hoping for the best for him, am I not?

    StephenA55 writes

    Apollo Speaks says,

    "You say that "Hitchens life of unbelief was the perfect preparation for death." Are you using your head on this one my friend? Think about it. The death Hitchens prepared himself for intellectually and morally was eternal death and oblivion, the complete, everlasting extinction of consciousness-an absolute materialist's fiction. Since the death Hitchens has isn't what he foresaw how then was he prepared for it?"

    Well, how do you prepare for an afterlife!?

    I won't bother because it would be a waste of my limited time here in this life. If it does happen I'll be ready. Unless it requires a lifetime of humble prayer, worship and other grovelling. If God wants that then I will argue that he should have given better evidence for his existence. And why should an omnipotent being be so needy?

    Of course there is no afterlife. Nothing to worry about. Take it easy AS, you have all you need. Just enjoy your one life, it's all anyone ever gets, but it's all you need.

    He'll be greatly missed.

    Aristotle believed that man could not live a truly good life without God.

    ApolloSpeaks 

    StephenA asks

    "Well, how do you prepare for an afterlife!?"

    Everything in moderation; and the contemplation of God (man's highest good and happiness) as Aristotle said in his Nicomachean Ethics.

    David Dowse | December 18, 2011 10:34 AM | Reply

    Apollo- you are in error.

    "Jan asks

    Do you really think you speak for *God* ??

    No. I speak from my soul about another human soul who foolishly believed he came from nothing and would return to nothing and shortened his life by his destructive excesses. If you honor the genius of Christopher Hitchens and believe that he was an asset to this country and the world then you must fault him for his nihilistic philosophy-the bad ideas that drove him to drink, chain-smoking, and God knows what else, and deprived the world prematurely of his genius.

    Read your post again, with all its questionable presumptions, then let me know, and we'll argue.

    Never mind, for the moment, the man's supposed excesses, in your view, or his "religious" bent - it is not for us to judge - we may, however, judge his work, which was prolific and astounding.

    Let him rest in peace.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from David Dowse 

    THE MOHAMMED OF ATHEISM

    Yes, his output was astounding. Even more astounding for a thoughtful man of the mind was his pathological hatred of God and all things spiritual. It was as though the God Idea had broken half of his astounding brain. His wanting to destroy religion (a throwback to the ghastly French Revolution) betrayed his insecurity and weakness of faith in atheism. He needed to have everyone believe as he believed so he could believe more strongly. This former communist could never fully free himself from totalitarianism. In a certain sense he was the mad Mohammad of atheism waging jihad with his pen and tongue for a sword.

    StephenA55 replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks 

    Hitch did not hate God.

    How could he hate God when he did not believe that God exists?

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from StephenA55 

    Hitchens hated the GOD IDEA. For him it was the most toxic, poisonous, and destructive thing in existence. The man who once believed that communism was the one solution to all the world's problems became an anti-God maniac believing that mankind's salvation greatly depended on eradicating God and religion from the earth. A world free of God and religion was Hitchens' life mission and utopian dream.

    StephenA55 replied to comment from ApolloSpeaks

    I would say that you exaggerate a great deal.

    His writings on religion were well thought out, clear and reasoned. To call him a maniac on the grounds of his speaking for rationalism as opposed to supernaturalism is absurd.

    He was also well aware that he would never see a world without religion in his lifetime. His views were expressed with passion, certainly, but he was touched by the warmth of his reception in the bible belt when on his speaking tours; that was not the response of a fanatic.

    He was a humane man who understood the need of many people to believe in God.

    ApolloSpeaks replied to comment from StephenA55 

    The God Idea was Hitchen's Great Satan, Ultimate Evil, mankind's worse and most destructive invention from which sprung most of our problems and ills. He was so blinded with hate for God, and the concept of a human soul and afterlife, that he couldn't see the slightest good in any religion or spiritual philosophy. That Hitchens displayed warmth toward friendly believers on occasion did nothing to deter him from his insane mission or soften his fanatical atheism. Till the end he remained hell-bent on his cause. To see Hitchens in perspective, and just how irrational and unhinged he was, study up on S.E. Cupp a sensitive, humane and understanding atheist who wrote a book against the Hitchens of the world and their mindless attack on the Judeo-Christian (Classical) tradition the bedrock of our civilization.

    Debate on Pajamas Media

    From Sam to Apollo:

    And how will you feel Apollo when you get there [to heaven] and truly understand that despite all of Hitchens’ atheism and dismissal of the eternal while he was alive, the Creator still loves him just as much as he loves you despite your lifetime of devotion?
    (Luke 15)

    Apollo to Sam:

    Like you I understand this in the here and now: that God is love (wisdom and justice) and loves his creatures and creations. I understand that despite his insane war against God (Divine Reason), and his nihilistic belief in the ultimate nothingness of existence, Hitchens still has life and being and the use of his mind and faculties by God's grace and the reality of the material and spiritual universe that He created. Having unexpectedly survived the death of his flesh Hitchens must be in a state of profound anguish and regret that he used his great intellect to no good end, in the service of big lies and very bad ideas: that God is nonexistent; that the physical world is ultimate reality; that everything comes from and returns to nothing. Now that Hitch’s disembodied state is painfully refuting his most cherished beliefs I am sure that he repents having lived his life in error spreading lies about the universe and its Creator. If he sincerely regrets his past mistakes and sins God I'm sure in his Mercy will forgive him.

    Posted on Huffington Post: 

    Christopher Hitchens' life was all sound and fury. And since he was an atheistic nihilist who believed that existence was an accident (that everything came from and returned to nothing with the Big Bang being a random unplanned event) by his own materialist philosophy he was an idiot telling a tale signifying nothing.

    No replies

    Posted on Atlas Shrugs

    CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS

    Loved the man and hated him. Loved his defense of freedom against the enemies of America and Western Man. Hated his militant atheism and his intemperate, brutal and savage attacks on all things religious and spiritual-from a God of incalculable creative power who can be known by direct experience, down to the indestructible human soul made in God's intellectual image. Right now Hitchens is most likely in torment (what Catholics and the Book of Maccabees call Purgatory) as the survival of his great mind after death is painfully refuting and shattering his atheistic materialism.

    No replies

     

    RUDY GIULIANI AND WHAT OBAMA MEANS BY “PATRIOTISM,” AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS

    Uncategorized
     
     
     
     Screen Shot 2015-02-21 at 9.44.24 AM
      
     

    DOES OBAMA LOVE AMERICA?

    He loves a romantic idea of America in his detached, professorial, abstract, theoretic, absurd leftist mind-America transformed into an egalitarian, cradle to grave, utopian welfare state-and childishly hates the reality with its inequalities, inequities and imperfections. Obama's patriotism (love of country) was aptly summed up by black American Communist singer Paul Robeson: "Patriotism means never being satisfied with your country [until it's perfect]." That is Obama's patriotism. That is his creed. That's how he loves this country. And it's unrealistic, unpatriotic, un-American and immature.

     Anti-American Utopian Communist Idealist Paul Robeson.

     

    RELATED

    FLAGLESS IN BERLIN

     

     

     
     

     

    GEORGE BUSH'S PATRIOTISM: I love my country (as it is) right or wrong.

    BARACK OBAMA'S PATRIOTISM; I'll love my country when it's PERFECT: only right and never wrong. Only Left not Right. Until then it sucks.

     

     
     

    BEWARE AMERICA! TEA PARTY TERROR ON THE RISE CALLING FOR VIOLENT FISCAL RESTRAINT AND BALANCED BUDGET JIHAD

    The extreme right-wing Tea Party is threatening terrorist austerity measures to save this country (so they say) from becoming a broken, bankrupt, socialist Greece with blood in the streets. Obama’s moderate, mainstream, transformational dream of a "MORE PERFECT ENTITLEMENT UNION" is in jeopardy. To realize this TRUE AMERICAN DREAM we must SPEND BABY SPEND, going deeper and deeper and deeper into debt, until we reach the promised land of cradle to grave welfare heaven. How can we save Obama's DREAM from the vast right-wing Tea Party terrorist austerity conspiracy?

    HILLARY CLINTON 2016 TO RESET AMERICA /sarc

     
     
     
     

    AMERICA ISN'T ABOVE CRITICISM

    But a true American loves his country right or wrong-as he loves his father, mother, sisters, brothers, uncles, aunts, cousins and friends right or wrong. That's what being a patriot means. But for truly devout Moslem Americans (who define themselves as citizens of Islam) this country will never be right (with God), and hatefully always be unGodly, perverse and wrong, until it's Islamized from border to border and coast to coast.

    Stop the Islamization of America NOW!

     

     
    OBAMA MOSUL MYSTERY SOLVED
     
    Obama by revealing the plan to retake Mosul is foolishly hoping that ISIS will see how serious he is and leave the city so our soldiers won't have to fight. But ISIS isn't leaving. They will stay there and go down fighting if necessary suffering the glorious death of  holy martyrs in a righteous cause, and pleasing Allah by killing as many Americans as possible.
     
     
     

    WHAT IS STUPID MR. BROOKS,

    and very dangerous, is Obama embracing as friends those Islamic supremacists who (like the Moslem Brethren) have a nonviolent approach to destroying us-at least for now.

     

    MAYBE THESE MOSLEM MEN

    should do what the 4th century Church Father Origen did to bring his sexual nature under control: castrate themselves.

    WE SHALL HAVE PEACE WITH ISLAM LIKE WE DO WITH GERMANY AND JAPAN

    Uncategorized
     
     
    The closest thing we have to a Moslem president is emboldening Jihad-Islam like never before in modern times and intensifying this new world war.  
     
    Truth is the Islam of the Prophet Mohammed has been at war with infidel humanity ever since that fateful day Mohammed (to save his faith from poverty and extinction) picked up his sword and looted his first Meccan caravan in Allah's name. From that first success at banditry and grand theft the terrible warlord Mohammed was born along with his empire of blood and death that spread across Arabia and beyond like an all consuming pestilence.
     
     The true Mohammed isn't the solution to the problem. He is the problem.
     
    And against all reality and history our idiot, appeasing, outreach nut of a  president believes that Mohammed was a prophet of peace (a 7th century Christ or Gandhi or Martin Luther King) when he was a menace to all infidels....and is still so today as millions of supremaicist Moslems-poisoned by his violent deeds and words of hate-see that first looted caravan as emblematic of humanity and a licence for conquest.
     
     The most beautiful smell in the world.
     
    Whether Obama likes it or not, admits it or not, is revolted by it or not the violent subversive imperialist Islam of Mohammed is the enemy. And we'll be at war with this enemy until we crush its will to victory and defeat it like Fascist Japan and Nazi Germany. Even if victory means killing millions of Moslems like we did Germans and Japanese Mohammed's Islam will be defeated and we shall have peace.
     
     
    POSTSCRIPT
     
    IS OBAMA MOSLEM?
     
     
    I can't blame anyone for suspecting that Obama might be a cypto-Moslem. It is clear that he wants Moslems to believe he's one of them. But his Secular Progressivism and left-wing relativist values make him unconvincing, and in part underlie his unpopularity in the Moslem world. For what traditional, mainstream, normative Moslem is pro-gay rights, pro-gay marriage, pro-partial birth abortion, pro-pot and champions women's rights? If Obama is Moslem he has reformed himself into being a mere caricature of one. In fact, with his radical left-wing politics and hedonistic (1960s) counterculture values Obama wouldn't last a day if he lived in the Moslem world. Most "religion-of-peace" Moslems would consider him a phony, Westernized, hypocritical believer profoundly and irredeemably corrupted by ungodly anti-Islamic values-the menacing enemy within-and would want him dead, jailed or banished from their society.
     
    In sum, Obama is a Secular Progressive Liberal disguised as a Christian sending signals to Moslems that he's really one of them. That is his act. And it's  failing.
     
     
    RELATED
     
     
     

    ATHEIST MORALITY AND THE COLD BLOODED MURDER OF THE CHAPEL HILL THREE (POSTSCRIPT ADDED ON DEBATE WITH ATHEISTS)

    Uncategorized
     
     
    This insightful article by Daniel Greenfield inspired me to write the following piece which I posted in the comment section and to which he kindly responded with a very interesting reply (posted below) about Dostoevsky and Christopher Hitchens.
     

     

    ANGRY MILITANT ATHEIST CRAIG HICKS' COLD BLOODED MURDER

    of three Chapel Hill students had everything to do with his atheism and disbelief in God and nothing to do with his victims being Moslem. It's all very simple to understand. If God (the Supreme Being) doesn't exist-as He doesn't for Hicks or any materialistic atheist-then there is no absolute, objective, extramental moral law of right and wrong for Hicks to follow, abide by, guide and constrain him. In other words, there is no being higher than Hicks, no God to ultimately judge his actions and hold him accountable for his crimes and sins; no after life of rewards or punishments determined by his choices in this life. Right and wrong are a matter of opinion and subjective belief for Hicks making him a law unto himself-with no authority (family, school, church or state) outside or over him. Whatever Hicks decides, believes, feels is good and evil, right and wrong, just and unjust is the only valid moral code for him. Hicks is his own god and lawgiver obeying nothing but his free, autonomous, liberated will-and if that means murder or any kind of  crime then so be it.

    In other words, as Dostoevsky said in his masterpiece The Brothers Karamazov "If there is no God, then all things are permitted." There are no rules to live by, no moral laws to follow, no higher authority to answer to and obey. Murder may be illegal and wrong according to conventional man-made rules and laws-which is someone's morality imposed on society-and killing someone could land you in jail and end your life in the electric chair if you're unlucky to get caught. But murdering another human being-erasing his existence which will end forever when he dies -is never in itself evil, immoral, unjust or wrong. We're all fated for extinction and it matters little when it comes. For in a world of random meaningless unguided chance, where life springs from nothing and returns to nothing, where there's no Intelligent Uncaused First Cause or Designer, no underlying purposeful teleological order-no ultimate measurer and architect of all things-nothing that lives (no animal and human being) has a right to life. For such a right would be innate in man, essential to his being, implying a giver of rights or Creator-a figment of man's imagination and need to believe according to atheists like Hicks.

    Now as morality for atheists like Hicks is a matter of personal opinion, feeling and belief-making him a law unto himself-killing someone who pisses him off, or angers him in a simmering dispute over a parking space that reaches a boiling point, is good, right and just if Hicks believes it so.

    In sum, Hicks' atheism (or anti-theism) was morally essential to his triple murder; while the religious belief of his victims (abhorrent as that was to Hicks) was incidental to their deaths-a mere chance accident. In fact, if we replace the three Moslem students with atheists like Hicks-hating God and despising all religions like him-they'd be just as dead today for angering him. 

     

    Daniel Greenfield writes:  

    "GREAT post!.........and you really went to the Oracle on these type of issues with your Dostoevsky quote. In his book the Possessed(or Demons in some translations)...Dostoevsky's nihilist character Kirilov makes the declaration......"If there is no God.........then I am God." And speaking of these New Atheists...........when Christopher Hitchens wrote his book...."god is not great"...........and he wanted to make his most powerful case against God.......who did he steal from? You got it............DOSTOEVSKY!  He basically hijacks the chapter "Rebellion" from? The Brothers Karamazov. But Hitchens didn't understand that Dostoevsky refutes his own argument later in the novel."

     
     
     
    POSTSCRIPT
     
    Debate on Jihad Watch
     
    (SEE)
     
     
    Don McKeller writes:
     
     
    "What a bizarre world you live in, ApolloSpeaks. So just because somebody is too intelligent to believe in imaginary dieties (sic), somehow that means that they feel free to murder innocent people and have no morality or ethics? Does it not occur to you that atheists have moms and dads and brothers and sisters and can fall in love? And because they have those things, does it not occur to you that they can appreciate and care about other human beings and what happens to them? And that they can be empathetic to other people? And therefore have very strong and good ethics and personal morality and understandings of justice and decency? Of course you haven’t thought any of this out at all, have you? No, because the atheist is the person who tells you there is no Santa Clause and no god and no heaven and that makes you scared. Really scared — because you can’t make any logical argument or prove them wrong in any way. So therefore, in your little mind, that person must be evil by nature. What a sad little world you live in."
     
    My reply:
     
    The only atheists I respect philosophically are those who logically, consistently and relentlessly apply the principle of moral relativism and believe that there are as many valid moralities and moral codes as there are individuals who invent them; and refuse to be judgmental of anyone’s morality, behavior or beliefs like theists are. In being judgmental the theist at least is logical as he consistently applies the principle of moral absolutism measuring everyone by a single standard of right and wrong. But for an atheist who denies the existence of a supreme being with an extramental absolute moral law to do this-not respecting the moral autonomy of others and sits in judgment over them as if his standards alone are valid and morally sound-completely contradicts the principle of moral relativism as he stupidly and unconsciously looks like a theist. In short, the atheist who says that I or Hicks or anyone is morally wrong is a fool.
     
    BTW, it's not I who am afraid. It's you who are afraid. Afraid to be a thoroughgoing atheist taking the principle of moral relativism to its logical conclusion of radical individual moral autonomy, or moral anarchy and chaos.
     
    DEBATE ON THE TELEGRAPH
     
     
     
    Verisimilitude  writes :
     
    "We are indeed fortunate--and equally so your argument--that no Christian ever commits murder."
     
    My reply:
     
    If we take the atheist's principle of moral relativism to its absolute logical conclusion then THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS MURDER IN REALITY. If I kill you for whatever reason I've simply taken your life with no moral qualification of right or wrong. Atheists who judge my killing you as evil or wrong are thinking in absolute moral terms like the theists they despise and ridicule. Such people are torn between moral relativism and moral absolutism and can't seem to make up their minds which way to go.
     
     

    HARF CALLS FOR JOBS IN MIDEAST ON ANNIVERSARY OF FAILED STIMULUS, ERIC HOLDER’S CONFUSION, AND ISIS’ CHIEF CHANNELING MOHAMMED, ETC.

    Uncategorized

    State Dept. Spokeswoman: ISIS Needs Jobs | Atlas Shrugs

    YESTERDAY WAS THE SIXTH ANNIVERSARY

    of Obama's failed, historic $860 billion stimulus bill (the largest of its kind) that was to trigger a robust Reagan-like jobs creating recovery like nothing ever seen in American and world history. What a sorry way to celebrate that day than with this clueless State Dept clown saying a jobs program for the people in the Middle East is needed to defeat ISIS.

    However, if Harf wants to be taken seriously she should propose something like reinstituting the military draft. That's the jobs program that could give hundreds and thousands of Americans work weaponizing them into deadly soldiers killing and destroying their way to victory over genocidal ISIS putting their death cult caliphate out of its misery.

     

     
     

    HOLDER'S MENTAL CONFUSION

    It's like Ralph Peters said on Fox yesterday "If in naming the enemy terminology doesn't matter [as Holder says] then why not call them Islamic extremists"? By stubbornly refusing to name the enemy Obama creates a divisive issue that distracts us from the war we're in-when we should be focused like a lasar beam on winning. No American wartime president has been this stupid and inept. Even Bush who said that "Islam was a religion of peace" identified the enemy as Islamic extremists-and on one occasion called them "Islamofascists (which he got hell for)." Again I say, with good reason 85% of our military contemptuously believe Obama is an awful Commander-in-Chief and have no confidence in his weak,  rudderless, demoralizing leadership which makes them sick.

     

     
    PAM WRITES:
     

    "No matter how much accommodation, self-censorship, and appeasement to Muslim sensitivities it is never enough." That is very true.  As absolute world power is the end and aim of fundamentalist Islam, for Islamic supremacists (like the Moslems at CAIR) who seek that end a glass that isn't full to overflowing is as good as empty. In short, not having it all is as good as nothing. For nothing short of the ultimate world triumph of Islam can vindicate their supremacist faith.

     

     

    THE TERRIBLE TRUTH ABOUT ISIS

    Deadly, murdering, genocidal Caliph Al-Baghdadi channels the infernal prophet Mohammed from his place in hell like no one else in Islam today. That’s why thousands are flocking to his banner of death dreaming of self-sacrifice and martyrdom in a war to make Islam a great power again.

     

     
     
    After reading this article by radical leftist Israel hater Philip Weiss  one is left with the impression that it's Netanyahu, not vicious Jew hating Islamonazis, who is making the Jews of Western Europe feel unsafe and causing them to leave. Anti-Zionist Jews like Weiss want a diminishing Jewish population in Israel-not a growing one-which in time, they hope, will be outnumbered by Israeli Arabs and end the Jewish State-hence his concern over Netanyahu's message to Europe's Jews. Weiss reminds me of Yassir Arafat begging Russia to stop the emigration of Russian Jews to Israel. The Jewish population of Israel is edging upwards while over in the Palestinian territories the fertility rate is in decline due to their  shrinking economy making large families too costly (see). Perhaps the PA and Hamas will soon start drawing on Palestinian refugees to cope with their growing demographic problem. Over time this could solve the refugee problem. Weiss and the anti-Israel left just can't win.
     
    BTW, Weiss has banned me from his site.
     
     
    What do 700 UK artists hope to achieve what 7 Arab armies failed to do 67 years ago?
     
     
     
     
     
    Obama bowed to the Japanese emperor. Truman A-bombed him into submission and humbled him. Would Obama have done that if he was the 33rd President?
     
     
     
     
     
    WHICH IS MORE DISGUSTING AND OFFENSIVE TO NORMAL PEOPLE?
     
    A Gay Pride Parade of perverts, queers and sickos celebrating their disgusting, filthy, dehumanizing vices? Or a public display of wild frenzied  Moslem freaks insanely flagellating themselves believing that they're pleasing God when only filthy demons delight in such things, as St Augustine said in the City of God.
     
     
     
     
     
    The Religion of Islamic Peace has had serious ongoing PR problems for 1400 years-with infidel humanity fearing and hating it more than any other faith. Why? Because every year of its existence Islam has been hijacked by radicals like ISIS posing as Moslems, I guess. /sarc
     
     

    JUST AS THE MURDERED CHRISTIAN COPTS

    in Libya were just ordinary Egyptian citizens to Obama. So this desecrated Christian Church would be just an ordinary Florida house of worship to him -unless, of course, it was a black church; then for Obama it would be a horrendous racist crime unrelated to Christianity. As Bill Clinton said in his post-9/11 speech in yesterday's piece "Christianity is still paying for the sins of the Crusades"-white Christianity that is.

     

     
     
     
    IT WAS A HARD DAYS NIGHT
     
    for this Moslem NOWHERE MAN.
     
    JamesonRocks adds,
     
    "Well, you know those moozies – they’re crazy EIGHT DAYS A WEEK…"

     

    BILL CLINTON IS BARACK OBAMA IN WHITE FACE WITH MORE SMARTS, CUNNING AND CHARM

    Uncategorized
       

    Critique of Bill Clinton's errors on the Crusades.

    WHO IS BILL CLINTON?

    Barack Hussein Obama in white face with more intelligence, charm and political cunning. Look at the comparison: 

    Anticipating Obama Bill Clinton said in response to the USS Cole bombing that killed 17 Americans that true Islam "had nothing to do with this atrocity or any act of terrorism." And sounding as if Islam was as American as apple pie (when it's our totalitarian opposite and enemy) Clinton said "there is nothing in Islam that would be destructive to our way of life, and that it's in harmony with the best of Western ideals." If so where is one Moslem country with a liberal, American-like democracy with division of powers, a free market system and equal rights for minorities? After 1400 years there should be at least one-but there's none. And what we see instead in Western Europe is a rising tide of anti-Western Islamic hatred hell-bent on turning the continent back to the Middle Ages of political oppression, injustice and moral darkness.

    BILL CLINTON ON THE CRUSADES

    57 days after the 9/11 disaster (57 is the number of Moslem countries) Bill Clinton anticipating by 13 years Obama's equating of the Christian Crusades with ISIS' genocidal killing rampage blamed the Crusades (and atrocities committed by Christians against Moslems who'd been slaughtering and enslaving Christians for centuries) as an important underlying factor for 9/11 and Moslem hatred of the West; and (as if he were the pope) Clinton apologized to Islam for it.

    Truth is if there hadn't been the Crusades the Soviets would still have invaded Afghanistan giving birth to al Qaida and the 9/11 event. For radical Islam's fanatical aim isn't to settle a score over the Crusades or any other grievance; its aim is IMPERIAL RESTORATION: reversing Islam's 500 year decline and restoring it as a great world power (caliphate) as a means to the greater end of world domination-the prophetic promise of the power mad, Hitler-like warlord Mohammed.

    CLINTON AND 9/11

    Indeed, this is the same soft-on-terror Bill Clinton who like Obama learning nothing from the explosive growth of Islamic extremism during his presidency (treating it as a common crime problem not an ideological/military conflict like Nazism and Communism) learned nothing from the first World Trade Center bombing, and the massive terror attacks in Saudi Arabia, East Africa and Yemen that followed-and handed George Bush the badly weakened national security system that al Qaida defeated on 9/11 killing 3000 innocent Americans.

    CLINTON AND NETANYAHU

    Moreover, Obama's hostility to Israeli PM Bibi Netanyahu was matched by Bill Clinton in the 1990s when he intervened in Israeli politics to effect Netanyahu's defeat against his weaker leftist Labor opponent Ehud Barak. That led to the failure of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks and the catastrophe of the Second Palestinian Intifada where thousands died.

    CLINTON AND THE HOUSING CRASH

     And lastly, this same Bill Clinton (an economic dumb ox slightly brighter than Obama) started the gigantic housing bubble (biggest in US history) that unstoppably grew exponentially during the Bush years and crashed the US economy as I wrote about HERE and HERE.  If Bill Clinton hadn't been president there would have been no 08 crash, and no disastrous Obama presidency.

     

    Bill Clinton: U.S. to Blame for Mexican Drug Violence | CNS News

     

    Now Bill Clinton is apologizing to Mexico for its escalating drug violence but hasn't yet offered one word of apology to the American people for 9/11 and the housing/finacial crash of which he was the fountainhead. And now this terrible, awful, reckless, lying man wants to return to the White House with his tired old worn out failed ex-Secretary of State wife to continue his legacy of liberal weakness, folly, confusion and destruction.

    RELATED

     

     

    IS SISTER OF SLAIN MOSLEM CHAPEL HILL STUDENT A JIHADIST? (UPDATE: BARAKAT’S BROTHER WAS ISLAMIST)

    Uncategorized
     
     
     
    Craig Stephen Hicks a religion hating radically left militant atheist who saw only evil in the God Idea but didn't hate all religions equally-prefering Islam and Moslems to Christians and their faith-shot and killed three students who  were incidentally Moslem over (what appears to be) a long simmering parking space dispute having nothing to do with their faith.
     
    But Dr. Mohamad Abu-Salha, father of two of the slain students and father-in-law of the third, disputes this. Believing that the murder of his kin was a "hate crime" he blames it on a deadly atmosphere of Moslem hate created by an anti-Moslem news media "bombarding every American every day with news about what they call Islamic terrorism, none of which is Islamic at all." In other words, if the media following our see-no-evil-in-Islam president had only censored itself not referring to Islamic terrorists as being Moslem Hicks might have thought differently of  Moslems, not  committed his "hate" crime and the three Moslem students would be alive today.
     

    What this says about Dr. Salha is that he takes his religion very seriously and (like Obama) thinks it a religion of justice and peace unfairly under attack by ignorant bigots. In other words, like Obama Dr. Salha is completely blind to 14 centuries of Islamic jihad rooted in the prophet or war whose name he bears and is the source of the deadly acts of Moslem jihadists.

     But contradicting Dr. Salha Dr. Suzanne Barakat, sister of one of the three slain students, blames Hick's crime on the controversial film American Sniper and its depiction of killing al Qaida terrorists by hero sniper Chris Kyle claiming that it diminishes the humanity of Moslems or dehumanizes them-making them look like vile despicable creatures worthy of death.

     Which is it then? Are radicals who kill in Allah's name real Moslems or not? And if they are  Moslem practicing true Islam in their crimes, as Ms. Barakat seems to believe, then what does that say about her? That prior to al Qaida terrorists being killed by Chris Kyle in Iraq they did nothing that diminished their humanity and dehumanized them? That their atrocities and crimes against US soldiers and fellow Moslems were Islamically justified? That in her eyes they were good Moslem men  who no more deserved death than did her brother? And that Chris Kyle should have left them alone free to kill American  soldiers at will? It sounds to me that the grieving Ms. Barakat, unlike the moderate Dr. Solha, is an Islamic supremacist who sided with al Qaida in Iraq during the war, and may now side with ISIS and the cause of radical Islam across the world.

    In short, this Moslem woman needs to be watched. If she embraces the ideology of Islamic supremacist jihad as I suspect, and blames the death of her brother on the film American Sniper and its depiction of justified and necessary killing of inhuman Moslem scum, she may be looking to avenge herself for her brother's death and strike out at this country in the name of Allah and Islam.

    UPDATE

    ChaimBenLevin just posted the following in the comment section about Barakat's brother:

    "Apollo. Your suspicions are confirmed. Barakat’s slain brother was a fucking Jew hating  pro-Islamist  9/11 truther."

    http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/02/12/well-well-looks-like-one-of-the-so-called-innocent-muslim-students-who-was-gunned-down-had-some-very-pro-islamic-terrorism-leanings-himself/

     

     

    CHRIS CUOMO POUNDS JUDGE MOORE AND SOUNDS ATHEIST, IN DEFENSE OF BRIAN WILLIAMS, THE CHAPEL HILL HATE CRIME? AND OTHER NONSENSICAL THINGS

    Uncategorized

     

    Un-American, anti-Constitutional Chris Cuomo arguing like a Marxist atheist with Judge Moore that our rights are from man not God.
     
    The late Mario Cuomo, a Liberal Roman Catholic Democat, believed in the biblical teaching as taught by his Church of an unwritten moral law of right and wrong that comes from God and is implanted in our souls before birth. And he admitted as much when he publicly stated his confused position on abortion: that he personally believed in the Church teaching that abortion was murder and morally wrong violating God's laws and the unborn's right to life. But that he also believed it was just as wrong to impose his religious beliefs on those who thought differently on the issue; and that the decision to murder the unborn should reside with individual women as allowed by Row v. Wade. Consequently, Cuomo was tolerant of the anti-abortion movement and never accused its members (as Obama and radical leftists do) of waging a war against women and wanting to oppress them.
     
    But Cuomo's tolerance is completely missing from his son Chris on the issue of same sex marriage. As we learned from his lengthy debate on CNN with Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy "Ten Commandments" Moore (a hero  to social and religious conservatives) only regressive bigots oppose gay marriage; and that "God's law against gays" is an imaginary projection of their bigotry and hate. Gone is Chris Coumo's Catholic upbringing and education from elementary school to Jesuit run Fordam University. Gone are Church teachings of a moral law innate in man requiring sexual sobriety for happiness and health. Gone is the Declaration of Independence which correctly states that our rights (and those of the unborn) originate from God. In fighting with Judge Moore over his decision to stop the issuing of marriage licences to gays in his state, no matter how much proof Moore offered (going back more than  a century) that his actions had judicial precedent and were perfectly legal under federal and state law, the ideological, politically correct, obsessive Cuomo (putting on a show for his few CNN fans) just couldn't accept it. Though gay marriage isn't the law of the land and it's against the Constitution of Alabama those like Judge Moore who stand  in its way (rejecting every form of marriage other than the traditional) are no better, to Chris Cuomo, than racial bigots practicing immoral, unjustified, irrational discrimination-homophobics driven by fear and hate, not principles based on Nature and Nature's God.
      
    What a far cry from his dad. If this were Mario Cuomo he'd have been more  civil and conciliatory on about gay marriage and said 'Though I personally agree with Church teaching that marriage should be between one man and one woman, and that same sex marriage is immoral, unnatural and wrong (as is homosexuality) I nevertheless think it's also wrong to impose this view on society and stop gays who want to marry from doing so.'  Unlike the son Marion Cuomo would have respected Judge Moore's court decisions and faith and not insinuated that he was a bigot driven by obsolete views and hate.
     
     But still, the Cuomos are CINOS (Catholics In Name Only) with the son (both of them) worse than the dad possibly being an atheist in disguise as he seems to believe that right and wrong are invented by man and not by Almighty God-the absolute measure of all things.

     

     
     
     

    IN DEFENSE OF BRAIN WILLIAMS

    If MSM gives Barack Obama a free pass on his compulsive lying about everything: healthcare, NSA snooping, deporting illegal aliens, the unemployment rate,  corruption at the IRS,  al Qaida's decimation and the War on Terror being won why should Brian Williams be punished for his lies? Which is worse? A President lying about healthcare, the IRS and al Qaida and thinking himself some kind of messiah? Or a newsman inventing stories about coming under rocket fire, or suffering dysentery during Katrina to make himself look bigger than he is? If a non-stop, serial lying Barack Obama can continue as President despite his severe truth and reality problems and lead the country and world into chaos, and he's revered by NBC who helped elect and reelect him, then why should Williams be suspended from his job, or possibly lose it because of his intermittent lies? What's fair about that?

     

     

    Embedded image permalink

    YOU WILL NOTICE

    that Obama is being hung in effigy with Jimmy Carter. Stands to reason. Obama is the greatest enabler of Iranian power since Carter mistook the evil Ayatollah Khomeini for a Jeffersonian democrat and Moslem saint. Carter midwifed the Iranian Revolution. Obama is midwifing a nuclear Iran and its expansion into a regional empire. But the Iranians are so barbaric, cruel and wicked that instead of showing gratitude to Carter and Obama they want to hang them dead. And Obama calls them "The Islamic Republic of Iran." I guess wanting him dead is true Islam.

     
    OUTRAGEOUS! Obama’s State Department Orders Marines To Destroy Their Weapons And Evacuate Yemen UNARMED! | The Gateway Pundit
     
    IF I UNDERSTAND THIS CORRECTLY 
     
    the darling president of theanti-gun left has made Yemen a US Marine Gun Free Zone with al Qaida murderers running loose lusting for American blood? Is it any wonder that 85% of the military despise this man thinking he's the worst and most demoralizing Commander in Chief in US history?
     
     
    DEVELOPING: Hate Group SPLC Connected To Radical Leftist Shooter At UNC Chapel Hill | The Gateway Pundit
     
     
                   Craig Stephen Hicks

     

    A RADICAL LEFTIST MILITANT ATHEIST NUT,

    who hates the God Idea and all religions equally, shot three people because they were Moslem? I don't buy it. If so  why didn't he go on a shooting spree killing every Moslem in sight until he weas stopped? Or walk into a mosque and gun down dozens of believers while at prayer?  Why would he limit himself to three victims if he lusted for Moslem blood? It doesn't make sense. I'm going with the parking dispute driving this guy mad with the victims accidentally being Moslem and not essential to the crime.

    BTW. leftist websites like pro-Islamist Mondoweiss and Loonwatch so badly want this murder to be an Islamophobic hate crime that they omit to mention Hick's militant atheism and espousal of leftwing causes like gay marriage. And when metrosexual Chris Hayes of MSNBC said that Chapel Hill was the "Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown moment for Moslems" he may have absolutely nailed it. For neither Martin nor Brown were victims of hate crimes.

    Lovelife writes on Media Matters

    "The killing of those kids was nothing short of a fox/media induced hate crime. That bastard is a terrorist just like Eric "the fiend" Frein .... Remember him? The liberal media sure doesn't."

    My unanswered reply:

    You're right, Lovelife. Where else but Fox would someone so disturbed as Hicks get his militant atheism, and hatred of homophobic rightwing Christians?/sarc. 

     

     
    ”I'M SHOCKED! SHOCKED! SHOCKED I TELL YOU!
     
    A radical leftist loon preferring Moslems to Christians?

     

     

    WHAT MR. PRESIDENT

    no post-mortem adoption? Moron!

     

    Obama’s Sad, Sick Selfie Stick | Atlas Shrugs

     

    Obama using selfie stick

     

    THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

    is both the longest running Amateur Hour show since Ted Mack, and the longest running clown show since Howdy Doody. In fact, as a clown Obama is an unfunny pathetic amateur sadder than depression hobo Emmett Kelly.

     

     

     
    RICHIUTTO IS RIGHT! CONSUMER SPENDING OVER THE HOLIDAYS
     
    was a disaster (worse than 2013) and continues to be poor into the new year. This despite consumer sentiment at a ten year high-due mainly to the dramatic drop in gas prices creating the illusion that the economy is returning to normal. It is not. Practically everything else is happy talk and lies  as Steve Richiutto notes.
     

    ELIJAH CUMMINGS AND THE RELIGION OF GOVERNMENT-OR GOVERNMENT AS SOUL FOOD

    Uncategorized
     
     
     

    Government is Congressman Cumming's holy religion as it is for all secular progressive liberals. Government is their Supreme Being, their God of Love, their moral absolute, their saving messiah and redeemer from the evils of this world (especially conservatism). For liberals like Cummings government is the source of all truth, wisdom and moral goodness which alone feed, nourish and sustain the human soul (or brain if they're materialists) curing it of ignorance, error and the misery of sin (like opposition to gay rights, abortion and open borders).

    Forget your Bibles Old and New; forget your Plato, Plutarch and Cicero. Forget Moses, Jeremiah, Jesus and the saints. Forget anything that brings you closer in mind and spirit to the one true living God (including prayer). Cummings hath spoken: there's no salvation outside of the state-no soul food to be gotten anywhere except what's given us mortals by the federal government-the center of the universe and lord of creation. Your true spiritual teachers and guides on earth aren't rabbis, priests, gurus and sages, but Congressmen like Cummings, Judges like Ginsburg and Presidents like Obama (once hailed the messiah). These alone will enlighten your mind with truth, elevate your moral nature with compassion (the left's master  virtue) and make you happy, whole and good-giving you a purpose in life to boot: ending poverty and racism with social injustice egalitarianism; and ending the horror of world destroying global warming (the terror of the ages). The great God government can do it all if it's given enough money and power.

    This is not a new idea. The Religion of Government is as old as the French Revolution which attempted to abolish Christianity from society closing down and destroying churches, ending the Catholic mass, killing priests and nuns in droves by beheading and hacking them to death (like ISIS does today).

    Sisters from the Order of St. Joseph being led to the guillotine by anti-clerical French Revolutionaries.
     

    While our Founding Fathers and Framers were separating Church and State French Revolutionaries were replacing the Church with the State-with an atheistic "Religion of Reason" administered by men like Cummings-a preposterous idea that catastrophically failed then and is failing today right under Cumming's Judeo-Christian hating liberal snoot.

    In our 238 glorious years never have the once great industrious, productive American people been more dependent on government for services and material things-for realizing the Good Life called the American Dream through the State; and never have they been more ignorant, senseless, sinful and miserable given up to sexual excess, drugs, drink and eating disorders. After decades of experimentation in government dependency with trillions redistributed in unearned wealth the STATE has proved itself once more (as it did in France, Russia North Korea, Cuba, etc.) to be a false God with a false faith and messianic pretensions failing at perfecting society which is liberalism's impossible goal. Instead of nourishing and sustaining our souls (which no government can do as we can't "live by bread alone") it corrupts and degrades us weakening our mental and moral powers, undermining good character (as FDR warned) and turning us into dopes-look at this lost generation of poorly educated dumbed down kids-it's a joke.

     Slums of Detroit.

    As a microcosm of what the Religion of Government is doing to us nationally look at broken, busted, bankrupt Detroit-an impoverished, depraved Third World-like sh*t hole liberal city of rising crime, violence, drug abuse, illiteracy, sexual lunacy, disease and death. Then look at Chicago the murder capital of the US. With $18 trillion in federal debt and growing, and $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities, the Detroiting of America is tragically underway as more and more Americans come under government's destructive sway-growing the state at the cost of freedom and shrinking the private sector where wealth is made.

    The Religion of Government (like liberalism in general) doesn't work; it's a false God that's exhausted, broken and dying dragging with it into bankruptcy and oblivion leftist politicians like Congressman Cummings-ironically named "Elijah" after the fierce biblical enemy of false prophets, idols and gods.

    Prophet Elijah smashing the idols of the false god Baal.
     

     The Age of Liberalism is over, It's finished with, done. And a new and glorious chapter in our country's heroic history is about to begin.

     

     

     

    OBAMA INSANELY BELIEVES IRAN MIGHT NOT BE BUILDING THE ISLAMIC BOMB BECAUSE OF ISLAM (EXTENSIVELY REVISED)

    Uncategorized

    Obama: Iran Won’t Pursue Nuclear Weapons Because It’s ‘Contrary to Their Faith’ | Atlas Shrugs

    PRESIDENT OBAMA:
     
    The issues now are sufficiently narrowed and sufficiently clarified where we're at a point where they need to make a decision. We are presenting to them in a unified fashion, the P5+1 supported by a coalition of countries around the world are presenting to them a deal that allows them to have peaceful nuclear power but gives us the absolute assurance that is verifiable that they are not pursuing a nuclear weapon. 

    And if in fact what they claim is true, which is they have no aspiration to get a nuclear weapon, that in fact, according to their Supreme Leader, it would be contrary to their faith to obtain a nuclear weapon, if that is true, there should be the possibility of getting a deal. They should be able to get to yes. But we don't know if that's going to happen.
     
    JIMMY CARTER ABANDONED THE SHAH
     

    on the belief that the Ayatollah Khomeini was a humane and saintly man and a Jeffersonian democrat who’d replace monarchy with democracy in Iran. And in so doing he unleashed the rise of Islamic Jihad in the Middle East and millions of deaths. If Obama believes in the possibility that Khomeini’s successor isn’t pursuing the bomb because it’s a sin against Allah and Islam then why continue negotiations? If Iran has nuclear aspirations nothing will stop them short of destroying the regime. If Khameine believes that Allah frowns upon nuclear weapons and thinks them a sin then Iran isn't pursuing the bomb, and in enriching uranium and building ICBMs is playing a game of strategic ambiguity-like Saddam played with WMDs. Either way negotiations are an exercise in futility...an idiot's game as the mullahs remain a rising imperialistic terror regime that must be destroyed.

    But let's be realistic. Iran has spent over $100 billion on its nuclear program and is hell bent on getting the bomb and delivering it to us . That is the reality no matter how much Tehran tries to disguise it and confuse us. And Obama in allowing for the possibility that the disguise might be reality, and Iran on religious grounds (despite the enrichment and ICBMs) isn't pursuing the bomb shows that he's hopelessly hoping against hope and grasping at straws. Obama is the greatest enabler of Iranian power since Jimmy Carter's stupidity and naivety midwifed radical jihadist Iran. Now Obama is aiding the mullahs in midwifing a nuclear Iran and becoming the North Korea of the Middle East-a nuclear menace to the world; and they must be stopped!

     

    OBAMA’S HISTORICAL IGNORANCE, 9/10 MENTALITY, FAILURE TO SAVE AMERICA AND OTHER GRIM THOUGHTS

    Uncategorized
     
     
     
     HISTORY LESSON WASTED
     
    Does anyone think that the President who, not once but TWICE, made the shrouding of Christian symbols at Georgetown University a condition for speaking there is going to care about the historical truth of the Crusades? HELL NO! The Moslem perception of the Crusades (adopted by the Left) as Christianity's ORIGINAL SIN against Islam-history's first great infamous act of unjustified ISLAMOPHOBIA by the Christian West-is one of the reasons for Obama's actions at Georgetown, declaration of America as no longer Christian and anti-Crusade remarks at the Prayer Breakfast. Moreover, it could very well be that Obama considers the oppression of Christians across the Moslem world as karmic retribution for the Crusades.  As Christians are the most targeted minority for persecution in the Middle East Obama has voiced little support for them. And though at the Prayer Breakfast he mentioned Christians persecuted in Nigeria when it came to ISIS only Yazidis not Christians were mentioned.
     
     
     
     
     AFTER HEARING THIS
     

    only a fool would say that fear of Obama is overblown. Obama is a 9/10 president in a post-9/11 world (George Bush and Bill Clinton before 9/11) and very dangerous in his ignorance, arrogance, weakness and self-lies.

     

     
     
     

    OBAMA'S AMERICA IS NO BETTER THAN ISIS?

    What does that mean? America is so irredeemably evil-so lost to justice and hardened in sin-that a two term radically left Alinskyite president can't save it.

     

     

    MORE ANTI-WEST HATE TALK FROM OBAMA'S "MOST TRUSTED" FOREIGN "ALLY"

    Anti-West Statements By Turkish President Erdogan And PM Davutoglu: Muslim Countries Must ‘Unite And Defeat The Successors Of Lawrence Of Arabia'; ‘No One Will Be Able To Stop’ The Rise Of Islam In Europe

    muslim confabAt the PUIC, Istanbul. Yeni Akit, January 21, 2015.
    Lawrence of Arabia was a Zionist of Arabia believing that the restoration of Israel in Palestine was a regional necessity for its progress towards modernity. And that is absolutely what Israel is despite its demonization by enemies and global unpopularity. Neo-Ottoman Islamist Turks like Erdogan will never forgive Lawrence for driving the Turks from Arabia and making the necessary rise of Israel possible. And he dreams that in revenge Islamic supremacists will conquer Europe. What a fool!  Islamists and Jihadists can't even reconquer Palestine. 

     

     
    combo coexist
    French street artist Combo was physically assaulted over his latest art work. Photo: Combo Culture Kidnapper/Facebook
     

    MOSLEMS TO FRENCH COEXIST ARTIST:

    Desist! Or cease to exist!

     

     

    VIDEO Obama: Murdered Paris Jews Were Just Random Victims | Atlas Shrugs

     

     

    FRENCHMEN

    who were randomly born Jews and were randomly at a Parisian deli that randomly served and sold kosher food to Jews, were randomly shot by Jew haters randomly belonging to a Jew hating religion randomly founded by a Jew hating prophet who also randomly killed Jews who ate kosher food randomly far from Paris.

    Now it's all beginning ti make sense.

     

     
     

    ISRAELS EXISTENCE TERRIFIES THE MOSLEM WORLD

    causing doubts about Islamic revelation, purpose and truth-which makes that woman a terrorist like all Israeli Jews./sarc

     

     

    SEND JIHAD JOHN'S DADDY TO JORDAN

    where he'll get swift, immediate, well deserved justice. In fact, send all Gitmo innmates there for speedy executions.

     

    Litigation Jihad: Muslim Workers Sue Hertz Again, This Time for “Islamofauxbia” | Atlas Shrugs

     

    THEY WON'T STOP SUING HERTZ

     

    until they're in the driver's seat owning it, or driving it into oblivion.

     

     

     

     

    WHITE HATING RACISTS WAKE UP!

    As I predicted the Black Lives Matter Movement would have a short life like Occupy Wall Street. As of today BLM is practically DEAD!

     

    OBAMA’S CRAZY ARGUMENT FOR THE MORAL EQUIVALENCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND ISIS (POSTSCRIPT: ATHEIST PRAISES CHRISTIANITY)

    Uncategorized

     

     
    The political Left (founded on the messianic notion that government can perfect human society)  is one vast insane asylum of moral and intellectual confusion; and Barack Obama (the Left's worst nightmare) is its most prominent (narcissistic) mental case. Take for example his argument for the moral equivalence of Christianity and ISIS:
     
     
    Because of the atrocities committed by Christians in the name of Christ during the antI-Islam Medieval Crusades (which America had nothing to do with), and during the periods of American slavery and Jim Crow (which Christians were at the forefront of fighting), Christian America is no better than murderous, sadistic Christian-hating ISIS. Therefore, no American should get on his "high [righteous] horse" and feel moral outrage and anger over ISIS' horrific crimes. For we too as  Christians have just as much evil to answer for in history.
     
     
     Wait a minute. Didn't Obama say in 2009 that "America is no longer a Christian nation"?
     
     
     Can someone make sense of this for me before I go stark raving mad.
     
     

    POSTSCRIPT:

    ATHEIST BRAINIAC PRAISES CHRISTIANITY

     

    Brainiac writing in the comment section said: "Let’s not forget that although Christians have committed atrocities in the past, and may commit some in the future they have done much to stop atrocities, racism, inequalities, perhaps more than any other religion

    Slavery, and atrocities committed on people is not new. Slavery has been around for quite a while, and many other races besides blacks have been slaves, and have had atrocities committed upon them. Blacks in Africa practiced a brutal slavery. And not just slavery, look at the atrocities around the world from that pilot being burned to sexual slavery of young people to one faction or group brutally wiping out some other faction. On balance no religion has done more good for the human race than Christianity. And I, brainiac, am an atheist."

     Brainaic isn't the first or only atheist to find value in Christianity: the Left's most hated religion. Conservative political commentator and ATHEIST S.E. Cupp wrote a controversial book excoriating the liberal media's jihad against Christianity.

     

     
     

    CRUSADERS AND ISLAMONAZIS, OBAMA’S CRYPTO ISLAMISM? IRAN RISING AND PALI POND SCUM

    Uncategorized
     
    Michael Ramirez Cartoon(Ripped off from Gateway Pundit.)

     

    WITH MOSLEM OUTREACH IN SHAMBLES,

    (like the rest of his foreign policy) and his popularity in the Middle East no better than George Bush's, Obama needed another Neville Chamberlain moment (he's had dozens of them) to pathetically remind Moslems how much he loves and respects Islam. But no one is listening. Moslems can no more respect Obama than our military and for the same reason: he's a coward and weakling with no warrior-no Mohammed-in him.

    THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHRISTIAN CRUSADERS AND ARMY OF ISIS

    The Christian Crusaders waged a defensive war against Islamic aggression. ISIS are Islamic aggressors at war with all infidels and Moslems in their way. It's that simple.

     

    Obama: “We are summoned to push back against those who would distort our religion for their nihilistic ends”

     EITHER OBAMA IS A CRYPTO MOSLEM

    or he’s trying to deceive Moslems into thinking he’s crypto to boost his popularity in the Middle East-his ratings there are about equal to Bush’s. Either way it won’t help. If he couldn’t become the darling of the region with his Cairo speech what could a butt-kissing Chamberlain moment do?

     

    Official Palestinian Authority TV quotes Qur’an: Jews are “apes and pigs" - Jihad Watch”

     

    IF ISRAEL, A LIGHT UNTO THE SICK, DYSFUNCTIONAL, DESPOTIC MIDDLE EAST,

    the freest, most progressive and productive nation in the region, is a country of Jewish “apes and pigs” than what does that make Palestinian annihilationists? Is pond scum too generous a term?

     

     

    JORDAN LEARNED ITS LESSON

    about releasing terrorists when they freed monster jihadist (forerunner of al-Baghdadi ) Abu al-Zarqawi in 1999. But we've learned nothing from that and continue to release Gitmo inmates equal to Zarqawi in evil.

      

     
     
     
     
     
     

    WHEN OBAMA WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT ON 11-04-2008

    it was the 29th anniversary of the Iranian Hostage Crisis-a prophetic sign anticipating he'd be the greatest enabler of radical Iranian power since hapless Jimmy Carter. And what did Carter's abandoning of the pro-US Shah for Ayatollah Khomeine lead to in the region? A horrific eight year war between Iran and Iraq where one million died and millions were injured. With over 200,000 dead in Syria and ISIS killing thousands for Islam one million dead could be reached in half the time. And now Iran is getting the bomb. It's frightening.

     

     

     

    EARLY IN HIS PRESIDENCY

     
    I predicted that Barack Obama-because of his shameless mendacity and unfitness to command-would end up in the "Presidents' Hall of Shame." Does anyone doubt that he's already there?

     

     

    FAR MORE PERVERSE THAN HOMOSEXUALS

    are those who want to kill them for their sins.

     

     

     

    AMERICAN SNIPER VS. AMERICAN DESERTER, RIGHT EYELESS HARRY REID’S BAD KARMA AND GREECE’S NEW RADICAL LEFT GOV’T

    Uncategorized


    Michael Moore: ‘Passion of Christ’ Crowd Behind Box-Office Success of ‘American Sniper’ | The Gateway Pundit

    Deserter Bowe Bergdahl's hatred of America  was so great that he wanted to end his US citizenship and become a citizen of Afghanistan or Pakistan believing that either country was morally superior to America and more worthy of his lofty spiritual soul.

    WHY DOESN'T OBESE ANTI-AMERICAN BIGOT MICHAEL MOORE

    zip it about Chris Kyle's alleged anti-Arab racism and psychopathic right-wing savagery and try to outdo the box office success of American Sniper with a film about leftist hero Bo Bergdahl called American Deserter. Let's see how well that does at the box office; or if it wins any Oscar nominations like his last laughable flops ridiculing capitalism and extolling Castro's Communist healthcare system .

     

    FIRST PHOTO: Battered Harry Reid on Senate Floor | The Gateway Pundit

    After losing his position of Senate Majority Leader on November 4th ( the 28th anniversary of winning his senate seat)  Harry Reid (58 days later) injured and possibly lost his right eye in a freak excercise accident. 

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ELzxsAuMnuI/Sk5RE7RJxpI/AAAAAAAABAc/p4sdD-E8XTM/s400/three_blind_mice.gif

     

    BACK IN 2009 WHEN DEMOCRATS

    ruled the Executive Branch and Congress I referred to the Unholy Leftist Power Trinity of Obama, Pelosi and Reid as the "Three Blind Mice" because of their staggering stupidity and blindness in domestic and foreign policy. Little did I imagine that one of the three might be physically half blind in six years. You will notice that the injury Reid sustained was to his RIGHT eye. Could this be Karmic Justice for viciously poking the Right in the eye all these years? For preventing the Senate from voting on 350 bills passed by Congress and lyingly calling them "obstructionists"? For his defamation of fellow Mormon Mitt Romney as a "tax cheat"?  For demonizing the Tea Party as "racists" and  his insane tirades against  the "unAmerican radical" Koch Brothers ? I'm surprised nobody blamed the Kochs for Harry's injury accusing them of booby trapping  the resistance bands on his treadmill

    RELATED

    Hating on Harry Reid - Kenneth P. Vogel - POLITICO.com 

     

    Obama Expresses Sympathy for New Radical Left Greek Govt. “You Cannot Keep Squeezing Countries” | The Gateway Pundit

    THE ECONOMIC IGNORAMOUS-IN-CHIEF

    is urging broken, busted Socialist Greece-which taxed, spent,  borrowed and lied its way into national bankruptcy and blood in the streets (as we're doing)-to double down on spending when it didn't work for us in the 1930s, isn't working now and hasn't worked for Japan in 22 years. What will save Greece is what saved Socialist Sweden from Grecification in the 1990s: AUSTERITY ECONOMICS. Sweden faced with fiscal, financial and economic collapse drastically slashed taxes, spending, regulations, pensions and privatized national industries, and within five years restored prosperity. Austerity Economics works. Sweden is proof. Obama is a worthless, tax and spend, government-is-the-answer leftist jerk.

    RELATED

     

    OBAMA’S IS-LIE-MO STATISTICS, BEHEADING OBAMA, REAL DEFLATE-GATE, CHRIS KYLE RACISM AND JAPAN’S REVENEGE……

    Uncategorized
     
     
     
     

    ISN’T THIS THE PRESIDENT WHO RESORTS TO STATISTICAL TRICKERY

    on the GDP, job growth, inflation, climate change and deported illegal aliens? And didn't he tell  a French reporter that according to statistics “America is one of the largest Moslem countries in the world?” There are lies, damned lies, and Barack Obama’s statistics

     

     Islamic State Threatens to Behead Obama in White House - Atlas Shrugs

    Obama-head-up-ass-96567955871.jpeg

    BEHEADING OBAMA WON'T BE EASY

    as his head is way way way up his tight skinny butt from which he leads this country.

     

     
     

    THOSE WHO FORGET THE LESSONS OF HISTORY

    are doomed to repeat its mistakes. The last time a US President (Bill Clinton) intervened in Israeli politics to oust Netanyahu his success ended in the disaster of the Second Intifada.

     

     

     

    DEFLATE-GATE

     

    THE REAL DEFLATE GATE

    Obama's deflating of American credibility, power, military might and wealth-as the air goes out of his administration and crashes like the Hindenburg.

     

     

     

     

    ANTI-AL QAIDA = RACIST?

    KILLING AL-QAIDA = KILLING SPREE?

    If the above is true then I'm a Chris Kyle racist who'd love to practice Chris Kyle racism and go on Chris Kyle killing sprees.

     

    RELATED

    THE ULTIMATE DEFENSE FROM INTERNATIONAL LAW AGAINST ALLEGATIONS THAT CHRIS KYLE WAS A MURDERING, PSYCHOPATHIC WAR CRIMINAL

     

     

     

    A RELIGION OF PEACE MOSLEM

    blown to peaces by the enemies of Islamic peace. May this kind of peace soon be upon Nasrhalla and the entire Hezbollah leadership.

     

    ISIS BEHEADS JAPANESE HOSTAGE KENJI GOTO (Video— Photos) | The Gateway Pundit

     
     
    TIME FOR JAPAN

     

    to unsheathe its sword and unleash its Samurai!

     

     

     
     
     

    OBL AFTER 9/11 ASPIRED TO BIGGER TERRORIST PLOTS

    But they never got past the dream stage. For after 9/11 OBL-the world's most hunted man-was relatively impotent, isolated and broke. However, ISIS is richly funded and attracting jihadis like flies to shit who'll die a thousand deaths for Islam. And that is frightening.

     

     

     

     
     
    SOUNDS LIKE 2ND AMENDMENT TEA PARTY WHACKOISM

    is speading to Pakistan. If so welcome to the club sisters.
     

     

     
     

     

    THE DALAI LAMA MAY BE AN ENLIGHTENED MAN

    on the subject of Buddhism. But when it comes to Islam too much of his consciousness dwells on his Root Chakra-the lowest of the seven psychic centers located between the anus and genitals.

     

     

     

     

    THE SOLUTION?

    Attach pages of the Koran to all non-Islamic books. Or would that desecrate the Koran and get people killed?

     

    OBAMA’S PEACEFUL, PEACE-LOVING TALIBAN MOSLEMS (POSTSCRIPT ADDED)

    Uncategorized

     

    Who needs Osama when we have Obama.

    Eric Schultz's controversial characterization of the Taliban as a local non-terrorist insurgency group wasn't nearly as ignorant, troubling and sad as this half forgotten remark made by gaffemaster Joe Biden three years ago to Newsweek's Leslie Gelb:

     "Look," said Biden seriously," THE TALIBAN PER SE IS NOT OUR ENEMY. That’s critical. There is not a single statement that the president has ever made in any of our policy assertions that the Taliban is our enemy because it threatens U.S. interests (see)."

    That is true. In his six years in office Obama has not once called the Taliban either "terrorists" or "enemies" or "radical extremists" like he's calls al-Qaida, ISIS and others. But what then are they in Obama's murky mind?  If the Taliban who in the name of Allah and Islam have been fighting us for 13 years killing our soldiers and trying to drive us from Afghanistan aren't "terrorist enemies" like al-Qaida and ISIS (with a radical ideology foreign to Islam) then what are they ?

    There is only one possible answer: for Obama, Biden, Kerry and the administration Mullah Omar and the Taliban (like the mullahs of Iran and their Islamic Republic) are MOSLEMS. Not radical extremists like al-Qaida and ISIS twisting, distorting and perverting the faith; but real, genuine, authentic, normative, moderate, traditional Moslems practicing and applying the true RELIGION OF PEACE. There is no other logical explanation. But how are the Taliban practicing and applying the "religion of (Islamic) peace" when they are fighting and killing our troops on the battlefield and trying to drive us from Afghanistan? What's authentically Islamic and peaceful about that? 

    Nothing on the surface. It's what's underneath that distinguishes the Taliban from al-Qaida and puts them on the side of true, peaceful, justice-loving Islam. And what's underneath that everyone's missing except the administration is that US and NATO forces are (unintentionally) the bad guys in the conflict.

    What that means from Obama's perspective is  that unfortunately when our troops invaded Afghanistan we toppled an innocent regime of peaceful, peace-loving Moslems who were minding their own business practicing their peaceful nonviolent faith (true Islam) in ruling over their peaceful country. And our aggression against them pushed them into justified jihad and armed (non-terrorist) insurgency against us. In fighting us the Taliban are acting Islamically applying the just war doctrine of their peaceful faith wanting to restore the status quo ante of their peaceful Islamic regime as would any moderate peace-loving Moslem country that was  invaded by a foreign power.

    In other words, the Taliban for Obama are victims of the Bush administration's overreacting to the 9/11 attack secretly launched by al-Qaida from Afghanistan unbeknownst to the peaceful nonviolent Taliban regime. If Obama had been the 43rd president instead of 44th history would have been different. There would have been no US invasion of Afghanistan and long 13 year war. Obama with the magic of his splendid personality, Moslem family roots and Middle Eastern middle name name would have greatly impressed and dazzled Mullah Omar succeeding where Bush had failed in making him a partner of the US in its war against al Qaida and global terror.  

    Of course the Taliban are very much the "terrorist enemies" of our country; and denying this is a crazy Obama leftist appeasement fantasy. Mullah Omar willingly partnered with his buddy bin Laden in his global jihad against the US; and approved his every death-dealing  terrorist strike not once publicly dissociating himself and his regime from any one of them. And when given the choice of doing the right thing and cooperating with us in bringing bin Laden to justice or going down in flames Omar chose loyalty to bin Laden over the survival of his regime. And down he went thinking perhaps that Allah would miraculously save him good pius Moslem that he is. Mullah Omar is our unappeasable terrorist enemy hating us more now than before 9/11 because of all the Taliban we killed. And if he returns to power he'll seek vengeance for our  crimes against Allah and Islam; and that means partnering with al Qaida all over again as Afghanistan returns to pre-9/11 mode.

    POSTSCRIPT

     

    SUMMERIZING APOLLO'S ARGUMENT

    By

    Franz Bolling

    True blue religion of peace Muslims are neither terrorists nor enemies of the United States. The Taliban, according to the Obama Administration, are neither terrorists nor enemies of the US. Therefore, the Taliban are true blue religion of peace Muslims.

     

    RELATED

    BARACK OBAMA’S IDEA OF A TRUE ISLAMIC STATE

    WHITE HOUSE SAYS TALIBAN NOT TERRORISTS THOUGH TALIBAN LEADER IS WANTED FOR TERRORISM

    Uncategorized

     Taliban an armed insurgency not a terrorist group says White House |Atlas Shrugs

     
     
    Deputy Press Secretary Eric Schultz telling ABC's Jonathan Karl that the Taliban are armed insurgents, not terrorists; and that it was okay for the administration to negotiate with them for the release of deserter Bo Bergdahl in exchange for five detained Taliban commanders.
     
    Wanted

    Information that brings to justice…

    Photo of Mullah Omar

    Mullah Omar

    Up to $10 Million Reward

    Mullah Omar's Taliban regime in Afghanistan sheltered Osama bin-Laden and his al-Qa'ida network in the years prior to the September 11 attacks.

     

     
    When given a choice by the US of keeping his power by rounding up and handing over Bin Laden and his group of monsters Mullah Omar remained streadfastly loyal to bin Laden chosing his downfall instead. And to this day he hasn't regretted his decision especially now that he sees victory over the US ahead.

     

    SO THE FIVE TOP LEVEL TALIBAN COMMANDERS

    who were jailed in Gitmo for terrorist jihad and exchanged for deserter Bo (pro-terrorist) Bergdahl were in reality non-terrorist insurgents-as is the entire Taliban army from its leader Mullah Omar down to the lowest ranking jihadi? Really? Well then if that's so why is the State Department offering up to $10 million for information leading to the capture of Mullah Omar as part of a program designed to fight against international terrorism? Afterall, wasn't it Taliban Omar's radical Islamic jihadist regime that provided shelter for and material support to radical Moslem Osama bin Laden when he publicly declared his Islamic jihad of terror and death on the United States, and then plotted and carried out his deadly Islamic terror attacks? Doesn't that make radical Islamic Mullah Omar an accessory to bin Laden's terror atrocities and  crimes: the terrorist mass murder and injury of thousands of innocent Americans in Africa, Yemen and here in the States? How then can the head of the Taliban be a top wanted Islamic terrorist  by the US State Dept. without the Taliban being an army of Islamic terrorists like ISIS, Hamas, Hezbollah and al Qaida? Does this make any sense? How does the White House explain this contradiction?

    SEE

     

     

    In the events leading up to the 2006 Lebanon War Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrhallah (above) relentlessly ridiculed Israeli PM Olmert's character and courage saying that he was less than half the leader with far less guts than his predecessor Ariel Sharon. Believing Olmert was a wimp who'd do nothing Nazrhallah ordered the kidnapping of Israeli soldiers for a prisoner swap and regretted the death and destruction it caused Lebanon ever since. Is it possible Nazrhalla will miscalculate like this again? With Obama insanely teamed up with Iran in fighting ISIS Nasrhallah and Tehran might believe that Hezbollah can attack Israel (and kidnap IDF soldiers again) with relative impunity; and that Obama will restrain Netanyahu from launching another devastating war. But then again could Tehran afford such a war and the cost of rebuilding post war Lebanon like it did in the past? With dropping oil prices hurting Iran's weak economy the answer is no. A second Israeli Hezbollah war at this time would be way too costly and serve to drastically slow down Iran's drive to build the Islamic terrorist bomb.
     
     
     
    THIS WOULD BE LIKE NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN AFTER THE NAZI TAKEOVER OF PRAGUE 
     
    meeting in Munich with Hitler for a new round of peace-in-our-time appeasement talks. After the political disaster of Morsi and the Brotherhood's brief radical Islamic rulership of Egypt this meeting shows that Obama has given a whole new meaning to the words naïvety, appeasement and insanity.
     
    RELATED
     
     
     
     
     
     
    THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY
     
    has its Winston Churchill in Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. But there's always room for another, and Newt Gingrich is he-as well as Dick Cheney.
     
     
     

    FROM THE LONE STAR STATE

    to the Lone Cresent/Star State-Sam Houston is rolling in his grave. How many years will it be before Texas (a gulf oil producing state) becomes a honored  member of OPEC?

    But don't despair Texans. Hope springs eternal!

     

    IGNORING RADICAL ISLAM INTO OBLIVION, UNISLAMIC BIN LADEN’S ISLAMIC FUNERAL AND THE MINOS OF GITMO

    Uncategorized

                                                                                                                                                                                     Former Defense Intel Chief Michael Flynn Blows the Whistle on Obama in Suppressing Bin Laden Terror Documents | Atlas Shrugs

                                                       5444538598_obama_crazy_faced_ ...

    Listen up people. If we learn to see no evil in Islam what evil is there will be ignored into oblivion and disappear.

    HOW CAN WE CONQUER OUR INORDINATE FEAR

     of non-Islamic "Moslem" extremism and terror, and learn to love the true religion of Islamic peace (as a force for good, justice and compassion in the world) if the treasure trove of Osama Bin Laden's captured terror documents (revealing the ubiquity of non-Islamic jihadist thinking and influence in the Moslem world) had been fully exploited by Flynn and the DIA or made public? It would only serve to confuse everyone with the truth; and feed divisive, bigoted, hate driven Islamophobia making Obama's noble work of passively ignoring "Islamic radicalism" into oblivion (wishing it away) far more difficult.  Obama sees the world as it should be and hates it as it is. And if enough of us see the world as he does he believes it will magically materialize. Jihad will go away, and  happiness and peace will reign . Damn those realists! If only he could shut them up. Free speech is anti-peace.

    THE MINOS OF GITMO

    And while I'm on the subject of false Islam and phony Moslems I need mention that what  still perplexes the hell out of me (as it should you) is why Obama gave Bin Laden the honor of a traditional Moslem funeral spoken in Arabic (with verses taken from the Koran?) if he was a monstrous, death loving, non-Moslem perverter of true, peaceful, nonviolent Islam (see)? Why was he accorded such respect when he's damaged Islam's name by killing so many  innocents? It makes no sense.

    And if that's not confusing enough why do the al Qaida terrorists jailed at Gitmo get Korans, prayer rugs and halal food if like their idol bin Laden they are sick, phony, perverse, unIslamic Moslems-Moslems In Name Only (MINOS)? How can we win the hearts and minds of true, real, peace-loving Moslems if we treat false, deadly, sinful, monstrous Moslems (a discredit to the faith) as if they were good, pure, virtuous believers like them? Then release them from prison as if they were harmless gents? What kind of outreach to Moslems is that?  It's insulting and makes no sense.

    RELATED

    < p style="text-align: center;">WHAT IS BARACK OBAMA’S IDEA OF A TRUE ISLAMIC STATE

    APOLLO TO ENTER PENTAGON ESSAY CONTEST HONORING DEAD SAUDI KING & DOES OBAMA HATE JEWS?

    Uncategorized
     
     

    In what is most likely an appeasement move by the fawning Obama administration for recently criticizing and angering the oppressive Saudi government of its now deceased King for its human rights crimes (see) the Pentagon has announced an essay contest to butt-kiss the Saudis and honor the supremacist King's memory.

    Dempsey Sponsors Essay Competition to Honor Saudi King

    By Jim Garamone
    DoD News, Defense Media Activity

    WASHINGTON, Jan. 26, 2015 – The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has established a research and essay competition in honor of Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah Bin Abdul-Aziz hosted by the National Defense University.

    The king, who died Jan. 23 at age 90, oversaw the modernization of his country’s military during the time he spent as commander of the Saudi Arabian National Guard, a position he held from 1963 until he became king in 2005.

    Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey said the essay competition is a fitting tribute to the life and leadership of the Saudi Arabian monarch.

     

    Needing the prize money (the Obama recovery has done nothing for me) I have

     decided to try my luck and enter the contest. My submission will be as follows:

     

     

     

    In March 2009 at the G-20 meeting in London Moslem Defender in Chief Barack Obama was videotaped above shaking the hand of Islamofacist Saudi King Abdullah while bending deeply from the waist in what was obviously a bow. Conservatives like me went bonkers over this heaping ridicule on Obama for stupidly demeaning his great office by bowing to an oppressive, freedom hating, medieval Moslem ruler (a phony Moslem by Obama's standards*) who is secretly spreading his poisonous, evil, hate-driven Wahabi faith inside our country and across the world (see).  But Obama's defenders in the media quickly struck back with this photo taken in 2005 of George Bush taking a lovely hand holding stroll with then Crown Prince Abdullah on his Crawford ranch.

    *Real Moslems of the religion of Islamic peace don't cut off heads and hands, torture or kill people  for apostasy, blasphemy and other similar "crimes" like the Saudis do. Right Mr. Obama?

     

     Now holding hands with the sad Saudi Prince is not the same as bowing to him; and  showing him a deference and respect he doesn't deserve being the enemy of all we believe in. What wasn't reported by MSM  is that the sad Saudi Prince who'd been sick for years (he was 81 at the time) was feeling gravely ill and feeble that day; and that Bush fearing the worse was lending him support so he wouldn't fall down on his sad Saudi face into a hot steaming pile of this
     
     
     Bush ranch horse sh*t.  
     
    This was one of those rare occasions when Bush's kindness got the best of him. If only it were Dick Cheney with the Prince this might have had a more appropriate outcome.
     
     
     
     
    Is Obama a Jew hater like Mark Levin says?  I don't know. But this much is certain: Obama hates Bibi Netanyahu and the Israeli electorate that backs him mainly for the following reason:
     

    OBAMA TO NETANYAHU:

    A thousand curses on you for depriving me of a Pali-Israeli peace agreement. Thanks to you I'll have nothing of great value or importance to show posterity on foreign policy but a legacy of ashes and dust.

    NETANYAHU TO OBAMA:

    Moron! Idiot! Schm*ck! Thanks to you radical jihadist genocidal Iran is getting the bomb and establishing an empire of blood and death across the Middle East. And what you want most is a Pali-Israeli peace deal when Israel has no peace partner? Schm*ck!

    THE JEW NETANYAHU IS KICKING OBAMA'S SKINNY LEFTIST BUTT
     
    And this Jew is enjoying every Zionist minute of it.
     
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
     
    DISQUS COMMENTS AND REPLIES
     
     
     Antisemitism is every citizens duty.
     

     

    Hitler's thousand-year Jew-free Reich fell 69 years ago after only 12 short years. And from the ashes of the Holocaust sprung the Jewish State with Hitler's Arab admirers unable to destroy her. Every day that Israel exists is a triumph over Hitler and Arab-Nazi scum.

     
     
    Genocidal Iran? It was Jews that invented genocide and are intent on perpetrating on Iran...and using gentile blood and money to do it. Israel is a parasite and it should be bombed out of existence for the crimes it has committed against America, like the Lavon bombings and the failed USS Liberty attack.
     
     
     
    Good heavens man,  get a grip!! If no one dares bomb North Korea out of existence for fear of its nukes who'd be crazy enough to do it to Israel with its stockpile of 200 plus land and sea based nuclear bombs?

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    THE ULTIMATE DEFENSE FROM INTERNATIONAL LAW AGAINST ALLEGATIONS THAT CHRIS KYLE WAS A MURDERING, PSYCHOPATHIC WAR CRIMINAL

    Uncategorized

     

    What Navy Seals did to Osama Bin Laden (under orders from Barack Obama) Navy Seal Chris Kyle did to 160 of his murdering jihadi followers.
     

     The ultimate, air tight, irrefutable, inarguable defense of Chris Kyle from outrageous leftwing PC allegations of being a psychopathic murdering war criminal whose 160 or so sniper killings were in violation of international law rests on UN Resolution 1483 (see). What is Res. 1483? It was a May 22, 2003 Security Council Resolution passed by a 14-0 vote making the US/UK military coalition in Iraq (the occupying forces) the "LEGAL AND LEGITIMATE GOVERNING AND PEACEMAKING AUTHORITY" of that country.  In other words, and contrary what anti-Iraq War leftists and their lying propaganda and media tools have been saying for years, the military occupation of post-Saddam Iraq (backed by 48 nations) was perfectly legal, moral and just  under international law (UNSC Resolution 1483).

    In other words, those Iraqi and foreign insurgents (al-Qaida Sunnis, Sadrist Shiites, Baathist bitter enders, etc. called "resistance forces," "freedom fighters" and laughably "Minutemen" by Michael Moore and pro-terrorist, anti-war Leftist nuts) who took up arms against coalition forces (the legitimate governing and peacemaking authority of Iraq) were in violation of international law (Res. 1483) and were themselves murdering,  bloodthirsty, psychopathic WAR CRIMINALS.

    So where does that leave controversial Navy Seal Chris Kyle? As an expert marksman and sniper "guardian angel" Kyle was protecting the peacekeeping forces of the  legal, legitimate governing power of post-Saddam Iraq from criminal insurgents violently attacking them with guns and bombs to drive them from the country they had every legal right to be in and occupy. In other words, Chris Kyle was empowered under international law (Res. 1483) to do what he did and kill the bad guys he killed who being illegally at war with coalition forces were enemy combatants and war criminals. How then is Chris Kyle a "psychopathic war criminal" from killing sadistic, savage, bloodthirsty, jihadist, Islamofacist criminals who killed US/UK led troops and the good citizens who cooperated with them? Do you see how absurd, sick and insane these allegations are?  How twisted, perverse and detached  from reality? Leftist can argue the wisdom of the war which is a matter of ongoing debate. But they cannot credibly argue the legality of the military occupation or the morality of Chris Kyle killing criminal insurgents who were violating international law in their so-called freedom fighting post-Saddam resistance.

     
    RELATED
     

    THE MOST OMINOUS SENTENCE IN OBAMA’S STATE OF THE UNION SPEECH-OR WHEN THE CLOCK STRUCK 9:11

    Uncategorized

     

     

    ON THE 6TH ANNIVERSARY OF BARACK OBAMA'S ELECTION AS PRESIDENT

    he lost the US Senate and nearly 70 House seats  to Republicans in a devastating, electoral defeat as most of the electorate fearing that the country is on the wrong track rejected his transformational agenda (see). But Tuesday  night  on the 6th anniversary of his swearing-in as president-when he botched his Constitutional Oath (foreshadowing the bungling and lawlessness of his errant  presidency)-it's clear that Obama has lost his mind as he doubles down hell-bent on staying his disastrous course on domestic and foreign policy blind to the harm he's doing to his legacy, the country and the world.

    Aside from the delusions and smoke and mirror lies about the US economy that continues to struggle with weak GDP growth, flat wages, poor consumer demand and spending, dropping auto sales, sky rocketing fiscal debt, massive dollar destroying money printing by the Fed and terrible unemployment numbers (concealed by statistical trickery) Obama detached from reality and the rising tide of chaos and war in the world claimed that our nation is the safest it's been since the horrifying attack on 9/11. But the truth is otherwise. As Obama systematically dismantles the Pax Americana along with our military (thinking it will improve our national image by making us seem less threatening to our Moslem and non-Moslem foes) ISIS, Iran, Russia and China emboldened by our retreat rush in to fill the power void hoping to be number one. Indeed, as ISIS inspires a new generation of death-loving jihadis world-wide (seeing in its leader al-Baghdadi the warlord-prophet Mohammed resurrected), and Iran builds a radical Islamic nuclear armed empire across the Middle East (terrifying Sunni states and starting a nuclear arms race)  America with its broken borders faces the worst terrorist threat since 9/11-and the public fears it as national security once again has priority with them.

    Indeed, from 9/11 to Charlie Hebdo, from the ISIS' conquests and horrifying beheadings to the Iranian backed Shiite coup in Yemen  Obama has learned nothing from these things about the true nature and causes of  ancient Islamic jihad and terror. Mistaking it as a reaction to US policies, and past Western imperialism in the Middle East, Obama continues to treat Islamic terror as something alien, foreign and abnormal to Islam when it was essential to its survival from its early beginnings as every fundamentalist knows. For it was terror and war that saved Islam from extinction as a desperate Prophet Mohammed turned to aggression against infidels when their peaceful conversion had failed. Indeed, after ten years of peacefully missionizing Mecca and having only 100 followers to show for it Mohammed turned to the sword as his only alternative to grow Islam into the world conquering faith he had imagined. And it's this militant Mohammed that was the inspiration behind the awesome killing machine that spread Islam beyond the Arabian peninsula across the world, and inspires jihadists across the ages today who dream of imperial restoration and making Islam powerful again. In short, as jihad saved Islam in Mohammed’s day so many fundamentalists and supremacists see it saving Islam today from impotency , injustice and decline  in a world they see as morally sick and depraved led by the West and the United States.

     Consequently, Barack Obama remains a dangerous delusional 9/10 man in a post-9/11 strife-torn world regarding Moslems as the poor suffering victims of past Western imperialism, injustice and crimes in need of coddling and appeasement and butt kissing lies about the greatness and peacefulness of their regressive, militant, murderous faith that's in its 500th year of self-caused decline-that millions want to reverse. If we can just hug Moslems hard enough (believes Obama and the empathetic pathetically weak Left) we can squeeze all the jihad out of them like juice from an orange and all will be well. This is the insanity we face.

     OBAMA SPOKE "TERROR"  WHEN THE CLOCK STRUCK 9:11 

    \

     Obama is a 9/10  man in an increasingly dangerous post-9/11 jihadist resurgent world that in part is of his own making; a world that he doesn't understand (or want to understand) and lacks the mentality, character and backbone to deal with as our own demoralized and disgusted military perceive. And this reality problem that deranges Obama seemed strangely reflected  in Tuesday's loony, feel good speech. Indeed, as Obama's intransigent, tragic  9/10 mindset (treating Moslem terrorists as non-Islamic criminals and felons), combined with his dangerously weak border security policies, is likely leading us into the worst mass terror attack since 9/11 his SOTU speech oddly, precisely and perhaps meaningfully began at 9:10:40 PM EST. Then as if supernaturally directed by a HIGHER POWER something astonishing occurred that was missed by everyone: just as the weak-on-terror 9/10 mentality of the Clinton and early Bush administrations set the stage for the 9/11 event so it seems is Obama's. For 20 seconds and 25 words into his speech, JUST AS THE CLOCK STRUCK 9:11, Obama ominously uttered the portentous word “TERROR.” This is what he said:

     (9:10:40 PM) "Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, my fellow Americans: We are 15 years into this new century.  Fifteen years that dawned with TERROR (9:11 PM) touching our shores; that unfolded with a new generation fighting two long and costly wars......" (See 2015 State Union Address | Video | C-SPAN.org )

     Amazingly, at the precise moment when 9:10 was turning into 9:11 PM Obama begins that part of his speech that deals with the 9/11 event-the dawn of domestic Islamic terror and the two wars that followed. Either this was accidental or providential-the work of blind, chaotic chance or of a Higher (organizing) Power directing Obama as if to warn him and us of a new horrific dawn of domestic mass murder driven by resurgent anti-American triumphant jihad.

     THE TWO JETLINER CRASHES AND A NEAR SOUTHERN BORDER MASSACRE

    And if (God forbid) another large scale Islamic attack should occur Obama will leave office in ignominy with a legacy of ashes and dust-regretting to his dying day his refusal to fully adopt the successful counterterrorism policies of his wiser predecessor and heed the three events that warned him like an oracle what was coming: the crashing of two jetliners and a horrible massacre related to 9/11 near our porous southern border.

    The first two events were the plane crashes of US Airways Flight 1561 and Colgen Flight 3407 occurring within 28 days of each other in Lower and Upper New York State. In the first crash called "The Hudson River Miracle (where no one died)” the brother of a dead 9/11 first responder (a fire fighter) was one of the survivors while the abandoned plane floated down stream coming to rest at Ground Zero. As this miracle happened just hours before George Bush gave his farewell address (focusing on national security) it was I believe a providential testament to his counterterrorism policies that kept us surprisingly  safe for seven years in the post-9/11  era when new mass attacks were expected (see).

     And in the second crash (where there was no life saving miracle) famed 9/11 activist and widow Beverly Eckert died with 49 others just six days after meeting with Obama at the White House-a terrible sign for the president if there ever was one that new horrors will come to America from bloodthirsty, death loving jihadists if he's foolish (see ).

    In the third event, The Tucson Massacre, a ten year old child Christina Green born 9/11/2001 was murdered by crazed gunmen Jared Laughner who was born 13 years earlier on a 9/10 date in the late 1980s. As the 9/10 mentality of two presidents gave us 9/11 the killing of a 9/11 child by a 9/10-born gunman just 60 miles north of our porous southern borders  looks like a frightful warning to our reality ignoring 9/10 president that he better wizen up (see).

    Indeed, under our see-no-evil-in-Islam president we’ve had the worst post-9/11 jihadist attacks on US soil with the FT. Hood Massacre killing 14 (including an unborn child); and the Boston Marathon Bombing killing three and injuring hundreds by young al Qaida inspired terrorists. Both these strikes are prelude it seems to worse attacks as our intransigent, stuck on stupid president defying reason, history and (it seems) DIVINELY GIVEN SIGNS (?) stays his  course to death and  disaster. 

    POSTSCRIPT:SIGNS OF 2016?

     From: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 (Obama’s inaugural)

    To Tuesday, January 20, 2015 (Obama’s 6th State of the Union)

    Result: 2191 days

     Or 6 years or 72 months (see)

     When Barack Obama gave his State of the Union speech last week it was the 2191st day of his presidency. What is remarkable and a bit scary about this number is that it’s encoded with the number 911 when the digits are rearranged. A remarkable coincidence for a man who spoke the word "TERROR" 20 seconds into his speech at exactly 9:11 PM

    Moreover, as last Tuesday was the 6th anniversary of Obama’s ominous 2009 inaugural (when Ted Kennedy collapsed from his LEFT-sided brain tumor shortly after Obama botched his Constitutional Oath) 6 years is exactly 72 months. What is interesting and maybe significant about this is that 72 is a factor of the number 2016 28x the year of the next presidential election. Now as the number 911 is encoded in the number 2191, and 2191 days = 72 months which in turn is a factor of 2016 could this be a sign that a 911 type terrorist event could decide the outcome of the 2016 election? I hope not. One 9/11 was one too many.

     RELATED

    GEORGE BUSH, THE HUDSON RIVER MIRACLE AND HIS 9/11 PRESIDENCY

     

     BARACK OBAMA AND THE TUCSON MASSACRE: THE 9/10 MAN IN A 9/11 WORLD 

    OBAMA’S GIFT TO BIBI IN REFUSING TO MEET HIM AND KING OF SAUDI HATE IS DEAD (POSTSCRIPT ADDED)

    Uncategorized

     

     Midgetman with Bibi.

     

    WHY BLAST OBAMA FOR NOT WANTING TO MEET WITH BIBI?

    In refusing to do so Barack Obama is possibly doing Bibi a political favor as he probably doesn't want to meet with him anyway. Why? I'll answer the question with a question: Why would Netanyahu just prior to an election want to meet with a US pres who's perceived by most Israelis as the most anti-Israel, pro-Arab, Islamophilic in history, and is utterly loathed by them? Most Israelis probably cringe when they see their great PM together with our despicable pres-a moral and mental dwarf by comparison. In fact, Obama understanding his unpopularity in Israel will not even attempt to do what the very popular George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton did in the 1990s: help the Labor candidates defeat the incumbent Likud PM-which proved in both cases to be a disaster for Israelis and Palestinians as it caused the Second Intifada. If the highly radioactive Obama tried this today he'd probably hand Bibi a resounding landslide victory. Beside why on just moral grounds would the Lion of Judah and Freedom (the Jewish Reagan and Churchill) want to meet with our Mickey Mouse prez-a fool lacking in courage and strength who no world leader fears, trusts or respects? Obama doesn't deserve to share the same stage with Bibi. In snubbing him Obama is doing him an unintended favor. 

     

     

    POSTSCRIPT

     
     
     
    A SPITTING 900LB GORILLA?

    What's so unusual about that?

    BTW, in 2007 when Nancy Pelosi and a congressional delegation (over the objections of the White House) met with Syrian dictator Bashar Assad to reignite the dead peace process between Israel and Syria she was applauded by Obama and Congressional Democrats for trying to succeed where Bush had failed.

     

    [Pelosi+meets+Assad.gif] 

     

    RELATED

     

    THE UNDERLYING CAUSES OF THE PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI CONFLICT

    IT’S THE JEWISHNESS OF ISRAEL STUPID, NOT HER “COLONIALISM”

    BARACK OBAMA AND THE SIGN OF THE 2008 HAWAII BLACKOUT DURING THE GAZA WAR

    ISLAM: THE RELIGION OF WORLD PEACE-THE ISLAMIST VIEW

    ISLAM’S JUST WAR DOCTRINE AND THE PROBLEM OF ISRAEL’S ENDURING EXISTENCE 

     
     

     

     

     

    SINK INTO THE DESERT SANDS O HOUSE OF SAUD!

    Your kingdom of evil and hate has reigned too long.

     

     
                     somepeoplecallmethestig  ApolloSpeaks • 
      
    Hey you should be happy, the Saudis are pumping oil fast and driving down the price of gas and Obama is taken credit.
     
     
    The big question is will Obama take credit for the increase in CO2 output as a result of cheaper gas?
     
     

     RELATED

     

    AT LAST, OBAMA HAD HIS REAGAN MOMENT. OR DID HE?

    Uncategorized

    Obama's 2015 State of the Union Was Reagan Moment He Imagined | The New Republic

     

            Obama vs Reagan Report card.

     Barack Obama has "turned the page" from Reagan's "Morning In America" to "Mourning For America"as four years of sunset has turned into an era of darkening night.

     

     

    OUR ANTI-REAGAN PRESIDENT WITH HIS ANTI-REAGAN DESTINY

     

    had a Ronald Reagan moment last night? Really? Where? With a disastrous foreign policy of peace through weakness and appeasement that dares not call an evil enemy by his proper name?  With a pathetic, weak, trickle growth recovery of 2%  though trillions of stimulus dollars have been borrowed, spent and printed? With a real unemployment rate of 9.9% when millions of discouraged workers are included? With $18 trillion in unsustainable debt, and $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities on top of that crushing us to death? With consumer sentiment high because of dropping gas prices, but consumer spending in the toilet (holiday sales were a disaster)? With auto sales declining though driven by risky subprime loans (a bubble in the making like the housing market)? With massive Fed money printing weakening the value of the dollar? With a phony FED manipulated 17,000 Dow (another bubble) that benefits the top 10% but not the rest of us (a failed trickle down wealth theory)? And then there's the blessings Obamacare which even Chuck Schumer can't tolerate and admits was a mistake as it punishes the middle class with higher insurance costs to benefit the poor-it's class warfare by healthcare means a community organizer’s dream.

    Obama putting up a mighty struggle to save his legacy from ashes and dust.
     
    What does any of the above have to do with Ronald Reagan, Reaganomics and patriotic Reaganism? How could Obama have a "Ronald Reagan Moment" when he's the dark, divisise  polar opposite of Reagan weakening the American Spirit, demoralizing the military and emboldening our enemies to strike? Compared to the Gipper Obama's a mental and moral pipsqueak who will enter the Hall of Presidential Shame on the glorious day he leaves office.
     
     
    HAHAHA! This former Nuclear Freeze activist says government is the answer after I proved that wrong. 
     
     
     
     
    RONALD REAGAN IN "BED TIME FOR OBAMZO" 
     
     

     POSTSCRIPT

    Tax hikes won't improve the state of our union - The Detroit News

    TDN nails it. And Obama knows it. In 2010 Obama signed into law a two year extension of all the Bush tax rates. Why?  Because letting them expire would have  had a contractionary effect on the struggling economy thus causing a double dip recession  and possibly killing his chances of winning reelection.

    MICHAEL MOORE: AMERICA HATING PRO-AL QAIDA IGNORANT SICKO PUTZ

    Uncategorized
     
     
    Pro-al-Qaida Michael Moore thinks killer of al-Qaida terrorists Chris Kyle a coward.
     
     In reaction to the great critical and box office success of American Sniper pro-al Qaida, sicko leftist film maker Michael Moore said this about legendary, life saving, heroic Chris Kyle
     
    "My uncle killed by sniper in WW2. We were taught snipers were cowards. Will shoot u in the back. Snipers aren't heroes. And invaders [US forces] r worse"
     
    And referring to the deadly al Qaida sniper that Kyle miraculously killed from a mile away, Moore sickeningly said : 
     
    "But if you're on the roof of your home defending it from invaders [the Syrian, rooftop, al Qaida sniper in the film] who've come 7K miles, you are not a sniper, u are brave, u are a neighbor."
     
     
     The truth is this: the evil Jordanian jihadist Abu al-Zarqawi invaded Iraq with thousands of al-Qaida terrorists shortly after the US led invasion to set up a radical Islamic totalitarian Caliphate-not to defend the country from US forces. Consequently, as American Sniper shows, Zarqawi and al-Qaida killed and tortured Sunnis, Shiites, Americans and anyone who dared to get in the way of their Mohammed-inspired Koranic goals.
     
     
     

     In 2004 Michael Moore openly and shamelessly supported the sadistic mass murdering Zarqawi with his army of terror and death calling them "freedom fighters" and "Minutemen"- predicting that their forces would grow victoriously strong; and overwhelming US troops defeat them and ignominiously drive them from Iraq. And joining this sick, twisted, ignorant putz was then anti-war senator Barack Obama who opposed the necessary troop surge in Iraq to defeat al-Qaida and turn the war around, and predicted it would fail in the long term-a self-fulfilled prophecy.

     

    Does Michael Moore consider Obama a cowardly sniper for ordering drone attacks on terrorists?
     

    Moore must be thrilled that Obama has made a shambles of Iraq; and that Zarqawi and AQ in Iraq (his heroic, failed "Minutemen") have been replaced by the utterly brutal and more successful al-Baghdadi and ISIS. Indeed, having supported Zarqawi how could Moore reasonably oppose al-Baghdadi who is trying to liberate Iraq from the Shiites that the US put in power, and reestablish the status quo ante of Sunni rule which Moore wanted?

    CLIMATE ALARMISTS VINDICATED! 2014 HOTTEST YEAR ON RECORD. OR WAS IT?

    Uncategorized
     
     
     
     
     
     
     From one end of the Warmunist Left to the other, from Obama on down to the fiercest eco-warrior, climate change alarmists have been suddenly, joyfully, ecstatically revived claiming vindication for their terrifying vision that humanity is headed toward collective, man-caused horrific extinction because of the heat trapping gases we're putting into the air. For word came down from NASA's Goddard Institute last week making it official: 2014 made the Guinness Book of Records as the hottest year since measurements were taken  smashing the record set in 2010 when we humans nearly roasted to death, as we did again last year .
     
     
     Warmunists hoping to silence cruel, uncaring, science-hating sceptics, and bring an indifferent public to its life and death senses, feel they now have all the proof they need  to scare us into mass hysteria; that there's a terrible looming climate change catastrophe ahead; and that this is the penultimate crisis of human history: the survival of our species. It's as John Kerry and his boss say: "Climate science is screaming at us."  Man-made Global Warming is a "WMD" and "a greater threat to world security than  (unIslamic) Global Jihad" and the thousands it kills every year in the name of a faith they misunderstand. For what is the murder of the Charlie Habdo Ten, or the thousands dying in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria and Nigeria compared to the extinction of up to 7 billion human beings, and billions more sentient creatures  (pet cats and dogs), either drowned to death in a biblical like flood, or asphyxiated by lethal amounts of green house gasses like holocaust victims in death camps? Who are the real terrorists we should fear? Al Qaida? ISIS? Iran? the Taliban? Or the greedy capitalist liars and big oil polluters slowly destroying the Earth and everyone on it (Moslem and infidel) for big profits? 2014 unmasked the real terrorists exposing their conspiracy of deception and lies that the heating of the Earth stopped 18 years ago; that global temperatures have leveled off despite a 25% increase of carbon emissions caused mostly by the dirty industrializing of developing Third World states.
     
     
    We were wrong. They were right. The facts are clear: THE WORLD IS WARMING AND DOOMSDAY IS NEAR! Unless the UN finds the $44 trillion that it needs to reverse this apocalyptic climate trend (and stop rising Third World pollution and burning of fossil fuels with clean technologies) it will be the end (see). Or will it?
    Yearly-global-LT-UAH-RSS-thru-Sept-2014

    The chart above tells a different tale. A tale that global temperatures in 2014 were lower than in 2010 when the record was set. What's going on here? How do we explain the discrepancy? The chart is based on global temperature data gathered by satellites from our lower atmosphere (where catastrophic warming is supposed  to occur). This is the most reliable,  precise and soundly scientific way of measuring global temperatures-the only way that really counts and should be used. But the Warmunists at NASA (with the same radical agenda as Obama and his EPA) ignore the satellite data preferring instead far less accurate, flawed ground thermometer readings gathered from 3000 stations around the globe measuring surface (not atmospheric) temperature.

     Aside from the fact that the surface temperature of the Earth is warmer than in the atmosphere (the higher up the colder it is) these surface stations are located in populated urban centers that are warmer than in other areas with small or nonexistent human populations. 

    For example if we were to move the city of Chicago to the center of Antarctica because of all the heat emitted by millions of human bodies driving millions of motor vehicles and living and working in hundreds and thousands of heated homes and buildings the city's temperature will always be warmer than in the surrounding barren frigid areas. But satellites measure both.

      Indeed, of planet Earth's surface of 196,939,900 square miles 139,440,000 (70%) is water: oceans, seas, rivers, lakes, etc. where there are no thermometer stations. But satellites cover and measure every square inch above this vast area, which can't be done by thermometers. Nor do these stations cover millions of square miles of desert lands, forests, mountain ranges and open prairies. But satellites inclusively measure it all  leaving out naught-not one bloody square inch.

    How then with extremely limited range can ground thermometers measure global, worldwide, planetary temperatures? They can't. It's impossible. But this is what the Warmunists and their PC corrupted scientists pretend to do and want us to believe. It's just more global warming trickery to get control of you and changethe way you live and consume energy. And fortunately it's not working. As the article in the New Yorker says Americans are coldly indifferent to history's hottest year. And that's not going to change. The public isn't deceived that Shell, Exxon and corporate greed are the real terrorists we should fear; and that a radical transition to a clean, green energy economy costing trillions and causing a global depression is our salvation. And, by the way, no sooner did NASA issue its ominous report about record-breaking 2014 then they said they were only 38% certain that it was true-when they should have said they lied. You won't be hearing that on MSNBC.

    RELATED

     

    ISRAEL, ISLAM AND ISLAMIC PEACE AND THE DEMORALIZATION AND DEFEAT OF JIHAD

    Uncategorized
     
     
     Or slamming Islamic peace upon you.
     
    What is Islam? The politically correct answer given by President Obama and his predecessor, and many on the Left and in academia, is summed up in six platitudinous words that we hear over and over ad nauseam: ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE. Why? Because, we are told, most of the world's 1.3 billion Moslems are harmless, good, peace-loving people who wouldn't hurt a hair on an unbeliever's head. And that may be true. But what of the rest of humanity? What of the Jews? What of Christians? What of Hindus and Buddhists? Aren't most of them peace-loving people too? Of course they are. So if peace-loving Moslems make Islam a religion of peace it stands to reason that peace-loving Jews, Christians, Hindus and Buddhists make Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism and Buddhism religions of peace.
      
     
    So with so many billions of human beings belonging to one or the other religion of peace why is there so much religious conflict in the world with Islam today, and going back ages into the past? Why  have so many millions of Christians, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists been killed in the name of Allah and Islam? And why has the Jewish state of Israel fought more than a dozen wars of survival with Moslems since its founding in 1948 when seven Arab nations tried and failed to strangle her  in the cradle? And just as bad why are Moslems killing Moslems so massively and ferociously? Why did a million Moslems die in the Iraq-Iran War in the 1980s? And why have more than 200,000 Moslems died in Syria in the last few years in what is the worst human holocaust of this century?  If all the major religions are religions of peace because most of its members are peace-loving people why is there so much conflict between Islam and much of the world, and within Islam itself?
     
    Thumbnail
    (thanks Nanna)
     
    The answer is simple: Islam is not religion of peace like other religions are peaceful and peace-loving. As I said HERE "ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF ISLAMIC PEACE." Not my peace or your peace. Not Jewish, Christian, Hindu or Buddhist peace. Not Democratic, Socialist, Secular Progressive, Capitalist or Communist peace. Islam is a religion of Islamic peace and only Islamic peace, unique among all faiths in its understanding of peace-which underlies all the trouble with Islam today, and why there's so much Islamic aggression against innocent, peace-loving unbelievers. For Islam is intolerant of other views of peace whether they be Jewish, Christian, Buddhist or secular and wants to impose by force its idea of peace on you and me and all mankind believing wrongly that it's God's Will, and the ultimate answer to our conflicts and problems. 
     
     
    Egypt's extraordinary, sensible Moslem president Abdel El-Sisi (a true reformed modernized Moslem) said it all when he warned last week that the hostile, antagonistic Moslem world of 1.3 billion souls cannot conquer or kill the remaining 6 billion people on this Earth to achieve its vision and version of peace.  He warned in effect that it's a dangerous utopian dream that could only end in a nightmare for Islam with perhaps millions dying as happened to Nazi Germany and Fascist Japan in World War 2. That's why El-Sisi boldly called for a "revolution" within Islam; an overthrow of the Jihadist thinking that permeates and infects the Moslem world like a plague-that's shouted from the house tops with the war cry "Allahu Akbar!;" that's preached in countless mosques and taught in Moslem schools poisoning millions of minds with a false dream of triumph and glory restored; a dream inspired by the military victories of the Prophet Mohammed who desperately took a failed, nonviolent religious movement in Mecca and transformed it into a merciless militant faith and killing machine hell-bent on conquering unbelievers worldwide-and achieving great success with an empire of blood and death stretching from the Pyrenees in Spain to the Himalayas 100 years after his death. As El-Sisi tacitly warns the imams and leaders of his faith those days are gone never to return, and attempting to restore them is madness on steroids. Take Israel for example:
     
     
    If after 66 years of war and conflict Islam can't conquer the tiny nation of Jewish Israel (once called Palestine) whose lands it had owned for centuries-taken by force from Byzantine Christians in the 7th century and lost to the British in the 20th when the Islamic Ottman Empire fell-how if Islam can't reconquer Palestine losing war after war could it possibly restore its lost empire of yore? And surpassing even that achieve totalitarian world domination in a one world universal caliphate (the promise of the prophet Mohammed in the Koran)? It's ludicrous and deranged as El Sisi affirms; and he warns that unless there's a revolution or reformation within Islam discrediting and marginalizing the one world Jihadist fanatics (who wrongly see Islam as God's end and purpose of history) the body count of Moslems will exponentially rise perhaps with millions dying as the Japanese did in conventional and nuclear bombings to crush their will to victory.
     
     
    It happened before and could do so again. Israel (God forbid) if pushed to the edge (by its Jihadist foes and useful idiots in the West) as a last resort will use its nuclear weapons to survive. It's called the "Samson Option (see)" and is summed up in the post-Holocaust cry 'NEVER AGAIN!'  Indeed, such a terrible thing could mean millions of deaths turning the Middle East into a radioactive wasteland where the Arab living will envy the Arab dead. A horrible prospect.
     
     
     Israel providentially exists as the homeland of the Jewish people, as a beacon of freedom, progress and hope for the dysfunctional, sick, medieval Middle East and to demoralize and defeat Islamic Jihad. In fact, Israel is a weapon that anti-Jihadists must learn to use more effectively to strike at the heart of militant Islam and discredit it for the mindless, savage, senseless, regressive, 7th century utopian barbarism it is. Israel in part exists to show how unrealistic and delusional Islamic Jihad is; that it's obsolete having no future in this world-its resurgence being its last hurrah before it dies.  After 66 years of Jihad and relentless Moslem hatred Israel stands taller and stronger today than ever its jihadist enemies unable to destroy her, powerless to drive its Jews into the sea and reconquer its lands for Allah, Mohammed and Moslem community. I am certain that Israel is a prophetic sign Islamic Jihad is in its end time.
     
     
     

     RELATED

    http://www.cyberistan.org/islamic/crusad... 
    http://factreal.wordpress.com/2010/01/30... 
    http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/... 
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution... 
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution... 
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution... 
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Thail... 
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_1...

    ISLAM: THE RELIGION OF WORLD PEACE-THE ISLAMIST VIEW

    AMAZING! EGYPT’S EL-SISI CALLS FOR ENDING JIHADIST THINKING AND REFORMATION OF ISLAM 

    FRANCE HAS LEARNED NOTHING FROM THE 1/7 MASSACRE, QUESTION FOR OBAMA ON RADICAL ISLAM AND BARACK OBAMA THE GREAT ENABLER OF RADICAL IRAN

    Uncategorized
     If I were an Islamic supremacist I'd be hopping mad that the French have learned nothing from the terrible 1/7 event; that the Charlie Hebdo massacre (a revelation of God's wrath) didn't stop the publication of their blasphemous mag; and that its circulation is now in the millions turning the mockery of Mohammed into a national anti-Islam fade. If I were a supremacist I'd be praying to Allah for worst to come and that he use me to increase France's carnage, horror, death and blood. But while cursing France I'd also praise the two martyred jihadis who terrorized Paris  killing 12 in avenging the Prophet's name. And I'd also hail Barack Obama for bravely boycotting the evil rally telling the world that he wasn't the slanderer Charlie.  I'd also be pleased that the number of Jews fleeing France and Europe is on the rise. It would please me because if driving them out of Palestine isn't possible at this time scaring them out of Europe will do. We're on our way to fulfilling Hitler's dream of making Europe Jew free. If I were an Islamic supremacist that would greatly, greatly please me.

     

     

    WH Explains Why It Won't Use Term 'Radical Islam' | Truth Revolt 

     
    QUESTION FOR BARACK OBAMA ON USING THE TERM "RADICAL ISLAM"
     
    Dear Mr. President,
     
    If Islam, as you believe, in its essence, nature and historical mission is "a religion of justice and peace" and isn't inherently violent or evil like its detractors have said for centuries; and that, as you believe, there is no such thing as "radical Islam,"  "Islamic extremism,"  "militant Islamic jihadism," or "Islamo-fascism." If, in fact, true, authentic, genuine (misunderstood) Islam isn't "radical," "extreme," "militant," "jihadist" or "fascist" then why do you call the radical, extreme, militant, jihadist, fascistic, oppressive, violent state of revolutionary Iran (designated by your State Department  "a state sponsor of [global] terror (see)" the "ISLAMIC REPUBLIC?" How can you sanely apply the term "ISLAMIC" to the terror masters of Iran whose theocratic government plotted jihad attacks on US soil (see)  and not apply it to al Qaida, ISIS and the terrorists who in Islam's name killed 12 at Ft. Hood, three in Boston and the Charlie Hebdo Ten in Paris? Either you publicly denounce Iran as a fake Islamic state  like you do Baghdadi's Islamic State (ISIS), or continue to look like an inchoherent, inconsistent, self-contradictory fool earning the contempt of the world. Which is it going to be Mr. President? Is terrorist Iran an "Islamic Republic?" Or is it a "perversion of Islam" like the Islamic State? 
     
    RELATED
     
     
     
     
     

    It was reported Tuesday,

    “In the eyes of most Iraqis, their country’s best ally in the war against the Islamic State group is not the United States and the coalition air campaign against the militants. It’s Iran, which is credited with stopping the extremists’ march on Baghdad.”

     

    FROM CARTER TO OBAMA:

    THE EVOLUTION OF IRANIAN POWER

    Since Jimmy Carter helped midwife radical, theocratic, genocidal Iran in 1979 Obama has become the greatest enabler of Iranian power doing more for Iran's hegemonic ambitions in the Middle East than all previous presidents combined. Ironically, on November 4, 2008 (as I've stated before) when Obama won the presidency it was on the 29th anniversary of the Iran Hostage Crisis-the first jihadist blow against America since the Barbary Wars foreshadowing the catastrophe of 9/11 and 3000 dead.

    In fact, in a very real way, what North Vietnam was to the South (upon the removal of our forces from South East Asia) Iran is to Iraq as Iraq is now Iran's dependent vassal state made possible by Obama's removal of our troops plunging that country into turmoil. And the horrors that over took South East Asia in the wake of the Vietnam War (Pol Pot and the killing fields, etc) have their parallel in ISIS and its bloodthirsty destabilizing jihad. Don't ever say that you haven't been warned (as McCain did in 2008) that Obama was unfit to command and would be Jimmy Carter on steroids.

    RELATED

     
     

    WHAT IF A MOSLEM MURDERED OBAMA? JIMMY CARTER AND THE GREATNESS OF ISLAM AND HITLER AND MOHAMMED: WHERE THEY DIFFER

    Uncategorized

     

     
     
     

    JIMMY CARTER IS CORRECT

    Every crisis is an opportunity to learn and grow in compassion, wisdom and grace. And what better time than now in the aftermath of the Charley Hebdo/Jewish Deli massacre in France to learn about the greatness and majesty of the Islam. And Carter, who speaks from experience, knows. Until the Islamic Revolution in Iran, and the 444 day hostage crisis, he was a dumb, ignorant, redneck, Southern Baptist hick completely in the dark about Islam treating it with contempt as the religion of Satan and the damned. Lucky him. If he hadn't forced the shah to let Khomeini return home from exile in France Carter would be a poorer soul, half the man, a credit to no one today. Just look at his record since he's been president, and the wonderful things he's achieved for peace in the Middle East and beyond. It takes my breath away thinking how he ended apartheid in Israel, persuaded Castro to hold elections in Cuba and stopped the Norks from getting nukes. The peace prize he won was well earned-and he deserves a second and third. But the question remains: having discovered the greatness of Islam why is Carter still a Christian? Or has he secretly converted to the faith?

     

     CBS News: “Hitler Appearing In Ads On SF Muni Buses” |  Atlas Shrugs

     
     
     

    WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MOHAMMED AND HITLER?

    The basic difference between the savage, militant,  totalitarian, Jew-hating conqueror Adolf Hitler (a hero to millions of sick, twisted, regressive,  bloodthirsty Moslems) and the savage, militant,  totalitarian, Jew-hating conqueror Mohammed (who like Hitler hated Jews above all other peoples) is this:  Hitler's 1000 year Reich (empire) of terror, blood, booty and death lasted a mere 12 years. Mohammed's Reich of terror, blood, booty and death has lasted more than 1200 years. One monster was an enduring success (though his empire has been decaying for centuries); and the other (by comparison) was a flash in the pan failure. Oh, by the way, one other difference that comes to mind is that Hitler loved dogs, Mohammed hated them believing they were gross, impure creatures.

     

     

     

     

    WHY OBAMA BOYCOTTED THE HISTORIC RALLY FOR CHARLIE HEBDO (NEW POSTSCRIPT ON OBAMA’S POST-PRESIDENCY AMBITIONS)

    Uncategorized

     

    Thumbnail

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    No one can know for certain why Barack Obama, the leader of the Free World and  the global war on terror, was AWOL from yesterday's massive four million man unity rally in Paris, France. No one but Obama can know why he shunned those millions braving death (including 50 world leaders) defiantly showing support for Charlie Hebdo against deadly, murderous, radical Islam-which wants to quash free speech by brutally punishing all mockery, blasphemy and criticism of Mohammed and their faith. These fanatics believe that Islam is God's greatest gift to mankind; it's His ultimate and final revelation of truth, justice and peace, the answer to the world's manifold problems and ills, surpassing and abrogating all other revelations; and Mohammed, God's anointed, blessed, chosen prophet and messenger of this gift-history's most perfect, exemplary and God-like man-stands above all criticism like a mighty colossus  overshadowing earlier prophets from Moses to Jesus in the evolution of the monotheistic faith. And those blind to this saving truth will suffer the certainty of God's wrath, if not in this life at the hands of jihadists (like killed 17 in France) then in the next endlessly tormented by devils in hell.

    Now only  the president knows why he wasn't at the rally and wouldn't let America be represented by no one higher than his former fundraiser Jane Hartley our ambassador to France. We can only speculate as to his reason. But after analyzing this from multiple angles I find only two credible explanations for Obama's inaction, which are as follows:

     Now if you were Barack Obama a man scorned and despised by most world leaders as a blundering, incompetent, feckless, irredeemable amateur on the world stage-like he's disrespected and despised by most US servicemen as unfit to be commander in chief (see)-would you have gone out of your way to join with these leaders in Paris yesterday? Would you have gone through the trouble of traveling thousands of miles only to feel painfully uncomfortable with people who (like millions of Americans) think you're the worst US president ever? And that America and the world would be better off without you? If you were as weak, thinned skinned, immature and cowardly as Obama (a man of great moral and mental deficiencies) would you have gone through the humiliation of attending that event with leaders not wanting you there unwillingly smiling, hugging you and shaking your hand just for appearances, while ridiculing you in private?  Probably not. Obama meeting with world leaders at G-20 summits and the like is compulsory and necessary and cannot be avoided. But a spontaneous mass rally in a foreign land caused by Islamic terrorism (with no Americans dead) is optional and unnecessary. So why go when your heart isn't in it? When you know it will be unpleasant? When you could be home in the White House watching the NFL?

    Outside of winning elections Barack Obama is a political rank amateur who has "oops" his way for six blundering years from a disastrous first tern into a catastrophic second term. 

    But perhaps I'm being too harsh on Obama, too unfair. Perhaps my own unwavering contempt for him-which I admit having had before his election seeing intuitively what a disaster he'd be (see)-is getting the better of my judgment and causing me to project my disdain for him on Merkel, Cameron, Netanyahu and the other heads of state-who might at least grudgingly have some regard for him. If that's the case then there is only one other possible reason for Obama not going to the event-or allowing Biden or Kerry or Holder to represent his administration and the nation; and that reason (the more credible of the two) is avoiding any chance of offending Islam and the Moslem world community. 

    Indeed, if the centerpiece of your foreign policy is outreaching, appeasing and making nice to Moslems (and defending Islam and its prophet against all forms of intolerance, bigotry and hate) would you have attended a massive, unprecedented rally in support of a satirical magazine that serially and relentlessly mocked the prophet and Islam?  A magazine that you personally criticised for this ugly, offensive practice? A magazine and its intolerant, hateful, bigoted cartoons that you (quoting Gandhi) likened to acts of physical violence and the destruction of Christian statues and churches (what a stretch)?

     Obama wrote in his autobiography that for him the sweetest smell in the world was the above./sarc
     

    Indeed, if you were Barack Obama, Defender of Islam in Chief (who sees no evil in Islam and its prophet), and said that the future mustn't belong to those who do what Charlie Hebdo did in the face of death (and will continue to do in the time ahead) what kind of message would you be sending if you'd been at that rally, or sent Biden, Kerry or  Holder in your place? After condemning and apologizing for a stupid, artless anti-Mohammed video that you said outraged Moslems and underlied rioting in Cairo, protests in Pakistan, and the deaths of an ambassador and three others in Benghazi, how can you in good conscience go to a rally in support of the very same sin and chance stirring up more trouble for your embassies and diplomats? It's bad enough you praise Islam to the skies and look insincere for not being Moslem. After the anti-Mohammed video and criticizing Hebdo, being at that rally would make you look like the world's biggest hypocrite undermining what little effectiveness you have in making  peace between America and the faith.

     No! For the sake of your master plan for healing US/Islamic relations it's better that you let your unknown, virtually invisible ambassador to France attend the unity rally. For this would cause no offence to those whose butt you've been kissing for six years with nothing to show for it but intensified personal hatred and contempt (Obama's more unpopular than Bush in the Moslem world, see) and worsening anti-US rage.  What a sad, sad man.

    In sum, Obama's reason for missing yesterday's rally was that he wanted the Moslem world to know that

     HE IS NOT CHARLIE

    Because he doesn't want more of this

     

    Or because he wants this

    POSTSCRIPT

    BARACK OBAMA SEC. GEN. OF THE UN?

    Was Obama AWOL from the rally yesterday  because he was looking to his post-presidency years as a possible successor to Moon as  Sec. Gen. of the UN? Saskin thinks so. And he could be right.

    American Thinker

    saksin  ApolloSpeaks 

    Yes, his being AWOL from this singular media event, with nothing except the NFL playoffs competing, must be a deliberate signal. What could move this narcissist to forego such a photo-op??? My guess is that he is not thinking of today, but of his future... say as Secretary General of the UN... To have even a prayer of getting there, he needs the votes of Muslim nations. From his Cairo speech to this, there is a consistent trajectory. He really sees himself as a world-historical personage, and all the evidence to the contrary seems to elude him...

    RELATED

    WILL WE HEAR THE PEOPLE SING?

    AVENGING THE DEATHS OF THE CHARLIE HEBDO TEN

     

    WILL WE HEAR THE PEOPLE SING?

    Uncategorized
     
     

     

    Will the millions expected to protest the jihadist murder of the Charlie Hebdo Ten in Paris and across France be the start of a sustained movement throughout the Free World? Will history mark this day as the turning point in the renewal and saving of our civilization from inner spiritual decay and its totalitarian enemies? There is a song for all great occasions. Below is our battle song for today. Will we hear the people sing?!
     
     
     
    PEOPLE OF FRANCE AMERICA STANDS WITH YOU!
     
    WE WERE BORN FREE
     
    BUT RADICAL ISLAM WANTS US IN CHAINS!
     
    VIVE LA FRANCE!
     
    VIVE LA AMERICA!
     
    VIVE LA LIBERTE!
     
     
     
     
     RELATED
     
     

    THE NON-MOSLEM ISLAMIC KILLERS OF THE CHARLIE HEBDO TEN, ISLAM’S PERFECT MAN OF WAR, INTOLERANCE AND DEATH AND OTHER THOUGHTS AND BLASPHEMOUS COMMENTS

    Uncategorized
     
    Thumbnail(thanks Nanna)

    The truth about Islam is this: "the Holy Koran," as Winston Churchill said "is the Mein Kampf of war." And the Prophet Mohammed was the conquering Adolf Hitler of his age whose lust for power, wealth and glory before he died turned a failed religious movement in Mecca into a killing machine for God bringing the entire blood soaked Middle East under its sway then expanding outwardly from the Himalayas to the Pyrenees in Spain. Islam is the religion of endless war against Christians, Jews and the human race driven by a prophetic vision of world domination that must be discredited and crushed like Nazism's quest for a Thousand Year Reich. It's the same totalitarian evil in a monotheistic form. Islamonazism is the enemy. And crush it we will!

    RELATED

    ISLAM: THE RELIGION OF WORLD PEACE-THE ISLAMIST VIEW

      
    We have it on the good authority of non-Moslem Howard Dean, non-Moslem Barack Obama, and non-Moslem French President Hollande that it was three non-Moslem gunmen who murdered the Charlie Hebdo Ten. But why? If it's true that they were non-Moslem like Dean, Obama and Hollande then Islam had nothing to do with the crime. In murdering the Charlie Hebdo Ten the three non-Moslem killers weren't avenging the honor of  Mohammed against anti-Moslem cartoon mockery. Then what was their motive and reason for their crime if the Prophet's honor and  Islam wasn't the cause? Did they murder for the hell of it? For the sport of it? For the joy of it?  Because they were natural-born killers who loved spilling blood and used Islam as a cover for their crimes? Is that it? Or could it be that they hated Moslems and wanted to ignite  a "racist" war against them hoping that thousands would die as they watched in glee? If the killers were as Moslem as Dean, Obama and Hollande , and if Islam had nothing to do with their deed, someone please tell me what other reason can there be? 
     
     
     
     Aristotle: the enemy and corrupter of Islam.
     
    WHEN ISLAMIC SCIENCE AND CULTURE WAS AT ITS INTELLECTUAL HEIGHT
     

    Aristotle was the most revered philosopher studied by all learned Moslems many of whom found more wisdom and truth in his philosophy than in Mohammed's Koran. But then came Al Ghazali (the Sufi defender of Islam) and his criticism of and jihad against Aristotle and his intellectual Moslem  followers as dangerous unIslamic thinkers subversive of Islamic society, culture and faith. Al-Ghazali (considered "the greatest Moslem since Mohammed") unfortunately won that battle with theocratic thinking, Sufi mysticism and blind faith in the Prophet triumphing over reason and science. Aristotle was branded an enemy of Allah and the Prophet, and Islam was saved from the "corrupting influence" of his philosophy as the Moslem world was frozen in the Middle Ages where most believers are mentally and emotionally stuck today.

    Al-Ghazali: the anti-Aristotelian destroyer of Moslem progress and thought . He locked the Islamic world in a Koranic box while the Christian West assimilated Arsitotle and the Greeks.

    Islamic studies in a school named after this great Greek philosopher demonized by Islam is a desecration of the institution and crime against truth and wisdom. "Aristotle," as Pam says, "is spinning in his grave" along with Ibn Sina, Averroes, Al Farabi and other Moslem Aristotelians whose reputation for wisdom, truth and virtue Al Ghazali singlehandedly destroyed. Largely because of Al Ghazali the Moslem world is the most dysfunctional, despotic, regressive, depressive and destitute part of the Earth. And Al Ghazali's reputation today among Moslem intellectuals and scholars is as high and shinning as it was in the 11th century when he launched his victorious jihad on human reason.

     
     
    MOSLEMS MUST STOP EMBARRASSING THEMSELVES
     
    by saying that Mohammed is the most perfect and greatest of men-an exemplary human being whose virtues and nearness to God no believer can match or attain. For if this were true, if Mohammed was a paragon of Islamic virtue and truth (the ideal Moslem man) then what does that say of them? For no Moslem can truly follow in the prophet's way (doing as he did as best they can) and be anything less than a beast. To understand what Mohammed would be like today if he were resurrected from the dead  study closely ISIS deadly caliph Al-Baghdadi.
     

    Kristof: "We Really, Really Have To Be Careful Not To Respond To Extraordinary Intolerance of These Jihadis With Our Own Intolerance"

    OBAMA IN DEFENSE OF ISLAM QUOTING GANDHI AT THE UN SAID:

    " Intolerance [against Islam] is itself a form of violence...." And more recently he said "the future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam." Well if intolerance of evil is a form of violence than I am a hopelessly and irredeemably violent man. And if being intolerant of the intolerant words and intolerant deeds of the intolerant Prophet of Islam makes me a slanderous bigot and Islamophobe then I'm a hopeless, fear driven slanderer and incurably bigoted fool. And if you are wise you'd be too.

     

     
     
     
    SARCASM 
     

    WITH ALL THE ISLAMOPHOBIC PROPAGANDA

    pouring from this and other right-wing hate sites these young, impressionable Denver girls need to see what Islam really is before the haters get to them. They need to meet the nice, friendly, peaceful imam and the nice, friendly, peaceful believers, in the nice, clean, antiseptic mosque to see how nice, friendly, clean and peaceful Islam is. And maybe, just maybe, seeds of faith will be planted in their minds that could sprout in time giving them the urge to become nice, friendly, peaceful, clean Moslem women. A nice peaceful trip to a nice peaceful mosque by children without faith (educated by secularists) could do wonders for a soul needing meaning, purpose and peace in life-Islamic peace that is.

     

     
    THE TERRORISM OF DOUBT AND UNBELIEF
     
    In reality the "TERRORISM" that Isalm and the Prophet came to "finish off" is the TERROR OF UNBELIEF- the worst evil on Earth and greatest offense to Allah. For UNBELIEF terrifies and torments the believer with DOUBT. The DOUBT that Islam is not the  ULTIMATE TRUTH. The DOUBT that it's not God's FINAL REVELATION  of himself to man. The DOUBT that history isn't GOD'S PLAN to conquer all infidels and abolish unbelief  so that believers can believe more strongly,  believe without doubt, believe without fear, believe in peace. It's the TERRORISM OF SCEPTICISM AND DOUBT in a world ruled by Moslems that Islam and the Prophet came to wipe out.
     
     
      

    WHY DOESN’T ITALY RECOGNIZE ISLAM

    as a legitimate religion like it does Catholicism, Prostestantism, Judaism and Buddhism? Because it spawns too many unassimilable anti-social jihadist nuts who want to do to the country what this violent, Christian hating, Koran driven lunatic did to these beautiful statues.

    RELATED

     ITALY GIVES ISLAM THE BOOT: WILL NOT RECOGNIZE IT AS LEGIT RELIGION

     
     

    Muslims sprayed bullets on Prof. Muhari, a renowned Hindu educationalist. (Source: Mukto-Mona)

     
    THIS IS ABSURD!
     

    We have it on the good authority of Karan Armstrong, renowned scholar of world religions and mysticism  (she has the inside dope on all the major faiths), that Mohammed was a man of peace-the Mahatma Gandhi of his age-a real loving Sufi saint who saw jihad as the conquest of his soul and loved all peoples compassionately. So why in the land of Gandhi (he was shot by a peace-loving Moslem fanatic) are believers celebrating Mohammed's birthday by beating up poor pagan, polytheistic Hindus? What kind of partying is that? Don't they know that Mohammed loved polytheistic, idol worshipping pagans and never lifted a finger of terror against them? Clearly they misunderstand the prophet of nonviolence and peace (who taught Gandhi all that he knew about turning his cheek) and need to read Armstrong's brilliant books to make true, peace-loving, pagan friendly Moslems of them./sarc 

     

     

    AVENGING THE DEATHS OF THE CHARLIE HEBDO TEN

    Uncategorized
     
    future-must-not-belong-to-those-who-slander-prophet-islam-mohammad-barack-hussein-obama-muslim
     
     
     
     I hope that our ignorant Defender-of-Islam in Chief -who seems to have  more respect for a tyrannical faith than he does for the United States- is happy today. For today there are ten French citizens who relentlessly mocked and ridiculed the prophet he wrongly esteems (a monster of war, intolerance, torture  and death) who no longer have a future in this world because of what he did and said. They 've joined the millions who've been killed in his name and won't be the last to meet this fate. I hope Obama is happy today. And I'm hoping that these Ten brave souls spark an anti-Mohammed mockery craze: a defiant world wide backlash against the crimes and atrocities of the prophet of hate who killed those who opposed and mocked him.  Isn't this what The Ten are crying from the grave? There could be no better way to honor their memory and avenge their Islamic inspired deaths than to continue the mockery  of Mohammed on a universal scale.
     
    MOCK MOHAMMED FOR THE CHARLIE HABDO TEN
     
    OR TELL THE TRUTH
     
    ABOUT HIM
     
    STRIKE A BLOW FOR LIBERTY 
     
    AND DESTROY
     
    ISLAMIC SUPREMACY
     
     &
     
    VIVE LA FRANCE!
     
     
    3D waving flag of France3D waving flag of France

     

    CLICK

     
    for patriotic inspiration French style.
     
     
    People gather in Toulouse last night to show their solidarity for the victims of the attack by gunmen on the offices of the satirical publication