"Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections."
"Experts" on the US judiciary and Constitutional Law horrified at President Trump "disrespecting" rogue Judge James Robart and the purely political decision to halt his popular, rational, temporary national security ban on immigrants from seven Moslem countries (effecting only 15% of the world's Moslem population) designated (by the Obama administration) as terrorist hotspots are coming out of the woodwork to castigate Trump and question his integrity and fitness for office-as if he has no right to criticize judges. One expert told NBC News that:
"The concern is that repeated attacks on individual judges could diminish the confidence that people have that judges are ruling on cases in accordance with the law"
Another expert said "
"I don't know whether he [Trump] deliberately wants to delegitimize the courts..... It is possible he lashed out in an unthinking way. But certainly the effect is to damage public confidence in the judicial system."
And still another said:
""He may go down in history as somebody who ran a brilliant campaign but disgraced himself in office. The 'so-called judge' insult was just stupid and reflects badly on his knowledge of the legal system."
But where were these experts and their grave concerns about damaging the judicial system when a blatantly lying, conniving Barack Obama playing politics at his 2010 State of the Union lashed out in a fiery attack on five Supreme Court Justices ( Roberts, Scalia, Alito, Kennedy and Thomas) for their so-called "unconstitutional ruling" in the Citizens United case on campaign finance reform? Where did they question Obama's integrity, credibility and fitness for office when he made a completely false, straw man argument that the ruling "reversed 100 years of law" and "lifted a ban (which is still in place) on foreign, off shore corporations, and foreign special interests spending without limit on US elections."
If Obama (a so-called "professor" of Constitutional Law) wasn't intentionally lying to humiliate (for no good reason) these five justices then it meant he's an ignoramus on basic, simple, US corporate law; and that he didn't know that the US subsidiaries of foreign companies, incorporated under US law, operating on US soil, employing US workers and earning US dollars are 100% US companies with the same rights as US national comoanies. He didn't know, for example that Toyota USA is every bit as much a US car manufacturer as let's say Ford USA -- as Ford in Japan is a domestic Japanese (not a US) company.
But whether Obama was right or wrong never before in US history has a President used the State of the Union to publicly humiliate Supreme Court Justices-to the wild applause of irresponsible Democrat lawmakers who were present. What utter hypocrites are Obama and the Dems for piling on Trump for his perfectly lawful and moderate executive order; and calling a radical (pro-Black Lives Matter) leftist federal judge a "so-called judge" when he was simply calling into question his judgement on the issues of terrorist infiltration, national security and lawful use of executive power. Compared to what Obama did in 2010 Trump looks completely and totally respectful of the judicial system; and far more responsible and fit for the office of the presidency.
Why Alito shook his head: Obama exaggerates impact of Supreme Court ruling on foreign companies | PolitiFact
AND IN OTHER NEWS
BERNIE SANDERS CIRCUMCISED A THIRD TIME
Bernie (a disgraceful self-hating socialist Jew) was circumcised first at birth. Then by Hillary. Now by Ted Cruz in his CNN debate on healthcare where, America sucks Bernie ("we're not a compassionate nation," he says) villainized a small (struggling) business owner for not being able to AFFORD health insurance for herself and her workers; and empathetically said that those opposed to Obamacare and Single Payer "want people to die."
What Cruz failed to mention, and should have to slap down Bernie even harder (and does he need it) is the underreported story that Single Payer Socialist Healthcare collapsed in his home state of Vermont. It required a doubling of state taxes in order to work and was rejected by Vermontans-one of the most liberal people of any state in the Union.