Anyone, anyone, anyone who owns a restaurant, runs or manages a restaurant, or worked at a restaurant as waiters, waitresses, bus boys, cooks, etc. knows that
FORMER RESTAURANT WAITRESS BEVERLY NELSON IS LYING ABOUT THE NIGHT OF HER ALLEGED ASSAULT BY JUDGE ROY MOORE.
Let me explain.
Like Beverly Nelson I worked at a restaurant as a teenager. It was a diner across the street from Francis Lewis High School in Fresh Meadows, Queens where I went to school in the 1960s. The diner (whose name escapes me but is now a Fat Boys Pizzeria see) was located at Utopia Parkway on the service road off the Long Island Expressway (aka Horace Harding Expressway). It was a part-time after school job - I also worked weekends. I worked there briefly perhaps no more than two months as I was offered a better paying job by a neighbor (a family friend) working up the street for a very busy bagel place (working the cash register). The bagel place, Bagel Oassis, still exists (see).
I worked at a diner similar to this.
Now at the diner, like young Beverly Nelson, I sometimes worked late shifts until it closed at 10:30 pm. Now everyone who has worked or eaten at restaurants until they close to the public for the night knows they stay open (with the entrance doors locked) until the patrons are finished eating; no diner or restaurant kicks out its patrons at closing time if they're still eating and drinking at booths, tables or counters.
However, and here's the rub that exposes Beverly Nelson as an evil, malicious, God damn liar: a restaurant closing its doors to the public at the end of the day and completely shutting down are two separate events. For example, when my diner closed and was empty of patrons, and I and the other waiters went home, the owner/manager and cooking crew stayed behind and continued working cleaning up the joint before completely shutting it down (switching off the lights then locking up); my diner, in fact, would stay open until at least 11 pm.
Indeed, the M.O. was no different at Oasis Bagel (which has since turned into a 24 hour deli and grill). When my late shift ended at close up time my neighbor Ralph would stay behind to it clean up and then lock it down. And as Ralph was a neighbor who lived on my block sometimes I'd wait around for him to finish his work so I could get a ride home (I was too young to drive).
But defying the common, ordinary, everyday experience of restaurant workers like myself this is not the story Beverly Nelson is giving us. On the night of the alleged assault by Roy Moore Nelson claims she worked the late shift till 10 pm. And as was apparently routine her boyfriend (if he exists) was scheduled to pick her up and drive her home. But Nelson says on this occasion her boyfriend was late and hadn't arrived when her shift ended. She says that Roy Moore then left the restaurant after her, and seeing that her ride was late he offered to take her home; she accepted the offer without reservation because she "trusted him being a DA...."
BUT HERE'S WHERE HER STORY BREAKS DOWN
Nelson said that because "there were no cell phones then*" she had no way to reach her boyfriend to see if he was on his way; or to tell him not to come as Moore would be taking her home. There's one huge problem here that no one to my knowledge has thought of:
BEVERLY NELSON ABSOLUTELY HAD ACCESS TO TELEPHONES
The restaurant which was still open (with her boss and crew inside cleaning up) had at least two land line phones that she could have used to call her boyfriend: the payphone and office phone.
*The cell phone remark is 13:20 into the video.
Moreover, as the restaurant was still open with owner and crew inside Nelson's reason for accepting Moore's offer because it was uncomfortably "cold" outside - she didn't want to freeze her poor bottoms off waiting for her guy - is a complete and total lie; there was no reason for her to step outside into the cold winter night when she could have waited for him inside the restaurant keeping nice and warm until he arrived.
Furthermore, as Nelson's boss was still in the restaurant why didn't she go back inside to alert him that if her boyfriend should arrive to tell him she got a ride home from "DA" Moore? It's not credible that she didn't do this so that her boyfriend wouldn't worry that something bad might have happened to her.
Come to think of it if Nelson's boyfriend* got a late start that night and couldn't be on time to pick her up surely he would have phoned the restaurant to tell her he'd be a bit late. Certainly the boyfriend had the restaurant's phone number in case of emergencies or delays in his departure. Also, if Nelson was stranded her boss could have taken her home once he finished closing up. As Nelson lived 10-15 minutes by car from the restaurant (her home was "two and a half miles away," she said) it wouldn't have been much of an imposition or inconvenience for her boss to drive her home. And, of course, a call home by Nelson from the restaurant and her parents would have picked her up (or sister if she had a license). Indeed, when Nelson's boyfriend wasn't available to drive her home the logical alternative would be her parents (or sister).
*Did Nelson have an older boyfriend at the time with a driver's licence and car to corroborate her story? If so who is he? What's his name? Why is Nelson hiding his identity? What is she afraid of?
In short, there was no compelling need or reason for Nelson to ride home with Moore that night. Her choice between freezing in the cold or Moore driving her home was completely false as she had the option (the most logical choice) to wait for her ride inside the warm restaurant.
But what is even more preposterous is the BS of what allegedly followed once Nelson got into Moore's car. With boss and crew still inside the restaurant (about to go home) and Moore intending to rape her Nelson says that Moore drove to the most unlikely and ridiculous place to commit his crime: the restaurant's dark parking lot. In other words, Moore took her to an extremely risky place outside a building occupied by people who could exit it at any moment and catch him in the act of violating her.
Moreover, Nelson said (as I noted above) that her house was "two and a half miles from the restaurant." In other words, along the route to Nelson's home surely there were dozens of places where Moore could have raped her in greater safety with far less risk of getting caught in the act than the restaurant's parking lot.
But what really defies credibility (as others have pointed out) is a 16-year-old girl allegedly suffering through perhaps the most terribly vile and violent experience of her life (which left her with bruises on her neck) not running back to the restaurant pounding on the door crying to her boss crew inside for help. Or when the boyfriend, moments after the incident, just happened to arrive this greatly traumatized girl was able to hide her extreme distress under a calm facade as if nothing happened; and that she was able to maintain this fake composure with her parents and sister once she was home; and then continue calm the following day with her friends, classmates and teachers at school. It's totally, preposterously, unbelievably ridiculous.
And to top off this cock and bull story this weeping distressed victim of a violent sexual attack (coached well by Gloria Allred), claims that she supported the candidacy of Donald Trump - accused last year by a dozen women of everything from groping them to rape. However, there is some doubt that Nelson voted for Trump or anyone last year; for in 2016 the State of Alabama had her listed as an "inactive" voter (see).
Does this woman really think we're so stupid as to believe her malicious, evil, moronic, contradictory story with the crocodile tears and rattled feelings after so many years as if it happened yesterday? That she kept it hidden so long until she told her sister four years later, her second husband just before they married (but not her first husband), and then her mother two years ago? And are we to believe that she was comfortable with Judge Moore handling her divorce case in 1999? That she refused to recuse herself and request another judge because of the painful memories of the alleged assault? Come to think of it if Judge Moore attacked her as she claims is it likely he would have dismissed her suit and chanced pissing her off when she had such leverage over him? By not granting Nelson the divorce in revenge she could have gone public with the assault and ruin him. Could it be that Nelson's lies about the assault was her revenge for the pain Moore's ruling caused her? It can't be ruled out as a motive - along with a little cash.
The question now is this: how big of a payout is Beverly Nelson and cash thirsty Gloria getting to smear and destroy Judge Moore with slander and lies? Who is the source or sources financing this hatchet job on his character and campaign - far and away the worst allegations to date?
Vehemently denied by Allred. But is it improbable?
That this attack is politically motivated is proved by Allred calling for an immediate US Senate Ethics Committee investigation into the alleged crime - the last thing she'd want as her client would fall apart under questioning given all the contradictions and lies. Moreover, Allred knows that the Senate Ethics Committee is for investigating sitting Senators, not candidates running for office.
Furthermore, Allred making her client's yearbook available for examination contingent on a Senate hearing before election day is laughable in the extreme - it's a stunt by a political hack to smear Republicans as well as Moore. When the Senate does nothing (which it can't) between now and December 12th watch Allred accuse it of supporting pedophilia and being cruelly insensitive to rape victims.
But in the meantime, a great conservative and honorable man is being crucified by an establishment witch hunt; and we must rally to his defense and make sure he wins his rightful place in the US Senate.
THIS PROFESSIONAL ANALYSIS COMPLETELY SHREDS NELSON'S AMATEUR, FAKE TEARS PERFORMANCE
It keeps on getting worse for Beverly Nelson. Now journalist and author Thomas Wictor believes that Roy Moore's signature in Nelson's high school yearbook is an easily provable forgery. And he is very, very persuasive. Judge for yourself....READ ON Hopefully Moore right now has a forensic expert doing an analysis ready to declare it a fraud.
Gloria Allred: 'I Haven't Asked' Beverly Young Nelson If She Saw Roy Moore Sign Her Yearbook - Breitbart
Moore's attorney demanded that Nelson's yearbook be handed over to him for handwriting analysis to test the authenticity of his signature. It appears that Nelson had Roy Moore's signature on divorce papers that he signed in 1999 when she tried to split from her first husband, and could have (probably) used it in a forgery to give her false story credibility.
BREAKING: Wolf Blitzer Repeatedly Asks Gloria Allred if the Yearbook Signature is a Forgery -- ALLRED REFUSES TO ANSWER!
A heartfelt off the cuff apology to Roy Moore by Darrel Nelson stepson of Beverly Nelson for her lying, malicious, evil accusations.
Beverly Young Nelson has finally admitted that she forged a portion of the infamous high school yearbook that she and attorney Gloria Allred used as proof of her accusations against U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore.
ALLRED THROWS WAPO UNDER THE BUS!
Three weeks ago, in a partisan effort to dismiss what is now an admitted forgery, and what at the time was an obvious forgery, the left-wing Washington Post’s Philip Bump (already a provenliar) consulted former FBI agent Mark Songer, a forensics documents examiner, to examine a yearbook produced by one of Roy Moore’s accusers as evidence he assaulted her. The expertconcluded that the “writing seems consistent with one writer.”